Notebookcheck Logo

惠普ZBook Fury 17 G8评测--配备4K梦幻色彩显示屏的移动工作站

过时的概念?

惠普的ZBook Fury 17 G8是一款传统的移动工作站,拥有强大的组件。你还会得到一个高质量的4K梦幻色彩显示屏,所以ZBook应该是内容创作者的一个好选择。
Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Tiger Lake Windows Workstation

惠普ZBook Fury 17 G8是一款经典的移动工作站,注重性能、端口种类以及维护选项等方面。这些产品类别并不遵循当前设备越来越轻薄的趋势,这意味着你必须做出妥协。你还可以通过广泛的CPU/GPU组合选择来很好地定制配置,满足你的要求。

我们的审查单位是一个相当强大的单位,配备了酷睿i9处理器和Nvidia RTX A3000 GPU(以前被称为Quadro),但还有更强大的GPU可供选择(一直到RTX A5000).你还会得到32GB内存、1TB NVMe SSD以及4K梦幻色彩显示屏,这使ZBook Fury 17 G8的价格上升到3800欧元左右。

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Processor
Intel Core i9-11950H 8 x 2.6 - 5 GHz, 106 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU - 6 GB VRAM, Core: 1485 MHz, RAM: 1375 MHz, 80 W TDP, GDDR6, 472.42, Optimus
Memory
32 MB 
, DDR4-3200, Single-Channel, 4 Slots, max. 128 GB
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 255 PPI, AUOCD8C, IPS, glossy: no, HDR, 60 Hz
Mainboard
Intel WM590 (Tiger Lake PCH-H)
Storage
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, 1024 GB 
, 885 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Tiger Lake PCH-H - cAVS (Audio, Voice, Speech)
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, Card Reader: SD, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader
Networking
Intel Ethernet Connection I219-LM (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.1
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 27 x 398 x 267
Battery
94 Wh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 720p
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 200W PSU, HP Tools, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
2.926 kg, Power Supply: 630 g
Price
3800 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

案例 - 存在异常质量问题的ZBook

底部面板显示出一些不均匀的缝隙。
底部面板显示出一些不均匀的缝隙。

我们已经熟悉了前辈的机箱设计ZBook Fury 17 G7而深灰色的机箱在专业环境中效果不错。机箱以及盖子的稳定性都很好,整体质量也很高,但我们注意到底板的安装问题。它只由一个杠杆和一个中央螺丝固定,所以非常容易拆卸,但面板与机箱的其他部分并不完全对齐,有明显的差异。这与高额的零售价格其实并不相符,而且影响了视觉效果。虽然卸下面板很容易,但我们更希望有一个更坚固的解决方案,有更多的螺丝。

惠普仍然使用16:9的面板,边框相当宽,尤其是在屏幕下方。虽然许多现代的15和16英寸的笔记本电脑正在回到16:10的面板,但现在似乎就是没有合适的17.3英寸面板。只有联想ThinkPad P17更为笨重,但其他所有的对比设备都比ZBook更为紧凑。

尺寸比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "0" not supported!

连接性 - Thunderbolt 4,但SD卡读卡器速度慢

你可以得到所有重要的端口,包括Thunderbolt/USB-C、常规USB-A端口、以太网、HDMI和Mini-DisplayPort。ZBook总共可以驱动四个屏幕。后面的空间被风扇的排气口占据,所以所有的端口都分布在两边。

左侧。以太网,纳米安全锁插槽,3x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (1x供电),3.5毫米立体声插孔,智能卡
左侧。以太网,纳米安全锁插槽,3x USB 3.2 Gen 1 (1x供电),3.5毫米立体声插孔,智能卡
右侧。SD读卡器、HDMI 2.0b、Mini-DisplayPort 1.4、2个Thunderbolt 4(USB 4,40 Gbps)、电源
右侧。SD读卡器、HDMI 2.0b、Mini-DisplayPort 1.4、2个Thunderbolt 4(USB 4,40 Gbps)、电源

SD卡阅读器

SD卡阅读器
SD卡阅读器

惠普仍然在右侧使用全尺寸的SD卡读卡器,而且SD卡完全插入。与之相比 之前的型号,但性能要低得多,我们在基准测试中只能达到90MB/s,而ZBook Fury 17 G7仍能达到170MB/s。除了我们目前的参考卡(Angelbird AV Pro V60),我们还检查了我们以前的东芝的卡,以排除任何兼容性问题,但结果几乎相同。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
188 MB/s +160%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H (AV Pro 60)
161.1 MB/s +123%
Average of class Workstation
  (49.6 - 200, n=15, last 2 years)
96 MB/s +33%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK (AV Pro V60)
83.6 MB/s +16%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
72.3 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
68.3 MB/s -6%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
205 MB/s +130%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H (AV Pro 60)
172.7 MB/s +94%
Average of class Workstation
  (81.2 - 227, n=15, last 2 years)
122.7 MB/s +38%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK (AV Pro V60)
89.5 MB/s 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
89.1 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
86.7 MB/s -3%

沟通

你可以升级一个WWAN模块(4G/LTE)。
你可以升级一个WWAN模块(4G/LTE)。

除了千兆以太网端口,你还可以得到一个来自英特尔的Wi-Fi 6模块,以及添加WWAN模块(4G/LTE)的可能性,因为所有必要的天线都已经包括在内。然而,惠普没有使用最新的标准,已经有了更现代的Wi-Fi 6E模块,而且在2022年有一个5G调制解调器也不错。Wi-Fi模块的性能仍然非常好,我们能够测量到超过1Gbps的传输速率。在与Netgear的Wi-Fi 6路由器或AVM FritzBox 7490(Wi-Fi 5)结合使用时,我们没有遇到任何稳定性问题。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1440 (1175min - 1571max) MBit/s
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1393 (713min - 1475max) MBit/s -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1346 (644min - 1421max) MBit/s -7%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (49.8 - 1775, n=324)
1161 MBit/s -19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
884 (468min - 938max) MBit/s -39%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
767 (421min - 954max) MBit/s -47%
iperf3 receive AX12
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675x (210NGW)
1456 (1371min - 1566max) MBit/s +14%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1400 (636min - 1472max) MBit/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1391 (1094min - 1575max) MBit/s +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1281 (1106min - 1426max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
  (136 - 1743, n=324)
1261 MBit/s -2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
579 (368min - 652max) MBit/s -55%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1281 (1106-1426)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1439 (1175-1571)

网络摄像头

ZBook Fury 17 G8仍然使用720p网络摄像头。它完成了自己的工作,但即使在体面的照明条件下,图片质量也不理想。

ColorChecker
14.4 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
14.2 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
2.9 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA: 10.57 ∆E min: 2.9 - max: 20.86 ∆E

维护

如前所述,拆除底板非常容易。你只需取下固定杠杆的中央螺丝,然后就可以直接取下它。然而,一旦进入内部,你会发现许多额外的盖子,所以进入实际组件毕竟需要更多的修整。四个内存插槽中的两个也位于键盘下方。在电池下面还有空间放置一个2.5英寸的驱动器,必要的安装工具也在盒子里。

拆除底板很容易。
拆除底板很容易。
内部布局
内部布局

输入设备 - 移动工作站仍然使用PointStick

输入设备与之前的型号相比没有变化。 以前的型号.黑色的键盘非常结实(不弯曲),并以非常清晰的压力点以及足够的行程而令人信服。除了ThinkPad工作站(如ThinkPad P17 G2),惠普当然也提供市场上最好的移动键盘之一。除了全尺寸的小键盘外,你还能得到两级白色照明,而且键盘还能防泼水。我们认为,方向键的垂直尺寸较小是该键盘唯一真正的缺点,你必须习惯它。

与EliteBook系列相反,惠普在ZBook上除了触摸板,还配备了PointStick。这两种输入方法都有自己的一套专用鼠标按钮,而且都能很好地工作。

输入设备
输入设备

显示 - 梦幻色彩现在具有DCI-P3功能

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
只有在边缘有轻微的背光渗出(对图片来说是增强的)。
只有在边缘有轻微的背光渗出(对图片来说是增强的)。

我们的评测单元配备了哑光4K DreamColor显示屏,它的长宽比仍然是16:9。与以前迭代的DreamColor显示屏相比,其中涵盖了AdobeRGB色彩空间。新版本 "只 "针对较小的DCI-P3色彩空间,就像Apple MacBook Pro机型。主观的画面印象仍然很好,只是明亮的表面显得有些颗粒感。

惠普宣传的平均亮度为550cd/m²,我们在测量后可以确认这个数值。考虑到高亮度,黑值也很体面,为0.33cd/m²,这导致了超过1700:1的非常高的对比度。即使在黑暗的背景上达到最大亮度,你也只能看到边缘有轻微的背光渗漏,但在实践中它们是没有问题的。没有PWM,只是响应时间相当慢,这导致了明显的重影。

571
cd/m²
599
cd/m²
590
cd/m²
540
cd/m²
568
cd/m²
580
cd/m²
529
cd/m²
539
cd/m²
558
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AUOCD8C tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 599 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 563.8 cd/m² Minimum: 27 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 569 cd/m²
Contrast: 1721:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.5
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
AUOCD8C, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
LP173WF4-SPF7, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI WE76 11UM-456
B173ZAN03.3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
ATNA60YV02-0, OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
AUOCD8C, , 3840x2160, 17.3"
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"
Display
-23%
-2%
5%
0%
Display P3 Coverage
99.1
67.9
-31%
82.1
-17%
99.9
1%
99.3
0%
sRGB Coverage
100
87.3
-13%
99.3
-1%
100
0%
99.9
0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
86.8
63.9
-26%
96
11%
98.6
14%
86.9
0%
Response Times
29%
67%
95%
-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
67.6 ?(31.6, 36)
39.2 ?(21.2, 18)
42%
17.6 ?(8.4, 9.2)
74%
2 ?(1, 1)
97%
56 ?(26, 30)
17%
Response Time Black / White *
26.8 ?(9.2, 17.6)
22.4 ?(11.6, 10.8)
16%
10.8 ?(5.6, 5.2)
60%
2 ?(1, 1)
93%
40 ?(22, 18)
-49%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(80)
Screen
-189%
-36%
-104%
-33%
170%
Brightness middle
568
361
-36%
419
-26%
353
-38%
573
1%
507
-11%
Brightness
564
334
-41%
416
-26%
360
-36%
586
4%
494
-12%
Brightness Distribution
88
87
-1%
93
6%
96
9%
91
3%
96
9%
Black Level *
0.33
0.35
-6%
0.34
-3%
0.38
-15%
0.02
94%
Contrast
1721
1031
-40%
1232
-28%
1508
-12%
25350
1373%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1
5.4
-440%
1.5
-50%
2.45
-145%
1.9
-90%
1.4
-40%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.4
9.9
-313%
4.7
-96%
3.75
-56%
4.2
-75%
2.8
-17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
0.5
3.2
-540%
0.9
-80%
2.77
-454%
0.7
-40%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
6.5
-282%
2
-18%
1.88
-11%
2.9
-71%
2.3
-35%
Gamma
2.18 101%
2.23 99%
2.17 101%
2.31 95%
2.1 105%
2.27 97%
CCT
6461 101%
7351 88%
6629 98%
6441 101%
6217 105%
6792 96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
77.6
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-61% / -122%
10% / -14%
-1% / -44%
-16% / -23%
170% / 170%

* ... smaller is better

CalMAN灰度(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN灰度(目标色彩空间P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(目标色彩空间P3)。
卡尔曼饱和度扫描(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN 灰度校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN 灰度校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN 饱和度扫描已校准(目标色彩空间P3)
CalMAN 饱和度扫描已校准(目标色彩空间P3)
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(目标色彩空间P3)。
CalMAN ColorChecker已校准(目标色彩空间P3)。

与以前配备可选DreamColor显示屏的ZBooks相比,另一个不同之处是不再有预装DreamColor软件,这意味着你不能再切换色彩空间。我们用专业的CalMAN软件和X-Rite i1 Pro 2分光光度计分析了该面板。与P3基准相比,灰度和颜色的偏差已经很低了,用户实际上没有必要进行校准。我们自己的校准(配置文件可在上面的方框中免费下载)确实进一步减少了偏差,但差别不大。根据我们的测量,P3色彩空间的覆盖率为99.1%。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
26.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.2 ms rise
↘ 17.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
67.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31.6 ms rise
↘ 36 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 98 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

这个大的17英寸设备当然不是最机动的装置,但哑光和明亮的显示屏在户外效果很好。IPS面板的视角稳定性也没有受到批评。

在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
在阳光下
视角稳定
视角稳定

性能 - 配备Core i9和RTX A3000的ZBook

惠普为ZBook Fury 17 G8提供了各种各样的组件,你甚至可以得到没有专用GPU的模型。你可以选择不同的英特尔CPU(第11代),包括Xeon芯片和AMD或Nvidia的专业显卡。我们的TGPRTX A3000的TGP设置为80瓦,在压力测试中,该设备已经超过了电源适配器的200瓦限制(根据规格表,200瓦的设备是最强大的),因此我们相信可选的RTX A4000RTX A5000也被限制在80W。基本上,我们面对的是较慢的Max-Q版本,尽管官方不再使用这一称呼了。

测试设置

惠普没有实施任何自定义电源配置文件或额外的性能设置,只使用常规的Windows电源设置。

处理器 - Core i9-11950H

我们的测试装置配备了酷睿i9-11950H,这是商务版的酷睿i9-11980HK.没有解锁的倍频,但作为回报,该芯片支持vPro。8个核心可以达到5GHz(或在所有核心同时受力时达到4.5GHz),因此这是最快的移动Tiger Lake 芯片之一。CPU可以在短暂的时间内消耗超过100瓦特,而在持续的工作负荷下,其消耗量约为70瓦特,这些都是很好的数值。

这意味着ZBook的CPU性能与工作站竞争产品相当,但英特尔全新的Alder Lake处理器使用的内核多得多,将在下一代机型中提供巨大的多核性能优势。AMDs目前的移动处理器在可比的TDP设置下也能提供更多性能。

在电池供电的情况下,功耗被限制在65瓦,这导致在多核场景下的性能赤字约为15%。更多的CPU基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.

Cinebench R15 Multi Loop

01102203304405506607708809901100121013201430154016501760187019802090Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA Intel Core i9-11950H: Ø1949 (1895.02-2129.93)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2018 (1959.15-2144.43)
MSI WE76 11UM-456 Intel Core i9-11980HK: Ø2021 (1955.32-2192.14)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 Intel Xeon W-11955M: Ø1771 (1747.11-1845.61)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H: Ø1456 (1429.34-1516.82)
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max Apple M1 Max; Rosetta 2: Ø1687 (1667.29-1693.05)
CPU数据 Cinebench R15多循环
CPU数据 Cinebench R15多循环
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Workstation
 
83.4 pt
MSI WE76 11UM-456 -1!
Intel Core i9-11980HK
71.1 pt
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max -5!
Apple M1 Max
68.3 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
65.8 pt
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
 
64.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
63.1 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
62.2 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
50.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Workstation
  (11026 - 27338, n=28, last 2 years)
17777 Points +36%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
13387 Points +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
13113 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
12876 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (12048 - 13113, n=4)
12394 Points -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
12385 Points -6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
10862 (10718min - 10862.2max) Points -17%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
8802 (8415.48min - 8801.64max) Points -33%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Workstation
  (1465 - 2178, n=28, last 2 years)
1835 Points +12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
1633 Points
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
1613 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (1569 - 1633, n=4)
1596 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
1530 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
1508 Points -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1480 Points -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
1284 Points -21%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Workstation
  (2990 - 10276, n=29, last 2 years)
6709 Points +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
5180 Points +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
5000 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (4471 - 5000, n=4)
4700 Points -6%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
4437 Points -11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
4250 Points -15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
3639 Points -27%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
2735 Points -45%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Workstation
  (564 - 827, n=29, last 2 years)
706 Points +12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
632 Points
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
622 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (610 - 632, n=4)
620 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
582 Points -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
568 Points -10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
489 Points -23%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
390 Points -38%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Workstation
  (1863 - 4363, n=28, last 2 years)
2780 Points +31%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
2192 (1955.32min - 2192.14max) Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
2144 (1959.15min - 2144.43max) Points +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
2130 (1895.02min - 2129.93max) Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (1827 - 2130, n=5)
1968 Points -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1846 (1747.11min - 1845.61max) Points -13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
1693 (1667min - 1693max) Points -21%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
1517 (1429.34min - 1516.82max) Points -29%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Workstation
  (166.2 - 301, n=28, last 2 years)
265 Points +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
249 Points
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
244 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (236 - 249, n=4)
243 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
231 Points -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
230 Points -8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
211 Points -15%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
197 Points -21%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
302 Seconds * -24%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
276 Seconds * -13%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (244 - 261, n=3)
253 Seconds * -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
250 Seconds * -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
244 Seconds *
Average of class Workstation
  (121 - 295, n=28, last 2 years)
200 Seconds * +18%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
189 Seconds * +23%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Workstation
  (47244 - 109204, n=28, last 2 years)
70695 MIPS +38%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
53426 MIPS +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
51402 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (50050 - 51402, n=3)
50504 MIPS -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
49079 MIPS -5%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
47264 MIPS -8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
41823 MIPS -19%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Workstation
  (4981 - 6960, n=28, last 2 years)
6068 MIPS +3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
5919 MIPS
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (5755 - 5919, n=3)
5816 MIPS -2%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
5726 MIPS -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
5589 MIPS -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
5444 MIPS -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
5222 MIPS -12%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Workstation
  (8050 - 19316, n=28, last 2 years)
13122 Points +61%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
12708 Points +56%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
10081 Points +24%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
8349 Points +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
8152 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
8147 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (7286 - 8152, n=3)
7802 Points -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
6529 Points -20%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Workstation
  (1474 - 2095, n=28, last 2 years)
1857 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max
1782 Points +10%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
1679 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (1623 - 1702, n=3)
1652 Points +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
1623 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
1557 Points -4%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
1487 Points -8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
1317 Points -19%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Workstation
  (12.7 - 27.1, n=28, last 2 years)
19.5 fps +37%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
15.8 fps +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
14.6 fps +3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
14.2 fps
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (13.8 - 14.5, n=4)
14.2 fps 0%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
13.4 fps -6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
11.3 fps -20%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
54.8 s * -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
53.2 s *
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
50.7 s * +5%
Average of class Workstation
  (36.5 - 95.2, n=28, last 2 years)
48.4 s * +9%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (38.6 - 53.2, n=4)
48.2 s * +9%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
47.7 s * +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
23 s * +57%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H
0.571 sec * -10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M
0.57 sec * -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H
0.569 sec * -9%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK
0.545 sec * -5%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (0.521 - 0.551, n=4)
0.54 sec * -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H
0.521 sec *
Average of class Workstation
  (0.3825 - 0.54, n=28, last 2 years)
0.4482 sec * +14%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
2130 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
297 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
249 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
5000 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
632 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1633 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
13113 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average of class Workstation
 
97.5 pt
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
85.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
 
82.1 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
81 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
64.8 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G -9!
Intel Core i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
0 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 -9!
Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
0 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Workstation
  (10658 - 25776, n=28, last 2 years)
17880 KRay/s +14%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
15661 KRay/s 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
15655 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (14407 - 15655, n=4)
15030 KRay/s -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
12196 KRay/s -22%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average of class Workstation
  (56664 - 113270, n=28, last 2 years)
88964 Points +40%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
64043 Points +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
63537 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (60286 - 63537, n=4)
62116 Points -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
59301 Points -7%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
4220 MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
4145 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (4003 - 4254, n=4)
4109 MB/s -1%
Average of class Workstation
  (2598 - 5598, n=28, last 2 years)
3968 MB/s -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
2945 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average of class Workstation
  (84022 - 144411, n=28, last 2 years)
107100 Points +9%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
98443 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
98328 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (97840 - 98772, n=4)
98279 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
93364 Points -5%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average of class Workstation
  (7906 - 14742, n=28, last 2 years)
11606 Points +11%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
10494 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
10462 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (9828 - 10462, n=4)
10186 Points -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
10168 Points -3%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average of class Workstation
  (27301 - 58181, n=28, last 2 years)
44611 Points +16%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
38635 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
38450 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (35735 - 38450, n=4)
37251 Points -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
30011 Points -22%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (83095 - 147249, n=4)
100296 MB/s +16%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
90742 MB/s +5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
86791 MB/s
Average of class Workstation
  (45568 - 128243, n=28, last 2 years)
81020 MB/s -7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
38869 MB/s -55%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Workstation
  (713 - 1691, n=28, last 2 years)
1092 MB/s +35%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
839 MB/s +3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
811 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (756 - 820, n=4)
789 MB/s -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
706 MB/s -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
0 MB/s -100%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Workstation
  (5580 - 13800, n=28, last 2 years)
9530 KRay/s +11%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
8566 KRay/s 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
8549 KRay/s
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (7871 - 8549, n=4)
8200 KRay/s -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
6497 KRay/s -24%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Workstation
  (18157 - 51647, n=28, last 2 years)
38975 MPixel/s +193%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
25908 MPixel/s +95%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (12933 - 26370, n=4)
18803 MPixel/s +41%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
13289 MPixel/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
11531 MPixel/s -13%

系统性能

ZBook Fury 17 G8的主观性能印象,正如预期的那样,非常好,这也被基准测试结果所证实。然而,我们对我们的设备只有一个32GB模块的单通道内存配置有点惊讶。总共有四个插槽,所以对于大多数用户来说,使用两个16GB模块的双通道配置会是更好的解决方案。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Workstation
  (5953 - 8587, n=28, last 2 years)
7259 Points +17%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
7023 Points +13%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
6951 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
6430 Points +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
6212 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  ()
6212 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5363 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Workstation
  (9151 - 12197, n=28, last 2 years)
10648 Points +20%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
10145 Points +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
10126 Points +14%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9591 Points +8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
8900 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  ()
8900 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
8059 Points -9%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
9604 Points +21%
Average of class Workstation
  (7846 - 10820, n=28, last 2 years)
9393 Points +19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
8971 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
8369 Points +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
7905 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  ()
7905 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7110 Points -10%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Workstation
  (7417 - 15093, n=28, last 2 years)
10492 Points +13%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
10203 Points +10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
10015 Points +8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
9248 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  ()
9248 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
8511 Points -8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
7427 Points -20%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Workstation
  (1154 - 2037, n=26, last 2 years)
1761 Points +19%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1674 Points +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1586 Points +7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1483 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  ()
1483 Points 0%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Workstation
  (1188 - 1902, n=26, last 2 years)
1677 Points +13%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1625 Points +10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1484 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  ()
1484 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1361 Points -8%
CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
2102 Points +29%
Average of class Workstation
  (1180 - 2311, n=26, last 2 years)
1963 Points +20%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1783 Points +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1633 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  ()
1633 Points 0%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1513 Points +37%
Average of class Workstation
  (990 - 1805, n=26, last 2 years)
1478 Points +34%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1107 Points
Average Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  ()
1107 Points 0%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
1080 Points -2%
PCMark 10 Score
6212 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Workstation
  (30324 - 95718, n=28, last 2 years)
63058 MB/s +143%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
47204 MB/s +82%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (25952 - 48565, n=4)
36676 MB/s +41%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
25952 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
22623 MB/s -13%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Workstation
  (30787 - 86584, n=28, last 2 years)
61266 MB/s +131%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
46298 MB/s +74%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (26064 - 47921, n=4)
36786 MB/s +38%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
26562 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
21933 MB/s -17%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Workstation
  (32728 - 93871, n=28, last 2 years)
66503 MB/s +191%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
45563 MB/s +99%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (22302 - 46818, n=4)
34449 MB/s +51%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
22867 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
19407 MB/s -15%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Workstation
  (83.4 - 140.8, n=28, last 2 years)
103.9 ns * -22%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
91.1 ns * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-11950H
  (82.6 - 88.6, n=4)
86.1 ns * -1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
85.4 ns *
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
59.7 ns * +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
0 ns * +100%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延时

我们的标准化延迟测试显示,目前的BIOS版本的延迟略有增加,因此并不完全适合于实时音频应用。

LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon概述
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
6610 μs * -604%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5161 μs * -450%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
1493 μs * -59%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
1287 μs * -37%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
939 μs *

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

两个M.2-2280插槽不支持最新的PCIe 4.0标准,但东芝的1TB固态硬盘(初始设置后用户可获得885GB)尽管采用了PCIe 3.0接口,但仍能管理超过3GB/s的高传输率。不过,许多竞争对手在这方面还是比较出色的。用于2.5英寸驱动器(SATA)的额外插槽显得相当过时,但惠普至少提供了必要的安装套件。更多的SSD基准测试可在 这里.

Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3291 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 3046 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 431.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 356.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 45.95 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 112.2 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 383.3 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 914 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
96.4 pt
Average of class Workstation
 
73.3 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
56.2 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
55.8 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
53.4 pt
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
 
48.1 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
46.1 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4108 (4076.21min - 4108.28max) MB/s +85%
Average of class Workstation
  (1844 - 5715, n=28, last 2 years)
3594 MB/s +62%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
2419 (2064.08min - 2418.84max) MB/s +9%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
2388 (2192.8min - 2388.07max) MB/s +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
2245 (2233.05min - 2244.71max) MB/s +1%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (2161 - 2354, n=5)
2239 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
2217 (2200.33min - 2216.93max) MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2053 (1931.06min - 2052.78max) MB/s -7%
seq write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4236 (4228min - 4235.95max) MB/s +128%
Average of class Workstation
  (1309 - 7289, n=28, last 2 years)
3809 MB/s +105%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
2755 (2420.1min - 2754.55max) MB/s +48%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
2720 (2204.11min - 2719.6max) MB/s +46%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
2700 (1328.55min - 2699.72max) MB/s +45%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2423 (2406.49min - 2422.82max) MB/s +30%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (1811 - 1983, n=5)
1863 MB/s 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1861 (1833.96min - 1860.59max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Workstation
  (3361 - 12631, n=28, last 2 years)
6593 MB/s +99%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
6274 (5892.58min - 6274.29max) MB/s +89%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
6053 (5002.76min - 6052.8max) MB/s +83%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5604 (4075.63min - 5603.92max) MB/s +69%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
3396 (3173.36min - 3395.84max) MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3316 (3284.77min - 3315.89max) MB/s
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (3257 - 3316, n=5)
3291 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
3223 (3041.71min - 3222.9max) MB/s -3%
seq q8 t1 write
Average of class Workstation
  (2526 - 9890, n=28, last 2 years)
5534 MB/s +83%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
5154 (5111.23min - 5153.51max) MB/s +70%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
5146 (4733.66min - 5145.56max) MB/s +70%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
4928 (4907.59min - 4927.89max) MB/s +63%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
3643 (1995.86min - 3643.44max) MB/s +20%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (3024 - 3065, n=5)
3051 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3024 (2822.98min - 3024.34max) MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2683 (2659.19min - 2682.76max) MB/s -11%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
86.4 (85.47min - 86.36max) MB/s +89%
Average of class Workstation
  (45.4 - 99, n=28, last 2 years)
65.6 MB/s +44%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
50.9 (43.69min - 50.91max) MB/s +11%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
44.1 (38.83min - 44.09max) MB/s -4%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (45.7 - 52.9, n=5)
50.6 MB/s +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
46.7 (46.55min - 46.68max) MB/s +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
45.7 (45.57min - 45.65max) MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
45.6 (45.39min - 45.62max) MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
222 (221.05min - 221.86max) MB/s +95%
Average of class Workstation
  (106.8 - 316, n=28, last 2 years)
157.2 MB/s +38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
142 (141.3min - 142.06max) MB/s +25%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (114 - 143, n=5)
129.4 MB/s +14%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
125 (124.7min - 125.4max) MB/s +10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
114 (112.92min - 113.57max) MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
106 (104.21min - 105.58max) MB/s -7%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
102 (100.51min - 101.6max) MB/s -11%
4k q32 t16 read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3953 (3766.95min - 3953.14max) MB/s +389%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2266 (2247.66min - 2265.92max) MB/s +180%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
2256 (2243.27min - 2255.8max) MB/s +179%
Average of class Workstation
  (561 - 4926, n=28, last 2 years)
1535 MB/s +90%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (509 - 1167, n=5)
934 MB/s +15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
809 (802.25min - 809.47max) MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
783 (693.78min - 782.9max) MB/s -3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
769 (682.08min - 768.78max) MB/s -5%
4k q32 t16 write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3069 (2955.28min - 3069.23max) MB/s +695%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2145 (1812.02min - 2145.19max) MB/s +456%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
1438 (1199.27min - 1438.1max) MB/s +273%
Average of class Workstation
  (361 - 3579, n=28, last 2 years)
1014 MB/s +163%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
443 (434.35min - 442.99max) MB/s +15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
434 (421.48min - 433.64max) MB/s +12%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (350 - 514, n=5)
442 MB/s +15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
386 (367.14min - 386.1max) MB/s
AS SSD
Score Total
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
8461 Points +139%
Average of class Workstation
  (2512 - 10591, n=28, last 2 years)
5740 Points +62%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
5700 Points +61%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
5047 Points +43%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
4256 Points +20%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (3297 - 4568, n=8)
3776 Points +7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
3541 Points
Score Read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3107 Points +157%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
2605 Points +115%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1915 Points +58%
Average of class Workstation
  (1162 - 3807, n=28, last 2 years)
1779 Points +47%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
1765 Points +46%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (1210 - 1801, n=8)
1386 Points +15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1210 Points
Score Write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3839 Points +118%
Average of class Workstation
  (742 - 4852, n=28, last 2 years)
3138 Points +78%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2215 Points +26%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
1918 Points +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1763 Points
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
1722 Points -2%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (1406 - 1869, n=8)
1718 Points -3%
Seq Read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
5414 MB/s +99%
Average of class Workstation
  (2873 - 7437, n=28, last 2 years)
5291 MB/s +95%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
4317 MB/s +59%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
3997 MB/s +47%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
2716 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
2423 MB/s -11%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (1287 - 2762, n=8)
2385 MB/s -12%
Seq Write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3865 MB/s +148%
Average of class Workstation
  (1785 - 6302, n=28, last 2 years)
3284 MB/s +110%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
2037 MB/s +30%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1561 MB/s
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (1257 - 2493, n=8)
1491 MB/s -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1203 MB/s -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
1049 MB/s -33%
4K Read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
79.2 MB/s +86%
Average of class Workstation
  (46.6 - 90.9, n=28, last 2 years)
62.4 MB/s +47%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
48.97 MB/s +15%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (42.6 - 52.1, n=8)
47.9 MB/s +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
44.96 MB/s +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
42.58 MB/s
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
42.24 MB/s -1%
4K Write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
198.2 MB/s +73%
Average of class Workstation
  (98.6 - 262, n=28, last 2 years)
176.2 MB/s +54%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (98.3 - 158, n=8)
129.5 MB/s +13%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
115.5 MB/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
115.3 MB/s +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
114.3 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
112.4 MB/s -2%
4K-64 Read
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
2486 MB/s +177%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
2160 MB/s +141%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1630 MB/s +82%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
1253 MB/s +40%
Average of class Workstation
  (649 - 3182, n=28, last 2 years)
1191 MB/s +33%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (896 - 1473, n=8)
1099 MB/s +23%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
896 MB/s
4K-64 Write
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
3254 MB/s +118%
Average of class Workstation
  (431 - 4090, n=28, last 2 years)
2633 MB/s +76%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
1979 MB/s +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
1697 MB/s +14%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
1493 MB/s
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
1473 MB/s -1%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (1142 - 1609, n=8)
1440 MB/s -4%
Access Time Read
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
0.156 ms * -232%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (0.039 - 0.094, n=8)
0.05788 ms * -23%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.057 ms * -21%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.017 - 0.105, n=28, last 2 years)
0.04943 ms * -5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
0.047 ms *
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
0.045 ms * +4%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.028 ms * +40%
Access Time Write
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
0.083 ms * -124%
Average of class Workstation
  (0.015 - 0.092, n=28, last 2 years)
0.04825 ms * -30%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
0.037 ms *
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
0.036 ms * +3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
0.033 ms * +11%
Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
  (0.027 - 0.039, n=8)
0.03213 ms * +13%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
0.021 ms * +43%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

01653304956608259901155132014851650181519802145231024752640280529703135Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA: Ø3272 (3251.22-3286.58)

GPU性能

GPU-Z。Nvidia RTX A3000
GPU-Z。Nvidia RTX A3000

Nvidia的RTX A3000是一款专业的上层主流移动显卡,其性能与消费版相当GeForce RTX 3060.由于有特殊的驱动程序,在一些应用程序中的性能可以高得多,这也得到了SPECviewperf基准测试结果的支持。由于TGP为80W,这是GPU的一个较慢的版本(在前几代中它会带有Max-Q的称号),考虑到笨重的机箱,这有点令人失望。可选的RTX A4000的最大功率消耗RTX A4000RTX A5000由于200W电源适配器的限制,GPU也应设置为80W。

从性能上看,RTX A3000基本与旧的Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q在前辈ZBook Fury 17 G7在大多数基准测试中,略低于我们数据库中的RTX A3000的平均得分。这里肯定有改进的余地,但在持续的工作负荷下,性能至少是稳定的;苛刻的3DMarkTime Spy 压力测试也很容易通过。

TGP在电池供电的情况下被限制在55瓦,这导致了大约25%的性能赤字(5000分对6580分@Time Spy Graphics)。更多的GPU基准测试被列在 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
96.1 pt
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2 -10!
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
95.2 pt
Average of class Workstation
 
85.4 pt
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
 
74.2 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
69.5 pt
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
59.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
58.7 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
41904 Points +77%
Average of class Workstation
  (9356 - 59715, n=29, last 2 years)
29325 Points +24%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (23699 - 27523, n=3)
25737 Points +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
23699 Points
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
23684 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
19437 Points -18%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
29610 Points +74%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
27271 Points +60%
Average of class Workstation
  (6121 - 45600, n=29, last 2 years)
20806 Points +22%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (17034 - 20417, n=3)
19054 Points +12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
17049 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
17034 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
14627 Points -14%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
11580 Points +77%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
10307 Points +58%
Average of class Workstation
  (1997 - 19741, n=29, last 2 years)
8356 Points +28%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (6530 - 7536, n=3)
7129 Points +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
6764 Points +4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
6530 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
5590 Points -14%
SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Average of class Workstation
  (91.8 - 230, n=25, last 2 years)
169.8 fps +13%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
157.7 fps +5%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (149.8 - 156.7, n=3)
152.7 fps +2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
149.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
139 fps -7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
112.1 fps -25%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
319.2 fps +37%
Average of class Workstation
  (48.9 - 555, n=25, last 2 years)
303 fps +30%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (233 - 279, n=3)
254 fps +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
232.9 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
225.4 fps -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
185.5 fps -20%
Showcase (showcase-02)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
131.9 fps +57%
Average of class Workstation
  (28.6 - 190.3, n=25, last 2 years)
95.9 fps +14%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (84.1 - 99.9, n=3)
91.3 fps +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
89.3 fps +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
84.1 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
69.5 fps -17%
Medical (medical-02)
Average of class Workstation
  (37.3 - 272, n=25, last 2 years)
127.6 fps +35%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
119.1 fps +26%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (89.2 - 102.8, n=3)
95.6 fps +1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
94.8 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
81.9 fps -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
72.9 fps -23%
Maya (maya-05)
Average of class Workstation
  (103 - 449, n=25, last 2 years)
268 fps +38%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
250.4 fps +29%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (194.8 - 228, n=3)
212 fps +9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
194.8 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
172 fps -12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
162 fps -17%
Energy (energy-02)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
74.3 fps +65%
Average of class Workstation
  (2.77 - 109.7, n=25, last 2 years)
51.9 fps +15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
45.12 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (41.2 - 45.1, n=3)
43.5 fps -4%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
35.33 fps -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
33.98 fps -25%
Creo (creo-02)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
251.7 fps +35%
Average of class Workstation
  (76.8 - 425, n=25, last 2 years)
247 fps +32%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (186.9 - 235, n=3)
211 fps +13%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
186.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
170.2 fps -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
162.1 fps -13%
Catia (catia-05)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
280.9 fps +21%
Average of class Workstation
  (99.5 - 418, n=25, last 2 years)
272 fps +18%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (231 - 257, n=3)
247 fps +7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
231.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
210.8 fps -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
181.6 fps -22%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
208.1 fps +43%
Average of class Workstation
  (80.8 - 288, n=24, last 2 years)
183 fps +25%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (145.9 - 181, n=3)
168.6 fps +16%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
145.9 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
137.9 fps -5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
129.5 fps -11%
SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
199.4 fps +35%
Average of class Workstation
  (50.6 - 347, n=21, last 2 years)
179.3 fps +22%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
169 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (147.4 - 170.1, n=3)
155.1 fps +5%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
147.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
126.4 fps -14%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
114.4 fps -22%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
309.1 fps +33%
Average of class Workstation
  (22.3 - 554, n=28, last 2 years)
276 fps +19%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
260.5 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (232 - 284, n=3)
256 fps +10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
232.4 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
186 fps -20%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
181 fps -22%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Workstation
  (15.6 - 152, n=28, last 2 years)
62.1 fps +40%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
58.7 fps +32%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
56.6 fps +27%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (42.7 - 46.6, n=3)
44.6 fps 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
44.4 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
38.33 fps -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
34.49 fps -22%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Workstation
  (102 - 660, n=28, last 2 years)
310 fps +50%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
290 fps +40%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
270.1 fps +30%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (207 - 287, n=3)
243 fps +17%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
207 fps
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
191.5 fps -7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
159.9 fps -23%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
71.6 fps +59%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
67.9 fps +51%
Average of class Workstation
  (2.78 - 109.7, n=28, last 2 years)
48.8 fps +8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
45.04 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (43.1 - 45, n=3)
44.3 fps -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
35.71 fps -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
33.85 fps -25%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
139.7 fps +17%
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
132.6 fps +11%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
119.7 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (101.1 - 124.5, n=3)
115.1 fps -4%
Average of class Workstation
  (45.9 - 169.5, n=28, last 2 years)
110.2 fps -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
98.3 fps -18%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
88.3 fps -26%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
106 fps +44%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
98.8 fps +34%
Average of class Workstation
  (21 - 131.4, n=28, last 2 years)
78.5 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (73.7 - 80.5, n=3)
78.2 fps +6%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
73.7 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
60.5 fps -18%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
59.7 fps -19%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
MSI WE76 11UM-456
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11980HK
129.6 fps +86%
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Intel Xeon W-11955M
123.1 fps +77%
Average of class Workstation
  (28.5 - 208, n=28, last 2 years)
96.6 fps +39%
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
  (69.7 - 103, n=3)
83.6 fps +20%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-11950H
69.7 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H
64.1 fps -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H
59.7 fps -14%
3DMark 11 Performance
20760 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
24449 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
15711 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
6490 points
Help

游戏性能

Nvidia的专业GPU也很适合游戏,RTX A3000的性能甚至常常足以满足原生4K分辨率的要求,只有像《赛博朋克2077》这样要求非常高的游戏才需要减少细节和/或分辨率。在较长的游戏过程中,性能是稳定的,但在电池电量上再次出现了小的不足;Witcher 3 Ultra在电池上的结果是43帧,而在主电源上是61帧。请参阅我们的 技术部分了解更多的游戏基准测试。

Witcher 3 FPS Diagram

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU: Ø61.1 (58-64)
CPU和GPU数据Witcher 3 Ultra
CPU和GPU数据Witcher 3 Ultra
lowmed.highultraQHD4K
GTA V (2015) 163 150 101 64.3 53.5 49.2
The Witcher 3 (2015) 263 176 112 61.1 45
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 156 131 119 108 77.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 130 86.7 67 50.7 28.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 103 82.1 66.7 40.5
Far Cry 5 (2018) 113 84 81 77 62 36
Strange Brigade (2018) 324 164 134 118 87 51
Cyberpunk 2077 1.0 (2020) 78 64 52 45 28 14
F1 2021 (2021) 202 131 114 75 56.7 26.9

排放 - ZBook保持凉爽

系统噪音

在日常工作中,ZBook Fury 17 G8通常是一个非常安静的伙伴,在更具挑战性的工作负荷中,由于没有高亢的噪音,风扇的杂音仍然可以忍受,大约为40 dB(A)。我们在最大负荷下测得高达47 dB(A),这是非常可听的,但我们没有注意到任何其他电子噪音,例如线圈啸叫。

Noise Level

Idle
24.5 / 24.5 / 26.8 dB(A)
Load
41.8 / 47.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 24.5 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.431.632.833.135.92535.435.130.535.133.13132.827.429.227.130.14030.832.333.132.830.95028.829.73026.530.16328.929.629.524.127.98028.225.624.421.725.110027.726.82720.524.312529.528.628.12024.816029.126.726.117.520.520032.230.32819.326.725033.733.931.517.820.631532.330.128.315.817.740032.730.829.613.816.950034.532.330.814.417.163033.732.229.513.414.780033.931.929.810.613.8100035.232.729.311.213.8125034.633.429.91113.8160038.436.233.612.116.3200037.934.932.811.514.2250036.735.330.811.414315035.532.628.511.813.5400034.532.129.611.812.4500033.531.126.912.112.4630033.230.525.212.312.7800030.22720.712.312.61000025.322.116.912.512.71250022.519.415.412.612.51600017.51512.911.912SPL47.144.941.824.526.8N5.953.90.60.9median 33.5median 31.1median 28.5median 12.3median 14Delta3.53.32.82.23.3hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, i9-11950H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
MSI WE76 11UM-456
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, i9-11980HK, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, W-11955M, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max 32-Core GPU, M1 Max, Apple SSD AP2048R
Noise
1%
-2%
-1%
-3%
4%
off / environment *
24.5
26.4
-8%
24.7
-1%
26
-6%
24.4
-0%
24.2
1%
Idle Minimum *
24.5
26.4
-8%
24.7
-1%
26
-6%
24.4
-0%
24.2
1%
Idle Average *
24.5
26.4
-8%
24.7
-1%
26
-6%
26.6
-9%
24.2
1%
Idle Maximum *
26.8
26.4
1%
27.5
-3%
26.5
1%
29
-8%
24.2
10%
Load Average *
41.8
38.1
9%
43.7
-5%
42
-0%
40.2
4%
42.9
-3%
Witcher 3 ultra *
44.9
38.1
15%
46.6
-4%
48
-7%
39.5
12%
Load Maximum *
47.1
45
4%
47.7
-1%
43
9%
48
-2%
42.9
9%

* ... smaller is better

温度

表面温度完全不挑剔,甚至在我们的压力测试中,我们只能在机箱底部的几个地方测到略高于50℃的温度。基本单元的顶部,包括键盘台面,要冷得多,没有划过40℃的大关,所以完全没有限制。在轻度工作负荷下,该装置根本没有真正升温。

在压力测试中,性能并不令人失望,但这应该是一个大型移动工作站的预期。几分钟后,处理器的性能被限制在标称的45瓦特,而专用显卡可以保持80瓦特。因此,在压力测试之后,并没有立即出现性能不足的情况。

CPU和GPU数据压力测试
CPU和GPU数据压力测试
Max. Load
 38.5 °C38.8 °C41.9 °C 
 33.2 °C37.4 °C37.1 °C 
 24.7 °C28 °C27.4 °C 
Maximum: 41.9 °C
Average: 34.1 °C
50.5 °C52.9 °C41.7 °C
44.4 °C51.7 °C33.2 °C
27.1 °C27.7 °C26.3 °C
Maximum: 52.9 °C
Average: 39.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  50.3 °C | Room Temperature 21 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.9 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.9 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.6 °C / 94 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.6 °C / 83.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-0.7 °C / -1.3 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底)。
表面温度应力测试(底)。
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
Intel Core i9-11950H, NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU
MSI WE76 11UM-456
Intel Core i9-11980HK, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
Intel Xeon W-11955M, NVIDIA RTX A5000 Laptop GPU
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
Apple M1 Max, Apple M1 Max 32-Core GPU
Heat
1%
-7%
-9%
6%
14%
Maximum Upper Side *
41.9
49.6
-18%
48.4
-16%
45.7
-9%
46.1
-10%
42.3
-1%
Maximum Bottom *
52.9
52.1
2%
56.2
-6%
48.3
9%
57.6
-9%
41.7
21%
Idle Upper Side *
28.2
26
8%
28.6
-1%
35.3
-25%
23.4
17%
23.9
15%
Idle Bottom *
30.7
27.6
10%
31.8
-4%
34.4
-12%
23.4
24%
23.9
22%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

ZBook的立体声扬声器提供良好的音质;它们有足够的音量和丰富的内容。它的音频性能无法与MacBook Pro 16,但集成模块绝不是坏事。麦克风在我们的审查中也留下了良好的印象,语音记录非常清晰,没有重大失真。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2033.134.12535.135.73127.132.24032.831.45026.531.56324.132.68021.737.910020.545.81252047.916017.554.220019.360.925017.862.231515.861.840013.860.250014.46563013.468.380010.671.1100011.272.712501173.6160012.168.2200011.568.3250011.467.2315011.869.2400011.870.2500012.168.4630012.367.7800012.359.91000012.560.11250012.653.71600011.946.6SPL24.581.1N0.651.8median 12.3median 65Delta2.25.43130.625.83227.830.434.533.633.534.330.333.333.933.923.931.625.436.92437.822.946.821.852.118.754.917.358.316.663.215.163.214.867.914.170.713.171.212.963.812.66012.858.912.855.812.762.51361.512.857.912.956.212.952.912.746.612.745.926.476.60.936median 13.1median 57.93.27.226.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EALenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025GApple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能量管理 - 体面的耐力

消耗功率

200W电源适配器
200W电源适配器

功耗与前一型号大致相当。 以前的型号.我们可以测量到在负载下略高于200瓦,所以该设备受到电源适配器的限制。我们对这种限制有点惊讶,强大的移动工作站过去都是用230W的单元发货的。根据官方的规格表,200W的模块是最强大的版本。

在压力测试中,消耗量将在160W左右趋于平稳,所以这不是什么大问题,但惠普可以使用更强大的GPU型号(具有更高的TGP值),并配备更强大的PSU。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.62 / 1 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.6 / 16.7 / 17.5 Watt
Load midlight 117 / 202 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"
MSI WE76 11UM-456
i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 2x Micron 2300 2TB MTFDHBA2T0TDV (RAID 0), OLED, 3840x2400, 16"
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, , 3840x2160, 17.3"
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP2048R, Mini-LED, 3456x2234, 16.2"
Average NVIDIA RTX A3000 Laptop GPU
 
Average of class Workstation
 
Power Consumption
21%
-28%
-12%
4%
20%
6%
4%
Idle Minimum *
7.6
6.1
20%
10.5
-38%
12.4
-63%
5.8
24%
5.4
29%
8.23 ?(6.3 - 10.8, n=3)
-8%
Idle Average *
16.7
10.9
35%
18.6
-11%
16.5
1%
14.8
11%
16.4
2%
Idle Maximum *
17.5
12.3
30%
20
-14%
25
-43%
17
3%
16.7
5%
Load Average *
117
106.3
9%
132.4
-13%
132
-13%
120.4
-3%
94
20%
109.3 ?(99.3 - 117, n=3)
7%
Witcher 3 ultra *
150
124
17%
232
-55%
132
12%
168.4
-12%
104
31%
Load Maximum *
202
168.9
16%
281.6
-39%
134
34%
199.8
1%
135
33%

* ... smaller is better

Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest

0153045607590105120135150165180195Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø150.5 (147-155)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø176.2 (156-202)

Power Consumption external screen

0102030405060708090100110120130140Tooltip
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø109.3 (106-134)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø124.8 (103-138)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø134.5 (131-145)
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø137.1 (132-148)

电池运行时间

充电
充电

尽管采用了4K面板,但94Wh电池的运行时间还算不错。在150尼特的调整亮度下(在我们的测试单元中为44%),我们的视频测试运行了8.5小时,Wi-Fi测试运行了7.5小时。当我们以最大显示亮度重复测试时,Wi-Fi运行时间下降到5小时多一点。

当你真正给设备施加压力时,电池在大约2小时后就空了,当设备打开时,充满电需要113分钟。大约35分钟后,50%的容量就会被重新充电。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 96)
7h 25min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 97)
5h 14min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 29min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 59min
HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA
i9-11950H, RTX A3000 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh
MSI WE76 11UM-456
i9-11980HK, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh
Asus ProArt StudioBook 16 W7600H5A-2BL2
W-11955M, RTX A5000 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA
i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, 94 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Max
M1 Max, M1 Max 32-Core GPU, 99.6 Wh
Average of class Workstation
 
Battery Runtime
5%
-23%
-56%
3%
52%
5%
H.264
509
568
12%
413
-19%
106
-79%
615
21%
1021
101%
WiFi v1.3
445
588
32%
377
-15%
301
-32%
455
2%
894
101%
Load
119
84
-29%
79
-34%
104
-13%
63
-47%
Witcher 3 ultra
94

Pros

+ 坚固的底盘
+ 非常好的性能利用
+ 非常好的输入设备
+ 4K梦幻色彩显示屏,色彩准确
+ 大量的端口
+ 易于接近内部结构...

Cons

- ......这是受额外盖子的影响
- SD阅读器比以前慢了
- 审查单通道内存的配置
- 坏的网络摄像头

结论 - ZBook Fury 17需要更新

在审查中。惠普ZBook Fury 17 G8。测试模型由德国惠普公司提供。
在审查中。惠普ZBook Fury 17 G8。测试模型由德国惠普公司提供。

ZBook Fury 17 G8在某些方面显得略为过时。你得到了现代的CPU和GPU,但2.5英寸的硬盘插槽在今天是相当罕见的。你也没有得到最新的通信模块(没有Wi-Fi 6E,没有5G),仍然有一个720p的网络摄像头,以及包括宽边框的16:9长宽比。

我们也有点惊讶,组件没有提供更多的性能。如果你得到这样一个 "经典 "的移动工作站,并有一个相对较重和笨重的机箱,你通常希望有尽可能高的性能。然而,由于对200W电源适配器的限制,制造商不必要地限制了自己,冷却解决方案当然可以处理更多。性能至少是稳定的。如果你需要更多的CPU性能,我们建议你等待下一代,由于英特尔新的Alder Lake芯片具有更多的CPU核心,因此有望实现重大飞跃。

适当的性能利用率和适度的排放。ZBook Fury 17 G8是一个坚实的移动工作站,但惠普在GPU性能方面相当保守。考虑到笨重的机箱,可以有更强大的GPU版本。

目前的DreamColor版本仍然提供非常好的画质。他们不再覆盖AdobeRGB,而是 "只 "参考DCI-P3,类似于MacBook Pro型号的Apple 。如果你在工作中使用大量的HDR内容,你应该考虑目前的MacBooks因为它们由于采用了Mini-LED技术,峰值亮度高得多。

带有大型维护盖的想法是好的,但该机制不应影响质量印象,我们的测试装置就是这种情况。对于近4000欧元的价格,你应该能够期待完美的制造质量,甚至是缝隙。各个组件的额外盖子也影响了对组件的方便接触。

如果你不愿意在GPU性能方面做出妥协,你应该看一下微星WE76(155W TGP),而ThinkPad P17 G2在许多方面与ZBook非常相似,但在键盘质量方面仍有轻微优势。不过,从其他ThinkPad键盘的发展来看,这种情况可能很快会改变。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

你可以在HP的网站上定制ZBook Fury 17 G8。.与我们的测试设备类似的配置,售价为4942美元,发货日期为5月。

HP ZBook Fury 17 G8-4A6A9EA - 02/16/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
83 / 98 → 85%
Keyboard
91%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
69 / 80 → 86%
Weight
57 / 10-66 → 84%
Battery
77 / 95 → 81%
Display
94%
Games Performance
92%
Application Performance
93%
Workstation
92%
Temperature
86 / 95 → 91%
Noise
86 / 90 → 95%
Audio
87%
Camera
29 / 85 → 34%
Average
81%
90%
Workstation - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普ZBook Fury 17 G8评测--配备4K梦幻色彩显示屏的移动工作站
Andreas Osthoff, 2022-02-17 (Update: 2022-02-17)