HP Dragonfly Pro笔记本电脑评测。AMD Ryzen 7 7736U让人眼前一亮
虽然蜻蜓系列最初是作为以商业为中心的精英笔记本电脑推出的,但后来的型号已经慢慢走向更多的专业消费者方向,以吸引在家工作的自由职业者或内容创作者。最新的机型是蜻蜓专业版,配备了优质材料、最新的AMD Zen 3+硬件选项,以及不同于现有Pavilion 、Envy、Spectre或EliteBook系列的全新轻薄设计。
我们审查的配置是市场上首批配备AMD Zen 3+ Ryzen 7 7736U处理器和超快的6400 MHz LPDDR5内存的产品之一,零售价约为1399美元。目前所有的SKU都配备了相同的CPU和14英寸1920 x 1200 IPS触摸屏,这意味着它们只在机箱颜色、内存和存储容量上有区别。
蜻蜓专业版的替代品包括其他高端14英寸专业消费型副笔记本,如Apple MacBook Pro 14,Asus ZenBook 14,Lenovo Yoga 7 14,LG Gram 14, 或Honor MagicBook 14 。
更多惠普评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
89.4 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M | 1.5 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
90.3 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17 mm | 13.50" | 3000x2000 | |
89.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 15.25 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
93.9 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU | 1.6 kg | 15.5 mm | 14.20" | 3024x1964 | |
87.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 15.28 mm | 13.40" | 3456x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
机箱 - EliteBook Vibes
全哑光的机箱与更闪亮的Spectre系列形成对比,同时保持了高档的外观和感觉。总体印象仍然类似于EliteBook 840系列,因为蜻蜓系列是作为Elitebook型号开始的。与去年的Elite Dragonfly G3相比,更大的Dragonfly Pro更具实质性和刚性,特别是在显示屏方面。
整体尺寸仅比MacBook Pro 14略大,而重量却少了约100克。它也比许多其他副笔记本略厚,包括XPS 13 Plus和惠普自己的Elite Dragonfly G3。这是一个强大的机箱设计,但它的代价是更大的构建。
连接性 - Thunderbolt 3来了!
集成端口只限于三个USB-C端口。其中两个端口支持USB4和雷电3,速度高达40Gbps,而最后一个端口只有USB-C 3.2,速度高达10Gbps。否则,所有三个端口都可以用于充电或视频输出。
当被问及为什么该型号不包括USB-A端口时,该决定纯粹是为了美观;惠普说,由于厚度要求,USB-A端口需要沿着笔记本电脑的边缘凸起。用户将不得不依靠对接站和适配器来代替。请记住,这里也没有3.5毫米的耳机插孔。
沟通
蜻蜓Pro是为数不多的采用新的高通WCN685x而不是英特尔AX模块的笔记本电脑之一。当使用Wi-Fi 6或6E时,传输率很高且非常稳定。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IRP G8 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
网络摄像头
高端的惠普笔记本电脑通常配备一些笔记本电脑上的最高分辨率网络摄像头。蜻蜓专业版延续了这一趋势,其500万像素的传感器可提供明显更清晰的图像。
有一个电子网络摄像头快门,而不是一个物理滑块来保护隐私。然而,拨动电子快门不会像Spectre上的电子快门那样,在网络摄像头上产生不透明的白色薄膜。
红外线是支持你好的标准配置。
维护
该系统的可维修性似乎与它自己不一致。虽然只用一把T5 Torx扳手就可以很容易地拆下底板,但里面的东西都不能升级,因为根据惠普的说法,内存、SSD和WLAN模块都是焊接的。因此,如果需要的话,只有主电池是可以轻松更换的。相比之下,Elite Dragonfly G3或Spectre x360 13.5的固态硬盘和无线局域网模块则很容易更换。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,零售盒中没有其他额外的东西。通常的一年有限制造商保修适用。
该系列的新功能是24/7实时聊天支持,包括在基本保修中。聊天程序内置在MyHP应用程序中,因此不需要在HP.com上跳过不同的障碍就能找到服务人员。惠普承诺,代理将是蜻蜓专业系列的专家,以更好地帮助解决具体问题或请求。
输入设备
键盘
与Spectre、EliteBook或ThinkPad系列相比,按键行程和反馈感觉略浅,而且更轻。即使是空格键和回车键,也明显更安静,一些用户可能会喜欢。
也许键盘最大的问题是沿键盘右侧边缘有一大列辅助键。这些是快速启动的MyHP键,用于网络摄像头控制和笔记本电脑支持。然而,问题是,这些不经常使用的按键占用了退格键、后斜线键和回车键的宝贵空间,而这些按键现在都变得更短、更拥挤了。因此,我们经常发现自己在按下回车键或退格键时意外地启动了MyHP。
触摸板
点击板的大小与去年的 蜻蜓G3 13.512 x 8厘米。除此以外,蜻蜓专业版的点击板有很大不同,在按下其表面时几乎完全没有声音。这是一个触觉触控板,很像MacBook系列,与大多数其他Windows笔记本电脑的标准触控板形成对比。这需要一些时间来适应,但如果能有更强的反馈就更好不过了。戴尔在某些Latitude ,尽管有更强的振动反馈,但也采取了类似的无凹陷点击板方法。
显示器 - 1200p IPS触摸屏
结账时只有一个面板选项,而大多数EliteBook机型有多种分辨率、亮度选项、色彩覆盖率、刷新率等。即便如此,Dragonfly Pro上的1200p触摸屏提供了完整的sRGB覆盖率和相对较高的IPS面板对比度。它最大的缺点也许是黑白和灰白的响应时间较慢,有较明显的重影现象。
|
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 425.9 cd/m²
Contrast: 1638:1 (Black: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.49
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
77.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
76.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.04
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 AU Optronics AUOA49A, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 SDC4160, OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED Samsung 134XK04, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.4" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Lenovo LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 16% | -8% | 30% | 19% | 19% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 76.6 | 99.9 30% | 68 -11% | 99.2 30% | 99.5 30% | 99.8 30% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 98.3 -2% | 100 0% | 100 0% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 77.4 | 90.8 17% | 69.9 -10% | 98.4 27% | 98.7 28% | |
Response Times | 96% | 13% | 37% | 95% | 98% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 65.6 ? | 1.9 ? 97% | 50.8 ? 23% | 35.2 ? 46% | 2.6 ? 96% | 1.2 ? 98% |
Response Time Black / White * | 36 ? | 2.16 ? 94% | 35.2 ? 2% | 26.4 ? 27% | 2.1 ? 94% | 1.2 ? 97% |
PWM Frequency | 60.2 ? | 14880 ? | 59.5 | 347.2 ? | ||
Screen | -4% | -9% | 211% | -1% | -31% | |
Brightness middle | 425.9 | 351.7 -17% | 387.2 -9% | 500 17% | 371.8 -13% | 367.3 -14% |
Brightness | 405 | 351 -13% | 360 -11% | 489 21% | 374 -8% | 369 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 87 0% | 80 -8% | 94 8% | 98 13% | 97 11% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.26 -0% | 0.02 92% | |||
Contrast | 1638 | 1489 -9% | 25000 1426% | |||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.81 | 1.78 37% | 2.36 16% | 1.2 57% | 2.37 16% | 5.2 -85% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.91 | 6.14 -25% | 4.79 2% | 2.6 47% | 6.1 -24% | 8.04 -64% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.49 | 0.63 -29% | ||||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.3 -5% | 3 -36% | 1.7 23% | 2 9% | 2.8 -27% |
Gamma | 2.04 108% | 2.11 104% | 2.17 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.29 96% | 2.21 100% |
CCT | 6688 97% | 6683 97% | 6137 106% | 6791 96% | 6261 104% | 5992 108% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 36% /
20% | -1% /
-6% | 93% /
163% | 38% /
22% | 29% /
6% |
* ... smaller is better
虽然显示器没有预先校准,但平均灰度和色彩deltaE值并不差。用X-Rite色度计自行校准面板,可以将灰度和色彩从2.2和2.81分别提高到0.8和0.49。我们建议应用我们上面的校准过的ICM配置文件,以便从显示器中获得更多。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise | |
↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
65.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 31.1 ms rise | |
↘ 34.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
400尼特的显示屏可能没有一些EliteBook型号的1000尼特选项那么亮,但在阴凉处也足够体面。仍应避免阳光照射,以减少眩光对光面屏幕的影响。请确保通过Radeon控制面板禁用AMD Vari-Bright,否则在电池供电的情况下,最大亮度上限将自动下降。
业绩
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们将Windows设置为性能模式。没有预装的 "命令中心 "软件用于调整风扇噪音或性能水平,这与惠普的许多其他笔记本电脑型号不同。
建议业主熟悉每个系统预装的MyHP软件。笔记本电脑的具体功能都可以通过MyHP访问,包括可编程键、网络摄像头调整、音频控制、支持帮助等。
值得注意的是,某些基准测试会自动导致蓝屏死亡,包括Geekbench 5.0和AIDA,因此下面不包括这些基准测试的结果。
处理器--接近于H系列的性能
对于U系列处理器来说,CPU性能是非常快的,尽管 Ryzen 7 7736U是Ryzen 7 6800U的翻版。 Ryzen 7 6800U.多线程性能比去年的Ryzen 7 5825U这使它领先于任何英特尔第12代Core-U或Core-P选项,甚至包括 酷睿i7-1280P.事实上,整体性能比更耗电的酷睿i7-12700H快5%到10%。 酷睿i7-12700H在许多大型游戏笔记本电脑上发现。很明显,Ryzen 7 7736U Ryzen 7 7736U是为了与英特尔即将推出的第13代酷睿U系列进行正面交锋。
考虑到小的外形尺寸,性能的可持续性还算不错。当循环运行CineBench R15 xT时,性能会随着时间慢慢下降,然后稳定在11%的赤字,如下图所示。相比之下 MacBook Pro 14在类似条件下,可以无限期地保持更高的性能水平。
请记住,Ryzen 7 7736U是Zen 3+而不是Zen 4。从右边开始的第二个数字标志着今年AMD新的(和混乱的)命名惯例中的处理器的世代。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
系统性能
我们的PCMark 10总体得分是所有采用Core U系列CPU的笔记本电脑中最高的之一。快速的处理器和图形帮助笔记本电脑在生产力和数字内容创作分测试中表现出色。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, AMD Radeon 680M () | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, AMD Radeon 680M () | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, AMD Radeon 680M () | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, AMD Radeon 680M () | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, AMD Radeon 680M () | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, AMD Radeon 680M () | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, AMD Radeon 680M () | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, AMD Radeon 680M () | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
PCMark 10 Score | 6261 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签或运行Prime95压力时,没有重大的DPC问题。然而,在以60 FPS播放4K内容时,有一个小问题,因为在我们长达1分钟的测试视频中,即使经过多次重测,我们也能记录到5个掉帧。在使用过程中,这还不足以引起注意,但没有理由出现任何掉帧。我们 遇到了类似的问题早在2020年推出移动Zen 2的时候,所以在新的移动Zen 3+系列中再次看到这个问题是令人失望的。希望AMD能像上次一样,尽快发布一个热修复。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
PCIe4 x4固态硬盘不是用户可拆卸的,也没有二级扩展槽可用。HWiNFO将其识别为模型 pseib512gabbmc0配有Phison PS5018控制器。然而,性能非常好,连续读取和写入率分别高达6800MB/s和3800MB/s。它也很稳定,即使在长时间的压力下也没有节流现象。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US | |
HP Elite Dragonfly G3 | |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--Playstation 4级别的图形
集成显卡的性能令人印象深刻,其3DMark结果比我们数据库中具有相同功能的普通笔记本电脑高出15%至20%。 Radeon 680MGPU。因此,尽管Ryzen 6000U和7000U系列之间没有明显的iGPU变化,但用户可以期待一个体面的同比性能增长。性能的提升足以让我们的Radeon 680M媲美独立的 GeForce 1650 Max-Q在许多情况下。换句话说,你正在获得PS4级别的性能,大多数游戏在1080p中等设置下平均为30FPS。
iGPU性能比老款Ryzen 6000U CPU的提升,部分归功于非常快的6400 MHz LPDDR5双通道内存。相比之下,大多数子笔记本的RAM在5000MHz范围内或更慢。
3DMark 11 Performance | 11523 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 35309 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6929 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 2914 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 145.8 | 48.7 | 22.8 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 132.8 | 41 | 24.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 118.8 | 101.7 | 76.6 | 65.7 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 65.4 | 33.6 | 23.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 54.8 | 42.8 | 34.6 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 155.8 | 57.7 | 46.5 | 40.1 |
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020) | 78 | 37 | 32 | 27 |
God of War (2022) | 34 | 27.9 | 22.9 | 15.2 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 36.9 | 28.1 | 20.2 | 15.7 |
排放
系统噪声 - 噪声大时音调高
在大多数中低负荷下,如网页浏览或视频流,几乎没有风扇噪音。在这种情况下,风扇噪音通常徘徊在26 dB(A)左右,而安静的背景为23 dB(A),当坐在与屏幕保持正常距离时几乎听不到。
当运行更高的负载如游戏时,风扇噪音将稳定在40 dB(A),比去年的Elite Dragonfly G3更响,或与XPS 13 Plus的噪音差不多。 XPS 13 Plus假设条件相似。不幸的是,由于蜻蜓专业版的内部风扇较小,高音调的风扇噪音在蜻蜓专业版上更为明显。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
Load |
| 27.8 / 40.3 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 Radeon 680M, R7 7736U, PSEIB512GABBMC0 | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1255U, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1265U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, M2 Pro, Apple SSD AP2048Z | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1280P, WDC PC SN810 512GB | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 0% | 6% | -3% | -5% | -7% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 23.5 -2% | 22.8 1% | 23.9 -4% | 23.4 -2% | 22.9 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 23.5 -2% | 23.2 -1% | 23.9 -4% | 23.4 -2% | 23.3 -1% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 23.5 -2% | 23.2 -1% | 23.9 -4% | 23.4 -2% | 23.5 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 23.5 -2% | 23.2 -1% | 23.9 -4% | 23.4 -2% | 23.5 -2% |
Load Average * | 27.8 | 27 3% | 25.1 10% | 26 6% | 35 -26% | 33.2 -19% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.6 | 36.2 11% | 32 21% | 41.6 -2% | 44.9 -11% | |
Load Maximum * | 40.3 | 42.4 -5% | 35.2 13% | 43.2 -7% | 39.9 1% | 44.6 -11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于内部的对称冷却解决方案,温度发展基本上是对称的。当长时间运行高要求的负载时,键盘中心和底部的热点温度可分别达到39C和43C。这比在 幽灵x360 13.5而比框架笔记本电脑13.5两者都采用较慢的英特尔CPU。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.8 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.1 °C / 70 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 23.8 °C / 74.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+5 °C / 9 F).
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 AMD Ryzen 7 7736U, AMD Radeon 680M | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 Intel Core i7-1255U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 Intel Core i7-1265U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Apple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240p Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 8% | -10% | -2% | -51% | -33% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38.6 | 36.4 6% | 39 -1% | 46.9 -22% | 47.6 -23% | 43.2 -12% |
Maximum Bottom * | 42.8 | 37 14% | 42.2 1% | 41.7 3% | 57 -33% | 45.6 -7% |
Idle Upper Side * | 22.2 | 20.8 6% | 26.8 -21% | 21.4 4% | 38.8 -75% | 34.6 -56% |
Idle Bottom * | 23.6 | 22.6 4% | 28.2 -19% | 21.4 9% | 41 -74% | 37 -57% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,时钟频率和电路板功耗将分别在几秒钟内飙升至3.9GHz和51W,然后下降并稳定在3.6GHz和40W。 精英蜻蜓G3 13.5在类似条件下的温度。
运行时的GPU时钟速率和温度 Witcher 3将分别稳定在1974 MHz和62 C,而上述Spectre的时钟频率为1097 MHz和65 C。蜻蜓专业版提供更快的图形性能,而不需要运行温度。
电池供电的性能略有下降。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回物理和图形分数,分别为15823和10856分,而在主电源上则为16618和11605分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 27 |
Prime95压力 | 3.5 - 3.6 | - | 73 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.9 | 1123 | 58 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 0.8 | 1974 | 62 |
发言人
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗--低谷和高潮
该系统非常省电,这解释了下一节中相对较长的电池寿命结果。根据亮度和电源配置文件,在桌面上空转只需要3W到6W,而Elite Dragonfly G3是3W到8W,XPS 13 Plus是6W到13W。 XPS 13 Plus OLED.
游戏需要比其他大多数U系列笔记本电脑更多的电力,但图形性能的增加对用户来说可能是值得的。例如,在我们的Dragon系列笔记本上运行 Witcher 3 蜻蜓专业版的平均功率为60瓦,比使用Iris X引擎的Spectre x360 13.5和XPS 13 Plus的要求分别高出67%和22%。XPS 13 Plus的要求分别高出67%和22%,而提供的图形性能却比两者都快40%至60%。
当CPU和iGPU的利用率为100%时,我们能够从小型(6.8 x 6.8 x 3厘米)的96瓦GaN交流适配器中记录到82瓦的最大功耗。如下图所示,这个最大速率是暂时的。
Off / Standby | 0.33 / 0.76 Watt |
Idle | 3.2 / 5.4 / 5.6 Watt |
Load |
42.2 / 82 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M, PSEIB512GABBMC0, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFH, OLED, 3000x2000, 13.5" | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048Z, Mini-LED, 3024x1964, 14.2" | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN810 512GB, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.4" | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -16% | 0% | -41% | -45% | -80% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 4 -25% | 3.4 -6% | 2.4 25% | 6.5 -103% | 8 -150% |
Idle Average * | 5.4 | 4.9 9% | 5.6 -4% | 11.3 -109% | 7.8 -44% | 14 -159% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.6 | 12.5 -123% | 8.4 -50% | 11.5 -105% | 13 -132% | 14.4 -157% |
Load Average * | 42.2 | 48.1 -14% | 40.8 3% | 59.6 -41% | 56.6 -34% | 59.6 -41% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 60 | 35.8 40% | 35.5 41% | 55.9 7% | 49.2 18% | 53.6 11% |
Load Maximum * | 82 | 65.2 20% | 68.4 17% | 100 -22% | 63 23% | 68.1 17% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命 - 超长
相对于你从硬件获得的性能而言,运行时间非常长。我们能够在现实世界的WLAN浏览中获得近13个小时的时间,这比许多其他的副笔记本包括英特尔驱动的 联想Yoga 9 14或戴尔XPS 13 Plus 9320。电池容量为65Wh,是这个尺寸级别的标准。
从空电到满电大约需要90分钟。
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023 R7 7736U, Radeon 680M, 65 Wh | HP Spectre x360 13.5 14t-ef000 i7-1255U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 66 Wh | HP Elite Dragonfly G3 i7-1265U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro M2 Pro, M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, 70 Wh | Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i7-1280P OLED i7-1280P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 14IAP7 82LU0001US i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 75 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -22% | 29% | -26% | -55% | -48% | |
Reader / Idle | 1393 | 1223 -12% | 2268 63% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 777 | 481 -38% | 706 -9% | 807 4% | 346 -55% | 405 -48% |
Load | 158 | 133 -16% | 209 32% | 70 -56% | ||
H.264 | 917 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 惠普对MacBook Pro 14和戴尔XPS 13 Plus的回应
蜻蜓专业版的目标受众与最近的 Spectre x360 13.5但有一个非常不同的方法。蜻蜓专业版没有提供英特尔处理器和更多的显示选项、更广泛的端口和更有光泽的颜色,而是提供AMD处理器和有限的配置以及柔和的哑光颜色。最终的结果是一个不加修饰的蛤壳,有一种专注而简约的感觉:我们喜欢这里的东西,但用户可能会错过其他PC上的所有省略功能,如HDMI、USB-A、读卡器、音频插孔、OLED或可扩展存储或内存。
蜻蜓专业版本质上是一个没有所有钟声和口哨声的Spectre,对生产力来说是一种更集中的方法。
重视制造质量和性能而不求助于耗电的独立显卡的用户可能会发现蜻蜓Pro更有吸引力。高度集成的内部设备和缺乏物理功能使其具有非常简洁的美感,而Ryzen 7 7736U的性能很容易成为U系列中最快的产品之一。特别是Radeon 680M,它的性能远远超过了它的重量,数字艺术家和休闲游戏者可以欣赏。
另一个需要注意的方面是相对较高的1400美元起价,这与Spectre x360系列或更快的Spectre x360相似。联想Yoga Slim 7 Pro X 配有独立的Nvidia Studio图形。当涉及到辅助功能和选项时,这些替代产品往往功能更全面。
价格和可用性
Dragonfly Pro今天开始在HP.com发货,512GB SSD/16GB RAM和1TB SSD/32GB RAM配置的起价分别为1400美元和1550美元。
HP Dragonfly Pro 2023
- 02/23/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.