Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 台式机显卡评测--英特尔预算内 GPU，支持 1080p 游戏，售价低于 200 美元
去年 10 月，英特尔推出了一款基于当前 GPU 架构、价格相对实惠的显卡，即英特尔 Arc A580。与 英特尔弧 A750和 英特尔 Arc A770不同，所有 Arc-A580 型号均由板卡合作伙伴独家销售。因此，我们将使用华擎提供的型号进行本次评测。华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 采用的图形芯片与两款速度更快的机型相同。英特尔 Arc A580 的着色器单元较少，性能略显不足。即便如此，这块本应较弱的显卡仍能提供出人意料的出色性能--这一点我们已经可以透露。
该显卡配备 8GB GDDR6 VRAM，通过 256 位接口连接。这里没有做任何削减，因为无论是 英特尔 Arc A750和 英特尔弧 A770提供相同的内存接口。英特尔 Arc A750 和英特尔 Arc A770 提供相同的内存接口。 评测过。
从外观上看，华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 并不是最抢眼的显卡，也没有任何 RGB 元素。不过，它安装的散热装置还是给人一种相对强大的感觉--两个 100 毫米的风扇可以在负载情况下保持组件冷却。对于 175 瓦的型号来说，这保证了安静的使用。除了 PCIe 4.0 x16 插槽，电源还通过两个 6 + 2 Pin PCIe 电源插座提供。在外部，华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 提供一个 HDMI-2.0 端口和三个 DisplayPort-2.0 接口。与 Nvidia 相比，我们的测试样本采用了较新的标准，不过 AMD 则更进一步，其 RX-7000 型号采用了 DisplayPort 2.1。
关于我们测试系统的信息
ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC
Processor
Intel Core i9-14900K 24 x 3.2 - 6 GHz, 253 W PL2 / Short Burst, 253 W PL1 / Sustained, Raptor Lake
Graphics adapter
Intel Arc A580 - 8 GB VRAM, Core: 2400 MHz, RAM: 2000 MHz, 175 W TDP, 31.0.101.5333 DCH
Memory
32 GB
, DDR5-6000, CL30
Mainboard
Intel Z690 (Alder Lake-S PCH)
Storage
Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G, 2048 GB
, M.2 NVMe
Weight
807 g, Power Supply: 0 g
Price
179 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
华擎 Arc A580 挑战者 OC 的详细介绍
技术规格对比
| 规格 | Intel Arc A770 | Intel Arc A750 | Intel Arc A580 | Intel Arc A380 | Radeon RX 7700 XT | Radeon RX 7600 | RTX 4060 Ti | RTX 4060 |
| GPU | DG2-512 | DG2-512 | DG2-512 | DG2-128 | Navi 32 XL | Navi 33 XL | AD106 | AD107 |
| 制造工艺 | 6 纳米 | 6 纳米 | 6 纳米 | 6 纳米 | 5/6 纳米 | 6 纳米 | TSMC 4N | TSMC 4N |
| 着色单元 | 4,096 | 3,584 | 3,072 | 1,024 | 3,456 | 2,048 | 4,352 | 3,072 |
| 纹理映射单元 | 256 | 224 | 192 | 64 | 216 | 128 | 136 | 96 |
| 光线加速器 | 32 | 28 | 24 | 8 | 54 | 32 | 34 | 24 |
| 基本时钟 | 2,100 MHz | 2,050 MHz | 1,700MHz | 2,000 MHz | 1,700 MHz | 1,720 MHz | 2,310 MHz | 1,830 MHz |
| 游戏时钟 | - | - | - | - | 2,171 MHz | - | - | 1,815 MHz |
| 提升时钟 | 2,400 MHz | 2,400 MHz | 2,000MHz | 2,050 MHz | 2,544 MHz | 2,535 MHz | 2,460 MHz | 2,105 MHz |
| 高速缓存 | 16 MB | 16 MB | 8 MB | 4 MB | 48 MB | 32 MB | 32 MB | 24 MB |
| 内存总线宽度 | 256 位 | 256 位 | 256 位 | 96 位 | 256 位 | 128 位 | 128 位 | 128 位 |
| 内存带宽 | 560 GB/s | 512 GB/s | 512 GB/s | 186 GB/s | 432 GB/s | 288 GB/s | 288 GB/s | 272 GB/s |
| 内存大小 | 16 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR6 | 6 GB GDDR6 | 12 GB | 8 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR6 |
| TBP | 225 瓦 | 225 瓦 | 175瓦 | 75 瓦 | 245 瓦 | 165 瓦 | 160 瓦 | 115 瓦 |
华擎 Arc A580 挑战者 OC 的时钟频率
华擎 Arc A580 挑战者 OC 的时钟频率大大高于 Intel 公布的 Arc A580 的参考频率。OC 这个缩写向我们揭示了华擎对 Arc A580 显卡进行了超频。在负载情况下，我们注意到测试样品的图形处理器最高时钟频率达到了 2,400 MHz。此外，华擎仅允许该型号显卡消耗 150 瓦的功率。同时，您可以在驱动程序中手动将功耗提高到 180 瓦。不过，在以下基准测试和测试中，我们并未改变其功率目标。
合成基准
合成基准测试向我们展示了华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 的大致性能分类。由于技术框架条件的限制，我们的测试样品在性能上落后于 宏碁掠夺者 BiFrost Arc A750 OC稍稍落后。基于相同的 GPU 芯片，但着色器单元略少，因此差距相对较小。不过，应该指出的是，英特尔目前的显卡还无法赶上 Nvidia 和 AMD 的现有型号。英特尔的 英伟达GeForce RTX 4060和 AMD Radeon RX 7600在某些情况下明显更快，但它们的价格也更高。就性能而言，华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 只能与较老的显卡相媲美，如 NvidiaGeForce RTX 2060 Super或 AMD Radeon RX 6600.
Performance Rating | 3DMark | Unigine Superposition | Unigine Heaven 4.0 | Unigine Valley 1.0 | 3DMark 11
| Performance Rating - Percent | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6600 | |
| Affinity Photo 2 - Combined (Single / Multi GPU) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6600 | |
| 3DMark 05 Standard | 72998 points | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 64759 points | |
| 3DMark Vantage P Result | 95677 points | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 31518 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 236713 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 67326 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 25411 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 12530 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 11729 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Score | 2235 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Score | 9171 points | |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | 9199 points | |
Help | ||
专业应用
AMD 和 Nvidia 都为专业用途提供专用显卡。英特尔并不服务于这一市场，尽管 AMD 和 Nvidia 的消费级显卡也可用于这一目的。相比之下，我们注意到华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 的性能最低。两款速度更快的英特尔 Arc 显卡也出现了类似的情况。因此，在专业领域，目前应避免使用英特尔弧形显卡。
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC i9-14900K | Intel Arc A750 R9 7950X | Intel Arc A770 R9 7950X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super (Desktop) R9 7950X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super (Desktop) R9 7950X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti R9 7950X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 R9 7950X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G R9 7950X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 R9 7950X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti R9 7950X | AMD Radeon RX 7600 R9 7950X | AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT R9 7950X | AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT R9 7950X | AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE R9 7950X | AMD Radeon RX 6600 R9 7950X | AMD Radeon RX 6650 XT R9 7950X | AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT R9 7950X | AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT R9 7950X | Average of class | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECviewperf 12 | 4% | 10% | 70% | 90% | 112% | 115% | 178% | 267% | 393% | 243% | 344% | 410% | 437% | 273% | 341% | 383% | 324% | 86% | |
| 1900x1060 3ds Max (3dsmax-05) | 154 | 166 8% | 179 16% | 220 43% | 247 60% | 297 93% | 251 63% | 290 88% | 382 148% | 436 183% | 279 81% | 373 142% | 427 177% | 444 188% | 258 68% | 310 101% | 363 136% | 377 145% | 192.3 ? 25% |
| 1900x1060 Catia (catia-04) | 162 | 166 2% | 174 7% | 84.5 -48% | 114 -30% | 114 -30% | 113 -30% | 128 -21% | 161 -1% | 192 19% | 273 69% | 351 117% | 386 138% | 448 177% | 256 58% | 314 94% | 339 109% | 360 122% | 105.4 ? -35% |
| 1900x1060 Creo (creo-01) | 45.5 | 45.7 0% | 45.3 0% | 58.8 29% | 65.7 44% | 65.2 43% | 60.6 33% | 73.4 61% | 89.1 96% | 99.4 118% | 115 153% | 123 170% | 148 225% | 155 241% | 133 192% | 142 212% | 152 234% | 154 238% | 64.4 ? 42% |
| 1900x1060 Energy (energy-01) | 2.02 | 2.25 11% | 2.44 21% | 11.6 474% | 12.4 514% | 14.4 613% | 15.9 687% | 22.6 1019% | 31.7 1469% | 48 2276% | 25.5 1162% | 33.4 1553% | 38.4 1801% | 40.3 1895% | 31.3 1450% | 37.6 1761% | 40.6 1910% | 30.1 1390% | 15.2 ? 652% |
| 1900x1060 Maya (maya-04) | 165 | 177 7% | 183 11% | 200 21% | 225 36% | 251 52% | 233 41% | 257 56% | 284 72% | 287 74% | 236 43% | 283 72% | 304 84% | 323 96% | 218 32% | 246 49% | 268 62% | 277 68% | 109.5 ? -34% |
| 1900x1060 Medical (medical-01) | 40.9 | 42.4 4% | 46.7 14% | 49.5 21% | 55.9 37% | 65.6 60% | 82.4 101% | 110 169% | 132 223% | 157 284% | 128 213% | 177 333% | 200 389% | 226 453% | 102 149% | 137 235% | 150 267% | 144 252% | 53.2 ? 30% |
| 1900x1060 Showcase (showcase-01) | 108 | 110 2% | 119 10% | 121 12% | 135 25% | 150 39% | 109 1% | 132 22% | 190 76% | 244 126% | 127 18% | 179 66% | 235 118% | 222 106% | 125 16% | 151 40% | 176 63% | 186 72% | 95.8 ? -11% |
| 1900x1060 Solidworks (sw-03) | 72.3 | 72.6 0% | 73.4 2% | 79.7 10% | 95.1 32% | 93.5 29% | 91.2 26% | 95.1 32% | 109 51% | 118 63% | 221 206% | 288 298% | 322 345% | 319 341% | 232 221% | 242 235% | 275 280% | 290 301% | 86.1 ? 19% |
| SPECviewperf 13 | 6% | 12% | 25% | 45% | 56% | 50% | 81% | 128% | 176% | 150% | 239% | 293% | 315% | 96% | 133% | 175% | 202% | 40% | |
| 3ds Max (3dsmax-06) | 151 | 163 8% | 179 19% | 218 44% | 247 64% | 297 97% | 252 67% | 289 91% | 381 152% | 433 187% | 280 85% | 371 146% | 434 187% | 439 191% | 258 71% | 310 105% | 360 138% | 379 151% | 184.7 ? 22% |
| Catia (catia-05) | 240 | 249 4% | 260 8% | 119 -50% | 163 -32% | 167 -30% | 163 -32% | 189 -21% | 241 0% | 290 21% | 410 71% | 529 120% | 588 145% | 661 175% | 387 61% | 482 101% | 528 120% | 565 135% | 197.9 ? -18% |
| Creo (creo-02) | 87.5 | 88.6 1% | 90 3% | 203 132% | 240 174% | 243 178% | 230 163% | 301 244% | 375 329% | 455 420% | 294 236% | 387 342% | 442 405% | 470 437% | 279 219% | 317 262% | 353 303% | 389 345% | 202 ? 131% |
| Energy (energy-02) | 15.7 | 19.3 23% | 22.5 43% | 21.9 39% | 23.8 52% | 26.1 66% | 34.6 120% | 45.3 189% | 54.2 245% | 72.8 364% | 82.9 428% | 115 632% | 139 785% | 150 855% | 44 180% | 59.8 281% | 74.3 373% | 80.6 413% | 35.7 ? 127% |
| Maya (maya-05) | 285 | 301 6% | 319 12% | 291 2% | 344 21% | 372 31% | 343 20% | 403 41% | 510 79% | 591 107% | 333 17% | 487 71% | 548 92% | 580 104% | 348 22% | 403 41% | 462 62% | 482 69% | 263 ? -8% |
| Medical (medical-02) | 74.9 | 82.8 11% | 80.8 8% | 54.2 -28% | 63.7 -15% | 74.3 -1% | 76.5 2% | 85.1 14% | 112 50% | 132 76% | 226 202% | 300 301% | 332 343% | 372 397% | 88.8 19% | 105 40% | 148 98% | 202 170% | 77.1 ? 3% |
| Showcase (showcase-02) | 109 | 110 1% | 119 9% | 122 12% | 135 24% | 150 38% | 108 -1% | 133 22% | 191 75% | 244 124% | 127 17% | 179 64% | 234 115% | 221 103% | 125 15% | 151 39% | 176 61% | 186 71% | 118 ? 8% |
| Solidworks (sw-04) | 79.5 | 76.8 -3% | 77.5 -3% | 119 50% | 136 71% | 135 70% | 127 60% | 135 70% | 157 97% | 168 111% | 195 145% | 265 233% | 294 270% | 287 261% | 220 177% | 231 191% | 272 242% | 286 260% | 120.4 ? 51% |
| SPECviewperf 2020 | 24% | 21% | 12% | 19% | 47% | 35% | 66% | 115% | 161% | 115% | 202% | 283% | 298% | 42% | 77% | 116% | 143% | 61% | |
| 3840x2160 Medical (medical-03) | 14.5 | 20 38% | 22.3 54% | 10.3 -29% | 12 -17% | 11.9 -18% | 13.7 -6% | 16.5 14% | 22.2 53% | 26.9 86% | 36.1 149% | 56.2 288% | 63.7 339% | 76.1 425% | 20.9 44% | 27.3 88% | 30.1 108% | 39.9 175% | 19.6 ? 35% |
| 3840x2160 Maya (maya-06) | 166 | 180 8% | 195 17% | 162 -2% | 185 11% | 235 42% | 196 18% | 237 43% | 305 84% | 372 124% | 178 7% | 261 57% | 346 108% | 161 -3% | 192 16% | 258 55% | 279 68% | 200 ? 20% | |
| 3840x2160 Energy (energy-03) | 17.6 | 35 99% | 25 42% | 22.9 30% | 17.8 1% | 31.2 77% | 33.2 89% | 44.9 155% | 57.6 227% | 75.7 330% | 67 281% | 95 440% | 111 531% | 133 656% | 29.5 68% | 44.2 151% | 52.2 197% | 56.3 220% | 47.9 ? 172% |
| 3840x2160 Creo (creo-03) | 51.7 | 51.9 0% | 52.9 2% | 77.2 49% | 85.8 66% | 91.2 76% | 85.9 66% | 95.9 85% | 112 117% | 121 134% | 106 105% | 130 151% | 151 192% | 159 208% | 93.4 81% | 105 103% | 123 138% | 130 151% | 75 ? 45% |
| 3840x2160 CATIA (catia-06) | 36.7 | 38.9 6% | 38.9 6% | 30.5 -17% | 36.7 0% | 40.5 10% | 34 -7% | 38.5 5% | 51.6 41% | 61.2 67% | 68 85% | 88.8 142% | 101 175% | 107 192% | 60.8 66% | 70.1 91% | 77.2 110% | 83.8 128% | 45.3 ? 23% |
| 3840x2160 3ds Max (3dsmax-07) | 45.2 | 40.7 -10% | 47.4 5% | 63.1 40% | 69.7 54% | 87 92% | 67.4 49% | 88.8 96% | 122 170% | 147 225% | 72.9 61% | 106 135% | 125 177% | 134 196% | 42.4 -6% | 51.5 14% | 85.4 89% | 96.8 114% | 76.9 ? 70% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
10% | 14% /
14% | 36% /
38% | 51% /
54% | 72% /
74% | 67% /
70% | 108% /
112% | 170% /
175% | 243% /
251% | 169% /
174% | 262% /
267% | 329% /
335% | 350% /
355% | 137% /
145% | 184% /
193% | 225% /
234% | 223% /
230% | 62% /
62% |
游戏性能
除了合成测试外，实际游戏测试对部件性能的分类更为重要。不过，华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 在这里的排名也是类似的。有时它的表现略胜一筹（尽管这往往只足以击败蓝宝石 Pulse Radeon RX 6600），有时又略逊一筹。不过，它与据称速度更快的 宏碁掠夺者 BiFrost Arc A750 OC的差距并不大--只落后几个百分点。
总的来说，华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 适合 1080p 游戏。不过，在玩大多数游戏时，您将不得不放弃最高级别的细节。与此同时，我们的测试样本在使用 "High "预设值时大部分都能达到可玩的帧率。另一方面，在我们测试的一些游戏中，华擎 Arc A580 挑战者 OC 却显得有些吃力。故事游戏《艾伦觉醒 2》（Alan Wake 2）和《阿凡达潘多拉边境》（Avatar Frontiers of Pandora）对图形性能的要求很高，这让我们这款经济实惠的测试卡很快就达到了极限。平均而言，它甚至无法达到 50fps。不过，随着未来驱动程序的改进，这种情况很可能会改变。
如果你现在想使用英特尔显卡玩游戏，那么你就必须做出一些妥协。即便如此，我们在测试过程中遇到的问题还是出乎意料地少。在低于 200 美元的入门级产品中，华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 绝对值得考虑，它显然是目前该领域中最好的显卡。
The Witcher 3 | Metro Exodus | Far Cry 5 | Far Cry 6 | F1 2021 | F1 22 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | A Plague Tale Requiem | Spider-Man Miles Morales | Borderlands 3 | God of War | GTA V | The Quarry | Tiny Tina's Wonderlands | GRID Legends | The Last of Us | F1 23 | Hogwarts Legacy | Returnal | Diablo 4
| F1 2021 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer (874931) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer (874931) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (874931) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (874931) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX, 16GB GDDR6 (874931) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT (874931) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT (874931) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (874931) | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition (874931) | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 (874931) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (874931) | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT (874931) | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC (874931) | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC (874931) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (874931) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6600 (874931) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset + Raytracing AA:T AF:16x | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer (874931) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer (874931) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (874931) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (874931) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT (874931) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX, 16GB GDDR6 (874931) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT (874931) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (874931) | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 (874931) | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition (874931) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (874931) | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC (874931) | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT (874931) | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC (874931) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (874931) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6600 (874931) | |
| F1 23 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (1016022) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (1022189) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX, 16GB GDDR6 (1022189) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT (1026791) | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 (1026791) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X (1008687) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT (1016022) | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC (1042581) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (1021115) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (1016022) | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition (1016022) | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC (1082038) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (1021115) | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT (1016022) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6600 (1016022) | |
| 2560x1440 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (1016022) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (1022189) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX, 16GB GDDR6 (1022189) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT (1026791) | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 (1026791) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X (1008687) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT (1016022) | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC (1042581) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (1021115) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT (1016022) | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition (1016022) | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC (1082038) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (1021115) | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT (1016022) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6600 (1016022) | |
The ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC's P1 values
Performance Rating | Sons of the Forest | Diablo 4 | The Last of Us | Star Wars Jedi Survivor | Resident Evil 4 Remake | The Quarry | Spider-Man Miles Morales | Uncharted Legacy of Thieves Collection | Atomic Heart | Control | Dead Island 2 | Dead Space Remake
光线追踪性能
在光线追踪性能方面，华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 依赖于 24 个 RT 核心。在我们的测试中，我们的测试样品在某种程度上更明显地与 AMD 抗衡，它甚至部分达到了与 AMD Radeon RX 7600 相当的性能水平。不过，与 Nvidia 相比，英特尔不得不承认失败。由于激活了光线追踪技术，其平均帧率大幅下降。如果你想不折不扣地玩游戏，那么你可能需要寻找一款更强大的显卡。
英特尔的 XeSS 可以让你选择通过 AI 升频来提高帧率。如今，很多游戏都提供了这项功能，而且 AMD 的 FSR 技术也适用于英特尔 GPU。
Metro Exodus | Spider-Man Miles Morales | Far Cry 6 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | The Callisto Protocol | Guardians of the Galaxy | Returnal | F1 23 | Star Wars Jedi Survivor | Hogwarts Legacy | Ghostwire Tokyo
| Metro Exodus - 1920x1080 Ultra Quality DXR AF:16x | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X Trio | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SG | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT | |
| ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti OC | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6600 | |
| Spider-Man Miles Morales - 1920x0180 Very High Preset + Ray-Tracing AA:T | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
| MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X Trio | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SG | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti OC | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6600 | |
| Far Cry 6 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics Quality + HD Textures + DXR AA:T | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X Trio | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SG | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 - 1920x1080 Ray Tracing Ultra Preset (DLSS off) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (1.6) | |
| ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti OC (1.6) | |
| MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X Trio (1.61) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SG (1.61) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (1.6) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE (1.5) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT (1.6) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT (1.6) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT (1.6) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X (1.6) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 (1.61) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (1.6) | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 (1.6) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC (1.6) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (1.6) | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC (1.6) | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition (1.6) | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT (1.5) | |
| The Callisto Protocol - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset (without FSR Upscaling) + Full Ray-Tracing | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT | |
| ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti OC | |
| MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X Trio | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SG | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6600 | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| PNY GeForce GTX 1660 | |
| KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super | |
| Guardians of the Galaxy - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Ultra Ray-Tracing | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X Trio | |
| ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti OC | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT | |
| Returnal - 1920x1080 Epic Preset + Epic Ray-Tracing | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
| ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti OC | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| F1 23 - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE (1016022) | |
| MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X Trio (1016022) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT (1022189) | |
| KFA2 GeForce GTX 1660 Super (1016022) | |
| ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti OC (1012607) | |
| PNY GeForce GTX 1660 (1016022) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT (1026791) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE (1021115) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 (1016022) | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 (1026791) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X (1008687) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT (1016022) | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC (1042581) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super (1021115) | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition (1016022) | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC (1082038) | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super (1021115) | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT (1016022) | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6600 (1016022) | |
| Star Wars Jedi Survivor - 1920x1080 Epic Preset + Ray Tracing | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X Trio | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE | |
| ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti OC | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6600 | |
| Hogwarts Legacy - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset + Full Ray Tracing AA:High T | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X Trio | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti OC | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT | |
| AMD Radeon RX 6800 | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| Ghostwire Tokyo - 1920x1080 Highest Settings + Maximum Ray Tracing | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| MSI Radeon RX 6950 XT Gaming X Trio | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
| ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti OC | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FE | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT | |
| Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6600 | |
Overview of the tested games using the ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC
| low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | 4K FSR | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prince of Persia The Lost Crown (2024) | 358 | 358 | 358 | 292 | 152.4 | ||
| Palworld (2024) | 111.9 | 94.8 | 73.5 | 67.9 | 48.5 | 26.7 | |
| Enshrouded (2024) | 62.7 | 54.9 | 47.8 | 41 | 32.9 | 27.5 | 20.4 |
| Helldivers 2 (2024) | 96.5 | 77.2 | 72.7 | 71.6 | 53.7 | 29 | |
| Skull & Bones (2024) | 68 | 64 | 54 | 45 | 38 | 33 | 26 |
| Last Epoch (2024) | 188.3 | 167.3 | 144.1 | 125.1 | 83.9 | 42.2 | |
| Alone in the Dark (2024) | 171.1 | 145.8 | 127.6 | 72.5 | 43.8 | ||
| Horizon Forbidden West (2024) | 72.9 | 67.1 | 48.4 | 46.2 | 38.8 | 24.2 | 23.3 |
| Dragon's Dogma 2 (2024) | 47.1 | 43.2 | 34.4 | 21.8 | |||
| Ghost of Tsushima (2024) | 83.9 | 71.9 | 64.8 | 53.3 | 41.5 | 33.5 | 20.8 |
| Senua's Saga Hellblade 2 (2024) | 41.2 | 35.7 | 28.1 | 18 | 17 | 10.5 | |
| F1 24 (2024) | 241 | 208 | 153.2 | 49.6 | 32 | 25.7 | 14.6 |
排放--效率不是它的强项
噪音排放
华擎 Arc A580 挑战者 OC 配备了两个 100 毫米风扇，运行时噪音很小。由于采用了风扇停止模式，散热器在 2D 使用时不会旋转，这意味着显卡可以完全静音运行。值得一提的是，我们的噪音测量是在开放式设置下进行的。在平均负载下，我们测得的噪音为 34.3 dB（A）。在压力测试中，我们的测试样本达到了 36.9 分贝（A），而在游戏时，这些数值略有上升。同时，我们注意到显卡在负载情况下会发出一些线圈啸叫。游戏时比压力测试时更明显，这也是其最大噪音值出现偏差的原因。在我们的游戏测试中，我们总是在关闭机箱的情况下进行测试，线圈啸叫声并不明显。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25.7 / 25.8 / 25.8 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 34.3 / 36.9 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.3 dB(A) | ||
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 4060 Ti OC | XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7700 XT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -14% | -28% | -5% | -12% | -13% | -4% | -5% | -1% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 25.3 | 25.4 -0% | 25.4 -0% | 24.7 2% | 30 -19% | 30 -19% | 25.8 -2% | 25.4 -0% | 25.4 -0% | 25 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25.7 | 29 -13% | 39 -52% | 26.8 -4% | 30.1 -17% | 30.2 -18% | 25.9 -1% | 26.7 -4% | 26.3 -2% | 27.4 -7% |
| Idle Average * | 25.8 | 29.2 -13% | 39 -51% | 27.2 -5% | 30.1 -17% | 30.2 -17% | 25.9 -0% | 26.7 -3% | 26.3 -2% | 27.5 -7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25.8 | 29.3 -14% | 39 -51% | 27.3 -6% | 30.1 -17% | 30.2 -17% | 25.9 -0% | 26.7 -3% | 26.3 -2% | 28 -9% |
| Load Average * | 34.3 | 35.1 -2% | 39 -14% | 30.7 10% | 30.2 12% | 31.8 7% | 30.3 12% | 29.3 15% | 29.6 14% | 32.6 5% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.1 | 44.2 -19% | 41.5 -12% | 42.6 -15% | 40.2 -8% | 45.2 -22% | 42.5 -15% | 39.6 -7% | 42.1 -13% | |
| Load Maximum * | 36.9 | 49.7 -35% | 42.1 -14% | 43 -17% | 44.7 -21% | 41.1 -11% | 43.5 -18% | 46 -25% | 39.4 -7% | 37.6 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
温度和功率要求
我们在压力测试中对显卡进行了测试，以评估散热装置的性能。总的来说，华擎为 Arc A580 Challenger OC 安装了坚固的散热装置，使其温度得到了很好的控制。我们注意到，在压力测试期间，GPU 芯片和 VRAM 的最高温度达到 78 °C。这意味着显卡始终保持相对低温，避免了因散热问题导致的性能下降。
。 英特尔 Arc A750和 英特尔弧 A770我们已经发现，英特尔弧形显卡并不是最高效的型号。由于采用了相同的架构，华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 也不得不面对这个问题。在压力测试中，我们测试系统的电源平均负载为 340 瓦，而在游戏过程中则高达 310 瓦。与目前的高端机型相比，这些数值看起来非常出色，但就其性能而言，华擎 Arc A580 挑战者 OC 只能排在倒数第二位。华擎为我们的测试样品推荐了 650 瓦的电源，这听起来可能有点过大。毕竟，显卡在标准工作状态下的功率极限只有 175 瓦。然而，当我们看到它的短期负载峰值时，就会很快明白华擎为什么会提出这样的建议。在压力测试中，我们测得的功率高达 350 瓦，这完全是显卡的功劳。
Power Consumption: 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor) | 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor) | Witcher 3 ultra Efficiency (external Monitor)
| Power Consumption / The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (Idle: 86.5 W) | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition | |
| Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG (Idle: 86.4 W) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (Idle: 84.6 W) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SG (Idle: 88.9 W) | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | |
| Power Consumption / FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor) | |
| Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (Idle: 86.5 W) | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT (Idle: 84.6 W) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SG (Idle: 88.9 W) | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG (Idle: 86.4 W) | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | |
| Power Consumption / Witcher 3 ultra Efficiency (external Monitor) | |
| Palit GeForce RTX 4090 GameRock OC | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4080 SG | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4070 EX Gamer | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX | |
| AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 1-Click-OC 2X | |
| Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6750 XT | |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition | |
| XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition | |
| KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SG | |
| Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6650 XT | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A770 OC, 16GB GDDR6 | |
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC | |
| Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC | |
Power Consumption: 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor) | 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor) | Witcher 3 ultra Efficiency (external Monitor)
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption with external monitor
ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC Arc A580, i9-14900K, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø337 (330-351)
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX, 16GB GDDR6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø304 (297-311)
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition Radeon RX 7600, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø333 (323-352)
Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC Arc A750, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø464 (313-512)
ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC Arc A580, i9-14900K, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø312 (302-321)
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX, 16GB GDDR6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø310 (306-336)
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition Radeon RX 7600, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø346 (340-351)
Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC Arc A750, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø329 (315-358)
ASRock Arc A580 Challenger OC Arc A580, i9-14900K, Kingston KC3000 2048G SKC3000D2048G; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø117.9 (110.7-136.3)
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX, 16GB GDDR6 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16G, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø93.3 (87.7-99.3)
XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition Radeon RX 7600, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø91.1 (87.8-100.3)
Acer Predator BiFrost Arc A750 OC Arc A750, R9 7950X, Corsair MP600; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø104.1 (99.1-137.4)
Pros
+ 良好的 1080p 游戏性能
+ 价格低廉
+ AV1 编码和解码
+ 支持光线追踪
+ 8 GB VRAM
+ 风扇停止模式
Cons
- 效率低于竞争对手
- 亟需可调整大小的 BAR
结论：价格实惠的 1080p 游戏显卡
如果您想铤而走险，给英特尔这个 GPU 制造商一个机会，那么华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 显卡目前将以相对较低的价格为您提供不错的性能。200 美元以下就能提供如此性能的显卡恐怕不多见。尽管英特尔的 Alchemist 代组件已在市场上销售了一年多，但在大量驱动程序优化的帮助下，其性能仍在不断提高。
目前，华擎 Arc A580 Challenger OC 作为 PC 系统的全高清游戏显卡，是 AMD 和 Nvidia 的经济实惠的替代产品。
华擎 Arc A580 挑战者 OC 的核心是采用与 AMD 和 Nvidia 相同的显卡。这意味着 A580 的分支也具有相同的技术特性。同时，与英特尔 Arc A750 相比，它的着色器单元数量相对较少，因此性能略显有限。不过，这款价格更实惠的机型拥有相对较大的内存容量，准确地说，是 8GB 内存，而且还通过宽内存接口连接。因此，我们测试的大多数游戏都能以 1080p 高画质运行，表现出色。与 AMD 相比，英特尔也拥有良好的光线追踪性能。不过，Nvidia 在这一领域独占鳌头，性能更胜一筹。在功能设置方面也是如此，Nvidia 的 DLSS 似乎更加成熟。在这方面，英特尔和 AMD 提供了类似的技术，即 XeSS 和 FSR。
价格和供应情况
华擎 Arc A580 挑战者 OC 可在许多在线零售商处购买，目前售价约为165 美元。.
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was freely purchased by the author at his/her own expense. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
