Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

1.7 TFLOPSAdreno X1-45是一款集成图形适配器，可用于 骁龙 X Plus 8 核 X1P-42-100SoC 的功能。与速度更快的 3.8 TFLOPS和 4.6 TFLOPSX1-85 iGPU 相比，这个小家伙不仅运行时钟速度较低，而且可使用的统一着色器数量也较少，最有可能只有 768 个。iGPU 2.1 TFLOPS X1-45则仅在时钟速度上有所不同。

架构

据报道，底层架构(ChipsAndCheese) 在许多方面与 Adreno 730因此 iGPU 兼容 DirectX 12，但不兼容 DirectX 12 Ultimate。光线追踪仅通过 Vulcan 1.3 支持。支持的最高 OpenGL 版本是 ES 3.2。iGPU 可以访问足够快的 RAM，但缓存相对较小且速度较慢。AVC、HEVC 和 AV1 视频编解码器可进行硬件解码和硬件编码；而 VP9 仅可进行解码。

支持的最高显示器分辨率是 UHD 2160p，而不是 SUHD 4320p。

性能

这在很大程度上取决于特定系统的功率目标，就像 AMD、Intel 和 Nvidia 的产品一样。尽管如此，1.7 TFLOPS 型号与 GeForce GTX 950M明显落后于 Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80 EUs)在合成基准测试中则明显落后。在游戏中，它与 GeForce MX350要好得多；不过，对于 2020 年前的游戏和高清 720p 等分辨率来说，这样的性能也只是刚刚够用。

值得一提的是，高通公司的图形驱动程序并不像 AMD、英特尔，尤其是 Nvidia 所提供的那样完善，导致某些游戏出现严重的视觉伪影。很多游戏根本无法启动。

功耗

Snapdragon X Plus 8 核芯片的功耗通常不超过 30 W，包括内置 RAM。因此，iGPU 的功耗极有可能不会超过 20 W。

由于采用了台积电的 N4P 工艺，因此可以肯定地说，到 2024 年底，这款 iGPU 的能效将优于平均水平。当然，它仍然远远落后于Apple 的 M 系列芯片，正如我们的 深度分析文章所示.

Snapdragon X Series

Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1536 @ 1.5 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 1536 @ 1.25 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Pipelines768 - unified
Memory Speed8448 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption20 Watt
technology4 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.)
FeaturesSUHD 2160p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/AV1 encoding and decoding
Date of Announcement03.09.2024
CPU in Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-1008 x ? MHz, 30 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-1008 x ? MHz, 30 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 981     avg: 983     median: 983 (3%)     max: 985 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 873     avg: 875     median: 875 (2%)     max: 877 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -87%
...
NVIDIA GeForce MX230
758 -13%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
763 -13%
AMD Radeon RX 540
787 -10%
AMD Radeon 540X
797 -9%
Qualcomm Adreno 690
811 -7%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
820 -6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
821 -6%
NVIDIA Quadro M620
862 -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
872 0%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
875
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11
936 7%
AMD Radeon Pro 450
952 9%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
956 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
971 11%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
991 13%
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
995 14%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
999 14%
AMD Radeon RX 640
1008 15%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
1012 16%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
19434 2121%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
36520 4074%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
19040 Points (20%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
27960 Points (7%)
+ 1 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3612     avg: 3652     median: 3651.5 (6%)     max: 3691 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3691     avg: 3742     median: 3741.5 (4%)     max: 3792 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3164     avg: 3176     median: 3175.5 (4%)     max: 3187 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4438     avg: 4439     median: 4439 (6%)     max: 4440 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4032     avg: 4033     median: 4032.5 (3%)     max: 4033 Points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   - Hide comparison chart
AMD Radeon HD 6250
171.8 -96%
...
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
3588 -11%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M SLI
3616 -10%
AMD Radeon R9 M370X
3638 -10%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
3691 -8%
AMD Radeon R8 M445DX
3761 -7%
NVIDIA Quadro M620
3761 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
3949 -2%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX
3979 -1%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
3996 -1%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
4033
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470M SLI
4070 1%
AMD Radeon 540X
4097 2%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
4146 3%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
4150 3%
NVIDIA GeForce MX150
4191 4%
AMD FirePro W5170M
4197 4%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480M SLI
4229 5%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
4230 5%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
4333 7%
...
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
59943 1386%
max:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
105674 2520%
0%
100%
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
min: 9991     avg: 9993     median: 9992.5 (3%)     max: 9994 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
min: 11315     avg: 11333     median: 11333 (3%)     max: 11351 points
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18     avg: 18.5     median: 18.5 (3%)     max: 18.9 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Witcher 3 ultra Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 0.582     avg: 0.6     median: 0.6 (49%)     max: 0.611 fps per Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 23.1     avg: 23.2     median: 23.2 (7%)     max: 23.2 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 23.3     avg: 23.4     median: 23.4 (3%)     max: 23.5 Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.306     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (73%)     max: 0.4205 fps per Watt
+ 2 benchmarks and specifications   + Show comparison chart
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty

2023
low 1920x1080
14.4 14.4 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.2 11.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.5 9.6 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.2 8.3 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
7.2
7.1
Baldur's Gate 3

Baldur's Gate 3

2023
low 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
33.1 33.7 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36.6 38.3 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.9 23.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.2 16.4 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
83 84 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
37 37 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21 21 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19 19 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17 17 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

2018
low 1280x720
37.1 37.8 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15 15.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7 10 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Dota 2 Reborn

Dota 2 Reborn

2015
low 1280x720
80.3 85 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
66 67.1 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55 55.2 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.8 47.9 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
The Witcher 3

The Witcher 3

2015
low 1024x768
65 68 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39 41 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22 22 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 11 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
94.4 95.9 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
88 91.2 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33 33.4 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14 14.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty1411108
Baldur's Gate 313.110.99.59.1
F1 2233372316
Strange Brigade84302319
Far Cry 537211917
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark371510
Dota 2 Reborn83675548
The Witcher 367402211
GTA V95903314
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps		2
3
4
4
3
2
7
2

7
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 16. 12:34:33

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 16 Sep 2024 05:32:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.051s ... 0.052s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.052s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.052s

#7 composed specs +0s ... 0.052s

#8 did output specs +0s ... 0.052s

#9 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.052s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12765 +0.015s ... 0.067s

#11 got single benchmarks 12765 +0.01s ... 0.077s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.077s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.348s ... 0.425s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.425s

#15 Got 126 rows for game benchmarks. +0.01s ... 0.435s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.435s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.007s ... 0.442s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.414s ... 0.856s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.858s

#20 return log +0s ... 0.858s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS graphics card

华硕 ProArt PZ13 评测--配备骁龙 X Plus 的耐用 OLED 可折叠手机

华硕 ProArt PZ13 评测--配备骁龙 X Plus 的耐用 OLED 可折叠手机

华硕新推出的 ProArt PZ13 是一款相对坚固的可转换设备，适合希望在恶劣条件下完成工作的创意用户。该设备采用高通公司最新的 8 核 Snapdragon X Plus 处理器，可确保较长的运行时间。不过，与其他 ProArt 机型一样，它的 OLED 触摸屏也被限制在 60 Hz。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 13.30" | 874 g
华硕 VivoBook S 15 OLED Snapdragon 8 核笔记本电脑评测--搭载 Snapdragon X Plus，几乎无声的日常伴侣

华硕 VivoBook S 15 OLED Snapdragon 8 核笔记本电脑评测--搭载 Snapdragon X Plus，几乎无声的日常伴侣

Vivobook S 15 OLED 是首批搭载新型骁龙 X Elite 的笔记本电脑之一，现在华硕也推出了搭载新型骁龙 X Plus 8 核的廉价版。不过，包括 120 Hz OLED 在内的其余规格完全相同。不过，与速度更快的 X Elite 型号相比，价格差距太小。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 15.60" | 1.4 kg
高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

在推出骁龙 X Elite 处理器和 10 核骁龙 X Plus 仅仅两个多月后，高通公司又发布了面向笔记本电脑的 ARM 处理器，包括配备较慢 GPU 的骁龙 X Plus 8 核变体。我们测试了更便宜的 X1P-42-100。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 13.30" | 874 g
高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

在推出骁龙 X Elite 处理器和 10 核骁龙 X Plus 仅仅两个多月后，高通公司又发布了面向笔记本电脑的 ARM 处理器，包括配备较慢 GPU 的骁龙 X Plus 8 核变体。我们测试了更便宜的 X1P-42-100。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 15.60" | 1.4 kg
高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜，但效率不高

在推出骁龙 X Elite 处理器和 10 核骁龙 X Plus 仅仅两个多月后，高通公司又发布了面向笔记本电脑的 ARM 处理器，包括配备较慢 GPU 的骁龙 X Plus 8 核变体。我们测试了更便宜的 X1P-42-100。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS |

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306

Please share our article, every link counts!

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA RTX 5000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 7900M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX A5500 Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6850M XT
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
RTX A4500 Laptop GPU
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 6000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6800M
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU
RTX A4000 Laptop GPU *

Class 2

Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 7600M XT *
Radeon RX 7700S *
M3 Max 40-Core GPU *
M2 Max 38-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
Radeon RX 6700M
M3 Max 30-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 7600M *
M2 Max 30-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 7600S
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
A770M *
Radeon RX 6650M XT *
M3 Pro 18-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 19-Core GPU *
Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6700S
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M3 Pro 14-Core GPU *
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU *
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q *
Radeon RX 6600S *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop) *
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop GPU
Nvidia RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
A730M *
Radeon Pro 5600M *
Radeon RX 5600M
Quadro P5000
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 6GB Laptop GPU
A570M *
RTX A1000 Laptop GPU
GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q
A550M *
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce RTX 3050 A Laptop GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
A530M *
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
RTX A500 Laptop GPU
Radeon RX 6550M *
Radeon RX 6500M
Radeon RX 6550S *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro M5500
Quadro P4000
Quadro T2000 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
A370M *
Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon Pro 5500M *
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 6450M *
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Arc 140V *
GeForce MX570 *
Radeon RX 6300M *
Arc 130V *
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000
GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q *
T1000
T1200 Laptop GPU *
Radeon 890M *
Quadro T1000 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
A310 *
Arc 8-Core *
A350M *
Arc 7-Core *
T600 Laptop GPU *
T550 Laptop GPU *

Class 3

GeForce GTX 980M
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
Radeon Pro Vega 20
Radeon 880M *
Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS *
Radeon 780M *
GeForce MX550
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
GeForce GTX 970M
T500 Laptop GPU *
GeForce MX450 *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
Vega M GL / 870
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 760M *
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS *
Radeon Radeon Steam Deck 8CU
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
GeForce GTX 965M
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Quadro M2200
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
Iris Xe G7 96EUs
GeForce MX350
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro M1200
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 550 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 640
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
GeForce MX250
GeForce MX330
GeForce MX150
Iris Xe G7 80EUs
Graphics 4-Core *
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon RX 540 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS *
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M470X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
Quadro M620 *
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
UHD Graphics 64EUs
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics P580
Iris Pro Graphics 580
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS *
Radeon R9 M470 *
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
Radeon 740M *
UHD Graphics 730
GeForce MX230
Vega 8 *
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
GeForce MX130
GeForce 940MX
Quadro M520
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
GeForce 930MX
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Iris Plus Graphics 655
Radeon R7 M445
Quadro M500M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
GeForce 930M
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 530
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 645
GeForce MX110 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
GeForce 920MX
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) *
Radeon R7 M460 *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon R8 M445DX
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M440
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 520
Radeon 610
Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000)
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
Vega 5 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
UHD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
Radeon R5 M430
Vega 3 *
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520
Iris Graphics 6100

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge)
HD Graphics 6000
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) *
HD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
UHD Graphics 605
HD Graphics 505
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics 500
HD Graphics 405 (Braswell)
HD Graphics (Braswell)
HD Graphics 400 (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-09-12)