华硕 Vivobook S16 笔记本电脑评测：日常使用的好电脑，电池续航时间近 20 小时，售价 899 欧元
配备 144 Hz IPS 显示屏的日常 PC。
凭借骁龙 X 处理器，华硕 Vivobook S16 的性能足以满足日常使用需求，而其雾面 IPS 显示屏的 2.5K 高分辨率和 144 Hz 也给人留下了深刻印象。此外，在测试过程中，近 20 小时的超长电池续航时间也给我们留下了深刻印象。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论Vivobook S16 是一款出色的日常笔记本电脑
Vivobook S16 是一款可靠的日常笔记本电脑，只要你不对 ARM 平台的某些局限性感到困扰，它就能提供足够的性能。
它的电池续航时间非常长，而且我们的评测设备在基本功能方面没有任何弱点，例如拥有良好的键盘、合适的扬声器和足够的 USB 4 端口。
高分辨率和 144 Hz 的哑光 2.5K IPS 显示屏给人留下了很好的印象，但出厂校准并不令人信服。
在日常使用中，按键的可视性很差，需要经常使用背光灯，这也是一个特别令人讨厌的缺点。
不过，899 欧元的建议零售价还是给了你一个不错的整体方案，其总体性能比同类产品更好。 联想 ThinkBook 16.
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
经测试的华硕 Vivobook S16 S3607QA 在MediaMarkt 的售价为 899 欧元。美国亚马逊上还没有这一型号的产品，但美国百思买有一款配备骁龙 X 和 FHD+ 显示屏的 Vivobook 16 X1607QA，售价 800 美元。
华硕推出的 Vivobook S16 是一款经济实惠的日常电脑。我们的评测设备目前售价为 899 欧元，配备了 骁龙 X1-26-10016 GB 内存、512 GB 固态硬盘和 144 Hz 的 2.5K IPS 雾面显示屏。
规格
外壳：稳定的塑料结构
华硕在 Vivobook S16 中采用了铝制盖子和塑料底座，因此表面不会留下指纹。总体而言，该机箱（有银色和深灰色可选）给人的印象是高品质、稳定性好。
扭动时只有极小的吱吱声，但这在日常使用中不成问题。铰链调整得当，最大开启角度可达 180°。维护选项仅限于固态硬盘、无线局域网模块、风扇和电池（如有必要）。
在板载硬件方面，您可以获得重要的 USB 4.0 和 HDMI 2.1 标准，但 Wi-Fi 6E WLAN 模块的工作频率仅为 80 MHz，这将最大传输速率限制在 1 Gb/s。1080p 网络摄像头配有机械光圈和红外传感器，拍照效果不错，支持 Windows Studio Effects。
Vivobook S16 是一款 Copilot+ 笔记本电脑。
| Networking | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
可持续性
华硕未提供任何有关使用回收材料或环保证书的信息。包装完全由纸/纸板制成。
输入设备：方便，但难以看到键盘
键盘具有数字键盘和三级白色照明。1.7 毫米的长笔触让打字手感非常舒适，即使是长篇文字也能轻松书写。
不过，我们的银色测试机的按键可视性是个问题，因为字母很难看清。因此，即使在明亮的环境中也必须使用键盘背光灯。
大触摸板略微偏向左侧，具有良好的滑动性能，两侧还有额外的亮度和音量手势。
显示屏：2.5K 144 Hz IPS，无 PWM
Vivobook S16 可配备 60 Hz 1080p OLED 或 2.5K 144 Hz IPS 面板，我们的评测设备安装的就是后者。主观画质非常好，光标移动尤其受益于高刷新率。
此外，在雾面屏幕上，即使是明亮的内容也不会显得有颗粒感，也不会出现 PWM 闪烁。响应时间一般不明显，但测试设备上有明显的光晕。亮度和色温都可以通过传感器进行调节。
IPS 面板在高亮度方面也有优势，亮度值约为 400 cd/m²（OLED：300 cd/m²）。0.22cd/m2的低黑电平带来了良好的最大对比度。
尽管如此，出厂校准并不是特别好，除了色彩偏差较大外，还有明显的蓝色调。
我们无法对面板进行校准，因为我们的校准软件与 Windows on ARM 不兼容。在这方面，拥有扩展色彩空间和相应色彩配置文件的 OLED 版本可能更有优势。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 387 cd/m²
Contrast: 1759:1 (Black: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.87
ΔE Greyscale 6.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
74.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
75.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA NE160QDM-NX4, IPS, 2560x1600, 16", 144 Hz | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K B160UAN04.3 (AUOA5AB), IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng CMN1640, IPS, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD LEN160-3.2K, IPS, 3200x2000, 16", 165 Hz | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE LEN160WUXGA , IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16", 60 Hz | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -48% | -41% | 15% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 75.6 | 36.8 -51% | 41.6 -45% | 96.3 27% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 98.3 | 55.3 -44% | 62.4 -37% | 100 2% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 74.6 | 38 -49% | 43 -42% | 86.9 16% | |
| Response Times | 2% | 11% | 67% | 14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36.6 ? | 36 ? 2% | 30.7 ? 16% | 13.9 ? 62% | 27 ? 26% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 21.9 ? | 21.4 ? 2% | 20.8 ? 5% | 6.3 ? 71% | 21.6 ? 1% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -26% | -15% | 17% | -30% | |
| Brightness middle | 387 | 326 -16% | 324 -16% | 422 9% | 315 -19% |
| Brightness | 401 | 303 -24% | 295 -26% | 403 0% | 298 -26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 89 -4% | 88 -5% | 93 0% | 91 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.24 -9% | 0.2 9% | 0.3 -36% | 0.17 23% |
| Contrast | 1759 | 1358 -23% | 1620 -8% | 1407 -20% | 1853 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 6.48 -47% | 5.13 -17% | 1.7 61% | 6.5 -48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.5 | 19.42 -128% | 16.11 -90% | 3.4 60% | 26.5 -212% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.4 | 3.85 40% | 4.24 34% | 2.4 62% | 4.1 36% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.79 79% | 2.3 96% | 2.19 100% | 2.33 94% |
| CCT | 7896 82% | 6739 96% | 7318 89% | 6989 93% | 6064 107% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.92 | 2.99 | 0.7 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -24% /
-27% | -15% /
-17% | 33% /
24% | -8% /
-22% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.7 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.7 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8488 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能骁龙 X，16GB 内存
华硕 Vivobook S16 配备了 骁龙 X1-26-100和 16 或 32 GB 焊接 LPDDR5x-8488 内存（取决于所选配置）。程序的兼容性仍有限制，因为在大多数情况下需要原生 ARM 版本。
传统的 x86 应用程序在大多数情况下可以被模拟，但结果各不相同，有的会降低性能，有的会崩溃。这限制了我们全面运行常用测试套件的能力。
高通公司有一个专门网站列出了哪些应用程序具有原生 ARM 版本。
测试条件
华硕提供与 Windows 设置相关联的各种能源配置文件。我们使用 "性能 "进行测试。
处理器骁龙 X1-26-100
Snapdragon X（X1-26-100）是用于笔记本电脑的速度最慢的 Snapdragon 处理器。与速度更快的型号一样，该 SoC 提供八个 CPU 内核，但最高时钟频率较低，仅为 2.96 GHz，而且没有双核涡轮增压功能。
由于无法读出骁龙芯片的 TDP，这一信息是基于测量的功耗得出的。
由于时钟频率较低，单核性能尤其较弱，但多核性能不错。该机的性能绝对足以应付日常任务，而且在电池电量不足的情况下也能保持稳定。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core
Geekbench 6.4: Multi-Core | Single-Core
| CPU Native Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (646 - 698, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (152.1 - 994, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (62.3 - 123.3, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (96 - 96, n=2) | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Multi-Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (10492 - 10618, n=3) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (662 - 14767, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench 6.4 / Single-Core | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (457 - 2871, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (2070 - 2126, n=3) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
Cinebench R15 Multi sustained performance test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| CPU Emulated Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Office (1577 - 20399, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (6897 - 7446, n=2) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (975 - 978, n=2) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Office (590 - 8086, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (2644 - 2842, n=2) | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (359 - 366, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 3132, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (1338 - 1404, n=2) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (98 - 294, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (181.5 - 186, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (440 - 477, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (163 - 1956, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Office (7532 - 76886, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (29312 - 29907, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (4088 - 4102, n=2) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Office (1.72 - 22.4, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (4.44 - 5.52, n=2) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (67.6 - 102.3, n=2) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (0.861 - 0.888, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (0.4098 - 1.135, n=85, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (763 - 31245, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (5435 - 5647, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (4113 - 125394, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (14133 - 16182, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (287 - 5398, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (2093 - 2364, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (44150 - 44593, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (404 - 18321, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (1370 - 1378, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (2075 - 66922, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (9051 - 9154, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (35860 - 40691, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Office (78 - 1366, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (474 - 484, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (432 - 17834, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (2766 - 3102, n=2) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (30286 - 31591, n=2) | |
| Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=87, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
系统性能
主观而言，Vivobook S16 是一款反应非常灵敏的笔记本电脑，尤其是在使用原生 ARM 应用程序时。如上所述，在使用模拟应用程序时，性能会明显下降。
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1093 - 1114, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1012 - 1022, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Average of class Office (340 - 2155, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1203 - 1226, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (1032 - 1081, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (353 - 357, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (121 - 455, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (248 - 249, n=2) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (80 - 328, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (399 - 1966, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (518 - 521, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
* ... smaller is better
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (61578 - 63432, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (116332 - 119746, n=2) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 (46150 - 48754, n=2) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
存储设备
* ... smaller is better
Disk throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
钛 Adreno X1-45所使用的 GPU 整体性能较低。iGPU 在播放高分辨率视频方面没有问题，但如果你想玩现代游戏，则需要依赖云游戏。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4524 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3627 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1065 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 1080 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 1080 points | |
Help | ||
| Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
| Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS (711 - 1055, n=7) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Average of class Office (245 - 3964, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
* ... smaller is better
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Average of class Office | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE -1! | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Average of class Office (6.65 - 29.6, n=38, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Average of class Office (7.96 - 30, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Average of class Office (3.98 - 47.8, n=76, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| Average of class Office (5.8 - 51.7, n=84, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD | |
| HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng | |
| Average of class Office (13.4 - 121.2, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE | |
| Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K | |
Cyberpunk 2077 Ultra FPS chart
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 88 | 84.8 | 32.4 | 14.6 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 79.5 | 63.2 | 56.3 | 48.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 36.8 | 14.9 | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 36 | |||
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 0 game wont start | |||
| Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 13.1 | 10.9 | 9.4 | 9.2 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 2.2 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 15.3 | 11.6 | 9.9 | 8.45 |
排放与能源：发热量低，电池寿命长
噪音排放
Vivobook 在低负载时非常安静，日常使用时几乎听不到风扇的声音。只有在 CPU 负载较重的情况下，它的噪音才会开始变大，最大噪音水平为 47.6 dB(A)。
尽管如此，对于这个性能级别（全功率：50.2 dB(A)；标准：41.3 dB(A)；静音：31.8 dB(A)）来说，它的噪音还是太大了。测试设备中没有其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 23.2 / 23.2 / 23.2 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 28.3 / 47.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.2 dB(A) | ||
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X1-26-100, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Radeon 860M, Ryzen AI 7 350, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng Radeon 740M, R5 8540U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Radeon 880M, Ryzen AI 9 365, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, SD X Plus X1P-42-100, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -2% | -5% | -7% | 2% | |
| off / environment * | 23.2 | 23 1% | 24 -3% | 24.5 -6% | 23.7 -2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 23.2 | 23 1% | 24 -3% | 24.5 -6% | 23.7 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 23.2 | 23 1% | 25 -8% | 24.5 -6% | 23.7 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 23.2 | 24.67 -6% | 26 -12% | 25.9 -12% | 23.7 -2% |
| Load Average * | 28.3 | 31.72 -12% | 38 -34% | 36.2 -28% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 38.4 | 41.53 -8% | 37 4% | 40.1 -4% | 31.9 17% |
| Load Maximum * | 47.6 | 42.51 11% | 39 18% | 40.1 16% | 47.8 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Vivobook S16 的表面温度并不高，因为即使在压力测试中，我们测量到的温度也没有超过 40 °C。因此，您可以毫不犹豫地将笔记本电脑放在膝上。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.2 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the class Office.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.3 °C / 77.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+2.3 °C / 4.2 F).
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, AMD Radeon 860M | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, AMD Radeon 740M | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, AMD Radeon 880M | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -9% | -9% | 0% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 39.1 | 48 -23% | 42 -7% | 38.2 2% | 41.3 -6% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 37.1 | 51 -37% | 44 -19% | 37.9 -2% | 32.7 12% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.7 | 22 14% | 26 -1% | 25.4 1% | 24.8 4% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.4 | 23 9% | 28 -10% | 25.7 -1% | 26 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器的音质出奇地好，也适合休闲时听音乐或看电影。
Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.65 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 81% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源消耗
总体功耗值并不突出。在压力测试中，所提供的 65 W 电源曾短暂耗尽，但在大约 45 秒后，耗电量降至 57 W。
| Off / Standby | 0.32 / 0.46 Watt |
| Idle | 2.9 / 5.8 / 7.1 Watt |
| Load |
18.5 / 65.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA SD X1-26-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, Micron 2500 MTFDKBA512QGN, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K Ryzen AI 7 350, Radeon 860M, Micron 2500 1TB MTFDKBA1T0QGN, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng R5 8540U, Radeon 740M, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD Ryzen AI 9 365, Radeon 880M, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB, IPS, 3200x2000, 16" | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE SD X Plus X1P-42-100, Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS, WD PC SN740 512GB SDDPMQD-512G-1101, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 16" | Average Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -120% | -50% | -207% | -4% | 0% | -48% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 4.7 -62% | 4 -38% | 6.4 -121% | 2.2 24% | 3.37 ? -16% | 4.57 ? -58% |
| Idle Average * | 5.8 | 8.2 -41% | 5 14% | 14.1 -143% | 6.5 -12% | 5.64 ? 3% | 7.57 ? -31% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.1 | 9 -27% | 6 15% | 14.3 -101% | 7.7 -8% | 7.33 ? -3% | 9.01 ? -27% |
| Load Average * | 18.5 | 59 -219% | 40 -116% | 83.4 -351% | 16.2 ? 12% | 42.4 ? -129% | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 19.1 | 65 -240% | 43 -125% | 79.8 -318% | 21 -10% | ||
| Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 17 | 58 -241% | 39.1 -130% | 77.5 -356% | 19.9 -17% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 65.7 | 74 -13% | 46 30% | 102.9 -57% | 66.5 -1% | 61.5 ? 6% | 62.7 ? 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Cyberpunk 2077 / Stress test
Power consumption: External monitor
电池寿命
Vivobook S16 的电池续航时间非常出色。在亮度为 150 cd/m²（亮度滑块设置为 58%）、刷新率为 60 Hz 的 WLAN 测试中，Vivobook S16 的续航时间接近 20 小时，即使在全亮度状态下，也能达到略低于 15 小时的续航时间。
只有 ThinkBook 16 G7在 WLAN 测试中表现更好，但这是因为它的电池容量更大，屏幕分辨率更低。
Notebookcheck 总体评分
华硕 Vivobook S16 的性能足以满足基本的日常工作需要，而且电池续航能力出色。
Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA
- 04/17/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Total Sustainability Score: Potential competitors in comparison
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. 84%  | Asus Vivobook S16 S3607QA Qualcomm Snapdragon X X1-26-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,349.00 ASUS Vivobook S 16 Laptop, I... 2. $45.99 Smatree Hard EVA Protective ... 3. $34.99 Laptop Case Cover for ASUS V... List Price: 899€ | 1.8 kg | 17.9 mm | 16.00" 2560x1600 189 PPI IPS |
2. 77.6%  | Asus Vivobook 16 M1606K AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 ⎘ AMD Radeon 860M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $474.00 ASUS Vivobook 16 Laptop, 16�... 2. $1,349.00 ASUS Vivobook S 16 Laptop, I... 3. $6.95 2PCS Keyboard Cover for 16" ... | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
3. 77.3%  | HP Pavilion 16-ag0057ng AMD Ryzen 5 8540U ⎘ AMD Radeon 740M ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $24.95 mCover Case ONLY Compatible ... 2. $869.99 HP Pavilion 16t-af000 Busine... 3. $1,146.91 HP Pavilion Plus 16 inch Lap... List Price: 730 EUR | 1.7 kg | 18.6 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS |
4. 86.6%  | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7+ AMD AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 ⎘ AMD Radeon 880M ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $712.20 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 ARP 2... 2. $588.95 Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 ARP 2... 3. $678.95 Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G7 ARP 2... List Price: 1399€ | 1.9 kg | 16.9 mm | 16.00" 3200x2000 236 PPI IPS |
5. 82.6%  | Lenovo ThinkBook 16 G7 QOY 21NH0005GE Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 ⎘ Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: $736.00 List Price: 960 Euro | 1.9 kg | 15.2 mm | 16.00" 1920x1200 142 PPI IPS LED |
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
