Notebookcheck Logo

Apple iPad Pro 12.9（2022）评测。巨大的平板电脑现在使用M2 SoC运行Apple

纤细的动力平板电脑。

Apple 已经给其最大的平板电脑进行了温和的升级，并采用了新的M2处理器。然而，其他改进却少之又少。阅读我们的评论，了解还有哪些新东西，以及升级到新平板电脑是否值得。
Apple iPad iPad Pro Touchscreen Tablet

Apple iPad Pro 12.9将事情提升到一个新水平。它拥有12.9英寸的显示屏，不仅因为其巨大的尺寸，而且因为所使用的迷你LED技术，它是一个罕见的产品。再加上可选的键盘和手写笔，这款平板电脑就变成了一台创意机器，而Apple M2处理器而M2处理器则让大多数笔记本电脑望尘莫及。然而，所有这些都是有代价的，随着新版本的推出，这个代价也在增加。

这里评论的是最便宜的入门级型号，没有移动连接，价格为1,099美元。所有的价格和存储变体，现在最高为2TB，可在下表中找到。

存储设备 价格(WLAN型号) 价格(带蜂窝调制解调器)
128 GB US$1,099 US$1,299.00
256 GB US$1,199 US$1,399.00
512 GB US$1,399 US$1,599
1.024 GB US$1,799 US$1,999
2.048 GB US$2,199 US$2,399
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (iPad Pro Series)
Processor
Apple M2 8 x 2.4 - 3.5 GHz
Graphics adapter
Apple M2 10-Core GPU
Memory
8 GB 
Display
12.90 inch 4:3, 2732 x 2048 pixel 265 PPI, capacitive, Liquid Retina XDR Display, Mini-LED, 1.8% reflectivity, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
128 GB NVMe, 128 GB 
, 112.9 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB-C, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Face ID, LiDAR-Scaner, Three-axis gyro, Accelerometer, Barometer
Networking
Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.3, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 6.4 x 280.6 x 214.9
Battery
40.88 Wh, 10702 mAh Lithium-Polymer, 10702
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple iPadOS 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 12 MPix (f/1.8) + 10 MPix (f/2.4, 125°), Sapphire crystal lens cover, 4k-Video
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (f/2.4, 122°), Full HD video
Additional features
Speakers: Quad, Keyboard: Onscreen, USB-C-Cabel, 20W-Charger, Sticker, 12 Months Warranty, HDR: HLG, HDR10, Dolby Vision, fanless
Weight
682 g, Power Supply: 70 g
Price
1449 Euro
Links
Apple homepage
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
91.8 %
v7 (old)
11 / 2022
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2, M2 10-Core GPU		682 g6.4 mm12.90"2732x2048
88.3 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730		572 g5.7 mm12.40"2800x1752
91.3 %
v7 (old)
06 / 2021
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1, M1 8-Core GPU		682 g6.4 mm12.90"2732x2048
89.1 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
SD 870, Adreno 650		565 g5.6 mm12.60"2560x1600
88.8 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2021
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Kirin 9000E, Mali-G78 MP22		609 g6.7 mm12.60"2560x1600

外壳--几乎和六个iPhone 14 Pro(s)一样大

尽管尺寸巨大，但Apple iPad Pro 12.9（2022）采用了纤细的一体式设计，手感良好。虽然它是对比领域中最重的平板电脑，但它并不像规格表上显示的那样笨重。有趣的是：它的显示面积几乎与6英寸的屏幕一样大。iPhone 14的优点.

制造质量是一流的。铝是一种触觉平坦的材料，对指纹不敏感。缝隙紧密而均匀。当受到扭转压力时，平板电脑会略微屈服，并发出轻微的吱吱声，但仍给人以稳定的印象。

iPad Pro 12.9不具备任何防尘或防水的认证。不幸的是，在可持续性方面，第六代产品没有显示出任何改进。Apple 可持续发展报告 ，显示能源效率下降，2TB型号的碳足迹比前代产品大，但所有其他存储版本的碳足迹较低。与iPad 10 ，这里也使用了再生金。

尺寸对比：iPad Pro 12.9（2022）与iPhone 14 Pro的对比

尺寸比较

❌
286.5 mm 184.7 mm 6.7 mm 609 g285.6 mm 184.5 mm 5.6 mm 565 g285 mm 185 mm 5.7 mm 572 g280.6 mm 214.9 mm 6.4 mm 682 g280.6 mm 214.9 mm 6.4 mm 682 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 -Apple 带有Thunderbolt 3 / USB 4的平板电脑

Apple 已经离开设备的去年的型号的设备，这已经是非常高的质量，没有被触及。这包括一个USB 4接口，它也支持Thunderbolt 3，因此数据传输率高达40 GBit/s，以及有线图像输出。

蓝牙5.3是一个新的补充，Apple 平板电脑现在也支持Wi-Fi 6E。可选的键盘可以连接到背面的智能连接器上，该连接器以磁力锁定到iPad Pro上。铅笔（第二代）可以通过右长侧的磁性表面连接和充电。

顶部：扬声器，2个麦克风，扬声器，电源
顶部：扬声器，2个麦克风，扬声器，电源
左边：话筒
左边：话筒
右边：音量，磁性连接器
右边：音量，磁性连接器
底部：扬声器、USB4/Thunderbolt、扬声器
底部：扬声器、USB4/Thunderbolt、扬声器

软件--iPadOS仍无法取代macOS

第六代Apple iPad Pro 12.9配备了iPadOS 16.1。在我们评测期间，我们的评测样本收到了16.1.1版本的错误修复更新。该移动操作系统仍然不是macOS的适当替代品。即使Apple 喜欢声称该平板电脑是成熟的笔记本替代品，但这可能只在少数情况下是真的，特别是在生产性工作中。这里的一个例外当然是创意方面，用笔和触摸屏比用笔记本电脑更流畅。我们喜欢Stage Manager进入iPad的事实。

目前的iPadOS继续做到没有臃肿的软件，iPad Pro 12.9应该在很长一段时间内提供更新。虽然Apple ，但我们预计至少有五年的软件更新。

通信与GNSS - 适用于iPad Pro 12.9的6GHz WiFi

Apple iPad Pro 12.9（2022）的一个新功能是支持Wi-Fi 6E，因此也支持WLAN的6GHz网络。这也与我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器配合使用，但传输速率远未达到预期。这在较小的iPad Pro 11.

可以选择具有广泛频率范围和5G的蜂窝模块，它可以使用nano-SIM或eSIM。

Networking
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
442 (min: 222) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
486 (min: 175) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
747 (min: 145) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
702 (min: 225) MBit/s ∼44%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
831 (min: 779) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
896 (min: 774) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1797 (min: 920) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1598 (min: 1441) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
iperf3 transmit AX12
722 (min: 678) MBit/s ∼41%
iperf3 receive AX12
780 (min: 699) MBit/s ∼62%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
719 (min: 644) MBit/s ∼87%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
851 (min: 475) MBit/s ∼95%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 transmit AX12
1750 (min: 878) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
1250 (min: 1126) MBit/s ∼100%
095190285380475570665760855950104511401235133014251520161517101805Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø747 (145-917)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1767 (920-1830)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø694 (225-834)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1598 (1441-1641)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø442 (222-528)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø830 (779-861)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø486 (175-591)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø896 (774-935)

WLAN模型不使用GNSS进行定位。相反，Apple 平板电脑使用Wi-Fi、数字罗盘和iBeacon微定位来确定自己的位置。然而，这对于导航任务或路线指引来说是不够的。

GNSS试骑：环湖航行
GNSS试骑：环湖航行
GNSS试骑：循环
GNSS试骑：循环
GNSS试骑：总结
GNSS试骑：总结

摄像机 - 4k ProRes并非适用于所有机型

与iPad Pro 12.9的自拍（2022）。
与iPad Pro 12.9的自拍（2022）。

Apple iPad Pro 12.9的前置摄像头具有12MPix的超广角（122°），支持智能HDR 4，可以每秒60帧的速度录制全高清视频。我们喜欢这些记录，它们很适合用于视频会议。

背面是一个双摄像头，由一个1200万像素的广角和一个1000万像素的超广角传感器组成。白平衡相当温暖，照片在近距离内非常连贯和平衡。细节被很好地保留下来，没有通过后期锐化被过度放大。然而，在全景拍摄或远处的物体时，动态效果急剧下降，噪声在黑暗的图像区域变得明显。超广角在边缘处变得有些模糊，景深也相当弱。由于这款平板电脑不是典型的摄影伴侣，给定的性能是绰绰有余的，并再次得到LiDAR扫描仪的补充。

视频以超高清录制，最高可达60 FPS，甚至可以用Apple's ProRes（最高4k，30 FPS）。那些想使用Intaframe格式的视频材料的人应该记住，这个功能在128GB型号中只在1,080p（30 FPS）的有限范围内工作。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraUltra wide angle5x zoomLow light

在受控的照明条件下，iPad Pro 12.9的主摄像头的特点是相对自然的色彩再现，没有显示出重大的异常值。白平衡是相当温暖的，就像在日常生活中一样。黑色被强烈提亮，看起来更像灰色。

测试图在中间被强烈地锐化，显示出很多细节，但在接近边缘时变得更加模糊。

ColorChecker
2.2 ∆E
3.7 ∆E
2.5 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
3.5 ∆E
6.9 ∆E
4.8 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
8.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022: 5.06 ∆E min: 2.11 - max: 9.82 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.6 ∆E
55.1 ∆E
39.8 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
45.6 ∆E
62 ∆E
53.5 ∆E
36.1 ∆E
44.2 ∆E
29 ∆E
64.7 ∆E
64.1 ∆E
31.5 ∆E
47.1 ∆E
37.8 ∆E
76 ∆E
44.6 ∆E
42 ∆E
93.7 ∆E
71 ∆E
52.5 ∆E
36.9 ∆E
23.8 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022: 47.05 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 93.69 ∆E

配件和保修 - 电缆现在密封在织物中

交付范围保持不变，包括一个模块化的20瓦电源适配器（USB-C）和一条织物覆盖的USB-C电缆。第二代Pencil手写笔可选，售价129.99美元，Magic Keyboard售价349.99美元。Apple ，还提供保护套、更强大的电源适配器等。

Apple 为iPad Pro提供12个月的保修，这并不影响零售商的保修（保修本身取决于国家/地区--购买前一定要向供应商咨询）。

还提供了Care+保险套餐。这需要一次性支付149.00美元（两年）或每月7.99美元的费用，包括在意外损坏情况下的无限次维修。每次事故的服务费为：iPad 49美元，Apple Pencil或Apple 品牌的iPad键盘29美元，外加适用税。

输入设备和操作 - 带Face ID的iPad

iPad Pro 12.9（2022）的巨大电容式触摸屏具有非常好的滑行性能，可以在所有区域快速、准确地实现输入。该面板还支持钢笔输入，这需要第二代Apple Pencil，只需与平板电脑配对，并通过夹在磁性连接器上充电。尽管到目前为止这还不是什么新鲜事，但现在即使铅笔悬浮在显示屏上方，面板也能识别它。

与较小的iPad Pro 11的一大区别是预装的键盘布局。这有更多的按键，这使得在大型iPad Pro上打字更加舒适，即使没有可选的键盘。

三维的Face ID面部识别可用于生物识别安全。这一点效果很好，但当Apple 平板电脑以横向模式持有时，必要的传感器往往被覆盖。

显示屏 - 准确的迷你LED面板在iPad Pro 2022年

子像素网格
子像素网格

与去年的机型相比，iPad Pro 12.9的显示屏没有发生根本性的变化 。Apple ，继续部署高分辨率的迷你LED面板，其工作刷新率高达120赫兹，并使用超过10,000个迷你LED，用于2596个局部调光区。

亮度分布非常均匀，在环境光传感器激活的情况下，可提供611cd/m²（SDR）的平均数值。那些喜欢手动调节的人，则有高达588cd/m²的亮度可供他们使用。在亮区和暗区均匀分布的情况下（APL18），这个数值为625 cd/m²。当显示HDR内容时，应该可以达到1600cd/m²，但我们无法从面板上提取这个数字。

在示波器下，我们观察到一个持续的高频闪烁。那些对脉冲宽度调制非常敏感的人在较长时间的使用中可能会有抱怨。否则，它不应该证明是有问题的，但它确实使我们难以测量响应时间。事实证明，这些时间是相当高的，OLED在这方面仍然有明显的优势。另一方面，正如通过显微镜进行的慢动作观察所显示的那样，不存在时间上的抖动。

608
cd/m²		612
cd/m²		621
cd/m²
609
cd/m²		611
cd/m²		613
cd/m²
573
cd/m²		591
cd/m²		606
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Liquid Retina XDR Display tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 621 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 604.9 cd/m² Minimum: 1.09 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 92 %
Center on Battery: 611 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
100% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.22
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
Mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.9"		Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Super AMOLED, 2800x1752, 12.4"		Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
IPS mini-LED, 2732x2048, 12.9"		Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
AMOLED, 2560x1600, 12.6"		Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
OLED, 2560x1600, 12.6"
Screen
-34%
-18%
-44%
-21%
Brightness middle
611
459
-25%
620
1%
552
-10%
383
-37%
Brightness
605
462
-24%
612
1%
555
-8%
390
-36%
Brightness Distribution
92
97
5%
96
4%
97
5%
94
2%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.4
2.2
-57%
1.8
-29%
3.43
-145%
2.1
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.3
4.9
-48%
4.9
-48%
7.25
-120%
3.7
-12%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.3
3.6
-57%
3.1
-35%
2
13%
2.1
9%
Gamma
2.22 99%
2.09 105%
2214 0%
2.253 98%
2.14 103%
CCT
6930 94%
6558 99%
6892 94%
6417 101%
6258 104%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 6401 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 6401 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 6401 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最小显示亮度
分钟。
25%的显示亮度
25%
50%的显示亮度
50%
75%的显示亮度
75%
最大显示亮度
100%

在固定的变焦水平和不同的亮度设置下进行的一系列测量

我们的平板电脑的色彩表现甚至比前代产品更准确。颜色没有出现任何可以用肉眼看到的偏差，而白平衡只是在关闭真实色调功能的情况下有点太冷。使用 "真实色调 "时，显示效果要暖和得多，但遗憾的是没有更准确。

灰度（禁用真实色调，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
灰度（禁用真实色调，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
颜色（禁用真实色调，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
颜色（禁用真实色调，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
色彩空间（禁用True Tone，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
色彩空间（禁用True Tone，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
饱和度（禁用真实色调，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。
饱和度（禁用真实色调，目标色彩空间：sRGB）。

Display Response Times

ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
   ↔    Response Time Black to White
37.53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16 ms rise
↘ 21.53 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
   ↔    Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14.8 ms rise
↘ 19.5 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Apple iPad Pro 12.9在户外给人留下良好印象，通常很容易阅读。然而，在阳光明媚的夏日，情况可能会有所不同，因为虽然亮度不错，但它没有提供足够的储备。抗反射涂层将反射明显控制在一定范围内。

户外活动
户外活动
在阴天的时候
在阴天的时候

iPad Pro 12.9中的迷你LED显示屏的可视角度稳定性非常好。即使在非常平坦的视角下，也几乎没有任何亮度损失，颜色也没有出现任何反转。我们在评测样本中也没有观察到任何光晕。

Apple iPad Pro 12.9（2022）的视角稳定性
Apple iPad Pro 12.9（2022）的视角稳定性

性能 - 带有Apple M2的iPad Pro

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2022)采用的是Apple M2 SoC并有8GB的内存。选择1TB或2TB版本的人甚至可以得到16GB的内存。这意味着，Apple 平板电脑在名义上具有与 MacBook Air或 MacBook Pro.

这在基准测试中的纯CPU性能方面得到了证实，因为iPad Pro 12.9在Geekbench中取得了与这两台笔记本电脑相同的结果。与前辈的M1相比，这意味着性能提高了百分之十一（单核）和百分之十六（多核）。

与Android 竞争对手相比，iPad Pro在所有领域都处于不同的水平。在存储速度方面，写入率有很大提高。

Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v9 | CrossMark | Geekbench ML | PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V10
Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Apple M2 (1887 - 1953, n=8)
1914 Points +1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
1890 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
1710 Points -10%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
1182 Points -37%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
955 Points -49%
Average of class Tablet (140 - 1887, n=71, last 2 years)
707 Points -63%
Multi-Core
Average Apple M2 (8491 - 8994, n=8)
8812 Points +3%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
8524 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
7378 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
3293 Points -61%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
3215 Points -62%
Average of class Tablet (312 - 8624, n=71, last 2 years)
2496 Points -71%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
1416727 Points
Average Apple M2 (1257986 - 1416727, n=2)
1337357 Points -6%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
1186706 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
821646 Points -42%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
707685 Points -50%
Average of class Tablet (92766 - 1286774, n=49, last 2 years)
464403 Points -67%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
1584 Points
Average Apple M2 (1437 - 1585, n=9)
1515 Points -4%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
1283 Points -19%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
999 Points -37%
Average of class Tablet (172 - 1944, n=63, last 2 years)
772 Points -51%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
732 Points -54%
Geekbench ML
0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
1245 Points
Average Apple M2 ()
1245 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
1041 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years)
374 Points -70%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
3383 Points
Average Apple M2 ()
3383 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
2855 Points -16%
Average of class Tablet (last 2 years)
177 Points -95%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
3150 Points
Average Apple M2 ()
3150 Points 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
2611 Points -17%
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V10
System
Average Apple M2 (41712 - 42909, n=2)
42311 Points +1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
41712 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
36884 Points -12%
Average of class Tablet (3594 - 55399, n=9, last 2 years)
21378 Points -49%
CPU Tests
Average Apple M2 (16881 - 18385, n=2)
17633 Points +4%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
16881 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
15535 Points -8%
Average of class Tablet (12398 - 25779, n=9, last 2 years)
9156 Points -46%
Memory Tests
Average Apple M2 (58833 - 79227, n=2)
69030 Points +17%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
58833 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
52461 Points -11%
Average of class Tablet (6750 - 108912, n=9, last 2 years)
39769 Points -32%
Disk Tests
Average of class Tablet (17301 - 209783, n=9, last 2 years)
88016 Points +181%
Average Apple M2 (31327 - 36785, n=2)
34056 Points +9%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
31327 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
23674 Points -24%
2D Graphics Tests
Average of class Tablet (7974 - 117743, n=9, last 2 years)
48507 Points +16%
Average Apple M2 (41679 - 44801, n=2)
43240 Points +4%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
41679 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
37702 Points -10%
3D Graphics Tests
Average of class Tablet (13144 - 61417, n=8, last 2 years)
29547 Points +30%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
22812 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
22578 Points -1%
Average Apple M2 (19092 - 22812, n=2)
20952 Points -8%
Storage Write
Average of class Tablet (444 - 3540, n=4, last 2 years)
2018 MB/s +121%
Average Apple M2 (914 - 2974, n=3)
1603 MB/s +75%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
914 MB/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
394 MB/s -57%
Storage Read
Average of class Tablet (879 - 1151, n=4, last 2 years)
953 MB/s +5%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
905 MB/s
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
901 MB/s 0%
Average Apple M2 (856 - 905, n=3)
880 MB/s -3%

Legend

 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Qualcomm Adreno 730, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 Apple M1, Apple M1 8-Core GPU, 128 GB NVMe
 
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 650, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 HiSilicon Kirin 9000E, ARM Mali-G78 MP22, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
 
Average Apple M2
 
Average of class Tablet

芯片 Apple M2 GPU确保了强大的性能，在3DMark中比前代产品提高了38%，在GFXBench中提高了55%。这主要是由于增加了两个核心。

3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal: offscreen Overall Score
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6909 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
4975 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2493 Points -64%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1805 Points -74%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1225 Points -82%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6919 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
5035 Points -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2473 Points -64%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1863 Points -73%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1232 Points -82%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
25317 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
18303 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8798 Points -65%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6399 Points -75%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4199 Points -83%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
120 fps 0%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
120 fps
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -1%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -49%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
873 fps
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
588 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
334 fps -62%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
232 fps -73%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
226 fps -74%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
120 fps
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
115 fps -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -25%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78 fps -35%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps -49%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
494 fps
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
318 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
163 fps -67%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
154 fps -69%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
132 fps -73%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
115 fps
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
74 fps -36%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps -49%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -50%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -57%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
340 fps
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
227 fps -33%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
121 fps -64%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -67%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
95 fps -72%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
89 fps
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
55.3 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
43 fps -52%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
41 fps -54%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -66%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
214 fps
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
150 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
72 fps -66%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -70%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -73%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
70 fps
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
43.7 fps -38%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -54%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -57%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps -71%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
90 fps
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
63 fps -30%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
37 fps -59%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -66%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -76%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
89 fps
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
67 fps -25%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -51%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps -51%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -64%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
241 fps
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe
177 fps -27%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
92 fps -62%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 fps -68%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
Adreno 650, SD 870, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -76%
Basemark ES 3.1 / Metal / Overall Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
9739 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
Mali-G78 MP22, Kirin 9000E, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2673 Points -73%

Basemark GPUScore

0102030405060708090100110120Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø96 (59.5-120.1)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø68 (41.7-86.3)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø67.4 (40.5-82.4)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 M1 8-Core GPU, M1, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: The Expedition; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø47.4 (28.2-60)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: Sacred Path; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.1 : Ø36.6 (31-48.7)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; GPUScore: Sacred Path; Official Native; 1.0.1 : Ø33.6 (26.6-45.3)

对于Apple 平板电脑来说，网络浏览是第二性的，即在日常使用中流畅且非常快。而配备M1的iPad Pro已经远远领先于竞争对手，而2022年的型号甚至更快。然而，我们敢于怀疑这在日常使用中是否明显。

Jetstream 2 | JetStream 1.1 | WebXPRT 4 | WebXPRT 3 | Speedometer 2.0 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1
Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average Apple M2 (220 - 257, n=9)
235 Points +4%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
225.315 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
182.5 Points -19%
Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 334, n=69, last 2 years)
108.7 Points -52%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)
108.3 Points -52%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)
95.424 Points -58%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)
72.8 Points -68%
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
403.4 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
206.89 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
206.89 Points
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)
184.5 Points
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)
126.4 Points
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Apple M2 (223 - 256, n=8)
238 Points +5%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
227 Points
Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=68, last 2 years)
104.3 Points -54%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average Apple M2 (342 - 387, n=8)
367 Points +7%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
342 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
221 Points -35%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)
155 Points -55%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)
151 Points -56%
Average of class Tablet (34 - 435, n=45, last 2 years)
149.6 Points -56%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)
97 Points -72%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
376 runs/min
Average Apple M2 (437 - 445, n=10)
366 runs/min -3%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
210 runs/min -44%
Average of class Tablet (2.59 - 572, n=63, last 2 years)
115.5 runs/min -69%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)
99.7 runs/min -73%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)
72.1 runs/min -81%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)
65.5 runs/min -83%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Apple M2 (72484 - 78736, n=9)
75019 Points +1%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
74614 Points
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
62789 Points -16%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)
41829 Points -44%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)
41256 Points -45%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 105178, n=86, last 2 years)
28653 Points -62%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)
24616 Points -67%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=74, last 2 years)
3789 ms * -740%
Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021 (Huawei Browser 11.1.4.302)
1629 ms * -261%
Lenovo Tab P12 Pro (Chrome 98)
1055 ms * -134%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G (Samsung Browser V16)
936.3 ms * -108%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378 (Safari 14.1.1)
495 ms * -10%
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 (Safari Mobile 16.1)
450.9 ms *
Average Apple M2 (440 - 467, n=9)
450 ms * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Spiele - 120-FPS-Gaming dankApple M2

不幸的是，我们的合作伙伴GameBench在审查时不支持当前的iPadOS，所以我们不能在这里呈现任何记录。

从名义上看，配备M2的iPad Pro 12.9有足够的游戏能力来充分运行x86游戏。那些来自App Store的游戏对该平板电脑不构成任何问题。元神冲击，一个要求非常高的游戏，甚至在全细节设置下提供了120 FPS的选项。这也适用于去年的模型 ，并且运行流畅：虽然帧率确实迅速下降，但没有延迟。

更大的问题更可能是平板电脑的尺寸和重量。

PUBG手机版
PUBG手机版
玄信影响
玄信影响

排放--iPad Pro M2在负载下节流

温度

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 M2的表面温度始终保持无害，即使在长时间负载的情况下，也只是部分超过背面的37度标志。

但产生的废热也没有让Apple 平板电脑不受影响。在3DMark Wild Life压力测试中，它在第一次运行时就耗尽了自己的能力，但帧率继续下降，直到20次运行结束时，性能下降约30%。但即使如此，iPad Pro的速度仍然是Tab S8+的两倍多。Galaxy Tab S8+的两倍多。 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

0102030405060708090100110120130140150Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø97.9 (82.8-119)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø40.5 (35-55.1)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø29.8 (27.1-41.5)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø11.8 (9.93-14.9)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø124.5 (113.6-152.4)
Max. Load
 36.9 °C32 °C29.7 °C 
 33.2 °C36.3 °C31.4 °C 
 31.2 °C34.9 °C30.9 °C 
Maximum: 36.9 °C
Average: 32.9 °C
33.8 °C35.9 °C34.5 °C
35.3 °C37.4 °C37.6 °C
31.5 °C35.6 °C35.8 °C
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  34.4 °C | Room Temperature 21.1 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 33.8 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.3 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

发言人

Apple iPad 12.9（2022）的四个立体声扬声器提供了非常好的音质。由于它的尺寸，低音大多听不见，但它有强大的中低频得分。使用Apple 平板电脑进行媒体播放是非常有趣的。

另外，USB端口也可用于有线声音输出。蓝牙5.3可以无线使用，但它只支持SBC和AAC音频编解码。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2037.532.42526.324.43123.721.64035.924.85036376324.927.48020.441.310018.546.612516.956.716017.964.72001663.325014.165.131512.269.640013.366.550010.973.563012.37380012.173.8100012.573.1125011.872.6160011.970.9200012.472.1250012.871315013.17040001374.9500013.274.7630013.670.6800013.671.11000013.7701250014671600013.854.1SPL2584.3N0.665.8median 13.2median 70.6Delta1.63.937.434.12825.532.623.527.7253441.22728.823.641.122.339.317.749.216.159.112.859.413.164.61268.4969.41174.310.772.910.37510.977.412.176.111.866.7126911.876.511.98012.979.413.376.413.474.513.576.813.675.714.873.414.155.924.688.20.678.7median 12.8median 74.31.26.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPad Pro 12.9 2022Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 2% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 14% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电源管理 - iPad Pro 12.9电池的容量为40.88Wh

消耗功率

Apple iPad Pro 12.9（第6代）的闲置功耗略高于前代产品。这是由于新的芯片组和新的操作系统的原因。然而，尽管有更强大的GPU，但在GFXBench中，iPad Pro 2022并没有从插座中提取更多能量。电源适配器不是一个限制因素，因为使用更强大的电源适配器，结果是相同的。

尽管如此，20瓦的电源适配器相当紧张，需要三个多小时才能将电池充满。Apple 平板电脑在停用的状态下也会消耗大量的电力。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 1.25 / 0.23 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 2.54 / 11.24 / 11.48 Watt
Load midlight 12.97 / 16.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
10702 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
10090 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
 mAh		Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
10200 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
10050 mAh
Power Consumption
39%
18%
48%
-9%
Idle Minimum *
2.54
3.08
-21%
1.8
29%
2.2
13%
6.2
-144%
Idle Average *
11.24
3.69
67%
9.6
15%
2.6
77%
9.07
19%
Idle Maximum *
11.48
3.76
67%
9.8
15%
3.2
72%
9.12
21%
Load Average *
12.97
7.72
40%
12.2
6%
7.1
45%
8.79
32%
Load Maximum *
16.6
9.87
41%
12.6
24%
11.5
31%
12.07
27%

* ... smaller is better

Leistungsaufnahme: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2: Ø9.71 (3.73-16.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø8.51 (3.67-15)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

012345678910111213141516Tooltip
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø16.7 (16.5-16.7)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø14.1 (13.2-15.3)
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 Apple M2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.67 (4.29-4.84)
Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.42 (3.31-4.05)

电池寿命

iPad Pro 12.9（2022）的电池容量再次达到40.88Wh，提供的电池运行时间几乎与去年一样。 去年的型号在我们的测试中。只有负载下的运行时间明显缩短。

相比之下，只有 华为MatePad Pro 12.6能以更好的运行时间而大放异彩，但它有一个旧的SoC和一个60 Hz的面板。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
30h 39min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari Mobile 16.1)
11h 11min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
13h 36min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 53min
Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022
10702 mAh		Samsung Galaxy Tab S8+ 5G
10090 mAh		Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2021 A2378
 mAh		Lenovo Tab P12 Pro
10200 mAh		Huawei MatePad Pro 12.6 2021
10050 mAh
Battery Runtime
-9%
16%
-2%
47%
Reader / Idle
1839
846
-54%
1034
-44%
2080
13%
H.264
816
607
-26%
818
0%
892
9%
1367
68%
WiFi v1.3
671
437
-35%
673
0%
627
-7%
740
10%
Load
173
309
79%
255
47%
236
36%
342
98%

Pros

+ 非常强大的扬声器
+ 伟大的扬声器
+ 准确而明亮的迷你LED显示屏
+ 长时间的更新供应

Cons

- 昂贵的配件
- 只有少数蓝牙音频编解码器
- 负载下的节流
- 只有 12 个月的保修期

结论 - iPad Pro 12.9的经典产品护理

回顾：Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2022)
回顾：Apple iPad Pro 12.9 (2022)

在这个尺寸级别的平板电脑中，没有任何一款能比iPad Pro 12.9提供更强的性能，即使在紧凑的外形尺寸中，更小的 iPad Pro 11是最好的。没有其他竞争对手的设备能接近。这不仅反映在基准测试中，而且在图像和视频编辑中也特别明显。甚至许多同价位的笔记本在性能上也根本无法跟上。

M2的粗暴力量 Apple M2的蛮力得到了明亮而准确的迷你LED显示屏的补充，它还支持高达120赫兹的刷新率。作为选择，平板电脑的使用还可以通过一个非常好的笔和各种键盘变体来扩展。

Apple iPad Pro 12.9是一款技术强大的平板电脑，在纯粹的媒体播放方面绝对是挑战不足。

在潜力方面，Apple ，这款平板电脑还可以配备大量的存储空间，雷电3端口使其看起来有无穷的可能性。然而，真正能够取代笔记本电脑的最大障碍是操作系统。与macOS不同，iPadOS更多的是为触摸手势而设计，这使得在许多方面的缩放不舒服，文件管理也不是真正的乐趣，特别是由于一个 MacBook Air同样的存储配置更便宜。

因此，iPad Pro 12.9是那些不想没有Apple Pencil的创意人士或不想做出任何妥协的准买家的乐园。即使只用于媒体消费，Apple ，这款平板电脑在音频和视觉方面都是一股不可忽视的力量。

强大的替代品主要来自于三星的 Galaxy Tab S8+和 Galaxy Tab S8 Ultra.后者有一个更大的OLED屏幕。联想Tab P11 Pro在生产力类别中也要便宜得多。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

iPad Pro 12.9可以从以下网站直接订购Apple所有的颜色和存储变体。其他供应商，如亚马逊，通常以更便宜的价格列出该设备。

Apple iPad Pro 12.9 2022 - 11/29/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
86 / 98 → 88%
Keyboard
78 / 80 → 97%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
66 / 70 → 94%
Weight
80 / 40-88 → 84%
Battery
89%
Display
92%
Games Performance
82 / 78 → 100%
Application Performance
93 / 92 → 100%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
91 / 91 → 100%
Camera
66 / 85 → 78%
Average
86%
92%
Tablet - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > Apple iPad Pro 12.9（2022）评测。巨大的平板电脑现在使用M2 SoC运行Apple
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-11-30 (Update: 2024-08-15)