华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 (2023) 笔记本电脑评测：酷睿 i9-13900H、RTX 4050 和 3.2K OLED 是业余创作者的好兆头

Name: Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU
Brand: Asus

观看生动，速度适中。

2023 年上市的华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 对于寻求全面笔记本电脑的新晋内容创作者来说是一个不错的选择。酷睿 i9-13900H、RTX 4050 和鲜艳的 3.2K 120 Hz OLED 面板的组合显示出良好的潜力，但我们在评测中发现，VivoBook Pro 16 的艺术追求并非没有局限性。

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 👁 Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 11/11/2023 🇺🇸 🇸🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Intel Raptor Lake Geforce

华硕在 2023 年更新了 VivoBook 产品线，推出了多款新机型。在回顾了华硕 VivoBook 14X,VivoBook 15X和VivoBook Pro 16X K6604现在，我们将目光转向最新的 VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU。

与上一代产品相比，2023 版 VivoBook Pro 16 主要进行了以下几方面的升级上一代产品.它配备了一些功能强大的组件，包括英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H处理器和英伟达GeForce RTX 4050显卡。我们的测试机还配备了 16GB 快速 DDR5-4800 内存、1TB PCIe Gen4 SSD 和支持杜比视界的 120 Hz 16:10 3.2K OLED 显示屏。

不过，这种配置并不便宜--我们的 VivoBook Pro 16 配置在印度市场的售价为 1,54,990 镑（2,199 欧元，含增值税）。我们对 VivoBook Pro 16 进行了测试，看看它是否对得起高昂的价格标签。

Test device courtesy of Asus India

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU (Vivobook Pro 16 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900H 14 x 1.9 - 5.4 GHz, 115 W PL2 / Short Burst, 50 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, 65 W TDP, GDDR6, Studio Driver 536.99, Optimus, MUX

Memory

16 GB

, DDR5-4800 Quad-Channel, 8 GB Soldered, Timings: 40-39-39-76, Upgradable up to 24 GB

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 3200 x 2000 pixel 236 PPI, Samsung ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, Dolby Vision, VESA Display HDR TrueBlack 600-certified, PANTONE-validated, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Mainboard

Intel Alder Lake-P PCH

Storage

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, 1024 GB

, 894 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-P/U/H PCH - cAVS

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo audio jack, Card Reader: microSD card reader, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 355.3 x 252

Battery

96 Wh Lithium-Ion, 3S2P, 6-cell

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: 1080p 3DNR webcam with privacy shutter
Primary Camera: 2.1 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo speakers with Smart Amp and harman/kardon tuning and Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: Chiclet, full-size, Keyboard Light: yes, MyAsus, ProArt Creator Hub, ScreenXpert, GlideX, Microsoft Office Home & Student 2021, Xbox Game Pass (3-month trial), 12 Months Warranty

Weight

1.9 kg, Power Supply: 320 g

Price

2199 EUR

Links

Asus homepage
Asus notebook section

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	11 / 2023	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	19 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
86.2 % v7 ^(old)	07 / 2023	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	22.8 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
89.7 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	19.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) R5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	27.3 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.9 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2023	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	2.2 kg	22.1 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	05 / 2023	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	1.9 kg	20 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
86.2 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	2.1 kg	18 mm	16.00"	3840x2400

底盘塑料结构，180° 金属盖

VivoBook Pro 16 机身有酷银和静谧蓝（我们的评测机）两种颜色可选，重 1.9 千克。与其他 VivoBook 一样，机身结构以塑料为主，金属盖可完全平放 180 度，单手即可轻松打开，无需滑动笔记本底座。

磨砂光滑的表面呈现出一种微妙而迷人的美感。VivoBook 的设计标志，如盖上的徽标和条纹状的回车键装饰，都一应俱全。与 VivoBook Pro 16X 类似，橙色的Esc键也提供了另一抹亮色。

整体制造质量尚可，键盘和显示屏有一些弯曲，但在正常使用中没有什么问题。铰链非常坚固，足以在任何角度牢牢固定屏幕，不会出现吱吱作响的情况。

尺寸比较

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF DIN A4 ❌

连接性Wi-Fi 6E 的吞吐量需要进行一些微调

华硕为 VivoBook Pro 16 配备了包括 Thunderbolt 4 在内的全套端口。USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C 端口支持 DisplayPort-out 和 Power Delivery。

与我们今年看到的其他 VivoBook 一样，端口分布偏向于设备的右侧，这在使用有线鼠标时可能会令人不快。值得庆幸的是，所有端口都可以同时使用，不会造成干扰。

左：USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A、3.5 毫米组合音频插孔、microSD 卡插槽

右侧雷电 4、USB 3.2 Gen2 Type-C（DisplayPort/电力传输）、USB 3.2 Gen1 Type-A、HDMI 2.1 输出、RJ-45、DC-输入

SD 读卡器

据华硕称，VivoBook Pro 16 的内置 microSD 读卡器支持高达 312 MB/s 的峰值传输速度。在使用 Angelbird AV Pro V60 microSD 卡进行的测试中，我们在 AS-SSD 连续读取基准测试中记录的连续读取速度高达 232 MB/s。从卡中复制各种 JPG 文件的最高速度为 163.5 MB/s。

虽然略低于华硕宣称的最高速度，但与上一代机型相比，读卡速度明显提高。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	181.2 (133.5^min - 187.53^max) MB/s +11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	163.5 (157.23^min - 168.58^max) MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	120 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	109.5 (97.05^min - 110.22^max) MB/s -33%
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=57, last 2 years)	101 MB/s -38%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	66.5 MB/s -59%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	257.13 MB/s +11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	232.36 MB/s
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	188.81 MB/s -19%
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=57, last 2 years)	142.8 MB/s -39%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	126 MB/s -46%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	72.2 MB/s -69%

交流

英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 在 5 GHz 频段的性能优于 6 GHz 频段

VivoBook Pro 16 配备了英特尔 Wi-Fi 6E AX211 无线网卡。在测试中，我们通过 5 GHz Wi-Fi 记录到了强大的发送和接收速度。

在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器进行的设置中，6 GHz 频段的性能还算不错，尽管没有 5 GHz 频段那么快。

相比之下联想Legion Pro 5的联发科 Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 卡提供了良好、相对稳定的 6 GHz 吞吐量。

Networking: iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | iperf3 receive AXE11000 | iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz

Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1611 (854^min - 1699^max) MBit/s 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1606 (1503^min - 1654^max) MBit/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1492 (829^min - 1665^max) MBit/s -7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1444 (1147^min - 1531^max) MBit/s -10%
Average of class Multimedia (358 - 1921, n=79, last 2 years)	1379 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (64 - 1921, n=248)	1228 MBit/s -24%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	920 (471^min - 966^max) MBit/s -43%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	776 (392^min - 802^max) MBit/s -52%

Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1714 (1675^min - 1737^max) MBit/s +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1701 (1196^min - 1751^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1562 (1285^min - 1684^max) MBit/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia (765 - 1789, n=78, last 2 years)	1468 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=248)	1385 MBit/s -19%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	905 (451^min - 919^max) MBit/s -47%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Realtek RTL8852BE	905 (765^min - 969^max) MBit/s -47%

Networking / iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1726 (868^min - 1783^max) MBit/s +25%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1595 (801^min - 1642^max) MBit/s +15%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1492 (1095^min - 1659^max) MBit/s +8%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1444 (745^min - 1487^max) MBit/s +5%
Average of class Multimedia (705 - 1816, n=29, last 2 years)	1384 MBit/s 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1381 (1289^min - 1536^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (385 - 1851, n=216)	1368 MBit/s -1%

Networking / iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1732 (1669^min - 1745^max) MBit/s +6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1712 (1593^min - 1743^max) MBit/s +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card	1712 (854^min - 1732^max) MBit/s +5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1628 (1598^min - 1648^max) MBit/s 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1628 (1393^min - 1717^max) MBit/s
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1611 (805^min - 1631^max) MBit/s -1%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (700 - 1857, n=216)	1494 MBit/s -8%
Average of class Multimedia (700 - 1807, n=30, last 2 years)	1473 MBit/s -10%

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1381 (1289-1536)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1698 (868-1783)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1628 (1393-1717)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1683 (854-1732)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1606 (1503-1654)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1583 (854-1699)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1701 (1196-1751)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1562 (1285-1684)

网络摄像头

带有物理隐私快门的 1080p 网络摄像头显示出较大的色彩偏差，但整体图像质量可以满足基本的视频通话和会议需求。细节保留得相当好，但清晰度和锐利度还有待提高。

ColorChecker Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU: 15.39 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 26.34 ∆E

安全

VivoBook Pro 16 的电源按钮上有一个指纹识别器，用于基于 Windows Hello 的登录。指纹识别器工作速度快，反应灵敏。TPM 2.0 模块可满足 Windows 11 的要求。

配件和保修

除了 150 W 电源适配器和常见的文件外，我们的设备包装盒内没有其他配件。

在印度，华硕为 VivoBook Pro 16 提供标准的一年保修服务。此外，买家还可以选择保修和意外损坏保护选项。从 ₹999 到 ₹2,999 不等，只要在 15 个日历日内注册购买即可。

维护

要进入 VivoBook Pro 16 内部，需要拧下九颗 Torx 螺钉才能拆下底板。在内部，可以对内存、NVMe 固态硬盘和 Wi-Fi 卡等关键部件进行升级。如果需要，还可以拧下电池进行更换。

内存最大扩展限制为 24 GB，因为主板上焊接了 8 GB DDR5 内存，只有一个 SO-DIMM 插槽可用于添加更多内存。

输入设备：全尺寸键盘，方向键狭小

键盘

华硕为 VivoBook Pro 16 配备了标志性的 ErgoSense 键盘，与我们在 VivoBook 15X 和 Pro 16X 机型上看到的类似。键盘的键程为 1.4 毫米，可提供灵敏的键入体验。通过 MyAsus 应用程序，可以将顶排按键的主要功能设置为 F1-F12 或特殊快捷键。

虽然方向键感觉有些拥挤，但打字感觉舒适，适合日常工作。三级白色背光有助于在黑暗中打字。

触摸板

9 厘米 x 13 厘米，可提供流畅、灵敏的滑动，整个表面可用作鼠标左键。完全支持 WindowsPrecision 手势。与 VivoBook Pro 16X 不同的是，它没有内置华硕拨号盘。

显示屏 3.2K Dolby Vision HDR OLED，240 Hz DC 调光

VivoBook Pro 16 采用与 Pro 16X 和 ProArt StudioBook 16X 相同的 16:10 三星 ATNA60BX01 OLED 面板。 ProArt StudioBook 16分辨率为 3200 x 2000，刷新率为 120 Hz。正如人们对 OLED 面板所期待的那样，它具有近乎无限的对比度，黑色深邃，没有任何背光渗漏。亮度分布也非常均匀。

在 SDR 模式下，我们记录的峰值亮度为 358 尼特。启用 HDR 后，显示屏亮度可达 566 尼特，接近 VESA DisplayHDR 600 规格。MyAsus 应用程序提供了多种调节功能，如直流调光、色域和防止烧毁的 OLED 像素偏移。

虽然 SDR 的最大亮度略低于理想值，但 OLED 面板完美的黑色还是营造出了身临其境的观看体验。


354 cd/m²	352 cd/m²	354 cd/m²
354 cd/m²	353 cd/m²	355 cd/m²
352 cd/m²	354 cd/m²	358 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Samsung ATNA60BX01-1 tested with X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3

Maximum: 358 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 354 cd/m² Minimum: 20.49 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 348 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.23 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.89, calibrated: 2.42
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
96.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3)

	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Samsung ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Samsung SDC4178 ATNA60BX01-1, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Samsung SDC4191 (ATNA60YV09-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V TMX1603 (TL160ADMP03-0), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) CSOT T3 MNG007DA2-2, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS BOE NE160WUM-NX2, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Au Optronics B160QAN02.L, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		-0%	0%	-5%	-17%	-20%	-4%
Display P3 Coverage	98.7	98.4 0%	99.9 1%	96.61 -2%	71.6 -27%	69.3 -30%	98.5 0%
sRGB Coverage	99.7	99.7 0%	100 0%	99.92 0%	99.8 0%	97.3 -2%	99.9 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	96.5	95.8 -1%	96.4 0%	84.63 -12%	72.9 -24%	70.7 -27%	86.1 -11%
Response Times		-32%	-61%	-209%	-802%	-1085%	-78%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.68 ?(0.32, 0.36)	1.6 ?(0.8, 0.8) -135%	2 ?(1, 1) -194%	3.8 ?(1.8, 2) -459%	12 ?(5.4, 6.6) -1665%	15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3) -2194%	2 ?(1, 1) -194%
Response Time Black / White *	13.2 ?(10.8, 2.4)	1.4 ?(0.6, 0.8) 89%	1.98 ?(0.5, 1.48) 85%	7.6 ?(4, 3.6) 42%	5.2 ?(1.8, 3.4) 61%	10 ?(5.7, 4.3) 24%	8 ?(1, 7) 39%
PWM Frequency	240 ?(100)	120 ?(100) -50%	60 -75%
Screen		23%	23%	24%	45%	18%	24%
Brightness middle	353	347 -2%	389.97 10%	486 38%	543 54%	301 -15%	504 43%
Brightness	354	346 -2%	395 12%	469 32%	516 46%	294 -17%	465 31%
Brightness Distribution	98	97 -1%	97 -1%	91 -7%	87 -11%	94 -4%	87 -11%
Black Level *		0.06	0.03	0.39	0.58	0.21	0.35
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.23	1.89 55%	2 53%	2.27 46%	1.35 68%	1.79 58%	1.83 57%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.13	3.26 54%	4.1 42%	5.73 20%	3.22 55%	3.48 51%	5.51 23%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	2.42	1.97 19%	1.68 31%	0.6 75%	1.31 46%	1.2 50%	1.34 45%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.5	1.55 38%	2.23 11%	3.36 -34%	1.03 59%	2.5 -0%	3.02 -21%
Gamma	2.4 ^92%	2.39 ^92%	2.41 ^91%	2.46 ^89%	2.38 ^92%	2.265 ^97%	2.39 ^92%
CCT	6642 ^98%	6458 ^101%	6323 ^103%	6625 ^98%	6452 ^101%	6157 ^106%	6688 ^97%
Contrast		5783	12999	1246	936	1433	1440
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-3% / 5%	-13% / -2%	-63% / -22%	-258% / -112%	-362% / -176%	-19% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

色彩测量和校准是在正常模式下使用原生色彩配置文件和 Display P3 色彩空间进行的。

VivoBook Pro 16 的显示屏支持广泛的色域，无论是多媒体消费还是内容创作都非常适合。

开箱后，VivoBook Pro 16 的色彩准确度还有待提高，在我们的 ColorChecker 测试中，平均 Delta E 值高于理想值。

我们使用 X-Rite i1Basic Pro 3 分光光度计和 Portrait Displays 的 Calman Ultimate 软件进行了校准，大大提高了灰度（0.7）和 ColorChecker Delta E 2000（2.42）值。

但仍存在一些细微的色彩表现问题，尤其是完全饱和的红色色调和某些肤色。

校准后的 ICC 文件可从以上链接下载。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 10.8 ms rise
13.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.68 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.32 ms rise
0.68 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.36 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms).

根据人工估算，100% 黑色到 100% 白色的转换大约需要 13.2 毫秒，还算不错。而 50% 灰色到 80% 灰色的转换则要快得多，仅需约 0.68 毫秒。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

240 Hz

≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8611 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

VivoBook Pro 16 的 OLED 面板在亮度低于 60% 时采用 240 Hz PWM，高于该阈值时则切换为 240 Hz DC 调光。虽然疲劳程度比 PWM 低，但更高频率的直流调光会更好。

在 60 Hz 的刷新率下，直流调光频率降至 120 Hz。为了减少潜在的眼睛疲劳，我们建议将亮度设置在 60% 以上。

更多信息请参阅我们的文章："PWM 为何令人头疼和"分析：直流调光与 PWM - 您能否对 AMOLED 显示器进行调光而不产生闪烁？".您还可以通过我们的 PWM 排名表.

光亮的屏幕使得户外阳光直射下的观看效果不佳。可视角度比较稳定，但在极端角度下确实会出现一些绿色色调，这在 OLED 显示屏上很常见。

性能：酷睿 i9-13900H 和 RTX 4050 组合未充分发挥潜力

华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU 采用英特尔第 13 代酷睿 i5-13500H和酷睿 i9-13900H选项，均配备英伟达GeForce RTX 4050显卡。另外还有一款 VivoBook Pro 16 K6602HC，配备较旧的酷睿 i9-11900H, RTX 3050 笔记本图形处理器和 FHD+ 120 Hz 显示屏。

测试条件

性能设置在 MyAsus 和 ProArt Creator Hub 应用程序中重复出现。我们在所有基准测试中都使用了性能模式，并将 MUX 切换到独立 RTX 4050 GPU。电池测试在 MSHybrid 模式下的 Whisper 设置中进行。

标准模式和性能模式的功率限制相同。不过，后者由于冷却效果更好，因此持续性能更高。

性能模式	PL1 (PBP) / Tau	PL2 (MTP) / Tau	Cinebench R15 Multi score	Cinebench R15 Multi score (30 loop)
Whisper	25 W / 56 s	115 W / 2.44 ms	1584 (-36%)	766 (-63%)
标准	50 瓦 / 56 秒	115 瓦 / 2.44 毫秒	2445 (-1.1%)	1748 (-16%)
性能	50 W / 56 s	115 W / 2.44 ms	2473 (100%)	2084 (100%)

处理器

英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H 是一款 14 核 20 线程处理器，拥有 6 个 P 核、8 个 E 核，单核最高主频可达 5.4 GHz。不过，这并不是我们见过的最快的酷睿 i9-13900H。

CPU 整体性能比上一代 VivoBook Pro 16 的酷睿 i7-12700H，甚至落后于 Ryzen 5 7645HXLegion 6% 的差距。在我们的测试设备中，有限的电源预算阻碍了酷睿 i9-13900H 的性能与笔记本电脑的比较，如技嘉 Aero 16 OLED和华硕 ROG Flow X16和华硕 ROG Flow X16

性能不敌酷睿 i9-13980HXVivoBook Pro 16X 中的酷睿 i9-13980HX，其性能累计领先 46%。

尽管如此，从相当稳定的 Cinebench R15 多核循环图中可以看出，VivoBook Pro 16 的散热似乎做得不错。

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2244 (2186.27-2513.98)

Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø3763 (3529.2-4703.12)

Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2665 (2515.25-3099.81)

Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX: Ø2240 (2217.05-2275.83)

Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS: Ø2646 (2596.9-2666.67)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2194 (2130.95-2446.31)

Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H: Ø2829 (2772.58-2962.96)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	82.4 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	70.5 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	65.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	62.5 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	61.6 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	59.1 pt
Average of class Multimedia	57.6 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	55.6 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	53.4 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	28963 Points +94%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	19293 Points +29%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	19188 Points +28%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	16907 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11997 - 20385, n=28)	16813 Points +12%
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years)	15951 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	14958 Points
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	14555 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	13985 Points -7%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	2016 Points +16%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1297 - 2054, n=26)	1887 Points +8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	1825 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	1809 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years)	1799 Points +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	1791 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	1740 Points
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	1739 Points 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	1707 Points -2%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	11260 Points +95%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	7491 Points +30%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	7254 Points +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6571 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (4935 - 7716, n=25)	6533 Points +13%
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11924, n=85, last 2 years)	5950 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	5774 Points
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	5551 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	5467 Points -5%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	773 Points +15%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (428 - 792, n=25)	720 Points +7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	717 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	702 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	699 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	673 Points
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=85, last 2 years)	671 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	670 Points 0%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	651 Points -3%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	4703 (3529.2^min - 4703.12^max) Points +87%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	3100 (2515.25^min - 3099.81^max) Points +23%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	2963 (2772.58^min - 2962.96^max) Points +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2061 - 3100, n=26)	2676 Points +6%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2666.7 Points +6%
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 5224, n=92, last 2 years)	2526 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	2514 (2186.27^min - 2513.98^max) Points
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	2446 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	2276 (2217.05^min - 2275.83^max) Points -9%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	289 Points +15%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	289 Points +15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	287 Points +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	283 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (211 - 297, n=26)	269 Points +7%
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=87, last 2 years)	263 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	252 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	252 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	243 Points -4%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Multimedia (100 - 502, n=85, last 2 years)	245 Seconds * -15%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	227 Seconds * -7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	224 Seconds * -5%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	213 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (166 - 268, n=24)	205 Seconds * +4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	189 Seconds * +11%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	180 Seconds * +15%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	172 Seconds * +19%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	136 Seconds * +36%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	104616 MIPS +62%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	74386 MIPS +15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	74123 MIPS +15%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	70081 MIPS +9%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (45045 - 79032, n=25)	66435 MIPS +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	64431 MIPS
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 130368, n=80, last 2 years)	61532 MIPS -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	60373 MIPS -6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	48332 MIPS -25%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	7124 MIPS +25%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	6972 MIPS +22%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	6621 MIPS +16%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	6285 MIPS +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3665 - 6600, n=25)	6054 MIPS +6%
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=80, last 2 years)	5784 MIPS +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	5721 MIPS
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	5590 MIPS -2%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	5570 MIPS -3%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	18475 Points +81%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	13919 Points +36%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	13796 Points +35%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (9094 - 15410, n=26)	12649 Points +24%
Average of class Multimedia (6390 - 23059, n=84, last 2 years)	12250 Points +20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	12111 Points +19%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	10214 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	10145 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	8346 Points -18%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	2032 Points +17%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	2001 Points +15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	1996 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	1971 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (1140 - 2043, n=26)	1895 Points +9%
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2555, n=84, last 2 years)	1848 Points +7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	1735 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	1718 Points -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	1683 Points -3%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	27 fps +62%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	21.4 fps +28%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	21 fps +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	20.8 fps +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	18.6 fps +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (14.1 - 22.3, n=25)	18.5 fps +11%
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 34.3, n=79, last 2 years)	17 fps +2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	16.7 fps
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	15.3 fps -8%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	57.8 s * -3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	56.3 s *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	56.2 s * -0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	51.4 s * +9%
Average of class Multimedia (23.9 - 146.7, n=81, last 2 years)	49.6 s * +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (34.4 - 82.8, n=25)	47.6 s * +15%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	47.4 s * +16%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	41.7 s * +26%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	38.1 s * +32%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4934 sec * -2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H	0.4873 sec * -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4834 sec *
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years)	0.477 sec * +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (0.4052 - 0.723, n=25)	0.4493 sec * +7%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	0.4302 sec * +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	0.4253 sec * +12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H	0.4165 sec * +14%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.4041 sec * +16%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2514 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

217 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

252 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5774 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

673 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1740 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

14958 Points

Help

... in comparison

Cinebench R15 多核测试显示，即使在性能模式下，VivoBook Pro 16 也很难充分利用酷睿 i9-13900H 的 115 W 功耗限制。在性能模式下，我们记录的 CPU 封装峰值功耗仅为 80 W，最大提升时钟频率仅为 3.6 GHz。

标准模式略显保守，峰值封装功耗为 76 W，最高频率为 3.5 GHz。

在 Whisper 模式下，VivoBook Pro 16 的最大功耗为 66.7 W，但 CPU 的平均封装功耗仅为 15 W 左右。

使用电池后，性能进一步受到限制，与交流电源相比，Cinebench R20 单核分数下降了 46.3%，多核分数下降了 27%。

Cinebench R15 循环期间的 CPU 时钟、核心温度和封装功率。(红色：高性能，绿色：标准，蓝色：低调）

Performance Rating
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	88.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	88.2 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	77.7 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	71.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	70.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900H	66 pt
Average of class Multimedia	64.5 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	63.6 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	55.6 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	28033 KRay/s +105%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	23070 KRay/s +69%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	21332 KRay/s +56%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	18385 KRay/s +35%
Average of class Multimedia (5121 - 50388, n=78, last 2 years)	15656 KRay/s +15%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6788 - 19557, n=25)	15135 KRay/s +11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	14390 KRay/s +5%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	13642 KRay/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	13150 KRay/s -4%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	122098 Points +70%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	108001 Points +50%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	94527 Points +31%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	90834 Points +26%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	86318 Points +20%
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 201874, n=79, last 2 years)	76553 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (22551 - 95579, n=25)	76236 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	72920 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	71957 Points

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	5264 MB/s +61%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	4566 MB/s +40%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	4245 MB/s +30%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	4187 MB/s +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3822 MB/s +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (2491 - 4270, n=25)	3561 MB/s +9%
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 8623, n=79, last 2 years)	3542 MB/s +8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	3375 MB/s +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	3269 MB/s

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	126758 Points +34%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	124433 Points +31%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	111227 Points +17%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (65121 - 120936, n=25)	105169 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	102438 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	99232 Points +5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	95175 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	94687 Points
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 181505, n=79, last 2 years)	90518 Points -4%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	15380 Points +74%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	13785 Points +56%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	11867 Points +34%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	11072 Points +25%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	10485 Points +19%
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 28794, n=79, last 2 years)	9871 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (6108 - 11631, n=25)	9675 Points +9%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	8932 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	8842 Points

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	63432 Points +87%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	53398 Points +58%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	49915 Points +47%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44967 Points +33%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	42925 Points +27%
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 105740, n=78, last 2 years)	38187 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (11283 - 48474, n=25)	37712 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	35011 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	33882 Points

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	149377 MB/s +23%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	121588 MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	105169 MB/s -14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3691 - 149377, n=25)	87238 MB/s -28%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	86309 MB/s -29%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	83870 MB/s -31%
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=79, last 2 years)	74886 MB/s -38%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	65858 MB/s -46%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	54106 MB/s -56%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1513 MB/s +57%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1221 MB/s +26%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	1192 MB/s +23%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	1089 MB/s +13%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (789 - 1254, n=25)	1040 MB/s +8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	966 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 2022, n=79, last 2 years)	966 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	940 MB/s -3%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	875 MB/s -9%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	15209 KRay/s +105%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	12421 KRay/s +67%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	11431 KRay/s +54%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	9803 KRay/s +32%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	9686 KRay/s +31%
Average of class Multimedia (2759 - 26875, n=79, last 2 years)	8490 KRay/s +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (3655 - 10716, n=25)	8215 KRay/s +11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	7629 KRay/s +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	7420 KRay/s

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44611 MPixel/s +15%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	43965 MPixel/s +14%
Average of class Multimedia (13699 - 58844, n=79, last 2 years)	41762 MPixel/s +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900H (10871 - 50488, n=25)	39722 MPixel/s +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	38636 MPixel/s
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	38385 MPixel/s -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	29922 MPixel/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	28391 MPixel/s -27%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	13699 MPixel/s -65%

我们的专用英特尔酷睿 i9-13900H页面提供更多信息和基准比较。

系统性能

在 PCMark 10 和 CrossMark 测试中也可以看到类似的趋势。在 PCMark 10 和 CrossMark 测试中也可以看到类似的趋势。酷睿 i9-13980HX-搭载酷睿 i9-13980HX 的 VivoBook Pro 16X 在 PCMark 10 总分上几乎与我们的测试机型持平，而在 CrossMark 综合测试中取得了 19% 的成绩。

尽管如此，我们在日常使用中并没有发现任何与通常的生产力、多媒体或网页浏览任务有关的问题。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7645HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	8105 Points +15%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	8058 Points +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	7927 Points +12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7884 Points +12%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	7054 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	7054 Points 0%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	6883 Points -2%
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=73, last 2 years)	6870 Points -3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	6652 Points -6%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7645HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	11866 Points +16%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11539 Points +13%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	11332 Points +11%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10844 Points +6%
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=73, last 2 years)	10561 Points +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	10547 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10237 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	10237 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	9540 Points -7%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7645HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	11127 Points +28%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	10505 Points +21%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	10222 Points +18%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	9231 Points +7%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	9030 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	9016 Points +4%
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10615, n=73, last 2 years)	8982 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	8667 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	8667 Points 0%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	13575 Points +26%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	11868 Points +11%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11272 Points +5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7645HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	10943 Points +2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	10737 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	10737 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=73, last 2 years)	9408 Points -12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	9291 Points -13%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	9288 Points -13%

CrossMark / Overall
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2050 Points +19%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1956 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7645HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1939 Points +12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1882 Points +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1774 Points +3%
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2255, n=85, last 2 years)	1739 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1724 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1724 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1683 Points -2%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1919 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7645HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1908 Points +15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1859 Points +12%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1781 Points +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1715 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1669 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1666 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1666 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2050, n=85, last 2 years)	1649 Points -1%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2353 Points +27%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2157 Points +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7645HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	2029 Points +9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1990 Points +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1978 Points +6%
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2795, n=85, last 2 years)	1950 Points +5%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1860 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1860 Points 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1699 Points -9%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1915 Points +26%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7645HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	1779 Points +17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1698 Points +11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1677 Points +10%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1651 Points +8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1524 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	1524 Points 0%
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2094, n=85, last 2 years)	1461 Points -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1388 Points -9%

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Multimedia (25615 - 104459, n=79, last 2 years)	71050 MB/s +20%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	68474 MB/s +16%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	66344 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	60600 MB/s +2%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	59712 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	59266 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	59266 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7645HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	48052 MB/s -19%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	25615 MB/s -57%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	75581 MB/s +12%
Average of class Multimedia (25586 - 125604, n=79, last 2 years)	71634 MB/s +6%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	68252 MB/s +1%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	68205 MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	67398 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	67398 MB/s 0%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	61609 MB/s -9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7645HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	50185 MB/s -26%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	25586 MB/s -62%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	72541 MB/s +20%
Average of class Multimedia (23679 - 117933, n=79, last 2 years)	72068 MB/s +19%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	68170 MB/s +13%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	67649 MB/s +12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	60748 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	60548 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	60548 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7645HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	53914 MB/s -11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	23679 MB/s -61%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=79, last 2 years)	109.5 ns * -17%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	94.4 ns * -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	93.7 ns *
Average Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU ()	93.7 ns * -0%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	92.3 ns * +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	91.1 ns * +3%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	90.4 ns * +4%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	89.9 ns * +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7645HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	84.2 ns * +10%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4484 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5200 points
PCMark 10 Score		7054 points
Help

DPC 延迟

我们测得从中断到处理的最高延迟时间约为 1,753.6 µs，这有可能导致实时音频/视频编辑工作流程出现问题。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2472 μs * -41%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1753.6 μs *
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1573.4 μs * +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1210.9 μs * +31%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Radeon RX 7600S, R9 7940HS, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1128.7 μs * +36%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, i9-13900H, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1053.8 μs * +40%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, R5 7645HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	666 μs * +62%

* ... smaller is better

更多 DPC 延迟比较可参见我们的 DPC 延迟排名页面。

存储设备

美光 2400 1 TB PCIe Gen4 M.2 固态硬盘被装在一个长长的铝制盖子下面，拆卸起来有点麻烦。硬盘的整体性能略好于美光 2400 512 GB 硬盘，但明显落后于竞争产品中的西部数据 SN560、技嘉和 SK 海力士 PC801。

美光 2400 在队列深度为 1 的 4K 读取中受到的冲击最大，不过在 4K Q32 读取中表现要好得多。

一个备用 M.2 插槽可用于存储扩展。无法添加 2.5 英寸 SATA 硬盘。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 4598.6 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3416 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 623.9 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 661.5 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 1896 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 2221 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 62.52 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 199.1 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 662.5 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1364.4 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	94.6 pt
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	79.5 pt
Average of class Multimedia	63.3 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	60 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	53.7 pt
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	50.8 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	49.7 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	47.1 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	45.3 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4770 (4758.02^min - 4770.39^max) MB/s +146%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3234 (3155.56^min - 3234.47^max) MB/s +67%
Average of class Multimedia (888 - 4861, n=77, last 2 years)	3012 MB/s +55%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2669 (2638.39^min - 2668.53^max) MB/s +38%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2519 MB/s +30%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2353 (2142.12^min - 2352.79^max) MB/s +21%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (1870 - 2660, n=18)	2289 MB/s +18%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	2253 (2206.83^min - 2252.55^max) MB/s +16%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1939 (1922.39^min - 1939.24^max) MB/s
seq write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4938 (864.6^min - 4938.37^max) MB/s +103%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3291 (3216.4^min - 3290.77^max) MB/s +35%
Average of class Multimedia (463 - 5711, n=77, last 2 years)	3168 MB/s +30%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2997 (2930.15^min - 2996.92^max) MB/s +23%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (2052 - 3141, n=18)	2643 MB/s +9%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2433 (2278.56^min - 2432.65^max) MB/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2292 (2277.15^min - 2292.43^max) MB/s -6%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2252 (2149.48^min - 2252.34^max) MB/s -7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1671 (1641.02^min - 1670.59^max) MB/s -31%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	7328 (6805.28^min - 7327.89^max) MB/s +62%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6935 (5510.15^min - 6934.86^max) MB/s +53%
Average of class Multimedia (944 - 7126, n=77, last 2 years)	5448 MB/s +20%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4940 MB/s +9%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (4129 - 5093, n=18)	4693 MB/s +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4529 (3752.85^min - 4529.22^max) MB/s
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4294 (3669.6^min - 4293.91^max) MB/s -5%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	3974 (3600.81^min - 3974.33^max) MB/s -12%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	3034 (2688.83^min - 3034.37^max) MB/s -33%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4936 (877.32^min - 4936.28^max) MB/s +56%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4926 (4833.5^min - 4926^max) MB/s +56%
Average of class Multimedia (555 - 6898, n=77, last 2 years)	4236 MB/s +34%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (2461 - 3635, n=18)	3320 MB/s +5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3185 (3154.12^min - 3184.87^max) MB/s +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3154 (3143.42^min - 3153.68^max) MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2934 (2895.62^min - 2933.5^max) MB/s -7%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2514 (2483.93^min - 2513.65^max) MB/s -20%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1773 (1734.23^min - 1773.16^max) MB/s -44%
4k q1 t1 read
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	84.7 (83.57^min - 84.65^max) MB/s +480%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	75.5 (74.6^min - 75.45^max) MB/s +417%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	66.9 (50.9^min - 66.86^max) MB/s +358%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	64.7 (63.36^min - 64.73^max) MB/s +343%
Average of class Multimedia (14.6 - 97.7, n=77, last 2 years)	63.6 MB/s +336%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	54.4 (50.25^min - 54.39^max) MB/s +273%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (14.6 - 40.3, n=18)	33.5 MB/s +129%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	32.8 (32.61^min - 32.76^max) MB/s +125%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	14.6 (12.18^min - 14.59^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	313 (306.34^min - 313.21^max) MB/s +53%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	296 (293.22^min - 295.97^max) MB/s +44%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	265 (263.14^min - 265.39^max) MB/s +29%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	205 (179.98^min - 205.28^max) MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (75.9 - 286, n=18)	175.1 MB/s -15%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	174.5 (172.12^min - 174.51^max) MB/s -15%
Average of class Multimedia (69.4 - 378, n=77, last 2 years)	173.3 MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	170.6 (167.61^min - 170.59^max) MB/s -17%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	132 (125.41^min - 131.99^max) MB/s -36%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	3794 (3727.63^min - 3793.69^max) MB/s +274%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3523 (3416.03^min - 3522.69^max) MB/s +247%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1705 (1701.1^min - 1704.63^max) MB/s +68%
Average of class Multimedia (295 - 4881, n=77, last 2 years)	1395 MB/s +37%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (283 - 2850, n=18)	1100 MB/s +8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1015 (955.09^min - 1015.02^max) MB/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	932 (902.95^min - 931.73^max) MB/s -8%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	906 (859.8^min - 906.06^max) MB/s -11%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	761 (749.41^min - 760.62^max) MB/s -25%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3597 (3488.54^min - 3597.4^max) MB/s +454%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	2679 (789.09^min - 2678.78^max) MB/s +313%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1585 (1554.44^min - 1585.47^max) MB/s +144%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1299 (1149.78^min - 1298.86^max) MB/s +100%
Average of class Multimedia (192.1 - 4074, n=77, last 2 years)	1078 MB/s +66%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (222 - 2635, n=18)	987 MB/s +52%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	649 (615.74^min - 649.21^max) MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	554 (543.86^min - 553.56^max) MB/s -15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	521 (510.95^min - 520.65^max) MB/s -20%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	8397 Points +101%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	5636 Points +35%
Average of class Multimedia (2033 - 9972, n=73, last 2 years)	5123 Points +23%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4607 Points +10%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	4261 Points +2%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (2404 - 6406, n=18)	4221 Points +1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	4175 Points
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	3959 Points -5%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	3450 Points -17%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	3413 Points +104%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1830 Points +9%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1805 Points +8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1675 Points
Average of class Multimedia (812 - 3501, n=73, last 2 years)	1648 Points -2%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (787 - 2482, n=18)	1476 Points -12%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1443 Points -14%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1215 Points -27%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1172 Points -30%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	3324 Points +95%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3012 Points +76%
Average of class Multimedia (656 - 4813, n=73, last 2 years)	2692 Points +58%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2498 Points +46%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2165 Points +27%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (1086 - 2796, n=18)	2047 Points +20%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1707 Points
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1684 Points -1%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1604 Points -6%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	5872 MB/s +62%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4582 MB/s +27%
Average of class Multimedia (837 - 5730, n=73, last 2 years)	4306 MB/s +19%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4068 MB/s +13%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (3616 - 4177, n=18)	3851 MB/s +7%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	3690.93 MB/s +2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	3615.69 MB/s
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	3160 MB/s -13%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2786.1 MB/s -23%
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	4253 MB/s +90%
Average of class Multimedia (414 - 5651, n=73, last 2 years)	2868 MB/s +28%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (1946 - 3177, n=18)	2563 MB/s +15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2347 MB/s +5%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2310 MB/s +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	2237.69 MB/s
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	2188.43 MB/s -2%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	2044 MB/s -9%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1633.49 MB/s -27%
4K Read
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	75.84 MB/s +51%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	70.52 MB/s +41%
Average of class Multimedia (28.7 - 97.4, n=73, last 2 years)	62.1 MB/s +24%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	61.3 MB/s +22%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	61.3 MB/s +22%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	55.48 MB/s +11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	50.14 MB/s
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (27.8 - 58.8, n=18)	48 MB/s -4%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	42.75 MB/s -15%
4K Write
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	288 MB/s 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	287.67 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	251.8 MB/s -12%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	248.8 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	244 MB/s -15%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	221.6 MB/s -23%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (135.6 - 288, n=18)	201 MB/s -30%
Average of class Multimedia (66.5 - 328, n=73, last 2 years)	192.1 MB/s -33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	118.17 MB/s -59%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	2755 MB/s +118%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1429.83 MB/s +13%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1285 MB/s +2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1263.15 MB/s
Average of class Multimedia (350 - 2989, n=73, last 2 years)	1155 MB/s -9%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (349 - 2005, n=18)	1043 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	974 MB/s -23%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	843 MB/s -33%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	817.72 MB/s -35%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	2647 MB/s +121%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2493 MB/s +109%
Average of class Multimedia (411 - 4265, n=73, last 2 years)	2214 MB/s +85%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2020 MB/s +69%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	1712 MB/s +43%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (669 - 2255, n=18)	1592 MB/s +33%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	1411.25 MB/s +18%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	1243.09 MB/s +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	1195.4 MB/s
Access Time Read
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	0.141 ms * -22%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.116 ms *
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	0.104 ms * +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.066 ms * +43%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.058 ms * +50%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (0.021 - 0.116, n=18)	0.05678 ms * +51%
Average of class Multimedia (0.018 - 0.15, n=73, last 2 years)	0.05305 ms * +54%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.041 ms * +65%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	0.039 ms * +66%
Access Time Write
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS Micron 2400 MTFDKBA512QFM	0.118 ms * -13%
Average Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM (0.091 - 0.139, n=18)	0.1086 ms * -4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM	0.104 ms *
Average of class Multimedia (0.013 - 0.414, n=73, last 2 years)	0.05948 ms * +43%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Solidigm P41 Plus SSDPFKNU010TZ	0.033 ms * +68%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU010TZ	0.028 ms * +73%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N	0.017 ms * +84%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.016 ms * +85%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.013 ms * +87%

* ... smaller is better

在队列深度为 8 的情况下，通过连续的 DiskSpd 读取循环，我们没有观察到任何磁盘性能节流现象。

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU: Ø4517 (4078.54-4558.9)

查看我们的硬盘和固态硬盘基准页面，了解更多存储性能比较。

图形处理器性能

VivoBook Pro 16 配备 60 W RTX 4050 笔记本电脑图形处理器

VivoBook Pro 16 采用了 60 W 的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑 GPU，最高可提升至 1,605 MHz。

该 GPU 的 3DMark 累计性能比 RTX 3050 Ti高出 58%。不过，它比Legion Pro 5 的 140 W RTX 4050 落后 16%。

与 VivoBook Pro 16X 及其 140 W RTX 4060相比，我们设备的 60 瓦 RTX 4050 在 3DMark 整体指标上仅落后 7%。

3DMarkTime Spy 图形分数在电池电量不足时会下降 21%。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	91.8 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	91.7 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	86.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	82.3 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	74.1 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	72.2 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	69.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia	46 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	43.8 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	41480 Points +50%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	35540 Points +28%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	33576 Points +21%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	33037 Points +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	31530 Points +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13339 - 32642, n=39)	28592 Points +3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	27686 Points
Average of class Multimedia (4033 - 60250, n=79, last 2 years)	20543 Points -26%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	16509 Points -40%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	157044 Points +30%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	155806 Points +29%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	149647 Points +24%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (51138 - 161152, n=25)	126416 Points +5%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	120789 Points
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	105600 Points -13%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	83553 Points -31%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	81407 Points -33%
Average of class Multimedia (24614 - 130614, n=36, last 2 years)	56394 Points -53%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	28885 Points +42%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	26801 Points +32%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	26154 Points +28%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	24184 Points +19%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	23721 Points +17%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (13591 - 24007, n=37)	21120 Points +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	20359 Points
Average of class Multimedia (3553 - 46022, n=82, last 2 years)	14742 Points -28%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	12449 Points -39%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	11798 Points +60%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	10402 Points +41%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	9404 Points +27%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	9203 Points +25%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	8954 Points +21%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (5107 - 9040, n=37)	7800 Points +6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	7391 Points
Average of class Multimedia (873 - 17620, n=83, last 2 years)	5605 Points -24%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	4611 Points -38%

3DMark 11 Performance		25180 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		232668 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		40077 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		18333 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		8859 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		7458 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | v3.3 Classroom CUDA | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	53 Seconds * -83%
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 105, n=44, last 2 years)	39.7 Seconds * -37%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	29 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25 - 37, n=38)	28.9 Seconds * -0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	28 Seconds * +3%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	26 Seconds * +10%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	22 Seconds * +24%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	21 Seconds * +28%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	93 Seconds * -75%
Average of class Multimedia (32 - 164, n=44, last 2 years)	67.3 Seconds * -27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47 - 175, n=38)	56.1 Seconds * -6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	53 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	47 Seconds * +11%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	45 Seconds * +15%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	42 Seconds * +21%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	34 Seconds * +36%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Multimedia (160 - 946, n=85, last 2 years)	414 Seconds * -10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (243 - 907, n=38)	392 Seconds * -4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H	379 Seconds * -1%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	377 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX	360 Seconds * +5%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	323 Seconds * +14%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900H	304 Seconds * +19%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Radeon RX 7600S, AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS	301 Seconds * +20%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	249 Seconds * +34%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

VivoBook Pro 16 的 RTX 4050 与华硕 TUF GAMING A16's Radeon RX 7600S在 1080p 超高清游戏综合性能方面并驾齐驱。不过，Legion Pro 5 的高瓦数 RTX 4050 在这方面明显领先。

尽管如此，今年的 Pro 16 代确实比上一代的 RTX 3050 Ti 提升了 44%，令人印象深刻。

Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	96.9 pt
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	91.2 pt
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	85.2 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	83.8 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	72.2 pt
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	72 pt
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	50.2 pt
Average of class Multimedia	48.7 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116 (48.5^P0.1, 82.5^P1) fps +51%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	106.5 (35.5^P0.1, 82.1^P1) fps +39%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	98.1 (84^min) fps +28%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	98 fps +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	89 fps +16%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76.6 (69^min, 69.34^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 143.2, n=69, last 2 years)	56.2 fps -27%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	47.1 (39^min) fps -39%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	123.2 (3.96^min, 76.9^P1) fps +38%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	110.3 (3.88^min, 71.4^P1) fps +24%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	105.4 (5.19^min, 66.7^P1) fps +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	101.7 (6.72^min, 62.5^P1) fps +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	92.9 (26.7^min, 62.5^P1) fps +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	89 (2.86^min, 58.8^P1) fps
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	53.8 (30.1^min, 38.5^P1) fps -40%
Average of class Multimedia (9.38 - 141.6, n=83, last 2 years)	53.1 fps -40%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116.2 fps +54%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	100.8 fps +33%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	86.3 fps +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	85.2 fps +13%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	84.4 fps +12%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	75.6 fps
Average of class Multimedia (10 - 141.8, n=83, last 2 years)	51.8 fps -31%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	46.2 fps -39%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	204 (39^min, 153.9^P1) fps +55%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	192.5 (23.6^min, 138.1^P1) fps +46%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	165.4 (5^min, 121.3^P1) fps +25%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	163.3 (16.3^min, 119.3^P1) fps +24%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	152.8 (57.9^min, 118.1^P1) fps +16%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	132 (22.5^min, 102.9^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (19 - 233, n=82, last 2 years)	89.9 fps -32%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	84.5 (48.3^min, 64.9^P1) fps -36%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	175.6 (149.7^min) fps +39%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	165.2 (140.9^min) fps +31%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	149.2 (118.7^min) fps +18%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	144.5 (123.6^min) fps +15%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	126 (107.9^min) fps
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	121.6 (100.8^min) fps -3%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	101.6 (87.6^min) fps -19%
Average of class Multimedia (29 - 179.9, n=84, last 2 years)	96.4 fps -23%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	116.4 fps +7%
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115.3 fps +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	110 fps +1%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	108.8 fps 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	108.4 fps
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	90.5 fps -17%
Average of class Multimedia (20.3 - 141.1, n=82, last 2 years)	66.6 fps -39%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	57.3 fps -47%

在旧版游戏中，使用 RTX 4050 可以在 QHD 超原生设置下实现可玩帧率。对于更现代的游戏，您需要 Nvidia DLSS、AMD FSR 或 Intel XeSS 等升频器的帮助。

The Witcher 3 | F1 23 | F1 22 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | Far Cry 5

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	116 (48.5^P0.1, 82.5^P1) fps +51%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	106.5 (35.5^P0.1, 82.1^P1) fps +39%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	98.1 (84^min) fps +28%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	98 fps +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	89 fps +16%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	76.6 (69^min, 69.34^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (18.5 - 94.7, n=39)	75.4 fps -2%
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 143.2, n=69, last 2 years)	56.2 fps -27%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	47.1 (39^min) fps -39%
2560x1440 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Multimedia (37 - 89, n=13, last 2 years)	62.3 fps +11%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	56.1 (50^min, 50.33^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (39 - 61.3, n=7)	54.7 fps -2%

F1 23
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	51.7 (41^min, 40^P1) fps +30%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	50.5 (40^min, 40^P1) fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (25.7 - 60.8, n=14)	43.2 fps +9%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	39.7 (15^min, 24^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (11 - 70.3, n=22, last 2 years)	32.3 fps -19%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	40.8 (30^min, 32^P1) fps +59%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	32.2 (18^min, 25^P1) fps +26%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (16.7 - 40.8, n=11)	31.2 fps +22%
Average of class Multimedia (14.3 - 44, n=10, last 2 years)	28.9 fps +13%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	25.6 (13^min, 20^P1) fps

F1 22
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	66.6 (58^min, 47^P1) fps +40%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	64.8 (53^min, 37^P1) fps +36%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	50.5 (36^min, 36^P1) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (10.9 - 56.4, n=23)	47.6 fps 0%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	47.5 (40^min, 34^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (6.02 - 72.6, n=47, last 2 years)	34.7 fps -27%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	24.3 (19^min, 19^P1) fps -49%
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	44.3 (38^min, 31^P1) fps +50%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	42.3 (35^min, 32^P1) fps +43%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	29.6 (24^min, 22^P1) fps
Average of class Multimedia (6.58 - 47.1, n=22, last 2 years)	28.2 fps -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (6.58 - 34, n=14)	27.9 fps -6%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	17.4 (14^min, 13^P1) fps -41%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	84.75 (28.94^min) fps +48%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	76.64 (38.99^min) fps +34%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (44.4 - 79.4, n=14)	62.1 fps +8%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	57.4 (41.9^min) fps
Average of class Multimedia (9.2 - 103, n=23, last 2 years)	52.4 fps -9%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	53.28 (28.06^min) fps +24%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	48.71 (37.46^min) fps +13%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	43.1 (35.4^min) fps
Average of class Multimedia (15.6 - 89, n=15, last 2 years)	43 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (27.2 - 43.1, n=10)	35.7 fps -17%

Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	149 fps +43%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	130 (101^min) fps +25%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	123 (85^min) fps +18%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	119 (92^min) fps +14%
Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	108 (77^min) fps +4%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	104 (73^min) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (50 - 127, n=23)	102.5 fps -1%
Average of class Multimedia (17 - 145, n=57, last 2 years)	67.8 fps -35%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU	115 fps +69%
Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	99 (87^min) fps +46%
Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	94 (84^min) fps +38%
Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	88 (79^min) fps +29%
Average of class Multimedia (26 - 117, n=28, last 2 years)	72.6 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU (47 - 88, n=14)	69.6 fps +2%
Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	68 (31^min) fps

Witcher 3 FPS 图表

我们观察到，在 1080p Ultra 下使用TheWitcher 3 时，帧率相对稳定，这表明 GPU 冷却系统足够。

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU: Ø74.3 (71-76)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	184.8	180.2	163.2	89	65.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)	356	258	138.7	76.6	56.1	44.7
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	169.6	153.7	140.1	126
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	167	107.2	75.6		53.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	159.2	134.6	108.4
Far Cry 5 (2018)	147	114	107	104	68
Strange Brigade (2018)	449	187.4	151.6	132
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	97.5	74.4	62.2	57.4	43.1
F1 22 (2022)	182.4	193.1	152.1	47.5	29.6
F1 23 (2023)	197	200	140.7	39.7	25.6

更多基准测试和游戏比较，请访问我们专门的 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4050 笔记本电脑 GPU页面。

排放：低于宣称的 90 W 综合 TDP

系统噪音

在标准配置下，VivoBook Pro 16 的风扇可将噪音水平保持在 40 dB(A) 以下。

华硕为每款 VivoBook Pro 16 的性能配置文件预设了风扇噪音限制，这与我们之前在其他 VivoBook 上看到的情况类似。

根据华硕的规格，"标准 "配置文件的目标是声压级（SPL）小于 40 dB（A），我们的测试也证实了这一点。耳语模式将声压级进一步降低到 30 分贝（A）以下。

性能模式将风扇转速提升到峰值，导致噪音水平明显升高，我们的测量结果高达 52 分贝（A）。

由于标准模式和性能模式的功率限制相似，我们建议使用前者，以获得更佳的音效，而不会受到风扇噪音的干扰。

Noise Level

Idle		25.28 / 25.28 / 25.28 dB(A)
Load		51.88 / 51.8 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 20.96 dB(A)

Ambient Noise: 20.96 dB(A)
性能模式	怠速 dB(A)	负载平均 dB(A)	负载最大 dB(A)	Witcher 3 1080p Ultra dB(A)
Whisper	22.22	27.73	28.47	28.17
标准	25.08	37.63	38.81	39.12
性能	25.28	51.88	51.80	49.03

	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) R5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Noise		-10%	4%	8%	-3%	-8%	-6%
off / environment *	20.96	25.2 -20%	24 -15%	23 -10%	25 -19%	25.2 -20%	23 -10%
Idle Minimum *	25.28	26.6 -5%	24 5%	23 9%	25 1%	25.2 -0%	23 9%
Idle Average *	25.28	26.6 -5%	24 5%	23 9%	26 -3%	25.2 -0%	23 9%
Idle Maximum *	25.28	29.2 -16%	24 5%	24.42 3%	28 -11%	25.2 -0%	33.64 -33%
Load Average *	51.88	53.4 -3%	36.71 29%	34.94 33%	43 17%	55.1 -6%	51.49 1%
Witcher 3 ultra *	49		50.92 -4%	43.79 11%	51 -4%		55.27 -13%
Load Maximum *	51.8	56.9 -10%	50.92 2%	50 3%	53 -2%	61.5 -19%	55.24 -7%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在性能模式下，我们记录到在最大负载下，顶部和底部表面的温度分别高达 42.6 ℃ 和 48.4 ℃。在 1080p Ultra的Witcher 3 压力下，底部温度热点高达 63.6 °C。

虽然这些温度发生在苛刻的测试场景中，但在运行繁重的工作负载时，仍然不建议使用笔记本。任何超出轻度工作负荷的操作都可能导致明显的热量积聚和不适。

触摸板和掌托区域即使在满载情况下也保持相对凉爽。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41.2 °C	40.6 °C	40.2 °C
37.4 °C	42.6 °C	41.4 °C
26 °C	26.4 °C	28.6 °C

Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 36 °C


47.6 °C	48.4 °C	46.6 °C
44.8 °C	44.8 °C	38.2 °C
26.8 °C	26.6 °C	26.2 °C

Maximum: 48.4 °C
Average: 38.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


35 °C	34.8 °C	33.4 °C
35.2 °C	39.4 °C	37.6 °C
27.2 °C	28.2 °C	28.2 °C

Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 33.2 °C


38.6 °C	39.4 °C	39.8 °C
35.8 °C	36 °C	33.2 °C
27.4 °C	26.8 °C	26.4 °C

Maximum: 39.8 °C
Average: 33.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.4 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


46.6 °C	46.8 °C	42.8 °C
42.8 °C	47.2 °C	43.6 °C
26.8 °C	27.4 °C	29.4 °C

Maximum: 47.2 °C
Average: 39.3 °C


54.4 °C	63.6 °C	60.6 °C
46 °C	47.8 °C	45.6 °C
27.4 °C	27 °C	26.8 °C

Maximum: 63.6 °C
Average: 44.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 52.8 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Amprobe TMD-50 // Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.2 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.6 °C / -1.1 F).

	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) AMD Ryzen 5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS, AMD Radeon RX 7600S	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF Intel Core i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
Heat		5%	8%	-1%	7%	2%	23%
Maximum Upper Side *	42.6	39.7 7%	46 -8%	45 -6%	53 -24%	44.2 -4%	41 4%
Maximum Bottom *	48.4	60 -24%	41 15%	54 -12%	48 1%	53 -10%	47 3%
Idle Upper Side *	39.4	30.9 22%	36 9%	36 9%	30 24%	32.1 19%	23 42%
Idle Bottom *	39.8	34.7 13%	33 17%	38 5%	30 25%	38.4 4%	23 42%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在 Prime95 就地大型 FFT 压力测试中，VivoBook Pro 16 的酷睿 i9-13900H 在 78.7 W 的功耗下达到了 3.49 GHz 的峰值时钟频率。平均时钟频率稳定在 2 GHz 左右，功耗为 40 W。

在增加 FurMark GPU 压力时，酷睿 i9-13900H 和 RTX 4050 竞争共享散热空间。CPU 的平均频率降至 1.1 GHz，功耗为 23.5 W，而 GPU 的峰值频率则升至 2,415 MHz，功耗为 82 W。

压力测试	CPU 时钟 (GHz)	GPU 时钟 (MHz)	CPU 平均温度 (°C)	GPU 平均温度(°C)
系统空闲	1.7	210	49	46.4
Prime95	2.01	210	79	60.6
Prime95 + FurMark	1.07	2,415	71	64.9
Witcher 3 1080p Ultra	2.3	2,400	72	77.7

在实际游戏负载中（Witcher 3，1080p 超高清），VivoBook Pro 16 显示酷睿 i9-13900H（2.3 GHz，平均 17.5 W）和 RTX 4050（2225 MHz，平均 65 W）之间的功耗分担更为合理。

根据华硕的说法，性能配置文件应允许 CPU 和 GPU 之间的综合 TDP 达到 90 W。然而，我们的压力测试却从未达到这个数值。

在 Prime95 + FurMark 测试中，综合峰值功耗短暂达到 162.5 W，但平均功耗仅为 53 W。在 Witcher 3 压力测试中，笔记本电脑表现较好，CPU 和 GPU 的综合峰值功耗为 86 W，平均功耗为 82 W。

Prime95 + FurMark 压力下的 CPU/GPU 时钟、温度和功耗变化

发言人

华硕提供了多种音频增强功能，如智能放大器、音频增强器和哈曼卡顿调音。板载扬声器能很好地重现中高音，但低音有所欠缺。

在我们的测试中，峰值响度达到 81.6 dB(A)，足以满足室内使用。通过 3.5 毫米插孔或蓝牙 5.3 外接音频可提供更好的体验，尤其是音乐和电影。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

能源管理：空载功耗较高，但在负载情况下非常节俭

耗电量

与同类产品相比，VivoBook Pro 16 在负载情况下的总体功耗非常经济。不过，待机和空闲时的功耗似乎令人担忧。

随机提供的 150 W 电源适配器足以在压力下为笔记本供电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.6 / 8.18 Watt
Idle	21.06 / 24.27 / 25.12 Watt
Load	52.4 / 146 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, OLED, 3200x2000, 16"	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) R5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU	Average of class Multimedia
Power Consumption		-32%	-9%	-10%	6%	-1%	-10%	6%	30%
Idle Minimum *	21.06	13.8 34%	9.6 54%	13 38%	7 67%	8.7 59%	11.8 44%	9.68 ?(2 - 21.1, n=31) 54%	6.97 ?(2.1 - 31.3, n=84, last 2 years) 67%
Idle Average *	24.27	16 34%	16 34%	17.4 28%	10 59%	13.1 46%	16.1 34%	14.5 ?(5 - 32, n=31) 40%	11.6 ?(4.6 - 38.3, n=84, last 2 years) 52%
Idle Maximum *	25.12	19 24%	16.9 33%	21.8 13%	15 40%	18.3 27%	17 32%	18.7 ?(7.9 - 33.9, n=31) 26%	13.5 ?(6 - 41.6, n=84, last 2 years) 46%
Load Average *	52.4	147 -181%	104 -98%	96.4 -84%	86 -64%	116 -121%	100.6 -92%	87.7 ?(52.4 - 151, n=31) -67%	71.5 ?(15.1 - 147, n=82, last 2 years) -36%
Witcher 3 ultra *	110.2	147.8 -34%	142 -29%	125 -13%	160.6 -46%	117.6 -7%	158 -43%
Load Maximum *	146	244 -67%	214 -47%	204 -40%	172 -18%	162 -11%	192 -32%	177.4 ?(104.2 - 280, n=31) -22%	117.3 ?(46 - 270, n=84, last 2 years) 20%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø52.4 (45.4-60.3)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø134.1 (120.7-146)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø110.2 (107.5-124.3)

Power Consumption: External monitor

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø100.1 (90.8-107.5)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø85.1 (84.3-85.7)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU; Cinebench R20 Single (external Monitor): Ø26.1 (22.5-63.6)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU; Cinebench R20 Multi (external Monitor): Ø82 (80.2-84.1)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø26.4 (22.7-42)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø81.5 (77.1-85.7)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø100.6 (93.4-108.4)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø108.9 (103.8-116.7)

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø22.2 (21.4-23)

电池寿命

96 瓦时的电池容量与去年机型的 70 瓦时相比有了明显改善。在浏览网页和以 150 尼特播放 H.264 1080p 视频时，电池可提供约 10 小时的运行时间。

随机提供的电源适配器可在约 30 分钟内将电池快速充电至 50%。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		10h 06min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		7h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 45min

	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 96 Wh	Asus Vivobook Pro 16X K6604JV-MX016W i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Asus ROG Flow X16 GV601V i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 5 16ARX8 (R5 7645HX, RTX 4050) R5 7645HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Asus TUF Gaming A16 FA617XS R9 7940HS, Radeon RX 7600S, 90 Wh	Asus VivoBook Pro 16 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 70 Wh	Gigabyte AERO 16 OLED BSF i9-13900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 88 Wh	Average of class Multimedia
Battery Runtime		-41%	-16%	-45%	26%	-28%	-25%	27%
H.264	585	319 -45%	532 -9%	325 -44%	746 28%		442 -24%	863 ?(319 - 1481, n=50, last 2 years) 48%
WiFi v1.3	606	390 -36%	474 -22%	333 -45%	745 23%	435 -28%	448 -26%	635 ?(262 - 1204, n=83, last 2 years) 5%
Load		88	89		52		126	99 ?(39 - 212, n=58, last 2 years)
Witcher 3 ultra				47				76 ?(57 - 96, n=3, last 2 years)
Reader / Idle					1217			1156 ?(612 - 2760, n=15, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 结构坚固，带 180° 上盖

+ 快速读卡器

+ 3.2K 120 Hz OLED 显示屏

+ 负载情况下功耗相对较低

+ 电池运行时间长

Cons

- Wi-Fi 6E 性能可能会更好

- 端口位置不是最理想

- 240 Hz DC 调光闪烁

- 酷睿 i9-13900H 和 RTX 4050 的总功耗低于宣传的 90 W

- 待机和空闲时功耗较高

结论购买 ProArt 系列产品前的第一站

华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 OLED K6602VU。评测机由华硕印度公司提供。

与前代产品相比，2023 华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU 带来了值得关注的升级升级.虽然 VivoBook Pro 16 并不奢华，但做工扎实。

由于采用了全新的 96 瓦时电池，电池续航时间也提高到了 10 小时左右。

华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 K6602 主要面向多媒体用户和业余创作者，在考虑价格更高的 ProArt StudioBook 系列之前，这款产品可谓恰到好处。虽然酷睿 i9-13900H 和 RTX 4050 组合可以完成大多数工作，但专业用户还是要另寻他处。"

Wi-Fi 6E 性能可以更好地优化，端口位置也可以改进。不过，我们对这款笔记本电脑的主要不满在于，华硕限制了酷睿 i9-13900H CPU 的潜力，将功率限制在了其性能之下。

CPU 和 GPU 组合未能达到华硕宣称的 90 W 综合 TDP 目标。不过，它仍能为日常工作和业余创作提供充足的性能。RTX 4050 甚至还能在升频器的支持下实现不错的高分辨率游戏。

VivoBook Pro 16 尽管有一些不足之处，但对于寻求全面的多媒体笔记本电脑的买家来说，它是一个强有力的竞争者，可以在 1,54,990 ₹（2,199 欧元）的价位左右进行创作和游戏。

对于那些喜欢 VivoBook 的美学设计，但又希望获得更强大功能的用户来说，华硕 VivoBook Pro X 可以满足他们的需求。

华硕 VivoBook Pro 16X K6604配备了酷睿 i9-13980HX 处理器。技嘉技嘉 Aero 16 OLED BSF是另一个可行但昂贵的选择，如果你正在寻求更高级的结构和强大的 GPU。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

测试配置的华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 OLED K6602VU 在华硕印度商店和亚马逊印度站的售价为 1,54,990 ₹。

在美国，百思买（Best Buy）目前正在销售配备 RTX 4060 的 VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VV，售价为 1,700 美元，而美国亚马逊（Amazon US）的售价为 1,673 美元。该型号的 FHD+ 版本在美国亚马逊的售价为 1,300 美元。

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU - 11/09/2023 v7 ^(old)
Vaidyanathan Subramaniam

Chassis

83 / 98 → 85%

Keyboard

85%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

72 / 80 → 90%

Weight

64 / 20-72 → 85%

Battery

86 / 95 → 90%

Display

87%

Games Performance

97 / 90 → 100%

Application Performance

93 / 90 → 100%

Temperature

82%

Noise

76 / 95 → 79%

Audio

83%

Camera

37 / 85 → 44%

Average

79%

88%

Multimedia - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Vaidyanathan Subramaniam - Managing Editor - 1982 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

contact me via: @Geeky_Vaidy

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 493444 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 华硕 VivoBook Pro 16 (2023) 笔记本电脑评测：酷睿 i9-13900H、RTX 4050 和 3.2K OLED 是业余创作者的好兆头

Vaidyanathan Subramaniam, 2023-11-11 (Update: 2023-11-11)

潜在的竞争对手比较

底盘塑料结构，180° 金属盖

尺寸比较

连接性Wi-Fi 6E 的吞吐量需要进行一些微调

SD 读卡器

交流

网络摄像头

安全

配件和保修

维护

输入设备：全尺寸键盘，方向键狭小

键盘

触摸板

显示屏 3.2K Dolby Vision HDR OLED，240 Hz DC 调光

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能：酷睿 i9-13900H 和 RTX 4050 组合未充分发挥潜力

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形处理器性能

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS 图表

排放：低于宣称的 90 W 综合 TDP

系统噪音

温度

压力测试

发言人

Asus VivoBook Pro 16 K6602VU audio analysis

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

能源管理：空载功耗较高，但在负载情况下非常节俭

耗电量

Power Consumption: The Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power Consumption: External monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论购买 ProArt 系列产品前的第一站

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison