联想ThinkPad P17 G2笔记本电脑评论。具有内部升级功能的大型工作站

Name: Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G
Brand: Lenovo

巨石号。

联想的P系列ThinkPads与传统的ThinkPads保持一致。虽然这不一定是件坏事，但16:9显示屏周围的显示边框可以稍微窄一些。然而，联想工作站在关键的地方大放异彩，提供了出色的性能和可扩展性。

Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL/Stefan Hinum), Published 10/05/2021 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

ThinkPad Thunderbolt Workstation Windows Laptop / Notebook Business Tiger Lake

17英寸的外形因素远远不是最受欢迎的选择，特别是当涉及到企业客户的商务笔记本电脑时。后一类的系统必须是小而轻的，以便有更大的便携性。尽管联想ThinkPad P17 G2也很便携，但这款移动工作站的大重量和大尺寸使其更适合固定使用。它是唯一提供的17英寸ThinkPad，其主要使用情况是为CAD和其他计算密集型任务提供足够的性能。

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G (ThinkPad P17 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i7-11800H 8 x 2.3 - 4.6 GHz, 80 W PL2 / Short Burst, 70 W PL1 / Sustained, Tiger Lake-H

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1687 MHz, RAM: 1500 MHz, 60 W TDP, GA107, 471.41, Optimus

Memory

16 GB

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, LP173WF4-SPF7, IPS LED, glossy: no, 60 Hz

Mainboard

Intel WM590 (Tiger Lake PCH-H)

Storage

Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G, 512 GB

, M.2 2280, NVMe PCIe 3.0, 431 GB free

Soundcard

Realtek ALC3306

Connections

2 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 3 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5mm audio jack, Card Reader: SD-Card, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader

Networking

Intel Ethernet Controller I225-V (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 28.38 x 415.44 x 280.81

Battery

94 Wh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p w/IR & ThinkShutter

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: 6 row Chiclet w/Numpad, 1.8mm key-travel, Keyboard Light: yes, 170W slim-tip charger, Lenovo Commercial Vantage, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

3.565 kg, Power Supply: 575 g

Price

2500 Euro

Links

Lenovo homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Potential competitors in comparison

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.8 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2021	Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	3.6 kg	28.38 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
86.6 % v7 ^(old)		Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)	3.5 kg	31 mm	17.30"	1920x1080
89.8 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2021	HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	2.9 kg	26.9 mm	17.30"	3840x2160
87 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2021	Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F W-10885M, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	2.5 kg	19.5 mm	17.00"	3840x2400
86.4 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2020	Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	2.5 kg	18.4 mm	17.00"	1920x1200

ThinkPad机箱。塑料外观，镁质底架

虽然联想去年已经更新了其最大的工作站，但去年的变化只集中在硬件上。事实上，自从ThinkPad P70上市以来，在设计方面几乎没有任何变化。 ThinkPad P70以来，在设计方面几乎没有任何变化。虽然相比于联想ThinkPad P73，一些小的细节发生了变化，但没有任何重大修订。

这一次，前几代产品中巨大的镁/铝底盖被纤维增强塑料外壳所取代。内部的、传统的ThinkPad结构框架由镁合金组成。因此，底座单元的刚度相当高。塑料上涂有天鹅绒质地的涂层，使其成为污点和指纹磁铁。显示屏盖的刚性令人惊讶，当试图从角落里扭转它时，几乎没有弯曲，在压力下几乎没有任何屈服。不幸的是，掌托的情况并非如此，它在靠近智能卡读卡器的地方很容易弯曲，而且不能顺利过渡到机箱前缘的底座上。

底座内的两个银色金属铰链足够牢固，可以将显示屏固定在原位，同时仍允许用户用一只手打开笔记本电脑。显示器的最大角度大于180度。

虽然我们会用 "传统 "这个相当正面的词来描述其构造，但显示屏边框的大小和机箱本身根本就已经过时了。除了去年的 ThinkPad P73我们的比较中没有其他17英寸工作站超过ThinkPad P17第二代的巨大尺寸，其中包括厚度和重量。因此，旅行时使用这款联想笔记本电脑可能是个例外。

Size comparison

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F DIN A4 ❌

连接性。联想笔记本电脑有很多端口

宽敞的外壳使联想能够包括众多的端口。也就是说，与ThinkPad P73相比，端口的选择略差，因为ThinkPad P17 G2少提供了一个USB-A端口。应该注意的是，这是第一款支持Thunderbolt 4的P系列笔记本电脑。

与所有P系列的ThinkPad工作站一样，ThinkPad P17 Gen 2通过专有的超薄尖端端口进行充电。虽然据称也支持USB-C电源传输，但它没有识别65W的USB-C充电器。不过，与较小的ThinkPad P1 G4一样，90W的USB-C充电器应该可以使用。

左边：HDMI 2.1，USB-A 3.1 Gen 1，SIM卡插槽，3.5毫米音频插孔

SD卡阅读器

用我们的128GB AV Pro microSD V60参考卡进行的基准测试显示了集成读卡器的快速速度。其性能与其他工作站笔记本电脑相当。当完全插入时，SD卡与边缘平齐。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	188 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	187 MB/s -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	184 MB/s -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA (AV Pro 60)	161.1 MB/s -14%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	154 MB/s -18%
Average of class Workstation (49.6 - 200, n=15, last 2 years)	96 MB/s -49%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	244.1 MB/s +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	206.3 MB/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	205 MB/s
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	189.8 MB/s -7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA (AV Pro 60)	172.7 MB/s -16%
Average of class Workstation (81.2 - 227, n=15, last 2 years)	122.7 MB/s -40%

沟通

除了前面提到的RJ45以太网连接外，联想ThinkPad P17 G2当然也配备了Wi-Fi支持。通过全新的Wi-Fi 6E模块AX210，制造商在这里也依靠英特尔。稍微令人失望的是。虽然接收数据时的传输速度还不错，但传输速度却没有达到我们的预期。

我们的测试设备包括联想ThinkPad P17第二代可选的WWAN/LTE模块的必要内部设备。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1427 (1103^min - 1464^max) MBit/s +86%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1346 (644^min - 1421^max) MBit/s +75%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (675 - 1602, n=27)	1166 MBit/s +52%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	941 (763^min - 1176^max) MBit/s +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	767 (421^min - 954^max) MBit/s
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	670 MBit/s -13%
iperf3 receive AX12
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	1525 (878^min - 1777^max) MBit/s +10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1400 (636^min - 1472^max) MBit/s +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1391 (1094^min - 1575^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (914 - 1716, n=27)	1309 MBit/s -6%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	1286 (1229^min - 1366^max) MBit/s -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200	547 MBit/s -61%

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1390 (1094-1575)

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø753 (421-954)

网络摄像头

联想终于开始在特定的ThinkPad型号中加入1080p网络摄像头。不幸的是，ThinkPad P17 G2并没有入选。因此，集成的720p在质量方面没有提供什么，只够用于视频通话。

ColorChecker Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G: 17.64 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 29.35 ∆E

安全问题

无论你需要哪种安全功能，联想P17 G2都很有可能支持它。智能卡读卡器、指纹传感器和红外摄像头保证了认证的安全性。同时，有一个 "ThinkShutter "网络摄像头快门，可以更好地保护隐私，还有一个Kensington锁可以防止被盗。如果ThinkPad丢失，可以在BIOS的computrace功能帮助下找到它。

维护

许多可升级的部件，可能难以调换--这对大多数老式的P系列ThinkPad来说都是如此。例如，为了清洁ThinkPad P73的风扇，整个机箱包括镁质框架都必须被拆开。在新的ThinkPad P17上，这种情况不再存在。拆下底板就可以接触到电池和冷却解决方案。底板上有14颗螺丝，其中两颗隐藏在小的维护舱口下面。卸下螺丝后，底板仅由塑料夹子固定。

在小型服务舱门下面有两个SODIMM和两个未被占用的M.2插槽。主固态硬盘、另外两个SODIMM插槽和M.2-2242 WWAN插槽位于键盘下方，键盘也可以相当容易地被拆除。它只由底部的两个螺丝固定。与所有ThinkPad笔记本电脑一样，联想提供了一份hardware维护手册。.

输入设备。ThinkPad P17 G2现在有了一个点击板

键盘

键盘方面没有任何变化，自ThinkPad P72以来，大部分都没有变化。平滑的按键带有两个亮度级别的背光，并有1.8毫米的行程，这比其他现代笔记本电脑明显多。长行程还是短行程更好，这是一个习惯和个人偏好的问题。在任何情况下，所安装的键盘都非常出色，无愧于ThinkPad的名字，反馈效果非常理想，既不会太软也不会太硬。联想Thinkpad P17第二代很适合甚至长时间的打字。与之不同的是 ThinkPad P15 G2键盘区域不会屈服。

与大多数大型工作站一样，在键盘区的右侧有一个小键盘，导致主键稍微向左偏移。键盘并没有完全伸展到底座的整个宽度上。此外，所有重要的功能都有专门的按键，包括导航，这使得工作流程更加高效。

触摸板和TrackPoint

通过ThinkPad P17，联想将其没有专用按键的点击板引入了另一个产品系列。然而，联想抓住了这个机会，改用玻璃触摸板。塑料表面提供了平滑的滑行性能，并有沉闷的高质量点击。在10 x 7厘米（约3.94 x 2.76英寸）处，触摸板大小适中。Synaptics触摸板的软件实现不值得批评。

除了触摸板，联想ThinkPad P17 G2还提供了标志性的ThinkPad TrackPoint及其三个专用按钮。TrackPoint优于触摸板，特别是在拖放方面，它允许用户在打字时移动鼠标指针。总的来说，它是一个很好的鼠标替代品，尽管对初学者来说可能需要一些练习。

显示屏。ThinkPad采用令人失望的全高清液晶屏

虽然16:9的形式因素还没有完全过时，但它现在几乎已经过时了。越来越多的笔记本电脑正在采用16:10或3:2的长宽比，尽管这一趋势似乎还没有对工作站领域产生多大影响。联想为ThinkPad P17第二代提供了两种17.3英寸16:9的显示屏选择，两种变体都是哑光IPS屏幕。触摸屏在这一型号上是不存在的，因为它们--连同OLED--都是较小的型号所独有的。联想ThinkPad P15 G2.

全高清（1920 x 1080），300尼特，100 % sRGB
4K超高清（3840 x 2160），500尼特，100 % AdobeRGB

该显示器毫不费力地超过了宣传的300尼特的亮度水平，其平均测量亮度为334尼特。虽然它比去年的型号更亮，但ThinkPad P17 G2的基本显示选项不能完全与竞争的惠普和戴尔系统的4K UHD液晶显示器竞争。

总的来说，原生全高清分辨率对于17英寸笔记本电脑来说几乎太低了，尤其是在工作站领域。图像看起来有些粗糙，大型液晶屏感觉被浪费了。我们希望联想能在未来的机型中切换到2K或QHD显示屏。


340 cd/m²	349 cd/m²	340 cd/m²
329 cd/m²	361 cd/m²	335 cd/m²
314 cd/m²	323 cd/m²	315 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

LP173WF4-SPF7 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 361 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 334 cd/m² Minimum: 3.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 357 cd/m²
Contrast: 1031:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.2
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
87.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G LP173WF4-SPF7, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE N173HCE-E31, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA AUOCD8C, , 3840x2160, 17.3"	Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Sharp LQ170R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 17"	Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T 170PUW1-A00, IPS, 1920x1200, 17"
Display		4%	32%	30%	30%
Display P3 Coverage	67.9	67.5 -1%	99.3 46%	83.6 23%	96.2 42%
sRGB Coverage	87.3	94.2 8%	99.9 14%	99.7 14%	99.8 14%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	63.9	67.8 6%	86.9 36%	97.7 53%	84.7 33%
Response Times		-14%	-61%	-29%	-19%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39.2 ?(21.2, 18)	40 ?(20.4, 19.6) -2%	56 ?(26, 30) -43%	41.2 ?(18.4, 22.8) -5%	41.2 ?(22, 19.2) -5%
Response Time Black / White *	22.4 ?(11.6, 10.8)	28 ?(17.2, 10.8) -25%	40 ?(22, 18) -79%	34 ?(20, 14) -52%	29.6 ?(16.4, 13.2) -32%
PWM Frequency		25000 ?(50)
Screen		6%	48%	16%	31%
Brightness middle	361	333 -8%	573 59%	483.8 34%	323 -11%
Brightness	334	310 -7%	586 75%	457 37%	308 -8%
Brightness Distribution	87	83 -5%	91 5%	90 3%	88 1%
Black Level *	0.35	0.39 -11%	0.38 -9%	0.37 -6%	0.36 -3%
Contrast	1031	854 -17%	1508 46%	1308 27%	897 -13%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.4	4.4 19%	1.9 65%	4.27 21%	1.1 80%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	9.9	7.5 24%	4.2 58%	8.78 11%	3.3 67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	3.2	2 37%	0.7 78%	4.01 -25%	0.8 75%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.5	5.1 22%	2.9 55%	3.5 46%	0.8 88%
Gamma	2.23 ^99%	2.39 ^92%	2.1 ^105%	2.43 ^91%	2.23 ^99%
CCT	7351 ^88%	7061 ^92%	6217 ^105%	1741 ^373%	6479 ^100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)		61.1	77.6	86.7	75.7
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)		94	100	99.9	99.8
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-1% / 3%	6% / 29%	6% / 13%	14% / 23%

* ... smaller is better

根据我们的X-Rite i1Pro 2色度计的CalMAN结果，LCD的色温在出厂时略微过冷。用X-Rite的iProfiler进行校准，大大改善了灰度，而颜色仍然不准确。即使有1031:1的对比度，也不能否认显示器的色彩准确性差。联想ThinkPad P17 G2的全高清显示屏并没有达到宣传的100％sRGB覆盖率。虽然87%并不是一个可怕的结果，但它绝对低于平均水平。对于专业的照片编辑，UHD液晶显示器应该是一个更好的选择。

户外使用主要是通过屏幕的哑光层实现的。300尼特的亮度至少可以满足在阴凉处使用。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 11.6 ms rise
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21.2 ms rise
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 56 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

由于采用了基本的IPS技术，ThinkPad显示屏提供了很好的可视角度。

性能。联想ThinkPad P17 G2的得分很高

随着ThinkPad P17的推出，P系列变得比以往任何时候都更具可配置性，因为GPU占据了一个独立的子板。这允许任意的处理器和图形组合。可用的处理器如下。酷睿i5-11500H, i7-11800H, i7-11850H, i9-11950H, Xeon W-11855M，以及 Xeon W-11955M.联想将这些CPU与 Nvidia T1200(60 W), Nvidia RTX A2000(60 W), RTX A3000(115 W),RTX A4000(115 W)或RTX A5000(115 W)。

四个SODIMM插槽总共支持128GB的DDR4-3200内存，在配置至强选项时具有ECC功能。此外，联想ThinkPad P17第二代最多可以接受三块M.2-2280固态硬盘。

处理器

的英特尔酷睿i7-11800H是英特尔第11代Tiger Lake 的H系列处理器，意味着10纳米的CPU终于被引入到ThinkPad P系列。H系列八核CPU的TDP为45W，时钟速度最高为4.6GHz。基本时钟位于2.3GHz。与其他处理器的比较可以在我们的 CPU比较页面.

联想ThinkPad P17 G2的最大功率限制被设定为出厂时的80瓦。在长时间的负载下，消耗量下降到70瓦，这仍然大大高于指定的TDP。高功率预算使我们的ThinkPad笔记本电脑在多线程性能方面轻松地超过了每一个采用老式英特尔CPU的竞争对手。同时，它的性能与联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH差不多，后者配备的是AMD Cezanne-H CPU RyzenR7 5800H它需要更少的功率来达到相同的性能水平。

在电池模式下，CPU性能下降了约12%。

Cinebench R15 Multi Dauertest

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø2018 (1959.15-2144.43)

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H: Ø1159 (1130-1229)

HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H: Ø1456 (1429.34-1516.82)

Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M: Ø1646 (1622.65-1794.37)

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H; Auto: Ø1108 (1067.38-1264.38)

Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H; Turbo: Ø1162 (1128.51-1249.06)

Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1945 (1923.82-1971.51)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R23: Single Core | Multi Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Workstation (564 - 827, n=29, last 2 years)	706 Points +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	582 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (520 - 586, n=47)	576 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	542 Points -7%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M	492 Points -15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	489 Points -16%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	460 Points -21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H	454 Points -22%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Workstation (2990 - 10276, n=29, last 2 years)	6709 Points +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	5180 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	4575 Points -12%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (2498 - 5408, n=50)	4459 Points -14%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M	4065 Points -22%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	3639 Points -30%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	2809 Points -46%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H	2428 Points -53%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Workstation (1465 - 2178, n=28, last 2 years)	1835 Points +22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	1508 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1386 - 1522, n=45)	1497 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1386 Points -8%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	1284 Points -15%

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Workstation (11026 - 27338, n=28, last 2 years)	17777 Points +38%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	12876 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	11727 Points -9%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (6508 - 14088, n=48)	11650 Points -10%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	8802 (8415.48^min - 8801.64^max) Points -32%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Workstation (166.2 - 301, n=28, last 2 years)	265 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	231 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (201 - 231, n=46)	225 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	224 Points -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M	211 Points -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	211 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H	192 Points -17%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	192 Points -17%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Workstation (1863 - 4363, n=28, last 2 years)	2780 Points +30%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	2144 (1959.15^min - 2144.43^max) Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1972 (1923.82^min - 1971.51^max) Points -8%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1342 - 2173, n=50)	1894 Points -12%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M	1666 (1622.65^min - 1794.37^max) Points -22%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	1517 (1429.34^min - 1516.82^max) Points -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H	1272 (1143^min - 1229^max) Points -41%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	1264 Points -41%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	1249 Points -42%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H	411 Seconds * -64%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	409 Seconds * -64%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	302 Seconds * -21%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M	286 Seconds * -14%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (217 - 454, n=46)	277 Seconds * -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	260 Seconds * -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	250 Seconds *
Average of class Workstation (121 - 295, n=28, last 2 years)	200 Seconds * +20%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Workstation (4981 - 6960, n=28, last 2 years)	6068 MIPS +11%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	5589 MIPS +3%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M	5507 MIPS +1%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (5138 - 5732, n=46)	5492 MIPS +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	5444 MIPS
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	5292 MIPS -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H	5020 MIPS -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	4886 MIPS -10%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Workstation (47244 - 109204, n=28, last 2 years)	70695 MIPS +44%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	52444 MIPS +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	49079 MIPS
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (33718 - 56758, n=46)	48384 MIPS -1%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M	45696 MIPS -7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	41823 MIPS -15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	31696 MIPS -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H	31087 MIPS -37%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Workstation (1474 - 2095, n=28, last 2 years)	1857 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (1429 - 1625, n=40)	1561 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	1557 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	1431 Points -8%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M	1347 Points -13%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	1317 Points -15%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	1222 Points -22%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H	1150 Points -26%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Workstation (8050 - 19316, n=28, last 2 years)	13122 Points +61%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (4655 - 9851, n=40)	8551 Points +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M	8491 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	8147 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	7438 Points -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	6529 Points -20%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	5310 Points -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H	5270 Points -35%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Workstation (12.7 - 27.1, n=28, last 2 years)	19.5 fps +34%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	14.6 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	13.8 fps -5%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (7.38 - 17.4, n=46)	13.8 fps -5%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M	13.6 fps -7%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	11.3 fps -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H	9.1 fps -38%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	8.54 fps -42%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	64.7 s * -28%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	54.8 s * -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	50.7 s *
Average of class Workstation (36.5 - 95.2, n=28, last 2 years)	48.4 s * +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	47.4 s * +7%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (38.6 - 59.9, n=45)	46.5 s * +8%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M	44.4 s * +12%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H	0.633 sec * -11%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H	0.571 sec * -0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H	0.569 sec *
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M	0.568 sec * -0%
Average Intel Core i7-11800H (0.548 - 0.615, n=46)	0.566 sec * +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 16ACH AMD Ryzen 7 5800H	0.544 sec * +4%
Average of class Workstation (0.3825 - 0.54, n=28, last 2 years)	0.4482 sec * +21%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

6833 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6839

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

177.1 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

2144 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

283 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

231 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

582 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

5180 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

12876 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1508 Points

Help

... in comparison

系统性能

正如预期的那样，高端硬件在PCMark 10中的表现异常出色。同样，日常性能也感觉很快。

PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Workstation (5953 - 8587, n=28, last 2 years)	7259 Points +13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	6430 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU ()	6430 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L	5768 Points -10%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02	5484 Points -15%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	5363 Points -17%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4918 Points -24%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Workstation (9151 - 12197, n=28, last 2 years)	10648 Points +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02	10351 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	10126 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU ()	10126 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L	9917 Points -2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	9214 Points -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	8059 Points -20%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Workstation (7846 - 10820, n=28, last 2 years)	9393 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	8369 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU ()	8369 Points 0%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02	8269 Points -1%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	7769 Points -7%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L	7641 Points -9%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	7110 Points -15%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Workstation (7417 - 15093, n=28, last 2 years)	10492 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	8511 Points
Average Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU ()	8511 Points 0%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	7427 Points -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), i7-9850H, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L	6876 Points -19%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, W-10885M, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02	5229 Points -39%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, i7-9750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	4511 Points -47%

PCMark 10 Score		6430 points
Help

DPC延迟

不幸的是，联想ThinkPad P17 Gen 2显然在DPC延迟问题上挣扎。这可能会导致实时音频和视频编辑过程中的中断。唯一的解决办法是联想的驱动程序更新。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, i7-11800H, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	6610 μs *
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, i9-10885H, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	5161 μs * +22%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

安装的512GB固态硬盘是由Kioxia制造的，以前被称为东芝内存。M.2-2280的Kioxia XG7固态硬盘比上一代的东芝XG6固态硬盘快。然而，这款NVMe PCIe 4.0固态硬盘不能完全匹配三星PM981。

	Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G	Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L	HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00	Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02	Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR	Average Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G
AS SSD		-16%	1%	-34%	14%	10%
Seq Read	3997	2693 -33%	2423 -39%	2025 -49%	2958 -26%	4551 ?(3997 - 5105, n=2) 14%
Seq Write	1049	1542 47%	1203 15%	1438 37%	2350 124%	1432 ?(1049 - 1815, n=2) 37%
4K Read	44.96	62.6 39%	42.24 -6%	38.77 -14%	56.6 26%	46.2 ?(45 - 47.5, n=2) 3%
4K Write	115.3	149.5 30%	115.5 0%	96.9 -16%	106.1 -8%	126.3 ?(115.3 - 137.3, n=2) 10%
4K-64 Read	2160	871 -60%	1630 -25%	1105 -49%	1836 -15%	2136 ?(2112 - 2160, n=2) -1%
4K-64 Write	1697	1006 -41%	1979 17%	1435 -15%	1789 5%	1700 ?(1697 - 1702, n=2) 0%
Access Time Read *	0.156	0.058 63%	0.057 63%	0.08 49%	0.061 61%	0.1105 ?(0.065 - 0.156, n=2) 29%
Access Time Write *	0.036	0.067 -86%	0.033 8%	0.116 -222%	0.036 -0%	0.033 ?(0.03 - 0.036, n=2) 8%
Score Read	2605	1203 -54%	1915 -26%	1347 -48%	2189 -16%	2638 ?(2605 - 2670, n=2) 1%
Score Write	1918	1309 -32%	2215 15%	1676 -13%	2130 11%	1970 ?(1918 - 2021, n=2) 3%
Score Total	5700	3088 -46%	5047 -11%	3686 -35%	5411 -5%	5793 ?(5700 - 5885, n=2) 2%

* ... smaller is better

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G

Sequential Read: 3997MB/s

Sequential Write: 1049MB/s

4K Read: 44.96MB/s

4K Write: 115.3MB/s

4K-64 Read: 2160MB/s

4K-64 Write: 1697MB/s

Access Time Read: 0.156ms

Access Time Write: 0.036ms

Score Read: 2605Points

Score Write: 1918Points

Score Total: 5700Points

Continuous read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

GPU性能

该 Nvidia RTX A2000是新的专业Nvidia GPU阵容的一部分，不再使用 "Quadro "名称。它基于Nvidia最新的安培架构，提供2560条流水线。与其他图形芯片的比较可以在我们专门的 GPU比较页面.

联想ThinkPad P17 G2的GPU可以通过128位总线访问4GB的专用GDDR6内存。联想笔记本电脑内的60瓦版本达到了一个可敬的性能水平，类似于 RTX 3000 Max-Q中的戴尔Precision 5750中的RTX 3000 Max-Q，而比RTX 4000 Max-Q慢约20％。 RTX 4000 Max-Q中的 ZBook Fury 17这取决于基准测试。

在电池模式下，其性能受到严重限制。当没有连接到交流适配器时，GPU的性能下降了近40%。

3DMark 11 | 3DMark | SPECviewperf 13 | SPECviewperf 2020

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Workstation (9356 - 59715, n=29, last 2 years)	29325 Points +51%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	23684 Points +22%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	19513 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	19437 Points
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (14831 - 19823, n=9)	17690 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	17569 Points -10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	17074 Points -12%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Workstation (6121 - 45600, n=29, last 2 years)	20806 Points +42%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	17049 Points +17%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	14627 Points
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	14328 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	13802 Points -6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	13196 Points -10%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (10415 - 15988, n=9)	13167 Points -10%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Workstation (1997 - 19741, n=29, last 2 years)	8356 Points +49%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	6764 Points +21%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	5590 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	5503 Points -2%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	5405 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (4228 - 6108, n=9)	5151 Points -8%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	4943 Points -12%

SPECviewperf 13
Solidworks (sw-04)
Average of class Workstation (91.8 - 230, n=25, last 2 years)	169.8 fps +22%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (121.3 - 177, n=9)	144.6 fps +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	139 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	123.7 fps -11%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	112.1 fps -19%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	110.8 fps -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	109.6 fps -21%
Siemens NX (snx-03)
Average of class Workstation (48.9 - 555, n=25, last 2 years)	303 fps +63%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	225.4 fps +22%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	202.1 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (135.2 - 223, n=9)	191 fps +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	185.5 fps
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	179.4 fps -3%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	160.6 fps -13%
Showcase (showcase-02)
Average of class Workstation (28.6 - 190.3, n=25, last 2 years)	95.9 fps +38%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	89.3 fps +28%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	73.3 fps +5%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	72.8 fps +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	69.5 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (58.8 - 79.2, n=9)	68 fps -2%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	67.8 fps -2%
Medical (medical-02)
Average of class Workstation (37.3 - 272, n=25, last 2 years)	127.6 fps +75%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	81.9 fps +12%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	73.9 fps +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	72.9 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (54.7 - 78.3, n=9)	70.4 fps -3%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	67.1 fps -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	53.9 fps -26%
Maya (maya-05)
Average of class Workstation (103 - 449, n=25, last 2 years)	268 fps +56%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (117.2 - 221, n=9)	174.5 fps +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	172 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	168.8 fps -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	162 fps -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	155.4 fps -10%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	146.4 fps -15%
Energy (energy-02)
Average of class Workstation (2.77 - 109.7, n=25, last 2 years)	51.9 fps +53%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	35.33 fps +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	33.98 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (23.9 - 36.8, n=9)	32.1 fps -6%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	28.6 fps -16%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	25.94 fps -24%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	25.76 fps -24%
Creo (creo-02)
Average of class Workstation (76.8 - 425, n=25, last 2 years)	247 fps +45%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	180.9 fps +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	170.2 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (117.1 - 207, n=8)	165.1 fps -3%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	162.1 fps -5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	160.6 fps -6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	151.8 fps -11%
Catia (catia-05)
Average of class Workstation (99.5 - 418, n=25, last 2 years)	272 fps +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	210.8 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (159.1 - 251, n=9)	205 fps -3%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	198.6 fps -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	185.8 fps -12%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	181.6 fps -14%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	166.9 fps -21%
3ds Max (3dsmax-06)
Average of class Workstation (80.8 - 288, n=24, last 2 years)	183 fps +33%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel Core i7-9850H	149.4 fps +8%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (120.5 - 165, n=9)	139.4 fps +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	137.9 fps
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Xeon W-10885M	136.2 fps -1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	129.5 fps -6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-9750H	120.3 fps -13%

SPECviewperf 2020
1920x1080 Solidworks (solidworks-05)
Average of class Workstation (50.6 - 347, n=21, last 2 years)	179.3 fps +42%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	126.4 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (106.3 - 142.3, n=9)	124.3 fps -2%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	114.4 fps -9%
1920x1080 Siemens NX (snx-04)
Average of class Workstation (22.3 - 554, n=28, last 2 years)	276 fps +48%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (136.9 - 222, n=9)	190.4 fps +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	186 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	181 fps -3%
1920x1080 Medical (medical-03)
Average of class Workstation (15.6 - 152, n=28, last 2 years)	62.1 fps +80%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	38.33 fps +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	34.49 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (27 - 38.4, n=9)	33.4 fps -3%
1920x1080 Maya (maya-06)
Average of class Workstation (102 - 660, n=28, last 2 years)	310 fps +62%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (172.4 - 266, n=9)	208 fps +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	191.5 fps
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	159.9 fps -17%
1920x1080 Energy (energy-03)
Average of class Workstation (2.78 - 109.7, n=28, last 2 years)	48.8 fps +44%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	35.71 fps +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	33.85 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (26.1 - 36.9, n=9)	32.4 fps -4%
1920x1080 Creo (creo-03)
Average of class Workstation (45.9 - 169.5, n=28, last 2 years)	110.2 fps +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	98.3 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (65.5 - 117, n=9)	97.6 fps -1%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	88.3 fps -10%
1920x1080 CATIA (catia-06)
Average of class Workstation (21 - 131.4, n=28, last 2 years)	78.5 fps +31%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	60.5 fps +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	59.7 fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (46 - 67.9, n=9)	58 fps -3%
1920x1080 3ds Max (3dsmax-07)
Average of class Workstation (28.5 - 208, n=28, last 2 years)	96.6 fps +62%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, Intel Core i9-10885H	64.1 fps +7%
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (54.4 - 72.9, n=9)	63.3 fps +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i7-11800H	59.7 fps

3DMark 06 Standard Score		36019 points
3DMark Vantage P Result		63738 points
3DMark 11 Performance		18193 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		94347 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		42670 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		13170 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		5904 points
Help

... in comparison

游戏性能

联想ThinkPad P17 G2绝对不是为游戏而生，但游戏开发可能有意义。RTX A2000装备精良，可以处理现代游戏，尽管在最高设置下，在最新的游戏中实现稳定的60 FPS并不总是可能。对于4K游戏，建议使用更强大的联想ThinkPad P17 G2版本。

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Average of class Workstation (34.9 - 298, n=23, last 2 years)	128.8 fps +34%
HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA Intel Core i9-10885H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q	115 fps +20%
Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F Intel Xeon W-10885M, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	107.4 (101^min - 116^max) fps +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE Intel Core i7-9850H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop)	101.3 fps +6%
Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T Intel Core i7-9750H, NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q	95.9 fps 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G Intel Core i7-11800H, NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	95.8 (79^min - 111^max) fps
Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU (45 - 108.6, n=9)	90.2 fps -6%

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagramm

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU: Ø51.3 (49-54)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	173	164	119	69.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)	256	160	95.8	54
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	156	133	129	121
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	131	76.3	51.6
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	115	97.9	78.5
Strange Brigade (2018)	290	135	110	95.7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	111	70.4	67.3	61.6
Hunt Showdown (2020)	169	81.2	68.6
Doom Eternal (2020)	207	110
Gears Tactics (2020)	143	125	85.1	63.9
Horizon Zero Dawn (2020)	109	77.9	70.1	54.8
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020)	118	68.6	63.7
Outriders (2021)	127	86.9	56
Days Gone (2021)	123	85.5	76.6	57.7
F1 2021 (2021)	205	137	109	50.6
Deathloop (2021)	104	64.3	50.8	42.3
New World (2021)	83.2	68.6	63.5	52.4

排放。比ThinkPad P15 G2更少的热量和噪音

系统噪音

在空闲时，联想ThinkPad P17 G2的两个风扇都保持沉默。在我们的中值负载测试中，我们测得的最大噪音水平为38.1 dB(A)，这已经相当明显了。在最大负荷下，风扇的速度进一步提高，在45 dB(A)时，接近可以承受的极限。至少，P17不会像其较小的兄弟姐妹那样吵闹，即 ThinkPad P15 G2它可以达到震耳欲聋的54.9分贝（A）。

我们没有注意到ThinkPad P17 G2的测试装置有任何线圈啸叫。

Noise Level

Idle		26.4 / 26.4 / 26.4 dB(A)
Load		38.1 / 45 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26.4 dB(A)

温度

ThinkPad在空转时仍然很凉爽。在我们的压力测试中，热点位于底座的后角附近，而底部的热点则位于后角之间的中央。最热的记录温度是125.78°F。在我们的测试中，峰值温度为129.56°F，甚至更高。 Witcher 3测试中的峰值温度甚至更高。

在压力测试期间，CPU和GPU的性能都要下降。一小时后，GPU的功耗停留在50瓦，而处理器的功率极限也在50瓦左右波动。尽管联想ThinkPad P17 G2随后不再以最大速度运行，但时钟速度仍然相对较高。在压力测试后直接进行的3DMark并没有产生明显的低分。在日常使用中，节流应该不会成为ThinkPad P17 G2用户的一个问题。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


45.7 °C	42.3 °C	49.6 °C
34.4 °C	40.9 °C	40.6 °C
25.6 °C	30 °C	29.9 °C

Maximum: 49.6 °C
Average: 37.7 °C


49.4 °C	52.1 °C	43.4 °C
49.5 °C	47.7 °C	36 °C
29.4 °C	28.7 °C	25.2 °C

Maximum: 52.1 °C
Average: 40.2 °C

Power Supply (max.) 46.5 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


25.9 °C	26 °C	25.6 °C
25.4 °C	25.7 °C	25 °C
24.6 °C	24.8 °C	24.7 °C

Maximum: 26 °C
Average: 25.3 °C


26.9 °C	27.6 °C	27 °C
25.9 °C	27.5 °C	26.8 °C
24.8 °C	25.3 °C	25.3 °C

Maximum: 27.6 °C
Average: 26.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 27.7 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


40.3 °C	37.2 °C	45.7 °C
30.2 °C	37.6 °C	38.6 °C
25.4 °C	28.8 °C	29.2 °C

Maximum: 45.7 °C
Average: 34.8 °C


48.7 °C	54.2 °C	43.8 °C
48.3 °C	46.1 °C	35.3 °C
27.6 °C	27.2 °C	24.6 °C

Maximum: 54.2 °C
Average: 39.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 42.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.7 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 32 °C / 90 F for the devices in the class Workstation.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.6 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 52.1 °C / 126 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).

发言人

与前代产品一样，联想将立体声扬声器置于ThinkPad P17 G2的键盘上方。虽然它们在低音、音量和平衡方面有所欠缺，但至少比上一代的同类产品要响亮。联想ThinkPad P73.

然而，无论你选择扬声器还是耳机，外部解决方案都是首选。专用的3.5毫米音频插孔可以完美地工作。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 44% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 94% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 3% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理。小电池满足低耗能

能源消耗

联想ThinkPad P17 G2是我们比较中唯一配备最新的Tiger Lake CPU的17英寸工作站。似乎更高效的10纳米芯片消耗的功率略低，因为FHD和4K竞争对手在空闲时都会消耗更多的功率。

专有的细长型交流适配器的额定功率为170瓦。这几乎与联想ThinkPad P17 G2在负载下的消耗完全一致。由于这个原因，更强大的P17第二代机型配备了更大的230瓦交流适配器。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.3 / 0.74 Watt
Idle	6.1 / 10.9 / 12.3 Watt
Load	106.3 / 168.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, Kioxia XG7 KXG7AZNV512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, , 3840x2160, 17.3"	Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F W-10885M, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Toshiba Kioxia XG6 KXG60PNV1T02, IPS, 3840x2400, 17"	Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS, 1920x1200, 17"	Average NVIDIA RTX A2000 Laptop GPU	Average of class Workstation
Power Consumption		-20%	-23%	-10%	-25%	-12%	-25%
Idle Minimum *	6.1	8.9 -46%	5.8 5%	6.3 -3%	11.3 -85%	6.6 ?(3.9 - 10.5, n=8) -8%	9.05 ?(2.6 - 33.8, n=28, last 2 years) -48%
Idle Average *	10.9	12.8 -17%	14.8 -36%	14.2 -30%	16 -47%	11.8 ?(7.2 - 18.1, n=8) -8%	14 ?(4 - 41.7, n=28, last 2 years) -28%
Idle Maximum *	12.3	16.4 -33%	17 -38%	17.3 -41%	16.8 -37%	16.7 ?(8.5 - 28.4, n=8) -36%	19.9 ?(5.6 - 49.7, n=28, last 2 years) -62%
Load Average *	106.3	108.4 -2%	120.4 -13%	121.2 -14%	93.6 12%	116.3 ?(82.8 - 182, n=8) -9%	95.2 ?(49.7 - 182, n=28, last 2 years) 10%
Witcher 3 ultra *	124	153 -23%	168.4 -36%	115.4 7%	106 15%
Load Maximum *	168.9	166 2%	199.8 -18%	130.7 23%	186.6 -10%	171.3 ?(124.8 - 229, n=8) -1%	166.7 ?(60.2 - 311, n=28, last 2 years) 1%

* ... smaller is better

Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø123.7 (122-127)

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø140.6 (137-169)

电池寿命

与联想ThinkPad P73相比，电池容量从99Wh缩减到94。因此，尽管该系统的功耗较低，但电池寿命也有所下降。然而，对于一个不太可能在旅行中经常使用的工作站来说，近十个小时的Wi-Fi使用时间仍然是一个可敬的结果。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 93)		9h 48min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 93)		7h 32min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		9h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 24min

	Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G i7-11800H, RTX A2000 Laptop GPU, 94 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE i7-9850H, Quadro RTX 3000 (Laptop), 99 Wh	HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA i9-10885H, Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q, 94 Wh	Dell Precision 5000 5750 P92F W-10885M, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, 97 Wh	Asus ProArt StudioBook Pro 17 W700G3T i7-9750H, Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q, 57 Wh	Average of class Workstation
Battery Runtime		6%	3%	33%	-16%	0%
H.264	568	585 3%	615 8%		412 -27%	671 ?(347 - 1067, n=8, last 2 years) 18%
WiFi v1.3	588	664 13%	455 -23%	652 11%	352 -40%	513 ?(148 - 897, n=28, last 2 years) -13%
Load	84	85 1%	104 24%	129 54%	99 18%	80.9 ?(55 - 114, n=15, last 2 years) -4%

Pros

+ 坚固的底盘

+ 功能丰富

+ ThinkPad输入设备

+ 模块化和可扩展

+ 高性能

Cons

- LCD色彩空间覆盖率（<90% sRGB

- 有宽边框的16:9 LCD

- 没有2K/QHD显示屏

- 非常大和重

- DPC延迟

结论。联想ThinkPad P17 G2在高端配置中是有意义的

工作站是为那些知道自己需要的人准备的。与ThinkPad P17 G2同属一类的系统不是为一般人使用的，而是为那些在CAD应用的帮助下设计建筑或产品的工程师准备的。

尽管牢记这一点很重要，但这并不是联想ThinkPad P17 G2的弱点的借口。过时的设计是一个明显的缺点：带有宽边框的16:9显示屏已不再具有时代性，尤其是当涉及到高端设备时。它们还使联想ThinkPad P17 G2变得不必要地大而重。另一个缺点。显示屏没有达到宣传的100% sRGB覆盖率，全高清分辨率对于17英寸屏幕来说感觉太低了。此外，有问题的DPC延迟也值得一提。

出色的输入设备、坚固的机身、多种多样的功能--P17 G2具有许多ThinkPad的典型优势。此外，还有一些特定型号的优势，如扩展性和性能。CPU的性能特别好，与较小的联想ThinkPad P15 G2不同，P17 G2的热量和噪音水平略低。在这里，宽敞的机箱绝对是有利的。

大而重，但也快而容易升级。联想ThinkPad P17 G2是一款传统的工作站。

虽然我们很乐意推荐ThinkPad P17 G2，但我们建议不要选择我们的测试配置。与更紧凑的工作站相比，这个低端型号根本没有提供足够的优势，例如惠普ZBook Fury 17.ThinkPad系统最适合那些想要最高端配置并能利用ThinkPad P17 G2的最大规格的买家。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

我们的测试配置绝对不便宜，约为2500美元。如果你是学生或有资格参加联想的教育计划，联想ThinkPad P17 G2有折扣。亚马逊列出了基本配置配备Nvidia RTX A2000的ThinkPad基本配置约为2350美元。

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G - 10/01/2021 v7 ^(old)
Benjamin Herzig

Chassis

86 / 98 → 87%

Keyboard

92%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

70 / 80 → 88%

Weight

53 / 10-66 → 76%

Battery

85 / 95 → 89%

Display

84%

Games Performance

90%

Application Performance

94%

Workstation

90%

Temperature

85 / 95 → 90%

Noise

91 / 90 → 100%

Audio

72%

Camera

24 / 85 → 28%

Average

79%

88%

Workstation - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Marius Schell - Tech Writer and translator - 398 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Stefan Hinum - Founder, CEO, CFO - 23599 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2006

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 联想ThinkPad P17 G2笔记本电脑评论。具有内部升级功能的大型工作站

Benjamin Herzig, 2021-10- 5 (Update: 2021-10- 5)

Potential competitors in comparison

ThinkPad机箱。塑料外观，镁质底架

Size comparison

连接性。联想笔记本电脑有很多端口

SD卡阅读器

沟通

网络摄像头

安全问题

维护

输入设备。ThinkPad P17 G2现在有了一个点击板

键盘

触摸板和TrackPoint

显示屏。ThinkPad采用令人失望的全高清液晶屏

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能。联想ThinkPad P17 G2的得分很高

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Dauertest

系统性能

DPC延迟

存储解决方案

Continuous read performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

GPU性能

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS-Diagramm

排放。比ThinkPad P15 G2更少的热量和噪音

系统噪音

温度

发言人

Lenovo ThinkPad P17 G2-20YU0025G audio analysis

HP ZBook Fury 17 G7 119W5EA audio analysis

Lenovo ThinkPad P73-20QR002DGE audio analysis

能源管理。小电池满足低耗能

能源消耗

Energieaufnahme Witcher 3 / Stresstest

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论。联想ThinkPad P17 G2在高端配置中是有意义的

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison