谷歌 Pixel 8a 评测--这款小型谷歌智能手机在中端市场独树一帜

Name: Google Pixel 8a
Brand: Google

更贵，但仍然物有所值？ Pixel 8a 的目标是将 Pixel 8 的优势与低价结合起来。得益于人工智能，经济实惠的 Pixel 系列现在在技术上应该比以往任何时候都更加智能，而且得益于其旗舰 SoC，也更加现代化。请阅读我们对 Pixel 手机的评测，看看这是否成功。

Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 07/02/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Smartphone Google Pixel

谷歌的 a 系列代表着优质的功能和诱人的价格，Pixel 8a 也是如此。不过，由于 128 GB 版本的 MRSP 为 499 美元，这款中端手机已经不能真正被归类为物美价廉。即便如此，Pixel 8a 仍然具有很强的可持续性，这要归功于其七年的操作系统更新，以及内部旗舰 SoC 张量 G3应该可以为未来几年做好充分准备。

谷歌的中端智能手机继续主打拍照。虽然 Pixel 8a 的相机硬件与Pixel 7a ，但改进之处包括其无数的 AI 相机功能。在这篇评测中，我们将看到这款手机与Pixel 8 系列的不同之处。

Test device courtesy of Google Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Google Pixel 8a (Pixel 8 Series)

Processor

Google Tensor G3 9 x 1.7 - 2.9 GHz, Zuma - Cortex X3 / A715 / A510

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G715 MP7

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.10 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 431 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 109.6 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, barometer, OTG, Miracast

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B32/B38/B40/B41/B42/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n12/n20/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n75/n76/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.9 x 152.2 x 72.7

Battery

4492 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 14

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (f/1.89, OIS, @2160p/60fps) + 13 MPix (f/2.2, wide angle lens), camera2 API: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix ( f/2.2, @2160p/30fps)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB cable, info material, 24 Months Warranty, widevine L1, SAR value: 1.00W/kg (Head), 1.12W/kg (Body), fanless, waterproof

Weight

188 g

Price

549 Euro

Links

Google homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Version	Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
v8	81.9 %	07/2024	Google Pixel 8a Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7	188 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2400x1080
v7 ^(old)	87.4 %	05/2024	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530	213 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.60"	2340x1080
v7 ^(old)	87.4 %	03/2024	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4	204.5 g	512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.67"	2712x1220
v7 ^(old)	83.1 %	09/2023	Sony Xperia 10 V SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	159 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.10"	2520x1080
v7 ^(old)	86.1 %	03/2024	Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6	186 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6.67"	2712x1220
v7 ^(old)	87.1 %	06/2023	Google Pixel 7a Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7	193.5 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2400x1080

请注意：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息请点击此处.

案例 - 配备大猩猩玻璃的谷歌 Pixel 8a

今年的 a 系列在设计上发生了很大变化--Pixel 8a 现在变得更加圆润，不再棱角分明。与 Pixel 7a 相比，6.1 英寸 OLED 面板周围的边框也略有缩小。像素 7a.因此，其 81.6% 的显示屏尺寸比要更好一些。即便如此，OLED 面板周围宽大的黑色边框仍不免让人联想到 "中端机型"。显示屏仍然只有大猩猩 3 号玻璃防刮花保护，而不是其姊妹机型--Pixel 8--所采用的更先进的 Victus 玻璃。像素 8-所配备的更先进的 Victus 玻璃。

谷歌 Pixel 8a 的颜色选择

Pixel 8a 有多种颜色可供选择--但只有内置 128 GB 存储空间的版本。存储容量为 256 GB 的版本仅有黑色可供选择，这其实并没有什么意义，肯定是一个值得注意的负面点。背面由塑料制成，但感觉并不廉价。从外观上看，这种材料与玻璃相似，但玻璃的触感更有质感。它的表面略微磨砂，因此对指纹痕迹的收集并不十分敏感。

Pixel 智能手机的外壳具有 IP67 级防尘和防止暂时浸入淡水的功能，而且是由高达 100% 的可回收材料（铝制部件）制成的。塑料背壳仅由 76% 的可回收材料制成。Pixel 8a 的制造质量很好，除了相机模型和设备背面之间的区域外，没有任何缝隙。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Sony Xperia 10 V Google Pixel 8a Google Pixel 7a DIN A6 ❌

连接性 - 配备 USB 3.2 接口的谷歌智能手机

在蓝牙 5.3、双 SIM 卡、Miracast、立体声扬声器和用于非接触式支付的 NFC 的帮助下，Pixel 8a 为中端设备提供了一系列不错的功能。尤其是它的 USB-C 端口采用了 3.2 规格。不过，在我们使用连接的 M2.SSD 硬盘（三星 980 Pro）进行复制测试时，USB 端口的传输速度仅为 74 MB/s，勉强比 USB 2.0 智能手机快一些。至少，谷歌现在已经通过该端口实现了有线图像输出。连接的存储介质可以用 FAT、FAT32 或 exFAT 格式化。不过，谷歌手机不支持 NTFS。

我们的测试样品拥有 128 GB 的 UFS 3.1 存储空间，但由于操作系统和一些预装应用程序的原因，实际可用存储空间只有 110 GB。如果需要更多空间，可以使用 USB-OTG 将文件传输到外部存储介质（如 U 盘）；但不能使用 microSD 卡扩展手机存储空间。

软件 - 长更新交付的谷歌像素 8a

购买中端 Pixel 8a 的理由之一是其超长的软件支持。谷歌将为其智能手机提供长达七年的安全补丁和Android 更新（与 Pixel 8 系列相同），这意味着到 2031 年（Android 21）仍将为其提供安全补丁。只有三星在中端市场中，只有三星在软件维护方面具有类似的可持续性，为其手机提供五年的安全补丁。

在测试时，Pixel 8a 使用的是当前的Android 14 版本，其最新的安全补丁是从 2024 年 6 月开始的。据制造商称，后者将每月更新一次。

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 技术的谷歌手机

虽然已安装的张量 G3理论上可以访问 WiFi 7 网络，但实际上 Pixel 8a 只支持 WiFi 6E。即便如此，通过 6 GHz 频段也能实现高速传输--使用我们的参考路由器（华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000），我们在测试期间测得的平均传输速率超过 800 MBit/s（5 GHz）。有趣的是，谷歌手机在 6 GHz 频道的传输速度较慢，而且不稳定，传输速率急剧下降到 500 MBit/s 以下。

要在旅途中连接网络，你可以使用 5G 标准，包括多种支持频率，但不包括毫米波支持。对于一款中端手机来说，它可用的 4G 频率也很丰富--在本次测试的地区（德国），所有相关的 LTE 频段都得到了支持。

请注意：我们收到的信息表明，Pixel 8a 实际支持的 5G 在某些情况下可能与其数据表不同。尽管谷歌智能手机根据其规格支持广泛的 5G 频段，但在某些国家，谷歌似乎对此有所限制。拉丁美洲和亚洲以及欧洲（英国）似乎都受到了影响。出国旅行前应考虑到这一点。

Networking
Google Pixel 8a
iperf3 receive AXE11000	834 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	856 (min: 450) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	521 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	754 (min: 611) MBit/s ∼56%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000	823 (min: 704) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	735 (min: 671) MBit/s ∼83%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000	848 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	881 (min: 669) MBit/s ∼100%
Sony Xperia 10 V
iperf3 receive AXE11000	347 (min: 332) MBit/s ∼36%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	363 (min: 180) MBit/s ∼41%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G
iperf3 receive AXE11000	861 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	812 (min: 583) MBit/s ∼92%
Google Pixel 7a
iperf3 receive AXE11000	957 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	819 (min: 499) MBit/s ∼93%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	930 (min: 471) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	934 (min: 915) MBit/s ∼69%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 receive AXE11000	688 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼72%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	712 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1474 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1345 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼100%

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø521 (418-644)

Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø915 (471-958)

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø753 (611-828)

Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø932 (915-946)

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø833 (780-855)

Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø940 (475-963)

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, ARM Mali-G715 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø841 (450-907)

Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, ARM Mali-G710 MP7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø819 (499-922)

在实际测试中，Pixel 8a 很好地确定了我们的位置。除了一些小偏差外，它对我们路线的记录非常准确。有时，对比设备（Garmin Venu 2）的误差甚至更大。谷歌手机可以在单频模式下访问所有主要的卫星系统。在测试中，我们可以连接到北斗（B1）、GPS-（L1）、伽利略（E1）和格罗纳斯（L1）系统。

电话功能和通话质量 - 支持双卡双待的 Pixel 手机

Pixel 8a 具有双卡双待功能--但前提是你必须使用 eSIM 卡，因为设备本身只安装了一个 nano-SIM 卡插槽。通话可以通过 Wi-Fi 网络（VoWiFi）或 LTE 网络（VoLTE）进行。

与像素 8相比，a 机型只有两个麦克风，但这两个麦克风确保了语音的良好传输。轻微的背景噪音也能被有效过滤掉。通过 "来电过滤 "功能，谷歌助手还可以直接接听来电，提前检测垃圾电话。

摄像头 - 配备双摄像头的谷歌 Pixel 8a

虽然与前代产品相比，Pixel 8a 的前置摄像头在技术上没有任何变化前置摄像头但它现在支持 UHD 视频录制。说到画质，分辨率为 1300 万像素的自拍摄像头拥有不错的清晰度和强大的 HDR 功能。不过，Pixel 8a 稍微夸大了对比度。

带 OIS 的主摄像头在背面工作，它的传感器来自索尼（IMX787），与 Pixel 7a 一样。传感器尺寸为 1/1.73 英寸，分辨率为 6400 万像素，像素非常小，只有 0.8 微米，但由于采用了像素分选技术，2.4 微米的虚拟像素被计算为标准像素。

用这款手机拍摄的照片具有不错的动态范围和自然的色彩平衡，尽管像素 8 Pro在直接对比中要锐利得多。在弱光条件下，使用 Pixel 8a 拍摄的主体轮廓也比 Pro 机型柔和，但其清晰度和照明效果在这个价位的手机中令人印象深刻。

它的后置摄像头配备了一个 1300 万像素镜头，用于超广角拍摄。有趣的是，它使用了与前置相同的传感器（索尼 IMX712）。照片的清晰度尚可，但即使在日光下，图像边缘也会变得略微嘈杂和模糊。在高变焦水平下，主要的质量差异会变得很明显，而这只能通过 Pixel 8a 以数字方式实现。传感器裁剪（2 倍）后，几乎没有任何值得一提的质量问题。

与前代产品相比，Pixel 8a 在新相机硬件方面的不足之处是前代产品人工智能功能（已从像素 8 手机)应该可以弥补。例如，谷歌通过将多张照片中的人脸组合在一起来优化合影照片，以确保没有人闭着眼睛。此外，谷歌还配备了音频消除器，以消除视频录制中的干扰噪音。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Wide-angle Wide-angle Low Light Ultra-wide angle Zoom 5x

click to load images

Google Pixel 8a

Google Pixel 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Google Pixel 8a

Google Pixel 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Google Pixel 8a

Google Pixel 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Google Pixel 8a

Google Pixel 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

click to load images

Google Pixel 8a

Google Pixel 8 Pro

Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max

Canon EOS 90D

在可控的照明条件下，这款谷歌中端手机在我们的测量中表现出了不错的色彩还原能力。不过，蓝色调的描绘尤其不够准确。总的来说，它的 DeltaE 偏差在 7.1 左右，还算不错。测试图中的细节看起来足够清晰，色彩渐变也显示得非常干净。

ColorChecker Google Pixel 8a: 7.05 ∆E min: 0.98 - max: 14.36 ∆E

配件和保修 - 不带电源的 Google 智能手机

Pixel 8a 的包装非常简洁。包装盒里除了一根 USB 数据线和 OTG 适配器，还有必备的信息资料和 SIM 卡工具。不过，在制造商的在线商店里有很多配件可供选择。除了一个 30 瓦的电源适配器外，还有各种可选的手机套。

谷歌手机的保修期取决于购买地点。更多信息请访问制造商网站。.谷歌没有为 Pixel 8a 提供可选的保险套餐或延长保修服务。

输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的 Google Pixel 8a

安装的 AMOLED 面板刷新率高达 120 Hz，使网站上的动画和滚动看起来漂亮流畅。此外，在 6.1 英寸显示屏上的输入可以快速、准确地执行到触摸屏的边角。制造商没有预装屏幕保护膜。

Pixel 8a 屏幕内的光学指纹传感器提供了生物识别安全性。传感器响应速度极快，识别率也非常高。在光线充足的条件下，你也可以通过前置摄像头的面部识别功能快速解锁屏幕，但这种 2D 方法并不可靠。

Pixel 手机的线性振动电机（z 轴）可以在设置中进行调整，而且精确度高，容易察觉。这使得在 Pixel 8a 上打字感觉非常舒适。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - 采用 OLED 显示屏的谷歌手机

OLED 显示屏采用 RGGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和两个绿色 LED 组成。

Pixel 8a 配备的 6.1 英寸 Actua 显示屏具有 1080p 分辨率，像素密度高达 430 ppi。默认情况下，面板的工作频率仅为 60 Hz。此外，还可以使用所谓的 "平滑模式 "将刷新率调整到 120 Hz。

与其前代谷歌在显示亮度方面有了很大改进。在环境光传感器激活的情况下，我们测得纯白屏幕的最高亮度为 1,556 cd/m²，令人印象深刻。在我们的测试中，我们测得的亮度为 2,136 cd/m²。在播放 4K 视频时，我们测得的亮度为 2,237 cd/m²，甚至超过了其宣传的 2,000 尼特峰值亮度。这使得 Pixel 8a 非常适合播放 HDR 内容。支持 HLG、HDR10+ 和 HDR10 标准。


1553 cd/m²	1502 cd/m²	1373 cd/m²
1556 cd/m²	1518 cd/m²	1371 cd/m²
1551 cd/m²	1394 cd/m²	1372 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1556 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1465.6 cd/m² Minimum: 1.94 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 1518 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.95
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.1% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2

	Google Pixel 8a AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Sony Xperia 10 V OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"	Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"	Google Pixel 7a OLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"
Screen		-8%	8%	0%	5%	0%
Brightness middle	1518	962 -37%	1240 -18%	933 -39%	1034 -32%	1006 -34%
Brightness	1466	967 -34%	1233 -16%	944 -36%	1035 -29%	1010 -31%
Brightness Distribution	88	99 13%	98 11%	97 10%	96 9%	95 8%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.2	1.6 -33%	1.1 8%	1.1 8%	1.1 8%	1.1 8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.3	2.6 21%	2.2 33%	1.7 48%	1.9 42%	2.5 24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	1.5 25%	1.4 30%	1.8 10%	1.4 30%	1.5 25%
Gamma	2.2 ^100%	2.13 ^103%	2.21 ^100%	2.29 ^96%	2.22 ^99%	2.25 ^98%
CCT	6786 ^96%	6382 ^102%	6669 ^97%	6611 ^98%	6674 ^97%	6531 ^100%

* ... smaller is better

与采用有机发光二极管的显示器一样，Pixel 8a 也使用 PWM 技术来控制亮度。与像素 8类似，a 型号的闪烁频率并不高，这意味着它对眼睛不太友好。我们使用示波器测量了最低显示亮度下恒定的 120 Hz 振幅曲线。从手机最大亮度的一半左右开始，该值翻倍至 240 Hz。

尽管如此，振幅偏移仍相对平缓，仅为 26%。该值偏离 0% 越大，亮度变化产生负面影响的可能性就越大。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

120 Hz
Amplitude: 26.3 %

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17373 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。

这款中端手机只有两种色彩模式。如果你想最准确地显示色彩和灰色调，就必须选择 "自然 "配置文件。遗憾的是，Pixel 8a 不支持色温调节。

我们使用卡尔曼分析软件和照片光谱仪检查了 AMOLED 面板的色彩再现能力。我们的测量结果偏差很小，我们注意到的 DeltaE 值明显在目标范围内（<3）。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.4965 ms rise
1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5575 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21.2 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
2.83 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 1.338 ms rise
2.83 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 1.494 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (33.2 ms).

谷歌手机的户外表现非常出色，亮度储备足以应对夏季的光照环境。不过，如果手动调节亮度，最高只能达到 777 cd/m²，这意味着大猩猩玻璃 3 表面的反光可能会影响盛夏条件下的可读性。

Pixel 8a 的视角稳定性令人印象深刻，只有在非常平的视角下才能看到亮度的轻微下降。

性能 - 搭载张量 SoC 的谷歌 Pixel 8a

Pixel 8a 采用了谷歌最新的旗舰芯片组张量 G3，并可使用 8GB LPDDR5 内存。虽然这款自制处理器还不能与骁龙 8 代 3，但对于一款中端设备来说，这并不是什么大问题。在这方面，Pixel 8a 肯定能跟上最好的产品。

在我们的基准测试包中，谷歌手机与 Poco X6 Pro 5G及其联发科 Dimensity 8300 Ultra-在中端竞争中遥遥领先。在 Geekbench 测试中，Pixel 8a 的单核性能尤其出色，而多核性能则略逊于小米手机。不过，在系统基准测试中，Tensor G3 的表现稍弱。

Geekbench 6.2
Single-Core
Average Google Tensor G3 (1653 - 1769, n=3)	1707 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1699 Points
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	1428 Points -16%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1424 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (193 - 2930, n=142, last 2 years)	1379 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	1157 Points -32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	1147 Points -32%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	904 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	4547 Points +3%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	4408 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 (4225 - 4538, n=3)	4390 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (845 - 7408, n=142, last 2 years)	3850 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	3456 Points -22%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	3383 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	2715 Points -38%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	2111 Points -52%

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1267 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 (1260 - 1274, n=3)	1267 Points 0%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1085 Points -14%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	1036 Points -18%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2138, n=188, last 2 years)	955 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	891 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	887 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	669 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	4366 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	4279 Points -2%
Average Google Tensor G3 (3395 - 4366, n=3)	3795 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	3349 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6681, n=188, last 2 years)	3179 Points -27%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	3093 Points -29%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	2521 Points -42%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1921 Points -56%

Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1465265 Points +40%
Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 2162423, n=81, last 2 years)	1177818 Points +12%
Average Google Tensor G3 (1049981 - 1113506, n=3)	1090261 Points +4%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1049981 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	767738 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	740935 Points -29%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	14716 Points +27%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	13393 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 21385, n=194, last 2 years)	12435 Points +8%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	12313 Points +6%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	11736 Points +1%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	11565 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 (10897 - 11824, n=3)	11429 Points -1%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	7933 Points -31%

CrossMark - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	987 Points +7%
Average Google Tensor G3 (919 - 955, n=3)	936 Points +2%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	934 Points +2%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	919 Points
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1474, n=158, last 2 years)	860 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	784 Points -15%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	686 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	597 Points -35%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	7122 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	7088 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 (6974 - 7088, n=2)	7031 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11438, n=154, last 2 years)	6074 Points -14%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	5751 Points -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	5192 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	4964 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3655 Points -48%
System
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	12177 Points +56%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	11778 Points +50%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=154, last 2 years)	10001 Points +28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	9366 Points +20%
Average Google Tensor G3 (7828 - 8251, n=2)	8040 Points +3%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	7953 Points +2%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	7828 Points
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	7803 Points 0%
Memory
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	9837 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 (9115 - 9837, n=2)	9476 Points -4%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	7784 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=154, last 2 years)	6561 Points -33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	5847 Points -41%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	5126 Points -48%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4146 Points -58%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	4109 Points -58%
Graphics
Average Google Tensor G3 (18837 - 18975, n=2)	18906 Points 0%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	18837 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	16594 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=154, last 2 years)	15771 Points -16%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	15766 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	10386 Points -45%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	8511 Points -55%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4376 Points -77%
Web
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	1762 Points
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	1734 Points -2%
Average Google Tensor G3 (1657 - 1762, n=2)	1710 Points -3%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	1636 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (747 - 2145, n=154, last 2 years)	1542 Points -12%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	1474 Points -16%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	1278 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1237 Points -30%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	64597 Points +118%
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	43053 Points +45%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	29654 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	28870 Points -3%
Average Google Tensor G3 (25563 - 29654, n=3)	27412 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 78964, n=147, last 2 years)	17376 Points -41%
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	5442 Points -82%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	5205 Points -82%

AImark - Score v3.x
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G MediaTek Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6, 12288	33858 Points
Average of class Smartphone (82 - 245629, n=129, last 2 years)	17850 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 (1109 - 1136, n=2)	1123 Points
Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192	805 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Samsung Exynos 1480, Xclipse 530, 8192	585 Points
Sony Xperia 10 V Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	445 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G MediaTek Dimensity 7200, Mali-G610 MP4, 12288	Points
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	Points

Geekbench ML
0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	998 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 ()	998 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years)	824 Points -17%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Average of class Smartphone (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years)	746 Points +6%
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	704 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 ()	704 Points 0%
0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI
Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3, Mali-G715 MP7, 8192	2488 Points
Average Google Tensor G3 ()	2488 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years)	647 Points -74%

在图形计算方面，Pixel 8a 配备了 Mali-G715 MP7在我们的测试中取得了极具竞争力的成绩，因此明显优于 Pixel 7a.与 Mali-G615 MP6和 Poco X6 Pro 5G尽管在要求苛刻的 3DMark 层级测试中，Pixel 8a 的性能差距令人震惊，但在我们的对比领域中，谷歌手机还是遥遥领先。看来，Pixel 8a 性能的热降低在这方面已经发挥了很大作用。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3085 Points +31%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2353 Points
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1832 Points -22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1202 Points -49%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	915 Points -61%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	353 Points -85%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	3068 Points +30%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2359 Points
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1860 Points -21%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1191 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	926 Points -61%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	358 Points -85%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	11204 Points +25%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8960 Points
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6855 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4483 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3992 Points -55%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1198 Points -87%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8976 Points
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6557 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4336 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3897 Points -57%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1206 Points -87%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6342 Points +111%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5850 Points +95%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4267 Points +42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3833 Points +28%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3512 Points +17%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3005 Points

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14498 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	13159 Points -9%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10121 Points -30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7275 Points -50%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7170 Points -51%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2990 Points -79%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	10622 Points +35%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7856 Points
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7756 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6828 Points -13%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6065 Points -23%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3092 Points -61%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +1%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps -7%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -24%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	59 fps -50%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	462 fps +24%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	373 fps
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	248 fps -34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	191 fps -49%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	134 fps -64%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	93 fps -75%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	120 fps +1%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps -32%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps -32%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	39 fps -67%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	241 fps
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	214 fps -11%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	134 fps -44%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps -54%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	95 fps -61%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps -80%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	117 fps +19%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -42%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -43%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps -47%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	26 fps -73%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	170 fps +45%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97 fps -17%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	73 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67 fps -43%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps -71%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	82 fps +9%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	32 fps -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	31 fps -59%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -79%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	110 fps +49%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps -14%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -51%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps -73%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66 fps +12%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -25%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -54%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	26 fps -56%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps -81%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	52 fps +44%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	19 fps -47%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.1 fps -77%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	91 fps +12%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	81 fps
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps -37%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -48%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	38 fps -53%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps -78%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	135 fps +41%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	96 fps
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -42%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -44%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -49%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps -77%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	24 fps +50%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	16 fps
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13 fps -19%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9.5 fps -41%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7.9 fps -51%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3.6 fps -77%

Pixel 8a 得益于良好的日常浏览器速度。网站加载迅速，滚动浏览流畅。谷歌手机在浏览器基准测试中的成绩差异很大。虽然它在某些测试中取得了非常好的成绩，但其他测试的成绩有时却远远低于 Pixel 7a.

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)	134.031 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	131.393 Points +39%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 351, n=164, last 2 years)	114 Points +20%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)	104.662 Points +10%
Average Google Tensor G3 (94.8 - 105.2, n=3)	101.4 Points +7%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)	94.765 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	83.784 Points -12%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)	78.167 Points -18%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)	180 runs/min +12%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)	161 runs/min
Average Google Tensor G3 (136 - 161, n=3)	151.7 runs/min -6%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)	125 runs/min -22%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 445, n=150, last 2 years)	124.9 runs/min -22%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	116 runs/min -28%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	112 runs/min -30%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)	72 runs/min -55%

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)	140 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	126 Points +33%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)	111 Points +17%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 212, n=155, last 2 years)	107.8 Points +13%
Average Google Tensor G3 (94 - 103, n=3)	97.3 Points +2%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)	95 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	86 Points -9%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)	67 Points -29%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)	157 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 304, n=94, last 2 years)	145.6 Points +8%
Google Pixel 8a	135 Points
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	135 Points 0%
Average Google Tensor G3 (115 - 135, n=3)	126.3 Points -6%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	92 Points -32%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Google Tensor G3 (46738 - 49506, n=3)	48007 Points +3%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)	46738 Points
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)	46286 Points -1%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)	44948 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	41576 Points -11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	39060 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 89112, n=207, last 2 years)	35057 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)	28902 Points -38%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (388 - 28190, n=163, last 2 years)	1645 ms * -86%
Sony Xperia 10 V (Chrome 116)	1388 ms * -57%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.90)	1296.2 ms * -46%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G (Chrome 123)	1012.6 ms * -14%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G (Chrome 122.0.6261.64)	1007.2 ms * -14%
Google Pixel 7a (Chrome 114)	919.6 ms * -4%
Average Google Tensor G3 (840 - 998, n=3)	908 ms * -2%
Google Pixel 8a (Chrome 126)	886.7 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Pixel 8a 的存储连接性让我们大吃一惊--不幸的是，它的连接性并不好。谷歌手机采用 UFS 3.1 标准，读取速度稳定，但整体速度并不快。它的低写入速度可能不是因为 Tensor SoC 的内置内存控制器造成的，因为像素 7a的 Tensor G2在我们的测试中表现更好，而且像素 8在这一领域也取得了更高的成绩。

	Google Pixel 8a	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G	Sony Xperia 10 V	Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G	Google Pixel 7a	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		76%	163%	-6%	422%	86%	63%	128%
Sequential Read 256KB	1509.65	1688.53 12%	1921.64 27%	444.54 -71%	3824.7 153%	1624.39 8%	1597 ?(1030 - 3134, n=57) 6%	1717 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years) 14%
Sequential Write 256KB	255.31	831.44 226%	1702.4 567%	438.02 72%	3642.57 1327%	996.44 290%	767 ?(233 - 1332, n=57) 200%	1322 ?(57.5 - 3875, n=198, last 2 years) 418%
Random Read 4KB	165.98	351.47 112%	248.21 50%	175.72 6%	355.7 114%	229.44 38%	243 ?(126.2 - 428, n=57) 46%	265 ?(22.2 - 543, n=198, last 2 years) 60%
Random Write 4KB	243.82	132.11 -46%	265.29 9%	165.15 -32%	467.74 92%	263.81 8%	245 ?(121.4 - 503, n=57) 0%	292 ?(9.4 - 709, n=198, last 2 years) 20%

游戏 - Pixel 8a 可以玩游戏

虽然我们在测试过程中记录 Pixel 8a 的准确帧率时遇到了问题，因此无法使用GameBench 读取任何帧率。应用程序读取帧率，但这款谷歌手机仍然非常适合玩游戏。我们测试的两款Android 游戏都运行流畅，没有出现任何明显的问题。

对图形要求较高的游戏《源氏冲击》使用高图形设置运行良好，但在玩这款奇幻动作角色扮演游戏时，不时出现一些图形错误和轻微的帧数下降。Android 。不过，后者只能与低细节结合使用。

在第二款游戏《PUBG Mobile》中，我们可以激活 UHD 模式，甚至是高清模式下的 "极限 "帧率。理论上，90 帧/秒是可能的。

排放 - 谷歌手机依然很酷

温度

在日常使用中，谷歌手机的表面温度问题不大，不过在用于视频录制或游戏时，Pixel 8a 确实会明显发热。在 Burnout 基准测试中，我们测得的温度接近 44 摄氏度。不过，与其他中端智能手机相比，这个数值还是可以接受的。

较难接受的是 Tensor G3在 3DMark Wild Life 压力测试中的节流程度。经过节流后，系统仅发挥了约 50% 的性能。散热更好的中端智能手机，如三星Galaxy A55 5G在这种情况下，它的运行速度超过了 90%。

Max. Load

Idle


40 °C	41.4 °C	38.9 °C
41 °C	42.4 °C	39.6 °C
42.1 °C	43.5 °C	38 °C

Maximum: 43.5 °C
Average: 40.8 °C


37.4 °C	39.4 °C	41.3 °C
37.5 °C	42.1 °C	41.5 °C
38.3 °C	39.2 °C	38.1 °C

Maximum: 42.1 °C
Average: 39.4 °C

Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 32.7 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 35 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 56 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.8 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.7 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.7 % +94%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.7 % +94%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 % +93%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	78.7 % +53%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54.3 % +6%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51.4 %
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99.5 % +94%
Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.2 % +93%
Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98.9 % +93%
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	66.8 % +30%
Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60.6 % +18%
Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51.3 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	65.2 %

Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø9.87 (7.57-14.8)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø5.59 (5.56-5.63)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø7.07 (7.05-7.08)

Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø12.8 (12-18)

Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø8.32 (6.73-11.1)

Google Pixel 8a Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G3, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø33.9 (26-50.6)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø23.1 (23.1-23.1)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G Mali-G610 MP4, Dimensity 7200, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø25.6 (25.4-25.7)

Sony Xperia 10 V Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.1.4.1: Ø7.21 (7.2-7.22)

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø44.4 (43.6-55.4)

Google Pixel 7a Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø27.2 (21.4-39.5)

Samsung Galaxy A55 5G Xclipse 530, Exynos 1480, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø23.7 (23.6-23.7)

Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Mali-G615 MP6, Dimensity 8300-Ultra, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø11.4 (11-16.9)

发言人

Pixel 8a 有两个扬声器，其中一个位于听筒内，因此无法产生均匀的立体声。谷歌手机的低音并不深沉，我们的粉红噪声测试也显示扬声器的中频曲线呈上升趋势。总的来说，作为一款中端设备，谷歌手机的音效还是相当不错的。

如果你想获得低音丰富的声音输出，可以使用有线 USB 端口或无线蓝牙 5.3。后者使用以下编解码器：SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、Opus、LDAC 和 LC3。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Google Pixel 8a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Google Pixel 7a audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池续航时间 - Google Pixel 8a 可以无线充电

耗电量

Pixel 8a 的电池容量接近 4,500 毫安时，充电功率最高只能达到 18 瓦，这意味着在我们的测试中，完全充满电需要大约 110 分钟。不过，我们无法测试它在使用谷歌原装电源适配器时的表现，因为我们的测试样品没有附带充电器。如果你想用无线方式为 Pixel 8a 充电，那就得更有耐心了，因为它的充电功率只有 7.5 瓦。

在空闲模式下，它的功耗为 1.5 瓦，虽然不是最高效的，但也不算高。在负载模式下，我们测得的 8 瓦功耗对于配备了强大 SoC（如张量 G3.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.08 / 0.23 Watt
Idle	0.92 / 1.46 / 1.65 Watt
Load	7.96 / 10.74 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

	Google Pixel 8a 4492 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 5000 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 V 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 7a 4385 mAh	Average Google Tensor G3	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		6%	-4%	40%	-13%	26%	11%	9%
Idle Minimum *	0.92	0.85 8%	1.22 -33%	0.56 39%	1.11 -21%	0.62 33%	0.703 ?(0.56 - 0.92, n=3) 24%	0.902 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=154, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Average *	1.46	1.51 -3%	1.47 -1%	0.91 38%	1.14 22%	0.87 40%	1.337 ?(1.08 - 1.47, n=3) 8%	1.448 ?(0.69 - 4.26, n=154, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Maximum *	1.65	1.71 -4%	1.58 4%	0.98 41%	1.16 30%	0.95 42%	1.457 ?(1.17 - 1.65, n=3) 12%	1.608 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=154, last 2 years) 3%
Load Average *	7.96	4.87 39%	8.09 -2%	5.34 33%	12.33 -55%	6.11 23%	8.14 ?(7.96 - 8.45, n=3) -2%	6.1 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=153, last 2 years) 23%
Load Maximum *	10.74	11.73 -9%	9.49 12%	5.46 49%	15.34 -43%	11.81 -10%	9.42 ?(8.63 - 10.7, n=3) 12%	9.04 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=153, last 2 years) 16%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.29 (1.092-13.3)

Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.07 (0.808-11.5)

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.923 (0.836-1.163)

Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.751 (0.709-0.953)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.68 (5.85-9.37)

Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.6 (6.07-11.2)

Google Pixel 8a Google Tensor G3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.923 (0.836-1.163)

Google Pixel 7a Google Tensor G2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.751 (0.709-0.953)

运行时间

对于一款刷新率为 120 Hz 的相对小巧的智能手机来说，Pixel 8a 的运行时间令人印象深刻。在我们无休止地循环播放 Big Buck Bunny 视频的过程中，谷歌手机的通信模块耗电量明显增加。Pixel 8a 的续航时间约为 19 小时，比我们在 Wi-Fi 电池测试中调整显示屏亮度（150 cd/m²）后的续航时间多出近 6 小时。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		30h 03min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 126)		13h 16min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 52min
Load (maximum brightness)		3h 31min

	Google Pixel 8a 4492 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A55 5G 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ 5G 5000 mAh	Sony Xperia 10 V 5000 mAh	Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 7a 4385 mAh
Battery Runtime		24%	16%	75%	6%	1%
Reader / Idle	1803	2202 22%	1586 -12%	4067 126%	1815 1%	1328 -26%
H.264	1132	1511 33%	937 -17%	1615 43%	967 -15%	1224 8%
WiFi v1.3	796	1077 35%	913 15%	1157 45%	942 18%	821 3%
Load	211	220 4%	373 77%	388 84%	251 19%	252 19%

Pros

+ 明亮的显示屏

+ 高性能

+ 手感舒适

+ 更新时间长

+ 良好的主摄像头

+ 高级功能（IP67、Qi 等）

Cons

- 宽边框

- USB 3.2 端口速度慢

- 高节流

- 电池充电时间长

- 只有单频 GPS

谷歌 Pixel 8a 的评价

谷歌的 Pixel 8a 是一款性能与舒适度兼顾的中端手机。虽然这家加利福尼亚制造商生产的 a 机型已经不再那么便宜，但购买者仍然可以买到物美价廉的智能手机--更不用说在发布后不久，这款手机已经可以以比其 MRSP 低得多的价格购买到，而且与其姊妹机型Pixel 8 的差距也一直保持着。

说到 Pixel 8，我们没有太多可抱怨的--我们只是希望，从价格上来说，谷歌不会在未来的新机型上滑向高端市场。

得益于其超高亮度的 OLED 面板、长期的软件支持、强大的主摄像头和高品质的外观，再加上无线充电或安装旗舰 SoC 等诸多高端功能，谷歌手机在中端市场中可谓独树一帜。它的 USB 3.2 端口通常会为其锦上添花，然而，它与 Pixel 8a 的连接速度相当慢，导致其理论速度优势无法实现。

说到 Pixel 8a 的外观，你不得不做出一些妥协。在这方面，用户将不得不接受它的宽边框。如果这些问题困扰着你，那么你不妨看看三星Galaxy A55它与谷歌手机的优势相似，但看起来更时尚。不过，一款 Poco X6 Pro也应该在对中端手机感兴趣的人的雷达上，因为它甚至比张力 G3Pixel 8a 中的 Tensor G3 性能还要略强一些，而且不会像谷歌手机那样面临大量的节流问题。

价格和供应情况

谷歌 Pixel 8a 可在大多数主要在线零售商处购买。例如，你目前可以在亚马逊上找到它，价格从499 美元起。

请注意：我们已经更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请访问这里。

Google Pixel 8a - 2024-07-02 07/02/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis

86%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

62 / 69 → 90%

Weight

89%

Battery

89%

Display

91%

Games Performance

22 / 55 → 41%

Application Performance

61 / 85 → 71%

AI Performance

76%

Temperature

88%

Noise

100%

Audio

74 / 90 → 82%

Camera

77%

Average

70%

82%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
50%

Packaging
50%

Power Use
96.2%

Repairability
46%

Software Updates
100%

Total Sustainability Score: 57%

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 298 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 429996 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 谷歌 Pixel 8a 评测--这款小型谷歌智能手机在中端市场独树一帜

Marcus Herbrich, 2024-07- 2 (Update: 2024-08-15)

谷歌 Pixel 8a 评测--这款小型谷歌智能手机在中端市场独树一帜

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例 - 配备大猩猩玻璃的谷歌 Pixel 8a

尺寸比较

连接性 - 配备 USB 3.2 接口的谷歌智能手机

软件 - 长更新交付的谷歌像素 8a

通信与全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 5G 技术的谷歌手机

电话功能和通话质量 - 支持双卡双待的 Pixel 手机

摄像头 - 配备双摄像头的谷歌 Pixel 8a

配件和保修 - 不带电源的 Google 智能手机

输入设备和操作 - 配备面部解锁功能的 Google Pixel 8a

显示屏 - 采用 OLED 显示屏的谷歌手机

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - 搭载张量 SoC 的谷歌 Pixel 8a

游戏 - Pixel 8a 可以玩游戏

排放 - 谷歌手机依然很酷

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Google Pixel 8a audio analysis

Google Pixel 7a audio analysis

电池续航时间 - Google Pixel 8a 可以无线充电

耗电量

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

运行时间

Pros

Cons

谷歌 Pixel 8a 的评价

价格和供应情况

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison