惠普ZBook Fury 17 G8评测--配备4K梦幻色彩显示屏的移动工作站

Name: HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Brand: HP

过时的概念？

惠普的ZBook Fury 17 G8是一款传统的移动工作站，拥有强大的组件。你还会得到一个高质量的4K梦幻色彩显示屏，所以ZBook应该是内容创作者的一个好选择。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 02/17/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Tiger Lake Windows Workstation

惠普ZBook Fury 17 G8是一款经典的移动工作站，注重性能、端口种类以及维护选项等方面。这些产品类别并不遵循当前设备越来越轻薄的趋势，这意味着你必须做出妥协。你还可以通过广泛的CPU/GPU组合选择来很好地定制配置，满足你的要求。

我们的审查单位是一个相当强大的单位，配备了酷睿i9处理器和Nvidia RTX A3000 GPU(以前被称为Quadro），但还有更强大的GPU可供选择（一直到RTX A5000).你还会得到32GB内存、1TB NVMe SSD以及4K梦幻色彩显示屏，这使ZBook Fury 17 G8的价格上升到3800欧元左右。

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA

Processor

Intel Core i9-11950H 8 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, 106 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1485 MHz, RAM: 1375 MHz, 80 W TDP, GDDR6, 472.42, Optimus

Memory

32 MB

, DDR4-3200, Single-Channel, 4 Slots, max. 128 GB

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AUOCD8C, IPS, glossy: no, HDR, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel WM590 (Tiger Lake PCH-H)

Storage

Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, 1024 GB

, 885 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: SD, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 27 x 398 x 267

Battery

94 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 200W PSU, HP Tools, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

2.926 kg, Power Supply: 630 g

Price

3800 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

案例 - 存在异常质量问题的ZBook

我们已经熟悉了前辈的机箱设计ZBook Fury 17 G7而深灰色的机箱在专业环境中效果不错。机箱以及盖子的稳定性都很好，整体质量也很高，但我们注意到底板的安装问题。它只由一个杠杆和一个中央螺丝固定，所以非常容易拆卸，但面板与机箱的其他部分并不完全对齐，有明显的差异。这与高额的零售价格其实并不相符，而且影响了视觉效果。虽然卸下面板很容易，但我们更希望有一个更坚固的解决方案，有更多的螺丝。

惠普仍然使用16:9的面板，边框相当宽，尤其是在屏幕下方。虽然许多现代的15和16英寸的笔记本电脑正在回到16:10的面板，但现在似乎就是没有合适的17.3英寸面板。只有联想ThinkPad P17更为笨重，但其他所有的对比设备都比ZBook更为紧凑。

尺寸比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "0" not supported!

连接性 - Thunderbolt 4，但SD卡读卡器速度慢

你可以得到所有重要的端口，包括Thunderbolt/USB-C、常规USB-A端口、以太网、HDMI和Mini-DisplayPort。ZBook总共可以驱动四个屏幕。后面的空间被风扇的排气口占据，所以所有的端口都分布在两边。

左侧。以太网，纳米安全锁插槽，3x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (1x供电)，3.5毫米立体声插孔，智能卡

右侧。SD读卡器、HDMI 2.0b、Mini-DisplayPort 1.4、2个Thunderbolt 4（USB 4，40 Gbps）、电源

SD卡阅读器

惠普仍然在右侧使用全尺寸的SD卡读卡器，而且SD卡完全插入。与之相比之前的型号，但性能要低得多，我们在基准测试中只能达到90MB/s，而ZBook Fury 17 G7仍能达到170MB/s。除了我们目前的参考卡（Angelbird AV Pro V60），我们还检查了我们以前的东芝的卡，以排除任何兼容性问题，但结果几乎相同。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	188 MB/s +160%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H (AV Pro 60)	161.1 MB/s +123%
Average of class Workstation (49.6 - 200, n=17, last 2 years)	93.3 MB/s +29%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK (AV Pro V60)	83.6 MB/s +16%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	72.3 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	68.3 MB/s -6%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	205 MB/s +130%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H (AV Pro 60)	172.7 MB/s +94%
Average of class Workstation (78.6 - 227, n=17, last 2 years)	117.9 MB/s +32%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK (AV Pro V60)	89.5 MB/s 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)	89.1 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)	86.7 MB/s -3%

沟通

除了千兆以太网端口，你还可以得到一个来自英特尔的Wi-Fi 6模块，以及添加WWAN模块（4G/LTE）的可能性，因为所有必要的天线都已经包括在内。然而，惠普没有使用最新的标准，已经有了更现代的Wi-Fi 6E模块，而且在2022年有一个5G调制解调器也不错。Wi-Fi模块的性能仍然非常好，我们能够测量到超过1Gbps的传输速率。在与Netgear的Wi-Fi 6路由器或AVM FritzBox 7490（Wi-Fi 5）结合使用时，我们没有遇到任何稳定性问题。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1440 (1175^min - 1571^max) MBit/s
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)	1393 (713^min - 1475^max) MBit/s -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1346 (644^min - 1421^max) MBit/s -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s -19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	884 (468^min - 938^max) MBit/s -39%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	767 (421^min - 954^max) MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)	1456 (1371^min - 1566^max) MBit/s +14%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1400 (636^min - 1472^max) MBit/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1391 (1094^min - 1575^max) MBit/s +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1281 (1106^min - 1426^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s -2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	579 (368^min - 652^max) MBit/s -55%

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1281 (1106-1426)

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1439 (1175-1571)

网络摄像头

ZBook Fury 17 G8仍然使用720p网络摄像头。它完成了自己的工作，但即使在体面的照明条件下，图片质量也不理想。

ColorChecker HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA: 10.57 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 20.86 ∆E

维护

如前所述，拆除底板非常容易。你只需取下固定杠杆的中央螺丝，然后就可以直接取下它。然而，一旦进入内部，你会发现许多额外的盖子，所以进入实际组件毕竟需要更多的修整。四个内存插槽中的两个也位于键盘下方。在电池下面还有空间放置一个2.5英寸的驱动器，必要的安装工具也在盒子里。

输入设备 - 移动工作站仍然使用PointStick

输入设备与之前的型号相比没有变化。以前的型号.黑色的键盘非常结实（不弯曲），并以非常清晰的压力点以及足够的行程而令人信服。除了ThinkPad工作站（如ThinkPad P17 G2），惠普当然也提供市场上最好的移动键盘之一。除了全尺寸的小键盘外，你还能得到两级白色照明，而且键盘还能防泼水。我们认为，方向键的垂直尺寸较小是该键盘唯一真正的缺点，你必须习惯它。

与EliteBook系列相反，惠普在ZBook上除了触摸板，还配备了PointStick。这两种输入方法都有自己的一套专用鼠标按钮，而且都能很好地工作。

显示 - 梦幻色彩现在具有DCI-P3功能

我们的评测单元配备了哑光4K DreamColor显示屏，它的长宽比仍然是16:9。与以前迭代的DreamColor显示屏相比，其中涵盖了AdobeRGB色彩空间。新版本 "只 "针对较小的DCI-P3色彩空间，就像Apple MacBook Pro机型。主观的画面印象仍然很好，只是明亮的表面显得有些颗粒感。

惠普宣传的平均亮度为550cd/m²，我们在测量后可以确认这个数值。考虑到高亮度，黑值也很体面，为0.33cd/m²，这导致了超过1700:1的非常高的对比度。即使在黑暗的背景上达到最大亮度，你也只能看到边缘有轻微的背光渗漏，但在实践中它们是没有问题的。没有PWM，只是响应时间相当慢，这导致了明显的重影。


571 cd/m²	599 cd/m²	590 cd/m²
540 cd/m²	568 cd/m²	580 cd/m²
529 cd/m²	539 cd/m²	558 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

AUOCD8C tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 599 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 563.8 cd/m² Minimum: 27 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 569 cd/m²
Contrast: 1721:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA AUOCD8C, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G LP173WF4-SPF7, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI WE76 11UM-456 B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"	HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA AUOCD8C, , 3840x2160, 17.3"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"
Display		-23%	-2%	5%	0%
Display P3 Coverage	99.1	67.9 -31%	82.1 -17%	99.9 1%	99.3 0%
sRGB Coverage	100	87.3 -13%	99.3 -1%	100 0%	99.9 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	86.8	63.9 -26%	96 11%	98.6 14%	86.9 0%
Response Times		29%	67%	95%	-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	67.6 ?(31.6, 36)	39.2 ?(21.2, 18) 42%	17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2) 74%	2 ?(1, 1) 97%	56 ?(26, 30) 17%
Response Time Black / White *	26.8 ?(9.2, 17.6)	22.4 ?(11.6, 10.8) 16%	10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2) 60%	2 ?(1, 1) 93%	40 ?(22, 18) -49%
PWM Frequency				240 ?(80)
Screen		-189%	-36%	-104%	-33%	170%
Brightness middle	568	361 -36%	419 -26%	353 -38%	573 1%	507 -11%
Brightness	564	334 -41%	416 -26%	360 -36%	586 4%	494 -12%
Brightness Distribution	88	87 -1%	93 6%	96 9%	91 3%	96 9%
Black Level *	0.33	0.35 -6%	0.34 -3%		0.38 -15%	0.02 94%
Contrast	1721	1031 -40%	1232 -28%		1508 -12%	25350 1373%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1	5.4 -440%	1.5 -50%	2.45 -145%	1.9 -90%	1.4 -40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.4	9.9 -313%	4.7 -96%	3.75 -56%	4.2 -75%	2.8 -17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.5	3.2 -540%	0.9 -80%	2.77 -454%	0.7 -40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	6.5 -282%	2 -18%	1.88 -11%	2.9 -71%	2.3 -35%
Gamma	2.18 ^101%	2.23 ^99%	2.17 ^101%	2.31 ^95%	2.1 ^105%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6461 ^101%	7351 ^88%	6629 ^98%	6441 ^101%	6217 ^105%	6792 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)					77.6
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)					100
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-61% / -122%	10% / -14%	-1% / -44%	-16% / -23%	170% / 170%

* ... smaller is better

与以前配备可选DreamColor显示屏的ZBooks相比，另一个不同之处是不再有预装DreamColor软件，这意味着你不能再切换色彩空间。我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计分析了该面板。与P3基准相比，灰度和颜色的偏差已经很低了，用户实际上没有必要进行校准。我们自己的校准（配置文件可在上面的方框中免费下载）确实进一步减少了偏差，但差别不大。根据我们的测量，P3色彩空间的覆盖率为99.1%。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9.2 ms rise
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
67.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 31.6 ms rise
67.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 36 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

这个大的17英寸设备当然不是最机动的装置，但哑光和明亮的显示屏在户外效果很好。IPS面板的视角稳定性也没有受到批评。

性能 - 配备Core i9和RTX A3000的ZBook

惠普为ZBook Fury 17 G8提供了各种各样的组件，你甚至可以得到没有专用GPU的模型。你可以选择不同的英特尔CPU（第11代），包括Xeon芯片和AMD或Nvidia的专业显卡。我们的TGPRTX A3000的TGP设置为80瓦，在压力测试中，该设备已经超过了电源适配器的200瓦限制（根据规格表，200瓦的设备是最强大的），因此我们相信可选的RTX A4000和RTX A5000也被限制在80W。基本上，我们面对的是较慢的Max-Q版本，尽管官方不再使用这一称呼了。

测试设置

惠普没有实施任何自定义电源配置文件或额外的性能设置，只使用常规的Windows电源设置。

处理器 - Core i9-11950H

我们的测试装置配备了酷睿i9-11950H，这是商务版的酷睿i9-11980HK.没有解锁的倍频，但作为回报，该芯片支持vPro。8个核心可以达到5GHz（或在所有核心同时受力时达到4.5GHz），因此这是最快的移动Tiger Lake 芯片之一。CPU可以在短暂的时间内消耗超过100瓦特，而在持续的工作负荷下，其消耗量约为70瓦特，这些都是很好的数值。

这意味着ZBook的CPU性能与工作站竞争产品相当，但英特尔全新的Alder Lake处理器使用的内核多得多，将在下一代机型中提供巨大的多核性能优势。AMDs目前的移动处理器在可比的TDP设置下也能提供更多性能。

在电池供电的情况下，功耗被限制在65瓦，这导致在多核场景下的性能赤字约为15%。更多的CPU基准测试可在我们的技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1949 (1895.02-2129.93)

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2018 (1959.15-2144.43)

MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK: Ø2021 (1955.32-2192.14)

Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M: Ø1771 (1747.11-1845.61)

HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H: Ø1456 (1429.34-1516.82)

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max; Rosetta 2: Ø1687 (1667.29-1693.05)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Workstation	83.3 pt
MSI WE76 11UM-456 ^-1! Intel Core i9-11980HK	72 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max ^-5! Apple M1 Max	69.1 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	66.6 pt
Average Intel Core i9-11950H	65 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	63.9 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	62.9 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	51.1 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Workstation (11026 - 27130, n=29, last 2 years)	17419 Points +33%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	13387 Points +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	13113 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	12876 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (12048 - 13113, n=4)	12394 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	12385 Points -6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	10862 (10718^min - 10862.2^max) Points -17%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	8802 (8415.48^min - 8801.64^max) Points -33%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Workstation (1465 - 2178, n=29, last 2 years)	1825 Points +12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	1633 Points
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	1613 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (1569 - 1633, n=4)	1596 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	1530 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	1508 Points -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	1480 Points -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	1284 Points -21%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Workstation (2990 - 10069, n=30, last 2 years)	6593 Points +32%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	5180 Points +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	5000 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (4471 - 5000, n=4)	4700 Points -6%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	4437 Points -11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	4250 Points -15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	3639 Points -27%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	2735 Points -45%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Workstation (564 - 827, n=30, last 2 years)	703 Points +11%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	632 Points
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	622 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (610 - 632, n=4)	620 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	582 Points -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	568 Points -10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	489 Points -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	390 Points -38%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Workstation (1863 - 4173, n=29, last 2 years)	2711 Points +27%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	2192 (1955.32^min - 2192.14^max) Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	2144 (1959.15^min - 2144.43^max) Points +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	2130 (1895.02^min - 2129.93^max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (1827 - 2130, n=5)	1968 Points -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	1846 (1747.11^min - 1845.61^max) Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	1693 (1667^min - 1693^max) Points -21%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	1517 (1429.34^min - 1516.82^max) Points -29%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Workstation (166.2 - 301, n=29, last 2 years)	263 Points +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	249 Points
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	244 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (236 - 249, n=4)	243 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	231 Points -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	230 Points -8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	211 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	197 Points -21%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	302 Seconds * -24%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	276 Seconds * -13%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (244 - 261, n=3)	253 Seconds * -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	250 Seconds * -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	244 Seconds *
Average of class Workstation (134 - 295, n=29, last 2 years)	202 Seconds * +17%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	189 Seconds * +23%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Workstation (47244 - 101027, n=29, last 2 years)	69189 MIPS +35%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	53426 MIPS +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	51402 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (50050 - 51402, n=3)	50504 MIPS -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	49079 MIPS -5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	47264 MIPS -8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	41823 MIPS -19%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Workstation (4981 - 6960, n=29, last 2 years)	6025 MIPS +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	5919 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (5755 - 5919, n=3)	5816 MIPS -2%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	5726 MIPS -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	5589 MIPS -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	5444 MIPS -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	5222 MIPS -12%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Workstation (8050 - 18407, n=29, last 2 years)	12873 Points +58%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	12708 Points +56%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	10081 Points +24%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	8349 Points +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	8152 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	8147 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (7286 - 8152, n=3)	7802 Points -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	6529 Points -20%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Workstation (1474 - 2095, n=29, last 2 years)	1849 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max	1782 Points +10%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	1679 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (1623 - 1702, n=3)	1652 Points +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	1623 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	1557 Points -4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	1487 Points -8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	1317 Points -19%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Workstation (12.7 - 27, n=29, last 2 years)	19.2 fps +35%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	15.8 fps +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	14.6 fps +3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	14.2 fps
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (13.8 - 14.5, n=4)	14.2 fps 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	13.4 fps -6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	11.3 fps -20%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	54.8 s * -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	53.2 s *
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	50.7 s * +5%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (38.6 - 53.2, n=4)	48.2 s * +9%
Average of class Workstation (36.5 - 95.2, n=29, last 2 years)	48 s * +10%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	47.7 s * +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	23 s * +57%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	0.571 sec * -10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M	0.57 sec * -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	0.569 sec * -9%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK	0.545 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (0.521 - 0.551, n=4)	0.54 sec * -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H	0.521 sec *
Average of class Workstation (0.3825 - 0.54, n=29, last 2 years)	0.4497 sec * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2130 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

297 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

249 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average of class Workstation	97.4 pt
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	86.3 pt
Average Intel Core i9-11950H	83.1 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	82 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	65.7 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G ^-9! Intel Core i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	0 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 ^-9! Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	0 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Workstation (10658 - 25776, n=29, last 2 years)	17590 KRay/s +12%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	15661 KRay/s 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	15655 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (14407 - 15655, n=4)	15030 KRay/s -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	12196 KRay/s -22%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Workstation (56664 - 109949, n=29, last 2 years)	87549 Points +38%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	64043 Points +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	63537 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (60286 - 63537, n=4)	62116 Points -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	59301 Points -7%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	4220 MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	4145 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (4003 - 4254, n=4)	4109 MB/s -1%
Average of class Workstation (2598 - 5134, n=29, last 2 years)	3896 MB/s -6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	2945 MB/s -29%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Workstation (84022 - 144411, n=29, last 2 years)	105427 Points +7%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	98443 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	98328 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (97840 - 98772, n=4)	98279 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	93364 Points -5%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Workstation (7906 - 14742, n=29, last 2 years)	11443 Points +9%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	10494 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	10462 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (9828 - 10462, n=4)	10186 Points -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	10168 Points -3%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Workstation (27301 - 58181, n=29, last 2 years)	43902 Points +14%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	38635 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	38450 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (35735 - 38450, n=4)	37251 Points -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	30011 Points -22%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (83095 - 147249, n=4)	100296 MB/s +16%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	90742 MB/s +5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	86791 MB/s
Average of class Workstation (45568 - 132156, n=29, last 2 years)	81900 MB/s -6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	38869 MB/s -55%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Workstation (713 - 1535, n=29, last 2 years)	1069 MB/s +32%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	839 MB/s +3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	811 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (756 - 820, n=4)	789 MB/s -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	706 MB/s -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s -100%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s -100%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	0 MB/s -100%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Workstation (5580 - 13800, n=29, last 2 years)	9378 KRay/s +10%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	8566 KRay/s 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	8549 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (7871 - 8549, n=4)	8200 KRay/s -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	6497 KRay/s -24%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Workstation (18157 - 51647, n=29, last 2 years)	38511 MPixel/s +190%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	25908 MPixel/s +95%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (12933 - 26370, n=4)	18803 MPixel/s +41%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	13289 MPixel/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	11531 MPixel/s -13%

系统性能

ZBook Fury 17 G8的主观性能印象，正如预期的那样，非常好，这也被基准测试结果所证实。然而，我们对我们的设备只有一个32GB模块的单通道内存配置有点惊讶。总共有四个插槽，所以对于大多数用户来说，使用两个16GB模块的双通道配置会是更好的解决方案。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Workstation (5953 - 8587, n=30, last 2 years)	7219 Points +16%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7023 Points +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	6951 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	6430 Points +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	6212 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU ()	6212 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	5363 Points -14%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Workstation (9151 - 12197, n=30, last 2 years)	10628 Points +19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	10145 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	10126 Points +14%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9591 Points +8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	8900 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU ()	8900 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	8059 Points -9%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI WE76 11UM-456 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9604 Points +21%
Average of class Workstation (7846 - 10820, n=30, last 2 years)	9390 Points +19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	8971 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	8369 Points +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	7905 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU ()	7905 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	7110 Points -10%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Workstation (6918 - 15093, n=30, last 2 years)	10348 Points +12%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10203 Points +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	10015 Points +8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	9248 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU ()	9248 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	8511 Points -8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	7427 Points -20%

CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Workstation (1154 - 2037, n=28, last 2 years)	1766 Points +19%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1674 Points +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1586 Points +7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1483 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU ()	1483 Points 0%

CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Workstation (1188 - 1902, n=28, last 2 years)	1680 Points +13%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1625 Points +10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1484 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU ()	1484 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1361 Points -8%

CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	2102 Points +29%
Average of class Workstation (1180 - 2311, n=28, last 2 years)	1966 Points +20%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1783 Points +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1633 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU ()	1633 Points 0%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI WE76 11UM-456 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1513 Points +37%
Average of class Workstation (990 - 1865, n=28, last 2 years)	1491 Points +35%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1107 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU ()	1107 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R	1080 Points -2%

PCMark 10 Score		6212 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Workstation (30324 - 95718, n=29, last 2 years)	62185 MB/s +140%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	47204 MB/s +82%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (25952 - 48565, n=4)	36676 MB/s +41%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	25952 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	22623 MB/s -13%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Workstation (30787 - 86584, n=29, last 2 years)	60492 MB/s +128%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	46298 MB/s +74%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (26064 - 47921, n=4)	36786 MB/s +38%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	26562 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	21933 MB/s -17%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Workstation (32728 - 93871, n=29, last 2 years)	65595 MB/s +187%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	45563 MB/s +99%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (22302 - 46818, n=4)	34449 MB/s +51%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	22867 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	19407 MB/s -15%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Workstation (83.4 - 140.8, n=29, last 2 years)	104 ns * -22%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	91.1 ns * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H (82.6 - 88.6, n=4)	86.1 ns * -1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	85.4 ns *
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	59.7 ns * +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

我们的标准化延迟测试显示，目前的BIOS版本的延迟略有增加，因此并不完全适合于实时音频应用。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	6610 μs * -604%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	5161 μs * -450%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	1493 μs * -59%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1287 μs * -37%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	939 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

两个M.2-2280插槽不支持最新的PCIe 4.0标准，但东芝的1TB固态硬盘（初始设置后用户可获得885GB）尽管采用了PCIe 3.0接口，但仍能管理超过3GB/s的高传输率。不过，许多竞争对手在这方面还是比较出色的。用于2.5英寸驱动器（SATA）的额外插槽显得相当过时，但惠普至少提供了必要的安装套件。更多的SSD基准测试可在这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3291 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3046 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 431.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 356.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.95 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 112.2 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 383.3 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 914 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	96.4 pt
Average of class Workstation	72.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	56.2 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	55.8 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	53.5 pt
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	48.1 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	46.1 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4108 (4076.21^min - 4108.28^max) MB/s +85%
Average of class Workstation (1844 - 5715, n=28, last 2 years)	3592 MB/s +62%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	2419 (2064.08^min - 2418.84^max) MB/s +9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	2388 (2192.8^min - 2388.07^max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	2245 (2233.05^min - 2244.71^max) MB/s +1%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (2161 - 2354, n=5)	2239 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	2217 (2200.33^min - 2216.93^max) MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	2053 (1931.06^min - 2052.78^max) MB/s -7%
seq write
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4236 (4228^min - 4235.95^max) MB/s +128%
Average of class Workstation (1309 - 7289, n=28, last 2 years)	3767 MB/s +102%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	2755 (2420.1^min - 2754.55^max) MB/s +48%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	2720 (2204.11^min - 2719.6^max) MB/s +46%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	2700 (1328.55^min - 2699.72^max) MB/s +45%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	2423 (2406.49^min - 2422.82^max) MB/s +30%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (1811 - 1983, n=5)	1863 MB/s 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1861 (1833.96^min - 1860.59^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Workstation (3361 - 12631, n=28, last 2 years)	6580 MB/s +98%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	6274 (5892.58^min - 6274.29^max) MB/s +89%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	6053 (5002.76^min - 6052.8^max) MB/s +83%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5604 (4075.63^min - 5603.92^max) MB/s +69%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	3396 (3173.36^min - 3395.84^max) MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	3316 (3284.77^min - 3315.89^max) MB/s
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (3257 - 3316, n=5)	3291 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	3223 (3041.71^min - 3222.9^max) MB/s -3%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Workstation (2526 - 9890, n=28, last 2 years)	5468 MB/s +81%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	5154 (5111.23^min - 5153.51^max) MB/s +70%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	5146 (4733.66^min - 5145.56^max) MB/s +70%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4928 (4907.59^min - 4927.89^max) MB/s +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	3643 (1995.86^min - 3643.44^max) MB/s +20%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (3024 - 3065, n=5)	3051 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	3024 (2822.98^min - 3024.34^max) MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	2683 (2659.19^min - 2682.76^max) MB/s -11%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	86.4 (85.47^min - 86.36^max) MB/s +89%
Average of class Workstation (45.4 - 92.2, n=28, last 2 years)	64 MB/s +40%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	50.9 (43.69^min - 50.91^max) MB/s +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	44.1 (38.83^min - 44.09^max) MB/s -4%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (45.7 - 52.9, n=5)	50.6 MB/s +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	46.7 (46.55^min - 46.68^max) MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	45.7 (45.57^min - 45.65^max) MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	45.6 (45.39^min - 45.62^max) MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	222 (221.05^min - 221.86^max) MB/s +95%
Average of class Workstation (106.8 - 251, n=28, last 2 years)	152 MB/s +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	142 (141.3^min - 142.06^max) MB/s +25%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (114 - 143, n=5)	129.4 MB/s +14%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	125 (124.7^min - 125.4^max) MB/s +10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	114 (112.92^min - 113.57^max) MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	106 (104.21^min - 105.58^max) MB/s -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	102 (100.51^min - 101.6^max) MB/s -11%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3953 (3766.95^min - 3953.14^max) MB/s +389%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	2266 (2247.66^min - 2265.92^max) MB/s +180%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	2256 (2243.27^min - 2255.8^max) MB/s +179%
Average of class Workstation (561 - 4414, n=28, last 2 years)	1461 MB/s +81%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (509 - 1167, n=5)	934 MB/s +15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	809 (802.25^min - 809.47^max) MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	783 (693.78^min - 782.9^max) MB/s -3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	769 (682.08^min - 768.78^max) MB/s -5%
4k q32 t16 write
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3069 (2955.28^min - 3069.23^max) MB/s +695%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	2145 (1812.02^min - 2145.19^max) MB/s +456%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	1438 (1199.27^min - 1438.1^max) MB/s +273%
Average of class Workstation (361 - 3306, n=28, last 2 years)	981 MB/s +154%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	443 (434.35^min - 442.99^max) MB/s +15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	434 (421.48^min - 433.64^max) MB/s +12%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (350 - 514, n=5)	442 MB/s +15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	386 (367.14^min - 386.1^max) MB/s

AS SSD
Score Total
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8461 Points +139%
Average of class Workstation (2512 - 8992, n=29, last 2 years)	5722 Points +62%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	5700 Points +61%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	5047 Points +43%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	4256 Points +20%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (3297 - 4568, n=8)	3776 Points +7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	3541 Points
Score Read
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3107 Points +157%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	2605 Points +115%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	1915 Points +58%
Average of class Workstation (1162 - 3378, n=29, last 2 years)	1791 Points +48%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	1765 Points +46%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (1210 - 1801, n=8)	1386 Points +15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1210 Points
Score Write
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3839 Points +118%
Average of class Workstation (742 - 4428, n=29, last 2 years)	3102 Points +76%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	2215 Points +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	1918 Points +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1763 Points
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	1722 Points -2%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (1406 - 1869, n=8)	1718 Points -3%
Seq Read
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5414 MB/s +99%
Average of class Workstation (2873 - 7437, n=29, last 2 years)	5222 MB/s +92%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	4317 MB/s +59%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	3997 MB/s +47%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	2716 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	2423 MB/s -11%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (1287 - 2762, n=8)	2385 MB/s -12%
Seq Write
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3865 MB/s +148%
Average of class Workstation (1785 - 6302, n=29, last 2 years)	3238 MB/s +107%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	2037 MB/s +30%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1561 MB/s
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (1257 - 2493, n=8)	1491 MB/s -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	1203 MB/s -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	1049 MB/s -33%
4K Read
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	79.2 MB/s +86%
Average of class Workstation (46.6 - 84, n=29, last 2 years)	61.7 MB/s +45%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	48.97 MB/s +15%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (42.6 - 52.1, n=8)	47.9 MB/s +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	44.96 MB/s +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	42.58 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	42.24 MB/s -1%
4K Write
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	198.2 MB/s +73%
Average of class Workstation (97.9 - 262, n=29, last 2 years)	172 MB/s +50%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (98.3 - 158, n=8)	129.5 MB/s +13%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	115.5 MB/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	115.3 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	114.3 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	112.4 MB/s -2%
4K-64 Read
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2486 MB/s +177%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	2160 MB/s +141%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	1630 MB/s +82%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	1253 MB/s +40%
Average of class Workstation (649 - 2790, n=29, last 2 years)	1210 MB/s +35%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (896 - 1473, n=8)	1099 MB/s +23%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	896 MB/s
4K-64 Write
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3254 MB/s +118%
Average of class Workstation (431 - 3818, n=29, last 2 years)	2607 MB/s +75%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	1979 MB/s +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	1697 MB/s +14%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	1493 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	1473 MB/s -1%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (1142 - 1609, n=8)	1440 MB/s -4%
Access Time Read
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	0.156 ms * -232%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (0.039 - 0.094, n=8)	0.05788 ms * -23%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	0.057 ms * -21%
Average of class Workstation (0.017 - 0.105, n=29, last 2 years)	0.0491 ms * -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	0.047 ms *
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	0.045 ms * +4%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.028 ms * +40%
Access Time Write
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	0.083 ms * -124%
Average of class Workstation (0.017 - 0.092, n=29, last 2 years)	0.0481 ms * -30%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	0.037 ms *
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	0.036 ms * +3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	0.033 ms * +11%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 (0.027 - 0.039, n=8)	0.03213 ms * +13%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.021 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA: Ø3272 (3251.22-3286.58)

GPU性能

Nvidia的RTX A3000是一款专业的上层主流移动显卡，其性能与消费版相当GeForce RTX 3060.由于有特殊的驱动程序，在一些应用程序中的性能可以高得多，这也得到了SPECviewperf基准测试结果的支持。由于TGP为80W，这是GPU的一个较慢的版本（在前几代中它会带有Max-Q的称号），考虑到笨重的机箱，这有点令人失望。可选的RTX A4000的最大功率消耗RTX A4000和RTX A5000由于200W电源适配器的限制，GPU也应设置为80W。

从性能上看，RTX A3000基本与旧的Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q在前辈ZBook Fury 17 G7在大多数基准测试中，略低于我们数据库中的RTX A3000的平均得分。这里肯定有改进的余地，但在持续的工作负荷下，性能至少是稳定的；苛刻的3DMarkTime Spy 压力测试也很容易通过。

TGP在电池供电的情况下被限制在55瓦，这导致了大约25%的性能赤字（5000分对6580分@Time Spy Graphics）。更多的GPU基准测试被列在这里.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | SPECviewperf 13 | SPECviewperf 2020

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	96.8 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 ^-10! NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	96 pt
Average of class Workstation	84.2 pt
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	74.8 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	70 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	59.9 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	59.2 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	41904 Points +77%
Average of class Workstation (9356 - 59715, n=31, last 2 years)	28769 Points +21%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (23699 - 27523, n=3)	25737 Points +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	23699 Points
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	23684 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	19437 Points -18%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	29610 Points +74%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	27271 Points +60%
Average of class Workstation (6121 - 45600, n=31, last 2 years)	20435 Points +20%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (17034 - 20417, n=3)	19054 Points +12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	17049 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	17034 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	14627 Points -14%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	11580 Points +77%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	10307 Points +58%
Average of class Workstation (1997 - 19741, n=31, last 2 years)	8204 Points +26%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (6530 - 7536, n=3)	7129 Points +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	6764 Points +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	6530 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	5590 Points -14%

SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Average of class Workstation (91.8 - 230, n=27, last 2 years)	167.8 fps +12%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	157.7 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (149.8 - 156.7, n=3)	152.7 fps +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	149.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	139 fps -7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	112.1 fps -25%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	319.2 fps +37%
Average of class Workstation (48.9 - 555, n=27, last 2 years)	296 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (233 - 279, n=3)	254 fps +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	232.9 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	225.4 fps -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	185.5 fps -20%
Showcase (showcase-02)
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	131.9 fps +57%
Average of class Workstation (28.6 - 190.3, n=27, last 2 years)	94.7 fps +13%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (84.1 - 99.9, n=3)	91.3 fps +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	89.3 fps +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	84.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	69.5 fps -17%
Medical (medical-02)
Average of class Workstation (37.3 - 272, n=27, last 2 years)	124 fps +31%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	119.1 fps +26%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (89.2 - 102.8, n=3)	95.6 fps +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	94.8 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	81.9 fps -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	72.9 fps -23%
Maya (maya-05)
Average of class Workstation (103 - 449, n=27, last 2 years)	261 fps +34%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	250.4 fps +29%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (194.8 - 228, n=3)	212 fps +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	194.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	172 fps -12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	162 fps -17%
Energy (energy-02)
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	74.3 fps +65%
Average of class Workstation (2.77 - 109.7, n=27, last 2 years)	50.6 fps +12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	45.12 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (41.2 - 45.1, n=3)	43.5 fps -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	35.33 fps -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	33.98 fps -25%
Creo (creo-02)
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	251.7 fps +35%
Average of class Workstation (76.8 - 425, n=27, last 2 years)	242 fps +29%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (186.9 - 235, n=3)	211 fps +13%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	186.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	170.2 fps -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	162.1 fps -13%
Catia (catia-05)
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	280.9 fps +21%
Average of class Workstation (99.5 - 418, n=27, last 2 years)	267 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (231 - 257, n=3)	247 fps +7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	231.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	210.8 fps -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	181.6 fps -22%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	208.1 fps +43%
Average of class Workstation (80.8 - 288, n=26, last 2 years)	180.6 fps +24%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (145.9 - 181, n=3)	168.6 fps +16%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	145.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	137.9 fps -5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	129.5 fps -11%

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	199.4 fps +35%
Average of class Workstation (50.6 - 347, n=23, last 2 years)	175.7 fps +19%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	169 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (147.4 - 170.1, n=3)	155.1 fps +5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	147.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	126.4 fps -14%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	114.4 fps -22%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	309.1 fps +33%
Average of class Workstation (22.3 - 554, n=29, last 2 years)	280 fps +20%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	260.5 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (232 - 284, n=3)	256 fps +10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	232.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	186 fps -20%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	181 fps -22%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Workstation (15.6 - 152, n=29, last 2 years)	60.6 fps +36%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	58.7 fps +32%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	56.6 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (42.7 - 46.6, n=3)	44.6 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	44.4 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	38.33 fps -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	34.49 fps -22%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Workstation (102 - 479, n=29, last 2 years)	292 fps +41%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	290 fps +40%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	270.1 fps +30%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (207 - 287, n=3)	243 fps +17%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	207 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	191.5 fps -7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	159.9 fps -23%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	71.6 fps +59%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	67.9 fps +51%
Average of class Workstation (2.78 - 109.7, n=29, last 2 years)	47.1 fps +5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	45.04 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (43.1 - 45, n=3)	44.3 fps -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	35.71 fps -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	33.85 fps -25%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	139.7 fps +17%
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	132.6 fps +11%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	119.7 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (101.1 - 124.5, n=3)	115.1 fps -4%
Average of class Workstation (45.9 - 169.5, n=29, last 2 years)	107.7 fps -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	98.3 fps -18%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	88.3 fps -26%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	106 fps +44%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	98.8 fps +34%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (73.7 - 80.5, n=3)	78.2 fps +6%
Average of class Workstation (21 - 131.4, n=29, last 2 years)	76.4 fps +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	73.7 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	60.5 fps -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	59.7 fps -19%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
MSI WE76 11UM-456 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK	129.6 fps +86%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M	123.1 fps +77%
Average of class Workstation (28.5 - 174.9, n=29, last 2 years)	91.6 fps +31%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU (69.7 - 103, n=3)	83.6 fps +20%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H	69.7 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	64.1 fps -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	59.7 fps -14%

3DMark 11 Performance		20760 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		24449 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		15711 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		6490 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

Nvidia的专业GPU也很适合游戏，RTX A3000的性能甚至常常足以满足原生4K分辨率的要求，只有像《赛博朋克2077》这样要求非常高的游戏才需要减少细节和/或分辨率。在较长的游戏过程中，性能是稳定的，但在电池电量上再次出现了小的不足；Witcher 3 Ultra在电池上的结果是43帧，而在主电源上是61帧。请参阅我们的技术部分了解更多的游戏基准测试。

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU: Ø61.1 (58-64)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	163	150	101	64.3	53.5	49.2
The Witcher 3 (2015)	263	176	112	61.1		45
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	156	131	119	108		77.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	130	86.7	67		50.7	28.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	103	82.1	66.7			40.5
Far Cry 5 (2018)	113	84	81	77	62	36
Strange Brigade (2018)	324	164	134	118	87	51
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020)	78	64	52	45	28	14
F1 2021 (2021)	202	131	114	75	56.7	26.9

排放 - ZBook保持凉爽

系统噪音

在日常工作中，ZBook Fury 17 G8通常是一个非常安静的伙伴，在更具挑战性的工作负荷中，由于没有高亢的噪音，风扇的杂音仍然可以忍受，大约为40 dB(A)。我们在最大负荷下测得高达47 dB(A)，这是非常可听的，但我们没有注意到任何其他电子噪音，例如线圈啸叫。

Noise Level

Idle		24.5 / 24.5 / 26.8 dB(A)
Load		41.8 / 47.1 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.5 dB(A)

	HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02	Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	MSI WE76 11UM-456 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)	HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
Noise		1%	-2%	-1%	-3%	4%
off / environment *	24.5	26.4 -8%	24.7 -1%	26 -6%	24.4 -0%	24.2 1%
Idle Minimum *	24.5	26.4 -8%	24.7 -1%	26 -6%	24.4 -0%	24.2 1%
Idle Average *	24.5	26.4 -8%	24.7 -1%	26 -6%	26.6 -9%	24.2 1%
Idle Maximum *	26.8	26.4 1%	27.5 -3%	26.5 1%	29 -8%	24.2 10%
Load Average *	41.8	38.1 9%	43.7 -5%	42 -0%	40.2 4%	42.9 -3%
Witcher 3 ultra *	44.9	38.1 15%	46.6 -4%		48 -7%	39.5 12%
Load Maximum *	47.1	45 4%	47.7 -1%	43 9%	48 -2%	42.9 9%

* ... smaller is better

温度

表面温度完全不挑剔，甚至在我们的压力测试中，我们只能在机箱底部的几个地方测到略高于50℃的温度。基本单元的顶部，包括键盘台面，要冷得多，没有划过40℃的大关，所以完全没有限制。在轻度工作负荷下，该装置根本没有真正升温。

在压力测试中，性能并不令人失望，但这应该是一个大型移动工作站的预期。几分钟后，处理器的性能被限制在标称的45瓦特，而专用显卡可以保持80瓦特。因此，在压力测试之后，并没有立即出现性能不足的情况。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


38.5 °C	38.8 °C	41.9 °C
33.2 °C	37.4 °C	37.1 °C
24.7 °C	28 °C	27.4 °C

Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 34.1 °C


50.5 °C	52.9 °C	41.7 °C
44.4 °C	51.7 °C	33.2 °C
27.1 °C	27.7 °C	26.3 °C

Maximum: 52.9 °C
Average: 39.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 50.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


27.6 °C	28.2 °C	28.2 °C
26 °C	26.7 °C	26.3 °C
25.2 °C	25.6 °C	25.5 °C

Maximum: 28.2 °C
Average: 26.6 °C


29.5 °C	30.7 °C	29.6 °C
29.1 °C	28.9 °C	27.4 °C
25.6 °C	26 °C	25.5 °C

Maximum: 30.7 °C
Average: 28 °C

Power Supply (max.) 24.8 °C | Room Temperature 20.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39 °C	40 °C	42.4 °C
32.6 °C	37.8 °C	37.7 °C
25.1 °C	28.6 °C	28.2 °C

Maximum: 42.4 °C
Average: 34.6 °C


51.3 °C	53.8 °C	42.6 °C
44 °C	52.9 °C	34.7 °C
26.9 °C	27.5 °C	26.1 °C

Maximum: 53.8 °C
Average: 40 °C

Power Supply (max.) 52.2 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.9 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.8 °C / 82 F (-0.8 °C / -1.5 F).

	HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU	HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Heat		1%	-7%	-9%	6%	14%
Maximum Upper Side *	41.9	49.6 -18%	48.4 -16%	45.7 -9%	46.1 -10%	42.3 -1%
Maximum Bottom *	52.9	52.1 2%	56.2 -6%	48.3 9%	57.6 -9%	41.7 21%
Idle Upper Side *	28.2	26 8%	28.6 -1%	35.3 -25%	23.4 17%	23.9 15%
Idle Bottom *	30.7	27.6 10%	31.8 -4%	34.4 -12%	23.4 24%	23.9 22%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

ZBook的立体声扬声器提供良好的音质；它们有足够的音量和丰富的内容。它的音频性能无法与MacBook Pro 16，但集成模块绝不是坏事。麦克风在我们的审查中也留下了良好的印象，语音记录非常清晰，没有重大失真。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能量管理 - 体面的耐力

消耗功率

功耗与前一型号大致相当。以前的型号.我们可以测量到在负载下略高于200瓦，所以该设备受到电源适配器的限制。我们对这种限制有点惊讶，强大的移动工作站过去都是用230W的单元发货的。根据官方的规格表，200W的模块是最强大的版本。

在压力测试中，消耗量将在160W左右趋于平稳，所以这不是什么大问题，但惠普可以使用更强大的GPU型号（具有更高的TGP值），并配备更强大的PSU。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.62 / 1 Watt
Idle	7.6 / 16.7 / 17.5 Watt
Load	117 / 202 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	MSI WE76 11UM-456 i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0), OLED, 3840x2400, 16"	HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, , 3840x2160, 17.3"	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048R, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"	Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU	Average of class Workstation
Power Consumption		21%	-28%	-12%	4%	20%	6%	10%
Idle Minimum *	7.6	6.1 20%	10.5 -38%	12.4 -63%	5.8 24%	5.4 29%	8.23 ?(6.3 - 10.8, n=3) -8%	8.12 ?(2.6 - 19.5, n=29, last 2 years) -7%
Idle Average *	16.7	10.9 35%	18.6 -11%	16.5 1%	14.8 11%	16.4 2%	14.6 ?(10.7 - 16.7, n=3) 13%	13 ?(4 - 35.9, n=29, last 2 years) 22%
Idle Maximum *	17.5	12.3 30%	20 -14%	25 -43%	17 3%	16.7 5%	15.3 ?(11.6 - 17.5, n=3) 13%	18.4 ?(5.6 - 47, n=29, last 2 years) -5%
Load Average *	117	106.3 9%	132.4 -13%	132 -13%	120.4 -3%	94 20%	109.3 ?(99.3 - 117, n=3) 7%	96.1 ?(49.7 - 182, n=29, last 2 years) 18%
Witcher 3 ultra *	150	124 17%	232 -55%	132 12%	168.4 -12%	104 31%
Load Maximum *	202	168.9 16%	281.6 -39%	134 34%	199.8 1%	135 33%	196.5 ?(177.4 - 210, n=3) 3%	162.6 ?(60.2 - 311, n=29, last 2 years) 20%

* ... smaller is better

Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø150.5 (147-155)

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø176.2 (156-202)

Power Consumption external screen

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø109.3 (106-134)

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø124.8 (103-138)

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø134.5 (131-145)

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø137.1 (132-148)

电池运行时间

尽管采用了4K面板，但94Wh电池的运行时间还算不错。在150尼特的调整亮度下（在我们的测试单元中为44%），我们的视频测试运行了8.5小时，Wi-Fi测试运行了7.5小时。当我们以最大显示亮度重复测试时，Wi-Fi运行时间下降到5小时多一点。

当你真正给设备施加压力时，电池在大约2小时后就空了，当设备打开时，充满电需要113分钟。大约35分钟后，50%的容量就会被重新充电。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 96)		7h 25min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 97)		5h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		8h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 59min

	HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh	MSI WE76 11UM-456 i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, 94 Wh	Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh	Average of class Workstation
Battery Runtime		5%	-23%	-56%	3%	52%	6%
H.264	509	568 12%	413 -19%	106 -79%	615 21%	1021 101%	671 ?(347 - 1067, n=8, last 2 years) 32%
WiFi v1.3	445	588 32%	377 -15%	301 -32%	455 2%	894 101%	520 ?(148 - 897, n=29, last 2 years) 17%
Load	119	84 -29%	79 -34%		104 -13%	63 -47%	83.7 ?(55 - 114, n=15, last 2 years) -30%
Witcher 3 ultra				94

Pros

+ 坚固的底盘

+ 非常好的性能利用

+ 非常好的输入设备

+ 4K梦幻色彩显示屏，色彩准确

+ 大量的端口

+ 易于接近内部结构...

Cons

- ......这是受额外盖子的影响

- SD阅读器比以前慢了

- 审查单通道内存的配置

- 坏的网络摄像头

结论 - ZBook Fury 17需要更新

ZBook Fury 17 G8在某些方面显得略为过时。你得到了现代的CPU和GPU，但2.5英寸的硬盘插槽在今天是相当罕见的。你也没有得到最新的通信模块（没有Wi-Fi 6E，没有5G），仍然有一个720p的网络摄像头，以及包括宽边框的16:9长宽比。

我们也有点惊讶，组件没有提供更多的性能。如果你得到这样一个 "经典 "的移动工作站，并有一个相对较重和笨重的机箱，你通常希望有尽可能高的性能。然而，由于对200W电源适配器的限制，制造商不必要地限制了自己，冷却解决方案当然可以处理更多。性能至少是稳定的。如果你需要更多的CPU性能，我们建议你等待下一代，由于英特尔新的Alder Lake芯片具有更多的CPU核心，因此有望实现重大飞跃。

适当的性能利用率和适度的排放。ZBook Fury 17 G8是一个坚实的移动工作站，但惠普在GPU性能方面相当保守。考虑到笨重的机箱，可以有更强大的GPU版本。

目前的DreamColor版本仍然提供非常好的画质。他们不再覆盖AdobeRGB，而是 "只 "参考DCI-P3，类似于MacBook Pro型号的Apple 。如果你在工作中使用大量的HDR内容，你应该考虑目前的MacBooks因为它们由于采用了Mini-LED技术，峰值亮度高得多。

带有大型维护盖的想法是好的，但该机制不应影响质量印象，我们的测试装置就是这种情况。对于近4000欧元的价格，你应该能够期待完美的制造质量，甚至是缝隙。各个组件的额外盖子也影响了对组件的方便接触。

如果你不愿意在GPU性能方面做出妥协，你应该看一下微星WE76(155W TGP)，而ThinkPad P17 G2在许多方面与ZBook非常相似，但在键盘质量方面仍有轻微优势。不过，从其他ThinkPad键盘的发展来看，这种情况可能很快会改变。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

你可以在HP的网站上定制ZBook Fury 17 G8。.与我们的测试设备类似的配置，售价为4942美元，发货日期为5月。

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA - 2022-02-16 02/16/2022 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

83 / 98 → 85%

Keyboard

91%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

69 / 80 → 86%

Weight

57 / 10-66 → 84%

Battery

77 / 95 → 81%

Display

94%

Games Performance

92%

Application Performance

93%

Workstation

92%

Temperature

86 / 95 → 91%

Noise

86 / 90 → 95%

Audio

87%

Camera

29 / 85 → 34%

Average

81%

90%

Workstation - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Andreas Osthoff - Managing Editor Business Laptops - 1692 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2013

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 452583 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普ZBook Fury 17 G8评测--配备4K梦幻色彩显示屏的移动工作站

Andreas Osthoff, 2022-02-17 (Update: 2022-02-17)