Apple iPad Air 5 2022年回顾。很多人赞成,很少有人反对
iPad Air,内部代号为iPad 13,16,是Apple'的中端平板电脑,定位在入门级iPad 9和高端iPad Pro 11" 3。Gen,由于他们去年在Pro中投入了非常多的M1芯片,后两者之间的差异越来越小。对于这一代,Pro的好处包括120赫兹的显示屏,Face ID,以及更好的摄像头。如果你觉得10英寸的外形尺寸太受限制,Apple ,他们较小的iPad Mini 6,较大的iPad Pro 12.9 with Mini LED display。
最受欢迎的非Apple Windows和Android 平板电脑是三星Galaxy Tab A8,Samsung Galaxy Tab S8 und S8+ vorgestellt: Die besten Android-Tablets für StudierendeGalaxy Tab S8,Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G Review: XXL-Android tablet with S Pen, but weaknesses in everyday useGalaxy Tab S7 FE,小米Pad 5,小米Pad 5 Pro,联想Tab M10 Plus,Surface Pro 8。我们要特别强调三星的Galaxy Tab系列,因为这些产品很突出,是iPad的主要竞争对手,三星在平板电脑市场上稳居第二(来源:Statista)。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
91.7 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Apple iPad Air 5 2022 M1, M1 8-Core GPU | 461 g | 6.1 mm | 10.90" | 2360x1640 | |
81 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 T618, Mali-G52 MP2 | 508 g | 6.9 mm | 10.50" | 1920x1200 | |
85.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G SD 750G 5G, Adreno 619 | 608 g | 6.3 mm | 12.40" | 2560x1600 | |
88.7 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro SD 870, Adreno 650 | 515 g | 6.85 mm | 11.00" | 2560x1600 | |
87.6 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2021 | Xiaomi Pad 5 SD 860, Adreno 640 | 511 g | 6.85 mm | 11.00" | 2560x1600 | |
83.4 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4 | 655 g | 7.9 mm | 11.00" | 2000x1200 | |
84.1 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Lenovo Tab P11 Plus Helio G90T, Mali-G76 MP4 | 490 g | 7.5 mm | 11.00" | 2000x1200 | |
76.8 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2019 | Lenovo Tab M10 SD 450, Adreno 506 | 480 g | 8.1 mm | 10.10" | 1920x1200 | |
88.5 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Apple iPad 2021 A13 Bionic, A13 Bionic GPU | 487 g | 7.5 mm | 10.20" | 2160x1620 | |
90.7 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2021 | Apple iPad Mini 6 A15, A15 GPU 5-Core | 297 g | 6.3 mm | 8.30" | 2266x1488 | |
92.6 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 M1, M1 8-Core GPU | 468 g | 5.9 mm | 11.00" | 2388x1668 | |
91.3 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1, M1 8-Core GPU | 682 g | 6.4 mm | 12.90" | 2732x2048 | |
90.7 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2020 | Apple iPad Air 4 2020 A14, A14 Bionic GPU | 458 g | 6.1 mm | 10.90" | 2360x1640 | |
89.1 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 891 g | 8.5 mm | 13.00" | 2880x1920 | |
88.5 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2021 | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 796 g | 8.5 mm | 12.30" | 2736x1824 |
案例
iPad Air 5的铝制外壳在2022年的型号中保持不变。和以前一样,我们发现一个高质量的一体成型的平板电脑,由回收的铝制成。与去年相比,唯一不同的是颜色,其中一些颜色略有变化。新的阵容包括太空灰、粉红色、紫色、蓝色和星光色。我们的评测模型采用的是新的紫色。
2022型号的厚度为6.1毫米(0.24英寸),与它的两个直接的 的前辈一样厚.不幸的是,摄像头继续从外壳上明显突出,伸出了高达2.1毫米(0.08英寸),导致用户在正面朝上放置在平坦的表面(如桌子)上时相当摇晃的体验。然而,这一点可以通过安装一个能补偿突出部分的外壳而完全消除。在重量上可以看到一个微小的差异,2022年的机型重量多了3克(0.11盎司),很可能是由于新的M1芯片的缘故。
建造质量很好,铝制表面不仅有很好的触摸和感觉,而且几乎不受指纹影响。在我们试图将其扭曲变形的过程中,该设备仍然完全无声,但在对显示屏施加压力时确实出现了轻微的扭曲。所有的面板缝隙都很紧密且一致。
与以前的设备一样,Apple,其重点是可持续性。除了回收的铝之外,新iPad Air的焊点还含有回收的锡,以及用于扬声器的回收稀土。包装盒由回收的木纤维和来自可持续管理的森林的新木材混合而成。截至目前,Apple ,仍计划在2030年实现100%的碳中和。
连接性
和以前一样,在连接方面,iPad Air 5仍然是一个坚定的极简主义者。该设备上唯一的端口是底部的USB-C端口和后部的魔术键盘智能连接器。虽然USB-C端口不幸不支持Thunderbolt协议,但根据Apple ,由于采用了M1芯片,其性能已经从5Gbps翻倍到10Gbps。与前代产品和专业系列一样,2022年的iPad Air也配备了著名的磁性无线充电端口,用于Apple Pencil 2。
用于连接有线耳机的3.5毫米音频插孔不见踪影,USB-C加密狗也没有出现。不过,这可以单独购买。
软件
在撰写本文时,我们的评测单元预装了iPadOS 15.4。由于快速的M1处理器和总共8GB的内存,我们预计会有很多年的更新。
和以前一样,iPadOS缺乏各种功能,而这些功能将使它更适合于专业用途,如一个完整的文件管理器或更多的多任务处理能力。反过来说,它是娱乐和媒体消费的理想选择。可用性是一件轻而易举的事,设备在任何时候都保持平稳。应用程序商店包含大量的iPad专用应用程序,与较大的iPad Pro 12.9或较小的iPad Mini不同,你可以期待应用程序针对iPad Air的显示屏尺寸和分辨率进行适当优化。
通信和GNSS
iPad Air 5的新功能之一是其可选的5G调制解调器(iPad Air型号A2589),不支持毫米波。我们的评测设备没有安装这种可选的5G调制解调器,因此没有蜂窝网络和GPS支持。作为回报,它的重量轻了几盎司,显然也便宜了不少。
内置的Wi-Fi调制解调器不支持目前的6GHz Wi-Fi 6E标准。因此,无线连接被限制在2.4和5GHz Wi-Fi 6与HT80和MIMO。蓝牙支持仅限于5.0版本。
虽然2022年的iPad Air在我们的Wi-Fi测试中的表现比它的前辈,即运行iOS 14的iPad Air 4略好,但仍有一些改进空间。微软的Surface Pro 8是一个典型的例子,说明在写这篇文章时有可能实现的。我们在无线信号的范围和质量方面没有问题,事实证明iPad Air在这方面是非常可靠的。
摄像机
在摄像头方面,只有正面的摄像头得到了升级。在后部,我们发现与之前完全相同的1200万像素的摄像头,光圈为f/1.8,这也是iPhone SE上的特色。据Apple ,iPad Air与iPhone SE和iPhone 8之间的唯一区别是,iPad的相机系统具有5个元素的镜头,而这两款iPhone的镜头由6个独立元素组成。我们发现该相机在日光下拍摄的照片还算不错,对于数字化文件来说也足够了。然而,就整体图像质量而言,它无法与更现代的iPhone相提并论,尤其是在光线变暗的情况下。
如上所述,前置摄像头已经升级,现在是我们已经知道的iPad Pro和iPad Mini的相同装置。它有一个1200万像素的传感器,光圈为f/2.4,有一个122°视场的超宽镜头。这允许中心舞台功能,在视频通话时跟随你,如果需要,可以自动放大和缩小。虽然这个功能在大多数情况下效果很好,但我们发现由于图像被裁剪,视频质量略显逊色。
在明亮的光线下,我们的测试和我们的色彩图表都被iPad Air的后置摄像头非常准确地捕捉到。
配件和保修
与目前的iPhone不同,iPad继续配备了一个充电器。不幸的是,它的额定功率只有20W,因此无法以31W的最大充电速率为平板电脑充电。
像所有Apple ,iPad Air 5有12个月的有限保修,包括电话支持。
输入设备和处理
iPad Air 5的电容式触摸屏非常快速和准确。然而,我们确实注意到iPad Air的60赫兹和iPad Pro的120赫兹显示屏之间的轻微差异。如果你喜欢不同于预装的键盘布局,Apple ,你可以在App Store中选择替代键盘。
集成在侧面电源按钮中的Touch ID,在我们的测试中感觉很好,工作无误。可靠性和性能都是一流的。然而,我们非常喜欢iPad Pro实施的Face ID,认为它更方便。
如果你是Apple Pencil的用户,你会发现它比iPad 8上的感觉更好。这支铅笔非常精确,完全适合做笔记和画草图。
显示
像许多其他方面一样,显示屏也保持不变。因此,我们发现同样的10.9英寸IPS面板以2360 x 1640像素的原始分辨率运行,最大亮度为500尼特。请记住,最大亮度取决于环境光线,我们只能在环境光线较暗的情况下,在100%的亮度下测量到最大444尼特。
iPad Air支持True Tone,它不仅可以通过内置的环境光传感器自动调节显示亮度,还可以调节色温,以实现平衡和理想的色彩表现。
在一个非常积极的方面,我们完全没有发现用于调节亮度的PWM的证据。
|
Brightness Distribution: 86 %
Center on Battery: 529 cd/m²
Contrast: 1430:1 (Black: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.35 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.183
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9" | Apple iPad 2021 IPS, 2160x1620, 10.2" | Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 IPS, 2388x1668, 11" | Apple iPad Air 4 2020 IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9" | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G LCD IPS, 2560x1600, 12.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Screen | -20% | -7% | -3% | -21% | |
Brightness middle | 529 | 507 -4% | 627 19% | 509 -4% | 619 17% |
Brightness | 490 | 491 0% | 598 22% | 486 -1% | 593 21% |
Brightness Distribution | 86 | 90 5% | 88 2% | 93 8% | 91 6% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.5 -35% | 0.44 -19% | 0.39 -5% | 0.22 41% |
Contrast | 1430 | 1014 -29% | 1425 0% | 1305 -9% | 2814 97% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.35 | 1.7 -26% | 1.6 -19% | 1.3 4% | 2.6 -93% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 2.45 | 3.9 -59% | 3.5 -43% | 2.8 -14% | 6.6 -169% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.1 | 2.4 -14% | 2.5 -19% | 2.2 -5% | 4 -90% |
Gamma | 2.183 101% | 2.25 98% | 2.25 98% | 2.21 100% | 2.17 101% |
CCT | 6939 94% | 6923 94% | 6969 93% | 6833 95% | 6973 93% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 99.3 |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
由于它的黑度很低,只有0.37尼特,所以显示屏的对比度非常好,接近1500:1。当然,只要你不把它与OLED面板或12.9版iPad Pro的Mini LED面板相比,它就无法与之竞争。
在禁用True Tone的情况下,我们发现iPad Air在MobileForge应用程序设置的sRGB色彩空间中的色彩准确性与它的前辈相当。换句话说:非常好。只有稍大的11英寸iPad Pro更准确。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.9 ms rise | |
↘ 14.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
24.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.6 ms rise | |
↘ 13.3 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 31 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
室外使用性总体上是不错的。然而,尽管它的反射水平相对较低,而且具有500尼特的高亮度,但在阳光直射下使用起来却相当有挑战性。与iPhone 13"高达830尼特 "的亮度相比。
正如IPS面板所预期的那样,iPad Air的可视角度非常好,亮度下降非常小,在极端角度有明显的红移。我们没有发现重影或背光渗出的证据。
业绩
得益于Apple"M1 SoC",iPad Air 5提供了足够的性能来应对你可能扔给它的所有东西,而且它还能够轻松超越其所有Android 竞争对手。与更昂贵的iPad Pro相比,性能是相同的,没有节流。
M1芯片带有四个效率核心(Icestorm)和四个性能核心(Firestorm)。它的最大时钟速度为3.2GHz,并配有一个Apple 开发的8核GPU,8GB的LPDDR4X统一内存,在CPU和GPU之间共享,以及一个16核的神经引擎,用于在照片中执行OCR。
在我们的CPU基准测试中,新iPad Air的表现与iPad Pro甚至采用相同M1芯片的MacBook Air几乎完全相同。因此,它的时钟很可能与这两者非常相似,如果不是完全相同的话。它的表现轻松地超过了所有Android ,甚至是搭载酷睿i7的Surface Pro 8。与它的直接前辈相比,它在Geekbench单核测试中表现略快,在多核测试中明显更快。
在我们的GPU测试中,它的表现与更昂贵的Pro机型也非常相似。鉴于它的表现超过了入门级的7核GPU MacBook Air M1,我们可以有把握地假设iPad Air上启用了所有8个GPU内核。2022年的iPad Air再次以显著的优势超过了它的直接前辈以及所有基于Android 的竞争对手。
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 | |
Average Apple M1 (4144 - 4997, n=5) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 | |
Apple iPad 2021 | |
Average of class Tablet (72 - 8889, n=71, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 | |
Average Apple M1 (60 - 120, n=6) | |
Average of class Tablet (14 - 144, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Apple iPad 2021 | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Average Apple M1 (557 - 670, n=6) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 | |
Apple iPad 2021 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (15 - 809, n=67, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 | |
Lenovo Tab M10 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 | |
Average Apple M1 (25.3 - 75, n=8) | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 | |
Apple iPad 2021 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (1.9 - 106.4, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
Average Apple M1 (60.9 - 81.7, n=9) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 | |
Apple iPad 2021 | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (0.9 - 114.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 | |
Average Apple M1 (40.1 - 102, n=8) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Apple iPad 2021 | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (3 - 120, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 |
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
Average Apple M1 (149 - 216, n=9) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 | |
Apple iPad 2021 | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro | |
Average of class Tablet (2.5 - 340, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 |
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
在我们的浏览器基准测试中,Apple ,由他们自己的内部Safari浏览器驱动的设备在很长一段时间内都是无比强大的,而2022年的iPad Air也不例外。使用新的iPad Air浏览网页是一种无比快乐和愉快的体验。
Jetstream 2 - Total Score | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry (Safari 15.1) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry (Safari 14.0.1) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 (Edge 95) | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1) | |
Average Apple M1 (175.4 - 191.3, n=8) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15) | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15) | |
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94) |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry (Safari 15.1) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry (Safari 14.0.1) | |
Average Apple M1 (402 - 436, n=7) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15) | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) |
WebXPRT 3 - Overall | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry (Safari 15.1) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry (Safari 14.0.1) | |
Average Apple M1 (216 - 304, n=8) | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 (Chrome 82) | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 | |
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus (Chrome 82) | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) |
Speedometer 2.0 - Result | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry (Safari 15.1) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry (Safari 14.0.1) | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15) | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15) | |
Average Apple M1 (209 - 265, n=8) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 (Edge 95) | |
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15) | |
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94) |
Octane V2 - Total Score | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 (Edge 95) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry (Safari 15.1.1) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry (Safari 14.0.1) | |
Average Apple M1 (62055 - 66974, n=8) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 (Safari 14.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1) | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15) | |
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total | |
Lenovo Tab M10 (Chrome 71.0.3578.99) | |
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 (Chrome93) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Lenovo Tab P11 Plus (Chrome 94) | |
Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G (Chrome91) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 (Chrome 96.0.4664.45) | |
Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro (Chrome 94.0.4606.85) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus (Chrome 82) | |
Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 (Chrome 82) | |
Apple iPad 2021 (Safari 15) | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 (Safari 15) | |
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry (Safari 14.0.1) | |
Apple MacBook Air 2020 M1 Entry (Safari 15.1) | |
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 (Safari 14.1) | |
Average Apple M1 (418 - 516, n=8) | |
Apple iPad Air 4 2020 (Safari Mobile 14) | |
Apple iPad Mini 6 (Safari 15) |
* ... smaller is better
和以前一样,入门级SKU配备了64GB的存储空间。在我们的PassMark基准测试中,它管理着514 MB/s的读取和221 MB/s的写入性能,因此明显慢于128 GB入门级iPad Pro(900 / 467 MB/s),但比64 GB iPhone 11 Pro Max(388 / 58 MB/s)略快。
游戏
其快速的GPU将iPad Air 5变成一个性能出色的游戏设备。我们找不到任何一款游戏受到iPad Air GPU的限制,大多数游戏在整个测试过程中都以60 FPS的速度运行。PUBG是一个明显的例外,因为它即使在最低设置下也被限制在只有40 FPS。
Geekbench ML | |
0.5 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 | |
Average Apple M1 (2601 - 2743, n=3) | |
0.5 TensorFlow Lite GPU | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 | |
Average Apple M1 (2855 - 2868, n=3) | |
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years) | |
0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5 | |
Average Apple M1 (945 - 1041, n=3) | |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 | |
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years) |
排放
噪声排放
和以前一样,iPad Air是被动冷却的,没有风扇。因此,它在负载下不会发出任何噪音,而且我们也没有发现线圈啸叫或其他电气噪音的证据。
温度
其强大的M1 SoC通过空气的表面温度让人感觉到。2022年机型的最高温度为35℃,比前代机型略高。尽管如此,Air的表面温度仍然在可接受的范围内,远未达到临界值。
你为这些低温付出的代价是在持续负载下的热节流。在我们的3DMark Wild Life压力测试中可以看到,在第一次运行后,性能明显下降,并在总共五次迭代后继续下降,在测试的剩余时间内保持一致。请记住,即使在热节流的情况下,2022年的iPad Air也比其没有节流的前辈表现好得多。
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
发言人
扬声器保持不变,尽管设备上总共有四个扬声器格栅,但iPad Air 5继续采用与前代完全相同的立体声扬声器设置。虽然iPad Pro的四个扬声器表现得更加出色,但整体声音表现非常均衡。它们也不像iPad Air的那样容易用手遮挡。
如果你打算使用耳机,你可以通过蓝牙无线连接或通过iPad Air的USB-C端口有线连接。iPad Air没有耳机插孔。如果你想把传统耳机连接到iPad Air上,你需要一个USB-C加密狗来实现。
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 9% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 89% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 87% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad 2021 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 7.7% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 32% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
尽管有强大的M1处理器,但Air的耗电量与前代产品相当。唯一的差异是新Air的关机功耗和待机功耗高得多(见图)。
Off / Standby | 1.07 / 0.25 Watt |
Idle | 1.65 / 8.1 / 9.4 Watt |
Load |
9.5 / 10.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G 10090 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 8600 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 5 8720 mAh | Lenovo Yoga Tab 11 7700 mAh | Lenovo Tab P11 Plus 7700 mAh | Lenovo Tab M10 4850 mAh | Apple iPad 2021 8686 mAh | Apple iPad Mini 6 5177 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 7538 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 mAh | Apple iPad Air 4 2020 mAh | Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 mAh | Microsoft Surface Pro 7 Plus mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 31% | 22% | 30% | 32% | 50% | 47% | 42% | 7% | 36% | 21% | -16% | 8% | -211% | -215% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.65 | 1.19 28% | 1.06 36% | 1.14 31% | 0.99 40% | 1.2 27% | 1.4 15% | 0.98 41% | 1.3 21% | 1.1 33% | 1.01 39% | 1.8 -9% | 1.3 21% | 3.9 -136% | 5.5 -233% |
Idle Average * | 8.1 | 4.63 43% | 6.25 23% | 4.3 47% | 4.2 48% | 1.5 81% | 1.6 80% | 4.45 45% | 7.5 7% | 2.2 73% | 6.2 23% | 9.6 -19% | 7.89 3% | 8.5 -5% | 9.1 -12% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.4 | 4.68 50% | 6.3 33% | 4.31 54% | 4.22 55% | 1.9 80% | 1.9 80% | 4.51 52% | 7.58 19% | 4.2 55% | 6.23 34% | 9.8 -4% | 7.91 16% | 9.8 -4% | 10.8 -15% |
Load Average * | 9.5 | 7.27 23% | 8.76 8% | 8.09 15% | 7.88 17% | 4.9 48% | 5.3 44% | 5.78 39% | 10.03 -6% | 6.7 29% | 8.99 5% | 12.2 -28% | 9.28 2% | 48 -405% | 39.2 -313% |
Load Maximum * | 10.4 | 9.17 12% | 9.54 8% | 10.32 1% | 10.63 -2% | 8.8 15% | 8.7 16% | 7.18 31% | 10.91 -5% | 11.4 -10% | 9.89 5% | 12.6 -21% | 10.78 -4% | 63 -506% | 62.5 -501% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.5 |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Power Consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
电池寿命
与Air的上一代产品相比,强大的M1芯片使电池寿命略有下降,特别是在负载(游戏)下,电池持续时间明显缩短。请记住,2022年的Air的性能回报要高得多。一些游戏可以进行调整以延长电池寿命,例如通过限制最大帧率,而其他游戏则需要降低显示亮度,以优化电池寿命。后者在我们的Wi-Fi测试中变得非常明显,设备在全亮度下只运行了一半的时间。考虑到电池寿命没有什么可写的,iPad Air只能把Surface Pro 8推到一边,而它的大多数Android 竞争对手都围着它跑。然而,在现实世界中,这一点被证明是不太重要的,因为电池仍然能够持续足够长的时间,只需要每隔几天就充电一次。
Apple iPad Air 5 2022 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab A8 2022 7040 mAh | Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 FE 5G 10090 mAh | Xiaomi Pad 5 Pro 8600 mAh | Apple iPad 2021 8686 mAh | Apple iPad Pro 11 2021 7538 mAh | Apple iPad Air 4 2020 mAh | Microsoft Surface Pro 8, i7-1185G7 mAh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -1% | 49% | 24% | 14% | 22% | 34% | -50% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 646 | 679 5% | 1020 58% | 921 43% | 805 25% | 819 27% | 702 9% | 456 -29% |
Load | 245 | 230 -6% | 342 40% | 255 4% | 253 3% | 286 17% | 388 58% | 70 -71% |
Reader / Idle | 1973 | 2485 | 3013 | 2292 | 2278 | 2039 | ||
H.264 | 824 | 1249 | 1009 | 898 | 932 | 671 | 604 |
使用附带的20W充电器,iPad Air可以在2:32小时内从接近空的状态充到满的状态。使用更强大的充电器将使iPad Air的充电功率达到32.4瓦,我们使用MacBook Pro 16 M1 Pro的140瓦电源代替,总共能够节省21分钟。
Pros
Cons
判决--M1的力量正在于此
通过将M1 SoC集成到iPad AirApple ,成功缩小了Air和Pro之间的差距。整体性能非常好,应该可以持续很多年。在撰写本文时,几乎没有任何应用程序将M1推到极限。与Magic Keyboard和Pencil 2搭配,iPad Air可以用来做很多事情,而不仅仅是媒体消费。然而,iPadOS的局限性和小显示屏仍然适用。
其余的硬件和以往一样好。外壳、显示屏和扬声器几乎没有任何瑕疵。
在Apple 更新iPad Pro(M2?)之前,2022年的iPad Air可能是许多用户的更好选择。Pro的120赫兹显示屏可能略微更流畅,Face ID可能更方便,扬声器可能更好一点,但在一天结束时,价格会产生差异。在光谱的另一边是新的iPad 9,与之相比,2022年的iPad Air完全是另一个级别。它的Android 竞争对手也是如此,iPad Air不费吹灰之力就超越了这些竞争对手,同时还提供了一个更好的软件生态系统。作为回报,你会失去一些灵活性(如:围墙花园)。
如果你倾向于使用Android ,我们建议仔细看看小米Pad 5 Pro,Pad 5,华为MatePad 11,以及三星Galaxy Tab S7 FE。这些都是我们的 顶级列表中目前最好的基于Android 的平板电脑 。
Apple iPad Air 5 2022
- 03/25/2022 v7 (old)
Klaus Hinum