努比亚 Z60S Pro 评测:配备 35 毫米主摄像头的旗舰杀手级智能手机
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
努比亚 Z60S Pro 是旗舰手机努比亚 Z60 Ultra 的小兄弟。 努比亚 Z60 Ultra.与旗舰机型相比,Pro 机型在摄像头和处理器方面有一些变化--它只配备了 高通骁龙 8 代 2SoC 和低分辨率长焦镜头。不过,Z60S Pro 支持一系列新的 AI 功能,旨在提高相机质量。
努比亚中端机型的起价为 599 欧元(12 GB 内存和 256 GB 闪存),而配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 闪存的顶级机型则要多花 200 欧元。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Version | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.6 % | v8 | 09/2024 | Nubia Z60S Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 220 g | 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" | 2800x1260 | |
82.1 % | v8 | 08/2024 | Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro SD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740 | 209 g | 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.67" | 3200x1440 | |
87.6 % | v7 (old) | 05/2024 | Motorola Edge 50 Pro SD 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720 | 186 g | 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.70" | 2712x1220 | |
82 % | v8 | 08/2024 | Realme GT 6 SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735 | 199 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.78" | 2780x1264 | |
85.5 % | v7 (old) | 03/2024 | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920 | 209 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
注:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里可在此处查阅。
外壳Z60S Pro 防水
得益于 6.78 英寸 OLED 面板的薄边设计,Z60S Pro 的外观非常吸引人。Z60S Pro 的显示屏屏占比接近 90%,与三星 S24 Ultra Pro 等旗舰产品非常相似。 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra.
做工符合中高端手机的要求。磨砂边框由金属制成,与玻璃背壳一样,给人留下了高品质的印象。
不过,通过 IP68 认证的防水外壳看起来非常笨重。努比亚采用龙溪耐久玻璃作为保护玻璃。
另一个特殊功能是一个可自由分配的专用按钮,用于快速启动相机或更改声音和静音配置文件(静音滑块)。
功能特点配备快速 USB 端口的 Z60S Pro
Z60S Pro 有三个不同版本,内存容量从 12 GB 到 16 GB 不等,UFS 4.0 存储容量从 256 GB 到 1 TB 不等。通过 USB 接口进行的数据传输采用快速 USB 3.2 Gen1 标准,也可进行图像传输。
与三星 980 Pro 结合使用,传输速度高达 821 MB/s。支持微软 Windows 首选的 exFAT 和 NTFS 文件系统。除蓝牙 5.3 和 NFC 外,Miracast 和 USB OTG 也是努比亚手机的功能之一。
软件:努比亚 Z60S Pro 预装Android 14
Z60S Pro 预装了谷歌Android 14 和该公司自己的 My OS 14 版本。在评测期间,操作系统基于 2024 年 8 月的安全补丁。
据努比亚称,Z60S Pro 的相关安全更新将至少持续到 2027 年。制造商没有就提供的操作系统升级次数发表任何声明。
可持续性
可持续发展不是努比亚的营销重点之一,因此无法了解材料提取或回收的前景。
不过,这款智能手机的包装似乎不含塑料。设备本身用铝箔包裹,而包装的其他部分则由纸板制成。
通信和全球导航卫星系统:配备 5G 的 Z60S Pro
Z60S Pro 配备了 Wi-Fi 6,在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器时,传输速率高达 1,900 MBit/s。我们的测试设备也在 6 GHz 频段与参考路由器进行通信。因此,Z60S Pro 甚至提供了 Wi-Fi 6E,这在这个价位的产品中并不常见。
为了连接到移动数据网络,努比亚手机支持广泛的 4G 和 5G 频率。所有与德语国家有关的频率均已覆盖。
努比亚还宣传了卫星通信功能,但似乎只在中国可用,因为我们的测试设备无法选择该功能。
Networking | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Realme GT 6 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 |
|
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz |
|
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz |
|
Z60S Pro 可以使用许多全球卫星网络(其中一些是三频网络)来确定其位置。
在一次骑行中,我们将其定位质量与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。
虽然在日常生活中可以毫不犹豫地执行导航任务,但努比亚手机在详细路线上的误差还是很明显的。
电话功能和语音质量Z60S Pro 具有双卡双待功能
Z60S Pro 支持两张实体 nano SIM 卡;没有 eSIM 集成。不过,努比亚手机允许 VoLTE 和通过家庭 Wi-Fi 通话(Wi-Fi 通话)。语音质量不刺耳,声音清晰响亮。
摄像头配备特殊主摄像头的 Z60S Pro
Z60S Pro 的 5000 万像素主摄像头有些与众不同,因为镜头配备了 35 毫米等效焦距。这使得拍摄对象的距离明显比竞争对手更近。
内置的索尼 IMX906 1/1.56 英寸传感器在日光下具有良好的锐度和逼真的色彩,给人留下深刻印象。即使在受控照明条件下,色彩还原也非常成功。
努比亚手机在黑暗环境中的表现几乎令人惊讶。在这里,它能拍摄出具有大量细节的迷人照片。
分辨率相当低的 800 万像素长焦摄像头和 5000 万像素超广角摄像头可提供稳定的照片质量,但也仅此而已。不过,这在中高档产品中也是意料之中的。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide angleWide angleLow light5x ZoomUltra-wide angle配件和保修:努比亚 Z60S Pro(含保护套和适配器
输入设备和操作:带面部解锁功能的 Z60S Pro
由于采用了 120 Hz 的面板,电容式触摸屏反应迅速,动画和菜单滚动非常流畅。一个小型线性 X 轴电动马达负责振动并提供清晰的触觉反馈。
通过前置摄像头的 2D 技术或 OLED 面板上的指纹传感器实现的人脸解锁功能确保了生物识别的安全性。
光学指纹传感器工作可靠,但解锁 X60S Pro 的速度并不快。
显示屏Z60S Pro 智能手机采用 OLED 显示屏
6.78 英寸 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏凭借 2,800 x 1,260 分辨率实现了 450 ppi 以上的高图像清晰度。制造商规定 Z60S Pro 的峰值亮度为 1,200 尼特,我们在播放 HDR 内容(1,141 cd/m²)时验证了这一点。
然而,正如 APL18 测试(834 cd/m²)显示的那样,该面板在日常使用中的亮度并不高。这正是竞争对手的亮度显示器的优势所在。
此外 Poco F6 Pro在 PWM 调光模式下的频率明显更高(3840 Hz)。相比之下,努比亚 Z60S Pro 使用频率较低的 980 Hz PWM 来调节亮度。
对于 120 Hz 的面板来说,PWM 振幅略低于 20%,也可以更平缓一些。
|
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 726 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94
ΔE Greyscale 1.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
Nubia Z60S Pro AMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8" | Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 50 Pro P-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Realme GT 6 AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8" | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Dynamic AMOLED x2, 2340x1080, 6.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | 5% | 11% | 31% | 0% | |
Brightness middle | 726 | 1025 41% | 1064 47% | 975 34% | 897 24% |
Brightness | 729 | 1021 40% | 1038 42% | 974 34% | 908 25% |
Brightness Distribution | 94 | 98 4% | 88 -6% | 98 4% | 97 3% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2 | 1.2 40% | 1.17 41% | 0.8 60% | 2.2 -10% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 2.4 -100% | 2 -67% | 0.9 25% | 1.7 -42% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% | 2.238 98% | 2.22 99% | 2.08 106% |
CCT | 6399 102% | 6656 98% | 6423 101% | 6467 101% | 6617 98% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3 | 2.47 | 1.4 | 3.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 120 Hz Amplitude: 19.61 % Secondary Frequency: 980 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17212 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured. |
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)
我们使用肖像显示器公司的 X-rite 分光光度计和 Calman Ultimate 软件进行分析,结果显示 Z60S Pro 相对较大的 P3 色彩空间的平均 Delta-E 偏差非常低。除了三种色彩配置文件外,还可以在设置菜单中单独调整白平衡。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.5805 ms rise | |
↘ 0.563 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.6995 ms rise | |
↘ 0.714 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms). |
这款中端手机在户外给人留下了良好的印象。Z60S Pro 有足够的亮度储备来应对大多数光线环境。不过,玻璃表面的反光可能会比较恼人。视角稳定性非常好。
性能Z60S Pro 配备高通 SoC
努比亚智能手机的动力来自快速的 骁龙8代2.虽然该芯片组不是最新的 旗舰 SoC但这款中端手机在 Geekbench CPU 基准测试中仍然表现出色。
特别是在单核心方面,Z60S Pro 比高通竞争对手的 高通竞争对手.努比亚手机在系统测试中的表现也非常出色。
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=143, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11338 - 16880, n=21) | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI | |
Average of class Smartphone (224 - 4122, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (224 - 505, n=4) | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI | |
Average of class Smartphone (213 - 32120, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (213 - 505, n=4) | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI | |
Average of class Smartphone (487 - 44381, n=16, last 2 years) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (487 - 1092, n=4) | |
Nubia Z60S Pro |
一个 Adreno 740可用于处理图形工作负载。在 3DMark 测试中,Z60S Pro 领先于 Poco F6 Pro.在 GFXBench 的屏幕数值中,可以看到 90 fps 的锁定。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Realme GT 6 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro |
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=157, last 2 years) | |
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125)) | |
Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (5.56 - 12.7, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 122) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 29.9, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128) | |
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125)) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 263, n=149, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125)) | |
Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121) | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 90158, n=192, last 2 years) | |
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125)) | |
Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128) | |
Average of class Smartphone (290 - 28190, n=156, last 2 years) | |
Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125)) | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22) | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121) | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127) |
* ... smaller is better
Nubia Z60S Pro | Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | Motorola Edge 50 Pro | Realme GT 6 | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | Average 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -7% | -47% | -12% | -48% | -10% | -46% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 3384.81 | 3070.33 -9% | 1023.6 -70% | 3452.12 2% | 1657.44 -51% | 3579 ? 6% | 1792 ? -47% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 2938.52 | 2987.47 2% | 1025.9 -65% | 3211.78 9% | 994.67 -66% | 2573 ? -12% | 1387 ? -53% |
Random Read 4KB | 451.45 | 381.58 -15% | 337 -25% | 315.76 -30% | 322.32 -29% | 414 ? -8% | 270 ? -40% |
Random Write 4KB | 544.38 | 520.87 -4% | 390.2 -28% | 397.65 -27% | 288.23 -47% | 404 ? -26% | 298 ? -45% |
排放:努比亚 Z60S Pro 显示中度节流
温度
在恒定负载下,表面温度有些偏高;我们测得的最高温度超过 54 °C。
不过,这在 3DMark 压力测试中只得到了部分反映。Z60S Pro 的性能往往不是特别稳定,但节流情况适中。
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Realme GT 6 |
扬声器
在我们的测试中,努比亚手机的立体声扬声器显示出线性的中音和一丝低音。高音也只是略有下降。此外,还可以通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙无线连接耳机。有多种音频编解码器可供选择。
Nubia Z60S Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 25% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能量Z60S Pro 充电迅速
耗电量
Z60S Pro 配备 5100 毫安时电池,可通过 USB-C 接口以最高 80 W 的功率充电。
这款 6.78 英寸的智能手机闲置时功耗超过 2 W,有点耗电,但负载时功耗超过 18 W,并不算低。
Off / Standby | 0.33 / 0.17 Watt |
Idle | 0.91 / 2.2 / 2.31 Watt |
Load |
7.64 / 18.05 Watt |
Nubia Z60S Pro 5100 mAh | Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro 5000 mAh | Motorola Edge 50 Pro 4500 mAh | Realme GT 6 5500 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S23 FE 4500 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 24% | 35% | 19% | 4% | 14% | 26% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.91 | 0.79 13% | 0.9 1% | 1.01 -11% | 0.69 24% | 1.036 ? -14% | 0.906 ? -0% |
Idle Average * | 2.2 | 1.05 52% | 1.3 41% | 1.09 50% | 1.15 48% | 1.766 ? 20% | 1.441 ? 34% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.31 | 1.13 51% | 1.6 31% | 1.16 50% | 1.26 45% | 1.94 ? 16% | 1.605 ? 31% |
Load Average * | 7.64 | 7.88 -3% | 4.8 37% | 9.86 -29% | 15.93 -109% | 7.22 ? 5% | 6.34 ? 17% |
Load Maximum * | 18.05 | 16.48 9% | 6.7 63% | 11.64 36% | 16.09 11% | 10.4 ? 42% | 9.35 ? 48% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在我们的 WLAN 测试中,这款中端手机在现实条件下表现出了出色的电池续航能力,显示屏亮度达到 150 cd/m²。
Z60S Pro 的内置电池可提供超过 17 小时的续航时间。
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 | |
Nubia Z60S Pro | |
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro | |
Motorola Edge 50 Pro | |
Realme GT 6 | |
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE |
Pros
Cons
评语:努比亚 Z60S Pro 是一款有趣的中端手机
在我们的测试中,努比亚 Z60S Pro 成为了中档手机中的佼佼者。这款来自中兴通讯子公司的智能手机价格诱人,功能齐全,包括 USB 3.2、三频 GNSS、Wi-Fi 6E,性能也很吸引人。
35 毫米广角摄像头在纸面上有些不同寻常,但其低光能力和精确校准的色彩平衡却令人惊喜。强劲的电池续航能力和动听的扬声器为努比亚 Z60S Pro 智能手机锦上添花。
凭借 Z60S Pro,努比亚为中端市场带来了一款非常有趣的智能手机,其优势明显大于劣势"。
我们只在 Z60S Pro 600 欧元以下的价格区间和较高的排放以及骁龙 8 代 2 的节流功能中看到了真正的弱点。 骁龙 8 代 2.
三年的更新保证还不错,但也没什么可写的。如果您希望获得更长时间的安全补丁,可以仔细看看 三星Galaxy S23 FE.除努比亚 Z60S Pro 之外,我们还发现了以下替代产品 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro或 Poco F6 Pro.
价格和供应情况
您可以从亚马逊等在线零售商或直接从制造商处购买努比亚 Z60S Pro。https://eu.nubia.com/de-de/products/nubia-z60s-pro?variant=43967257903304.
注:我们更新了评级系统,第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里可在此处查阅。
Nubia Z60S Pro
-
09/27/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Transparency
The present review sample was made available to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or a shop for the purposes of review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review.