Notebookcheck Logo
Image source: Daniel Schmidt / Notebookcheck

努比亚 Z60 超极版领先版评测--超越价格的热门交易

让它燃烧吧

尽管努比亚 Z60 Ultra 仍然相对较新,但改进版已经重新发布。由于努比亚将主要精力放在通过更快的 SoC 和新的相机传感器来改进设备上,因此两款机型在设计上非常一致。请看评测,看看这些变化是否改进了这款已经非常出色的经济型旗舰机。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version (Z60 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 8 x 3.4 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)
Graphics adapter
Qualcomm Adreno 750, Core: 1000 MHz
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.80 inch 20:9, 2480 x 1116 pixel 400 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, Longxi Durable Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: G-Sensor, elec. Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, OTG
Networking
Qualcomm FastConnect 7800 (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 8), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.78 x 163.98 x 76.35
Battery
6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 80W Charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX906, 35 mm, 1/1.56", f/1.59, OIS) + 50 MPix (Ultra Wide, OV50E, 18 mm, 1/1.55", f/1.8, OIS) + 64 MPix (Zoom, OV64B, 85 mm, 1/2", f/3.3, OIS) Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.0)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, 80W-Charger, Clear Case, USB-C-Cabel, MyOS K, 12 Months Warranty, GNSS: GPS (L1, L2, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B2, B1c, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b), QZSS (L1, L5); Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, Opus, LDAC, LC3; HDR: HLG: HLG, HDR10; DRM Widevine L1; IP68, fanless, waterproof
Weight
246 g, Power Supply: 135 g
Price
779 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
Price
81.6 %v8
10 / 2024
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
246 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2480x1116
90.6 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Honor Magic6 Pro
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
229 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"2800x1280
91.1 %
v7 (old)
v7 (old)
05 / 2024
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750
232 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.80"3120x1440
88.1 %v8
06 / 2024
OnePlus 12
SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750
220 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.82"3168x1440

注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请访问这里

外壳和功能 - 领先版本采用龙溪玻璃

努比亚 Z60 Ultra 旗舰机型的设计棱角分明,背面的摄像头设置引人注目。不过,由于重新设计了后面板,它很容易与前代产品区分开来。手机重量为 246 克,虽然偏重,但拿在手上仍然感觉很平衡,避免了头重脚轻的不适感。背面采用哑光铝合金边框和大理石饰面,几乎看不到指纹。

我们非常喜欢 Z60 Ultra 的制造质量。没有吱吱作响或晃动,一切都感觉严丝合缝、安全可靠。缝隙精确恒定,正面由龙溪耐用玻璃覆盖。它还通过了 IP68 等级认证,这意味着它可以防尘防水。

努比亚 Z60 超领先版有银色和黑色两种颜色,在全球有以下配置可供选择:

内存和存储 价格 (RRP)
8/256 GB $us609
12/256 GB $us659
16/512 GB $us739
16/1,024 GB $us839

其余功能与 努比亚 Z60 Ultra.

图片来源:Daniel Schmidt / NotebookcheckDaniel Schmidt / Notebookcheck
(图片来源:Daniel Schmidt / Notebookcheck)
图片来源:Daniel Schmidt / NotebookcheckDaniel Schmidt / Notebookcheck
图片来源:Daniel Schmidt / NotebookcheckDaniel Schmidt / Notebookcheck
图片来源:Daniel Schmidt / NotebookcheckDaniel Schmidt / Notebookcheck
图片来源:Daniel Schmidt / NotebookcheckDaniel Schmidt / Notebookcheck

尺寸比较

164.3 mm 75.8 mm 9.2 mm 220 g163.98 mm 76.35 mm 8.78 mm 246 g162.5 mm 75.8 mm 8.9 mm 229 g162.3 mm 79 mm 8.6 mm 232 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

通信和软件 - Z60 Ultra 仅提供三年的更新服务

努比亚 Z60 超前版配备了配套的快速充电器。(图片来源:Daniel Schmidt / Notebookcheck)
努比亚 Z60 超前版配备了配套的快速充电器

努比亚 Z60 超强领先版包括谷歌Android 14 和 MyOS 14 用户界面。截至 2024 年 8 月 1 日的安全修复在测试时是相当及时的。不过,努比亚只为这款智能手机提供一次主要的操作系统升级和三年的安全更新。

它支持 5G 和 Wi-Fi 7,覆盖广泛的频段,提供稳定、快速的 Wi-Fi 网速。该智能手机支持两个 nano-SIM,但不支持 eSIM。它支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能,将设备放在耳边时,语音质量非常稳定,不过嘈杂的环境会降低清晰度。

在生物识别安全方面,Z60 Ultra 在显示屏中嵌入了一个光学指纹传感器,该传感器工作可靠、快速。此外,还可通过前置摄像头进行面部识别。线性振动电机可提供清晰的反馈,同时保持令人愉悦的安静。可定制滑动开关的回归是另一项值得欢迎的功能。

Networking
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm FastConnect 7800
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1005 (min: 506) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
969 (min: 482) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1852 (min: 1711) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1678 (min: 1565) MBit/s ∼100%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
904 (min: 308) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
806 (min: 404) MBit/s ∼43%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
556 (min: 253) MBit/s ∼50%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
801 (min: 397) MBit/s ∼43%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1553 (min: 815) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1461 (min: 1284) MBit/s ∼87%
OnePlus 12
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1119 (min: 1086) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1857 (min: 1766) MBit/s ∼100%
01002003004005006007008009001000110012001300140015001600170018001900Tooltip
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1852 (1711-1890)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1676 (1565-1772)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø948 (482-987)
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1857 (1766-1917)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø988 (506-1020)
OnePlus 12 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 750; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1117 (1086-1176)

可持续性 - 改善有限

努比亚 Z60 超前版不支持扩展更新,发货时外包装全部用塑料薄膜包裹。包装盒内部也使用了塑料。

努比亚没有分享任何有关使用可回收材料或产品可回收性的信息。此外,这款智能手机也没有可持续发展报告或二氧化碳足迹披露。

由于努比亚不提供维修说明或出售可互换部件,因此 Z60 Ultra 不供用户维修之用。

相机 - Z60 超领先版使用索尼 IMX906

努比亚 Z60 超极版领先版自拍
前置摄像头自拍

努比亚 Z60 超领先版的摄像头设置与前代产品几乎完全相同,主要区别在于主摄像头采用了新的传感器。努比亚保留了 35 毫米焦距,这在智能手机中并不常见,但我们并不认为这是一个缺点。不过,新的 IMX906 传感器带来了明显的改进,使 Z60 Ultra 能够拍摄出高质量的图像。

超广角镜头可在 18 毫米和 24 毫米之间选择,在不牺牲图像质量的前提下提供了更大的通用性。视频可录制成 8K(30 FPS)或超高清(120 FPS)格式,使该设备能够捕捉令人印象深刻的画面。虽然前置摄像头巧妙地隐藏在显示屏下方,提供了时尚的外观,但在图像质量方面仍有改进的余地。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
8.5 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version: 6.69 ∆E min: 2.52 - max: 11.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
19.4 ∆E
30.1 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
27.4 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
19.5 ∆E
19 ∆E
17.4 ∆E
32.6 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
28.6 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
29.8 ∆E
21.5 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
33.1 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
27 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version: 25.38 ∆E min: 12.19 - max: 35.4 ∆E

显示屏 - 不间断 OLED 显示屏,亮度高达 1,200 cd/m²

子像素结构
子像素结构

领先版的显示屏与标准版相同 努比亚 Z60 Ultra的显示屏完全相同。峰值亮度达到 1,202 cd/m²(APL18)或 1,212 cd/m²(HDR 视频),还算不错,但与其他高端智能手机相比还有差距,后者的亮度至少是后者的两倍。最低亮度也可能略低。

在示波器下,OLED 面板以稳定的 60 Hz 频率闪烁,显示出极其均匀的振幅曲线。努比亚声称该显示屏使用高达 2,160 Hz 的 PWM 调光,我们的手动测量也基本证实了这一点。在最低亮度下,我们检测到 2000 Hz 的闪烁率。

982
cd/m²
1000
cd/m²
1010
cd/m²
981
cd/m²
1003
cd/m²
1010
cd/m²
986
cd/m²
992
cd/m²
1012
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1012 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 997.3 cd/m² Minimum: 3.38 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1003 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"
Honor Magic6 Pro
OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8"
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8"
OnePlus 12
AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8"
Response Times
132%
117%
-389%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
0.99 ?(0.4855, 0.4995)
1.51 ?(0.6415, 0.8695)
-53%
3.8 ?(1.76, 2.046)
-284%
1.01 ?(0.54, 0.47)
-2%
Response Time Black / White *
0.85 ?(0.4295, 0.424)
1.28 ?(0.6765, 0.607)
-51%
1.41 ?(0.771, 0.6435)
-66%
11.6 ?(10, 1.6)
-1265%
PWM Frequency
60
360
500%
480
700%
120
100%
Screen
9%
-26%
1%
Brightness middle
1003
1575
57%
1317
31%
1026
2%
Brightness
997
1508
51%
1365
37%
991
-1%
Brightness Distribution
97
89
-8%
94
-3%
91
-6%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
1.7
-21%
3.4
-143%
1.19
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.1
3.9
-26%
5
-61%
3.3
-6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.4
2.4
-0%
2.8
-17%
2.4
-0%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.22 99%
2 110%
2.24 98%
CCT
6119 106%
6398 102%
6458 101%
6920 94%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
99.5
Total Average (Program / Settings)
71% / 50%
46% / 22%
-194% / -129%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.85 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4295 ms rise
↘ 0.424 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.99 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4855 ms rise
↘ 0.4995 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz
Amplitude: 16.9 %
Secondary Frequency: 2000 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
Min.
25% 显示屏亮度
25%
50% 显示亮度
50%
75% 显示亮度
75%
最大手动显示亮度
100%

在固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(虽然最小亮度下的振幅看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。您可以在信息框中看到放大后的最小亮度下的振幅)。

灰度(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
灰度(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩空间(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
色彩空间(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
饱和度(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
饱和度(色彩模式:标准,色温:正常,目标色彩空间:DCI-P3)
努比亚 Z60 Ultra 领先版户外版
户外活动
努比亚 Z60 超领先版的视角稳定性
视角稳定性

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 真的很热

努比亚 Z60 超领先版采用Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ,"领先 "版因其增强的性能而脱颖而出。主频为 3.4 GHz,与标准机型相比提升了 100 MHz,很可能与Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 的性能相仿。Galaxy 。Adreno 750 GPU 的核心频率也略有提高。

不过,基准测试显示,努比亚智能手机在热量管理方面比 Galaxy S24 Ultra在某些情况下,它的性能比前代产品更慢。最明显的问题是在压力测试中出现大量热量积聚,我们记录到的温度高达 145.76 °C--太热了,尤其是摄像头模块内部甚至出现了冷凝水,不过最终还是消失了。为了控制发热,需要对软件进行节流,但在日常使用中,我们没有观察到任何重大的性能问题,也没有观察到因发热过多而造成的持久损坏。

领先版的 6,000 毫安时电池可实现超长的电池续航时间。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2287 Points +2%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2251 Points
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
2148 Points -5%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2127 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (954 - 2329, n=21)
2106 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points -34%
Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7102 Points +1%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
7036 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6765 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (4564 - 7501, n=21)
6638 Points -6%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
6630 Points -6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points -41%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
20446 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18672 Points -9%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18155 Points -11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (12156 - 21628, n=20)
17861 Points -13%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
15690 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -36%
3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
20321 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
20068 Points -1%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
19545 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (15108 - 20321, n=16)
18675 Points -8%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
17681 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 25785, n=188, last 2 years)
7929 Points -61%
Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5177 Points +1%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5105 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
5040 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (3967 - 5338, n=18)
4842 Points -5%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
4444 Points -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=195, last 2 years)
2172 Points -57%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5167 Points +3%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5009 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
4804 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (3991 - 5190, n=17)
4764 Points -5%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
4331 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=193, last 2 years)
2166 Points -57%
Solar Bay Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8791 Points
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8677 Points -1%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
8237 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (6788 - 8791, n=18)
8165 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
7510 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3223 - 13244, n=59, last 2 years)
7021 Points -20%
Steel Nomad Light Score
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1826 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1796 Points -2%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1667 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (1243 - 1826, n=8)
1573 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone
  (153 - 2849, n=55, last 2 years)
1178 Points -35%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
114 fps +90%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (50 - 121, n=18)
87.1 fps +45%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
60 fps 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
60 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=208, last 2 years)
51.8 fps -14%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
228 fps +13%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
202 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (92 - 241, n=19)
188.9 fps -6%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
188 fps -7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
187 fps -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=208, last 2 years)
84.7 fps -58%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
92 fps +53%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (42 - 119, n=18)
72.1 fps +20%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
72 fps +20%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
60 fps 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
60 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=208, last 2 years)
39 fps -35%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
90 fps +43%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
78 fps +24%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (43 - 96, n=20)
76.3 fps +21%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
71 fps +13%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
63 fps
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 129, n=208, last 2 years)
34.1 fps -46%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
42 fps +11%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
40 fps +5%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
38 fps
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (31 - 42, n=19)
36.7 fps -3%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
35 fps -8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 53, n=208, last 2 years)
16 fps -58%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
72011 Points +171%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
68223 Points +157%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (25953 - 72665, n=19)
50413 Points +90%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +45%
Honor Magic6 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
37221 Points +40%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
26537 Points
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 4619, n=41, last 2 years)
766 Points +105%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
488 Points +30%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
374 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (243 - 489, n=8)
372 Points -1%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (122 - 32432, n=41, last 2 years)
3626 Points +870%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
487 Points +30%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
374 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (227 - 498, n=8)
365 Points -2%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone
  (118 - 44657, n=41, last 2 years)
5224 Points +550%
OnePlus 12
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 16384
1128 Points +40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
  (508 - 1128, n=8)
817 Points +2%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
804 Points
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionHonor Magic6 ProSamsung Galaxy S24 UltraOnePlus 12Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-1%
-33%
-8%
-21%
-51%
Sequential Read 256KB
3995.95
3923.31
-2%
3610.25
-10%
3297.57
-17%
3608 ?(3249 - 4384, n=26)
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
3065.04
3678.35
20%
1893.63
-38%
3246.21
6%
2530 ?(555 - 3348, n=26)
-17%
Random Read 4KB
483.2
415.68
-14%
437.12
-10%
438.5
-9%
406 ?(218 - 483, n=26)
-16%
Random Write 4KB
729.58
678.39
-7%
181.55
-75%
652.8
-11%

温度

Max. Load
 57.1 °C56 °C51.2 °C 
 62 °C56.2 °C50.4 °C 
 63.2 °C58.4 °C47.9 °C 
Maximum: 63.2 °C
Average: 55.8 °C
47.7 °C50.2 °C54.7 °C
47.3 °C53.4 °C54.1 °C
47.4 °C52.9 °C55.6 °C
Maximum: 55.6 °C
Average: 51.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  30.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 55.8 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 63.2 °C / 146 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.6 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


3DMark Stress test

0102030405060708090100Tooltip
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø22.4 (18-30.2)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-28.2)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø73.4 (61.9-106.8)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84 (79.2-101.1)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø24.4 (21-30.5)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø10.9 (9.6-13.4)
OnePlus 12 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø11.3 (11-12.5)

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.439.92534.1383126.934.44034.331.65037.435.26324.933.38020.634.810024.536.312517.638.716015.849.920011.653.92501057.231514.358.94007.9585006.565.26308.167.58008.668.1100010.57212508.773.116009.873.920009.276.525009.479.131509.88340009.386.650009.581.8630010.374.7800010.872100001166.91250011.164.31600010.859.6SPL22.391.4N0.477.8median 10median 68.1Delta1.7921.625.124.525.715.217.415.822.219.22319.622.221.526.726.83623.244.816.249.518.754.513.559.214.160.817.462.78.863.45.868.56.570.86.671.16.770.35.969.95.469.95.670.86.472.45.973.54.971.15.369.74.861.14.773.44.368.63.452.420.282.60.357median 6.4median 68.64.76.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseNubia Z60 Ultra Leading VersionOnePlus 12
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 15% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

OnePlus 12 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

运行时间

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Honor Magic6 Pro
5600 mAh
1548 min +17%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
6000 mAh
1326 min
OnePlus 12
5400 mAh
1237 min -7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
5000 mAh
1148 min -13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=210, last 2 years)
991 min -25%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 129)
22h 06min

Pros

+ 不间断 120 Hz OLED
+ 通过 IP68 认证
+ 电池寿命长、充电快
+ 良好的摄像头设置

Cons

- 温度会很高
- 不支持 eSIM 卡
- 不支持无线充电
- 更新时间短
- 扬声器效果一般

结论--领先版本并不总是更胜一筹

回顾:努比亚 Z60 Ultra 领先版。测试设备由努比亚提供
回顾:努比亚 Z60 Ultra 领先版。测试设备由努比亚提供

领先版 Z60 Ultra 最显著的创新是主摄像头采用了新的传感器,将其提升到了一个全新的水平,Z60S Pro 也采用了这种传感器。在测试过程中,电池续航能力非常出色,显示屏也保持稳定。

凭借升级后的摄像头和具有竞争力的价格,努比亚 Z60 超领先版成为了一款极具吸引力的替代产品,但它也有一个明显的缺点--会变得非常热。

虽然新的 SoC 被宣传为速度更快,但努比亚智能手机并没有充分利用这一优势。在某些情况下,它甚至比标准的Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 还要慢。努比亚仍未能完全解决额外的发热问题,在某些情况下,软件节流功能可能需要更早启动。更新支持也明显有限。

如果您想获得类似的拍照体验,但又想少一些妥协,Z60S Pro 可提供相同的主摄像头,但设置不太灵活。另外,Galaxy S24 也是一个更小巧的选择。

价格和供应情况

虽然亚马逊提供普通版,但只有Nubia提供可直接购买的 Z60 超领先版。

注:我们最近更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请访问这里

Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version - 10/09/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
86%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
92%
Connectivity
50 / 69 → 72%
Weight
87%
Battery
93%
Display
90%
Games Performance
38 / 55 → 69%
Application Performance
77 / 85 → 91%
AI Performance
33%
Temperature
30%
Noise
100%
Audio
76 / 90 → 84%
Camera
82%
Average
58%
82%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
12.5%
Power Use
94.5%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
39%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 31%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 努比亚 Z60 超极版领先版评测--超越价格的热门交易
Daniel Schmidt, 2024-10-10 (Update: 2024-10-10)