华硕 VivoBook S15 BAPE 笔记本电脑评测：性能超强的 OLED 笔记本电脑？还是特别版会铩羽而归？

Name: Asus VivoBook S15 K5504
Brand: Asus

A Bathing Ape 笔记本电脑。

华硕 VivoBook S15 OLED BAPE 版脱颖而出--不仅因为它的设计，还因为它的包装盒。请进入我们的 "A Bathing Ape "笔记本电脑评测，了解这款多媒体设备、其 OLED 显示屏和英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 是否能在日常使用中给人留下深刻印象。

Marcus Schwarten, 👁 Marc Herter (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/05/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Intel Laptop / Notebook Alder Lake Windows

并不是每天都能在笔记本盖子上看到可爱的猴子和其他动物。然而，华硕 VivoBook S15 BAPE 版的出现，却让这一切成为现实。华硕 VivoBook S15 BAPE 版是与日本时尚品牌 A Bathing Ape（简称 BAPE）合作推出的一款特别版多媒体笔记本电脑。

从硬件上看，BAPE 版与型号为 K5504 的普通 VivoBook S15 OLED 并无不同。不过，它在设计和包装盒中的内容方面确实有所不同。由于我们还没有机会对这款笔记本电脑进行评测，因此我们的分析将不仅关注这款引人注目的特别版的突出视觉特性。

配备了英特尔酷睿 i9-13900HVivobook S 15 OLED BAPE 版配备了英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H、16 GB LPDDR5 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘，可与其他笔记本电脑正面交锋，其中包括它的同系列兄弟华硕 VivoBook Pro 16。.该机配备了AMD Ryzen 7 6800H。相同的 CPU 和英伟达GeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑图形处理器。.其他竞争对手包括采用相同 CPU/iGPU 组合的华为 MateBook 16s 以及宏碁 Swift Go 16及其高分辨率 120 Hz OLED 面板。

Test device courtesy of Asus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

ASUS Vivobook S 15 OLED BAPE Edition (K5504)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 64 W PL2 / Short Burst, 45 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Core: 1500 MHz

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5 on board

Display

15.60 inch 16:9, 2880 x 1620 pixel, no, Samsung SDC4180, OLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, 1024 GB

, 900 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS

Connections

1 USB 2.0, 1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm Combo Audio Jack, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 358 x 231

Battery

75 Wh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix 1080p FHD camera

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, wireless optical mouse, carry case, BAPE figure and sticker, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

1.64 kg, Power Supply: 242 g

Price

1499 Euro

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.9 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.6 kg	19 mm	15.60"	2880x1620
88.5 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.6 kg	16.9 mm	14.50"	2880x1800
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2023	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	19 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
86.6 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.6 kg	19 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
86 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2 kg	17.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1680
83.2 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M	1.9 kg	18.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080

外壳和功能 - 采用致命设计的特别版

第一眼看到华硕 VivoBook S15 OLED 时，你就会明白它不是一款普通的笔记本电脑。金属外壳上有一只猴子和其他动物，它们都属于 Baby Milo 独有的印花图案。不过，由于采用了照片光压印技术，它们显得非常低调。

与街头服饰品牌 "A Bathing Ape"（BAPE）的合作在打开设备时也得以延续。就连触摸板上也印有相同的图案。此外，笔记本电脑的边角和底座上也印有可爱的猿猴图案。颜色方面，该设备采用黑色。选择基于英特尔酷睿 i5-13500H 处理器的较弱配置版本的用户将获得银色的 BAPE 机型。

除此以外，华硕特别版还附带了一个直接的双键鼠标和一个笔记本电脑保护套，两者都采用了 BAPE 的装饰风格。此外，还包括一个 "A Bathing Ape "人偶、一台微型版笔记本电脑和一些贴纸。

在制造质量方面，我们没有任何抱怨。该设备符合 MIL-STD 810H 军用标准，坚固耐用。这款 15.6 英寸笔记本电脑的重量为 1.6 千克，对于具有这些规格的机器来说是可以接受的。在设备的左侧，华硕只配备了一个速度较慢的 USB-A 2.0 端口。在右侧，你会发现 Thunderbolt 4 和 HDMI 1.4 等接口。

与同类产品相比，该机的 Wi-Fi 性能较差，远低于所安装的英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 的平均水平。网络摄像头表现稳定，Delta E 平均值为 10，其隐私快门也能得分。

尺寸比较

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC DIN A4 ❌

右：1 个 3.5 毫米音频插孔、1 个 Thunderbolt 4、1 个 USB 3.2 Gen1 A 型、1 个 DC IN

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1615 (826^min - 1724^max) MBit/s +69%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1606 (1503^min - 1654^max) MBit/s +68%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1498 (704^min - 1623^max) MBit/s +57%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1459 (796^min - 1577^max) MBit/s +53%
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1921, n=78, last 2 years)	1359 MBit/s +42%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1921, n=238)	1233 MBit/s +29%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	954 (866^min - 1015^max) MBit/s
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W MediaTek MT7921	720 (674^min - 765^max) MBit/s -25%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1701 (1196^min - 1751^max) MBit/s +87%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1553 (1528^min - 1565^max) MBit/s +70%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1541 (1471^min - 1585^max) MBit/s +69%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1476 (1300^min - 1531^max) MBit/s +62%
Average of class Multimedia (709 - 1789, n=77, last 2 years)	1447 MBit/s +59%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=238)	1379 MBit/s +51%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	911 (468^min - 944^max) MBit/s
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W MediaTek MT7921	709 (702^min - 714^max) MBit/s -22%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1583 (1034^min - 1700^max) MBit/s +24%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1442 (1087^min - 1646^max) MBit/s +13%
Average of class Multimedia (705 - 1816, n=37, last 2 years)	1416 MBit/s +11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1381 (1289^min - 1536^max) MBit/s +8%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (632 - 1851, n=212)	1372 MBit/s +8%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1351 (577^min - 1575^max) MBit/s +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1274 (787^min - 1410^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1628 (1393^min - 1717^max) MBit/s +17%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1539 (1497^min - 1558^max) MBit/s +11%
Average of class Multimedia (700 - 1807, n=37, last 2 years)	1494 MBit/s +7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=211)	1493 MBit/s +7%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1485 (1454^min - 1528^max) MBit/s +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1391 (670^min - 1499^max) MBit/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1337 (676^min - 1552^max) MBit/s -4%

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1274 (787-1410)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1381 (1289-1536)

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1368 (670-1499)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1628 (1393-1717)

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø954 (866-1015)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1606 (1503-1654)

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø895 (468-944)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1701 (1196-1751)

ColorChecker Asus VivoBook S15 K5504: 10.42 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 20.11 ∆E

输入设备 - 使用爪子也很方便

橙色的 ESC 键和 ENTER 键的斑马纹设计并非 BAPE 特别版设计语言的一部分，而是华硕 VivoBook S15 OLED 的标准设计线索。虽然光学设计令人眼前一亮，但从技术上讲，几乎没有什么值得批评的地方。chiclet键盘的键程为1.35毫米，即使是大手也能获得良好的打字体验，由此产生的噪音也是可以忍受的。背光可设置为三种亮度之一或完全关闭。此外，华硕还在 F1 到 F12 键之间应用了一些特殊功能。

触摸板的尺寸为 13 x 8 厘米，同样，除了外观和相当大的点击噪音外，它并不显眼。

显示屏 - 120 Hz OLED 显示屏，光洁度极佳

华硕为 VivoBook S15 配备了 3K（2,880 x 1,620）高分辨率 OLED 面板，对角线尺寸为 15.6 英寸，刷新率为 120 赫兹。它的平均亮度为 370 cd/m²，光照非常均匀，与同类设备相比毫不逊色。不过，由于其表面光亮，它不得不与反光作斗争，因此很难建议在户外使用。

由于采用了 OLED 技术，该面板具有深黑色、高对比度和鲜艳的色彩还原，但也存在 PWM 闪烁的问题。总而言之，在同类产品中，安装的三星面板可以说是最好的之一，与华硕 ZenBook 14X 相比仅略有不足。


384.4 cd/m²	376.6 cd/m²	376.3 cd/m²
373.5 cd/m²	370.4 cd/m²	377.1 cd/m²
371.5 cd/m²	371.8 cd/m²	380.7 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Samsung SDC4180 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 384.4 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 375.8 cd/m² Minimum: 0.8809 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 371.3 cd/m²
Contrast: 18520:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.51 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.36
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.52% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.93% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Samsung SDC4180, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6"	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Samsung ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Samsung SDC4161, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Samsung, OLED, 2880x1800, 14.5"	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 BOE0BB0 TV160DKT-NH1, IPS, 2560x1680, 16"	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Samsung SDC418D ATNA60BC03-0, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"
Display		0%	1%	-1%	-25%	1%
Display P3 Coverage	99.93	98.7 -1%	99.9 0%	99 -1%	63 -37%	99.91 0%
sRGB Coverage	100	99.7 0%	100 0%	100 0%	94.9 -5%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	95.52	96.5 1%	98.6 3%	95 -1%	65.1 -32%	98.87 4%
Response Times		-165%	-4%	1%	-813%	-2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	2 ?(1, 1)	0.68 ?(0.32, 0.36) 66%	0.74 63%	2 ?(1, 1) -0%	34 ?(16, 18) -1600%	2 ?(1, 1) -0%
Response Time Black / White *	2 ?(1, 1)	13.2 ?(10.8, 2.4) -560%	2 ?(1, 1) -0%	2 ?(1, 1) -0%	17 ?(7, 10) -750%	2 ?(1, 1) -0%
PWM Frequency	240	240 ?(100) 0%	59 ?(50) -75%	250 ?(70) 4%	26 ?(10) -89%	227 ?(50) -5%
Screen		-47%	-8%	14%	-191%	-19%
Brightness middle	370.4	353 -5%	378 2%	372 0%	448 21%	370 0%
Brightness	376	354 -6%	378 1%	376 0%	436 16%	371 -1%
Brightness Distribution	96	98 2%	98 2%	98 2%	93 -3%	98 2%
Black Level *	0.02			0.01 50%	0.35 -1650%
Contrast	18520			37200 101%	1280 -93%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.51	4.23 -180%	2.2 -46%	2.01 -33%	1.6 -6%	2.77 -83%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.89	7.13 -147%	4.87 -69%	4.05 -40%	4.44 -54%	4.08 -41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	3.36	2.42 28%	2.68 20%	2.17 35%	0.64 81%	2.83 16%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.1	2.5 -19%	1.43 32%	1.84 12%	2.78 -32%	2.58 -23%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.4 ^92%	2.47 ^89%	2.39 ^92%		2.46 ^89%
CCT	6536 ^99%	6642 ^98%	6464 ^101%	6488 ^100%	6582 ^99%	6241 ^104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)					2.43
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-71% / -63%	-4% / -5%	5% / 9%	-343% / -282%	-7% / -10%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 7 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1 ms rise
2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

性能 - CPU 性能强大，但不咬合

这里介绍的华硕 VivoBook S15 OLED BAPE 版（型号 KK5504）配备了英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H.它是与 "A Bathing Ape "合作生产的两款特殊机型中性能较强的一款。另外，性能较弱的英特尔酷睿 i5-13500H也可供选择。

图形处理任务由 Iris Xe G7 96EUsiGPU 处理。华硕将其与双通道运行的 16 GB LPDDR5 内存（板载）以及 1TB M.2 NVMe PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘相结合。

测试条件

在 MyAsus 应用程序中，华硕提供了三种不同的风扇模式（性能模式、标准模式和耳语模式）。除非另有说明，我们使用性能模式和 Windows "最佳性能 "能耗状态进行了基准测试。

处理器

安装的英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H是 Raptor Lake H 系列中的高端 CPU，共有 6 个带超线程的性能内核，主频高达 5.4 GHz，还有 8 个效率内核（20 个线程）。

但是，华硕并没有充分发挥 VivoBook S15 处理器的潜力。基准测试结果低于平均水平，但与其他大多配备相同处理器的竞争设备相当。这些结果通常使它跻身前三名。多核性能比单核性能更好。在 Cinebench R15 多连续测试中，经过最初的峰值后，性能随着时间的推移相当稳定。

归根结底，这款评测设备的日常 CPU 性能即使不是出类拔萃，也是不错的，而且在电池模式下也能正常运行，只是略有局限。

Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2242 (2190.82-2500.94)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2244 (2186.27-2513.98)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H: Ø1970 (1926.5-2121.45)

Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2188 (2143.85-2496.57)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2518 (2463.05-2968.46)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H: Ø1906 (1816.37-2350.45)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	83.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	76.5 pt
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	73.8 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	71.6 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	70.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia	68.6 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	68.4 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	61.1 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	17754 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11997 - 20385, n=28)	16813 Points +8%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	15591 Points
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)	15387 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	14958 Points -4%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	14950 Points -4%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	14099 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	12570 Points -19%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	2037 Points +15%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	1934 Points +9%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	1891 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=26)	1887 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	1772 Points
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)	1757 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	1740 Points -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1547 Points -13%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	6808 Points +16%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4935 - 7716, n=25)	6533 Points +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	5857 Points
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	5782 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	5774 Points -1%
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years)	5683 Points -3%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	5310 Points -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	4839 Points -17%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	784 Points +25%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	738 Points +17%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	720 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=25)	720 Points +14%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	673 Points +7%
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years)	652 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	629 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	603 Points -4%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	2968 (2463.05^min - 2968.46^max) Points +19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=26)	2676 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	2514 (2186.27^min - 2513.98^max) Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	2501 (2190.82^min - 2500.94^max) Points
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	2497 (2143.85^min - 2496.57^max) Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years)	2435 Points -3%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	2350 (1816.37^min - 2350.45^max) Points -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2121 (1926.5^min - 2121.45^max) Points -15%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	293 Points +24%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=26)	269 Points +14%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	267 Points +13%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	260 Points +10%
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years)	257 Points +9%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	252 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	243 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	236 Points

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	255 Seconds * -19%
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years)	253 Seconds * -18%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	252 Seconds * -18%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	217 Seconds * -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	214 Seconds *
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	213 Seconds * -0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=24)	205 Seconds * +4%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	190 Seconds * +11%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	70860 MIPS +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=25)	66435 MIPS +5%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	64431 MIPS +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	63244 MIPS
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	63045 MIPS 0%
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years)	60265 MIPS -5%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	56351 MIPS -11%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	54857 MIPS -13%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	6533 MIPS +20%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	6164 MIPS +13%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	6148 MIPS +13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=25)	6054 MIPS +11%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	5748 MIPS +5%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years)	5722 MIPS +5%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	5721 MIPS +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	5460 MIPS

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	13768 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=26)	12649 Points +7%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	12304 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years)	11967 Points +1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	11831 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	11817 Points
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	10214 Points -14%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	9263 Points -22%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	2003 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	1975 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	1949 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=26)	1895 Points -3%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	1861 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years)	1818 Points -7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	1735 Points -11%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	1568 Points -20%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	19.4 fps +13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.1 - 22.3, n=25)	18.5 fps +8%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	17.1 fps
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	16.7 fps -2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	16.7 fps -2%
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years)	16.4 fps -4%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	15.7 fps -8%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	15.4 fps -10%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	56.3 s * -56%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	50.2 s * -39%
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years)	49.6 s * -37%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	48.3 s * -34%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=25)	47.6 s * -32%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	40.8 s * -13%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	40.7 s * -13%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	36.1 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H	0.504 sec *
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	0.495 sec * +2%
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)	0.484 sec * +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4834 sec * +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25)	0.4493 sec * +11%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H	0.4426 sec * +12%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4397 sec * +13%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4131 sec * +18%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2501 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

107 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

236 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5857 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

629 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1772 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

15591 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	94.9 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	88.5 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	88.5 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	84.7 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	84.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia	83.3 pt
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	83.2 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	78.3 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	15712 KRay/s +6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=25)	15135 KRay/s +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	14829 KRay/s
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years)	14429 KRay/s -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	14093 KRay/s -5%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	14064 KRay/s -5%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	13642 KRay/s -8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	13289 KRay/s -10%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	88203 Points +20%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	78309 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=25)	76236 Points +4%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	73690 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	73606 Points
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years)	72714 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71957 Points -2%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66971 Points -9%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3653 MB/s +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=25)	3561 MB/s +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3391 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years)	3389 MB/s 0%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3317 MB/s -2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3269 MB/s -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	3085 MB/s -9%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3059 MB/s -10%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	120936 Points +17%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	110863 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=25)	105169 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	103776 Points
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	102605 Points -1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	102497 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	94687 Points -9%
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years)	90849 Points -12%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	12439 Points +33%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	10143 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=25)	9675 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years)	9329 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	9324 Points
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	9243 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8842 Points -5%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8586 Points -8%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	47989 Points +34%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	38706 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=25)	37712 Points +5%
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years)	36169 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	35833 Points
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	34573 Points -4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	33882 Points -5%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	33244 Points -7%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	134355 MB/s +98%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	124499 MB/s +83%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	121588 MB/s +79%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=25)	87238 MB/s +28%
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years)	75995 MB/s +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	68004 MB/s
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66198 MB/s -3%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62143 MB/s -9%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=25)	1040 MB/s +5%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1022 MB/s +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	995 MB/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	966 MB/s -3%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	938 MB/s -6%
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years)	935 MB/s -6%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	870 MB/s -13%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	772 MB/s -22%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	8275 KRay/s +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=25)	8215 KRay/s +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7952 KRay/s
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years)	7836 KRay/s -1%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7530 KRay/s -5%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	7452 KRay/s -6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	7420 KRay/s -7%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7221 KRay/s -9%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40864 MPixel/s +2%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40617 MPixel/s +1%
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years)	40459 MPixel/s +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40251 MPixel/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	40107 MPixel/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=25)	39722 MPixel/s -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	38636 MPixel/s -4%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	28346 MPixel/s -30%

系统性能

在我们用来检查系统性能的基准测试中，华硕 OLED 笔记本电脑再次发现自己大多处于下半部分，甚至是对比图的底部。不过，这并不影响日常工作任务。安装的 LPDDR5 内存提供了不错的性能。

PCMark 10 / Score
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7054 Points +14%
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years)	6795 Points +10%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	6780 Points +10%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	6406 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	6330 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5944 - 6802, n=8)	6328 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6192 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	6190 Points

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	11774 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10347 - 12286, n=8)	11372 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11193 Points
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	11156 Points 0%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10937 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years)	10521 Points -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	10381 Points -7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10237 Points -9%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	9603 Points +26%
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years)	8932 Points +18%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8667 Points +14%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	7966 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7319 - 8526, n=8)	7782 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7624 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7594 Points
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	7505 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10737 Points +42%
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years)	9202 Points +22%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	8485 Points +12%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	8073 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (7527 - 8155, n=8)	7774 Points +3%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	7745 Points +2%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7727 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7573 Points

CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2146 Points +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1766 - 2146, n=7)	1902 Points +5%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	1869 Points +3%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1868 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1811 Points
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1724 Points -5%
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years)	1703 Points -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1590 Points -12%

CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2064 Points +20%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1684 - 2064, n=7)	1824 Points +6%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1787 Points +4%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	1775 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1722 Points
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1666 Points -3%
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years)	1616 Points -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1566 Points -9%

CrossMark / Creativity
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2224 Points +9%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	2080 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2041 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1789 - 2224, n=7)	2029 Points -1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2009 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years)	1909 Points -6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1860 Points -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1708 Points -16%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2171 Points +47%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1474 - 2171, n=7)	1794 Points +22%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1715 Points +16%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	1583 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1524 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1474 Points
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years)	1435 Points -3%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1340 Points -9%

PCMark 10 Score		6190 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years)	68580 MB/s +9%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	63839 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62899 MB/s
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62724 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (37448 - 74486, n=25)	61864 MB/s -2%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	61697 MB/s -2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	59266 MB/s -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	48209 MB/s -23%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years)	69599 MB/s +19%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	67398 MB/s +15%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (41599 - 75433, n=25)	62438 MB/s +7%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	60901 MB/s +4%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58899 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58557 MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58209 MB/s -1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	50443 MB/s -14%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	70522 MB/s +2%
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years)	69752 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	69292 MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	69264 MB/s 0%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	68217 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (36152 - 88505, n=25)	65109 MB/s -6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	60548 MB/s -13%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	55085 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years)	106.6 ns * -20%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	95.9 ns * -8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	93.7 ns * -5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (75.8 - 102.3, n=25)	89.3 ns * -0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	88.9 ns *
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	88.3 ns * +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, Radeon 680M	88.2 ns * +1%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	88 ns * +1%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

测得的延迟时间低于大多数对比设备。即使这只是一个快照分析，在执行实时音频任务时也不太可能存在问题。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2645.7 μs * -165%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	2290 μs * -129%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1753.6 μs * -76%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	1682 μs * -69%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	998 μs *
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	515 μs * +48%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储器

在基准测试中，配备的 WD 1 TB SSD 的日常性能令人满意，排名中游。

AS SSD

DiskSpd

WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00

Sequential Read: 3992.32MB/s

Sequential Write: 1951.27MB/s

4K Read: 59.9MB/s

4K Write: 221.3MB/s

4K-64 Read: 855.29MB/s

4K-64 Write: 2233.12MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.047ms

Access Time Write: 0.017ms

Copy ISO: 2678.93MB/s

Copy Program: 898.56MB/s

Copy Game: 1932.57MB/s

Score Read: 1314Points

Score Write: 2650Points

Score Total: 4549Points

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	92.3 pt
Average of class Multimedia	68.5 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	68 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	63.3 pt
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	61.4 pt
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	56.9 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	51.3 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	42.7 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2406 - 4128, n=18)	3183 MB/s +26%
Average of class Multimedia (1629 - 4861, n=76, last 2 years)	2970 MB/s +17%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2534 (2495.65^min - 2534.16^max) MB/s
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	2471 (2378.24^min - 2470.54^max) MB/s -2%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2317 (2303.3^min - 2316.74^max) MB/s -9%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	2220 (2131.96^min - 2220.01^max) MB/s -12%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	2203 (2164.89^min - 2202.64^max) MB/s -13%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1939 (1922.39^min - 1939.24^max) MB/s -23%
seq write
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	3932 (3910.5^min - 3931.84^max) MB/s +30%
Average of class Multimedia (463 - 5711, n=76, last 2 years)	3092 MB/s +2%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3058 (2997.76^min - 3057.65^max) MB/s +1%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	3024 (2969.99^min - 3023.88^max) MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3024 (2941.45^min - 3024.09^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2235 - 3416, n=18)	2922 MB/s -3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2433 (2278.56^min - 2432.65^max) MB/s -20%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1923 (1820.33^min - 1922.81^max) MB/s -36%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Multimedia (2132 - 7126, n=76, last 2 years)	5486 MB/s +11%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4921 (3974.96^min - 4921.18^max) MB/s
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	4908 (4437.72^min - 4908.21^max) MB/s 0%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (3728 - 5023, n=18)	4902 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4529 (3752.85^min - 4529.22^max) MB/s -8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4513 (3871.13^min - 4512.65^max) MB/s -8%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	3595 (2871^min - 3595.09^max) MB/s -27%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	3576 (3118.88^min - 3576.06^max) MB/s -27%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Multimedia (555 - 6898, n=76, last 2 years)	4169 MB/s +25%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	3942 (3931.01^min - 3941.68^max) MB/s +19%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3574 (3515.97^min - 3573.95^max) MB/s +7%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	3443 (540.23^min - 3442.93^max) MB/s +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3326 (3267.12^min - 3325.66^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2957 - 3464, n=18)	3238 MB/s -3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3154 (3143.42^min - 3153.68^max) MB/s -5%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1956 (1934.83^min - 1956.01^max) MB/s -41%
4k q1 t1 read
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	77.5 (74.89^min - 77.46^max) MB/s +26%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	64 (61.9^min - 64^max) MB/s +4%
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=76, last 2 years)	62.9 MB/s +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	61.4 (58.57^min - 61.39^max) MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (41.9 - 73.3, n=18)	56.6 MB/s -8%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	47 (39.82^min - 46.98^max) MB/s -23%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	37.1 (36.31^min - 37.14^max) MB/s -40%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	14.6 (12.18^min - 14.59^max) MB/s -76%
4k q1 t1 write
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	376 (372.19^min - 376.19^max) MB/s +125%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	277 (271.48^min - 277.03^max) MB/s +66%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	205 (179.98^min - 205.28^max) MB/s +23%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	182.1 (177.01^min - 182.12^max) MB/s +9%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (78 - 318, n=18)	176.8 MB/s +6%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	174.7 (144.56^min - 174.67^max) MB/s +4%
Average of class Multimedia (69.4 - 378, n=76, last 2 years)	170.9 MB/s +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	167.2 (164.63^min - 167.17^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	2938 (2929.68^min - 2937.5^max) MB/s +343%
Average of class Multimedia (295 - 4881, n=76, last 2 years)	1357 MB/s +105%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1282 (1164.42^min - 1282.42^max) MB/s +93%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1171 (1165.75^min - 1170.99^max) MB/s +77%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (592 - 1544, n=18)	1061 MB/s +60%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1015 (955.09^min - 1015.02^max) MB/s +53%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	677 (625.48^min - 677.28^max) MB/s +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	663 (616.18^min - 663.42^max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 write
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	3754 (3732.05^min - 3753.87^max) MB/s +665%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2194 (1844.86^min - 2194.33^max) MB/s +347%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (227 - 2783, n=18)	1030 MB/s +110%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=76, last 2 years)	1025 MB/s +109%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	649 (615.74^min - 649.21^max) MB/s +32%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	503 (264.6^min - 502.73^max) MB/s +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	491 (479.11^min - 490.6^max) MB/s
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	407 (388.53^min - 407.32^max) MB/s -17%

AS SSD
Score Total
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	8041 Points +77%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	6406 Points +41%
Average of class Multimedia (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)	5061 Points +11%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	4782 Points +5%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4549 Points
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4175 Points -8%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (2750 - 5610, n=16)	4109 Points -10%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	3381 Points -26%
Score Read
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	2945 Points +124%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2413 Points +84%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1675 Points +27%
Average of class Multimedia (669 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)	1630 Points +24%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (961 - 1761, n=16)	1353 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1314 Points
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	1203 Points -8%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1136 Points -14%
Score Write
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	3621 Points +37%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	2989 Points +13%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2796 Points +6%
Average of class Multimedia (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)	2660 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2650 Points
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (651 - 3010, n=16)	2134 Points -19%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1747 Points -34%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1707 Points -36%
Seq Read
Average of class Multimedia (1718 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)	4248 MB/s +6%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	4093.46 MB/s +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3992.32 MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3940.4 MB/s -1%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (3074 - 4328, n=16)	3878 MB/s -3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3615.69 MB/s -9%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	3066 MB/s -23%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	2831 MB/s -29%
Seq Write
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3155.67 MB/s +62%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	3147.93 MB/s +61%
Average of class Multimedia (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)	2749 MB/s +41%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (1536 - 3101, n=16)	2299 MB/s +18%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2237.69 MB/s +15%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	2233 MB/s +14%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1951.27 MB/s
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1092 MB/s -44%
4K Read
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	98.45 MB/s +64%
Average of class Multimedia (28.7 - 98.5, n=73, last 2 years)	61.6 MB/s +3%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	60 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	59.9 MB/s
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	58.13 MB/s -3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	50.14 MB/s -16%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (36.6 - 61.3, n=16)	49.7 MB/s -17%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	35.43 MB/s -41%
4K Write
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	316.53 MB/s +43%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	287.67 MB/s +30%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	256 MB/s +16%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	224.86 MB/s +2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	221.3 MB/s
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (117 - 512, n=16)	205 MB/s -7%
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)	190.3 MB/s -14%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	115.95 MB/s -48%
4K-64 Read
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	2437.31 MB/s +185%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1961.03 MB/s +129%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1263.15 MB/s +48%
Average of class Multimedia (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)	1144 MB/s +34%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (551 - 1272, n=16)	916 MB/s +7%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	855.29 MB/s
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	837 MB/s -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	817 MB/s -4%
4K-64 Write
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	2989.61 MB/s +34%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	2510 MB/s +12%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2255.47 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2233.12 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)	2195 MB/s -2%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (172.9 - 2500, n=16)	1717 MB/s -23%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	1522 MB/s -32%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1195.4 MB/s -46%
Access Time Read
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.116 ms * -147%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	0.083 ms * -77%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	0.082 ms * -74%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	0.074 ms * -57%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.074 ms * -57%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (0.03 - 0.17, n=16)	0.07281 ms * -55%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)	0.0551 ms * -17%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.047 ms *
Access Time Write
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.136 ms * -700%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	0.132 ms * -676%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	0.131 ms * -671%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.104 ms * -512%
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)	0.06104 ms * -259%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01	0.054 ms * -218%
Average WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 (0.016 - 0.088, n=16)	0.03494 ms * -106%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.017 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Continuous Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4833 (4210.03-4867.07)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4517 (4078.54-4558.9)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G: Ø3601 (2999.77-3614.76)

Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK: Ø3572 (3025.14-3586.13)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 321JN1024GB-TX01: Ø4896 (4216.79-4912.37)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM: Ø4432 (3774.46-4479.31)

图形卡

华硕在其 VivoBook S15 OLED BAPE 版中没有使用专用图形解决方案。取而代之的是集成英特尔 Iris Xe 图形 G796个EU。在竞争设备对比图中，iGPU 的性能表现尚可，但要比配备专用 GPU 的设备高出不少。在电池模式下，性能下降了约 10%。

尽管有 120 Hz 的显示屏，但你不应该指望这款多媒体设备能提供游戏级的性能。如果要玩相对较新的游戏，只能在最低或最多中等设置下进行。老式游戏有时可以在较高的图形设置和适当的帧速率下运行。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	100 pt
Average of class Multimedia	66.1 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	34 pt
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	26.9 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	26.8 pt
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC ^-2! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	25.6 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	24.7 pt
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	22.3 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	27686 Points +275%
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years)	20075 Points +172%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	9772 Points +32%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	7471 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	7389 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	7243 Points -2%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2867 - 7676, n=202)	6353 Points -14%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	120789 Points +273%
Average of class Multimedia (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years)	56887 Points +76%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	43225 Points +33%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	32393 Points
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	31190 Points -4%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	28754 Points -11%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (13162 - 38578, n=180)	26508 Points -18%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	25452 Points -21%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	20359 Points +240%
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years)	14437 Points +141%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	6661 Points +11%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	6143 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	5988 Points
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	5610 Points -6%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	5580 Points -7%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (2286 - 6482, n=215)	4920 Points -18%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	7391 Points +315%
Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years)	5446 Points +206%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	2373 Points +33%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1829 Points +3%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	1787 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	1782 Points
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (707 - 1871, n=212)	1495 Points -16%

3DMark 11 Performance		8095 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		27025 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		5574 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		2037 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average of class Multimedia (308 - 683, n=5, last 2 years)	461 Seconds *
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	400 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 105, n=45, last 2 years)	42.7 Seconds *
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	29 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 181, n=46, last 2 years)	74.5 Seconds *
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	53 Seconds *
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (336 - 1259, n=101)	696 Seconds * -83%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-13700H	452 Seconds * -19%
Average of class Multimedia (189 - 946, n=84, last 2 years)	430 Seconds * -13%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800H	425 Seconds * -12%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	387 Seconds * -2%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	380 Seconds *
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	377 Seconds * +1%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i9-13900H	336 Seconds * +12%

* ... smaller is better

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	100 pt
Average of class Multimedia	67 pt
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 ^-1! Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	31.9 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	30 pt
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	30 pt
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	27.7 pt
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC ^-1! Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	26.1 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76.6 (69^min, 69.34^P1) fps +356%
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)	54 fps +221%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	24 fps +43%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.1 (10.9^min) fps +8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.3 fps +3%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17 fps +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.8 (16^min, 16^P1) fps

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	89 (2.86^min, 58.8^P1) fps +724%
Average of class Multimedia (5.09 - 126.3, n=80, last 2 years)	53.5 fps +395%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	20.6 (5.54^min, 14.5^P1) fps +91%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.9 (2.26^min, 6.17^P1) fps +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.8 (4.99^min, 6.13^P1) fps
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	10.6 (3.67^min, 6.9^P1) fps -2%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	75.6 fps +180%
Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=81, last 2 years)	50.9 fps +89%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	27 fps
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	22.4 fps -17%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	19.6 fps -27%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.7 fps -34%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	132 (22.5^min, 102.9^P1) fps +366%
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 233, n=80, last 2 years)	87.4 fps +209%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	39.2 (18.3^min, 25^P1) fps +39%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	29.4 (5.6^min, 10.2^P1) fps +4%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.7 (5.6^min, 9.49^P1) fps +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	28.3 (5.5^min, 8.1^P1) fps
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	27.2 (5.4^min, 7.64^P1) fps -4%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	0 fps -100%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	126 (107.9^min) fps +92%
Average of class Multimedia (26.3 - 179.9, n=82, last 2 years)	96.4 fps +47%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	70.8 (64^min) fps +8%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	68.3 (60.7^min) fps +4%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	65.6 (56.3^min) fps
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	61.7 (53.9^min) fps -6%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	36 (34.5^min) fps -45%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	108.4 fps +172%
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)	66.8 fps +68%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	41 fps +3%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	40.1 fps +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	39.8 fps
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	34.5 fps -13%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	34.4 fps -14%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	34.3 fps -14%

The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	356 (321^min, 323.79^P1) fps +233%
Average of class Multimedia (36 - 428, n=47, last 2 years)	213 fps +99%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	125 fps +17%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	106.8 (100^min, 101.1^P1) fps
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	87 fps -19%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (28.9 - 117.2, n=186)	84 fps -21%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	258 (224^min, 224.31^P1) fps +274%
Average of class Multimedia (23 - 327, n=40, last 2 years)	144.6 fps +110%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	77 fps +12%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	69 (63^min, 63^P1) fps
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	67.2 fps -3%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	59 fps -14%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (21.4 - 77.8, n=184)	53.6 fps -22%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	138.7 (123^min, 123.66^P1) fps +273%
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years)	100.8 fps +171%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	40 fps +8%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	37.2 (33^min, 33^P1) fps
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	33 fps -11%
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10.6 - 45.9, n=189)	28.7 fps -23%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	25.6 fps -31%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	23.1 fps -38%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76.6 (69^min, 69.34^P1) fps +356%
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years)	54 fps +221%
Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	24 fps +43%
Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	18.1 (10.9^min) fps +8%
Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17.3 fps +3%
Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	17 fps +1%
Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	16.8 (16^min, 16^P1) fps
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (8.79 - 20.1, n=179)	14 fps -17%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø16.8 (16-18)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø74.3 (71-76)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M: Ø23.9 (19-25)

Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Ø17.3 (16-19)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	126.6	107.5	25.6	10.8
The Witcher 3 (2015)	106.8	69	37.2	16.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	114.5	85.9	72.5	65.6
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	46.6	27	27		14
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	55.2	46.3	39.8
Strange Brigade (2018)	101	44.7	35.2	28.3
Dirt 5 (2020)	44.7	22.5	18	14
F1 23 (2023)	50	44	30

排放与能源 - 酷热无声的笔记本电脑

噪音排放

华硕 VivoBook S15 KK5504 BAPE 版证明了自己是一款安静的产品。与其他设备一样，它在空闲运行时保持安静。同样，在负载情况下，它的平均噪音低于大多数竞争对手，仅在峰值时高于前三名。遗憾的是，我们的评测设备偶尔也会发出线圈呜呜声。

Noise Level

Idle		25.3 / 25.3 / 25.3 dB(A)
Load		43.5 / 50.75 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.3 dB(A)

	Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W Radeon 680M, R7 6800H, WD PC SN735 SDBPNHH-512G	Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i9-13900H, 321JN1024GB-TX01	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-13700H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
Noise		-1%	-12%	2%	-4%	-2%
off / environment *	25.3	20.96 17%	26 -3%	25.2 -0%	25.7 -2%	25.7 -2%
Idle Minimum *	25.3	25.28 -0%	26 -3%	25.2 -0%	25.7 -2%	26.1 -3%
Idle Average *	25.3	25.28 -0%	26 -3%	25.2 -0%	28.4 -12%	26.1 -3%
Idle Maximum *	25.3	25.28 -0%	28.1 -11%	26.5 -5%	28.4 -12%	27.2 -8%
Load Average *	43.5	51.88 -19%	56.9 -31%	39.8 9%	45.3 -4%	44.2 -2%
Load Maximum *	50.75	51.8 -2%	62.6 -23%	45.5 10%	45.6 10%	47.5 6%
Witcher 3 ultra *		49

* ... smaller is better

温度

评测样本的温度高达 41 °C，即使在空闲运行时也会相对较热，但不会令人感到不适。如果推动硬件，机箱温度会升至 62 °C。尽管最热的区域靠近数字键盘和机身底座，但温度还是让人不舒服。

Max. Load

Idle


42.1 °C	46.5 °C	51.5 °C
38.1 °C	49 °C	51.3 °C
31.6 °C	30.5 °C	35.7 °C

Maximum: 51.5 °C
Average: 41.8 °C


61.1 °C	62.4 °C	55.3 °C
43.7 °C	47.9 °C	36.7 °C
29.3 °C	29.4 °C	27.9 °C

Maximum: 62.4 °C
Average: 43.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 43 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated)

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.8 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.5 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 62.4 °C / 144 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.7 °C / 96.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.9 °C / -12.5 F).

	Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W AMD Ryzen 7 6800H, AMD Radeon 680M	Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 Intel Core i9-13900H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 Intel Core i7-13700H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat		10%	13%	20%	22%	19%
Maximum Upper Side *	51.5	42.6 17%	50.2 3%	38.9 24%	43.2 16%	44.4 14%
Maximum Bottom *	62.4	48.4 22%	50.2 20%	43.4 30%	44.7 28%	48 23%
Idle Upper Side *	41.7	39.4 6%	32.1 23%	33.5 20%	32.1 23%	31.9 24%
Idle Bottom *	37.2	39.8 -7%	34.6 7%	35.3 5%	30.1 19%	31.9 14%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

虽然两个哈曼卡顿扬声器的最大音量都在可控范围内，但声音的再现是线性的，高音均衡但低音完全不足。因此，我们建议通过蓝牙或 3.5 毫米音频插孔使用耳机。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 35% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

功耗略高于配备类似 CPU 但没有专用 GPU 的对比设备。不过，有些笔记本电脑的显示屏较小，而且缺乏 OLED 技术。该设备的最大功耗为 94 瓦，超出了所提供的 90 瓦 PSU 的最大功率。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.04 / 0.04 Watt
Idle	5.73 / 14.5 / 15.6 Watt
Load	40.5 / 94 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø74.9 (55.6-92.2)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø66.4 (62.7-70.4)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø76.7 (71.3-118)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø61.1 (52.8-92.7)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø90.8 (88.3-93.7)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø96.1 (88.4-118.8)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø73 (66.9-95.8)

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø14.5 (11.4-19.5)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.77 (4.27-8.99)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.34 (8.64-11.1)

Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø5.83 (4.89-7.96)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø72.8 (64.2-94.8)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø64.6 (60.9-91.3)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø74.3 (66.9-86)

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø38.2 (35.6-40.6)

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø82.1 (73.3-94)

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø54.5 (51.4-68.1)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø70.2 (65.7-85.5)

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø71.3 (63.5-84.2)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø64.4 (62.7-75.4)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø74 (71.4-80.4)

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.77 (2.32-8.61)

Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø3.28 (2.88-5.38)

Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø9.05 (0.92-15.8)

电池寿命

VivoBook S15 BAPE 配备 75 Wh 电池。这意味着这款评测设备在电池容量方面处于中等水平。在负载情况下的运行时间不错，在其他使用情况下也很稳定。上网或观看视频的时间约为 8 到 9 小时。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		8h 30min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 57min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 29min

	Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 96 Wh	Asus VivoBook S15 M3502RA-L1029W R7 6800H, Radeon 680M, 70 Wh	Asus ZenBook 14X UX3404VC i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh	Huawei MateBook 16s i9 i9-13900H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 84 Wh	Acer Swift Go SFG16-71 i7-13700H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 65 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		14%	2%	-17%	11%	-25%	8%
H.264	537	585 9%	766 43%				821 ?(319 - 1481, n=52, last 2 years) 53%
WiFi v1.3	510	606 19%	692 36%	600 18%	787 54%	467.7 -8%	625 ?(279 - 1204, n=85, last 2 years) 23%
Load	209		59 -72%	103 -51%	142 -32%	121 -42%	97.8 ?(39 - 212, n=64, last 2 years) -53%
Reader / Idle				1056			1168 ?(612 - 2760, n=17, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 为 BAPE 粉丝量身打造的非凡设计

+ 高分辨率 120 Hz OLED 面板

+ 性能稳定

+ 坚固的外壳

+ 附带便携包和鼠标

Cons

- 高反射显示屏

- PWM 闪烁

- Wi-Fi 性能低于平均水平

结论 - 总体而言，这是一款适合 BAPE 粉丝使用的可靠笔记本电脑

当然，华硕 VivoBook S15 OLED BAPE 版的出色之处主要在于其醒目而不张扬的 "A Bathing Ape "设计。

对于 BAPE 的粉丝来说，这款设备是他们向小猴子、它的朋友们以及背后的时尚品牌及其硬件功能表达喜爱的好机会。

在技术上，VivoBook S15 OLED 是一款成熟的设备，没有太大的弱点。这款多媒体笔记本电脑得分很高，尤其是在智能而光亮的 OLED 屏幕、CPU 性能和电池续航时间方面，所有这些都被安置在一个坚固而相对轻巧的机壳内。

当然，华硕还提供各种规格的 VivoBook S15，但没有 BAPE 品牌。如果您想获得更好的游戏性能，不妨考虑一下其他产品，如 VivoBook Pro 16.

价格和供应情况

华硕 Vivobook S 15 OLED BAPE 版（K5504）配备英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H、16 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘，零售价为 1499 美元，但可直接从制造商处购买，价格仅为 1300 美元。只需 1300 美元。在亚马逊上还可以找到不含 BAPE 的变体，售价约为 989 美元。

Asus VivoBook S15 K5504 - 01/25/2024 v7 ^(old)
Marcus Schwarten

Chassis

80 / 98 → 82%

Keyboard

90%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

60 / 80 → 75%

Weight

67 / 20-72 → 91%

Battery

81 / 95 → 85%

Display

92%

Games Performance

73 / 90 → 81%

Application Performance

95 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

79%

Noise

84 / 95 → 88%

Audio

51%

Camera

46 / 85 → 54%

Average

76%

85%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 114 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 VivoBook S15 BAPE 笔记本电脑评测：性能超强的 OLED 笔记本电脑？还是特别版会铩羽而归？

Marcus Schwarten, 2024-02- 5 (Update: 2024-02- 5)