Notebookcheck Logo

XMG Oasis的Schenker XMG Neo 15回顾。RTX 3080 Ti没有散热限制

水上游戏。

强大的15英寸游戏机的用户往往不得不忍受高温和噪音水平。虽然笔记本电脑组件的效率越来越高,但要想在静音和冷却的高性能笔记本电脑上进行游戏,可能还需要一段时间。也许Schenker认为现在是提供一些实用的临时解决方案的时候了,因此决定通过创造一个带有可选的液体冷却系统的游戏笔记本电脑XMG Oasis来进行试验。这是一项成功的桥接技术吗?在我们的评论中可以找到答案。
Alder Lake Gaming Geforce Intel Laptop / Notebook

今年2月,我们得到了XMG Neo 15的一个预生产模型(连同XMG Oasis)。初步生产的XMG Neo 15模型(与XMG Oasis一起),并收集了初步的基准结果。并收集了初步的基准测试结果。现在,Neo 15和外置的Oasis液体冷却装置已经准备好投入生产,是时候进行适当和彻底的测试了。

我们的审查样本结合了一个i7-12700H和一个 RTX 3080 Ti在一个15.6英寸的机箱中。此外,还有32GB的DDR5和一个几乎完全覆盖sRGB的QHD显示屏。这款机箱来自同方/Uniwill,编号为GM5AG8W。

XMG Neo 15与XMG Oasis
XMG Neo 15与XMG Oasis

外置的XMG Oasis液体冷却装置可以单独购买,价格为199欧元(约合199美元),应该可以提高性能,并降低噪音和温度。

我们看看笔记本电脑和Oasis,并在我们的基准测试中比较有无液冷的Neo 15。为了进行外部比较,我们使用了其他配备RTX 3080 Ti的笔记本电脑,以及前身的笔记本电脑。这些包括 Razer Blade 15,但也包括 华硕ROG Zephyrus Duo 16,以及 Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5Alienware x17 R2 由于缺乏其他配备RTX 3080 Ti的15英寸笔记本电脑。

XMG Neo 15 (2022) (XMG Neo 15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12700H 14 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 95 W PL2 / Short Burst, 95 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), Geforce 512.95, Nvidia Optimus
Memory
32 GB 
, 2x 16 GB Samsung DDR5
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, BOE0A67, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, 1024 GB 
, PCIe 4x, 867 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Speaker-out + Microphone-in, Card Reader: SD-Reader (SD/SDHC/SDXC)
Networking
Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth Bluetooth 5
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 26.6 x 360.2 x 243.5
Battery
93 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Camera
Webcam: HD Webcam
Primary Camera: 1 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo Speaker, Keyboard: optomechanical keyboard with RGB per key, Keyboard Light: yes, 24 Months Warranty, Pickup & Return
Weight
2.26 kg, Power Supply: 1.057 kg
Price
3555.99 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.4 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg26.6 mm15.60"2560x1440
87 %
v7 (old)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
2.2 kg26 mm15.60"2560x1440
89.1 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.1 kg16.99 mm15.60"2560x1440
88.2 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.6 kg20.5 mm16.00"3840x2400
84.7 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2.3 kg22.4 mm16.00"3840x2400
89.2 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3.1 kg20.9 mm17.30"1920x1080

外壳。上面是金属,下面是塑料

XMG Neo 15

相对不显眼的正面LED灯条
相对不显眼的正面LED灯条

对于一个游戏玩家来说,Neo显得相当朴素。除了键盘之外,没有闪烁的RGB元素,甚至连必须的彩色规格贴纸也在掌托上 "失踪"。哑光的黑色设计在功能上很简单,不显眼,也正是因为这些原因而令人愉悦。即使是专业人士也不必为把Neo放在办公桌上而感到尴尬。不过,前面有一种带格子结构的条状物,也可以让键盘背光照射出来,但不会太碍眼。

背面的液体冷却端口
背面的液体冷却端口

初步检查NEO时,一个明显的特征是背面有两个金色的液体冷却管口,由橡胶帽保护。

显示屏的盖子和底板的上端是由金属制成的,而下端是由塑料制成的。底座非常稳定,在受到扭转时不会发出任何破裂或吱吱作响的声音。这也适用于显示盖,但这自然更容易弯曲。铰链也许可以再紧一点,但它们很牢固。

金属表面对指纹和油脂污渍很敏感。建造质量非常好;我们没有发现任何不正常或不均匀的缝隙。

XMG绿洲

外部液体冷却装置的形式是一个黑色塑料盒。冷却剂或蒸馏水从顶部倒入。两个软管接口在一侧的底部,电源接口在另一侧。这是连接Neo的电源的地方,然后从Oasis的一条短线进入Neo的电源槽作为电源馈线。

尼奥的水管和电源线
尼奥的水管和电源线
后面。Neo的电源插座
后面。Neo的电源插座

箱子大约18厘米高,至少一样长,大约7.5厘米宽。顶部是注水孔,由一个小的塑料盖子固定,插入一个橡胶盖,以防止泄漏。

在前面有一个狭窄的、透明的观察柱,你可以在那里看到填充物的水平。不幸的是,这几乎看不到,至少在使用蒸馏水时是如此。一个被水推起的彩色 "球 "或类似的东西在这里会有帮助。

冷却剂从顶部倒入:塑料盖位于一个橡胶密封圈中。
冷却剂从顶部倒入:塑料盖位于一个橡胶密封圈中。
你能看到填充水平吗?提示:就在顶线之前。
你能看到填充水平吗?提示:就在顶线之前。
尼奥和绿洲之间的联系
尼奥和绿洲之间的联系

将Oasis连接到Neo后,你要给Oasis注入蒸馏水。当两个设备连接后,一些水被泵入Neo的冷却回路,因此必须再次添加一点水。之后,水位应保持恒定,只要你不把水从Neo中放出来,就不需要再加水(例如,为了在没有Oasis的情况下把它作为移动笔记本电脑使用)。因此,如何使用冷却剂是根据您自己的笔记本电脑的使用情况而定的。移动用户经常要放掉冷却剂并重新加水。在固定使用中,Oasis几乎不需要加注,因为冷却剂无处可去。

正面
正面
背面
背面

尺寸比较

因为与16英寸和17英寸机型的比较没有什么意义,我们在这里使用其他15英寸的游戏机,也有不同的GPU。

与前代产品相比,没有任何变化。Razer Blade 15比Neo略小且明显更薄,但其他竞争对手往往略大。总的来说,与竞争对手相比,Neo 15在重量或尺寸方面并没有太明显的变化。

363.5 mm 272.9 mm 26.8 mm 2.5 kg360.2 mm 243.5 mm 26.6 mm 2.3 kg359.8 mm 243 mm 26 mm 2.2 kg359 mm 259 mm 25 mm 2.3 kg354 mm 259 mm 27.2 mm 2.3 kg355 mm 235 mm 16.99 mm 2.1 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备。Thunderbolt,FHD网络摄像头和液体冷却端口

Neo 15总共有四个USB端口,其中三个是A型,一个是C型,也是一个Thunderbolt端口。后者支持DisplayPort,但不幸的是,由于与iGPU的连接,它不具备VR功能,而且不支持PowerDelivery。在三个USB-A端口中,只有左边的一个能够达到10Gbit/s,右边的两个只有5Gbit/s(USB 3.2 Gen1对应于USB 3.0)。

两个独立的音频端口也是一个不错的功能。但特别之处当然是位于背面的外部液体冷却端口。

端口分布在三个侧面,其中大部分都在后面。从强大的280瓦电源适配器到笔记本电脑的电缆对我们来说有点短。

左边:Kensington,USB-A 3.2 Gen 1(USB 3.0),麦克风,耳机
左边:Kensington,USB-A 3.2 Gen 1(USB 3.0),麦克风,耳机
右边。SD阅读器,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen1(USB 3.0)。
右边。SD阅读器,2个USB-A 3.2 Gen1(USB 3.0)。
后部:液体冷却端口、带雷电4的USB-C 4.0、HDMI、LAN、电源
后部:液体冷却端口、带雷电4的USB-C 4.0、HDMI、LAN、电源

SD卡阅读器

SD读卡器在右侧,让那些只插入而没有正确锁定的SD卡伸出来一半。虽然传输率的功能多于速度,但至少有一个读卡器。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)
182.9 MB/s +82%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
165.4 MB/s +65%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
155 MB/s +54%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
100.5 (59.03min - 141.54max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)
95.9 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
79 MB/s -21%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK (AV Pro V60)
220.6 MB/s +166%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
185 MB/s +123%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
182 MB/s +119%
Average of class Gaming
  (25.8 - 269, n=87, last 2 years)
120.4 MB/s +45%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)
89 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
83.05 MB/s

沟通

可更换的WiFi模块
可更换的WiFi模块

安装的英特尔AX201模块在2.4和5GHz范围内提供快速传输率,但还不能使用新的6GHz Wifi 6E网络。在测试中,该设备在寻找我们的参考路由器的5GHz网络时屡屡出现问题,它经常不能出现在可用的Wi-Fi连接列表中。

探测到后,连接很稳定,而且速度也令人满意,大约为1600 Mbit/s。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1528 (1341min - 1654max) MBit/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1517 (1451min - 1574max) MBit/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)
1209 (896min - 1302max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1743 (864min - 1763max) MBit/s
Razer Blade 15 2022
 
1470 (1448min - 1522max) MBit/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel AX1675s 160MHz (211NGW)
1399 (1332min - 1446max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1692 (1567min - 1738max) MBit/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1667 (839min - 1727max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (390 - 1734, n=77)
1413 MBit/s -15%
Average of class Gaming
  (680 - 1890, n=147, last 2 years)
1390 MBit/s -17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1030 (752min - 1313max) MBit/s -38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1695 (1556min - 1768max) MBit/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1592 (1234min - 1729max) MBit/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1333 (1044min - 1390max) MBit/s -16%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (438 - 1715, n=72)
1276 MBit/s -20%
Average of class Gaming
  (469 - 1843, n=147, last 2 years)
1227 MBit/s -23%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti); iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1638 (839-1727)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti); iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1592 (1234-1729)

网络摄像头

Schenker使用了一个1080p网络摄像头。这是一个从根本上受欢迎的功能,但尽管是全高清分辨率,质量却相当平庸,而且颜色偏差相当大。

ColorChecker
16.5 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
17.3 ∆E
20.2 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
18.3 ∆E
13.2 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
20.3 ∆E
16.2 ∆E
18.6 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
19.4 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
ColorChecker SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti): 17.13 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 28.97 ∆E

安全问题

有一个Kensington端口,也有TPM。然而,Neo并不提供诸如指纹传感器、红外摄像头或类似的功能。

配件和保修

额外的:鼠标垫和U盘
额外的:鼠标垫和U盘

除了通常的文件之外,Neo还附带了一个典型的Schenker U盘,里面有驱动程序--很实用。还包括一个大的鼠标垫。

德国的保修期为24个月,包括提货和退货服务。这在其他国家和地区可能有所不同,所以在购买前一定要向你的供应商查询。

维护

尼欧15的内部
尼欧15的内部

为了进入内部,总共需要拆掉14颗十字螺丝。幸运的是,所有的螺丝都有相同的长度,包括液体冷却端口的三个。之后,用手可以很容易地撬开底部,最好是从侧面的后方撬开。

一旦进入内部,你可以接触到内存、固态硬盘(包括第二个M.2插槽)、风扇、电池、液体冷却电路和可更换的Wifi模块。

2个RAM插槽
2个RAM插槽
供热和供水管道
供热和供水管道

输入设备。光学机械键盘

键盘

极为整洁的设计
极为整洁的设计
功率和性能模式切换
功率和性能模式切换
你可以偷看钥匙下面
你可以偷看钥匙下面

键盘占据了15英寸底座的整个空间,至少在宽度上是如此。这使得它成为一个成功的正常尺寸的键盘设计,各键之间有良好的间距,右边还有一个小键盘。极为整洁的布局令人欣喜:即使是方向键也有适当的尺寸,一切似乎都在正确的位置。

电源键被设计成键盘上方的一个额外的键,旁边是另一个可以切换性能模式的键。奇怪的是,"结束 "键作为次要功能位于右方向键上,以及它正上方的数字键盘的 "1 "上,所以这两个键是直接在对方上面的。我们花了一些时间才找到键盘照明的按键,其符号很小,在空格键的左上角。

字母总体上比较小,但主要保持在暗色调中,这意味着在白天次优的照明条件下有时无法识别--更亮和/或更大的字母在这里会有帮助。

光学机械键具有良好的打字感觉,行程为2毫米,反馈令人愉快。打字噪音只比 "普通 "键盘略高,但比纯机械键盘低得多。键帽非常薄。你可以看到盖子下面,从而瞥见底层的机械结构。

每个键都可以被单独照亮,而且一个键的任何特殊功能也会被暗中照亮。

触摸板

相当大的触摸板
相当大的触摸板
LED灯亮起:触摸板已停用
LED灯亮起:触摸板已停用

触摸板的尺寸约为11.6 x 7.4厘米,所以它相当大。左上角的白色迷你LED显示它是否被(去)激活。触摸板的表面非常光滑,即使在缓慢的移动过程中也不会造成卡顿。

Schenker依靠的是集成键,这些键要按得很紧,反馈清晰,声音适中,但有时根本无法执行所需的功能。偶尔,连续点击几下都不起作用,但随后通过手指在垫子上敲击一下就起作用了。

显示。QHD,240赫兹,完整的sRGB覆盖率

安装了京东方的雾面QHD IPS面板,刷新率为240赫兹。面板亮度超过300尼特,但分布可以更好,尤其是在左下角,亮度下降得更厉害。黑色水平和对比度是平均水平。

屏幕出血现象只在下角极少可见,而且PWM不用于亮度控制。响应时间令人满意,约为10毫秒。

由于哑光覆盖,子像素略带颗粒感
由于哑光覆盖,子像素略带颗粒感
左下角有轻微的屏幕出血现象
左下角有轻微的屏幕出血现象
342
cd/m²
347
cd/m²
346
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
336
cd/m²
295
cd/m²
350
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
BOE0A67 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 365 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 335.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 365 cd/m²
Contrast: 1141:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.38 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.22
ΔE Greyscale 1.36 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.48
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
BOE0A67, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY2, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Razer Blade 15 2022
Sharp LQ156T1JW03, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
BOE NE160QAM-NX1, IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16"
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Samsung SDC416B, AMOLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
AU Optronics B173HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
1%
24%
24%
11%
Display P3 Coverage
68.2
68.6
1%
99.1
45%
98
44%
79.2
16%
sRGB Coverage
97.2
98.6
1%
99.9
3%
99.9
3%
99.8
3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
69.4
69.3
0%
86.8
25%
86.3
24%
79.6
15%
Response Times
-33%
-24%
9%
79%
-3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
12.4 ?(5.8, 6.6)
16 ?(8.4, 7.6)
-29%
14.4 ?(6.8, 7.6)
-16%
14.6 ?(6.7, 7.9)
-18%
2.4 ?(1.2, 1.2)
81%
12.4 ?(6.4, 6)
-0%
Response Time Black / White *
8.8 ?(4.6, 4.2)
12 ?(6, 6)
-36%
11.6 ?(5.6, 6)
-32%
5.6 ?(2, 3.6)
36%
2 ?(1, 1)
77%
9.2 ?(5.2, 4)
-5%
PWM Frequency
60 ?(58)
Screen
-94%
-39%
-72%
388%
-69%
Brightness middle
365
324
-11%
286
-22%
459
26%
368
1%
365.4
0%
Brightness
335
307
-8%
271
-19%
434
30%
368
10%
344
3%
Brightness Distribution
81
91
12%
89
10%
88
9%
93
15%
85
5%
Black Level *
0.32
0.27
16%
0.25
22%
0.44
-38%
0.01
97%
0.29
9%
Contrast
1141
1200
5%
1144
0%
1043
-9%
36800
3125%
1260
10%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.38
3.36
-143%
2.74
-99%
2.97
-115%
2.33
-69%
3.17
-130%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.01
9.87
-391%
5.21
-159%
8.13
-304%
4.34
-116%
7.69
-283%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.22
1.23
-1%
2.52
-107%
1.03
16%
0.51
58%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.36
5.8
-326%
1.1
19%
4.9
-260%
0.8
41%
5.3
-290%
Gamma
2.48 89%
2.311 95%
2.2 100%
2.235 98%
2.119 104%
2.18 101%
CCT
6412 101%
7087 92%
6408 101%
6775 96%
6569 99%
5879 111%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
69
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
93
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-42% / -65%
-13% / -24%
-13% / -40%
234% / 326%
-20% / -42%

* ... smaller is better

AdobeRGB和DisplayP3的覆盖率都略低于70%,而sRGB几乎完全覆盖,达到97%。例如,Razer Blade在这方面显然更好,因为其面板也几乎完全覆盖了DisplayP3。

sRGB: 97,2%
sRGB: 97,2%
AdobeRGB: 69,4%
AdobeRGB: 69,4%

显示器已经被校准得相当好了,手动校准又在一定程度上降低了已经很低的DeltaE值。我们的ICC配置文件可以在上面下载。

灰度
灰度
饱和度
饱和度
颜色检测器
颜色检测器
灰度标定
灰度标定
饱和度校准
饱和度校准
校准的ColorChecker
校准的ColorChecker

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
8.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.6 ms rise
↘ 4.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
12.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 5.8 ms rise
↘ 6.6 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 22 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

哑光表面、适当的亮度和坚实的对比度确保了在户外对屏幕内容的良好可见性,至少在阴凉处是如此。在阳光下的能见度就比较差了。

在阳光下的室外
在阳光下的室外
阳光下的宽广可视角度
阳光下的宽广可视角度

即使不直接观看,所有内容仍然非常明显。亮度只在极端视角下受到影响。

性能。RTX 3080 Ti和i7-12700H

尼欧15也可使用理论上更快的CPUi9-12900H的组合。 i7-12700HRTX 3080 Ti对于游戏玩家来说也是一个坚实的组合,应该能够流畅地运行所有游戏。如果不是因为色彩空间覆盖率不理想,Neo将是一个有趣的选择,因为它的时尚设计和安静的液体冷却选项,可以用于编辑或内容创作的苛刻任务。

除了CPU之外,用户还可以选择GPU,选择一个 RTX 3070 Ti作为替代。

测试条件

我们的测试比平时更全面,因为我们同时评测两台设备,即一方面是Neo 15,另一方面是带Oasis的Neo 15,这应该会产生不同(更清晰)的基准和排放结果。

我们在XMG控制中心调整了我们的设置。这里你可以选择三种性能模式。平衡模式、热心模式、过度增强模式。为了获得最佳成绩,我们选择了Overboost,但将其保留在默认设置中。然而,RTX 3080 Ti在这里 "只 "得到5W的动态提升。为了获得完整的25W动态提升,你可以在手动设置中把数值设置为最大,我们偶尔会这样做(也为读者指明)。

我们也让XMG Oasis处于正常模式(平衡),但也有两种更安静的模式,在这些模式下,它不太活跃,也不太容易起火。

控制中心:性能简介
控制中心:性能简介
手动功率设置
手动功率设置
动态提升 - 手动
动态提升 - 手动

处理器

芯片 酷睿i7-12700H是游戏笔记本电脑的标准CPU之一。它有14个核心和20个线程,应该能够处理所有当前的任务,尽管有一个更快的替代品,即 i9-12900H.

主电源上的Cinebench R15回路。TDP为95W
主电源上的Cinebench R15回路。TDP为95W
手动PL设置最大化为120W
手动PL设置最大化为120W
不含绿洲的最大120W设置
不含绿洲的最大120W设置
Cinebench R15循环电池。TDP为29W
Cinebench R15循环电池。TDP为29W

在Cinebench R15循环中,i7-12700H始终表现在一个非常高的水平。在Aero 16的多线程基准中,它的表现也与i9-12900H相当,比我们数据库中配备该CPU的普通笔记本电脑快5%到10%。在测试运行中,TDP相当稳定,为95W。

如果你在控制中心手动最大化CPU的限制,在Cinebench循环中达到120W,分数甚至更高(最高2815分,而不是2711分)。然而,尽管有液体冷却,Neo的风扇转速比95W性能峰值时高得多。然而,在没有绿洲的情况下,Neo在开始时短暂地达到119W,然后下降到103W,在测试过程中缓和到98W。

在电池模式下,Cinebench R15的多线程性能有所下降。在电池模式下,Cinebench R15的多线程性能有所下降,不再是95瓦,而是只有29瓦,分数也相应地从2700分左右下降到只有1600分。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) Intel Core i7-12700H: Ø2688 (2667.56-2711.13)
Razer Blade 15 2022 Intel Core i7-12800H: Ø2081 (2061.43-2178.41)
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2247 (2222.47-2257.72)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5 Intel Core i9-12900HK: Ø2616 (2562.79-2779.9)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
82.2 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
74.7 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
73.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
72.2 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
65.4 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
64.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
62.2 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
59.1 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Gaming
  (5668 - 36249, n=189, last 2 years)
21994 Points +25%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18106 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
17971 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
17626 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4032 - 19330, n=63)
15636 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
14893 (13078min - 14893.1max) Points -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
14088 Points -20%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
14085 Points -20%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1940 Points +7%
Average of class Gaming
  (1136 - 2235, n=188, last 2 years)
1894 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1808 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
1800 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1796 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (778 - 1826, n=62)
1758 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1566 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
1520 Points -16%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (2179 - 13832, n=186, last 2 years)
8352 Points +24%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6941 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
6915 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
6741 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1576 - 7407, n=63)
5933 Points -12%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5731 Points -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5489 Points -19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
5408 Points -20%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Gaming
  (439 - 856, n=186, last 2 years)
727 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
696 Points +1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
690 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
690 Points
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
685 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (300 - 704, n=63)
679 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
595 Points -14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
581 Points -16%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming
  (905 - 5663, n=193, last 2 years)
3440 Points +27%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
2780 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
2749 (2683.66min - 2748.76max) Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
2711 (2667.56min - 2711.13max) Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1379 - 2916, n=69)
2517 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
2292 Points -15%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
2178 (2061.43min - 2178.41max) Points -20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
2173 (2123.03min - 2172.97max) Points -20%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
279 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (191.9 - 318, n=190, last 2 years)
278 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
262 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
261 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
258 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (113 - 263, n=64)
253 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
249 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
230 Points -12%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
226 Seconds * -27%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (168 - 732, n=62)
225 Seconds * -27%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
220 Seconds * -24%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
217 Seconds * -22%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
200 Seconds * -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
177.7 Seconds *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
175.8 Seconds * +1%
Average of class Gaming
  (87 - 555, n=181, last 2 years)
169.4 Seconds * +5%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Gaming
  (23795 - 140932, n=185, last 2 years)
85738 MIPS +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
71914 MIPS 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
71756 MIPS
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
68520 MIPS -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
64457 MIPS -10%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
61936 MIPS -14%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (22844 - 73067, n=62)
60292 MIPS -16%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
56758 MIPS -21%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Gaming
  (4199 - 7581, n=185, last 2 years)
6322 MIPS +8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
6186 MIPS +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
5848 MIPS
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
5822 MIPS 0%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
5727 MIPS -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
5726 MIPS -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
5716 MIPS -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2743 - 5972, n=62)
5648 MIPS -3%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (4557 - 23194, n=186, last 2 years)
15098 Points +15%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
13865 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
13493 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
13161 Points
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
12434 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (5144 - 13745, n=63)
11729 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
10167 Points -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
9851 Points -25%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Gaming
  (986 - 2210, n=186, last 2 years)
1898 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
1870 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
1795 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
1758 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
1755 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (803 - 1851, n=63)
1732 Points -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
1625 Points -7%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
1594 Points -9%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (6.72 - 38.9, n=185, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +14%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
20.9 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
20.7 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
18.1 fps -13%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
18 fps -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
17.4 fps -16%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
17.2 fps -17%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (4.67 - 21.8, n=63)
16.7 fps -19%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
51.5 s * -7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
48.2 s *
Average of class Gaming
  (31.4 - 199, n=182, last 2 years)
48.1 s * -0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
46.8 s * +3%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (34.2 - 95.3, n=62)
45.7 s * +5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
45 s * +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
41.3 s * +14%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
39 s * +19%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.556 sec * -22%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
0.4799 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (0.4441 - 1.052, n=62)
0.4723 sec * -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H
0.4715 sec * -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4565 sec *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H
0.4564 sec * -0%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.3609 - 0.759, n=186, last 2 years)
0.4366 sec * +4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK
0.4155 sec * +9%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2711 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
201 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
262 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
6741 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
690 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1808 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
17626 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Gaming
 
97.1 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
84.6 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
67.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62.6 pt
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
 
62.5 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62.2 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55.3 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (4986 - 60169, n=182, last 2 years)
21963 KRay/s +140%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
16852 KRay/s +84%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (2585 - 17957, n=62)
10834 KRay/s +18%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9759 KRay/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9246 KRay/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9159 KRay/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
8265 KRay/s -10%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
7671 KRay/s -16%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Gaming
  (25360 - 252486, n=182, last 2 years)
106952 Points +156%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
103794 Points +149%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12439 - 90760, n=62)
52825 Points +27%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
43695 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41723 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
41578 Points 0%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38277 Points -8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
36695 Points -12%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Gaming
  (1339 - 10389, n=182, last 2 years)
4920 MB/s +52%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3547 MB/s +10%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3504 MB/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3235 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
3226 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (833 - 4242, n=62)
3077 MB/s -5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2931 MB/s -9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
2681 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Gaming
  (50699 - 200651, n=182, last 2 years)
117347 Points +20%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107120 Points +9%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107042 Points +9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
104920 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98325 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98058 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (57923 - 103202, n=62)
97916 Points 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
93492 Points -5%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Gaming
  (4800 - 32988, n=182, last 2 years)
13290 Points +34%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
12955 Points +31%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
10402 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9928 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9923 Points
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9655 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9205 Points -7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (3249 - 9939, n=62)
9055 Points -9%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57334 Points +123%
Average of class Gaming
  (12321 - 134044, n=182, last 2 years)
53819 Points +109%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (7135 - 44760, n=62)
27939 Points +9%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
27285 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
26008 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
25690 Points
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
22873 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
21312 Points -17%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
139407 MB/s +115%
Average of class Gaming
  (19065 - 328679, n=182, last 2 years)
109208 MB/s +68%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
106367 MB/s +64%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
91041 MB/s +40%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (31839 - 144360, n=62)
85388 MB/s +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65972 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64966 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55775 MB/s -14%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Gaming
  (373 - 2409, n=182, last 2 years)
1369 MB/s +21%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1203 MB/s +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1142 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
1128 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
988 MB/s -12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (305 - 1171, n=62)
970 MB/s -14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
928 MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
890 MB/s -21%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Gaming
  (2540 - 31796, n=182, last 2 years)
11830 KRay/s +122%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
9001 KRay/s +69%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (1437 - 9692, n=62)
5986 KRay/s +12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5748 KRay/s +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5392 KRay/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
5337 KRay/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4776 KRay/s -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
4173 KRay/s -22%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40992 MPixel/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40824 MPixel/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40310 MPixel/s
Average of class Gaming
  (10805 - 60161, n=183, last 2 years)
40303 MPixel/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38990 MPixel/s -3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
34534 MPixel/s -14%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (12863 - 52207, n=62)
33149 MPixel/s -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
29705 MPixel/s -26%

系统性能

在PCMark 10中,我们的Neo 15与Razer Blade 15和Aero 16持平。只有Alienware x17稍稍领先。因此,XMG Oasis并没有带来任何与性能有关的优势。

PCMark 10
PCMark 10
PCMark 10 / Score
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
8186 Points +8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
7816 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (5776 - 9852, n=163, last 2 years)
7813 Points +3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7706 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7579 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6868 - 7638, n=7)
7382 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7376 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7190 Points -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
6351 Points -16%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
11205 Points +6%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10945 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (9057 - 12334, n=162, last 2 years)
10836 Points +2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
10708 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10586 Points
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (9987 - 11318, n=7)
10543 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10271 Points -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9987 Points -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9374 Points -11%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
10144 Points +11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
10050 Points +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (6662 - 14612, n=162, last 2 years)
9909 Points +9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
9581 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8944 - 10726, n=7)
9480 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9318 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
9111 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
8983 Points -1%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7704 Points -15%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
13098 Points +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
12249 Points
Average of class Gaming
  (6807 - 18475, n=162, last 2 years)
12168 Points -1%
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
12104 Points -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
11777 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
11704 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (8956 - 12249, n=7)
10984 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10932 Points -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9626 Points -21%
CrossMark / Overall
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2113 Points +17%
Average of class Gaming
  (1247 - 2344, n=144, last 2 years)
1910 Points +6%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1903 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1761 - 1861, n=4)
1823 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1808 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1761 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1711 Points -5%
CrossMark / Productivity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2031 Points +20%
Average of class Gaming
  (1299 - 2204, n=144, last 2 years)
1809 Points +7%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1808 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1645 - 1800, n=4)
1732 Points +2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1698 Points 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1696 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1645 Points -3%
CrossMark / Creativity
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2161 Points +6%
Average of class Gaming
  (1275 - 2660, n=144, last 2 years)
2099 Points +3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
2095 Points +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2041 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2006 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1936 - 2041, n=4)
1984 Points -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1724 Points -16%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2228 Points +46%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1715 Points +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (1030 - 2330, n=144, last 2 years)
1707 Points +12%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1666 Points +9%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (1461 - 1868, n=4)
1658 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1526 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1461 Points -4%
PCMark 10 Score
7579 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Gaming
  (21842 - 94222, n=182, last 2 years)
65546 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62646 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62532 MB/s 0%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62522 MB/s 0%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
62419 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25615 - 80511, n=62)
53891 MB/s -14%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53861 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53162 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Gaming
  (23681 - 99713, n=182, last 2 years)
69486 MB/s +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66724 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66478 MB/s
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65933 MB/s -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65835 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (25586 - 79442, n=62)
57340 MB/s -14%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57237 MB/s -14%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53321 MB/s -20%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Gaming
  (22986 - 108954, n=182, last 2 years)
67309 MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66074 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65444 MB/s 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
65252 MB/s
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
61981 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
57180 MB/s -12%
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (23679 - 88660, n=62)
54793 MB/s -16%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
54443 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98.4 ns *
Average of class Gaming
  (59.5 - 259, n=182, last 2 years)
93.8 ns *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.3 ns *
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
89.7 ns *
Average Intel Core i7-12700H
  (76.2 - 133.9, n=60)
77.8 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
0 ns *
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns *
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
0 ns *

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

LatencyMon一打开就显示延迟,打开多个标签后,延迟会增加。播放我们的4K/60帧的YouTube视频时,延迟值进一步增加,但只有一个丢帧的结果。总的来说,延迟明显过高,与其他设备相比也是如此。

YouTube测试
YouTube测试
LatencyMon主
LatencyMon主
LatencyMon驱动程序
LatencyMon驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2181.7 μs *
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1364 μs * +37%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1101.9 μs * +49%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
623 μs * +71%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
533 μs * +76%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
521.5 μs * +76%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

在AS SSD中,980 Pro的得分低于平均水平。
在AS SSD中,980 Pro的得分低于平均水平。

Schenker安装了著名的三星SSD 980 Pro(1TB),它在我们的SSD/HDD排名而且速度非常快。

在尼奥中,它的性能在一段时间内是一致的,但它的读取性能尤其落后于我们数据库中的平均模型。它也比前辈的相同型号要慢。

Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 6935.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 5179.6 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 449.67 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 372.34 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 74.47 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 147.71 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 393.82 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 1053.42 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
80.7 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
74.3 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
66.9 pt
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
 
64.7 pt
Average of class Gaming
 
58.2 pt
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
56.4 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
55.9 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
52.7 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
4931 (4875.77min - 4930.83max) MB/s +33%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
4903 MB/s +32%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4119 (4098.66min - 4118.81max) MB/s +11%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2659 - 4315, n=26)
3877 MB/s +5%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3819 (3405.77min - 3819.33max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3705 (3693.25min - 3705.04max) MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (1319 - 7045, n=164, last 2 years)
3477 MB/s -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3385 (3365.72min - 3385.43max) MB/s -9%
seq write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7889 (6495.73min - 7888.81max) MB/s +148%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
4819 (4728.89min - 4819.25max) MB/s +51%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
4457 MB/s +40%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4167 (4120.63min - 4166.62max) MB/s +31%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (2839 - 4493, n=26)
3893 MB/s +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (535 - 9307, n=164, last 2 years)
3818 MB/s +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3185 (2997.88min - 3185.36max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2842 (2816.48min - 2842.27max) MB/s -11%
seq q8 t1 read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
13195 (9412.86min - 13194.8max) MB/s +94%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
10557 (9742.97min - 10557.3max) MB/s +55%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
7028 (6634.28min - 7027.76max) MB/s +3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
6921 (6631.14min - 6921.02max) MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6809 (5948.57min - 6809.45max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6574 (5853.99min - 6573.59max) MB/s -3%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3227 - 6902, n=26)
6544 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (2594 - 16089, n=164, last 2 years)
6318 MB/s -7%
seq q8 t1 write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
9830 (9799.27min - 9829.82max) MB/s +98%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
8227 (8104.29min - 8226.71max) MB/s +66%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
5004 (4980.32min - 5004.43max) MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4970 (4954.68min - 4969.54max) MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4920 (4893.91min - 4919.52max) MB/s -1%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3184 - 5087, n=26)
4879 MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (539 - 14571, n=164, last 2 years)
4859 MB/s -2%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4740 (4542.15min - 4740.19max) MB/s -5%
4k q1 t1 read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
88.7 MB/s +19%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (61.1 - 94.3, n=26)
79.9 MB/s +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
79.6 (78.85min - 79.63max) MB/s +7%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
79.3 (77.82min - 79.25max) MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
77.3 (77.09min - 77.34max) MB/s +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
74.7 (73.84min - 74.66max) MB/s
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
73.1 (72.79min - 73.06max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming
  (30.6 - 95.9, n=164, last 2 years)
65.9 MB/s -12%
4k q1 t1 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
373 (371.9min - 373.21max) MB/s +143%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
359 (324.09min - 358.58max) MB/s +134%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
256 (23.49min - 256.28max) MB/s +67%
Average of class Gaming
  (78 - 397, n=164, last 2 years)
223 MB/s +45%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (132.2 - 311, n=26)
217 MB/s +41%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
170.2 (168.21min - 170.2max) MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
169 (167.84min - 168.95max) MB/s +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
153.4 (152.53min - 153.37max) MB/s
4k q32 t16 read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3555 (3552.55min - 3555.1max) MB/s +284%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (895 - 4483, n=26)
3197 MB/s +245%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3184 (3180.75min - 3183.86max) MB/s +244%
Average of class Gaming
  (417 - 6172, n=164, last 2 years)
2565 MB/s +177%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
2390 (2226.95min - 2390.15max) MB/s +158%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1271 (1259.92min - 1271.12max) MB/s +37%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
926 (908.86min - 925.85max) MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
874 (867.39min - 873.79max) MB/s -6%
4k q32 t16 write
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3612 (3585.78min - 3612.01max) MB/s +909%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (345 - 4383, n=26)
2341 MB/s +554%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2141 (2137.08min - 2141.26max) MB/s +498%
Average of class Gaming
  (162.3 - 4869, n=164, last 2 years)
2128 MB/s +494%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1542 (1501.74min - 1541.63max) MB/s +331%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
470 (454.64min - 470.28max) MB/s +31%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
461 (442.02min - 461.29max) MB/s +29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
358 (345.46min - 358.45max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
9380 Points +67%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
7659 Points +36%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (3394 - 9322, n=24)
7334 Points +30%
Average of class Gaming
  (2271 - 13854, n=155, last 2 years)
6733 Points +20%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6724 Points +19%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
6635 Points +18%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5629 Points
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
4941 Points -12%
Score Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3634 Points +142%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
3431 Points +129%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1501 - 3512, n=24)
2811 Points +87%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
2619 Points +74%
Average of class Gaming
  (776 - 4721, n=155, last 2 years)
2440 Points +63%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1948 Points +30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1850 Points +23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1501 Points
Score Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4058 Points +17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3991 Points +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3462 Points
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1130 - 4194, n=24)
3159 Points -9%
Average of class Gaming
  (515 - 7208, n=155, last 2 years)
3109 Points -10%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2563 Points -26%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
2556 Points -26%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
2137 Points -38%
Seq Read
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
6561.69 MB/s +30%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
5750 MB/s +14%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
5588 MB/s +10%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
5344.88 MB/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5065 MB/s
Average of class Gaming
  (2260 - 12763, n=155, last 2 years)
4948 MB/s -2%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (545 - 5692, n=24)
4838 MB/s -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4830 MB/s -5%
Seq Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
7663.27 MB/s +186%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
4073 MB/s +52%
Average of class Gaming
  (495 - 11316, n=155, last 2 years)
3759 MB/s +40%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (1613 - 4136, n=24)
3490 MB/s +30%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
3480.87 MB/s +30%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3267 MB/s +22%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2678 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2032 MB/s -24%
4K Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
109.4 MB/s +53%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (53.5 - 86.8, n=24)
72 MB/s +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
71.34 MB/s
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
69.21 MB/s -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
68.93 MB/s -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
67.2 MB/s -6%
Average of class Gaming
  (27.8 - 112.1, n=155, last 2 years)
65 MB/s -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
62.3 MB/s -13%
4K Write
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
328.69 MB/s +81%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
321.6 MB/s +77%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
221.3 MB/s +22%
Average of class Gaming
  (108.8 - 512, n=155, last 2 years)
212 MB/s +17%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (134.6 - 254, n=24)
188.8 MB/s +4%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
184.49 MB/s +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
181.62 MB/s
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
146.4 MB/s -19%
4K-64 Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
2966 MB/s +221%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
2789 MB/s +202%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (915 - 2938, n=24)
2234 MB/s +142%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
2015.68 MB/s +118%
Average of class Gaming
  (451 - 3475, n=155, last 2 years)
1874 MB/s +103%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1305 MB/s +41%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1223.07 MB/s +33%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
922.98 MB/s
4K-64 Write
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3708 MB/s +23%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
3342 MB/s +11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3012.05 MB/s
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (557 - 3708, n=24)
2622 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming
  (277 - 5909, n=155, last 2 years)
2524 MB/s -16%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
1934 MB/s -36%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
1604.89 MB/s -47%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
1460.96 MB/s -51%
Access Time Read
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
0.056 ms * -33%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.016 - 0.379, n=154, last 2 years)
0.05551 ms * -32%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
0.053 ms * -26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.042 ms *
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (0.022 - 0.073, n=24)
0.04075 ms * +3%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
0.03 ms * +29%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.029 ms * +31%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.023 ms * +45%
Access Time Write
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
0.066 ms * -200%
Razer Blade 15 2022
SSSTC CA6-8D1024
0.058 ms * -164%
Average of class Gaming
  (0.011 - 1.028, n=155, last 2 years)
0.04751 ms * -116%
Average Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
  (0.018 - 0.089, n=24)
0.03363 ms * -53%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.027 ms * -23%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.022 ms *
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
0.013 ms * +41%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Phison ESR01TBMFCT
0.012 ms * +45%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

034569010351380172520702415276031053450379541404485483051755520586562106555Tooltip

图形卡

为了利用XMG Oasis的全部潜力,Schenker部署了RTX 3080 Ti。这是目前笔记本电脑上最强大的显卡,可以确保在4K及以上的游戏中保持流畅的帧率。

在3DMarks方面,带Oasis的Neo 15始终领先于不带Oasis的Neo 15,但只是在低个位数范围内的几个百分点。尽管配备和不配备Oasis的Neo总是领先于选定的竞争对手,但其前身配备的 RTX 3080几乎没有任何差错。

在电池模式下,3D性能急剧下降。再运行Fire Strike ,只能得到2643个点,而不是大约31000个点!

3DMark 11
3DMark 11
3DMarkFire Strike
3DMarkFire Strike
3DMarkTime Spy
3DMarkTime Spy
3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Gaming
 
99.6 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
98.1 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
95 pt
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
93.8 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
90.9 pt
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
87.9 pt
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
86.5 pt
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
75.1 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming
  (1029 - 72178, n=182, last 2 years)
43891 Points +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
43032 Points +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
42087 Points +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
40518 Points
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
40257 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (13920 - 45841, n=45)
39402 Points -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
37438 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
33249 Points -18%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
31799 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming
  (781 - 53059, n=193, last 2 years)
31461 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
31341 Points +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
30976 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (6928 - 34439, n=43)
29496 Points -5%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
28601 Points -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
27562 Points -11%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
24580 Points -21%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming
  (224 - 22717, n=188, last 2 years)
13142 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
12635 Points +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12700H
12055 Points
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
11916 Points -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (4921 - 13835, n=43)
11850 Points -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
11227 Points -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-12800H
11071 Points -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-12900HK
9488 Points -21%
3DMark 11 Performance
34407 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
65137 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
27169 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
12294 points
Help

游戏性能

在游戏中,液体冷却的优势取决于所选择的游戏。在Witcher 3 或《Far Cry 5》中,使用Oasis(标准超增压)没有可衡量的帧数优势,但在《赛博朋克》中却有,其优势至少为8%。但总的来说,这些优势可以忽略不计,因为Neo 15中的RTX 3080 Ti在没有Oasis的情况下仍然有足够的能力在FullHD中实现光线追踪效果(Cyberpunk)。

我们用最大的Overboost值测量了Dying Light 2。在这里,Neo在有Oasis的情况下总是比没有Oasis的情况下快8%左右,与《赛博朋克2077》相似。然而,即使是RTX 3080 Ti也不足以在原生分辨率下实现高光线追踪效果,只能达到平均25帧。

The Witcher 3
1920x1080 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Gaming
  (129 - 451, n=28, last 2 years)
266 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
262 fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (235 - 310, n=8)
259 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
255.7 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
227 (198min) fps -11%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
267.7 (247min) fps +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (40.1 - 449, n=119, last 2 years)
243 fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
242.8 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
227.3 fps -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (144 - 268, n=28)
220 fps -9%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
213.7 (196min) fps -12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
198 (174min) fps -18%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
197.9 (47.7min, 61.4P0.1, 127.7P1) fps -18%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
144 (33.3min, 39.8P0.1, 65P1) fps -41%
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming
  (18.4 - 216, n=162, last 2 years)
128.5 fps +1%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
128 (124min) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
127.8 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
124.6 fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 130.6, n=43)
112.1 fps -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111.1 (30min, 41.5P0.1, 74.7P1) fps -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
108 (88min) fps -15%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107.2 (99min) fps -16%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.2 (19.1min, 45.8P0.1, 67.7P1) fps -28%
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6
1920x1080 High Preset
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
116.2 (29.8min) fps +15%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
109.1 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (64 - 145.6, n=14)
102.8 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
100.93 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (12.2 - 205, n=57, last 2 years)
99.1 fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
98.3 (22.1min) fps -3%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
72.4 (49.6min) fps -28%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
115.7 (46.4min) fps +39%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
99.1 (29min) fps +19%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (54 - 144.1, n=16)
93.6 fps +12%
Average of class Gaming
  (16.7 - 159.7, n=68, last 2 years)
93.5 fps +12%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
89.9 fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
83.23 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
73.2 (55.1min) fps -12%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset
Average of class Gaming
  (37.7 - 116, n=56, last 2 years)
69.6 fps +30%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
69.56 fps +30%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (36 - 69.6, n=13)
55.4 fps +4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53.7 (33.5min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
53.37 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
39.7 (26.6min) fps -26%
1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
49.9 (28.1min) fps +27%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.1 - 74, n=25, last 2 years)
49 fps +25%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (39.2 - 49.9, n=7)
43.3 fps +10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
42.2 fps +8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40.3 (29.8min) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
39.21 fps
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
144 (119min) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
142 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (118 - 167, n=22)
141.7 fps 0%
Average of class Gaming
  (35 - 232, n=97, last 2 years)
140.2 fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
140 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
130 (105min) fps -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
127 (94min) fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
120 (73min) fps -15%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
135 (107min) fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
134 fps +2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (111 - 162, n=24)
133 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
132 fps
Average of class Gaming
  (34 - 218, n=100, last 2 years)
131.2 fps -1%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
122 (97min) fps -8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
120 (95min) fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111 (82min) fps -16%
2560x1440 Ultra Preset AA:T
Average of class Gaming
  (71 - 194, n=80, last 2 years)
119.6 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
118 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
116 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (86 - 134, n=20)
114.3 fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
107 (85min) fps -8%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
107 (90min) fps -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
104 (75min) fps -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
86 (77min) fps -26%
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
180.8 (3.24min, 142.9P1) fps +2%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
179 (3.17min, 143P1) fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
177.7 (3.45min, 125P1) fps
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
177 (3.71min, 125P1) fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (153.4 - 184.3, n=28)
175.1 fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
172 (4.4min, 125P1) fps -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
170.2 (3.96min, 125P1) fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (24.2 - 187.1, n=144, last 2 years)
169.6 fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
158.9 (4.88min, 111.1P1) fps -11%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
126.3 (5.94min, 90.9P1) fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
123.1 (5.36min, 83.3P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
119.5 (7.19min, 83.3P1) fps -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
118 (4.44min, 76.9P1) fps -4%
Average of class Gaming
  (12.1 - 167.7, n=169, last 2 years)
113.8 fps -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
113 (20.6min, 76.9P1) fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 139.2, n=42)
111 fps -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
109 (6.01min, 76.9P1) fps -11%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
101.5 (21.1min, 71.4P1) fps -18%
2560x1440 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
110.8 (4.43min, 71.4P1) fps
Average of class Gaming
  (36.9 - 160.6, n=111, last 2 years)
107.1 fps -3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
106.6 (7.28min, 76.9P1) fps -4%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30 - 121.2, n=28)
98.2 fps -11%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
97.8 (4.26min, 62.5P1) fps -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.2 (19.3min, 66.7P1) fps -17%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
82.7 (20.6min, 55.6P1) fps -25%
Strange Brigade
1920x1080 high AA:high AF:8
Average of class Gaming
  (49.4 - 465, n=151, last 2 years)
256 fps +14%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
243 (91.8min, 171.1P1) fps +8%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
226 (42.3min, 155.2P1) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
225 (88.1min, 166.3P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
221 (85.5min, 166P1) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (156 - 255, n=29)
219 fps -3%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
205 (74.7min, 147P1) fps -9%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
198.8 (67.5min, 136.8P1) fps -12%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
168 (43.1min, 131P1) fps -25%
1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 421, n=178, last 2 years)
229 fps +14%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
213 (71.8min, 156.1P1) fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
201 (40.6min, 148.9P1) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
201 (32.1min, 147.3P1) fps 0%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
197 (83.8min, 141P1) fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (42.3 - 224, n=41)
187.3 fps -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
184 (33.3min, 131P1) fps -8%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
182.4 (66.8min, 132.6P1) fps -9%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
151 (35.4min, 116P1) fps -25%
2560x1440 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Average of class Gaming
  (52.8 - 322, n=122, last 2 years)
190.7 fps +31%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
151 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
146 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (34.8 - 166.8, n=28)
140.4 fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
140.2 (57.9min, 105.5P1) fps -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
132 (78.6min, 106P1) fps -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
113 (40.6min, 86.9P1) fps -23%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
167.8 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
158.5 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
157 fps -1%
Average of class Gaming
  (33.5 - 230, n=144, last 2 years)
155.1 fps -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (110 - 189.3, n=27)
151.7 fps -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
141 fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
139 fps -12%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
138.7 fps -12%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
110 fps -31%
1920x1080 High Quality
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
127.8 fps +10%
Average of class Gaming
  (19.2 - 201, n=181, last 2 years)
120.1 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
119.6 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
116.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30.7 - 140.6, n=42)
113.8 fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
108 fps -7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
106 fps -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
105 fps -10%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
85.8 fps -26%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (32.5 - 169.2, n=132, last 2 years)
104.7 fps +19%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
92.2 fps +5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
87.8 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (30.8 - 105.8, n=34)
85.9 fps -2%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
84.6 fps -4%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
82.9 fps -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
80.6 fps -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64.8 fps -26%
X-Plane 11.11
1920x1080 med (fps_test=2)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
143.9 fps +18%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
140 fps +14%
Average of class Gaming
  (38.9 - 193.1, n=186, last 2 years)
138.4 fps +13%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
134 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (35.2 - 164.7, n=43)
125.6 fps +3%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
123.2 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
122.4 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
104 fps -15%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
95.1 fps -22%
1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
112.9 fps +14%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
110 fps +11%
Average of class Gaming
  (32.8 - 166.2, n=193, last 2 years)
108.5 fps +9%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
108 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (32.6 - 127, n=45)
101.1 fps +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
100 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
99.4 fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
82.8 fps -17%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
78.2 fps -21%
3840x2160 high (fps_test=3)
Average of class Gaming
  (64.3 - 145.5, n=63, last 2 years)
104.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (32.9 - 109.5, n=20)
82.7 fps
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
78.6 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
66.1 fps
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
168 (146.5min) fps +8%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
166.6 (146.7min) fps +7%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
164 (142.8min) fps +5%
Average of class Gaming
  (69.3 - 244, n=185, last 2 years)
162.2 fps +4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
155.9 (136.3min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
155 (135.1min) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
154 (134.3min) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (29.9 - 180.8, n=45)
148.1 fps -5%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
114.8 (99.4min) fps -26%
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
160 (139.4min) fps +7%
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
158.9 (139.1min) fps +6%
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
156 (135.1min) fps +4%
Average of class Gaming
  (65.1 - 220, n=186, last 2 years)
151.2 fps +1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
149.9 (129.9min) fps
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
147.9 (129.5min) fps -1%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
146 (126.6min) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (29.9 - 170.5, n=45)
141.1 fps -6%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
111.3 (96.1min) fps -26%
Dying Light 2
1920x1080 Medium Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (64 - 206, n=7, last 2 years)
122.9 fps +28%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
103 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
96 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (79 - 103, n=5)
93.1 fps -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
88.4 (36.2min, 69.4P0.1, 80.1P1) fps -8%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
79 (30.1min, 37.7P0.1, 70.5P1) fps -18%
1920x1080 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (52 - 174, n=10, last 2 years)
109.8 fps +32%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
88.4 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
83 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (69.2 - 88.4, n=5)
80.5 fps -3%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
77.6 (65.2min, 69.1P0.1, 71.6P1) fps -7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
69.2 (52min, 58.4P0.1, 62.9P1) fps -17%
2560x1440 High Quality
Average of class Gaming
  (35.6 - 121, n=9, last 2 years)
80.8 fps +35%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
64 fps +7%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
60 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (49.6 - 64, n=5)
57.7 fps -4%
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
55.8 (49.5min, 51.1P0.1, 52.2P1) fps -7%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
49.6 (25.1min, 40.2P0.1, 44.3P1) fps -17%
1920x1080 High Quality Raytracing
Average of class Gaming
  (19.8 - 83.9, n=10, last 2 years)
50.2 fps +26%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
42.3 fps +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
40 fps
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
38.8 (22.1min, 25.7P0.1, 30.7P1) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
  (33.4 - 42.3, n=5)
38.5 fps -4%
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
33.4 (23.3min, 24.3P0.1, 27.8P1) fps -16%

Witcher 3 Ultra下的帧率在一个小时内保持非常稳定。

在所有情况下,使用和不使用Oasis的帧数差异相当小,但有一个模式。例如,如果你在Neo(没有绿洲)中把所有的值都最大化,性能输出也是最大化的。然而,由于强烈的热需求,这很快就会下降,有时甚至低于Neo在标准超增中的帧数。

有了Oasis,情况就不同了:在这里,标准Overboost的性能输出与Neo(没有Oasis)相当,但它不会随着时间的推移而下降,反而会增加。因此,使用Oasis,帧数总是高一点。

Witcher 3 fps Neo vs Neo with Oasis以及标准Overboost vs max Overboost
Witcher 3 fps Neo vs Neo with Oasis以及标准Overboost vs max Overboost

尽管在没有Oasis的情况下,Witcher的帧率只有微小的差别,但液体冷却系统在内部赋予了很多优势。CPU核心温度从平均86°C降至60°C!但这并没有使时钟频率明显提高,因为热节流并不总是生效。然而,这并没有导致时钟频率的明显提高,因为热节流并不是一直生效的。

GPU也有类似的情况:温度从86℃下降到只有59℃,但GPU核心时钟只提高了200MHz左右。即使使用最大的偏移值,情况也是一样的。

GPU温度
GPU温度
GPU时钟速率
GPU时钟速率

有趣的是,最大化偏移值并没有带来任何帧数的提高,至少在Witcher 3 。显卡的温度升高了一些,但与没有最大偏移值的标准超频相比,消耗的能量并没有增加。CPU也显示了同样的效果。有可能是控制软件没有正确实现最大化的设置--在当前版本中仍然有一个确认的错误,它阻止了性能值和动态提升的同时激活(至少在视觉上),但最大化应该仍然是激活的。

GPU的耗电量。红色 = 单独的Neo,最大的overboost。绿色 = Neo & Oasis 标准超增。蓝色 = Neo & Oasis 最大超增量。
GPU的耗电量。红色 = 单独的Neo,最大的overboost。绿色 = Neo & Oasis 标准超增。蓝色 = Neo & Oasis 最大超增量。
GPU温度
GPU温度
GPU时钟:使用Oasis时从标准到最大没有差异
GPU时钟:使用Oasis时从标准到最大没有差异
lowmed.highultraQHD
GTA V (2015) 186 182.4 177.7 123.1 110.8
The Witcher 3 (2015) 407 341 242.8 127.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 177.8 165 155.9 149.9
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 203 158.5 116.4 87.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 140.3 122.4 99.4
Far Cry 5 (2018) 152 142 132 116
Strange Brigade (2018) 474 285 225 201 146
Dying Light 2 (2022) 139 96 83 60
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 138.35 134.17 100.93 83.23 53.37

排放。没有 "绿洲 "的声音和热度

系统噪音

在噪音方面,该系统当然得益于液体冷却。虽然Neo 15(不含绿洲)的风扇在游戏过程中转速相当高,但使用绿洲后,风扇仍然保持在一个更安静的水平。当然,Oasis本身也不安静,特别是在 "平衡 "模式下,Oasis的大型单风扇持续发出约44分贝的嗡嗡声(麦克风在15厘米的距离)。另一方面,这比没有绿洲的Neo的风扇要安静得多。

然而,在 "非常安静 "模式下,Oasis发出高亢、令人不快的呼啸声,而在其他两种模式下是听不见的。这使得 "静音 "模式在降噪方面成为更可取的选择。风扇肯定需要在这里进行优化,以便使 "非常安静 "名副其实。

从Oasis到Neo的软管连接约为57厘米长。这为您提供了一定但有限的灵活性。你可以把Oasis进一步向后移,而把它放在桌子下面会带来一些问题。但是,通过改变位置,绿洲本身的感知音量还是可以得到一定程度的降低。

非常安静,安静的,平衡的
非常安静,安静的,平衡的

在这一点上,出现了对申克公司对绿洲风扇模式的标示政策的一点批评。平衡模式是可能的最高模式,所以集成风扇在这里变得最响。如上所述,总共有三种模式:非常安静、安静和平衡。将这些模式命名为 "安静"、"平衡 "和 "性能 "会更诚实,因为最高的可能模式和最高的噪音水平应该是平衡的?也许不久之后,风扇模式会被称为安静、非常安静和极度安静?

相比之下,Neo本身也有三种风扇模式,这构成了标签方面的另一个极端。平衡、热情和超增压。所以这里的一切都为性能而设计。即使在平衡模式下,当笔记本电脑闲置时,风扇也会频繁启动。虽然它们的旋转相对安静,但我们希望在办公室使用时有一个静音模式。因此,很难测量XMG Oasis的噪音水平,因为Neo的风扇也几乎一直在活动,即使只是安静地活动。

当空闲和低负载时,由于Very Quiet模式下的电子噪音和Neo 15的低噪音水平,Oasis的作用不大,有时甚至无用。另一方面,在游戏和重载时,这种组合导致了明显的噪音降低。然而,没有液体冷却的Razer Blade在负载下也只发出适度的噪音。在没有Oasis的情况下,与竞争对手的设备直接比较,Neo 15是重负荷下最吵的设备。

Noise Level

Idle
23 / 26.39 / 26.39 dB(A)
Load
45.52 / 55.89 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2038.532.538.52535.338.235.33139.441.739.44034.131.734.15030.833.330.86334.831.534.88031.124.431.110030.325.130.312532.521.132.516032.21932.220035.923.235.925036.819.636.831539.313.639.340042.112.342.150041.31041.363041.710.541.780042.48.842.4100044.97.844.9125045.38.645.3160046.7946.7200045.49.245.4250042.51042.5315042.710.542.7400044.410.644.4500041.910.841.963003810.938800035.111.135.11000032.711.232.71250029.61129.61600023.51023.5SPL55.223.355.2N10.20.510.2median 41.3median 10.8median 41.3Delta5.335.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
Razer Blade 15 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-12800H, SSSTC CA6-8D1024
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, R9 6900HX, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0)
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, Phison ESR01TBMFCT
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HK, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0)
Noise
-25%
-8%
-0%
-0%
-9%
10%
off / environment *
23
23
-0%
25
-9%
25.4
-10%
26
-13%
25
-9%
22.7
1%
Idle Minimum *
23
40.84
-78%
27
-17%
26.2
-14%
26
-13%
30
-30%
23.1
-0%
Idle Average *
26.39
41.4
-57%
30
-14%
26.2
1%
27
-2%
32
-21%
23.1
12%
Idle Maximum *
26.39
44.33
-68%
32
-21%
28.4
-8%
29
-10%
33
-25%
23.1
12%
Load Average *
45.52
44.33
3%
46
-1%
44.7
2%
41
10%
45
1%
31.9
30%
Witcher 3 ultra *
55.89
46.25
17%
52
7%
44.7
20%
48
14%
50
11%
52.5
6%
Load Maximum *
55.89
51.26
8%
55
2%
51.9
7%
50
11%
52
7%
52.5
6%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在重载情况下,表面温度也因绿洲而下降,特别是底部的温度从最高56℃降至49℃。

怠速时也有明显的温度下降,但这是在平衡模式下记录的,由于噪音大,不太可能用于怠速。

Oasis对表面温度的影响不是最强的,而是对核心和硬件温度的影响,这在下一节 "压力测试 "中可以看到。

Max. Load
 39 °C44 °C38 °C 
 36 °C41 °C36 °C 
 32 °C32 °C31 °C 
Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 36.6 °C
51 °C56 °C44 °C
32 °C55 °C44 °C
28 °C29 °C29 °C
Maximum: 56 °C
Average: 40.9 °C
Power Supply (max.)  45 °C | Room Temperature 23 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Fluke 62 Mini
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.6 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37 °C / 98.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.1 °C / -14.6 F).


Top:Witcher 3 与绿洲
Top:Witcher 3 与绿洲
底部:Witcher 3 与Oasis
底部:Witcher 3 与Oasis
电源:Witcher 3 与Oasis
电源:Witcher 3 与Oasis
Top:Witcher 3 不含绿洲
Top:Witcher 3 不含绿洲
底部:Witcher 3 ,不含 "绿洲"。
底部:Witcher 3 ,不含 "绿洲"。
电源:Witcher 3 ,不含Oasis
电源:Witcher 3 ,不含Oasis
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 with XMG Oasis
Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU
Razer Blade 15 2022
Intel Core i7-12800H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
Intel Core i9-12900HK, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat
15%
11%
3%
11%
6%
14%
Maximum Upper Side *
44
44
-0%
39
11%
50
-14%
45
-2%
49
-11%
49.6
-13%
Maximum Bottom *
56
49
12%
50
11%
47
16%
50
11%
55
2%
42.4
24%
Idle Upper Side *
38
30
21%
34
11%
37.4
2%
33
13%
33
13%
29.2
23%
Idle Bottom *
41
30
27%
37
10%
38.4
6%
33
20%
33
20%
32
22%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

而这正是XMG Oasis最终做出了明显的积极贡献的地方。由于Neo 15的平均CPU核心温度略低于90℃,Oasis将这一数值降低了10℃以上,仅为79℃。这在功耗方面也很明显,因为在Oasis的存在下,没有热限制。因此,该系统可以始终利用全部95W(标准超增压模式)或更多(超增压
max),而单独的Neo无法维持95W,因此由于热限制而下降到平均79W。

相应地,CPU的时钟速率也更高,即有Oasis的情况下比没有Oasis的情况下高出约300MHz。因此,由于Oasis的存在,你可以尝试手动偏移值,甚至可以无忧无虑地将其最大化。

显卡的结果是类似的:在Oasis下,GPU的温度不是67℃,而是只有58℃,而时钟速率几乎翻了一番,从800MHz到1600MHz!甚至内存时钟也几乎是500MHz。甚至内存时钟也提高了近500MHz,芯片能够消耗更多的能量。

压力测试
压力测试
CPU核心温度
CPU核心温度
CPU的总耗电量
CPU的总耗电量
CPU核心时钟
CPU核心时钟
GPU温度
GPU温度
GPU时钟
GPU时钟
GPU内存时钟
GPU内存时钟
GPU的耗电量
GPU的耗电量
有/无Oasis CPU时钟(GHz) GPU时钟(MHz) CPU平均温度(°C) GPU平均温度(°C)
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 3,3 / 3,6 815 / 1.625 90 / 79 67 / 58
Witcher 3 应力 3,2 1.435 / 1.602 86 / 60 86 / 59

发言人

尽管与前代产品相比,尼奥的扬声器略大,但它的音量相当平庸,提供的低音仍然太少。中音也有点过高。只有高音部分是相当平衡的。

Neo提供了两个连接模拟音频设备的插孔,即耳机和麦克风的独立插孔。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.332.532.32533.338.233.33138.741.738.74029.531.729.55026.833.326.86328.331.528.38029.624.429.61003025.13012535.821.135.816042.51942.520045.523.245.525048.519.648.531553.513.653.54005912.35950066.31066.363071.410.571.480073.58.873.5100070.77.870.71250668.666160062.7962.7200067.89.267.8250063.21063.2315063.110.563.1400060.510.660.5500066.310.866.3630063.510.963.5800059.411.159.4100005011.2501250050.81150.81600049.31049.3SPL78.623.378.6N42.10.542.1median 60.5median 10.8median 60.5Delta8.338.338.735.538.728.629.428.627.626.427.628.424.728.430.321.130.33026.43031.623.831.635.62135.64418.74453.618.553.658.419.758.462.320.462.36524.96570.722.270.773.322.473.374.117.974.175.414.575.478.515.878.579.616.779.682.517.282.58217.48281.914.281.980.712.180.770.212.770.275.912.475.977.212.177.270.512.470.576.512.276.573.414.173.46611.46690.928.490.987.7187.7median 74.1median 16.7median 74.17.53.67.5hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseSCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)Razer Blade 15 2022
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.58 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Razer Blade 15 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 21% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理。高性能等于高消耗

消耗功率

Neo在空闲时的功耗相当低,但在负载下的功耗却高于许多竞争对手。只有Alienware的消耗量更大。我们测得的短期负载峰值约为300W,但游戏平均消耗234W。因此,巨大的(约18 x 8.5 x 3.5厘米)280 W电源应该总是有足够的储备。还计划为极端用户提供330瓦的电源。

Oasis的耗电量在4到9瓦之间变化。我们在平衡模式下测得的平均功率为6.6瓦。

Power Consumption
Idledarkmidlight 15 / 18 / 18 Watt
Load midlight 123 / 301 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, SSSTC CA6-8D1024, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6"
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung SSD 980 Pro 2TB MZ-V8P2T0 (RAID 0), IPS-Level, 3840x2400, 16"
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Phison ESR01TBMFCT, AMOLED, 3840x2400, 16"
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 2x Samsung PM9A1 1TB (RAID 0), IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Gaming
 
Power Consumption
7%
-46%
-14%
-34%
-62%
-21%
-3%
Idle Minimum *
15
15
-0%
33.2
-121%
19
-27%
26
-73%
24.1
-61%
17.2 ?(7 - 33.2, n=28)
-15%
Idle Average *
18
17
6%
36.4
-102%
24
-33%
30
-67%
28.5
-58%
23.3 ?(11 - 38, n=28)
-29%
Idle Maximum *
18
22
-22%
37.6
-109%
31
-72%
37
-106%
60
-233%
30.8 ?(17 - 60.8, n=28)
-71%
Load Average *
123
101
18%
116.7
5%
104
15%
127
-3%
128.7
-5%
121.2 ?(92 - 150, n=28)
1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
234
195
17%
172
26%
186.5
20%
176
25%
254
-9%
Load Maximum *
301
230
24%
228.6
24%
256
15%
236
22%
323
-7%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

020406080100120140160180200220240260280300Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti); Witcher 3 ultra: Ø234 (215.98-248.92)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti); 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø199.9 (173.75-301.79)

Power consumption with external monitor

0153045607590105120135150165180195210225240Tooltip
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti); Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø163.9 (161.7-165.33)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti); Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø158.4 (156.9-160.14)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti); 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø232 (218.14-240.49)
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti); 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø242 (237.2-253.5)

电池寿命

93Wh的电池与竞争设备所提供的尺寸差不多。将刷新率从240赫兹降低到60赫兹,对长时间的合理运行非常重要。

在降低亮度的情况下,一个电影之夜可以计划整整7个小时,或者在240赫兹下刚刚超过3小时。简单的网上冲浪也能持续6至7小时,这取决于亮度。

在电池模式下,Oasis是不活跃的,因为它从电源插头中获取电源,不能由Neo反过来供电。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
7h 44min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
6h 19min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
7h 08min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 28min
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti)
i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 93 Wh
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Tiger Lake
i7-11800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop GPU, 93 Wh
Razer Blade 15 2022
i7-12800H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 80 Wh
Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo 16 GX650RX
R9 6900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
Gigabyte Aero 16 YE5
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99 Wh
Alienware x17 R2 P48E
i9-12900HK, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 87 Wh
Average of class Gaming
 
Battery Runtime
13%
-37%
1%
-1%
-62%
-9%
H.264
428
352
-18%
559
31%
452
6%
WiFi v1.3
464
338
-27%
292
-37%
469
1%
381
-18%
117
-75%
Load
88
161
83%
62
-30%
96
9%
46
-48%
Reader / Idle
749
533
234

Pros

+ 稳定、简单的设计,由金属和塑料制成
+ 用于外部水冷的端口
+ 带有Thunderbolt的USB-C(但不具备VR功能)
+ 维护简单
+ 良好的键盘
+ 240赫兹的体面显示屏
+ 高性能和许多性能设置

Cons

- 5GHz网络检测偶尔不成功
- 键盘字迹暗淡且小
- 左键有时会掉线
- 显示屏亮度分布相当弱
- 负载下声音大且温暖
- 耗电量非常大

判决。绿洲 "是玩家的福音?

XMG Neo 15 (E22)与XMG Oasis,由Schenker提供。
XMG Neo 15 (E22)与XMG Oasis,由Schenker提供。

这里显示的评测等级是指不含液冷的XMG Neo 15,液冷必须作为附件单独购买。

除了原始性能外,我们还喜欢它的键盘、设计、结构,以及除一些缺点外的显示屏。当然,15英寸的外形尺寸有限制性能的热限制,但这些限制是非常温和的。然而,作为回报,Neo也变得非常响亮和温暖。

使用Oasis液体冷却系统,温度和硬件的热负荷就会大幅下降。性能上的好处只是微乎其微,因为Neo本身的限制已经很少。用户必须把所有的性能值都调到最大,才能达到热极限,才能从Oasis的性能中受益。

也就是说,Oasis确实在其他方面带来了优势:在游戏过程中,音量明显下降,温度下降更多。这只能是有利于组件的寿命。尽管液体冷却系统不适合移动使用,但它在固定使用中带来了明显的优势。

相应地,使用Oasis,Neo的评级会高一些。但在某种程度上,Oasis只是掩盖了Neo 15的弱点,在没有液冷的情况下,Neo 15是该领域最吵、最热的设备。同时,其性能值也无可挑剔。

XMG Neo 15是一个非常强大的游戏机,有许多手动选项,但它也会变得非常响亮和热。与XMG Oasis一起,这些缺点得到了缓解,即使仍有优化的潜力。

例如,Razer Blade 15,即使没有水冷,其运行也比Neo 15安静得多,但却没有相同水平的蛮力表现。

价格和可用性

Neo 15(E22)可以通过Schenker自己的主页bestware.com进行配置和订购。.我们的评测单位版本的价格约为3400欧元,而Windows 11家庭版的许可证是可选的,价格约为40欧元。

XMG Oasis可以直接在配置器中订购,价格为199欧元。奇怪的是,Oasis可以以双包形式订购,希望这并不表明它的寿命很短,因为你当然一次只能把一个Oasis连接到Neo上。

SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (i7-12700H, RTX 3080 Ti) - 07/06/2022 v7 (old)
Christian Hintze

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
86%
Pointing Device
82%
Connectivity
69 / 80 → 86%
Weight
61 / 10-66 → 92%
Battery
74 / 95 → 78%
Display
92%
Games Performance
98%
Application Performance
96%
Temperature
80 / 95 → 84%
Noise
75 / 90 → 84%
Audio
70%
Camera
45 / 85 → 53%
Average
78%
88%
Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > XMG Oasis的Schenker XMG Neo 15回顾。RTX 3080 Ti没有散热限制
Christian Hintze, 2022-07-10 (Update: 2022-07-10)