努比亚 Z70 Ultra 评测--经济型旗舰手机中最热门的选择

Name: Nubia Z70 Ultra
Brand: Nubia

热，更热，Z70 Ultra。

在推出 Z60 系列旗舰手机几个月后，努比亚又推出了新的旗舰手机 Z70 Ultra，它不仅仅是高通公司目前顶级 SoC 的升级版。除其他方面外，它还改进了电池和 IP 认证。不过，前代产品的一些问题依然存在。
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 01/01/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone

结论 - 性能良好，价格适中，但也有不足之处

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的整体性能不错，其 35 毫米主摄像头是一个相当吸引人的独特卖点。该相机设置往往能拍出不错的照片。由于采用了最新的骁龙 8 Elite 芯片，这款智能手机的性能非常出色，即使 AI 基准测试结果有些令人失望。

强大的电池和没有任何令人分心的凹槽或冲孔的无卡顿显示屏是我们留下深刻印象的另两个原因。不过，显示屏的缺点是显示屏下的前置摄像头没有达到预期。如果能忽略这一点，就能获得快速无线模块、红外爆破器和高达 80 瓦的快速充电等好处。

Test device courtesy of Nubia

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

在我们的测试中，Z70 Ultra 被证明是一款非常烫手的手机--真的。手机外壳会变得相当热。虽然这在日常使用中很少成为问题，但在游戏过程中，智能手机会明显发热。努比亚不存在的更新政策是另一个令人讨厌的缺点。

Pros

+ 快速、无卡顿的 144 Hz 显示屏

+ 良好的摄像头设置

+ 超长电池寿命和快速充电

+ 通过 IP68 / IP69 认证

+ 三频 GNSS 定位功能强大

Cons

- 在负载情况下温度会很高

- 没有 eSIM 卡

- 无无线充电功能

- 更新时间短

价格和供应情况

在德国，Z70 Ultra 可直接从努比亚或通过亚马逊购买。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 85.4%	Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: 1. $9.99 NOUKAJU Screen Protector for... 2. $11.99 NOUKAJU Screen Protector for... 3. $6.88 Damolong Screen Protector Co... List Price: 869€	228 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.85" 2688x1216 431 PPI AMOLED
2. 89.8%	Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 24 GB Memory, 1024 GB	Amazon: 1. $1,099.00 Google Pixel 9 Pro XL - Unlo... 2. $11.98 Guizzcg 2 Pack Screen Protec... 3. $10.99 MOOISVS [2+2pack for Asus Ro... List Price: 1499€	227 g	1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.78" 2400x1080 388 PPI AMOLED
3. 85.7%	Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 128 GB	Amazon: 1. $899.99 Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke... 2. $9.99 OMOTON 3+2 Pack for Google P... 3. $1,779.00 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un...	199 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.30" 2856x1280 495 PPI OLED
4. 89.8% ^{v7 (old)}	Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘ Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB	Amazon: $819.99 List Price: 1149€	196 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.70" 3120x1440 513 PPI AMOLED
5. 81.6%	Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB	Amazon: 1. $12.99 Vaxson 2-Pack Film Protector... 2. $12.98 Puccy 2 Pack Back Protector ... 3. $6.88 Screen Protector Compatible ... List Price: 779€	246 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.80" 2480x1116 400 PPI AMOLED

结论 - 性能良好，价格适中，但也有不足之处
努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的规格
外壳 - 改进努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的 IP 认证
功能 - USB 3.2 和红外触发器
软件 -Android 15，仅承诺一次更新
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 适用于努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的三频全球导航卫星系统
电话功能和语音质量
相机 - 可变光圈和物理快门按钮
配件和保修 - 努比亚 Z70 Ultra 随附电源适配器
输入设备 - 光学指纹传感器
显示屏 - 高达 144 Hz 的明亮 AMOLED 显示屏
性能 - 骁龙 8 精英版
Games
排放--努比亚可能会变得相当热
电池续航时间 - 努比亚采用硅碳技术
Notebookcheck 总体评分

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 是继 Z60 Ultra和 Z60 Ultra 领先版.仅仅几个月时间，Z70 Ultra 就配备了大量新功能。除了最新的骁龙 8 精英处理器之外，Z70 Ultra 还通过了 IP 认证、配备了专用拍照按钮和采用硅碳技术的更大容量电池。

遗憾的是，Z70 Ultra 与我们在评测前代产品时发现的问题如出一辙。尽管如此，这款手机在德国的价格相对实惠，从 749 欧元起。根据内存/存储容量和颜色的不同，价格最高可达 969 欧元。

内存/存储	黑色彩盒	黄色彩盒	星夜彩盒
12/256 GB	749 欧元	749 欧元	-
16/512 GB	849 欧元	849 欧元	869 欧元
24/1,024 GB	969 欧元	-	-

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的规格

Nubia Z70 Ultra

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 830

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

6.85 inch 19.9:9, 2688 x 1216 pixel 431 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, Longxi Durable Glass, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB

, 485.06 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Gravity sensor, proximity sensor, digital compass, gyroscope, vibration motor, OTG, IR-Blaster

Networking

Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G-Sub6 (1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 164.3 x 77.1

Battery

6150 mAh Lithium-Ion, 80 W charging, silicon-carbon anode battery

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Sony IMX906, 35 mm, f/1.59 - f/4.0, QPD, OIS) + 50 MPix (Ultra Wide / Macro, OV50D, 122 °, 18 mm, f/2.0, AF) + 64 MPix (2x Tele, OV64B, 70 mm, f/2.48, OIS); Camera-2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix (f/2.0, FF)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Virtual onscreen keyboard, 80 W charger, USB-C cable, protective case, SIM tool, NebulaOS 1.0, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LC3, Opus | GNSS: GPS/A-GPS (L1, L2, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b) | HDR: HLG, HDR10 | DRM Widevine L1 | IP68 / IP69 | USB Copy Test: 1201 MB/s (connected to Samsung 980 Pro in an Asus ROG Strix Arion Case (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | SAR: not specified yet | max. charging speed: 80 W (wired), fanless, waterproof

Weight

228 g, Power Supply: 135 g

Price

869 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

外壳 - 改进努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的 IP 认证

与前代产品相比，努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的外壳略显圆润。背面突出的摄像头凸起依然存在。尽管如此，这款智能手机并没有头重脚轻的感觉，拿在手上非常舒适。滑动开关被移到了左侧边缘，而专用的相机按钮则位于右侧边缘。虽然按键有点松软，但按压点柔软，使用起来很方便。

我们喜欢 Z70 Ultra 的制造质量。在试图扭转手机时，需要比想象中更大的力才能产生噼啪声。正面的缝隙均匀，但背面有轻微的错位。

这款手机不仅通过了 IP68 防水和防尘认证。它还通过了 IP69 认证，可抵御高压液流。

Z70 Ultra 有黑色、黄色和星夜三种配色。最后一种配色适用于样品机。黄色选项并不鲜艳，而是蛋壳黄和浅米色的混合色。

尺寸比较

Nubia Z70 Ultra Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Samsung Galaxy S24+ Google Pixel 9 Pro DIN A6 ❌

功能 - USB 3.2 和红外触发器

提供的功能与前代手机并无太大区别。其中，现在使用的是速度更快的 USB 端口规格，在我们的文件拷贝测试中，传输速率超过了 1GB/s。它还支持有线图像输出，但遗憾的是仅限于简单地镜像手机屏幕上显示的内容。

它还集成了红外线发射器，可以遥控空调、电视和其他兼容产品。

软件 -Android 15，仅承诺一次更新

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 运行谷歌Android 15，拥有自己的 Nebula AI OS 用户界面。

这听起来很有前景，但真正实现的人工智能功能却很少。其中包括通话时的实时翻译和无线信号的智能优化。

努比亚有一个非常基本的Android 更新政策。对于这款手机，只有一个Android 版本更新。努比亚承诺三年内持续发布安全补丁。不过，根据以往的经验，更新都是零星推出的。在测试时，最后一个补丁是 2024 年 10 月 1 日发布的，因此相对来说是最新的。

可持续性

交货时，外包装全部用薄膜包裹，包装盒内还有大量塑料。

努比亚没有提供任何有关使用可回收材料或产品可回收性的信息。此外，也没有关于智能手机^二氧化碳排放量的可持续发展报告或数据。

Z70 Ultra 不具备用户维修功能，因为努比亚没有提供说明书或备件供用户购买。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 适用于努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的三频全球导航卫星系统

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 配备了 Wi-Fi 7、蓝牙 5.4 和 5G，支持最新的通信标准。虽然可用频段的范围在我们看来不错，但这款智能手机并不是真正为全球使用而设计的。

在使用我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 进行的 iPerf 测试中，Z70 Ultra 实现了较高且稳定的传输速率。

Networking
Nubia Z70 Ultra Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1003 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	891 (min: 823) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1945 (min: 971) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1862 (min: 1729) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	993 (min: 953) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	565 (min: 427) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1864 (min: 929) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1549 (min: 1517) MBit/s ∼83%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	955 (min: 858) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	795 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1830 (min: 1666) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1602 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	859 (min: 401) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	648 (min: 582) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1581 (min: 1247) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1117 (min: 1031) MBit/s ∼60%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm FastConnect 7800
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1005 (min: 506) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	969 (min: 482) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1852 (min: 1711) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1678 (min: 1565) MBit/s ∼90%
Average Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1012 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	992 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1529 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1552 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼83%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	726 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	712 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1438 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1383 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼74%

Nubia Z70 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1913 (971-1969)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1833 (929-1912)

Nubia Z70 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1854 (1729-1901)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1548 (1517-1569)

Nubia Z70 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø987 (508-1019)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø993 (953-1015)

Nubia Z70 Ultra Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø888 (823-978)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø564 (427-612)

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 支持最常见卫星导航网络的三频连接，在我们的自行车骑行测试中提供了出色的路线映射。

电话功能和语音质量

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 可容纳两张 nano SIM 卡，但不支持 eSIM。支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话等功能。

将智能手机贴近耳朵时，语音质量很好，但嘈杂的环境噪声会影响语音质量和清晰度。在免提模式下，用户的声音听起来很刺耳，但总体来说，音质还是可以接受的。

相机 - 可变光圈和物理快门按钮

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的前置摄像头分辨率有所提升，质量与前代手机相比略有改善，但仍未达到预期效果。此外，它只能以每秒 30 帧的速度录制全高清视频。

真正的主角是背面的三摄像头，它得到了大量改进。例如，主镜头现在配备了可变光圈。虽然镜头仍然基于 35 毫米格式，但也可以在设置中切换为 24 毫米。它拍摄的图像往往看起来不错，但在弦光条件下，会有很多曝光过度的区域。除此之外，该镜头的细节和动态范围都很出色。

超广角镜头也采用了新的传感器。该镜头现在还能进行微距拍摄。潜望镜变焦的工作范围为 70 毫米，但在相机应用程序中，实际提供的是 85 毫米，EXIF 数据也证实了这一点。在最大 140 毫米的情况下也能获得不错的效果。最大变焦级别为 50 倍（1,750 毫米）。

视频可录制成 8K（30 FPS）、4K（30、60、120 FPS）、全高清（30、60 FPS）和 720p（30 FPS）格式。不过，视频防抖功能最高只能达到 4K60。主镜头和长焦镜头都具有光学防抖（OIS）功能，当智能手机晃动时会产生明显的嘎嘎声。

手机右侧边缘还有一个相机按钮，拍摄时可用作开始/停止按钮，拍照时不仅可用作快门释放按钮，还有一个用于自动对焦的压力点。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

Nubia Z70 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy S24

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Nubia Z70 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy S24

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Nubia Z70 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy S24

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Nubia Z70 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy S24

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Nubia Z70 Ultra

Samsung Galaxy S24

Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

ColorChecker Nubia Z70 Ultra: 7.83 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 15.3 ∆E

配件和保修 - 努比亚 Z70 Ultra 随附电源适配器

Z70 Ultra 随附模块化充电器（80 瓦）、USB-C 数据线、哑光硅胶保护盖和 SIM 卡工具。

虽然努比亚提供了各种可选配件，但保护壳只能从第三方供应商处购买。制造商在德国只提供 12 个月的保修，这与经销商保修.

输入设备 - 光学指纹传感器

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的电容式触摸屏工作可靠，可快速处理输入。显示屏内嵌光学指纹传感器，能可靠地识别指纹并快速解锁智能手机。面部识别功能也可通过前置摄像头实现，但往往难以识别用户，尤其是在弱光环境下，而且并不安全。

滑动开关可用于启动相机应用或执行其他操作。这可以在设置菜单中进行调整。专用相机按钮也是如此。

线性振动电机可提供清晰的触觉反馈，但声音可能有点大。

显示屏 - 高达 144 Hz 的明亮 AMOLED 显示屏

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的 6.9 英寸 AMOLED 显示屏拥有高分辨率，并首次支持高达 144 Hz 的刷新率。不过，由于不是 LTPO 面板，刷新率最低只能降至 60 Hz。

努比亚提高了亮度。在激活环境光传感器显示纯白图像时，我们在屏幕中央测得的亮度为 1,331 cd/m²。如果缩小白色区域的大小（APL18），亮度会增加到 1,753 cd/m²。播放 HDR 视频时，亮度为 1,840 cd/m²。

我们的测量结果表明，OLED 面板以 60 Hz 的恒定频率闪烁，振幅曲线足够稳定（但我们仍希望它能更平缓一些）。高频 PWM 调光功能也已搭载，其工作频率据称高达 2,160 Hz。我们甚至在最低亮度下测到了更高的频率。虽然测得的闪烁不太可能导致健康问题，但敏感的人在订购这款手机前还是应该三思而后行。


1299 cd/m²	1329 cd/m²	1398 cd/m²
1305 cd/m²	1331 cd/m²	1413 cd/m²
1300 cd/m²	1321 cd/m²	1378 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1413 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1341.6 cd/m² Minimum: 3.19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 1331 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.29

	Nubia Z70 Ultra AMOLED, 2688x1216, 6.9"	Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.8"	Google Pixel 9 Pro OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"	Samsung Galaxy S24+ AMOLED, 3120x1440, 6.7"	Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"
Screen		7%	27%	-58%	-31%
Brightness middle	1331	1682 26%	2083 56%	1358 2%	1003 -25%
Brightness	1342	1685 26%	2016 50%	1358 1%	997 -26%
Brightness Distribution	92	97 5%	84 -9%	92 0%	97 5%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.2	1.1 8%	0.7 42%	3 -150%	1.4 -17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	1.8	2.1 -17%	2 -11%	4.4 -144%	3.1 -72%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	1.7 -6%	1.1 31%	2.5 -56%	2.4 -50%
Gamma	2.29 ^96%	2.27 ^97%	2.22 ^99%	1.98 ^111%	2.22 ^99%
CCT	6321 ^103%	6581 ^99%	6560 ^99%	6656 ^98%	6119 ^106%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

60 Hz
Amplitude: 27.02 %
Secondary Frequency: 2222 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

固定变焦级别和不同亮度设置下的测量结果（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看似平坦，但这是由于缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下振幅的放大版本，以便更加清晰）。

面板色彩表现出色。饱和度并没有失控，这一点令人惊叹。

ColorChecker （色彩模式：标准，色温：正常，目标色彩空间：DCI-P3）

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.7075 ms rise
1.47 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7585 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.03 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.5125 ms rise
1.03 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5215 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

只要环境光传感器处于激活状态，努比亚手机就能为户外使用提供足够的亮度。手动调节亮度时，最大亮度限制在 611 cd/m²。

其可视角度稳定性良好。在平视角下亮度略有下降，但不会出现色彩衰减。

性能 - 骁龙 8 精英版

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的核心是一个骁龙 8 精英版根据配置的不同，它配备了 12、16 或 24 GB LPDDR5x 内存。

Z70 Ultra 的性能非常高，但由于散热限制，SoC 的全部潜能可能永远无法得到充分发挥，与 ROG Phone 9 Pro 的对比就证明了这一点。此外，Z70 Ultra 的 AI 基准成绩也没有达到预期。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	3215 Points +2%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	3144 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3001 - 3228, n=7)	3116 Points -1%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	2251 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	2066 Points -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1971 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 3479, n=177, last 2 years)	1488 Points -53%
Multi-Core
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	10323 Points +7%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	9620 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (9019 - 10401, n=7)	9620 Points 0%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	7036 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	6534 Points -32%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	4820 Points -50%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 10401, n=177, last 2 years)	4173 Points -57%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	2956859 Points +17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (2534428 - 3015111, n=6)	2759534 Points +9%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2534428 Points
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1983872 Points -22%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	1777871 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3015111, n=108, last 2 years)	1311330 Points -48%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1139380 Points -55%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	27169 Points
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	26863 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (18231 - 27169, n=6)	22556 Points -17%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	20446 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	17534 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 27169, n=198, last 2 years)	13213 Points -51%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	11823 Points -56%

CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1718 - 2674, n=5)	2203 Points +5%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2093 Points
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	2044 Points -2%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1395 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	1290 Points -38%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1021 Points -51%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=166, last 2 years)	924 Points -56%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	12993 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (9067 - 12993, n=5)	10941 Points -16%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	10677 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	9467 Points -27%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	8148 Points -37%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	7716 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 12993, n=160, last 2 years)	6457 Points -50%
System
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	17953 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (14039 - 17953, n=5)	15830 Points -12%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	15745 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	15253 Points -15%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	11329 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 17953, n=160, last 2 years)	10301 Points -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	8029 Points -55%
Memory
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	18911 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (7873 - 18911, n=5)	13538 Points -28%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	12408 Points -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	10197 Points -46%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	10178 Points -46%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	8266 Points -56%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 18911, n=160, last 2 years)	7010 Points -63%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (35527 - 44189, n=5)	41219 Points +16%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	38586 Points +9%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	35527 Points
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	26972 Points -24%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	25796 Points -27%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	23041 Points -35%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=160, last 2 years)	17924 Points -50%
Web
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2363 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	1998 Points -15%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1879 Points -20%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	1745 Points -26%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1202 - 2363, n=5)	1732 Points -27%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	1724 Points -27%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2363, n=160, last 2 years)	1571 Points -34%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	36578 Points +313%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	19134 Points +116%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (8865 - 22767, n=5)	18035 Points +103%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=151, last 2 years)	17765 Points +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	11342 Points +28%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	8865 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (1790 - 307528, n=6)	52859 Points +2686%
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=144, last 2 years)	25149 Points +1226%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	1971 Points +4%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	1897 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1146 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 12288	1121 Points -41%

Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 4619, n=42, last 2 years)	784 Points +99%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	754 Points +92%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (267 - 754, n=3)	471 Points +20%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	393 Points
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	376 Points -4%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	374 Points -5%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	4176 Points +1169%
Average of class Smartphone (122 - 32432, n=42, last 2 years)	3765 Points +1044%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	755 Points +129%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (271 - 755, n=3)	452 Points +37%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	374 Points +14%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	329 Points
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	6269 Points +689%
Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44657, n=42, last 2 years)	5410 Points +581%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	1765 Points +122%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (641 - 1765, n=3)	1067 Points +34%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	804 Points +1%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	795 Points

AI Benchmark
Score V5
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	3177 Points +2219%
Average of class Smartphone (66.3 - 3219, n=25, last 2 years)	1229 Points +797%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	287 Points +109%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (137 - 287, n=2)	212 Points +55%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	137 Points
Score V6
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288	5170 Points +1612%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (302 - 10739, n=5)	2707 Points +796%
Average of class Smartphone (177 - 10739, n=18, last 2 years)	2589 Points +757%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384	1112 Points +268%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 24576	770 Points +155%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	302 Points

集成的 Adreno 830 GPU 负责图形处理。这正是努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的真正优势所在，它能提供出色的效果。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5846 Points
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	5575 Points -5%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5009 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4235 Points -28%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2605 Points -55%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5906 Points
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	5642 Points -4%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5105 Points -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4256 Points -28%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2547 Points -57%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	22004 Points
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	21065 Points -4%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	20321 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13098 Points -40%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9476 Points -57%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10059 Points
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	9430 Points -6%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8791 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8774 Points -13%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10075 Points
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	9447 Points -6%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9262 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8765 Points -13%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2155 Points
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	2039 Points -5%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1765 Points -18%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1026 Points -52%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2159 Points
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	2047 Points -5%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1826 Points -15%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1001 Points -54%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	10259 Points +7%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9622 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	7199 Points -25%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5602 Points -42%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	35552 Points
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	33560 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	23545 Points -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16300 Points -54%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	22303 Points 0%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	22236 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	15675 Points -30%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11444 Points -49%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	166 fps +177%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +98%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	765 fps +42%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	537 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	415 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	378 fps -30%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	166 fps +177%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +98%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	457 fps +129%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	310 fps +55%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	245 fps +23%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	200 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	166 fps +177%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	119 fps +98%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	104 fps +73%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	335 fps +95%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	244 fps +42%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	172 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	165 fps -4%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	154 fps +157%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps +13%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -10%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	216 fps +48%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	152 fps +4%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	146 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	139 fps -5%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	85 fps -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	144 fps +140%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	68 fps +13%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -22%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	112 fps +30%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	86 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	75 fps -13%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	63 fps -27%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -49%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	166 fps +177%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	83 fps +38%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77 fps +28%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	263 fps +48%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	202 fps +13%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	178 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	176 fps -1%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -33%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps +13%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	46 fps
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	38 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	34 fps -26%
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20 fps -57%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Nubia Z70 Ultra (Edge 131)	288.938 Points
Nubia Z70 Ultra (Chrome 131)	89.739 Points -69%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)	240.864 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (89.7 - 289, n=7)	229 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)	139.087 Points -52%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=170, last 2 years)	125.1 Points -57%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)	108.429 Points -62%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Nubia Z70 Ultra (Edge 131)	393 runs/min
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)	382 runs/min -3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (342 - 393, n=3)	372 runs/min -5%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)	260 runs/min -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)	207 runs/min -47%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)	143.7 runs/min -63%

Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (23.5 - 34, n=6)	28 runs/min +16%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)	25.9 runs/min +7%
Nubia Z70 Ultra (Edge 131)	24.2 runs/min
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)	15.8 runs/min -35%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=68, last 2 years)	12.1 runs/min -50%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (168 - 255, n=5)	212 Points +2%
Nubia Z70 Ultra (Edge 131)	207 Points
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)	195 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)	176 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=160, last 2 years)	117.8 Points -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)	106 Points -49%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Nubia Z70 Ultra (Edge 131)	94399 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (72825 - 94399, n=6)	85850 Points -9%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)	72825 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)	63452 Points -33%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)	60566 Points -36%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=211, last 2 years)	38821 Points -59%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version (Chrome 129)	26537 Points -72%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=168, last 2 years)	1519 ms * -247%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)	699 ms * -60%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ (Chrome 121)	630.8 ms * -44%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro (Chrome 131)	573.9 ms * -31%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (422 - 574, n=6)	457 ms * -4%
Nubia Z70 Ultra (Edge 131)	437.5 ms *

* ... smaller is better

	Nubia Z70 Ultra	Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro	Google Pixel 9 Pro	Samsung Galaxy S24+	Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version	Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		5%	-65%	-44%	5%	-14%	-49%
Sequential Read 256KB	4107.66	4026.96 -2%	1717.9 -58%	2450.9 -40%	3995.95 -3%	3625 ?(1851 - 4512, n=36) -12%	1894 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) -54%
Sequential Write 256KB	3145.55	3773.6 20%	253.53 -92%	1523.87 -52%	3065.04 -3%	3001 ?(1524 - 3889, n=36) -5%	1480 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years) -53%
Random Read 4KB	437.83	441.13 1%	218.41 -50%	387.42 -12%	483.2 10%	386 ?(250 - 480, n=36) -12%	280 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years) -36%
Random Write 4KB	633.68	637.2 1%	261.55 -59%	176.19 -72%	729.58 15%	467 ?(45.7 - 709, n=36) -26%	313 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years) -51%

Games

Nubia Z70 Ultra; Dead Trigger 2; 2.1.0: Ø143.4 (125-145)

Nubia Z70 Ultra; League of Legends: Wild Rift; High Definition: Ø119.7 (114-121)

Nubia Z70 Ultra; League of Legends: Wild Rift; max: Ø60 (57-61)

Nubia Z70 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.5.0: Ø118.1 (106-121)

Nubia Z70 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø60 (55-61)

Nubia Z70 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.5.0: Ø40 (36-41)

排放--努比亚可能会变得相当热

温度

相机镜头下有水汽凝结的 Z70 Ultra（图片来源：Daniel Schmidt）

与 Z60 Ultra 领先版的情况类似，Z70 Ultra 在持续负载下的触感也会变得不舒适，某些区域的温度会升至 63°C 以上，这实在太高了。虽然这种情况在日常使用中不太可能发生，但像 Burnout 基准这样的压力测试确实会导致温度飙升，从而引起软件干预并停止对组件造成压力的应用程序。此外，由于温度过高，主摄像头的镜头下会出现冷凝现象。幸好智能手机冷却后，这种现象就会消失。

不出所料，SoC 在持续负载下会出现节流。值得庆幸的是，时钟速度和性能下降并不严重。

Max. Load

Idle


60.9 °C	56.8 °C	50.1 °C
63.3 °C	60 °C	49 °C
63.7 °C	52.2 °C	46.8 °C

Maximum: 63.7 °C
Average: 55.9 °C


50.6 °C	48.7 °C	45.5 °C
48.1 °C	46.9 °C	44.2 °C
44.7 °C	46.7 °C	42 °C

Maximum: 50.6 °C
Average: 46.4 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28.4 °C | Room Temperature 20.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 55.9 °C / 133 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 63.7 °C / 147 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50.6 °C / 123 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	90.5 % +19%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	82.1 % +8%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	76 %
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67.6 % -11%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58 % -24%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	90.6 % +17%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	81.5 % +6%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	77.2 %
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69.3 % -10%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.6 % -23%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	89.5 % +11%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	80.3 %
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	69 % -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24+ Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	59.5 % -26%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	99.2 % +14%
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash	89.8 % +3%
Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	87.2 %
Google Pixel 9 Pro Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	77.3 % -11%
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	71.7 % -18%

Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø31 (27.2-35.2)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø32.2 (30.7-33.8)

Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø115.1 (98.4-129.4)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø118.2 (112.9-124.7)

Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø131.2 (127.7-131.8)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø124.9 (124.6-126.2)

Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø30.9 (27.4-33.7)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø31.5 (31.4-31.5)

Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø30.8 (26.8-33.3)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø30.1 (27.8-31.1)

Nubia Z70 Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15.6 (14.1-16.2)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3, with Fan: Ø15.2 (15.2-15.3)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø15 (13.7-15.3)

发言人

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的两个扬声器可提供稳定的音效，但音质略显单薄，全音量时还会有轻微失真。

有线耳机只能通过 USB-C 接口连接。对于无线耳机，有一套可靠的蓝牙编解码器可供选择。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Nubia Z70 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.6% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - 努比亚采用硅碳技术

耗电量

我们记录的数据在预期范围内。在最大显示亮度下，手机的耗电量比我们希望的要大一些。

Z70 Ultra 不支持无线充电，但提供高达 80 瓦的快速充电功能。使用随机附带的电源适配器，充满电仅需 47 分钟，18 分钟可充至 50%，33 分钟可充至 80%。这不禁让人担心电池的长期健康状况以及快速充电过程对电池的友好程度。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.11 / 0.2 Watt
Idle	0.8 / 2.06 / 2.1 Watt
Load	8.01 / 18.7 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Nubia Z70 Ultra 6150 mAh	Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro 5800 mAh	Google Pixel 9 Pro 4700 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S24+ 4900 mAh	Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version 6000 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		1%	24%	38%	20%	14%	21%
Idle Minimum *	0.8	0.99 -24%	0.59 26%	0.43 46%	0.7 12%	0.782 ?(0.5 - 0.99, n=6) 2%	0.884 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years) -11%
Idle Average *	2.06	1.08 48%	1.1 47%	0.84 59%	1.55 25%	1.398 ?(0.9 - 2.06, n=6) 32%	1.469 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years) 29%
Idle Maximum *	2.1	1.14 46%	1.2 43%	0.95 55%	1.61 23%	1.482 ?(1.1 - 2.1, n=6) 29%	1.624 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years) 23%
Load Average *	8.01	12.97 -62%	7.15 11%	6.76 16%		9.72 ?(6.7 - 13, n=6) -21%	6.6 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years) 18%
Load Maximum *	18.7	19.21 -3%	20.37 -9%	16.42 12%		13.4 ?(9.3 - 19.2, n=6) 28%	9.93 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years) 47%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø7.59 (1.206-21.6)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.15 (1.439-19.1)

Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.202 (1.134-1.515)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.942 (0.853-1.818)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.78 (4.72-11.3)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15 (12.6-17.4)

Nubia Z70 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.202 (1.134-1.515)

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.942 (0.853-1.818)

电池寿命

6,150 mAh 锂离子电池使用硅碳负极来提高能量密度，该技术由Honor 首次引入。 Magic V2.

因此，虽然电池续航时间略逊于前代产品，但也非常出色。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 131)		21h 49min

Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Nubia Z70 Ultra 6150 mAh	1309 min
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro 5800 mAh	1262 min
Google Pixel 9 Pro 4700 mAh	1017 min
Samsung Galaxy S24+ 4900 mAh	1009 min
Nubia Z60 Ultra Leading Version 6000 mAh	1326 min

Notebookcheck 总体评分

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 以相对实惠的价格提供了强大的技术和多功能相机设置。不过，可持续发展性在这里退居其次。

Back to the verdict

Nubia Z70 Ultra - 12/13/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

87%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

67 / 69 → 96%

Weight

88%

Battery

93%

Display

91%

Games Performance

47 / 55 → 85%

Application Performance

87 / 85 → 100%

AI Performance

20%

Temperature

21%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

81%

Average

58%

85%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
0%

Power Use
95.6%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
39%

Total Sustainability Score: 29.1%

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 评测--经济型旗舰手机中最热门的选择

热，更热，Z70 Ultra。

结论 - 性能良好，价格适中，但也有不足之处

Pros

Cons

价格和供应情况

潜在的竞争对手比较

Table of Contents

努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的规格

外壳 - 改进努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的 IP 认证

尺寸比较

功能 - USB 3.2 和红外触发器

软件 -Android 15，仅承诺一次更新

可持续性

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 适用于努比亚 Z70 Ultra 的三频全球导航卫星系统

电话功能和语音质量

相机 - 可变光圈和物理快门按钮

配件和保修 - 努比亚 Z70 Ultra 随附电源适配器

输入设备 - 光学指纹传感器

显示屏 - 高达 144 Hz 的明亮 AMOLED 显示屏

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 骁龙 8 精英版

Games

排放--努比亚可能会变得相当热

温度

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

发言人

Nubia Z70 Ultra audio analysis

Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro audio analysis

电池续航时间 - 努比亚采用硅碳技术

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Notebookcheck 总体评分

More articles related to this device

Transparency