Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar
努比亚 Z60 超极版领先版评测--超越价格的热门交易
让它燃烧吧
尽管努比亚 Z60 Ultra 仍然相对较新，但改进版已经重新发布。由于努比亚将主要精力放在通过更快的 SoC 和新的相机传感器来改进设备上，因此两款机型在设计上非常一致。请看评测，看看这些变化是否改进了这款已经非常出色的经济型旗舰机。Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.6 % | v8 | 10 / 2024 | Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 | 246 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" | 2480x1116 | |
| 90.6 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Honor Magic6 Pro SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 | 229 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" | 2800x1280 | |
| 91.1 % v7 (old) | v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750 | 232 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.80" | 3120x1440 | |
| 88.1 % | v8 | 06 / 2024 | OnePlus 12 SD 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750 | 220 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.82" | 3168x1440 |
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请访问这里 。
外壳和功能 - 领先版本采用龙溪玻璃
努比亚 Z60 Ultra 旗舰机型的设计棱角分明，背面的摄像头设置引人注目。不过，由于重新设计了后面板，它很容易与前代产品区分开来。手机重量为 246 克，虽然偏重，但拿在手上仍然感觉很平衡，避免了头重脚轻的不适感。背面采用哑光铝合金边框和大理石饰面，几乎看不到指纹。
我们非常喜欢 Z60 Ultra 的制造质量。没有吱吱作响或晃动，一切都感觉严丝合缝、安全可靠。缝隙精确恒定，正面由龙溪耐用玻璃覆盖。它还通过了 IP68 等级认证，这意味着它可以防尘防水。
努比亚 Z60 超领先版有银色和黑色两种颜色，在全球有以下配置可供选择：
| 内存和存储 | 价格 (RRP) |
|---|---|
| 8/256 GB | $us609 |
| 12/256 GB | $us659 |
| 16/512 GB | $us739 |
| 16/1,024 GB | $us839 |
其余功能与 努比亚 Z60 Ultra.
通信和软件 - Z60 Ultra 仅提供三年的更新服务
努比亚 Z60 超强领先版包括谷歌Android 14 和 MyOS 14 用户界面。截至 2024 年 8 月 1 日的安全修复在测试时是相当及时的。不过，努比亚只为这款智能手机提供一次主要的操作系统升级和三年的安全更新。
它支持 5G 和 Wi-Fi 7，覆盖广泛的频段，提供稳定、快速的 Wi-Fi 网速。该智能手机支持两个 nano-SIM，但不支持 eSIM。它支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能，将设备放在耳边时，语音质量非常稳定，不过嘈杂的环境会降低清晰度。
在生物识别安全方面，Z60 Ultra 在显示屏中嵌入了一个光学指纹传感器，该传感器工作可靠、快速。此外，还可通过前置摄像头进行面部识别。线性振动电机可提供清晰的反馈，同时保持令人愉悦的安静。可定制滑动开关的回归是另一项值得欢迎的功能。
| Networking | |
| Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Honor Magic6 Pro | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| OnePlus 12 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
可持续性 - 改善有限
努比亚 Z60 超前版不支持扩展更新，发货时外包装全部用塑料薄膜包裹。包装盒内部也使用了塑料。
努比亚没有分享任何有关使用可回收材料或产品可回收性的信息。此外，这款智能手机也没有可持续发展报告或二氧化碳足迹披露。
由于努比亚不提供维修说明或出售可互换部件，因此 Z60 Ultra 不供用户维修之用。
相机 - Z60 超领先版使用索尼 IMX906
努比亚 Z60 超领先版的摄像头设置与前代产品几乎完全相同，主要区别在于主摄像头采用了新的传感器。努比亚保留了 35 毫米焦距，这在智能手机中并不常见，但我们并不认为这是一个缺点。不过，新的 IMX906 传感器带来了明显的改进，使 Z60 Ultra 能够拍摄出高质量的图像。
超广角镜头可在 18 毫米和 24 毫米之间选择，在不牺牲图像质量的前提下提供了更大的通用性。视频可录制成 8K（30 FPS）或超高清（120 FPS）格式，使该设备能够捕捉令人印象深刻的画面。虽然前置摄像头巧妙地隐藏在显示屏下方，提供了时尚的外观，但在图像质量方面仍有改进的余地。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
显示屏 - 不间断 OLED 显示屏，亮度高达 1,200 cd/m²
领先版的显示屏与标准版相同 努比亚 Z60 Ultra的显示屏完全相同。峰值亮度达到 1,202 cd/m²（APL18）或 1,212 cd/m²（HDR 视频），还算不错，但与其他高端智能手机相比还有差距，后者的亮度至少是后者的两倍。最低亮度也可能略低。
在示波器下，OLED 面板以稳定的 60 Hz 频率闪烁，显示出极其均匀的振幅曲线。努比亚声称该显示屏使用高达 2,160 Hz 的 PWM 调光，我们的手动测量也基本证实了这一点。在最低亮度下，我们检测到 2000 Hz 的闪烁率。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1003 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.6% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
| Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8" | Honor Magic6 Pro OLED, 2800x1280, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120x1440, 6.8" | OnePlus 12 AMOLED, 3168x1440, 6.8" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 132% | 117% | -389% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 0.99 ? | 1.51 ? -53% | 3.8 ? -284% | 1.01 ? -2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 0.85 ? | 1.28 ? -51% | 1.41 ? -66% | 11.6 ? -1265% |
| PWM Frequency | 60 | 360 500% | 480 700% | 120 100% |
| Screen | 9% | -26% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle | 1003 | 1575 57% | 1317 31% | 1026 2% |
| Brightness | 997 | 1508 51% | 1365 37% | 991 -1% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 89 -8% | 94 -3% | 91 -6% |
| Black Level * | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.4 | 1.7 -21% | 3.4 -143% | 1.19 15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.1 | 3.9 -26% | 5 -61% | 3.3 -6% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 2.4 -0% | 2.8 -17% | 2.4 -0% |
| Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.22 99% | 2 110% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 6119 106% | 6398 102% | 6458 101% | 6920 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.5 | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 71% /
50% | 46% /
22% | -194% /
-129% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0.85 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4295 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.424 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 0.99 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4855 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.4995 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz Amplitude: 16.9 % Secondary Frequency: 2000 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8750 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
在固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（虽然最小亮度下的振幅看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。您可以在信息框中看到放大后的最小亮度下的振幅）。
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 真的很热
努比亚 Z60 超领先版采用Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ，"领先 "版因其增强的性能而脱颖而出。主频为 3.4 GHz，与标准机型相比提升了 100 MHz，很可能与Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 的性能相仿。Galaxy 。Adreno 750 GPU 的核心频率也略有提高。
不过，基准测试显示，努比亚智能手机在热量管理方面比 Galaxy S24 Ultra在某些情况下，它的性能比前代产品更慢。最明显的问题是在压力测试中出现大量热量积聚，我们记录到的温度高达 145.76 °C--太热了，尤其是摄像头模块内部甚至出现了冷凝水，不过最终还是消失了。为了控制发热，需要对软件进行节流，但在日常使用中，我们没有观察到任何重大的性能问题，也没有观察到因发热过多而造成的持久损坏。
领先版的 6,000 毫安时电池可实现超长的电池续航时间。
| Geekbench AI | |
| Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (191 - 4619, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 12 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (243 - 489, n=7) | |
| Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version | |
| Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (192 - 32432, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 12 | |
| Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (227 - 498, n=7) | |
| Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44657, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| OnePlus 12 | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (508 - 1128, n=7) | |
| Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version | |
| Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version | Honor Magic6 Pro | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | OnePlus 12 | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -1% | -33% | -8% | -20% | -52% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 3995.95 | 3923.31 -2% | 3610.25 -10% | 3297.57 -17% | 3609 ? -10% | 1834 ? -54% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 3065.04 | 3678.35 20% | 1893.63 -38% | 3246.21 6% | 2609 ? -15% | 1420 ? -54% |
| Random Read 4KB | 483.2 | 415.68 -14% | 437.12 -10% | 438.5 -9% | 414 ? -14% | 276 ? -43% |
| Random Write 4KB | 729.58 | 678.39 -7% | 181.55 -75% | 652.8 -11% | 423 ? -42% | 309 ? -58% |
温度
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 63.2 °C / 146 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 55.6 °C / 132 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Stress test
发言人
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.9% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 77% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
OnePlus 12 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 10% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
运行时间
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Honor Magic6 Pro | |
| Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version | |
| OnePlus 12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
Pros
Cons
结论--领先版本并不总是更胜一筹
领先版 Z60 Ultra 最显著的创新是主摄像头采用了新的传感器，将其提升到了一个全新的水平，Z60S Pro 也采用了这种传感器。在测试过程中，电池续航能力非常出色，显示屏也保持稳定。
凭借升级后的摄像头和具有竞争力的价格，努比亚 Z60 超领先版成为了一款极具吸引力的替代产品，但它也有一个明显的缺点--会变得非常热。
虽然新的 SoC 被宣传为速度更快，但努比亚智能手机并没有充分利用这一优势。在某些情况下，它甚至比标准的Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 还要慢。努比亚仍未能完全解决额外的发热问题，在某些情况下，软件节流功能可能需要更早启动。更新支持也明显有限。
如果您想获得类似的拍照体验，但又想少一些妥协，Z60S Pro 可提供相同的主摄像头，但设置不太灵活。另外，Galaxy S24 也是一个更小巧的选择。
注：我们最近更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请访问这里 。
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version
- 10/09/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
