Razer Blade 16 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测：配备超高速三星 OLED 显示屏

Name: Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090
Brand: Razer

OLED 还是迷你 LED？

笔记本电脑制造商目前的日子并不好过。英特尔 14 代几乎没有带来任何性能提升，也没有新的 Nvidia GPU 可供安装--那么你有什么理由让客户购买你每年更新的笔记本电脑呢？Razer 从显示器中找到了答案：制造商宣传的是三星制造的全球首款 16 英寸 240-Hz OLED 显示屏。它的新显示屏真的有那么好吗？我们的测试将揭晓答案。

Christian Hintze, 👁 Christian Hintze (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/20/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook Nvidia Raptor Lake Thunderbolt

与去年的前代产品相比，Razer Blade 有哪些新变化？简而言之：WiFi 7、英特尔第 14 代处理器和 OLED 显示屏。后者是雷蛇宣传的最大新功能。即便如此，前代机型已经非常出色的 Mini-LED 显示屏选项仍得以保留，这意味着你现在可以在 OLED 和 Mini-LED 显示屏之间做出选择。因此，在这次评测中，我们将特别仔细地查看这款笔记本电脑的显示屏。此外，我们还将检查英特尔第 14 代处理器与第 13 代处理器相比，在刀锋 16 中能提供怎样的性能。

我们的 2024 Razer Blade 16 将与其他配备RTX 4090 的 16 英寸游戏本竞争，首先是联想旗舰Legion 9i Gen 8 16IRX8，但也包括申克 XMG Neo 16 E23 和华硕 ROG Zephyrus M16 。当然，我们还将把它与配备 Gen-13-HX CPU 和 RTX 4090 的前代产品进行比较。为了在比较领域中至少有一台采用全新 Gen-14 CPU 的笔记本电脑，我们还将把它与配备i7-14650HX 的LenovoLegion 5i 16 G9 进行比较。

Test device courtesy of Razer

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 (Blade 16 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-14900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.8 GHz, 140 W PL2 / Short Burst, 60 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX Refresh

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 551.23, Advanced Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5600

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 2560 x 1600 pixel 189 PPI, Samsung SDC41AB (ATNA60DL03-0), OLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Storage

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, 2048 GB

, 1770 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS

Connections

5 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5mm Headphone / Microphone Combo Port, Card Reader: SD Reader

Networking

Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW) (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 22 x 355 x 244

Battery

95.2 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: Full HD infrared webcam with shutter, 1.080p
Primary Camera: 2 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: 4-speaker array (2x tweeters, 2x woofers), Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 12 Months Warranty

Weight

2.452 kg, Power Supply: 967 g

Price

4850 Euro

Amazon

$4,395.00

Links

Razer homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
91.1 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	22 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.8 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	21.99 mm	16.00"	3840x2400
90.2 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2023	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.6 kg	22.7 mm	16.00"	3200x2000
87.7 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.5 kg	29.9 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.1 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2024	Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	25.2 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

外壳和连接性 - 金属一体成型机身，带钛金属板

这款笔记本电脑的外壳几乎没有任何变化--硬件依然采用铝合金一体式机身，底座前部还镶嵌了一块钛金属板，以提高其坚固性。外壳和键盘仍然是真正的指纹磁铁。

但有一点变化是：你现在可以选择 "水星 "版的 Blade，它采用了轻型设计。

有关该设备的外壳、连接和输入设备的更多信息，请参阅我们对2023 型号的评测。

尺寸比较

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 DIN A4 ❌

左：电源、2 个 USB-A 3.2 Gen 2、USB-C 3.2 Gen 2 (PD)、3.5 毫米耳机

右侧SD 读卡器、USB-C Thunderbolt 4、HDMI 2.1、Kensington

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelbird AV PRO 128 GB V60)	188.2 (162.9^min - 196.43^max) MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	171 (169.48^min - 194.55^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=88, last 2 years)	95.8 MB/s -44%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	84.8 MB/s -50%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	71 MB/s -58%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	27.1 MB/s -84%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX (Angelbird AV PRO 128 GB V60)	203.01 MB/s +12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	181.81 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)	120 MB/s -34%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	87.9 MB/s -52%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	83 MB/s -54%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	28.8 MB/s -84%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1635 (1528^min - 1715^max) MBit/s +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1585 (642^min - 1670^max) MBit/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)	1577 (796^min - 1617^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1489 (1329^min, 1338.28^P1 - 1686^max) MBit/s -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1308 (606^min - 1544^max) MBit/s -17%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW) (831 - 1609, n=4)	1290 MBit/s -18%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=148, last 2 years)	1225 MBit/s -22%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1733 (1700^min - 1761^max) MBit/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1665 (839^min - 1716^max) MBit/s +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)	1604 (1554^min - 1623^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW) (1317 - 1644, n=4)	1539 MBit/s -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1398 (1327^min, 1333.09^P1 - 1464^max) MBit/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=148, last 2 years)	1393 MBit/s -13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1178 (483^min - 1393^max) MBit/s -27%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1632 (1509^min - 1662^max) MBit/s +6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)	1538 (784^min - 1597^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1472 (1007^min - 1545^max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (648 - 1878, n=68, last 2 years)	1429 MBit/s -7%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW) (1210 - 1538, n=2)	1374 MBit/s -11%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1751 (1679^min - 1777^max) MBit/s +15%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW)	1518 (762^min - 1536^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1498 (754^min - 1540^max) MBit/s -1%
Average of class Gaming (853 - 1788, n=68, last 2 years)	1488 MBit/s -2%
Average Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW) (1111 - 1518, n=2)	1315 MBit/s -13%

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1512 (784-1597)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1472 (1007-1545)

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1492 (762-1536)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1472 (754-1540)

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1550 (796-1617)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1286 (606-1544)

Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1489 (1329-1686)

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 7 BE1750W 320 MHz (BE200NGW); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1604 (1554-1623)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1177 (483-1393)

Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1398 (1327-1464)

ColorChecker Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090: 12.99 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 24.26 ∆E

输入设备 - 触摸板是不是太大了？

这款笔记本电脑的薄膜开关键相当大，键与键之间有一点空隙。反过来，Razer 决定不安装数字键盘。

按键的抬升距离很短，达到平均水平，反馈效果也不错。遗憾的是，上/下箭头键的高度减半，但除此之外，布局感觉不错，空间宽敞。

每个按键的 RGB 背光（Razer Chroma）可通过 Synapse 应用程序进行广泛配置，这也是 Razer 的典型特色。

触摸板非常大！大到旁边的掌托都显得太小了。这有时会导致触控板输入失败，因为你的手只是放在触控板的一侧，却不小心碰到了触控板。在这方面，少一点会更多一些。

显示屏 - 采用 OLED 或 Mini-LED 的 Blade 16？

我们的测试机型安装了全新的三星 OLED 显示屏，这也是 Razer 所推崇的显示屏。不过，你也可以选择配备优质 Mini-LED 显示屏的笔记本电脑。客户面临着一个艰难的抉择，因为两种面板类型各有利弊。

Mini-LED 的亮度最高可达 1,000 尼特（HDR），而前代机型在 SDR 模式下仍能达到 700 尼特以上。我们的 OLED 屏幕 "只能 "达到平均 420 尼特，但它却拥有完美的黑色值和高对比度。它可以使显示屏上的个别区域完美变暗。

Mini-LED 显示屏有两种原生分辨率模式，即 FHD+ 和 UHD+。OLED 的分辨率 "限制 "在 1600p（QHD+），但它的响应速度极快，在 0.2（灰到灰）和 0.4 毫秒（黑到白）之间。无论您最终选择哪款显示屏，Razer 的产品都不会让您失望。

我们的 Blade 测试机型采用的三星 OLED 显示屏表面反光、清晰。Razer 宣传该机型获得了各种认证，包括 VESA ClearMR 11000（240 Hz 时屏幕上移动物体的最高显示清晰度）、Calman Verified（色彩校准）和 VESA DisplayHDR True Black 500。

除了获得众多认证外，这款分辨率为 2,560 x 1,600 像素的 16:10 OLED 还支持 G-Sync，并经过预校准。OLED 没有背光出血现象。


422 cd/m²	418 cd/m²	416 cd/m²
420 cd/m²	418 cd/m²	417 cd/m²
421 cd/m²	424 cd/m²	423 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

Samsung SDC41AB (ATNA60DL03-0) tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 424 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 419.9 cd/m² Minimum: 3.9 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 416 cd/m²
Contrast: 20900:1 (Black: 0.02 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.07
ΔE Greyscale 1.12 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 3)

	Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung SDC41AB (ATNA60DL03-0), OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 AUO B160ZAN01.U, mini-LED, 3840x2400, 16"	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 CSOT T3 MNG007ZA2-2, Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16"	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 BOE0AF0 NE160QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NE160QDM-NZ3, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
Display		-1%	-4%	-21%	-16%
Display P3 Coverage	99.1	99.9 1%	97.2 -2%	67.3 -32%	72.4 -27%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	100 0%	99.9 0%	96.7 -3%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	95.6	90.9 -5%	87 -9%	68.9 -28%	74.1 -22%
Response Times		-6469%	-2616%	-3996%	-3592%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	0.24 ?(0.15, 0.09)	10.2 ?(5.8, 4.4) -4150%	13.3 ?(5.7, 7.6) -5442%	14.5 ?(7.1, 7.4) -5942%	12.5 ?(6.1, 6.4) -5108%
Response Time Black / White *	0.4 ?(0.2, 0.2)	62.04 ?(58.04, 4) -15410%	11.6 ?(5.1, 6.5) -2800%	8.6 ?(3.9, 4.7) -2050%	8.7 ?(4.6, 4.1) -2075%
PWM Frequency	960	2420 ?(100) 152%	4742 394%
Screen		-42%	-49%	-201%	-176%
Brightness middle	418	730 75%	674.9 61%	372 -11%	526 26%
Brightness	420	729 74%	682 62%	349 -17%	500 19%
Brightness Distribution	98	94 -4%	96 -2%	88 -10%	87 -11%
Black Level *	0.02	0.0045 77%	0.04 -100%	0.32 -1500%	0.33 -1550%
Contrast	20900	162222 676%	16873 -19%	1163 -94%	1594 -92%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.07	5.65 -428%	2.56 -139%	2.06 -93%	1.2 -12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.04	10.11 -150%	4.16 -3%	3 26%	2.1 48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.07	1.85 -73%	2.47 -131%	1.5 -40%	1 7%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.12	8.1 -623%	3 -168%	1.9 -70%	1.3 -16%
Gamma	2.29 ^96%	1.98 ^111%	2.38 ^92%	2.312 ^95%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	6417 ^101%	5874 ^111%	6799 ^96%	6747 ^96%	6391 ^102%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-2171% / -1319%	-890% / -553%	-1406% / -705%	-1261% / -630%

* ... smaller is better

正如所承诺的那样，该面板几乎涵盖了 DisplayP3 的全部内容，当然也包括 sRGB。此外，AdobeRGB 的覆盖率约为 96%。

根据 Razer 的说法，每款 16 英寸 Blade 型号都经过预校准，我们的测量也证实了这一点。它的灰度和色彩偏差非常小，只有 1 左右，这意味着 Blade 16 非常适合编辑照片和视频。

制造商还在 Synapse 软件中为此设置了几种色彩配置文件，即 DCI-P3、Adobe RGB、Rec.709 和 sRGB。此外，还可以选择单独调整色彩模式，以及本机色彩模式。我们选择 DCI-P3 进行测量。

总的来说，我们认为 OLED 面板比 Mini-LED 显示屏略胜一筹，这主要是因为它具有出色的色彩空间覆盖率、色彩准确性、深黑色、高对比度和快速响应时间。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.2 ms rise
0.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.15 ms rise
0.24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.09 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 0 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

960 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 960 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 960 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

笔记本电脑 0.2 毫秒和 0.4 毫秒的响应时间非常快，对于我们测试设备的自动记录模式来说太快了。下面是我们手动记录的上升和下降时间。

在室外，由于 Blade 16 表面反光，使用起来可能会有些困难。尽管如此，其强烈的对比度还是稍微弥补了这一点。在阴凉处，户外工作应该没问题。

性能 - 尽管有新一代 CPU，但仍停滞不前

凭借其强大的 RTX 4090和同样强大的英特尔酷睿 i9-14900HX当然，Blade 16 主要面向游戏玩家。但凭借其出色的屏幕和优雅轻薄的设计，Razer 也一直刻意将创意专业人士作为目标客户。32 GB 内存、WiFi 7 和 2 TB SSD 是我们测试样品的全部配置。

测试条件

Razer Synapse 是 Blade 型号的指挥和控制中心。您可以通过它设置四种性能模式（静音、平衡、涡轮、自定义）之一以及灯光效果，并进行进一步调整。

有时软件需要进行自我更新，这需要花费很长的时间，我们甚至不得不在更新后重新启动设备，这有点令人烦恼。在漫长的自动更新过程中，无法访问选项。主屏幕也不是最好的。虽然软件会记住 Windows 会话期间打开的最后一个选项卡（如性能），但我们总是要重启后才能进入主屏幕。在这里，我们首先要选择我们的设备（即使它是我们唯一的 Razer 设备），然后点击正确的选项卡；"自定义 "被默认选中（设置功能键）--一个可能很少使用的选项卡。

在基准测试中，我们使用自定义模式最大限度地提高了 CPU 和 GPU 的性能。不过，我们将风扇设置为自动，否则风扇会一直开到最大音量。有时图形切换会出现一些问题，某些应用程序会出现故障。例如，3DMark 06 只能在 dGPU 模式下启动。

处理器

酷睿 i9-14900HX 酷睿 i9-14900HX是目前笔记本电脑 Raptor-Lake-Refresh 系列中的佼佼者。不过，与去年的 Raptor Lake 相比，其架构保持不变，只是涡轮时钟频率略有提高。现在，它的主频高达 5.8 GHz，除此之外，英特尔的旗舰 CPU 还拥有 24 个内核（8 个 P 核心、16 个 E 核心；32 个线程）。

在 Cinebench R15 循环测试中，CPU 提供了非常高且稳定的性能，在运行 1 到 3 次后，性能没有出现通常的下降。即便如此 Legion 9与去年的顶级型号酷睿 i9-13980HX和英特尔 13 代的其他顶级 CPU 一样快，只是稍逊一筹。性能较弱的 i7-14650HX在当前的 Legion 5则稍显落后。与其前代，当前 CPU 的性能提高了约 8%。尽管性能出色，但并没有太多理由支持花大价钱购买英特尔第 14 代处理器，因为第 13 代处理器的速度几乎与第 14 代处理器相同。请看我们的对新的第 14 代 CPU 的分析了解更多信息。

在下表中，我们列出了 Cinebench R15 使用不同性能模式时的功耗，右侧的截图说明了这些值。如果我们断开电源，Synapse 会自动切换到无法更改的平衡模式。不过，TDP 值甚至低于插入电源时的相同模式--它们与静音模式下的值更为接近。

性能模式/值	Cinebench R15 分数，首次运行	运行开始时的 TDP	运行结束时的 TDP
用户定义（增压/高）	4,456	139	135
涡轮	4,305	139	126
平衡型	2,678	58	54
静音型	1,888	38	35
电池	1,835	37	34

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX: Ø4396 (4349.72-4455.83)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø3945 (3056-4339.34)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4416 (4337.45-4565.69)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4121 (3925.8-4598.23)

Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX: Ø3471 (3409.19-3799.39)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	85.3 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	83 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 ^-2! Intel Core i9-13900HX	82.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX	82.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 ^-2! Intel Core i9-13950HX	75.2 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	73.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	66.5 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	29892 (28505.8^min - 29891.7^max) Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	29082 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	28867 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (17078 - 36249, n=38)	28781 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	28422 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	24455 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years)	21980 Points -24%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1720 - 2245, n=39)	2146 Points +1%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	2129 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2117 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2076 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	1963 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	1952 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=189, last 2 years)	1894 Points -11%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	11155 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	11010 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	10968 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6579 - 13832, n=37)	10930 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	10738 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	9349 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)	8348 Points -24%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (657 - 859, n=37)	824 Points +2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	810 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	797 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	754 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	754 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)	727 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	723 Points -11%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4598 (3925.8^min - 4598.23^max) Points +3%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	4566 (4337.45^min - 4565.69^max) Points +2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	4456 (4349.72^min - 4455.83^max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3263 - 5589, n=38)	4424 Points -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	4339 (3056^min - 4339.34^max) Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	3799 (3409.19^min - 3799.39^max) Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3437 Points -23%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	311 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (247 - 323, n=37)	305 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	303 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	301 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	287 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	278 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points -11%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)	169.4 Seconds * -50%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	141 Seconds * -25%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (91 - 206, n=37)	121.2 Seconds * -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	117 Seconds * -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	117 Seconds * -4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	113 Seconds *
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	103 Seconds * +9%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	117479 MIPS +2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	115695 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	115262 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (66769 - 136645, n=37)	111239 MIPS -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	108860 MIPS -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	93686 MIPS -19%
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)	85671 MIPS -26%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	7070 MIPS +1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (5452 - 7545, n=37)	7021 MIPS 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	7018 MIPS
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	6965 MIPS -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	6715 MIPS -4%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	6695 MIPS -5%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)	6318 MIPS -10%

Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	17559 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	17472 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13158 - 19665, n=37)	17321 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	16010 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (5340 - 19665, n=113, last 2 years)	14205 Points -19%

Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (2419 - 3129, n=37)	2967 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2964 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	2961 Points 0%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	2761 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (1490 - 3129, n=113, last 2 years)	2649 Points -11%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	21075 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	20639 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (8618 - 23194, n=37)	19449 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	19372 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	16810 Points -13%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	16776 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)	15093 Points -22%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	2135 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	2131 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1669 - 2210, n=37)	2092 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2049 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	1959 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	1933 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)	1897 Points -11%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	31.7 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	31 fps +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	30.5 fps +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	30.1 fps
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (16.8 - 38.9, n=37)	29.3 fps -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	25.6 fps -15%
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)	23.6 fps -22%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	52.1 s * -10%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=183, last 2 years)	48.2 s * -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	47.5 s *
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (31.4 - 199, n=37)	47.5 s * -0%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	43.8 s * +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	37.3 s * +21%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	35 s * +26%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)	0.4366 sec * -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX	0.4195 sec * -11%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.3971 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (0.3604 - 0.4859, n=37)	0.385 sec * -2%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.3797 sec * -0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX	0.3789 sec *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.375 sec * +1%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4456 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

262 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

311 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

10968 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

810 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2117 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

28867 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	95.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	90.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX	90.1 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83.4 pt
Average of class Gaming	76.3 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	66.5 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	27175 KRay/s +6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	25682 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (13098 - 33474, n=36)	24763 KRay/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	22497 KRay/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)	21945 KRay/s -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	19044 KRay/s -26%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	18131 KRay/s -29%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	133962 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	127908 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (67573 - 166040, n=36)	124114 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	115346 Points -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	109158 Points -15%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)	106890 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	95271 Points -26%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	6692 MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	6188 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (3589 - 7979, n=36)	6130 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	6112 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	5937 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)	4916 MB/s -21%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	4214 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138473 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (118405 - 148966, n=36)	138261 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136898 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	135672 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134299 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)	117223 Points -15%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	101500 Points -27%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	15857 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	15467 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (10475 - 18517, n=36)	15241 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	14811 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)	13280 Points -16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	12381 Points -22%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	11913 Points -25%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	68019 Points +6%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	64134 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (32543 - 83662, n=36)	61081 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	55564 Points -13%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)	53779 Points -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	47097 Points -27%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	46539 Points -27%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	210913 MB/s +72%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	204491 MB/s +66%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (86964 - 241777, n=36)	139038 MB/s +13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	127602 MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	122937 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)	109108 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	86485 MB/s -30%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1929 MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1863 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (1054 - 2292, n=36)	1791 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1772 MB/s -5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1724 MB/s -7%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)	1369 MB/s -27%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	1289 MB/s -31%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	14940 KRay/s +7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	13993 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (6809 - 18349, n=36)	13332 KRay/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	12069 KRay/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)	11818 KRay/s -16%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	10316 KRay/s -26%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	9787 KRay/s -30%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	50864 MPixel/s +3%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	50656 MPixel/s +2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	49616 MPixel/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	48753 MPixel/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (23903 - 54702, n=36)	46878 MPixel/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)	40327 MPixel/s -19%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	33763 MPixel/s -32%

系统性能

在 CrossMark 中，Blade 16 领先于对比设备，而在 PCMark 10 中，这款游戏机比具有相同 CPU/GPU 组合的普通笔记本电脑落后约 3%。总的来说，所有对比设备都取得了相似的成绩。

主观而言，系统运行流畅，只有图形切换会在启动应用程序时造成几秒钟的停滞，但这也是许多使用 dGPU 的其他游戏机的情况。

PCMark 10 / Score
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	9068 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (8230 - 9234, n=13)	8674 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8401 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	8374 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7811 Points -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7645 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7597 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	11644 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10778 - 11628, n=13)	11125 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	10972 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10915 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10903 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)	10829 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10804 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11150 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	11067 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9458 - 11759, n=13)	10610 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)	9907 Points -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	9837 Points -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	9241 Points -17%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	8330 Points -25%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	15702 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (13219 - 16462, n=13)	15042 Points +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	14764 Points +12%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	13219 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	13099 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (6807 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)	12167 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	12144 Points -8%

CrossMark / Overall
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2149 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1877 - 2344, n=10)	2119 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2113 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2092 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2019 Points -6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1935 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years)	1910 Points -11%

CrossMark / Productivity
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2007 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1738 - 2162, n=10)	1968 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1957 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1938 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1909 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years)	1809 Points -10%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1764 Points -12%

CrossMark / Creativity
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2430 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2418 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2195 - 2660, n=10)	2387 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2336 Points -3%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	2267 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2222 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years)	2099 Points -13%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	1889 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1478 - 2327, n=10)	1862 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1851 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1792 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1750 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years)	1707 Points -8%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1586 Points -14%

WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	349 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	331 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	330 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (279 - 339, n=10)	323 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	311 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (215 - 480, n=162, last 2 years)	304 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	266 Points -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	266 Points -19%

WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	306 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	304 Points
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (246 - 309, n=8)	291 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	283 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	283 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	283 Points
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	283 Points
Average of class Gaming (176.4 - 328, n=151, last 2 years)	267 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=177, last 2 years)	503 ms * -12%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	486 ms * -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	478 ms * -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	478 ms * -6%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (428 - 535, n=11)	456 ms * -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	453 ms * -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	450 ms *
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	447 ms * +1%

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 10 Score		8401 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78799 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78494 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78266 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	77217 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (38028 - 83392, n=36)	75105 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)	65623 MB/s -17%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	59727 MB/s -24%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86387 MB/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85683 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	85503 MB/s -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	84390 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (43306 - 87568, n=36)	81377 MB/s -6%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	71455 MB/s -17%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)	69502 MB/s -20%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76487 MB/s +1%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76314 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	75421 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (37146 - 80589, n=36)	72406 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	71877 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)	67348 MB/s -11%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	51138 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)	94 ns * -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	89.8 ns * -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86 ns * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86 ns * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-14900HX (76.1 - 105, n=36)	84.7 ns * -2%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	84 ns * -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	83.4 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

一旦打开浏览器，LatencyMon 软件就会检测到轻微的延迟。当在我们的网站上打开多个标签页时，这些延迟就会增加。我们的 4K/60 fps YouTube 视频播放流畅，但有一帧掉帧。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	18846.9 μs * -1256%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2006 μs * -44%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	5340 μs * -284%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	2026.5 μs * -46%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2024.9 μs * -46%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1389.7 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

Razer 在测试设备中安装了一块来自三星的 2-TB PCIe-4-NVMe 固态硬盘。这款速度相对较快的存储设备在我们的最佳榜单的第 13 位。在刀锋战士中，固态硬盘首先以最佳速度运行，但在较长时间内无法保持稳定--由于热节流，它的传输速率在一段时间后下降了约 30%。随后，它仍然保持了较快的速度，不过，Razer确实应该采取措施，确保一开始就不会出现热节流现象。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7066 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5156 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 749 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 534 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 58.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 205 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 2032 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 2559 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	84.2 pt
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	74.3 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	73.6 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	67.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	67.3 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	65.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	53.1 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4182 (4112.68^min - 4181.96^max) MB/s +10%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2376 - 5676, n=32)	3898 MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3795 (3693.04^min - 3794.8^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3552 (3489.45^min - 3551.53^max) MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=165, last 2 years)	3479 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	3087 (3070.23^min - 3086.59^max) MB/s -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2945 (2911.9^min - 2945.45^max) MB/s -22%
seq write
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	8109 (7978.61^min - 8108.5^max) MB/s +114%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2370 - 7628, n=32)	4122 MB/s +9%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4064 (3527.07^min - 4064.49^max) MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3881 (3721.08^min - 3880.99^max) MB/s +2%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=165, last 2 years)	3827 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3794 (3745.51^min - 3793.5^max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2991 (2423.86^min - 2991.17^max) MB/s -21%
seq q8 t1 read
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	7439 (6642.31^min - 7439.43^max) MB/s +11%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3471 - 12556, n=32)	7102 MB/s +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6854 (5913.47^min - 6854.12^max) MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	6673 (5801.28^min - 6672.72^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6651 (5971.64^min - 6651.33^max) MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	6551 (5445.88^min - 6551.19^max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=165, last 2 years)	6322 MB/s -5%
seq q8 t1 write
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	11187 (11074.2^min - 11187.3^max) MB/s +127%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3537 - 10261, n=32)	5469 MB/s +11%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4952 (4919.08^min - 4952.42^max) MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4936 (4909.47^min - 4936.28^max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=165, last 2 years)	4867 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4571 (4228.28^min - 4571.37^max) MB/s -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4562 (4255.12^min - 4561.93^max) MB/s -8%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	83.9 (83.66^min - 83.86^max) MB/s +18%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (56.2 - 91.2, n=32)	77.5 MB/s +9%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	71.4 (66.19^min - 71.35^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	68.8 (67.29^min - 68.75^max) MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=165, last 2 years)	66 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	62.5 (57.13^min - 62.48^max) MB/s -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	49.8 (49.12^min - 49.75^max) MB/s -30%
4k q1 t1 write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	280 (219.78^min - 279.72^max) MB/s +37%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	246 (236.18^min - 245.56^max) MB/s +20%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=165, last 2 years)	223 MB/s +9%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (115.5 - 295, n=32)	214 MB/s +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	205 (202.97^min - 204.75^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	178.4 (174.74^min - 178.37^max) MB/s -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	119.3 (117.59^min - 119.29^max) MB/s -42%
4k q32 t16 read
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4010 (4002.81^min - 4009.85^max) MB/s +8%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3726 (3704.12^min - 3725.6^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3140 (2418.16^min - 3140.47^max) MB/s -16%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (658 - 4075, n=32)	2876 MB/s -23%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=165, last 2 years)	2579 MB/s -31%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1666 (1310.98^min - 1665.65^max) MB/s -55%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1350 (1194.53^min - 1349.82^max) MB/s -64%
4k q32 t16 write
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3548 (3533.85^min - 3548.33^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2646 (2422.02^min - 2645.88^max) MB/s -25%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2213 (924.87^min - 2213.39^max) MB/s -38%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (387 - 3548, n=32)	2190 MB/s -38%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=165, last 2 years)	2134 MB/s -40%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1433 (1370.49^min - 1433.18^max) MB/s -60%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	601 (540.73^min - 601.05^max) MB/s -83%

AS SSD
Score Total
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8677 Points +23%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (3537 - 9031, n=31)	7222 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7040 Points
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)	6749 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6429 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	5751 Points -18%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	4895 Points -30%
Score Read
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3242 Points +14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2848 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2848 Points
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1224 - 3399, n=31)	2666 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)	2444 Points -14%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	2002 Points -30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1890 Points -34%
Score Write
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3846 Points +39%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1081 - 3999, n=31)	3262 Points +18%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)	3119 Points +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	3007 Points +9%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2766 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2255 Points -18%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1903 Points -31%
Seq Read
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	8168.77 MB/s +87%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	5731.31 MB/s +31%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (2591 - 9971, n=31)	5479 MB/s +25%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5413 MB/s +24%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)	4952 MB/s +13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	4823 MB/s +10%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4371 MB/s
Seq Write
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	7332.87 MB/s +93%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (1900 - 8590, n=31)	3992 MB/s +5%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3979 MB/s +5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3791 MB/s
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)	3770 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3153.03 MB/s -17%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2496 MB/s -34%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	81.2 MB/s +33%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (49.8 - 86.4, n=31)	72.4 MB/s +18%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +7%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	62.87 MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	62.66 MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	61.1 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	49.34 MB/s -19%
4K Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	227.62 MB/s +42%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)	212 MB/s +32%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (112.6 - 254, n=31)	197.6 MB/s +23%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	194.6 MB/s +21%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	162.28 MB/s +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	160.6 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	149.1 MB/s -7%
4K-64 Read
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2619 MB/s +11%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2350 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2212.03 MB/s -6%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (662 - 2811, n=31)	2045 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)	1878 MB/s -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	1358 MB/s -42%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1122.07 MB/s -52%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3253 MB/s +46%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (567 - 3414, n=31)	2665 MB/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	2608 MB/s +17%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s +14%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2226 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1712.38 MB/s -23%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	1007.57 MB/s -55%
Access Time Read
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.085 ms * -158%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.059 ms * -79%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)	0.05539 ms * -68%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (0.018 - 0.078, n=31)	0.03406 ms * -3%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	0.033 ms * -0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.033 ms *
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.021 ms * +36%
Access Time Write
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	0.071 ms * -184%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.055 ms * -120%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)	0.04732 ms * -89%
Average Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB (0.017 - 0.092, n=31)	0.03371 ms * -35%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.025 ms *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	0.024 ms * +4%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.02 ms * +20%

* ... smaller is better

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø5414 (3853.78-6701.45)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0): Ø6539 (4611.21-7454.56)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8: Ø6442 (5614.61-6552.24)

Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR; diskspd 2.0.17 f: Ø4118 (3284.7-6662.02)

图形卡

......（英文 RTX 4090是目前笔记本电脑最强大的 GPU。在刀锋 16 中，它甚至可以使用最大 175 瓦（150 瓦 + 25 瓦动态提升，取决于模式）。它还配备了 16 GB 内存。

在合成 3DMark 基准测试中，RTX-4090 的竞争对手都取得了类似的成绩，只有 XMG Neo 16 E23快了约 7%。总而言之，Blade 16 中的 RTX 4090 所取得的成绩与我们数据库中所有配备 RTX 4090 的笔记本电脑的平均成绩相当。与 2023刀锋16只高出 5%。

在电池模式下重复运行另一次 "Fire-Strike"，笔记本电脑的图形分数下降了 85%！

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	98.6 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	93.9 pt
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	93.1 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	93 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	89.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	69.6 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX	52.8 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	72070 Points +9%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	65956 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (54073 - 73027, n=42)	65041 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	63925 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	60602 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43848 Points -34%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX	37410 Points -43%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	152306 Points
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	144209 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	144032 Points -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (95671 - 164399, n=14)	142227 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	140386 Points -8%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	48556 Points +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	46527 Points
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	46386 Points 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (40259 - 53059, n=41)	46365 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	45431 Points -2%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31437 Points -32%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX	27474 Points -41%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	22529 Points +13%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	21391 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16950 - 23292, n=43)	20950 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	19878 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	19836 Points 0%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)	13128 Points -34%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX	11267 Points -43%

3DMark 11 Performance		44454 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		65797 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		34756 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		18732 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX	23 Seconds * -92%
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=179, last 2 years)	20.8 Seconds * -73%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	13 Seconds * -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9 - 19, n=39)	12.1 Seconds * -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	12 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	11 Seconds * +8%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	10 Seconds * +17%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX	41 Seconds * -128%
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=185, last 2 years)	36.9 Seconds * -105%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16 - 24, n=39)	18.3 Seconds * -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	18 Seconds * -0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	18 Seconds *
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	17 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	16 Seconds * +11%
v3.3 Classroom CPU
Average of class Gaming (138 - 962, n=188, last 2 years)	293 Seconds * -45%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-14650HX	247 Seconds * -22%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	224 Seconds * -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	205 Seconds * -1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-14900HX	202 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (144 - 305, n=39)	199.1 Seconds * +1%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	194 Seconds * +4%

* ... smaller is better

游戏

在游戏方面，笔记本电脑也有类似的表现。与上一代产品相比，Blade 再次取得了约 7% 的领先优势。其他上一代竞争对手，如 XMG Neo 16或 Legion 9等其他上一代竞争对手在游戏方面甚至超过了 Blade。

总的来说，Blade 16 的性能足以支持所有 4K 游戏。不过，在运行《Dying Light 》时，它的帧率有时会降至 60 帧以下。

在玩《赛博朋克 2077》1.6 版时，新款刀锋 16 在 4K 超高清下的帧数约为 52 帧。在 4K 下，无论是否使用最佳 GPU，在最高 RT 画质下帧率都会下降到无法播放的数值。

即使使用 DLSS 或帧生成 (FG)，也无法与显示器的刷新率相媲美--至少在其原始 1600p 分辨率下是如此。在《赛博朋克》中，我们测得的刷新率为 53.42fps（DLSS），约为 85fps（FG）。在《使命召唤：现代战争 III》中，系统的刷新率为 161fps（DLSS）和 183fps（FG）；在《艾伦觉醒 II》中，我们测得的刷新率为 73.5fps（DLSS）和 112.6fps（FG）。

下表显示了 Witcher 3FHD Ultra 在各种性能模式下的 FPS、耗电量和体积值。

性能模式/值	Witcher 3 fps（最大/平均）	噪音辐射（分贝）	功耗（瓦特
用户定义（增强/高）	211 / 193	46.81	243
涡轮	203 / 191	46.81	242
平衡	177 / 169	42.99	196
静音	141 / 132	32.16	141

Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	98.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	97.2 pt
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	91.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	84.5 pt
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	69.1 pt
Average of class Gaming	68.9 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	210 (170^min) fps +5%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	208.7 (191^min) fps +4%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	200 fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	174.8 (156^min, 157.44^P1) fps -13%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)	128.5 fps -36%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	97.2 (93^min, 94^P1) fps -51%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	150.7 (3^min, 111.1^P1) fps +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	148.2 (7.32^min, 100^P1) fps +7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138.1 (4.19^min, 83.3^P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	128.7 (3.97^min, 66.7^P1) fps -7%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	120.2 (4.33^min, 76.9^P1) fps -13%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=170, last 2 years)	113.7 fps -18%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	184.9 fps +34%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	181.3 fps +32%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	137.5 fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	122.2 fps -11%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=182, last 2 years)	120 fps -13%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	106.3 fps -23%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	387 (23.7^min, 277^P1) fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	384 (116.1^min, 281^P1) fps +7%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	359.8 (30.2^min, 253^P1) fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	328 (81.9^min, 202^P1) fps -9%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)	229 fps -36%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	210 fps -42%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	193.1 (162.4^min) fps +3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	188.1 (155.2^min) fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	183.5 (149.1^min) fps -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	182.6 (154.9^min) fps -3%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	168.7 (146.8^min) fps -10%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=187, last 2 years)	151.2 fps -20%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	146.2 fps
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	140.1 fps -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	135.6 fps -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	133 fps -9%
Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU	130.9 fps -10%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=194, last 2 years)	108.4 fps -26%

Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	143.4 (82.1^min) fps +38%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	131.4 (23.8^min) fps +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (91 - 159.7, n=20)	124 fps +20%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	103.58 (23.78^min) fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	96.6 (24.5^min) fps -7%
Average of class Gaming (16.7 - 159.7, n=68, last 2 years)	93.5 fps -10%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	112.1 (25.5^min) fps +29%
Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	98.8 (28.3^min) fps +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (75.7 - 116, n=21)	95.4 fps +10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86.7 (25^min) fps 0%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	86.59 (18.87^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (37.7 - 116, n=56, last 2 years)	69.6 fps -20%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (38.8 - 56, n=16)	47.7 fps +3%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	46.1 (15.42^min) fps
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	45.4 (32.6^min) fps -2%
Average of class Gaming (17.4 - 56, n=34, last 2 years)	36 fps -22%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (56.5 - 74, n=8)	65.6 fps +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	62.7 (21.7^min) fps +1%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	62.06 fps
Average of class Gaming (19.1 - 74, n=25, last 2 years)	49 fps -21%
3840x2160 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	19.8 (15.7^min) fps +3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16.5 - 22.4, n=7)	19.7 fps +2%
Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	19.3 fps
Average of class Gaming (3.3 - 22.4, n=11, last 2 years)	16.6 fps -14%

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø192.6 (177-211)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø189.7 (166-213)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø198.7 (181-213)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø205 (192-219)

Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU: Ø97.2 (93-102)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	184	181.9	181.6	138.1	126.9	168
The Witcher 3 (2015)	567	425	354	200	164
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	233	210	201	188.1		187.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	171.7	155.7	137.5		126.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	204	182.3	146.2			145.5
Far Cry 5 (2018)	173	140	134	127	125	103
Strange Brigade (2018)	487	372	368	359.8	279	157
Dying Light 2 (2022)	223.1	196.6	155.6		117.3	59.8
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022)	146.7	138.51	123.6	103.58	86.59	46.1
F1 23 (2023)				113.2	72.4	36.9
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023)				95.35	83.39	39.61
Assassin's Creed Mirage (2023)				130	117	74
Alan Wake 2 (2023)			108.6		78.4	41.6
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 2023 (2023)				179	138	91
Avatar Frontiers of Pandora (2023)				98	67	34

排放与功率 - Razer Blade 提供大量定制选项

噪音排放

在将 CPU 和 GPU 性能最大化的自定义模式下，风扇有时会静止不动，但大多数情况下，风扇会在 27 分贝左右嗡嗡作响，即使在空闲时也是如此。

在平均负载情况下（3DMark 06），风扇分两步加速。在最初的 30 秒内，风扇转速缓慢上升，并在超过 43 分贝之前将平均噪音水平维持了约一分钟。例如，价格便宜得多的戴尔 G16则安静得多，在整个测试过程中输出音量保持在 27 分贝。在这种情况下，该笔记本电脑的前代产品也保持了较低的噪音。

从结果来看，涡轮增压模式在性能或噪音排放方面都没有带来任何优势。 Witcher 3但 Blade 的散热效果更好。

尽管性能几乎相同，但即使在最大压力下，新款 Blade 的噪音也比前代产品小得多。不过，竞争对手在游戏时的噪音更大。

Noise Level

Idle		23 / 23 / 27.66 dB(A)
Load		43.76 / 50.37 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A)

	Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-14900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0)	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8	Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, i7-14650HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
Noise		4%	-2%	-30%	-11%
off / environment *	23	20.84 9%	23.7 -3%	25 -9%	24 -4%
Idle Minimum *	23	23.65 -3%	24 -4%	31 -35%	24 -4%
Idle Average *	23	23.65 -3%	24 -4%	33 -43%	28.8 -25%
Idle Maximum *	27.66	23.65 14%	30.4 -10%	42 -52%	32 -16%
Load Average *	43.76	43.35 1%	30.4 31%	58 -33%	45.5 -4%
Witcher 3 ultra *	46.81	46.7 -0%	52.2 -12%	57 -22%	53.1 -13%
Load Maximum *	50.37	46.72 7%	54.9 -9%	59 -17%	55.7 -11%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在最大压力下，我们测得的热点温度高达 47 °C。如果把设备放在腿上，温度就会过高，但与同类产品相比，温度还是比较低的。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


43 °C	45 °C	38 °C
34 °C	35 °C	33 °C
34 °C	33 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 36.2 °C


40 °C	45 °C	39 °C
37 °C	44 °C	41 °C
32 °C	38 °C	36 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 39.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 47 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


29 °C	29 °C	26 °C
26 °C	27 °C	26 °C
26 °C	26 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 29 °C
Average: 26.8 °C


29 °C	30 °C	28 °C
28 °C	30 °C	28 °C
26 °C	28 °C	26 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 28.1 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


41 °C	45 °C	41 °C
31 °C	36 °C	32 °C
32 °C	34 °C	31 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 35.9 °C


38 °C	46 °C	39 °C
41 °C	47 °C	41 °C
33 °C	37 °C	34 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 39.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 46 °C | Room Temperature 18 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.8 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).

	Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 Intel Core i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU
Heat		-10%	-12%	-2%	-2%
Maximum Upper Side *	45	52 -16%	49.6 -10%	50 -11%	40.4 10%
Maximum Bottom *	45	47.6 -6%	48.6 -8%	51 -13%	43.8 3%
Idle Upper Side *	29	33 -14%	33.2 -14%	28 3%	30.3 -4%
Idle Bottom *	30	30.6 -2%	34.2 -14%	26 13%	35.3 -18%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

与许多其他游戏笔记本电脑不同，Blade 16 有四个扬声器，两个高音扬声器和两个低音扬声器。这为听众提供了均衡的高音和中音，而且与许多竞争对手不同的是，低音也很明显。

不过，这也有其局限性，扬声器的音量仍然不会过大。只有一个 3.5 毫米插孔用于连接模拟设备。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

耗电量

新款 "刀锋战士 "在功耗方面取得了巨大进步。尤其是在空闲状态下，它的耗电量降到了预期的水平；而上一代机型在这种情况下非常耗电。

即使在玩《巫师》时，尽管性能相同甚至略有提高，但功耗也略有下降。现在，只有 328 瓦的理论临时最大功耗要高一些。

Razer 为自己的电源装置感到自豪是理所当然的，这些装置通常比一般第三方制造商的同类解决方案更小，但却能提供相同的性能。附带的 330 瓦电源大小恰好可以吸收峰值负载，而且据 Razer 称，与同类解决方案相比，其体积节省了约 60%。事实上，Razer 电源的体积明显小于戴尔 G16 所配备的 330 瓦电源。戴尔 G16(2024)等产品的 330 瓦电源要小得多。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.02 / 0.02 Watt
Idle	16.9 / 17.8 / 19.6 Watt
Load	128 / 328 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, OLED, 2560x1600, 16"	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, mini-LED, 3840x2400, 16"	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 2x SK Hynix HFS001TEJ9X115N (RAID 0), Mini-LED, 3200x2000, 16"	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Crucial P5 Plus 1TB CT1000P5PSSD8, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-41%	-69%	-6%	10%	-20%	3%
Idle Minimum *	16.9	27.5 -63%	32.3 -91%	8 53%	15.4 9%	16.2 ?(6 - 32.3, n=29) 4%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=155, last 2 years) 20%
Idle Average *	17.8	34.4 -93%	42.6 -139%	18 -1%	19.7 -11%	23.1 ?(10.9 - 42.6, n=29) -30%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=155, last 2 years) -7%
Idle Maximum *	19.6	35.4 -81%	57.9 -195%	28 -43%	20.7 -6%	34.2 ?(11.6 - 57.9, n=29) -74%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=155, last 2 years) -37%
Load Average *	128	147.8 -15%	121 5%	133 -4%	102.6 20%	130.5 ?(79 - 201, n=29) -2%	106.1 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) 17%
Witcher 3 ultra *	243	256 -5%	254 -5%	294 -21%	191.3 21%
Load Maximum *	328	286.7 13%	297.7 9%	399 -22%	246.6 25%	324 ?(221 - 418, n=29) 1%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) 24%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø243 (230.21-266.29)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø256 (245-271)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø254 (244-263)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø294 (270-323)

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø259 (202.16-327.81)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø204 (134.3-287)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø272 (254-298)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø289 (277-346)

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø17.3 (12.33-24.231)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø37.2 (33.2-58.1)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø15.3 (5.82-23.4)

Power consumption with external monitor

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø181.5 (164.8-196.09)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø211 (195.9-228)

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø185.7 (183.65-187.38)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø249 (237-257)

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø170.8 (96.25-193.68)

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø228 (219.42-241.81)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø246 (233-261)

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø233 (225.61-244.99)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø252 (243-269)

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø22.4 (21.053-27.295)

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø32.3 (21.8-57.2)

运行时间

笔记本电脑的电池容量保持不变，仍为 95.2 Ah。运行时间也是如此。我们测得的上网时间约为 5.5 小时，观看视频约为 6.5 小时。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing		5h 29min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness		4h 25min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		7h 36min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 19min

	Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 i9-14900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 RTX 4090 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh	Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 16 E23 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Lenovo Legion 5 16IRX G9 i7-14650HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU, 80 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		6%	-40%	-1%	6%	4%
H.264	456	503 10%		349 -23%	576 26%	413 ?(129 - 837, n=78, last 2 years) -9%
WiFi v1.3	329	345.5 5%	159 -52%	399 21%	444 35%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=153, last 2 years) 14%
Load	79	81 3%	58 -27%		46 -42%	85.7 ?(41 - 173, n=116, last 2 years) 8%
Witcher 3 ultra		95		84		78.3 ?(47 - 155, n=16, last 2 years)
Reader / Idle			404			567 ?(155 - 1290, n=66, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 稳定的金属一体成型机身

+ 小巧轻薄

+ WiFi 7

+ OLED 色彩准确度高，色彩空间覆盖面广

+ 相对较小的电源

Cons

- 与前代产品相比，性能几乎没有提升

- 固态硬盘受热节流

结论 - 从 2023 型升级为 2023 型的理由不多

Razer Blade 16 再次成为一款非常成功的游戏笔记本电脑。它小巧纤薄，功能强大，拥有高品质的外观。凭借其快速而漂亮的 OLED 显示屏，其配置也丰富了一个漂亮的屏幕选择。

不过，同样配备了非常出色的 Mini-LED 显示屏的 2023 机型的用户其实并没有升级的理由--它的性能几乎没有通过 Raptor Lake Refresh 得到提升，也没有为该机型添加任何必备功能。

就像它的前辈一样，2024 版的 Razer Blade 16 是一款非常成功的高端游戏机。然而，与几乎等同的前代产品相比，几乎没有任何升级的理由。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和供应情况

新款 Blade 16 目前在亚马逊上的售价为4,699.99 美元。

▶ load Youtube video

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 - 02/19/2024 v7 ^(old)
Christian Hintze

Chassis

92 / 98 → 94%

Keyboard

83%

Pointing Device

89%

Connectivity

72 / 80 → 90%

Weight

60 / 10-66 → 89%

Battery

69 / 95 → 73%

Display

93%

Games Performance

98%

Application Performance

97%

Temperature

86 / 95 → 91%

Noise

82 / 90 → 91%

Audio

89%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Average

81%

91%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 351 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 471608 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Razer Blade 16 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测：配备超高速三星 OLED 显示屏

Christian Hintze, 2024-02-20 (Update: 2024-08-15)

Razer Blade 16 (2024) 笔记本电脑评测：配备超高速三星 OLED 显示屏

OLED 还是迷你 LED？

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳和连接性 - 金属一体成型机身，带钛金属板

尺寸比较

输入设备 - 触摸板是不是太大了？

显示屏 - 采用 OLED 或 Mini-LED 的 Blade 16？

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 尽管有新一代 CPU，但仍停滞不前

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test

系统性能

DPC 延迟

存储设备

Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放与功率 - Razer Blade 提供大量定制选项

噪音排放

温度

发言人

Razer Blade 16 2024, RTX 4090 audio analysis

Lenovo Legion 9 16IRX8 audio analysis

耗电量

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

运行时间

Pros

Cons

结论 - 从 2023 型升级为 2023 型的理由不多

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison