Notebookcheck Logo

Apple iPhone 14 Pro评测-- 智能手机已经准备好在岛上使用了。Apple

动画的双冲孔。

今年对Apple ,iPhone的年度升级不仅带来了强制性的新SoC,还带来了缺口的结束。取而代之的是,新机型引入了一个双孔冲孔解决方案,通过一些巧妙的软件调整转化为新的动态岛。这是第一次,相机现在可以使用4800万像素的传感器和像素分选。在下面的评论中了解更多。
5G Apple Touchscreen Smartphone iPhone iOS

iPhone进入了下一轮,iPhone 14 Pro接替了去年的 iPhone 13 Pro.与每一代新产品一样,Apple ,采用了新的SoC,改进了摄像头,以及最新的iOS版本,同时这次保留了外形尺寸。今年的相机升级特别有趣,因为加州人首次使用4800万像素的主传感器和像素分层技术。

正如下表所详述的,今年的价格有了明显的提高。

存储 iPhone 14 Pro (德国) iPhone 13 Pro (德国) iPhone 14 Pro (美国,税前)
128GB 1,299欧元(+13.05 %) 1,149欧元 999美元
256GB 1,429欧元(+12.61 %) 1,269欧元 1,099美元
512 GB 1,689 欧元(+ 12.68 %) 1,499 欧元 1,299 美元
1024 GB 1,949 欧元(+ 12.72 %) 1,729 欧元 1,499 美元

正如我们在后面的评论中所看到的,摄像爱好者将不幸地跳过最小的存储选项。

Apple iPhone 14 Pro (iPhone Series)
Processor
Apple A16 Bionic 6 x 2 - 3.5 GHz, Crete
Graphics adapter
Apple A16 GPU 5-Core
Memory
6 GB 
Display
6.10 inch 19.5:9, 2556 x 1179 pixel 461 PPI, Capacitive, Super Retina XDR OLED, Dynamic Island, Always-On, Wide color (P3), Haptic Touch, ProMotion, DolbyVision, Fingerprint-resistant oleophobic coating, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz
Storage
256 GB NVMe, 256 GB 
Connections
1 USB 2.0, 1 Firewire, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: Lightning, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Barometer, High dynamic range gyro, High-g accelerometer, Proximity sensor, Lightning, U1-UWB
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900), 3G (850, 900, 1700/2100, 1900, 2100), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 53, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 53, 66, 70, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 7.85 x 147.5 x 71.5
Battery
3200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 50% charge in 30 minutes with 20W adapter or higher
Charging
wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Apple iOS 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix (24 mm, f/1.78, 2nd Gen. sensor‑shift optical image stabilization, 7‑element lens, 4K video) + 12 MPix (77 mm, f/2.8, 3x optical zoom range) + 12 MPix (48 mm, f/1.78, 7‑element lens) + LiDAR-Sensor
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix (23 mm, f/1.9, autofocus) + Face ID
Additional features
Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, Cabel (Lightning to USB-C), Sticker, 12 Months Warranty, Dual-GNSS: GPS, Glonass, QZSS, BeiDou, Galileo; Emergency SOS via satellite, Crash Detection, fanless, waterproof
Weight
206 g
Price
1429 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Drive
Size
Resolution
Price
90.3 %
v7 (old)
01 / 2023
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16, A16 GPU 5-Core
206 g256 GB NVMe6.10"2556x1179
89.4 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2022
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920
228 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.80"3088x1440
89.2 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2022
Oppo Find X5 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
221 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.70"3216x1440
89.3 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
198.5 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.67"2400x1080
88.8 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
SD 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730
225 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.73"3200x1440
87.7 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2022
Sony Xperia 1 IV
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
185 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.50"3840x1644
88.6 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2022
Honor Magic4 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
215 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.81"2848x1312
88.5 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Vivo X80 Pro
SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730
215 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.78"3200x1440

保护壳--iPhone 14 Pro现在没有凹槽了

在明亮的照明条件下,动态岛的核心元素变得非常明显。
在明亮的照明条件下,动态岛的核心元素变得非常明显。

iPhone 14 Pro有四种不同的颜色。太空黑,银色,金色和深紫色。背面的摄像头现在更加突出于外壳,达到4.15毫米(约0.16英寸)。在iPhone 13 Pro上,这个凸起略小,为3.75毫米(约0.15英寸)。这导致智能手机在桌子上或其他平面上放置时,会有相当大的晃动。由于多了3克,新的iPhone也稍微重了一些。

iPhone 14 Pro的制造质量和材料都很出色。间隙非常紧密和均匀。虽然智能手机也非常耐受来自角落的扭曲尝试,但有一些来自内部的吱吱声。正面和背面都由玻璃组成,后者是哑光的。虽然这带来了很好的触觉和光学效果,但它也把手机变成了一个指纹磁铁。指纹迅速而明显地积累,甚至在哑光的背面。抛光的高光不锈钢框架也是如此。

凹槽已死,动态岛万岁。它不是由一个,而是由显示屏上的两个打孔中断组成,包含了前置摄像头、Face ID和其他传感器。软件在视觉上将这两个区域合二为一,形成动态岛。当显示屏变得非常明亮时,对比度下降,边缘变得明显。说到这一点,它们是相当宽的,尤其是与其他制造商的解决方案相比。

物理按钮似乎是高质量的,它们被牢固地连接起来。行程不是太浅,但清晰而精确。SIM卡插槽,在我们的欧洲型号上仍然包括,在框架内平齐放置。内部sim托盘由金属组成,能够容纳一张nano SIM卡。iPhone 14 Pro继续具有IP68认证,标志着防尘和防水功能。据Apple ,后者可保证在6米(约20英尺)的深度内,最长30分钟。

在可维护性方面,我们的同事们在iFixit的同事们给iPhone打出了很长一段时间内的最佳分数之一(7/10)。他们对智能手机的全面内部检修以及由此带来的寿命和环境效益感到满意。然而,这并不适用于Max机型。完整的产品环境报告可在Apple "的官方网页上找到。.

尺寸比较

164.57 mm 75.3 mm 9.1 mm 215 g165 mm 71 mm 8.2 mm 185 g163.6 mm 74.7 mm 9.15 mm 215 g163.2 mm 75 mm 9.1 mm 225 g163.3 mm 77.9 mm 8.9 mm 228 g163.7 mm 73.9 mm 8.5 mm 221 g161.76 mm 73.5 mm 8.39 mm 198.5 g147.5 mm 71.5 mm 7.85 mm 206 g146.7 mm 71.5 mm 7.65 mm 203 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g

连接性--仍然没有为iPhone提供USB

Apple iPhone 14 Pro继续依靠Lightning 接口进行有线数据传输和充电。由于传输速率对应于USB 2.0标准,大型文件传输和本地备份会占用更多时间。视频和音频适配器可以通过可选的配件连接到智能手机上。

喜欢用iPhone拍摄视频的用户应该跳过最小的变体。启用ProRes时,128GB机型的视频质量仅限于全高清,最高30FPS。在256GB及以上机型上,该模式还支持高达60FPS或高达30FPS的超高清。值得庆幸的是,至少电影院模式没有任何限制。

支持蓝牙5.3、NFC、UWB和MagSafe。MagSafe指的是智能手机背面的磁铁,用于连接配件和充电底座。

返回顶部
返回顶部
左边:SIM卡、音量、静音
左边:SIM卡、音量、静音
右边。电源按钮
右边。电源按钮
底部。扬声器,Lightning, 麦克风
底部。扬声器,Lightning, 麦克风

软件--iOS 16、动态岛和永远在线

Apple iPhone 14 Pro配备了iOS 16,在我们测试期间已经收到了两个包含错误修复的更新,这使得我们在测试时的iOS版本为16.0.2。新的操作系统预计将适用于所有型号,直至 iPhone 88 Plus使得过去五年内发布的所有iPhone都成为最新版本。由于某些功能依赖于新的硬件,因此并非所有的新功能都能在旧机型上使用。虽然没有任何来自Apple 的官方声明,但用户很可能期待iPhone 14 Pro上有类似的更新支持。

虽然iOS在设计上没有重大变化,但锁屏现在更容易定制。例如,实时活动允许用户显示正在进行的事件,而无需解锁iPhone。小工具的功能和聚焦模式也得到了扩展。听写功能现在可以自动插入标点符号并允许使用表情符号。家庭应用程序已被完全改造,现在支持智能家居标准 "Matter"。

动态岛是一个新的软件解决方案,旨在掩盖前面显示屏上的打孔,并以节省空间的方式呈现当前活动应用程序的信息。这在使用过程中效果不错,非常实用。虽然在撰写本文时,该功能仍主要限于Apple"自己的应用程序,但其他应用程序开发人员也能够访问该界面。iPhone现在有一个永远在线的显示屏,可以根据自己的喜好进行定制。虽然这不完全是一个突破性的新功能,但它很实用,其实施效果也很好。

关于iOS 16的所有新功能的详细概述,可直接从Apple.当动态岛被禁用时,显示中来自相机孔的中断会被隐藏。

锁定屏幕
没有动态岛的主屏幕
主屏幕上的Spotify和Timer应用占据了动态岛的位置
快速访问菜单

通信和GNSS - iPhone 14 Pro不带Wi-Fi 6E

高通公司骁龙X65 5G调制解调器-射频系统确保了最佳的移动连接,支持的频段非常广泛,传输速率高达10Gb/s。美国机型独家支持毫米波5G。通过卫星的紧急呼叫功能也是如此。碰撞检测功能在所有型号上都有,并且能够在识别危险情况时呼叫紧急服务,尽管这似乎并不是在所有情况下都能完美地工作。

Wi-Fi模块不太符合最新标准,因为它不支持Wi-Fi 6E和相关的6-GHz频段。此外,我们的华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000参考路由器的5-GHz网络内的传输速率有些慢,但至少在两个方向上是一致的。

Networking
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 365) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
822 (min: 409) MBit/s ∼52%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
716 (min: 539) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
521 (min: 311) MBit/s ∼33%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1704 (min: 852) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1702 (min: 1642) MBit/s ∼100%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
820 (min: 799) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
890 (min: 433) MBit/s ∼56%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
881 (min: 446) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
839 (min: 531) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1657 (min: 1379) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1522 (min: 1278) MBit/s ∼89%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
948 (min: 929) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
941 (min: 880) MBit/s ∼59%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1226 (min: 590) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1590 (min: 1449) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1748 (min: 870) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1459 (min: 723) MBit/s ∼86%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1369 (min: 720) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1499 (min: 1195) MBit/s ∼94%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1383 (min: 1126) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1328 (min: 378) MBit/s ∼84%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
iperf3 transmit AX12
698 (min: 632) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
660 (min: 599) MBit/s ∼100%
Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 receive AXE11000
714 (min: 34.8) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
729 (min: 40.5) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1451 (min: 229) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1368 (min: 668) MBit/s ∼80%
09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1676 (852-1767)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1694 (1642-1735)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Apple A16 Bionic, Apple A16 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø710 (365-741)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø715 (539-791)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Apple A16 Bionic, Apple A16 GPU 5-Core; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø808 (409-835)
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G Samsung Exynos 2200, Samsung Xclipse 920; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø510 (311-704)

该设备使用双频GNSS进行地理定位,支持GPS、Glonass、Galileo、BeiDou和QZSS等卫星网络。在日常使用中,卫星上行链路可以迅速建立,即使在建筑物中也相对精确。

为了仔细观察定位能力的精度,我们带着iPhone 14 Pro骑自行车。在这里,它与 Garmin Venu 2.虽然在Apple 智能手机上记录的总距离短了70米,而且详细的进展显示,iPhone要求更新位置的频率低于智能手表,但总体而言,路线记录仍然非常准确。

GNSS试骑。湖泊
GNSS试骑。湖泊
全球卫星导航系统试骑。转弯
全球卫星导航系统试骑。转弯
全球卫星导航系统试骑。概述
全球卫星导航系统试骑。概述

电话和通话质量

Apple iPhone 14 Pro的通话质量在安静的环境中非常好,声音听起来非常自然。当环境噪音,如背景中的人的声音被引入时,它们对你的对话伙伴来说可以在短时间内听到,随后被过滤掉。在主干道附近,这个过程需要明显的时间,噪音碎片仍然可以偶尔渗透到对话中,用户的声音会变得失真。

由于在免提电话时,环境噪音不会被iPhone过滤掉,这种模式最好是保留在安静的环境中。虽然在这种情况下,我们的声音听起来比把手机举到耳边时更沉闷,但它仍然听起来相当自然,尽管有一些小的干扰进入了我们的电话样本,特别是当智能手机离用户很近时。麦克风的范围很好,在两米(约6.56英尺)外以几乎相同的音量捕捉到我们的声音。

iPhone支持VoLTE和Wi-Fi通话。我们的测试设备接受一个纳米级的SIM卡。此外,或者说,还有一个集成的eSIM。在美国销售的设备不再配备物理SIM卡插槽,而是提供双eSIM卡支持。

电话应用
电话应用
主动呼叫
主动呼叫
动态岛的主动呼叫
动态岛的主动呼叫
应用切换器中的主动呼叫
应用切换器中的主动呼叫

摄像机 - 48MP和传感器移位OIS

iPhone 14 Pro自拍
iPhone 14 Pro自拍

在iPhone 14 Pro的摄像头方面,有很多变化。从前置摄像头开始,传感器的分辨率仍为1200万像素,但现在具有一个名义上更加感光的f/1.9光圈和自动对焦。这导致即使在低光照情况下也能获得良好的自拍效果。前置摄像头甚至支持RAW拍摄,并在视频录制方面全力以赴。视频可以用包括杜比视界在内的高达60 FPS的超高清视频,以ProRes(4K @30 FPS,1080p @60 FPS)拍摄,或使用影院模式。

虽然这对Android 用户来说并不新鲜,但这款iPhone标志着Apple 首次使用带有像素分选的4800万像素主摄像头,即把四个像素合并成一个大像素。经验表明,这既能在光线不足的条件下拍出更好的照片,也能拍出更多的细节。用户在选择图像尺寸方面受到限制,它被固定在12MP。RAW模式是一个例外,也提供48MP的选择。此外,主传感器具有第二代传感器移位的光学图像稳定功能。

我们对日光下的图像质量感到满意,它被定义为具有精细细节的平衡构图、温暖的色彩平衡和自然色彩。在黑暗中,不同光线的区域被准确捕捉,尽管在试图减少图像噪音时,后期处理往往会夸大对比度。总的来说,只要允许相机应用自动略微增加曝光时间,iPhone就能在弱光条件下捕捉许多细节。虽然一些用户报告了HDR捕捉的问题,但到目前为止,我们还无法重现这个问题。

带有传统光学图像稳定系统(OIS)的3倍光学变焦镜头是增强拍摄的基础。对于2倍变焦的照片,Apple ,仍然依靠主传感器的数字变焦,这使得在这个变焦水平上的照片明显比 iPhone 13 Pro.在稍高的变焦水平下,iPhone 14 Pro的相机设置仍然表现令人钦佩,尽管在更高的放大率下,质量迅速恶化,15倍是可用的最大变焦。

超广角镜头继续依靠1200万像素的传感器,而许多竞争对手提供更高分辨率的超广角相机,这一点在图片的直接对比中也很明显。方便的是,相机应用程序可以自动切换到附带的微距模式,这也可以通过一个可选的切换键来访问。根据照明条件,虽然iPhone 13 Pro上的主传感器和微距传感器的颜色会经常变化,但Apple ,声称已经解决了这个问题。该解决方案似乎是部分成功的,尽管仍有明显的差异。

视频模式能够从改进的图像稳定中受益,电影院模式现在终于支持高达30 FPS的超高清。虽然该模式得到了进一步的改善,但没有大量运动或清晰可见的对焦元素的平静序列可能会导致自动对焦变得混乱并转移对焦层。iPhone 14 Pro的相机在可用的视频格式和可选的杜比视界方面提供了很大的灵活性。只有8K录制和16:9以外的长宽比仍然不可用。

ProRes拍摄被限制在4k/30FPS或1080p/60FPS。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

HauptkameraHauptkameraUltraweitwinkel5-facher ZoomLow-Light
ColorChecker。超宽/微距镜头
ColorChecker。超宽/微距镜头
测试图。没有夜间模式
测试图。没有夜间模式

我们在实际使用中的印象在受控的照明条件下得到了证实。色彩平衡有些偏暖,大多数颜色都被准确捕捉。绿色和青色调是唯一的例外,deltaE偏差太高。

同样,直接比较超广角镜头和微距镜头的ColorChecker图片,可以发现相当明显的色彩差异,与主传感器相比,色彩更加苍白,饱和度更低。

测试图被均匀地描绘出来,并在边缘处有许多细节。夜间模式进一步增强了在黑暗中拍摄的照片。然而,如果没有它,照片仍然很暗。

ColorChecker
9.6 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
10.2 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
6.3 ∆E
11.4 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
10.5 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
7.8 ∆E
9.7 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
7.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 14 Pro: 9.22 ∆E min: 3.56 - max: 14.11 ∆E
ColorChecker
21.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
24.8 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
15.1 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
19.1 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
30.3 ∆E
18.1 ∆E
32.5 ∆E
16.9 ∆E
15.6 ∆E
24.6 ∆E
29.3 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
17.2 ∆E
24.3 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
22.8 ∆E
13.3 ∆E
ColorChecker Apple iPhone 14 Pro: 21.25 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 32.54 ∆E

配件和保修 - 无限次维修的Care+服务

Apple 关怀+
Apple 关怀+

iPhone 14 Pro的交货范围并不十分巨大。Apple ,只包括一条数据/充电线(Lightning to USB type-C)、SIM卡工具、Apple 贴纸、快速入门指南和保修信息。

当然,Apple ,提供了许多可选配件。这包括充电器、MagSafe产品、电缆、适配器、耳机和其他很多东西。

在美国,标准的12个月保修期适用。更多信息可以在我们的 常见问题页面.可选的Apple Care+计划再次提供一次性费用,涵盖两年或每月付款。虽然第二种方案略微昂贵,但它允许覆盖范围超过两年。该套餐总体上略微贵一些,尽管每年不再有意外损坏维修的限制。

输入设备和处理 - 包括Face ID

Apple iPhone 14 Pro配备了一个出色的触摸屏,能够快速准确地响应输入。触觉效果很好,滑行性能也不值得批评。Apple ,继续使用自己的键盘布局,有许多功能,现在包括打字时的同步语音输入。此外,现在还提供了键盘的触觉反馈。

三维面部识别解决方案Face ID可用于以生物识别方式保护设备,即使在使用面具时也能识别用户。虽然这需要用户低头,并花费稍长的时间,但它的效果相当好。

单手模式已经默认启用,通过在屏幕底部边缘向下滑动即可使用。敲击背部再次得到认可,并区分了双击和三击,可以通过设置设置为不同的动作。

显示屏 - iPhone 14 Pro配备了明亮无比的120赫兹OLED显示屏

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Apple iPhone 14 Pro的所谓超级视网膜XDR OLED显示屏对角线尺寸为6.1英寸(15.49厘米),分辨率为2556 x 1179像素,并在1至120赫兹之间自动调整刷新率。

虽然1000尼特的亮度与前代产品相匹配,但Apple ,大大提升了峰值亮度,它声称最高可达到2000尼特。我们测量了一个更高的数值,即2294尼特(APL18),代表了我们迄今为止看到的绝对最高值。

为了达到这些高度,环境光传感器必须被启用。当亮度被手动控制时,亮度的最大值为845尼特。由于基础的OLED技术和由此产生的绝对黑值,该面板的对比度理论上接近无限大。

即使是iPhone也不能幸免于OLED闪烁。我们的示波器显示,在最低亮度时,循环相当平静,频率为240赫兹,在39%以上的亮度时,频率为稳定的480赫兹,这与高频的直流调光相当。这应该会减少敏感用户的眼睛疲劳。我们没有观察到时间上的抖动。为了测试这一点,我们用显微镜和240-FPS慢动作视频(深灰色,最大亮度)观察显示器。

1053
cd/m²
1047
cd/m²
1045
cd/m²
1056
cd/m²
1046
cd/m²
1039
cd/m²
1058
cd/m²
1057
cd/m²
1044
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 1058 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1049.4 cd/m² Minimum: 2.02 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1046 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 1.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Super Retina XDR OLED, 2556x1179, 6.1"
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Dynamic AMOLED, 3088x1440, 6.8"
Oppo Find X5 Pro
AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
OLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"
Sony Xperia 1 IV
OLED, 3840x1644, 6.5"
Honor Magic4 Pro
OLED, 2848x1312, 6.8"
Vivo X80 Pro
AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.8"
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
OLED, 2532x1170, 6.1"
Screen
11%
3%
-1%
-7%
6%
-47%
11%
9%
Brightness middle
1046
1077
3%
746
-29%
1020
-2%
831
-21%
890
-15%
956
-9%
938
-10%
1050
0%
Brightness
1049
1093
4%
744
-29%
1020
-3%
807
-23%
897
-14%
959
-9%
947
-10%
1058
1%
Brightness Distribution
98
97
-1%
97
-1%
96
-2%
91
-7%
97
-1%
94
-4%
97
-1%
98
0%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.2
1.2
-0%
0.9
25%
1
17%
1.03
14%
0.9
25%
2.4
-100%
0.9
25%
1
17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
3.1
2
35%
1.6
48%
2.8
10%
3.06
1%
2.4
23%
5.2
-68%
1.9
39%
2.4
23%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
1.7
1.3
24%
1.6
6%
2.1
-24%
1.8
-6%
1.4
18%
3.3
-94%
1.3
24%
1.5
12%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.37 93%
2.23 99%
2.29 96%
2.233 99%
2.21 100%
2.26 97%
2.2 100%
2.2 100%
CCT
6538 99%
6526 100%
6499 100%
6502 100%
6396 102%
6320 103%
6804 96%
6518 100%
6504 100%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

最低亮度
分钟。
25%的亮度
25 %
50%的亮度
50 %
75%的亮度
75 %
最大手动亮度
100 %

在不同的亮度设置下,在固定的变焦水平上进行测量

我们在分光光度计和CalMAN分析软件的帮助下评估了iPhone 14 Pro显示屏的色彩准确性。我们的研究结果显示,在禁用True Tone的情况下,色彩精确度更高。这种模式会根据周围的照明条件调整显示屏的色彩平衡。这通常会导致较暖的色彩平衡,随着日光的消失,其强度会增加。不管怎么说,启用True Tone后,显示屏在主观上更容易让人看清。这两种模式都提供了很高的色彩准确性。

灰度(真实色调:已启用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(真实色调:已启用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(真实色调:启用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(真实色调:启用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(真实色调:已启用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(真实色调:已启用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(真实色调:已启用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(真实色调:已启用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(真实色调:禁用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
灰度(真实色调:禁用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(真实色调:禁用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
颜色(真实色调:禁用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(真实色调:禁用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
色彩空间(真实色调:禁用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)
饱和度(真实色调:禁用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)。
饱和度(真实色调:禁用;目标色彩空间:sRGB)。

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
0.81 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.409 ms rise
↘ 0.401 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.81 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.9645 ms rise
↘ 0.844 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

iPhone 14 Pro似乎非常适用于户外使用。环境光传感器对不断变化的条件迅速做出反应,在明亮的阳光下也不吝啬其亮度。超过2200尼特,Apple 智能手机在任何情况下都保持可读性。

秋天阳光下的iPhone 14 Pro
秋天阳光下的iPhone 14 Pro
树荫下
树荫下

Apple iPhone 14 Pro的可视角度非常好。即使从极端角度看,可感知的亮度几乎没有下降,色彩平衡只是看起来略微冷一些。

Apple iPhone 14 Pro的可视角度
Apple iPhone 14 Pro的可视角度

性能 - 配备A16仿生技术的iPhone 14 Pro

存储测试。128-GB版本
128 GB
存储测试:256-GB版本
256 GB

今年的iPhone 14 Pro再次使用了制造商自己提供的新SoC,即 Apple A16 Bionic,这一次是专业机型独有的。该芯片使用的CPU有六个核心,其中两个是性能核心,四个是效率核心。快速核心现在有更高的时钟速度,最高可达3.46GHz。晶体管数量也略有增长。

根据Geekbench的数据,iPhone 14 Pro的单核和多核性能分别提高了7%和15%,其水平远远高于Android ,其竞争对手为 骁龙8+第一代.

系统基准测试结果并不十分令人印象深刻,高通-SoC竞争对手在安兔兔中表现更好,而在CrossMark中与Apple 智能手机相比再次落后。尽管在我们的比较中,NPU加速也很出色,但与去年的机型相比,AIMark的得分明显更差。这与我们对许多骁龙设备在这一特定基准测试中的观察相吻合。Geekbench ML得分似乎对比较而言更有意义,并显示A16有时会非常领先。

iPhone的存储性能与它的前辈相匹配,尽管128GB型号的性能更差,这可能有一个类似于在 MacBook Air,单个存储块已经变得更大,单个128GB的存储芯片比两个存储芯片并行工作的智能手机要慢。不过,这对日常使用没有明显的影响。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (1878 - 1885, n=4)
1882 Points 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1878 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1749 Points -7%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1328 Points -29%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1325 Points -29%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1257 Points -33%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1237 Points -34%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1234 Points -34%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1226 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1154 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)
995 Points -47%
Multi-Core
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
5538 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (4688 - 5538, n=4)
5273 Points -5%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
4829 Points -13%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4399 Points -21%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
4251 Points -23%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3685 Points -33%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3560 Points -36%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3489 Points -37%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
3488 Points -37%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
3377 Points -39%
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)
3312 Points -40%
Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1073804 Points +11%
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (949107 - 1373449, n=4)
1066574 Points +10%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1057309 Points +9%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
965593 Points
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
944782 Points -2%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
940036 Points -3%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
856953 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
800608 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone
  (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)
798401 Points -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
704479 Points -27%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
692924 Points -28%
CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1332 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (1260 - 1332, n=3)
1307 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1165 Points -13%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1135 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1103 Points -17%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1079 Points -19%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
990 Points -26%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
956 Points -28%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
942 Points -29%
Average of class Smartphone
  (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)
884 Points -34%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
879 Points -34%
AImark - Score v2.x
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
105536 Points +171%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
38930 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (38169 - 38930, n=2)
38550 Points -1%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
7448 Points -81%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
6602 Points -83%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6355 Points -84%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6273 Points -84%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
6217 Points -84%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
6034 Points -85%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
5982 Points -85%
Geekbench ML
0.5 TensorFlow Lite CPU 0.5
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (1016 - 1135, n=3)
1065 Points +2%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
1043 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
Apple A15 Bionic, A15 GPU 5-Core, 6144
951 Points -9%
Average of class Smartphone
  (215 - 1418, n=12, last 2 years)
598 Points -43%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
568 Points -46%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
441 Points -58%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
398 Points -62%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
334 Points -68%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
284 Points -73%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite GPU
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
2522 Points
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (2207 - 2540, n=3)
2423 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
2186 Points -13%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1913 Points -24%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
1881 Points -25%
Average of class Smartphone
  (474 - 2842, n=12, last 2 years)
1673 Points -34%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1631 Points -35%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
842 Points -67%
0.5 TensorFlow Lite NNAPI / Core ML
Average Apple A16 Bionic
  (3170 - 3377, n=4)
3235 Points +1%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
Apple A16 Bionic, A16 GPU 5-Core, 6144
3190 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192
2056 Points -36%
Vivo X80 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
1662 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone
  (344 - 3638, n=10, last 2 years)
1269 Points -60%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
619 Points -81%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288
441 Points -86%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Samsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
402 Points -87%

芯片 Apple A16 GPU再次由五个核心组成,由于6GB LPDDR5内存的更宽的内存总线,应该可以达到约19%的性能。我们只在某些GFXBenchmark方案中看到了这一点,GPU通常低于这个值。不管怎么说,它的速度非常快,能够让 阿德雷诺730在灰尘中,特别是在使用为金属API制作的软件时。然而,高通GPU(Vulkan API)能够在全新的4K Aztec Ruins High TierGFXBench方案中迎头赶上,而在Basemark GPUScore中也不会相差太远。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3265 Points
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2899 Points -11%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
2864 Points -12%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2768 Points -15%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2585 Points -21%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2523 Points -23%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2456 Points -25%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2038 Points -38%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1916 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
3383 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
3059 Points -10%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2873 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2796 Points -17%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2639 Points -22%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2575 Points -24%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2567 Points -24%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2073 Points -39%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2044 Points -40%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
12429 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
11700 Points -6%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11073 Points -11%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10982 Points -12%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10317 Points -17%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10175 Points -18%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10151 Points -18%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7932 Points -36%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7288 Points -41%
3DMark / Wild Life Score
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9826 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
9386 Points
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7901 Points
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
7236 Points
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +140%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps +97%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps +50%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
462 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
456 fps -1%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
445 fps -4%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
439 fps -5%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
417 fps -10%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
380 fps -18%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
303 fps -34%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
302 fps -35%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
267 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
144 fps +140%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps +92%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps +80%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
108 fps +80%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
84 fps +40%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
292 fps
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
247 fps -15%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
237 fps -19%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
229 fps -22%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
187 fps -36%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
182 fps -38%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
181 fps -38%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps -43%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
147 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +98%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +68%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps +68%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
71 fps +18%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -7%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
197 fps
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
189 fps -4%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
179 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
151 fps -23%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
151 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
127 fps -36%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps -43%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
111 fps -44%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 fps -50%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps +48%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps +32%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58 fps -3%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps -18%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -20%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -35%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
39 fps -35%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
114 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps -10%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps -14%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
97 fps -15%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
95 fps -17%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -40%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66 fps -42%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -45%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps -56%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps +15%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps +5%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps +2%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
59 fps
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps -12%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
51 fps -14%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
45 fps -24%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
36 fps -39%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
31 fps -47%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +18%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
46 fps +5%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
44 fps
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -9%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
39 fps -11%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
34 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -32%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
29 fps -34%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
104 fps +73%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
98 fps +63%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
67 fps +12%
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps 0%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
60 fps
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
57 fps -5%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53 fps -12%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -30%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
133 fps
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe
119 fps -11%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps -11%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
115 fps -14%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
113 fps -15%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
94 fps -29%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
87 fps -35%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73 fps -45%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68 fps -49%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps 0%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
23 fps
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -4%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
21 fps -9%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
15 fps -35%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
14 fps -39%

Basemark GPUScore

0102030405060708090100110120130140150160Tooltip
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø46.9 (28.5-59.2)
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø27.4 (11.2-83.2)
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø27.3 (12.1-129)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 2560x1440 Official; 1.0.0 : Ø28.2 (11-165.1)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø56.2 (34.8-71.5)
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø26 (11.7-96.7)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Official Native; 1.0.0 : Ø34.9 (11.5-146)
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 2560x1440 Official VRS; 1.0.0 : Ø28.8 (11.4-79.1)
Honor Magic4 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 2560x1440 Official VRS; 1.0.0 : Ø28.7 (11.3-72.8)
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; 2560x1440 Official VRS; 1.0.0 : Ø29.9 (10.3-135.7)

iPhone 14 Pro在我们的浏览器基准测试中大放异彩,远远领先于所有Android 竞争对手。在日常使用中浏览网页感觉非常流畅和舒适。不过,主观差异比基准测试显示的要小。

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
281.762 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
181.6 Points -36%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
124.37 Points -56%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)
120.4 Points -57%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
117.894 Points -58%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
108.34 Points -62%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
103 Points -63%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
96.8 Points -66%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
77.337 Points -73%
Vivo X80 Pro
72.786 Points -74%
Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
375 runs/min
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
243 runs/min -35%
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)
136.2 runs/min -64%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
112 runs/min -70%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
108 runs/min -71%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
104 runs/min -72%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
99.2 runs/min -74%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
87.9 runs/min -77%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
80.8 runs/min -78%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
65.5 runs/min -83%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
202 Points
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
119 Points -41%
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=152, last 2 years)
113.8 Points -44%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
102 Points -50%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
101 Points -50%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
71 Points -65%
WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
292 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
248 Points -15%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
161 Points -45%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)
148.7 Points -49%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
145 Points -50%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
142 Points -51%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
133 Points -54%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
124 Points -58%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
101 Points -65%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
79 Points -73%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
74261 Points
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
64222 Points -14%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
46339 Points -38%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
44631 Points -40%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
38407 Points -48%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)
37161 Points -50%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
37098 Points -50%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
36742 Points -51%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
34055 Points -54%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
27730 Points -63%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)
1568 ms * -230%
Honor Magic4 Pro (Chrome 102)
1440.1 ms * -203%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G (Chrome 99)
1259 ms * -165%
Vivo X80 Pro (Chrome 103)
1240.1 ms * -161%
Oppo Find X5 Pro (Chrome 99)
1125 ms * -137%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra (Chrome 105)
1104 ms * -132%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra (Chrome 104)
1102.2 ms * -132%
Sony Xperia 1 IV (Chrome 103)
847.4 ms * -78%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro (Safari 16)
475.3 ms *
Apple iPhone 13 Pro (Safari 15)
413.6 ms * +13%

* ... smaller is better

游戏--拥有大量游戏能力的iPhone

从纸面上看,iPhone 14 Pro是一款出色的游戏智能手机。这包括A16 GPU的极高性能,快速的120Hz显示屏,甚至立体声扬声器。尽管在某些游戏中,动态岛有些令人分心,因为它阻碍了部分屏幕,但这并不是一个大问题。

在这里,我们想向你介绍由我们的合作伙伴GameBench提供的各种游戏的详细分析。但不幸的是,该软件尚未与最新的iOS版本兼容。我们将尽快附上基准和分析。

排放 - 勉强比iPhone 13在负载下的速度更快

温度

Apple iPhone 14 Pro的表面温度在空闲时非常低,几乎没有超过29度的标志。尽管不出意料,这种情况在负载下会发生变化,设备只变得触感温润。

在内部,加利福尼亚人确实出了一身汗,而 A16 SoCs在长时间的3DMark压力下不得不降低其性能。虽然与许多Android 竞争对手相比,性能下降并不明显,这导致智能手机每秒渲染的帧数要比 Edge 30 Ultra,它只比 iPhone 13 Pro多一个。这就是游戏智能手机的好处变得明显的地方,因为 ROG Phone 6 Pro和它在无风扇模式下的野生生活压力测试中比我们的Apple 手机多了11个FPS。总的来说,所有的竞争对手都提供了足够的性能,以获得持续流畅的体验。

虽然在苛刻的极限测试中差异较小,但即使在开始时,帧率也太低,无法实现流畅的视觉效果。

Max. Load
 35.4 °C36 °C34.1 °C 
 37.2 °C37.6 °C34.9 °C 
 37.1 °C37.4 °C35.1 °C 
Maximum: 37.6 °C
Average: 36.1 °C
34.8 °C36.1 °C34.9 °C
34.8 °C37.3 °C37.9 °C
32.3 °C37.4 °C37.5 °C
Maximum: 37.9 °C
Average: 35.9 °C
Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.1 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.6 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.9 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
82 %
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
68.1 % -17%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
65.3 % -20%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 % -24%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 % -27%
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
59.6 % -27%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
58.5 % -29%
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
53.7 % -35%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
75.8 % +11%
Vivo X80 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.3 % +8%
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe
68 %
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.1 % -7%
Oppo Find X5 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.7 % -8%
Honor Magic4 Pro
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.6 % -8%
Sony Xperia 1 IV
Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62.5 % -8%
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
61.8 % -9%
0510152025303540455055606570Tooltip
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test: Ø15 (13.7-20.2)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; with Fan: Ø16.7 (16.6-16.7)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 0.0.0.0: Ø13.7 (13.1-18.5)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø53.3 (48.7-59.4)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; without Fan: Ø61.5 (59.8-62.8)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49.7 (47.5-58.5)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro A16 GPU 5-Core, A16, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø57.9 (54.7-74.4)
Asus ROG Phone 6 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8+ Gen 1, 512 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability; with Fan: Ø65.7 (65.6-66.1)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro A15 GPU 5-Core, A15, 256 GB NVMe; Wild Life Unlimited Stress Test Stability: Ø51.5 (47.1-70.2)

发言人

iPhone 14 Pro的两个扬声器产生了相当平衡的声音,有明显的中低频,但仍然没有真正的深度,更不用说低音了,随着音量的增加,这一点变得更加明显。

希望使用有线耳机的用户必须拥有一副Lightning 耳机,或者使用USB type-C或3.5毫米适配器。前面提到的3.5毫米适配器可从Apple ,作为一个可选的配件,售价9美元,包括一个D/A转换器,使连接的耳机能够接收无损音频。虽然通过蓝牙只支持SBC和AAC音频编解码器,但杜比全景声和3D音频也是可用的。发烧友很快就会遇到限制,因为不支持aptX LL或LDAC等高清晰度编解码器。

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.630.92535.2263132.630.3402928.85037.437.66330.632.38029.334.710026.732.312524.341.816022.555.520018.856.725016.258.13151257.44009.95950011.76763010.367.880011.967.610001270.6125012.174.316001276200012.179.5250012.777.8315012.779.3400012.980500013.378.9630013.279.1800013.680.31000013.676.21250013.368.81600012.764.2SPL25.189.5N0.778median 12.7median 70.6Delta2103533.93030.921.926.822.832.334.842.524.331.623.23327.831.514.733.720.950.221.250.717.55513.46114.164.113.167.511.571.413.175.511.780.511.879.21380.212.180.612.180.812.380.412.577.41378.113.272.71367.213.768.813.569.314.266.425.190.20.779.8median 13.1median 71.41.511.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseApple iPhone 14 ProSamsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 30% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.3% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 75% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 38% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--iPhone 14 Pro配备3200毫安时电池

能源消耗

Apple iPhone 14 Pro的耗电量堪称典范,在固定亮度的情况下,与Android 竞争对手相比,耗电量明显降低。虽然这也适用于Geekbench和GFXBench中的前款机型,但 iPhone 13 Pro在闲置时更经济。

不包括充电器。为了尽快给智能手机充电,Apple ,建议使用额定功率至少为20瓦的充电器,它应该能够在半小时内将电池充电到50%。这些并不是完全打破记录的速度。作为比较。淘宝网上的摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra能够在同一时间段内使用附带的125瓦的充电器对其电池(4610毫安时)进行完全充电。

另外,Apple 智能手机可以在MagSafe充电站上以15瓦的功率充电,或在兼容Qi的充电板上以7.5瓦的功率充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.84 / 0.29 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 0.56 / 1.37 / 1.42 Watt
Load midlight 3.42 / 5.56 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
3200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
4860 mAh
Sony Xperia 1 IV
5000 mAh
Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh
Vivo X80 Pro
4700 mAh
Average Apple A16 Bionic
 
Average of class Smartphone
 
Power Consumption
-30%
-31%
-12%
-9%
-51%
-48%
-48%
-24%
-49%
Idle Minimum *
0.56
0.58
-4%
1.24
-121%
0.74
-32%
0.9
-61%
1.06
-89%
0.87
-55%
0.92
-64%
0.695 ?(0.56 - 0.9, n=4)
-24%
Idle Average *
1.37
0.71
48%
1.39
-1%
1.84
-34%
1
27%
1.71
-25%
2.04
-49%
2.04
-49%
1.54 ?(1 - 2.09, n=4)
-12%
Idle Maximum *
1.42
1.16
18%
1.42
-0%
1.86
-31%
1.2
15%
1.89
-33%
2.26
-59%
2.05
-44%
1.59 ?(1.1 - 2.11, n=4)
-12%
Load Average *
3.42
7.07
-107%
3.58
-5%
2.75
20%
3.5
-2%
4.99
-46%
4.97
-45%
4.29
-25%
4.4 ?(3.42 - 6, n=4)
-29%
Load Maximum *
5.56
11.32
-104%
6.99
-26%
4.54
18%
6.9
-24%
8.91
-60%
7.46
-34%
8.75
-57%
7.84 ?(5.56 - 13.6, n=4)
-41%

* ... smaller is better

Consumption: Geekbench (150 nits)

01234567891011Tooltip
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Apple A16 Bionic: Ø3.5 (0.1174-5.92)
Vivo X80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø5.76 (1.144-11.4)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Apple A15 Bionic: Ø4.98 (0.783-10.2)

Consumption: GFXBench (150 nits)

012345678910Tooltip
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Apple A16 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø5.84 (5.78-5.88)
Vivo X80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.59 (8.78-10.7)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Apple A15 Bionic; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø7.84 (3.75-9.01)
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Apple A16 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.776 (0.721-0.852)
Vivo X80 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.378 (1.241-1.559)
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Apple A15 Bionic; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.664 (0.641-0.717)

电池寿命

尽管iPhone 14 Pro的电池寿命非常好,但它比iPhone 13 Pro短,尽管我们在较新的机型上测得了较低的消耗。在我们的实际Wi-Fi测试中,在固定的显示亮度(150尼特)下,这可以用通信模块的耗电量增加来解释,但我们用短片《Big Buck Bunny》进行的离线无限视频循环测试的结果则更难解释。Apple ,在未来的软件更新中可能还会调整一些参数。不管怎么说,iPhone的电池应该很容易持续一整天,即使是密集使用。

Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
44h 19min
WiFi Websurfing (Safari Mobile 16)
13h 27min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
23h 17min
Load (maximum brightness)
5h 51min
Apple iPhone 14 Pro
3200 mAh
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra 5G
5000 mAh
Oppo Find X5 Pro
5000 mAh
Motorola Edge 30 Ultra
4610 mAh
Xiaomi 12S Ultra
4860 mAh
Sony Xperia 1 IV
5000 mAh
Honor Magic4 Pro
4600 mAh
Vivo X80 Pro
4700 mAh
Apple iPhone 13 Pro
3095 mAh
Battery Runtime
-7%
-17%
-8%
-11%
-45%
-21%
-21%
6%
Reader / Idle
2659
1973
-26%
1269
-52%
2206
-17%
1766
-34%
979
-63%
1346
-49%
1728
-35%
2614
-2%
H.264
1397
1078
-23%
1142
-18%
1188
-15%
1112
-20%
637
-54%
995
-29%
943
-32%
1493
7%
WiFi v1.3
807
844
5%
788
-2%
872
8%
951
18%
424
-47%
687
-15%
852
6%
993
23%
Load
351
410
17%
367
5%
323
-8%
327
-7%
297
-15%
389
11%
272
-23%
333
-5%

Pros

+ 超强的 120-Hz显示屏
+ 高效的性能
+ 亮度高
+ 良好的相机设置
+ 准确的定位
+ 更新时间短

Cons

- 没有Wi-Fi 6E
- 在美国范围内不使用毫米波。
- 电话机具有更小的尺寸限制
- 支持蓝牙的音频解码器
- 只有 12 个月的保修期

结论--成功的升级与营销的精细化

回顾:Apple iPhone 14 Pro
回顾:Apple iPhone 14 Pro

Apple iPhone 14 Pro在其自身的发展中是朝着正确的方向迈出了一步。新的 A16处理器再次提供了比前代产品更高的性能,但差别并不大。就持续性能而言,它几乎没有比其前辈的 iPhone 13 Pro.经常被批评和经常被复制的缺口已经被一个双孔冲的解决方案所取代,苹果通过软件将其创造性地转化为一个岛屿,为久经考验的技术注入了新的活力。

同样,新的相机传感器有4800万像素,使用像素分选,自2018年以来一直由索尼在Android 。虽然这在技术上并没有使它成为一个主要的新功能,但Apple ,已经设法将该组件很好地整合到iPhone的生态系统中,让人感觉它应该一直存在。图像质量很好,加州人没有过度承诺,说2倍数码变焦的效果好到需要一个专用按钮。

iPhone 14 Pro是一款制作精良的智能手机,很适合其量身定做的生态系统,给竞争对手留下的攻击点很少。

在技术方面,Apple ,几乎所有的事情都做对了,略显逊色的Wi-Fi传输率是极少数的弱点之一。然而,这是否会对日常使用产生任何影响是值得怀疑的。同时,不支持6-GHz的Wi-Fi频段。虽然我们可以原谅欧洲型号的iPhone 14 Pro缺乏毫米波5G,但由于该设备的寿命很长,我们会很高兴看到该功能已经包括在内。同样,有限的蓝牙音频编解码器支持也是一个恼人的问题。

如果你选择一部iPhone,你很可能不会后悔。也就是说,我们发现没有真正的理由从一个 iPhone 12 Pro或13 Pro升级到新机型。如果你想要更多的屏幕空间和更长的电池寿命,那么 iPhone 14 Pro Max姐妹机型可能值得考虑。如果你在Apple 宇宙中感到不自在,很难驾驭它,如果你错过了一些功能,或者只是想花更少的钱,来自Android 部门的强大竞争对手,如 三星Galaxy S22 Ultra, 谷歌Pixel 6 Pro, 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Ultra, 或 Honor 魔法4 Pro都可以是不错的选择。

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

价格和可用性

所有颜色和存储配置的iPhone 14 Pro都可以从以下网站直接购买Apple,而众多型号也可从主要零售商,如BestBuy.

Apple iPhone 14 Pro - 09/30/2022 v7 (old)
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis
92%
Keyboard
67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device
97%
Connectivity
60 / 70 → 85%
Weight
88%
Battery
91%
Display
94%
Games Performance
71 / 64 → 100%
Application Performance
95 / 86 → 100%
Temperature
91%
Noise
100%
Audio
79 / 90 → 87%
Camera
81%
Average
85%
90%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Apple iPhone 14 Pro评测-- 智能手机已经准备好在岛上使用了。Apple
Daniel Schmidt, 2022-10- 5 (Update: 2024-08-15)