Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

出色的电池续航时间和方便的尺寸 - Google Pixel 9a 评测

瘦下来了

谷歌 Pixel 9a 更扁平,同时拥有更大的电池和显示屏。据说,后者甚至会变得更亮。此外,更多的人工智能功能也出现在了这款智能手机上。这足以成为中端手机中的佼佼者吗?
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
5G Android Google Pixel Smartphone Touchscreen

结论 - 一款运行时间较长的中档手机

喜欢轻薄小巧智能手机的用户一定会喜欢 Pixel 9a,因为它的摄像头几乎与机身背部齐平,虽然尺寸有所增大,但它仍然是市场上最小巧的Android 智能手机之一。

它的显示屏亮度超高,但没有使用高频 PWM 调光,我们测试设备的照明并不完全均匀。虽然 Tensor G4 的峰值性能在同价位产品中较高,但从长远来看,它的节流现象非常严重。此外,小巧的存储配置也略显局促。

即便如此,Pixel 9a 还是一款不错的中端智能手机,电池续航时间长,通过了 IP68 认证,支持无线充电、eSIM 卡和较长的更新交付期。其背面的摄像头也能带来不错的效果。

Pros

+ 出色的相机
+ 电池续航时间长
+ 通过 IP68 认证
+ 无线充电
+ 更新时间长

Cons

- 仅康宁大猩猩玻璃 3
- PWM 频率低
- 负载情况下 SoC 节流现象严重
- 充电速度慢

价格和供应情况

Amazon Logo
$799.00
Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked Android Smartphone with Gemini, 24-Hour Battery, Advanced Camera, and 6.3" Actua Display - Obsidian - 128 GB
  • $5.39
    Ferilinso 3 Pack Screen Protector for Google Pixel 9A, Tempered Glass Phone Case Friendly Accessories, Protector de Pantalla for Google Pixel 9A
  • $7.99
    Supershieldz (3 Pack) Designed for Google Pixel 9a Tempered Glass Screen Protector, Anti Scratch, Bubble Free

谷歌 Pixel 9a 继 8a的脚步,带来了设计上的变化和更大的显示屏。它的电池容量也大幅增加,手机的 SoC 也得到了升级。此外,手机的防水性能也得到了提升。

虽然它具有新的人工智能功能,但与旗舰机型相比,这些功能已被精简了一些。谷歌智能手机的价格保持不变,MRSP 为 499 美元(128 GB)和 599 美元(256 GB)。

规格谷歌 Pixel 9a

Google Pixel 9a (Pixel 9 Series)
Processor
Google Tensor G4 8 x 2 GHz
Graphics adapter
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5x
Display
6.30 inch 20:9, 2424 x 1080 pixel 421 PPI, Capacitive, pOLED, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB 
, 114 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, OTG, Titan M2
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66, 75), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 154.7 x 73.3
Battery
5100 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (f/1.7, 1/2", 25 mm, OIS) + 13MP (f/2.2, 1/3.1")
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix (f/2.2, 20 mm)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, USB-Cabel, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, LC3 | GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C), Galileo (E1), QZSS (L1), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+ | DRM Widevine L1 | eSIM | IP68 | USB Copy Test: 200.12 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT | Body-SAR: 1.39 W/kg, Head-SAR: 0.99 W/kg | max. charging speed: 23 W (wired) / 7.5 W (wireless), fanless, waterproof
Weight
185.9 g
Price
549 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳 - Pixel 9a 现已通过 IP68 认证

谷歌 Pixel 9a 有四种颜色可供选择:Iris(淡紫色)、Poeny(珊瑚色)、Porcelain(白色)和 Obsidian(黑色)。从外观上看,它变得更加棱角分明,尽管与 Pixel 8a 的机身高度相同,却显得更厚一些。 像素 8a.它的摄像头模块现在变得更小、更扁平,仅突出机身 0.55 毫米。

由于所有缝隙都严丝合缝、均匀一致,其制造质量非常出色。后盖和边框之间只有一些轻微的不规则。磨砂铝质边框不易沾染指纹,触感良好。当试图扭转时,Pixel 9a 看起来很牢固,但确实会发出轻微的吱吱声。

这款谷歌手机通过了 IP68 认证,因此既能防尘又能防水。它的正面使用了康宁大猩猩 3 号玻璃,谷歌本可以采用更现代、更耐用的玻璃。

尺寸比较

163.52 mm 77.5 mm 8.39 mm 211 g162.53 mm 74.67 mm 8.85 mm 205 g162.2 mm 77.5 mm 7.4 mm 198 g154.7 mm 73.3 mm 8.9 mm 185.9 g152.2 mm 72.7 mm 8.9 mm 188 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.8 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 入门级机型,存储空间有限

在我们的测试中,谷歌 Pixel 9a 的 USB 端口可以进行有线图像输出(屏幕镜像),而且速度比上一代产品更快。它在复制测试中的速度略高于 200MB/s,但只能与能耗较低的三星便携式固态硬盘 T7 配合使用。对于三星 980 Pro 来说,它的输出功率还不够。

买家可以选择 128 GB 和 256 GB 的内部存储空间。考虑到 Pixel 9a 的价格区间,我们认为这似乎太少了,尤其是用户无法扩展手机存储空间。

首页: 麦克风
首页: 麦克风
左侧
左侧
右:功率、音量
右:功率、音量
底部:扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡
底部:扬声器、USB、麦克风、SIM 卡

软件 - Pixel 9a 的 7 年更新

Pixel 9a 配备了谷歌Android 15,从发布起,将在七年内定期提供更新。

双子座 "现已牢固地集成到系统中,一些支持人工智能的功能也是 Pixel 9a 的一部分。其中包括相机功能 "添加我 "和 "最佳拍摄"。此外,微距对焦、魔术编辑器和 Pixel Studio 也已加入。

双子座高级版的一年免费试用期似乎只保留给 Pro 机型。遗憾的是,谷歌没有明确指出哪些功能只能在云端使用。

可持续性

谷歌在其网站上提供了一份https://sustainability.google/reports/google-pixel-9a-product-environmental-report/Pixel 9a 的可持续发展报告。外包装完全不使用塑料。除了回收铝,手机背面还使用了 81% 的回收塑料。根据重量计算,这款智能手机由 23% 的可回收材料制成。

维修说明和备件通过iFixit 提供和分发。.

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 6 千兆赫无线局域网,带手刹

好消息是,Pixel 9a 支持包括 6 GHz 频段在内的 Wi-Fi 6E。但遗憾的是,它只支持 2x2 MIMO,因此传输速率并不比使用传统 Wi-Fi 6 时高。

Pixel 9a 支持广泛的蜂窝通信频率,因此长途旅行应该不成问题。我们在城市环境中没有发现接收问题。

Networking
Google Pixel 9a
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 receive AXE11000
920 (min: 458) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
807 (min: 348) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
780 (min: 731) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
833 (min: 789) MBit/s ∼54%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
766 (min: 698) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
666 (min: 568) MBit/s ∼71%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
892 (min: 522) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
674 (min: 627) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1698 (min: 1552) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1539 (min: 695) MBit/s ∼100%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
951 (min: 922) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
826 (min: 709) MBit/s ∼88%
Apple iPhone 16e
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
765 (min: 732) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
727 (min: 715) MBit/s ∼77%
Google Pixel 8a
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
856 (min: 450) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
521 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼31%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
754 (min: 611) MBit/s ∼49%
Average Wi-Fi 6E
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 227) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
940 (min: 442) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1371 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1331 (min: 598) MBit/s ∼86%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
726 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
732 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼78%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼82%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1392 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼90%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900Tooltip
Google Pixel 9a Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø780 (731-867)
Google Pixel 9a Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø833 (789-843)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø766 (698-805)
Google Pixel 9a Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø905 (458-947)
Google Pixel 9a Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø806 (348-873)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø666 (568-772)
GPS 测试:户外
户外活动
GPS 测试:室内
室内

Pixel 9a 仅支持单频 GNSS,但其卫星定位能力在室外既快速又精确。而在室内,情况则有所不同。在我们的测试中,它花了很长时间才确定我们的位置,而且非常不准确,还时不时地失去连接。

在一次自行车旅行中,我们将谷歌手机与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。虽然 9a 在这种情况下出现了一些误差,但它仍然足以胜任导航任务。

全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:环湖之旅
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:转折点
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:总结
全球导航卫星系统测试之旅:总结

电话功能和通话质量

谷歌 Pixel 9a 为 Nano SIM 卡预留了空间,同时还支持 eSIM 卡,可同时用于双卡双待操作。它还支持 WLAN 通话和 VoLTE。

当把 Pixel 9a 放在耳边时,只要周围的噪音不是太大,它就能显示出良好的语音通话质量。繁忙的主干道可能足以让 Pixel 用户无法听清声音。免提模式在安静的环境中也没有问题,即使距离手机 2 米远,我们在测试中也能很好地听懂。

相机 - Pixel 9a 的出色照片

使用 Pixel 9a 进行人像自拍
使用 Pixel 9a 进行人像自拍

前置摄像头具有均衡的色彩还原、不错的清晰度和良好的 HDR 特性。您最多可以以 30fps 的速度录制超高清视频。质量不错,但在快速移动时,拍摄对象并不总是对焦。

谷歌为其主摄像头配备了新的传感器,分辨率为 4800 万像素,低于 像素 8a-但 Pixel 9a 的传感器更大。由于进行了像素分选,照片的大小只有 1200 万像素,用户无法在 9a 上使用全分辨率。这款智能手机的拍照效果不错,高水平的细节和均衡的图像构图给人留下了深刻印象。虽然在弱光环境下细节水平会有所下降,但照片仍然给人留下了良好的印象。

附加的超广角镜头效果不错,但在拍摄近距离物体(微距模式)时,外围区域很早就会变得模糊;但这不适用于全景拍摄。这款手机只能进行数字变焦。放大倍率最高为 2 倍,在日光下拍摄效果非常好,但超过这个倍率,伪影就会清晰可见。最大变焦可达 8 倍。

Pixel 9a 最多能以 60fps 的速度录制超高清视频。如果限制在 30fps,则可以使用两个镜头进行录制,并在拍摄过程中进行切换。数字变焦仅限于 5 倍放大。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light
orginal image
click to load images

在可控光照条件下,谷歌 Pixel 9a 的色彩表现良好,没有出现任何重大异常。浅肤色的显示有点偏红,只有在显示青色时,其 DeltaE 值才会超过 10。我们的测试图依然细节丰富,边缘清晰。

ColorChecker
6.4 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.4 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
3.3 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
2.7 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 9a: 6.03 ∆E min: 2.73 - max: 10.52 ∆E
ColorChecker
14.5 ∆E
20.1 ∆E
18.2 ∆E
21 ∆E
20.9 ∆E
27.3 ∆E
21.1 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
28.1 ∆E
26.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
16.4 ∆E
23.1 ∆E
20.8 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
21 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Google Pixel 9a: 19.38 ∆E min: 9.56 - max: 28.15 ∆E

配件和保修 - 进一步缩小供货范围

谷歌 Pixel 9a 配备了 USB-C 数据线和 SIM 卡工具。谷歌取消了 OTG 适配器,但如果需要,你仍可以单独购买。谷歌还通过其网站提供手机壳和配套的电源适配器。

在美国,这款手机享有 12 个月的标准保修服务,不能延长或扩展保修期。

输入设备和操作 - 配备光学指纹传感器的 Pixel 9a

谷歌 Pixel 9a 的电容式触摸屏能可靠、快速地响应触摸输入。显示屏上集成了光学指纹传感器,识别率可靠,解锁速度快。此外,用户还可以通过前置摄像头进行面部识别,但该摄像头在黑暗环境中很快就会达到极限,可靠性较低。

手机的线性振动马达可提供清晰的触觉反馈。长按电源键时,数字助理会预先指定电源键,但也可以调用经典菜单。此外,还提供单手模式。

显示屏 - 高达 120 Hz 的明亮 pOLED 显示屏

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Pixel 9a 的 pOLED 显示屏已增至 6.3 英寸,这不仅是因为智能手机本身的尺寸略有增大,还因为其边框略微变窄。

它的分辨率提供了很高的像素密度,刷新率高达 120 Hz,但只能降低到 60 Hz。面板具有高亮度,但照明效果一般。不过,这在日常使用中应该不会成为一个不利因素。

在 HDR 测试中,9a 达到了最高亮度(2,679 cd/m²),但在显示缩小的白色区域时,亮度几乎没有降低(APL18:2,653 cd/m²)。我们测量到屏幕闪烁的频率相当稳定,为 240 Hz,这可能是 PWM 的缘故。虽然幅度不大,但敏感的人还是会有一些抱怨。

1909
cd/m²
1933
cd/m²
1741
cd/m²
1922
cd/m²
1978
cd/m²
1672
cd/m²
1509
cd/m²
1763
cd/m²
1552
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1978 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1775.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.38 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 76 %
Center on Battery: 1978 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.84
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
98.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Google Pixel 9a
pOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
AMOLED, 2392x1080, 6.8"
Apple iPhone 16e
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1"
Google Pixel 8a
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"
Screen
-19%
0%
-11%
13%
-6%
Brightness middle
1978
1184
-40%
1210
-39%
1318
-33%
833
-58%
1518
-23%
Brightness
1775
1179
-34%
1222
-31%
1306
-26%
837
-53%
1466
-17%
Brightness Distribution
76
99
30%
92
21%
98
29%
99
30%
88
16%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
1.7
-55%
1
9%
1.5
-36%
0.7
36%
1.2
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3
3.2
-7%
2.7
10%
2.9
3%
1.6
47%
3.3
-10%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
2.4
-9%
1.5
32%
2.3
-5%
0.6
73%
2
9%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.12 104%
2.25 98%
2.26 97%
2.19 100%
2.2 100%
CCT
6622 98%
6544 99%
6509 100%
6819 95%
6525 100%
6786 96%

* ... smaller is better

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2653 cd/m²
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2136 cd/m² -19%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1952 cd/m² -26%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
1412 cd/m² -47%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1280 cd/m² -52%
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
832 cd/m² -69%
Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
3081 cd/m² +15%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2679 cd/m²
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2237 cd/m² -16%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2001 cd/m² -25%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
1347 cd/m² -50%
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
1201 cd/m² -55%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz
Amplitude: 12.82 %

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8363 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。

我们的卡尔曼测量结果表明,只要使用《自然》配置文件,Pixel 9a 就能准确再现色彩。否则,其显示屏会明显偏冷。

灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(配置文件:自然,目标色彩空间:sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.81 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4405 ms rise
↘ 0.367 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.93 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4575 ms rise
↘ 0.474 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

在室外,Pixel 的显示屏在任何光线条件下都清晰易读,但在强光下,玻璃表面的反光可能会分散注意力。

室外使用的谷歌 Pixel 9a
户外活动
室外使用的谷歌 Pixel 9a
室外使用的谷歌 Pixel 9a

谷歌 Pixel 9a 的视角稳定性非常好。即使在非常平整的视角下,智能手机也能始终保持清晰易读,面板亮度只会略微降低,显示的色彩也略微偏冷。

谷歌 Pixel 9a 的视角稳定性
谷歌 Pixel 9a 的视角稳定性

性能 - 配备张量 G4 的 Pixel 9a

Pixel 9a 与谷歌 9 系列的其他智能手机共享相同的芯片组,即 张力 G4.不过,9a 的可用内存只有 8 GB。因此,它的性能与同类产品不相上下,如 像素 9等同类产品的性能相当。

尽管如此,它在系统基准测试中的表现却较弱。例如,Pixel 9 在 PCMark 中快了 22%,在 Basemark OS II 中甚至快了 34%。内存和图形处理器似乎在其中扮演了重要角色。即便如此,Pixel 9a 在日常使用中仍能流畅运行。

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16e
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
3338 Points +96%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (1702 - 1982, n=5)
1881 Points +11%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1702 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1699 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (196 - 3479, n=214, last 2 years)
1577 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
1380 Points -19%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1179 Points -31%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1162 Points -32%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 16e
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
8044 Points +81%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (4453 - 4820, n=5)
4610 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (830 - 10401, n=214, last 2 years)
4528 Points +2%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4453 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4408 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
3890 Points -13%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
3298 Points -26%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
3239 Points -27%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16e
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
1432050 Points +70%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=143, last 2 years)
1321143 Points +57%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (844082 - 1322101, n=4)
1081893 Points +28%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1049981 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
901303 Points +7%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
844082 Points
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
787469 Points -7%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
756800 Points -10%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
14298 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 - 27169, n=200, last 2 years)
14154 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
13874 Points +22%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (11398 - 13948, n=5)
12668 Points +11%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
11565 Points +1%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
11398 Points
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
10617 Points -7%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7088 Points +38%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 14066, n=159, last 2 years)
6917 Points +34%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (5154 - 7716, n=4)
6850 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
5881 Points +14%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5430 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5402 Points +5%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
5154 Points
System
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 20776, n=159, last 2 years)
10734 Points +108%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
10153 Points +96%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
9765 Points +89%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
7930 Points +53%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
7828 Points +51%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (5170 - 8038, n=4)
7208 Points +39%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
5170 Points
Memory
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
9837 Points +140%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (4094 - 10197, n=4)
8222 Points +101%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8078 Points +97%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 20572, n=159, last 2 years)
7713 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
6960 Points +70%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
5642 Points +38%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4094 Points
Graphics
Average Google Tensor G4
  (18582 - 23041, n=4)
21072 Points +13%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1046 - 58651, n=159, last 2 years)
19900 Points +7%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18837 Points +1%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
18582 Points
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
10319 Points -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
9482 Points -49%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8662 Points -53%
Web
Average Google Tensor G4
  (1648 - 1983, n=4)
1826 Points +2%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1794 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
1762 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
1706 Points -5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 2363, n=159, last 2 years)
1626 Points -9%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1567 Points -13%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1566 Points -13%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
37104 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (35227 - 37104, n=4)
36239 Points -2%
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
29654 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=151, last 2 years)
18604 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
11181 Points -70%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8652 Points -77%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
8460 Points -77%
AImark - Score v3.x
Apple iPhone 16e
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
30473 Points +4316%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=135, last 2 years)
27444 Points +3877%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (690 - 1434, n=4)
1035 Points +50%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
926 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
702 Points +2%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
690 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 1501, n=52, last 2 years)
454 Points +52%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
298 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (n=1)
298 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
276 Points -7%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
231 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
230 Points -23%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
4240 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (n=1)
4240 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 - 9453, n=52, last 2 years)
1056 Points -75%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
276 Points -93%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
232 Points -95%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
231 Points -95%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
8020 Points
Average Google Tensor G4
  (n=1)
8020 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 13084, n=52, last 2 years)
1784 Points -78%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
646 Points -92%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
549 Points -93%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
536 Points -93%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Average of class Smartphone
  (68.9 - 12578, n=52, last 2 years)
4211 Points +376%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1373 Points +55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, Adreno 810, 12288
1246 Points +41%
Average Google Tensor G4
  (885 - 1168, n=4)
1056 Points +19%
Google Pixel 9a
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192
885 Points
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Samsung Exynos 1580, Xclipse 540, 8192
301 Points -66%

集成 ARM Mali-G715 MP7负责图形计算。它不支持光线追踪,运行速度似乎比 Pixel 9 Pro 中名义上相同的变体要慢一些。 Pixel 9 Pro和 co 中的相同型号相比,运行速度似乎要慢一些,但这也可能是由于散热较差造成的。

相比之下,它的性能仍然很高,只有 iPhone 16e 超越了它。 iPhone 16e超越。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
2827 Points +12%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2520 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2353 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1362 Points -46%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
1060 Points -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1039 Points -59%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
3330 Points +27%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2615 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2359 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1382 Points -47%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
1055 Points -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1054 Points -60%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
14024 Points +51%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9302 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8960 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5237 Points -44%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
4176 Points -55%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4131 Points -56%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
6120 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
5557 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
Points
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
1149 Points +11%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1038 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
989 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
659 Points -37%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
383 Points -63%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
354 Points -66%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
1517 Points +44%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1055 Points
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
654 Points -38%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
375 Points -64%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
359 Points -66%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps +93%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98 fps +63%
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
60 fps 0%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
397.5 fps +3%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
386 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
373 fps -3%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
156 fps -60%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
131 fps -66%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
130 fps -66%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps +62%
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
59 fps -2%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
259.9 fps +29%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
241 fps +20%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
201 fps
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -44%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
85 fps -58%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
84 fps -58%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +63%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps +23%
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
54 fps -10%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
42 fps -30%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
175.3 fps +15%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
153 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps -24%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps -44%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
62 fps -59%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
61 fps -60%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +25%
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -30%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
29 fps -52%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -62%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
129.1 fps +43%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
74 fps -18%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -48%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
35 fps -61%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
34 fps -62%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
59.2 fps 0%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -39%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
28 fps -53%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
22 fps -63%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
50 fps +28%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
20 fps -49%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
20 fps -49%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
81 fps +35%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
59.9 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -12%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
46 fps -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
35 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
140 fps +28%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
96 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -40%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
52 fps -52%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
52 fps -52%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
20.6 fps +8%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
19 fps
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps -37%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
8.8 fps -54%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
8.8 fps -54%

浏览器基准测试结果喜忧参半。虽然 Pixel 9a 在 Octane 2.0 或 Speedometer 3.0 中如愿获得了第二名,但在其他基准测试中的表现却出人意料地弱。

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18)
299.928 Points +194%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
151.579 Points +49%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=165, last 2 years)
139.2 Points +37%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134)
132.67 Points +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
118.037 Points +16%
Average Google Tensor G4 (102 - 117.5, n=4)
108.8 Points +7%
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137)
101.959 Points
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
94.765 Points -7%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18)
550 runs/min +122%
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137)
248 runs/min
Average Google Tensor G4 (182 - 248, n=4)
206 runs/min -17%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
191 runs/min -23%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 585, n=144, last 2 years)
174.6 runs/min -30%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 135)
170 runs/min -31%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
161 runs/min -35%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
144 runs/min -42%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18)
33.3 runs/min +127%
Average Google Tensor G4 (14.7 - 15.8, n=4)
15.1 runs/min +3%
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137)
14.7 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=101, last 2 years)
12.7 runs/min -14%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
12 runs/min -18%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
10.5 runs/min -29%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 135)
10 runs/min -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
8.58 runs/min -42%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18)
273 Points +203%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
138 Points +53%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 273, n=156, last 2 years)
129.6 Points +44%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134)
125 Points +39%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
110 Points +22%
Average Google Tensor G4 (90 - 112, n=4)
102.8 Points +14%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
95 Points +6%
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137)
90 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18)
97104 Points +86%
Average Google Tensor G4 (52224 - 62374, n=5)
58757 Points +13%
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137)
52224 Points
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
50719 Points -3%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
46738 Points -11%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134)
44460 Points -15%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=212, last 2 years)
43657 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
37415 Points -28%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=165, last 2 years)
1343 ms * -24%
Google Pixel 9a (Chrome 137)
1081.2 ms *
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 132)
1044 ms * +3%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)
886.7 ms * +18%
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro (chrome 134)
875.1 ms * +19%
Average Google Tensor G4 (699 - 1081, n=4)
809 ms * +25%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G (Chrome 134)
792.6 ms * +27%
Apple iPhone 16e (Safari 18)
287.8 ms * +73%

* ... smaller is better

在我们的测试中,谷歌 Pixel 9a 的 UFS 3.1 存储速度很高,但在连续写入时速度可能会更快一些。

Google Pixel 9aSamsung Galaxy A56 5GXiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5GNothing Phone (3a) ProGoogle Pixel 8aAverage 128 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-8%
-23%
-1%
-30%
-7%
42%
Sequential Read 256KB
1688.82
1634.8
-3%
992.72
-41%
996.23
-41%
1509.65
-11%
Sequential Write 256KB
853.5
999.95
17%
931.68
9%
970.63
14%
255.31
-70%
Random Read 4KB
241.03
207.01
-14%
171.2
-29%
255.89
6%
165.98
-31%
Random Write 4KB
261.8
184.08
-30%
186.14
-29%
304.95
16%
243.82
-7%

游戏 - 并非总是稳定的 60fps

我们使用GameBench 分析了 Pixel 9a 的游戏性能。.一般来说,大多数游戏都能流畅运行,但《PUBG Mobile》等游戏显示,负载下的节流也会影响帧率。唯一奇怪的是,细节级别最低的设置比高清设置产生的帧数更少。

051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Google Pixel 9a; PUBG Mobile; Smooth: Ø52.3 (41-58)
Google Pixel 9a; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.8.0: Ø53.8 (39-60)
Google Pixel 9a; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.8.0: Ø39.7 (33-41)
Google Pixel 9a; Diablo Immortal: Ø58.6 (16-60)

排放 - 散热不良导致 Pixel 9a 运行速度减慢

温度

在闲置模式下,手机表面温度完全无害,即使在持续负载的情况下,也不会上升到临界值。

在 3DMark 的压力测试中,我们发现 Pixel 9a 的散热性能相当薄弱,名义上速度很快的 SoC 在热量的作用下速度大大降低,甚至比 Exynos 1580Galaxy A56一样快。

Max. Load
 43 °C42.5 °C40.3 °C 
 42.3 °C42.2 °C39.2 °C 
 41.9 °C42 °C39.2 °C 
Maximum: 43 °C
Average: 41.4 °C
39.4 °C43.1 °C42.6 °C
38.6 °C40.6 °C43.4 °C
37.3 °C40.8 °C42.2 °C
Maximum: 43.4 °C
Average: 40.9 °C
Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.4 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 30 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
99.5 % +83%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95.4 % +75%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
93.4 % +71%
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
83 % +52%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.5 %
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.4 % -6%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
99 % +70%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97.7 % +67%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
97.3 % +67%
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
82.5 % +41%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.4 %
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % -12%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
95.2 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3
99 % +17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
Adreno 810, SD 7s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % +17%
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98.7 % +17%
Google Pixel 9a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84.5 %
Apple iPhone 16e
A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe
75 % -11%
Google Pixel 8a
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54.1 % -36%
0510152025303540455055Tooltip
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø11.3 (9.19-15.7)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.6 (8.48-8.68)
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.6 (14-17)
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37 (30.1-55.2)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø32.2 (31.3-32.8)
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø50.2 (49-59)
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø14.5 (14.1-14.8)
Google Pixel 9a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.34 (6.66-7.88)
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G Xclipse 540, Exynos 1580, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø4.85 (4.81-4.88)
Apple iPhone 16e A18 GPU, A18, 128 GB NVMe; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.88 (7.52-10)

发言人

智能手机的两个扬声器音质不错,但在高音量时显得有点弱。高音过于明显,缺乏清晰度。

另外,你也可以通过 USB 输出声音。蓝牙可用于无线,但遗憾的是,谷歌没有提供任何关于支持哪些编解码器的信息,也阻止用户在开发者选项中读取这些信息。虽然它的外观很可能与前代产品相似。尚未支持 Auracast。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.843.42530.131.73126.7264027.829.85035.941.46328.324.28028.827.610027.33012517.238.816016.353.420014.751.625012.853.631513.257.440012.657.850012.36363012.268.280012.172.7100012.372.3125012.372.5160012.172.520001274.4250012.270.931501376.4400013.182.7500013.181.3630013.573.2800013.469.21000013.466.91250013.566.51600013.360.6SPL2588.1N0.668.4median 13.1median 68.4Delta1.77.237.839.828.125.424.427.920.524.929.532.418.92517.727.515.831.313.436.113.947.611.249.510.453.611.752.810.1588.863.88.962.89.268.99.870.210.372.510.872.411.876.411.379.71277.21380.312.678.512.873.912.971.313.367.513.556.213.645.123.887.70.566.5median 11.8median 67.51.510.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseGoogle Pixel 9aSamsung Galaxy A56 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Google Pixel 9a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy A56 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 大容量电池,续航时间长

耗电量

当显示屏亮度较高时,谷歌 Pixel 9a 的功耗会特别高,但这是由于它在未激活环境光传感器的情况下具有较高的亮度(1,188 cd/m²)。

Pixel 9a 通过线缆充电的最大功率为 23 瓦,无线充电的最大功率为 7.5 瓦。在我们的测试中,使用摩托罗拉提供的 125 瓦电源(PD 2/3)充满电需要 96 分钟(50%:31 分钟,80%:54 分钟,90%:69 分钟)。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.13 / 0.34 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.71 / 2.36 / 2.41 Watt
Load midlight 8.24 / 15.36 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Google Pixel 9a
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
5110 mAh
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 16e
4005 mAh
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
Average Google Tensor G4
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
14%
30%
39%
28%
15%
4%
19%
Idle Minimum *
0.71
0.72
-1%
1.07
-51%
0.89
-25%
0.68
4%
0.92
-30%
0.744 ?(0.48 - 1.28, n=5)
-5%
Idle Average *
2.36
1.45
39%
1.26
47%
1.3
45%
1.89
20%
1.46
38%
1.894 ?(1.1 - 2.99, n=5)
20%
Idle Maximum *
2.41
1.49
38%
1.28
47%
1.33
45%
1.93
20%
1.65
32%
2.11 ?(1.2 - 3.32, n=5)
12%
Load Average *
8.24
9.68
-17%
3.7
55%
3.29
60%
3.77
54%
7.96
3%
Load Maximum *
15.36
13.39
13%
7.52
51%
4.76
69%
9.04
41%
10.74
30%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213Tooltip
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.97 (0.86-13.4)
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.43 (0.81-13.9)
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.908 (0.86-1.094)
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.645 (0.596-0.931)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789Tooltip
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.31 (7.56-9.22)
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.15 (7.27-8.9)
Google Pixel 9a Google Tensor G4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.908 (0.86-1.094)
Google Pixel 9 Google Tensor G4; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.645 (0.596-0.931)

运行时间

在我们的测试中,谷歌 Pixel 9a 的运行时间非常出色,明显优于前代产品和 Pixel 9。

不过,尤其是在调整了显示屏亮度的 Wi-Fi 测试中,对比场的距离更近一些,差距也更小一些。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
44h 48min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137)
21h 13min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
31h 47min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 02min
Google Pixel 9a
5100 mAh
Samsung Galaxy A56 5G
5000 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi Note 14 Pro+ 5G
5110 mAh
Nothing Phone (3a) Pro
5000 mAh
Apple iPhone 16e
4005 mAh
Google Pixel 8a
4492 mAh
Battery Runtime
8%
-24%
-7%
-2%
-31%
Reader / Idle
2688
3173
18%
1433
-47%
2842
6%
1803
-33%
H.264
1907
2506
31%
1109
-42%
1460
-23%
1132
-41%
WiFi v1.3
1273
1199
-6%
1168
-8%
1188
-7%
1390
9%
796
-37%
Load
242
215
-11%
249
3%
244
1%
211
-13%

Notebookcheck 总评分

谷歌 Pixel 9a 的综合实力很强,它拥有超长的更新供应时间、较高的峰值性能、长效电池和出色的双摄像头。

不过,在测试过程中,它明亮的显示屏并没有完全避开我们的批评,存储选项有限,充电速度也不是特别快。

Google Pixel 9a - 06/17/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
85%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
48 / 69 → 70%
Weight
90%
Battery
92%
Display
90%
Games Performance
26 / 55 → 47%
Application Performance
62 / 85 → 73%
AI Performance
64%
Temperature
87%
Noise
100%
Audio
77 / 90 → 85%
Camera
77%
Average
78%
81%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
89.1%
Materials
50%
Packaging
95%
Power Use
94.3%
Repairability
72%
Software Updates
100%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 83.4%

可能的替代品比较

Benchmark Comparison Plugin: ERROR, Layout "57" not supported!

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 出色的电池续航时间和方便的尺寸 - Google Pixel 9a 评测
Daniel Schmidt, 2025-06-19 (Update: 2025-06-19)