Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi 15

小米 15 智能手机评测--小米旗舰手机在性能和电池续航时间方面树立了新标杆

成功秘诀

Snapdragon 8 Elite 使小米 15 成为目前市场上速度最快的Android 手机之一。此外,这款 6.36 英寸的小米旗舰手机还能提供更多,例如创纪录的运行时间和更亮的显示屏(峰值可达 3500 尼特)。我们的测试将揭示竞争对手的实力。
Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
Android 5G Touchscreen Smartphone

对小米 15 的评价--速度更快,续航能力更强

小米进一步改进了其旗舰智能手机。除了一个例外,小米 15 继承了前代产品的强大连接功能,现在可以更好地应对来自Apple 的竞争。信息很明确:如果你正在寻找一款紧凑型智能手机,那么 6.36 英寸的小米 15 是Apple iPhone 16 或 iPhone 16 Pro 的不错替代品。这款小米旗舰手机有很多优点,其中有三点尤为突出。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

其 120 Hz LTPO OLED 显示屏现在更加明亮,HDR 亮度超过 2,500 尼特大关。此外,骁龙 8 Elite 使小米 15 成为目前市场上运行速度最快的Android 智能手机之一--其安兔兔跑分达到 2,677,100 分,充分证明了这一点。此外,17% 的大容量电池也为小米 15 带来了惊人的续航时间,几乎没有其他手机能与之媲美。

如果不考虑中国测试版本的局限性,负面清单就相对较短,因为全球版本应该不会有这些问题。那么,真正的缺点只有两个:骁龙 8 精英版在负载情况下容易过热,而较小的远摄变焦(从小米 14 的 3.2 倍缩小到 2.6 倍)则使其徕卡相机系统失去了一些灵活性。

Pros

+ 超亮 120Hz 显示屏
+ 极高性能
+ USB-C 3.2
+ 出色的三摄像头(3x 50 MP
+ 出色的电池续航时间
+ 高达 90 瓦的快速充电
+ IP68 认证

Cons

- 废热高
- 长焦镜头只有 2.6 倍变焦
- 不支持 eSIM 卡(仅限中国版)
- 仅提供 12 个月保修(仅中国版)

价格和供应情况

小米 15 目前无法在美国购买。不过,您可以从我们的贷方TradingShenzhen 以进口设备的形式订购。订购,价格约为 800 美元。

可能的替代品比较

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
88.4%
Xiaomi 15
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $149.99
Xiaomi Smartwatch, Xiaomi Wa...
2. $7.99
U. EHome (3 Pack) For Xiaomi...
3. $32.59
JOYFAR Portable-Charger-Powe...
List Price: 760€
191 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"
2670x1200
460 PPI
OLED
2.
88.2%
Apple iPhone 16
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18 ⎘
Apple A18 GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 512 GB SSD
Amazon:
1. $22.00
Apple iPhone 16 Silicone Cas...
2. $22.49
Wireless Charger iPhone Char...
3. $25.99
3 in 1 Charging Station for ...
List Price: 1329€
170 gApple 512GB NVMe6.10"
2556x1179
460 PPI
Super Retina XDR OLED
3.
85.7%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $839.99
Google Pixel 9 Pro - Unlocke...
2. $609.00
Google Pixel 9 - Unlocked An...
3. $9.99
OMOTON 3+2 Pack for Google P...
199 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.30"
2856x1280
495 PPI
OLED
4.
90% v7 (old)
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400 ⎘
Samsung Xclipse 940 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
List Price: 899€
167 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.20"
2340x1080
416 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X
5.
89% v7 (old)
Sony Xperia 5 V
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon: $878.00
List Price: 999€
182 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.10"
2520x1080
449 PPI
OLED
6.
89.8% v7 (old)
Xiaomi 14
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon: $749.00
List Price: 700€
193 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.36"
2670x1200
460 PPI
OLED

小米正在重新推出其旗舰智能手机。小米 15 已于 10 月底在中国上市,但最迟应在 2025 年初与我们见面。不过,我们不想等那么久,已经对中国版进行了近距离观察,它与全球版应该只有几处不同。

小米没有改变前代机型 6.36 英寸的尺寸。这使得小米 15 成为目前最小巧的高端智能手机之一。正如我们的测试所显示的,尽管尺寸相对较小,Android 15 手机在性能和电池续航时间方面却遥遥领先于竞争对手,超过了 小米 14在这两方面都优于小米 14。

规格小米 15

Xiaomi 15 (15 Series)
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Memory
12 GB 
, LPDDR5X
Display
6.36 inch 20:9, 2670 x 1200 pixel 460 PPI, capacitive touchscreen, OLED, touch sampling rate up to 300 Hz, max. brightness 3200 nits; HDR: HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB 
, 491 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Proximity sensor, Rear ambient light sensor, Acceleration sensor, Gyroscope, Electronic compass, X-axis linear motor, Infrared remote control, flicker sensor, laser focus sensor, barometer, Hall sensor, 4x4 MIMO, Camera2 API Level 3, Dolby Atmos, Wi-Fi Direct, Miracast
Networking
Wi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (B2/3/5/8), 3G (B1/2/4/5/6/8/19), 4G (B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/26/28/34/38/39/40/41/42/48/66), 5G (n1/2/3/5/7/8/12/20/26/28/38/40/41/48/66/77/78/80/81/83/84/89); Head SAR & Body SAR < 2 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 8.08 x 152.3 x 71.2
Battery
5400 mAh Lithium-Ion, 90W charging; 50W wireless charging, 10W wireless reverse charging; supports QC3+, QC3.0, QC2.0, PD3.0, PD2.0; Silicon-Carbon-Anode
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 15
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (Light Hunter 900, OIS, f/1.62, 23mm, 2.4μm pixel size) + 50 MP telephoto (2.6x optical zoom, OIS, f/2.0, 60mm) + 50 MP ultrawide (115°, EIS, f/2.2, 14mm); video recording up to 8K@30fps, 4K@60fps
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix f/2.0, 22mm; video recording up to 4K@60fps
Additional features
Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: virtual, 90W charger, USB-C cable, SIM tool, protective case, Quick start guide, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, IP68; GPS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (G1), Galileo (E1, E5a), Beidou (B1, B1c, B2a), QZSS (L1, L5), fanless, waterproof
Weight
191 g, Power Supply: 97 g
Price
760 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

表壳 - 从玻璃到鳄鱼皮,应有尽有

小米 15 比小米 14 更纤薄、更轻巧。 小米 14.从外观上看,由于采用了更扁平、更具棱角的设计,它几乎可以成为 iPhone 的替代品。玻璃版采用磨砂后盖,几乎不会留下指纹痕迹。

它的边框尺寸也有所缩小,现在宽度仅为 1.4 毫米,显示屏与表面的比例提高到 94%。与小米 14 一样,机身背面的摄像头也突出了几毫米。不过,LED 闪光灯不再是镜头组合的一部分,而是位于镜头右侧。

手机外壳的材料再次由玻璃和铝组成。小米 15 采用了所谓的龙晶玻璃,据制造商称,其坚固程度是小米 14 的大猩猩玻璃 Victus 的十倍。总而言之,它的制造质量非常好,所有缝隙都紧密均匀。我们尝试扭动小米 15,它也丝毫不为所动,而且它还具有 IP68 级防尘防水保护。

小米智能手机有玻璃版本,与我们的测试设备一样,后盖为薄荷绿色,还有淡蓝色、白色和黑色三种配色。中国的买家还可以购买亮银配色,其后盖采用了波浪图案。此外,还有一款钻石限量版手机,铝制边框内镶嵌水晶,后盖为鳄鱼皮材质,极具视觉冲击力。在这些版本中,手机壳的厚度分别从 8.1 毫米增加到 8.5 毫米和 8.4 毫米。

小米 15
小米 15
小米 15
小米 15
小米 15
小米 15
小米 15
小米 15
小米 15
小米 15
小米 15
小米 15
采用薄荷绿后盖的小米 15
浅蓝色外壳的小米 15
采用黑色后盖的小米 15
采用白色后盖的小米 15

尺寸比较

154 mm 68 mm 8.6 mm 182 g152.8 mm 72 mm 8.5 mm 199 g152.8 mm 71.5 mm 8.2 mm 193 g152.3 mm 71.2 mm 8.08 mm 191 g147.6 mm 71.6 mm 7.8 mm 170 g147 mm 70.6 mm 7.6 mm 167 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性 - 小米 15 最高配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 存储空间

小米 15 保留了前代产品强大的连接功能,但增加了一些额外功能,不过这些都是小细节。它的显示屏下方不再使用光学指纹传感器,而是采用了超声波指纹传感器,屏幕的触摸采样率也从 240 Hz 提高到了 300 Hz。

除了红外爆破器之外,它的功能还包括双卡双待、WiFi 7、NFC、蓝牙 5.4、立体声扬声器和双频 GPS。不过,它仍然没有配备 iPhone 等手机使用的 UWB 芯片。带有 USB 3.2 连接的 USB-C 端口可确保快速数据传输。在使用 M2.SSD 三星 980 Pro(USB 3.2 Gen.2)进行复制测试时,它的速度达到了 346 MByte/s。

在中国市场,小米旗舰手机有四种存储容量:12/256 GB、12/512 GB、16/512 GB 和 16/1024 GB。目前尚不清楚全球版本是否也会提供所有这些存储空间。

左:无连接
左:无连接
右:电源按钮、音量摇杆
右:电源按钮、音量摇杆
顶部:无连接
顶部:无连接
底部:双 SIM 卡、麦克风、USB-C 3.2 Gen 1、扬声器
底部:双 SIM 卡、麦克风、USB-C 3.2 Gen 1、扬声器

软件 - HyperOS 2.0,基于Android 15

小米 15 运行基于Android 15 的 HyperOS 2.0。小米手机的用户界面操作方法与小米 14 上的 HyperOS 1.0 基本相同。 小米 14这反过来又与标准的Android 非常相似。然而,在系统底层,却发生了很大变化。

除了各种系统优化之外,这些变化自然也与人工智能这一热门话题有关。例如,HyperOS 可以根据描述生成文本、扫描身份证和查找照片。此外,HyperOS 还加入了新的个性化选项,例如新的开始屏幕和主屏幕设计和小部件,以及动画壁纸。不过,在全球版本中,由于小米与谷歌的合作,人工智能功能可能会显得更加与众不同。

HyperOS 2.0 已于 11 月在小米智能手机、平板电脑和智能手表上推出。小米公司创始人雷军在他的 X 账户上公布了这一计划的时间表。

在中文版中,HyperOS 2.0 除简体中文、繁体中文、藏文和维吾尔文外,系统语言只支持英文。谷歌应用商店没有安装,但可以通过小米的 GetApps 应用商店立即加装,因为谷歌框架已经在后台运行。小米 15 还支持 DRM Widevine L1。

小米没有提供任何关于我们中国测试版本更新周期的信息。不过,与前代产品一样,它应该会提供 4 年的操作系统升级和 5 年的Android 安全补丁。在 12 月初进行测试时,其Android 安全补丁的更新日期为 11 月 1 日。

小米 15
小米 15
小米 15
小米 15
小米 15
小米 15

可持续性

关于智能手机中使用的可回收材料的比例,小米还没有提供任何准确的信息。不过,据该制造商称,智能手机部件中的再生铝、金和铜的用量有所增加。该公司还通过利用废弃渔网生产塑料材料和以旧换新计划等措施,尽可能减少对生态环境的影响。

小米公司的目标是,到 2026 年,共回收 38,000 吨电子垃圾。到目前为止,这一目标已经实现了 44%。该公司还遵循经合组织受冲突影响地区和高风险地区矿产负责任供应链尽职调查指南》(OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas 美国矿业协会负责任矿产 倡议》(RBA Responsible Minerals Initiative,RMI)的规定,规范锡、钨、钽、金和钴等冲突材料的采购。

通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 配备 WiFi 7 和双 SIM 卡的小米手机

小米 15 支持目前最快的 Wi-Fi 标准,即 WiFi 7。与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器连接后,它在 6 GHz 频段上实现了很高的数据吞吐量,峰值略低于 1,800 Mbps。不过,在我们的测试中,它的接收方向传输速率一开始并不高,只有 628 MBit/s。

在我们的进口版本中,其蜂窝频段针对中国市场进行了优化。令人惊讶的是,它支持的频率还包括 LTE 频段 20,这在亚洲几乎不起作用,但在欧洲却非常重要--尤其是在农村地区要有良好的手机信号接收。

小米 15 的全球版本支持的蜂窝频段可能会比中国版本多得多,因此预计在这方面不会有任何限制。

Networking
Xiaomi 15
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
876 (min: 445) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
871 (min: 785) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1386 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼76%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1793 (min: 1671) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPhone 16
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
928 (min: 893) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
776 (min: 764) MBit/s ∼48%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1401 (min: 1319) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1257 (min: 1214) MBit/s ∼70%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
955 (min: 858) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
795 (min: 680) MBit/s ∼49%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1830 (min: 1666) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1602 (min: 1387) MBit/s ∼89%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
913 (min: 688) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
774 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼48%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
958 (min: 934) MBit/s ∼56%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
838 (min: 818) MBit/s ∼52%
Xiaomi 14
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1716 (min: 1119) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1623 (min: 1502) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1738 (min: 1597) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1737 (min: 873) MBit/s ∼97%
Average Wi-Fi 7
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1011 (min: 556) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
989 (min: 565) MBit/s ∼61%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1556 (min: 563) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1554 (min: 892) MBit/s ∼87%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼44%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼79%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1385 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼77%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700175018001850Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1365 (628-1900)
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1791 (1671-1841)
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø861 (445-968)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø913 (688-994)
Xiaomi 15 Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø869 (785-951)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø772 (699-820)
室内 GPS 测试
室内 GPS 测试
外部 GPS 测试
外部 GPS 测试

小米手机使用所有重要的卫星导航服务来确定当前位置,如 GPS、Glonass、Galileo、Beidou 和 QZSS。这通常是在双频模式下完成的,在我们的测试中,定位精度达到了 3 米。无论我们是在室外还是室内,这都没有关系。

该设备非常适合导航任务。它记录的 10 公里自行车骑行路线几乎与我们的参考设备 Garmin Venu 2 健身智能手表一样精确。

GPS 测试:总结
GPS 测试:总结
GPS 测试:环湖旅行
GPS 测试:环湖旅行
GPS 测试:转折点
GPS 测试:转折点

电话功能和通话质量 - 不支持 eSIM 卡的小米 15 进口版

小米 15 配备了双卡槽,支持 VoLTE 和 Wi-Fi 通话。不过,该功能应该会在全球版本中加入。

在我们的测试中,小米手机拥有良好的通话质量,语音传输清晰而明确。在免提模式下,即使在嘈杂的环境中,背景噪音似乎也能被有效过滤掉。

相机 - 一台分辨率为 50 百万像素的徕卡三重相机

使用自拍相机拍摄的照片
使用自拍相机拍摄的照片

小米 15 的自拍摄像头分辨率为 3200 万像素,视频录制速度高达 4K,每秒 60 帧。它的拍照效果很好,可以在不进行像素分档的情况下使用全部 3200 万像素。

在新旗舰手机方面,小米也坚持与徕卡合作。因此,相机应用再次采用了名为 "徕卡活力"(色彩更饱和)和"徕卡真实"(色彩逼真)的两种徕卡图像模式。镜头构成也保持不变。主长焦和超广角摄像头的像素均为 5000 万像素。

小米 14一样,其主摄像头采用了 1/1.31 英寸的 Light Hunter 900,这是一款 OIS 防抖传感器,可通过 4 合 1 像素二进制技术拍摄 1250 万像素的照片。在光线条件良好的情况下,图像清晰度高、色彩自然、对比鲜明。

手机的超广角摄像头也采用了 4 合 1 像素分选技术,色彩平衡与主摄像头相似。不过,它的细节表现无法与主摄像头相提并论,图像边缘模糊的问题也比较突出。

与小米 14 相比,OIS 稳定长焦镜头甚至退步了一小步。它不再具有 3.2 倍光学变焦和 75 毫米焦距,现在只有 2.6 倍变焦,焦距缩短至 60 毫米。尽管如此,它的画质还是很稳定的,长焦镜头可以捕捉到大量细节,放大倍率可达 5 倍左右。

其主摄像头能以 24 FPS 的速度录制高达 8K 的优质视频。超广角镜头和长焦镜头可以每秒 60 帧的速度录制高达 4K 的视频。拍摄时,您可以在三个镜头之间来回切换。

使用主相机拍摄的照片(无变焦)
使用主相机拍摄的照片(无变焦)
使用主相机拍摄的照片(2 倍变焦)
使用主相机拍摄的照片(2 倍变焦)
使用长焦相机(2.6 倍变焦)拍摄的照片
使用长焦相机(2.6 倍变焦)拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片
使用主相机拍摄的照片

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Daylight photo 1Daylight photo 2Ultra-wide angle5x zoomLow-light photo
orginal image
click to load images

在可控的照明条件下,主相机证明了它可以相对准确地捕捉色彩,但在深棕色和绿色色调方面存在一些误差。在 1 勒克斯的残余光下,主摄像头只能模糊地描绘出测试图,但它是完整和清晰可辨的。

ColorChecker
18.4 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
11 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
8.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
5.5 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
16.3 ∆E
4.1 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
14 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
3.4 ∆E
8.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
11.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 15: 10.48 ∆E min: 3.4 - max: 22.75 ∆E
ColorChecker
24 ∆E
39.5 ∆E
28.9 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
46 ∆E
36.6 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
27.6 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
46.1 ∆E
48.5 ∆E
19.8 ∆E
33.6 ∆E
23 ∆E
43.1 ∆E
31.3 ∆E
32.2 ∆E
38.9 ∆E
45.7 ∆E
41.1 ∆E
31.4 ∆E
21.6 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi 15: 32.48 ∆E min: 12.81 - max: 48.52 ∆E

附件和保修 - 含 90 瓦电源

附带的 90 瓦电源。
附带的 90 瓦电源。

中国版小米 15 附带一个 90 瓦电源适配器(最高 20V/4.5A,插头类型 A)、一条 USB-C 数据线、一个 SIM 卡工具、一个保护盖和一份快速入门指南。全球版本可能会省略电源适配器。凡是在我们的借货商 TradingShenzhen 购买智能手机的用户,都将免费获得一个电源适配器。

TradingShenzhen 为小米 15 提供 12 个月的保修服务。按照小米的惯例,全球版本的保修期可能是 24 个月。

输入设备与操作 - 配备超声波指纹传感器的小米 15

搭载 骁龙8精英版小米 15 的运行非常流畅,其可精确调节的振动电机可提供精确的触觉反馈。即使同时打开大量应用程序,系统也能保持稳定的高速运行。只有通过测试应用程序(如 Burnout 基准)才能将手机性能发挥到极致,该测试程序会将 CPU 和 GPU 置于最大负载之下。120 Hz OLED 屏幕的触摸采样率为 300 Hz,输入非常准确。

虽然 小米 14仍然配备了光学指纹传感器,而小米 15 则使用了超声波指纹传感器。与以往一样,它位于显示屏下方,即使在屏幕关闭时也能做出反应,并拥有出色的识别率。此外,还可以通过 2D 面部识别进行生物识别认证,在光线充足的环境下也同样可靠。

在横向模式下加装的 Google Gboard ...
在横向模式下加装的 Google Gboard ...
... 和纵向模式。
... 和纵向模式。

显示屏 - HDR 模式下高达 3,500 尼特

子像素
子像素

小米 15 的 120 Hz 显示屏与其前代产品非常相似。6.36 英寸 LPTO OLED 的分辨率保持不变,仍为 2,670 x 1,200 像素,像素密度仍为 460 PPI。不过,根据规格表,其亮度有所提高。OLED 面板的亮度不再是 "仅 "3000 尼特,而是高达 3200 尼特。

在显示全白背景时,我们测得的平均亮度为 1,018 cd/m²,乍听之下并不惊人。然而,当显示较小的图像部分(APL18)时,OLED 面板的亮度增加到了 3463 cd/m²,实现了它的承诺。在 HDR 模式下,显示屏的峰值为 3,593 cd/m²,亮度更高,确保了一流的 HDR 效果。

如果关闭亮度传感器,亮度仍为三位数。在默认设置下,亮度最高可达 611 cd/m²,而在激活阳光模式后,亮度可达 814 cd/m²。

OLED 面板使用脉宽调制(PWM)来控制亮度。这意味着在我们测量的所有亮度级别中,它都会以 120 Hz 的低频率闪烁,这可能会对敏感用户造成困扰。不过,该显示器也可以使用高频 PWM 调光来弥补 PWM 闪烁的负面影响。我们测得的 PWM 调光频率为 3846 赫兹。手机的数据表中没有说明该频率应该有多高。

1008
cd/m²
1016
cd/m²
1011
cd/m²
1016
cd/m²
1021
cd/m²
1021
cd/m²
1020
cd/m²
1020
cd/m²
1025
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1025 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1017.6 cd/m² Minimum: 2.11 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1021 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.25
Xiaomi 15
OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"
Apple iPhone 16
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.1"
Google Pixel 9 Pro
OLED, 2856x1280, 6.3"
Samsung Galaxy S24
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2340x1080, 6.2"
Sony Xperia 5 V
OLED, 2520x1080, 6.1"
Xiaomi 14
OLED, 2670x1200, 6.4"
Screen
23%
53%
-28%
-6%
6%
Brightness middle
1021
1101
8%
2083
104%
1349
32%
889
-13%
1043
2%
Brightness
1018
1102
8%
2016
98%
1369
34%
898
-12%
1052
3%
Brightness Distribution
98
99
1%
84
-14%
97
-1%
97
-1%
96
-2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.3
0.9
31%
0.7
46%
3.3
-154%
1.4
-8%
1.1
15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
2.9
1.5
48%
2
31%
5
-72%
4.5
-55%
2.8
3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.2
1.3
41%
1.1
50%
2.4
-9%
1
55%
1.9
14%
Gamma
2.25 98%
2.16 102%
2.22 99%
1.97 112%
2.23 99%
2.23 99%
CCT
6658 98%
6480 100%
6560 99%
6635 98%
6456 101%
6740 96%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 Hz
Amplitude: 17.54 %
Secondary Frequency: 3846 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低显示亮度
分钟
25 % 显示屏亮度
25 %
显示屏亮度为 50
50 %
75 % 显示亮度
75 %
最大手动显示亮度
100 %

固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列(最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平,但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图)。

我们使用照片光谱仪和 Calman 软件进行分析后发现,小米 15 的 OLED 面板的平均 Delta-E 偏差非常小。使用Original Color PRO色彩配置文件并将色温设置为暖色,其色彩描绘最为准确。

用户还可以选择生动饱和两种色彩配置文件。此外,您还可以调整色彩空间和色温,并激活自适应色彩模式,该模式可根据环境光线调整显示色彩。

色彩准确度(色彩配置文件 Original Color Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩准确度(色彩配置文件 Original Color Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩配置文件 Original Color Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩空间(色彩配置文件 Original Color Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(色彩配置文件 Original Color Pro,色温暖,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
灰度(色彩配置文件 Original Color Pro,色温暖,目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(色彩配置文件 Original Color Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB)
色彩饱和度(色彩配置文件 Original Color Pro、色温暖色、目标色彩空间 sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
1.01 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5325 ms rise
↘ 0.4815 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.86 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.492 ms rise
↘ 0.3725 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

小米 15 在户外表现出色。它能轻松应对冬季的光照条件,但由于其高亮度储备,在夏季也能清晰显示内容。OLED 面板的视角稳定性非常好。

室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
室外使用
视角
视角

性能 - 配备骁龙 8 精英处理器的小米 15

小米 15 是首款采用高通公司新型高端 骁龙8精英版SoC 处理器。这款八核处理器采用 3 纳米结构宽度制造,使用 2 个主频高达 4.32 GHz(可临时超频)的核心以及 6 个主频高达 3.53 GHz 的性能核心进行计算。骁龙 8 精英版的两侧是 Adreno 830图形处理器,并可在小米 15 内访问高达 16 GB LPDDR5X 内存。

骁龙 8 精英版帮助小米 15 实现了出色的性能。在合成基准测试中,该 SoC 提供了新的Android 最佳值,从而取代了之前的性能领导者 骁龙 8 第三代.Apple 阵营中出现的阻力是 Apple A18.虽然Apple SoC 在安兔兔 v10 中远远落后,但它在 Geekbench 6 中以更高的单核性能击败了骁龙 8 Elite,并在 AImark v3 中以较大优势夺得第一。

Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
3377 Points +13%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (3001 - 3228, n=5)
3135 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
3001 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2144 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
2045 Points -32%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
2006 Points -33%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1971 Points -34%
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=171, last 2 years)
1491 Points -50%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (9202 - 10401, n=5)
9783 Points +6%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
9202 Points
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
8362 Points -9%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6914 Points -25%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
6456 Points -30%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
5198 Points -44%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4820 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=171, last 2 years)
4177 Points -55%
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2173 - 2258, n=4)
2219 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2173 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1684 Points -23%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1553 Points -29%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1497 Points -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1372 Points -37%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=177, last 2 years)
1039 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (6789 - 8816, n=4)
7841 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
7733 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6307 Points -18%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
5561 Points -28%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
4998 Points -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
3787 Points -51%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 8816, n=177, last 2 years)
3470 Points -55%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2534428 - 3015111, n=5)
2789124 Points +4%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
2677100 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1980553 Points -26%
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
1632305 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1616403 Points -40%
Average of class Smartphone
  (142748 - 3015111, n=106, last 2 years)
1307393 Points -51%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1139380 Points -57%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (19192 - 27169, n=5)
23421 Points +22%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
19192 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
17763 Points -7%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17620 Points -8%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
15925 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years)
13179 Points -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
11823 Points -38%
CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1718 - 2485, n=4)
2085 Points +21%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1718 Points
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
1492 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1256 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1170 Points -32%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1165 Points -32%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1021 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 2485, n=164, last 2 years)
920 Points -46%
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (10677 - 12993, n=4)
11410 Points +3%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
11031 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10370 Points -6%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
9287 Points -16%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
8863 Points -20%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
7716 Points -30%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1196 - 12993, n=157, last 2 years)
6460 Points -41%
System
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16439 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14039 - 17953, n=4)
16044 Points -2%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
15741 Points -4%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
14618 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
14406 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone
  (2368 - 17953, n=157, last 2 years)
10308 Points -37%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
8029 Points -51%
Memory
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
16961 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (11536 - 18911, n=4)
14954 Points -12%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11252 Points -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
10197 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
10193 Points -40%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
9266 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (962 - 18911, n=157, last 2 years)
7016 Points -59%
Graphics
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
44189 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (35527 - 44189, n=4)
40485 Points -8%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
31876 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
26783 Points -39%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
26141 Points -41%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
23041 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (1017 - 58651, n=157, last 2 years)
17782 Points -60%
Web
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2048 Points +70%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1908 Points +59%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1879 Points +56%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1202 - 2363, n=4)
1845 Points +53%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1743 Points +45%
Average of class Smartphone
  (841 - 2363, n=157, last 2 years)
1574 Points +31%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1202 Points
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
36578 Points +101%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
18370 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
18154 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (1267 - 81594, n=150, last 2 years)
17814 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8865 - 22767, n=4)
17230 Points -5%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
16413 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
11574 Points -36%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1790 - 307528, n=5)
63034 Points +3421%
Apple iPhone 16
Apple A18, A18 GPU, 8192
33181 Points +1754%
Average of class Smartphone
  (82 - 307528, n=143, last 2 years)
25319 Points +1314%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1790 Points
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1381 Points -23%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 8192
1160 Points -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1146 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1134 Points -37%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
500 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (311 - 689, n=3)
500 Points 0%
Average of class Smartphone
  (121 - 1501, n=12, last 2 years)
474 Points -5%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
315 Points -37%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
283 Points -43%
Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 - 9453, n=12, last 2 years)
1197 Points +144%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
491 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (303 - 654, n=3)
483 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
324 Points -34%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
301 Points -39%
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (445 - 13084, n=12, last 2 years)
2035 Points +88%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
1096 Points +1%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
1080 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (761 - 1375, n=3)
1072 Points -1%
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
669 Points -38%
AI Benchmark
Score V5
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
3194 Points
Average of class Smartphone
  (66.3 - 3219, n=25, last 2 years)
1229 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (137 - 287, n=2)
212 Points
Samsung Galaxy S24
Samsung Exynos 2400, Xclipse 940, 8192
182 Points
Score V6
Xiaomi 14
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
5332 Points +438%
Average of class Smartphone
  (213 - 7302, n=15, last 2 years)
1721 Points +74%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1112 Points +12%
Xiaomi 15
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288
991 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (302 - 991, n=4)
699 Points -29%

小米 15 的图形性能同样令人印象深刻。骁龙 骁龙 8 精英版's Adreno 830GPU 使这款智能手机在图形基准测试中连连获胜。无论是 骁龙 8 第 3 代Apple A18都无法与之抗衡。即便如此,高通 SoC 还是遭遇了一个小失常:在 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme(ES 3.1)Unlimited 测试中,它获得了中等偏上的物理分数,这也是小米 15 在这项测试中仅排名中游的原因。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5845 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4729 Points -19%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
4142 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3933 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3627 Points -38%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2605 Points -55%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5995 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4744 Points -21%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
4255 Points -29%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3902 Points -35%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3667 Points -39%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2547 Points -58%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24960 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19319 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
16523 Points -34%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
13993 Points -44%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12652 Points -49%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9476 Points -62%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
10764 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8264 Points -23%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
7453 Points -31%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6649 Points -38%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11649 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8689 Points -25%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
7422 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6673 Points -43%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2258 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1569 Points -31%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1026 Points -55%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2362 Points
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
1803 Points -24%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1001 Points -58%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7939 Points +45%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7231 Points +32%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6268 Points +15%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5602 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5466 Points
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33210 Points
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32235 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
25121 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23181 Points -30%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16300 Points -51%
3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19187 Points +23%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16451 Points +5%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15607 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14492 Points -7%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11444 Points -27%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
718 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
538 fps -25%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
477 fps -34%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
476 fps -34%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
415 fps -42%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
403 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps -1%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
423 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
331 fps -22%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps -29%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
297 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
289 fps -32%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
245 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps -13%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
308 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
264 fps -14%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
214 fps -31%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
205 fps -33%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
201 fps -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
165 fps -46%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
110 fps -8%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -12%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -16%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
54 fps -55%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
192 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
156 fps -19%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
139 fps -28%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
131 fps -32%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps -39%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
85 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
115 fps
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps -9%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
93 fps -19%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
59.9 fps -48%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
47 fps -59%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
100 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84 fps -16%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps -31%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -39%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
52.3 fps -48%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +1%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
118 fps -2%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -36%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
274 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
207 fps -24%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
165 fps -40%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
153 fps -44%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
140 fps -49%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -57%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
47 fps
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
38 fps -19%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps -32%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -36%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
25.5 fps -46%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -57%

在小米 15 上进行网上冲浪似乎与其他操作一样:一切都运行得非常流畅,感觉毫不费力。不过,浏览器基准测试并没有完全反映出这一点,因为这款智能手机仅处于中上游水平。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
280.143 Points +46%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (89.7 - 289, n=6)
222 Points +16%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
215.569 Points +12%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
191.986 Points
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
179.212 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
128.638 Points -33%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=169, last 2 years)
124.4 Points -35%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
108.429 Points -44%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
539 runs/min +58%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (342 - 393, n=3)
372 runs/min +9%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
342 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
267 runs/min -22%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
264 runs/min -23%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
207 runs/min -39%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
179 runs/min -48%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=152, last 2 years)
143.9 runs/min -58%
Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
32.4 runs/min +38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (23.5 - 34, n=5)
27.8 runs/min +18%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
23.5 runs/min
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
15.8 runs/min -33%
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 34, n=66, last 2 years)
11.9 runs/min -49%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 122)
11.6 runs/min -51%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
263 Points +57%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (168 - 235, n=4)
201 Points +20%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
196 Points +17%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
176 Points +5%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
171 Points +2%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
168 Points
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=159, last 2 years)
117.1 Points -30%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
106 Points -37%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
96054 Points +22%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (72825 - 94399, n=5)
86085 Points +9%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
78653 Points
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
68454 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
63748 Points -19%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
61881 Points -21%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
60566 Points -23%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years)
38550 Points -51%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=167, last 2 years)
1523 ms * -235%
Sony Xperia 5 V (Chrome 117.0.5938.60)
705.9 ms * -55%
Google Pixel 9 Pro (Chrome 131.0.6778.81)
699 ms * -54%
Samsung Galaxy S24 (Chrome 122)
662.3 ms * -46%
Xiaomi 14 (Chrome 120.0.6099.210)
623.9 ms * -37%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (422 - 574, n=5)
464 ms * -2%
Xiaomi 15 (Chrome 131.0.6778.104)
454.4 ms *
Apple iPhone 16 (Safari 18)
284.5 ms * +37%

* ... smaller is better

小米 15 的 UFS 4.0 存储确保了极高的数据吞吐量。连续读取性能接近 4000 MByte/s,应用程序总能在很短的时间内加载完毕。

Xiaomi 15Google Pixel 9 ProSamsung Galaxy S24Sony Xperia 5 VXiaomi 14Average 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-51%
-24%
-17%
17%
8%
-34%
Sequential Read 256KB
3934.92
1717.9
-56%
3701.23
-6%
1812.23
-54%
3385.74
-14%
Sequential Write 256KB
3889.06
253.53
-93%
1435.39
-63%
1331.81
-66%
2906.65
-25%
3024 ?(1524 - 3889, n=35)
-22%
Random Read 4KB
296.95
218.41
-26%
373.12
26%
359.71
21%
420.99
42%
Random Write 4KB
360.36
261.55
-27%
175.98
-51%
473.91
32%
594.78
65%

游戏 - 丰富的图形处理能力

对于小米 15 而言,流畅显示最新游戏简直是小菜一碟。我们的测试游戏《源氏冲击》和《PUBG Mobile》在所有细节级别都以最高帧率运行。理论上,帧率还可以更高,但这两款游戏都有内部 FPS 限制。Genshin Impact》全程以每秒 60 帧运行,而《PUBG Mobile》则根据图形设置在每秒 40 到 90 帧之间运行。现在,《PUBG Mobile》还允许在最低图形设置下达到 120 FPS,但小米 15 似乎没有提供这一选项。

我们使用Gamebench 对游戏帧率进行了测量。.

源泉冲击
源泉冲击
PUBG Mobile
PUBG Mobile
0510152025303540455055606570758085Tooltip
Xiaomi 15; Genshin Impact; lowest 120 fps; 5.2.0_28336591_28351161: Ø60.2 (57-61)
Xiaomi 15; Genshin Impact; highest 120 fps; 5.2.0_28336591_28351161: Ø60.1 (57-61)
Xiaomi 15; PUBG Mobile; Smooth; 3.5.0: Ø89.7 (85-90)
Xiaomi 15; PUBG Mobile; HD; 3.5.0: Ø59.9 (54-61)
Xiaomi 15; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD; 3.5.0: Ø39.9 (37-41)

排放 - 骁龙 8 精英版过热

温度

小米 15 在负载情况下发热很快。我们在后盖摄像头模块旁边测得的温度热点为 47 °C。虽然从散热角度看,这个数值并无大碍,但在长时间游戏过程中,将智能手机握在手中的感觉已不再舒适。小米 15 在 "Burnout "基准测试中再次出现过热现象,因为它在压力测试应用程序中使用了很短的时间后就过热了。

在负载情况下,小米智能手机的性能也会迅速下降。在 3DMark 压力测试中,连续 20 次渲染相同的游戏场景,第一次运行后分数就下降了,到最后才稳定在初始值的 2/3 左右。尽管热敏触发了 SoC 手刹,小米 15 仍能如箭一般快速运行,我们在测试过程中没有发现应用程序或游戏有任何限制。

Max. Load
 44.1 °C44.8 °C43.9 °C 
 45.4 °C46.6 °C43.6 °C 
 45 °C45.8 °C41.8 °C 
Maximum: 46.6 °C
Average: 44.6 °C
40.7 °C44.3 °C43.2 °C
40 °C45.3 °C47 °C
39.4 °C42.7 °C47 °C
Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 43.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  28.9 °C | Room Temperature 20.4 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.6 °C / 116 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Steel Nomad stress test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
93.3 % +41%
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75.5 % +14%
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67.6 % +2%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.3 %
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 % -22%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.3 % +1%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
68.7 % 0%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68.7 %
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57 % -17%
Sony Xperia 5 V
Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51.3 % -25%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
72.5 % +8%
Xiaomi 14
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71 % +6%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.9 %
Samsung Galaxy S24
Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.9 % -13%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77.3 % +11%
Apple iPhone 16
A18 GPU, A18, Apple 512GB NVMe
72.4 % +4%
Xiaomi 15
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.5 %
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø29 (26.2-38.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø17.9 (14.7-25.8)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø101.2 (87.7-132.2)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø73 (66.2-87.7)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø117.4 (98.5-139.4)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø76.6 (62-85.7)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.8 (16.9-29.8)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø27.8 (24.8-37.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Xclipse 940, Exynos 2400, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø19.3 (16.7-28.9)
Xiaomi 15 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø13.8 (12.2-17.6)
小米 15
小米 15

发言人

兼容 Dolby Atmos 的立体声扬声器能发出相当响亮的声音,中高音非常均衡。不过,我们注意到几乎没有低音。

通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 5.4 连接外部扬声器或耳机时,音效会好很多。我们的进口版本支持一些常见的 BT 音频编解码,包括 SBC、AAC、LDAC 以及 aptX、aptX HD 和 aptX Adaptive。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2032.440.72533.836.13117.834.64021.234.75030.437.96324.338.68015.342.410016.840.212514.145.816013.454.420013.154.525013.55831513.461.340011.762.450011.367.163010.371.880010.476.9100012.778125011.679.9160012.780.4200013.879.5250014.381.3315013.779400012.681500013.480.9630013.379.8800013.381.71000013.571.61250013.667.8160001461.5SPL25.191.3N0.690.6median 13.4median 76.9Delta0.79.536.236.430.733.325.636.826.733.336.735.824.636.417.639.218.739.818.244.515.956.117.35615.260.414.161.913.462.113.86714.365.413.770.612.476.112.777.712.175.212.978.512.579.312.282.712.882.713.181.313.582.613.17913.775.91472.513.36925.291.40.786.8median 13.5median 75.21.28.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi 15Samsung Galaxy S24
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi 15 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.5% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S24 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5.3% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 运行、运行、再运行

耗电量

尽管机身尺寸几乎相同,小米 15 的电池容量却比 小米 14增加了 790 毫安时,达到 5,400 毫安时,而之前的电池容量为 4,610 毫安时。这要归功于硅碳负极,它可以使更小的电池具有更高的能量密度。

这款手机拥有超低的最大负载功耗,仅为 9.3 瓦。当小米 15 承受巨大压力时,它有时会比竞争对手省电一倍。

小米 15 的能源供应来自其 90 瓦的电源装置。在我们的测试中,仅用了 45 分钟就将电池电量从 1% 恢复到了 100%。仅用了 30 分钟,电池电量就达到了 80%。

对于快速充电是否会长期损害手机电池的问题,小米做出了如下回答:在经过 1,600 次充电后,电池的容量应该仍然超过原来的 80%。如果智能手机每两天才充满一次电(由于该设备的电池寿命较长,这应该是一个现实的时间跨度),那么 80% 的电量要在 8 年多后才能达到。

小米 15 支持 50 瓦的无线充电和 10 瓦的反向无线充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.06 / 0.28 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.5 / 1.11 / 1.13 Watt
Load midlight 8.91 / 9.3 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi 15
5400 mAh
Apple iPhone 16
3561 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro
4700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 V
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-4%
-24%
-23%
-7%
7%
-41%
-26%
Idle Minimum *
0.5
0.51
-2%
0.59
-18%
0.42
16%
0.79
-58%
0.51
-2%
0.788 ?(0.5 - 0.99, n=4)
-58%
Idle Average *
1.11
1.42
-28%
1.1
1%
0.93
16%
1.08
3%
0.89
20%
1.498 ?(1.08 - 2.06, n=4)
-35%
Idle Maximum *
1.13
1.43
-27%
1.2
-6%
1.07
5%
1.12
1%
0.92
19%
1.555 ?(1.13 - 2.1, n=4)
-38%
Load Average *
8.91
4.21
53%
7.15
20%
15.43
-73%
7.93
11%
9.08
-2%
10.1 ?(8.01 - 13, n=4)
-13%
Load Maximum *
9.3
10.96
-18%
20.37
-119%
16.51
-78%
8.78
6%
9.11
2%
14.8 ?(9.3 - 19.2, n=4)
-59%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø5 (0.695-9.3)
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø3.8 (0.822-12.1)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø9.31 (0.634-16.5)
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.681 (0.615-1.184)
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.693 (0.662-0.794)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.27 (9.11-9.3)
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.81 (6.37-11.3)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.2 (6.48-16.6)
Xiaomi 15 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.681 (0.615-1.184)
Apple iPhone 16 Apple A18; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.693 (0.662-0.794)
Samsung Galaxy S24 Samsung Exynos 2400; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.586 (0.548-0.797)

运行时间

小米 15 的电池容量比小米 14 大约 17%,这帮助小米 15 实现了出色的续航时间,目前几乎没有其他紧凑型旗舰智能手机能与之媲美。在我们的测试中,小米 15 的模拟网上冲浪和连续视频播放分别持续了近 23 小时和近 30 小时。

我们只能通过运行 "Burnout "基准测试来确定它在拉手刹时的最短运行时间。在测试中,我们只启动了 CPU 负载,因为 CPU 和 GPU 负载加在一起会导致智能手机在大约 15 分钟后过热。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
62h 39min
WiFi Websurfing
22h 47min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
29h 44min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 26min
Xiaomi 15
5400 mAh
Apple iPhone 16
3561 mAh
Google Pixel 9 Pro
4700 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S24
4000 mAh
Sony Xperia 5 V
5000 mAh
Xiaomi 14
4610 mAh
Battery Runtime
-25%
-26%
-39%
-15%
-16%
Reader / Idle
3759
2772
-26%
2398
-36%
2788
-26%
2926
-22%
H.264
1784
1385
-22%
1227
-31%
1493
-16%
1674
-6%
WiFi v1.3
1367
1096
-20%
1017
-26%
880
-36%
952
-30%
1092
-20%
Load
326
217
-33%
159
-51%
371
14%
277
-15%

Notebookcheck 总评分

小巧的小米 15 凭借其非常明亮的 OLED 显示屏、强劲的性能和出色的电池续航时间而得分。

Xiaomi 15 - 12/11/2024 v8
Manuel Masiero

Chassis
90%
Keyboard
66 / 75 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
67 / 69 → 96%
Weight
89%
Battery
93%
Display
91%
Games Performance
45 / 55 → 81%
Application Performance
79 / 85 → 93%
AI Performance
33%
Temperature
84%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 90 → 92%
Camera
79%
Average
72%
88%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
50%
Packaging
90%
Power Use
96.4%
Repairability
40%
Software Updates
77.8%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 59%

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 小米 15 智能手机评测--小米旗舰手机在性能和电池续航时间方面树立了新标杆
Manuel Masiero, 2024-12-15 (Update: 2024-12-15)