联想ThinkPad T14s G2 AMD笔记本电脑评测。超极本的效率与工作站的力量相结合
ThinkPad T14s G2是受欢迎的 联想ThinkPad T14s笔记本电脑评测:有了AMD的商务本更好T14s的继任者,其受欢迎程度仅次于联想自己的T系列ThinkPad,没有 "s "后缀。我们最近审查了英特尔SKU,现在是时候仔细看看AMD模型了。我们的评测单位,型号为20XGS01100,是为欧洲教育市场制造的,装备非常好。以略低于1500欧元的价格,你可以得到一个AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U8核CPU,32GB焊接的LPDDR4X内存,一个Vega 8iGPU,一个1TB大的NVMe SSD,和一个400尼特FHD IPS低功耗显示屏。
考虑到该机箱与配备英特尔的兄弟姐妹相同,如果你想了解更多关于其机箱、连接性、输入设备和扬声器的信息,我们想请你参考我们对 ThinkPad T14s Gen2英特尔。
它的主要竞争对手是惠普 EliteBook 845,戴尔戴尔Latitude 14 5420评论。一台接近夺取商务冠的笔记本电脑 Latitude 14 5420,配备英特尔的T14s G2,X1 Carbon G9,以及最后但并非最不重要的是其直接 配备AMD的前辈。另一个潜在的对手是联想自己的 ThinkPad X13 Gen2(AMD)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
90.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 R7 PRO 5850U, Vega 8 | 1.3 kg | 16.14 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
89.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.3 kg | 16.14 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
90.5 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7 | 1.3 kg | 16.1 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
90.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 14.9 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2400 | |
90.6 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE R5 PRO 5650U, Vega 7 | 1.4 kg | 18.19 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1200 | |
88.2 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
84.8 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.5 kg | 20.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
连接性。ThinkPad T14s G2 AMD具有良好的连接性
沟通
我们的评测设备配备了Realtek Wi-Fi调制解调器,其性能明显比其前任的英特尔AX200差。事实上,它的表现如此之差,以至于它没有设法打破最后的位置。然而,请记住,一些SKU配备的是英特尔、高通或联发科的Wi-Fi调制解调器。
显示屏 - 4K选项终于可用
在六个显示器选项中,我们终于找到了联想的AMD驱动的14英寸ThinkPad的4K显示器。我们的评测单位配备了400尼特的FHD低功耗显示屏,非常 ,与我们在T14s G2英特尔SKU中发现的面板 。更多信息可以在该评论中找到。
- FHD (1920 x 1080), IPS, 250 cd/m², 45 % NTSC, 亚光
- FHD (1920 x 1080), IPS, 300 cd/m², 45 % NTSC, 哑光
- FHD (1920 x 1080), IPS, 300 cd/m², 45 % NTSC, matte, touch
- FHD (1920 x 1080), IPS, 400 cd/m², 72 % NTSC, 哑光, 低功耗
- FHD (1920 x 1080), IPS, 500 cd/m², 72 % NTSC, matte, PrivacyGuard & touch
- 4K UHD (3840 x 2160), IPS, 500 cd/m², 100 % AdobeRGB, 光面, Dolby Vision™ HDR
请记住,低功耗显示器是由三个不同的OEM厂商生产的,整体质量可能有很大的不同。例如,我们的评测单元的面板是迄今为止三个中最差的一个。对于联想 ,这种显示屏抽奖并不新鲜。此外,低功耗显示器往往会出现重影现象。我们发现了一些背光渗漏,但在日常使用中远没有亮到足以引起注意的程度。AMD Freesync支持频率在48和60赫兹之间,以防止屏幕撕裂。
|
Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 397 cd/m²
Contrast: 1418:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.9
ΔE Greyscale 8.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
67.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
69.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.07
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 NE140FHM-N61, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 N140HCG-GQ2, IPS , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW MNE007A1-2, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE NV133WUM-N61, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U AU Optronics AUO068B, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W AUO5491 / B140HAN, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 2% | 26% | 5% | 3% | -45% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 69.7 | 66.8 -4% | 95.2 37% | 70.1 1% | 68.2 -2% | 36 -48% |
sRGB Coverage | 91.8 | 97.9 7% | 99.8 9% | 99.4 8% | 98.5 7% | 54 -41% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.2 | 69 3% | 89.2 33% | 71.3 6% | 69.8 4% | 37 -45% |
Response Times | 365% | 46% | 61% | 26% | 53% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 84 ? | 32.4 ? 61% | 46 ? 45% | 34 ? 60% | 65.2 ? 22% | 41 ? 51% |
Response Time Black / White * | 56 ? | 15.2 ? 73% | 30 ? 46% | 22 ? 61% | 39.6 ? 29% | 26 ? 54% |
PWM Frequency | 2451 ? | 26040 ? 962% | ||||
Screen | 28% | 36% | 24% | 24% | -7% | |
Brightness middle | 397 | 404 2% | 497 25% | 309 -22% | 432.5 9% | 290 -27% |
Brightness | 386 | 371 -4% | 488 26% | 297 -23% | 405 5% | 282 -27% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 88 0% | 87 -1% | 81 -8% | 86 -2% | 81 -8% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.34 -21% | 0.35 -25% | 0.26 7% | 0.3 -7% | 0.26 7% |
Contrast | 1418 | 1188 -16% | 1420 0% | 1188 -16% | 1442 2% | 1115 -21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.8 | 1.4 76% | 1.2 79% | 1.6 72% | 2.34 60% | 4.65 20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 12.6 | 3.2 75% | 2.1 83% | 3 76% | 3.59 72% | 7.5 40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.9 | 0.8 58% | 0.9 53% | 0.8 58% | 1.83 4% | 3.98 -109% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.3 | 1.6 81% | 1.3 84% | 2 76% | 2.5 70% | 3.22 61% |
Gamma | 2.07 106% | 2.13 103% | 2.16 102% | 2.24 98% | 2.1 105% | 2.54 87% |
CCT | 6867 95% | 6480 100% | 6690 97% | 6315 103% | 6582 99% | 6169 105% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 79.37 | 63.8 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.9 | 99.78 | 99.4 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 132% /
90% | 36% /
35% | 30% /
25% | 18% /
20% | 0% /
-7% |
* ... smaller is better
在1408:1的情况下,显示器的对比度还算不错。然而,由于只有92%的sRGB,其色彩空间覆盖率还有一些改进的余地。总体响应时间很慢,这对办公使用来说不是特别有问题。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
56 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise | |
↘ 30 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
84 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 42 ms rise | |
↘ 42 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 99 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 2451 Hz | ||
≤ 50 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 2451 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 2451 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于ThinkPad T14s的磨砂显示屏和高达400尼特的显示亮度,它在户外非常适用。然而,它的亮度远远不够,无法在明亮的直射阳光下保持可用性。
正如IPS面板常见的那样,它的可视角度约为170°,而可选的4K显示屏提供高达178°。只有OLED显示屏才能提供更多。
性能 - 配备高效8核CPU的ThinkPad T14s
ThinkPad T14s有多种CPU选择,从四核到八核不等,搭配Vega 7或Vega 8 iGPU,功能强大,足以满足办公应用、多个同步高分辨率视频流,甚至是偶尔的游戏。
不幸的是,与前两代产品一样,内存被焊接在主板上,无法升级。不过,总共32GB的LPDDR4X-4267(比DDR4-3200快7%左右)对大多数用户来说应该是足够了。与支持四通道内存的英特尔SKU不同,AMD型号的内存仅有双通道(更多细节见下面的AIDA64内存基准测试结果)。与内存不同,M.2-2280固态硬盘可以被替换和升级。
处理器
AMD的Ryzen 7 Pro 5850U,在1.9至4.4 GHz之间运行,具有八个核心,共有16个线程。在大约一秒钟的时间里,它以8倍3GHz的速度运行,消耗30W的功率,即使ThinkPad的冷却器能够在更长时间内保持这种高水平的提升,联想的风扇曲线非常保守,有利于降低噪音排放。因此,在最初的一秒钟之后,CPU的功率下降到了8倍2.7GHz,还是比较充分的。与英特尔SKU相比,它被允许消耗40W,峰值为55W。尽管如此,Core i7-1165G7不能与AMD的八核Ryzen 7 Pro相提并论,后者在多核负载中提供了高达50%的性能,但效率更高,为22W(前辈:18W)。为了雪上加霜,英特尔SKU在30分钟后就会出现热节流,从而使AMD SKU的速度提高了一倍。
凭借其新的CPU,AMD再次成为单核性能之王,并以非常微弱的优势击败了英特尔的竞争对手,仅有1%。与去年的Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U相比,惠普的EliteBook 845 G7这构成了25%的改进。我们没有发现AMD设备在电池上有任何节流的迹象,而英特尔SKU则必须节流16%左右。你可以在我们的技术部分找到更多的CPU基准测试.
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U -2! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 -2! | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (8201 - 9111, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (1401 - 1431, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (3184 - 3523, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (543 - 558, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (1398 - 1527, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (225 - 227, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (331 - 364, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (38553 - 45543, n=3) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (5050 - 5300, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (5137 - 7039, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=94, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (1354 - 1448, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (9.89 - 11.6, n=3) | |
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=91, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (49.1 - 51.9, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (0.536 - 0.557, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20UES00H00 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (9410 - 10606, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20UES00H00 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (60918 - 65754, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20UES00H00 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (2087 - 2322, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20UES00H00 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (76279 - 83425, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20UES00H00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (9713 - 10108, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20UES00H00 | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (33509 - 36663, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20UES00H00 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (87129 - 94210, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20UES00H00 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (552 - 599, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20UES00H00 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (5034 - 5599, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20UES00H00 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=92, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (9552 - 19340, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20UES00H00 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
系统性能
在PCMark 10中,AMD SKU再次成功地超越了所有的竞争对手。在大约90%的所有基准测试中,包括上面提到的那些,Ryzen 7八核CPU比所有的竞争对手跑得更快。这意味着无论何种应用,都能获得出色的实际性能。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (5491 - 5933, n=3) | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (8772 - 10331, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (8967 - 9512, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=85, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=85, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (5141 - 5938, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) () | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) () | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) () | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) () | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
PCMark 10 Score | 5933 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (20295 - 41057, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (23469 - 43938, n=3) | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P1 G4-20Y4Z9DVUS | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P14s G2 AMD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U (23491 - 41204, n=3) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
我们还没有找到一个具有良好DPC延迟的T14s,目前的模型也不例外。因此,实时音频和视频编辑可能会有一些问题。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE | |
HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
安装的1TB UMIS AM630固态硬盘可能是为PCIe Gen 4总线连接而设计的,不幸的是它只连接到PCIe 3 x4总线,因此明显比我们大多数的固态硬盘慢。由于其PCIe 4.0总线,X1 Carbon Gen 9是无可争议的山丘之王。尽管如此,我们发现我们的审查单位的整体系统性能是绰绰有余的。
在T14s G2的WWAN插槽中可以安装一个二级M.2-2242固态硬盘。请记住,这个插槽既不支持SATA固态硬盘,也不支持启动。
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 Vega 8, R7 PRO 5850U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPETJ1T24MGE2QDQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE Vega 7, R5 PRO 5650U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-256G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 19% | 8% | 41% | 0% | -31% | -54% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1039 | 943 -9% | 277.8 -73% | ||||
Copy Program MB/s | 365 | 428.6 17% | 71 -81% | ||||
Copy ISO MB/s | 2264 | 2546 12% | 1422 -37% | ||||
Score Total | 3662 | 4336 18% | 4185 14% | 4873 33% | 3902 7% | 3862 5% | 1406 -62% |
Score Write | 1719 | 2146 25% | 2529 47% | 2426 41% | 2086 21% | 2214 29% | 420 -76% |
Score Read | 1326 | 1491 12% | 1121 -15% | 1688 27% | 1244 -6% | 1101 -17% | 685 -48% |
Access Time Write * | 0.031 | 0.019 39% | 0.028 10% | 0.02 35% | 0.034 -10% | 0.104 -235% | 0.049 -58% |
Access Time Read * | 0.06 | 0.055 8% | 0.05 17% | 0.032 47% | 0.075 -25% | 0.058 3% | 0.138 -130% |
4K-64 Write | 1455 | 1827 26% | 2262 55% | 2032 40% | 1829 26% | 1970 35% | 216 -85% |
4K-64 Read | 996 | 1147 15% | 850 -15% | 1176 18% | 903 -9% | 853 -14% | 447 -55% |
4K Write | 125 | 190.6 52% | 132.2 6% | 206.3 65% | 110.6 -12% | 105.5 -16% | 138.9 11% |
4K Read | 49 | 61.2 25% | 42.56 -13% | 77.4 58% | 47.96 -2% | 50.7 3% | 44.07 -10% |
Seq Write | 1391 | 1288 -7% | 1343 -3% | 1882 35% | 1457 5% | 1389 0% | 646 -54% |
Seq Read | 2806 | 2825 1% | 2291 -18% | 4337 55% | 2936 5% | 1976 -30% | 1934 -31% |
* ... smaller is better
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形性能
AMD的RX Vega 8,比T14s的前身Vega 7,快了约13%,但同时比英特尔的Iris Xe G7(96EUs),明显受益于英特尔SKU的四通道内存接口,它的速度大约是戴尔Latitude 14,配备单通道的Iris Xe G7(80EUs)。
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 22663 points | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 6353 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 23045 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3644 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1349 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
在我们的Witcher 3 压力测试中,我们没有发现掉帧或滞后的证据(超级设置)。
Witcher 3 FPS Graph
low | med. | high | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 60 | 44.4 | 21 | 14 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 115 | 90.2 | 56.2 | 52.5 | 20.6 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 45.6 | 35.8 | 31.4 | 31.6 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 48 | 25 | 23 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 89.7 | 34.6 | 29.3 | 24.8 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 60 | 22 | 21 |
排放。AMD ThinkPad T14s安静、凉爽、高效
噪声排放
在常规负载以及Cinebench引起的CPU高负载下,风扇完全保持沉默。AMD T14s几乎给人一种被动冷却设备的感觉。只有当我们把GPU的负载加到一起时,风扇才最终升温,它仍然相当安静,为30-34 dB(A),特别是从主观的角度来看。我们没有发现线圈啸叫的证据。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 26.81 / 26.81 / 26.81 dB(A) |
Load |
| 30.16 / 33.98 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 26.81 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 Vega 8, R7 PRO 5850U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPETJ1T24MGE2QDQ | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE Vega 7, R5 PRO 5650U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U Vega 7, R7 PRO 4750U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-256G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | -5% | 6% | 8% | -13% | -8% | |
off / environment * | 26.81 | 24.81 7% | 29.2 -9% | 23.66 12% | 24.17 10% | 30 -12% | 25 7% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.81 | 24.81 7% | 29.2 -9% | 23.6 12% | 24.17 10% | 30.6 -14% | 25 7% |
Idle Average * | 26.81 | 24.81 7% | 29.2 -9% | 23.6 12% | 24.17 10% | 30.6 -14% | 25 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.81 | 24.81 7% | 29.6 -10% | 23.6 12% | 24.17 10% | 30.6 -14% | 25 7% |
Load Average * | 30.16 | 35.14 -17% | 30.2 -0% | 33.5 -11% | 29.92 1% | 33.6 -11% | 36.5 -21% |
Load Maximum * | 33.98 | 35.14 -3% | 32.3 5% | 34.3 -1% | 31.52 7% | 39.2 -15% | 52.4 -54% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 32.3 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
温度总体上保持很低。在综合负荷下(Prime95和FurMark同时进行),后部箱体通风口略微发热,只有当你在折磨测试设备时碰巧决定给电池充电时,在靠近电池所在的底部以及键盘的后部才会有点热。然而,这在现实世界中几乎不应该发生。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-0.2 °C / -0.3 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 4750U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -6% | 1% | -12% | 4% | -3% | 0% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.2 | 47.5 -7% | 44.7 -1% | 51.5 -17% | 43.7 1% | 43.6 1% | 41.7 6% |
Maximum Bottom * | 38.9 | 43.4 -12% | 44.6 -15% | 45.3 -16% | 38 2% | 52.6 -35% | 35.6 8% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.7 | 28.4 -3% | 25.6 8% | 29.6 -7% | 25.8 7% | 22.4 19% | 29.9 -8% |
Idle Bottom * | 28.3 | 28.3 -0% | 25.6 10% | 30 -6% | 26.2 7% | 27.2 4% | 29.7 -5% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
最初,在我们的Prime95压力测试中,CPU的功耗高达22W,与配备英特尔的T14不同,我们配备AMD的评测装置设法保持几乎两倍的时钟速度(在两倍的核心数),8倍的2.3-2.6GHz,核心温度约68℃。在综合负载下,GPU运行在900MHz,在我们的测试中没有任何一点节流。温度被发现为非常好的67℃。
除了一些小的波动外,我们没有发现真正的热节流,降低了CPU最初的22W,从而在任何时候都有完整的八核性能。这意味着我们评测单位的冷却解决方案比其前身或英特尔SKU的冷却器表现得更好。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
系统空闲 | 1900 | 200 | 44 | 41 |
Prime95压力 | 2500 | 200 | 72 | 69 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2600 | 900 | 69 | 67 |
Witcher 3 应力 | 1400 | 1800 | 70 | 65 |
发言人
请参阅西部模型的测试报告.
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 10.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 90% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 86% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理。T14s AMD在同类产品中的最佳电池寿命
消耗功率
联想ThinkPad T14s G2 AMD是我们对比组中最高效的设备,特别是在负载情况下。其短暂的47W功耗峰值可以被尺寸充足的65W电源轻松处理。
T14s在待机状态下的0.56W功耗还不错,转化为理论上的待机时间略高于4天。但在我们的实际体验中,T14s的持续时间要长得多。其5.6至8.9瓦的空闲功耗也有改进的余地。
Off / Standby | 0.32 / 0.56 Watt |
Idle | 3.16 / 5.6 / 7.13 Watt |
Load |
30.86 / 46.55 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 R7 PRO 5850U, Vega 8, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPETJ1T24MGE2QDQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-1T00, IPS , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS LED, 3840x2400, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE R5 PRO 5650U, Vega 7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -4% | -41% | -61% | -7% | 2% | -18% | -41% | -34% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.16 | 2.2 30% | 5.7 -80% | 5 -58% | 3.82 -21% | 2.6 18% | 3.4 -8% | 5.26 ? -66% | 4.47 ? -41% |
Idle Average * | 5.6 | 5.5 2% | 8.9 -59% | 10.2 -82% | 5.74 -3% | 5 11% | 7.1 -27% | 7.78 ? -39% | 7.42 ? -33% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.13 | 6.1 14% | 11 -54% | 11 -54% | 7.65 -7% | 5.6 21% | 8.4 -18% | 9.18 ? -29% | 8.9 ? -25% |
Load Average * | 30.86 | 41.3 -34% | 38.2 -24% | 51.7 -68% | 35.79 -16% | 39.8 -29% | 35.3 -14% | 44.9 ? -45% | 42.1 ? -36% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37 | 34.5 7% | 35.6 4% | 37.1 -0% | 35.4 4% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 46.55 | 67.3 -45% | 40.2 14% | 67.5 -45% | 45.04 3% | 49.9 -7% | 67 -44% | 59.4 ? -28% | 61.8 ? -33% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stress Test
Power Consumption with External Monitor
电池寿命
AMD进一步改进其Ryzen CPU,目前这一代是更有效的竞争者。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中浏览网页的电池寿命超过14小时,在我们的视频播放测试中超过15小时,令人印象深刻。
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 R7 PRO 5850U, Vega 8, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20WM003TGE i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9-20XWCTO1WW i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE R5 PRO 5650U, Vega 7, 54.7 Wh | HP EliteBook 845 G7 Ryzen 7 Pro 4750U R7 PRO 4750U, Vega 7, 53 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 5420-D2G5W i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 63 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -17% | -5% | -31% | -20% | -9% | 17% | -11% | |
H.264 | 891 | 874 -2% | 792 -11% | 559 -37% | 814 -9% | 716 ? -20% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 877 | 580 -34% | 612 -30% | 442 -50% | 556 -37% | 795 -9% | 769 -12% | 611 ? -30% |
Load | 101 | 85 -16% | 127 26% | 94 -7% | 86 -15% | 146 45% | 116.7 ? 16% |
Pros
Cons
评测 ThinkPad T14s G2 AMD:一个永不停歇的超薄工作站
我们的campuspoint提供的联想ThinkPad T14s G2 AMD评测装置在许多方面都是非常好的设备,尽管我们发现它的16:9显示屏在考虑到该设备刚刚重新设计的情况下是一个有点缺点的。这两款产品,ThinkPad X1 Carbon G9和ThinkPad X13 Gen 2都提供低功耗的2.5k分辨率显示屏,在这方面更有吸引力。ThinkPad X13还具有可维护的键盘,尽管我们必须记住,这款13英寸的笔记本电脑比T14s要小和轻不少(-150克/-5.29盎司)。尽管如此,它在所有其他方面还是非常相似。
T14s的全宽键盘非常棒,而且该设备比X13更轻、更薄,令人愉快。由于联想的显示抽奖活动,它的明亮和哑光的低功率显示屏时好时坏,而我们的评测单元的图像朦胧而沉闷,显然是个失误。
一台不停运转的工作站。除了沉闷的16:9显示屏之外,T14s没有任何重大缺陷。它的键盘有1.5毫米的行程,非常出色,其抓地力强的外壳终于可以抗污。此外,性能和排放也得到了明显改善。
总的来说,联想ThinkPad T14s G2 AMD是一款比较可靠的高端商务笔记本。它提供了接近工作站的性能,同时又保持了完全的静音,其电池寿命也很好。因此,与英特尔SKU相比,它是我们的首选,特别是考虑到其较低的价格。
如果你正在寻找更实惠的替代品,你可能要考虑ThinkPad L14,它同样保持着低温和安静,提供较短的电池寿命,具有较高的重量和尺寸,有两个内存插槽,最多可容纳64GB的内存,一个microSD卡插槽,以及一个以太网端口。另一个选择是没有 "s "后缀的ThinkPad T14,以及几乎相同的P14s Gen2 AMD。
然而,另一个联想制造的替代品是ThinkPad E14。它的显示屏比较暗(可选100%sRGB),而且运行温度较高,但作为回报,它提供了出色的电池寿命,甚至更好的键盘,一个以太网端口和一个内存插槽。它在负载下也会有轻微的节流现象,而且大约重300克(0.66磅),更厚的显示屏边框也更薄。
价格和可用性
鉴于我们的评测机型20XGS01100是为欧洲编辑市场制造的,它在美国没有供应。T14s在美国的起价略高于1,000美元,可以通过联想自己的网店购买和单独配置。.
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100
- 03/21/2022 v7 (old)
Marvin Gollor