Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

1.7 TFLOPSAdreno X1-45是一款集成图形适配器,可用于 骁龙 X Plus 8 核 X1P-42-100SoC 的功能。与速度更快的 3.8 TFLOPS4.6 TFLOPSX1-85 iGPU 相比,这个小家伙不仅运行时钟速度较低,而且可使用的统一着色器数量也较少,最有可能只有 768 个。iGPU 2.1 TFLOPS X1-45则仅在时钟速度上有所不同。

架构

据报道,底层架构(ChipsAndCheese) 在许多方面与 Adreno 730因此 iGPU 兼容 DirectX 12,但不兼容 DirectX 12 Ultimate。光线追踪仅通过 Vulcan 1.3 支持。支持的最高 OpenGL 版本是 ES 3.2。iGPU 可以访问足够快的 RAM,但缓存相对较小且速度较慢。AVC、HEVC 和 AV1 视频编解码器可进行硬件解码和硬件编码;而 VP9 仅可进行解码。

支持的最高显示器分辨率是 UHD 2160p,而不是 SUHD 4320p。

性能

这在很大程度上取决于特定系统的功率目标,就像 AMD、Intel 和 Nvidia 的产品一样。尽管如此,1.7 TFLOPS 型号与 GeForce GTX 950M明显落后于 Iris Xe Graphics G7 (80 EUs)在合成基准测试中则明显落后。在游戏中,它与 GeForce MX350要好得多;不过,对于 2020 年前的游戏和高清 720p 等分辨率来说,这样的性能也只是刚刚够用。

值得一提的是,高通公司的图形驱动程序并不像 AMD、英特尔,尤其是 Nvidia 所提供的那样完善,导致某些游戏出现严重的视觉伪影。很多游戏根本无法启动。

功耗

Snapdragon X Plus 8 核芯片的功耗通常不超过 30 W,包括内置 RAM。因此,iGPU 的功耗极有可能不会超过 20 W。

由于采用了台积电的 N4P 工艺,因此可以肯定地说,到 2024 年底,这款 iGPU 的能效将优于平均水平。当然,它仍然远远落后于Apple 的 M 系列芯片,正如我们的 深度分析文章所示.

Snapdragon X Series

Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1536 @ 1.5 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 1536 @ 1.25 GHz? Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 2.1 TFLOPS 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS 768 128 Bit @ 8448 MHz
Pipelines768 - unified
Memory Speed8448 MHz
Memory Bus Width128 Bit
Memory TypeLPDDR5x
Shared Memoryyes
APIDirectX 12_1, OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 3.0, Vulkan 1.3
Power Consumption20 Watt
technology4 nm
Displays3 Displays (max.)
FeaturesSUHD 2160p60 resolution support, AVC/HEVC/AV1 encoding and decoding
Date of Announcement03.09.2024
CPU in Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPSGPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-46-1008 x ? MHz, 30 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-1008 x ? MHz, 30 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Score
min: 981     avg: 983     median: 983 (3%)     max: 985 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
min: 873     avg: 875     median: 875 (2%)     max: 877 Points
Intel UHD Graphics 605
113 -87%
...
758 -13%
Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs
763 -13%
787 -10%
AMD Radeon 540X
797 -9%
Qualcomm Adreno 690
811 -7%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
820 -6%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
821 -6%
862 -1%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 9
872 0%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
875
936 7%
AMD Radeon Pro 450
952 9%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
956 9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
971 11%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 7
991 13%
995 14%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
999 14%
1008 15%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X
1012 16%
...
19434 2121%
max:
36259 4044%
0%
100%
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Score
19040 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Graphics
27960 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Score
min: 3612     avg: 3652     median: 3651.5 (6%)     max: 3691 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Graphics
min: 3691     avg: 3742     median: 3741.5 (4%)     max: 3792 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
min: 3164     avg: 3176     median: 3175.5 (4%)     max: 3187 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
min: 4438     avg: 4439     median: 4439 (6%)     max: 4440 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
min: 4032     avg: 4033     median: 4032.5 (3%)     max: 4033 Points
171.8 -96%
...
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
3588 -11%
3616 -10%
AMD Radeon R9 M370X
3638 -10%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
3691 -8%
3761 -7%
3761 -7%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M
3949 -2%
3979 -1%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
3996 -1%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
4033
4070 1%
AMD Radeon 540X
4097 2%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
4146 3%
NVIDIA Quadro P520
4150 3%
4191 4%
AMD FirePro W5170M
4197 4%
4229 5%
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
4230 5%
4333 7%
...
59943 1386%
max:
104201 2484%
0%
100%
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU OpenCL
min: 9991     avg: 9993     median: 9992.5 (3%)     max: 9994 points
Geekbench 6.3 - Geekbench 6.3 GPU Vulkan
min: 11315     avg: 11333     median: 11333 (3%)     max: 11351 points
Power Consumption - The Witcher 3 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 18     avg: 18.5     median: 18.5 (3%)     max: 18.9 Watt
05101520Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 23.1     avg: 23.2     median: 23.2 (7%)     max: 23.2 Watt
05101520253035Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 23.3     avg: 23.4     median: 23.4 (3%)     max: 23.5 Watt
0510152025Tooltip
Power Consumption - Cyberpunk 2077 ultra Power Efficiency
min: 0.306     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (44%)     max: 0.3064 fps per Watt
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

low 1920x1080
14.4 14.4 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
11.2 11.2 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.5 9.6 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
8.2 8.3 ~ 8 fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
Additional Benchmarks
30min Start Ultra Preset (FSR off) 1920x1080
7.2
7.1
low 1920x1080
13.1  fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
10.9  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.5  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
9.1  fps    + Compare
» The benchmarks indicate that the game is not playable in the tested settings.
F1 22

F1 22

2022
low 1920x1080
33.1 33.7 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
36.6 38.3 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22.9 23.3 ~ 23 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
16.2 16.4 ~ 16 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
Strange Brigade

Strange Brigade

2018
low 1280x720
83 84 ~ 84 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
30  fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
23  fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
19  fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

2018
low 1280x720
37 37 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
21 21 ~ 21 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
19 19 ~ 19 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
17 17 ~ 17 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
37.1 37.8 ~ 37 fps    + Compare
med. 1920x1080
15 15.1 ~ 15 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
9.7 10 ~ 10 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings low.
low 1280x720
80.3 85 ~ 83 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
66 67.1 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
55 55.2 ~ 55 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
47.8 47.9 ~ 48 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings ultra.
low 1024x768
65 68 ~ 67 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
39 41 ~ 40 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
22 22 ~ 22 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
11 11 ~ 11 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
GTA V

GTA V

2015
low 1024x768
94.4 95.9 ~ 95 fps    + Compare
med. 1366x768
88 91.2 ~ 90 fps    + Compare
high 1920x1080
33 33.4 ~ 33 fps    + Compare
ultra 1920x1080
14 14.3 ~ 14 fps    + Compare
» With all tested laptops playable in detail settings med..
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty1411108
Baldur's Gate 313.110.99.59.1
F1 2233372316
Strange Brigade84302319
Far Cry 537211917
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark371510
Dota 2 Reborn83675548
The Witcher 367402211
GTA V95903314
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
2
3
4
4
3
2
7
2

7
1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

v1.28
log 19. 11:43:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 no ids found in url (should be separated by "_") +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 19 Nov 2024 05:32:27 +0100 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.037s ... 0.037s

#5 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#6 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0s ... 0.038s

#7 composed specs +0s ... 0.038s

#8 did output specs +0s ... 0.038s

#9 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.038s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 12765 +0.012s ... 0.05s

#11 got single benchmarks 12765 +0.008s ... 0.059s

#12 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.292s ... 0.351s

#14 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.351s

#15 Got 126 rows for game benchmarks. +0.009s ... 0.359s

#16 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.359s

#17 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.006s ... 0.365s

#18 benchmarks composed for output. +0.361s ... 0.726s

#19 no comparison url found in template nbc.compare_page_1 needed +0.002s ... 0.728s

#20 return log +0s ... 0.728s

Notebook reviews with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS graphics card

华硕 ProArt PZ13 评测--配备骁龙 X Plus 的耐用 OLED 可折叠手机

华硕 ProArt PZ13 评测--配备骁龙 X Plus 的耐用 OLED 可折叠手机

华硕新推出的 ProArt PZ13 是一款相对坚固的可转换设备,适合希望在恶劣条件下完成工作的创意用户。该设备采用高通公司最新的 8 核 Snapdragon X Plus 处理器,可确保较长的运行时间。不过,与其他 ProArt 机型一样,它的 OLED 触摸屏也被限制在 60 Hz。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 13.30" | 874 g
华硕 VivoBook S 15 OLED Snapdragon 8 核笔记本电脑评测--搭载 Snapdragon X Plus,几乎无声的日常伴侣

华硕 VivoBook S 15 OLED Snapdragon 8 核笔记本电脑评测--搭载 Snapdragon X Plus,几乎无声的日常伴侣

Vivobook S 15 OLED 是首批搭载新型骁龙 X Elite 的笔记本电脑之一,现在华硕也推出了搭载新型骁龙 X Plus 8 核的廉价版。不过,包括 120 Hz OLED 在内的其余规格完全相同。不过,与速度更快的 X Elite 型号相比,价格差距太小。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 15.60" | 1.4 kg
高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜,但效率不高

高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜,但效率不高

在推出骁龙 X Elite 处理器和 10 核骁龙 X Plus 仅仅两个多月后,高通公司又发布了面向笔记本电脑的 ARM 处理器,包括配备较慢 GPU 的骁龙 X Plus 8 核变体。我们测试了更便宜的 X1P-42-100。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 13.30" | 874 g
高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜,但效率不高

高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜,但效率不高

在推出骁龙 X Elite 处理器和 10 核骁龙 X Plus 仅仅两个多月后,高通公司又发布了面向笔记本电脑的 ARM 处理器,包括配备较慢 GPU 的骁龙 X Plus 8 核变体。我们测试了更便宜的 X1P-42-100。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS | 15.60" | 1.4 kg
高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜,但效率不高

高通骁龙 X Plus 8 核分析 - X1P-42-100 更小、更便宜,但效率不高

在推出骁龙 X Elite 处理器和 10 核骁龙 X Plus 仅仅两个多月后,高通公司又发布了面向笔记本电脑的 ARM 处理器,包括配备较慢 GPU 的骁龙 X Plus 8 核变体。我们测试了更便宜的 X1P-42-100。...
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100 | Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS

Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306: Qualcomm Snapdragon X Plus X1P-42-100, 13.30", 0.9 kg
  External Review » Asus ProArt PZ13 HT5306

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo

» Comparison of GPUs
Detailed list of all laptop GPUs sorted by class and performance.

» Benchmark List
Sort and restrict laptop GPUs based on performance in synthetic benchmarks.

» Notebook Gaming List
Playable games for each graphics card and their average FPS results.

Class 1

M4 40-core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Class 2

M4 32-core GPU *
M1 Max 32-Core GPU *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
M1 Max 24-Core GPU *
Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q
Radeon RX 5700M *
GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
Quadro RTX 4000 (Laptop)
M1 Pro 16-Core GPU *
Radeon PRO W6600M *
GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q *
M1 Pro 14-Core GPU *
Quadro P5200
Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q *
Quadro P4200
Quadro P5000 Max-Q *
GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P3200
Radeon RX 580X (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 580 (Laptop)
Radeon Pro 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M
Quadro P3000 Max-Q *
Quadro T2000 Max-Q *
Radeon Pro WX 7100 *
Radeon RX 570X (Laptop) *

Class 3

Radeon RX 570 (Laptop) *
Radeon RX 470 (Laptop) *
Quadro T1000 Max-Q *
Vega M GH
Quadro M5000M
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
Radeon 680M
Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro M4000M
T500 Laptop GPU *
Radeon R9 M395X
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q *
Radeon Pro Vega 16
WX Vega M GL
Radeon R9 M485X
Quadro M3000M
FirePro W7170M
Radeon R9 M395
GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q *
Radeon 660M
Radeon Pro WX 4150 *
Radeon RX 560X (Laptop)
Radeon RX 560 (Laptop)
Radeon RX 460 (Laptop)
Quadro P1000
Radeon R9 M390
Xe MAX
Radeon Pro 560X
Radeon Pro 560
Radeon Pro 460
Radeon Pro WX 4130 *
GeForce GTX 960M
Quadro P620 *
Radeon RX 550X (Laptop)
Radeon Pro WX 3200 *
Radeon Pro 555X
Radeon Pro 555
Radeon Pro 455
Quadro P600
Quadro M2000M
Radeon RX 540X *
Radeon Pro WX 2100 *
Radeon Pro WX 3100 *
GeForce GTX 950M
Radeon Pro 450
Radeon 630
Radeon 540X *
Radeon R9 M385X
Quadro P520
Quadro M1000M
GeForce 945M
Quadro P500 *
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) *
Vega 10 *
Iris Pro Graphics 580
FirePro W5170M *
Radeon R9 M370X
Vega 9
FirePro W5130M
UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs *
UHD Graphics 32EUs
UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
UHD Graphics 750
UHD Graphics 730
Vega 7
Radeon R7 M465
Iris Pro Graphics 6200
Vega 8
GeForce 940M
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU)
Quadro M600M
FirePro W4190M
Radeon R9 M375
Radeon R7 M445
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Iris Graphics 550
Radeon 625
Vega 6 *
Iris Plus Graphics 640
Iris Graphics 540
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) *
Radeon R7 M360
GeForce 920M
Radeon 620
Radeon R7 M340
Radeon 610
Radeon 610M *
Vega 6 *
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) *
HD Graphics 530
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
Adreno 690 *
Adreno 685 *
Adreno 680 *
Radeon R5 M330
GeForce 910M
HD Graphics 520

Class 4

Radeon R5 M320 *
Radeon R5 M315 *
Radeon R5 M420 *
Vega 2 *
UHD Graphics 617
UHD Graphics 615
HD Graphics 515
UHD Graphics 610
HD Graphics 510
UHD Graphics 605
Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
VideoCore VII *
UHD Graphics 600
HD Graphics (Braswell)

* Approximate position of the graphics adapter

> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > FAQ / 小提示/ 技术参数 > 移动显示芯片——基准测试成绩列表 > Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 1.7 TFLOPS
Klaus Hinum (Update: 2024-09-12)