XMG Neo 16(早期 24)评测:在小巧的游戏笔记本电脑中充分发挥 RTX 4090 的威力
![](fileadmin/_processed_/e/3/csm_4zu3_XMG_Neo16_E24_842d097012.jpg)
申克公司推出的 Neo 16 服务于高端市场,因此没有半点马虎:酷睿 i9 处理器、GeForce RTX 4090 和 32GB 内存使这款笔记本电脑能够应对苛刻的应用场景(流媒体、渲染、游戏)。但是,这是有代价的:您需要支付约 4000 美元(当前美元/欧元汇率)购买评测机型,不过也有 2000 美元起的廉价机型。同方裸机(GM6IX9B)为您提供了基础。竞争对手包括 雷蛇刀锋 16、 Medion Erazer Beast X40和 华硕 ROG Strix Scar 17.
该设备与 2023 型号相似,但具有一些新功能:更亮的显示屏、经过全面改进的散热系统和更大的开孔角度。前代产品中的机械键盘(可选)不在 2024 型号的产品范围内。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Best Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.5 % | v8 (new) | 06/2024 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 26.6 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
91.1 % | v7 (old) | 02/2024 | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 22 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.2 % | v7 (old) | 02/2024 | Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 36 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.2 % | v7 (old) | 08/2023 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 28.3 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
机箱 - XMG 笔记本电脑采用铝制机箱
目前的 Neo 机型并未采用 2023 机型的机箱。新的外壳与最新的 XMG 笔记本电脑的外壳更为相似,这是朝着正确方向迈出的一步:制造商不再混合使用塑料和金属,而是采用了完全由金属制成的机箱(例外:显示屏边框由塑料制成)。机箱的稳定性与你所期望的一样好。底座和盖子只能轻微扭动。盖子的开启角度可达 180 度(2023 型号:135 度)。当有几个人在场时,可以更方便地查看内容。紧密的铰链使盖子在几乎任何角度都能牢牢固定。单手即可打开设备。
引人注目的设计元素不见踪影,这意味着这款哑光黑色电脑显得相当严肃。除了背光按键(RGB)外,用户还可以自定义 LED 灯带,从而实现多彩的灯光效果。
最新的 Neo 16 看起来比前代产品更小巧一些,但在重量方面,这两款笔记本电脑并无区别。只有 刀锋 16更小巧,而且重量几乎相同。
功能 - 内置 USB 4
Neo 16 的 5 个 USB 端口中有 4 个(3 个 USB-A、2 个 USB-C)按照 USB 3.2 Gen 1 标准工作。只有后部的 USB-C 端口采用了 Thunderbolt 4(USB 4),包括支持 Power Delivery 和 Display Alt 模式。共有两个视频输出接口(1x HDMI、1x DP)。一个音频接口和一个千兆以太网端口(2.5 GBit/s)使产品更加完善。
USB 端口之间的距离(右侧:12 毫米,左侧:8 毫米)似乎比例适当:可同时插入两个典型尺寸的数据棒(连接器)(见图库图片)。视频输出和电源接口位于设备后部。相关的电缆都在背面,因此不会碍事。
SD 读卡器
SD 读卡器(参考型号:AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)属于中等速度型号:76 MB/s(传输 250 张 jpg 图像,每个文件 5 MB)和 87 MB/s(复制大数据块)的传输速度可以接受。该型号 Razer Blade 16显示可以达到更高的速度。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=97, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) |
交流
在最佳条件下(附近没有 Wi-Fi 设备,笔记本电脑与服务器电脑之间的距离较短),可以达到很好甚至极佳的数据传输速度 - WiFi 6E 芯片(英特尔 AX211)使之成为可能。有线连接由 Realtek 千兆以太网控制器(RTL8125,2.5 GBit/s)执行。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头(210 万像素)质量一般,支持 Windows Hello。此外,还有一个机械快门。
![ColorChecker](fileadmin/_processed_/7/4/csm_cam-1_05514b3e86.jpg)
配件
笔记本电脑附带一个 USB 记忆棒(驱动程序、说明书)、贴纸和鼠标垫。可选配件包括外置水冷系统(230 美元)。($230).
维护
保修
在欧盟,全球国际货运提供两年基本保修服务,包括取件服务和 6 个月快速维修服务(48 小时内维修)。36 个月的保修服务费用大约在 100 美元到 160 美元之间,具体取决于所选的快速维修期限。
输入设备 - 带有独立按键照明的键盘
键盘
去年的 Neo 16 可以选配机械键盘,但现在的机型只配备了chiclet 键盘。键盘覆盖了笔记本电脑的整个宽度,还配备了数字键盘和独立按键照明(RGB)。凹面弧形按键的键程适中,按压点清晰,阻力适中。键入时键盘不会弯曲。值得注意的是,偏离中心的全尺寸方向键使用起来非常舒适,这是对去年机型的改进。
显示屏 - 申克选择了明亮的 IPS 面板
安装的 16 英寸显示屏(2,560 x 1,600 像素)在亮度(约 500 cd/m²)方面没有任何不足,但对比度(1.000:1)可以更高一些。在这方面 刀锋 16 的OLED 面板提供了更好的整体解决方案--由于其设计,它能提供出色的黑色值和对比度。一般来说,Neo 16 所达到的数据足以满足在室内使用该设备的需要。在室外,只要阳光不是太强烈,显示屏也是清晰可读的。一些积极的方面是,16:10、240 Hz 的面板(IPS、G-Sync)反应灵敏、视角稳定,无论亮度设置如何,都不会出现 PWM 闪烁。没有其他显示屏可供选择。
|
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 530 cd/m²
Contrast: 1000:1 (Black: 0.53 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.99, calibrated: 1.44
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.57-98 Ø5.2
70.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
70.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.226
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) BOE NE160QDM-NZA, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung SDC41AB (ATNA60DL03-0), OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 BOE0AF0 NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 26% | -1% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 70.2 | 99.1 41% | 68.1 -3% | 67.3 -4% |
sRGB Coverage | 98 | 99.9 2% | 99.5 2% | 96.7 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 70.6 | 95.6 35% | 69 -2% | 68.9 -2% |
Response Times | 95% | -20% | -49% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 11.2 ? | 0.24 ? 98% | 11.7 ? -4% | 14.5 ? -29% |
Response Time Black / White * | 5.1 ? | 0.4 ? 92% | 6.9 ? -35% | 8.6 ? -69% |
PWM Frequency | 960 | |||
Screen | 251% | 25% | 15% | |
Brightness middle | 530 | 418 -21% | 422 -20% | 372 -30% |
Brightness | 497 | 420 -15% | 388 -22% | 349 -30% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 98 15% | 87 2% | 88 4% |
Black Level * | 0.53 | 0.02 96% | 0.42 21% | 0.32 40% |
Contrast | 1000 | 20900 1990% | 1005 1% | 1163 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.21 | 1.07 67% | 1.42 56% | 2.06 36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 4.04 30% | 1.97 66% | 3 48% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.44 | 1.07 26% | 0.7 51% | 1.5 -4% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 1.12 73% | 1.2 71% | 1.9 55% |
Gamma | 2.226 99% | 2.29 96% | 2.078 106% | 2.312 95% |
CCT | 6448 101% | 6417 101% | 6581 99% | 6747 96% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 124% /
181% | 1% /
13% | -12% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
开箱即用,显示屏的色彩再现效果不错:DeltaE 为 3.2,偏离目标值(DeltaE < 3)。校准后,偏差值降至 1.44,这是一个不错的数字。在所有标准色彩空间(AdobeRGB、sRGB、DCI P3)中,该面板与 Erazer Beast X40 的显示屏一样,几乎只能完全显示 sRGB 空间。能显示所有三种色彩空间的是 Blade 16 的 OLED 面板。 刀锋 16.
我们创建的色彩配置文件可以免费下载和使用。在显示屏的信息框中可以找到链接。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
5.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 3.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 13 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.3 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
11.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5.2 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.2 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 20 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.5 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17655 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
性能 - 猛禽湖和艾达-拉芙蕾丝确保了强大的动力
Neo 16(早期 24)面向游戏玩家、创作者以及所有需要强大性能的用户群体。每种规格都配备了酷睿 i9 14900HX,图形处理器从 RTX 4060 到 RTX 4090 不等,我们的型号是 RTX 4090。通过 Bestware.com(德语)可以进行个性化配置和购买笔记本电脑。我们这里的评测设备售价约为 4000 美元,入门级型号(RTX 4060)约为 2000 美元。RTX 4080 或 RTX 4090 Neo 16 型号可选配水冷系统(Oasis MK2)。
测试条件
您可以选择三种制造商特定的性能模式(见表)。在测试过程中,我们使用了 "Overboost"(基准测试)和 "Balanced"(电池测试)模式。GPU 模式设置为 "混合"(= Optimus)。您可以通过控制中心管理各个配置文件。这意味着你可以调整 CPU 功率限制、GPU 的 TGP 和/或温度上限。 一个单独的按键(在电源按钮旁边)可以在不同模式之间快速切换。
我们可以选配外置水冷(Oasis Mk2),但在测试过程中并未使用。不过,我们还是进行了一些独立于官方测试的测量(见对比表)。
功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 205 瓦 | 205 瓦 205 瓦 | |
---|---|---|---|
功率限制 1 (HWInfo) | 205 瓦 | 205 瓦 | 205 瓦 |
功率限制 2 (HWInfo) | 205 瓦 | 205 瓦 | 205 瓦 |
噪音 (Witcher 3) | 54 dB(A) | 51 dB(A) | 32 dB(A) |
性能 (Witcher 3) | 214fps | 198fps | 30fps (锁定) |
处理器
这款笔记本搭载了 酷睿 i9 14900HX(Raptor Lake)--其他 CPU 不可用。酷睿 i9 提供整整 24 个内核(8P + 16E = 32 个线程),最高主频为 5.8 GHz(P)和 4.1 GHz(E)。持续的多线程负载(CB15 循环)会导致性能持续但略有下降(超增压)--使用 Oasis 水冷系统可消除这种影响。其他两种电源模式即使不使用水冷也能确保稳定的性能--当然,是在较低水平上。
"超频 "模式的 CPU 性能高于平均水平,而 "发烧友 "模式则略低于平均水平--这主要体现在多线程性能上。在这三种配置文件中,单线程性能同样处于较高水平。可选的水冷系统(Oasis)可带来微弱的性能提升。
Cinebench R15 Multi Continuous Test
Cinebench R20 | |
CPU (Multi Core) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (Overboost, Oasis, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8427 - 13832, n=26) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
CPU (Single Core) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (Overboost, Oasis, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (657 - 859, n=26) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Average of class Gaming (439 - 855, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Geekbench 6.2 | |
Multi-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (6.2.1) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (6.2.1) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (15849 - 19665, n=26) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (6.2.1) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (6.2.1) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (6.2.1) | |
Single-Core | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (6.2.1) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.2.1) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (6.2.1) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2419 - 3129, n=26) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (6.2.1) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Average of class Gaming (1599 - 3129, n=88, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (6.2.1) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (6.2.1) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (Overboost, Oasis) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (22.7 - 38.9, n=26) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=209, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (6.3.4.2) | |
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (6.3.4.2) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (6.3.4.2) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (6.3.4.2) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (31.4 - 85.1, n=26) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.3.4.2) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (6.3.4.2) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (6.3.4.2, Overboost, Oasis) |
R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.658, n=208, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (0.3609 - 0.4859, n=26) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (Overboost, Oasis, Overboost, Oasis) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (17244 - 33474, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (v6.85.6300) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (88537 - 166040, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (v6.92.6600) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (v6.75.6100) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (4267 - 7979, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (v6.75.6100) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (118405 - 148966, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (v6.75.6100) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (v6.85.6300) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (41257 - 200651, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (v6.92.6600) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (12217 - 18517, n=25) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (v6.85.6300) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (v6.75.6100) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (3925 - 32988, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (v6.92.6600) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (43302 - 83662, n=25) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (v6.75.6100) | |
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (v6.92.6600) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (v6.75.6100) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (86964 - 241777, n=25) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (v6.85.6300) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (v6.85.6300) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1265 - 2292, n=25) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (v6.75.6100) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (269 - 2409, n=205, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (v6.92.6600) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (9170 - 18349, n=25) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (v6.75.6100) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (v6.92.6600) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (v6.92.6600) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (v6.85.6300) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (v6.92.6600) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (v6.92.6600) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (v6.92.6600) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (v6.75.6100) | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (33960 - 54702, n=25) | |
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=206, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (v6.88.6413 Beta) |
系统性能
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (8230 - 9234, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average of class Gaming (5442 - 9852, n=185, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10871 - 11628, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Average of class Gaming (8829 - 12334, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9951 - 11759, n=10) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=184, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (13219 - 16462, n=10) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average of class Gaming (6462 - 18475, n=184, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Overall | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1877 - 2344, n=10) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1738 - 2162, n=10) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2195 - 2660, n=10) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1478 - 2327, n=10) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=162, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (279 - 339, n=9) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=186, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (246 - 309, n=7) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (157.9 - 328, n=168, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (421 - 737, n=197, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (428 - 535, n=10) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 9017 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (56992 - 83392, n=25) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (54443 - 87507, n=25) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 90647, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (51387 - 80589, n=25) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 103259, n=205, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 152.5, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (76.1 - 105, n=25) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储器
* ... smaller is better
Continuous Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
目前 GeForce RTX 4090是 Nvidia 移动 GPU 中性能最高的。9,728 个着色器、256 位总线以及快速 GDDR6 RAM(16,384 MB)是这款像素加速器的特点。最大 TGP 为 175 瓦(150 瓦 + 25 瓦动态提升),不可能更高。
到目前为止,基准测试结果高于(超频)和低于(发烧级、平衡级)RTX 4090 的平均水平。绿洲 "水冷系统帮助实现了性能的小幅提升。无论如何,主要竞争对手 刀锋 16与之保持一定距离。在 dGPU 和 Optimus 之间切换无需重启:支持高级 Optimus。
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 62889 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 43829 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 38597 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 20588 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 5102 points | |
Help |
Geekbench 6.2 | |
GPU Vulkan 6.2 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (6.2.1) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.2.1) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (6.2.1) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (6.2.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9584 - 196201, n=16) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (6.2.1) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (4286 - 196201, n=85, last 2 years) | |
GPU OpenCL | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (6.2.1) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (6.2.1, Overboost, Oasis) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (6.2.1) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (6.2.1) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (159127 - 209521, n=18) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (6.2.1) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (6.2.1) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (6.2.1) | |
Average of class Gaming (4321 - 207373, n=87, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
XMG 电脑旨在以最高设置处理 QHD 游戏。对于 RTX 4090(超增压)来说,帧率高于平均水平,水冷性能略有提升。图形处理器功能、帧生成和 DLSS 3 可在最大设置下通过光线追踪实现更高分辨率,但仅限于提供这些功能的游戏。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (139.2 - 216, n=35) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F | |
Average of class Gaming (13.1 - 216, n=203, last 2 years) |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (91.1 - 167.7, n=38) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (6.38 - 167.7, n=191, last 2 years) |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (1.3, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (1.3) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (1.3) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (1.3) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (1.3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (1.3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (1.3) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (122.2 - 201, n=38) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (1.3) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (1.3) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (1.3) | |
Average of class Gaming (9.13 - 201, n=204, last 2 years) |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Overboost, Oasis) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (233 - 421, n=37) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F (1.47.22.14 D3D12) | |
Average of class Gaming (14.6 - 421, n=202, last 2 years) |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (Overboost, Oasis) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (115.7 - 220, n=40) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (33.2 - 220, n=211, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X | |
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 16 G634JZR | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (v6.92.6600, Overboost, Oasis) | |
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 RTX4090 | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (77.8 - 166.2, n=44) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 | |
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=217, last 2 years) | |
Alienware x16 R2 P120F |
F1 24 | |
1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (1119215) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (113.6 - 127, n=3) | |
XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (1118244) | |
Average of class Gaming (60.6 - 127, n=4, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (1119215) | |
XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (72.1 - 84.7, n=3) | |
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX9, RTX 4090 (1118244) | |
Average of class Gaming (59.1 - 84.7, n=3, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Quality DLSS AF:16x | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) (1119215) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Gaming (86.3 - 129.5, n=2, last 2 years) |
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 | |
1920x1080 High Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (74 - 78.8, n=2) | |
XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
2560x1440 High Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average of class Gaming (last 2 years) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (51.8 - 57.3, n=2) | |
XMG Neo 16 E23 | |
2560x1440 High Preset + Quality DLSS | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU () | |
Average of class Gaming (last 2 years) |
Horizon Forbidden West | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:T | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (93.7 - 125.2, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (30.2 - 125.2, n=7, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Very High Preset AA:T | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (75.2 - 98, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (24.1 - 98, n=7, last 2 years) |
Alone in the Dark | |
1920x1080 Cinematic Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (141 - 189.9, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (13.6 - 189.9, n=5, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Cinematic Preset | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (99 - 133.6, n=2) | |
Average of class Gaming (64.7 - 133.6, n=4, last 2 years) |
我们使用Witcher 3 检查帧频的稳定性:游戏(最高设置,全高清)运行了大约 1 小时,游戏角色没有移动,我们也没有观察到帧速率有任何下降。
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
GTA V (2015) | 187.6 | 187.4 | 185.7 | 159.3 | 156 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 643 | 562.3 | 412.7 | 214 | 169.4 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 248 | 221 | 210 | 194.6 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 233 | 225 | 196.9 | 162.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 208 | 184.2 | 144.5 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 194 | 184 | 172 | 156 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 579 | 444 | 397 | 403 | 305 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 168.5 | 157.8 | 138 | 131.5 | 93.8 |
Alan Wake 2 (2023) | 128.5 | 128 | 123.3 | 87.1 | |
Alone in the Dark (2024) | 219 | 217 | 216 | 189.9 | 133.6 |
Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 165.4 | 160.5 | 126.2 | 125.2 | 98 |
Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 122.3 | 103.3 | 78.8 | 57.3 | |
F1 24 (2024) | 346 | 369 | 302 | 127 | 84.7 |
排放 - XMG 笔记本电脑具有特定等级的排放要求
噪音排放
噪音水平最高可达 56 dB(A),但在游戏时,这一数字会稍低一些(过载)。使用 "平衡 "功能可以大大降低噪音水平,但会牺牲性能。这样就可以玩游戏了。在日常使用(办公、上网)和空闲运行时,计算机一般都能安静地工作,与激活的性能模式无关。
使用外部水冷会产生一些噪音:水泵工作时非常安静,而风扇则更加明显。从主观角度看,我们认为使用外部水冷时的噪音水平更令人愉悦,但并不一定更安静。
例如,在进行 Diskspd 测试时,笔记本电脑内部偶尔会发出电子噼啪声。这可能是固态硬盘造成的。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 28 / 29 / 31 dB(A) |
Load |
| 51 / 56 dB(A) |
![]() | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX3D, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 14% | 3% | 3% | -12% | |
off / environment * | 26 | 23 12% | 25 4% | 23 12% | 25 4% |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 23 18% | 28 -0% | 23 18% | 31 -11% |
Idle Average * | 29 | 23 21% | 29 -0% | 27.7 4% | 33 -14% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 27.66 11% | 32 -3% | 34.7 -12% | 42 -35% |
Load Average * | 51 | 43.76 14% | 48 6% | 53.4 -5% | 58 -14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 54 | 46.81 13% | 50 7% | 53.4 1% | 57 -6% |
Load Maximum * | 56 | 50.37 10% | 52 7% | 53.4 5% | 59 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在负载情况下(压力测试和Witcher 3 测试),笔记本电脑会明显发热:某些区域的温度有时会超过 50 °C。不过,在掌托上,温度保持在中等水平。在日常使用中(办公、上网),这些数据处于绿色区域。
Witcher 3 测试凸显了可选水冷系统的效果:GPU 温度相差约 17 °C(80.7 °C 对 63.4 °C)。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.4 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 2% | -7% | 8% | 1% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 45 4% | 47 -0% | 40.1 15% | 50 -6% |
Maximum Bottom * | 56 | 45 20% | 54 4% | 46.7 17% | 51 9% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27 | 29 -7% | 30 -11% | 26.5 2% | 28 -4% |
Idle Bottom * | 27 | 30 -11% | 32 -19% | 27.7 -3% | 26 4% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
发言人
立体声扬声器缺乏低音。除此之外,它们大多能产生不错的音效。使用耳机或外置扬声器可以获得更好的音质。
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理 - Schenker Neo 的电池续航能力不错
耗电量
对于我们这里安装的硬件来说,功耗处于正常水平。Witcher 3 测试和压力测试的功耗略有下降。电源适配器(330 瓦)大小合适。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung 990 Pro 1 TB, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-BICS5, IPS, 2560x1600, 17.00 | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.30 | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2560x1600, 16.00 | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -22% | -1% | -23% | -9% | -19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 6 | 16.9 -182% | 7 -17% | 15.4 -157% | 8 -33% | 13.5 ? -125% |
Idle Average * | 16 | 17.8 -11% | 15 6% | 21.6 -35% | 18 -13% | 19 ? -19% |
Idle Maximum * | 28 | 19.6 30% | 33 -18% | 22.2 21% | 28 -0% | 26.9 ? 4% |
Load Average * | 130 | 128 2% | 134 -3% | 116.7 10% | 133 -2% | 110.1 ? 15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 302 | 243 20% | 280 7% | 262 13% | 294 3% | |
Load Maximum * | 361 | 328 9% | 294 19% | 327.1 9% | 399 -11% | 253 ? 30% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24) i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh | Medion Erazer Beast X40 2024 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 G733PYV-LL053X R9 7945HX3D, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -11% | 7% | -34% | -2% | -9% | |
Reader / Idle | 600 | 551 ? -8% | ||||
H.264 | 418 | 456 9% | 302 -28% | 349 -17% | 399 ? -5% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 350 | 329 -6% | 374 7% | 287 -18% | 399 14% | 370 ? 6% |
Load | 122 | 79 -35% | 55 -55% | 85.7 ? -30% | ||
Witcher 3 ultra | 84 | 77 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论--高端火球
Neo 16 兑现了它的承诺:性能高端的硬件(酷睿 i9、RTX 4090)可以进行视频编辑、渲染、流媒体传输,当然还有 QHD 游戏。通过选择适当的性能模式,可以将预期的高辐射降低到更适中的水平。
通过 XMG Neo 16(早期 24),申克以紧凑的外形提供了强大的动力。
要想获得不折不扣的解决方案,就必须选配外部水冷系统(230 美元):这有助于实现性能的小幅提升和排放的降低。尽管如此,笔记本电脑还是被固定在一个固定的位置上。
16 英寸 16:10 雾面显示屏(2,560 x 1,600 像素,sRGB,IPS,240 Hz)在很大程度上给人留下了良好印象,其高亮度尤其讨人喜欢。在对比度和色彩空间覆盖率方面还有待改进。两个固态硬盘插槽(PCIe 4)包括 RAID 0/1 支持,可提供大量存储空间和较短的加载时间。
单次电池充电(99.8 瓦时)足以支持 6 至 7 小时的实际运行时间,数据相当不错。优点电池可通过 USB-C 充电器(100 瓦、20 V、5 A)充电,TB4 端口支持 Power Delivery,这意味着 PSU(330 瓦)理论上可以留在家里。
另一种选择是 雷蛇刀锋 16 (2024).这款电脑的计算能力略低,但与 Neo 不同的是,它的对比度更高,搭载的 OLED 显示屏也更生动。
价格和供应情况
XMG Neo 16(早期 24)可单独配置,并可在申克在线商店(德国)购买,价格代表测试时的美元/欧元汇率。我们的评测机型价格约为 4000 美元。入门级型号(配备 RTX 4060)的起价约为 2000 美元。申克公司表示,它们将于 6 月底(RTX 4090)和 7 月中(RTX 4060/70/80)上市。可选的水冷散热将需要支付约 230 美元。
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 (Early 24)
-
06/19/2024 v8 (new)
Sascha Mölck
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.