MSI Raider GE78 HX 13VH笔记本电脑评测。13代酷睿i9-13950HX和GeForce RTX 4080的升级版
在2023年CES上亮相的16:10 17.0英寸的Raider GE78继承了16:9 17.3英寸的2022年Raider GE77,升级了内部设备和一个全新的机箱设计。它配备了目前任何笔记本电脑型号上最强大的猛禽湖-H英特尔CPU和移动GeForce 40 GPU。微星GE系列在分类上仅次于更昂贵、更大的GT77 Titan系列。
SKU的范围从第13代酷睿i9-13950HX CPU、140WGeForce RTX 4070 GPU和1920 x 1200 165 Hz IPS显示屏到酷睿i9-13980HX、175W RTX 4090和2560 x 1600 240 Hz IPS显示屏,价格约4200美元。我们的具体审查单位是一个中端配置,配备酷睿i9-13950HX,175瓦RTX4080和1600p显示屏,价格约为3700美元。
GE78的竞争者包括其他高端17英寸游戏笔记本电脑,如 Razer Blade 17, 华硕ROG Strix Scar 17,阿利安人m17 R5, 或Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2.也有一个16.0英寸的版本,叫做Raider GE68。
更多MSI评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
88.3 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | 3 kg | 23 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
89.9 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 2.9 kg | 27 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
88.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 30.7 mm | 17.30" | 2560x1440 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2023 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | 3.5 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
86.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 3.1 kg | 25.9 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 | |
89.9 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | 2.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 17.30" | 3840x2160 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 复古-未来主义
根据微星的说法,上一个GE型号的设计优先考虑了极简主义与光滑的平面。为了给该系列带来一些风格,GE78的设计灵感来自8位游戏和80年代的美学。因此,最新的模型沿其后部加入了更多的曲线,并沿前部边缘重新设计了一个由单个LED RGB "像素 "组成的灯条。像素化的灯光与现代Ioniq 6的风格相似,后者本身也受到复古美学的启发。最终的结果是一个独特的外观,有助于在视觉上将GE78与市场上的其他游戏笔记本区分开来。然而,新的GE78是否比旧的GE77看起来更好,完全是一个品味问题。
建筑质量并没有因为所有的审美变化而退居二线。例如,新的铰链现在比GE77上的铰链更大、更牢固,因此它们可能会持续更长时间。事实上,它们看起来很像华硕Strix Scar系列的铰链。 华硕Strix Scar系列.机箱的刚性与GE77相似,吱吱作响的情况很少,只是在外盖上施加压力时有一点翘起。
由于GE78的骨架由更多的独立部件组成,而不是像Razer Blade这样典型的一体式设计,因此材料之间出现缝隙的可能性更高。这在后部和边缘尤其如此,我们可以注意到在我们的测试单元上,一侧的缝隙比另一侧略宽。这不是任何问题,但还是值得检查。
由于长宽比从16:9变为16:10,GE78的长度更短,但宽度更宽,占地面积比前代产品要大。然而,它仍然薄了几毫米,所以不要以为GE78只是因为其复古的美学设计而更厚。整体重量约为200克,比 雷蛇刀片17.
连接性--全方位的USB-C
与GE77相比,端口选项和定位都有变化。最值得注意的是,GE78将一个USB-A端口换成了第三个USB-C端口,因此现在机箱的每一侧都有一个USB-C端口。
不幸的是,这三个USB-C端口并不都是一样的。首先,Thunderbolt设备只能通过左边的USB-C端口支持。其次,它们的DisplayPort功能与MUX设置相联系。例如,当dGPU处于激活状态时,我们的DP外部显示器将只在沿着右边的USB-C端口上工作,而在左边或后面的USB-C端口上则无法工作。如果iGPU或混合GPU模式处于激活状态,我们的DP外部显示器将只在左侧边缘的USB-C端口上工作,而在后部或右侧边缘的USB-C端口上不工作。我们根本无法让DP在后部的USB-C端口上工作。
第三,微星宣传电力传输,但我们也无法使其工作。我们的设备无法通过USB-C充电,无论我们测试哪个端口或多少个USB-C适配器。
SD卡阅读器
考虑到GE78的高价格,集成SD读卡器的传输速率令人失望。将1GB的图片从我们的UHS-II测试卡移动到桌面上需要大约16秒,而在Razer Blade 17上只需要一半时间。 Razer Blade 17.
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI (Angelibird AV Pro V60) |
沟通
Killer AX1690i是Wi-Fi 6E和蓝牙5.3连接的标准配置。杀手模块基本上是一个重新命名的英特尔AX210/211,为游戏笔记本电脑优化。当与我们的华硕AXE11000 6 GHz测试路由器配对时,我们没有遇到问题。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US |
网络摄像头
GE78上集成的200万像素网络摄像头仍然是大多数游戏笔记本电脑的标准。其他一些制造商,如Razer,已经将其提高到500万像素,以获得更清晰的图像。
红外线和物理网络摄像头快门是标准配置,分别用于支持你好和增加隐私。
维护--比以前更难
底部面板由12颗飞利浦螺钉固定。按照微星的惯例,如果用户想拆下底板进行任何维修,必须打破 "工厂密封 "贴纸。
建议在拆卸底板时使用锋利的塑料边缘,因为边缘的锁扣可能相当紧。一旦取出,用户将可以直接接触到2个SODIMM插槽、2个M.2 SSD插槽、WLAN模块和电池。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件外,盒子里没有其他额外的东西。如果在美国购买,则适用标准的一年有限保修。
输入设备--更大、更精良
键盘
相比之下,微星对键帽和钥匙上的标签进行了改造。 键盘.按键反馈仍然很好,甚至比以前更好;特别是空格键和回车键,这次声音更大,点击更多,打字体验更令人满意。
方向键和数字键盘还需要一些改进。尽管有17英寸的大尺寸,但这些特定的按键却很小,很拥挤。相比之下,在联想 系列上的方向键和数字键盘就显得很小。 联想Legion 系列则更大、更宽敞。经常利用方向键的游戏,如赛车游戏,在微星系统上玩起来可能更困难。
每个键的RGB灯光效果由预装的SteelSeries GG软件控制,如下面的截图所示。该软件还控制着沿着机箱前缘的像素 "矩阵 "光条。
触摸板
点击板的尺寸已经从GE77的10.5 x 6.5厘米的微小表面区域扩大到GE78的13 x 8.2厘米,空间更大。然而,在塑料表面上的滑行比预期的更粘,因此在以较快速度滑行时,阻力略大。按压时的反馈很安静,但太浅太弱,总体感觉不尽人意。
显示器 - G-Sync支持在哪里?
GE78是我们数据库中第一个采用友达光电B170QAN01.2 IPS面板的笔记本电脑。然而,我们所有的内部测量显示,除了尺寸(17.0英寸对17.3英寸)、长宽比(16:10对16:9)和刷新率(240赫兹对120赫兹),它与去年GE77的友达光电B173ZAN06.1面板基本相同。核心属性,如宽广的P3色彩,快速的响应时间,400尼特的亮度,以及体面的对比度,在它们之间保持着类似的视觉体验。
也许该显示器最令人震惊的方面是它在我们特定的测试装置上糟糕的背光出血控制。正如下面的截图所示,特别是在播放有黑色边框的电影或玩某些游戏时,出光很明显。大多数IPS面板都会有一定程度的背光渗漏,但在我们的GE78这样的高端笔记本电脑上,这种渗漏太严重了。
|
Brightness Distribution: 89 %
Center on Battery: 398.6 cd/m²
Contrast: 867:1 (Black: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.05 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.02
ΔE Greyscale 6.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US AU Optronics B170QAN01.2, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 BOE NE170QDM-NZ1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI BOE0B69, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI B173ZAN06.C, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS AU Optronics B173ZAN06.1, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 AU Optronics B173ZAN06.9, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -16% | 0% | 1% | -1% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 97.6 | 69.1 -29% | 98.3 1% | 94.9 -3% | 96.6 -1% | 99.4 2% |
sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.7 0% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 99.8 0% | 100 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 86.5 | 69.8 -19% | 85.9 -1% | 92.4 7% | 85.8 -1% | 87.3 1% |
Response Times | -117% | -30% | -565% | -13% | -34% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 4.2 ? | 12 ? -186% | 5.3 ? -26% | 38.4 ? -814% | 5.8 ? -38% | 7.5 ? -79% |
Response Time Black / White * | 6.4 ? | 9.4 ? -47% | 8.6 ? -34% | 26.6 ? -316% | 5.6 ? 12% | 5.6 ? 12% |
PWM Frequency | 2380 ? | |||||
Screen | 27% | 27% | 77665% | -32% | 36% | |
Brightness middle | 398.6 | 417.3 5% | 327 -18% | 606 52% | 381 -4% | 503 26% |
Brightness | 384 | 387 1% | 320 -17% | 602 57% | 371 -3% | 486 27% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 87 -2% | 89 0% | 93 4% | 84 -6% | 84 -6% |
Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.42 9% | 0.38 17% | 0.0001 100% | 0.52 -13% | 0.44 4% |
Contrast | 867 | 994 15% | 861 -1% | 6060000 698862% | 733 -15% | 1143 32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.05 | 2.14 47% | 1.01 75% | 4.8 -19% | 1.08 73% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.68 | 4.09 53% | 4.01 54% | 8.2 6% | 4.54 48% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.02 | 0.42 59% | 0.41 60% | 1.8 -76% | 2.53 -148% | 0.6 41% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.5 | 3.1 52% | 1.6 75% | 6.5 -0% | 1.3 80% | |
Gamma | 2.11 104% | 2.19 100% | 2.168 101% | 2.63 84% | 2.151 102% | |
CCT | 7518 86% | 6040 108% | 6659 98% | 6596 99% | 6541 99% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -35% /
-3% | -1% /
13% | 25700% /
49847% | -15% /
-20% | 1% /
19% |
* ... smaller is better
显示屏默认设置为P3颜色,开箱即用。虽然颜色的准确性并不差,但该模型在出厂时并没有进行校准,不像在 微星创造者系列.我们建议应用我们上面的校准过的ICM配置文件,以便从面板上获得更准确的颜色,特别是由于它完全涵盖了sRGB和P3。我们能够用X-Rite色度计将平均灰度和色彩DeltaE值分别降至2和1.02。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
6.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 2.8 ms rise | |
↘ 3.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 16 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
4.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.9 ms rise | |
↘ 2.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
室外能见度与GE77大致相同。Titan GT77上的迷你LED面板泰坦GT77的迷你LED面板更亮1.5倍,户外可视性更好,但该模型本身比我们的GE78大得多。
性能 - 英特尔第13代+移动GeForce RTX 40
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们将我们的设备设置为极限性能模式、自动风扇模式、独立显卡模式和Windows最佳性能模式。令人讨厌的是,微星的电源模式并不与Windows同步,因此有可能同时将微星中心设置为极限性能模式和Windows设置为省电模式。
另一种风扇模式被称为Cooler Boost模式,它将风扇提高到最高转速,而不考虑屏幕上的活动。然而,这并不一定能提高性能,正如我们下面的压力测试部分所显示的。
请注意,在独立显卡模式下运行时,微星中心会自动将自己设置为极限性能模式,即使你告诉软件在平衡模式下运行。如果任何性能模式选项与当前的GPU选择不兼容,最好是简单地将其灰化,以避免混淆。
不支持高级优化,因此在独立GPU(MUX)和MS混合模式之间切换时,需要重新启动。内部显示器不支持G-Sync。
处理器
原始的CPU性能是任何笔记本电脑上最快的之一,不管是什么尺寸或制造商。第13代 酷睿i9-13950HX在我们的MSI中的性能将超过最新的Zen 4 Ryzen 9 7945HX在竞争的华硕ROG Strix G17 G713PI中,在多线程和单线程测试中的表现分别高达5%和15%。与之前的第12代产品相比,同比增长了 酷睿i9-12900HX在去年的GE77中也有很大的提升,达到45%。
尽管酷睿i9-13950HX可能令人印象深刻,但潜在买家可能仍然想考虑较小的 酷睿i9-13900HX配置,因为这两款处理器之间的性能差异仅在5%以内。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 -2! | |
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T -12! |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (8697 - 12648, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (742 - 816, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (3625 - 5227, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 | |
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (274 - 303, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 | |
Asus Strix GL753VD-GC045T |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (100 - 137, n=7) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (99351 - 127295, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (6445 - 7064, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (16776 - 21853, n=7) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (1805 - 2097, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (26 - 34.5, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (32.8 - 52.1, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 SE G733CX-LL014W | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (0.3823 - 0.4121, n=7) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (18131 - 28957, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (102591 - 144303, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (4981 - 7093, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (131931 - 140103, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (12381 - 17057, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (46539 - 71038, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (99981 - 204491, n=7) | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (1472 - 2069, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (9787 - 15573, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (40233 - 50864, n=7) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
系统性能
PCMark 10的结果一直领先于在上一代硬件上运行的GE77,特别是在数字内容分测试中,GPU的性能被看好。
我们的设备遇到了一个问题,它有时不能从睡眠中唤醒,然后每次都需要硬重启。这个问题似乎更经常发生在dGPU模式,而不是MS混合模式。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (7888 - 8771, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (11078 - 11488, n=2) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (8271 - 10474, n=2) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (14535 - 15221, n=2) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1592 - 1899, n=2) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1509 - 1846, n=2) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1780 - 2035, n=2) | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU (1342 - 1681, n=2) |
PCMark 10 Score | 8771 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (61938 - 78494, n=7) | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (62368 - 86207, n=7) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (59501 - 80441, n=7) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Average Intel Core i9-13950HX (84.4 - 99.5, n=7) | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签时,即使只设置为iGPU,也存在DPC问题。Nvidia已经承认其最新的图形驱动程序有一个错误,导致DPC延迟过高。
在我们长达1分钟的测试视频中,以60FPS播放4K视频是不完美的,有6个丢帧。重复测试不会改善我们的结果。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备--为PCIe5 SSD做好准备
我们的测试设备配备了一个 2TB三星PM9A1这是目前最快的PCIe4 x4 NVMe SSD之一。正如我们下面的DiskSpd循环结果所显示的那样,即使在压力下,该驱动器也能保持超过7000MB/s的传输率。这是可以预期的,因为GE78可以支持更快的PCIe5固态硬盘,一旦它们被广泛使用。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能 - 175W图形
该模型目前提供三个移动GPU选项: GeForce RTX 4070, 4080, 或 4090.从移动版4070跳到移动版4080将提高40%到60%的性能,而从移动版4080跳到移动版4090将只提高10%左右的性能。了解这三种移动GPU的相互比较,应该有助于决定购买哪种GE78配置。
我们的RTX 4080配置比移动RTX 3080 Ti的原始性能快30%至50%。 移动RTX 3080 Ti去年的GE77中的移动RTX 3080 Ti。如果标题支持DLSS 3,如《赛博朋克2077》,那么性能可以快2到3倍。我们建议查看我们的 关于移动RTX 4080的专门评论页面了解更多与移动GeForce 40系列相关的基准和比较。
移动RTX 4080不应直接与 桌面RTX 4080相比,后者明显更耗电,甚至快了约1.5倍。
3DMark 11 Performance | 44893 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 34260 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 18732 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating - Percent | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng -2! | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 -5! |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
SCHENKER Compact 17 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng |
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 | |
Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI | |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US | |
MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS | |
MSI Katana 17 B13VFK | |
SCHENKER XMG Core 15 (M22) | |
HP Omen 15-en0375ng | |
Corsair Voyager a1600 | |
Alienware m17 R5 (R9 6900HX, RX 6850M XT) |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 172.9 | 170 | 164.7 | 102.9 | 103.7 | 144.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 605.7 | 539.8 | 382.9 | 175.9 | 129.4 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 180.4 | 161.7 | 154.8 | 145.6 | 142.6 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 180.4 | 166.9 | 148.5 | 131.6 | 76.2 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 174.1 | 157.4 | 126.8 | 110 | ||
Strange Brigade (2018) | 324 | 272 | 267 | 258 | 237 | 121.5 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 149.2 | 142.6 | 136.8 | 135.8 | 88.6 | 40.2 |
F1 22 (2022) | 237 | 235 | 228 | 115.4 | 77.4 | 39 |
排放--一个响亮的游戏者
系统噪音
无论屏幕上的负载如何,内部风扇几乎总是处于活动状态。我们能够记录到24.2分贝(A)的安静嗡嗡声,而在省电模式下,安静的背景为23.4分贝(A)。如果进行网络浏览或视频流,风扇噪音通常会在25至31 dB(A)之间徘徊。它不够响亮,不会让人分心,但还是很明显的。竞争对手的机器,如Eluktronics Mech-17或华硕ROG Strix G17 G713PI也会有类似的表现。
在性能模式(或极限模式)下的游戏会引起略高于56 dB(A)的风扇噪音,当涉及到游戏笔记本电脑时,这是高端的光谱。例如,前面提到的Eluktronics和华硕笔记本,在类似的游戏负载下,运行时明显更安静,分别为51和46分贝(A)。
启用Cooler Boost模式,无论屏幕上的负载如何,都会将风扇转速提高到绝对极限,噪音水平接近60分贝(A)。然而,游戏性能不一定会更快,所以Cooler Boost模式更多的是关于温度控制而不是性能控制。我们在其他具有相同Cooler Boost功能的微星笔记本电脑上也有类似的观察。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.2 / 25.6 / 31 dB(A) |
Load |
| 43.3 / 59.1 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.4 dB(A) |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, R9 7945HX, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, i9-13950HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900HX, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, i9-12900H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | 1% | -7% | -15% | -3% | |
off / environment * | 23.4 | 25.2 -8% | 25 -7% | 24.6 -5% | 26 -11% | 26 -11% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.2 | 28 -16% | 26 -7% | 29.2 -21% | 26 -7% | 26 -7% |
Idle Average * | 25.6 | 28 -9% | 29 -13% | 29.2 -14% | 34 -33% | 27 -5% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 30.4 2% | 30 3% | 29.2 6% | 46 -48% | 32 -3% |
Load Average * | 43.3 | 41 5% | 46 -6% | 50.7 -17% | 50 -15% | 50 -15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 56.3 | 50.7 10% | 46 18% | 53.3 5% | 55 2% | 51 9% |
Load Maximum * | 59.1 | 52.6 11% | 47 20% | 61 -3% | 57 4% | 51 14% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
表面温度在微星GE和GT型号上通常不是问题,因为它们基本上是塑料和较厚的设计。例如,在GE78上玩游戏时,顶部和底部的平均表面温度约为32摄氏度,而在Razer Blade 17上则为43摄氏度至44摄氏度。 Razer Blade 17.
如下面的温度图所示,系统上的任何热点都是朝向机箱的后部,远离正面。因此,在打字或游戏时,手掌或手指不应感到不舒服的温度。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 30.5 °C / 87 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.6 °C / 76.3 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+4.3 °C / 7.7 F).
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 Intel Core i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI Intel Core i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU | MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS Intel Core i9-12900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 Intel Core i9-12900H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 1% | -5% | 5% | -33% | -24% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 37.4 | 39 -4% | 42 -12% | 40.6 -9% | 53 -42% | 50 -34% |
Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 44 2% | 41 9% | 41.1 9% | 58 -29% | 56 -24% |
Idle Upper Side * | 29.8 | 31 -4% | 33 -11% | 26.2 12% | 38 -28% | 36 -21% |
Idle Bottom * | 32.4 | 29.8 8% | 34 -5% | 30.3 6% | 43 -33% | 38 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,时钟频率和电路板功耗将分别提升到4.5 GHz和173 W,仅持续几秒钟或直到达到95 C的核心温度。此后,时钟频率和电路板功耗将稳步下降,直到分别稳定在大约3.7 GHz和144 W。核心温度将保持在非常高的91摄氏度,这意味着任何额外的处理器性能的空间都非常小。在Razer Blade 16上重复这个相同的测试Razer Blade 16使用类似的酷睿i9处理器,将导致更慢的平均时钟速率和更低的核心温度,分别为~3.2 GHz和82 C。英特尔第13代酷睿i9系列可能很快,但预计核心温度会全面偏高。
运行 Witcher 3代表典型的游戏负载,将导致稳定的GPU时钟频率、GPU温度和主板功耗分别为2430 MHz、73 C和156 W。如果启用Cooler Boost,结果将保持一致。如果配置更快的RTX 4090 GPU,我们预计电路板功耗将接近175 W。
在电池上运行限制了性能,这也在意料之中。Fire Strike 在电池上运行,物理学和图形学得分分别只有18881分和22232分,而在电源上运行时则为41339分和42663分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | GPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 45 | 37 |
Prime95压力 | 3.7 | -- | 91 | 53 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.4 - 3.7 | 960 - 2360 | 82 - 85 | 53 - 60 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~1.6 | 2430 | 93 | 73 |
发言人
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--高耗能的发力砖
消耗功率
现在的功耗甚至高于在上一代12代英特尔CPU和GeForce 30 GPU上运行的笔记本电脑,这些CPU和GPU的功耗开始时已经相当高了。例如,游戏将消耗286瓦,而GE77的消耗量为247瓦。然而,GeForce 40系列的每瓦特GPU性能仍然更好,所以至少在所有的事情上,消耗的上升是相对较小的。
在外部显示器上运行Prime95,在类似的负载下,比GE77多消耗32%的电力,原始处理器性能提升40%至45%。因此,在第12代和第13代Core-H系列之间跳跃时,CPU的每瓦性能只是勉强提高。
当CPU和GPU在Prime95和FurMark下同时受到压力时,我们能够从笨重的(约19.9 x 9.8 x 4.2厘米)330瓦交流适配器中记录到288瓦的临时最大消耗。与Razer不同,MSI还没有迁移到GaN充电,因此它的330W电源砖明显比Razer的330W解决方案更大、更重。
Off / Standby | 0.07 / 0.5 Watt |
Idle | 16.1 / 24 / 34 Watt |
Load |
123.6 / 285.7 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, IPS, 2560x1440, 17.3" | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, Mini-LED, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL22T0HBLB, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 1% | 15% | 2% | 5% | 6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 16.1 | 14 13% | 15 7% | 14 13% | 13 19% | 17 -6% |
Idle Average * | 24 | 19.3 20% | 20 17% | 21.6 10% | 19 21% | 23 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 34 | 36.8 -8% | 29 15% | 24.8 27% | 29 15% | 34 -0% |
Load Average * | 123.6 | 117.2 5% | 121 2% | 122.5 1% | 143 -16% | 120 3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 286 | 304 -6% | 179.8 37% | 265 7% | 247 14% | 229 20% |
Load Maximum * | 285.7 | 342.5 -20% | 246 14% | 418 -46% | 352 -23% | 243 15% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
考虑到内部苛刻的硬件,运行时间相当不错。在iGPU处于激活状态下的平衡电源配置文件中,我们能够获得超过6小时的真实世界WLAN浏览时间。竞争者如Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2或华硕ROG Strix G17 G713PI等竞争对手,在类似条件下,会分别缩短一到两个小时。
从空电到满电需要大约2.5小时,这比大多数超极本要多出整整一个小时。虽然微星说支持PD充电,但我们无法通过三个USB-C端口为我们的测试设备充电。
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Eluktronics Mech-17 GP2 i9-13900HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G17 G713PI R9 7945HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Laptop GPU, 90 Wh | MSI Titan GT77 HX 13VI i9-13950HX, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU, 99.9 Wh | MSI Raider GE77 HX 12UHS i9-12900HX, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 99.99 Wh | Razer Blade 17 Early 2022 i9-12900H, GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Laptop GPU, 82 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -16% | -33% | -8% | 20% | -8% | |
Reader / Idle | 439 | 590 34% | 428 -3% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 363 | 305 -16% | 255 -30% | 319 -12% | 324 -11% | 229 -37% |
Load | 89 | 58 -35% | 86 -3% | 122 37% | 103 16% | |
H.264 | 166 | 358 | 389 | 290 | ||
Witcher 3 ultra | 64 |
Pros
Cons
评语--卓越的同比性能提升
从性能上讲,GE78的性能较之于 显著提高。 只是功耗略高。然而,你必须获得RTX 4080或4090配置才能看到性能优势,因为RTX 4070的性能更接近于老款RTX 3080 Ti。
在设计方面,一些用户可能更喜欢老款GE77的16:9极简主义外观,而不是16:10复古风格的GE78,反之亦然。在美学方面,我们不会说一个比另一个好,但我们会把优势给GE78,因为它的铰链更强,按键和点击板更大。
在性能方面,微星GE78比GE77前进了一大步。然而,它的一些功能在竞争中是缺乏的,特别是当考虑到超过3000美元的价格范围。
希望我们所经历的问题在零售设备上并不普遍。从睡眠中醒来时的冻结、严重的光线渗漏和DPC延迟问题,这些问题不应该出现在像GE78这样昂贵的机型上。缺乏G-Sync、Advanced Optimus和更薄的GaN充电也是令人遗憾的,因为替代产品如 Razer Blade系列现在默认提供这些功能。
价格和可用性
微星GE78目前在亚马逊 和Newegg的有限SKU中发货。 更多的选择可能会在未来几周内出现。截至目前,只有RTX 4090 SKU有库存,价格为4000-4200美元。
MSI GE78HX 13VH-070US
- 03/21/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.