Notebookcheck Logo

小米12T 5G评测--价格诱人的顶级智能手机

成功地进行了微调。

在我们的评论中，小米12T试图以其较新的SoC，重新设计的三摄系统来扭转局面。与专业机型类似，它也可以用高达120瓦的功率充电--而且所有这些都没有对价格产生很大影响。继续阅读，我们的评论将揭开这些改进是否值得从你目前的手机中转换。
5G Android ARM Smartphone Touchscreen

小米12T 5G继 小米11T后，是小米12T Pro 5G的较小兄弟姐妹。12T Pro 5G.基本细节与它的前辈非常相似。这两款设备都选择了6.67英寸的大型AMOLED显示屏，频率高达120Hz。此外，它们都有8GB的内存可供支配，并有128或256GB的内部存储器可供选择。三摄像头的核心是一个10800万像素的传感器，两款设备都由5000毫安时的电池供电。

小米12T 5G使用了一个更新、更强大的联发科-SoC。虽然内存的数量相同，但12T拥有更现代的标准的LPDDR5。快速充电技术得到了大幅升级，现在最高支持120瓦。然而，关于相机，我们的审查表明，仅仅因为东西比较新，并不自动使它更好。

在价格方面，小米智能手机的小存储版本的建议零售价约为490美元，256GB型号的手机需要额外支付40美元。

Xiaomi 12T (12T Series)
Processor
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 8 x 2 - 2.9 GHz, Cortex-A78 / A55
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G610 MP6
Memory
8 GB 
, LPDDR5
Display
6.67 inch 20:9, 2712 x 1220 pixel 446 PPI, capacitive, touch sampling rate: up to 480 Hz, AMOLED, AdaptiveSync display: 30 Hz, 60 Hz, 90 Hz, 120 Hz, Corning Gorilla Glass 5, HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 256 GB 
, 230.5 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, accelerometer, electronic compass, gyroscope, linear motor, flicker sensor, IR-Blaster
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 163.1 x 75.9
Battery
5000 mAh Lithium-Ion, 120W wired turbo charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 12
Camera
Primary Camera: 108 MPix (Samsung Iscocell HM6, 1/1.67", 0.64 µm, f/1.7, OIS) + 8 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 120 °) + 2 MPix (Macro, f/2.4); 4k-video; Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.24, 1080p video up to 60 FPS)
Additional features
Speakers: Dual with Dolby Atmos, Keyboard: On-screen, UBS-C cable, SIM tool, protective case, 120W charger, MIUI 13, 12 Months Warranty, Body SAR: 0.992 W/kg, Head SAR: 0.989 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5), SBAS; DRM Widevine L1; Bluetooth Audio-Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, LDAC, LHDC V1-V4, fanless
Weight
202 g, Power Supply: 227 g
Price
650 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
86.4 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Xiaomi 12T
Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6		202 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2712x1220
86.6 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Xiaomi 11T
Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9		203 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
88.5 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Google Pixel 7
Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7		197 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"2400x1080
89.3 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy S22
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920		167 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"2340x1080
87.4 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
SD 888+ 5G, Adreno 660		172 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.55"2400x1080
87.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Realme GT 2 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		189 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
所有12T的颜色变化（图片：小米）。
颜色变化

小米12T 5G有三种颜色版本：蓝色、黑色和银色，也就是我们测试设备的颜色。小米保持了其前辈的基本设计，只有摄像头的设置得到了光学改造，但继续突出。

这款智能手机在玻璃前面板方面有所退步，采用了老式的康宁大猩猩5号玻璃，而不是目前的Vitus类型。 11T.后面板现在配备了哑光玻璃，在两侧有弧度，其他方面小米没有说明。一个非常时尚的外观，但指纹仍然清晰可见。

该设备以其高质量的外观给人留下深刻印象。部分哑光的铝制框架有一个优质的外观，尽管它的重量很重，但由于后面板的弧形侧面，12T 5G的手感不错。侧面的按钮很容易够到，只有左撇子需要稍微调整一下握力来增加音量。 虽然缝隙紧密而均匀，但设备在扭曲时有很大的吱吱声。

SIM卡槽与边框平齐关闭，内部拥有一个小的橡胶密封圈。然而，小米12T 5G没有提供任何认证的防尘或防水保护。

尺寸比较

❌
164.1 mm 76.9 mm 8.8 mm 203 g163.1 mm 75.9 mm 8.6 mm 202 g163.2 mm 74.7 mm 8.2 mm 189 g158.48 mm 71.99 mm 7.45 mm 172 g155.6 mm 73.2 mm 8.7 mm 197 g146 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

特点 - 小米智能手机的USB2.0功能

小米12T 5G有一个USB-2.0端口，支持OTG，可以连接外围设备和存储介质。通过microSD卡扩展内存是不可能的。

与这个价格类别的极少数智能手机一样，12T也没有无线电接收器或集成音频插孔。任何希望使用有线耳机的人只能在USB适配器的帮助下这样做。然而，该机仍有一个红外发射器，可用于控制多媒体设备、相机和空调系统。除了NFC，该设备还配备了现代蓝牙5.3。

顶部：扬声器、麦克风、红外线
顶部：扬声器、麦克风、红外线
左边
左边
右边：音量按钮，电源
右边：音量按钮，电源
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB、SIM卡
底部：扬声器、麦克风、USB、SIM卡

软件 - 小米12T将获得Android 15

小米12T 5G搭载了Android 12和MIUI 13。制造商承诺为12T系列提供三个大的Android ，确保12T也会收到Android 15和安全补丁继续一年。然而，更新间隔相对较大，因为我们的测试设备从2022年11月1日开始，在我们的测试结束时，仍然是MIUI 13.0.10。小米最可能的目标是每季度更新一次。

通常情况下，对于MIUI来说，当涉及到能源管理时，该系统是非常严格的。对于任何希望确保总是收到来自重要应用程序的推送通知的人来说，应该在每个应用程序的设置中取消适当的限制。

通信和GNSS - 稳定的WiFi 6和良好的GPS跟踪

小米12T 5G除了采用较新的蓝牙标准外，还拥有与前代产品类似的通信功能。该智能手机支持WiFi 6，但还不支持6E，因此只能使用2.4和5.0GHz频段。与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的传输速度和高，而且非常稳定。

在旅途中，12T用5G-Sub6连接网络，并提供了一个体面的频率范围，应该不会导致欧洲境内的任何连接瓶颈。

Networking
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
888 (min: 833) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
981 (min: 965) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AX12
884 (min: 817) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
836 (min: 737) MBit/s ∼100%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
904 (min: 816) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
936 (min: 863) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1716 (min: 845) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1757 (min: 1694) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
763 (min: 386) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
823 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼84%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
775 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
844 (min: 744) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1670 (min: 610) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
800 (min: 597) MBit/s ∼46%
Realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
862 (min: 780) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
933 (min: 826) MBit/s ∼95%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
711 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
725 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1443 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1387 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼79%
055110165220275330385440495550605660715770825880935990Tooltip
Xiaomi 12T MediaTek Dimensity 8100, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø886 (833-922)
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø862 (780-919)
Xiaomi 12T MediaTek Dimensity 8100, ARM Mali-G610 MP6; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø982 (965-1014)
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø933 (826-963)
GPS测试：在室内
在室内
GPS测试：户外
户外活动
GPS测试：可用的GNSS
全球导航卫星系统

小米12T 5G支持所有全球卫星网络及其相关频段，包括印度NavIC以及SBAS。在室外，Satfix迅速而准确地进行，而在室内，它可能需要半分钟，但精度几乎相同。

在一次自行车旅行中，我们将小米智能手机与Garmin Venu 2正面交锋。记录的近十公里的总距离仅有20米的偏差。详细的路线计划显示，12T有一些不准确的地方，但仍能做到令人信服的定位性能。

全球导航卫星系统试驾：湖泊之旅
全球导航卫星系统试驾：湖泊之旅
GNSS试运行：转折点
GNSS试运行：转折点
全球导航卫星系统试运行：总结
全球导航卫星系统试运行：总结

电话功能和通话质量

小米12T 5G支持两个Nano SIM卡的双SIM卡，支持VoLTE和WiFi通话。然而，该设备没有整合SIP账户，也可能要使用第三方应用程序来代替。

当放在耳边时，智能手机的通话质量很好，但降噪功能只足以应对较安静的环境噪音，在繁忙的街道或大型人群聚集地，该设备很快就会达到极限。扬声器模式充分地完成了它的工作，只有轻微的回响，并且有一个可用的麦克风范围。

照相机 - 小米智能手机的附加镜头很弱

与小米12T 5G自拍
与小米12T 5G自拍

在分辨率方面，前置摄像头略有增加，有2000万像素可供支配，但只用于像素组合。不幸的是，这些众多的像素并没有反映在无比良好的图像质量上。尽管成像性能坚如磐石，而且有些地方缺少细节，但一般来说，我们喜欢这种冷色调的再现。在最好的情况下，视频以60fps的速度全高清录制。

技术核心是一个108MPix的照片传感器：三星ISOCELL HM6。这比11T中的HM2要小一点。11T这也反映在较小的像素上。相比之下，三星提高了自动对焦的像素密度，以便能够更好地捕捉移动物体。 利用像素分选，九个相邻的像素被合并成一个超级像素，有助于提高低光性能。在测试中，成像性能令人印象深刻，并提供了吸引人的结果。人工智能不会过度锐化图像，色彩也不会过度饱和。在黑暗场景中，主体被正确捕捉，但某些区域显得浑浊和像素化。

这款三合一相机的两个附加镜头都包括一个超广角镜头以及一个微距镜头。后者在11T中仍有500万像素，现在不得不用200万像素来做。超广角镜头很好地完成了它的工作，但在细节上有些不足，但微距镜头却很差。

小米12T 5G最多只能录制超高清视频（最高30fps）。有了这个传感器，理论上，24fps的8K或高达120fps的4K应该是可能的。然而，SoC的ISP似乎是这里的限制因素。

用小米12T拍摄微距

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
orginal image
click to load images

在受控的照明条件下，色彩的再现更加饱和。特别是，红色和绿色调的DeltaE大大高于10。

小米12T显示了测试图的准确表述。只有在全放大的情况下，才会发现有一些细节丢失，甚至在图像的中心。然而，这种影响只在图像的边缘略有增加。

ColorChecker
9.3 ∆E
10 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
10.8 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
12.3 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
0.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 12T: 8.02 ∆E min: 0.66 - max: 17.64 ∆E
ColorChecker
30 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
40.2 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
65.5 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.9 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
38.2 ∆E
76.8 ∆E
45 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
92.9 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37.5 ∆E
24.4 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 12T: 47.4 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 92.94 ∆E

配件和保证 - 现在包括一个120W的充电器

小米12T 5G只提供一年的保证，不能延长。该 保证义务仍然不受影响。

对于一款2022年的智能手机来说，该设备配备了大量的额外设施。其中包括一个模块化的120瓦充电器，一条USB线（A型到C型），一个SIM卡工具，一个透明的硅保护壳以及几种语言的常规文件。与去年不同的是，不包括音频插孔适配器。

输入设备和操作 - 高采样率的触摸屏

小米12T 5G的电容式触摸屏的采样率高达480赫兹，可以同时识别多达10次的触摸。该显示屏已经配备了一个出厂时安装的屏幕保护膜。显示屏流畅，反应灵敏，输入反应迅速而准确。

一个集成的屏内指纹传感器负责生物识别安全，提供可靠的识别率并快速解锁手机。另外，也可以通过前置摄像头设置不太安全的面部识别。

振动电机运行安静，提供良好的触觉反馈。

小米12T 5G有一个明亮的120赫兹OLED

子像素结构
子像素结构

在显示屏方面，与小米12T Pro相比，没有必要做出任何妥协。 小米12T Pro，因为它们在结构上是相同的。6.67英寸的AMOLED面板采用了不寻常的分辨率，但提供更高的像素密度。此外，小米智能手机支持最常见的HDR标准，只缺少杜比视界。

由于激活了环境光传感器，亮度非常高，显示为纯白色，并能达到平均914cd/m²。随着光线和黑暗区域的均匀分布，（APL18）这一数值攀升至1118 cd/m²。对于任何只希望手动调节亮度的人来说，可以使用502 cd/m²。

OLED闪烁并不特别明显，因为12T在整个亮度范围内以恒定的直流调光模式运行。通过示波器，我们只能测量到显示器刷新率下的一致闪烁。通过显微镜进行延时观察发现，没有使用时间性抖动。

912
cd/m²		904
cd/m²		923
cd/m²
910
cd/m²		915
cd/m²		927
cd/m²
904
cd/m²		911
cd/m²		920
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 927 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 914 cd/m² Minimum: 1.99 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 915 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
Xiaomi 12T
AMOLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"		Xiaomi 11T
AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"		Google Pixel 7
OLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"		Samsung Galaxy S22
AMOLED, 2340x1080, 6.1"		Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"		Realme GT 2 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"
Screen
-23%
3%
-17%
-2%
-85%
Brightness middle
915
781
-15%
936
2%
853
-7%
954
4%
740
-19%
Brightness
914
782
-14%
947
4%
858
-6%
961
5%
732
-20%
Brightness Distribution
98
94
-4%
95
-3%
96
-2%
98
0%
98
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.1
2
-82%
1.3
-18%
1.9
-73%
1.5
-36%
3.25
-195%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.7
2.9
-7%
2.7
-0%
3.2
-19%
2.5
7%
6.46
-139%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2
2.3
-15%
1.4
30%
1.9
5%
1.8
10%
4.7
-135%
Gamma
2.24 98%
2.28 96%
2.25 98%
2.07 106%
2.24 98%
2.213 99%
CCT
6457 101%
6852 95%
6664 98%
6460 101%
6254 104%
5663 115%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
闵行区。
25％的显示亮度
25 %
50 %的显示亮度
50 %
75％的显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

使用固定变焦和各种亮度设置进行测量

只要应用原色方案，小米12T 5G的显示屏上的颜色表现得非常自然。在第一次启动时，手机被设置为鲜艳，这明显更冷，并使用更大的DCI-P3色彩空间。

灰度（配色方案：原色，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
灰度（配色方案：原色，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
颜色（配色方案：原始颜色，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
颜色（配色方案：原始颜色，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配色方案：原始色彩，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（配色方案：原始色彩，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（配色方案：原色，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
饱和度（配色方案：原色，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
0.89 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.4525 ms rise
↘ 0.4375 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5915 ms rise
↘ 0.6085 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

在户外，小米12T 5G拥有足够的亮度储备，在任何时候都能保持清晰。只有表面的反射有时可能会有点烦人。

正如预期，AMOLED显示屏的可视角度非常好。只有在狭窄的视角下，才会有轻微的绿纱覆盖在内容上，亮度也会稍稍下降。然而，这在日常使用中并不具有破坏性。

小米12T 5G可视角度稳定
小米12T 5G可视角度稳定

性能 - 小米12T配备联发科Dimensity 8100 Ultra

小米12T 5G采用的是 联发科Dimensity 8100Ultra，有8GB的内存。然而，Ultra的名称似乎只是一个营销术语。至少在规格方面，找不到与标准机型的区别，基准测试也没有发现任何重大差异。

SoC在基准测试中显示了良好的CPU性能，这强调了该智能手机的高端等级主张。然而，在PCMark和AnTuTu中，12T的表现比Poco X4 GT ，后者同样配备了Dimensity 8100，但在日常使用中，它提供流畅的系统性能。

Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v9 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1267 Points +40%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1158 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1145 Points +26%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1050 Points +16%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=176, last 2 years)
1037 Points +14%
Realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
971 Points +7%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (887 - 971, n=3)
922 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
907 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
887 Points -2%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
857 Points -6%
Multi-Core
Realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
4012 Points +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (3701 - 4012, n=3)
3811 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
3720 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
3701 Points -1%
Realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3641 Points -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
3544 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3474 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=176, last 2 years)
3464 Points -7%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
3265 Points -12%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
2916 Points -22%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
965911 Points +24%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
829929 Points +7%
Realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
819433 Points +5%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
813746 Points +5%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 2056989, n=104, last 2 years)
810694 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
809368 Points +4%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (778486 - 819433, n=3)
802429 Points +3%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
778486 Points
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
773655 Points -1%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
570375 Points -27%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
14650 Points +15%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
14068 Points +11%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (12684 - 14650, n=3)
13463 Points +6%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
13056 Points +3%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
12684 Points
Realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
12279 Points -3%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
12136 Points -4%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
12120 Points -4%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
10530 Points -17%
CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
957 Points +25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points +20%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
898 Points +18%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
850 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
828 Points +8%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (764 - 850, n=3)
801 Points +5%
Realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
789 Points +3%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
764 Points
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
612 Points -20%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7147 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6991 Points +30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=158, last 2 years)
6499 Points +21%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6382 Points +18%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
6247 Points +16%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
6157 Points +14%
Realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
6015 Points +12%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (5393 - 6157, n=3)
5855 Points +9%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
5393 Points
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
5319 Points -1%
System
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
11897 Points +18%
Realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
11696 Points +16%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (10066 - 11897, n=3)
11220 Points +11%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11210 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=158, last 2 years)
10346 Points +3%
Realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
10247 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
10066 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
9864 Points -2%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
9601 Points -5%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
9292 Points -8%
Memory
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7144 Points +53%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=158, last 2 years)
7058 Points +51%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
6569 Points +41%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6413 Points +38%
Realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
6356 Points +36%
Realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6162 Points +32%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
6016 Points +29%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (4662 - 6356, n=3)
5678 Points +22%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
5392 Points +16%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
4662 Points
Graphics
Realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
21885 Points +100%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=158, last 2 years)
17998 Points +65%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17269 Points +58%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
16001 Points +47%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
14811 Points +36%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
11595 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
10920 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (10106 - 11595, n=3)
10874 Points 0%
Realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
10106 Points -7%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
7516 Points -31%
Web
Samsung Galaxy S22
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1924 Points +17%
Realme GT 2 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1888 Points +14%
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
1838 Points +11%
Realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
1742 Points +6%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1732 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
1728 Points +5%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (1651 - 1742, n=3)
1708 Points +3%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
1651 Points
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
1604 Points -3%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=158, last 2 years)
1578 Points -4%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 7
Google Tensor G2, Mali-G710 MP7, 8192
42556 Points +61%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G, Adreno 660, 8192
32339 Points +23%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
27192 Points +3%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
  (25609 - 27192, n=3)
26391 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12T
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 8192
26371 Points
Realme GT Neo 3
MediaTek Dimensity 8100, Mali-G610 MP6, 12288
25609 Points -3%
Xiaomi 11T
MediaTek Dimensity 1200, Mali-G77 MP9, 8192
21846 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points -32%

图形计算由SoC集成的 ARM Mali-G610 MP6.在基准测试中，这意味着与Mali-G77 MP9相比，性能提高了10-46%。 Mali-G77 MP9中发现的 11T.不幸的是，3DMark Wild Life（Extreme）的分数没有了，因为12T的系统没有授予该应用程序必要的权限。

3DMark: 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
3DMark: 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5040 Points +7%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5017 Points +6%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4971 Points +5%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4716 Points
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4086 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4000 Points -15%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11893 Points +22%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11491 Points +18%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10930 Points +12%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9929 Points +2%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9738 Points
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8353 Points -14%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8677 Points +10%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8268 Points +5%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8192 Points +4%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8155 Points +4%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7875 Points
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7256 Points -8%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
116 fps -3%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -25%
Realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
Realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
380 fps +40%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps +11%
Realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
274 fps +1%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
272 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
271 fps
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
249 fps -8%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
185 fps -32%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps +19%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +11%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps +5%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
107 fps
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps -1%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -16%
Realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -44%
Realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
194 fps +50%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
193 fps +50%
Realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
169 fps +31%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
141 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
134 fps +4%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
132 fps +2%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
129 fps
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
122 fps -5%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps +55%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps +29%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +22%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps +21%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75 fps +3%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps
Realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -18%
Realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -18%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
143 fps +51%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
123 fps +29%
Realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps 0%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -6%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps -17%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +55%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +50%
Realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +33%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +33%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +20%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +10%
Realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +5%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86 fps +59%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +26%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +24%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +15%
Realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +9%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps +2%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps -15%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps +59%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps +50%
Realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +31%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps +22%
Realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps +16%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps +13%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +3%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps +58%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
33 fps +27%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps +12%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
27 fps +4%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
26 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
24 fps -8%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -19%
Realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps -54%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps +35%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps +33%
Realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +20%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps +18%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps +16%
Realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps +8%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Realme GT 2 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
100 fps +49%
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +6%
Realme GT Neo 3
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +3%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +1%
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65 fps -3%
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -21%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps +17%
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps 0%
Xiaomi 12T
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11 fps -8%
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10906 Points
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10331 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10206 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10117 Points
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8041 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
17842 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15730 Points
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15555 Points
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13699 Points
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11770 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi Poco X4 GT
Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5283 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
Adreno 660, SD 888+ 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5260 Points
Google Pixel 7
Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4749 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4086 Points
Xiaomi 11T
Mali-G77 MP9, Dimensity 1200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3813 Points
0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Xiaomi 12T Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø18.7 (9.86-132.1)
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø22.5 (13.4-57)
Xiaomi 12T Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 0.9.1 Vulkan 1.0: Ø20.2 (9.92-158)
Google Pixel 7 Mali-G710 MP7, Tensor G2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø28.7 (18.7-133.1)
Xiaomi 12T Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.1: Ø6.45 (3.44-12.9)
Xiaomi 12T Mali-G610 MP6, Dimensity 8100, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 0.9.0 Vulkan 1.1: Ø7 (4.35-14.6)

用小米12T上网是很快的，尽管基准测试将小米智能手机置于中间位置。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points +53%
Realme GT 2 Pro (Chrome 99)
102.3 Points +26%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion (Chrome 105)
100.393 Points +24%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
96.4 Points +19%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
96.314 Points +19%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (80.5 - 82.5, n=3)
81.4 Points 0%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
81.171 Points
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
51.8 Points -36%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min +123%
Realme GT 2 Pro (Chome 99)
127 runs/min +97%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
111 runs/min +72%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
100 runs/min +55%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (64.5 - 79.3, n=3)
72.1 runs/min +12%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
64.5 runs/min
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
54.1 runs/min -16%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points +48%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion (Chrome 105)
104 Points +32%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
93 Points +18%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (79 - 94, n=2)
86.5 Points +9%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
79 Points
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
150.2 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
149 Points +32%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
113 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (101 - 113, n=3)
106.7 Points -6%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
98 Points -13%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
70 Points -38%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Google Pixel 7
45158 Points +28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
38992 Points +11%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points +9%
Realme GT 2 Pro (Chrome 99)
37650 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion (Chrome 105)
37446 Points +6%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
35255 Points
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (33046 - 35255, n=3)
33846 Points -4%
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
29912 Points -15%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Samsung Galaxy S22 (Chrome 100.0.4896.79)
1566 ms * -8%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -5%
Xiaomi 12T (Chrome 108)
1446.8 ms *
Xiaomi 11T (Chrome 94.0.4606.85)
1444 ms * -0%
Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100 (1274 - 1447, n=3)
1349 ms * +7%
Realme GT 2 Pro (Chrome 99)
1137 ms * +21%
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion (Chrome 105)
1117.9 ms * +23%
Google Pixel 7 (Chrome 106)
1021.8 ms * +29%

* ... smaller is better

小米12T的高速UFS-3.1没有辜负它的潜力，并且在这样做的时候，设法从竞争中冲刺出来。

Xiaomi 12TXiaomi 11TGoogle Pixel 7Samsung Galaxy S22Motorola Edge 30 FusionRealme GT 2 ProAverage 256 GB UFS 3.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-45%
-40%
-31%
-31%
-24%
-21%
-16%
Sequential Read 256KB
1834.32
1790
-2%
1280.81
-30%
1486
-19%
1870.18
2%
1749
-5%
1742 ?(950 - 2037, n=102)
-5%
1887 ?(226 - 4512, n=198, last 2 years)
3%
Sequential Write 256KB
1768.39
942
-47%
879.39
-50%
993
-44%
689.24
-61%
1225
-31%
1160 ?(452 - 2004, n=102)
-34%
1471 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=198, last 2 years)
-17%
Random Read 4KB
342.8
139.3
-59%
210.47
-39%
273
-20%
248.86
-27%
273
-20%
286 ?(173.5 - 543, n=102)
-17%
278 ?(22.2 - 483, n=198, last 2 years)
-19%
Random Write 4KB
437.07
133.3
-70%
253.92
-42%
257.6
-41%
276.74
-37%
264
-40%
319 ?(132.1 - 499, n=103)
-27%
311 ?(9.4 - 753, n=198, last 2 years)
-29%

游戏 - 丰富的游戏能力

小米12T 5G拥有强大的基础性能，它知道如何将其用于游戏。这甚至适用于性能要求高的游戏，如《玄幻冲击》，它在最高质量设置下运行非常流畅，平均为59fps。从技术上讲，仍有更大的改进空间，但无论如何，系统不允许这个游戏超过60fps。我们通过使用GameBench确定这些数字.

由于它的大显示屏，12T提供了一个很好的概述游戏中发生的情况。不幸的是，在横屏模式下手持设备时，扬声器被玩家的手遮住了。

玄信影响
玄信影响
PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
暗黑破坏神不朽
暗黑破坏神不朽
051015202530354045505560Tooltip
Xiaomi 12T; Genshin Impact; 3.3.0_11741873_11806263: Ø59 (50-61)
Xiaomi 12T; PUBG Mobile; HD; 2.3.0: Ø59.4 (54-61)
Xiaomi 12T; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 2.3.0: Ø39.6 (37-41)
Xiaomi 12T; Diablo Immortal; 1.7.0: Ø59.2 (36-61)

排放--SoC在负载下几乎没有节流。

温度

不能使用3DMark压力测试。
3DMark
GFXBench电池测试。T-Rex (OpenGL ES 2.0)
T-Rex
GFXBench电池测试。曼哈顿（OpenGL ES 3.1）
曼哈顿

小米12T 5G的表面温度没有任何不愉快的地方，即使在负载下，智能手机的触感也不会变热。

不幸的是，由于前面提到的系统限制，我们无法进行3DMark压力测试，以测试SoC的性能稳定性。在GFXBench电池测试中，12T在较早的T-Rex测试（OpenGL ES 2.0）中证明自己是稳定的。要求更高的曼哈顿测试（OpenGL ES 3.1）结束了，但随后吐出了 "内存不足 "的信息。因此，紧接着，我们再次运行了阿兹特克废墟（High Tier，Vulkan）测试，以便将结果（29fps）与冷状态下的结果（32fps）进行比较。发生了轻微的节流（-9.6 %），但在限制范围内。

Max. Load
 31.6 °C30.8 °C31.5 °C 
 31.5 °C31.5 °C31.1 °C 
 31.7 °C31.5 °C30.2 °C 
Maximum: 31.7 °C
Average: 31.3 °C
29.2 °C29.7 °C30.1 °C
29.2 °C29.2 °C30.3 °C
28.5 °C29.8 °C29.9 °C
Maximum: 30.3 °C
Average: 29.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  25.3 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.7 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.3 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.6 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

发言人

虽然小米12T 5G的两个扬声器名义上支持杜比全景声，但它们在粉红噪声测试中无法给人留下深刻印象。正如预期的那样，它们缺乏深度，但低中音也非常平淡。然而，通过扬声器，讲话清晰易懂，在观看电影时，整体包装还不错，至少在中等音量下是如此。

一切都通过外部扬声器或耳机听起来更好，可以通过USB-C进行有线连接。蓝牙5.3可通过无线方式提供非常广泛的编解码。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2031.239.22532.732.83130.322.94026.429.65040.735.46325.923.88019.125.81002027.712514.134.816018.450.120015.749.925013.155.231515.154.340010.652.150010.364.66309.965.580010.566.7100011.173.3125011.477.7160010.875.6200011.874.4250011.777.6315012.577.5400012.780.3500012.974.8630013.572.2800012.865.71000013.469.11250013.770.31600013.666.8SPL24.587.4N0.666.9median 12.8median 66.9Delta1.69.837.439.52830.932.628.127.7303435.82730.123.630.322.328.317.733.916.148.712.846.813.152.71258.2959.91165.310.768.310.373.510.976.312.178.111.878.61278.811.880.511.980.712.979.113.37713.47113.575.913.669.814.869.614.166.324.689.50.677median 12.8median 711.210hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 12TSamsung Galaxy S22
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 12T audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S22 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 41% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池运行时间 - 超级快速的120瓦充电

能源消耗

小米12T 5G的功耗可以说是经济的。虽然在闲置使用时，面板变暗时，功耗出奇的高。设置为自适应显示亮度（150cd/m²），在GFXBench中显示非常经济。

一个亮点当然是智能手机的快速充电技术。在120瓦的情况下，电池在21分钟内充满，11分钟后突破65%大关，16分钟后达到88%大关。然而，这只能通过附带的充电器实现，无线充电是不存在的。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.07 / 0.38 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.38 / 1.83 / 1.9 Watt
Load midlight 3.23 / 7.71 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 12T
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 7
4355 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S22
3700 mAh		Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
4400 mAh		Realme GT 2 Pro
5000 mAh		Average MediaTek Dimensity 8100
 		Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
1%
29%
-2%
16%
-9%
-0%
-12%
Idle Minimum *
1.38
0.78
43%
0.89
36%
0.69
50%
0.83
40%
1
28%
1.087 ?(0.78 - 1.38, n=3)
21%
0.883 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=160, last 2 years)
36%
Idle Average *
1.83
1.86
-2%
1.07
42%
1.19
35%
1.72
6%
1.4
23%
1.77 ?(1.5 - 1.98, n=3)
3%
1.467 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=160, last 2 years)
20%
Idle Maximum *
1.9
1.88
1%
1.2
37%
1.26
34%
1.75
8%
1.7
11%
2 ?(1.9 - 2.1, n=3)
-5%
1.621 ?(0.83 - 4.46, n=160, last 2 years)
15%
Load Average *
3.23
3.98
-23%
3.27
-1%
6.97
-116%
2.76
15%
5.3
-64%
3.82 ?(3.23 - 4.43, n=3)
-18%
6.55 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=154, last 2 years)
-103%
Load Maximum *
7.71
8.78
-14%
5.5
29%
8.85
-15%
6.74
13%
11.1
-44%
7.9 ?(7.71 - 8.2, n=3)
-2%
9.9 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=154, last 2 years)
-28%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Xiaomi 12T MediaTek Dimensity 8100; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5.24 (1.507-10.4)
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.17 (3.19-11.1)
Xiaomi 12T MediaTek Dimensity 8100; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.344 (1.282-1.555)
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.342 (1.121-1.691)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

01234567891011Tooltip
Xiaomi 12T MediaTek Dimensity 8100; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.96 (5.19-6.98)
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11 (10.5-11.1)
Xiaomi 12T MediaTek Dimensity 8100; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.344 (1.282-1.555)
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.342 (1.121-1.691)

电池寿命

强大的5000毫安时电池帮助小米12T 5G实现了非常长的电池寿命。然而，当与它的直接竞争对手竞争时，12T在视频播放方面落后，而且显示的整体耐力水平低于 realme GT 2 Pro它有一个相同大小的电池，但有一个更强大的高通SoC。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
26h 18min
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 108)
16h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 07min
Load (maximum brightness)
4h 16min
Xiaomi 12T
5000 mAh		Xiaomi 11T
5000 mAh		Google Pixel 7
4355 mAh		Samsung Galaxy S22
3700 mAh		Motorola Edge 30 Fusion
4400 mAh		Realme GT 2 Pro
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
18%
-5%
5%
-30%
15%
Reader / Idle
1578
2244
42%
1063
-33%
2182
38%
2056
30%
H.264
1027
1450
41%
1230
20%
887
-14%
1083
5%
WiFi v1.3
984
813
-17%
731
-26%
675
-31%
686
-30%
1053
7%
Load
256
267
4%
302
18%
324
27%
296
16%

Pros

+ 明亮而准确的OLED显示屏
+ 快速的SoC
+ 良好的主摄像头
+ 120瓦的充电
+ 优秀的电池寿命

Cons

- 薄弱的附加镜头
- 既不防尘也不防水
- 没有6GHz WiFI
- 没有无线充电

结论 - 一款功能强大的高端智能手机

已评测。小米12T。测试设备由notebooksbilliger.de提供。
已评测。小米12T。测试设备由:

与它的前辈相比，11T小米12T 5G代表了一个适度的升级。 一个区别是看起来令人印象深刻的玻璃背板。处理器也被赋予了一个较新的型号，但与更昂贵的高通-SoC不同的是12T Pro它配备的是联发科Dimensity 8100，被定位在最高级别。

小米12T 5G是一款功能强大的高端智能手机，价格诱人的入门级。

然而，根据不同的型号，内存容量保持不变，为128或256GB。相机已经收到了一个新的主传感器，主要是在对准移动物体时提供了好处。不幸的是，两个附加镜头都很弱，微距镜头比11T中的镜头更差。

小米在其他一些领域也少走了一些弯路。前面的玻璃现在是由旧的Gorilla Glas 5制成，而不是现在的Victus。此外，耳机插孔适配器不再作为标准配置。作为回报，12T拥有120瓦的超快充电。

优秀的替代品无疑是像素7以及Galaxy S22，尤其是realme GT 2 Pro.

价格和可用性

在美国，小米12T 5G可以通过亚马逊购买，128GB型号为489美元，256GB版本为510美元。

Xiaomi 12T - 01/19/2023 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
82%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
93%
Connectivity
54 / 70 → 77%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
93%
Games Performance
61 / 64 → 95%
Application Performance
83 / 86 → 96%
Temperature
94%
Noise
100%
Audio
72 / 90 → 80%
Camera
68%
Average
80%
86%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

More articles related to this device

Xiaomi 12T (12T Series)
Review
•
小米12T Pro 5G评论。拥有200MP和骁龙8+ Ge...

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 小米12T 5G评测--价格诱人的顶级智能手机
Daniel Schmidt, 2023-01-23 (Update: 2024-08-15)