Aorus 17X AZF回顾：带有i9-13900HX和RTX 4090的高端游戏笔记本电脑在一个薄薄的盒子里

Name: Aorus 17X AZF
Brand: Aorus

极端的动力源!

最新的Gigabyte Aorus 17X配备了目前笔记本电脑市场所能提供的最佳产品。Nvidia的GeForce RTX 4090和Intel的Core i9-13900HX属于绝对的高端范围，技嘉将这两个强者装入一个非常薄的笔记本电脑。在我们的详细审查中，通过大量的测量和基准测试，了解这种组合是否有效。

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 04/18/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Gaming Geforce Intel Raptor Lake

新的Aorus 17X AZF建立在英特尔猛禽湖H处理器和Nvidia的最新移动GPU旗舰上。一个英特尔酷睿i9 13900HX与一个 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090笔记本GPU在引擎盖下。仅仅是这两个组件就可以看出这台笔记本电脑的预期用途。但是，硬件在超薄的情况下表现如何？我们看了一下，以后会有更多细节。但是，仅有CPU和GPU并不能成为一台好的游戏笔记本电脑--在Aorus 17X AZF中，这些都伴随着240赫兹的17英寸屏幕，以及总共2TB的SSD存储，可以轻松存储大量的游戏和其他程序。这样一个配置的价格为3,499.00美元。

另外，Aorus 17X还可以选择配备英特尔酷睿i7 13700HX。虽然在显卡方面没有其他选择，但DDR5内存的速度可以有所不同。酷睿i7在技术上被限制在最高4800MT/s，而酷睿i9型号则有最高5600MT/s供其使用。

Test device courtesy of Gigabyte Aorus Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Aorus 17X AZF (17X Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 157 W PL2 / Short Burst, 86 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU - 16 GB VRAM, Core: 2040 MHz, RAM: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, Nvidia 531.41

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5600, 2 von 2 installiert, max. 64 GB

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE09F9, IPS, glossy: no, 240 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Storage

Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10, 1024 GB

, M.2 2280, NVMe, 1800 GB free

Soundcard

Intel Raptor Lake-S PCH - cAVS

Connections

4 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 20Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5mm Klinke

Networking

Realtek RTL8125 2.5GBe Family Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000/2500MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 21.8 x 396 x 293

Battery

99 Wh, 6200 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: FHD (1080p)
Primary Camera: 2 MPix
Secondary Camera: IR (Windows Hello Support)

Additional features

Speakers: 2x 2.5W Speaker, 330-Watt-Netzteil, Gigabyte Control Center, 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.92 kg, Power Supply: 990 g

Price

3800 EUR

Amazon

$2,299.00

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

当你看技术规格时，这个级别的竞争笔记本电脑也提供类似的性能水平，因为它们也配备了英特尔猛禽湖H处理器和移动Ada-Lovelace GPU。对比设备的详细概述可在下表中找到。

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
86 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Aorus 17X AZF i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	21.8 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2.9 kg	33 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
88.3 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	3 kg	23 mm	17.00"	2560x1600
85.4 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	27 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
90.7 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2023	Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.9 kg	26.7 mm	18.00"	1920x1200
89 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	3.5 kg	23 mm	17.30"	3840x2160

外壳 - Aorus 17X上的铝和塑料

Aorus 17X主要由铝和塑料制成。这有低重量的优势，因为不到3公斤，该设备是这里比较轻的代表之一。只有惠普Omen 17稍微轻一些。

在稳定性方面，材料的选择被证明是有些不利的，但在我们的压力测试中仍然被证明是稳固的。制造商总是要在大型17英寸笔记本电脑的稳定性和移动性之间取得平衡，我们认为这在Aorus 17X AZF上是成功的。上方由铝制成的显示盖相对稳定，尽管它仍然可以用一点力气扭动。铰链也很稳定，感觉很扎实，将摇晃减少到最低限度。此外，单手打开显示屏是可能的。

唯一的颜色元素是在背面以发光的Aorus字母形式出现。显示屏盖上还有一个银色的Aorus标志，这打破了完全黑色设备的单调性。

尺寸比较

Alienware m18 R1 HP Omen 17-ck2097ng MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Aorus 17X AZF Medion Erazer Beast X40 MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US DIN A4 ❌

装备

不幸的是，Aorus 17X AZF没有提供这么多的端口选择，但可用的接口还是应该满足大多数用户。毕竟，有一个带有Power Delivery（PD）的现代Thunderbolt 4端口和三个传统USB端口。同时，外部显示器可以通过HDMI或DisplayPort连接。接口的位置很好，尽管由于内部有膨胀的热管结构，制造商并没有很多选择。

左侧：2个USB 3.2 Gen2（Type-A），3.5mm组合音频（来源：Aorus）。

右侧：雷电4（Type-C，Power Delivery），USB 3.2 Gen2（Type-A）（来源：Aorus）。

后部：电源接口，HDMI 2.1，Mini DP 1.4（120 Hz），LAN（RJ45）（来源：Aorus）。

沟通

安装的WLAN模块提供了良好的性能，因此Aorus 17X AZF在这里不必回避竞争。我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000被用来作为测试路由器。另外，Aorus 17X AZF还提供一个以太网端口，提供高达2.5 GBit/s的速率。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1582 (1517^min, 1518.74^P1 - 1636^max) MBit/s +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1467 (733^min - 1546^max) MBit/s +1%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1456 (1068^min - 1561^max) MBit/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1364 (1079^min - 1473^max) MBit/s -6%
Alienware m18 R1 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1272 (922^min - 1396^max) MBit/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=148, last 2 years)	1230 MBit/s -16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1145 (867^min - 1272^max) MBit/s -21%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (565 - 1670, n=25)	1086 MBit/s -25%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1627 (1381^min - 1714^max) MBit/s 0%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210	1619 (1579^min - 1691^max) MBit/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1578 (1516^min - 1627^max) MBit/s -3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1545 (1508^min, 1510.9^P1 - 1569^max) MBit/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=148, last 2 years)	1392 MBit/s -14%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (715 - 1711, n=25)	1202 MBit/s -26%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1690i 160MHz	1194 (839^min - 1398^max) MBit/s -26%
Alienware m18 R1 Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1155 (761^min - 1320^max) MBit/s -29%

Aorus 17X AZF; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1456 (1068-1561)

Aorus 17X AZF; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1618 (1579-1691)

网络摄像头

Aorus 17X AZF的网络摄像头具有FHD功能，使其适用于简单的视频电话。由于缺乏色彩保真度，因此被扣了几分。另一方面，双阵列麦克风做得很好，因为来自不同方向的录音都以类似的音量播放。

ColorChecker Aorus 17X AZF: 12.06 ∆E min: 1.76 - max: 19.62 ∆E

维护

Aorus 17X AZF的维护工作从根本上说是可能的。然而，用许多螺钉连接的底板必须被卸下。所有重要的东西都在底板下面，如四个风扇、大容量存储和内存。在我们的案例中，笔记本电脑已经配备齐全，没有空闲的插槽用于内存或SSD。

担保

在德国，Aorus 17X AZF有24个月的保修期，包括提货和退货服务。当然，这可能会因国家而异，所以买家在购买前应仔细检查。

软件

技嘉控制中心（GCC）用于控制和监测Aorus 17X AZF的组件。在我们的测试中，GCC没有遇到任何问题，它可以用来调节笔记本性能，从而影响背景噪音。风扇曲线可以通过风扇控制选项卡稍作调整。此外，可以为键盘选择大量的背光效果。

输入设备

键盘

Aorus 17X AZF配备了一个背光的6排chiclet键盘，包括一个数字键盘。平滑的按键具有中等行程和清晰的压力点。键盘在打字时略微倾斜，但这并不过分明显。背光可以通过组合键调节三个级别的亮度，而且通过GCC（技嘉控制中心）还有更多的照明效果选项。

触摸板

多点触摸ClickPad形式的鼠标替代品（约12.1 x 7.6厘米）提供了一个令人愉快的尺寸。Aorus还在触摸板上叠加了自己的标志，在视觉上令人愉悦。ClickPad提供了一个光滑的表面，使手指能够顺利滑动。输入表面可以整体使用，在角落里也有良好的反应。触摸板为输入提供了一个短的行程，由于其清晰的压力点，提供了清晰的反馈。

显示

Aorus 17X AZF配备了良好的QHD面板，刷新率为240赫兹，应该能满足大多数游戏玩家的需求。然而，与竞争对手相比，我们的测试设备的平均亮度明显较弱。平均只有276cd/m²，太低了，只够排在最后。Aorus 17X AZF在显示得分方面也因轻微的光晕而失去了重要分数。没有检测到PWM。

其他显示选项，如4K面板，并不打算用于Aorus 17X AZF。


266 cd/m²	273 cd/m²	281 cd/m²
272 cd/m²	294 cd/m²	283 cd/m²
266 cd/m²	278 cd/m²	271 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE09F9 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 294 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 276 cd/m² Minimum: 29 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 294 cd/m²
Contrast: 1050:1 (Black: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.81 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 0.86
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
84.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.301

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Aorus 17X AZF BOE09F9, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Medion Erazer Beast X40 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US AU Optronics B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17"	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng BOE BOE09BF, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3"	Alienware m18 R1 Chi Mei 180JME, IPS, 1920x1200, 18"
Display		-16%	1%	-17%	2%	2%
Display P3 Coverage	96.7	68.6 -29%	97.6 1%	67.4 -30%	94.9 -2%	97.7 1%
sRGB Coverage	99.9	99.8 0%	99.9 0%	97.6 -2%	99.9 0%	100 0%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	84.5	69.4 -18%	86.5 2%	69.6 -18%	92.4 9%	89.8 6%
Response Times		23%	54%	1%	-169%	41%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	14 ?(6.9, 7.1)	11.3 ?(5.4, 5.9) 19%	4.2 ?(1.9, 2.3) 70%	15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3) -11%	38.4 ?(13.6, 24.8, n) -174%	3 ?(1.5, 1.5) 79%
Response Time Black / White *	10.1 ?(5.3, 4.8)	7.5 ?(3.3, 4.2) 26%	6.4 ?(2.8, 3.6) 37%	8.9 ?(3.7, 5.2) 12%	26.6 ?(9.2, 17.4, n) -163%	9.9 ?(5.4, 4.5) 2%
PWM Frequency					2380 ?(100)
Screen		11%	-24%	14%	64117%	26%
Brightness middle	294	384 31%	398.6 36%	371 26%	606 106%	372.8 27%
Brightness	276	377 37%	384 39%	350 27%	602 118%	367 33%
Brightness Distribution	90	90 0%	89 -1%	90 0%	93 3%	97 8%
Black Level *	0.28	0.45 -61%	0.46 -64%	0.32 -14%	0.0001 100%	0.32 -14%
Contrast	1050	853 -19%	867 -17%	1159 10%	6060000 577043%	1165 11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.81	2.05 27%	4.05 -44%	1.74 38%	4.8 -71%	1.92 32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.7	3.64 36%	8.68 -52%	3.59 37%	8.2 -44%	3.65 36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	0.86	0.74 14%	1.02 -19%	1.01 -17%	1.8 -109%	0.51 41%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.4	2.3 32%	6.5 -91%	2.8 18%	6.5 -91%	1.5 56%
Gamma	2.301 ^96%	2.017 ^109%	2.11 ^104%	2.19 ^100%	2.63 ^84%	2.34 ^94%
CCT	7389 ^88%	6546 ^99%	7518 ^86%	6474 ^100%	6596 ^99%	6607 ^98%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		6% / 7%	10% / -7%	-1% / 5%	21317% / 41195%	23% / 23%

* ... smaller is better

从主观上看，屏幕的显示质量无可挑剔，尽管是哑光表面，但没有明显的纹理。总之，在交付状态下，测量的DeltaE-2000值相对接近目标值3。然而，同类产品中的其他笔记本电脑表明，这可以做得更好。我们能够通过手动校准大大改善这些数值。此外，我们还能够减少一点偏蓝。因此，如果你想使用该设备进行图像编辑，我们建议使用上面链接的ICC配置文件。

测量的色彩空间覆盖率很好，sRGB色彩空间完全覆盖，达到100%。扩展的AdobeRGB色彩空间被充分覆盖，为84.5%，P3色彩空间为96.7%。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
10.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 5.3 ms rise
10.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4.8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 6.9 ms rise
14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 7.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 24 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

相对较低的显示亮度不利于户外使用。然而，在全亮度的情况下，户外工作是可能的，尽管有一些限制。应避免阳光直接照射。

安装的IPS面板在正常使用中提供了出色的图像质量。只有在四个角的图像中会出现轻微起雾的困难。

表演 - 猛禽湖与阿达-洛夫莱斯的结合

Aorus 17X AZF是目前最强大的游戏笔记本之一，在Raptor Lake和Ada Lovelace的推动下提供了出色的性能。该测试装置的配置为3499.99美元。

测试条件

除了典型的性能模式（见表），Aorus 17X AZF的控制中心（Gigabyte Control Center）提供了一个更高级别的AI Boost功能，我们使用了这个功能。然后控制中心选择适当的配置文件--游戏模式和创造者模式用于基准测试， 节能睡眠模式用于电池测试。

涡轮增压模式在个别情况下会启动，使性能小幅提高，但这是有代价的：风扇一直在全功率工作。在会议模式下，设备的工作非常安静，几乎达到了无声的程度。性能因此而明显下降，尽管多线程性能比单线程性能受到的影响更大。

	Creator Modus	Turbo Modus	Gaming Modus	Meeting Modus	Energiespar Ruhemodus
功率限制1	86瓦特	86瓦特	86瓦特	15瓦特	15瓦特
功率限制2	157瓦	157瓦	157瓦	30瓦	30瓦

处理器

芯片 Intel Core-i7-13900HX-Prozessor(猛禽湖）包括16个高效核心（无超线程，1.6至3.9 GHz）和8个性能核心（超线程，2.2至5.4 GHz）。总共有32个逻辑CPU核心，这在我们的测试中伴随着巨大的多线程性能。在基准测试中，所有竞争者都处于激烈的正面竞争中。然而，在CPU性能评级中，这代表了所提出的基准的平均值，我们的测试装置排在倒数第二位。只有惠普Omen 17、使用相同的SoC，在这里可以被打败，而 Medion Erazer Beast提供了更好的性能。其他竞争者由于其稍快的SoC而表现更好。然而，与微星GE78HX的差距微星GE78HX的差距是可控的，只有12%。

CB15循环测试表明，CPU的提升只在开始时被利用。模拟的永久性多线程负载导致时钟在第一次运行后略有下降，尽管从第三次运行开始性能保持稳定。

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø3258 (3190.05-4396.09)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø4532 (4437.05-4828.15)

MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4856 (4818.7-5120.98)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø2810 (2649.18-4311.13)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4980 (4889.98-5226.71)

Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX: Ø4934 (4579.8-4989.4)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	81.8 pt
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	81.2 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	80.6 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	78.1 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	74.7 pt
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	72.3 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	71.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	60.6 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	33277 Points +20%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	32664 (29653.8^min - 32664.5^max) Points +18%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	32601 (28888.6^min - 32601.4^max) Points +17%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	30932 Points +11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24270 - 32623, n=22)	28225 Points +2%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	27776 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	26407 Points -5%
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=190, last 2 years)	21953 Points -21%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	2113 Points +1%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	2106 Points 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	2100 Points 0%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	2097 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	2095 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1867 - 2105, n=19)	2044 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2035 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (1136 - 2235, n=189, last 2 years)	1893 Points -10%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	12648 Points +20%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	12574 Points +19%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	12423 Points +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	11780 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=20)	10766 Points +2%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	10557 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	10118 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=187, last 2 years)	8336 Points -21%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	810 Points
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	807 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	805 Points -1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	803 Points -1%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	803 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=20)	784 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	782 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (439 - 856, n=187, last 2 years)	727 Points -10%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	5227 (4889.98^min - 5226.71^max) Points +16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	5121 (4818.7^min - 5120.98^max) Points +14%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	4989 (4579.8^min - 4989.4^max) Points +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	4828 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=21)	4522 Points +1%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	4487 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	4311 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3433 Points -23%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	304 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	303 Points 0%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	303 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	301 Points -1%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	300 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	297 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=21)	292 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points -9%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=182, last 2 years)	169.7 Seconds * -18%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	153 Seconds * -6%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	144 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=21)	117.9 Seconds * +18%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	104 Seconds * +28%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	101 Seconds * +30%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	100 Seconds * +31%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	97 Seconds * +33%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	129804 MIPS +38%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	127295 MIPS +35%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	127033 MIPS +35%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	121921 MIPS +30%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (90675 - 127283, n=20)	111796 MIPS +19%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	94649 MIPS +1%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	93947 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=186, last 2 years)	85566 MIPS -9%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	7177 MIPS
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	7064 MIPS -2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	6925 MIPS -4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	6897 MIPS -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	6890 MIPS -4%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	6889 MIPS -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6340 - 7177, n=20)	6848 MIPS -5%
Average of class Gaming (4199 - 7581, n=186, last 2 years)	6318 MIPS -12%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	22200 Points +15%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	21853 Points +13%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	20634 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	20245 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	20182 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17614 - 21075, n=21)	19809 Points +3%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	19272 Points
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=187, last 2 years)	15073 Points -22%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	2097 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	2079 Points +1%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	2063 Points
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	2062 Points 0%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	2043 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	2036 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1345 - 2093, n=21)	1988 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=187, last 2 years)	1897 Points -8%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	34.5 fps +43%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	33.1 fps +37%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	32.7 fps +35%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	30.5 fps +26%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=21)	29.1 fps +20%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	25.2 fps +4%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	24.2 fps
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=186, last 2 years)	23.6 fps -2%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 199, n=183, last 2 years)	48.1 s * -8%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	46.8 s * -5%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	46.7 s * -4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	46.5 s * -4%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	44.7 s *
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	44.2 s * +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	43 s * +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=20)	42.5 s * +5%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=187, last 2 years)	0.4368 sec * -11%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.4033 sec * -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21)	0.402 sec * -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.4014 sec * -2%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3935 sec *
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.3931 sec * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3862 sec * +2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.3823 sec * +3%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

11781

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

16618 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

111582 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

17169 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

15678

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

76718

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

3.24 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

45.71 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

191.67 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

3.67 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

49.5 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

208.27 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

304 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4487 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

295.32 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

10557 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

810 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

27776 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2097 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	97.3 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	94.5 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	94 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	89.7 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	84.7 pt
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	75.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	72.5 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	67.4 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	29553 KRay/s +53%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	28957 KRay/s +50%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	27883 KRay/s +45%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	27524 KRay/s +43%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21)	24097 KRay/s +25%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=183, last 2 years)	21914 KRay/s +14%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	19255 KRay/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	17589 KRay/s -9%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	148168 Points +55%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	144303 Points +51%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	141829 Points +49%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134221 Points +41%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21)	120602 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=183, last 2 years)	106726 Points +12%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	95343 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	88686 Points -7%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7142 MB/s +46%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	7093 MB/s +45%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	6905 MB/s +41%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	6758 MB/s +38%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21)	6061 MB/s +24%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=183, last 2 years)	4910 MB/s +1%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	4880 MB/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	4362 MB/s -11%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	141758 Points +10%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	140103 Points +9%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	139649 Points +8%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	134514 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21)	133924 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	133197 Points +3%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	128728 Points
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=183, last 2 years)	117145 Points -9%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	17057 Points +32%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	16799 Points +30%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16656 Points +29%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	15947 Points +23%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21)	14889 Points +15%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=183, last 2 years)	13258 Points +2%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	12939 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	12334 Points -5%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	73758 Points +55%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	71038 Points +49%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	69911 Points +47%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67872 Points +43%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21)	59821 Points +26%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=183, last 2 years)	53700 Points +13%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	47560 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	43850 Points -8%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	174819 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21)	139015 MB/s -20%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136551 MB/s -22%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	136520 MB/s -22%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	134830 MB/s -23%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	127548 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=183, last 2 years)	109216 MB/s -38%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	89413 MB/s -49%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2069 MB/s +53%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2059 MB/s +52%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	2003 MB/s +48%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1928 MB/s +42%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21)	1755 MB/s +30%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=183, last 2 years)	1367 MB/s +1%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	1353 MB/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	1284 MB/s -5%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	16325 KRay/s +59%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	15573 KRay/s +52%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	15367 KRay/s +50%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	14995 KRay/s +46%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21)	13066 KRay/s +27%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=183, last 2 years)	11803 KRay/s +15%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	10268 KRay/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	9481 KRay/s -8%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	52949 MPixel/s +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	50563 MPixel/s 0%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	50348 MPixel/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	50323 MPixel/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21)	48439 MPixel/s -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	43025 MPixel/s -15%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	40896 MPixel/s -19%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=184, last 2 years)	40243 MPixel/s -20%

系统性能

在系统性能基准测试中，Aorus 17X AZF的排名与CPU测试相似。然而，系统性能非常好，远高于过去两年中游戏笔记本的平均水平。在AIDA64基准测试中，由于快速的DDR5内存，Aorus 17X AZF提供了完美的结果，这使我们的评测装置在第二位，仅次于阿利安人m18 R1.

PCMark 10 / Score
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8884 Points +16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8771 Points +14%
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	8758 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (7690 - 9331, n=8)	8466 Points +10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	7932 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=164, last 2 years)	7803 Points +1%
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	7690 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	7609 Points -1%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	11824 Points +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11761 Points +5%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11488 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10972 - 11983, n=8)	11364 Points +2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	11275 Points +1%
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	11242 Points 0%
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	11188 Points
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=163, last 2 years)	10833 Points -3%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	11321 Points +9%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	10474 Points +1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9038 - 11680, n=8)	10423 Points 0%
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10403 Points
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10125 Points -3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	9976 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=163, last 2 years)	9904 Points -5%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9851 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	16424 Points +55%
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	16012 Points +51%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	15221 Points +44%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (10605 - 16395, n=8)	14052 Points +33%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=163, last 2 years)	12134 Points +14%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	10611 Points 0%
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	10605 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10135 Points -4%

CrossMark / Overall
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2176 Points +1%
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2163 Points
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2139 Points -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2125 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1825 - 2295, n=8)	2107 Points -3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1991 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=145, last 2 years)	1910 Points -12%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1899 Points -12%

CrossMark / Productivity
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2050 Points
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2005 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1978 Points -4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1977 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1666 - 2166, n=8)	1960 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1846 Points -10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1828 Points -11%
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=145, last 2 years)	1809 Points -12%

CrossMark / Creativity
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2469 Points +6%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2423 Points +4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2389 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (2162 - 2514, n=8)	2379 Points +3%
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2319 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2239 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=145, last 2 years)	2097 Points -10%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2035 Points -12%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2063 Points
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1904 Points -8%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1861 Points -10%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	1857 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (1441 - 2275, n=8)	1833 Points -11%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1808 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=145, last 2 years)	1709 Points -17%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1681 Points -19%

PCMark 10 Score		7690 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	80776 MB/s +3%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	78171 MB/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77973 MB/s 0%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77283 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21)	75033 MB/s -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	67716 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=183, last 2 years)	65434 MB/s -16%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	63863 MB/s -18%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	89096 MB/s +1%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	88462 MB/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	86248 MB/s -3%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	85378 MB/s -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21)	82199 MB/s -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	74284 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=183, last 2 years)	69366 MB/s -22%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	62807 MB/s -29%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	79917 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	76988 MB/s +1%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	76529 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	76482 MB/s 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21)	73168 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=183, last 2 years)	67198 MB/s -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	65472 MB/s -14%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	60389 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=183, last 2 years)	93.7 ns * -17%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.8 ns * -15%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	89.1 ns * -11%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21)	86.3 ns * -7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84.7 ns * -5%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84.4 ns * -5%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	80.4 ns *
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	79.4 ns * +1%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

我们的标准化延迟监测测试（网络冲浪、4k视频播放、Prime95高负荷）显示了Aorus 17X AZF的极端值。未来的软件更新应该会改善这一点，从而使该系统适合于实时视频和音频编辑，不受限制。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	12614 μs *
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4710.9 μs * +63%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3493.7 μs * +72%
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2669.6 μs * +79%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2275.2 μs * +82%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2103 μs * +83%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

Aorus 17X AZF使用了内部的SSD。更准确地说，我们的测试装置提供了两块NVMe固态硬盘，每块都有1TB的存储空间，适合其预定用途。因此，大量的数据可以存储在这两个大容量存储设备上。这两个驱动器支持PCIe 4.0，并且还通过全带宽的四通道连接。性能是稳固的，即使在某些情况下几个比较设备显示出更好的性能。然而，Aorus 17X AZF已经完全配备了两块SSD。另外，2TB型号当然也可以安装在设备中。同时，机箱的底部被利用来进行有效的冷却，因此该设备以优异的成绩通过了我们的压力测试。

关于更多的比较和基准，我们参考了我们的比较表，这里.

SSD 1

SSD 2

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10

Sequential Read: 3066 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1824 MB/s

512K Read: 2378 MB/s

512K Write: 2502 MB/s

4K Read: 58.54 MB/s

4K Write: 307.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 1291 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 1021 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	80.8 pt
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	78.9 pt
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	71.6 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	67.8 pt
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	67.6 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	65.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	64.5 pt
Average of class Gaming	57.5 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5598 (5462.22^min - 5597.85^max) MB/s +76%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4233 (4196.61^min - 4232.61^max) MB/s +33%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3848 (3815.64^min - 3848.21^max) MB/s +21%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=165, last 2 years)	3475 MB/s +9%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (2519 - 4224, n=10)	3439 MB/s +8%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3326 (3303.54^min - 3326.08^max) MB/s +4%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3185 (2979.13^min - 3184.87^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3127 (2701.13^min - 3126.72^max) MB/s -2%
seq write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7533 (7482.85^min - 7532.79^max) MB/s +152%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5145 (5060.48^min - 5145.38^max) MB/s +72%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4849 (4812.78^min - 4849.24^max) MB/s +62%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4387 (4345.42^min - 4387.07^max) MB/s +47%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=165, last 2 years)	3812 MB/s +28%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3218 (2245.63^min - 3218.43^max) MB/s +8%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (2200 - 4236, n=10)	3133 MB/s +5%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2988 (2534.41^min - 2987.71^max) MB/s
seq q8 t1 read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	11242 (10740.3^min - 11242.2^max) MB/s +62%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7085 (6214.7^min - 7085.23^max) MB/s +2%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (6864 - 7112, n=10)	6974 MB/s +1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	6956 (5970.17^min - 6956.25^max) MB/s 0%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	6936 (6051.54^min - 6936.09^max) MB/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6878 (6539.55^min - 6877.94^max) MB/s -1%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6815 (6081.32^min - 6815.12^max) MB/s -2%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=165, last 2 years)	6323 MB/s -9%
seq q8 t1 write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9942 (9912.92^min - 9941.76^max) MB/s +129%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6110 (6082.58^min - 6110.11^max) MB/s +41%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6097 (6073.79^min - 6096.81^max) MB/s +40%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5219 (5185.74^min - 5219.39^max) MB/s +20%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	4986 (4917.82^min - 4985.65^max) MB/s +15%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=165, last 2 years)	4851 MB/s +12%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4348 (4155.37^min - 4348.35^max) MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (3611 - 4999, n=10)	4259 MB/s -2%
4k q1 t1 read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	83.1 (79.37^min - 83.07^max) MB/s +51%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	80 (78.03^min - 80.03^max) MB/s +45%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	76.2 (75.22^min - 76.22^max) MB/s +39%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (55 - 91, n=10)	75.6 MB/s +37%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	70.4 (69.8^min - 70.36^max) MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=165, last 2 years)	66 MB/s +20%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	56.8 (53.63^min - 56.77^max) MB/s +3%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	55 (54.75^min - 55.02^max) MB/s
4k q1 t1 write
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	324 (317.18^min - 324.02^max) MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (201 - 391, n=10)	324 MB/s 0%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	293 (278.18^min - 292.65^max) MB/s -10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	289 (284.65^min - 288.96^max) MB/s -11%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	283 (273.23^min - 283.12^max) MB/s -13%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	228 (227.02^min - 228.2^max) MB/s -30%
Average of class Gaming (78 - 397, n=165, last 2 years)	224 MB/s -31%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	213 (205.52^min - 212.72^max) MB/s -34%
4k q32 t16 read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5829 (5404.65^min - 5828.67^max) MB/s +63%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5703 (5624.48^min - 5703.41^max) MB/s +59%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3583 (3572.22^min - 3582.76^max) MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3543 (3529.91^min - 3542.8^max) MB/s -1%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (3318 - 3583, n=10)	3521 MB/s -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3467 (3436.61^min - 3466.79^max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=165, last 2 years)	2571 MB/s -28%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1469 (1266.81^min - 1469.47^max) MB/s -59%
4k q32 t16 write
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3719 (3569.84^min - 3718.59^max) MB/s +3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3688 (3576.03^min - 3687.54^max) MB/s +2%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3622 (3512.08^min - 3621.76^max) MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (2584 - 3667, n=10)	3502 MB/s -3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3208 (2280.32^min - 3207.74^max) MB/s -11%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2354 (2252.28^min - 2353.53^max) MB/s -35%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=165, last 2 years)	2137 MB/s -41%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1424 (1251.47^min - 1423.75^max) MB/s -61%

AS SSD
Score Total
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10562 Points +20%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10330 Points +18%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	8788 Points
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (5636 - 10783, n=10)	8549 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	8477 Points -4%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	8252 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=156, last 2 years)	6746 Points -23%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4850 Points -45%
Score Read
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3622 Points +3%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3522 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3448 Points -2%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3394 Points -4%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (1805 - 3629, n=10)	3256 Points -8%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3177 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=156, last 2 years)	2446 Points -31%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2035 Points -42%
Score Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5157 Points +43%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5110 Points +41%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (2849 - 5339, n=10)	3713 Points +3%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3618 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	3511 Points -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3399 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=156, last 2 years)	3112 Points -14%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1877 Points -48%
Seq Read
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	9511 MB/s +95%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5891.83 MB/s +21%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5861.95 MB/s +20%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	5638.22 MB/s +15%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (4494 - 5715, n=10)	5048 MB/s +3%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=156, last 2 years)	4945 MB/s +1%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	4887 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	4799.93 MB/s -2%
Seq Write
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	7181 MB/s +280%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5634.39 MB/s +198%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5242.91 MB/s +177%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	4458.9 MB/s +136%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	3925.33 MB/s +108%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=156, last 2 years)	3760 MB/s +99%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (1891 - 4476, n=10)	3202 MB/s +69%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	1891 MB/s
4K Read
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (61.3 - 112.1, n=10)	90.5 MB/s +25%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	72.8 MB/s 0%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	72.6 MB/s
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	68.69 MB/s -5%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=156, last 2 years)	65.2 MB/s -10%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	65.13 MB/s -10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	63.85 MB/s -12%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	60.64 MB/s -16%
4K Write
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (206 - 358, n=10)	287 MB/s +1%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	284 MB/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	251.87 MB/s -11%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	248.62 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=156, last 2 years)	213 MB/s -25%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	194.62 MB/s -31%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	177.9 MB/s -37%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	175.47 MB/s -38%
4K-64 Read
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2967.47 MB/s 0%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	2961 MB/s
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2853.84 MB/s -4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2798.41 MB/s -5%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (1285 - 2964, n=10)	2660 MB/s -10%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2544.4 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=156, last 2 years)	1881 MB/s -36%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	1011 MB/s -66%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4380.62 MB/s +39%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4297.73 MB/s +37%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	3145 MB/s
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (2403 - 4533, n=10)	3105 MB/s -1%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	2870.73 MB/s -9%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	2830.74 MB/s -10%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=156, last 2 years)	2527 MB/s -20%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	981 MB/s -69%
Access Time Read
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.086 ms *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	0.085 ms * +1%
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (0.028 - 0.094, n=10)	0.0632 ms * +27%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=155, last 2 years)	0.05576 ms * +35%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.041 ms * +52%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.036 ms * +58%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.035 ms * +59%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.03 ms * +65%
Access Time Write
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.064 ms * -357%
Alienware m18 R1 SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.052 ms * -271%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=156, last 2 years)	0.04728 ms * -238%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB	0.023 ms * -64%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Phison E18-1TB-PHISON-SSD-B47R	0.023 ms * -64%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.018 ms * -29%
Aorus 17X AZF Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10	0.014 ms *
Average Gigabyte AG470S1TB-SI B10 (0.011 - 0.018, n=10)	0.0135 ms * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

Aorus 17X AZF: Ø6890 (5212.74-6934.62)

图形卡

Aorus 17X AZF使用了一个NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090 笔记本电脑GPU，其最大可能的TGP高达175瓦（150瓦+25瓦的动态提升）。3D性能也相应不错，尽管采用相同显卡的竞争性笔记本电脑能够在性能上略胜一筹。与 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080笔记本GPU的差距要大得多，分别为9%和18%。与之相比 Medion Erazer Beast相比，我们在Aorus 17X AZF中几乎看到了相同的性能。

更多关于NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090笔记本GPU的基准测试可以找到这里。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	98.6 pt
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	98.5 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	93.8 pt
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	93.1 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.7 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	85.1 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	76.7 pt
Average of class Gaming	61.1 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	71383 Points +14%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	69211 Points +11%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	68692 Points +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (54073 - 73027, n=42)	65041 Points +4%
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	62544 Points
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	59348 Points -5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	55111 Points -12%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points -30%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	49247 Points +2%
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	48251 Points
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	46998 Points -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (40259 - 53059, n=41)	46365 Points -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	44759 Points -7%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	42663 Points -12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	40449 Points -16%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points -35%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	22547 Points +7%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	22254 Points +5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	21278 Points +1%
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	21158 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16950 - 23292, n=43)	20950 Points -1%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	19299 Points -9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	15982 Points -24%
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)	13118 Points -38%

3DMark 05 Standard		61850 points
3DMark 06 Standard Score		61681 points
3DMark 11 Performance		43896 points
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		247981 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		58934 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		35428 points
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		24235 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		20085 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=179, last 2 years)	20.9 Seconds * -49%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	16 Seconds * -14%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	15 Seconds * -7%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	14 Seconds * -0%
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	14 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (9 - 19, n=39)	12.1 Seconds * +14%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	11 Seconds * +21%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=185, last 2 years)	36.9 Seconds * -76%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	22 Seconds * -5%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	22 Seconds * -5%
Aorus 17X AZF NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	21 Seconds *
Medion Erazer Beast X40 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	19 Seconds * +10%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (16 - 24, n=39)	18.3 Seconds * +13%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	17 Seconds * +19%
Alienware m18 R1 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	17 Seconds * +19%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

这款笔记本配备了QHD显示屏，这意味着所有当前的标题都能以最大的细节播放而没有问题。有时候，性能的NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090笔记本GPU可以轻松地为原生分辨率的外部4K显示器提供动力。16GB的VRAM很好，面向未来，即使在QHD中也不会成为瓶颈。在我们的游戏测试中，Aorus 17X AZF稳居第三位。所有使用 NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090笔记本GPU提供类似的性能水平。

Performance Rating - Percent
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	99.3 pt
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	94.8 pt
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	92.9 pt
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	90.8 pt
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	76.6 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	76.2 pt
Average of class Gaming	66.9 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	213.9 (205^min) fps +7%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	200 (174^min) fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	198.9 (190^min, 191^P1) fps -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	195.1 (169^min) fps -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	175.9 (166^min) fps -12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	164 (128^min) fps -18%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps -36%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	151.3 (2.81^min, 111.1^P1) fps +12%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	149 (3.13^min, 111.1^P1) fps +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	140.9 (3.54^min, 83.3^P1) fps +4%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	135.3 (6.48^min, 90.9^P1) fps
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	121.1 (13.2^min, 83.3^P1) fps -10%
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=170, last 2 years)	113.7 fps -16%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	102.9 (4.87^min, 76.9^P1) fps -24%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	194.8 fps +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	187.4 fps +6%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	177.6 fps
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	176.2 fps -1%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	148.5 fps -16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	145.4 fps -18%
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=182, last 2 years)	119.9 fps -32%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	386 (35.7^min, 279^P1) fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	373 (29.9^min, 272^P1) fps -3%
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	373 (73.3^min, 273^P1) fps -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	365 (90.9^min, 268^P1) fps -5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	276 (60.5^min, 196.3^P1) fps -28%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	258 (51.3^min, 185.4^P1) fps -33%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=179, last 2 years)	229 fps -41%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	194.2 (157.6^min) fps +10%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	185.9 (157.5^min) fps +6%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	176.1 (149.8^min) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	171.5 (144.2^min) fps -3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	155.3 (128.4^min) fps -12%
Average of class Gaming (65.1 - 220, n=187, last 2 years)	151.2 fps -14%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	145.6 (127.5^min) fps -17%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	143.5 fps +4%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138.5 fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134.2 fps -3%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	134.1 fps -3%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	128.3 fps -7%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	126.8 fps -8%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	119.4 fps -14%
Average of class Gaming (32.8 - 166.2, n=194, last 2 years)	108.4 fps -22%

F1 22 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	144.7 (124^min, 94^P1) fps +12%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138.2 (118^min, 84^P1) fps +7%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	128.9 (108^min, 78^P1) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	118.2 (98^min, 70^P1) fps -8%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	115.4 (94^min, 72^P1) fps -10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	97.5 (84^min, 68^P1) fps -24%
Average of class Gaming (13 - 144.7, n=96, last 2 years)	84.9 fps -34%

The Callisto Protocol - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling)
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	144 fps +10%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	131.1 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (102.6 - 150.7, n=6)	130.9 fps 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (111.5 - 120.4, n=2)	116 fps -12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	111.5 fps -15%
Average of class Gaming (10.3 - 150.7, n=21, last 2 years)	89.6 fps -32%

Returnal - 1920x1080 Epic Preset
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	155 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (141 - 155, n=3)	147.3 fps -5%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	146 (65^min) fps -6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	121 (32^min) fps -22%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (107 - 121, n=4)	111 fps -28%
Average of class Gaming (27 - 155, n=26, last 2 years)	84.7 fps -45%

Atomic Heart - 1920x1080 Atomic Preset
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (128.6 - 166, n=3)	144.4 fps +4%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	138.5 (15.8^min, 92.2^P0.1, 113.7^P1) fps
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	128.6 (29^min, 91.2^P0.1, 105.8^P1) fps -7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	100.3 (48.1^min, 72.5^P0.1, 80.8^P1) fps -28%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ()	100.3 fps -28%
Average of class Gaming (10.2 - 166, n=18, last 2 years)	72.8 fps -47%

Company of Heroes 3 - 1920x1080 Maximum Settings
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	235.2 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (215 - 235, n=2)	225 fps -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	215.2 (32.4^P0.1, 87.8^P1) fps -9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	205.31 (73.6^P0.1, 116.7^P1) fps -13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ()	205 fps -13%
Average of class Gaming (43.8 - 235, n=16, last 2 years)	129 fps -45%

Dead Space Remake - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	140.8 (25.7^min, 29.3^P0.1, 35^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (129 - 140.8, n=2)	134.9 fps -4%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	129 fps -8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ()	109.3 fps -22%
Average of class Gaming (14 - 140.8, n=14, last 2 years)	70.1 fps -50%

Tiny Tina's Wonderlands - 1920x1080 Badass Preset (DX12)
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	187.7 fps +19%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	182 fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (141.1 - 189.4, n=14)	174.3 fps +10%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	158.3 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (112.9 - 167.1, n=9)	145.5 fps -8%
Average of class Gaming (22.3 - 189.4, n=47, last 2 years)	123.1 fps -22%

High On Life - 1920x1080 Very High Preset
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	185.2 (38.8^min, 87.6^P0.1, 123.2^P1) fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (180.3 - 185.2, n=2)	182.8 fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU ()	148.4 fps -20%
Average of class Gaming (9.55 - 185.2, n=16, last 2 years)	94.5 fps -49%

The Witcher 3: 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)

The Witcher 3 / High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	441.6 (406^min) fps +12%
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	422 fps +7%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	395.8 fps
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	382.9 (358^min) fps -3%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (290 - 449, n=23)	380 fps -4%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	363.8 (319^min) fps -8%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	287.8 (248^min) fps -27%
Average of class Gaming (40.1 - 449, n=120, last 2 years)	242 fps -39%

The Witcher 3 / Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	213.9 (205^min) fps +7%
Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	200 (174^min) fps
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	198.9 (190^min, 191^P1) fps -1%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU (139.2 - 216, n=35)	198.5 fps -1%
Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	195.1 (169^min) fps -2%
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	175.9 (166^min) fps -12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	164 (128^min) fps -18%
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps -36%

为了检查帧率是否在较长时间内保持稳定和恒定，我们在全高清分辨率和最大细节下运行 "TheWitcher 3" 60分钟。游戏角色没有被移动。刷新率是一致的，正如图表所显示的那样。

Witcher 3 FPS chart

Aorus 17X AZF i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø199.2 (176-205)

Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø189.4 (179-197)

MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø166.7 (160-178)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø157.5 (139-169)

MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø198.9 (190-214)

Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU: Ø197.9 (178-214)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD	4K
GTA V (2015)	187	186.1	182.2	135.3	132.9	174.3
The Witcher 3 (2015)	554.3	506.7	395.8	200		145.9
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	235.6	199.8	191.6	176.1		175.75
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	222	205	177.6		152.4	89.9
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	195.9	173.5	138.5			118.5
Far Cry 5 (2018)	186	170	161	162	152	98
Strange Brigade (2018)	527	441	414	386	300	154.6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	247	219	210	198.6	162.5	95.2
Far Cry New Dawn (2019)	170	148	145	131	128	102
Metro Exodus (2019)	187.7	160.6	134.5	112.9	98	68.6
Borderlands 3 (2019)	208	182.1	163.6	146.5	115.8	67.9
F1 2020 (2020)	413	354	344	305	253	148.7
F1 2021 (2021)	466	421	356	204	182.7	107.8
Far Cry 6 (2021)	175.7	154.3	136.3	128.9	115.1	73.1
God of War (2022)	176.8	176.7	166.8	123.6	101.5	72.7
GRID Legends (2022)	227	209	190.1	183.2	178.9	128.6
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022)	320	263	194	158.3	112.5	65.7
F1 22 (2022)	315	299	283	128.9	83.5	43
The Callisto Protocol (2022)	193.3	168.2	166.4	131.1	101.3	61.6
High On Life (2023)	277	246	211	185.2	126.1	56.9
Dead Space Remake (2023)	153.4	150.7	142.3	140.8	105.6	56.2
Hogwarts Legacy (2023)	116	100.7	93.7	89.7	80.9	50.5
Returnal (2023)	195	191	176	155	119	70
Atomic Heart (2023)	217	187.1	166.6	138.5	107.8	62.7
Company of Heroes 3 (2023)	308.5	280.4	239.6	235.2	194.8	117.4
Resident Evil 4 Remake (2023)	232	189.7	187.3	136.3	109.2	63.4
The Last of Us (2023)	113.7	110.8	109	105	81.8	43.8

排放 - Aorus 17X AZF也可以是安静的

噪声

在闲置和日常使用（办公室和互联网）期间，四个风扇经常以低速旋转。在高达34 dB(A)的情况下，Aorus 17X AZF是非常可以忍受的。在负载情况下，它偶尔会变得非常响亮，在我们的压力测试中记录的最高值为54 dB(A)。此外，风扇会产生高频声音，主观上会使音量更大。

原则上，Aorus 17X AZF也可以实现近乎无声的操作。这需要使用会议模式 或节能睡眠模式配置文件，可以通过GCC（技嘉控制中心）选择。由此减少的CPU功耗仍足以满足日常使用。

GCC还可以用来手动控制风扇。除了预定义的配置文件外，您还可以使用自己的风扇曲线。

Noise Level

Idle		28 / 29 / 34 dB(A)
Load		51 / 54 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A)

	Aorus 17X AZF i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Noise		4%	7%	4%	1%	16%
off / environment *	25	24 4%	23.4 6%	24 4%	24.6 2%	22.8 9%
Idle Minimum *	28	25 11%	24.2 14%	31 -11%	29.2 -4%	23 18%
Idle Average *	29	29 -0%	25.6 12%	32 -10%	29.2 -1%	23 21%
Idle Maximum *	34	35 -3%	31 9%	33 3%	29.2 14%	23 32%
Load Average *	51	51 -0%	43.3 15%	45 12%	50.7 1%	35.6 30%
Witcher 3 ultra *	57	51 11%	56.3 1%	45 21%	53.3 6%	51.3 10%
Load Maximum *	54	53 2%	59.1 -9%	50 7%	61 -13%	56.7 -5%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在办公室和互联网的简单日常使用中，没有观察到高的外壳温度。只有在负载情况下，如压力测试或游戏期间，笔记本才会明显发热。我们在底部和风扇出口的区域登记了最高的温度。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


40 °C	43 °C	44 °C
33 °C	47 °C	45 °C
32 °C	29 °C	34 °C

Maximum: 47 °C
Average: 38.6 °C


47 °C	47 °C	41 °C
50 °C	51 °C	39 °C
46 °C	42 °C	33 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 44 °C

Power Supply (max.) 45 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


27 °C	29 °C	27 °C
29 °C	30 °C	29 °C
28 °C	29 °C	25 °C

Maximum: 30 °C
Average: 28.1 °C


30 °C	30 °C	29 °C
31 °C	31 °C	29 °C
30 °C	29 °C	28 °C

Maximum: 31 °C
Average: 29.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 31 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


40 °C	43 °C	44 °C
35 °C	46 °C	44 °C
28 °C	33 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 46 °C
Average: 38 °C


47 °C	49 °C	44 °C
52 °C	50 °C	43 °C
40 °C	39 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 52 °C
Average: 44 °C

Power Supply (max.) 50 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).

	Aorus 17X AZF Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X40 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Alienware m18 R1 Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU
Heat		-1%	7%	13%	12%	15%
Maximum Upper Side *	47	48 -2%	37.4 20%	41 13%	40.6 14%	39 17%
Maximum Bottom *	51	52 -2%	45 12%	51 -0%	41.1 19%	36.4 29%
Idle Upper Side *	30	30 -0%	29.8 1%	24 20%	26.2 13%	29.2 3%
Idle Bottom *	31	31 -0%	32.4 -5%	25 19%	30.3 2%	27.8 10%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

我们用Prime95和Furmark模拟连续运行的压力测试，代表了检查系统在全负荷下的稳定性的一个极端情况。CPU以高的时钟速率开始，由于PL2不能永久保持，所以在很短的时间内就被扼杀。英特尔酷睿i7 13900HX的P核和E核英特尔酷睿i7 13900HX长时间持续运行在略低于2GHz的水平。

发言人

立体声扬声器能产生扎实的声音，但由于音量不够，低音的效果不甚理想。建议使用耳机或外部扬声器系统以获得更好的声音体验。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Aorus 17X AZF audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Medion Erazer Beast X40 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理

消耗功率

Aorus 17X AZF在能源消耗方面没有显示出任何异常情况。闲置时的确认值似乎相当好，在某些情况下明显优于竞争对手。我们看到负载下的正常比率。电源适配器的大小为330瓦，即使在短时间内需要334瓦，也是足够的。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / Watt
Idle	11 / 17 / 29 Watt
Load	134 / 334 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Aorus 17X AZF i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		-3%	-14%	-4%	-9%	-46%	-19%	4%
Idle Minimum *	11	11 -0%	16.1 -46%	16 -45%	14 -27%	21.6 -96%	16.2 ?(6 - 32.3, n=29) -47%	13.6 ?(2 - 39, n=155, last 2 years) -24%
Idle Average *	17	18 -6%	24 -41%	20 -18%	21.6 -27%	25.2 -48%	23.1 ?(10.9 - 42.6, n=29) -36%	19 ?(8 - 55.6, n=155, last 2 years) -12%
Idle Maximum *	29	30 -3%	34 -17%	26 10%	24.8 14%	56.7 -96%	34.2 ?(11.6 - 57.9, n=29) -18%	26.8 ?(9 - 101.1, n=155, last 2 years) 8%
Load Average *	134	136 -1%	123.6 8%	135 -1%	122.5 9%	164.1 -22%	130.5 ?(79 - 201, n=29) 3%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) 21%
Witcher 3 ultra *	278	280 -1%	286 -3%	215 23%	265 5%	311 -12%
Load Maximum *	334	363 -9%	285.7 14%	299 10%	418 -25%	338.9 -1%	324 ?(221 - 418, n=29) 3%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) 25%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Aorus 17X AZF; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø278 (267-296)

Aorus 17X AZF; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø163.2 (123.4-275)

Aorus 17X AZF; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø16.9 (11.9-21)

Power consumption with an external monitor

Aorus 17X AZF; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø126.3 (116.6-203)

Aorus 17X AZF; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø160.8 (158.2-169.2)

Aorus 17X AZF; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø239 (233-273)

Aorus 17X AZF; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø276 (261-289)

Aorus 17X AZF; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø22.5 (18.2-30.9)

电池寿命

Aorus 17X AZF在我们的WLAN测试（通过脚本调用网站）和视频测试（短片Big Buck Bunny，H.264编码，FHD，循环播放）中的运行时间分别为6:29 h和6:43 h。这些都是可以接受的速度，反映了游戏类笔记本电脑的平均水平。在这两项测试中，笔记本电脑的节能功能被禁用，显示亮度被设置为150cd/m²左右。在我们的案例中，这意味着亮度降低了50%。

Aorus 17X AZF配备了一个99Wh的大电池，这也是笔记本电脑中的最大值。几乎所有的对比设备都提供相同容量的电池。只有惠普Omen 17不得不使用较小的83Wh电池，因此明显落后。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		9h 01min
WiFi Websurfing (112.0.1722.39)		6h 29min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (EDGE: 112.0.1722.39)		3h 56min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		6h 43min
Load (maximum brightness)		2h 08min

	Aorus 17X AZF i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	Medion Erazer Beast X40 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.8 Wh	MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Alienware m18 R1 i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 97 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		-2%	-19%	-44%	-21%	-46%	-8%
Reader / Idle	541	565 4%	439 -19%	249 -54%		334 -38%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) 4%
H.264	403	416 3%		220 -45%	358 -11%		409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) 1%
WiFi v1.3	389	382 -2%	363 -7%	217 -44%	319 -18%	260 -33%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years) -4%
Load	128	114 -11%	89 -30%	86 -33%	86 -33%	44 -66%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) -33%

Pros

+ 240Hz的QHD屏幕

+ 良好的色彩空间覆盖率

+ RTX 4090笔记本GPU，16GB VRAM

+ 卓越的游戏性能

+ 两个PCIe-4 SSD，每个1TB

+ 带有电源传输的雷电4

+ 良好的电池寿命

+ 在降低功率水平时很安静

Cons

- 负载下非常嘈杂

- 没有存储卡读卡器

- 显示屏亮度

评语--移动游戏的动力源泉，不折不扣。

Aorus 17X AZF是一款为极端要求设计的游戏笔记本。这台17英寸的笔记本能够在原生显示分辨率下毫无问题地运行所有测试的游戏，并且在质量上没有损失。然而，人们被限制在1440p游戏，这很好。性能储备是可用的，可以通过外部4K显示器访问。该NvidiaGeForce RTX 4090笔记本GPU提供了大量的性能，并且能够永久地保持这种性能。它的侧面是一个强大的英特尔Core-i7-13900HX.然而，在与同类设备的直接比较中，Aorus 17X AZF的CPU并不总是能够证明自己。然而，差距并不大，人们在日常生活中不太可能注意到这一点。

我们非常喜欢其余的硬件：32GB DDR5内存和总共2TB的固态硬盘存储使系统总体上非常出色，这样你就不必在一段时间内升级。支持QHD的显示屏也很适合笔记本电脑，也适用于照片和视频编辑。

另一方面，音量有限制，在加载过程中不能忽视。话说回来，这个问题也是其他游戏笔记本的通病，并不是Aorus 17X AZF独有的。连接性也需要改进，对于一个17英寸的设备来说可以更广泛。至少该笔记本有一个现代的Thunderbolt连接。

在移动性方面，Aorus 17X AZF的定位很好，因为记录的电池运行时间反映了一个良好的等级平均水平。该设备甚至可以通过技嘉控制中心进行几乎无声的操作，该中心提供了许多调整选项。

那些寻找更便宜的替代品的人应该看看惠普Omen 17，它在1,440p下也能提供出色的性能，并配有NvidiaGeForce RTX 4080笔记本GPU.

价格和可用性

建议有兴趣的买家直接通过技嘉网店的相应产品页面进行查询，在那里可以找到官方经销商/分销商的名单。例如，在美国，Aorus 17X AZF在Amazon和Newegg售价为3,499.00美元（但目前在这两个平台上已经售罄）。

价格截至17.04.2023，可能会有变化。

Aorus 17X AZF - 04/14/2023 v7 ^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Chassis

78 / 98 → 79%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

86%

Connectivity

68 / 80 → 85%

Weight

57 / 10-66 → 84%

Battery

70 / 95 → 73%

Display

87%

Games Performance

100%

Application Performance

90%

Workstation

91%

Temperature

83 / 95 → 87%

Noise

67 / 90 → 74%

Audio

81%

Camera

43 / 85 → 50%

Average

77%

86%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Jacob Fisher - Translator - 1418 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 470341 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Aorus 17X AZF回顾：带有i9-13900HX和RTX 4090的高端游戏笔记本电脑在一个薄薄的盒子里

Sebastian Bade, 2023-04-18 (Update: 2023-04-18)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - Aorus 17X上的铝和塑料

尺寸比较

装备

沟通

网络摄像头

维护

担保

软件

输入设备

键盘

触摸板

显示

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

表演 - 猛禽湖与阿达-洛夫莱斯的结合

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load

系统性能

DPC延迟

存储设备

SSD 1

SSD 2

Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

Witcher 3 FPS chart

排放 - Aorus 17X AZF也可以是安静的

噪声

温度

压力测试

发言人

Aorus 17X AZF audio analysis

Medion Erazer Beast X40 audio analysis

能源管理

消耗功率

Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test

Power consumption with an external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

评语--移动游戏的动力源泉，不折不扣。

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison