华硕 ZenBook Duo OLED 评测--配备英特尔 Arrow Lake 处理器的多屏可转换产品
多任务怪物
Zenbook Duo 是首批配备英特尔新款 Arrow Lake 移动处理器的设备之一,由于采用了多屏概念,它仍然是一款非常有趣的设备。我们的测试设备安装了两块 14 英寸 FHD 分辨率的 OLED 屏幕,这尤其有助于延长电池寿命。Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
结论 - 由于采用了 Arrow Lake 技术,Zenbook Duo 的 CPU/GPU 性能提高了约 20
2025 年,Zenbook Duo 凭借其两块 OLED 屏幕,继续成为一款极其令人兴奋的可折叠产品。由于两个屏幕提供相同的功能,因此高效工作不成问题,而且可以移动窗口,不会出现任何缩放问题。由于内置脚架和出色的可拆卸键盘,Zenbook Duo 有多种使用方式。其整体概念的缺点是重量较重,机身厚度不足 2 厘米。此外,它的维护选项非常有限,因为你必须拆开一半设备才能访问 M.2 2280 SSD。华硕还稍微改变了端口的分布,现在两侧都有一个 USB-C 端口,非常方便。
Zenbook Duo 是首批使用英特尔全新 Arrow Lake H 移动处理器的设备之一。这些处理器是流星湖一代的直接后续产品,处理器和显卡的性能都提高了 20% 以上。不过,它的功耗限制仍然很低,尤其是在连续负载的情况下,而且笔记本电脑无法充分利用 酷睿至尊 9 285H的性能潜力。与高效的 Lunar Lake 处理器不同,Arrow Lake 芯片使用的是较弱的 NPU,这也是该设备缺少 Copilot+ 官方认证的原因。即便如此,网络摄像头的 Studio Effects 或实时字幕等功能仍然可用,这意味着这对最终用户的影响并不大。
与去年的机型一样,你可以选择两种不同的 OLED 版本。120 Hz 的 2.8K 面板适用于最昂贵的版本,价格约为 2,600 美元,而我们的测试设备(价格约为 2,170 美元)配备的是 60 Hz 的 1200p 型号。频率较低是最明显的问题,但从主观上看,屏幕的画面仍然非常出色,而且除了分辨率和频率外,两种屏幕型号的规格也不相上下。笔记本电脑的功耗以及电池续航时间都得益于 1200p OLED 屏幕,这对于移动设备来说绝对是一个值得考虑的因素。
华硕 Zenbook Duo 仍然是无与伦比的,因为目前市场上没有任何其他设备可以在不做出任何真正妥协的情况下实现如此多功能的使用。联想的 Yoga Book但在这种情况下,它的无线键盘必须外置,打字感觉并不舒适,而且整体性能也明显较低。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
新款 Zenbook Duo OLED 可能会在二月底上市。
可能的替代品比较
Image | Model / Review | Price | Weight | Height | Display |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Intel Core Ultra 9 285H ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 140T ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,499.99 ASUS Zenbook Duo Laptop, Dua... 2. $1,435.00 ASUS Zenbook Duo 2-in-1 Lapt... 3. $39.99 Smatree Hard EVA Protective ... List Price: 2099€ | 1.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" 1920x1200 162 PPI OLED | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA Intel Core Ultra 9 185H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,499.99 List Price: 2499€ | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U ⎘ Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ⎘ 16 GB Memory | Amazon: $2,119.99 List Price: 2000 USD | 1.4 kg | 15.95 mm | 13.30" 2880x1800 255 PPI OLED | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 226V ⎘ Intel Arc Graphics 130V ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD | Amazon: 1. $1,549.99 SAMSUNG 16” Galaxy Book5 P... 2. $1,349.99 SAMSUNG 15.6” Galaxy Book5... 3. $1,349.99 SAMSUNG Galaxy Book3 Pro 360... List Price: 1799€ | 1.7 kg | 12.8 mm | 16.00" 2880x1800 212 PPI OLED | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 1024 GB SSD | Amazon: $1,599.00 List Price: 1550 USD | 1.3 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155H ⎘ Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU ⎘ 32 GB Memory, 2048 GB SSD | Amazon: List Price: 1899€ | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" 2880x1800 243 PPI OLED |
去年,华硕推出了 Zenbook Duo,这是一款有趣的可折叠产品,功能非常全面,配备了两个 14 英寸 OLED 面板和一个可拆卸的蓝牙键盘。最重要的是,两块相同的面板在使用过程中被证明是一大优势。当时,Zenbook Duo 配备了英特尔流星湖处理器(Meteor Lake Processor),而现在,2025 版 Zenbook Duo 是首批配备英特尔全新箭湖移动处理器的设备之一。在我们的测试设备(MRSP 约 2170 美元)中,全新的酷睿 Ultra 9 285H 与 32 GB 内存和 1 TB 固态硬盘配合使用。与去年的测试设备不同的是,现在安装了两块 60 Hz 的全高清 OLED 显示屏,这就是为什么它的画质会受到一定影响,但电池续航时间却更长的原因。价格约为 2,600 美元(32 GB 内存、2 TB 固态硬盘)的机型仍采用 120 Hz 的 3K OLED 显示屏。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
规格
外壳和连接
总体而言,新款 Zenbook Duo 的设计与前代产品并无不同。从外观上看,我们可以看到与普通 Zenbook 有很多相似之处,包括屏幕盖上的大型 ProArt 标志。外壳(镁合金)的制造质量和稳定性都非常好。除了普通屏幕外,Zenbook Duo 还在底座顶部配备了另一块 OLED 触摸屏。再加上可拆卸键盘,这就为您提供了一个用途广泛的可转换设备。为了支撑 Zenbook Duo,底部有一个内置脚架,一般来说效果不错。不过,如果你想在所谓的桌面模式下使用两个屏幕(就像一本打开的书),这个解决方案还是不太理想,因为主屏幕会稍微向后折叠。不过,总的来说,这个概念还是非常有效的。不过,它的厚度略低于 2 厘米,重量接近 1.8 千克(包括键盘),比普通的 14 英寸可折叠机要重得多,也厚得多。
在谈到笔记本的连接时,华硕已将我们的批评铭记于心,并改变了其布局,现在两侧都有一个 USB-C 端口(Thunderbolt 4)。此外,它现在还使用了现代 W-Fi 7 模块,在我们使用华硕参考路由器进行的测试中,其传输速率非常高。它的 1080p 网络摄像头也能正常工作,而且还支持高级 Studio 效果。不过,官方称新的 Arrow Lake 设备不是 Copilot+ 设备,因为 NPU 太弱。除了 Studio Effects,Zenbook 还支持 Windows live 字幕等功能。不过,由于采用了第二块屏幕,访问所有组件都比较困难。首先要通过底部的一个小挡板松开两个连接处,然后才能进一步拆开外壳。内部安装了一个 M.2 2280 固态硬盘,理论上可以更换,但这需要拆下天线电缆、连接电缆和部分主板。
Networking | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
可持续性
Zenbook Duo 的外壳由 90% 的可回收材料制成,包装则是 100% 的可回收材料。该设备还符合各种环保标准,如能源之星、EPEAT Gold 和 RoHS。没有提供生产过程中产生的二氧化碳排放量的信息,也没有提供维修说明。
输入设备
除了两个触摸屏外,该设备当然还支持使用附带的华硕笔 2.0 进行笔输入,而且效果非常好。不过,我们眼中真正的亮点是可拆卸的键盘装置,它通过磁铁牢固地吸附在外壳上。键盘的键程为 1.4 毫米,按键安静,而且具有很高的硬度,带来非常舒适的打字体验。在这方面,Zenbook Duo 甚至比一些普通笔记本电脑更具优势。ClickPad 也非常好用,能发出清脆的咔哒声。
蓝牙键盘配有电池,可以通过 USB-C 接口充电,但只要把它放在底座上,它就会连接到 pogo pins,键盘就会自动充电。据华硕称,键盘中的电池续航时间长达 24 小时。三级白色背光可通过传感器激活。
显示屏 - 1200p 双 OLED
Zenbook Duo 配备了两块相同的 14 英寸 OLED 面板,因此可以同时使用两块屏幕而不会出现任何问题(画质相同,移动窗口时不会出现缩放问题)。去年的测试设备配备了两块高分辨率 OLED,分辨率为 2.8K,频率为 120 Hz,而我们目前的测试配置则是两块全高清 OLED,频率为 60 Hz。除此之外,其他功能都是一样的。屏幕的亮度可以通过传感器自动调节,但色温不能自动调节。
它们的画质总体上非常好,只有在明亮的内容上仔细观察才能看到轻微的光栅效应,但这在日常使用中应该不会很明显。我们测得的 SDR 最大亮度平均为 362 cd/m²,再加上低黑度,这就形成了 OLED 典型的高对比度。在 HDR 模式下(必须手动激活),我们发现在显示小幅图像时亮度最高可达 625 cd/m²,在显示几乎全白的图像时亮度最高可达 601 cd/m²。屏幕的响应速度非常快,而且没有背光出血现象,不过在亮度为 86% 或更低时,屏幕确实会以 480 Hz 的频率闪烁。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 359 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.9
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA ATNA40CT02-0, OLED, 1920x1200, 14", 60 Hz | Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA SDC419D, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 SDC ATNA33AA02-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3", 60 Hz | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 ATNA60CL09-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 16", 120 Hz | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng SDC4197, OLED, 2880x1800, 14", 120 Hz | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 4% | 4% | 4% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 98.4 | 99.6 1% | 99.7 1% | 99.9 2% | 99.8 1% | 99.8 1% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.8 | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.7 | 91.8 6% | 97 12% | 96.6 11% | 97.3 12% | 89.3 3% |
Response Times | 31% | -55% | 24% | 8% | 31% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.51 ? | 0.77 ? 49% | 1.88 ? -25% | 0.48 ? 68% | 0.8 ? 47% | 0.77 ? 49% |
Response Time Black / White * | 1.36 ? | 0.76 ? 44% | 2.1 ? -54% | 0.64 ? 53% | 1 ? 26% | 0.75 ? 45% |
PWM Frequency | 480 ? | 480 ? 0% | 60 ? -87% | 240 ? -50% | 240.5 ? -50% | 480 0% |
Screen | -1% | -73% | 16% | -78% | 7% | |
Brightness middle | 359 | 381 6% | 362.6 1% | 387 8% | 371.6 4% | 378 5% |
Brightness | 362 | 384 6% | 368 2% | 392 8% | 373 3% | 384 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 97 -1% | 98 0% | 99 1% | 97 -1% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.2 | 1.6 -33% | 4.66 -288% | 1 17% | 4.91 -309% | 1.4 -17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3.2 | 2 37% | 7.25 -127% | 1.9 41% | 8.33 -160% | 2.2 31% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 2.6 -24% | 2.6 -24% | 1.7 19% | 2.2 -5% | 1.7 19% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.2 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 6433 101% | 6784 96% | 6055 107% | 6325 103% | 6120 106% | 6256 104% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.56 | 1.59 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
8% | -41% /
-49% | 15% /
15% | -22% /
-36% | 13% /
12% |
* ... smaller is better
我们使用专业的 CalMAN 软件对笔记本的显示效果进行了分析。像往常一样,华硕提供了各种配置文件,默认情况下 "原生 "配置文件处于激活状态,但遗憾的是,该配置文件显示的色彩有些过饱和。开箱即用的 P3 配置文件非常准确。此外,还有一个 sRGB 配置文件,两种色彩空间都完全覆盖。我们使用自己的校准无法进一步改善其显示效果。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
1.36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.74 ms rise | |
↘ 0.62 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.81 ms rise | |
↘ 0.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.7 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 480 Hz Amplitude: 14 % | ≤ 86 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 480 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 86 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 480 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8627 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在室外,闪亮的屏幕在反光方面很吃力,尤其是在明亮的环境中。除了在广角时会有轻微的蓝色光泽(这是 OLED 的典型特征),我们在视角稳定性方面没有发现任何问题。
性能 - 箭湖-H
全新的 Zenbook Duo 只配备了英特尔全新的 Arrow Lake H 处理器(Core Ultra 7 或 Core Ultra 9),与 16 或 32 GB 内存(LPDDR5x-7467)组合在一起。内存是焊接在一起的,不能扩展。
测试条件
用户可以选择四种不同的能源配置文件,这些配置文件也与 Windows 设置相关联。我们在标准模式下进行了以下基准测试和测量。使用其他两种模式可以略微提高 CPU 性能,但这也会导致风扇噪音明显增大。
能源概况 | TDP | CB 2024 Multi | Time Spy 图形 | 最大风扇噪音排放 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Whisper | 28 瓦 | 13,144 点 | 3,726 点 | 33.2 dB(A) |
标准 | 60/35/24 瓦 | 16,632 点 | 4,074 点 | 39.8 dB(A) |
性能 | 60/45/35 瓦 | 17,249 分 | 4,103 分 | 50.2 分贝(A) |
全速 | 60/45/35 瓦 | 18,758 分 | 4,105 分 | 54.3 分贝(A) |
处理器 - Core Ultra 9 285H
我们的测试设备配备了箭湖 H 系列的全新顶级型号,即 英特尔酷睿至尊 9 285H.它是流星湖处理器的后继型号,共有 16 个 CPU 内核(6 倍性能、8 倍效率、2 倍低功耗效率)。有关新移动处理器的更多详情,请参阅我们的分析文章。根据英特尔的说法,Arrow Lake H 芯片的运行功耗再次达到 28-115 瓦,因此设备的功耗限制和散热再次对性能产生了重大影响。就 Zenbook Duo 而言,我们注意到它的功耗在短时间内高达 60 瓦,随后为 35 瓦,而在较长时间的负载情况下,其功耗趋于平稳,约为 24 瓦。因此,酷睿至尊 9 285H 的性能潜力无法得到充分发挥。
与旧版 酷睿至尊 9 185H在所有基准测试中,我们测得的优势约为 20%,这是一个不错的结果。不过,它的性能下降很快,这在短时间运行的 CB-R15 循环中尤为明显。运行 25 次后,其多核性能骤降近 40%。在电池模式下,性能没有进一步下降。更多 CPU 基准测试 此处.
Cinebench R15 Multi continuous test
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 6.3: Multi-Core | Single-Core
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (16632 - 20442, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Average of class Convertible (2949 - 18698, n=60, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (2126 - 2163, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Average of class Convertible (914 - 2163, n=60, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (6517 - 7920, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average of class Convertible (1124 - 7303, n=60, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (810 - 827, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Convertible (348 - 827, n=59, last 2 years) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (2797 - 3282, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Average of class Convertible (478 - 2889, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (313 - 314, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 313, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Convertible (175 - 1051, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (197 - 235, n=2) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (53335 - 60639, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (5999 - 6138, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (15330 - 17992, n=4) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Convertible (2291 - 15476, n=46, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Geekbench 6.3 / Single-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (2665 - 3110, n=4) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Average of class Convertible (1003 - 2814, n=47, last 2 years) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (14243 - 16626, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Convertible (2188 - 14243, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (1982 - 2096, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Average of class Convertible (806 - 2062, n=58, last 2 years) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (18.8 - 23.6, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Convertible (3.43 - 22.4, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Average of class Convertible (42.7 - 84.3, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (44 - 52.1, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 0.84, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (0.427 - 0.4343, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (15160 - 18797, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (2179 - 29594, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (78572 - 93122, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (11392 - 114033, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (3695 - 4281, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (797 - 4841, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (22413 - 120368, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (61461 - 66818, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (7275 - 7852, n=2) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average of class Convertible (1120 - 16315, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (40946 - 48804, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (5749 - 61249, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (58110 - 67900, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average of class Convertible (21774 - 169089, n=58, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (886 - 1012, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (218 - 1243, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (7741 - 9920, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (1169 - 16065, n=58, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (58844 - 58848, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Average of class Convertible (13761 - 58848, n=58, last 2 years) |
系统性能
与前代机型相比,它的系统基准也有所改进,但这在日常使用中并不明显,因为旧款 Zenbook Duo 已经是一款反应非常灵敏的设备。该系统还能很好地应对多屏操作,在我们的测试中也没有出现稳定性问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
WebXPRT 3: Overall
WebXPRT 4: Overall
Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (7514 - 7838, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Convertible (3229 - 7963, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (10931 - 11171, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Convertible (7233 - 11912, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (8818 - 9594, n=2) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (4777 - 10800, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (11948 - 12193, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (2496 - 12360, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1812 - 2173, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Convertible (524 - 1912, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1693 - 2050, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average of class Convertible (554 - 1790, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (2125 - 2377, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average of class Convertible (550 - 2183, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (1375 - 1981, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Average of class Convertible (381 - 1868, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng |
WebXPRT 3 / Overall | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (280 - 358, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Average of class Convertible (171 - 426, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 |
WebXPRT 4 / Overall | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (254 - 324, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average of class Convertible (91.2 - 314, n=57, last 2 years) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total | |
Average of class Convertible (407 - 1089, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T (422 - 464, n=2) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 Score | 7514 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (88278 - 97612, n=2) | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Average of class Convertible (29473 - 108544, n=58, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (79730 - 80277, n=2) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Average of class Convertible (28905 - 126517, n=58, last 2 years) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (62446 - 75619, n=2) | |
Average of class Convertible (30110 - 117920, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Average Intel Core Ultra 9 285H (130.7 - 133.1, n=2) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的标准化延迟测试(上网、4K YouTube 播放、CPU 负载)中,我们的测试设备在当前 BIOS 版本下没有显示出任何限制。虽然有一个异常值,但重要的 "中断到进程延迟 "值非常低。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
我们的测试设备安装了 1 TB 版本的西部数据 SN5000S,用户在首次启动笔记本电脑后仍可使用 870 GB。在测试过程中,PCIe 4.0 固态硬盘的性能非常出色,即使在长时间负载的情况下也能保持稳定。因此,这方面没有任何问题。更多固态硬盘基准测试请参见 技术部分.
* ... smaller is better
Reading continuous performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
酷睿超 9 285H 的集成显卡名为 Intel Arc Graphics 140T,是带有 8 个 Xe 核心的旧版 Intel Arc Graphics 的改进版。它继续使用第一代产品的 Xe 核心,因此从技术上讲,与英特尔 Arc Graphics 140V 已经有了明显的区别。 英特尔弧形显卡 140V的明显区别。所有其他技术细节请参见我们的 GPU 分析文章。
在合成基准测试中,新款 140T 比配备 8 个 Xe 核心的老款 Arc Graphics 领先约 20%,但 Arc Graphics 140V 几乎不相上下。但在实际游戏基准测试中,Lunar Lake GPU 在某些情况下优势明显。不过,与旧款 Zenbook Duo 相比,它的优势仍然超过 20%。英特尔 iGPU 现在还支持特定游戏中的帧生成功能,这一点带来了明显的不同,我们在 GPU 分析中对此进行了更深入的研究。无论是在电池模式下还是在长时间负载情况下,它的性能都保持稳定。
3DMark 11 Performance | 14934 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9595 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4330 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 834 points | |
3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 3620 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Average of class Convertible (269 - 2067, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Average Intel Arc Graphics 140T (341 - 417, n=2) |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 -1! | |
Average of class Convertible | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng -2! | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA -2! | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 -2! |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (FSR off) | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Convertible (8.2 - 83.5, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Baldur's Gate 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Average of class Convertible (9.2 - 63.1, n=20, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Convertible (7.2 - 114.3, n=48, last 2 years) | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average of class Convertible (4.48 - 107.1, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average of class Convertible (10.8 - 196.9, n=53, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Average of class Convertible (18.8 - 158.3, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP G9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 16 UM5606WA-RK052W | |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA | |
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 | |
Asus Zenbook S 14 UX5406 Core Ultra 9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s Gen 6 21M2S00G00 | |
Average of class Convertible (12.8 - 101.4, n=58, last 2 years) | |
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng | |
Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA | |
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 | |
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 172 | 161.1 | 41.7 | 16.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 105.6 | 83.5 | 80.1 | 69.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 80.6 | 46.9 | 29.4 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 56.3 | 44.7 | 38.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 80 | 48 | 45 | 38 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 200 | 90.2 | 75.1 | 61.2 |
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) | 39.4 | 30.7 | 25.7 | 24.4 |
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) | 37.6 | 32.3 | 27.7 | 24.1 |
F1 24 (2024) | 77.7 | 69.5 | 56.6 | 19.3 |
排放与能源
噪音排放
两个风扇的整体噪音发展与前代机型相当。在标准模式下,执行简单任务时通常会完全停止散热。在较高负载情况下(如游戏、CPU 负载或压力测试),我们测得的最大噪音为 39.8 dB(A),这当然清晰可闻,但还不至于令人讨厌。在耳语模式下(该模式也能为日常工作提供足够的性能),Zenbook Duo 仍然安静得多,最大噪音为 33.2 dB(A)。而在两种更快的模式(性能模式和全速模式)下,噪音则超过了 50 分贝(A),令人不快。在测试阶段,我们的测试设备没有发出其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23.6 / 23.6 / 23.6 dB(A) |
Load |
| 39.8 / 39.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.6 dB(A) |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 | Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -3% | 11% | 3% | -1% | 8% | |
off / environment * | 23.6 | 24 -2% | 23.3 1% | 23.6 -0% | 23.2 2% | 23.4 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 23.6 | 24 -2% | 23.3 1% | 23.6 -0% | 23.6 -0% | 23.4 1% |
Idle Average * | 23.6 | 24 -2% | 23.3 1% | 23.6 -0% | 23.6 -0% | 23.4 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 23.6 | 26.7 -13% | 24.6 -4% | 23.6 -0% | 25 -6% | 25.6 -8% |
Load Average * | 39.8 | 39.4 1% | 26.2 34% | 29.4 26% | 34.8 13% | 25.6 36% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 39.8 | 40.6 -2% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 39.8 | 39.4 1% | 27.3 31% | 40.6 -2% | 46.2 -16% | 32.6 18% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.4 | 27.3 | 37.7 | 30.9 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
与旧型号相比,其表面温度没有大的变化。在空闲模式和执行简单任务时,机箱保持非常凉爽。在负载情况下,我们注意到底部中上部区域有一个热点,但 47 °C绝非危急情况,您仍可将其放在大腿上而不受任何限制。键盘的温度仍然很低,不过由于它是一个独立的组件,因此自然会对你有所帮助。在压力测试中,处理器最初短暂达到 60 瓦,几分钟后稳定在 35 瓦,之后又降至 24 瓦左右(旧型号约为 20 瓦)。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.3 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.2 °C / 86 F.
(+) 3: The average temperature for the upper side is 31.5 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.2 °C / 86 F for the class Convertible.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.5 °C / 83.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (-0.5 °C / -0.9 F).
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, Intel Arc Graphics 140T | Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA Intel Core Ultra 9 185H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155U, Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Intel Core Ultra 5 226V, Intel Arc Graphics 130V | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -8% | -12% | 1% | -17% | 2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 35.3 | 35.6 -1% | 39.2 -11% | 40.9 -16% | 40 -13% | 39.3 -11% |
Maximum Bottom * | 47.2 | 46.6 1% | 41 13% | 45.1 4% | 43 9% | 45 5% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.8 | 27.1 -9% | 32.2 -30% | 23.8 4% | 32 -29% | 23.8 4% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.2 | 32.3 -23% | 31.6 -21% | 23.5 10% | 35.2 -34% | 24 8% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
立体声扬声器的性能依然非常出色,但对比设备的性能都差不多。
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 10.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 3% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 96% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
耗电量
功耗测量结果表明,全高清 OLED 显示屏比我们在前代机型上测试的 2.8K 机型更具优势。不过,在负载情况下,两款产品并无太大差异,这并不奇怪,因为它们的功率限制完全相同。在压力测试中,我们测得的最大功率为 65 瓦,很快就降到了 54 瓦,然后又降到了 45 瓦左右。因此,从原则上讲,65 瓦的紧凑型电源在体积上已经足够。不过,其 1.1 瓦的待机功耗略高,也高于旧型号(0.71 瓦)。
Off / Standby | 0.42 / 1.1 Watt |
Idle | 4.1 / 8.2 / 8.7 Watt |
Load |
56.7 / 65.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Arc 140T, Ultra 9 285H, Western Digital PC SN5000S SDEQNSJ-1T00 | Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA Arc 8-Core, Ultra 9 185H, WD PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00 | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Graphics 4-Core, Ultra 7 155U | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Arc 130V, Core Ultra 5 226V, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZVL4512HBLU | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Samsung PM9C1a MZAL81T0HDLB | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Arc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Kioxia XG8 KXG80ZNV2T04 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -23% | -37% | 8% | -9% | 28% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.1 | 6.9 -68% | 7.1 -73% | 5.3 -29% | 4.2 -2% | 3.2 22% |
Idle Average * | 8.2 | 10.2 -24% | 9.1 -11% | 6.7 18% | 7.1 13% | 4.2 49% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.7 | 10.9 -25% | 18.4 -111% | 7.3 16% | 12.9 -48% | 4.9 44% |
Load Average * | 56.7 | 52.8 7% | 51.3 10% | 37.6 34% | 58.9 -4% | 40.5 29% |
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra * | 48.7 | 44.6 8% | ||||
Cyberpunk 2077 ultra external monitor * | 47 | 42.8 9% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 65.1 | 67.1 -3% | 65.5 -1% | 64.1 2% | 66.7 -2% | 68.6 -5% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.2 | 41.5 | 49.5 | 37.9 |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Cyberpunk / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
运行时间
75 Wh 的电池没有任何变化,但屏幕分辨率/频率的降低对笔记本电脑的电池运行时间产生了积极影响。在 150 cd/m²(相当于我们测试设备最大 SDR 亮度的 70%)的 WLAN 测试中,在显示屏激活的情况下,其运行时间从略低于 9.5 小时增加到略高于 11 小时。在全亮度条件下,我们注意到它的运行时间略低于 8.5 小时,而上一代产品的运行时间为 7 小时。不出所料,在使用两个有源显示屏的情况下,其运行时间有所缩短,但在 150 cd/m² 下为 8:17 小时,在全亮度下为 6 小时,这样的成绩并不差。在 150 cd/m² 和单屏的视频测试中,我们甚至记录了近 17 个小时,比之前多了近 3.5 个小时。
不过,其更好的成绩主要归功于显示屏,而不是新的处理器。因此,如果您选择配备 2.8K OLED 显示屏,您可以使用我们的 2024 评测中的运行时间作为参考。在设备开启的情况下,充满电需要 110 分钟,大约 65 分钟后可恢复 80% 的电量。
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA Ultra 9 285H, Arc 140T, 75 Wh | Asus Zenbook Duo OLED UX8406MA Ultra 9 185H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Book 9 13IMU9 Ultra 7 155U, Graphics 4-Core, 80 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro 360 Core Ultra 5 226V, Arc 130V, 76 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 9 2-in-1 14IMH9 Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 Wh | HP Spectre x360 14-eu0078ng Ultra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 68 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -18% | -9% | 7% | -10% | -10% | -13% | |
H.264 | 1015 | 820 -19% | 1181 16% | 999 -2% | 837 ? -18% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 667 | 561 -16% | 608 -9% | 646 -3% | 600 -10% | 555 -17% | 616 ? -8% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
Zenbook Duo 仍然是一款非常令人兴奋的多屏可转换产品。我们测试机型采用的 1200p OLED 屏幕虽然无法达到更昂贵配置的 2.8K 屏幕的画质,但却降低了功耗,从而延长了笔记本电脑的电池续航时间。新的 Arrow Lake 处理器的 CPU 性能比以前提高了约 20%,但总体而言,Zenbook Duo 的功耗限制仍然很低(尤其是在长时间负载的情况下),无法充分发挥酷睿至尊 9 285H 的性能潜力。
Asus ZenBook Duo OLED UX8406CA
- 02/08/2025 v8
Andreas Osthoff
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.