华硕TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC笔记本评测。1440p、165赫兹和全P3颜色，价格低于1000美元
与华硕ROG旗舰系列不同，华硕TUF系列是中端游戏笔记本的主场，通常省略了RGB灯或华硕键鼠等豪华功能，以支持更实惠的价格。尤其是TUF Dash F15 FX517系列可以配置预算GeForce RTX 3050选项（FX517ZC），一直到RTX 3070（FX517ZR）。本评论侧重于RTX 3050选项。
我们建议查看我们对RTX 3070配置的现有评论，因为它与RTX 3050配置共享相同的1440p 165 Hz显示屏、Core i7-12650H CPU和基本相同的物理功能。这一领域的竞争者包括其他零售价为1000美元或更低的经济型游戏笔记本电脑，如 戴尔G15 5510, MSI Bravo 15, 联想IdeaPad Gaming 3 15, 或 技嘉G5.
更多华硕评论。
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC (TUF Dash F15 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i7-12650H 10 x 1.7 - 4.7 GHz, 93 W PL2 / Short Burst, 57 W PL1 / Sustained, Alder Lake-H
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU - 4 GB VRAM, Core: 1550 MHz, RAM: 1525 MHz, 75 W TDP, GDDR6, 516.59, MUX, Optimus
Memory
16 GB
, DDR5-4800, SK Hynix, 40-39-39-76, Dual-Channel, 2x SODIMM
Display
15.60 inch 16:9, 2560 x 1440 pixel 188 PPI, BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, AdaptiveSync, glossy: no, 165 Hz
Mainboard
Intel Alder Lake-P PCH
Storage
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, 512 GB
Weight
1.945 kg, Power Supply: 599 g
Price
950 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.9 kg | 20.7 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
| 85.8 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 20.7 mm | 15.60" | 2560x1440 | |
| 81 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Dell G15 5510 i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 2.5 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 78.2 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US R5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M | 2.3 kg | 24.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 79.7 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 2 kg | 24.2 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 81.7 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Gigabyte G5 GD i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 2.1 kg | 31.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
案例
连接性
值得注意的是，虽然有两个USB-C接口，但只有最靠近前缘的那个支持USB-C充电。除此之外，这两个端口都能够使用DisplayPort-over-USB。
沟通
该模型没有Wi-Fi 6E支持，可能是为了节省成本。不过，对于经济型游戏玩家的目标受众来说，性能是足够的，也足够稳定。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1278 (997-1422)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1428 (759-1517)
网络摄像头
集成的网络摄像头是标准的100万像素，没有隐私快门或红外功能。
18.5 ∆E
13.8 ∆E
17.8 ∆E
20.7 ∆E
19.2 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
15.2 ∆E
18.8 ∆E
19 ∆E
15.7 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
14.9 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
16.1 ∆E
23.6 ∆E
14.5 ∆E
20.6 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
16 ∆E
17.5 ∆E
16.8 ∆E
12.5 ∆E
维护
底部面板只需一把飞利浦螺丝刀就可以非常容易地拆下，露出2个M.2存储托架、2个SODIMM插槽，以及藏在主M.2固态硬盘下面的WLAN模块。与FX517ZR相比，我们的FX517ZC在GPU上使用了较少的铜热管，如下图所示，重量稍轻。
显示
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 355 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 330.2 cd/m² Minimum: 17.85 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 354.2 cd/m²
Contrast: 1107:1 (Black: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.06 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 6.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR BOE CQ NE156QHM-NY1, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Dell G15 5510 YMHWH_156HRA (CMN1522), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE LEN156FHD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte G5 GD Chi Mei N156HRA-EA1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 1% | -48% | -47% | -50% | -48% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 95.8 | 98.4 3% | 41.6 -57% | 42.1 -56% | 39.7 -59% | 41.8 -56% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.9 | 99.9 0% | 62.2 -38% | 62.8 -37% | 59.6 -40% | 62.3 -38% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 85.1 | 85.9 1% | 43 -49% | 43.6 -49% | 41.1 -52% | 43.2 -49% |
| Response Times | 22% | -198% | -162% | -345% | -217% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 8.4 ? | 5.6 ? 33% | 33.3 ? -296% | 25.6 ? -205% | 46.4 ? -452% | 34.4 ? -310% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 10.4 ? | 9.4 ? 10% | 20.7 ? -99% | 22.8 ? -119% | 35.2 ? -238% | 23.2 ? -123% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||||
| Screen | 17% | -5% | -25% | -15% | -5% | |
| Brightness middle | 354.2 | 286 -19% | 288 -19% | 265.1 -25% | 307 -13% | 261 -26% |
| Brightness | 330 | 266 -19% | 264 -20% | 245 -26% | 292 -12% | 246 -25% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 87 -1% | 88 0% | 87 -1% | 88 0% | 87 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.25 22% | 0.24 25% | 0.35 -9% | 0.21 34% | 0.19 41% |
| Contrast | 1107 | 1144 3% | 1200 8% | 757 -32% | 1462 32% | 1374 24% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.06 | 2.14 47% | 3.67 10% | 4.68 -15% | 5.9 -45% | 3.9 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.81 | 5.22 41% | 18.12 -106% | 19.96 -127% | 21.6 -145% | 19.26 -119% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.7 | 2.8 58% | 2.6 61% | 4.5 33% | 4.9 27% | 2.7 60% |
| Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.23 99% | 2.187 101% | 2.22 99% | 2.26 97% | 2.248 98% |
| CCT | 6731 97% | 7092 92% | 6971 93% | 6632 98% | 6504 100% | 6828 95% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.67 | 3.22 | 3.7 | 4.8 | 3.24 | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 13% /
14% | -84% /
-45% | -78% /
-51% | -137% /
-74% | -90% /
-48% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 10.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 6.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 25 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 8.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 4.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows fast response rates in our tests and should be suited for gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 18 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
业绩
测试条件
在运行下面的任何性能基准测试之前，我们将我们的设备设置为涡轮和独立GPU模式。该系统利用MSHybrid/MUX进行图形切换，用户可以通过Armoury Crate软件进行切换。我们强烈建议用户熟悉Armoury Crate，因为它是系统的指挥中心。该模型甚至在键盘上有一个方便的专用键来启动该应用程序。
处理器
CPU的总体性能与以下方面最为相似 酷睿i7-11800H在多线程应用中，与酷睿i7-11800H最为相似，而在单线程应用中则快了约15%至20%。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC Intel Core i7-12650H: Ø1811 (1786.43-1839.59)
Eurocom RX315 NH57AF1 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1697 (1672.94-1779.91)
MSI Alpha 15 B5EEK-008 AMD Ryzen 7 5800H: Ø1973 (1963.86-1985.21)
MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 Intel Core i7-11800H: Ø1910 (1886.79-2011.67)
MSI GE67 HX 12UGS Intel Core i7-12800HX: Ø3215 (3163.31-3383.24)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (2106 - 6009, n=14) | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (552 - 696, n=14) | |
| MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (753 - 2253, n=14) | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (206 - 261, n=14) | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (6.62 - 17.4, n=16) | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (35.1 - 58.5, n=14) | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
| MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| MSI GS66 Stealth 10UG | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| MSI GP66 Leopard 11UH-028 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Dell G15 5515 | |
| Gigabyte A5 X1 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (0.4584 - 0.515, n=14) | |
| MSI GE67 HX 12UGS | |
| Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR | |
| MSI Raider GE66 12UHS | |
| MSI Vector GP66 12UGS | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (5422 - 15620, n=14) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (26386 - 76434, n=14) | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (1479 - 3244, n=14) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (59278 - 89537, n=14) | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (4690 - 8726, n=14) | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (15001 - 37738, n=14) | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (32702 - 92530, n=14) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (443 - 891, n=14) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (3096 - 8448, n=14) | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (22046 - 44164, n=14) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
系统性能
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| CrossMark / Overall | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| CrossMark / Productivity | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| CrossMark / Creativity | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU () | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 6908 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (43261 - 69735, n=14) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (47313 - 67412, n=14) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (45617 - 59361, n=14) | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-12650H (71.6 - 103.9, n=14) | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
我们在主页上打开多个浏览器标签时遇到了DPC问题。在60FPS下的4K视频播放是完美的，在我们长达1分钟的视频中只有一个掉帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 支持多达2个M.2 SSDs
我们的测试设备配备了一个中档的 英特尔670p固态硬盘以获得约2300MB/s的持续连续读取率。该系统可以同时支持两个内部M.2 2280 SSD。
Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
2837.08 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1660.58 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
2640.25 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
1655.7 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
467.15 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
433.99 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
87.31 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
247.75 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Gigabyte G5 GD | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR | |
| Dell G15 5510 | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC | |
| Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE | |
| MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC: Ø2180 (1949.01-2325.57)
GPU性能
我们的75W GeForce RTX 3050的性能比105W的RTX 3050大约慢40%。 GeForce RTX 3070在FX517ZR中。当运行像《赛博朋克2077》这样的GPU重度游戏时，这种差异变得更加明显，我们的RTX 3050几乎落后50%。仍在使用旧版RTX 2060的笔记本玩家并没有错过什么，因为图灵GPU比RTX 3050快大约25%。
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 18168 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 45518 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 12139 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 5427 points | |
Help | ||
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | The Witcher 3 | GTA V | Strange Brigade | X-Plane 11.11 | Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 | Dota 2 Reborn
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU: Ø47.4 (38-53)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTA V (2015) | 184 | 179 | 148.2 | 70.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 282.1 | 171.6 | 98.7 | 51.9 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 176.5 | 163.2 | 156.3 | 147.7 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 143.4 | 74 | 51 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 148.1 | 129.9 | 103.1 | |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 320 | 135.8 | 108.1 | 90.8 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 77.9 | 62.1 | 44 | 36.1 |
排放
系统噪音 - 游戏时超过50dB(A)
风扇噪音在很大程度上取决于Armoury Crate的电源配置文件设置。Windows、静音、平衡、涡轮和手动。如果只是简单的网络浏览或流媒体，我们强烈建议使用静音模式，否则内部风扇会相当响。例如，如果在平衡模式下，风扇会经常脉冲到32 dB(A)，而沉默的背景是24 dB(A)，仅仅是网络浏览。
在平衡模式和涡轮模式下玩游戏时，风扇噪音将分别稳定在48.7分贝（A）和53.4分贝（A）。我们下面的压力测试部分显示，只有在Turbo模式下才能获得更高的TDP和TGP，这意味着如果用户想获得笔记本的全部性能，就必须忍受更响亮的风扇。50多分贝（A）的范围高于大多数其他游戏笔记本电脑，包括戴尔G15 5510或联想Ideapad Gaming 3 15 ，每个都有相同的RTX 3050 GPU。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 24 / 24 / 32.3 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 43.7 / 53.6 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.9 dB(A) | ||
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, i7-12650H, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB | Dell G15 5510 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-10500H, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N | MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US Radeon RX 5500M, R5 5600H, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i5-11300H, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD | Gigabyte G5 GD GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i5-11400H, ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -6% | -1% | -2% | 4% | -9% | |
| off / environment * | 23.9 | 26 -9% | 26 -9% | 24.5 -3% | 23.9 -0% | 24 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 24 | 26 -8% | 26 -8% | 24.5 -2% | 23.9 -0% | 29 -21% |
| Idle Average * | 24 | 32 -33% | 27 -13% | 32.8 -37% | 26.8 -12% | 30 -25% |
| Idle Maximum * | 32.3 | 33 -2% | 33 -2% | 32.8 -2% | 26.8 17% | 32 1% |
| Load Average * | 43.7 | 48 -10% | 45 -3% | 34.5 21% | 43.5 -0% | 53 -21% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.4 | 47 12% | 45 16% | 42.5 20% | 43.5 19% | 52 3% |
| Load Maximum * | 53.6 | 49 9% | 47 12% | 58.5 -9% | 53.1 1% | 54 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
在游戏时，键盘中心的表面温度可以达到33摄氏度到37摄氏度，这比我们观察到的更冷。 Acer Swift X 16配备相同的RTX 3050 GPU的温度要低几度以上。华硕的热点可以达到43摄氏度或更高，但值得庆幸的是，这个区域在第一排键盘按键上方，正如下面的温度图所示，用户在游戏时不太可能触摸到这个区域。
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 19.2 °C / 67 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 19.4 °C / 66.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+9.5 °C / 17.1 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.4 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 19.2 °C / 67 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.3 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 19.4 °C / 66.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+9.5 °C / 17.1 F).
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR Intel Core i7-12650H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU | Dell G15 5510 Intel Core i5-10500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, AMD Radeon RX 5500M | Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE Intel Core i5-11300H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Gigabyte G5 GD Intel Core i5-11400H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -36% | -15% | -32% | -10% | -20% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 43.4 | 52 -20% | 52 -20% | 52.2 -20% | 43.2 -0% | 45 -4% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 44.4 | 52 -17% | 49 -10% | 48.6 -9% | 47.9 -8% | 50 -13% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 21.2 | 33 -56% | 26 -23% | 38 -79% | 24.9 -17% | 28 -32% |
| Idle Bottom * | 24 | 36 -50% | 26 -8% | 28.4 -18% | 27 -13% | 31 -29% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在启动Prime95压力时，CPU时钟速率、核心温度和封装功耗将分别飙升至3.7 GHz、95 C和93 W。然而，时钟频率将立即开始下降，最终稳定在2.9GHz和57W的封装功耗，以防止核心温度达到任何更高。很明显，冷却解决方案是提高CPU性能的一个限制因素。
当运行在平衡电源配置文件时，GPU时钟、内存时钟和核心温度将分别稳定在1612 MHz、1500 MHz和86 C。 Witcher 3 在平衡电源配置文件上运行时，GPU时钟和内存时钟将分别稳定在1612 MHz、1500 MHz和86 C。如果在Turbo模式下运行，GPU时钟和内存时钟将略有增加，但GPU温度将保持不变，因为如上所述，Turbo模式下的风扇噪音更高，以补偿更高的时钟。请注意，在Turbo模式下运行时，GPU和CPU封装的功耗将分别从50W增加到65W和19W增加到28W。 Witcher 3在Turbo模式下，GPU和CPU的功耗将分别从50W和19W增加到28W。
游戏时的GPU温度与FX517ZR一样高，尽管我们的GPU速度要慢得多。
| CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(℃) | GPU平均温度(℃) | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 42 | 39 |
| Prime95压力 | ~2.9 | -- | 95 | 52 |
| Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | 2.0 | 1455 | 84 | 87 |
| Witcher 3 应力（平衡模式） | ~0.8 | 1612 | 68 | 86 |
| Witcher 3 应力（涡轮模式） | ~0.9 | 1665 | 78 | 86 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 70% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 15% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--仍旧是耗电大户
消耗功率
如果RTX 3050比RTX 3070慢40%，这是否意味着我们可以预期功耗也会降低40%？不幸的是，我们的FX517ZC在相同的图形设置下运行相同的游戏时，需求仅比FX517ZR少7%。
请注意，FX517ZC使用的是180瓦的交流适配器（约15 x 7.2 x 2.3厘米），而FX517ZR使用的是稍大的200瓦适配器。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 0.71 / 7.3 Watt |
| Idle | 9.2 / 15.9 / 29.5 Watt |
| Load |
124.8 / 178.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1440, 15.6" | Dell G15 5510 i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, SK Hynix BC711 HFM512GD3HX015N, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US R5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M, Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Micron 2210 MTFDHBA512QFD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte G5 GD i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, ESR512GTLG-E6GBTNB4, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 4% | 28% | 33% | 35% | 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 9.2 | 10 -9% | 3 67% | 6.6 28% | 4.9 47% | 13 -41% |
| Idle Average * | 15.9 | 14 12% | 8 50% | 9.8 38% | 8.3 48% | 15 6% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.5 | 20 32% | 13 56% | 10.8 63% | 8.9 70% | 20 32% |
| Load Average * | 124.8 | 122 2% | 103 17% | 70.5 44% | 81 35% | 102 18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 129.2 | 138.6 -7% | 139.5 -8% | 103.2 20% | 119 8% | 124 4% |
| Load Maximum * | 178.4 | 189 -6% | 204 -14% | 175 2% | 172 4% | 148 17% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø129.2 (120.8-140)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø138.6 (134.5-145.2)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø154.9 (127.5-178.4)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø140.5 (116.2-181.1)
Power Consumption external Monitor
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø112.7 (107.4-163.3)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø108.1 (77.7-129.4)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø109.9 (95.4-127.3)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø134.5 (129.8-159.5)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø126.2 (119.9-133)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø129.4 (128-137.1)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø121.2 (115.1-131)
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø133.4 (128.7-138)
电池寿命 - 没有那么长
电池寿命比预期的要短，但我们预计它是一个错误。当设置为平衡电源配置文件，并通过MSHybrid激活集成GPU时，我们只能记录到4小时的运行时间，而FX517ZR为7小时。即使在重复测试后，结果也不会改善。
| Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR i7-12650H, GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU, 76 Wh | Dell G15 5510 i5-10500H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 56 Wh | MSI Bravo 15 B5DD-010US R5 5600H, Radeon RX 5500M, 53 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad Gaming 3 15IHU-82K1002RGE i5-11300H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 45 Wh | Gigabyte G5 GD i5-11400H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 41 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 73% | 50% | 56% | 65% | -23% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 241 | 417 73% | 362 50% | 375 56% | 397 65% | 186 -23% |
| Reader / Idle | 650 | 680 | 549 | 339 | ||
| H.264 | 346 | 460 | 214 | |||
| Load | 137 | 57 | 58 | 64 | 68 |
Pros
+ 165赫兹1440p IPS显示屏，具有快速响应时间和P3色彩
+ 易于维修；2个SODIMM，2个M.2 2280 SSD插槽
+ 支持Thunderbolt 4
+ 价格相对便宜
+ 可以通过USB-C充电
Cons
- 负载下CPU和GPU温度很高
- 相对较高的耗电量
- 有限的CPU Turbo Boost潜力
- 没有网络摄像头隐私快门
- 底部边框很厚
结论 - 入门级的价格和出色的高级别显示
除了明显的价格节省，人们可能更喜欢入门级游戏笔记本电脑，因为与更强大的高端选项相比，它们的风扇更安静，温度更低，电池寿命更长，功耗更低。因此，我们期望华硕TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC及其RTX 3050比其TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR RTX 3070对应产品更安静、更冷、更持久、要求更低。现实情况是，FX517ZC和FX517ZR之间在温度、功耗和噪音方面的任何差异，相对于它们之间非常大的GPU性能差距而言，都是不幸的小事。换句话说，如果你希望FX517ZC比它的高端配置明显更安静、更冷、更持久，那么你可能会感到失望。
华硕TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC配备的1440p165 IPS显示屏比其价格范围的预期要好。然而，功耗、风扇噪音和电池寿命并没有比更快的高端机型好。
然而，对于一个入门级的游戏笔记本电脑，FX517ZC仍然是相当不错的，因为它没有吝啬在显示器、内存或CPU上，而这是许多其他产品所不具备的。 许多其他游戏笔记本电脑往往在1000美元和以下的范围内做。1440p面板提供全P3覆盖，快速响应时间，自适应同步，以及165赫兹，这在预算系统中是非常罕见的。第12代酷睿i7-12650H CPU，虽然与第11代酷睿i7-11800H没有什么不同，但在这种情况下，与经济实惠的RTX 3050 GPU搭配得很好。
价格和可用性
华硕TUF Dash F15 FX517系列现在已经在网上广泛销售。然而，我们特定的RTX 3050 SKU并不常见。用户会发现RTX 3050 Ti、RTX 3060和RTX 3070的配置在写这篇文章时更容易获得。RTX 3060配置可以在亚马逊上找到https://www.amazon.com/ASUS-Display-i7-12650H-Thunderbolt-FX517ZM-AS73/dp/B09RMH9B6F/?tag=nbcnewsnet-20售价1070美元，而RTX 3050 Ti可以在百思买上找到，售价1200美元。售价为1200美元。
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZC
- 08/08/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Gaming - Weighted Average
Price comparison
