华为nova 9智能手机评论。没有5G,但有一些特殊的相机功能
那些看过我们的测试的人 Honor 50尽管两家公司分开了,但华为提供了一个几乎相同的智能手机。然而,它只是没有5G和谷歌服务,因为这些仍然受到针对中国供应商的贸易限制的影响。
大约500欧元(约566美元),华为智能手机配备了一个 高通骁龙778G4G,一个高通Adreno-642L图形单元,8GB内存,和128GB内部存储。配备了这些硬件,它必须与下面列出的对比设备竞争。
Possible Competitors for Comparison
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.3 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Huawei Nova 9 SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L | 175 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.57" | 2340x1080 | |
85.5 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Honor 50 SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L | 175 g | 256 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.57" | 2340x1080 | |
84.2 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Motorola Edge 20 SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L | 163 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.70" | 2400x1080 | |
85.1 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L | 189 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.50" | 2400x1080 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Xiaomi 11T Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9 | 203 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 一个高质量的华为智能手机
华为nova 9的外壳采用了金属框架和玻璃背面。后者以相机系统为主,设计了一个形成双圆的框架,这也可以在手机中找到。 Honor 50.做工显示出很高的质量,所有的按键都紧紧地坐在框架里。制造商放弃了IP认证。与其他同级别的智能手机相比,nova 9相对较轻,只有175克(约6.2盎司),并且由于其小框架而非常紧凑。
设备 - nova 9不提供音频端口
软件--华为手机中没有谷歌服务
通信和GNSS--华为nova9中没有5G
nova 9能够通过GSM、3G和LTE建立移动连接。通过LTE Cat.11/12,下载速率可达 600 Mbit/s,上传速率可达 100 Mbit/s。
对于近距离通信,华为智能手机可以使用NFC、蓝牙5.2和WiFi 6。结合我们的参考路由器,我们测量了传输时的平均速度为692 Mbit/s,接收数据时的平均速度为727 Mbit/s,使nova 9在我们的测试领域处于倒数第二。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Xiaomi 11T | |
Honor 50 | |
Motorola Edge 20 | |
Huawei Nova 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Xiaomi 11T | |
Motorola Edge 20 | |
Honor 50 | |
Huawei Nova 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G |
电话功能和语音质量 - 与华为的良好连接
在打电话的时候,nova 9能产生很高的音量,并提供良好的噪音抑制。谈话双方都很容易理解,他们的声音也能清晰地传递。
电话应用程序提供快速访问最近的电话和数字键盘,你也可以从这里访问收藏夹和存储的联系人。
摄像机 - 广泛的Vlog功能
华为nova 9的前置摄像头能够记录自拍,分辨率为32MP。细节刻画得很好,颜色再现得相对自然。然而,专业模式仅适用于主摄像头。
nova 9背面的5千万像素传感器确保近距离拍摄有非常丰富的细节。颜色显得非常鲜艳,我们的测试对象被清晰地再现出来,并具有丰富的细节。我们的全景照片也显示出鲜艳的色彩,但在阴天时物体显得略微模糊。用800万像素的超广角镜头拍摄的照片也显示了前面提到的明亮的色彩,但物体的边缘和细节在这里也显得不是很有层次感。
用数码变焦放大的物体显示出同样的模糊性,在全景拍摄中也可以看到这种模糊性。在恶劣的光线条件下,nova 9能够清晰地记录图像中心的细节。除了已经提到的传感器外,华为智能手机还包括一个用于深度信息的200万像素传感器和一个用于微距拍摄的200万像素传感器。相机软件的专业模式允许你手动调整焦点区域、ISO值、曝光、照明和白平衡。
视频记录显示出与我们的测试照片相同的质量。你可以选择30帧/秒的4K分辨率或30或60帧/秒的1080p和720p分辨率。一个特殊的VLOG模式允许你创建在前后摄像头之间无缝转换的记录。画中画和同时显示前后摄像头的对象也是可以无缝实现的。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
NahaufnahmePanoramabildUltraweitwinkelZoom (5-Fach)LowLightColorChecker Passport的图像显示,nova 9记录的颜色比应该的颜色略为明亮。测试图显示了许多细节和鲜艳的色彩。在下角,我们看到对比度有轻微的弱点。


配件和保修 - 包括保护罩
除了带有相应USB-C电缆的快速充电器外,nova 9的包装盒还包括一个SIM卡工具和一个硅胶制成的保护罩。你还可以直接从制造商那里购买其他配件。
华为为nova 9提供24个月的保修。
输入设备和操作 - SwiftKey作为GBoard的替代品
显示屏 - 一个120赫兹的OLED面板
|
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 621 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.88
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.1
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.17
Huawei Nova 9 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | Honor 50 OLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | Motorola Edge 20 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5" | Xiaomi 11T AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -41% | -32% | -15% | 4% | |
Brightness middle | 621 | 731 18% | 479 -23% | 736 19% | 781 26% |
Brightness | 632 | 722 14% | 480 -24% | 751 19% | 782 24% |
Brightness Distribution | 96 | 97 1% | 94 -2% | 96 0% | 94 -2% |
Black Level * | |||||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.7 | 3.1 -82% | 2.06 -21% | 2.18 -28% | 2 -18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.8 | 5.8 -107% | 4.54 -62% | 5.69 -103% | 2.9 -4% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 4.2 -91% | 3.5 -59% | 2.1 5% | 2.3 -5% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.19 100% | 2.205 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.28 96% |
CCT | 6806 96% | 6818 95% | 6794 96% | 6563 99% | 6852 95% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 500 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8531 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 11 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.8 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
2.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.6 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.5 ms). |
表现 - 良好的日常表现
华为使用的是 高通骁龙778G4G和8GB内存,以确保nova 9的系统运行顺畅。在基准测试中,Android 智能手机提供了一个平均良好的结果,只是在图形重度测试中比我们测试领域的其他智能手机稍差。其性能与5G版本的骁龙778相同。
在日常操作中,即使是要求较高的应用程序也能快速启动,而且系统总是可以顺利运行。由于缺乏Play Store支持,我们无法运行一些标准测试,如Geekbench 5.4或当前版本的3D和PCMark。
PCMark for Android - Work 2.0 performance score (sort by value) | |
Huawei Nova 9 | |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | |
Xiaomi 11T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (8501 - 11645, n=2) |
GFXBench 3.0 | |
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL (sort by value) | |
Huawei Nova 9 | |
Honor 50 | |
Motorola Edge 20 | |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | |
Xiaomi 11T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (59 - 69, n=11) | |
Average of class Smartphone (15 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Nova 9 | |
Honor 50 | |
Motorola Edge 20 | |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | |
Xiaomi 11T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (77 - 79, n=11) | |
Average of class Smartphone (12 - 502, n=174, last 2 years) |
GFXBench 3.1 | |
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Nova 9 | |
Honor 50 | |
Motorola Edge 20 | |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | |
Xiaomi 11T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (48 - 53, n=11) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.9 - 166, n=174, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Huawei Nova 9 | |
Honor 50 | |
Motorola Edge 20 | |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | |
Xiaomi 11T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (56 - 58, n=11) | |
Average of class Smartphone (8.3 - 365, n=174, last 2 years) |
AnTuTu v8 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Huawei Nova 9 | |
Motorola Edge 20 | |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | |
Xiaomi 11T | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (422597 - 452805, n=5) |
在浏览器基准测试中,华为nova 9只排在我们测试领域的低端。然而,在日常操作中,网站的渲染速度仍然很快,媒体内容的加载也很快。此外,流畅的滚动也是可能的,没有任何问题。
Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=172, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95) | |
Honor 50 (Chrome 96) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (58.8 - 86.8, n=11) | |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93) | |
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303) | |
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95) | |
Honor 50 (Chrome 96) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (102.6 - 155.3, n=7) | |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93) | |
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95) | |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (93 - 131, n=10) | |
Honor 50 (Chrome 96) | |
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303) | |
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95) | |
Honor 50 (Chrome 96) | |
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (23915 - 31915, n=11) | |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93) | |
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Huawei Nova 9 (Huawei Browser 12.0.0.303) | |
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G (Chrome 93) | |
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (1323 - 1893, n=11) | |
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=171, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Honor 50 (Chrome 96) | |
Motorola Edge 20 (Chrome 95) |
* ... smaller is better
nova 9的128GB存储空间在我们的测试中显示了竞争对手水平的快速访问率。它不可能通过microSD卡扩展存储。
Huawei Nova 9 | Honor 50 | Motorola Edge 20 | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G | Xiaomi 11T | Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | 0% | -17% | -23% | 4% | 16% | 67% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 1030 | 984 -4% | 1011 -2% | 951 -8% | 1790 74% | 1602 ? 56% | 2004 ? 95% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 759 | 609 -20% | 471.4 -38% | 486.5 -36% | 942 24% | 748 ? -1% | 1618 ? 113% |
Random Read 4KB | 229.6 | 245.7 7% | 190.2 -17% | 168.2 -27% | 139.3 -39% | 243 ? 6% | 283 ? 23% |
Random Write 4KB | 239.2 | 280.2 17% | 210.6 -12% | 192.5 -20% | 133.3 -44% | 244 ? 2% | 324 ? 35% |
游戏--华为nova 9适合游戏
内部 高通Adreno 642L华为nova 9的图形单元能够在高图形设置下流畅地运行更加苛刻的游戏。我们测试的游戏没有出现任何微小的停顿或类似的情况,控制总是轻松而流畅地工作。
辐射 - 扬声器适用于声音
温度
在负载情况下,华为nova 9的表面升温到最高34.1℃(93.4°F)。在这种情况下,智能手机只是感觉到温暖,不会变得太热,比如说拿在手里。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.4 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
nova 9能产生相对较大的音量和强调高频的声谱。这使它能够相对较好地再现语音内容,但对于更复杂的媒体内容,建议使用外部扬声器或耳机。这款华为智能手机有一个听筒和一个扬声器用于声音输出。
Huawei Nova 9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi 11T audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 36%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池寿命 - 它不像竞争对手那样持续时间长
消耗功率
我们的测量结果证明,nova 9的功耗与我们测试领域中的其他智能手机相似。它只是在我们的空闲--最大场景中略微多用了一点电量。
Off / Standby | ![]() ![]() |
Idle | ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Load |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | |
Key:
min: ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Huawei Nova 9 4300 mAh | Honor 50 4300 mAh | Motorola Edge 20 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G 4500 mAh | Xiaomi 11T 5000 mAh | Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||||
WiFi v1.3 | 652 | 907 39% | 716 10% | 721 11% | 813 25% | 760 ? 17% | 1022 ? 57% |
Power Consumption | -8% | 16% | 13% | 10% | -1% | -6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 0.96 | 1.02 -6% | 1 -4% | 1.2 -25% | 0.78 19% | 1.106 ? -15% | 0.872 ? 9% |
Idle Average * | 2.47 | 2.98 -21% | 1.3 47% | 1.4 43% | 1.86 25% | 2.07 ? 16% | 1.435 ? 42% |
Idle Maximum * | 2.55 | 3.11 -22% | 1.6 37% | 1.7 33% | 1.88 26% | 2.32 ? 9% | 1.583 ? 38% |
Load Average * | 3.85 | 3.59 7% | 3.9 -1% | 3.6 6% | 3.98 -3% | 4.17 ? -8% | 6.97 ? -81% |
Load Maximum * | 7.43 | 7.12 4% | 7.2 3% | 6.9 7% | 8.78 -18% | 7.81 ? -5% | 10.4 ? -40% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
0% | 13% /
15% | 12% /
13% | 18% /
12% | 8% /
2% | 26% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
在我们现实的WLAN测试中,华为nova 9实现了几乎11小时的运行时间。就凭这一点,它对其4300毫安时的电池的利用还不如类似装备的Honor 50,比如说。
使用附带的66瓦快速充电器,电池可以在大约1小时内完全充电。
Huawei Nova 9 4300 mAh | Honor 50 4300 mAh | Motorola Edge 20 4000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G 4500 mAh | Xiaomi 11T 5000 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 652 | 907 39% | 716 10% | 721 11% | 813 25% |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 没有谷歌,但有价格优势
通过nova 9,华为推出了一款在视觉上与Honor 50完全相同的智能手机。规格也是一样的,只是你不得不放弃5G和谷歌服务。虽然你几乎不必在性能方面做出任何妥协,但主要在电池寿命和软件方面存在一些不足。
华为nova 9同样装备精良,比Honor 50更实惠,但在电池寿命方面显示出一些弱点。
nova 9仍然是一款拥有良好技术的智能手机,它适合所有无论如何不想使用谷歌服务和5G的人。此外,该机的价格约为100欧元(约113美元),低于 Honor 50,同时仍然提供相同的相机设备。这也应该对购买决定产生影响。然而,那些可以接受较少内存的人已经可以用比nova 9更少的钱买到6GB内存的Honor 50。
另一方面,与 摩托罗拉Edge 20和 小米11T,竞争对手也有类似的、部分功能更强大的智能手机。
Huawei Nova 9
- 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker