realme GT Neo 3评论。具有快速充电技术的创新智能手机

Name: Realme GT Neo 3
Brand: Realme

超快或更快？

赛车式的设计，150瓦的充电和专用显示芯片，使游戏更有效率。realme GT Neo 3有很多东西可以提供。在我们的评论中，我们对这款智能手机进行了测试，看看它是否达到了其大胆的承诺。

Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 06/29/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android ARM Smartphone

那些推断realme GT Neo 3是GT Neo 2的继任者的人 GT Neo 2命名的人在看了价格后一定会问自己。那为什么它的价格会贵这么多呢？

事实上，今年realme正在大幅扩大其手机组合，所以它是realme GT Neo 3T应该被看作是GT Neo 2的直接继任者。 GT Neo 2，而GT Neo 3则凭借新的SoC和一些有趣的设备细节转向更高（价格）领域。

我们的深入审查将检查智能手机的所有细节。特别是，我们将阐明新处理器的性能如何，专用显示芯片带来了什么，以及新的150瓦充电技术实际上有多快。所以，本着赛车设计的精神。各就各位!准备好!出发！

Test device courtesy of realme Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Realme GT Neo 3 (GT Series)

Processor

MediaTek Dimensity 8100 8 x 2 - 2.9 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55

Graphics adapter

ARM Mali-G610 MP6

Memory

12 GB

Display

6.70 inch 20:9, 2412 x 1080 pixel 394 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, AMOLED, 1.07 billion colours, Gorilla Glass 5, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB

, 240 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass, Heart Rate Monitor

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B13/B17/B18/B19/B20/B26/B28/B38/B39/B40/B41/B66), 5G (n1/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 163.3 x 75.6

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 150W UltraDart Charge, also available with 80 watt charging

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/1.88, phase comparison-AF (omnidirectional), OIS, dual LED-flash, Videos @2160p/60fps (Camera 1); 8.0MP, f/2.25, wide angle lens (Camera 2); 2.0MP, f/2.4, macro lens (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.45, Videos @1080p/30fps

Additional features

Speakers: stereo speakers (hybrid), Keyboard: virtual keyboard, charger, USB-cable, SIM tool, bumper, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.910W/kg (head), 1.274W/kg (body); , fanless

Weight

188 g

Price

700 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	Realme GT Neo 3 Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6	188 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2412x1080
85.2 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2021	Realme GT Neo 2 SD 870, Adreno 650	200 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.62"	2400x1080
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2021	Google Pixel 6 Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20	207 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.40"	2400x1080
88.1 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Xiaomi 12X SD 870, Adreno 650	176 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.28"	2400x1080
88.8 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G SD 888 5G, Adreno 660	177 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.40"	2340x1080

案例：灵感来自于赛车传奇

我们已经看到GT Neo 2试图用它的霓虹灯绿色外壳来打响知名度。对于realme GT Neo 3，潜在买家可以选择简单的沥青黑颜色，但这将减弱智能手机的特殊吸引力；带有赛车条纹的亮蓝色或白色变体则更有趣。根据制造商的说法，它们从20世纪60年代的传奇赛车中获得了灵感。

背面由哑光防眩光玻璃制成，不会留下明显的指纹。在正面，屏幕由大猩猩5号玻璃保护，不幸的是，这已经不是最新版本的保护玻璃了。相比之下，谷歌Pixel 6或小米12X配备的是弹性更强的大猩猩玻璃Victus 6。

不幸的是，realme GT Neo 3在扭动时发出吱吱声，这降低了我们对质量的总体印象。否则，这款智能手机很稳定，能很好地承受压力。它的使用感觉也很好，就其尺寸而言，188克的重量相当轻。

没有IP认证，所以客户不能确定他们的智能手机是否能在水中游泳。

尺寸比较

设备。realme GT Neo 3的储蓄选项

制造商在可供选择的变体方面做出了一个不寻常的决定。这些通常只在内存方面有区别，但在realme GT Neo 3中还有另一个区别（除了廉价型号的内存较少外）。廉价的GT Neo 3仅用80瓦特充电，而更昂贵的变体则用最大150瓦特将电池抽满。

价格如下。

realme GT Neo 3（80瓦）8GB内存/256GB：取决于购买的国家。在德国：599.99欧元
realme GT Neo 3 (150瓦) 12 GB RAM / 256 GB取决于购买的国家。在德国：699.99欧元

因此，如果便宜的机型适合他们的需要，买家就有机会节省。

Realme智能手机的另一个不错的功能是新的蓝牙5.3功能，这应该是为了提高连接质量和连接设备的电池寿命，以及其他方面。

当然，NFC也是可用的，而且realme承诺背部的覆盖面积特别大。这在一个简短的测试中得到了证实。然而，正如制造商在其网站上所说，NFC并不能在GT Neo 3的所有地方工作，也不能从每个角度工作。

软件：Realme智能手机的短暂更新承诺

realme UI 3安装在智能手机上，用户界面是基于Android 12。然而，它在许多方面看起来像Android 11--除了谷歌自己的应用程序外，谷歌推出的新设计还没有被纳入系统界面。如果你以前有一部旧的Android 手机，这也有助于你找到自己的方向。

不像运营商GT Neo 3将只收到2个Android 更新和3年的安全补丁。在撰写本文时，所安装的安全补丁是2022年5月的，因此不再是最新的。

有一个DRM-L1认证，所以在流媒体服务中观看高清内容是可以没有问题的。

通信与GNSS：快速连接

realme GT Neo 3配备了WiFi 6，因此在WLAN传输速率方面可以轻松跟上同类智能手机。SoC甚至会支持WiFi 6E，但realme并没有启用这一功能。

根据我们的测试，千兆字节的连接不能被完全利用，但你仍然可以很好地利用它。我们使用我们的华硕ROG AXE11000参考路由器进行测试。

数据传输以相对稳定的速度工作，但偶尔会出现接收下降的情况。

在移动连接方面，GT Neo 3也不必回避顶级的竞争性智能手机。包括5G NSA和SA，以及大量的4G频率，所以这应该足以满足世界上大多数国家的移动互联网。

在测试期间，我们还反复检查了4G网络的接收质量。realme手机与其他高端手机处于类似水平，无论是在建筑物还是在狭窄的小巷，都能提供良好的信号质量。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	855 (649^min - 889^max) MBit/s +6%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	803 (630^min - 853^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	736 (644^min - 826^max) MBit/s -8%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)	714 MBit/s -11%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	860 (787^min - 887^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	745 (391^min - 809^max) MBit/s -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	737 (358^min - 769^max) MBit/s -14%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)	729 MBit/s -15%
iperf3 transmit AX12
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	867 (836^min - 893^max) MBit/s
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	802 (421^min - 857^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	895 (870^min - 907^max) MBit/s
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	771 (585^min - 832^max) MBit/s

Realme GT Neo 3; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø802 (630-853)

Realme GT Neo 3; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø860 (787-887)

智能手机在户外的定位相对较快，持续几秒钟就能准确定位，精确度可达1米。在SBAS辅助系统的帮助下，这种精确的定位是由众多卫星快速找到的。

为了进行实际测试，我们去骑自行车，并带着Garmin Venu 2智能手表进行比较。在这里，GT Neo 3的表现相当糟糕：智能手机几乎无法识别我们在骑行过程中的环形路线，而且在老城区的狭窄街道上多次穿过建筑物。总的来说，在运动中，你不应该过分依赖定位的准确性。

电话和语音质量。大部分都很清晰，可以理解

realme已经安装了谷歌的手机应用，所以Android ，用户应该能够迅速掌握这款智能手机。

通过听筒的语音质量很好，麦克风能清晰地捕捉到我们的声音。我们还可以通过扬声器和免提麦克风进行良好的沟通，但realme打电话的人说话声音不能太小，否则接收者将听不到任何声音。

相机。仍然没有混合变焦

具有光学图像稳定功能的索尼IMX766被用作相机的主传感器。它的原始分辨率为5000万像素，但通常只拍摄1200万像素的照片，并使用较大的像素以获得更高的光输出。

图像质量不错，但明亮的地方偶尔会出现过亮的情况，其他地方的亮度也可以更好一点。在低光和高对比度的情况下，有很好的细节显示，但在黑暗区域的闪电不足。

有些恼人的是，该相机仍然不提供广角和主摄像头之间的混合变焦；你只能在镜头之间直接切换。否则，广角镜头可以很好地纠正失真，但在放大时有明显的细节损失。

视频的最高录制速度为4K和60帧，你必须在录制前决定所需镜头。图像质量，以及自动对焦和曝光补偿的反应，都是无可挑剔的。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Blume Hauptkamera Umgebung Hauptkamera Low Light Weitwinkelkamera

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在实验室里，我们又看了一下相机在受控条件下的表现。在这里，我们看到良好的对比度再现，以及干净的色彩过渡。然而，一般的图像清晰度可以高一点。

ColorChecker Realme GT Neo 3: 9.83 ∆E min: 3.64 - max: 20.5 ∆E

附件和保修。包括充电器

买家会收到一个指定充电功率的充电器，一条USB线，一个SIM卡工具和一个硅胶保险杠。realme目前没有在其网站上提供智能手机的特殊配件。

在欧盟购买时，保修期为24个月。这在其他国家和地区可能有所不同。

输入设备和操作。可测量心率

触摸屏对输入的反应迅速而可靠。由于采用了120赫兹显示屏，输入工作更加顺畅。你可以在120赫兹和60赫兹之间选择，也可以选择激活动态调整。

指纹传感器的反应非常迅速，能够可靠地识别我们的指纹。然而，它被放置在机箱上的位置很低，这意味着你有时必须将拇指完全抓在边缘才能工作。

银行软件和私人文件等应用可以用指纹传感器解锁，也可以很容易地用来测量心率。

人脸识别也是可能的，但只能通过一个相对不可靠的软件解决方案。

▶ load Youtube video

显示。色彩非常准确

屏幕使用2412 x 1080的分辨率，可以显示10.7亿种颜色，也是HDR功能的。我们在测试中用分光光度计测得的亮度高达759 cd/m²。这是一个很好的价值，但一些智能手机，如小米12X显然在前面。如果没有亮度传感器，realme智能手机的最大可能亮度为500 cd/m²。

我们观察到通常的PWM闪烁，这是OLED屏幕的典型特征，在50%左右的亮度下特别明显。在开发者设置中，有一个选项可以激活直流调光，这大大减少了闪烁效果，但也可能导致低亮度时的颜色变化。


770 cd/m²	765 cd/m²	753 cd/m²
768 cd/m²	759 cd/m²	749 cd/m²
759 cd/m²	751 cd/m²	750 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 770 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 758.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.96 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 759 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.232

	Realme GT Neo 3 AMOLED, 2412x1080, 6.7"	Realme GT Neo 2 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Google Pixel 6 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4"	Xiaomi 12X OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"	Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.4"
Screen		-108%	-6%	23%	-10%
Brightness middle	759	767 1%	805 6%	910 20%	758 0%
Brightness	758	767 1%	805 6%	908 20%	758 0%
Brightness Distribution	97	97 0%	98 1%	97 0%	99 2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.3	3.47 -167%	1.4 -8%	0.8 38%	1.5 -15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.73	9.23 -238%	3.7 -36%	1.8 34%	3.1 -14%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.7	5.9 -247%	1.8 -6%	1.3 24%	2.3 -35%
Gamma	2.232 ^99%	2.275 ^97%	2.29 ^96%	2.25 ^98%	2.06 ^107%
CCT	6616 ^98%	7800 ^83%	6507 ^100%	6414 ^101%	6378 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

359 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 359 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 359 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

镜头下的画面是固定的放大镜和不一样的智能显示

对于色彩的准确性，我们建议使用 "自然 "配置文件。这样显示器就能提供非常准确的色彩再现，看起来就像人眼看到的现实。sRGB色彩空间的覆盖率为100%。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3 ms rise
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 2 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 8 ms rise
18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

这款智能手机在户外表现良好。即使在相当明亮的日子里，屏幕内容通常仍可识别。

从侧面看，图像看起来与你直视屏幕时几乎完全一样。因此，可视角度是非常好的。

性能。上流社会的力量

新的联发科Dimensity 8100被用作realme智能手机的SoC。虽然这在性能上不属于绝对的顶级梯队，但它仅次于它，因此可以在某种程度上让便宜的智能手机拥有接近旗舰的性能。

事实上，现实世界中的GT Neo 3在许多基准测试中被证明是非常快的，甚至时不时地在与竞争设备的竞争中取得第一名。然而，它没有快速的单核心，所以在不支持多处理器核心的应用程序中，它被迫让路。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	1092 Points +12%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	1041 Points +7%
Realme GT Neo 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288	1004 Points +3%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	1000 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points +2%
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	971 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (887 - 971, n=3)	922 Points -5%
Multi-Core
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	4012 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (3701 - 4012, n=3)	3811 Points -5%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	3377 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	3204 Points -20%
Realme GT Neo 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288	3095 Points -23%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	2805 Points -30%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	819433 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (778486 - 819433, n=3)	802429 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)	798401 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	743221 Points -9%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	714406 Points -13%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	702981 Points -14%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	14650 Points
Realme GT Neo 2 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 12288	14573 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	14107 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (12684 - 14650, n=3)	13463 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)	12976 Points -11%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	11778 Points -20%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	10409 Points -29%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)	884 Points +12%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	871 Points +10%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	849 Points +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (764 - 850, n=3)	801 Points +2%
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	789 Points
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	719 Points -9%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points +5%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	6287 Points +5%
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	6015 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (5393 - 6157, n=3)	5855 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	5839 Points -3%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	5551 Points -8%
System
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	11696 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (10066 - 11897, n=3)	11220 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	9119 Points -22%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	9085 Points -22%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	9002 Points -23%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	6683 Points +5%
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	6356 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	6248 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	6071 Points -4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (4662 - 6356, n=3)	5678 Points -11%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points +67%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	15303 Points +51%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	13588 Points +34%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (10106 - 11595, n=3)	10874 Points +8%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	10386 Points +3%
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	10106 Points
Web
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	1851 Points +6%
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	1742 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (1651 - 1742, n=3)	1708 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points -10%
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	1519 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	1501 Points -14%

AImark - Score v2.x
Xiaomi 12X Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Adreno 650, 8192	123847 Points +1697%
Realme GT Neo 3 MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288	6893 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (6367 - 6893, n=2)	6630 Points -4%
Google Pixel 6 Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 8192	5723 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 6144	Points -100%

的作为图形单元的ARM Mali-G610 MP6作为图形单元也提供了很好的性能率，在非常苛刻的基准测试中只需与更高质量的SoC抗衡。

3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1823 Points +58%
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1236 Points +7%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1232 Points +7%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1152 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	974 Points -15%
Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2067 Points +40%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1500 Points +1%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1481 Points
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1237 Points -16%
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1232 Points -17%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7064 Points +107%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5872 Points +72%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4304 Points +26%
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4230 Points +24%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3406 Points
Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6954 Points +108%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5683 Points +70%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4309 Points +29%
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4232 Points +27%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3336 Points

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +100%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +98%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps +68%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps +50%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	274 fps
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	228 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	178 fps -35%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	171 fps -38%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	144 fps -47%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps +90%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	103 fps +72%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	102 fps +70%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	79 fps +32%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	169 fps
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	140 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps -36%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	104 fps -38%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90 fps -47%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	88 fps +47%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps +23%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	73 fps +22%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57 fps -5%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	99 fps -9%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	75 fps -31%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	72 fps -34%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -45%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps -4%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -21%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -32%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps 0%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	45 fps -24%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps -27%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -32%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps 0%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	40 fps -5%
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps -19%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	30 fps -29%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	25 fps +108%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	23 fps +92%
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	22 fps +83%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	18 fps +50%
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	12 fps
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59 fps
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps -14%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -17%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	47 fps -20%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	69 fps
Realme GT Neo 2 Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps -22%
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	50 fps -28%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	49 fps -29%

网络浏览在realme智能手机上以良好的速度运行。我们的评测设备在对比设备中属于中场，但仍然提供快速的网站加载时间，通常在滚动时加载图像。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points +50%
Xiaomi 12X (Chrome 98.0.4758.101)	97.5 Points +21%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	90.1 Points +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (80.5 - 82.5, n=3)	81.4 Points +1%
Realme GT Neo 3 (Chrome 103)	80.505 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)	63.9 Points -21%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +88%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	104 runs/min +44%
Realme GT Neo 3 (Chome 103)	72.4 runs/min
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (64.5 - 79.3, n=3)	72.1 runs/min 0%
Xiaomi 12X (Chrome 98.0.4758.101)	72 runs/min -1%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)	46.92 runs/min -35%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Xiaomi 12X (Chrome 98.0.4758.101)	151 Points +50%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +47%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)	136 Points +35%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	110 Points +9%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (101 - 113, n=3)	106.7 Points +6%
Realme GT Neo 3 (Chrome 103)	101 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	43376 Points +31%
Xiaomi 12X (Chrome 98.0.4758.101)	40652 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (33046 - 35255, n=3)	33846 Points +2%
Realme GT Neo 3 (Chrome 103)	33238 Points
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)	31070 Points -7%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * -18%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G (Chrome 96)	1417 ms * -7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (1274 - 1447, n=3)	1349 ms * -2%
Realme GT Neo 3 (Chrome 103)	1326.2 ms *
Xiaomi 12X (Chrome 98.0.4758.101)	1069 ms * +19%
Google Pixel 6 (Chrome 96)	1034 ms * +22%

* ... smaller is better

UFS 3.1能够缩短加载时间，在realme GT Neo 3中工作非常迅速。

	Realme GT Neo 3	Realme GT Neo 2	Google Pixel 6	Xiaomi 12X	Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G	Average 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-21%	-50%	-19%	-29%	-9%	-5%
Sequential Read 256KB	1779	1761 -1%	1546 -13%	1732 -3%	1639 -8%	1749 ?(950 - 2037, n=101) -2%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 3%
Sequential Write 256KB	1421	763 -46%	233.4 -84%	795 -44%	760 -47%	1163 ?(452 - 2004, n=101) -18%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 0%
Random Read 4KB	331	281.1 -15%	126.2 -62%	291.9 -12%	245.1 -26%	286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=101) -14%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) -16%
Random Write 4KB	330	260.2 -21%	190.3 -42%	279.9 -15%	211.2 -36%	319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=102) -3%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) -6%

游戏：可能有60帧的游戏

realme智能手机能够达到120帧是可能的，但这首先必须由游戏开发者启用。因此，在我们测试的游戏中，最高只能达到60帧。这些帧率是在Armajet和PUBG Mobile的低细节下达到的。在《PUBG》中，高设置下最多只能达到40 fps。我们用GameBench测量帧率。.

据realme称，这款智能手机有自己的显示芯片，可以通过人工智能和图像分析来计算中间帧，从而使游戏运行得更加流畅。例如，元神冲击是支持的游戏之一，要求高的玩家可以有更流畅的滚动体验。

Realme GT Neo 3; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø59.4 (55-61)

Realme GT Neo 3; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 2.0.0: Ø59.6 (57-61)

Realme GT Neo 3; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.0.0: Ø39.5 (37-41)

排放。轻度节流

温度

realme智能手机在负载下会明显发热。虽然表面的温度并不总是变得很关键，但在较高的环境温度下，它们可能会这样做。

另一方面，芯片的性能似乎只受到高温的最小影响：在3D Mark Wild Life压力测试中，性能最初下降，但再次增加到原来的水平。

Max. Load

Idle


44.8 °C	43.6 °C	41.6 °C
45 °C	43.7 °C	42.1 °C
45 °C	43.6 °C	41.9 °C

Maximum: 45 °C
Average: 43.5 °C


40.5 °C	41.9 °C	42.8 °C
39.7 °C	42 °C	44 °C
39.4 °C	41.5 °C	43.7 °C

Maximum: 44 °C
Average: 41.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 40.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 43.5 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	90.1 (19.7^min) %
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67.8 (17.5^min) % -25%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58.6 (20^min) % -35%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53.1 (22.2^min) % -41%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	93.5 (8.28^min) %
Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	67.5 (5^min) % -28%
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56.1 (5.09^min) % -40%
Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54.9 (7.06^min) % -41%

Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø8.63 (8.28-8.85)

Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.5.1: Ø8.78 (7.06-12.9)

Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø6.78 (5-7.42)

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.7.2: Ø5.44 (5.09-9.07)

Realme GT Neo 3 Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø31.6 (29.7-33)

Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø27.5 (22.2-41.9)

Xiaomi 12X Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø23.3 (17.5-25.8)

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø22.6 (20-34.1)

Google Pixel 6 Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø28.2 (19.7-42.9)

发言人

realme GT Neo 3中安装了立体声扬声器，听筒作为第二个扬声器。该智能手机即使在最大音量下也不会使声音失真。对于完整的声音，低音是缺乏的，但智能手机整体听起来不错。

想连接外部音频系统或耳机的人可以使用USB-C接口。当然，通过蓝牙进行无线通信也是可以的。目前所有的aptX编解码器、LDAC和LHDC都可用。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Realme GT Neo 3 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 17% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 6.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 22% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命。大电池可以持续很长时间

消耗功率

这款智能手机在低负荷下比其竞争对手更耗费能量。相反，它在负载下非常经济。

我们的评测设备可以用高达150瓦的功率充电，几分钟内就可以使用几个小时，不到30分钟就可以充满。用80瓦的电源充电也应该是非常快的。因此，如果每一分钟对你来说都不重要，你可以放心地选择更便宜的方案。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	/ 0.1 Watt
Idle	1.1 / 1.5 / 2.1 Watt
Load	3.8 / 7.8 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Realme GT Neo 3 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 6 4614 mAh	Xiaomi 12X 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G 4500 mAh	Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		13%	-5%	-6%	-3%	-10%
Idle Minimum *	1.1	0.68 38%	0.75 32%	1.01 8%	1.087 ?(0.78 - 1.38, n=3) 1%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 19%
Idle Average *	1.5	1 33%	1.88 -25%	1.5 -0%	1.77 ?(1.5 - 1.98, n=3) -18%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 3%
Idle Maximum *	2.1	1.02 51%	1.94 8%	1.6 24%	2 ?(1.9 - 2.1, n=3) 5%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) 23%
Load Average *	3.8	5.39 -42%	4.99 -31%	5.54 -46%	3.82 ?(3.23 - 4.43, n=3) -1%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -70%
Load Maximum *	7.8	9 -15%	8.66 -11%	9.16 -17%	7.9 ?(7.71 - 8.2, n=3) -1%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -26%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Realme GT Neo 3: Ø5.9 (1.772-12.5)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Realme GT Neo 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø8.69 (7.36-10.8)

Realme GT Neo 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.522 (1.36-2.21)

电池寿命

5,000毫安时的大电池非常棒。这款智能手机实现了良好的运行时间，如在我们的WLAN测试中达到16:29小时。然而，与此同时，在每个测试场景中，都有一些竞争性的智能手机，尽管电池较弱，但持续时间更长。

尽管如此，realme GT Neo 3在日常使用中提供了非常好的运行时间，甚至可以经受两个工作日的正常使用。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		40h 32min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 29min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		20h 06min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 55min

	Realme GT Neo 3 5000 mAh	Realme GT Neo 2 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 6 4614 mAh	Xiaomi 12X 4500 mAh	Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G 4500 mAh
Battery Runtime		-3%	-14%	4%	-18%
Reader / Idle	2432		2020 -17%	2116 -13%	1430 -41%
H.264	1206		1219 1%	1381 15%	934 -23%
WiFi v1.3	989	962 -3%	627 -37%	1028 4%	594 -40%
Load	295		291 -1%	322 9%	388 32%

Pros

+ 整洁的赛车设计

+ 快速充电

+ 运行时间长

+ 功率大

+ 快速记忆

+ 色彩准确的AMOLED显示屏

+ 直流调光

Cons

- 局部不准确的定位

- 没有IP认证

- 没有WiFi 6E

- 更新周期相对较短

- 一些创新在日常使用中难以察觉

- 没有混合变焦

- 外壳在扭转时发出吱吱声

评语。不错，但不是所有的承诺都能兑现

realme GT Neo 3有许多创新。有些是很好的噱头，如通过指纹传感器测量心率的选项。其他一些创新，如NFC芯片响应范围的增加，在日常使用中几乎没有被注意到，而专用显示芯片不幸地只在某些游戏中带来真正的优势。

剩下的就是一款设计时尚、基准值良好、价格合理的智能手机。这款相机可以拍出不错的照片，但与高端手机的水平相差甚远，因为它缺乏混合变焦，比如说。

较低的价格也是以缺少诸如无线充电、IP认证、更稳定的玻璃显示屏和WiFi 6E等功能为代价的。此外，其他制造商在软件更新方面明显领先，而且GPS追踪的准确性也不是顶级水平。

realme GT Neo 3是一款迅速而时尚的上层智能手机，但由于一些弱点而没有完全获得顶级评价。

realme GT Neo 3的积极方面包括其伟大的、色彩准确的AMOLED显示屏。尽管直流调光功能有点难找，但只要掌握一点技巧，还是可以激活的。内存的速度快如闪电，电池运行时间总体上也很稳定。由于充电时间非常快，现实世界中的GT Neo 3是一款全面的智能手机，但在购买前应仔细检查其弱点。

谷歌Pixel 6 提供更坚硬的显示玻璃和无线充电，但重量更大。realme GT Neo 2 前身的性能较差，充电速度较慢，但价格也便宜很多。

价格和可用性

由于realme GT Neo 3最近才推出，并且由于目前全球的供应链问题，这款智能手机可能无法立即在你的国家购买。在撰写本文时（2022年6月28日），realme GT Neo 3似乎在美国、加拿大、澳大利亚或新西兰没有供应。因此，建议读者定期通过谷歌或亚马逊查询是否有货。

英国亚马逊提供150瓦的变体，有12GB内存和256个存储空间，售价为599.00英镑，型号为Asphalt Black或Nitro Blue.

Realme GT Neo 3 - 08/30/2022 v7 ^(old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis

83%

Keyboard

65 / 75 → 87%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

52 / 70 → 74%

Weight

89%

Battery

91%

Display

93%

Games Performance

60 / 64 → 93%

Application Performance

84 / 86 → 98%

Temperature

85%

Noise

100%

Audio

75 / 90 → 83%

Camera

67%

Average

80%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1344 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 458020 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > realme GT Neo 3评论。具有快速充电技术的创新智能手机

Florian Schmitt, 2022-06-29 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

案例：灵感来自于赛车传奇

尺寸比较

设备。realme GT Neo 3的储蓄选项

软件：Realme智能手机的短暂更新承诺

通信与GNSS：快速连接

电话和语音质量。大部分都很清晰，可以理解

相机。仍然没有混合变焦

附件和保修。包括充电器

输入设备和操作。可测量心率

显示。色彩非常准确

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能。上流社会的力量

游戏：可能有60帧的游戏

排放。轻度节流

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

Realme GT Neo 3 audio analysis

Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G audio analysis

电池寿命。大电池可以持续很长时间

消耗功率

Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语。不错，但不是所有的承诺都能兑现

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison