努比亚 Z60S Pro 评测：配备 35 毫米主摄像头的旗舰杀手级智能手机

Name: Nubia Z60S Pro
Brand: Nubia

照片质量令人印象深刻。努比亚 Z60S Pro 以中档手机的价格出售，但却拥有一些旗舰功能，如 IP68 等级、三频 GNSS 和高达 1 TB 的 UFS 4.0 存储空间。请阅读我们的评测，了解这款努比亚智能手机是否值得推荐购买。
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 09/30/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

努比亚 Z60S Pro 是旗舰手机努比亚 Z60 Ultra 的小兄弟。努比亚 Z60 Ultra.与旗舰机型相比，Pro 机型在摄像头和处理器方面有一些变化--它只配备了高通骁龙 8 代 2SoC 和低分辨率长焦镜头。不过，Z60S Pro 支持一系列新的 AI 功能，旨在提高相机质量。

努比亚中端机型的起价为 599 欧元（12 GB 内存和 256 GB 闪存），而配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 闪存的顶级机型则要多花 200 欧元。

Test device courtesy of Nubia

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Nubia Z60S Pro (Z60 Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 740

Memory

12 GB

Display

6.78 inch 20:9, 2800 x 1260 pixel 453 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB

, 223 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass , OTG, Miracast

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 163.63 x 75.98

Battery

5100 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.59, OIS, 35 mm, 1/1,56 Zoll, Videos @4320p/30fps) + 50 MPix (f/2.0, marcro 2,5 cm. wide angle lens) + 8 MPix (f/2.4, 3x optical telephoto lens), Camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix ( f/2.45, under display)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, case, USB cable, info material, MyOS, 12 Months Warranty, widvine L1, GPS (L1/L2/L5), GLONASS, BeiDou (B1I/B1C/B2a/B2b), Galileo (E1/E5a), QZSS (L1/L5), HDR10, HGL, fanless, waterproof

Weight

220 g, Power Supply: 129 g

Price

599 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Version	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
84.6 %	v8	09/2024	Nubia Z60S Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	220 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.78"	2800x1260
82.1 %	v8	08/2024	Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740	209 g	1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.67"	3200x1440
87.6 %	v7 ^(old)	05/2024	Motorola Edge 50 Pro SD 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720	186 g	512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.70"	2712x1220
82 %	v8	08/2024	Realme GT 6 SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735	199 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.78"	2780x1264
85.5 %	v7 ^(old)	03/2024	Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920	209 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080

注：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。这里可在此处查阅。

外壳Z60S Pro 防水

得益于 6.78 英寸 OLED 面板的薄边设计，Z60S Pro 的外观非常吸引人。Z60S Pro 的显示屏屏占比接近 90%，与三星 S24 Ultra Pro 等旗舰产品非常相似。三星Galaxy S24 Ultra.

做工符合中高端手机的要求。磨砂边框由金属制成，与玻璃背壳一样，给人留下了高品质的印象。

不过，通过 IP68 认证的防水外壳看起来非常笨重。努比亚采用龙溪耐久玻璃作为保护玻璃。

另一个特殊功能是一个可自由分配的专用按钮，用于快速启动相机或更改声音和静音配置文件（静音滑块）。

尺寸比较

功能特点配备快速 USB 端口的 Z60S Pro

Z60S Pro 有三个不同版本，内存容量从 12 GB 到 16 GB 不等，UFS 4.0 存储容量从 256 GB 到 1 TB 不等。通过 USB 接口进行的数据传输采用快速 USB 3.2 Gen1 标准，也可进行图像传输。

与三星 980 Pro 结合使用，传输速度高达 821 MB/s。支持微软 Windows 首选的 exFAT 和 NTFS 文件系统。除蓝牙 5.3 和 NFC 外，Miracast 和 USB OTG 也是努比亚手机的功能之一。

软件：努比亚 Z60S Pro 预装Android 14

Z60S Pro 预装了谷歌Android 14 和该公司自己的 My OS 14 版本。在评测期间，操作系统基于 2024 年 8 月的安全补丁。

据努比亚称，Z60S Pro 的相关安全更新将至少持续到 2027 年。制造商没有就提供的操作系统升级次数发表任何声明。

可持续性

可持续发展不是努比亚的营销重点之一，因此无法了解材料提取或回收的前景。

不过，这款智能手机的包装似乎不含塑料。设备本身用铝箔包裹，而包装的其他部分则由纸板制成。

通信和全球导航卫星系统：配备 5G 的 Z60S Pro

Z60S Pro 配备了 Wi-Fi 6，在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器时，传输速率高达 1,900 MBit/s。我们的测试设备也在 6 GHz 频段与参考路由器进行通信。因此，Z60S Pro 甚至提供了 Wi-Fi 6E，这在这个价位的产品中并不常见。

为了连接到移动数据网络，努比亚手机支持广泛的 4G 和 5G 频率。所有与德语国家有关的频率均已覆盖。

努比亚还宣传了卫星通信功能，但似乎只在中国可用，因为我们的测试设备无法选择该功能。

Networking
Nubia Z60S Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000	970 (min: 896) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	951 (min: 646) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1902 (min: 1860) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1816 (min: 1734) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro
iperf3 receive AXE11000	664 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	818 (min: 430) MBit/s ∼86%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1600 (min: 1384) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1081 (min: 838) MBit/s ∼60%
Realme GT 6
iperf3 receive AXE11000	816 (min: 348) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	837 (min: 412) MBit/s ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE
iperf3 receive AXE11000	914 (min: 461) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	822 (min: 789) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1588 (min: 1465) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1446 (min: 1398) MBit/s ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	706 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	723 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1424 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1336 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼74%

Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1902 (1860-1939)

Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 720; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1600 (1384-1648)

Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1804 (1734-1840)

Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 720; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1080 (838-1239)

Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø964 (896-980)

Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (646-1026)

Z60S Pro 可以使用许多全球卫星网络（其中一些是三频网络）来确定其位置。

在一次骑行中，我们将其定位质量与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。

虽然在日常生活中可以毫不犹豫地执行导航任务，但努比亚手机在详细路线上的误差还是很明显的。

电话功能和语音质量Z60S Pro 具有双卡双待功能

Z60S Pro 支持两张实体 nano SIM 卡；没有 eSIM 集成。不过，努比亚手机允许 VoLTE 和通过家庭 Wi-Fi 通话（Wi-Fi 通话）。语音质量不刺耳，声音清晰响亮。

摄像头配备特殊主摄像头的 Z60S Pro

Z60S Pro 的 5000 万像素主摄像头有些与众不同，因为镜头配备了 35 毫米等效焦距。这使得拍摄对象的距离明显比竞争对手更近。

内置的索尼 IMX906 1/1.56 英寸传感器在日光下具有良好的锐度和逼真的色彩，给人留下深刻印象。即使在受控照明条件下，色彩还原也非常成功。

努比亚手机在黑暗环境中的表现几乎令人惊讶。在这里，它能拍摄出具有大量细节的迷人照片。

分辨率相当低的 800 万像素长焦摄像头和 5000 万像素超广角摄像头可提供稳定的照片质量，但也仅此而已。不过，这在中高档产品中也是意料之中的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide angle Wide angle Low light 5x Zoom Ultra-wide angle

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

配件和保修：努比亚 Z60S Pro（含保护套和适配器

努比亚的送货范围堪称典范。

其中包括一个 80W 快速充电器、一个保护盖和一条 USB-C 数据线。此外，还附送了屏幕保护膜。

中兴通讯提供 24 个月保修。保修。

输入设备和操作：带面部解锁功能的 Z60S Pro

由于采用了 120 Hz 的面板，电容式触摸屏反应迅速，动画和菜单滚动非常流畅。一个小型线性 X 轴电动马达负责振动并提供清晰的触觉反馈。

通过前置摄像头的 2D 技术或 OLED 面板上的指纹传感器实现的人脸解锁功能确保了生物识别的安全性。

光学指纹传感器工作可靠，但解锁 X60S Pro 的速度并不快。

显示屏Z60S Pro 智能手机采用 OLED 显示屏

OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。

6.78 英寸 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏凭借 2,800 x 1,260 分辨率实现了 450 ppi 以上的高图像清晰度。制造商规定 Z60S Pro 的峰值亮度为 1,200 尼特，我们在播放 HDR 内容（1,141 cd/m²）时验证了这一点。

然而，正如 APL18 测试（834 cd/m²）显示的那样，该面板在日常使用中的亮度并不高。这正是竞争对手的亮度显示器的优势所在。

此外 Poco F6 Pro在 PWM 调光模式下的频率明显更高（3840 Hz）。相比之下，努比亚 Z60S Pro 使用频率较低的 980 Hz PWM 来调节亮度。

对于 120 Hz 的面板来说，PWM 振幅略低于 20%，也可以更平缓一些。


722 cd/m²	724 cd/m²	752 cd/m²
718 cd/m²	726 cd/m²	753 cd/m²
707 cd/m²	712 cd/m²	744 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 753 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 728.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.86 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 726 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23

	Nubia Z60S Pro AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"	Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"	Motorola Edge 50 Pro P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Realme GT 6 AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"	Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Dynamic AMOLED x2, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Screen		5%	11%	31%	0%
Brightness middle	726	1025 41%	1064 47%	975 34%	897 24%
Brightness	729	1021 40%	1038 42%	974 34%	908 25%
Brightness Distribution	94	98 4%	88 -6%	98 4%	97 3%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2	1.2 40%	1.17 41%	0.8 60%	2.2 -10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.2	2.4 -100%	2 -67%	0.9 25%	1.7 -42%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.21 ^100%	2.238 ^98%	2.22 ^99%	2.08 ^106%
CCT	6399 ^102%	6656 ^98%	6423 ^101%	6467 ^101%	6617 ^98%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *		3	2.47	1.4	3.1

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 19.61 %
Secondary Frequency: 980 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17212 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）

我们使用肖像显示器公司的 X-rite 分光光度计和 Calman Ultimate 软件进行分析，结果显示 Z60S Pro 相对较大的 P3 色彩空间的平均 Delta-E 偏差非常低。除了三种色彩配置文件外，还可以在设置菜单中单独调整白平衡。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.5805 ms rise
1.14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.563 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6995 ms rise
1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.714 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

这款中端手机在户外给人留下了良好的印象。Z60S Pro 有足够的亮度储备来应对大多数光线环境。不过，玻璃表面的反光可能会比较恼人。视角稳定性非常好。

性能Z60S Pro 配备高通 SoC

努比亚智能手机的动力来自快速的骁龙8代2.虽然该芯片组不是最新的旗舰 SoC但这款中端手机在 Geekbench CPU 基准测试中仍然表现出色。

特别是在单核心方面，Z60S Pro 比高通竞争对手的高通竞争对手.努比亚手机在系统测试中的表现也非常出色。

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	2033 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1432 - 2104, n=17)	1926 Points -5%
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384	1898 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1601 Points -21%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1432 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 3149, n=144, last 2 years)	1384 Points -32%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	1147 Points -44%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4255 - 5765, n=17)	5226 Points 0%
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	5203 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	5100 Points -2%
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384	4879 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	3938 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7663, n=144, last 2 years)	3859 Points -26%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	3129 Points -40%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1562350 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1398472 - 1607558, n=12)	1539082 Points -1%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1536373 Points -2%
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384	1519490 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 2162423, n=86, last 2 years)	1169518 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1124908 Points -28%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	767395 Points -51%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	20394 Points
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384	19083 Points -6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11562 - 20394, n=24)	15817 Points -22%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	15165 Points -26%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	14517 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	13573 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 21385, n=183, last 2 years)	12636 Points -38%

CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (778 - 1356, n=22)	1138 Points +13%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1041 Points +3%
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1009 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	888 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1474, n=151, last 2 years)	860 Points -15%
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384	778 Points -23%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	759 Points -25%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	9237 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (7354 - 9730, n=22)	8794 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	8631 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	7179 Points -22%
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384	6785 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11438, n=149, last 2 years)	6152 Points -33%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	6028 Points -35%
System
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	13837 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (10786 - 15148, n=22)	13173 Points -5%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	13142 Points -5%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	11239 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	11081 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=149, last 2 years)	10042 Points -27%
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384	9875 Points -29%
Memory
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	10834 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (6601 - 10834, n=22)	9479 Points -13%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	8397 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	7614 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=149, last 2 years)	6651 Points -39%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	5719 Points -47%
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384	5456 Points -50%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (22837 - 32334, n=22)	27375 Points +8%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	27062 Points +7%
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384	25745 Points +2%
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	25342 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	17941 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=149, last 2 years)	16197 Points -36%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	13308 Points -47%
Web
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	1902 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	1858 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1077 - 2044, n=22)	1777 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	1755 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (747 - 2145, n=149, last 2 years)	1547 Points -19%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	1543 Points -19%
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384	1534 Points -19%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years)	16535 Points +32%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11338 - 16880, n=21)	15142 Points +21%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384	14466 Points +15%
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	12535 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	10374 Points -17%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	8985 Points -28%

AImark - Score v3.x
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	173234 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (941 - 173234, n=18)	29790 Points -83%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 245629, n=129, last 2 years)	21629 Points -88%
Realme GT 6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384	1163 Points -99%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288	717 Points -100%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192	0 Points -100%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (224 - 4122, n=16, last 2 years)	708 Points +216%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (224 - 505, n=4)	384 Points +71%
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	224 Points
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (213 - 32120, n=16, last 2 years)	2550 Points +1097%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (213 - 505, n=4)	383 Points +80%
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	213 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (487 - 44381, n=16, last 2 years)	3949 Points +711%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (487 - 1092, n=4)	837 Points +72%
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288	487 Points

一个 Adreno 740可用于处理图形工作负载。在 3DMark 测试中，Z60S Pro 领先于 Poco F6 Pro.在 GFXBench 的屏幕数值中，可以看到 90 fps 的锁定。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3689 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3315 Points -10%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2907 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1702 Points -54%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1451 Points -61%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3709 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	3394 Points -8%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2983 Points -20%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1702 Points -54%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1474 Points -60%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13984 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	12705 Points -9%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11983 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6440 Points -54%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	5434 Points -61%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6350 Points
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4752 Points

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5382 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	4825 Points -10%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4686 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3589 Points -33%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5343 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	4844 Points -9%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4813 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3631 Points -32%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1081 Points
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1055 Points -2%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	986 Points -9%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1098 Points
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1032 Points -6%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	992 Points -10%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6345 Points
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6212 Points -2%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6113 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4288 Points -32%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	23436 Points +9%
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	21465 Points
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	18743 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11774 Points -45%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	14501 Points +3%
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	14132 Points
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	12776 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8483 Points -40%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +33%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +32%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	116 fps +29%
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	90 fps
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -33%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	489 fps
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	486 fps -1%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	451 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	218 fps -55%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	174 fps -64%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +32%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps +24%
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	90 fps
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	78 fps -13%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -33%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	324 fps
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	287 fps -11%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	270 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	135 fps -58%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	107 fps -67%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	105 fps +17%
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	90 fps
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	89 fps -1%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	60 fps -33%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -33%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	223 fps
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	222 fps 0%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	181 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps -55%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	84 fps -62%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81 fps
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	63 fps -22%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -26%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -31%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps -62%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	129 fps 0%
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	129 fps
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	90 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps -51%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 fps
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	55 fps -20%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	55 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -39%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	27 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	70 fps
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps -3%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	46 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps -60%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	23 fps -67%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	90 fps
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	89 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps -31%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps -33%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -56%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	185 fps +2%
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	181 fps
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	175 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps -57%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	57 fps -69%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	33 fps
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	31 fps -6%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	21 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12 fps -64%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps -67%

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)	171.1 Points +118%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23)	133.1 Points +69%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)	123.193 Points +57%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=157, last 2 years)	113.5 Points +44%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))	94.736 Points +21%
Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128)	78.563 Points
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)	13.847 Points -82%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (5.56 - 12.7, n=4)	9.72 runs/min +75%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 122)	8.98 runs/min +62%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 29.9, n=48, last 2 years)	8.63 runs/min +55%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)	7.04 runs/min +27%
Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128)	5.56 runs/min
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))	5.18 runs/min -7%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)	156 Points +100%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22)	130.6 Points +67%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)	130 Points +67%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 263, n=149, last 2 years)	108.4 Points +39%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)	103 Points +32%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))	101 Points +29%
Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128)	78 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)	51202 Points +128%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)	49818 Points +122%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25)	45827 Points +104%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)	39130 Points +74%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 90158, n=192, last 2 years)	35368 Points +58%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))	30234 Points +35%
Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128)	22453 Points

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128)	1767.4 ms *
Average of class Smartphone (290 - 28190, n=156, last 2 years)	1658 ms * +6%
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))	1221.4 ms * +31%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)	1150 ms * +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22)	1023 ms * +42%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)	840.3 ms * +52%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)	802.4 ms * +55%

* ... smaller is better

	Nubia Z60S Pro	Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro	Motorola Edge 50 Pro	Realme GT 6	Samsung Galaxy S23 FE	Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-7%	-47%	-12%	-48%	-10%	-46%
Sequential Read 256KB	3384.81	3070.33 -9%	1023.6 -70%	3452.12 2%	1657.44 -51%	3579 ?(3249 - 4384, n=23) 6%	1792 ?(226 - 4512, n=186, last 2 years) -47%
Sequential Write 256KB	2938.52	2987.47 2%	1025.9 -65%	3211.78 9%	994.67 -66%	2573 ?(1014 - 3348, n=23) -12%	1387 ?(57.5 - 3875, n=186, last 2 years) -53%
Random Read 4KB	451.45	381.58 -15%	337 -25%	315.76 -30%	322.32 -29%	414 ?(367 - 460, n=23) -8%	270 ?(22.2 - 543, n=186, last 2 years) -40%
Random Write 4KB	544.38	520.87 -4%	390.2 -28%	397.65 -27%	288.23 -47%	404 ?(152.9 - 681, n=23) -26%	298 ?(9.4 - 709, n=186, last 2 years) -45%

排放：努比亚 Z60S Pro 显示中度节流

温度

在恒定负载下，表面温度有些偏高；我们测得的最高温度超过 54 °C。

不过，这在 3DMark 压力测试中只得到了部分反映。Z60S Pro 的性能往往不是特别稳定，但节流情况适中。

Max. Load

Idle


54.2 °C	52.2 °C	42.5 °C
52.4 °C	50.8 °C	45.1 °C
49.9 °C	50 °C	42.9 °C

Maximum: 54.2 °C
Average: 48.9 °C


43.9 °C	47.2 °C	46.8 °C
44 °C	45.3 °C	45 °C
42.4 °C	45.3 °C	46.7 °C

Maximum: 47.2 °C
Average: 45.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 30.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	88.6 % +33%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69.9 % +5%
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66.8 %
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.7 % -18%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.4 % -19%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	98.8 % +38%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	73.5 % +2%
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	71.8 %
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	69.5 % -3%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53.7 % -25%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	91.1 %
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	74.4 % -18%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 % -24%
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.3 % -44%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	98.1 %
Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	50.3 % -49%

Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.6 (16.1-22.4)

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.7 (14.2-20.4)

Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.78 (8.73-8.83)

Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø15 (9.85-18.3)

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.59 (7.53-10.2)

Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø67.4 (54.1-81)

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.1 (39.9-72.9)

Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø29.7 (28.6-32.3)

Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49 (37.2-68.4)

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø30.9 (26.6-38.1)

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.3 (11.9-15.9)

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø9.91 (8.77-12)

Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.8 (15.8-17.4)

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.8 (11.7-15.7)

Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.7 (8.51-16.6)

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø9.78 (8.18-11.9)

Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø8.12 (8.04-8.2)

Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.01 (4.04-8.03)

扬声器

在我们的测试中，努比亚手机的立体声扬声器显示出线性的中音和一丝低音。高音也只是略有下降。此外，还可以通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙无线连接耳机。有多种音频编解码器可供选择。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Nubia Z60S Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能量Z60S Pro 充电迅速

耗电量

Z60S Pro 配备 5100 毫安时电池，可通过 USB-C 接口以最高 80 W 的功率充电。

这款 6.78 英寸的智能手机闲置时功耗超过 2 W，有点耗电，但负载时功耗超过 18 W，并不算低。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.33 / 0.17 Watt
Idle	0.91 / 2.2 / 2.31 Watt
Load	7.64 / 18.05 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Nubia Z60S Pro 5100 mAh	Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5000 mAh	Motorola Edge 50 Pro 4500 mAh	Realme GT 6 5500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S23 FE 4500 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		24%	35%	19%	4%	14%	26%
Idle Minimum *	0.91	0.79 13%	0.9 1%	1.01 -11%	0.69 24%	1.036 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=23) -14%	0.906 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=147, last 2 years) -0%
Idle Average *	2.2	1.05 52%	1.3 41%	1.09 50%	1.15 48%	1.766 ?(0.8 - 7.18, n=23) 20%	1.441 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=147, last 2 years) 34%
Idle Maximum *	2.31	1.13 51%	1.6 31%	1.16 50%	1.26 45%	1.94 ?(1.07 - 8.22, n=23) 16%	1.605 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=147, last 2 years) 31%
Load Average *	7.64	7.88 -3%	4.8 37%	9.86 -29%	15.93 -109%	7.22 ?(2.61 - 15.3, n=23) 5%	6.34 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=145, last 2 years) 17%
Load Maximum *	18.05	16.48 9%	6.7 63%	11.64 36%	16.09 11%	10.4 ?(4.57 - 18.1, n=23) 42%	9.35 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=145, last 2 years) 48%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.21 (1.024-14.6)

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.26 (1.051-14.6)

Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.076-1.206)

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.863 (0.736-1.089)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.83 (3.53-4.18)

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.6 (10.3-13.1)

Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.076-1.206)

Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.863 (0.736-1.089)

电池寿命

在我们的 WLAN 测试中，这款中端手机在现实条件下表现出了出色的电池续航能力，显示屏亮度达到 150 cd/m²。

Z60S Pro 的内置电池可提供超过 17 小时的续航时间。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 128)		17h 06min

Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Nubia Z60S Pro 5100 mAh	1026 min
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5000 mAh	909 min
Motorola Edge 50 Pro 4500 mAh	979 min
Realme GT 6 5500 mAh	1155 min
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE 4500 mAh	815 min

Pros

+ 优质 OLED 面板

+ 高质量外壳，达到 IP68 防护等级

+ 高速芯片组和内存

+ 吸引人的主摄像头

+ 快速充电+前置电源适配器

+ 功能强大

Cons

- 显示屏可以再亮一些

- 高废热 + 节流

- 仅 3 年更新

- 笨重

评语：努比亚 Z60S Pro 是一款有趣的中端手机

在我们的测试中，努比亚 Z60S Pro 成为了中档手机中的佼佼者。这款来自中兴通讯子公司的智能手机价格诱人，功能齐全，包括 USB 3.2、三频 GNSS、Wi-Fi 6E，性能也很吸引人。

35 毫米广角摄像头在纸面上有些不同寻常，但其低光能力和精确校准的色彩平衡却令人惊喜。强劲的电池续航能力和动听的扬声器为努比亚 Z60S Pro 智能手机锦上添花。

凭借 Z60S Pro，努比亚为中端市场带来了一款非常有趣的智能手机，其优势明显大于劣势"。

我们只在 Z60S Pro 600 欧元以下的价格区间和较高的排放以及骁龙 8 代 2 的节流功能中看到了真正的弱点。骁龙 8 代 2.

三年的更新保证还不错，但也没什么可写的。如果您希望获得更长时间的安全补丁，可以仔细看看三星Galaxy S23 FE.除努比亚 Z60S Pro 之外，我们还发现了以下替代产品摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro或 Poco F6 Pro.

价格和供应情况

您可以从亚马逊等在线零售商或直接从制造商处购买努比亚 Z60S Pro。https://eu.nubia.com/de-de/products/nubia-z60s-pro?variant=43967257903304.

注：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。这里可在此处查阅。

Nubia Z60S Pro - 2024-09-27 09/27/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

88%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

92%

Connectivity

62 / 69 → 89%

Weight

88%

Battery

91%

Display

90%

Games Performance

39 / 55 → 71%

Application Performance

66 / 85 → 78%

AI Performance

14%

Temperature

80%

Noise

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 86%

Camera

80%

Average

61%

85%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
92.2%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
33.3%

Total Sustainability Score: 35.9%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 439432 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 努比亚 Z60S Pro 评测：配备 35 毫米主摄像头的旗舰杀手级智能手机

Marcus Herbrich, 2024-09-30 (Update: 2024-09-30)

努比亚 Z60S Pro 评测：配备 35 毫米主摄像头的旗舰杀手级智能手机

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳Z60S Pro 防水

尺寸比较

功能特点配备快速 USB 端口的 Z60S Pro

软件：努比亚 Z60S Pro 预装Android 14

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统：配备 5G 的 Z60S Pro

电话功能和语音质量Z60S Pro 具有双卡双待功能

摄像头配备特殊主摄像头的 Z60S Pro

配件和保修：努比亚 Z60S Pro（含保护套和适配器

输入设备和操作：带面部解锁功能的 Z60S Pro

显示屏Z60S Pro 智能手机采用 OLED 显示屏

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能Z60S Pro 配备高通 SoC

排放：努比亚 Z60S Pro 显示中度节流

温度

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

扬声器

Nubia Z60S Pro audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S23 FE audio analysis

能量Z60S Pro 充电迅速

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语：努比亚 Z60S Pro 是一款有趣的中端手机

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison