Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyarvivo V40 SE 5G 评测--支持 eSIM 的经济型中端智能手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price from |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 74 % | 07 / 2024 | Vivo V40 SE 5G SD 4 Gen 2, Adreno 613 | 191 g | 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 | |
| 84.6 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | Motorola Edge 40 Neo Dimensity 7030, Mali-G610 MP3 | 170 g | 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash | 6.55" | 2400x1080 | |
| 86.1 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2024 | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G Dimensity 8300-Ultra, Mali-G615 MP6 | 186 g | 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash | 6.67" | 2712x1220 | |
| 85.9 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2024 | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Exynos 1380, Mali-G68 MP5 | 209 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2340x1080 |
请注意：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不可比。更多信息 请点击此处.
外壳和连接性 - Vivo V40 SE 采用塑料/玻璃混合材质
Vivo V40 SE 5G 有两种颜色：水晶黑和皮革紫。后者采用仿皮背壳。虽然手机的边框看起来像金属，但实际上是由塑料制成的。尽管如此，这并不影响 vivo 手机整体的高品质感。
V40 SE 虽然棱角略显突出，但握持感仍然不错。所有缝隙都贴合均匀，扭动时只会产生轻微的吱吱声。正面由 Dragontrail DT-Star2 Plus 玻璃保护。混合卡槽可容纳两张 nano-SIM 卡，或用 microSD 卡代替第二张 SIM 卡。
虽然可以选择性地扩展 vivo 手机的存储空间是件好事，但遗憾的是，卡槽的速度非常慢。在我们的复制测试中，USB 端口的传输速率也不高（13.44 MB/s）。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Sony Xperia 10 V (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
| Vivo V40 SE 5G (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作
vivo V40 SE 5G 最多只能通过现代 5G 网络访问移动数据。Wi-Fi 5 支持本地互联网连接--我们注意到，与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器结合使用时，数据传输率稳定在预期水平左右。不过，这绝不是快速。
V40 SE 的电话功能还包括 Wi-Fi 通话和 VoLTE。将手机贴在耳边时，通话质量不错，但在环境噪声较大的情况下，其噪音抑制功能很快就会达到极限。智能手机上最多可保存八个 eSIM 配置文件。
谷歌Android 14 被用作该设备的操作系统，vivo 在其上运行自己的 FuntouchOS 14。V40 SE 将接受两次重大更新，即更新至Android 16，以及另外一年的安全补丁。这些更新最初将按月发布，之后（没有更详细的定义）将按季度发布。
手机的 ERM 振动电机提供的触觉反馈很容易感觉到，声音也不大，但可能有点太软。安装在显示屏上的光学指纹传感器具有良好的识别率，能快速、可靠地解锁智能手机。同样，使用前置摄像头的面部识别功能也不太安全。
| Networking | |
| Vivo V40 SE 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
摄像头--vivo V40 SE 的主传感器性能出色
vivo V40 SE 5G 的前置摄像头自拍效果不错，但视频最多只能录制全高清（30fps）。
三摄像头依赖于三星的主传感器，具有 5000 万像素的分辨率--它采用了像素分级技术，确保即使在弱光环境下也能拍出好看的照片。考虑到这款手机的价格，这种技术的效果出人意料地好，在日光下拍摄的照片也令人印象深刻。另外两个镜头是一个超广角镜头和一个专用微距镜头。这两个镜头的成像质量都相当一般。
主摄像头也只能录制 1,080p （30fps）的视频。没有光学防抖（OIS）功能。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow light
显示屏 - V40 SE 采用明亮的 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏
在我们的测试中，vivo V40 SE 的 AMOLED 屏幕被证明非常明亮，在激活环境光传感器的情况下显示全白时，平均亮度约为 1,200 cd/m²。在显示明暗分布均匀的表面（APL18）时，它的亮度甚至达到了 1,944 cd/m²。如果手动控制亮度，则可达到 499 cd/m²。
显示屏的色彩还原基本自然，只有少数蓝色调会产生肉眼可见的偏差。值得庆幸的是，在日常使用过程中，这不会造成任何影响。
在最低显示亮度下，OLED 屏幕以 476 Hz 的频率闪烁，但幅度相当平缓。即便如此，敏感的人也可能会感到不适。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 97 %
Center on Battery: 1206 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.23
| Vivo V40 SE 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7" | Motorola Edge 40 Neo pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7" | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G Super AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | -13% | -21% | -48% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.67 ? | 1.6 ? 4% | 1.69 ? -1% | 3 ? -80% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 1.62 ? | 1.1 ? 32% | 1.4 ? 14% | 1.831 ? -13% |
| PWM Frequency | 476 | 120.4 -75% | 120 -75% | 240 -50% |
| Screen | 1% | 23% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle | 1206 | 966 -20% | 1034 -14% | 904 -25% |
| Brightness | 1199 | 957 -20% | 1035 -14% | 912 -24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 97 | 97 0% | 96 -1% | 97 0% |
| Black Level * | ||||
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.3 | 1.87 19% | 1.1 52% | 2.1 9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5 | 4.34 13% | 1.9 62% | 2.8 44% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.9 | 2.5 14% | 1.4 52% | 2.2 24% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.272 97% | 2.22 99% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 6626 98% | 6582 99% | 6674 97% | 6478 100% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-4% | 1% /
8% | -22% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1.62 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.8345 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7895 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 1.67 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.888 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 0.7805 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 476 Hz Amplitude: 22.47 % |  | |
The display backlight flickers at 476 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 476 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。
性能、排放和电池寿命
vivo V40 SE 采用 高通骁龙 4 代 2可使用 8 GB LPDDR4x RAM。如果需要，还可以通过额外的 8 GB vRAM 扩展内存。
SoC 基于现代的 4 纳米结构宽度，CPU 的时钟频率略高于 骁龙 4 代 1的时钟频率略高，因此速度提升不大。图形运算方面则不然，因为它采用了 Adreno 613实际上比 Adreno 619还要慢。这里的重点似乎是节能。
在持续负载的情况下，手机表面温度仅升至 40 °C以上--我们在正面的部分区域注意到了这一点。值得庆幸的是，即使在压力测试中，这颗入门级 SoC 的性能也没有受到任何影响。
vivo V40 SE 的两个扬声器在中等音量下可提供可用但有限的声音，但根据音调的不同会出现声音失真。如果将智能手机的音量开到最大，这种效果会被放大。它支持多种蓝牙音频编解码器。
凭借 5000 毫安时电池，vivo 智能手机在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试（150 cd/m²）中取得了超过 17 小时的出色续航时间。使用数据线，V40 SE 的充电功率可达 44 瓦，充满一次电约需一小时。据说该电池还特别耐用，四年后仍有 80% 的剩余电量。
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
| Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years) | |
| Geekbench ML | |
| 0.6 TensorFlow Lite CPU | |
| Average of class Smartphone (246 - 1342, n=34, last 2 years) | |
| Vivo V40 SE 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 () | |
| 0.6 TensorFlow Lite GPU | |
| Average of class Smartphone (123 - 1478, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| Vivo V40 SE 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 () | |
| 0.6 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI | |
| Average of class Smartphone (186 - 3410, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| Vivo V40 SE 5G | |
| Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 () | |
| Vivo V40 SE 5G | Motorola Edge 40 Neo | Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | Average 256 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | 29% | 221% | -39% | 6% | 69% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 956.35 | 1004.4 5% | 3824.7 300% | 529.32 -45% | 887 ? -7% | 1839 ? 92% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 808.91 | 930.9 15% | 3642.57 350% | 270 -67% | 694 ? -14% | 1425 ? 76% |
| Random Read 4KB | 201.11 | 279.5 39% | 355.7 77% | 244.24 21% | 228 ? 13% | 277 ? 38% |
| Random Write 4KB | 181.2 | 284.1 57% | 467.74 158% | 62.59 -65% | 238 ? 31% | 309 ? 71% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.3 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.8 °C / 86 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
发言人
Vivo V40 SE 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 28% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 26% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 47% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.6% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.9% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
运行时间
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Vivo V40 SE 5G | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=202, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro 5G | |
| Samsung Galaxy A35 5G | |
| Motorola Edge 40 Neo | |
Pros
Cons
评语 - 这款欧洲智能手机令人印象深刻，但也有一些小瑕疵
vivo 的 V40 SE 5G 是一款经济实惠的中低端智能手机，而且还是 2024 年欧洲杯的官方智能手机。在其价格范围内，vivo 成功地打造了一个成功的整体包装，尤其是其明亮的显示屏、可扩展的存储空间、eSIM 支持、良好的主摄像头和超长的电池续航时间。
vivo V40 SE 5G 是一个成功的整体包装，外壳极具吸引力。
不过，我们的测试也显示，其 USB 端口和 microSD 卡插槽的速度都相对较慢。它所搭载的 SoC 也是如此：骁龙 4 代 2.0 处理器。 骁龙 4 代 2.虽然系统速度不错，但在游戏时芯片组很快就会达到极限。尽管它的显示屏很亮，但也不支持 HDR，尽管它具有 DRM 认证。
V40 SE 的有力替代品包括 Galaxy A35或 Nothing Phone (2a).
价格和供应情况
Vivo V40 SE 5G 的最高售价约为 320 美元。在撰写本文时，这款手机尚未在任何美国在线零售商处出售。
请注意：我们已经更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。更多信息请访问这里。
Vivo V40 SE 5G
- 07/02/2024 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Total Sustainability Score: Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
