Notebookcheck Logo

诺基亚XR21评测--坚固耐用的智能手机，适合日常工作，通过IP69K认证

安全第一!

诺基亚XR21旨在成为一款强调可持续性和长电池寿命的智能手机。它不仅防水、防尘、防震，而且还提供长时间的更新，甚至得到扩大的保修。在我们的测试中，看看XR21是否兑现了它的承诺。
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

来自HMD Global的诺基亚XR21直接继承了 诺基亚XR20.制造商保持了相同的设计理念，旨在为客户提供一个特别坚固和持久的智能手机，而不像经典的耐用智能手机那样笨重。

这在去年已经取得了很好的效果，HMD在许多方面对XR21进行了改进，特别是其坚固性。电池容量增加了，刷新率更高了，有一个新的摄像头，还包括一个更先进的SoC。为了弥补这一点，建议零售价增加了20欧元（约合22美元），达到599欧元（约合656美元），而且不再提供存储量减少的更实惠的入门级型号了。

Nokia XR21 (XR Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 619
Memory
6 GB 
, LPDDR4x
Display
6.49 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 406 PPI, capacitive, TFT-LCD, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB 
, 114 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio port, USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: barometer, G-sensor, eCompass, gyroscope, proximity sensor
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 13, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 20, 25, 28, 40, 41, 66, 71, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 10.45 x 168 x 78.58
Battery
4800 mAh Lithium-Ion, QC 3.0, PD 2.0
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 64 MPix (OV64B40, f/1.8) + 8 MPix (ultra wide, OV08D10, f/2.2); Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (OC16A1Q, fixfocus, f/2.5)
Additional features
Speakers: dual, Keyboard: onscreen, USB cable, SIM tool, 36 Months Warranty, DRM Widevine L1, GNSS: GPS (L1, L5); Galileo (E1, E5a), GLONASS (L1), Beidou (B1, B1C, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5) ,NavIC (L5), two configurable buttons, impact protected polycarbonate, impact absorbing TPU bumpers, IP68/IP69K, fanless, ruggedized, waterproof
Weight
231 g
Price
599 Euro
Links
Nokia homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
82.3 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2023
Nokia XR21
SD 695 5G, Adreno 619		231 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.49"2400x1080
82.6 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
Gigaset GX6
Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4		278 g128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.60"2412x1080
81.9 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L		235 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.60"2408x1080
88.5 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Google Pixel 7
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7		197 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"2400x1080
79.7 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
CAT S75
Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256		268 g128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.58"2408x1080

诺基亚XR21有午夜黑和松树绿两种颜色。它的厚度为10.45毫米（约0.41英寸），绝对不是一款纤薄的智能手机，但它仍然比CAT S75等经典的耐用型手机更纤薄，尤其是还明显更轻。然而，设计看起来仍然有点老化，77%的相当平庸的显示与表面比率也造成了这种印象。

智能手机的橡胶角不是很明显，但你还是能感觉到它们。HMD Global称它们为阻尼TPU冲击。背部由抗震的聚碳酸酯制成，正面由康宁大猩猩玻璃Victus保护。诺基亚XR21给人留下了高质量和特别坚固的印象，以简洁的做工呈现出来。

这款智能手机不仅符合IP68防尘防水标准，而且还获得了IP69K认证，使其能够承受100巴压力的水流。从1.8米（约5.9英尺）的高度跌落不会给XR21带来任何问题。根据MIL-STD-810H标准，它通过了从1.5米（约4.9英尺）高处跌落的认证，可以在-20至+55°C（-4至131°F）的温度下使用。 它也可以在湿手或手套下操作。

诺基亚XR21的外壳是由100%的回收铝制成的，HMD Global还提供了一份简短的环境影响简介。HMD Global还提供了该智能手机的简短环境影响简介。

(照片: Alexander Schmidt)
(照片: Alexander Schmidt)
(照片: Alexander Schmidt)
(照片: Alexander Schmidt)
(照片: Alexander Schmidt)

尺寸比较

❌
171 mm 80 mm 11.9 mm 268 g170.7 mm 82.2 mm 11.9 mm 278 g171.6 mm 81.5 mm 10.6 mm 248 g168.8 mm 79.9 mm 9.9 mm 235 g168 mm 78.58 mm 10.45 mm 231 g155.6 mm 73.2 mm 8.7 mm 197 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

设备 - 诺基亚智能手机，不含microSD

与之相反的是形成鲜明对比的是XR20诺基亚XR21只提供一个USB-2.0端口，没有提供通过microSD卡进行存储扩展的选项。

但至少，音频端口仍然存在。由于连接的耳机也作为天线，该端口也是操作模拟无线电接收器的必要条件。此外，蓝牙5.1、NFC和两个快速访问键也是可用的。

顶部：麦克风、快速访问键、音频端口（照片：Alexander Schmidt）。
顶部：麦克风、快速访问键、音频端口
左图：电源端口（照片：Alexander Schmidt）。
左边：电源端口
右图：音量摇杆、电源按钮（照片：Alexander Schmidt）。
右边：音量摇杆，电源按钮
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡插槽（照片：Alexander Schmidt）。
底部：扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM卡插槽

软件 -Android 12，有4年的更新。

诺基亚XR21交付时仍有谷歌Android 12，保持了非常纯粹的状态。但也预装了几个第三方应用，这些都可以卸载。HMD Global承诺为XR21提供三个大型更新，并在四年内每月提供安全补丁，从全球市场引进开始。虽然这最初听起来不错，但不幸的是，XR21并没有直接与Android 13一起交付，尽管14版已经在起步阶段，而且前代产品甚至在去年就已经收到更新。此外，每月分发安全补丁的计划已经不起作用，因为在本次测试时，我们的测试装置仍处于2023年3月5日的水平。

通信和GNSS - 刹车后的Wi-Fi 6

诺基亚XR21支持目前所有的移动通信标准，包括5G-Sub6，提供了大量的频段，因此它应该能够在世界大部分地区没有任何问题地建立连接。在我们的测试中，通信特性在城市环境中表现良好。

从名义上看，XR21与去年的机型一样支持Wi-Fi 6。然而，在与华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的测试中，传输速度出乎意料地低，尽管它们保持稳定。该速度处于相当平庸的交流无线局域网的水平。尽管速度在XR20中已经不是很突出了 XR20的速度并不突出，但它仍然明显较高。也许HMD Global仍将在这方面做出一些改进。

Networking
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
346 (min: 320) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
360 (min: 326) MBit/s ∼38%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
892 MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
743 MBit/s ∼42%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
944 (min: 866) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
910 (min: 677) MBit/s ∼52%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
904 (min: 816) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
936 (min: 863) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1716 (min: 845) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1757 (min: 1694) MBit/s ∼100%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
345 (min: 331) MBit/s ∼38%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
372 (min: 353) MBit/s ∼40%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AX12
630 (min: 561) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
649 (min: 589) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1443 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼79%
03570105140175210245280315350385420455490525560595630665Tooltip
Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø346 (320-352)
Nokia XR20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø648 (589-673)
Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø360 (326-373)
Nokia XR20 Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø630 (561-645)
GPS测试：在室内
在室内
GPS测试：户外
户外活动

诺基亚XR21能够使用所有全球卫星网络，甚至能够在室内建立连接。尽管后者需要更多时间，但它仍能在几秒钟内找到相当准确的位置。正如预期的那样，这在户外的工作速度要快得多，而且更准确。

我们将智能手机与Garmin Venu 2进行短途骑行比较。在近10公里（约6.2英里）的总路线上，记录的路线差异为60米（约197英尺），但XR21报告的穿越海拔高度明显更高。路线记录在细节视图中相当准确，使我们能够证明诺基亚智能手机具有良好的定位能力。

GNSS测试路线：环湖
GNSS测试路线：环湖
GNSS测试路线：转折点
GNSS测试路线：转折点
GNSS测试路线：概述
GNSS测试路线：概述

电话功能和语音质量

电话应用
电话应用（设置）

诺基亚XR21提供全面的双SIM卡支持，可以使用两张物理Nano-SIM卡，或者也可以用eSIM卡替换其中一张。还支持其他功能，如VoLTE和WLAN通话。

语音质量很好。在安静的环境中，对话双方都很容易理解，听起来很自然，噪音不大。轻微的噪音干扰被过滤掉了。 在扬声器模式下，我们听到一些轻微的伴随着噼啪声的噪音，麦克风只安静地记录口语。

相机 - 诺基亚XR21采用全新的双摄像头

与XR21的自拍（纵向模式）。
与XR21的自拍（纵向模式）。

诺基亚XR21的前置摄像头拥有1600万像素的分辨率，但由于它使用了像素分选，所以拍出的照片分辨率只有410万像素。这些照片相当不错，能够以有吸引力的图像构图给人留下深刻印象。但清晰度可以再高一点。视频只以30FPS的全高清记录，快速运动也会导致一些明显的条纹。

后面的双摄像头系统使用一个主传感器，分辨率为64MP。不幸的是，它不提供光学图像稳定（OIS）。图像的特点是色彩表现非常自然，但在某些地方有点暗。虽然在低光照条件下，许多细节会丢失，但拍出的照片仍然很好，物体仍然容易辨认。你只能进行数字变焦（最大8倍）。在2倍变焦的情况下，质量还可以，但在更高的水平上，结果就很难使用了。 超宽角度提供的分辨率低于 XR20但仍然做得很好。深度锐利度还可以，但这里的图像还可以稍微明亮一些。

诺基亚XR21还提供专业模式，包括RAW支持。主传感器的全部64MP分辨率也可以使用。视频可以用1,080p（16:9）记录，最好是30或60FPS。电子图像稳定系统工作得相当好，但不幸的是，自动对焦不时地重新聚焦。使用影院模式，你还可以以24 FPS的速度录制21:9格式的视频，用户可以选择以20或50 Mbps的速度录制。由于采用了OZO音频，声音的记录相当清晰。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
4.8 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
1.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
1.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
2.6 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia XR21: 3.89 ∆E min: 1.13 - max: 8.25 ∆E
ColorChecker
27.9 ∆E
49.8 ∆E
36.8 ∆E
34 ∆E
41.7 ∆E
59.8 ∆E
50.3 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
38.6 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
61.5 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
28.8 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
34.3 ∆E
71.7 ∆E
40 ∆E
43.3 ∆E
79.2 ∆E
67.8 ∆E
49.6 ∆E
35 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
ColorChecker Nokia XR21: 43.83 ∆E min: 12.64 - max: 79.22 ∆E

附件和保修 - XR21不包括充电器

诺基亚XR21的包装盒只包括一条USB线和一个SIM卡工具。不包括相应的充电器，但HMD Global可选择提供一个约35欧元（约38美元）的充电器。

XR21的保修期为36个月，更换有缺陷的显示屏的保修期为一年。

输入设备和操作 - 两个快速访问键

诺基亚XR21的电容式触摸屏可同时识别多达10个触摸点，快速而准确地执行命令。玻璃表面的滑动特性非常好。ERM振动电机足够强大，很容易被注意到，但它的反馈相当松散。

XR21提供两个快速访问键：一个在顶部，另一个在框架的左侧。这两个键都可以单独配置，用系统元素、应用程序或紧急功能占用。这些按键可以区分短按或长按，允许你为每个按键分配两种功能。

集成在电源键上的指纹传感器可用于生物识别安全。虽然它的速度相当不错，但识别率却相当一般。此外，或者说，你也可以使用前置摄像头配置不太安全的人脸识别，它的工作速度非常快，而且很可靠。用户的脸在黑暗中仍然可以被识别，因为智能手机为此目的增加了面板的亮度。

显示屏 - XR21采用120赫兹的液晶显示屏，对比度丰富

子像素网格
子像素网格

诺基亚XR21的LCD显示屏缩小到了6.49英寸，并提供了全高清+的高像素密度。刷新率可以由系统调整，在这种情况下自动在60和120赫兹之间切换。你也可以直接将其设置为60赫兹。名义上，该面板支持HLG和HDR10的HDR标准，但由于亮度低，这可能是相当值得怀疑的。

HMD Global规定阳光下的亮度最高为550尼特。在我们的测量中，在亮度传感器保持停用的情况下，我们达到了503cd/m2的最高值。当我们激活它时，我们只能从智能手机上获得最大的495cd/m2。在0.45cd/m2的情况下，黑色值是体面的，导致1,118:1的高对比度。

液晶显示器的优点是不使用脉冲宽度调制（PWM）来控制亮度。使用我们的示波器，我们只看到一个高频的闪烁，但这对于非常敏感的用户来说，应该不会造成任何问题。

494
cd/m²		494
cd/m²		495
cd/m²
487
cd/m²		503
cd/m²		483
cd/m²
481
cd/m²		475
cd/m²		474
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 503 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 487.3 cd/m² Minimum: 1.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 503 cd/m²
Contrast: 1118:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Nokia XR21
TFT-LCD, 2400x1080, 6.5"		Gigaset GX6
IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6"		Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6"		Google Pixel 7
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"		CAT S75
IPS LCD, 2408x1080, 6.6"		Nokia XR20
IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen
-8%
-96%
52%
-34%
-11%
Brightness middle
503
505
0%
510
1%
936
86%
566
13%
599
19%
Brightness
487
491
1%
495
2%
947
94%
529
9%
598
23%
Brightness Distribution
94
93
-1%
92
-2%
95
1%
83
-12%
99
5%
Black Level *
0.45
0.3
33%
0.46
-2%
0.47
-4%
0.33
27%
Contrast
1118
1683
51%
1109
-1%
1204
8%
1815
62%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.4
4.32
-80%
7.41
-209%
1.3
46%
5.02
-109%
4.52
-88%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.6
7.22
-9%
13.26
-101%
2.7
59%
9.6
-45%
7.6
-15%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.9
3
-58%
10.6
-458%
1.4
26%
4.4
-132%
4.2
-121%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.268 97%
2.518 87%
2.25 98%
2.248 98%
2.279 97%
CCT
6602 98%
7098 92%
10050 65%
6664 98%
7173 91%
7309 89%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 55100 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 55100 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 55100 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

显示器的色彩再现不能由用户调整，所以我们非常惊讶，白平衡处于一个非常好的水平。尽管色彩校准并不十分准确和成功，但仍处于良好水平。

灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（目标色彩空间：sRGB）

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
22.54 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.912 ms rise
↘ 13.63 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 18.9 ms rise
↘ 23.15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

亮度传感器对光线条件变化的反应有点迟钝，但这是可以容忍的。不幸的是，最大亮度不是特别高，所以在明亮的阳光下，你几乎看不到显示屏上的任何东西。

在色彩方面，LCD的视角稳定性非常好。即使在非常陡峭的视角下，也几乎没有任何颜色反转，但亮度却急剧下降。在黑暗中，既没有任何明显的鬼影效应，也没有光晕。

诺基亚XR21的可视角度稳定性
诺基亚XR21的可视角度稳定性

性能--诺基亚XR21使用骁龙695 5G

诺基亚XR21采用了 骁龙695 5G配备6GB工作内存。就其性能而言，该SoC被定位在中低端，能够实现有吸引力的系统性能。

在基准测试中，该SoC的性能达到了预期水平，几乎与Dimensity 900处于同一水平。 Dimensity 900在 芝华仕GX6在CPU速度方面，几乎与Dimensity 900处于同一水平。但它与 骁龙778G从 XCover 6 Pro.

Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.3 | Geekbench 6.0 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1050 Points +56%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
773 Points +15%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
693 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (659 - 697, n=24)
676 Points 0%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
673 Points
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
641 Points -5%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
504 Points -25%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points +80%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3265 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
2802 Points +46%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
2095 Points +9%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1923 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1663 - 2038, n=24)
1904 Points -1%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
1787 Points -7%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1662 Points -14%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points +65%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (893 - 919, n=8)
906 Points 0%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
903 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points +102%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1993 - 2189, n=8)
2073 Points 0%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
2064 Points
Geekbench 6.0
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (188 - 2008, n=41, last 2 years)
1257 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (888 - 898, n=2)
893 Points
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
832 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (512 - 5702, n=41, last 2 years)
3366 Points
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
1998 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1918 - 2067, n=2)
1993 Points
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points +119%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
773655 Points +109%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
505982 Points +37%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
394141 Points +7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (344344 - 416086, n=18)
389461 Points +5%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
369861 Points
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
322933 Points -13%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points +44%
Gigaset GX6
MediaTek Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144
12444 Points +36%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
12113 Points +32%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
10530 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6897 - 11732, n=23)
9629 Points +5%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
9180 Points
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7090 Points -23%
CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points +54%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
898 Points +50%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
606 Points +1%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
599 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (521 - 606, n=18)
583 Points -3%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points +78%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
6247 Points +72%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
4079 Points +12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3171 - 3848, n=19)
3648 Points 0%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3642 Points
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
3527 Points -3%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3265 Points -10%
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points +30%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
9601 Points +20%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
8858 Points +11%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
7987 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (6789 - 8231, n=19)
7725 Points -3%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
6635 Points -17%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6296 Points -21%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points +72%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5392 Points +32%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
4352 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3167 - 4836, n=19)
4227 Points +3%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4094 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
3988 Points -3%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3847 Points -6%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points +315%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
16001 Points +269%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
6594 Points +52%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (3975 - 4426, n=19)
4340 Points 0%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
4339 Points
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
4298 Points -1%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
3765 Points -13%
Web
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1838 Points +48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points +27%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
1276 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (1078 - 1434, n=19)
1253 Points +1%
Nokia XR20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1247 Points +1%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
1239 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G, Adreno 642L, 6144
1188 Points -4%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
42556 Points +536%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points +166%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (5442 - 9348, n=15)
6775 Points +1%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
6693 Points
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
5039 Points -25%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +5465%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1002 Points +120%
CAT S75
MediaTek Dimensity 930, IMG BXM-8-256, 6144
953 Points +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
  (426 - 3080, n=7)
825 Points +81%
Nokia XR21
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144
455 Points

ǞǞǞAdreno 619已经是一顶老帽子了，不幸的是，这在基准测试中也很明显，诺基亚XR21在GPU基准测试中更多地处于比较领域的低端。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1800 Points +408%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
684 Points +93%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
594 Points +68%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
287 Points -19%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1841 Points +409%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
686 Points +90%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
607 Points +68%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
362 Points
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
294 Points -19%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6660 Points +451%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2472 Points +105%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2167 Points +79%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1208 Points
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
977 Points -19%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6513 Points +437%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2464 Points +103%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2179 Points +80%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1212 Points
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
980 Points -19%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3068 Points
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2986 Points
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2613 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4050 Points
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2754 Points
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2250 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3781 Points
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2778 Points
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2322 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4086 Points +18%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4025 Points +16%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3468 Points
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
3090 Points -11%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11491 Points +285%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4217 Points +41%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2984 Points
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2448 Points -18%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8192 Points +166%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4173 Points +35%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3080 Points
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
2566 Points -17%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points -100%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
108 fps +35%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps +13%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
80 fps
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
64 fps -20%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
60 fps -25%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
59 fps -26%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
249 fps +165%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
132 fps +40%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
102 fps +9%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
94 fps
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
81 fps -14%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
73 fps -22%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps +120%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
68 fps +66%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
54 fps +32%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps +27%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
41 fps
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37 fps -10%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
132 fps +181%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
77 fps +64%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
64 fps +36%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
61 fps +30%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
47 fps
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
41 fps -13%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps +193%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
48 fps +60%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
37 fps +23%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
26 fps -13%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
18 fps -40%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +162%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
56 fps +65%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
42 fps +24%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
29 fps -15%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps -18%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +265%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
28 fps +65%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
21 fps +24%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
16 fps -6%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
14 fps -18%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +240%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
33 fps +65%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
25 fps +25%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -15%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps -20%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +300%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps +58%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps +33%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
12 fps
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
10 fps -17%
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
10 fps -17%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +302%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
13 fps +59%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
11 fps +34%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.2 fps
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
6.6 fps -20%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
6.5 fps -21%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +242%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
30 fps +58%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
24 fps +26%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
19 fps
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
17 fps -11%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
16 fps -16%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +223%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps +55%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
28 fps +27%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -9%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
18 fps -18%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps +289%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5.9 fps +64%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
4.4 fps +22%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3.6 fps
CAT S75
IMG BXM-8-256, Dimensity 930, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
2.6 fps -28%

使用诺基亚XR21浏览网页没有任何问题，但更复杂的网站往往需要更多的时间，这也反映在基准测试中。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +99%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
96.314 Points +54%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
72.887 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 105.3, n=19)
71.2 Points +14%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
64.737 Points +4%
Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114)
62.469 Points
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
46.44 Points -26%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
100 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 80.1, n=16)
54 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chome 104)
53.8 runs/min
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
44.1 runs/min
Nokia XR20 (Chome 92)
37.62 runs/min
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +72%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
93 Points +37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (58 - 111, n=18)
74.3 Points +9%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
74 Points +9%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
69 Points +1%
Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114)
68 Points
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
104 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 - 156, n=12)
101 Points
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
98 Points
CAT S75 (Chromee 114)
93 Points
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
69 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Google Pixel 7
45158 Points +105%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +75%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
25445 Points +15%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 31647, n=21)
24051 Points +9%
Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114)
22080 Points
Gigaset GX6 (Chrome 107)
21753 Points -1%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
20342 Points -8%
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
17816 Points -19%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nokia XR20 (Chrome 92)
2383 ms * -25%
CAT S75 (Chrome 114)
1985.5 ms * -4%
Nokia XR21 (Chrome 114)
1913 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1298 - 2501, n=18)
1769 ms * +8%
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Chrome 104)
1708.8 ms * +11%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * +20%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
1021.8 ms * +47%

* ... smaller is better

诺基亚XR21提供128GB的UFS 2.2存储空间，结果比我们从规格上预期的要慢。然而，这可以追溯到SoC，因为我们一直在观察所有配备SD695的智能手机中的相同行为。 SD695.

Nokia XR21Gigaset GX6Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 ProGoogle Pixel 7CAT S75Nokia XR20Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
3%
21%
76%
60%
-7%
17%
155%
Sequential Read 256KB
509.76
953.5
87%
841.6
65%
1280.81
151%
991.21
94%
485
-5%
728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71)
43%
1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years)
270%
Sequential Write 256KB
465.31
454.7
-2%
484.7
4%
879.39
89%
878.23
89%
452
-3%
527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71)
13%
1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years)
216%
Random Read 4KB
187.51
194.9
4%
170.6
-9%
210.47
12%
221.56
18%
174.8
-7%
191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71)
2%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years)
48%
Random Write 4KB
167.51
39.9
-76%
204.2
22%
253.92
52%
233.91
40%
146.2
-13%
185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71)
11%
311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years)
86%

游戏--它们在运行，但很少是漂亮的。

尽管集成的 阿德诺-619-GPU虽然集成的Adreno-619-GPU已经有些老化，但对于大多数休闲游戏来说，它仍然是完全足够的。然而，对于图形要求较高的游戏，情况可能会非常不同，我们用GameBench更详细地分析了其中的两个游戏。.

在《PUBG Mobile》中，你最多可以选择高清设置，然后也被限制在30FPS。但至少这些保持稳定。在《源氏冲击》中，你应该放弃最高的细节水平，因为在该设置下仍然有一些明显的卡顿。 另一方面，如果你使用中等细节设置，你已经可以玩得相当舒适，即使帧率降低。

玄信影响
玄信影响
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Nokia XR21; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 3.7.0_14806628_14807925: Ø45.1 (25-60)
Nokia XR21; Genshin Impact; medium 120 fps; 3.7.0_14806628_14807925: Ø35.9 (29-47)
Nokia XR21; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 3.7.0_14806628_14807925: Ø28.3 (18-41)
Nokia XR21; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.6.0: Ø39.9 (38-41)
Nokia XR21; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.6.0: Ø29.9 (28-31)

辐射 - 诺基亚XR21可能会变得相当热

温度

虽然诺基亚XR21的表面温度在空闲运行时完全没有理由担心，但在恒定的负载下温度会升高。我们使用Burnout基准模拟了这一点，达到了高于50 ºC（122 ºF）的水平。 然而，由于这样的高负荷在日常操作中很少发生，我们认为这并不重要。

SoC没有受到所有压力测试的影响，总是提供稳定的性能。

Max. Load
 50.8 °C49.6 °C47.6 °C 
 51 °C50.6 °C46.3 °C 
 50.7 °C50.4 °C45.7 °C 
Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 49.2 °C
44.7 °C48.2 °C53.5 °C
44.2 °C48.2 °C51.9 °C
45.2 °C47.1 °C50.2 °C
Maximum: 53.5 °C
Average: 48.1 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53.5 °C / 128 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.7 % 0%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.6 % 0%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.4 %
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 % 0%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.5 % -34%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
Adreno 642L, SD 778G 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99.6 % +1%
Gigaset GX6
Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.4 % 0%
Nokia XR20
Adreno 619, SD 480, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
99.1 % 0%
Nokia XR21
Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
99 %
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72.9 % -26%
0510152025303540Tooltip
Nokia XR21 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)
Gigaset GX6 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø3.65 (3.63-3.65)
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø9.65 (8.06-11.1)
Nokia XR21 Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø7.22 (7.22-7.26)
Gigaset GX6 Mali-G68 MP4, Dimensity 900, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.1 (13.1-13.1)
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.8 (25.8-39.3)
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø34.4 (28.6-40.2)

发言人

诺基亚XR21的两个扬声器可以变得非常响亮，尽管它们的声音只是一般。但如果你不把音量调得太高，你仍然会得到一个可以接受的质量。

通过3.5毫米音频端口（SNR：70.21 dBFS）输出的声音，能够提供一个体面的信噪比，是比较好的。对于无线连接，你可以使用蓝牙5.1，它支持广泛的音频编解码器（SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+和LDAC）。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.932.72526.234.43129.428.14028.733.25036.635.8632234.98019.734.110017.937.112518.536.916017.747.120015.146.825015.550.931516.554.5400135950013.467.563014.272.28001377.6100012.880.1125013.880.3160013.777200013.677.1250013.278.331501480.3400013.579.8500013.680.4630013.977.5800013.671.71000013.671.71250013.864.61600013.162.4SPL25.890N0.781.8median 13.7median 72.2Delta0.811.839.441.139.143.531.537.629.832.433.438.126.630.922.320.720.52415.627.514.733.711.437.21043.28.848.6953.610.558.312.262.514.366.411.670.11271.410.271.210.465.111.165.812.769.614.466.214.268.214.769.515.668.816.567.816.558.417.348.325.480.20.646.6median 12.7median 65.12.610.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNokia XR21Gigaset GX6
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nokia XR21 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Gigaset GX6 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--诺基亚智能手机，4,800毫安时

消耗功率

诺基亚XR21的耗电量总体上不算太高。然而，在最大亮度水平下，它可以更低，尽管它不是很亮。

电池的容量为4800毫安时，可在33瓦特的条件下充电。要做到这一点，充电器必须支持QC 3.0或PD 2.0。使用符合这一要求的快速充电器，智能手机在136分钟后完全充电。17分钟后达到25%的目标，67分钟后达到50%的目标，96分钟后达到80%，103分钟后达到90%。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.02 / 0.22 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.83 / 2.29 / 2.32 Watt
Load midlight 4.41 / 6.12 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Nokia XR21
4800 mAh		Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
4050 mAh		Google Pixel 7
4355 mAh		CAT S75
5000 mAh		Nokia XR20
4630 mAh		Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
3%
26%
12%
32%
11%
-10%
Idle Minimum *
0.83
0.9
-8%
0.89
-7%
1.1
-33%
0.7
16%
0.886 ?(0.56 - 1.2, n=18)
-7%
0.88 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=158, last 2 years)
-6%
Idle Average *
2.29
1.4
39%
1.07
53%
1.5
34%
1.1
52%
1.76 ?(0.91 - 4.76, n=18)
23%
1.444 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=158, last 2 years)
37%
Idle Maximum *
2.32
1.8
22%
1.2
48%
1.9
18%
1.6
31%
1.92 ?(0.98 - 4.79, n=18)
17%
1.6 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=158, last 2 years)
31%
Load Average *
4.41
4.7
-7%
3.27
26%
3.2
27%
2.7
39%
3.86 ?(2.4 - 9.52, n=18)
12%
6.57 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=153, last 2 years)
-49%
Load Maximum *
6.12
8.1
-32%
5.5
10%
5.2
15%
4.9
20%
5.45 ?(4.32 - 9.92, n=18)
11%
9.91 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=153, last 2 years)
-62%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.13 (1.139-5.64)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.72 (2.8-9.91)
Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.299 (1.27-1.415)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.385 (1.097-2.05)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567Tooltip
Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.65 (3.42-3.76)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.65 (5.06-7.73)
Nokia XR21 Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.299 (1.27-1.415)
Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.385 (1.097-2.05)

电池寿命

在电池寿命方面，仅仅因为它的大电池，诺基亚XR21就能在比较领域中把许多竞争对手甩在后面。虽然它在我们的测试中也提供了良好的运行时间，但HMD Global宣传的长达两天的电池寿命可能只能在实际使用中达到，如果该智能手机被适度使用。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
39h 04min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 113)
14h 35min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 05min
Load (maximum brightness)
6h 40min
Nokia XR21
4800 mAh		Gigaset GX6
5000 mAh		Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro
4050 mAh		Google Pixel 7
4355 mAh		CAT S75
5000 mAh		Nokia XR20
4630 mAh
Battery Runtime
15%
-28%
-21%
2%
-15%
Reader / Idle
2344
1321
-44%
1063
-55%
1786
-24%
H.264
1085
856
-21%
1230
13%
895
-18%
WiFi v1.3
875
1002
15%
768
-12%
731
-16%
896
2%
927
6%
Load
400
266
-33%
302
-24%
301
-25%

Pros

+ 抗水、抗尘、抗震
+ 更新时间长
+ 良好的电池寿命
+ 两个快速访问键

Cons

- WLAN比预期的要慢
- 平庸的扬声器
- 在其推出时只有Android 12
- 黑暗的显示屏

结论 - 一款适合日常工作的轻薄坚固的手机

测试诺基亚XR21。测试装置由HMD Global提供（照片：Alexander Schmidt）。
测试诺基亚XR21。测试装置由HMD Global提供

诺基亚XR21并不希望被视为真正的坚固耐用的智能手机，而是更希望被视为日常任务的坚固伙伴。凭借其IP69K认证、防震结构和宽广的工作温度范围，这款来自HMD Global的智能手机可以轻松实现这一愿望。此外，制造商还包括两个快速访问键，在按下按钮时总共有四个不同的动作。强大的4800毫安时电池也提供了非常好的电池寿命。

诺基亚XR21是一个坚韧的日常伴侣，具有潜在的长寿命。

与竞争对手相比，你还会徒劳地寻找类似的36个月的扩大保修期，并对显示屏进行额外保修。名义上较长的更新期因XR21仍使用Android 12这一事实而略显逊色，尽管 XR20的前辈已经收到了Android 13。WLAN的速度也比预期的稍慢。另一方面，你可以得到完整的双SIM卡，包括eSIM卡支持。只有显示屏可以更亮。

随着更多的模块化设计，在 吉格赛特GX6提出自己作为一个替代，和 Galaxy XCover 6 Pro可能也是一个有趣的选择。

价格和可用性

诺基亚XR21可以直接从制造商的在线商店购买，价格约为500美元。.

Nokia XR21 - 06/21/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
48 / 70 → 69%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
88%
Games Performance
34 / 64 → 52%
Application Performance
72 / 86 → 84%
Temperature
77%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 83%
Camera
66%
Average
76%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 诺基亚XR21评测--坚固耐用的智能手机，适合日常工作，通过IP69K认证
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-06-23 (Update: 2024-08-15)