HP Omen 17 (2023)回顾：游戏笔记本使用RTX 4080

Name: HP Omen 17-ck2097ng
Brand: HP

高端游戏玩家。

酷睿i9-13900HX和GeForce RTX 4080为视频处理、渲染和QHD游戏提供足够的性能。笔记本电脑的键盘还提供单独的按键照明，六个宏键，以及大量的方向键空间。

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Florian Glaser (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 03/31/2023 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Gaming Geforce Intel Raptor Lake Thunderbolt Windows

Omen 17的2023型号是一款高端游戏笔记本电脑，使用了我们已经知道的前代产品的相同外壳，但包括当前的硬件：这款笔记本电脑由猛禽湖和艾达-洛夫莱斯芯片运行。惠普将酷睿i9与RTX 4080 GPU结合在一起，整套设备要价近3,300欧元（3,582美元）。竞争对手包括笔记本电脑，如 Alienware m17 R5，以及Razer Blade 16（2023年初），以及华硕ROG Strix G16 G614JZ，以及联想Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H.

你可以在我们对上一代机型的评论中找到关于机箱、设备、输入设备和扬声器的信息。对前代机型的评论，在这些方面都是相同的。

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng (Omen 17 Series)

Processor

Intel Core i9-13900HX 24 x 1.6 - 5.4 GHz, 130 W PL2 / Short Burst, 55 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake-HX

Graphics adapter

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU - 12 GB VRAM, Core: 2010 MHz, RAM: 2250 MHz, 175 W TDP ( including 25 W Dynamic Boost), GDDR6, 31.0.15.3118, Optimus

Memory

32 GB

, DDR5-5600, dual-channel mode, two memory slots (both in use)

Display

17.30 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 170 PPI, BOE BOE09BF, IPS, glossy: no, 165 Hz

Mainboard

Intel HM770 (Raptor Lake-S PCH)

Storage

SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N, 1024 GB

, 893 GB free

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: combo audio port, Card Reader: SD, SDXC, SDHC, TPM 2.0

Networking

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 27 x 397.1 x 262

Battery

83 Wh, 6880 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Home

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: stereo, Keyboard: chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, McAfee LiveSafe (trial), Microsoft 365 (trial), Microsoft OneNote (trial), 24 Months Warranty

Weight

2.766 kg, Power Supply: 1.154 kg

Price

3299 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
85.4 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.8 kg	27 mm	17.30"	2560x1440
86.1 % v7 ^(old)	01 / 2023	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	3.4 kg	26.7 mm	17.00"	3840x2160
91.2 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	21.99 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
89.4 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2023	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.7 kg	26 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
88.4 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2023	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	2.4 kg	30.4 mm	16.00"	2560x1600

尺寸比较

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 DIN A4 ❌

左边：电源、千兆以太网、USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A)、Mini DisplayPort、HDMI 2.1、Thunderbolt 4 (USB-C；Power Delivery、DisplayPort)、音频组合、存储卡阅读器(SD)

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	125 MB/s +74%
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years)	95.5 MB/s +33%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	72 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	207.6 MB/s +144%
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years)	119.3 MB/s +40%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60)	85 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1579 (848^min - 1696^max) MBit/s +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1545 (1189^min - 1625^max) MBit/s +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1467 (733^min - 1546^max) MBit/s
Average of class Gaming (469 - 1843, n=151, last 2 years)	1235 MBit/s -16%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (464 - 1921, n=238)	1233 MBit/s -16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1155 (495^min - 1441^max) MBit/s -21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921	981 MBit/s -33%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1627 (1381^min - 1714^max) MBit/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter	1619 (1537^min - 1665^max) MBit/s 0%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1557 (795^min - 1691^max) MBit/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (680 - 1890, n=151, last 2 years)	1383 MBit/s -15%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 (582 - 1890, n=238)	1379 MBit/s -15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211	1328 (1093^min - 1448^max) MBit/s -18%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921	968 MBit/s -41%

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1443 (733-1546)

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø976 (930-1012)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1155 (495-1441)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1551 (848-1696)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1545 (1189-1625)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1626 (1381-1714)

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) MediaTek MT7921; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø968 (947-983)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1327 (1093-1448)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Killer Wi-Fi 6E AX1675i 160MHz Wireless Network Adapter; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1618 (1537-1665)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1530 (795-1691)

ColorChecker HP Omen 17-ck2097ng: 10.63 ∆E min: 2.95 - max: 20.42 ∆E

显示屏 - QHD，包括sRGB覆盖

虽然此时许多竞争对手喜欢使用16:10的显示屏，但惠普在Omen中仍然忠实于16:9的格式。一个积极的特征是，反应灵敏的165-Hz面板在任何亮度水平下都不会出现任何PWM闪烁。

哑光的17.3英寸显示屏（2,560 x 1,440像素）的亮度和对比度符合要求（>300 cd/m²和1,000:1）。然而，在我们的竞争对手的显示器中，Omen显示器提供的亮度最低。的 Legion 7 Pro 拥有这里最亮的面板。


337 cd/m²	349 cd/m²	360 cd/m²
334 cd/m²	371 cd/m²	358 cd/m²
347 cd/m²	357 cd/m²	336 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

BOE BOE09BF tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 371 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 349.9 cd/m² Minimum: 19 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 371 cd/m²
Contrast: 1159:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.01
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
69.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng BOE BOE09BF, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3"	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AU Optronics AUODBA3, IPS, 3840x2160, 17"	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 CSOT T3 MNG007DA4-1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H MNG007DA2-3 (CSO1628), IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ TL160ADMP03-0, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	HP Omen 17-ck1075ng BOE09EE, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display		24%	26%	2%	23%	-11%
Display P3 Coverage	67.4	97.2 44%	98.5 46%	69.1 3%	97 44%	59.03 -12%
sRGB Coverage	97.6	99.6 2%	100 2%	99.7 2%	99.9 2%	87.46 -10%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	69.6	88.4 27%	89.7 29%	71.2 2%	84.9 22%	61.04 -12%
Response Times		-18%	12%	28%	47%	-1%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	15.6 ?(7.3, 8.3)	16.4 ?(7.8, 8.6) -5%	6.6 ?(3.4, 3.2) 58%	12.3 ?(5.7, 6.6) 21%	5.1 ?(2.3, 2.8) 67%	14 ?(7, 7) 10%
Response Time Black / White *	8.9 ?(3.7, 5.2)	11.6 ?(6.2, 5.4) -30%	12 ?(6.8, 5.2) -35%	5.9 ?(2.2, 3.7) 34%	6.6 ?(2.2, 4.2) 26%	10 ?(6, 4) -12%
PWM Frequency						100 ?(50)
Screen		-88%	-12%	25%	3%	-15%
Brightness middle	371	484 30%	456.8 23%	511 38%	470 27%	321 -13%
Brightness	350	449 28%	437 25%	469 34%	459 31%	302 -14%
Brightness Distribution	90	87 -3%	83 -8%	86 -4%	93 3%	84 -7%
Black Level *	0.32	0.55 -72%	0.35 -9%	0.4 -25%	0.42 -31%	0.41 -28%
Contrast	1159	880 -24%	1305 13%	1278 10%	1119 -3%	783 -32%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.74	4.8 -176%	3.7 -113%	0.95 45%	1.86 -7%	1.62 7%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.59	7.48 -108%	6.42 -79%	2.07 42%	3.87 -8%	4.08 -14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.01	4.74 -369%	0.66 35%	0.91 10%	0.93 8%	1.93 -91%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.8	5.5 -96%	2.6 7%	0.6 79%	2.7 4%	1.24 56%
Gamma	2.19 ^100%	2.42 ^91%	2.3 ^96%	2.176 ^101%	2.246 ^98%	2.41 ^91%
CCT	6474 ^100%	6148 ^106%	6108 ^106%	6545 ^99%	6711 ^97%	6261 ^104%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-27% / -54%	9% / -0%	18% / 21%	24% / 13%	-9% / -12%

* ... smaller is better

在交付状态下，色彩再现已经非常好，通过校准可以进一步改善，使色彩偏差从1.74下降到1（目标值<3）。此外，灰度也随之更均匀地再现。

该显示器几乎能够完全覆盖sRGB色彩空间，但不能覆盖AdobeRGB和DCI-P3色彩空间。大多数竞争者的显示器在这里表现得更好，仅有的面板的 Legion处于同一水平。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 3.7 ms rise
8.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 5.2 ms fall
The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 21 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.3 ms rise
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

IPS面板的可视角度很稳定，因此可以从任何视角进行阅读。只要没有阳光直射，就可以在户外阅读该显示屏。

性能 - 惠普笔记本电脑提供强大的硬件

通过Omen 17，惠普公司提供了一款17.3英寸的笔记本电脑，其目标是用于QHD游戏，但在其他需要高性能的应用领域也取得了不错的成绩。必要的计算性能是由Raptor Lake和Ada Lovelace芯片提供的。我们的测试单位Omen的价格约为3,300欧元（约3,582美元）。

测试条件

预装的Omen Gaming Hub软件代表了笔记本电脑的控制中心。除了选择一种电源模式（见表），它还允许你给CPU降压和配置单独的风扇曲线。由于 "性能 "模式在我们的测试装置中产生了一些问题（奇怪的停顿和性能下降），我们主要使用 "平衡 "电源模式和自动风扇控制。Optimus被激活。

	性能	平衡	生态
功率限制1	100瓦	55瓦	55瓦
功率限制2	130瓦	130瓦	130瓦

处理器

芯片酷睿i9-13900HX猛禽湖）处理器由16个效率核心（无超线程，1.6至3.9GHz）和8个性能核心（超线程，2.2至5.4GHz）组成，总共有32个逻辑CPU核心。

在主电源操作中，该处理器以中高到高（多线程）和高到最高（单线程）的时钟速度运行Cinebench R15基准的CPU测试。虽然单线程性能（254分）在电池运行中略有下降，但多线程性能的下降是显著的（1303分）。

基准结果的范围在CPU的平均水平（单线程）或以下（多线程）。总的来说，"性能 "模式只带来了轻微的性能优势，其中AIDA基准测试获益最大。另一方面，它也会使CPU速度在持续的多线程负载下保持在一个较高的水平，正如CB15循环测试所显示的那样。

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX: Ø2810 (2649.18-4311.13)

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX: Ø2287 (2247.19-2314.81)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W Intel Core i9-12950HX: Ø2740 (2605.18-3101.02)

HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Performance: Ø2434 (2349.9-2579.98)

HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H; Balanced: Ø1944 (1886.88-2518.1)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX: Ø4512 (4463.29-4528.99)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX; Leistung: Ø4174 (4028.2-4381.06)

CPU Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	84.4 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	83 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	81.2 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	80.5 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	77.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	75.6 pt
Average of class Gaming	65.8 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	48.4 pt

Cinebench R23
Multi Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	30162 Points +14%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	30139 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (24270 - 32623, n=22)	28225 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	27299 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	26736 (22394.1^min - 26736.1^max) Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	26407 Points
Average of class Gaming (5668 - 36249, n=193, last 2 years)	21651 Points -18%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	13872 Points -47%
Single Core
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	2126 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	2095 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	2077 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1867 - 2105, n=19)	2044 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	2043 Points -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	2029 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (1088 - 2235, n=191, last 2 years)	1877 Points -10%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1554 Points -26%

Cinebench R20
CPU (Multi Core)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	11510 Points +14%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	11500 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9152 - 12541, n=20)	10766 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	10537 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	10118 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	8697 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (2179 - 13832, n=191, last 2 years)	8240 Points -19%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5306 Points -48%
CPU (Single Core)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	818 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	805 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	796 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	788 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (722 - 810, n=20)	784 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	742 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (427 - 856, n=191, last 2 years)	722 Points -10%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	612 Points -24%

Cinebench R15
CPU Multi 64Bit
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	4819 (4429.68^min - 4819.28^max) Points +12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX (turbo)	4764 (4425.76^min - 4764.17^max) Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	4731 (1123.72^min - 4730.93^max) Points +10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	4529 (4463.29^min - 4528.99^max) Points +5%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (3913 - 4970, n=21)	4522 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	4381 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	4311 Points
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=198, last 2 years)	3394 Points -21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	2315 (2247.19^min - 2314.81^max) Points -46%
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	306 Points +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX (turbo)	296 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	301 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	301 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	300 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (247 - 304, n=21)	292 Points -3%
Average of class Gaming (176.6 - 318, n=195, last 2 years)	276 Points -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	274 Points -9%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	250 Points -17%

Blender - v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	221 Seconds * -44%
Average of class Gaming (87 - 555, n=186, last 2 years)	172.1 Seconds * -12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	153 Seconds *
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (101 - 153, n=21)	117.9 Seconds * +23%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	114 Seconds * +25%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	114 Seconds * +25%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	106 Seconds * +31%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	105 Seconds * +31%

7-Zip 18.03
7z b 4
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	122254 MIPS +29%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	114658 MIPS +21%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	112526 MIPS +19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (90675 - 127283, n=20)	111796 MIPS +18%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	109330 MIPS +16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	94649 MIPS
Average of class Gaming (23795 - 140932, n=190, last 2 years)	84653 MIPS -11%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	61988 MIPS -35%
7z b 4 -mmt1
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	7035 MIPS +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	6925 MIPS
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	6909 MIPS 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (6340 - 7177, n=20)	6848 MIPS -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	6811 MIPS -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	6445 MIPS -7%
Average of class Gaming (4168 - 7581, n=190, last 2 years)	6281 MIPS -9%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	5734 MIPS -17%

Geekbench 5.5
Multi-Core
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	21058 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	20245 Points
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17614 - 21075, n=21)	19809 Points -2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	19801 Points -2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	19433 Points -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	18152 Points -10%
Average of class Gaming (4557 - 23194, n=191, last 2 years)	14891 Points -26%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	10021 Points -51%
Single-Core
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	2084 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	2079 Points
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	2044 Points -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	2025 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1345 - 2093, n=21)	1988 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (986 - 2210, n=191, last 2 years)	1882 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	1805 Points -13%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	1575 Points -24%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - 4k Preset
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	31.9 fps +27%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	30.1 fps +19%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	29.7 fps +18%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (23.5 - 34.4, n=21)	29.1 fps +15%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	28.7 fps +14%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	25.2 fps
Average of class Gaming (6.72 - 38.9, n=190, last 2 years)	23.3 fps -8%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	16.8 fps -33%

LibreOffice - 20 Documents To PDF
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	57.3 s * -30%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	47.7 s * -8%
Average of class Gaming (31.4 - 96.6, n=187, last 2 years)	47.6 s * -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	47.5 s * -7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	44.2 s *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	44 s * -0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (32.8 - 51.1, n=20)	42.5 s * +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	41.7 s * +6%

R Benchmark 2.5 - Overall mean
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	0.486 sec * -26%
Average of class Gaming (0.3609 - 0.759, n=191, last 2 years)	0.4402 sec * -14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX	0.4121 sec * -7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (0.375 - 0.4564, n=21)	0.402 sec * -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3979 sec * -3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	0.3959 sec * -3%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX	0.387 sec * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX	0.3862 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

4311 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

275 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

301 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

10118 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

805 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

2095 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

26407 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	97.2 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	95.9 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	94.4 pt
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX	91.4 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	88.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	77.5 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	72.2 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	62.8 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	27227 KRay/s +55%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	26741 KRay/s +52%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	25857 KRay/s +47%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (17589 - 27615, n=21)	24097 KRay/s +37%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	23990 KRay/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (4986 - 60169, n=187, last 2 years)	21640 KRay/s +23%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	17589 KRay/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	16202 KRay/s -8%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	133668 Points +51%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	131131 Points +48%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	125944 Points +42%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (88686 - 137015, n=21)	120602 Points +36%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	118518 Points +34%
Average of class Gaming (25360 - 252486, n=187, last 2 years)	106090 Points +20%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	104841 Points +18%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	88686 Points

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	6750 MB/s +55%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	6596 MB/s +51%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	6350 MB/s +46%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (4362 - 7029, n=21)	6061 MB/s +39%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	5888 MB/s +35%
Average of class Gaming (1339 - 10389, n=187, last 2 years)	4852 MB/s +11%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	4362 MB/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	3457 MB/s -21%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	143409 Points +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	134514 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	134227 Points 0%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (125644 - 141385, n=21)	133924 Points 0%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	133226 Points -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	125644 Points -7%
Average of class Gaming (50699 - 200651, n=187, last 2 years)	116237 Points -14%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	105169 Points -22%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	17026 Points +38%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	15813 Points +28%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	15807 Points +28%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	14959 Points +21%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (12334 - 17179, n=21)	14889 Points +21%
Average of class Gaming (4800 - 32988, n=187, last 2 years)	13175 Points +7%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	12918 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	12334 Points

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	66753 Points +52%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	66336 Points +51%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	63308 Points +44%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (43850 - 69202, n=21)	59821 Points +36%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	59656 Points +36%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	57695 Points +32%
Average of class Gaming (12321 - 134044, n=187, last 2 years)	53471 Points +22%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	43850 Points

AIDA64 / CPU AES
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (89413 - 237881, n=21)	139015 MB/s +55%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	128070 MB/s +43%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	127698 MB/s +43%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	125644 MB/s +41%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	114553 MB/s +28%
Average of class Gaming (19065 - 328679, n=187, last 2 years)	109176 MB/s +22%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	89413 MB/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	54897 MB/s -39%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	1936 MB/s +51%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	1912 MB/s +49%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	1850 MB/s +44%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (1284 - 1958, n=21)	1755 MB/s +37%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	1747 MB/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (373 - 2409, n=187, last 2 years)	1349 MB/s +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	1284 MB/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	854 MB/s -33%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	14722 KRay/s +55%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	14671 KRay/s +55%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	13844 KRay/s +46%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (9481 - 15279, n=21)	13066 KRay/s +38%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	12871 KRay/s +36%
Average of class Gaming (2540 - 31796, n=187, last 2 years)	11654 KRay/s +23%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	9481 KRay/s
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	8777 KRay/s -7%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	50834 MPixel/s +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	50563 MPixel/s
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100, Leistung)	50544 MPixel/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.85.6300)	48626 MPixel/s -4%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (42994 - 51994, n=21)	48439 MPixel/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (10805 - 60161, n=188, last 2 years)	39919 MPixel/s -21%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (v6.75.6100)	37069 MPixel/s -27%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT (v6.75.6100)	30343 MPixel/s -40%

系统性能

运行平稳的系统为渲染和游戏等耗电的应用领域提供了足够的计算性能。工作内存的传输率在DDR5-5600存储的正常水平。它们伴随着良好的PC-Mark结果。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (7609 - 8549, n=3)	7996 Points +5%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7888 Points +4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	7830 Points +3%
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=168, last 2 years)	7774 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	7609 Points
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7292 Points -4%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7223 Points -5%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	12031 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	11824 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	11703 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (10982 - 11824, n=3)	11503 Points -3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	11078 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=167, last 2 years)	10836 Points -8%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	10250 Points -13%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10788 Points +8%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (9976 - 10788, n=3)	10417 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	9976 Points
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=167, last 2 years)	9878 Points -1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	9090 Points -9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	8271 Points -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	7686 Points -23%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	14535 Points +43%
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=167, last 2 years)	12030 Points +19%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (10135 - 14720, n=3)	11725 Points +16%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	11296 Points +11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	11058 Points +9%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	10319 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10135 Points

CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2182 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1991 - 2194, n=2)	2093 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1991 Points
Average of class Gaming (1247 - 2344, n=151, last 2 years)	1899 Points -5%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1597 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1592 Points -20%

CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2044 Points +12%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1828 - 2059, n=2)	1944 Points +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1828 Points
Average of class Gaming (1299 - 2204, n=151, last 2 years)	1801 Points -1%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1565 Points -14%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1509 Points -17%

CrossMark / Creativity
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2400 Points +7%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2239 - 2411, n=2)	2325 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2239 Points
Average of class Gaming (1275 - 2660, n=151, last 2 years)	2083 Points -7%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1780 Points -21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1738 Points -22%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1990 Points +10%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1808 - 1998, n=2)	1903 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	1808 Points
Average of class Gaming (1030 - 2330, n=151, last 2 years)	1699 Points -6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1342 Points -26%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1315 Points -27%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5074 points
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		6244 points
PCMark 10 Score		7609 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77973 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77544 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	77060 MB/s -1%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (67716 - 78835, n=21)	75033 MB/s -4%
Average of class Gaming (21842 - 94222, n=187, last 2 years)	64907 MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	62189 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	53008 MB/s -32%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	50334 MB/s -35%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	86248 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	85073 MB/s -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84869 MB/s -2%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (73998 - 88462, n=21)	82199 MB/s -5%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	72658 MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (23681 - 99713, n=187, last 2 years)	68658 MB/s -20%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	59935 MB/s -31%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	50996 MB/s -41%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	80441 MB/s +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	76988 MB/s
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (65472 - 77045, n=21)	73168 MB/s -5%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	70939 MB/s -8%
Average of class Gaming (22986 - 108954, n=187, last 2 years)	66727 MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	59912 MB/s -22%
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	58827 MB/s -24%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	55214 MB/s -28%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	100.8 ns * -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	99.5 ns * -17%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	94.6 ns * -12%
Average of class Gaming (59.5 - 259, n=187, last 2 years)	94.1 ns * -11%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	87.5 ns * -3%
Average Intel Core i9-13900HX (80.4 - 91.1, n=21)	86.3 ns * -2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84.7 ns *
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	83.2 ns * +2%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

标准化的延迟监测测试（网络冲浪、4k视频再现、Prime95高负荷）显示了一些明显的行为。该系统似乎并不适合实时处理视频和音频。未来的软件更新可能会带来一些改进，或者使事情变得更糟糕。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13980HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2505 μs * -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2448.6 μs * -16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2103 μs *
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) Radeon RX 6850M XT, R9 6900HX, SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1366.3 μs * +35%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	437.7 μs * +79%

* ... smaller is better

存储解决方案

Omen提供了两个M.2-2280格式的PCIe 4固态硬盘的空间。这里使用的SK海力士的PCIe 4 SSD（1TB）提供了非常好的传输速率。然而，在DiskSpd循环的后期，我们观察到一些偶尔的性能下降，可能是由于热节流的原因。

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 7152 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 6095 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 752.4 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 461.8 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 5626 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 5120 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 74.2 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 286.5 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	92.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	85.1 pt
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	70 pt
Average of class Gaming	67.6 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	64.6 pt
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	61.1 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	51.9 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4525 (4498.41^min - 4525.41^max) MB/s +18%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4093 (4067.17^min - 4092.59^max) MB/s +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3650 (3626.52^min - 3649.67^max) MB/s -5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3848 (3815.64^min - 3848.21^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3844 (3257.93^min - 3843.87^max) MB/s 0%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2511 - 5665, n=18)	3832 MB/s 0%
Average of class Gaming (1319 - 7045, n=168, last 2 years)	3487 MB/s -9%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3428 (3412.07^min - 3428.49^max) MB/s -11%
seq write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5145 (5060.48^min - 5145.38^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4378 (4355.78^min - 4378.43^max) MB/s -15%
Average of class Gaming (535 - 9307, n=168, last 2 years)	3797 MB/s -26%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (1690 - 5181, n=18)	3776 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3416 (3372.4^min - 3415.84^max) MB/s -34%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3366 (3313.08^min - 3366.35^max) MB/s -35%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3243 (3188.93^min - 3243.04^max) MB/s -37%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3242 (1498^min - 3241.78^max) MB/s -37%
seq q8 t1 read
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (6508 - 7177, n=18)	6917 MB/s +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6878 (6539.55^min - 6877.94^max) MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6872 (4963.33^min - 6872.25^max) MB/s 0%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	6861 MB/s 0%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	6682 (5778.28^min - 6681.95^max) MB/s -3%
Average of class Gaming (2594 - 16089, n=168, last 2 years)	6328 MB/s -8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5023 MB/s -27%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5017 (4534.25^min - 5017.23^max) MB/s -27%
seq q8 t1 write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	6110 (6082.58^min - 6110.11^max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2382 - 6159, n=18)	5647 MB/s -8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4943 (4923.06^min - 4943.2^max) MB/s -19%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4831 (4610.18^min - 4830.79^max) MB/s -21%
Average of class Gaming (539 - 14571, n=168, last 2 years)	4823 MB/s -21%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4244 (427.59^min - 4244.22^max) MB/s -31%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3429 (3365.09^min - 3429.47^max) MB/s -44%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3387 (3363.41^min - 3386.9^max) MB/s -45%
4k q1 t1 read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	95.3 (93.25^min - 95.25^max) MB/s +19%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	80 (78.03^min - 80.03^max) MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (54.3 - 85, n=18)	68.9 MB/s -14%
Average of class Gaming (30.6 - 95.9, n=168, last 2 years)	65.8 MB/s -18%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	62.5 (61.85^min - 62.46^max) MB/s -22%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	61.5 (60.59^min - 61.49^max) MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	56.5 (49.8^min - 56.49^max) MB/s -29%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	52.5 (50.71^min - 52.46^max) MB/s -34%
4k q1 t1 write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	289 (284.65^min - 288.96^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	255 (243.79^min - 255.25^max) MB/s -12%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	239 (230.87^min - 239.2^max) MB/s -17%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	236 (223.33^min - 235.64^max) MB/s -18%
Average of class Gaming (66.6 - 397, n=168, last 2 years)	222 MB/s -23%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	220 (56.84^min - 219.56^max) MB/s -24%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (77.7 - 335, n=18)	192.3 MB/s -33%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	126.7 (123.88^min - 126.69^max) MB/s -56%
4k q32 t16 read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5829 (5404.65^min - 5828.67^max) MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4100 (4085.58^min - 4100.1^max) MB/s -30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3111 (2388.54^min - 3111.42^max) MB/s -47%
Average of class Gaming (417 - 6172, n=168, last 2 years)	2555 MB/s -56%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (353 - 5829, n=18)	2082 MB/s -64%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1533 (1526.72^min - 1532.76^max) MB/s -74%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1527 (1525.66^min - 1526.54^max) MB/s -74%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	843 (833.55^min - 843.1^max) MB/s -86%
4k q32 t16 write
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3537 (3519.01^min - 3536.66^max) MB/s +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3208 (2280.32^min - 3207.74^max) MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2783 (2698.54^min - 2783.41^max) MB/s -13%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2689 (2088.87^min - 2688.7^max) MB/s -16%
Average of class Gaming (162.3 - 4869, n=168, last 2 years)	2101 MB/s -35%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1282 (960.6^min - 1281.78^max) MB/s -60%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (148.5 - 3719, n=18)	1210 MB/s -62%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	288 (123^min - 287.76^max) MB/s -91%

AS SSD
Score Total
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	10330 Points
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	8224 Points -20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	7311 Points -29%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (4390 - 10562, n=18)	6931 Points -33%
Average of class Gaming (2271 - 13854, n=159, last 2 years)	6737 Points -35%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	5610 Points -46%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4008 Points -61%
Score Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	3448 Points
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3308 Points -4%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3188 Points -8%
Average of class Gaming (776 - 4721, n=159, last 2 years)	2441 Points -29%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (953 - 3793, n=18)	1997 Points -42%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1761 Points -49%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1250 Points -64%
Score Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5157 Points
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2690 - 5157, n=18)	3976 Points -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	3468 Points -33%
Average of class Gaming (515 - 7208, n=159, last 2 years)	3113 Points -40%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	3010 Points -42%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2428 Points -53%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2211 Points -57%
Seq Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5861.95 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	5429.33 MB/s -7%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (3522 - 5892, n=18)	5299 MB/s -10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	5144.76 MB/s -12%
Average of class Gaming (2260 - 12763, n=159, last 2 years)	4944 MB/s -16%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	4716 MB/s -20%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	4308.28 MB/s -27%
Seq Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	5242.91 MB/s
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	4064.76 MB/s -22%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2489 - 5880, n=18)	3846 MB/s -27%
Average of class Gaming (495 - 11316, n=159, last 2 years)	3720 MB/s -29%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	3058.47 MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2890.58 MB/s -45%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2671 MB/s -49%
4K Read
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	85.9 MB/s +35%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (56 - 79.4, n=18)	66.1 MB/s +4%
Average of class Gaming (27.8 - 112.1, n=159, last 2 years)	65.1 MB/s +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	63.85 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	58.78 MB/s -8%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	49.65 MB/s -22%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	49.14 MB/s -23%
4K Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	251.87 MB/s
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	220.74 MB/s -12%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (144.4 - 286, n=18)	220 MB/s -13%
Average of class Gaming (108.8 - 512, n=159, last 2 years)	211 MB/s -16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	205.06 MB/s -19%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	144.8 MB/s -43%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	120.14 MB/s -52%
4K-64 Read
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	2798.41 MB/s
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	2744.3 MB/s -2%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2558.72 MB/s -9%
Average of class Gaming (451 - 3475, n=159, last 2 years)	1876 MB/s -33%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (359 - 3131, n=18)	1401 MB/s -50%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	1271.5 MB/s -55%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	728.79 MB/s -74%
4K-64 Write
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	4380.62 MB/s
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (2206 - 4381, n=18)	3371 MB/s -23%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	2856.24 MB/s -35%
Average of class Gaming (277 - 5909, n=159, last 2 years)	2533 MB/s -42%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	2499.95 MB/s -43%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1944.47 MB/s -56%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	1824.12 MB/s -58%
Access Time Read
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.087 ms * -112%
Average of class Gaming (0.016 - 0.379, n=158, last 2 years)	0.05509 ms * -34%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.041 ms *
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (0.017 - 0.062, n=18)	0.03817 ms * +7%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.031 ms * +24%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.028 ms * +32%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.025 ms * +39%
Access Time Write
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.082 ms * -356%
Average of class Gaming (0.011 - 1.028, n=159, last 2 years)	0.04843 ms * -169%
Average SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N (0.017 - 0.069, n=18)	0.03561 ms * -98%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024	0.032 ms * -78%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR	0.019 ms * -6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N	0.018 ms *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00	0.017 ms * +6%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng SK hynix PC801 HFS001TEJ9X101N: Ø6777 (3480.47-7122.14)

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø4118 (1511-6910.52)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 SSSTC CA6-8D1024: Ø6412 (5645.36-6872.58)

Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR: Ø5697 (3283.58-6647.05)

Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00: Ø5002 (4613.53-5017.26)

图形卡

随着GeForce RTX 4080笔记本电脑GPU，惠普使用了目前Nvidia移动GPU组合中的第二号。它有7,424个着色器，192位总线，并能够使用快速的GDDR6存储（12,288 MB）。RTX 4080的TGP配置为175瓦（150瓦+25瓦动态提升），这是Nvidia认为的可配置的最大值。根据我们的TheWitcher 3 测试，TGP并没有完全使用。

基准结果的范围低于我们迄今为止测试的RTX 4080 GPU的平均值。性能 "配置文件将导致一些偶尔的图形性能的小幅增长。dGPU模式将不会导致任何进一步的改善。在dGPU和Optimus之间切换不需要重新启动--支持高级Optimus。

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	98.9 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	94.4 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 ^-1! NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	94.3 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	90 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	89.1 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	86.1 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	85.8 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	77.9 pt
Average of class Gaming	74.2 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	60038 Points +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	59457 Points +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	58631 Points +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (45199 - 63128, n=24)	56791 Points +3%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	56565 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	55111 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)	54336 Points -1%
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=186, last 2 years)	43521 Points -21%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	41942 Points -24%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	168293 Points +30%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	164706 Points +27%
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	142796 Points +10%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	138528 Points +7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (92134 - 167815, n=10)	133526 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)	133330 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	131984 Points +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	129611 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	43847 Points +8%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	43525 Points +8%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (33058 - 45220, n=22)	40862 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	40570 Points 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	40449 Points
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	39852 Points -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)	38171 Points -6%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	34948 Points -14%
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=196, last 2 years)	31245 Points -23%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	19157 Points +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	18441 Points +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	18417 Points +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (13282 - 19663, n=22)	17777 Points +11%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	16852 Points +5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung, dGPU)	16584 Points +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	15982 Points
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=191, last 2 years)	13034 Points -18%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	11912 Points -25%

Blender | V-Ray 5 Benchmark | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.0

Blender
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX
Average of class Gaming (9 - 95, n=177, last 2 years)	21 Seconds * -31%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)	16 Seconds *
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (13 - 20, n=21)	15.1 Seconds * +6%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)	15 Seconds * +6%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)	15 Seconds * +6%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)	14 Seconds * +12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, Leistung)	14 Seconds * +12%
v3.3 Classroom CUDA
Average of class Gaming (16 - 175, n=183, last 2 years)	36.7 Seconds * -67%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)	23 Seconds * -5%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, Leistung)	23 Seconds * -5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (21 - 28, n=22)	22.8 Seconds * -4%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (3.3.3)	22 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3)	22 Seconds *
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (3.3.3)	22 Seconds * -0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (3.3.3, dGPU, Leistung)	22 Seconds * -0%

V-Ray 5 Benchmark
GPU RTX
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)	2688 mpaths
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung)	2672 mpaths -1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	2655 mpaths -1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, Leistung)	2632 mpaths -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (2128 - 2843, n=17)	2620 mpaths -3%
Average of class Gaming (171 - 3824, n=114, last 2 years)	2181 mpaths -19%
GPU CUDA
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung)	1989 mpaths 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, Leistung)	1988 mpaths 0%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)	1983 mpaths
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1647 - 2112, n=17)	1949 mpaths -2%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	1945 mpaths -2%
Average of class Gaming (120 - 2797, n=116, last 2 years)	1568 mpaths -21%
CPU
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, Leistung)	19593 mpaths +30%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX (5.0.1)	18935 mpaths +26%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1, dGPU, Leistung)	17206 mpaths +14%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (11906 - 21823, n=17)	17159 mpaths +14%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (5.0.1)	15071 mpaths
Average of class Gaming (3562 - 26944, n=119, last 2 years)	15070 mpaths 0%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10
GPU
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, Leistung)	940 mpaths +2%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )	939 mpaths +1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )	937 mpaths +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )	926 mpaths
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Leistung)	923 mpaths 0%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (812 - 1036, n=15)	923 mpaths 0%
Average of class Gaming (54 - 1334, n=152, last 2 years)	701 mpaths -24%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )	83 mpaths -91%
CPU
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )	30622 ksamples +31%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX (v4.10.07 )	30614 ksamples +31%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, Leistung)	29548 ksamples +27%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (19636 - 31653, n=15)	27585 ksamples +18%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07, dGPU, Leistung)	25321 ksamples +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (v4.10.07 )	23289 ksamples
Average of class Gaming (5413 - 37629, n=152, last 2 years)	21367 ksamples -8%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX (v4.10.07 )	14626 ksamples -37%

Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13980HX	189320 Points +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (Leistung)	177979 Points +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX (dGPU, Leistung)	174882 Points +1%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13950HX	173311 Points +1%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	172437 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (146413 - 189320, n=22)	170378 Points -1%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	165052 Points -4%
Average of class Gaming (5039 - 237138, n=193, last 2 years)	125975 Points -27%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT, AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX	107088 Points -38%

Geekbench 6.0 - GPU OpenCL 6.0
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Intel Core i9-13900HX	175235 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (153564 - 175235, n=3)	164645 Points -6%
Average of class Gaming (30029 - 213472, n=46, last 2 years)	115603 Points -34%

* ... smaller is better

游戏性能

针对QHD游戏的Omen在高至最高设置下，在连接相应的显示器时，也可以实现更高的分辨率。我们测试的游戏的帧率范围低于我们到目前为止测试的所有RTX 4080 GPU的平均水平。性能 "配置文件导致帧率的增加，略高于平均水平。在一些游戏中，dGPU模式能够提供额外的增加。

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	98.5 pt
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	97.3 pt
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	96.2 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	93 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	91 pt
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	90.9 pt
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	84.8 pt
Average of class Gaming	73.4 pt
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	58.2 pt

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	178 (151^min) fps +9%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	176.8 (159^min) fps +8%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	175 (150^min) fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU)	174.9 (128^min) fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)	172.2 (121^min) fps +5%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (130.4 - 186.1, n=20)	168 fps +2%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	164 (128^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years)	126.9 fps -23%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	126.2 fps -23%

GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	146.1 (5.24^min, 100^P1) fps +21%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	145.5 (3.79^min, 100^P1) fps +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	140.7 (3.02^min, 100^P1) fps +16%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (102.9 - 152.7, n=20)	131.6 fps +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)	128.1 (5.93^min, 83.3^P1) fps +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Leistung)	125.7 (8.63^min, 83.3^P1) fps +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	121.1 (13.2^min, 83.3^P1) fps
Average of class Gaming (12.1 - 167.7, n=171, last 2 years)	113 fps -7%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	92.6 (7.62^min, 55.6^P1) fps -24%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)	168.1 fps +16%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3, dGPU, Leistung)	163.4 fps +12%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3, Leistung)	163.1 fps +12%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)	162.4 fps +12%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (129 - 182.1, n=22)	159.5 fps +10%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)	157.8 fps +9%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.3)	145.4 fps
Average of class Gaming (19.2 - 201, n=184, last 2 years)	119 fps -18%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.3)	113.6 fps -22%

Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	338 (43.6^min, 243^P1) fps +22%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, dGPU, Leistung)	330 (13.4^min, 237^P1) fps +20%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	323 (61.7^min, 222^P1) fps +17%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	318 (29.2^min, 228^P1) fps +15%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (239 - 357, n=21)	314 fps +14%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12, Leistung)	305 (27.1^min, 203^P1) fps +11%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	276 (60.5^min, 196.3^P1) fps
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.47.22.14 D3D12)	230 (121.4^min, 165.6^P1) fps -17%
Average of class Gaming (38.9 - 421, n=182, last 2 years)	227 fps -18%

Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	194.7 (160^min) fps +25%
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	180.7 (154.9^min) fps +16%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	179 (152.4^min) fps +15%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)	165.9 (140.7^min) fps +7%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Leistung)	165.2 (142.4^min) fps +6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (133 - 194.7, n=22)	164.3 fps +6%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	155.3 (128.4^min) fps
Average of class Gaming (30.8 - 220, n=190, last 2 years)	149.3 fps -4%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	94 (75.5^min) fps -39%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	138.8 fps +16%
Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	137 fps +15%
Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	131.8 fps +10%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (dGPU, Leistung)	130.5 fps +9%
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (89.3 - 143.5, n=23)	123.6 fps +4%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (Leistung)	123.5 fps +3%
HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	119.4 fps
Average of class Gaming (31.5 - 166.2, n=196, last 2 years)	107.2 fps -10%
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	43.3 fps -64%

为了评估帧率是否在较大程度上保持恒定，我们在全高清分辨率和最高质量设置下运行游戏 "TheWitcher 3"约60分钟。在这段时间内，游戏角色没有被移动。我们没有注意到帧率的任何下降。

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø157.5 (139-169)

Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT: Ø114.1 (101-125)

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W i9-12950HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø118.8 (111-126)

Eurocom Nightsky TXi317 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø107.4 (100-116)

HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU: Ø105.5 (72.6-190.19)

Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU: Ø166.9 (141-179)

	low	med.	high	ultra	QHD
GTA V (2015)	183.8	183.1	175.5	121.1	116
The Witcher 3 (2015)	459.7	400.5	287.8	164
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	206	180.5	167.2	155.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	192.4	173	145.4		117.5
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	169	146.9	119.4
Far Cry 5 (2018)	160	132	129	126	124
Strange Brigade (2018)	388	300	290	276	208
F1 22 (2022)	255	248	231	97.5	67.6
The Callisto Protocol (2022)	167.6	153.7	148.3	111.5	83.7
Returnal (2023)	150	147	137	121	92
Atomic Heart (2023)	170.8	142.3	121.1	100.3	79.2
Company of Heroes 3 (2023)	275	244.6	206.5	205.31	153.8
Sons of the Forest (2023)	78.1	75	74.6	69.7	66.8

排放物 - 惠普笔记本电脑产生大量的噪音

噪声水平

在日常操作（办公室、互联网）和空闲操作中，持续运行的风扇是可以清楚听到的。在重载情况下（压力测试，Witcher 3 ），噪音水平进一步增加，音量可能达到50dB（A）。在 "性能 "模式下，噪音水平增加得更快，达到最大，并保持在该水平。噪声包括一些呼呼声，伴随着低沉的口哨声。

Omen的BIOS包含惠普自己的 "风扇常开 "选项，该选项在默认情况下被激活。停用这个选项并没有给我们的测试设备带来任何变化。

Noise Level

Idle		31 / 32 / 33 dB(A)
Load		45 / 50 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24 dB(A)

	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Noise		11%	12%	-2%	2%	-2%
off / environment *	24	23 4%	23 4%	24 -0%	25 -4%	25.4 -6%
Idle Minimum *	31	23 26%	23 26%	26 16%	26 16%	28 10%
Idle Average *	32	28.11 12%	23 28%	28 12%	28 12%	28 12%
Idle Maximum *	33	28.11 15%	23.6 28%	34 -3%	30 9%	31.2 5%
Load Average *	45	30.62 32%	39 13%	47 -4%	48 -7%	52.2 -16%
Witcher 3 ultra *	45	49.75 -11%	51.6 -15%	55 -22%	49 -9%	52.2 -16%
Load Maximum *	50	50.17 -0%	51.3 -3%	56 -12%	52 -4%	52.2 -4%

* ... smaller is better

温度

在日常操作中（办公、互联网），机箱温度保持在绿色范围内。在负载情况下（压力测试，Witcher 3 ），笔记本电脑明显发热，但这仍然在限制范围内 - 至少在顶部。CPU的温度没有让人担心的理由。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


34 °C	38 °C	37 °C
38 °C	41 °C	39 °C
34 °C	34 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 41 °C
Average: 36.7 °C


46 °C	51 °C	43 °C
45 °C	45 °C	39 °C
35 °C	35 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 51 °C
Average: 41 °C

Power Supply (max.) 36 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


24 °C	24 °C	23 °C
24 °C	24 °C	24 °C
23 °C	24 °C	23 °C

Maximum: 24 °C
Average: 23.7 °C


24 °C	24 °C	24 °C
24 °C	24 °C	24 °C
25 °C	23 °C	23 °C

Maximum: 25 °C
Average: 23.9 °C

Power Supply (max.) 25 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


38 °C	40 °C	40 °C
40 °C	42 °C	40 °C
35 °C	34 °C	35 °C

Maximum: 42 °C
Average: 38.2 °C


57 °C	61 °C	50 °C
52 °C	53 °C	44 °C
39 °C	34 °C	29 °C

Maximum: 61 °C
Average: 46.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 41 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-6.1 °C / -11 F).

	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX, AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ Intel Core i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 17-ck1075ng Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU
Heat		-20%	-8%	-28%	-23%	-16%
Maximum Upper Side *	41	53 -29%	40 2%	48 -17%	54 -32%	31.3 24%
Maximum Bottom *	51	56 -10%	37.6 26%	49 4%	55 -8%	43.3 15%
Idle Upper Side *	24	30 -25%	32.4 -35%	40 -67%	29 -21%	31.3 -30%
Idle Bottom *	25	29 -16%	31.4 -26%	33 -32%	33 -32%	43.3 -73%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

我们的Prime95和Furmark持续运行的压力测试代表了一种极端情况，我们用它来评估系统在全负荷下的稳定性。CPU（P：3.8 GHz，E：3.2 GHz）和GPU（2至2.1 GHz）以高时钟速度开始测试。短时间后，CPU速度下降到大约1.8 GHz（P核）和2 GHz（E核），GPU速度同时增加到2.3 - 2.4 GHz。

发言人

立体声扬声器产生了体面的声音，但它几乎没有任何低音。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理--配备330瓦电源的游戏笔记本电脑

消耗功率

对于所使用的硬件来说，耗电量在正常水平。在我们的TheWitcher 3 测试中，功耗保持不变，而在压力测试中，功耗在几分钟后下降--CPU被节流了。附带的电源（330瓦）的大小足够了。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.1 / Watt
Idle	16 / 20 / 26 Watt
Load	135 / 299 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU	Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		18%	-16%	-13%	5%	13%	-5%	11%
Idle Minimum *	16	13 19%	15.2 5%	18 -13%	10 37%	12.2 24%	16.1 ?(8 - 39, n=19) -1%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=157, last 2 years) 16%
Idle Average *	20	16.5 17%	22.8 -14%	24 -20%	16 20%	18 10%	21.5 ?(9.5 - 44.6, n=19) -8%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=157, last 2 years) 5%
Idle Maximum *	26	17 35%	49.8 -92%	32 -23%	27 -4%	19.4 25%	33.4 ?(13.7 - 68.1, n=19) -28%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=157, last 2 years) -3%
Load Average *	135	93 31%	121.2 10%	130 4%	129 4%	128 5%	117.9 ?(77 - 135, n=19) 13%	106.6 ?(32.1 - 201, n=155, last 2 years) 21%
Witcher 3 ultra *	215	239 -11%	242 -13%	260 -21%	247 -15%	209 3%
Load Maximum *	299	251 16%	273.7 8%	320 -7%	342 -14%	266 11%	296 ?(197.2 - 360, n=19) 1%	249 ?(55.3 - 418, n=157, last 2 years) 17%

* ... smaller is better

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø215 (206-224)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø232 (197.1-285)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø18.6 (17.9-20.9)

Power Consumption with External Monitor

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø106.1 (92.1-177.9)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø193.5 (190.2-205)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø198 (185.7-205)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø203 (194.4-211)

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø25.8 (21.1-33.5)

电池寿命

Omen的电池寿命并不令人满意。即使是一台强大的游戏笔记本，也要能在擎天柱的操作下持续更长的时间，电池容量为83瓦时。我们直到现在也无法确定这是由硬件还是软件问题造成的。

日志文件给出了问题的一个迹象：在低负荷运行测试期间（WiFi、空闲、视频），GeForce GPU应该是不活动的，把所有工作留给iGPU。然而，GeForce GPU在这里经常以最大速度运行--在0%的负载下。根据GPU-Z的数据，这导致了高达45瓦的功率消耗。

出于这个原因，我们要求惠普提供一个新的测试装置来仔细检查，但我们还没有收到。一旦我们能够得到它，我们将再次进行测试。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		4h 9min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 111)		3h 37min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		3h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 26min

	HP Omen 17-ck2097ng i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 83 Wh	Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) R9 6900HX, Radeon RX 6850M XT, 97 Wh	Razer Blade 16 Early 2023 i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 95.2 Wh	Lenovo Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh	Asus ROG Strix G16 G614JZ i9-13980HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh	HP Omen 17-ck1075ng i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop GPU, 78 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		31%	59%	46%	73%	79%	71%
Reader / Idle	249		533 114%	385 55%		532 114%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=69, last 2 years) 127%
H.264	220	294 34%					408 ?(129 - 837, n=80, last 2 years) 85%
WiFi v1.3	217	290 34%	365 68%	303 40%	583 169%	371 71%	376 ?(85 - 889, n=157, last 2 years) 73%
Load	86	107 24%	81 -6%	124 44%	65 -24%	131 52%	85.3 ?(41 - 173, n=121, last 2 years) -1%
Gaming						62

Pros

+ 具有165赫兹的QHD显示屏

+ 先进的Optimus

+ 可扩展的工作存储器

+ PCIe-4固态硬盘(可容纳第二个固态硬盘)

+ 独立按键照明

+ 带电源传输的雷电4

+ 通过软件实现欠压

Cons

- 对于RTX 4080来说，性能略低于平均水平

- 高噪音水平

- 箱子很吵

- 电池寿命微不足道

结论 - 一个坚实的高端游戏笔记本电脑

通过Omen 17，惠普提供了一个强大的QHD游戏笔记本电脑的高端领域。凭借其酷睿i9-13900HX处理器和 GeForce RTX 4080笔记本电脑的GPU，这款笔记本电脑在其他应用领域，如视频处理和渲染方面也应该很好地工作。一个快速的PCIe 4固态硬盘（1TB）提供了必要的存储空间，并确保短的加载时间。还有一个空间可以放置第二块固态硬盘。

惠普Omen 17（2023）代表了一个坚实的游戏笔记本电脑，但它并没有充分利用其潜力。

处理器和图形核心能够以持续的高时钟速度运行。噪音和热量的发展处于这个级别的笔记本电脑的正常水平。然而，这款笔记本电脑在日常运行中产生的噪音太大。

哑光的17.3英寸显示屏（QHD，IPS，165Hz，sRGB）给人留下了坚实的印象。它的整体表现比类似结构的FHD面板稍好。 Omen的前辈但比大多数竞争对手差。一个Thunderbolt 4连接提供了一些扩展选项（对接方案、外部GPU）。此外，它还可用于用USB-C充电器为电池充电（最小65瓦，20伏），并支持Power Delivery。

由于可能存在缺陷，我们目前无法对电池寿命做出最终判断。一旦我们从惠普得到一个替换装置，我们将重新测量电池寿命。由于电池寿命对游戏笔记本的最终评价几乎没有任何影响，所以评价最多只是略有变化。

作为替代，你可以看一下联想Legion Pro 7 16IRX8H，它能够从相同的CPU/GPU组合中获得更高的性能。此外，它在16:10的格式中拥有更明亮的显示屏。

价格和可用性

Omen 17（2023）可从惠普购买，起价1499.99美元。除了拥有i7-13700之外，与我们测试的配置类似的型号在美国需要2429.99美元。

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng - 03/28/2023 v7 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis

79 / 98 → 80%

Keyboard

81%

Pointing Device

81%

Connectivity

67 / 80 → 84%

Weight

58 / 10-66 → 86%

Battery

54 / 95 → 57%

Display

90%

Games Performance

99%

Application Performance

85%

Temperature

83 / 95 → 87%

Noise

69 / 90 → 77%

Audio

79%

Camera

40 / 85 → 47%

Average

74%

85%

Gaming - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 534 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > HP Omen 17 (2023)回顾：游戏笔记本使用RTX 4080

Sascha Mölck, 2023-03-31 (Update: 2023-03-31)

HP Omen 17 (2023)回顾：游戏笔记本使用RTX 4080

高端游戏玩家。

潜在的竞争对手比较

尺寸比较

显示屏 - QHD，包括sRGB覆盖

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - 惠普笔记本电脑提供强大的硬件

测试条件

处理器

Cinebench R15 Multi Constant Load Test

系统性能

DPC延迟

存储解决方案

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形卡

游戏性能

The Witcher 3 FPS Chart

排放物 - 惠普笔记本电脑产生大量的噪音

噪声水平

温度

压力测试

发言人

HP Omen 17-ck2097ng audio analysis

Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W audio analysis

电源管理--配备330瓦电源的游戏笔记本电脑

消耗功率

Power Consumption The Witcher 3 / Stress Test

Power Consumption with External Monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 一个坚实的高端游戏笔记本电脑

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Transparency

Price comparison