Notebookcheck Logo
Teaser

小米红米 14C 智能手机评测--屏幕比 iPhone 更快的经济型手机

让人眼前一亮

小米红米 14C 有醒目的外观和低调的外观,这取决于你的品味。不过,它始终配备了非常快的屏幕、NFC 和指纹传感器,这在廉价智能手机中并不多见。在我们的测试中,我们将了解处理器功率是否足以满足日常使用。
Florian Schmitt, 👁 Florian Schmitt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android ARM Smartphone

判决

一方面,在同价位手机中,小米红米 14C 是一款时尚、做工精良、配置丰富的手机。超长的电池续航时间、快速的屏幕和性能良好的照相系统也令人印象深刻。

即使在低亮度下也不用担心 PWM 闪烁,有多种蓝牙音频编解码器可以实现无线声音传输,即使长时间使用也几乎没有明显的发热现象。

另一方面是 SoC,对于它的选择,小米不得不听取明确的批评意见:新的名称实际上隐藏着一个旧的 SoC,它现在也能驱动 120 Hz 的屏幕。但在其他方面,它的性能甚至略逊于前代产品的 SoC 红米 13C在这个低价位的日常使用中,这一点是显而易见的。

您可以选择低调或不寻常的外壳,这一点非常好,因为这可以让红米手机毫不突兀地融入任何环境,或成为真正的抢眼之物。此外,红米 14C 在互联网上已经大幅降价的价格也很有吸引力。而且 4 年的软件更新保证在这个价位上也不是什么坏事。

Pros

+ 经济型智能手机
+ 配备 NFC 和指纹传感器
+ 120 Hz 显示屏
+ 坚固时尚的外壳
+ 多种蓝牙音频编解码器
+ 摄像头图像质量好
+ 更新保证至 2028 年

Cons

- 相当重
- 扬声器质量中等
- SoC 速度慢
- 内存速度慢

价格和供应情况

红米 14C 的三种官方发售配色在欧洲广泛销售,包括两种内存版本。甚至在一些零售商处也能买到紫色版本。

与制造商的官方售价相比,这款手机的售价已经低了很多,例如在亚马逊网站(amazon.de)上,128 GB 机型的测试价格不到 120 欧元(约合 126 美元)。

Amazon Logo
$120.99
Xiaomi Redmi 14C 4G LTE (128GB + 4GB) Factory Unlocked Global ROM GSM 6.88" 50MP Triple Camera (Tello Mint & Global) + (Free Fast Car Dual USB) (Sage Green Global Version)
Bestpreis 99.9€ alza.de
Xiaomi Redmi 14C 128GB/4GB Midnight Black
2. 110 € euronics-maxi-media
3. 110 € DOPODO
4. 112.85 € haym.infotec

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
70.7%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon: $120.99
List Price: 150€
211 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.88"
1640x720
260 PPI
IPS
2.
77.7% v7 (old)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
4 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon: $122.50
List Price: 149€
192 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.74"
1600x720
260 PPI
IPS
3.
78.8% v7 (old)
Motorola Moto G24
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85 ⎘
ARM Mali-G52 MP2 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB eMMC
Amazon: $119.50
List Price: 150€
181 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.56"
1612x720
269 PPI
IPS
4.
77.2% v7 (old)
Nokia G11 Plus
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606) ⎘
ARM Mali-G57 MP1 ⎘
3 GB Memory, 32 GB eMMC
Amazon: $99.99
List Price: 150€
192 g32 GB eMMC Flash6.52"
1600x720
269 PPI
IPS

小米公司在 "红米 "品牌下推出了多款价格低廉的手机,这些手机通常以低廉的价格提供丰富的功能。

小米红米 14C 是另一款特别实惠的智能手机:售价不到 150 欧元(约合 158 美元)。尽管如此,制造商还是提供了充足的内存、大容量电池和快速显示屏,甚至可以与更昂贵的设备相媲美。

在本次测试中,我们将对这款经济实惠的红米手机进行更深入的了解。

规格

Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Processor
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A75 / A55
Graphics adapter
Memory
4 GB 
Display
6.88 inch 20:9, 1640 x 720 pixel 260 PPI, capactive touchscreen, IPS, glossy: yes, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB eMMC Flash, 128 GB 
, 102 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: 3.5mm, Card Reader: microSD (dedicated, up to 1TB), 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B5/​B8), 4G (B1/​B3/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B20/​B28/​B38/​B40/​B41) , Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.2 x 171.9 x 77.8
Battery
5160 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18W charging (USB-PD)
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 14
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix f/​1.8, phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p/​30fps (camera 1), 2MP, f/2.4 (camera 2)
Secondary Camera: 13 MPix f/2.0, Videos @1080p/​30fps
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, USB cable, SIM tool, 24 Months Warranty, SAR: 0.987W/​kg Head, 0.902W/​kg Body
Weight
211 g
Price
150 Euro
Amazon
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

外壳和功能 - 坚固的塑料外壳

小米红米 14C 的机身由塑料制成,有不同的颜色可供选择:在欧洲有三种款式,分别是经典的午夜黑,表面为磨砂质感,以及橄榄绿的鼠尾草绿,质感轻盈。

更有趣的是 "星空蓝"(Starry Blue),它的颜色从灰色渐变到蓝色,由于在其上磨出了环形线条,它的外观会随着光线的照射而发生微妙的变化。国际上还有淡紫色的背面可供选择。

正面屏幕边缘清晰可见,但对于一款廉价智能手机来说,边缘相对较窄。小米没有提供任何有关屏幕保护玻璃的信息。

红米 14C 采用 6.88 英寸屏幕,是一款相当大的智能手机,这也反映在它的重量上,为 211 克(约 7.4 盎司)。总体而言,红米 14C 的手感不错,边缘的圆润处理也很讨人喜欢。做工也令人印象深刻,材料过渡几乎看不出来。手机也非常稳定,几乎不会扭曲或凹陷。

红米 14C 配备 4GB 内存和 128GB 存储空间。还有一个更大的版本,配备 8GB 内存和 256GB 大容量存储空间;与制造商的差价为 30 欧元(约合 32 美元)。包装上还标明了其他内存大小,但这些都是虚拟内存,即在速度慢得多的数据内存中的交换文件。

NFC 用于非接触式支付。

尺寸比较

171.9 mm 77.8 mm 8.2 mm 211 g168 mm 78 mm 8.1 mm 192 g164.8 mm 75.9 mm 8.6 mm 192 g163.5 mm 74.5 mm 8 mm 181 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
36.9 MB/s +13%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra (Angelbird V60)
32.6 MB/s
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85 (Angelbird V60)
30.2 MB/s -7%
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years)
29.3 MB/s -10%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606) (Angelbird V60)
24.4 MB/s -25%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 14C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.4 (26.1-43.9)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø31.6 (19.3-45.4)
Motorola Moto G24 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø34.7 (22.9-43.6)
Nokia G11 Plus Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø38.5 (21.2-48)
Xiaomi Redmi 14C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø71.6 (34.6-79.9)
Xiaomi Redmi 13C Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø69.8 (31.7-79.9)
Motorola Moto G24 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø77.5 (33-81.7)
Nokia G11 Plus Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø72.4 (38.1-82.1)

通信和运行 - 无 5G 网络

小米红米 14C 是一款 4G 手机,所以你不得不放弃快速的 5G 网络。我们在测试期间随机测试了信号强度,发现小米红米 14C 有时在确保良好接收方面存在问题,尤其是在高楼之间等困难地点。

WiFi 5 是最快的 Wi-Fi 标准。我们的测试设备实现了大约 300 到 350 MBit/s 的传输速率,符合预期值。在传输时,有时会出现低至 221 MBit/s 的骤降,这种情况在测试过程中也多次出现。而数据接收则比较稳定。

由于能达到 120 Hz,显示屏使用起来相当流畅,但设备偶尔会出现卡顿,这可能是由于 SoC 速度较慢所致。指纹传感器内置在右侧的待机键中,一次性学习后可以快速解锁智能手机。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (40.5 - 1810, n=192, last 2 years)
731 MBit/s +169%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
365 (346min - 378max) MBit/s +34%
Nokia G11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
363 (242min - 376max) MBit/s +33%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (10.5 - 718, n=183)
353 MBit/s +30%
Motorola Moto G24
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
352 (295min - 377max) MBit/s +29%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
272 (221min - 319max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Average of class Smartphone
  (34.8 - 1875, n=190, last 2 years)
715 MBit/s +94%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
369 (342min - 380max) MBit/s
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  (20.1 - 695, n=182)
327 MBit/s -11%
Motorola Moto G24
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
319 (294min - 338max) MBit/s -14%
Nokia G11 Plus
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
313 (243min - 321max) MBit/s -15%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
309 (276min - 335max) MBit/s -16%
050100150200250300350Tooltip
Xiaomi Redmi 14C; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø272 (221-319)
Xiaomi Redmi 14C; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø369 (342-380)

软件和可持续性 - 4 年更新

小米手机红米 14C 搭载的 HyperOS 1 仍基于Android 14。 该操作系统经过了大量定制,如果你以前使用的是更干净的Android ,那么你必须在很多方面适应它。

安全更新保证持续到 2028 年 9 月 26 日。但没有说明更新的频率。此外,也没有关于该设备将收到多少个新操作系统版本的信息。

没有关于设备可持续性的具体说明,也没有任何维修手册。不过,你可以在小米公司的网站上找到维修所需的备件的大致费用。而且包装基本不使用塑料。

相机 - 出乎意料的好

录制前置摄像头
录制前置摄像头

在小米红米 14C 的背面可以看到两个摄像头镜头:主摄像头为 5000 万像素,与 红米 13C.第二颗摄像头镜头似乎不再有任何用处,尽管在前代产品上它仍被用于拍摄极限特写,但这一选项已不再可用。

在对 红米 13C的测试中,我们可以证明对于这样一款价格低廉的手机来说,主摄像头的成像质量还是不错的。那么现在的红米 14C 又是什么样子呢?在这里,我们也可以确认主摄像头的成像质量相当不错:照片的细节和清晰度都相当不错。色彩显示也很好,即使在弱光和高对比度环境下,一些细节仍然清晰可见。另一方面,照相馆中的测试图对比度不高。

视频录制速度可达 1080p 和 30 fps。自动对焦往往需要一段时间才能找到正确的焦距,曝光也不总是立即合适。不过,总体而言,考虑到该设备的价格,照片效果还是不错的。

与前代机型相比,前置摄像头的像素略有增加:现在这里安装了一个 1300 万像素的摄像头。用它自拍效果相当不错,即使是非常明亮的背景也不会导致图像太亮。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main Camera PlantMain camera EnvironmentMain camera Low Light
ColorChecker
8.4 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
8.7 ∆E
12.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
6.8 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
7.6 ∆E
4 ∆E
7.9 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
5.9 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 14C: 7.37 ∆E min: 2.54 - max: 13.62 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.9 ∆E
55.3 ∆E
39.4 ∆E
35.3 ∆E
45.2 ∆E
62.4 ∆E
54.2 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
44.4 ∆E
28.2 ∆E
66.2 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
29.4 ∆E
48.1 ∆E
37.6 ∆E
77.4 ∆E
44 ∆E
41.9 ∆E
94.3 ∆E
71.4 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
37 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Redmi 14C: 47.12 ∆E min: 13.38 - max: 94.34 ∆E

显示屏 - 可达到 120 赫兹

子像素图像
子像素图像

红米 14C 的 IPS 屏幕尺寸为 6.88 英寸,非常大,但分辨率仍然只有 1,640 x 720 像素。这导致在某些情况下显示效果有些模糊。

该机的一大亮点是最高帧频可达 120 Hz。这使得滚动非常流畅,操作速度也很快,只是偶尔会因 SoC 速度较慢而减慢速度。

屏幕的最大亮度在全白区域为 422 cd/m²,在较小区域可达 566 cd/m²,达到了同类产品的水平。不过,这款手机很难适合在明亮的户外或其他非常明亮的环境中使用。

即使在低亮度下,我们也不会注意到 PWM 闪烁,但色彩还原的准确度却不尽如人意,尤其是在色彩强烈的情况下。

411
cd/m²
408
cd/m²
376
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
422
cd/m²
386
cd/m²
402
cd/m²
399
cd/m²
381
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 422 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 400.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.57 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 422 cd/m²
Contrast: 1407:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.9 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.382
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
IPS, 1640x720, 6.9"
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
IPS, 1600x720, 6.7"
Motorola Moto G24
IPS, 1612x720, 6.6"
Nokia G11 Plus
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Screen
-13%
-17%
-45%
Brightness middle
422
430
2%
521
23%
395
-6%
Brightness
401
424
6%
510
27%
385
-4%
Brightness Distribution
89
92
3%
93
4%
94
6%
Black Level *
0.3
0.28
7%
0.39
-30%
0.3
-0%
Contrast
1407
1536
9%
1336
-5%
1317
-6%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
3.21
4.06
-26%
4.83
-50%
6.21
-93%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
6.29
8.11
-29%
7.71
-23%
10.61
-69%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.9
5
-72%
5.3
-83%
8.3
-186%
Gamma
2.382 92%
2.35 94%
2.111 104%
2.639 83%
CCT
6338 103%
7813 83%
7021 93%
7999 81%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.


卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.7 ms rise
↘ 22.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
58.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 31.1 ms rise
↘ 27 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 94 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

性能、排放和电池寿命--持续时间长

联发科 联发科 Helio G81 Ultra在我们的测试设备中被用作 SoC,在很大程度上与 G80除了能够驱动 120 Hz 的显示屏之外,它的性能与 Helio G80 基本一致。不过,这也表明红米 14C 的性能略低于红米 13C。 红米 13C略逊一筹。 Helio G85.

我们的基准测试也证实了这一点:红米 14C 在 CPU 和 GPU 性能方面都略逊于前代产品。鉴于性能水平已经很低,这在日常使用中肯定会造成差异:在日常使用中,红米 14C 的卡顿现象会更频繁一些,而且尽管名义上显示速度更快,但运行起来并不总是像前代产品那样流畅。

缓慢的 eMMC 闪存也没有改变:因此,数据复制速度相对较慢,应用程序加载时间较长。

长时间负载后,机身外壳的最高温升为 42.6 °C(约 109 °F),温度适中。3DMark 压力测试也显示,在多次基准测试运行后,性能几乎没有下降。

单声道扬声器发出的声音一般都比较单薄,但至少比前代产品多了一些中低音。外置音频设备可通过 3.5 毫米音频接口连接。目前几乎所有的蓝牙音频编解码器都可用于耳机或扬声器的无线连接。

红米 14C 的电池容量为 5,160 毫安时,比上一代产品略有增加,在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中,其续航时间也略有延长:测试设备的续航时间为 16:16 小时。这是一个很好的值,所以你应该可以在不充电的情况下使用两天。该设备的最大充电功率为 18 瓦,但没有配备充电器。该手机与我们现有的充电器配合良好,完全充电周期大约需要 2:15 小时。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=170, last 2 years)
1484 Points +262%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
411 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
410 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
410 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
366 Points -11%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=170, last 2 years)
4151 Points +311%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1316 Points +30%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1251 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1011 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
1011 Points 0%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13163 Points +40%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
9403 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9393 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
9393 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9338 Points -1%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
7562 Points -19%
3DMark
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=112, last 2 years)
2823 Points +378%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
742 Points +26%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
730 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
591 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
591 Points 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
404 Points -32%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 25785, n=187, last 2 years)
7849 Points +1197%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
750 Points +24%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
726 Points +20%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
605 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
605 Points 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
403 Points -33%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=194, last 2 years)
2150 Points +1261%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
190 Points +20%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
187 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
158 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
158 Points 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
110 Points -30%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=192, last 2 years)
2144 Points +1283%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
188 Points +21%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
182 Points +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
155 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
155 Points 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
115 Points -26%
GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 52, n=208, last 2 years)
15.8 fps +1217%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps +25%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
1.5 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.2 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
1.2 fps 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
0.8 fps -33%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 144, n=208, last 2 years)
38.6 fps +408%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.5 fps +12%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.6 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
7.6 fps 0%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
7.4 fps -3%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
6.5 fps -14%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 115, n=208, last 2 years)
33.6 fps +1100%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.4 fps +21%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
3.3 fps +18%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2.8 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
2.8 fps 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
2 fps -29%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 247, n=208, last 2 years)
51.5 fps +329%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
16 fps +33%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
14 fps +17%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
12 fps 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
10 fps -17%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 321, n=208, last 2 years)
83.5 fps +999%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.9 fps +17%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
8.8 fps +16%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.6 fps
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
7.6 fps 0%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
5.5 fps -28%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38304 Points +163%
Motorola Moto G24
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 8192
14717 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
14565 Points
Average Mediatek Helio G81 Ultra
  ()
14565 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
13977 Points -4%
Nokia G11 Plus
Unisoc T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1, 3072
10596 Points -27%
Xiaomi Redmi 14CXiaomi Redmi 13CMotorola Moto G24Nokia G11 PlusAverage 128 GB eMMC FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
14%
10%
-5%
-11%
425%
Sequential Read 256KB
300.9
300.2
0%
291.9
-3%
270.6
-10%
Sequential Write 256KB
193.1
179.4
-7%
252
31%
196
2%
Random Read 4KB
88.6
101.5
15%
86.3
-3%
81.5
-8%
Random Write 4KB
78.9
114.8
46%
90.9
15%
77.1
-2%
Max. Load
 42.6 °C37.1 °C31.9 °C 
 41.2 °C35.5 °C33.4 °C 
 39.5 °C33.9 °C32.3 °C 
Maximum: 42.6 °C
Average: 36.4 °C
29.9 °C36.3 °C38.9 °C
30.7 °C34.8 °C37.3 °C
30.3 °C35.6 °C36.6 °C
Maximum: 38.9 °C
Average: 34.5 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.2 °C | Room Temperature 19 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.4 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.9 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.1 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Moto G24
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.8 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.3 %
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
97.1 % -1%
Nokia G11 Plus
Mali-G57 MP1, T7200 (T606), 32 GB eMMC Flash
95.4 % -3%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Motorola Moto G24
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
98.5 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash
97.9 % +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G81 Ultra, 128 GB eMMC Flash
97.3 %
前方热图
前方热图
热图返回
热图返回
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2045.953.12540.643.73134.833.34034.436.35037.844.26327.728.58018.419.410021.222.312524.429.416023.637.420022.443.325019.547.631519.852.740014.453.250012.859.463014.266.780013.170.3100012.475.9125010.775.1160010.876200010.576.4250011.275.8315011.773.8400012.272.8500011.973.3630012.175.3800012.273.31000012.168.81250011.866.61600011.457.4SPL2586N0.763.5median 12.2median 68.8Delta2.610.837.24330.335.924.126.631.431.637.334.925.924.819.517.616.515.813.715.513.721.49.2288.337.36.744.7753.18.857.58.3638.967.710.772.88.770.39.169.19.766.910.663.911.361.71269.512.971.913.771.614.46815.365.91669.4175823.980.80.546.6median 10.7median 63.92.713.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Redmi 14CXiaomi Redmi 13C
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Redmi 14C audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 57% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi 13C audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 36.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (25.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 76% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
16h 16min
Xiaomi Redmi 14C
5160 mAh
Xiaomi Redmi 13C
5000 mAh
Motorola Moto G24
5000 mAh
Nokia G11 Plus
5000 mAh
Battery Runtime
-3%
-1%
6%
WiFi v1.3
976
948
-3%
969
-1%
1038
6%
Reader / Idle
2143
H.264
1347
Load
336

Notebookcheck 总体评分

小米红米 14C 的 120 Hz 显示屏和出色的摄像头给人留下了深刻印象。坚固、美观、做工精良的外壳也是一个亮点。不过,与前代产品相比,该机的性能有所下降,这在入门级手机中非常明显,不会给人留下好印象。

总之,你只需花很少的钱就能买到一款功能丰富的高品质手机,但没有 5G。

Xiaomi Redmi 14C - 12/04/2024 v8
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
91%
Connectivity
40 / 69 → 58%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
81%
Games Performance
2 / 55 → 4%
Application Performance
46 / 85 → 54%
AI Performance
20%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
74 / 90 → 82%
Camera
55%
Average
54%
71%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
0%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
45%
Repairability
0%
Software Updates
43.3%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 29.7%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米红米 14C 智能手机评测--屏幕比 iPhone 更快的经济型手机
Florian Schmitt, 2024-12- 5 (Update: 2024-12- 5)