Notebookcheck Logo

初步的XMG Neo 15 E22 with RTX 3080 Ti (Tongfang GM5AG8W)评论。水冷是游戏笔记本电脑的一个临时但可行的解决方案吗?

要像水一样,我的朋友。

哇!一台拥有Alder Lake-H、全新的Geforce RTX 3080 Ti和DDR5内存的游戏笔记本电脑。如果这还不够,申克公司在新的Neo 15上安装了一个水冷接口。该公司给我们寄来了Neo 15的预生产样品,以及其XMG Oasis外部水冷系统的预生产模型。我们测试了他们所提供的东西。
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook

注意事项:Neo 15和Oasis都是明确的预生产设备。在发布之前,很多东西仍可能发生变化,生产缺陷仍可能存在。我们建议读者在考虑下面的基准时注意这一点。完成的系统可能会有不同的表现

Schenker敢于通过新的XMG Neo 15 E22进入未知领域。制造商现在为该笔记本电脑配备了一个新的端口,可以选择水冷系统。当你购买Neo时,你还可以以199欧元的价格订购XMG Oasis。这应该可以在游戏或其他压力下大幅降低温度和噪音水平。但是客户会接受购买和操作这样一个额外的设备吗?配备热刺RTX 3080 Ti的XMG Neo在没有水冷的情况下表现如何?我们在测试中研究了这些方面。

Schenker在几个方面升级了XMG Neo。全新的 RTX 3080 Ti 笔记本GPU而不是RTX 3080,使用Alder Lake-H CPU而不是Tiger Lake ,然后还有这个用于水冷的新端口。我们的配置价格约为3,442欧元,不含XMG Oasis(外部水冷),选择它又增加了199欧元。

我们将新的Neo 15 E22与去年同样强大的前辈(87%的评分)进行比较。我们还创建了一个名为 "XMG Neo加XMG Oasis "的比较元素,并将其加入到基准比较中。此外,我们还考虑其他高端游戏笔记本电脑进行比较。这些包括 华硕ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS,以及Razer Blade 15 Advanced ModelWWW.STEELT.CN刀片15高级模型,Alienware m15 R6, 还有17英寸微星Raider GE76 ,由于缺乏新一代的CPU/GPU比较,所以采用Alder Lake和RTX 3080 Ti。

Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, 175 W TDP ( including 50 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 511.14, NVIDIA Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB PC5-38400 DDR5 SDRAM Samsung
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, BOE0A67 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1), IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW, 250 GB 
, 62 GB free
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Microphone and Headset, Card Reader: SD Card Reader
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 26.6 x 360.2 x 243.5
Battery
93 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Camera
Webcam: FullHD
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo Speakers, Keyboard: optomechanical keyboard with RGP per key, Keyboard Light: yes, opto-mechanical keyboard with RGB per key, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
2.227 kg, Power Supply: 1.047 kg
Price
3.441 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price

v (old)
03 / 2022
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.2 kg26.6 mm15.60"2560x1440
87 %
v7 (old)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg26 mm15.60"2560x1440
88.9 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2 kg16.99 mm15.60"1920x1080
86.3 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.3 kg27.2 mm15.60"2560x1440
86.1 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2021
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.5 kg22.85 mm15.60"1920x1080
87.5 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2022
MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3 kg26 mm17.30"1920x1080

案例。一个用于水冷的端口!

外壳与前代产品基本相同--只有背面的水接口是新增加的。此外,电源插头也变得更加坚固。底部由塑料制成,而机箱的其余部分,包括盖子,甚至显示器的边缘都是由哑光黑铝制成。特别是底座看起来非常坚固,但显示屏盖子也相对抗扭,尽管其表面强烈吸引指纹。整体建造质量非常好。

设计相当朴素,因此,这台笔记本电脑不仅在桌面上看起来适合游戏玩家,而且也适合创意和专业用户。在机箱前缘有一个带小孔的条状物,这意味着键盘照明作为一个 "LED条 "微弱地照到前面。

尽管增加了水路,但笔记本电脑并没有变得更厚。它绝对不属于苗条的人群,但考虑到极其强大的硬件,它也不是特别厚。然而,Razer Blade和Alienware M15都明显更薄。

考虑到硬件,2.2公斤的重量也是适中的。Razer Blade要轻200克,而Alienware要重300克。

尺寸比较

397 mm 284 mm 26 mm 3 kg360.2 mm 243.5 mm 26.6 mm 2.2 kg359.8 mm 243 mm 26 mm 2.2 kg354 mm 259 mm 27.2 mm 2.3 kg356.2 mm 272.5 mm 22.85 mm 2.5 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备。Thunderbolt 4和水的连接!

电源线过短
电源线过短

虽然水口确实占用了一些空间,但申克公司并没有放弃其他的端口。从SD读卡器到带Thunderbolt 4的USB-C和两个音频插孔,一切都在船上。笔记本电脑不能通过USB-C充电。另外,带有Thunderbolt 4的Alder Lake笔记本电脑本身并不是VR就绪的,因为DisplayPort信号不再直接发送到dGPU,而是通过iGPU。只有当有第二个USB-C端口与dGPU或专用DisplayPort连接时,它们才是VR就绪的。

这些端口之间的距离相当近,但这只是在某些情况下令人讨厌。相当便宜的微星GP66 Leopard 11UH显示了端口的位置可以做得更好。

关于电源的问题。从电源到笔记本电脑的电缆非常短,因此很烦人。如果你有一张稍高的桌子,并且不得不把电缆从桌子前面拉到笔记本端口的后面,那么电源就会悬在空中,紧得非常恼人。如果能有一条稍长的电缆就更好了。

右边。SD阅读器,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen1(USB 3.0)。
右边。SD阅读器,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen1(USB 3.0)。
左边:Kensington,USB-A 3.2 Gen 1(USB 3.0),麦克风,耳机
左边:Kensington,USB-A 3.2 Gen 1(USB 3.0),麦克风,耳机
后部。水口、USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4、HDMI、LAN、电源
后部。水口、USB-C 4.0与Thunderbolt 4、HDMI、LAN、电源
前面。用于RGB键盘照明的LED孔
前面。用于RGB键盘照明的LED孔

SD卡阅读器

SD卡伸出了一半
SD卡伸出了一半

所安装的SD读卡器至少在两代中是较慢的型号之一。该级别的平均速度约为两倍--如果根本没有安装的话,因为许多竞争厂商甚至不再安装SD读卡器了。

我们的测试卡AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60并没有卡住,而只是插入,并且有一半的卡突出在插槽外。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s +40%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
79.9 MB/s +17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
79 MB/s +16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
68.3 (65.41min - 69.52max) MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)
120.4 MB/s +51%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
89 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
79.9 MB/s

沟通

英特尔AX201无线模块
英特尔AX201无线模块

英特尔AX201是与前代产品相同的WLAN模块,需要时可以换掉。

然而,我们测得的传输速率略低于1GBit/s,而前代产品达到了1.5GBit/s以上。这是否可以通过驱动更新进行优化,还有待观察。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1517 (1451min - 1574max) MBit/s +42%
MSI GE76 Raider
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1257 (650min - 1337max) MBit/s +18%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s +9%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1076 (944min - 1117max) MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1067 (561min - 1121max) MBit/s
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
1026 (520min - 1143max) MBit/s -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
MediaTek MT7921
631 (581min - 693max) MBit/s -41%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1743 (864min - 1763max) MBit/s +81%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1386 (1274min - 1446max) MBit/s +44%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s +31%
MSI GE76 Raider
Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter
1137 (588min - 1235max) MBit/s +18%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Killer Wi-Fi 6 AX1650i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter (201NGW)
982 MBit/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
963 (680min - 984max) MBit/s
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
MediaTek MT7921
852 (831min - 887max) MBit/s -12%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12: Ø837 (680-984)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1714 (864-1763)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12: Ø1020 (561-1121)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1517 (1451-1574)

网络摄像头

申克公司安装了一个全高清摄像头。色彩偏差还可以,但即使在中等光照条件下,画面仍然非常嘈杂,看起来很冲。

ColorChecker
8.3 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
2.8 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
11.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti): 7.23 ∆E min: 2.78 - max: 11.06 ∆E

安全问题

一个Kensington锁端口和一个TPM 2.0芯片都是可用的。然而,缺少一个指纹传感器。

辅料

由于这是一个预生产的模型,所以还不能对配件做出任何声明。按照Schenker的典型做法,应该包括驱动光盘和U盘。在评论中经常提到的XMG Oasis,可以额外购买199欧元(约199美元)。

维护

许多螺钉
许多螺钉

整体维护相当简单。水冷系统只需要再卸下四个十字螺丝(共14个)。之后,机箱可以比较容易地被撬开。

风扇、包括水路在内的热管、两条内存和M.2固态硬盘插槽以及Wi-Fi模块都可以接触到。这也表明,如果该型号变得流行,为制造商实施有效的、额外的水路是多么容易。

打开了XMG Neo
打开了XMG Neo
2个M.2插槽
2个M.2插槽
2个RAM插槽
2个RAM插槽
水冷却回路
水冷却回路

担保

Schenker通常对其笔记本电脑提供两年的保修。

输入设备。光学机械键盘


键盘

这是它应该有的标签样子
这是它应该有的标签样子

制造商采用了带有RGB单键照明、数字键盘、N键翻转和防鬼怪功能的光学机械键盘。触觉无声开关的行程为2毫米,行程为1毫米。

键的触发在行程开始时有清晰的反馈;打字的感觉很好,速度也很快。

我们的预生产模型带有空白键,所以我们还不能对字体说什么。没有标记的小键盘在右边看起来非常拥挤,而且与键盘的其他部分没有间隙。尽管如此,方向键的大小是正常的,尽管它们在某种程度上被挤在键盘和小键盘之间。

电源开关以及切换各种性能模式的专用开关被整合在键盘的右侧上方。

由于采用了光学机械式开关,噪音比一些比较安静的小键盘略大。然而,它比全尺寸的机械键盘要安静得多。


仍未贴上标签的键盘
仍未贴上标签的键盘
电源按钮和电源模式切换器
电源按钮和电源模式切换器

触摸板

带转角开关的触摸板(左上)。
带转角开关的触摸板(左上)。

相当大的触摸板尺寸约为11.6厘米×7.4厘米,有一个非常光滑的表面,即使在缓慢移动时也几乎没有动摇。

轻击左上角两次可停用触摸板,并以同样的方式再次激活它,这很方便。

集成的按钮相当清晰,给人留下了可靠的印象。 我们在使用触摸板时没有遇到任何问题。

显示。要整理的预生产模型

哑光像素网格
哑光像素网格
最小的屏幕出血量
最小的屏幕出血量

和它的前辈一样,Schenker使用京东方的哑光IPS显示屏,分辨率为WQHD(2560×1440像素)。然而,这些型号略有不同。现在没有165赫兹,而是采用了240赫兹的面板。然而,与前一型号一样,目前的型号没有达到制造商宣传的350尼特;我们平均只测量到273尼特。

预生产型号的亮度分布也是如此糟糕,只有62%。申克公司向我们保证,这样的面板将不会出售。因此,在发布之前仍会有一些变化。因此,我们将暂时不测量色彩空间

293
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
243
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
301
cd/m²
199
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE0A67 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 321 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 277.2 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 62 %
Center on Battery: 293 cd/m²
Contrast: 1054:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.36 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.43 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.44
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
BOE0A67 (BOE CQ NE156QHM-NZ1), IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
TL156VDXP02-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
AU Optronics AUO9092 (B156HAN), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI GE76 Raider
AU Optronics B173HAN05.4 (AUOE295), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
Display P3 Coverage
68.6
66.9
97.6
74.1
63.1
sRGB Coverage
98.6
97.1
99.9
99.5
94
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.3
69
85.3
75.7
65.2
Response Times
-11%
39%
-6%
65%
36%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
14.4 ?(6.6, 7.8)
16 ?(8.4, 7.6)
-11%
4.2 ?(2.6, 1.6)
71%
14 ?(7.2, 6.8)
3%
2.8
81%
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
61%
Response Time Black / White *
10.8 ?(5.4, 5.4)
12 ?(6, 6)
-11%
10 ?(5.2, 4.8)
7%
12.4 ?(7.2, 5.2)
-15%
5.6
48%
9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4)
11%
PWM Frequency
Screen
-20%
8%
-8%
-1%
23%
Brightness middle
295
324
10%
353.4
20%
304.3
3%
359
22%
290
-2%
Brightness
277
307
11%
340
23%
286
3%
344
24%
290
5%
Brightness Distribution
62
91
47%
92
48%
76
23%
85
37%
96
55%
Black Level *
0.28
0.27
4%
0.31
-11%
0.33
-18%
0.35
-25%
0.23
18%
Contrast
1054
1200
14%
1140
8%
922
-13%
1026
-3%
1261
20%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.36
3.36
-42%
2.17
8%
2.76
-17%
3.3
-40%
1.59
33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.24
9.87
-133%
5.69
-34%
5.57
-31%
4.84
-14%
3.17
25%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.43
5.8
-69%
3.4
1%
4
-17%
3.66
-7%
2.5
27%
Gamma
2.44 90%
2.311 95%
2.2 100%
2.14 103%
2.43 91%
2.253 98%
CCT
6266 104%
7087 92%
6830 95%
6844 95%
5896 110%
6640 98%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.23
1.05
2.38
3.28
0.87
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
69
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-16% / -18%
24% / 14%
-7% / -8%
32% / 12%
30% / 25%

* ... smaller is better

也就是说,显示器在出厂时就已经被校准得很好,Delta E值很低。黑色水平和对比度都远远高于平均水平。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检测器
颜色检测器

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
10.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.4 ms rise
↘ 5.4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6.6 ms rise
↘ 7.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

响应时间对于游戏来说有些偏低。该面板不使用PWM。

在户外,哑光涂层消除了大部分反射。黑色水平和对比度也足够好,至少在阴天和阴暗处仍能很好地看到屏幕的内容。

阴天时在室外
阴天时在室外
斜视图带来的光反射
斜视图带来的光反射

视角的稳定性很好。即使在极端角度下,画质的下降也相当低。

性能。高!

我们在这里处理的是绝对高端的硬件,特别是新的RTX 3080 Ti,它可以通过控制中心以175W的最大TGP运行。新的桤木湖 英特尔酷睿i7-12700H处理器,以及首次采用的32GB DDR5内存,使 "新Neo "成为真正的高性能游戏笔记本电脑。

测试条件

为了获得最佳的基准测试结果,我们在控制中心启用了超增压模式,还在手动性能设置中最大化了CPU的PL值。

对于GPU,我们将动态提升设置为25W。设置了动态提升后,你就不能再自己设置GPU的TGP了。该选项是灰色的,被固定在150W,因此,最大的175W总共是最大的。

剖面图的过度增强
剖面图的过度增强
CPU的手动PL值
CPU的手动PL值
GPU的动态提升
GPU的动态提升
绿洲粉丝简介
绿洲粉丝简介

XMG Oasis还提供几种风扇模式(非常安静、安静和平衡)。除非指定,否则我们使用平衡模式,以获得最佳的冷却性能。

处理器

英特尔酷睿i7-12700H是一款基于新Alder Lake架构的高端CPU。它总共有14个内核,首次像ARM处理器那样被分为性能内核(6个P内核)和效率内核(8个E内核)。只有P核支持超线程,所以你总共有20个线程。一个具有96个EU和高达1.4GHz时钟的英特尔Xe图形单元被集成到CPU中。

在一小时的Cinebench循环测试中,该CPU与其稍高时钟的姐妹型号进行了正面交锋 酷睿i9-12900HK而且随着时间的推移,甚至以微弱的优势获胜。只有酷睿i9-12900HK的输出功率更高。

使用 "绿洲 "的性能比不使用 "绿洲 "的性能要高得多,在开始时看到的性能小幅下降的情况没有发生。然而,短期性能没有差别。

在第一次运行时,封装功率最大为115W,后来只有100W。使用Oasis,封装功率没有下降到100W,而是相当稳定地保持在115W。

没有绿洲,套餐功率略有下降
没有绿洲,套餐功率略有下降
带绿洲的套餐功率,更稳定的115W
带绿洲的套餐功率,更稳定的115W

在多线程测试中,酷睿i7-12700H比其Tiger Lake 的前辈整整高出30%!同样的情况也适用于AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX华硕ROG Strix Scar 15中。这两颗桤木湖CPU在其他基准测试中也几乎不相上下,并在排行榜上领先。

在电池模式下,CPU的性能损失超过50%。在Cinebench R15 Multi中只达到1214分,而在直流电上则达到2824分。

Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15
Cinebench R15电池模式
Cinebench R15电池模式

Cinebench R15 Multi Dauertest

01503004506007509001050120013501500165018001950210022502400255027002850Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2766 (2740.48-2824.46)
SCHENKER XMG Oasis  : Ø2834 (2808.4-2857.76)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2153 (2123.03-2172.97)
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX: Ø2175 (2157.5-2197.2)
MSI GE76 Raider Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2722 (2660.99-2908.88)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
83.1 pt
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
77.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
75 pt
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
74.7 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
66.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
60.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS -2!
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
56.2 pt
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
55.7 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021) -2!
Intel Core i7-11800H
52.9 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
21994 Points +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
18452 Points
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
18437 Points 0%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18288 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19330, n=63)
15636 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
14088 Points -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
13519 (13222.6min - 13519.5max) Points -27%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
13477 Points -27%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
12197 (11396.1min - 12197.5max) Points -34%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1909 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1894 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
1790 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1782 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1826, n=62)
1758 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
1520 Points -15%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1513 Points -15%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
1481 Points -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
1469 Points -18%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8352 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
7060 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
6988 Points
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6849 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7407, n=63)
5933 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
5408 Points -23%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5214 Points -25%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
4706 Points -33%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
4532 Points -35%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
734 Points +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
688 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 704, n=63)
679 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points -17%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
577 Points -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
574 Points -18%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3440 Points +22%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2909 (2660.99min - 2908.88max) Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
2858 (2808.4min - 2857.76max) Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
2824 (2740.48min - 2824.46max) Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2916, n=69)
2517 Points -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
2197 (2157.5min - 2197.2max) Points -22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
2173 (2123.03min - 2172.97max) Points -23%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
2134 (1720.8min - 2133.9max) Points -24%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
1877 (1776.59min - 1876.96max) Points -34%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points +7%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
275 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
261 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=64)
253 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
234 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
230 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
227 Points -13%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
226 Points -13%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
265 Seconds * -50%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
259 Seconds * -46%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
240 Seconds * -36%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (168 - 732, n=62)
225 Seconds * -27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
217 Seconds * -23%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
181 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
177 Seconds *
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.4 Seconds * +4%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
168 Seconds * +5%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85738 MIPS +17%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
73357 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
73067 MIPS
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
72836 MIPS 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
61422 MIPS -16%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=62)
60292 MIPS -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
56758 MIPS -22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
53597 MIPS -27%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
52729 MIPS -28%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6322 MIPS +9%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6144 MIPS +6%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
5851 MIPS +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5775 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
5716 MIPS -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5972, n=62)
5648 MIPS -2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
5568 MIPS -4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
5480 MIPS -5%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
5450 MIPS -6%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15098 Points +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
13745 Points
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13648 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
13256 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=63)
11729 Points -15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
9851 Points -28%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
9395 Points -32%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1918 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1784 Points
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
1737 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=63)
1732 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
1625 Points -9%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
1574 Points -12%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
22 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
20.9 fps
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
19.9 fps -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
17.4 fps -17%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.8, n=63)
16.7 fps -20%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
15.6 fps -25%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
15 fps -28%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
13.6 fps -35%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
52.3 s * -22%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
48.1 s * -12%
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.1 s * -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.8 s * -9%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
45.9 s * -7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 95.3, n=62)
45.7 s * -7%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
44.5 s * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
42.9 s *
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
38.9 s * +9%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.558 sec * -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * -22%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.55 sec * -21%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
0.4908 sec * -8%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62)
0.4723 sec * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4553 sec *
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
0.451 sec * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4366 sec * +4%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4252 sec * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2824 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
193 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
261 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6988 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
696 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1782 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
18452 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
96.9 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
80.1 pt
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
73.9 pt
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
63.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
63.3 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
62.3 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)
21963 KRay/s +130%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
15961 KRay/s +67%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
15150 KRay/s +59%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 17957, n=62)
10834 KRay/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
9545 KRay/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9537 KRay/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9065 KRay/s -5%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)
106952 Points +156%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
100744 Points +141%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
65636 Points +57%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 90760, n=62)
52825 Points +27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41732 Points
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
41727 Points 0%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40570 Points -3%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)
4920 MB/s +47%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
4439 MB/s +33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
3412 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
3383 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3343 MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3178 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 4242, n=62)
3077 MB/s -8%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)
117347 Points +20%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
106414 Points +9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
102329 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
99320 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 103202, n=62)
97916 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
97871 Points
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
91757 Points -6%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)
13290 Points +34%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
12610 Points +27%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
10237 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
9934 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9928 Points
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
9781 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9939, n=62)
9055 Points -9%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
55702 Points +108%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)
53819 Points +101%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
39464 Points +47%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 44760, n=62)
27939 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
27262 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
26824 Points
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
24693 Points -8%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
149388 MB/s +122%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
132655 MB/s +97%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)
109208 MB/s +62%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
100062 MB/s +49%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 144360, n=62)
85388 MB/s +27%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67282 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
66237 MB/s -2%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)
1369 MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1156 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
1152 MB/s 0%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1085 MB/s -6%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=62)
970 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
841 MB/s -27%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
830 MB/s -28%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)
11830 KRay/s +111%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
8717 KRay/s +56%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
8644 KRay/s +54%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 9692, n=62)
5986 KRay/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
5695 KRay/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5597 KRay/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5239 KRay/s -6%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
40625 MPixel/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40524 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)
40303 MPixel/s -1%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40000 MPixel/s -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 52207, n=62)
33149 MPixel/s -18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
25533 MPixel/s -37%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
23347 MPixel/s -42%

系统性能

在PCMark 10中的得分并不具有全面的说服力。Razer Blade 15在总分上超过了Neo 15。另一方面,在数字内容创作测试中,Neo 15仅次于硬件相似的微星GE76 Raider,但在基本要素和生产力测试中,该笔记本略微落后。在后者中,带有Oasis附件的Neo的表现要好10%左右。

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Score
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8007 Points +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7813 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
,
7474 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6868 - 7638, n=7)
7382 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7356 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
7240 Points
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
7201 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7190 Points -1%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
7177 Points -1%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
11064 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)
10836 Points +8%
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10688 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9987 - 11318, n=7)
10543 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10271 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10218 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
10070 Points
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9934 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
,
9800 Points -3%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10100 Points +13%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
10066 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9909 Points +11%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
,
9807 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8944 - 10726, n=7)
9480 Points +6%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
9372 Points +5%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9015 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8983 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
8944 Points
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
12905 Points +13%
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12168 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
,
11787 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
11434 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8956 - 12249, n=7)
10984 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10932 Points -4%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10831 Points -5%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10775 Points -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
9852 Points -14%
PCMark 10 Score
7240 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
65546 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65103 MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62554 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
61831 MB/s -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25615 - 80511, n=62)
53891 MB/s -17%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
43361 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
43318 MB/s -33%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
69486 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
66742 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66265 MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65452 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25586 - 79442, n=62)
57340 MB/s -13%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
49659 MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
45841 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
67309 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
65672 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65495 MB/s
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64282 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (23679 - 88660, n=62)
54793 MB/s -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
46062 MB/s -30%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
45486 MB/s -31%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
97.5 ns *
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
93.8 ns *
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.6 ns *
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
85.3 ns *
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 133.9, n=60)
77.8 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 ns *
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
0 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

LatencyMon已经显示在打开Edge浏览器时延迟增加。当打开多个标签并播放我们的4K/60帧YouTube视频时,情况变得更糟。不过,视频播放时没有掉帧。

Youtube测试
Youtube测试
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon主页
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4392 μs * -444%
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1642 μs * -103%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1380 μs * -71%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
961 μs * -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
808 μs *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
533 μs * +34%

* ... smaller is better

大容量存储

我们来自中国的预生产模型最初并没有固态硬盘。Schenker给我们送来了一个快速的三星980 Pro,可惜只有250GB用于测试,由于其体积小,几乎不会被安装,甚至没有出现在我们的固态硬盘最佳列表到目前为止。

在安装了Windows 11 Home之后,只剩下大约60到80GB用于其他程序。生产模型可能会有至少512GB。

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6427 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 2678 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 669 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 463.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 89.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 220.1 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2079 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2001 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
89.5 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
80.6 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
76.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
74.1 pt
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
 
74.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
70.1 pt
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
63.8 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
24.7 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3802 (3789.11min - 3801.66max) MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3477 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3385 (3365.72min - 3385.43max) MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
3225 (3206.01min - 3225.21max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
3225 MB/s 0%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2529 (2450.31min - 2528.54max) MB/s -22%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2514 (2492.51min - 2513.65max) MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1160 (560.08min - 1160.14max) MB/s -64%
seq write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3923 (3818.83min - 3922.64max) MB/s +47%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3818 MB/s +43%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3804 (3790.18min - 3804.02max) MB/s +43%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2842 (2816.48min - 2842.27max) MB/s +7%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2753 (2740.35min - 2752.51max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2661 (2641.11min - 2661max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
2661 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1156 (590.64min - 1155.74max) MB/s -57%
seq q8 t1 read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6883 (1.68min - 6882.51max) MB/s +52%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
6722 (5765.49min - 6722max) MB/s +48%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6574 (5853.99min - 6573.59max) MB/s +45%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6318 MB/s +39%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
4536 (4257.18min - 4536.14max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
4536 MB/s 0%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3421 (3159.78min - 3420.66max) MB/s -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1741 (791.56min - 1740.72max) MB/s -62%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4999 (4978.75min - 4998.98max) MB/s +88%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4920 (4893.91min - 4919.52max) MB/s +85%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4859 MB/s +82%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4658 (45.63min - 4657.56max) MB/s +75%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3134 (3124.55min - 3133.56max) MB/s +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2665 (2644.09min - 2664.64max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
2665 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1185 (657.19min - 1184.83max) MB/s -56%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
89.8 (89.42min - 89.75max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
89.7 (89.47min - 89.72max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
89.7 MB/s 0%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
80.1 (78.53min - 80.11max) MB/s -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
77.3 (77.09min - 77.34max) MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s -27%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
57 (56.75min - 56.96max) MB/s -36%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
23.3 (23.23min - 23.32max) MB/s -74%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
275 (273.95min - 275.11max) MB/s +23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
223 (222.49min - 223.25max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
223 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
223 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
201 (200.58min - 201.14max) MB/s -10%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
184 (179.2min - 184.27max) MB/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
169 (167.84min - 168.95max) MB/s -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
138 (137.2min - 137.78max) MB/s -38%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4073 (4064.94min - 4073.47max) MB/s +79%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3492 (3485.59min - 3492.13max) MB/s +54%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3197 (3193.46min - 3197.21max) MB/s +41%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2565 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2272 (2266.88min - 2271.97max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
2272 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1271 (1259.92min - 1271.12max) MB/s -44%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
439 (211.56min - 439max) MB/s -81%
4k q32 t16 write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2613 (2594.87min - 2613.35max) MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
2613 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2129 (2122.07min - 2128.79max) MB/s -19%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2128 MB/s -19%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1076 (1068.95min - 1075.63max) MB/s -59%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1066 (1060.72min - 1066.17max) MB/s -59%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
618 (524.5min - 618max) MB/s -76%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
470 (454.64min - 470.28max) MB/s -82%
AS SSD
Score Total
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8982 Points +43%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7821 Points +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6733 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6724 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
6267 Points
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
6267 Points 0%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5683 Points -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1814 Points -71%
Score Read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3587 Points +46%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3344 Points +36%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2955 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2462 Points
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
2462 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2440 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1850 Points -25%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
637 Points -74%
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4058 Points +52%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3997 Points +50%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3109 Points +17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2661 Points
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
2661 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2490 Points -6%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1230 Points -54%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
882 Points -67%
Seq Read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5739 MB/s +14%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5120 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
5022 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
5022 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4948 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4830 MB/s -4%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2834 MB/s -44%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1757 MB/s -65%
Seq Write
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4201 MB/s +70%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3759 MB/s +52%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3692 MB/s +50%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2544 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2466 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
2466 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2032 MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
1071 MB/s -57%
4K Read
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
82.8 MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
80.4 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
80.4 MB/s 0%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
72.7 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65 MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
62.3 MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
53.8 MB/s -33%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
22.07 MB/s -73%
4K Write
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
241.3 MB/s +25%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
193.7 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
193.7 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
179.2 MB/s -7%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
167.7 MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
146.4 MB/s -24%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
124.2 MB/s -36%
4K-64 Read
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2959 MB/s +57%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2749 MB/s +46%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2598 MB/s +38%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
1880 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
1880 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1874 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1305 MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
439.4 MB/s -77%
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3708 MB/s +67%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3387 MB/s +52%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2524 MB/s +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
2221 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
2221 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1891 MB/s -15%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
808 MB/s -64%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
651 MB/s -71%
Access Time Read
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05551 ms * -122%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
0.043 ms * -72%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.036 ms * -44%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.029 ms * -16%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.029 ms * -16%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.027 ms * -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
0.025 ms *
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
0.025 ms * -0%
Access Time Write
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
0.341 ms * -1450%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.154 ms * -600%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04751 ms * -116%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.027 ms * -23%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.025 ms * -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
0.022 ms *
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
  ()
0.022 ms * -0%
MSI GE76 Raider
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.018 ms * +18%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0230460690920115013801610184020702300253027602990322034503680391041404370Tooltip

图形卡

全新的NvidiaGeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU是目前笔记本电脑中最快的显卡。Max-Q和Whisper模式可用,但在Neo 15中没有Advanced Optimus。该卡的GDDR6显存为16GB。

TGP可在150至175瓦之间调整
TGP可在150至175瓦之间调整

Nvidia再次让制造商决定耗电量,从而决定性能。Schenker通过控制中心将这一决定传递给客户。

在3DMark测试中,Neo 15的排名通常仅次于微星GE76 Raider,后者也以175W的全功率运行RTX 3080 Ti。然而,Neo 15的前辈在许多3DMark测试中只落后几个百分点,在整体性能评级中落后约12%。

与Oasis几乎没有任何值得注意的差异,而且该组合通常甚至落后于仅有Neo的比率。

离开了电源插座,3D性能就大大下降了。在3DMark 11中,笔记本的性能整整下降了87%。在TheWitcher 3WQHD中,帧率从略低于100帧下降到只有约10至11帧--也损失了近90%!不幸的是,考虑到当前GPU的高功耗,这是标准的。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
100 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
92.1 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
90.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
87.5 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
84.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
81.3 pt
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
80.4 pt
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
79 pt
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
73.4 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
45050 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
43999 Points +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43891 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
43546 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
42087 Points -3%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
39782 Points -9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13920 - 45841, n=45)
39402 Points -10%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
38674 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
35663 Points -18%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
192520 Points +20%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
164717 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
160517 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (73574 - 192520, n=26)
145836 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (15902 - 193851, n=100, last 2 years)
144470 Points -10%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
123658 Points -23%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
118468 Points -26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
96785 Points -40%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
78421 Points -51%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
34041 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
32703 Points
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
32183 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31461 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
31341 Points -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6928 - 34439, n=43)
29496 Points -10%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
28740 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
27266 Points -17%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
26956 Points -18%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI GE76 Raider
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
13324 Points +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13142 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
12799 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
12320 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
11916 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4921 - 13835, n=43)
11850 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
11396 Points -7%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10836 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
10250 Points -17%
3DMark 11 Performance
35910 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
63903 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
27983 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
12480 points
Help

游戏性能

使用 RTX 3080 Ti的情况下,Neo 15可以在原生WQHD分辨率下流畅地玩所有当前游戏。大多数时候也应该有足够的储备用于4K。

Witcher 3,在2,560 x 1,440像素的超分辨率下运行约95帧,在全高清下运行120帧。Far Cry 5,在原生分辨率下也能运行超过100帧。

笔记本电脑配备RTX 3080滞后约10%,而微星GE76 Raider的速度则微乎其微。我们无法安装 GTA V因为SSD容量太小,而Windows 11又太耗费空间。希望我们能在生产模型中弥补这一点。

使用绿洲冷却,《Witcher 3》《Far Cry 5》的运行速度约为3-5%,这在实践中通常不明显,但会导致较大的温度差异。

《Witcher 3》一小时的压力评估表明,Neo 15的GPU在Oasis的作用下平均能够提高150MHz的频率,保持整整16℃的温度,消耗更多的电力,并能使用更多的内存。

使用Oasis的GPU时钟更高(绿色)。
使用Oasis的GPU时钟更高(绿色)。
没有绿洲的GPU更热(红色)。
没有绿洲的GPU更热(红色)。
视频存储器的占用率更高
视频存储器的占用率更高
使用 "绿洲 "的TGP更高、更稳定
使用 "绿洲 "的TGP更高、更稳定

《Witcher 3》中,对CPU的影响要小一些。时钟频率几乎相同,即使没有Oasis,CPU也没有明显的热节流现象。然而,连接Oasis后,CPU的温度要低11℃左右。

相同的CPU时钟
相同的CPU时钟
使用Oasis后,CPU温度明显降低
使用Oasis后,CPU温度明显降低
The Witcher 3
1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
465.4 (437min) fps +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.2 - 718, n=94, last 2 years)
460 fps +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
427 (363min) fps +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (316 - 543, n=24)
418 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
393 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
388.4 fps
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
325 (302min) fps -16%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
312 fps -20%
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
384 (317min) fps +18%
Average of class Gaming
  (168.5 - 617, n=97, last 2 years)
367 fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
333 fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (200 - 411, n=26)
330 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
325.6 fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
317.3 (287min) fps -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
311 (269min) fps -4%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
276 fps -15%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
270.1 (257min) fps -17%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
247 (213min) fps +16%
Average of class Gaming
  (40.1 - 449, n=119, last 2 years)
243 fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
222 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (144 - 268, n=28)
220 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
212.4 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
198 (174min) fps -7%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
197.3 (176min) fps -7%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
189.5 (186min) fps -11%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
149 fps -30%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)
128.5 fps +6%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
126 (108min) fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
126 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
121 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 130.6, n=43)
112.1 fps -7%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
108.4 fps -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
108 (88min) fps -11%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
105.8 (100min) fps -13%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
102.8 (96min) fps -15%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
150 fps +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (124 - 176, n=20)
149.4 fps +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (38 - 248, n=84, last 2 years)
146.2 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
145 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
132 (105min) fps -9%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
126 fps -13%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
144 fps +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (118 - 167, n=22)
141.7 fps +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (35 - 232, n=97, last 2 years)
140.2 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
140 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
127 (94min) fps -9%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
119 fps -15%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
135 fps +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (111 - 162, n=24)
133 fps +2%
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=100, last 2 years)
131.2 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
131 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
120 (95min) fps -8%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
113 fps -14%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (71 - 194, n=80, last 2 years)
119.6 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
119 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
116 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (86 - 134, n=20)
114.3 fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
107 (85min) fps -8%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
164 (144.3min) fps +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (69.3 - 244, n=185, last 2 years)
162.2 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
155 (136.7min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
154 (134.3min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
153 (134.6min) fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
151 (132.2min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (29.9 - 180.8, n=45)
148.1 fps -3%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
144 (126.1min) fps -6%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
131 (112.1min) fps -14%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
156 (137min) fps +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
151.2 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
147 (129.7min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
147 (129.5min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
146 (126.6min) fps -1%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
142 (124.2min) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (29.9 - 170.5, n=45)
141.1 fps -4%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
135 (118.4min) fps -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
119 (103.6min) fps -19%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 Standard Quality
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
171 (94min) fps +13%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
157 fps +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.5 - 230, n=144, last 2 years)
155.1 fps +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (110 - 189.3, n=27)
151.7 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
151 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
139 fps -8%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
139 fps -8%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
130 fps -14%
1920x1080 High Quality
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
131 (86min) fps +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
120.1 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
119 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
115 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 140.6, n=42)
113.8 fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
105 fps -9%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
105 fps -9%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
97.1 fps -16%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (32.5 - 169.2, n=132, last 2 years)
104.7 fps +20%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
93.2 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
87.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30.8 - 105.8, n=34)
85.9 fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
80.6 fps -8%
X-Plane 11.11
1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Average of class Gaming
  (39 - 221, n=183, last 2 years)
157.9 fps +11%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
155 fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
143 fps +1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (38.9 - 187.7, n=43)
142.1 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
142 fps
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
138 fps -3%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
127 fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
117 fps -18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
103 fps -27%
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 193.1, n=186, last 2 years)
138.4 fps +12%
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
133 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (35.2 - 164.7, n=43)
125.6 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
124 fps
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
124 fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
123 fps -1%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
110 fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
104 fps -16%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
92.3 fps -26%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
109 fps +8%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
108.5 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (32.6 - 127, n=45)
101.1 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101 fps
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
101 fps 0%
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
97.3 fps -4%
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
87.9 fps -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
82.8 fps -18%
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
76 fps -25%

Witcher 3》中的帧率在一小时内只略有下降,但表现也不太稳定。使用 "绿洲",帧率类似,但总是比我们在没有水冷的情况下看到的高7%左右。因此,长期性能的提高是微乎其微的。

The Witcher 3 - FPS Diagram

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø112.9 (102-128)
SCHENKER XMG Oasis  : Ø123 (113-128)
lowmed.highultraQHD
The Witcher 3 (2015) 388.4 325.6 212.4 121
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 175 162 153 147
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 151 115 87.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 142 124 101
Far Cry 5 (2018) 164 145 140 131 116

排放。我们有没有提到水冷?

噪声排放

我们使用的手动最大化TDP/TGP值的过度增压模式肯定不是通常的使用情况。该硬件提供了足够的功率,也可以在更安静的 "爱好者 "或 "平衡 "模式下运行(带耳语模式)。

即使在过载模式下,该设备至少也不会比配备RTX 3080的前代产品更吵。比较设备运行时也只是稍微安静一些。

遗憾的是,使用Oasis,噪音排放只略有下降(Oasis Balanced)--从54分贝到53分贝,在 Witcher 3 。在压力测试中,噪音水平的下降也很低。绿洲不一定安静的风扇将其音量增加到内部风扇的音量,然后以较低的速度旋转。总的来说,这种差异比我们希望的要小。

然而,这些数值是在一个小时的游戏和压力测试后测量的。在短时负载期间,如3DMark06分项测试,我们注意到由于Oasis的原因,内部风扇根本没有启动。从这个角度来看,理论上噪音排放已经大大降低。此外,可以为Oasis设置三种风扇配置文件(平衡、安静、非常安静)。在安静状态下, Witcher 3,只产生49分贝,而不是53或54分贝(在15-20厘米的距离测量)。

在负载情况下,我们听到Neo机箱发出呼呼的声音,但由于整个风扇的声音,它逐渐消失在背景中。

Noise Level

Idle
24 / 24 / 27.76 dB(A)
Load
38.81 / 54.18 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.63535.62534.437.634.43141.640.441.64031.931.431.95030.230.430.26332.329.432.38028.225.528.210031.72831.712531.222.231.216032.419.232.420034.423.334.425035.923.935.931538.814.538.840040.714.740.750041.411.341.463040.39.640.380042.19.742.1100043.31043.3125042.99.542.9160041.29.841.2200041.410.541.4250042.410.442.4315043.910.343.9400042.811.242.8500042.311.642.3630038.311.638.3800033.811.733.81000029.511.829.51250024.61224.61600019.611.419.6SPL53.624.353.6N9.30.69.3median 40.3median 11.6median 40.3Delta5.33.75.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, R9 5900HX, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
MSI GE76 Raider
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Noise
-11%
1%
-6%
0%
-14%
off / environment *
24
25
-4%
25.1
-5%
25.5
-6%
23
4%
26
-8%
Idle Minimum *
24
27
-13%
25.3
-5%
25.5
-6%
23
4%
26
-8%
Idle Average *
24
30
-25%
25.3
-5%
25.5
-6%
23
4%
27
-13%
Idle Maximum *
27.76
32
-15%
25.3
9%
37.1
-34%
30
-8%
40
-44%
Load Average *
38.81
46
-19%
42
-8%
39.2
-1%
41.26
-6%
50
-29%
Witcher 3 ultra *
54.2
52
4%
45.6
16%
50.5
7%
53.4
1%
53
2%
Load Maximum *
54.18
55
-2%
51.6
5%
51.8
4%
53.37
1%
53
2%

* ... smaller is better

温度

Oasis终于可以显示其在温度排放方面的优势。我们看到上面的GPU和CPU温度明显降低,而这至少部分延续到了表面温度。

由于RTX 3080 Ti不受阻碍,我们在一小时的压力测试后,在底部测得的温度高达68℃。然而,Schenker也怀疑这里是预发布模型的缺陷。有了Oasis,这个数值降低到了更容易容忍的51℃。

Max. Load
 41 °C51 °C40 °C 
 41 °C52 °C41 °C 
 35 °C34 °C32 °C 
Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 40.8 °C
60 °C68 °C63 °C
50 °C68 °C52 °C
29 °C31 °C31 °C
Maximum: 68 °C
Average: 50.2 °C
Power Supply (max.)  47 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 52 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 68 °C / 154 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Oasis
 
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
MSI GE76 Raider
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
22%
11%
3%
8%
-5%
11%
Maximum Upper Side *
52
42
19%
39
25%
51
2%
43.4
17%
61
-17%
43
17%
Maximum Bottom *
68
51
25%
50
26%
52
24%
48.2
29%
58
15%
47
31%
Idle Upper Side *
32
34
-6%
35.2
-10%
35.2
-10%
38
-19%
33
-3%
Idle Bottom *
36
37
-3%
37.8
-5%
37
-3%
36
-0%
37
-3%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

核心在大约3.6GHz的频率下开始我们的压力测试。在一小时的过程中,时钟下降,然后在2.2和3GHz之间波动。平均时钟约为2.6 GHz。使用Oasis,平均时钟在更高的3.1 GHz,同时核心温度降低了8℃,而封装功率提高了25W!

Oasis CPU的时钟速率明显更高(绿色)
Oasis CPU的时钟速率明显更高(绿色)
温度差异
温度差异
不使用绿洲的较低TDP(红色)。
不使用绿洲的较低TDP(红色)。

GPU时钟似乎是相同的,但内存时钟显然在没有Oasis的情况下下降得更频繁。同时,Oasis提供了平均20°C的GPU温度!

在压力之后直接运行新的3DMark 11,产生的分数与没有事先压力的运行相同。

相同的核心时钟
相同的核心时钟
在没有Oasis的情况下,内存时钟更经常下垂(红色)。
在没有Oasis的情况下,内存时钟更经常下垂(红色)。
使用 "绿洲 "时,GPU的运行温度降低了约20℃(绿色)。
使用 "绿洲 "时,GPU的运行温度降低了约20℃(绿色)。
空气冷却/绿洲
CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(℃) GPU平均温度(℃)
Prime95 + FurMark压力 2.6/3.1 1.3 88/80
Witcher 3 压力 2.5/2.6 1.5/1.6 71/60

扬声器

放大的扬声器(图片来源:Schenker)。
放大的扬声器(图片来源:Schenker)。

Schenker扩大了新Neo的扬声器。它们现在的音量最小,提供的低音也最小,但显然还是太低。

一个麦克风/线路输入和一个耳机端口可用于模拟第三方设备。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2041.633.741.62549.239.749.23146.642.346.64033.332.633.35030.128.530.16334.426.834.48034.82434.810036273612539.221.539.216044.818.844.820047.72647.725051.821.951.831558.117.258.140063.511.863.550069.310.269.363076.29.776.280075.99.875.9100071.810.271.8125070.110.270.1160065.610.665.6200063.511.363.5250062.811.662.8315059.811.559.8400060.111.460.1500065.111.865.1630067.91267.9800067.512.267.51000061.212.261.21250053.612.953.61600059.611.859.6SPL80.824.680.8N48.30.648.3median 62.8median 11.8median 62.8Delta7.43.47.443.13837.238.247.653.132.435.938.93926.431.619.322.522.224.318.231.32239.723.54517.850.115.550.414.854.212.660.213.467.911.670.912.168.911.865.711.9601264.312.364.414.463.314.164.813.462.713.672.213.671.61468.313.161.812.661.525.779.10.744.5median 13.6median 62.72.78.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 12% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 64% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理。高消耗,良好的电池性能

消耗功率

带短线的电源
带短线的电源

RTX 3080 Ti自然对电源有一定的要求。 Witcher 3

,该系统从插座中平均吸取228瓦,使用XMG Oasis后,这一数值增加了约10瓦。然而,特别是在开始的时候,消耗量也可以达到280瓦。

在压力测试期间,消耗的功率甚至更大。我们测量了平均242瓦和高达330瓦的负载峰值,此外还有一个波动的消耗,在长期运行中总是跳到280瓦左右。总的来说,耗电量和性能一样高。

短连接的大型电源(约18 x 8.5 x 3.4厘米)是为280 W的输出功率设计的,实际上应该能够适应开始时测量的数值,但在所有情况下的可靠充电可能不是一种可能性。有计划设计一个330W的电源。

Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 14 / 18 / 19 Watt
Load midlight 115 / 307 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 250GB MZ-V8P250BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, ADATA Swordfish 2 TB, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
6%
-19%
5%
3%
-5%
-22%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
14
15
-7%
19.5
-39%
11.2
20%
14
-0%
12
14%
17.2 ?(7 - 33.2, n=28)
-23%
Idle Average *
18
17
6%
23.3
-29%
16.4
9%
18
-0%
17
6%
23.3 ?(11 - 38, n=28)
-29%
Idle Maximum *
19
22
-16%
40.1
-111%
29.4
-55%
29
-53%
28
-47%
30.8 ?(17 - 60.8, n=28)
-62%
Load Average *
115
101
12%
98.9
14%
106.2
8%
93
19%
118
-3%
121.2 ?(92 - 150, n=28)
-5%
Witcher 3 ultra *
228
195
14%
174
24%
189
17%
190
17%
252
-11%
Load Maximum *
307
230
25%
214
30%
213.6
30%
203
34%
272
11%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption - The Witcher 3 / Stress test

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø228 (209.46-284.11)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø242 (161.41-306.89)

Power consumption with external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø173.3 (167.29-178.83)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø182.8 (175.14-186.23)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø211 (207.74-215.92)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø229 (224.93-233.96)

电池寿命

93瓦时的电池表现良好。显然,可以通过提供的性能配置文件对省电机制进行一些改进。前代产品在同样大小的电池下持续时间较短。在我们的Wi-Fi和视频测试中,我们测量了大约6到7小时。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
6h 43min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
6h 31min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
6h 53min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 48min
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 E22 (Early 2022, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 93 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 93 Wh
Razer Blade 15 Advanced (Mid 2021)
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Asus ROG Strix Scar 15 G533QS
R9 5900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Alienware m15 R6, i7-11800H RTX 3080
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 84 Wh
MSI GE76 Raider
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
-20%
-12%
-27%
-34%
-24%
-23%
H.264
413
352
-15%
333
-19%
WiFi v1.3
403
338
-16%
353
-12%
440
9%
302
-25%
306
-24%
Load
228
161
-29%
85
-63%
98
-57%
Reader / Idle
668

判决。通过 "绿洲 "获得真正的附加值

XMG Neo 15与XMG Oasis,由Schenker提供。
XMG Neo 15与XMG Oasis,由Schenker提供。

XMG Neo 15是一款优秀的游戏笔记本电脑,它有一个独特的增值卖点--水口。即使在风冷的情况下,热节流也不会过度干扰,这不仅导致了非常高的游戏性能,也导致了非常高的表面温度。

使用200欧元的外部水冷系统--XMG Oasis,温度明显下降。因此,噪音也减少了,而且根据应用,只要避免因温度下降而导致的热节流,性能也可以更高。总的来说,Oasis的声效仍可优化,也许在泵或尽管有通风的情况下出现的潺潺声。也就是说,从整体上看,这些优点说服了我们。对于有高性能要求的玩家来说,这种组合肯定能得到回报,而且在系统的寿命方面也是如此。

细节,如显示屏,将首先在我们对生产模型的测试中得到澄清。但是预生产型号已经做了很多正确的事情。

XMG Neo 15具有极高的性能,并且有一个真正独特的增值卖点,那就是XMG Oasis,不过,它需要额外支付199欧元。在没有水冷的情况下,预生产的模型会变得非常热。

价格和可用性

目前,预生产的模型还没有上市。然而,它已经可以在bestware上预购了。预计将于4月初开始交付。我们的测试配置是512GB固态硬盘,而不是250GB,价格为3,427.00欧元。

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 初步的XMG Neo 15 E22 with RTX 3080 Ti (Tongfang GM5AG8W)评论。水冷是游戏笔记本电脑的一个临时但可行的解决方案吗?
Christian Hintze, 2022-03- 3 (Update: 2022-03- 3)