realme Narzo 50i Prime评测--用很少的钱买到大电池的智能手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
74.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Realme Narzo 50i Prime T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1 | 182 g | 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
75.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Realme C31 T7225 (T612), Mali-G52 MP1 | 197 g | 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
77.1 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Motorola Moto E40 Tangula T700, Mali-G52 MP2 | 198 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
76.6 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Xiaomi Redmi 10C SD 680, Adreno 610 | 190 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.71" | 1650x720 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳和功能 - 重量轻的手机,存储空间小
realme Narzo 50i Prime是realme产品组合中新加入的一款150欧元以下非常实惠的入门级手机。在功能方面,它让人强烈地想起了 realme C31而且价格也非常相似:在测试时,你可以在amazon.de上买到Narzo手机,价格略低于120欧元。购买,价格略低于120欧元。
Realme为Narzo 50i Prime提供了一个新的设计:边角很圆润,但看起来比Realme C31等更有棱角。Realme C31.相机模块在视觉上占据了更多的空间,这也是目前其他手机的趋势。深蓝和薄荷绿可作为颜色变体。由于其背面有轻微的凹槽结构,这款手机看起来相当高端。
机箱很结实,只有在扭曲时才会发出低沉的吱吱声。这款手机也能很好地应对屏幕上的压力。仅有182克,realme也建造了一个相当轻的手机。
虽然realme安装了非常快的UFS存储,但它只有32GB,而且更大的版本在欧洲没有供应。存储空间可以通过microSD插槽扩展,除了2个SIM卡插槽外,还可以使用。在使用我们的参考microSD Angelbird V60的测试中,该手机在从卡中或向卡中的传输速率方面与同价位的手机相当。
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10C (Angelbird V60) | |
Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Realme Narzo 50i Prime (Angelbird V60) | |
Realme C31 (Angelbird V60) | |
Motorola Moto E40 (Angelbird V60) |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 有限的软件
不幸的是,该机只有WiFi 4,这在这个价格范围内并不罕见,但realme已经表明,在这里有更多的可能性。 C31.Narzo手机只能达到很慢的传输速率,有时会让用户等待更长的时间来下载。
用户还必须削减大量的LTE频率:这里只有欧洲最需要的频率,但如果你想在本地使用移动互联网,出国旅行时应该做好计划。在我们的测试中,随机样本的接收效果很一般,不在高端手机的水平上。不幸的是,Narzo 50i Prime不具备NFC功能,但小米红米10C的对比设备有这个功能。
Narzo手机仍然基于Android 11,上面是内部的realme UI,尽管是 "R版"。这对一些用户来说是一个重要的区别,因为一些功能如游戏模式或分屏在这里是不存在的。令人遗憾的是,制造商没有更好地照顾其软件,因为我们的Narzo 50i Prime上的安全补丁在测试时是2022年5月的,因此相当旧。关于更新周期寿命的长短,也一无所知。
Narzo 50i Prime是通过一个60赫兹的触摸屏操作的。它的边角也很精确,但在操作上感觉并不像更高质量的屏幕那样直接。这款手机没有指纹传感器,但可以通过前置摄像头使用面部解锁。这是一个软件解决方案,在光线良好的情况下可以合理可靠地工作。然而,它并不那么安全,因为主人的照片也可能导致解锁。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Motorola Moto E40 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Motorola Moto E40 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
Realme C31 | |
Realme Narzo 50i Prime | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
Realme C31 | |
Realme Narzo 50i Prime |
照相机 - 后面只有一个镜头
即使对入门级手机来说,单摄像头也已变得不寻常,但Narzo 50i Prime的背面只有一个镜头。另一方面,对比设备的低分辨率微距和景深摄像头往往没有增加多少价值,所以单摄像头至少是诚实的。
相当不知名的SmartSens SmartPixel SC800CS被用作主摄像头的传感器。800万像素的分辨率不是特别高,光敏度也有限,光圈为f/2.0。尽管如此,该相机在低光环境下的表现甚至比例如 摩托罗拉Moto E40的像素分选相机。虽然亮起的区域夹杂着像素伪影,而且细节上的锐度也很低,但暗处的亮起还是相当不错的。
在正常的日光下,锐度还有待提高,较大的区域显示出明显的颗粒感。该相机对于快照来说是足够的,但你不应该期望更多。视频一般只能以30帧的速度录制,最高分辨率为全高清。自动对焦有时需要一秒钟的思考,但亮度调整工作得相当好。
前面还有一个500万像素的自拍摄像头,在光线良好的情况下可以拍出相当吸引人的照片。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLow Light显示屏 - realme手机的亮度很小
720p的分辨率在这个价格范围内很常见,但realme Narzo 50i Prime的IPS屏幕在亮度方面明显落后:平均只有354 cd/m²,这让人想起5年前的智能手机显示屏。
对比设备在这里都比较好,在照明的均匀性和部分色彩再现方面也是如此。在我们用分光光度计和软件CalMAN进行的测试中,Narzo Phone显示出明显的蓝色偏移。
至少显示屏没有PWM闪烁,但屏幕的响应时间相当慢。
|
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 365 cd/m²
Contrast: 811:1 (Black: 0.45 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.58 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.28
Realme Narzo 50i Prime IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Realme C31 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto E40 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Xiaomi Redmi 10C IPS, 1650x720, 6.7" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Response Times | -81% | -49% | -4% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34 ? | 62 ? -82% | 44 ? -29% | 33 ? 3% |
Response Time Black / White * | 19 ? | 34 ? -79% | 32 ? -68% | 21 ? -11% |
PWM Frequency | ||||
Screen | 10% | 17% | 39% | |
Brightness middle | 365 | 413 13% | 452 24% | 511 40% |
Brightness | 354 | 394 11% | 431 22% | 478 35% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 91 10% | 90 8% | 84 1% |
Black Level * | 0.45 | 0.4 11% | 0.46 -2% | 0.42 7% |
Contrast | 811 | 1033 27% | 983 21% | 1217 50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.58 | 4.89 -7% | 4.15 9% | 1.51 67% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.81 | 8.35 5% | 6.47 27% | 2.53 71% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 4.9 6% | 4 23% | 2.9 44% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.395 92% | 2.157 102% | 2.266 97% |
CCT | 7929 82% | 7598 86% | 7557 86% | 6443 101% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -36% /
-9% | -16% /
4% | 18% /
31% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9.5 ms rise | |
↘ 9.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 38 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 良好的运行时间
该 Unisoc Tiger T612作为SoC为该级别提供了典型的性能率。入门级SoC在图形性能方面无法跟上对比设备的步伐。在日常使用中,只要不对智能手机提出太多要求,就能实现稳定的系统性能。
快速的内存也应该为系统的相对平稳运行做出很大贡献:事实上,安装UFS内存在这个级别中还不是理所当然的事情。内存控制器不能完全跟上,但Narzo 50i Prime提供了快速的数据传输率。
在负载下,SoC会产生大量的废热,这在机箱中也很明显,温度有时会上升到近45℃。这一点很明显,在非常温暖的环境温度下也会变得令人不快。
小巧的单声道扬声器达到了一个合格的音量,并提供了一个相当令人愉悦的声音。然而,有时仿佛限制器抓住了太大声的声音,并有最小的延迟以防止失真。aptX HD作为蓝牙编解码器被支持,但更现代的aptX变体,例如专门用于TWS耳机的,则不被支持。有一个用于耳机的3.5毫米输出。
Narzo 50i Prime不附带充电器,最大充电功率为10瓦。因此,它需要相当长的时间,直到5000毫安时的电池再次充满,这可能是3小时。在我们的WLAN测试中,屏幕亮度设置为15:21小时,这款智能手机在其价格范围内表现良好,甚至可以在离开电源插座的情况下持续2天。
GFXBench | |
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme Narzo 50i Prime | |
Realme C31 | |
Motorola Moto E40 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
Average Unisoc T7225 (T612) (4.7 - 10, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=206, last 2 years) | |
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme Narzo 50i Prime | |
Realme C31 | |
Motorola Moto E40 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
Average Unisoc T7225 (T612) (5.3 - 5.6, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=206, last 2 years) | |
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme Narzo 50i Prime | |
Realme C31 | |
Motorola Moto E40 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
Average Unisoc T7225 (T612) (3 - 6.4, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years) | |
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen (sort by value) | |
Realme Narzo 50i Prime | |
Realme C31 | |
Motorola Moto E40 | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10C | |
Average Unisoc T7225 (T612) (1.9 - 2, n=5) | |
Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years) |
Realme Narzo 50i Prime | Realme C31 | Motorola Moto E40 | Xiaomi Redmi 10C | Average 32 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AndroBench 3-5 | -53% | -69% | 8% | -26% | 139% | |
Sequential Read 256KB | 658.2 | 478.8 -27% | 265 -60% | 927.7 41% | 569 ? -14% | 1894 ? 188% |
Sequential Write 256KB | 445.6 | 131.9 -70% | 156.3 -65% | 510.2 14% | 289 ? -35% | 1476 ? 231% |
Random Read 4KB | 161.8 | 89 -45% | 56 -65% | 120.2 -26% | 125.4 ? -22% | 278 ? 72% |
Random Write 4KB | 189.8 | 61.5 -68% | 30.7 -84% | 195.2 3% | 125.7 ? -34% | 312 ? 64% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.1 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.7 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Realme Narzo 50i Prime audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 80% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 16% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi Redmi 10C audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
Motorola Moto E40 | |
Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=208, last 2 years) | |
Realme C31 | |
Realme Narzo 50i Prime | |
Xiaomi Redmi 10C |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 低价位的雅致设备
realme Narzo 50i Prime有一个不寻常的外观,并以其有点前卫的设计取悦。在其价格范围内,它只有一个摄像头的事实并不那么悲惨;在竞争中,额外的相机镜头通常很难发挥作用。Narzo智能手机的相机传感器在黑暗环境中提供合理的照明,但在细节清晰度方面还有待提高。
屏幕相当暗淡,WLAN也很慢。没有NFC的设备也是相当平庸的。我们对电池寿命和快速的内存比较信服。然而,这款低价手机并没有配备充电器。
realme Narzo 50i Prime是一款非常便宜的智能手机,但你必须降低你的期望。快速的内存和别致的底盘仍然可以使它对休闲用户感兴趣。
如果你想要用于移动支付服务的NFC,更明亮的屏幕和更多的存储空间,你可以购买 小米红米10C.
价格和可用性
realme Narzo 50i Prime可从制造商处获得https://buy.realme.com/eu/goods/226为139.99欧元。然而,在促销期间,它有时也会便宜一些,仅低于120欧元。
该智能手机也可在amazon.de可用。
Realme Narzo 50i Prime
- 07/27/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt