宏碁Aspire 5 A515-57G笔记本电脑评测:RTX 2050的表现疲软
审查模型(A515-57G-53N8)的价格约为1,000欧元(1,030美元)。对于这个价格,你得到的是一个最新一代的英特尔阿尔德湖处理器(高效的 酷睿i5-1240P),16GB DDR4-3200内存(2x 8GB双通道),512GB NVMe M.2固态硬盘,以及一个用于高要求图形应用的NvidiaGeForce RTX 2050。该GPU配有4GB GDDR6 VRAM,但只提供64位内存总线。宏碁为这台笔记本电脑配备了亚光全高清IPS面板,并选择安装Windows 11 Home作为操作系统。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
Aspire 5的竞争对手是其他具有中档硬件的14至15英寸笔记本电脑,如 Honor 魔法书14(也是RTX 2050)。 华硕TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC(RTX 3050)。 华硕ROG Strix G15 G512LI(GTX 1650 Ti)和 联想Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05(GTX 1650).所有这些笔记本都将出现在下面的表格中,用于比较。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
80.7 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.6 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
84.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 20.7 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
80.8 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2020 | Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 2.3 kg | 25.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.1 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2021 | Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 1.8 kg | 17.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
底盘
机箱给我们留下了复杂的感觉。乍一看,Aspire 5似乎是高质量的。时尚(但相当简单)的设计与中灰色的表面结合起来看起来很好。然而,如果你仔细看一下,你会发现只有盖子是由金属制成的。底座部分是由塑料制成的,当你用力按压它时,会表现出明显的弯曲(特别是在键盘上方的中间部分)。总的来说,Aspire 5在这个类别的笔记本电脑中没有最坚固的底盘。
同时,该设备的装配和加工几乎没有什么可以批评的地方。在我们的评测单元上,所有元素之间的接缝都是干净整洁的。铰链的表现符合预期,并正确地完成了它们的工作。当笔记本电脑打开时,该机制被设计为将底座部分的后部提升几毫米,以促进空气流动。
虽然我们希望屏幕边框能稍微薄一些,但Aspire 5并不占用太多空间。它的尺寸为36.3 x 23.8厘米(14.3 x 9.4英寸),是典型的15英寸笔记本电脑,使该设备处于我们比较组的中间位置。其重量(1.8公斤,或3.97磅)的情况也类似。宏碁笔记本电脑在关闭时有1.8厘米(0.7英寸)厚,这对于这样的笔记本电脑来说同样是平均水平。
特点
接口
如果你不介意没有读卡器,你会对端口的选择感到相当满意。Aspire 5不仅提供三个USB-A 3.0端口,而且还有一个支持Thunderbolt 4的USB-C端口。还有一个最新的HDMI 2.1输出,一个RJ45以太网端口,一个音频插孔和一个Kensington锁插槽。不幸的是,电源上的桶状插头非常精致,接近于易碎。这有可能限制该设备的耐用性。
我们喜欢笔记本电脑上的端口排列方式。它们中的大多数都位于两侧的后部,这意味着在使用鼠标时,你的行动不会受到太多限制(而且有许多电缆插在上面)。
连接性
在Wi-Fi性能方面仍有改进的余地。在我们的信号强度测试中,联发科MT7921芯片只提供了一般的性能,这涉及到将笔记本电脑放在离我们的新参考路由器华硕AXE11000一米的地方。发射和接收速率约为1,000 Mbit/s,Aspire 5无法与配备英特尔模块的竞争笔记本保持同步。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头是相当标准的。正如通常的情况一样,它在色彩准确性和图像清晰度方面都有所欠缺。
辅料
除了一些信息手册外,宏碁只在Aspire 5中包含一个充电器。这个90瓦的适配器很好,结构紧凑,约12×5×3厘米(4.7×2.0×1.2英寸),重量仅约0.3公斤(0.7磅)。
维护
打开该产品进行维护的过程与其他多媒体笔记本电脑类似。要进入该设备的内部,你必须首先卸下10个十字螺丝,然后用一个扁平的工具将底盖从笔记本电脑上抬起来。在引擎盖下,你会发现一块小得惊人的主板,有一对热管流向两个风扇。还有两个内存插槽和两个M.2插槽(见照片)。打开Aspire 5还能让你接触到Wi-Fi模块和电池。
担保
宏碁为该笔记本电脑提供24个月的保修。
输入设备
键盘
输入设备充其量只能算是一般。键盘最大的缺点是按键上的字体很小。根据观察角度、时间和环境光线的不同,可能很难将字体与灰色背景区分开来(可读性差)。宏碁应该用黑色的按键和更大的字体来代替。同样,键盘的打字感觉也不太理想。除了前面提到的坚固性问题外,我们对按键相当模糊的反馈也没有留下什么印象。因此,经常打字的人可能应该看看其他替代品。
另一方面,在布局上也没有什么可抱怨的。主要部分大多遵循标准的键盘布局。我们唯一不喜欢的是小的上下方向键和数字键盘的三列而不是四列。背光只有一个亮度,这也是一个遗憾。
触摸板
触摸板也不会赢得任何奖项。和键盘一样,它也感觉相当粘稠--底部的左键和右键区提供的反馈太少。此外,触摸板有响动的趋势,这减弱了设备的质量感。触摸板的手势支持和质地没有什么了不起的,它们既不坏也不特别。触摸板的尺寸为12.5 x 8厘米(4.9 x 3.1英寸),对于一台15英寸的笔记本电脑来说也是绰绰有余。
显示
那些对图像质量非常挑剔的人不会对Aspire 5 A515-57G感到满意。该设备上的全高清屏幕(CMN N156HCA-EAB)充其量只能算是一般。
一旦笔记本电脑被打开,你会马上注意到屏幕的亮度不足。它的平均峰值亮度为234cd/m²,对于户外使用来说太低了,只适合在亮度不高的室内空间使用。
|
Brightness Distribution: 79 %
Center on Battery: 250 cd/m²
Contrast: 1316:1 (Black: 0.19 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.94 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.09
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
44.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.081
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 CMN N156HCA-EAB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 HD140ZB-01A, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI Panda LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE BOE CQ NV156FHM-N69, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 54% | 88% | -8% | 55% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 43.3 | 67.9 57% | 95.8 121% | 39.73 -8% | 68.7 59% |
sRGB Coverage | 65 | 98.5 52% | 99.9 54% | 59.8 -8% | 97.1 49% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.8 | 68.7 53% | 85.1 90% | 41.06 -8% | 70.3 57% |
Response Times | -6% | 67% | -4% | 81% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.6 ? | 37.2 ? -4% | 8.4 ? 76% | 33.6 ? 6% | 5 ? 86% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24.5 ? | 26.3 ? -7% | 10.4 ? 58% | 27.6 ? -13% | 6 ? 76% |
PWM Frequency | 28400 ? | ||||
Screen | 31% | -4% | -31% | -17% | |
Brightness middle | 250 | 330 32% | 354.2 42% | 271.2 8% | 360 44% |
Brightness | 234 | 320 37% | 330 41% | 252 8% | 320 37% |
Brightness Distribution | 79 | 90 14% | 88 11% | 79 0% | 81 3% |
Black Level * | 0.19 | 0.21 -11% | 0.32 -68% | 0.53 -179% | 0.18 5% |
Contrast | 1316 | 1571 19% | 1107 -16% | 512 -61% | 2000 52% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.94 | 1.8 54% | 4.06 -3% | 5.04 -28% | 6.84 -74% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.73 | 4.7 72% | 8.81 47% | 16.07 4% | 12.52 25% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.09 | 1.6 48% | 4.26 -38% | 2.54 18% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.6 | 3 17% | 6.7 -86% | 3.4 6% | 12.94 -259% |
Gamma | 2.081 106% | 2.18 101% | 2.12 104% | 2.09 105% | 2.55 86% |
CCT | 6476 100% | 6697 97% | 6731 97% | 7079 92% | 6973 93% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.8 | 63 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.5 | 97 | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 26% /
31% | 50% /
28% | -14% /
-22% | 40% /
13% |
* ... smaller is better
色彩覆盖率也明显低于IPS技术所能达到的水平。该显示器只能覆盖65%的sRGB色彩空间--只有华硕ROG Strix G15的表现比这更糟。从这个角度来说,好的显示器能够达到100%的sRGB覆盖率。
你也不应该期待15英寸设备的快速屏幕响应时间。60Hz的屏幕对于游戏玩家来说不是一个很好的选择。这款显示器只因其巨大的对比度(1316:1)和低黑度(0.19 cd/m²)而免于受到更差的评价。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.8 ms rise | |
↘ 10.7 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise | |
↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
业绩
Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8在价格和性能方面都是一款中档笔记本电脑。酷睿i5-1240P和GeForce RTX 2050组成了一个平衡的全能组合,有足够的能力完成日常任务,如办公室工作、视频播放和互联网浏览。这同样适用于16GB内存和512GB的固态硬盘存储。然而,Aspire 5不应该被看作是一台游戏笔记本电脑。
测试条件
不幸的是,宏碁预装了其他公司的各种工具和程序,以便多赚几美元。值得庆幸的是,在过去的几年里,包含臃肿的软件已经不那么常见了--至少在其他笔记本电脑制造商那里是这样。因此,这使宏碁以一种消极的方式脱颖而出。由于我们在系统上没有找到任何性能配置文件(例如在宏碁护理中心),所有的测量都是在笔记本电脑的出厂设置下进行的。
处理器
酷睿i5-1240P是英特尔Alder Lake系列的一款全新芯片。这款指定TDP为28瓦的10纳米芯片有4个性能核心(带超线程)和8个效率核心(无超线程),使其能够并行运行多达16个线程。
1240P在我们一系列的CPU测试中表现良好。虽然该处理器的速度没有目前英特尔GPU的TDP高(如 酷睿i5-12500H和 酷睿i7-12650H),但它仍然比旧的处理器,如 酷睿i7-10750H.我们的Cinebench循环测试表明,Aspire 5能够提供足够的持续性能。经过最初的小幅下滑,结果稳定在一个相当稳定的水平。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (2405 - 9694, n=16) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (7407 - 49934, n=16) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (415 - 2462, n=16) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (29405 - 76736, n=16) |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (2135 - 6540, n=16) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (5113 - 23992, n=16) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (8849 - 90370, n=16) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (101.6 - 812, n=16) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (1154 - 5258, n=16) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (11873 - 43661, n=16) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI |
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) |
系统性能
在系统性能方面,Aspire 5在我们比较的笔记本中排名第三。PCMark 10的5,703分表明,它是一台有能力的全能型笔记本电脑。
PCMark 10 Score | 5703 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (23312 - 70537, n=16) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (18989 - 70553, n=16) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (23454 - 62496, n=16) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1240P (85.1 - 188.3, n=11) | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
这台15英寸的笔记本电脑赢得了在对比组中DPC延迟最高的可耻荣誉。根据LatencyMon,宏碁笔记本电脑在处理实时音频和视频处理方面有困难。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE |
* ... smaller is better
大容量存储
在SSD性能方面,Aspire 5也表现不佳。美光公司提供的M.2驱动器(型号2450)在几乎所有的SSD基准测试中都排在最后。虽然如此,但性能差距往往相当小。只有Honor MagicBook 14的SSD比竞争对手快得多。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
GeForce RTX 2050是市场上相当罕见的GPU。大多数情况下,制造商要么通过将低端GPU,如 GeForce MX450在多媒体笔记本电脑中,或者使用与GeForce RTX 3050(Ti)相同水平的显卡。拥有2048个着色单元的RTX 2050的性能在很大程度上取决于制造商指定的TGP。虽然Honor MagicBook 14中的RTX 2050可以获得60瓦的功率,但Aspire 5中的GPU只有35瓦的功率可以使用。这种差距在一些GPU基准测试中非常明显。
尽管这两台笔记本电脑有相同的GPU,但根据我们的性能测试,Honor ,平均比宏碁快25%。由于微薄的TGP,Aspire 5中的RTX 2050只与GeForce GTX 1650的速度差不多,而后者在市场上已经存在了很久。当然,与GTX 1650不同的是,RTX 2050支持光线追踪,但该卡的RT性能非常一般,以至于Nvidia可能根本就不包括这一功能。
3DMark 11 Performance | 10988 points | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 121654 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24390 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 7428 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 3396 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
相应地,游戏测试得出的结论也有分歧。尽管这款笔记本电脑能够在原生全高清分辨率(1,920 x 1,080)下运行较老的、要求不高的游戏,并且经常在高或最大细节水平上运行,但对于具有惊人图形的游戏,你需要降低设置(如 福尔扎地平线5).由于可用的视频内存较少,RTX 2050也不太适合未来的发展。现在,玩家至少应该买一个有6GB或更多的8GB VRAM的GPU。
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (46.7 - 78, n=8) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (24.3 - 39.6, n=9) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 |
在60分钟的比赛中,没有任何异常情况。 Witcher 3测试(FHD/Ultra)。除了帧率的小幅下降,其他方面的性能仍然相当稳定。
Witcher 3 FPS Graph
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 159.8 | 150.8 | 79.3 | 40.2 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 145 | 98.4 | 56.4 | 32.7 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 143.3 | 132.8 | 97.9 | 90.2 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 77.9 | 45.8 | 33.3 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 98.7 | 78.9 | 60.2 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 81 | 53 | 52 | 49 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 164.7 | 73.1 | 60.9 | |
Hunt Showdown (2020) | 112.2 | 51 | 43 | |
Doom Eternal (2020) | 121.5 | 86.9 | ||
Gears Tactics (2020) | 164 | 84.2 | 55.1 | 35.6 |
Death Stranding (2020) | 68.3 | 54.2 | 49.8 | 48.3 |
Crysis Remastered (2020) | 130.8 | 65.4 | 25.3 | 20 |
Serious Sam 4 (2020) | 123 | 42.8 | 31.9 | 28.4 |
Mafia Definitive Edition (2020) | 60.7 | 42 | 38.8 | |
Star Wars Squadrons (2020) | 202 | 114 | 111.2 | 93.5 |
Watch Dogs Legion (2020) | 64 | 46 | 39 | 18 |
Dirt 5 (2020) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) | 0 game wont start (crash) |
Assassin´s Creed Valhalla (2020) | 72 | 42 | 21 | 7 |
Yakuza Like a Dragon (2020) | 53.1 | 43.5 | 42.6 | 38.8 |
Hitman 3 (2021) | 132 | 68.3 | 59 | 53.8 |
Outriders (2021) | 55.3 | 34.6 | 33.5 | 30.3 |
Resident Evil Village (2021) | 90 | 64.4 | 57.9 | 47.9 |
Mass Effect Legendary Edition (2021) | 69.8 | 67.9 | ||
Days Gone (2021) | 72 | 49 | 44.5 | 32.6 |
Deathloop (2021) | 77.9 | 39.5 | 30.1 | 22.4 |
Alan Wake Remastered (2021) | 73.6 | 57.8 | 49.7 | |
Far Cry 6 (2021) | 81 | 51 | 43 | 27 |
Back 4 Blood (2021) | 155 | 82.4 | 65.8 | 65.3 |
Guardians of the Galaxy (2021) | 67 | 48 | 47 | 45 |
Riders Republic (2021) | 76 | 49 | 38 | 33 |
Forza Horizon 5 (2021) | 111 | 62 | 53 | 18 |
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) | 138.2 | 89.3 | 63.1 | 52.6 |
Halo Infinite (2021) | 72.5 | 54.8 | 40.7 | 37.5 |
God of War (2022) | 42.6 | 37 | 29 | 19.7 |
Rainbow Six Extraction (2022) | 88 | 70 | 66 | 42 |
Dying Light 2 (2022) | 34.9 | 28.5 | 23.5 | |
GRID Legends (2022) | 104 | 70.4 | 61.4 | 49.2 |
Elden Ring (2022) | 50.1 | 43.1 | 39 | 34.9 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 45.5 | 42.1 | 28.1 | 27.4 |
Elex 2 (2022) | 46.5 | 36.7 | 32.4 | 29.6 |
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022) | 53.7 | 51.5 | 50.8 | 45 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 74.6 | 59.2 | 37.8 | 29.5 |
Vampire Bloodhunt (2022) | 115.8 | 77.7 | 72.8 | 65.8 |
F1 22 (2022) | 71 | 69 | 56 | 16 |
The Quarry (2022) | 50.7 | 36.9 | 30.7 | 23.6 |
排放
噪声排放
鉴于这款笔记本电脑所提供的性能,它在负载下是相当响亮的。在42至47 dB(A)时,产生的噪音清晰可闻,足以困扰许多用户。这就是说,它的一些竞争对手也同样响亮,甚至可能更吵。不过在怠速状态下,Aspire 5在大部分情况下是令人愉快的安静,因为风扇要么不转,要么几乎听不到。但是,冷却系统不时地转动一下,在我们看来,这有点不必要(特别是当笔记本电脑运行简单任务时)。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25 / 29 / 31 dB(A) |
Load |
| 46 / 47 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25 dB(A) |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 6% | -2% | -15% | 5% | |
off / environment * | 25 | 24.3 3% | 23.9 4% | 27.7 -11% | 24.9 -0% |
Idle Minimum * | 25 | 24.3 3% | 24 4% | 34.2 -37% | 24.9 -0% |
Idle Average * | 29 | 24.3 16% | 24 17% | 36 -24% | 24.9 14% |
Idle Maximum * | 31 | 24.3 22% | 32.3 -4% | 36.6 -18% | 30.8 1% |
Load Average * | 46 | 39.8 13% | 43.7 5% | 44.3 4% | 41.9 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42 | 45.4 -8% | 53.4 -27% | 47.9 -14% | 41.9 -0% |
Load Maximum * | 47 | 50.6 -8% | 53.6 -14% | 49.3 -5% | 41.7 11% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
发热情况与其他多媒体笔记本电脑相似。在我们进行了60分钟的压力测试(运行FurMark和Prime95)后,顶部的温度高达43°C(109°F),底部的温度高达48°C(118°F)。虽然这些数值不是最佳值,但只要你不把设备放在腿上,它们是可以接受的。在空闲状态下,整个机箱保持良好的冷却状态,低于30°C(86°F)。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.7 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.2 °C / -4 F).
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -3% | 9% | -8% | 15% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 43 | 44.6 -4% | 43.4 -1% | 46.2 -7% | 39.8 7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 48 | 51.6 -8% | 44.4 7% | 53.6 -12% | 36.5 24% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26 | 26.1 -0% | 21.2 18% | 27.4 -5% | 22.9 12% |
Idle Bottom * | 27 | 26.8 1% | 24 11% | 28.6 -6% | 23 15% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
特别是CPU,在压力测试中挣扎。虽然GeForce RTX 2050甚至设法略微提高其时钟速度(约920兆赫),但Core i5-1240P节流到只有900兆赫(P核)和700兆赫(E核)。在测试期间,CPU和GPU的温度达到约60°C(140°F)。
发言人
内置2.0扬声器系统的音质更偏向于平均水平。它特别缺乏低音,这是笔记本电脑扬声器的典型特征。最大音量(72分贝)也可以做得更好。
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 60% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 44% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 49% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理
消耗功率
图形切换 (Nvidia Optimus)有助于确保Aspire 5在空闲时相当有效地运行。闲置功耗为4至13瓦,该设备完全不必在竞争中畏缩不前。我们的电源使用监测器显示,在运行3D图形时,该笔记本电脑需要60至70瓦的功率。这一水平的功耗可以被认为是平均水平,不会使电源适配器过载。
Off / Standby | 0.3 / Watt |
Idle | 4 / 8 / 13 Watt |
Load |
62 / 70 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -25% | -121% | -63% | -44% | -39% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4 | 4.5 -13% | 9.2 -130% | 5.7 -43% | 6.9 -73% | 6.78 ? -70% |
Idle Average * | 8 | 10.1 -26% | 15.9 -99% | 9.3 -16% | 10 -25% | 11.3 ? -41% |
Idle Maximum * | 13 | 10.5 19% | 29.5 -127% | 20.9 -61% | 12.6 3% | 13.4 ? -3% |
Load Average * | 62 | 83.2 -34% | 124.8 -101% | 105.1 -70% | 96 -55% | 71.1 ? -15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 60 | 85 -42% | 129.2 -115% | 94.5 -58% | 75 -25% | |
Load Maximum * | 70 | 107.1 -53% | 178.4 -155% | 160.8 -130% | 134 -91% | 117.3 ? -68% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Energieaufnahme mit externem Monitor
电池寿命
尽管Aspire 5只有一个50Wh的电池,但它拥有很好的电池寿命。在通过Wi-Fi浏览网页时,它能够持续大约7小时(显示亮度为150cd/m²)。这一水平的电池寿命只有联想Yoga Creator 7(70Wh,约9小时)和Honor MagicBook 14(75Wh,约11小时)可以超越,因为它们的电池更大。
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8 i5-1240P, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 50 Wh | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 75 Wh | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Strix G15 G512LI i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 48 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Creator 7 15IMH05 82DS000VGE i7-10750H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 70 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 32% | -43% | -19% | 20% | 29% | |
Reader / Idle | 947 | 797 -16% | 1543 63% | 1168 ? 23% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 424 | 665 57% | 241 -43% | 271 -36% | 539 27% | 628 ? 48% |
Load | 84 | 90 7% | 81 -4% | 59 -30% | 97.8 ? 16% | |
H.264 | 755 | 834 | 821 ? |
Pros
Cons
判决书
不幸的是,制造商显然在Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8上走了一些弯路以降低成本。
在我们看来,如此暗淡无光的显示屏在一台售价1000欧元(1030美元)的笔记本电脑上没有任何意义。同样,机箱(关键词:坚固)和输入设备(海绵状反馈)也不能完全证明该产品的要价。GeForce RTX 2050也不完全是要让人惊叹。该显卡的TGP为35瓦,使其无法发挥全部潜力。
Aspire 5值得强调的一些积极因素包括其出色的电池寿命、低能耗、空的M.2插槽和雷电4端口的存在。
尽管如此,我们建议你在这个价格范围内看看其他具有类似规格的设备,如Honor MagicBook 14 ,这是一款滑点更少、质量更好的笔记本电脑。
价格和可用性
宏碁Aspire 5 A515-57G可从亚马逊购买。并将为你提供大约1000欧元(1030美元),这取决于配置。
Acer Aspire 5 A515-57G-53N8
- 09/21/2022 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser