结论 - 一款运行时间较长的中档手机
喜欢轻薄小巧智能手机的用户一定会喜欢 Pixel 9a,因为它的摄像头几乎与机身背部齐平,虽然尺寸有所增大,但它仍然是市场上最小巧的Android 智能手机之一。
它的显示屏亮度超高,但没有使用高频 PWM 调光,我们测试设备的照明并不完全均匀。虽然 Tensor G4 的峰值性能在同价位产品中较高,但从长远来看,它的节流现象非常严重。此外,小巧的存储配置也略显局促。
即便如此,Pixel 9a 还是一款不错的中端智能手机,电池续航时间长,通过了 IP68 认证,支持无线充电、eSIM 卡和较长的更新交付期。其背面的摄像头也能带来不错的效果。
Pros
Cons
价格和供应情况
您可以直接通过谷歌在线商店订购 Pixel 9a。.
Table of Contents
- 结论 - 一款运行时间较长的中档手机
- 规格谷歌 Pixel 9a
- 外壳 - Pixel 9a 现已通过 IP68 认证
- 连接性 - 入门级机型,存储空间有限
- 软件 - Pixel 9a 的 7 年更新
- 通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 6 千兆赫无线局域网,带手刹
- 电话功能和通话质量
- 相机 - Pixel 9a 的出色照片
- 配件和保修 - 进一步缩小供货范围
- 输入设备和操作 - 配备光学指纹传感器的 Pixel 9a
- 显示屏 - 高达 120 Hz 的明亮 pOLED 显示屏
- 性能 - 配备张量 G4 的 Pixel 9a
- 游戏 - 并非总是稳定的 60fps
- 排放 - 散热不良导致 Pixel 9a 运行速度减慢
- 电池寿命 - 大容量电池,续航时间长
- Notebookcheck 总评分
- 可能的替代品比较
谷歌 Pixel 9a 继 8a的脚步,带来了设计上的变化和更大的显示屏。它的电池容量也大幅增加,手机的 SoC 也得到了升级。此外,手机的防水性能也得到了提升。
虽然它具有新的人工智能功能,但与旗舰机型相比,这些功能已被精简了一些。谷歌智能手机的价格保持不变,MRSP 为 499 美元(128 GB)和 599 美元(256 GB)。
规格谷歌 Pixel 9a
外壳 - Pixel 9a 现已通过 IP68 认证
谷歌 Pixel 9a 有四种颜色可供选择:Iris(淡紫色)、Poeny(珊瑚色)、Porcelain(白色)和 Obsidian(黑色)。从外观上看,它变得更加棱角分明,尽管与 Pixel 8a 的机身高度相同,却显得更厚一些。 像素 8a.它的摄像头模块现在变得更小、更扁平,仅突出机身 0.55 毫米。
由于所有缝隙都严丝合缝、均匀一致,其制造质量非常出色。后盖和边框之间只有一些轻微的不规则。磨砂铝质边框不易沾染指纹,触感良好。当试图扭转时,Pixel 9a 看起来很牢固,但确实会发出轻微的吱吱声。
这款谷歌手机通过了 IP68 认证,因此既能防尘又能防水。它的正面使用了康宁大猩猩 3 号玻璃,谷歌本可以采用更现代、更耐用的玻璃。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
连接性 - 入门级机型,存储空间有限
软件 - Pixel 9a 的 7 年更新
可持续性
谷歌在其网站上提供了一份https://sustainability.google/reports/google-pixel-9a-product-environmental-report/Pixel 9a 的可持续发展报告。外包装完全不使用塑料。除了回收铝,手机背面还使用了 81% 的回收塑料。根据重量计算,这款智能手机由 23% 的可回收材料制成。
维修说明和备件通过iFixit 提供和分发。.
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 6 千兆赫无线局域网,带手刹
好消息是,Pixel 9a 支持包括 6 GHz 频段在内的 Wi-Fi 6E。但遗憾的是,它只支持 2x2 MIMO,因此传输速率并不比使用传统 Wi-Fi 6 时高。
Pixel 9a 支持广泛的蜂窝通信频率,因此长途旅行应该不成问题。我们在城市环境中没有发现接收问题。
Networking | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average Wi-Fi 6E | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Average of class Smartphone | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
电话功能和通话质量
谷歌 Pixel 9a 为 Nano SIM 卡预留了空间,同时还支持 eSIM 卡,可同时用于双卡双待操作。它还支持 WLAN 通话和 VoLTE。
当把 Pixel 9a 放在耳边时,只要周围的噪音不是太大,它就能显示出良好的语音通话质量。繁忙的主干道可能足以让 Pixel 用户无法听清声音。免提模式在安静的环境中也没有问题,即使距离手机 2 米远,我们在测试中也能很好地听懂。
相机 - Pixel 9a 的出色照片
前置摄像头具有均衡的色彩还原、不错的清晰度和良好的 HDR 特性。您最多可以以 30fps 的速度录制超高清视频。质量不错,但在快速移动时,拍摄对象并不总是对焦。
谷歌为其主摄像头配备了新的传感器,分辨率为 4800 万像素,低于 像素 8a-但 Pixel 9a 的传感器更大。由于进行了像素分选,照片的大小只有 1200 万像素,用户无法在 9a 上使用全分辨率。这款智能手机的拍照效果不错,高水平的细节和均衡的图像构图给人留下了深刻印象。虽然在弱光环境下细节水平会有所下降,但照片仍然给人留下了良好的印象。
附加的超广角镜头效果不错,但在拍摄近距离物体(微距模式)时,外围区域很早就会变得模糊;但这不适用于全景拍摄。这款手机只能进行数字变焦。放大倍率最高为 2 倍,在日光下拍摄效果非常好,但超过这个倍率,伪影就会清晰可见。最大变焦可达 8 倍。
Pixel 9a 最多能以 60fps 的速度录制超高清视频。如果限制在 30fps,则可以使用两个镜头进行录制,并在拍摄过程中进行切换。数字变焦仅限于 5 倍放大。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light在可控光照条件下,谷歌 Pixel 9a 的色彩表现良好,没有出现任何重大异常。浅肤色的显示有点偏红,只有在显示青色时,其 DeltaE 值才会超过 10。我们的测试图依然细节丰富,边缘清晰。


配件和保修 - 进一步缩小供货范围
谷歌 Pixel 9a 配备了 USB-C 数据线和 SIM 卡工具。谷歌取消了 OTG 适配器,但如果需要,你仍可以单独购买。谷歌还通过其网站提供手机壳和配套的电源适配器。
在美国,这款手机享有 12 个月的标准保修服务,不能延长或扩展保修期。
输入设备和操作 - 配备光学指纹传感器的 Pixel 9a
显示屏 - 高达 120 Hz 的明亮 pOLED 显示屏
|
Brightness Distribution: 76 %
Center on Battery: 1978 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.84
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Google Pixel 9a pOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3" | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7" | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8" | Apple iPhone 16e OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1" | Google Pixel 8a AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -19% | 0% | -11% | 13% | -6% | |
Brightness middle | 1978 | 1184 -40% | 1210 -39% | 1318 -33% | 833 -58% | 1518 -23% |
Brightness | 1775 | 1179 -34% | 1222 -31% | 1306 -26% | 837 -53% | 1466 -17% |
Brightness Distribution | 76 | 99 30% | 92 21% | 98 29% | 99 30% | 88 16% |
Black Level * | ||||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.1 | 1.7 -55% | 1 9% | 1.5 -36% | 0.7 36% | 1.2 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 3 | 3.2 -7% | 2.7 10% | 2.9 3% | 1.6 47% | 3.3 -10% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 2.4 -9% | 1.5 32% | 2.3 -5% | 0.6 73% | 2 9% |
Gamma | 2.22 99% | 2.12 104% | 2.25 98% | 2.26 97% | 2.19 100% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6622 98% | 6544 99% | 6509 100% | 6819 95% | 6525 100% | 6786 96% |
* ... smaller is better
Display / APL18 Peak Brightness | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Apple iPhone 16e |
Display / HDR Peak Brightness | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Apple iPhone 16e |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 240 Hz Amplitude: 12.82 % | ||
The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8363 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
0.81 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4405 ms rise | |
↘ 0.367 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
0.93 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.4575 ms rise | |
↘ 0.474 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms). |
性能 - 配备张量 G4 的 Pixel 9a
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (35227 - 37104, n=4) | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 81594, n=151, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
Geekbench AI | |
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 1501, n=52, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (n=1) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (n=1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (51 - 9453, n=52, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2 | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (n=1) | |
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 13084, n=52, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro |
集成 ARM Mali-G715 MP7负责图形计算。它不支持光线追踪,运行速度似乎比 Pixel 9 Pro 中名义上相同的变体要慢一些。 Pixel 9 Pro和 co 中的相同型号相比,运行速度似乎要慢一些,但这也可能是由于散热较差造成的。
相比之下,它的性能仍然很高,只有 iPhone 16e 超越了它。 iPhone 16e超越。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
3DMark / Solar Bay Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro |
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro |
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro |
浏览器基准测试结果喜忧参半。虽然 Pixel 9a 在 Octane 2.0 或 Speedometer 3.0 中如愿获得了第二名,但在其他基准测试中的表现却出人意料地弱。
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132) | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (102 - 117.5, n=4) | |
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18) | |
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137) | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (182 - 248, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=144, last 2 years) | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 135) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132) |
Speedometer 3.0 - Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18) | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (14.7 - 15.8, n=4) | |
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137) | |
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 135) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132) |
WebXPRT 4 - Overall | |
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=156, last 2 years) | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132) | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (90 - 112, n=4) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18) | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (52224 - 62374, n=5) | |
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=212, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=165, last 2 years) | |
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137) | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132) | |
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126) | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134) | |
Average Google Tensor G4 (699 - 1081, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134) | |
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18) |
* ... smaller is better
在我们的测试中,谷歌 Pixel 9a 的 UFS 3.1 存储速度很高,但在连续写入时速度可能会更快一些。
Google Pixel 9a | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | Google Pixel 8a | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -8% | -23% | -1% | -30% | -7% | 42% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1688.82 | 1634.8 -3% | 992.72 -41% | 996.23 -41% | 1509.65 -11% | 1581 ? -6% | 2082 ? 23% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 853.5 | 999.95 17% | 931.68 9% | 970.63 14% | 255.31 -70% | 742 ? -13% | 1687 ? 98% |
Random Read 4KB | 241.03 | 207.01 -14% | 171.2 -29% | 255.89 6% | 165.98 -31% | 242 ? 0% | 288 ? 19% |
Random Write 4KB | 261.8 | 184.08 -30% | 186.14 -29% | 304.95 16% | 243.82 -7% | 238 ? -9% | 330 ? 26% |
游戏 - 并非总是稳定的 60fps
我们使用GameBench 分析了 Pixel 9a 的游戏性能。.一般来说,大多数游戏都能流畅运行,但《PUBG Mobile》等游戏显示,负载下的节流也会影响帧率。唯一奇怪的是,细节级别最低的设置比高清设置产生的帧数更少。
排放 - 散热不良导致 Pixel 9a 运行速度减慢
温度
在闲置模式下,手机表面温度完全无害,即使在持续负载的情况下,也不会上升到临界值。
在 3DMark 的压力测试中,我们发现 Pixel 9a 的散热性能相当薄弱,名义上速度很快的 SoC 在热量的作用下速度大大降低,甚至比 Exynos 1580的 Galaxy A56一样快。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark | |
Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Google Pixel 8a | |
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability | |
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro | |
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G | |
Google Pixel 9a | |
Apple iPhone 16e | |
Google Pixel 8a |
发言人
智能手机的两个扬声器音质不错,但在高音量时显得有点弱。高音过于明显,缺乏清晰度。
另外,你也可以通过 USB 输出声音。蓝牙可用于无线,但遗憾的是,谷歌没有提供任何关于支持哪些编解码器的信息,也阻止用户在开发者选项中读取这些信息。虽然它的外观很可能与前代产品相似。尚未支持 Auracast。
Google Pixel 9a audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 大容量电池,续航时间长
耗电量
当显示屏亮度较高时,谷歌 Pixel 9a 的功耗会特别高,但这是由于它在未激活环境光传感器的情况下具有较高的亮度(1,188 cd/m²)。
Pixel 9a 通过线缆充电的最大功率为 23 瓦,无线充电的最大功率为 7.5 瓦。在我们的测试中,使用摩托罗拉提供的 125 瓦电源(PD 2/3)充满电需要 96 分钟(50%:31 分钟,80%:54 分钟,90%:69 分钟)。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Google Pixel 9a 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 5110 mAh | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 5000 mAh | Apple iPhone 16e 4005 mAh | Google Pixel 8a 4492 mAh | Average Google Tensor G4 | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 14% | 30% | 39% | 28% | 15% | 4% | 19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.71 | 0.72 -1% | 1.07 -51% | 0.89 -25% | 0.68 4% | 0.92 -30% | 0.744 ? -5% | 0.871 ? -23% |
Idle Average * | 2.36 | 1.45 39% | 1.26 47% | 1.3 45% | 1.89 20% | 1.46 38% | 1.894 ? 20% | 1.425 ? 40% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.41 | 1.49 38% | 1.28 47% | 1.33 45% | 1.93 20% | 1.65 32% | 2.11 ? 12% | 1.582 ? 34% |
Load Average * | 8.24 | 9.68 -17% | 3.7 55% | 3.29 60% | 3.77 54% | 7.96 3% | 7.52 ? 9% | 7.13 ? 13% |
Load Maximum * | 15.36 | 13.39 13% | 7.52 51% | 4.76 69% | 9.04 41% | 10.74 30% | 18 ? -17% | 10.7 ? 30% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
运行时间
在我们的测试中,谷歌 Pixel 9a 的运行时间非常出色,明显优于前代产品和 Pixel 9。
不过,尤其是在调整了显示屏亮度的 Wi-Fi 测试中,对比场的距离更近一些,差距也更小一些。
Google Pixel 9a 5100 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A56 5G 5000 mAh | Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G 5110 mAh | Nothing Phone (3a) Pro 5000 mAh | Apple iPhone 16e 4005 mAh | Google Pixel 8a 4492 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 8% | -24% | -7% | -2% | -31% | |
Reader / Idle | 2688 | 3173 18% | 1433 -47% | 2842 6% | 1803 -33% | |
H.264 | 1907 | 2506 31% | 1109 -42% | 1460 -23% | 1132 -41% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 1273 | 1199 -6% | 1168 -8% | 1188 -7% | 1390 9% | 796 -37% |
Load | 242 | 215 -11% | 249 3% | 244 1% | 211 -13% |
Notebookcheck 总评分
谷歌 Pixel 9a 的综合实力很强,它拥有超长的更新供应时间、较高的峰值性能、长效电池和出色的双摄像头。
不过,在测试过程中,它明亮的显示屏并没有完全避开我们的批评,存储选项有限,充电速度也不是特别快。
Google Pixel 9a
- 06/17/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
可能的替代品比较
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.