Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyarrealme C30智能手机评测--快速存储和大量条状物的经济型手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Realme C30 T612, Mali-G52 MP1 | 182 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 75.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Realme C31 T612, Mali-G52 MP1 | 197 g | 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 75.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Motorola Moto E32s Helio G37, PowerVR GE8320 | 185 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 77 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Nokia G11 T606, Mali-G57 MP1 | 190 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
外壳和功能 - 重量轻，结构紧凑，但不太结实
Realme在市场上推出了另一款廉价手机C30，它相当配备了一个摄像头，并没有在背面显示两个或更多的镜头，其中只有一个是真正可用的。32GB版本由realme自己提供，价格为139欧元，我们得到了64GB版本进行测试，没有价格信息。
然而，由于在测试时，内存较小的型号已经在amazon.de上以119欧元的价格上市。，较大的型号可能在互联网上以139欧元（约119美元）的价格出售。
乍一看，realme C30的浅蓝色和绿色版本的不寻常的条纹设计很引人注目，而黑色模型的背面有一个小规模的华夫饼干图案。这些图案不只是装饰，实际上可以清楚地感觉到，与光亮的塑料一起看起来很别致。相机模块原来相当大，但仔细一看，发现实际的相机镜头相当小。
外壳很轻，相对紧凑，但在稳定性方面可以做得更好：安静的吱吱声和明显的扭动就是证明。realme C30的USB端口不再是最新的了：无法理解为什么制造商在这里安装了一个microUSB，从而继续鼓励电缆混乱。
很好的是，realme安装了2个SIM卡插槽，这也是独立于microSD端口的设计。microSD读卡器的速度一般。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Nokia G11 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto E32s (Angelbird V60) | |
| Realme C30 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Realme C31 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 只有少数LTE频率
realme C30有一个LTE调制解调器，但它只支持中欧最必要的频率，所以在旅行时连接到LTE网络可能很困难。在我们的测试中，接收效果经常低于一半，而质量更高的手机能提供更多的信号强度。realme C30没有NFC模块，所以不能使用谷歌支付等移动支付服务。
不幸的是，Wi-Fi模块只支持Wi-Fi 4，所以传输速度很慢。与其他带有WiFi 5的廉价手机相比，这一点尤其明显，例如 摩托罗拉Moto E32s或 诺基亚G11.
使用的软件是Android 11，安全补丁是从2022年8月开始的，因此在测试时只是稍微过期。在我们的测试期间，几乎每个月都有一次更新，但制造商并没有说明未来多久会执行更新。令人讨厌的是，没有DRM认证，所以你通常只能以标清方式观看大型流媒体门户的内容。
这款廉价的手机也没有配备指纹扫描仪，但前置摄像头可以通过面部识别来解锁realme C30。这在光线充足的情况下效果很好，但由于是纯软件解决方案，所以并不安全。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Realme C31 | |
| Realme C30 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Realme C31 | |
| Realme C30 | |
摄像机 - 单一摄像机必须证明自己
后面只有一个摄像头，分辨率为800万像素，基于SmartSens传感器。录制的照片只提供平淡的色彩，而且当你放大时，很快就会发现清晰度不是很好。表面也显示很少的细节；例如，你可以用更高质量的手机摄像头看到墙壁上的结构，而真正的C30的主摄像头却无法显示。
在黑暗中，细节表现下降得更多，但至少增亮效果还算可以。视频最多能以1080p和30帧记录，但它们也受到低细节表现的影响。在光线良好的情况下，图片和视频都可以用于简单的使用。然而，那些有更高要求的人将会感到失望。
前置摄像头的分辨率为500万像素，在光线良好的情况下，自拍效果相当不错，在黑发区也能看到一点画风。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
显示--光亮度小
1,600 x 720像素的IPS显示屏显示了部分相当类似于 realme C31例如，386cd/m²的平均亮度对于廉价手机来说是一个体面的水平，但对于在明亮的光线下使用来说太低了。亮度分布也不那么均匀，黑值增加了，这在黑暗的屏幕背景和不规则的色调导致的很少的环境光线中特别明显。
我们没有注意到这款廉价的手机有任何PWM闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 410 cd/m²
Contrast: 820:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.56 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
94.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.179
| Realme C30 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Realme C31 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto E32s IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Nokia G11 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -39% | 21% | -22% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 62 ? -51% | 30 ? 27% | 48 ? -17% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 34 ? -26% | 23 ? 15% | 34 ? -26% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | 2% | -13% | -7% | |
| Brightness middle | 410 | 413 1% | 346 -16% | 502 22% |
| Brightness | 386 | 394 2% | 330 -15% | 486 26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 91 7% | 90 6% | 89 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.4 20% | 0.47 6% | 0.53 -6% |
| Contrast | 820 | 1033 26% | 736 -10% | 947 15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.56 | 4.89 -7% | 5.4 -18% | 5.73 -26% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.37 | 8.35 -13% | 9 -22% | 8.72 -18% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 4.9 -23% | 5.5 -38% | 6.8 -70% |
| Gamma | 2.179 101% | 2.395 92% | 2.874 77% | 2.352 94% |
| CCT | 7450 87% | 7598 86% | 5971 109% | 8800 74% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -19% /
-6% | 4% /
-7% | -15% /
-10% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 19 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命--相对较快
的 Unisoc Tiger T612作为经济型智能手机的SoC，并不是一个糟糕的选择，毕竟它为日常使用提供了合理稳固的性能。这意味着在菜单中的导航大多是流畅的。然而，对于复杂的应用程序或高要求的游戏来说，其性能仍然太低。
这款手机在我们的基准测试中也表现良好。快速的UFS 2.2内存也让人觉得realme C30比一些便宜的对手更适合日常使用。
这款手机在负载情况下，正面和背面会明显发热，在炎热的环境下，背面的外壳温度也可能变得不舒服。然而，总的来说，发热仍然在限制范围之内。
单声道扬声器在声音方面是相当重的。因此，声音通常传输得很清楚，但在最大音量时，偶尔会有点令人不快的耳鸣。如果你想要更好的声音，你可以使用3.5毫米音频端口或蓝牙5.0；aptX和aptX HD是可用的，但不是更现代的编解码版本。
在我们的无线网络测试中，这款手机的5000毫安时电池获得了15:29小时的体面运行时间。然而，这比对比设备--诺基亚G11--少了一点。 诺基亚G11甚至能达到相当高的水平。尽管如此，在适度使用的情况下，它应该足以满足两天的运行时间。附带的充电器管理10瓦，因此需要2个多小时才能再次完全填满空电池。
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value) | |
| Realme C30 | |
| Realme C31 | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Average UNISOC T612 (6566 - 7776, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years) | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme C30 | |
| Realme C31 | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Average UNISOC T612 (4.7 - 10, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme C30 | |
| Realme C31 | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Average UNISOC T612 (5.3 - 5.6, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme C30 | |
| Realme C31 | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Average UNISOC T612 (3 - 6.4, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
| Realme C30 | |
| Realme C31 | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Average UNISOC T612 (1.9 - 2, n=5) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| Realme C30 | Realme C31 | Motorola Moto E32s | Nokia G11 | Average 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -44% | -62% | -60% | 15% | 168% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 569 | 478.8 -16% | 248.6 -56% | 252.7 -56% | 770 ? 35% | 1834 ? 222% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 414.7 | 131.9 -68% | 184.3 -56% | 187.6 -55% | 399 ? -4% | 1426 ? 244% |
| Random Read 4KB | 125.4 | 89 -29% | 49.1 -61% | 48.2 -62% | 156.6 ? 25% | 278 ? 122% |
| Random Write 4KB | 169.4 | 61.5 -64% | 40 -76% | 59 -65% | 177.7 ? 5% | 310 ? 83% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.2 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Realme C30 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 82% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 14% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia G11 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Nokia G11 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto E32s | |
| Realme C31 | |
| Realme C30 | |
Pros
Cons
结论--微不足道的设备符合体面的性能
realme C30是一款不寻常的手机。结构明显、棱角分明的设计和非常便宜的手机中的快速内存促成了这种印象。对于一款入门级手机来说，其性能是令人信服的，但当然，你不应该期待奇迹。屏幕足够明亮，单摄像头至少是诚实的，因为它没有相当无用的附加镜头。
缓慢的Wi-Fi和少数LTE频率限制了现实世界中C30的通信能力。它还缺乏NFC模块、指纹传感器和DRM认证。
realme C30是一款装备非常简单的入门级手机，主要可以在性能和光线以及奢侈的设计方面说服人。
随着 realme C31制造商在这个价格范围内已经有了另一款手机，它能以更快的无线局域网和同样多的功率得分，而且它也有一个指纹识别传感器。然而，它要重得多，而且设计也不尽如人意。摩托罗拉的 摩托E32s也有快得多的Wi-Fi，但提供的性能比我们的评测样本还要低。
价格和可用性
在测试时，realme C30还没有在中欧的这么多零售商处上市，这款手机应该从10月初开始发售。
在amazon.de你可以订购这款手机的32GB版本，交货时间为几天，价格略低于120欧元加运费。目前，该版本也可在Saturn和MediaMarkt但交货日期还没有确定。
Realme C30
-
09/28/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Price comparison
