vivo V23 5G评测--拥有奢华色彩的自拍智能手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Vivo V23 5G Dimensity 920, Mali-G68 MP4 | 181 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.44" | 2400x1080 | |
| 87.4 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Google Pixel 6 Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20 | 207 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2400x1080 | |
| 88.8 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G SD 888 5G, Adreno 660 | 177 g | 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.40" | 2340x1080 | |
| 88.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Xiaomi 12X SD 870, Adreno 650 | 176 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.28" | 2400x1080 |
外壳和功能 - Vivo V23 5G的别致色彩渐变
Vivo V23 5G有阳光金和星尘黑两种颜色。前者也是我们的测试设备，其背面可以在紫外光下改变颜色。略微闪亮的金色随后变成了浓郁的绿松石色。它的两面还受到肖特Xensation Up玻璃的保护。
制造质量很好，背面的哑光玻璃不容易沾染指纹。然而，这并不适用于高度抛光的铝制框架，其特点是有角度的设计。
设备清单相当短。USB端口只能按照2.0标准工作，既没有microSD插槽，也没有音频插孔。无线充电也不被支持。
通信、软件和操作 - Vivo V23配备5G和Wi-Fi 6
Vivo V23使用Wi-Fi 6模块，与我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000相结合，可以实现高度和稳定的数据传输。蜂窝调制解调器涵盖所有现代标准，并提供广泛的频段。
vivo智能手机还在两个方向上提供良好的语音质量。支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话。vivo还在系统中直接实现了SIP账户管理。
谷歌的Android 12被用作操作系统，制造商在上面洒上了自己的用户界面Funtouch OS 12。与中国使用的较新的Origin OS相比，它看起来没有那么现代。在测试时，安全补丁在2022年5月1日已经更新。
电容式触摸屏对输入的反应迅速而可靠，屏幕在出厂时还覆盖了一层保护膜。下面的肖特玻璃更滑，触觉上非常舒服。生物识别安全由显示屏下方的光学指纹扫描仪提供，它的工作非常可靠，但当智能手机从待机状态解锁时，速度相对较慢。当显示屏处于激活状态时，这一过程明显加快。
| Networking | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Google Pixel 6 | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Xiaomi 12X | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
摄像头 - 前置双光学系统，带闪光灯
vivo V23 5G的明星是在前面。5000万像素的主传感器不仅有自动对焦功能，而且还有一个额外的超广角镜头。两个LED点也应该确保任何时候都有完美的照明。这使得在日常使用中可以获得非常好的自拍，在逆光下通过自动HDR模式也能成功。vivo还提供了许多过滤器和效果。不幸的是，视频只能以30FPS的超高清或60FPS的全高清录制。更多的是不可能用SoC。
背面的主摄像头原来比平均水平要好。由于显示屏太亮，色彩再现并不总是自然。尽管如此，照片缺乏亮度，动态范围应该更大。超广角显示景深较浅，微距镜头的分辨率只有200万像素。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
显示屏 - Vivo智能手机采用90赫兹OLED技术
Vivo V23 5G的6.44英寸AMOLED显示屏的刷新率高达90赫兹。它既可以设置为60或90赫兹，也可以在这两种模式之间自动切换。
在启用环境光传感器的情况下，亮度值很好，但那些喜欢手动调节亮度的人只有299cd/m²可用。随着明亮和黑暗区域的均匀分布（APL18），亮度增加到792 cd/m²。这是相当明亮的，但在这个价格范围内，有一些竞争对手有更多的储备。
像其他采用OLED面板的智能手机一样，vivo V23使用PWM来调节亮度。在最低亮度时，频率范围在119和373.2赫兹之间。在可调亮度的54%以上，根据设定的刷新率，只有60或90赫兹是可测量的。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 606 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 1.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.7% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
| Vivo V23 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Google Pixel 6 OLED, 2400x1080, 6.4" | Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.4" | Xiaomi 12X OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -71% | -113% | 51% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 2.688 ? | 6.8 ? -153% | 10.4 ? -287% | 0.777 ? 71% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 2.04 ? | 3.2 ? -57% | 2.4 ? -18% | 1.204 ? 41% |
| PWM Frequency | 373.2 | 367.6 ? -2% | 247.5 -34% | 523 40% |
| Screen | 24% | 17% | 43% | |
| Brightness middle | 606 | 805 33% | 758 25% | 910 50% |
| Brightness | 606 | 805 33% | 758 25% | 908 50% |
| Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 99 1% | 97 -1% |
| Black Level * | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.4 39% | 1.5 35% | 0.8 65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.8 | 3.7 53% | 3.1 60% | 1.8 77% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.6 | 1.8 -13% | 2.3 -44% | 1.3 19% |
| Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.29 96% | 2.06 107% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6632 98% | 6507 100% | 6378 102% | 6414 101% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -24% /
-7% | -48% /
-26% | 47% /
46% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2.04 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.062 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.9775 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 2.688 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.328 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 1.36 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 373.2 Hz |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 373.2 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 373.2 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列
性能、排放和电池寿命
vivo V23 5G采用的是 联发科Dimensity 920然而，这与它的前任几乎没有什么区别 Dimensity 900不同。从纸面上看，只有两个Cortex-A78性能核心的时钟分别增加了100MHz。联发科承诺将游戏性能提高9%，但vivo并没有能够把这一点说出来。用GameBench的测试甚至显示在Armajet中只有30FPS。然而，智能手机的温度发展是不明显的，无论是表面还是SoC。
下巴上的扬声器可以变得非常响亮，但只能提供一个平庸的质量，其特点是外观空洞。然而，当vivo智能手机不设置太大声时，声音是相当好的。V23没有插孔，但可以通过USB-C输出声音。蓝牙可以无线使用，支持所有常见的音频编解码器（SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、aptX Adaptive、aptX TWS+和LDAC）。
在WLAN测试中，4200毫安时的强大电池为手机提供了近15个小时的能量，并调整了显示亮度（150cd/m²），尽管面板以90赫兹持续工作。因此，V23的装备很适合长时间使用。
| AImark - Score v2.x (sort by value) | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Google Pixel 6 | |
| Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G | |
| Xiaomi 12X | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 920 () | |
| UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI (sort by value) | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Google Pixel 6 | |
| Average MediaTek Dimensity 920 (21981 - 23618, n=2) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 75143, n=146, last 2 years) | |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
| Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5s | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme | |
| Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5s | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score | |
| Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5s | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| 3DMark / Wild Life Score | |
| Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5s | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5s | |
| Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | |
| Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5s | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited | |
| Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5s | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5s | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5s | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5s | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Nubia RedMagic 7 | |
| Motorola Edge 30 Pro | |
| Xiaomi 12 | |
| Asus ROG Phone 5s | |
| Vivo V23 5G | |
| Oppo Find X5 Lite | |
| Vivo V23 5G | Google Pixel 6 | Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G | Xiaomi 12X | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -13% | 32% | 49% | 11% | 87% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 994.44 | 1546 55% | 1639 65% | 1732 74% | 887 ? -11% | 1863 ? 87% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 497.9 | 233.4 -53% | 760 53% | 795 60% | 694 ? 39% | 1446 ? 190% |
| Random Read 4KB | 219.19 | 126.2 -42% | 245.1 12% | 291.9 33% | 228 ? 4% | 278 ? 27% |
| Random Write 4KB | 214.81 | 190.3 -11% | 211.2 -2% | 279.9 30% | 238 ? 11% | 309 ? 44% |
Games
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.8 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
演讲者
Vivo V23 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 18% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Xiaomi 12X audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Vivo V23 5G 4200 mAh | Google Pixel 6 4614 mAh | Samsung Galaxy S21 FE 5G 4500 mAh | Xiaomi 12X 4500 mAh | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | |||||
| WiFi Websurfing | 887 | 627 -29% | 594 -33% | 1028 16% | 985 ? 11% |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 奢华的设计和良好的电池运行时间
vivo V23 5G以其非凡的外观令人信服，特别是在金色的变体中。那些喜欢更庄重的外观的人可以选择黑色的型号。vivo专注于自拍，并为该智能手机提供了强大的解决方案，在测试中令人信服。两个前置LED灯可以使用不同的色温，不仅用于增亮，也用于图像合成。
凭借强大的前置摄像头和长的电池运行时间，vivo V23 5G赢得了消费者的青睐。
显示屏也很好，显示出准确的色彩再现以及高亮度。然而，即使在便宜的设备中，后者有时也会更高，这可能会产生积极的影响，特别是在户外使用时。安装的联发科SoC提供了良好的系统性能，尽管在测试中不时可以看到停顿。
然而，考虑到高昂的价格，我们本以为至少会有一个更高级的功能。不管是无线充电还是IP认证。主摄像头也可以配备更好的附加镜头。
对于自拍，在这个价格范围内不会有一个智能手机能像vivo V23 5G一样好。更强的计算能力和更强大的相机是Pixel 6的特点之一。 像素6或 小米12X.
价格和可用性
vivo V23 5G的建议零售价为549欧元（约549美元）。在测试的时候，它最便宜的是Amazon它在Cyberport的价格稍高一些
Vivo V23 5G
- 08/30/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt
Price comparison
