中兴通讯Axon 40 Ultra智能手机评测--隐形自拍镜、三个6400万像素摄像头和旗舰级性能

Name: ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Brand: ZTE

没有凹槽？没问题。

Axon 40 Ultra则不同。中兴通讯的新旗舰机的自拍相机隐藏在显示屏下面。此外，手机的玻璃后盖上有多达三个6400万像素的摄像头，包括一个3.5倍光学变焦的长焦镜头。相比之下，其他高端组件，如120赫兹的AMOLED显示屏和骁龙8代似乎几乎是小菜一碟。

Manuel Masiero, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/06/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

对于其新的旗舰智能手机Axon 40 Ultra，中兴通讯正专注于相机系统。考虑到评测指南的前30页几乎都是关于这个主题的，这一点相当明显。在产品页面上，你也同样要一直滚动到底部，才能发现更多关于智能手机的信息，而不仅仅是其相机的功能。

关于相机确实有一些东西可以说。在后盖上，你会发现主摄像头、超广角摄像头和长焦摄像头，每个都有一个6400万像素的传感器。在正面，一个自拍相机位于AMOLED显示屏下面，因此在手机使用时是看不见的。继续阅读我们的评论，看看这个相机包的性能是否与优秀的前辈一样好。 Axon 30 Ultra.

这款手机的其他规格也同样令人印象深刻。这款手机的核心是一个骁龙8代1- 这是目前最快的Android 处理器之一。这款手机还配备了高达12GB的内存、256GB的存储空间、5000毫安时的电池和一个能够达到120赫兹刷新率和360赫兹触摸采样率的AMOLED显示屏。盒子里有一个65瓦的充电器。

Test device courtesy of ZTE Global

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Axon Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 8 x 1.8 - 3 GHz, Cortex-X2 / A710 / A510 (Kryo) Waipio

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 730

Memory

8 GB

, LPDDR5X

Display

6.80 inch 20:9, 2480 x 1116 pixel 400 PPI, AMOLED, Curved FHD+, 10-bit colour depth, 10.7 billion colours, 100% DCI-P3, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash, 128 GB

, 109 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Accelerometer, proximity, compass, gyroscope, DRM Widevine L1, Camera2 API Level 3, IR blaster

Networking

Wi-Fi 6E (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (band 2/3/5/8), 3G (band 1/2/5/8), 4G (band 1/3/5/7/8/20/28/38/40/41), 5G (band 1/3/5/7/28/38/40/41/78), head SAR 0.921 W/kg, body SAR 1.556 W/kg, Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.41 x 163.28 x 73.56

Battery

5000 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (Sony IMX787, f/1.6, OIS) + 64MP ultrawide camera + macro camera (Sony IMX787, f/2.35, 4cm AF macro shot) + 64MP tele camera (f/2.5, 5,7x optical zoom, OIS), videos up to 8K@30fps
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix Under-display camera

Additional features

Speakers: dual speakers, Keyboard: virtual, 65w charger, USB cable (type c to c), SIM tool, protective case, warranty card, MyOS, 24 Months Warranty, fanless

Weight

204 g, Power Supply: 99 g

Price

829 Euro

Links

ZTE homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
87.5 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	204 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.80"	2480x1116
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Motorola Edge 30 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	196 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	2400x1080
87.9 % v7 ^(old)	04 / 2022	Oppo Find X5 SD 888 5G, Adreno 660	196 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.55"	2400x1080
87.4 % v7 ^(old)	03 / 2022	Realme GT 2 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	189 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.70"	3216x1440
87.6 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	Xiaomi 12 Pro SD 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730	204 g	256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.73"	3200x1440
86.4 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2021	ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G SD 888 5G, Adreno 660	188 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.68"	2400x1080

底座--以玻璃机身和弧形显示屏为特色

与它的前辈一样，中兴Axon 40 Ultra在欧盟地区只提供哑黑色的玻璃机身。由于传感器的垂直排列，后盖上的大型相机模块变得稍长，但失去了在Axon 30 Ultra上看到的光洁度。 Axon 30 Ultra.这使得这款手机整体上相当不容易沾染指纹。

由于AMOLED显示屏在长边上明显弯曲，中兴Axon 40 Ultra的正面和背面几乎无缝地融合在一起。然而，你仍然可以用手指稍微感觉到金属框架，这与手机本来非常高质量的感觉不太相符。总的来说，该设备具有出色的制造质量，感觉特别结实。尽管如此，你不应该让它掉进水里，因为它没有达到IP等级。

Axon 40 Ultra的正面有一个非常干净的外观。没有必要开孔或缺口，因为自拍镜被隐藏在显示屏下。这使得屏幕占据了手机正面的93%，可能打破了记录。尽管如此，弧形显示屏的边缘仍然足够宽，以确保意外按下屏幕的情况不会经常发生。一个光学指纹传感器也位于AMOLED屏幕的下方。

尺寸比较

规格 - 高达12GB的内存和256GB的存储空间

Axon 40 Ultra有两种配置。你可以直接从制造商那里以829欧元（799美元）获得配备8GB LPDDR5X内存和128GB UFS 3.1存储的版本。配备12/256GB的高端配置价格为949欧元（899美元）。没有用于存储扩展的microSD卡插槽。

该手机既没有3.5毫米音频插孔，也没有无线电调谐器。它有一对立体声扬声器、NFC、蓝牙5.2和用于无线屏幕镜像的Miracast。兼容OTG的USB-C端口支持USB 3.2 Gen 1，提供高达5 Gbit/s的传输速率。

软件 -Android 12和MyOS 12

Axon 40 Ultra搭载了Android 12和中兴自己的MyOS 12用户界面。在审查时（8月初），该设备上的Android 安全补丁是6月1日的，这意味着它们是最新的。而且，由于该设备支持Widevine DRM L1，它也能够流式传输高清内容。中兴通讯没有提供任何关于该公司打算在多长时间内继续向Axon 40 Ultra推出更新的信息。

除了谷歌应用和中兴通讯的一些工具，该设备上只预装了一些第三方应用，包括Ume浏览器、Facebook、WPS Office和Booking.com。但所有这些都可以被删除。在初始设置之后，我们的评测单元上128GB的容量中大约有109GB可以使用。

连接性和GNSS - Wi-Fi 6E和精确的GPS

双SIM卡的中兴Axon 40 Ultra支持欧盟地区相关的所有4G和5G频段。Wi-Fi模块与Wi-Fi 6E标准兼容，能够与我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000实现高数据传输速度。

数据传输在上传和下载方向都非常稳定，并设法达到了900 Mbit/s的峰值速度。最初的低传输率是由于路由器被唤醒。即使手机支持Wi-Fi 6E，我们也无法使用6GHz频段。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1465 (1307^min - 1536^max) MBit/s +63%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	933 (833^min - 949^max) MBit/s +4%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	900 (844^min - 951^max) MBit/s
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	862 (780^min - 919^max) MBit/s -4%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	789 (351^min - 863^max) MBit/s -12%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)	714 MBit/s -21%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1214 (516^min - 1524^max) MBit/s +46%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	976 (953^min - 1017^max) MBit/s +17%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	933 (826^min - 963^max) MBit/s +12%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	898 (852^min - 931^max) MBit/s +8%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	831 (428^min - 859^max) MBit/s
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)	729 MBit/s -12%
iperf3 transmit AX12
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1175 (1141^min - 1218^max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	786 (755^min - 837^max) MBit/s

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø899 (844-951)

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø817 (428-859)

Axon 40 Ultra使用卫星导航系统GPS（L1，L5）、Glonass（L1）、Galileo（E1，E5a）和Beidou（B1，B1c，B2a）来识别其位置。在我们的审查中，该设备在建筑物内和室外都能相当迅速地做到这一点--精确到3米。

中兴通讯的手机在日常使用中也能提供准确的位置数据。在大约10公里长的自行车骑行过程中，Axon 40 Ultra对我们位置的追踪几乎与Garmin Venu 2一样准确。虽然在建筑密度较高的路段，它有时会稍微偏离实际路线，但总体准确度仍然很高。

电话功能和通话质量 - VoLTE和VoWiFi

Axon 40 Ultra的双卡槽可以容纳两张nano sim卡。这款手机同时支持VoLTE和VoWiFi。在我们的测试中，该设备提供了良好的通话质量。降噪效果可靠；在通话过程中，每个人都能很好地理解谈话内容，即使是在免提模式下。

摄像头 - 三个6400万像素的摄像头和一个显示屏下的自拍摄像头

乍一看，Axon 40 Ultra的相机系统似乎与前代产品几乎没有任何区别，因为它们都有三个6400万像素的传感器。然而，这些传感器的分配方式不同。在Axon 30 Ultra上有四个摄像头。摄像机一个主摄像头，一个超广角摄像头和一个人像摄像头（每个都是6400万像素），以及一个800万像素长焦摄像头。

Axon 40 Ultra摆脱了人像相机，而选择了三摄像头设置：一个主摄像头、一个超广角摄像头和一个长焦摄像头，每个都配备了6400万像素传感器。

这款手机的主摄像头（f/1.6，35毫米，OIS）和超广角摄像头（f/2.35，16毫米）分别配备了一个索尼IMX787传感器。超广角相机也用于微距摄影，并在该模式下切换到自动对焦范围，近至4厘米。
与主摄像头一样，6400万像素的长焦摄像头有一个光学图像稳定器。它使用了相当于91毫米的焦距和3.5倍的光学变焦。如果包括超广角摄像头，该手机的总光学变焦范围为5.7倍。这款手机能够以高达8K和30 fps的速度录制视频。

在白天，这三个摄像头可以拍摄出优秀的照片，其图像质量不愧为旗舰手机。我们审查期间拍摄的照片以其自然的色彩和高动态范围看起来令人印象深刻。甚至照片的边缘也保持了高度的清晰度。

由于其等效焦距为35毫米，主摄像头非常适用于人像摄影。如果你保持在5倍左右的适度变焦水平内，图像的清晰度只会稍稍受到影响。该设备能够实现40倍的数字变焦。Axon 40 Ultra在夜间摄影方面不是特别好--其他旗舰智能手机在这方面表现得更好。

Axon 40 Ultra最引人注目的相机功能位于前面。虽然Axon 30 Ultra将其1600万像素的自拍相机放在一个冲孔里，但它的继任者具有一个显示屏下的相机，在手机使用时是看不到的。即使在屏幕关闭或黑暗的情况下，你仍然需要运用一些技巧才能看到摄像头。当你用它来拍照时，自拍相机上方的像素会关闭。

在审查过程中，显示屏下的自拍镜让我们感到很矛盾。一方面，我们非常喜欢它，因为它使屏幕显得漂亮和干净。另一方面，在图像质量方面，它远远达不到标准自拍相机的水平，只产生了泥泞和模糊的照片，看起来比使用预算智能手机拍摄的照片更糟糕。然而，问题并不在于中兴通讯。显示屏下技术本身目前根本无法提供更多。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Tageslicht-Aufnahme 1 Tageslicht-Aufnahme 2 Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Lowlight-Aufnahme

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

在受控的照明条件下，主摄像头显示它能够相当准确地再现色彩，只有在较暗的参考绿色下才有轻微的失误。测试图表的照片通常看起来很清晰，但在1勒克斯的低光照度下拍摄的照片几乎不可能看清任何东西。

ColorChecker ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: 7.24 ∆E min: 2.02 - max: 15.36 ∆E

配件和保修 - 包括65瓦的充电器

中兴通讯在Axon 40 Ultra中包括一个65瓦的充电器，一条USB线，一个SIM卡弹出工具和一个透明保护壳。该公司没有为该智能手机提供任何特殊的配件。但你可以在中兴通讯商店购买保护套、耳机和其他配件。

在欧盟，中兴Axon 40 Ultra有24个月的保修期。

输入设备和可用性 - 360赫兹触摸采样率

由于其360赫兹的高触摸采样率，该设备的AMOLED屏幕对输入的反应非常准确。显示屏的120赫兹刷新率确保了滚动浏览菜单和网站时的流畅、无卡顿体验。

显示屏下方的光学指纹传感器可以快速、可靠地解锁智能手机。你可以从六种不同颜色的指纹扫描仪动画中进行选择。例如，这使你更容易根据你的锁屏背景来提高扫描区域的可见度。虽然没有那么安全，但二维面部识别与指纹传感器的反应一样快。

显示器 - AMOLED面板，刷新率为120赫兹。

Axon 40 Ultra的6.8英寸弧形显示屏的分辨率为2480 x 1116，相当于400PPI的高像素密度。支持HDR的20:9屏幕以120赫兹的速度运行，光线非常均匀。整个面板的平均峰值亮度为683 cd/m²。

当测量被限制在面板上一个较小的区域时，它设法达到了810 cd/m²的峰值亮度（APL18）。在没有环境光传感器的情况下，屏幕在最高设置下的亮度高达542cd/m²，在最低设置下仅为5cd/m²。

AMOLED面板使用全脉冲调制（PWM）来控制亮度。在所有测试的亮度水平上，PWM以60赫兹的低频率运行。这可能会给那些敏感的用户带来问题，因为使用更高的亮度设置不会帮助他们避免PWM的闪烁。然而，我们可以提供一些保证：在Axon 40 Ultra上，由于持续的低频率，PWM波形非常平坦，这意味着结果类似于永久性直流调光，因此对眼睛的压力应该较小。


668 cd/m²	680 cd/m²	706 cd/m²
666 cd/m²	682 cd/m²	703 cd/m²
666 cd/m²	676 cd/m²	697 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 706 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 682.7 cd/m² Minimum: 5.07 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 94 %
Center on Battery: 682 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.16

	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra AMOLED, 2480x1116, 6.8"	Motorola Edge 30 Pro AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Oppo Find X5 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.6"	Realme GT 2 Pro AMOLED, 3216x1440, 6.7"	Xiaomi 12 Pro AMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"	ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"
Screen		20%	22%	-32%	30%	-89%
Brightness middle	682	649 -5%	709 4%	740 9%	959 41%	638 -6%
Brightness	683	649 -5%	718 5%	732 7%	977 43%	641 -6%
Brightness Distribution	94	98 4%	95 1%	98 4%	96 2%	93 -1%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.8	1.18 34%	1.3 28%	3.25 -81%	1.1 39%	4 -122%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	4.7	2.07 56%	2.5 47%	6.46 -37%	3.1 34%	14 -198%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	1.5 37%	1.3 46%	4.7 -96%	1.9 21%	7.2 -200%
Gamma	2.16 ^102%	2.236 ^98%	2.27 ^97%	2.213 ^99%	2.22 ^99%	2.27 ^97%
CCT	6634 ^98%	2538 ^256%	6489 ^100%	5663 ^115%	6498 ^100%	7190 ^90%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

60 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在显示设置中，你可以选择三种颜色模式。"多彩"、"标准 "和 "柔和"。此外，色温可以使用色温轮或其中一个预设值（"暖"、"正常 "和 "冷"）进行调整。

我们能够使用 "柔和 "色彩模式和 "正常 "色温的组合来获得最佳的色彩再现。在这种情况下，颜色精度落在理想的范围内（Delta E < 3），正如色温和RGB平衡的情况一样。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.741 ms rise
1.42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.681 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.03 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.505 ms rise
1.03 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.527 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

只要你避免在阳光直射下使用，Axon 40 Ultra在户外的表现很好。即使从一个非常平坦的角度观看，你仍然可以很容易地知道屏幕上的内容。

性能--由Snapdragon 8 Gen 1驱动

中兴通讯Axon 40 Ultra搭载了骁龙8代1- 目前Android 手机的最快SoC之一。这款高端处理器能够毫不费力地处理最具挑战性的应用程序，配备了Adreno 730GPU，并在Axon 40 Ultra中配以8GB或12GB的LPDDR5X内存。

中兴通讯在合成基准测试中名列前茅，与其他配备相同SoC的Android 手机一样快。只有AIMark中的人工智能计算对骁龙8代来说不是那么好。骁龙888 5G，在诸如以下手机上发现中兴通讯Axon 30 Ultra和 Oppo Find X5骁龙888 5G的整体速度并不慢，但在AIMark中表现更好。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1267 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1181 - 1298, n=21)	1231 Points +1%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1217 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1195 Points -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1192 Points -2%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1156 Points -5%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1121 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=172, last 2 years)	995 Points -18%
Multi-Core
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3738 Points +14%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3659 Points +11%
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	3641 Points +11%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (3269 - 3839, n=21)	3548 Points +8%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	3456 Points +5%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	3376 Points +3%
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=172, last 2 years)	3312 Points +1%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	3289 Points

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	970465 Points +5%
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	965911 Points +5%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	962824 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (692924 - 1041980, n=18)	928953 Points +1%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	922942 Points
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	824694 Points -11%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	809906 Points -12%
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)	798401 Points -13%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	16564 Points +54%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	13913 Points +29%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13611 Points +27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (10140 - 17025, n=21)	13216 Points +23%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	13131 Points +22%
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=190, last 2 years)	12976 Points +21%
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	12279 Points +14%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	10745 Points

CrossMark - Overall
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1042 Points +39%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (749 - 1169, n=14)	993 Points +33%
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=157, last 2 years)	884 Points +18%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	811 Points +8%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	749 Points

BaseMark OS II
Overall
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	7665 Points
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7147 Points -7%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7070 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (6007 - 7665, n=15)	6951 Points -9%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	6921 Points -10%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	6843 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=151, last 2 years)	6297 Points -18%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6007 Points -22%
System
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	11207 Points +14%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	10896 Points +10%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10739 Points +9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (9273 - 11338, n=15)	10312 Points +4%
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10247 Points +4%
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=151, last 2 years)	10163 Points +3%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	10006 Points +1%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	9873 Points
Memory
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	8906 Points
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	7684 Points -14%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	7610 Points -15%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	7357 Points -17%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (5125 - 8906, n=15)	6787 Points -24%
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=151, last 2 years)	6767 Points -24%
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	6162 Points -31%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	5125 Points -42%
Graphics
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	21885 Points +1%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	21650 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (15216 - 22308, n=15)	20338 Points -6%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	17159 Points -21%
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=151, last 2 years)	16908 Points -22%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	15216 Points -30%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	14770 Points -32%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	13543 Points -37%
Web
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1983 Points +9%
Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1888 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1843 Points +2%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	1822 Points 0%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	1813 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	1669 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1291 - 1888, n=15)	1659 Points -8%
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=151, last 2 years)	1564 Points -14%

AImark - Score v2.x
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	264766 Points +4010%
Oppo Find X5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G, Adreno 660, 8192	257002 Points +3889%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 12288	72572 Points +1027%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (1046 - 96317, n=14)	17097 Points +165%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, Adreno 730, 8192	6442 Points

中兴通讯Axon 40 Ultra在图形性能方面也同样达到了最佳水平，是目前最快的Android 智能手机之一。

中兴通讯的强大SoC在四项3DMark基准测试（Sling Shot Extreme ES 3.1、Sling Shot Extreme Vulkan Unlimited、Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited和Wild Life）中轻而易举，甚至没有给手机发分。

3DMark | GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 | GFXBench 3.0 | GFXBench 3.1 | GFXBench

3DMark
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2545 Points +16%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2513 Points +15%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2188 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1567 Points -28%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1535 Points -30%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1478 Points -32%
Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2609 Points +3%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2594 Points +3%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2528 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1629 Points -36%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1556 Points -38%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1542 Points -39%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10384 Points +8%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10164 Points +6%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9593 Points
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6483 Points -32%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5888 Points -39%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5765 Points -40%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4150 Points +3%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4033 Points
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	3865 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	14143 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13950 Points -1%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11599 Points -18%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9149 Points +1%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9083 Points
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8029 Points -12%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11384 Points +3%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	11000 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	10958 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20842 Points 0%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	20795 Points
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	17179 Points -17%
2560x1440 Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	5220 Points +26%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4153 Points
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4120 Points -1%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	121 fps +6%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps +5%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +4%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	114 fps
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -47%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -47%
1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	426 fps
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	425 fps 0%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	380 fps -11%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	306 fps -28%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	294 fps -31%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	290 fps -32%

GFXBench 3.0
on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	120 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps -1%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	118 fps -2%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	117 fps -2%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	62 fps -48%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -50%
1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	251 fps +30%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	194 fps +1%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	193 fps
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	180 fps -7%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	165 fps -15%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	158 fps -18%

GFXBench 3.1
on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	111 fps
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	109 fps -2%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	97 fps -13%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	87 fps -22%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	61 fps -45%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -46%
1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	169 fps +47%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	143 fps +24%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	126 fps +10%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	119 fps +3%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	115 fps
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	112 fps -3%

GFXBench
on screen Car Chase Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	68 fps +6%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64 fps
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -6%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	56 fps -12%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps -34%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	36 fps -44%
1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86 fps +23%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	86 fps +23%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	74 fps +6%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	71 fps +1%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	70 fps
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	66 fps -6%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +15%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	51 fps -2%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps -21%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	37 fps -29%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	27 fps -48%
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	42 fps +24%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	41 fps +21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps 0%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	34 fps
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps -15%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	29 fps -15%
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	98 fps +29%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	76 fps
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63 fps -17%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps -21%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	53 fps -30%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	44 fps -42%
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	101 fps +26%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	100 fps +25%
Xiaomi 12 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92 fps +15%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	80 fps
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	78 fps -2%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	70 fps -12%

中兴通讯的手机在浏览互联网时也是快如闪电。网站和图片的加载速度非常快，可以快速滚动浏览。

Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | WebXPRT 3 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	130.189 Points
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)	125.1 Points -4%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	121.6 Points -7%
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=161, last 2 years)	120.4 Points -8%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (72.8 - 134.6, n=16)	107.9 Points -17%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G (chrome 90)	107.7 Points -17%
Realme GT 2 Pro (Chrome 99)	102.3 Points -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	84.1 Points -35%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chome 99)	129 runs/min +9%
Realme GT 2 Pro (Chome 99)	127 runs/min +7%
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)	121 runs/min +2%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	118.5 runs/min
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G (chrome 90)	114 runs/min -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (64.4 - 129.3, n=16)	104 runs/min -12%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	73.5 runs/min -38%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)	182 Points +84%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	167 Points +69%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G (chrome 90)	158 Points +60%
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points +50%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (79 - 193, n=15)	142.9 Points +44%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	119 Points +20%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	99 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	50626 Points +7%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	47182 Points
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)	46054 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (27730 - 50626, n=17)	42391 Points -10%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G (chrome 90)	38401 Points -19%
Realme GT 2 Pro (Chrome 99)	37650 Points -20%
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=203, last 2 years)	37161 Points -21%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	29750 Points -37%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=160, last 2 years)	1568 ms * -93%
Xiaomi 12 Pro (Chrome 97)	1330 ms * -63%
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G (chrome 90)	1297 ms * -59%
Realme GT 2 Pro (Chrome 99)	1137 ms * -40%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (814 - 1440, n=16)	1010 ms * -24%
Oppo Find X5 (Chrome 99.0.4844.73)	923 ms * -13%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro (Chrome 99)	819 ms * -1%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (Chrome 103.0.5060.71)	813.5 ms *

* ... smaller is better

Axon 40 Ultra使用快速的UFS 3.1存储，与其他比较中的设备类似。该设备表明，它甚至比储存速度当涉及到存储速度时。

	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra	Motorola Edge 30 Pro	Oppo Find X5	Realme GT 2 Pro	Xiaomi 12 Pro	ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G	Average 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		6%	-6%	2%	26%	-21%	-16%	12%
Sequential Read 256KB	1638.15	1832 12%	1964 20%	1749 7%	1620 -1%	1464 -11%	1600 ?(1030 - 3134, n=59) -2%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=192, last 2 years) 12%
Sequential Write 256KB	1065.13	1028 -3%	782 -27%	1225 15%	1465 38%	689 -35%	756 ?(233 - 1332, n=59) -29%	1425 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=192, last 2 years) 34%
Random Read 4KB	313.35	277.7 -11%	272.9 -13%	273 -13%	324.9 4%	208.2 -34%	244 ?(126.2 - 428, n=59) -22%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=192, last 2 years) -12%
Random Write 4KB	273.19	339.5 24%	259.3 -5%	264 -3%	448.9 64%	265 -3%	243 ?(121.4 - 503, n=59) -11%	309 ?(9.4 - 753, n=192, last 2 years) 13%

游戏--即使在最高设置下也能流畅地进行游戏

Adreno 730即使在最高设置下运行当前的游戏也没有任何问题。然而，PUBG Mobile在高清/高设置下运行时，帧率上限为30帧，可能是为了帮助节省电池。Armajet也有一个类似的帧率上限，尽管是60帧。

游戏过程中的帧率是用GameBench测量的。

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra; Armajet; 1.61.6: Ø60 (60-60)

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra; PUBG Mobile; 2.0.0: Ø30 (28-31)

排放--Axon 40 Ultra即使在负载下也能保持低温

温度

虽然骁龙8代1充满了计算能力，但它只能在相对短暂的时间内完全发挥这种性能。当SoC的温度过高时--这种情况发生得相当快--它将开始降低其时钟速度，并以降低的性能运行。然而，降低的时钟速度仍然很高，你不会注意到任何节流。此外，这款手机的底盘在使用过程中几乎不会发热。在温度最高达到34.9°C（94.8°F）的情况下，即使在负载下，手机的外部仍然很凉爽，触摸起来总是很舒服。相比之下，其前身的运行温度明显更高。

Max. Load

Idle


34.8 °C	33.5 °C	32.6 °C
34.5 °C	33 °C	31.5 °C
34.5 °C	34.1 °C	31.4 °C

Maximum: 34.8 °C
Average: 33.3 °C


31.1 °C	32.9 °C	33.6 °C
31.3 °C	31.7 °C	34.5 °C
31 °C	33.3 °C	34.9 °C

Maximum: 34.9 °C
Average: 32.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 28.3 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.8 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 34.9 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.3 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	92.8 % +56%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63.6 % +7%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.6 %
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	57.4 % -4%
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	55.1 % -8%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	96.9 % +50%
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64.8 %
Oppo Find X5 Adreno 660, SD 888 5G, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	64.4 % -1%
Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	63.7 % -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	59.6 % -8%

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø10.3 (9.26-14.3)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.9 (9.21-15.5)

Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.8.1: Ø10.2 (9.62-15.1)

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø36.8 (31.7-53.3)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø38.6 (34.3-59.7)

Realme GT 2 Pro Adreno 730, SD 8 Gen 1, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø43.1 (36.7-57.7)

发言人

Axon 40 Ultra上的两个支持DTS:X Ultra的扬声器的音量可以达到85.5 dB(A)，听起来就像你对典型智能手机的预期：中音和高音很均衡，但低音不足。

外部音频设备可以通过USB-C音频适配器或通过蓝牙5.2无线连接到手机上。支持以下蓝牙编解码器：aptX、aptX HD、aptX自适应、AAC、LDAC和SBC。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 31.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 24% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 68% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 45% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.2% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 21% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命--Axon 40 Ultra是持久性的

消耗功率

Axon 40 Ultra消耗的电力更少，比我们比较的大多数设备明显更有效率，特别是在最大负荷运行时。

包括一个65瓦的电源适配器（20伏/3.35安），用于为5000安时的电池充电。在我们的测试中，从0到100%的充电只花了46分钟；仅仅30分钟后，手机已经充满了80%。

Axon 40 Ultra不支持无线充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.09 / 0.24 Watt
Idle	0.88 / 1.57 / 1.6 Watt
Load	5.06 / 7.91 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra 5000 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 Pro 4800 mAh	Oppo Find X5 4800 mAh	Realme GT 2 Pro 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh	ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G 4600 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-26%	-0%	-11%	3%	-20%	-26%	-9%
Idle Minimum *	0.88	1.2 -36%	1.01 -15%	1 -14%	0.94 -7%	1 -14%	1.255 ?(0.7 - 3.18, n=15) -43%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) -2%
Idle Average *	1.57	1.6 -2%	1.59 -1%	1.4 11%	1.24 21%	1.99 -27%	2.02 ?(1.04 - 4.38, n=15) -29%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 7%
Idle Maximum *	1.6	2.5 -56%	1.6 -0%	1.7 -6%	1.34 16%	2.02 -26%	2.21 ?(1.15 - 4.45, n=15) -38%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) -1%
Load Average *	5.06	5.2 -3%	3.87 24%	5.3 -5%	5.7 -13%	5.15 -2%	5.49 ?(3.58 - 8.04, n=15) -8%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -27%
Load Maximum *	7.91	10.4 -31%	8.74 -10%	11.1 -40%	8.12 -3%	10.36 -31%	8.75 ?(6.67 - 11.3, n=15) -11%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -24%

* ... smaller is better

Leistungsaufnahme: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø6.29 (1.067-11.4)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø7.11 (1.702-12.6)

Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1: Ø8.17 (3.19-11.1)

Leistungsaufnahme: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.06 (7.39-9.73)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.5 (10.4-12.5)

Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11 (10.5-11.1)

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.205 (1.086-1.695)

Motorola Edge 30 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.619 (1.378-2.67)

Realme GT 2 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.342 (1.121-1.691)

电池寿命

Axon 40 Ultra拥有出色的电池寿命。在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，与现实生活中的使用相比较，5000毫安时的电池只在超过16小时后就放弃了。这款智能手机还能够播放一整天的H.264视频。虽然Axon 40 Ultra的竞争对手无法完全跟上它的步伐，但他们的电池寿命总体上也同样不错。

Battery Runtime

Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)		40h 46min
WiFi Websurfing		16h 15min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		24h 28min
Load (maximum brightness)		4h 56min

	ZTE Axon 40 Ultra 5000 mAh	Motorola Edge 30 Pro 4800 mAh	Oppo Find X5 4800 mAh	Realme GT 2 Pro 5000 mAh	Xiaomi 12 Pro 4600 mAh	ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G 4600 mAh
Battery Runtime		-16%	-13%	-9%	-18%	-37%
Reader / Idle	2446	1985 -19%	2075 -15%	2056 -16%	2036 -17%
H.264	1468	1006 -31%	1294 -12%	1083 -26%	788 -46%
WiFi v1.3	975	816 -16%	937 -4%	1053 8%	766 -21%	615 -37%
Load	296	306 3%	231 -22%	296 0%	337 14%

Pros

+ AMOLED显示屏能够达到120赫兹

+ 良好的性能

+ 非常好的三摄像头设置

+ 电池寿命长

+ USB 3.2 Gen.1 (= USB 3.0)

+ 包括65瓦的充电器

+ 显示屏下的自拍相机...

Cons

- ...图像质量差

- 没有IP认证

- 没有无线充电

- 负载下的节流

结论。Axon 40 Ultra

Axon 40 ultra是中兴通讯目前的旗舰手机，以其829欧元（799美元）的官方价格代表了一个引人注目的整体包装。它的强项包括AMOLED面板，能够达到120赫兹刷新率和360赫兹触摸采样率。这使得这款智能手机的响应速度非常快。此外，还有一些功能，如高端的Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SoC，高达12GB的LPDDR5X内存和256GB的UFS 3.1存储。这款中兴手机还以其非常好的电池寿命和65瓦的适配器给人留下深刻印象，该适配器可以在大约45分钟内将设备充满。

中兴Axon 40 Ultra看起来不错，速度快如闪电，电池寿命非常长，并以创新的相机设置脱颖而出。然而，显示屏下的自拍相机产生的图像质量不高。

相机是这款结构非常好的中兴智能手机最显著的特征。三个6400万像素的摄像头可以拍摄非常好的照片，在图像质量方面很容易超过大多数高端智能手机。然而，由于其低光性能不佳，该相机设置还不足以在绝对高端领域占有一席之地。

自拍相机也是一个好坏参半的袋子。由于自拍相机在显示屏下，屏幕上既没有为相机开孔，也没有开槽，因此Axon 40 Ultra的外观非常 "干净"。然而，自拍相机在图像质量方面令人彻底失望。也就是说，Axon 40 Ultra由于其隐形的自拍相机，可能对一些人仍有吸引力。这是因为不是每个智能手机用户都需要一个前置摄像头，用它进行视频聊天，或对其图像质量非常重视。

我们希望在 "真正的 "旗舰手机上看到更多的功能，如IP等级和无线充电。看看它的竞争对手，如Apple ，三星和谷歌，我们也需要提到该公司的更新政策。目前还不清楚中兴通讯打算为Axon 40 Ultra提供多久的Android 升级和安全更新。

中兴通讯Axon 40 Ultra的最佳替代品包括Motorala Edge 30 Pro和小米12 Pro.那些喜欢用手机拍照的人应该仔细研究一下谷歌Pixel 6 Pro.

价格和可用性

Axon 40 Ultra可直接从中兴通讯或在亚马逊.配备8GB或内存和128GB存储空间的型号价格为829欧元（799美元），而更高端的型号（12GB内存，256GB存储空间）价格为949欧元（899美元）。

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra - 08/30/2022 v7 ^(old)
Manuel Masiero

Chassis

86%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

94%

Connectivity

53 / 70 → 75%

Weight

88%

Battery

92%

Display

91%

Games Performance

58 / 64 → 91%

Application Performance

89 / 86 → 100%

Temperature

92%

Noise

100%

Audio

77 / 90 → 86%

Camera

75%

Average

82%

88%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Zhiwei Zhuang - Translator - 178 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 中兴通讯Axon 40 Ultra智能手机评测--隐形自拍镜、三个6400万像素摄像头和旗舰级性能

Manuel Masiero, 2022-08- 6 (Update: 2022-08- 6)

潜在的竞争对手比较

底座--以玻璃机身和弧形显示屏为特色

尺寸比较

规格 - 高达12GB的内存和256GB的存储空间

软件 -Android 12和MyOS 12

连接性和GNSS - Wi-Fi 6E和精确的GPS

电话功能和通话质量 - VoLTE和VoWiFi

摄像头 - 三个6400万像素的摄像头和一个显示屏下的自拍摄像头

配件和保修 - 包括65瓦的充电器

输入设备和可用性 - 360赫兹触摸采样率

显示器 - AMOLED面板，刷新率为120赫兹。

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能--由Snapdragon 8 Gen 1驱动

游戏--即使在最高设置下也能流畅地进行游戏

排放--Axon 40 Ultra即使在负载下也能保持低温

温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

发言人

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra audio analysis

ZTE Axon 30 Ultra 5G audio analysis

电池寿命--Axon 40 Ultra是持久性的

消耗功率

Leistungsaufnahme: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Leistungsaufnahme: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论。Axon 40 Ultra

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison