联想Yoga Pro 7 14评测--采用AMD Zen 3+的几乎完美的超极本
联想Yoga Pro 7 14是一款新的14英寸超极本,有多种配置。消费者可以选择一系列AMD和英特尔处理器,以及专用的Nvidia显卡,包括最近发布的中端GeForce RTX 4050 Laptop。今天我们将首先检查变体14 ARP G8,它采用AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS ,以及集成Radeon 680M iGPU。该处理器是Zen 3+芯片(Rembrandt-R),去年已经出现在一些笔记本电脑上。我们的评测单位还配备了16GB内存和1TB NVMe SSD。校园版售价为999欧元(1095美元),但不包括Windows系统,而普通客户则需要支付1129欧元(1237美元)的配置(包括Windows 11 Home)。
今后,你还可以选择用较新的Zen 4芯片配置Yoga Pro 7。但我们仍然没有任何关于可用性的信息。我们还得到了一个型号,配备了 英特尔猛禽湖酷睿i7-13700H,一个专门的 GeForce RTX 4050笔记本电脑和一个具有120Hz能力的3K IPS显示屏(1699欧元,或1863美元),并将很快发表评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.50" | 2560x1600 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
87.3 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 i5-12500H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 18.8 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.3 kg | 14.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.4 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | Honor MagicBook View 14 i7-11390H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 14.5 mm | 14.20" | 2520x1680 | |
88.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 16.7 mm | 14.20" | 2520x1680 |
机身 - 铝制外壳的Yoga Pro 7
Yoga Pro 7的机箱完全由铝制成,有风暴灰和潮汐青两种颜色。灰色变体在视觉上非常低调,因此可以很好地融入几乎任何专业环境。机箱看起来非常高级,材料也非常容易处理。指纹方面也没有什么大问题。屏幕边框很好,也很薄,允许83%的屏幕与机身比例,令人尊敬。
这台笔记本电脑同样非常坚固,在这方面没有什么可抱怨的。它的铰链调校得非常好:当你调整屏幕角度(最多180°)时,只有极少的晃动。盖子也可以用一只手轻松打开。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Yoga 7 14比其直接竞争对手略宽,但这部分是由于它的14.5英寸显示屏有点大。它重1,477克(3.26磅),也是比较中最重的机型之一。这就是说,重量上的差异并不特别大。总的来说,评测单位仍然是高度便携的,可以很容易地装入大多数袋子或背包。100瓦的充电器重量为378克(0.83磅)。
规格 - 带有USB 4的AMD Yoga
新的Yoga Pro 7提供了一个实用的端口选择。除了两个USB-C端口,这款笔记本电脑还具有一个全尺寸的HDMI和一个USB-A端口。在日常使用中,你基本上不需要任何适配器就可以搞定。在基于AMD的机型上,后部的USB-C端口支持新的USB4协议,其速度可达40Gbit/s。这意味着,如果你愿意,你可以连接一个外部GPU。然而,Yoga Pro 7的用户将不得不在没有SD读卡器的情况下使用。
连接性
联想为Pro 7配备了一个现代的Wi-Fi 6E无线模块,支持蓝牙5.1。然而,在我们的测试中,我们无法连接到华硕参考路由器的6GHz网络。即便如此,在5G网络(Wi-Fi 6)上的传输速率仍然非常高且稳定。我们在测试中没有注意到连接质量的任何问题。
Networking | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
网络摄像头
在屏幕上方,你会发现边框中内置了一个1080p网络摄像头。这个摄像头的质量比旧的720p型号略好。联想给了它一个电子快门(eShutter),可以通过设备右侧的开关启用。还有一个红外摄像头,用于与Windows Hello结合的人脸识别。
维护
底部的盖子由几颗T5 Torx螺丝固定,不费吹灰之力就可以拆掉。一旦进去,你就可以看到两个风扇、电池、无线模块和M.2 2280 SSD。但其余的组件,包括内存,都是焊接的。
输入设备 - 异常舒适的键盘
Yoga Pro 7配备了一个非常舒适的键盘,有1.5毫米(0.6英寸)的行程。在打字的感觉上,它几乎不比更贵的ThinkPads的键盘差,甚至比一些ThinkPads的1.35毫米(0.05英寸)键程的键盘更好。键盘非常安静,不会太僵硬--总而言之,Yoga Pro 7的键盘给我们带来了非常积极的惊喜。即使是较长的文字,在它上面也很容易输入。键盘还有一个白色背光,有两个亮度级别,可以使用环境光传感器打开和关闭。
大型触摸板(13.5 x 8厘米,或5.3 x 3.1英寸)为光标控制提供了充足的空间,并支持最多四个手指的手势。由于触摸板的光滑表面,它工作起来非常可靠和出色。触摸板的下半部分可以被压下,但这会产生非常响亮的点击声,听起来很廉价。我们建议只敲击触摸板进行点击输入。
显示器 - 2.5K IPS,具有90Hz功能
联想为Yoga Pro 7提供了两种不同的14.5英寸面板,可以选择哑光显示屏或光面触摸屏。我们的评测单位配备的是基本型号:2.5K IPS显示屏(2560 x 1600像素),长宽比为16:10,刷新率为90Hz。在我们眼中,哑光IPS面板的图像质量非常好。内容看起来很清晰,颜色很鲜艳,尽管是哑光处理,但明亮的区域不会出现颗粒感。由于其90Hz的刷新率,该显示器也能产生流畅的图像,但它最初默认设置为60Hz。根据我们的主观评价,2.5K面板和3K IPS面板的图像质量实际上是一样的(尽管3K面板的色彩覆盖率和亮度更出色)。
联想声称,该显示器的最大亮度为350cd/m²。我们的评测单元略微超过了这个数值,整个面板的平均峰值亮度为365cd/m²。由于0.26cd/m²的体面黑度,该屏幕具有大约1,500:1的出色对比度。这款笔记本电脑可以根据环境光线条件自动调整屏幕亮度,这一功能运行良好。响应时间也同样相当好。不使用PWM控制亮度。
|
Brightness Distribution: 91 %
Center on Battery: 386 cd/m²
Contrast: 1485:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.2
ΔE Greyscale 6.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
73.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.09
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 LEN145WQXGA, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 AU Optronics AUOA49A, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 Samsung SDC4171 (ATNA40YK07-0), OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 LEN140WQ+, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Honor MagicBook View 14 CSO MNE208UA1-1 (CSO140B), LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.2" | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 CSOTT3 U17B MNE208ZA1-3, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.2" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 5% | 23% | 5% | -4% | -4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 71.8 | 76.6 7% | 98.05 37% | 77.7 8% | 67.5 -6% | 67.8 -6% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.2 | 100 1% | 99.63 0% | 100 1% | 98.6 -1% | 98.3 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.1 | 77.4 6% | 97.22 33% | 78.4 7% | 70.1 -4% | |
Response Times | -46% | 88% | 26% | 22% | 15% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.2 ? | 65.6 ? -52% | 35.2 ? 19% | 33.2 ? 23% | 37.6 ? 13% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 25.9 ? | 36 ? -39% | 3 ? 88% | 17.6 ? 32% | 20.8 ? 20% | 21.6 ? 17% |
PWM Frequency | 360 | 27780 ? | ||||
Screen | 25% | 103% | 14% | 27% | 27% | |
Brightness middle | 386 | 425.9 10% | 389 1% | 469 22% | 418 8% | 419 9% |
Brightness | 366 | 405 11% | 389 6% | 445 22% | 408 11% | 407 11% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 87 -4% | 98 8% | 90 -1% | 91 0% | 93 2% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.26 -0% | 0.029 89% | 0.24 8% | 0.23 12% | |
Contrast | 1485 | 1638 10% | 13414 803% | 1742 17% | 1822 23% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 2.81 26% | 3.51 8% | 3.5 8% | 1.28 66% | 1.9 50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.1 | 4.91 46% | 6.87 25% | 5.3 42% | 3.48 62% | 3.6 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.2 | 0.49 59% | 2.11 -76% | 1.7 -42% | 1.01 16% | 0.9 25% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.2 | 2.2 65% | 2.2 65% | 3.3 47% | 2.7 56% | 2.9 53% |
Gamma | 2.09 105% | 2.04 108% | 2.16 102% | 1.97 112% | 2.19 100% | 2.14 103% |
CCT | 6618 98% | 6688 97% | 6320 103% | 6512 100% | 7043 92% | 6733 97% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
10% | 71% /
84% | 15% /
14% | 15% /
22% | 13% /
19% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro2)分析了显示器。开箱后,该显示器就有轻微的绿色色调。对于灰色阴影和颜色,实际输出和参考sRGB色域之间的差异(Delta-E 2000)大大超过了3的关键阈值。尽管如此,该面板确实有潜力:尽管我们的校准(产生的配置文件可在上面免费下载)导致最大亮度下降了约30cd/m²,但现在两种颜色和灰色阴影只与各自的参考值有非常小的偏差;绿色色调也完全消失。只有100%的红色略微高于目标水平(差异约为4)。尽管如此,结合其全sRGB覆盖率,该面板仍然适用于图像和视频编辑。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.3 ms rise | |
↘ 12.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 59 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.9 ms rise | |
↘ 23.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
哑光显示屏在户外的表现相当好。它有一个很好的视角,只有在阳光直射的情况下才会变得足够明亮,使屏幕上的内容可以合理地阅读。
性能 - Zen 3+的额定功率为45瓦
基于AMD的新Yoga Pro 7版本只提供额定功率为45瓦的Ryzen HS处理器。我们应该在这里提到,Ryzen 7000的标签已被应用于Zen 3+和较新的Zen 4芯片,这可能有些令人困惑。区分它们的一个方法是看产品型号中的最后两位数字:"35 "表示Zen 3+,"40 "表示Zen 4 CPU。现在只有Zen 3+处理器可用。目前还不知道Zen 4版本何时推出。联想还提供了为笔记本电脑配备专用GPU的选项。你可以选择一个 GeForce RTX 3050笔记本电脑(TGP为58瓦)和一个 GeForce RTX 4050笔记本电脑(TGP为55瓦)。
测试条件
在联想Vantage应用程序中,有三种性能模式可供选择:电池保护器、智能冷却和高性能。你可以通过按Fn+Q在它们之间切换。在我们只使用iGPU的机型上使用高性能 设置是没有意义的。这是因为该模式只能小幅提高多核CPU性能(见CPU部分),但对iGPU或游戏性能没有影响。因此,不值得忍受更高的风扇活动。我们只在合成压力测试中注意到明显的差异。但在这种情况下,你可以简单地切换到高性能模式。出于这个原因,我们在进行下面的基准测试和测量时,默认使用智能冷却 模式。
处理器
新 "的AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS本质上是一个重塑的 Ryzen 7 6800HS提升时钟增加了50MHz。它仍然有8个Zen 3+核心,可以同时运行16个线程。该处理器能够在短时间内消耗高达60瓦的电力,并在持续负载下稳定在大约45-50瓦的水平。高性能模式将短期和长期功率限制分别提高到65瓦和60瓦。然而,循环运行Cinebench 15显示,这并没有任何重大影响。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
基准测试结果从整体上看是优秀的。在多核测试中,Ryzen 7 7735HS ,基本上领先于其直接竞争对手。英特尔芯片只在单核测试中略有领先。总而言之,对于这个熟悉的处理器来说,这是一个很好的表现。
用电池电源运行笔记本电脑并不会降低性能。请参阅本页了解更多CPU基准测试。
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 -2! | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (11072 - 14131, n=12) | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2001, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1288 - 1570, n=12) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (4339 - 5502, n=12) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (502 - 613, n=12) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1795 - 2355, n=14) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=66, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (206 - 255, n=13) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (214 - 279, n=12) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (48327 - 63698, n=12) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (4779 - 5849, n=12) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (7368 - 10258, n=12) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1327 - 1615, n=12) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (12.7 - 17.9, n=12) | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (44.3 - 63.9, n=12) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (0.4822 - 0.585, n=12) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (12718 - 17161, n=13) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1141 - 32888, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (81722 - 105483, n=13) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6838 - 123315, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (2818 - 3494, n=13) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (90101 - 108729, n=13) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11579 - 115682, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (11441 - 13097, n=13) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (44756 - 58232, n=13) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (3366 - 65433, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (49927 - 137629, n=13) | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (651 - 906, n=13) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (166.9 - 1379, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (1459 - 9094, n=13) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 54881, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (19153 - 30542, n=13) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
系统性能
在日常使用中,Yoga Pro 7是一个绝对反应灵敏的设备,即使在处理高要求的应用程序时也不会动摇。良好的基准测试结果强调了我们对笔记本电脑性能的印象,在我们评估该产品的整个过程中,我们没有发现任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (5722 - 7000, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=51, last 2 years) | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (9933 - 11124, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (8829 - 9862, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=51, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (5798 - 8726, n=5) | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (1387 - 1736, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 1971, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (1443 - 1725, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1875, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (385 - 2210, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (1376 - 1785, n=5) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M (1247 - 1653, n=5) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1899, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
PCMark 10 Score | 6767 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Subnotebook (14916 - 108756, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (30324 - 52012, n=13) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 122210, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (33938 - 51856, n=13) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Subnotebook (16513 - 117898, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (33175 - 55284, n=13) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.2 - 187.8, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS (78.2 - 109.7, n=13) |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
在我们的标准化DPC延迟测试中(网页浏览、4K YouTube视频播放、CPU负载),评测单位在现有的BIOS版本中没有表现出任何限制,因此适合实时音频任务。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
联想为Yoga Pro 7配备了快速的PCIe 4.0 NVMe驱动器--在我们的案例中是1TB三星PM9A1。传输速率非常好,高达7GB/s。然而,在持续负载几分钟后,性能几乎下降了一半。也就是说,这在日常使用中不应该有任何影响,我们在测试中没有遇到任何问题。你可以访问这个页面了解更多的SSD基准测试。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Load Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
图形处理由集成的Radeon 680M ,我们已经在去年发布的Ryzen 6000芯片上看到过。新的Radeon 780M应该会更快,尽管暂时还找不到新的APU。因此,Radeon 680M仍然是一个很好的选择,因为它比英特尔最新的Raptor Lake CPU上的集成Xe Graphics G7 ,提供了相当多的性能(约40-50%)。
虽然680M至少能够与功能较少的专用GPU(如GeForce MX450 和MX550 )相媲美,但独立的GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop 的速度要快得多(约70%)。在游戏过程中,680M的性能足以在中高设置下运行许多游戏,并且比英特尔的iGPU有很大优势。
图形性能在持续负载以及电池供电的情况下也保持完全稳定。你可以在这里找到更多的GPU基准测试https://www.notebookcheck.net/Mobile-Graphics-Cards-Benchmark-List.844.0.html.
3DMark 11 Performance | 11387 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6993 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2879 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=53, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (7.81 - 53, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11.9 - 44.2, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook View 14 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (17.7 - 70.7, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 | |
Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (13 - 99.5, n=64, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 |
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 138.5 | 119.7 | 53.4 | 24.2 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 150 | 48 | 27.1 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 116.5 | 104.5 | 81.3 | 70.9 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 74.7 | 36.9 | 25.9 | 18.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 53.8 | 44 | 35.1 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 70 | 45 | 41 | 40 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 167.5 | 63 | 53.1 | 44.2 | |
F1 2021 (2021) | 186.3 | 88.4 | 67 | 27.3 | |
F1 22 (2022) | 83.1 | 70.1 | 54.9 | 12.3 |
排放--Yoga Pro 7保持了令人愉快的安静
噪声排放
新的Yoga Pro 7在日常使用中非常安静;当笔记本电脑运行基本任务时,风扇通常不会旋转。在游戏过程中,你可以期待设备发出约36-42 dB(A)的噪音,尽管这取决于CPU的利用率。在我们的压力测试中,噪音水平只上升到36.2分贝(A),并保持恒定。Yoga Pro 7在高性能模式下达到了更高的47.3分贝(A),我们认为这是不必要的。我们的评测设备没有发出任何其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.2 / 24.2 / 24.2 dB(A) |
Load |
| 36.2 / 36.2 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 Radeon 680M, R7 7735HS, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 Radeon 680M, R7 7736U, PSEIB512GABBMC0 | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-12500H, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Honor MagicBook View 14 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11390H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 5% | -4% | -1% | -9% | -1% | |
off / environment * | 24.2 | 23 5% | 25.15 -4% | 23.7 2% | 25 -3% | 24.3 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.2 | 23 5% | 25.15 -4% | 23.7 2% | 26 -7% | 24.3 -0% |
Idle Average * | 24.2 | 23 5% | 25.15 -4% | 25.1 -4% | 27 -12% | 24.3 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.2 | 23 5% | 25.15 -4% | 25.1 -4% | 29 -20% | 28.4 -17% |
Load Average * | 36.2 | 27.8 23% | 35.6 2% | 38.4 -6% | 38 -5% | 31.7 12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.7 | 40.6 5% | 38.4 10% | 40 6% | 31.7 26% | |
Load Maximum * | 36.2 | 40.3 -11% | 40.3 -11% | 39.4 -9% | 45 -24% | 46.8 -29% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
联想成功地控制了Pro 7的表面温度。底盖中心(向后)是唯一在负载下明显变热的区域,在我们的测试中达到约50°C(122°F)。但在游戏过程中,这部分的温度略低,为45°C(113°F),这意味着将超极本放在腿上仍然是可能的。在任何情况下,铝制机箱在普通的、要求不高的任务中总是能够保持愉快的温度。
在压力测试中,SoC的功耗最初下降到略高于30瓦,随后在大约15分钟后稳定在15瓦。我们的压力测试代表一种极端情况,在这种情况下,你可以切换到高性能模式。这将使功耗提高到60瓦,但同时也增加了风扇的噪音。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.8 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.1 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.5 °C / 81.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.8 °C / 1.4 F).
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS, AMD Radeon 680M | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, AMD Radeon 680M | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 Intel Core i5-12500H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Honor MagicBook View 14 Intel Core i7-11390H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 8% | -11% | -11% | 0% | -2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.2 | 38.6 2% | 43 -10% | 42.3 -8% | 41 -5% | 41.1 -5% |
Maximum Bottom * | 49.8 | 42.8 14% | 45.6 8% | 52.8 -6% | 46 8% | 45.4 9% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.2 | 22.2 8% | 29.5 -22% | 27.1 -12% | 25 -3% | 25.3 -5% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.1 | 23.6 6% | 30.3 -21% | 29.1 -16% | 25 -0% | 26.5 -6% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
联想为Yoga配备了一个四扬声器系统,整体听起来相当不错。扬声器足够响亮和清晰。低音是唯一缺乏的东西。对于正常的视频播放或一些背景音乐,它们当然足够好。然而,竞争对手的产品,如 马特本14s表明仍有改进的余地。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Huawei MateBook 14s i7 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理--大量的耐力
消耗功率
我们的测量表明,基于AMD的新Yoga Pro 7效率很高,在屏幕亮度全部调高、刷新率设置为90Hz的情况下,空闲时的耗电量仅为7.9瓦。负载下也没有任何问题:你可以预期在游戏过程中的用电量约为60瓦特。在压力测试中,笔记本电脑首先达到了约84瓦的峰值功耗,然后迅速稳定在约65-70瓦的状态。因此,100瓦的充电器对该设备来说绝对足够强大。
Off / Standby | 0.36 / 0.45 Watt |
Idle | 4.1 / 7.7 / 7.9 Watt |
Load |
66.2 / 84.3 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 14.5" | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M, PSEIB512GABBMC0, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 i5-12500H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Honor MagicBook View 14 i7-11390H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.2" | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, LTPS, 2520x1680, 14.2" | Average AMD Radeon 680M | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 20% | -15% | 1% | 7% | 3% | -17% | 5% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 3.2 22% | 6.1 -49% | 5.6 -37% | 4 2% | 4.4 -7% | 6.94 ? -69% | 4.44 ? -8% |
Idle Average * | 7.7 | 5.4 30% | 6.8 12% | 9.3 -21% | 7 9% | 8.7 -13% | 8.92 ? -16% | 7.55 ? 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 5.6 29% | 15 -90% | 9.6 -22% | 11 -39% | 9.6 -22% | 10.5 ? -33% | 9.45 ? -20% |
Load Average * | 66.2 | 42.2 36% | 45 32% | 49 26% | 50 24% | 46 31% | 53.9 ? 19% | 45.8 ? 31% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 61.5 | 60 2% | 47.1 23% | 38.2 38% | 44.8 27% | 42.2 31% | ||
Load Maximum * | 84.3 | 82 3% | 97 -15% | 65.2 23% | 67 21% | 87.6 -4% | 70.8 ? 16% | 68.4 ? 19% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
电池寿命
73Wh的大电池,加上笔记本的低功率使用,使得电池寿命特别长。我们在显示屏处于150cd/m²以及全亮度的情况下进行了Wi-Fi测试,每次都将刷新率设置为60Hz和90Hz。我们发现,将屏幕亮度全部调高只会导致电池寿命有大约一小时的差异。60Hz刷新率的结果几乎是一样的。Yoga Pro 7有一个非常强大的表现,即使在最大亮度的情况下,60Hz下持续了近10小时,90Hz下持续了9小时。当亮度被调整到150cd/m²时(相当于我们评测设备最大亮度的81%),该设备在Wi-Fi测试中甚至能够达到13小时,在视频播放中达到15小时。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8 R7 7735HS, Radeon 680M, 73 Wh | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M, 65 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF314-71-56U3 i5-12500H, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7i Pro 14IAP G7 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 61 Wh | Honor MagicBook View 14 i7-11390H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14s i7 i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 42% | -45% | -31% | -15% | -11% | 9% | |
H.264 | 903 | 426 -53% | 643 -29% | 693 -23% | 911 ? 1% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 783 | 777 -1% | 312 -60% | 517 -34% | 544 -31% | 618 -21% | 726 ? -7% |
Load | 86 | 158 84% | 66 -23% | 61 -29% | 88 2% | 95 10% | 115.4 ? 34% |
Reader / Idle | 1393 | 1382 | 1750 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论--Yoga Pro 7是最好的超极本之一
新的联想Yoga Pro 7在审查期间给我们留下了深刻印象,几乎在所有部门都表现出色。其中包括优质的铝制机箱,有足够的端口选择,非常舒适的键盘,哑光IPS显示屏,长的电池寿命和出色的系统性能。
当然,我们希望看到这款笔记本电脑配备新的AMD Zen 4 CPU,但其去年的Zen 3+处理器仍然是一个非常坚实的选择,总体上比英特尔目前的Raptor Lake型号提供更多的性能(特别是在GPU方面)。此外,在电池供电的情况下,性能仍然稳定,处理器的效率很高。这一点,加上大电池,使该笔记本电脑能够提供良好的电池寿命。用户应该可以在没有充电器的情况下轻松度过整个工作日。
Yoga Pro 7应该配备新的Zen 4芯片,但现在没有人可以说这将在何时发生。基于Zen 4的机型预计也会稍微贵一些。尽管如此,鉴于其极高的性价比,我们可以全心全意地推荐Zen 3+评测机型。在我们看来,目前在1,129欧元(1,239美元)的价格下,你不会找到更好的整体方案。
虽然处理器已经使用了一年,但性能仍然和以前一样出色。新的联想Yoga Pro 7 14是一个了不起的整体包装,有一个伟大的屏幕,奇妙的键盘和长的电池寿命。它还具有极高的性价比,当然是目前市场上最好的超极本之一--确实值得我们授予编辑选择奖。
新的Yoga Pro 7没有任何真正的弱点。我们唯一的不满是机上缺少SD卡读卡器。但考虑到它的价格,这款超极本真的没有什么其他可抱怨的。你甚至可以给它配置一个更好的显示面板,有P3的覆盖率。HP Dragonfly Pro (配备Ryzen 7 7736U--基本上是去年的Ryzen 7 6800U),我们最近评测过,它的端口大大减少,采用光面FHD面板,而且不能升级存储。基于英特尔的竞争对手提供的性能较差,特别是在集成显卡方面,尽管如此,通常也更昂贵。那些需要更多图形力量的人也可以得到新的Yoga Pro 7,配备GeForce RTX 4050笔记本电脑(最大55瓦)。我们目前也在测试这一型号,所以请关注我们即将发布的评论。
价格和可用性
在德国,你现在可以从联想购买Yoga Pro 7 14的评测配置,价格为1129欧元(1239美元),或者从Campuspoint购买校园版本999欧元(1095美元)从Campuspoint购买,后者为我们提供了评测设备。同样的配置在英国需要972英镑,可以从联想商店购买。
Yoga Pro 7在北美也被称为联想Slim Pro 7,预计将于2023年7月开始在该地区销售。价格将从1449美元开始。
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ARP G8
- 04/19/2023 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.