Honor MagicBook 14 2022回顾。配备RTX 2050的多媒体笔记本电脑
到目前为止,Honor's MagicBook 14一直是一个相当便宜的多媒体笔记本。 相当便宜的多媒体笔记本(起价约850美元),配备英特尔或AMD处理器,与华为的MateBook D系列有很多相似之处。这种情况现在随着新的MagicBook 14 2022的推出而改变,因为外壳已经大大升级,Honor ,现在部署了更强大的组件,如可选的 GeForce RTX 2050 GPU.
这次审查的主题是一个带有专用GPU的模型,支持Alder Lake H处理器(酷睿i5-12500H).对于1299欧元(约1300美元)的价格,你还会收到16GB的内存,512GB的SSD和14英寸的3:2格式的显示屏,我们已经知道从 华为MateBook 14.没有GeForce GPU的基本型号价格为1099欧元(约1100美元)。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Honor MagicBook 14 2022 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | 1.6 kg | 16.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
87.2 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.7 kg | 18.87 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
87.7 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | SCHENKER Vision 14 i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | 1.1 kg | 15.6 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2022 | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | 1.5 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
84.8 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
86.4 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2022 | Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.5 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 像MateBook 14
新款Honor MagicBook 14的整个外壳看起来像 华为的MateBook 14,即使在细节上有轻微差异。这并不是一个批评点,因为Honor ,与前代产品相比,该设备有了明显的升级,铝制机箱的质量非常令人满意。做工和稳定性都很好:没有吱吱嘎嘎的声音,底座在压力下也只是轻微弯曲。
中央铰链从根本上说调整得很好,用一只手打开屏幕没有问题。然而,不能完全防止摇晃,这当然是由于外形因素和相对较深的屏幕盖子造成的。当对屏幕背面施加大量压力时,显示屏上会出现图像伪影,但这在日常使用中不应该引起关注。
我们还发现太空灰的外壳颜色在视觉上很吸引人,而且表面不是特别容易被弄脏。显示屏边缘相当窄,特别是在侧面,屏幕与机身的比例总体上为82%。
新的MagicBook 14的重量不到1.56公斤,并不轻,但这也是由于专用显卡、冷却和大电池的原因。然而,与竞争对手相比,该设备的表现并不差。只有申克视觉14的移动性要好得多,只有1.1公斤。GeForce 版本的MagicBook 14配备了一个相当笨重的135瓦电源适配器,连同电缆一起又重了500克。另一方面,iGPU版本是与著名的65瓦插入式电源适配器一起出售(约200克)。
设备--无雷电的MagicBook
在连接方面,MagicBook 14同时提供现代的USB-C端口和传统的USB-A端口,这对日常使用非常实用。你也不需要没有HDMI输出。然而,制造商削减了USB 4和Thunderbolt的许可费用,考虑到这个价格,这有点令人惊讶。
沟通
通过英特尔的AX201模块,Honor ,安装了一个现代WLAN模块,支持Wi-Fi 6(802.11ax)和蓝牙5.2,但不支持最新的6GHz网络(Wi-Fi 6E)。与我们的华硕参考路由器配合使用,传输速率非常高,几乎达到1.7GBit/s,也非常稳定。
网络摄像头
网络摄像头位于屏幕的上边缘,但只提供最基本的720p传感器,不能拍出好照片。你还必须做的是没有机械快门或通过Windows Hello进行面部识别的红外网络摄像头。
维护
底板用十颗Torx螺丝(T5)固定,很容易拆卸。除了更换M.2-2280固态硬盘和清洁风扇外,没有什么可做的,因为所有其他组件,包括内存和WLAN模块,都焊接在主板上。只有电池似乎是用螺丝固定的。
输入设备 -Honor ,有更多的键程
键盘
虽然几乎所有的制造商都在继续减少按键行程以使设备更薄,但Honor ,在这里采取了不同的方法,将按键行程从1.3毫米增加到1.5毫米。打字感觉的差异是立即和积极地注意到的。加上精确的反馈,我们有一个体面的键盘,在上面打长文没有问题。我们的评测样品的布局是美国版本,但其他国家的机型当然也会出售相应的区域键盘。
Honor 还安装了一个两段式白色背光,可以通过Fn+空格键组合激活。照明的持续时间可以在PC管理器中方便地调整。键盘右上方的电源按钮的位置不是很理想,因为这是你期望删除键的位置。它也是一个指纹扫描仪,在测试中工作无误。
触摸板
12 x 7.2厘米,ClickPad为正常的指针控制和最多四个手指的手势提供了足够的空间。然而,我们评测设备的下部区域的垫子没有被整合得非常干净,而且有轻微的响声,这在日常使用中是很烦人的。此外,当你真正按下下部区域时,点击的噪音是相当大的。
显示器 - 3:2格式的IPS
Honor 使用14英寸IPS面板,分辨率为2160x1440像素(185DPI),采用3:2格式,我们也从MateBook 14知道。然而,这里使用的是来自不同供应商的面板,其整体得分稍差。然而,主观的图片印象仍然非常好。该设备得益于光洁的表面,即使它不是一个触摸屏。
制造商规定亮度为300cd/m²,我们的评测设备略微超过了这个数值。尽管超过1,500:1的对比度非常好,但MateBook 14的面板几乎在所有领域都提供了更好的数值。在我们的测量中,从40%或更低的亮度开始,也会出现PWM闪烁,尽管28kHz的频率不应该引起任何问题。然而,明显可以注意到的是黑暗内容中明显的光晕,这在播放视频时尤其令人讨厌,因为由于3:2格式,你几乎总是有黑色的垂直条。
视角的稳定性没有留下批评的余地,响应时间也不明显。
|
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 330 cd/m²
Contrast: 1571:1 (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.6
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
68.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
98.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 HD140ZB-01A, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 InfoVision 140NWHE, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | SCHENKER Vision 14 MNE007ZA1, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T SAMSUNG: SDC4171, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 BOE XS TV140WTM-NHH0, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | 6% | 28% | 30% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 67.9 | 68.8 1% | 74.3 9% | 99.41 46% | 99.9 47% | 65.6 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 98.5 | 99.3 1% | 97.6 -1% | 99.94 1% | 100 2% | 97.4 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.7 | 69.5 1% | 75.7 10% | 94.79 38% | 97.6 42% | 67.5 -2% |
Response Times | 13% | 11% | 27% | 29% | 17% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.2 ? | 32.8 ? 12% | 40.4 ? -9% | 3 ? 92% | 2.4 ? 94% | 34 ? 9% |
Response Time Black / White * | 26.3 ? | 22.8 ? 13% | 18.4 ? 30% | 3 ? 89% | 2.4 91% | 20 ? 24% |
PWM Frequency | 28400 ? | 360 -99% | 362.3 ? -99% | |||
Screen | -8% | -2% | 46% | 2824% | 19% | |
Brightness middle | 330 | 331.1 0% | 407 23% | 384 16% | 399 21% | 364 10% |
Brightness | 320 | 326 2% | 407 27% | 385 20% | 401 25% | 367 15% |
Brightness Distribution | 90 | 85 -6% | 94 4% | 98 9% | 98 9% | 82 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.29 -38% | 0.25 -19% | 0.07 67% | 0.001 100% | 0.145 31% |
Contrast | 1571 | 1142 -27% | 1628 4% | 5486 249% | 399000 25298% | 2510 60% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 2.23 -24% | 2.6 -44% | 1.75 3% | 2.5 -39% | 1.92 -7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.7 | 5.44 -16% | 4.4 6% | 3.41 27% | 4.6 2% | 3.7 21% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.6 | 0.63 61% | 2 -25% | 2.32 -45% | 2.2 -38% | 0.95 41% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3 | 3.6 -20% | 2.7 10% | 1.06 65% | 1.8 40% | 2.61 13% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.21 100% | 2.18 101% | 2.39 92% | 2.17 101% | 2.38 92% |
CCT | 6697 97% | 6022 108% | 6316 103% | 6440 101% | 6368 102% | 7063 92% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
-3% | 5% /
2% | 34% /
39% | 961% /
1706% | 11% /
14% |
* ... smaller is better
我们用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)进行分析,发现显示器在交付状态下已经很体面了,没有明显的偏色。这似乎也几乎是最好的结果,因为我们无法通过自己的校准进一步减少偏差,这很不寻常,尤其是在灰度方面。该面板几乎完全覆盖了小的sRGB色彩空间,这对于日常使用来说完全足够,而且由于色彩偏差低,图片/视频编辑也是可能的。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
26.3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.1 ms rise | |
↘ 11.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 62 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 19.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 28400 Hz | ≤ 40 % brightness setting | |
≤ 70 cd/m² brightness | |||
The display backlight flickers at 28400 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % (70 cd/m²) and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 28400 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. As the flickering occurs only on very low brightness settings, it should not be an issue in typical office settings. Nonetheless, use in low light conditions may be straining to the eyes. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8738 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在明亮的环境中,高度反射的屏幕是有问题的,由于许多强烈的反射,内容很难被识别。在这里,合理的使用是不可能的;为此,面板必须要更亮才行。另一方面,用户应该能够在阴天找到一个合适的位置。
性能 - Alder Lake-H和GeForce RTX
测试条件
预装的PC管理器提供两种不同的性能模式,这对两个组件的性能也有很大影响。智能 模式在默认情况下是激活的,但是要想获得全面的性能,你必须使用高性能模式,该模式只在主电源运行时可用。我们在下面列出了TDP/TGP值。
性能模式 | CPU负载 | GPU负载 | 压力测试 | 最大风扇噪音Witcher 3 | 最大风扇噪音压力测试 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
智能 | 84W -> 35W | 45W | CPU: 20WGPU :40W -> 30W |
39,8 dB(A) | 45,4 dB(A) |
高性能 | 84W ->56W | 60W | CPU: 25WGPU :45W |
45,4 dB(A) | 50,6 dB(A) |
我们在高性能 和Windows的最佳性能 模式下进行了以下基准测试和测量,但我们也在个别章节中考察了智能 模式的能力。注意:在某些情况下,Windows的性能模式没有改变,这可能导致即使在高性能 模式下的数值也较低。这种情况也发生在我们的案例中,因此我们被迫重复一些测试。总的来说,冷却系统能够保持70瓦的持续冷却。
处理器 - 酷睿i5-12500H
芯片 酷睿i5-12500H属于英特尔目前的Alder Lake H系列,提供4个性能和8个效率核心。在CPU配置方面,它对应的是酷睿i7-1260P,而 酷睿i7-12700H提供两个更多的性能核心。在这种情况下,处理器的选择是否会产生差异是值得怀疑的:在永久负载下高达84瓦或56瓦的高功率限制下,性能值会变得很好。戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420中的Core i7-12700H 戴尔Inspiron 14 Plus 7420,例如,只是在短时间内稍微快一点。有趣的是,戴尔的酷睿i7的消耗率明显较低,为38瓦(在永久负载下)。然而,这两个额外的核心却能以56瓦的功率实现与酷睿i5相同的多核性能,这再次表明性能核心在高时钟频率下的工作效率是多么的低。在智能 模式下,前两次运行的性能是相当的,但随后略微下降到~1600分。CB循环在第一次运行后也显示出轻微的性能下降,因为风扇必须启动并开始运行,大约一分钟后性能才稳定下来。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
在多核测试中,酷睿i5与AMD相比显得有些逊色,因为联想的Yoga Slim 7 Pro 中的旧Ryzen 9 5900HS以42瓦的速度更快。目前 Yoga 7 14中的Ryzen 7 6800U 在整个Cinebench循环中也只是略微慢一些,尽管消耗量从最高的44瓦降到25瓦。
另一方面,我们不想掩盖单核性能非常好的事实,但这也适用于Alder Lake P或Alder Lake U芯片。然而,这里的性能是以高功耗为代价的(~25W IA核心,28W CPU封装功率)。在电池模式下,功耗从最初的56瓦迅速下降到35瓦,在多核测试中,性能损失仍在限制范围内,约为15%。更多的CPU基准测试可在我们的 技术部分.
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (6936 - 30789, n=100, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (11330 - 14686, n=9) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Multimedia (878 - 2290, n=91, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (1558 - 1701, n=9) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Multimedia (2681 - 11768, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (4687 - 5640, n=9) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (341 - 853, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (602 - 656, n=9) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (1970 - 2283, n=10) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (220 - 250, n=9) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (107 - 502, n=84, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (223 - 288, n=9) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Multimedia (30592 - 121228, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (44105 - 54380, n=9) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Multimedia (3398 - 7545, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (5151 - 5563, n=9) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (4990 - 23059, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (7962 - 10828, n=9) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Multimedia (891 - 2342, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (1471 - 1693, n=9) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Multimedia (5.26 - 30.5, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (12 - 16.6, n=9) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6.7 - 146.7, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (40.1 - 58.5, n=9) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (0.4748 - 0.535, n=9) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (0.3604 - 0.947, n=79, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average of class Multimedia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Multimedia (4906 - 36957, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (6851 - 13947, n=9) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (14528 - 147248, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (29874 - 68178, n=9) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1529 - 6698, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (2287 - 3337, n=9) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (21547 - 141074, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (77935 - 80703, n=9) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1240 - 19021, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (6590 - 7431, n=9) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average of class Multimedia (9903 - 75780, n=76, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (18252 - 34041, n=9) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (50298 - 111567, n=9) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Average of class Multimedia (31432 - 169946, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average of class Multimedia (454 - 1973, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (746 - 924, n=9) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average of class Multimedia (2738 - 20608, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (3848 - 7405, n=9) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Average of class Multimedia (7419 - 53918, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (13686 - 43813, n=9) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
系统性能
MagicBook 14是一个非常快的系统,在系统基准测试和内存测试中都表现良好。在测试中也没有发现任何问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average of class Multimedia (4542 - 8670, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Average of class Multimedia (8480 - 12420, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Multimedia (6089 - 10742, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average of class Multimedia (3651 - 13548, n=72, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Multimedia (978 - 2184, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Multimedia (913 - 2064, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Multimedia (1054 - 2594, n=87, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile () | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average of class Multimedia (869 - 2171, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
PCMark 10 Score | 6524 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Average of class Multimedia (20549 - 104459, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (23850 - 66598, n=9) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Multimedia (22917 - 125604, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (24879 - 68013, n=9) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Average of class Multimedia (20226 - 117933, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (23543 - 58797, n=9) | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average of class Multimedia (7 - 346, n=77, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Average Intel Core i5-12500H (83.8 - 114.7, n=9) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
在我们的标准化延迟测试中(网页浏览、4K YouTube播放、CPU负载),评测设备没有显示任何限制。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
Honor 安装了一个快速的PCIe 4.0接口和一个相应的三星PM9A1(980 Pro的商业版本)的快速驱动器。512GB(其中第一次启动后共有约410GB),有足够的存储空间,在超过6GB/s的传输速率下,这里没有速度问题。
然而,硬盘性能在永久性负载下并不完全稳定,有一些波动,这可能是由于高温造成的。话又说回来,这在日常使用中应该很难起到作用(与工厂分区相比)。不幸的是,在每一次对 或华为笔记本电脑的评测中,我们都必须解决这一点,因为无论固态硬盘有多大,系统驱动器往往只分配到120GB左右。在减去Windows和普通程序后,用户只有不到70GB的可用空间,而其余的则存储在另一个分区。那些在这里不注意下载、导入图片/视频或安装程序/游戏的人很快就会遇到容量问题,这根本没有必要。更多的SSD基准测试可在
Honor 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Performance Read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形卡
集成的 Xe Graphics G7的处理器处理日常使用中的图形处理,效果也非常好。它是Xe Graphics G7的更快版本,有96个EUs,但那些想在MagicBook上正常玩当前游戏的人肯定应该选择有RTX 2050的版本。
基本上,该RTX 2050是一个 GeForce MX570支持RayTracing和DLSS,但与RTX 2060(64位,4GB GDDR6)相比,其内存接口要小得多。由于高TGP配置(60瓦),RTX 2050在基准测试中表现良好,它的排名非常接近对手,有 RTX 3050或 RTX 3050 Ti总体而言,即使这些产品的TGP为50瓦,消耗的功率也较少。
在永久性负载下,性能保持完全稳定(Time Spy 压力测试:99.5%)。在智能 模式下,TGP为45瓦,GPU性能只降低了约10%。在电池模式下,性能甚至进一步降低到30瓦,这导致了约20%的亏损。更多的GPU基准测试可在这里.
3DMark 11 Performance | 15542 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 39594 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 9475 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 4326 points | |
Help |
游戏性能
的游戏性能。GeForce RTX 2050是不错的,该GPU再次排名仅次于RTX 3050 GPU。因此,在许多情况下,其性能足以满足全高清分辨率和高到最大的细节。只有像《赛博点2077》这样要求极高的游戏才需要进一步降低图形设置。游戏性能也绝对稳定,但你应该期待在电池模式下有明显的性能下降(-25%)。更多游戏基准测试可在 这里.
The Witcher 3 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (46.7 - 78, n=8) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 | |
Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T | |
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 | |
SCHENKER Vision 14 | |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile (24.3 - 39.6, n=9) | |
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 183.2 | 175.8 | 111.5 | 55.8 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 217 | 141 | 78 | 39.6 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 159.3 | 143.6 | 138.1 | 130.1 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 112.6 | 60.8 | 42.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 117 | 93.6 | 82.3 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 141 | 78 | 71 | 66 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 198.7 | 89.7 | 74 | 65.3 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 248 | 137.5 | 107.6 | 52.3 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 49 | 42 | 30 | 25 |
排放物 - MagicBook 14可以变得很吵
噪声
在日常使用中,MagicBook 14是一个非常安静的设备,因为在轻度任务中,两个风扇通常是停用的,在负载情况下,两个风扇至少需要30秒才能启动。然而,当你把设备置于真正的压力之下时,特别是在高性能 模式下,它就会变得非常响亮,最高可达50 dB(A)。在游戏时,人们可以期待大约45 dB(A),但风扇的噪音并不高频或令人不快。特别是,我们建议在狭窄的空间使用耳机。没有发现其他电子噪音。
性能模式 | 3DMark 06 | Witcher 3 Ultra | 压力测试 |
---|---|---|---|
智能 | 32,7 dB(A) | 39,8 dB(A) | 45.4 dB(A) |
高性能 | 39,8 dB(A) | 45,4 dB(A) | 50,6 dB(A) |
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.3 / 24.3 / 24.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 39.8 / 50.6 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A) |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, i5-12500H, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, i7-12700H, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N | SCHENKER Vision 14 GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, R5 5600H, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 GeForce MX450, R9 5900HS, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N | Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -2% | -2% | -16% | -0% | 3% | |
off / environment * | 24.3 | 23.2 5% | 24.3 -0% | 25.4 -5% | 24.7 -2% | 25 -3% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.3 | 23.2 5% | 24.3 -0% | 25.4 -5% | 24.7 -2% | 25 -3% |
Idle Average * | 24.3 | 23.2 5% | 24.3 -0% | 25.4 -5% | 24.7 -2% | 25 -3% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.3 | 23.2 5% | 25.9 -7% | 30.9 -27% | 27.3 -12% | 25 -3% |
Load Average * | 39.8 | 47.5 -19% | 43.3 -9% | 56 -41% | 41 -3% | 35.4 11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 45.4 | 51.7 -14% | 44.6 2% | 43.5 4% | ||
Load Maximum * | 50.6 | 51.7 -2% | 49.5 2% | 56 -11% | 43.5 14% | 40.2 21% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
Honor 新的MagicBook 14的表面温度得到了很好的控制。金属外壳在低负荷下完全不发热,即使在性能模式下的最大负荷下也只有个别的热点。在底部,这些热点在设备的中间,温度为48-51℃,所以理论上,你仍然可以把笔记本放在你的大腿上。中间的键盘区域也会明显变热,但这并不限制打字。
压力测试显示了与上述相同的行为。显卡保持在45瓦,而处理器在68瓦的短暂峰值消耗后,几分钟内保持在31瓦,最后平息在25瓦。没有观察到压力测试后性能的降低。
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.4 °C / -2.6 F).
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 Intel Core i5-12500H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | SCHENKER Vision 14 Intel Core i7-11370H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T AMD Ryzen 5 5600H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 AMD Ryzen 9 5900HS, NVIDIA GeForce MX450 | Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 7% | -11% | -16% | -12% | 2% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 44.6 | 40 10% | 49.7 -11% | 42.3 5% | 44.5 -0% | 40 10% |
Maximum Bottom * | 51.6 | 36.4 29% | 56 -9% | 49.6 4% | 56.4 -9% | 47.1 9% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.1 | 27 -3% | 28.8 -10% | 34.2 -31% | 29.1 -11% | 27.7 -6% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.8 | 29.2 -9% | 30.6 -14% | 37.9 -41% | 34 -27% | 28.7 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器提供了体面的声音,但它缺乏活力。不过,对于背景音乐或偶尔的电影/电视剧来说,其音质是完全足够的。你肯定应该激活预装的Nahimic软件,它提供了各种预设。这使得声音明显更饱满,也更响亮。
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 28% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--75Wh的电池带来了充足的体力
消耗功率
闲置时的消耗率略高于华为MateBook 14的消耗率,尽管后者的显示屏更亮一些。总的来说,这些数值还是可以的。根据HWiNFO的数据,我们看到在压力测试开始时,负载下的总消耗量约为138瓦,在纯粹的CPU负载期间,消耗量高达113瓦。据此,Honor ,MagicBook 14的dGPU版本还提供了135瓦的电源。这听起来很合理,但不幸的是,由于两个USB-C端口(3.2 Gen.2)最多只能吸收100瓦多一点,所以在实践中没有什么帮助。我们尝试了几个USB-C电源适配器,测量出最大功耗为107瓦。由于峰值负载无论如何只能维持很短的时间,然后才会大幅下降,所以这个问题在实践中并没有真正起到作用。尽管如此,我们还是询问了Honor ,这是否是一个基本的限制,或者在笔记本电脑上市之前是否会有驱动程序更新。一旦我们收到答案,本文将立即更新。
Off / Standby | 0.43 / 0.82 Watt |
Idle | 4.5 / 10.1 / 10.5 Watt |
Load |
83.2 / 107.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, SK Hynix BC711 512GB HFM512GD3GX013N, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | SCHENKER Vision 14 i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 2880x1800, 14" | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, Intel SSD 670p SSDPEKNU512GZ, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450, SK Hynix PC711 1TB HFS001TDE9X084N, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU, IPS, 2160x1440, 14" | Average NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -33% | -21% | 0% | -28% | 26% | 4% | -17% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.5 | 6.3 -40% | 6.7 -49% | 6.6 -47% | 9.5 -111% | 4.7 -4% | 5.11 ? -14% | 6.78 ? -51% |
Idle Average * | 10.1 | 10.3 -2% | 12.6 -25% | 9.6 5% | 14.1 -40% | 9.1 10% | 9.15 ? 9% | 11.3 ? -12% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.5 | 20 -90% | 15.4 -47% | 7.3 30% | 14.9 -42% | 10.1 4% | 11.2 ? -7% | 13.4 ? -28% |
Load Average * | 83.2 | 106.2 -28% | 85.7 -3% | 73 12% | 79.5 4% | 39 53% | 70.6 ? 15% | 71.1 ? 15% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 85 | 96.1 -13% | 83 2% | 74.4 12% | 73.5 14% | 40.1 53% | ||
Load Maximum * | 107.1 | 136.5 -27% | 110.9 -4% | 119 -11% | 98.5 8% | 66 38% | 87.4 ? 18% | 117.3 ? -10% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
75Wh的大电池确保了非常好的运行时间。调整后的屏幕亮度为150cd/m²(相当于这里最大亮度的62%),我们的视频测试运行了12.5小时,WLAN测试刚刚超过11小时(全亮度下7.5小时)。这些结果非常好,使MagicBook 14在这些领域领先于其竞争对手。
在设备打开的情况下,充满电只需要77分钟。约30分钟后,可获得50%的电池容量。
Honor MagicBook 14 2022 i5-12500H, GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, 75 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 Plus 7420 i7-12700H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 64 Wh | SCHENKER Vision 14 i7-11370H, GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU, 53 Wh | Asus Vivobook Pro 14 M3401QC-KM007T R5 5600H, GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU, 63 Wh | Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14 OLED Ryzen 9 R9 5900HS, GeForce MX450, 61 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 2021, i7-1165G7 i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -38% | -34% | 5% | -51% | -7% | 4% | |
H.264 | 755 | 405 -46% | 531 -30% | 821 ? 9% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 665 | 432 -35% | 327 -51% | 569 -14% | 327 -51% | 562 -15% | 626 ? -6% |
Load | 90 | 54 -40% | 86 -4% | 112 24% | 111 23% | 97.8 ? 9% | |
Reader / Idle | 712 | 687 | 1168 ? |
Pros
Cons
评语。一台好的多媒体笔记本电脑
Honor 在新的MagicBook 14 2022中提供了一个强大的多媒体笔记本,它还可以处理游戏,这要归功于 GeForce RTX 2050.该设备与旧版MagicBook 14没有任何共同之处,价格也大幅提高。这也适用于外壳的质量,现在是在良好的水平上的 华为MateBook 14.
高的系统性能、具有扩展键程的良好键盘以及3:2 IPS面板普遍良好的主观画质,证明在日常使用中是稳固的。然而,明显可见的光晕和相对较低的亮度在这里是有问题的。再加上高度反光的表面,在明亮的日子里,这台笔记本电脑很容易被当作化妆镜使用。
Alder Lake H处理器和专用的GeForce RTX-2050 GPU的性能总体上非常好,但这两个组件都没有在效率方面创造任何记录。因此,冷却系统被迫做得更多,风扇会变得非常响。以AMD处理器和,例如,一个 GeForce RTX 3050,Honor ,可以用更少的功耗达到同样的性能水平。此外,短期功耗非常高,但USB-C端口限制了最大充电功率,附带的135瓦电源适配器根本无法利用。不幸的是,Honor ,这里省略了Thunderbolt 4。
Alder Lake-H和GeForce RTX 2050的组合提供了良好的性能值,但效率不是特别高,这就是为什么你不得不满足于在负载下的巨大风扇。除此之外,新的Honor MagicBook 14只有小的缺陷,总体上是一个好的多媒体笔记本,电池运行时间长。
竞争对手的设备,如 戴尔Inspiron 14, 华硕VivoBook Pro 14或 瑜伽瘦身7专业版14提供略微更有效或更快的组件。VivoBook Pro 14和Yoga Slim 7甚至提供了一个OLED面板,但也有缺点。如果你想在一个更紧凑的设备中寻找相同水平的图形性能,你应该看一下 申科视界14,它有一个 RTX 3050 Ti在一个1.1公斤重的箱子里。
价格和可用性
Honor新的MagicBook 14似乎在所有地区都能买到,但并不是所有的产品都像我们的样品那样提供相同的规格(Core i5-12500H和RTX 2050)。建议国际读者直接通过Honor "的官方网站查询。从他们选定的地点进行查询。例如,我们发现,我们的审查配置在印度和新加坡(这个列表并不详尽)。
Honor MagicBook 14 2022
- 09/05/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff