Notebookcheck Logo

realme Narzo 50i Prime评测--用很少的钱买到大电池的智能手机

板上的UFS内存。

制造商依靠一个别致的外观为realme Narzo 50i Prime。除此之外,这款廉价的手机配备了快速内存,但也只有一个摄像头。Narzo 50i Prime是否值得其140欧元的要价?
Android ARM Smartphone
realme Narzo 50i Prime
Realme Narzo 50i Prime (Narzo Series)
Processor
Unisoc T7225 8 x 1.8 - 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G52 MP1
Memory
3 GB 
Display
6.50 inch 20:9, 1600 x 720 pixel 270 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 32 GB 
, 22 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, Card Reader: microSD up to 1 TB (dedicated), Sensors: proximity, acceleration
Networking
802.11 b/g/n (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/), Bluetooth 5.0, 2G, 3G, 4G (1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.5 x 164.1 x 75.6
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 10 Watt charging
Operating System
Android 11
Camera
Primary Camera: 8 MPix f/2.0, 27mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF, LED flash, video @1080p, 30 fps
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, 27mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, video @720p, 30 fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
182 g
Price
140 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
74.8 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
T7225, Mali-G52 MP1
182 g32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"1600x720
75.9 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Realme C31
T7225, Mali-G52 MP1
197 g32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.50"1600x720
77.1 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2021
Motorola Moto E40
Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2
198 g64 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720
76.6 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
SD 680, Adreno 610
190 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.71"1650x720

外壳和功能 - 重量轻的手机,存储空间小

realme Narzo 50i Prime是realme产品组合中新加入的一款150欧元以下非常实惠的入门级手机。在功能方面,它让人强烈地想起了 realme C31而且价格也非常相似:在测试时,你可以在amazon.de上买到Narzo手机,价格略低于120欧元。购买,价格略低于120欧元。

Realme为Narzo 50i Prime提供了一个新的设计:边角很圆润,但看起来比Realme C31等更有棱角。Realme C31.相机模块在视觉上占据了更多的空间,这也是目前其他手机的趋势。深蓝和薄荷绿可作为颜色变体。由于其背面有轻微的凹槽结构,这款手机看起来相当高端。

机箱很结实,只有在扭曲时才会发出低沉的吱吱声。这款手机也能很好地应对屏幕上的压力。仅有182克,realme也建造了一个相当轻的手机。

虽然realme安装了非常快的UFS存储,但它只有32GB,而且更大的版本在欧洲没有供应。存储空间可以通过microSD插槽扩展,除了2个SIM卡插槽外,还可以使用。在使用我们的参考microSD Angelbird V60的测试中,该手机在从卡中或向卡中的传输速率方面与同价位的手机相当。

realme Narzo 50i Prime
realme Narzo 50i Prime
realme Narzo 50i Prime
realme Narzo 50i Prime
realme Narzo 50i Prime

尺寸比较

169.6 mm 76.6 mm 8.3 mm 190 g165.1 mm 75.6 mm 9.1 mm 198 g164.7 mm 76.1 mm 8.4 mm 197 g164.1 mm 75.6 mm 8.5 mm 182 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
  (Angelbird V60)
34.9 MB/s +69%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years)
29.2 MB/s +42%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
  (Angelbird V60)
20.6 MB/s
Realme C31
  (Angelbird V60)
15.3 MB/s -26%
Motorola Moto E40
  (Angelbird V60)
11.8 MB/s -43%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Realme Narzo 50i Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225, 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø28.9 (21.1-40.1)
Realme C31 Mali-G52 MP1, T7225, 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø30.7 (19.8-43.9)
Motorola Moto E40 Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø24.6 (14.6-35.2)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.2 (26.4-46.1)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime Mali-G52 MP1, T7225, 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø75.3 (31.8-83.1)
Realme C31 Mali-G52 MP1, T7225, 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø74.9 (58.6-79.3)
Motorola Moto E40 Mali-G52 MP2, Tangula T700, 64 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77.2 (42-85.8)
Xiaomi Redmi 10C Adreno 610, SD 680, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø78.7 (28.6-82.6)

通信、软件和操作 - 有限的软件

不幸的是,该机只有WiFi 4,这在这个价格范围内并不罕见,但realme已经表明,在这里有更多的可能性。 C31.Narzo手机只能达到很慢的传输速率,有时会让用户等待更长的时间来下载。

用户还必须削减大量的LTE频率:这里只有欧洲最需要的频率,但如果你想在本地使用移动互联网,出国旅行时应该做好计划。在我们的测试中,随机样本的接收效果很一般,不在高端手机的水平上。不幸的是,Narzo 50i Prime不具备NFC功能,但小米红米10C的对比设备有这个功能。

Narzo手机仍然基于Android 11,上面是内部的realme UI,尽管是 "R版"。这对一些用户来说是一个重要的区别,因为一些功能如游戏模式或分屏在这里是不存在的。令人遗憾的是,制造商没有更好地照顾其软件,因为我们的Narzo 50i Prime上的安全补丁在测试时是2022年5月的,因此相当旧。关于更新周期寿命的长短,也一无所知。

Narzo 50i Prime是通过一个60赫兹的触摸屏操作的。它的边角也很精确,但在操作上感觉并不像更高质量的屏幕那样直接。这款手机没有指纹传感器,但可以通过前置摄像头使用面部解锁。这是一个软件解决方案,在光线良好的情况下可以合理可靠地工作。然而,它并不那么安全,因为主人的照片也可能导致解锁。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Motorola Moto E40
802.11 b/g/n
86.9 (78min - 93max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
Motorola Moto E40
802.11 b/g/n
87.2 (46min - 105max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
315 (269min - 336max) MBit/s +403%
Realme C31
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
78.3 (73min - 92max) MBit/s +25%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
802.11 b/g/n
62.6 (58min - 74max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
222 (194min - 242max) MBit/s +401%
Realme C31
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
72.5 (34min - 78max) MBit/s +64%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
802.11 b/g/n
44.3 (22min - 58max) MBit/s
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Realme Narzo 50i Prime; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø44.2 (22-58)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø62.6 (58-74)

照相机 - 后面只有一个镜头

前置摄像头的录制
前置摄像头的录制

即使对入门级手机来说,单摄像头也已变得不寻常,但Narzo 50i Prime的背面只有一个镜头。另一方面,对比设备的低分辨率微距和景深摄像头往往没有增加多少价值,所以单摄像头至少是诚实的。

相当不知名的SmartSens SmartPixel SC800CS被用作主摄像头的传感器。800万像素的分辨率不是特别高,光敏度也有限,光圈为f/2.0。尽管如此,该相机在低光环境下的表现甚至比例如 摩托罗拉Moto E40的像素分选相机。虽然亮起的区域夹杂着像素伪影,而且细节上的锐度也很低,但暗处的亮起还是相当不错的。

在正常的日光下,锐度还有待提高,较大的区域显示出明显的颗粒感。该相机对于快照来说是足够的,但你不应该期望更多。视频一般只能以30帧的速度录制,最高分辨率为全高清。自动对焦有时需要一秒钟的思考,但亮度调整工作得相当好。

前面还有一个500万像素的自拍摄像头,在光线良好的情况下可以拍出相当吸引人的照片。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow Light
ColorChecker
18.4 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
19.3 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
17 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
12.6 ∆E
13.7 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
15 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
11.7 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
15.8 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme Narzo 50i Prime: 12 ∆E min: 4.18 - max: 22.67 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
55 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
36.3 ∆E
45.1 ∆E
63.7 ∆E
53.8 ∆E
35.6 ∆E
43.5 ∆E
28 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
48.6 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
77.5 ∆E
44 ∆E
44.1 ∆E
88.5 ∆E
70.6 ∆E
52 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Realme Narzo 50i Prime: 46.93 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 88.5 ∆E

显示屏 - realme手机的亮度很小

子像素结构
子像素结构

720p的分辨率在这个价格范围内很常见,但realme Narzo 50i Prime的IPS屏幕在亮度方面明显落后:平均只有354 cd/m²,这让人想起5年前的智能手机显示屏。

对比设备在这里都比较好,在照明的均匀性和部分色彩再现方面也是如此。在我们用分光光度计和软件CalMAN进行的测试中,Narzo Phone显示出明显的蓝色偏移。

至少显示屏没有PWM闪烁,但屏幕的响应时间相当慢。

366
cd/m²
358
cd/m²
327
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
365
cd/m²
321
cd/m²
372
cd/m²
385
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 385 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 354.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.4 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 365 cd/m²
Contrast: 811:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.58 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Realme C31
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Motorola Moto E40
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
IPS, 1650x720, 6.7"
Response Times
-81%
-49%
-4%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
34 ?(19, 15)
62 ?(33, 29)
-82%
44 ?(23, 21)
-29%
33 ?(17, 16)
3%
Response Time Black / White *
19 ?(9.5, 9.5)
34 ?(21, 13)
-79%
32 ?(15, 17)
-68%
21 ?(9, 12)
-11%
PWM Frequency
Screen
10%
17%
39%
Brightness middle
365
413
13%
452
24%
511
40%
Brightness
354
394
11%
431
22%
478
35%
Brightness Distribution
83
91
10%
90
8%
84
1%
Black Level *
0.45
0.4
11%
0.46
-2%
0.42
7%
Contrast
811
1033
27%
983
21%
1217
50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.58
4.89
-7%
4.15
9%
1.51
67%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
8.81
8.35
5%
6.47
27%
2.53
71%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.2
4.9
6%
4
23%
2.9
44%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.395 92%
2.157 102%
2.266 97%
CCT
7929 82%
7598 86%
7557 86%
6443 101%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-36% / -9%
-16% / 4%
18% / 31%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9.5 ms rise
↘ 9.5 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
CalMAN颜色精度
CalMAN颜色精度
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间sRGB
CalMAN饱和度
CalMAN饱和度

性能、排放和电池寿命 - 良好的运行时间

Unisoc Tiger T612作为SoC为该级别提供了典型的性能率。入门级SoC在图形性能方面无法跟上对比设备的步伐。在日常使用中,只要不对智能手机提出太多要求,就能实现稳定的系统性能。

快速的内存也应该为系统的相对平稳运行做出很大贡献:事实上,安装UFS内存在这个级别中还不是理所当然的事情。内存控制器不能完全跟上,但Narzo 50i Prime提供了快速的数据传输率。

在负载下,SoC会产生大量的废热,这在机箱中也很明显,温度有时会上升到近45℃。这一点很明显,在非常温暖的环境温度下也会变得令人不快。

小巧的单声道扬声器达到了一个合格的音量,并提供了一个相当令人愉悦的声音。然而,有时仿佛限制器抓住了太大声的声音,并有最小的延迟以防止失真。aptX HD作为蓝牙编解码器被支持,但更现代的aptX变体,例如专门用于TWS耳机的,则不被支持。有一个用于耳机的3.5毫米输出。

Narzo 50i Prime不附带充电器,最大充电功率为10瓦。因此,它需要相当长的时间,直到5000毫安时的电池再次充满,这可能是3小时。在我们的WLAN测试中,屏幕亮度设置为15:21小时,这款智能手机在其价格范围内表现良好,甚至可以在离开电源插座的情况下持续2天。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
347 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
346 Points 0%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
356 Points +3%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
377 Points +9%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (344 - 347, n=5)
346 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points +187%
Multi-Core (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1326 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1322 Points 0%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1393 Points +5%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1644 Points +24%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (1311 - 1419, n=5)
1340 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points +150%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
7705 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
7776 Points +1%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8743 Points +13%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
5884 Points -24%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (6566 - 7776, n=5)
7419 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)
12976 Points +68%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
997 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
989 Points -1%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1486 Points +49%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1353 Points +36%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (979 - 997, n=4)
987 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=73, last 2 years)
3084 Points +209%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
841 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
834 Points -1%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1309 Points +56%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1177 Points +40%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (826 - 841, n=4)
832 Points -1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=73, last 2 years)
3263 Points +288%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2858 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2832 Points -1%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2821 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2831 Points -1%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (2773 - 2858, n=4)
2811 Points -2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=73, last 2 years)
3286 Points +15%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
987 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
988 Points 0%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1554 Points +57%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1350 Points +37%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (986 - 1006, n=4)
992 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7767 Points +687%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
830 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
829 Points 0%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1368 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
1175 Points +42%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (829 - 847, n=4)
834 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11536 Points +1290%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2940 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
2990 Points +2%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2961 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
2825 Points -4%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (2909 - 2990, n=4)
2944 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4613 Points +57%
Wild Life Score (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
415 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
411 Points -1%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
729 Points +76%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
450 Points +8%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (411 - 419, n=4)
414 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)
2840 Points +584%
Wild Life Unlimited Score (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
410 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
410 Points 0%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
722 Points +76%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
438 Points +7%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (410 - 426, n=4)
414 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 20321, n=181, last 2 years)
7533 Points +1737%
Wild Life Extreme (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
114 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
117 Points +3%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
184 Points +61%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
122 Points +7%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (114 - 117, n=4)
115.3 Points +1%
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=187, last 2 years)
2053 Points +1701%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
111 Points
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
111 Points 0%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
183 Points +65%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
122 Points +10%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (111 - 111, n=3)
111 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=185, last 2 years)
2051 Points +1748%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
10 fps
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
10 fps 0%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
19 fps +90%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
17 fps +70%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (4.7 - 10, n=5)
7.98 fps -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years)
49.5 fps +395%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
5.3 fps
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
5.3 fps 0%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
11 fps +108%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
9.5 fps +79%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (5.3 - 5.6, n=5)
5.38 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years)
79.8 fps +1406%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
6.4 fps
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
6.4 fps 0%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps +88%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
10 fps +56%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (3 - 6.4, n=5)
5.1 fps -20%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years)
37.4 fps +484%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1.9 fps
Realme C31
Unisoc T7225, Mali-G52 MP1, 3072
1.9 fps 0%
Motorola Moto E40
UNISOC Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.7 fps +95%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G, Adreno 610, 4096
3.2 fps +68%
Average Unisoc T7225
  (1.9 - 2, n=5)
1.94 fps +2%
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years)
32 fps +1584%
Realme Narzo 50i PrimeRealme C31Motorola Moto E40Xiaomi Redmi 10CAverage 32 GB UFS 2.2 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-53%
-69%
8%
-26%
133%
Sequential Read 256KB
658.2
478.8
-27%
265
-60%
927.7
41%
569 ?(479 - 658, n=2)
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB
445.6
131.9
-70%
156.3
-65%
510.2
14%
Random Read 4KB
161.8
89
-45%
56
-65%
120.2
-26%
125.4 ?(89 - 161.8, n=2)
-22%
Random Write 4KB
189.8
61.5
-68%
30.7
-84%
195.2
3%
125.7 ?(61.5 - 189.8, n=2)
-34%

温度

Max. Load
 44.1 °C36.6 °C34.8 °C 
 43.8 °C35.4 °C36.1 °C 
 41.7 °C35.3 °C35.2 °C 
Maximum: 44.1 °C
Average: 38.1 °C
33.4 °C35.3 °C44.7 °C
34.4 °C35.7 °C43.2 °C
34.7 °C35.7 °C40.2 °C
Maximum: 44.7 °C
Average: 37.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  41.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.1 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热力图前线
热力图前线
热图 背面
热图 背面

演讲者

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2043.939.12534.533.23127.730.44028.528.45033.235.26326.3278023.423.710022.521.812515.420.216014.629.620012.335.125013.342.431511.645.84007.550.750011.458.963015.261.280014.764.1100011.870.212501268.1160010.369.420009.365.8250010.861.1315014.763.5400014.371.2500014.977.463001578.8800015.472.91000016.868.91250016.172.1160001757.4SPL25.983.9N0.752.1median 14.6median 63.5Delta2.111.236.736.735.738.527.330.233.331.237.432.225.226.718.219.820.520.413.52017.33113.535.413.541.713.14612.950.313.358.815.462.514.165.612.969.19.669.910.668.510.368.21167.812.666.415.264.416.865.316.461.916.565.616.671.815.972.316.654.726.379.30.743median 13.5median 64.42.411.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseRealme Narzo 50i PrimeXiaomi Redmi 10C
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Realme Narzo 50i Prime audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi 10C audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 50% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Motorola Moto E40
5000 mAh
995 min +8%
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years)
984 min +7%
Realme C31
5000 mAh
947 min +3%
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
5000 mAh
921 min
Xiaomi Redmi 10C
5000 mAh
908 min -1%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
15h 21min

Pros

+ 重量轻,外观好
+ 快速内存
+ 专用的microSD读卡器
+ 没有PWM闪烁现象
+ 良好的运行时间

Cons

- 昏暗的屏幕
- 没有指纹传感器
- 没有NFC
- 蹩脚的WLAN
- 内存不足
- 负载下强烈发热
- 不含充电器
- 模糊的相机
- 过时的软件

评语 - 低价位的雅致设备

评测中:realme Narzo 50i Prime。测试设备由德国realme公司提供。
评测中:realme Narzo 50i Prime。测试设备由德国realme公司提供。

realme Narzo 50i Prime有一个不寻常的外观,并以其有点前卫的设计取悦。在其价格范围内,它只有一个摄像头的事实并不那么悲惨;在竞争中,额外的相机镜头通常很难发挥作用。Narzo智能手机的相机传感器在黑暗环境中提供合理的照明,但在细节清晰度方面还有待提高。

屏幕相当暗淡,WLAN也很慢。没有NFC的设备也是相当平庸的。我们对电池寿命和快速的内存比较信服。然而,这款低价手机并没有配备充电器。

realme Narzo 50i Prime是一款非常便宜的智能手机,但你必须降低你的期望。快速的内存和别致的底盘仍然可以使它对休闲用户感兴趣。

如果你想要用于移动支付服务的NFC,更明亮的屏幕和更多的存储空间,你可以购买 小米红米10C.

价格和可用性

realme Narzo 50i Prime可从制造商处获得https://buy.realme.com/eu/goods/226为139.99欧元。然而,在促销期间,它有时也会便宜一些,仅低于120欧元。

该智能手机也可在amazon.de可用。

Realme Narzo 50i Prime - 07/27/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
80%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
89%
Connectivity
35 / 70 → 50%
Weight
90%
Battery
91%
Display
81%
Games Performance
12 / 64 → 18%
Application Performance
65 / 86 → 76%
Temperature
88%
Noise
100%
Audio
54 / 90 → 60%
Camera
45%
Average
69%
75%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > realme Narzo 50i Prime评测--用很少的钱买到大电池的智能手机
Florian Schmitt, 2022-07-29 (Update: 2022-07-29)