Notebookcheck Logo

测试中的 Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power 游戏掌上电脑 - 口袋里的 Zen4 Power

游戏小矮人

Ayaneo Air 1S 是如此之小,以至于大多数人的口袋都可以装下它。尽管如此,这家亚洲制造商还是将足够的计算能力装进了这个配备 5.5 英寸 OLED 显示屏的小机箱中,以满足我们 Steam 资料库中最新游戏的需要。
AMD Ryzen (Zen) Touchscreen Windows Zen 4 Gaming
Ayaneo Air 1S 复古动力游戏掌上电脑

Ayaneo 并不是便携式游戏机领域的新玩家。该公司早在 2019 年就已经推出了搭载 Windows 系统和 AMD 处理器的小型掌上电脑,拥有强大的计算能力。新款 Air 1S 依靠的是 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U.由于集成了 Radeon RX 780MTDP 仅为 25 瓦,也能流畅渲染当前的游戏。在上次对游戏掌机的评测让我们有些失望之后,Ayaneo Air 1S 的表现完全令人信服。除了强大的硬件外,该机型还拥有更多可用的软件。
带有霍尔传感器的拇指摇杆和触发器可确保在任何情况下都能精确输入。使用 Ayaneo Air 1S 不用担心摇杆漂移。

Air 1S 最重要的两个竞争对手可能是华硕ROG Ally Z1 ExtremeOneXPlayer 2.此外,还有GPD Win 4也是一款有趣的掌上电脑,它无疑是以索尼 PSP 为基础开发的。在所有对比设备中,只有 Ayaneo Air 1S 配备了反应灵敏的 OLED 屏幕。

Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 8 x 3.3 - 5.1 GHz, 28 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Phoenix-U (Zen 4)
Graphics adapter
Memory
32 GB 
, DDR5
Display
5.50 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, 10-Point Touchscreen, Ayaneo-OLED, OLED, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB, 2048 GB 
, 1800 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm Headset-Anschluss, Card Reader: microSD, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Sensors: Hall Sensor Triggers and Thumbsticks, Gyroskop
Networking
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 21 x 224 x 90
Battery
37.5 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Home
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
443.8 g, Power Supply: 160 g
Price
975 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
88.2 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2023
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M
443.8 g21 mm5.50"1920x1080
87.5 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
611 g21.22 mm7.00"1920x1080
80.3 %
v7 (old)
03 / 2023
GPD Win 4
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
607 g28 mm6.00"1920x1080
84 %
v7 (old)
07 / 2023
One Netbook XPlayer 2
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
864 g23 mm8.40"2560x1600

v (old)
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
669 g49 mm7.00"1280x800
80.1 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2023
Aokzoe A1
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M
735 g21 mm8.00"1920x1200

外壳 - 大量塑料,但非常稳定

Ayaneo Air S1 有两种不同的外壳和四种不同的颜色。极光白、极地黑、复古动力和超轻薄限量版是不同型号的名称。我们评测的样品是 Retro Power 版本,浅米色搭配深洋红色的 X、Y、A 和 B 按钮,以及大量的黑色和灰色,其颜色很像经典的 Game Boy 或泛黄的超级任天堂。Ayaneo 与 Game Boy 按键的典型洋红色并不一致,但整体配色和谐,唤起了人们对 90 年代的回忆。

设备本身并不比索尼 PSP 大多少。Air 1S 仅重 453 克。轻薄型配置的重量几乎减轻了 50 克。因此,Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power 给人的感觉是非常小巧。 我们无法迫使手持设备弯曲或吱吱作响,所以我们放弃了。在游戏过程中,你绝对可以信任这款设备。只有玻璃盖子的 OLED 显示屏是一个潜在的弱点。这款掌上电脑在结构上的最大缺陷是出风口处的注塑边缘清晰可见。

外壳本身厚约 21 毫米,两个控制器手柄部分甚至更厚一些。因此,这款掌上电脑非常适合握在手中,但厚度仍不足 3 厘米,因此比 Game Boy 甚至 Steam Deck 都要扁平得多。总之,我们的手指拥有了一个小巧的手持设备,其磨砂表面也让我们在长时间握持时倍感舒适。因此,在长时间游戏时没有任何障碍。

这款游戏手持设备还具有典型的 RGB 灯光。两个拇指杆周围各有一个 RGB 灯环。它可以相对自由地配置,也可以提供充电状态或其他状态信息。

Ayaneo Air 1S 与其他掌上电脑的比较
Ayaneo Air 1S 与其他掌上电脑的比较

Ayaneo Air 1S 采用 5.5 英寸显示屏,是市场上最小的游戏掌上电脑之一。在我们的数据库中,至少有两款产品的尺寸与之相似:而 Steamdeck、华硕 Rog Ally Z1 甚至任天堂 Switch 都要大得多,重量也要重几克。

尺寸比较

298 mm 117 mm 49 mm 669 g310 mm 127 mm 23 mm 864 g280.44 mm 111.2 mm 21.22 mm 611 g227 mm 160 mm 23 mm 1 kg220 mm 92 mm 28 mm 607 g224 mm 90 mm 21 mm 443.8 g198 mm 92 mm 27 mm 553 g297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

设备 - 两次 USB 4

Ayaneo 并没有在小巧的机身上设置太多接口。不过,屏幕下方和上方各有一个 USB 4 端口。这两个接口都配备齐全,因此也适用于充电或连接外部硬件和显示器。4K60Hz 显示器可在这两个接口上操作。手持设备底部还有一个 microSD 读卡器。无需网络摄像头或内置麦克风。耳机可通过 3.5 毫米插孔连接。

底部:microSD 读卡器(盖板下);3.5 毫米耳机端口;USB C 4.0(DisplayPort、Power Delivery)
底部:microSD 读卡器(盖板下);3.5 毫米耳机端口;USB C 4.0(DisplayPort、Power Delivery)
顶部:电源按钮中的指纹传感器;音量摇杆;USB C 4.0(DisplayPort、电力传输)
顶部:电源按钮中的指纹传感器;音量摇杆;USB C 4.0(DisplayPort、电力传输)

SD 读卡器

AS SSD:SD 卡
AS SSD:SD 卡

我们的 AV PRO microSD 在游戏手持设备的测试中达到了约 80 MB/s。两个方向的传输速度相同。因此,SD 插槽似乎只适合在有限的范围内扩展游戏内存。不过,较老的游戏应该可以通过 SD 卡流畅运行并快速加载。

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
193.9 MB/s +145%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
132.4 MB/s +67%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
132 MB/s +67%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (20.9 - 184, n=8, last 2 years)
103.5 MB/s +31%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
79.26 MB/s
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
63.3 MB/s -20%
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
  (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
42 MB/s -47%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
265.8 MB/s +214%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (Angelbird AV Pro V60)
247.7 MB/s +193%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)
238.6 MB/s +182%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (84.6 - 260, n=7, last 2 years)
174.5 MB/s +106%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60)
92.8 MB/s +10%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
84.62 MB/s

交流

英特尔 AX 210 配备了 WiFi 6E。这款小型手持设备在 5 GHz 无线局域网中的性能略逊一筹,但在与华硕 ROG AXE11000 一起使用 6 GHz 网络时,至少在接收方面完全令人信服。两种网络连接都很稳定,足以满足流畅的在线游戏需求。

传输速率低也可能是由于我们测试设备的天线线缆安装不正确造成的。我们将在维护部分详细说明。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1648 (1587min - 1746max) MBit/s +90%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1584 (802min - 1625max) MBit/s +83%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1439 (1375min - 1517max) MBit/s +66%
Beelink SER7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1324 (665min - 1408max) MBit/s +53%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (711 - 1675, n=8, last 2 years)
1226 MBit/s +41%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (565 - 1670, n=24)
1107 MBit/s +28%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
867 (134min - 975max) MBit/s
GPD Win 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
669 (485min - 777max) MBit/s -23%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card
1735 (1708min - 1755max) MBit/s +83%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1597 (1517min - 1621max) MBit/s +69%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1294 (1201min - 1342max) MBit/s +37%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (715 - 1711, n=8, last 2 years)
1246 MBit/s +32%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (715 - 1711, n=24)
1220 MBit/s +29%
Beelink SER7
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
1193 (588min - 1333max) MBit/s +26%
GPD Win 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
990 (909min - 1056max) MBit/s +5%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
947 (931min - 961max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1457 (1038min - 1597max) MBit/s +49%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (975 - 1762, n=6, last 2 years)
1425 MBit/s +46%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (712 - 1615, n=21)
1341 MBit/s +38%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1339 (1169min - 1567max) MBit/s +37%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
975 (796min - 1248max) MBit/s
GPD Win 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
712 (410min - 795max) MBit/s -27%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1672 (839min - 1693max) MBit/s
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1383 - 1858, n=6, last 2 years)
1642 MBit/s -2%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
  (885 - 1827, n=22)
1477 MBit/s -12%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
1460 (1393min - 1503max) MBit/s -13%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1402 (766min - 1534max) MBit/s -16%
GPD Win 4
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210
951 (921min - 975max) MBit/s -43%
0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750Tooltip
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø975 (796-1248)
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø712 (410-795)
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1339 (1169-1567)
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1457 (1038-1597)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1643 (839-1693)
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (921-975)
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1460 (1393-1503)
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1376 (766-1534)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø852 (134-975)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1648 (1587-1746)
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø669 (485-777)
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1558 (802-1625)
Beelink SER7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1302 (665-1408)
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1439 (1375-1517)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø946 (931-961)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1735 (1708-1755)
GPD Win 4 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø990 (909-1056)
One Netbook XPlayer 2 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX210; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1596 (1517-1621)
Beelink SER7 Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1173 (588-1333)
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1294 (1201-1342)

安全

Ayaneo 在 Air 1S 的电源按钮上集成了指纹传感器。除此之外,目前 AMD 处理器的安全功能也一应俱全。处理器 Ryzen 7 7840U提供了 TPM 2.0 等功能。

配件

Ayaneo 1S 配备了一个非常小巧的 65 瓦电源和一些旅行适配器,可以在全球范围内使用。制造商还提供了两个 USB-A 3.0 转 USB-C 适配器。

Ayaneo 在自己的商店里提供各种配件。从便携包、电源箱、拇指棒盖到扩展坞和控制器,您可以找到与设备相匹配的大量选择。

附带适配器的一个问题是它们会粘在一起。使用了一段时间后,我们的欧盟适配器外壳的两半就分开了。用强力胶进行修复后成功了,但如果在插入电源时发生这种情况,就会有相当大的风险。

Ayaneo Air 1S 随附配件
Ayaneo Air 1S 随附配件
有缺陷的适配器很容易重新粘合
有缺陷的适配器很容易重新粘合

软件

要在掌上电脑上流畅地玩游戏,除了强大的硬件之外,最重要的一点就是要有好的软件。在OneXPlayer 2的评测中,我们发现附带的名为 Gamer Zone 的控制中心有很多不足之处,因为它喜欢将游戏发送到后台,而且只提供几个设置选项。

Ayaneo 的 AyaSpace 提供了近乎完美的用户体验。该应用程序可随时通过自己的按钮作为覆盖层启动,并提供各种选项来控制小型掌上电脑的性能。其中包括许多舒适度设置、带有 FPS 计数器的性能叠加、控制器设置等等。长按 Aya 按钮可在全屏模式下打开应用程序。在这里可以管理和启动游戏,还可以进行许多其他设置。从 Steam、GOG、Epic 和 Ubisoft 下载的游戏会自动添加到游戏库中。我们只需手动帮助从 Amazon Prime Gaming 下载游戏。

作为覆盖层的 AyaSpace(Ouick 工具 2.0)

AYAspace 叠加(Ouick 工具 2.0)
AYAspace 叠加(Ouick 工具 2.0)
AYAspace 叠加(Ouick 工具 2.0)
AYAspace 叠加(Ouick 工具 2.0)
AYAspace 叠加(Ouick 工具 2.0)
AYAspace 叠加(Ouick 工具 2.0)

全屏模式下的 AyaSpace

因此,AyaSpace 被证明是一个灵活的伴侣,不仅可高度定制,还具有良好的可控性。遗憾的是,定制选项并不包括语言。如果不懂英文或中文,就无法使用该应用程序。其他语言暂时还不可用。

维护

在底部 USB-C 端口的两侧,很容易就能找到将设备固定在一起的前两颗螺丝。另一颗隐藏在 microSD 卡插槽的盖板下。还有几颗螺丝固定着机壳上侧的两半部分。要接触到它们,必须小心取下肩部按键之间的上部横杆。每个扳机键下方还隐藏着一颗螺丝。拧下螺丝后,只有一个塑料开启工具可以帮助撬出许多卡扣。总的来说,这款手机很难打开。

维护 - 杆下螺丝
维护 - 杆下螺丝
维护 - 肩部按钮下的螺丝
维护 - 肩部按钮下的螺丝
维护 - 半壳体
维护 - 半壳体

在分离两半机壳时,还应注意电源按钮指纹传感器的带状线缆。这根电缆足够长,可以原谅这里的许多错误,但仍有一定的风险会伤害到敏感的电缆。在手持设备的内部,我们看到的是非常紧凑的设备,但仍留有很大的维修空间。

细究起来,也有一些值得批评的地方。例如,连接 WiFi 模块的灰色天线线缆从一开始就没有整齐地放置在其环路中,而且在天线和扬声器模块上也没有合理地布线,尽管这里实际上提供了相应的切口。结果导致线缆稍有挤压。另一个值得批评的地方是小小的保修贴纸。但这并不值得认真对待,因为它可以很容易地被一张张撕下。因此,您可以尽情地摆弄设备,然后重新贴上贴纸。

不过,我们发现 Ayaneo Air 1S 的优点要多于缺点。我们感到惊讶的是,尽管该产品结构紧凑,但制造商却采用了标准组件作为 Wi-Fi 模块和 M.2-2280 固态硬盘。只有 32 GB 的大容量工作内存是焊接的。除此之外,我们还在 Ayaneo 的在线商店中发现了许多其他模块化组件。

在组装过程中,我们注意到扳机按钮既可以插在左边,也可以插在右边。不过,如果你不确定哪个按钮属于哪个位置,也可以在安装点上找到标签。

最后,Ayaneo Air 1S 表明,笔记本电脑制造商往往在模块化方面为所期望的笔记本电脑的紧凑性找借口。Ayaneo 向我们展示了如何打造一款易于维修的设备,即使它可以放在口袋里,也有许多可更换的部件。

输入设备 - 控制器强大,但振动较弱

触发器和两个拇指杆上都装有霍尔传感器,因此你永远不必担心摇杆漂移。除了 X-Box 手柄上的典型按键外,Ayaneo Air 1S 还提供了一些可自由分配的按键。在两个大的肩部按键之间,还有两个可分配功能或宏的按键。Ayaneo 键旁边的按键也可自由分配。还可以通过输入手势保存其他宏。

玩游戏时,Air 1S 的手感很好。两个拇指杆提供了出色的精确度。可调节的死区和舒适的手感确保了高精度。

另一方面,我们发现 A、B、X 和 Y 四个键有点小。它们的直径只有 7 毫米,明显小于一般的控制器或 Gameboy 和 PSP。这也是第一次清楚地看到手持设备到底有多小。但这四个按键提供了明确的压力点,因此我们也注意到,即使在紧张的游戏场景中,小按键也不会导致更多的错误输入。两个肩部按键也有明确的受力点。这些按键也没有什么值得批评的地方。

Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power 与复古掌上电脑的比较
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power 与复古掌上电脑的比较
AyaSpace 键(大)和宏键(小)
AyaSpace 键(大)和宏键(小)

两个触发器提供了非常线性的输入。不过,有些玩家可能会对按键电阻过低感到困扰。

除了各种按键、触发器和拇指杆外,还可使用触摸屏进行输入。在桌面模式下,触摸屏也能良好可靠地工作。但在游戏过程中,触摸屏会发热。在这里,您应该坚持使用控制器元素的输入选项。

如果你离不开鼠标,可以通过 Ayaneo Space 将控制器切换为虚拟鼠标。左摇杆用于移动鼠标指针,右摇杆用于滚动。X 触发右键点击,A 触发左键点击。肩键可用作前进和后退键。

只是内置的振动电机被证明有点弱。你可以感受到一定程度的隆隆声,但振动远不如 XBOX 或 Playstation 手柄那么清晰。不过,你也必须考虑到这款小型手持设备的重量。PS5 的 Dualsense 重 281 克,而 Ayaneo Air 1S 甚至不到 200 克。因此,触觉电机所占的重量比例应大大降低。

显示屏 - 响应式 OLED

子像素结构
子像素结构

Ayaneo Air 1S 配备了一块全高清分辨率的 OLED 显示屏,画面效果十分逼真。5.5 英寸屏幕的像素密度约为 400 ppi。因此,很难注意到单个像素。对于一款游戏设备来说,60 Hz 的刷新率乍看之下可能很低。不过,OLED 面板的响应速度非常快,在全高清分辨率和中等画质设置下的大多数游戏中,60 FPS 的硬件几乎都能得到充分利用。只有在少数情况下,当你特别留意时,低帧率才会变得明显。例如,在某些游戏中爬楼梯或滚动浏览网站时,有时会出现伪影。最后,我们可以说,考虑到硬件的性能,60 Hz 已经完全足够了。目前的游戏在全高清的中等画质设置下大多能以 30 到 60 FPS 的速度运行。

与其他游戏掌机相比,Air 1S 的屏幕可能是最好的。ROG ROG Ally Z1 Extreme配备了更亮的 120 Hz IPS 屏幕,但其响应时间部分是我们测试设备的两倍。

作为 OLED 屏幕的典型代表,我们看到了深邃的黑色和明亮的色彩。整体画面最多会因该技术带来的闪烁而受到影响。在 OLED 屏幕中,屏幕是逐行更新的,最新的一行会被关闭。不过,由于在小屏幕上实现了高分辨率,并同时更新多行,因此在全亮度条件下,我们将亮度传感器和示波器组合在一起,这种效果并不明显。

358
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
363
cd/m²
331
cd/m²
326
cd/m²
361
cd/m²
335
cd/m²
325
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
Ayaneo-OLED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 363 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 338.9 cd/m² Minimum: 22.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 90 %
Center on Battery: 335 cd/m²
Contrast: 4729:1 (Black: 0.07 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.76 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 5.04
ΔE Greyscale 8.79 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.71% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.85% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.155
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo-OLED, OLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
TL070FVSX01-0, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
GPD Win 4
G1618-04, IPS, 1920x1080, 6"
One Netbook XPlayer 2
FLQ8423, IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
1280x800, 7"
Aokzoe A1
BOE0207, IPS, 1920x1200, 8"
Display
-25%
-27%
-19%
-20%
Display P3 Coverage
99.85
65.6
-34%
63.1
-37%
75.4
-24%
72.3
-28%
sRGB Coverage
100
92.1
-8%
92
-8%
97
-3%
92.6
-7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
99.71
67.9
-32%
64.6
-35%
71.1
-29%
73.4
-26%
Response Times
-80%
-414%
-546%
-141%
1058%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
4.4 ?(2.6, 1.8)
10.5 ?(5, 5.5)
-139%
26.8 ?(12.5, 14.3)
-509%
36.8 ?(16.9, 19.9)
-736%
30.1 ?(13.6, 16.5)
-584%
28.9 ?(13.8, 15.1)
-557%
Response Time Black / White *
5 ?(2.5, 2.5)
6 ?(2.7, 3.3)
-20%
20.9 ?(11.4, 9.5)
-318%
22.8 ?(10.4, 12.4)
-356%
14.5 ?(4.8, 9.7)
-190%
21.1 ?(11.1, 10)
-322%
PWM Frequency
240 ?(300)
1080 ?(70, 374)
350%
9970.7
4054%
Screen
-44%
-60%
-41%
-66%
-80%
Brightness middle
331
513
55%
413.1
25%
369
11%
517
56%
328.4
-1%
Brightness
339
474
40%
407
20%
363
7%
524
55%
323
-5%
Brightness Distribution
90
84
-7%
81
-10%
89
-1%
97
8%
92
2%
Black Level *
0.07
0.38
-443%
0.39
-457%
0.28
-300%
0.47
-571%
0.39
-457%
Contrast
4729
1350
-71%
1059
-78%
1318
-72%
1100
-77%
842
-82%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.76
3.7
22%
6.97
-46%
7.1
-49%
5.7
-20%
10.17
-114%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
9.2
8.3
10%
14.11
-53%
10.9
-18%
10.5
-14%
18.14
-97%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
5.04
1.24
75%
2.6
48%
1.07
79%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.79
5.1
42%
9.9
-13%
8.3
6%
5.7
35%
12.7
-44%
Gamma
2.155 102%
2.14 103%
2.04 108%
2.01 109%
2.18 101%
2.7 81%
CCT
7571 86%
7732 84%
9571 68%
8838 74%
7733 84%
12502 52%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-50% / -45%
-167% / -103%
-202% / -108%
-104% / -87%
319% / 160%

* ... smaller is better

Ayaneo Air 1S 当然不是为图形设计师或视频编辑而设计的设备。它是为游戏而设计的,因此我们更高兴地看到,内置的 OLED 面板能够几乎完全再现 AdobeRGB 和 DiplayP3。不过,100% 还原 sRGB 和屏幕的短响应时间对于游戏来说至关重要。

Ayaneo 与 AdobeRGB
Ayaneo 与 AdobeRGB
Ayaneo 与 DisplayP3
Ayaneo 与 DisplayP3

游戏手持设备的屏幕是否必须具有很高的色彩准确度值得商榷。对于游戏设备来说,无需进一步校准,ColorChecker 的平均 ΔΕ2000 值为 4.72 是完全可以接受的。我们的 ICC 配置文件(在信息框中下载)并不能改善实际的色彩还原,但可以显著改善灰阶。

尤其是对动态范围较小的阴暗场景依赖较大的游戏,更应受益于我们的 ICC 配置文件。

饱和度校准
饱和度校准
灰度校准
灰度校准
已校准的 ColoChecker
已校准的 ColoChecker
饱和度(DisplayP3)
饱和度(DisplayP3)
色彩检查器(DisplayP3)
色彩检查器(DisplayP3)
灰度(DisplayP3)
灰度(DisplayP3)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.5 ms rise
↘ 2.5 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 14 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
4.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 2.6 ms rise
↘ 1.8 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 12 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 240 Hz
≤ 300 cd/m² brightness

The display backlight flickers at 240 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 300 cd/m² and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 240 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

Flickering occurs even at high brightness setting and may have an effect on the user during everyday use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

亮度为 100
亮度为 100
90% 亮度
90% 亮度
亮度为 80
亮度为 80
70 % 亮度
70 % 亮度
亮度为 60
亮度为 60
50% 亮度
50% 亮度
40% 亮度
40% 亮度
30 % 亮度
30 % 亮度
20 % 亮度
20 % 亮度
10 % 亮度
10 % 亮度

Ayaneo Air 1S 的平均亮度约为 340 cd/m²,亮度并不出众。光亮的显示屏表面更是雪上加霜。不过,正如下面的图片所示,户外使用并不困难。即使在明亮的阳光下,OLED 显示屏通常仍然易于阅读。不过,在阴暗处使用手持设备玩游戏会更好。

户外使用的 Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
户外使用的 Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
户外使用的 Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
户外使用的 Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power

通常情况下,OLED 显示屏在较大视角下会出现轻微的彩虹效果。在这里,即使在陡峭的视角下,我们也几乎察觉不到任何色彩变化。围绕水平轴的倾斜对于游戏来说可能更重要,因为你通常需要用双手握住设备。

Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power 不同视角的屏幕
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power 不同视角的屏幕

性能 - 令人信服的 AMD Zen4 处理能力

所有 Ayaneo Air 1S 都配备了 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U.根据配置的不同,安装的内存大小也不同。我们的设备配置较高,拥有 32 GB 工作内存和 2 TB 硬盘。在 32 GB 工作内存中,最多 16 GB 用于 Radeon 780M.因此,测试设备中的图形芯片可以显示出它的能力。

测试条件

通过 Ayaspace 可以使用多种电源计划,它还可以切换 Windows 中的电源计划。所有电源方案均可根据用户需求自由调整。在市电模式下,最大 TDP 为 25 瓦。在电池模式下,PL2(持续功率)最大为 20 瓦。我们决定在以下所有基准测试中将预装的 "AAA 游戏 "功率方案限制在 20 瓦,以显示设备的移动性能。

可以通过 AYASpace 设置各种电源设置。还可以设置风扇曲线。在智能 TDP 模式下,Air 1S 的提升功率会受到限制。这样,处理器的耗电量就会减少,电池寿命也会延长。经验表明,升压性能的降低对游戏过程中的预期 FPS 影响很小。

电源设置
电源设置
风扇曲线
风扇曲线

处理器

......(英文 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U是一款高端处理器,能以较低的 TDP 提供较高的性能。这主要得益于现代台积电 4 纳米 FinFET 工艺。它有 8 个内核、16 个线程,并由 Radeon 780M 提供支持。Ayaneo 的 APU 几乎完全相同与 AMDRyzen Z1 Extreme中使用的 华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme联想Legion Go.

在多核性能基准测试中,该处理器的性能比 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme 低约 15%。不过,后者的持续功耗也有 30 瓦,提升功耗为 43 瓦。在多消耗 30% 到 50% 的情况下,ROG Ally 在基准测试中的性能优势显得非常小。结合低 TDP,AMD 处理器在多核性能比较中总体上非常强劲。与联想 ThinkBook Plus Gen4 的简短对比也证明了这一点。 联想 ThinkBook Plus Gen 4.尽管 PL1 相近,但在处理器性能方面,它明显落后于 Ayaneo。

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

0130260390520650780910104011701300143015601690182019502080221023402470Tooltip
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power AMD Ryzen 7 7840U: Ø1855 (1830.91-1873.89)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme; Turbo: Ø2271 (2104.49-2396.5)
GPD Win 4 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1487 (1450.64-1776.28)
One Netbook XPlayer 2 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U: Ø1452 (1430.41-1463.22)
GPD Win Max 2 Intel Core i7-1260P: Ø1070 (1059.8-1080.5)
Beelink SER7 AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS: Ø2544 (2511.62-2564.76)
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Intel Core i7-1355U: Ø1192 (1059.24-1408.15)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
87.2 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
82.7 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
 
72.1 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
70.3 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
70.1 pt
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
63.6 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
61 pt
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
55.7 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2 -1!
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
47.1 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
16105 (15785.6min - 16105.2max) Points +36%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
14960 Points +26%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (11739 - 15074, n=10)
12884 Points +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3984 - 15120, n=10, last 2 years)
12062 Points +2%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
11829 Points
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10546 (8992.1min - 10546max) Points -11%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
9130 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
8390 (7972.06min - 8390.3max) Points -29%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
6941 (6788.58min - 6941.04max) Points -41%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
1827 Points +6%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
1796 Points +4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1779 Points +3%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1774 Points +3%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1721 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1597 - 1770, n=9, last 2 years)
1709 Points -1%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (1373 - 1742, n=10)
1646 Points -4%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1534 Points -11%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
878 Points -49%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6344 Points +34%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
5825 Points +23%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (4469 - 5917, n=10)
5039 Points +7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
4722 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1521 - 5917, n=8, last 2 years)
4628 Points -2%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
4107 Points -13%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3529 Points -25%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
3221 Points -32%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
2653 Points -44%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
698 Points +4%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
698 Points +4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
692 Points +3%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
690 Points +3%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
669 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (533 - 678, n=10)
644 Points -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (357 - 684, n=8, last 2 years)
628 Points -6%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
602 Points -10%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
341 Points -49%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
2565 (2511.62min - 2564.76max) Points +37%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2397 (2104.49min - 2396.5max) Points +28%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (1025 - 2439, n=12)
1946 Points +4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1874 (1830.91min - 1873.89max) Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (689 - 2439, n=8, last 2 years)
1872 Points 0%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1776 (1450.64min - 1776.28max) Points -5%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1463 (1430.41min - 1463.22max) Points -22%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
1408 (1059.24min - 1408.15max) Points -25%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
1081 (1059.8min - 1080.5max) Points -42%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
283 Points +7%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
280 Points +6%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
264 Points
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (246 - 268, n=7, last 2 years)
261 Points -1%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
256 Points -3%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
256 Points -3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (217 - 272, n=10)
256 Points -3%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
246 Points -7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
142.6 Points -46%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
450 Seconds * -72%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
389 Seconds * -48%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
347 Seconds * -32%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
304 Seconds * -16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
262 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (208 - 270, n=10)
251 Seconds * +4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (208 - 315, n=6, last 2 years)
248 Seconds * +5%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
213 Seconds * +19%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
196 Seconds * +25%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
69882 MIPS +31%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
62657 MIPS +18%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (50087 - 62156, n=10)
55687 MIPS +5%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
53198 MIPS
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19684 - 64454, n=8, last 2 years)
51738 MIPS -3%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
49708 MIPS -7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
40058 MIPS -25%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
35361 MIPS -34%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
29214 MIPS -45%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
6734 MIPS +16%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
6316 MIPS +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (4657 - 6408, n=10)
5816 MIPS +1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
5782 MIPS
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
5551 MIPS -4%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
5549 MIPS -4%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
5472 MIPS -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (3653 - 6077, n=7, last 2 years)
5438 MIPS -6%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
3398 MIPS -41%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
11423 Points +54%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
10917 Points +48%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (7399 - 10558, n=10)
9113 Points +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (4457 - 10713, n=9, last 2 years)
8486 Points +15%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
8034 Points +9%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7737 Points +5%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7399 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
6854 Points -7%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
6499 Points -12%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
1983 Points +20%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
1956 Points +18%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
1791 Points +8%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
1734 Points +5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1355 - 1917, n=9, last 2 years)
1721 Points +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (1355 - 1933, n=10)
1705 Points +3%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
1652 Points
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1549 Points -6%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
926 Points -44%
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
20.4 fps +40%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
18.4 fps +26%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (12.5 - 18.7, n=7, last 2 years)
15.9 fps +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (14.4 - 18.6, n=10)
15.7 fps +8%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
14.6 fps
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
12.9 fps -12%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
11.8 fps -19%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
9.52 fps -35%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
7.57 fps -48%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
84.9 s * -77%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (46.2 - 57.8, n=7, last 2 years)
51.2 s * -6%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
50.9 s * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (43.4 - 67.1, n=10)
50.1 s * -4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
48.1 s *
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
46.5 s * +3%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
43.6 s * +9%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
43 s * +11%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
39.7 s * +17%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
0.52 sec * -12%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U
0.483 sec * -4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (0.4559 - 0.581, n=11)
0.4821 sec * -4%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.4601 - 0.4945, n=8, last 2 years)
0.475 sec * -2%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
0.4651 sec *
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P
0.4612 sec * +1%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
0.4447 sec * +4%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
0.4446 sec * +4%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
7342
Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit
15918 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit
59874 Points
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit
13006 Points
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
11162
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
36812
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
2.97 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
20.46 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
264 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.9 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
120.9 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1874 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
669 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
4722 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
11829 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1721 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
99.5 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
89.2 pt
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
 
81.8 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
80.7 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
71.6 pt
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
61.9 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
54 pt
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
42.7 pt
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
36 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
25685 KRay/s +37%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
24067 KRay/s +28%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (17924 - 25901, n=10)
21031 KRay/s +12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (10795 - 25901, n=8, last 2 years)
20412 KRay/s +9%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
18736 KRay/s
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
11279 KRay/s -40%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
10902 KRay/s -42%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7147 KRay/s -62%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4076 KRay/s -78%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
109853 Points +40%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
102584 Points +31%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (78360 - 109745, n=10)
89071 Points +13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (58068 - 109745, n=8, last 2 years)
87639 Points +11%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
78607 Points
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
72386 Points -8%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
67503 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
36381 Points -54%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
20086 Points -74%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
4783 MB/s +30%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
4420 MB/s +20%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (3519 - 4847, n=10)
4069 MB/s +10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2707 - 4847, n=8, last 2 years)
3964 MB/s +7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
3691 MB/s
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
2485 MB/s -33%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
2296 MB/s -38%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1856 MB/s -50%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1207 MB/s -67%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
111969 Points +23%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
106595 Points +17%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (83206 - 114294, n=10)
99477 Points +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (69419 - 114294, n=8, last 2 years)
95967 Points +5%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
91289 Points
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
86451 Points -5%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
69720 Points -24%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
63751 Points -30%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
62082 Points -32%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
14705 Points +20%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
14070 Points +15%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (11969 - 14822, n=10)
13054 Points +6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (8463 - 14822, n=8, last 2 years)
12710 Points +3%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
12286 Points
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
11141 Points -9%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
7753 Points -37%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5874 Points -52%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4755 Points -61%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
58699 Points +41%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
54962 Points +32%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (40720 - 58482, n=10)
47352 Points +13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (28245 - 58482, n=8, last 2 years)
46269 Points +11%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
41726 Points
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
39913 Points -4%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
37417 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
17958 Points -57%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
11157 Points -73%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
161216 MB/s +145%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (57678 - 166333, n=8, last 2 years)
107225 MB/s +63%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (53018 - 166333, n=10)
105137 MB/s +60%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
102968 MB/s +56%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
87114 MB/s +32%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
76146 MB/s +16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
65903 MB/s
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
49619 MB/s -25%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
37224 MB/s -44%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
964 MB/s +19%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
949 MB/s +18%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (801 - 1047, n=10)
876 MB/s +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (654 - 1047, n=8, last 2 years)
854 MB/s +6%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
807 MB/s
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
631 MB/s -22%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
554 MB/s -31%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
544 MB/s -33%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
499 MB/s -38%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
13904 KRay/s +43%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
12875 KRay/s +32%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (9347 - 13846, n=10)
11110 KRay/s +14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5732 - 13846, n=8, last 2 years)
10740 KRay/s +10%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
9738 KRay/s
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
5926 KRay/s -39%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
5925 KRay/s -39%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3818 KRay/s -61%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2366 KRay/s -76%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
42370 MPixel/s +57%
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon 780M
41088 MPixel/s +53%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M
37540 MPixel/s +40%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (26622 - 49287, n=8, last 2 years)
34547 MPixel/s +28%
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
33940 MPixel/s +26%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (26622 - 38173, n=10)
32058 MPixel/s +19%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
27090 MPixel/s +1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
26903 MPixel/s
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, Radeon 680M
26427 MPixel/s -2%

系统性能

原则上,Ayaneo Air 1S 在 PCMark10 基准测试中的表现也相当不错,但 ROG Ally 无法再次充分发挥其性能优势。在系统性能基准测试中,Ayaneo 比华硕更大的掌上电脑落后约 15%。因此,该设备再次证明了其强大的性能。此外,Ryzen 7 的集成 Radeon 780M在 PCMark 10 的基准测试中显示出优势。另一方面,Crossmark 测试的是提升性能。在对比领域,Ayaneo 相差甚远,这也解释了它在该基准测试中表现较差的原因。

不过,这也表明,在设备齐全的工作场所,手持设备也可以通过扩展坞替代电脑。其性能足以满足办公和互联网应用的需要。

PCMark 10 / Score
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
7225 Points +23%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
6907 Points +18%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
6394 Points +9%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (5866 - 7149, n=8, last 2 years)
6366 Points +9%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
5866 Points
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
5747 Points -2%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
5431 Points -7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
5057 Points -14%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
11531 Points +27%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10819 Points +19%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
10743 Points +18%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10296 Points +14%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
10205 Points +13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (9068 - 10633, n=8, last 2 years)
9753 Points +8%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
9068 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
8480 Points -6%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
10452 Points +25%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
10074 Points +20%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
9235 Points +10%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7323 - 9912, n=8, last 2 years)
8585 Points +2%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
8386 Points
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
7339 Points -12%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
6997 Points -17%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
6089 Points -27%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
9052 Points +26%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
8621 Points +20%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (7204 - 9408, n=8, last 2 years)
8402 Points +17%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
7529 Points +5%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
7204 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
6799 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
6385 Points -11%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
5514 Points -23%
CrossMark / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1718 Points +37%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1700 Points +35%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1657 Points +32%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1610 Points +28%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1575 Points +25%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (840 - 1693, n=7, last 2 years)
1390 Points +11%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1256 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
1009 Points -20%
CrossMark / Productivity
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1662 Points +25%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1657 Points +25%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1621 Points +22%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1596 Points +20%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1587 Points +20%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (874 - 1649, n=7, last 2 years)
1407 Points +6%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1326 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
971 Points -27%
CrossMark / Creativity
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1953 Points +56%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1878 Points +50%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1708 Points +37%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1679 Points +34%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1596 Points +28%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (808 - 1868, n=7, last 2 years)
1421 Points +14%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1251 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
1054 Points -16%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
1593 Points +47%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1457 Points +35%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1451 Points +34%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
1405 Points +30%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
1293 Points +20%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (831 - 1538, n=7, last 2 years)
1270 Points +17%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1082 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
994 Points -8%
WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
432 Points +84%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
332 Points +41%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
293 Points +25%
GPD Win Max 2
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB
290 Points +23%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
290 Points +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (188.4 - 306, n=8, last 2 years)
258 Points +10%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
235 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
181.3 Points -23%
WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
277 Points +41%
Beelink SER7
Radeon 780M, R7 7840HS, Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8
263 Points +34%
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N
256 Points +30%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
220 Points +12%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (107 - 255, n=5, last 2 years)
197.2 Points 0%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
196.4 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
133.2 Points -32%
PCMark 10 Score
5866 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (43255 - 70532, n=11)
58370 MB/s +35%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (32617 - 81717, n=9, last 2 years)
56912 MB/s +32%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
43255 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (37399 - 61602, n=10)
49647 MB/s +33%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25380 - 80481, n=8, last 2 years)
49150 MB/s +31%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
37399 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (49426 - 92289, n=12)
71395 MB/s +43%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (25596 - 108872, n=10, last 2 years)
65858 MB/s +32%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
49816 MB/s
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, Radeon 780M
132.7 ns *
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112.6 - 139.6, n=9, last 2 years)
127.1 ns * +4%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
  (90 - 137.2, n=11)
121.3 ns * +9%

* ... smaller is better

DPC 延迟

在使用 LatencyMon 进行的 DPC 延迟测试中,Ayaneo 的表现并不突出。不过,我们在浏览和执行其他任务时观察到的延迟明显低于 ROG Ally。由此可见,当前的 AMD 驱动程序可能更成熟一些。

我们更关心的是以 4K 60 Hz 播放 YouTube 测试视频的情况。在此测试中,尽管 CPU 和 GPU 的负载都不高,但还是出现了 69 帧的帧数偏差。

延迟监控
延迟监控
LatencyMon 驱动程序
LatencyMon 驱动程序
YouTube 4K60 测试视频
YouTube 4K60 测试视频
 
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
2016.6 μs * -315%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1421.6 μs * -193%
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
732.6 μs * -51%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
485.6 μs *
Aokzoe A1
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
421.5 μs * +13%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

来自 Ayaneo 的 Cyberthunder 2TB
来自 Ayaneo 的 Cyberthunder 2TB
AS 固态硬盘
AS 固态硬盘

容量为2 TB的Cyberthunder固态硬盘的速度不及许多游戏笔记本电脑的固态硬盘。显然,Ayaneo采用的是白标解决方案,因为没有程序能在Windows下找出固态硬盘的正确名称。2280格式存储的最高测量传输速率约为每秒2千兆字节。作为回报,固态硬盘的性能保持不变。与竞争对手相比,Ayaneo Air 1S的固态硬盘速度明显较慢。

Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
Sequential Read: 2183.33MB/s
Sequential Write: 1602.26MB/s
4K Read: 34.04MB/s
4K Write: 90.74MB/s
4K-64 Read: 589.89MB/s
4K-64 Write: 910.02MB/s
Access Time Read: 0.151ms
Access Time Write: 0.067ms
Score Read: 842Points
Score Write: 1161Points
Score Total: 2412Points
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
92.4 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
70.1 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
66.6 pt
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
65.6 pt
Aokzoe A1
 
62.7 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
54.6 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
41.3 pt
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
 
41.3 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (431 - 5565, n=9, last 2 years)
2767 MB/s +28%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2253 (2225.97min - 2253.49max) MB/s +5%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2154 (2143.71min - 2153.78max) MB/s
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
2154 MB/s 0%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2119 (2112.04min - 2119.17max) MB/s -2%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
2106 (2093.38min - 2106.19max) MB/s -2%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
2024 (2003.2min - 2023.75max) MB/s -6%
Aokzoe A1
 
1823 (1818.37min - 1822.97max) MB/s -15%
seq write
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3392 (3368.45min - 3391.72max) MB/s +123%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2757 (2694.69min - 2756.71max) MB/s +81%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
2713 (2668.42min - 2712.9max) MB/s +78%
Aokzoe A1
 
2544 (2506.1min - 2543.79max) MB/s +67%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (259 - 5102, n=9, last 2 years)
2189 MB/s +44%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1644 (1600.76min - 1644.1max) MB/s +8%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1524 (244.88min - 1523.68max) MB/s
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
1524 MB/s 0%
seq q8 t1 read
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2458 - 7005, n=9, last 2 years)
4671 MB/s +83%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
4274 (3828.24min - 4274.42max) MB/s +67%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3538 (3155.81min - 3537.9max) MB/s +39%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
3410 (3100.94min - 3410.49max) MB/s +34%
Aokzoe A1
 
3400 (2999.01min - 3400.02max) MB/s +33%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
3212 (2755.45min - 3212.49max) MB/s +26%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2553 (2224.87min - 2553.07max) MB/s
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
2553 MB/s 0%
seq q8 t1 write
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3410 (3384.74min - 3409.86max) MB/s +101%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2842 (2705.33min - 2842.27max) MB/s +67%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
2830 (2802.69min - 2829.69max) MB/s +67%
Aokzoe A1
 
2694 (2604.45min - 2693.79max) MB/s +59%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (256 - 6151, n=9, last 2 years)
2441 MB/s +44%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1790 (1750.28min - 1789.5max) MB/s +5%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1698 (1529.75min - 1697.81max) MB/s
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
1698 MB/s 0%
4k q1 t1 read
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
77.5 (77.45min - 77.51max) MB/s +78%
Aokzoe A1
 
74.3 (73.91min - 74.3max) MB/s +71%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
70.3 (68.56min - 70.26max) MB/s +62%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
68 (67.5min - 67.95max) MB/s +56%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (37.3 - 97.4, n=9, last 2 years)
58.8 MB/s +35%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
43.5 (42.13min - 43.46max) MB/s
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
43.5 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
33.4 (33.02min - 33.38max) MB/s -23%
4k q1 t1 write
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
429 (418.44min - 428.64max) MB/s +277%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
213 (211.2min - 212.65max) MB/s +87%
Aokzoe A1
 
195.5 (191.32min - 195.46max) MB/s +72%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (112.3 - 226, n=10, last 2 years)
168.7 MB/s +48%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
153.8 (152.6min - 153.77max) MB/s +35%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
151.3 (148.2min - 151.25max) MB/s +33%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
113.9 (109.63min - 113.92max) MB/s
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
113.9 MB/s 0%
4k q32 t16 read
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
1846 (1845.27min - 1846.32max) MB/s +177%
Aokzoe A1
 
1650 (1644.31min - 1649.6max) MB/s +148%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1647 (1638.92min - 1646.84max) MB/s +147%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1632 (1627.81min - 1632.27max) MB/s +145%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (86 - 4025, n=9, last 2 years)
1302 MB/s +95%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
984 (894.6min - 983.67max) MB/s +48%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
666 (656.44min - 665.61max) MB/s
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
666 MB/s 0%
4k q32 t16 write
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3254 (2684.59min - 3253.6max) MB/s +846%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1113 (1107.59min - 1113.49max) MB/s +224%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1090 (1080.49min - 1090.38max) MB/s +217%
Aokzoe A1
 
1056 (1045.77min - 1055.6max) MB/s +207%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (89.1 - 2871, n=9, last 2 years)
859 MB/s +150%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
434 (400.52min - 433.94max) MB/s +26%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
344 (235.14min - 343.5max) MB/s
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
344 MB/s 0%
AS SSD
Score Total
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
6893 Points +186%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2412 - 8425, n=5, last 2 years)
4799 Points +99%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
4326 Points +79%
Aokzoe A1
 
4272 Points +77%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
4241 Points +76%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
3522 Points +46%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2412 Points
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
2412 Points 0%
Score Read
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2685 Points +219%
Aokzoe A1
 
1908 Points +127%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1881 Points +123%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1859 Points +121%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (842 - 2527, n=5, last 2 years)
1664 Points +98%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1319 Points +57%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
842 Points
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
842 Points 0%
Score Write
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2821 Points +143%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1161 - 4632, n=5, last 2 years)
2324 Points +100%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1623 Points +40%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1475 Points +27%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1437 Points +24%
Aokzoe A1
 
1395 Points +20%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1161 Points
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
1161 Points 0%
Seq Read
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2183 - 5260, n=5, last 2 years)
3542 MB/s +62%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
3395 MB/s +55%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3161.58 MB/s +45%
Aokzoe A1
 
3005.12 MB/s +38%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2972.75 MB/s +36%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
2729 MB/s +25%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
2183.33 MB/s
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
2183 MB/s 0%
Seq Write
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
3133.52 MB/s +96%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
2628 MB/s +64%
Aokzoe A1
 
2626.89 MB/s +64%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
2598.37 MB/s +62%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (1397 - 4573, n=5, last 2 years)
2588 MB/s +62%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
1602.26 MB/s
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
1602 MB/s 0%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1370 MB/s -14%
4K Read
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
91.08 MB/s +168%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
70.67 MB/s +108%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
68.4 MB/s +101%
Aokzoe A1
 
68.39 MB/s +101%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (34 - 73.2, n=5, last 2 years)
54.9 MB/s +61%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
44.6 MB/s +31%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
34.04 MB/s
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
34 MB/s 0%
4K Write
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
350.26 MB/s +286%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
177.01 MB/s +95%
Aokzoe A1
 
171.67 MB/s +89%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
169.1 MB/s +86%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (90.7 - 218, n=5, last 2 years)
165.5 MB/s +82%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
130 MB/s +43%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
90.74 MB/s
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
90.7 MB/s 0%
4K-64 Read
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2277.61 MB/s +286%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1540 MB/s +161%
Aokzoe A1
 
1538.81 MB/s +161%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1490.58 MB/s +153%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (590 - 1928, n=5, last 2 years)
1255 MB/s +113%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
935 MB/s +59%
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
590 MB/s 0%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
589.89 MB/s
4K-64 Write
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
2157.55 MB/s +137%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (885 - 3957, n=5, last 2 years)
1900 MB/s +109%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
1356 MB/s +49%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
1043 MB/s +15%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
1000.03 MB/s +10%
Aokzoe A1
 
960.34 MB/s +6%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
910.02 MB/s
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
910 MB/s 0%
Access Time Read
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
0.151 ms *
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
0.151 ms * -0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.029 - 0.151, n=5, last 2 years)
0.08 ms * +47%
Aokzoe A1
 
0.078 ms * +48%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
0.055 ms * +64%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
0.045 ms * +70%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
0.036 ms * +76%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
0.031 ms * +79%
Access Time Write
Aokzoe A1
 
0.29 ms * -333%
GPD Win 4
BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
0.289 ms * -331%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
Micron 2450 1TB MTFDKBA1T0TFK
0.175 ms * -161%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
0.115 ms * -72%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
 
0.097 ms * -45%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
0.067 ms *
Average Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
  ()
0.067 ms * -0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (0.016 - 0.067, n=5, last 2 years)
0.03 ms * +55%

* ... smaller is better

Continuous reading: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

03156309451260157518902205252028353150346537804095441047255040535556705985Tooltip
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB: Ø2546 (2208.3-2562.21)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM: Ø4046 (2891.85-4197.44)
GPD Win 4 BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB: Ø3406 (3167.54-3417.39)
One Netbook XPlayer 2  : Ø3170 (2962.02-3188.81)
GPD Win Max 2 BiWin NQ200 1TB CNF82GS1D00-1TB: Ø2392 (1918.83-3321.05)
Beelink SER7 Crucial P3 Plus CT1000P3PSSD8: Ø5151 (4560.99-5169.27)
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N: Ø6174 (5699.71-6299.22)

图形

AyaSpace VRAM 设置
AyaSpace VRAM 设置

Ayaneo Air 1S 没有专用的图形处理器。因此 Radeon 780M就足够了。在出厂设置中,为图形芯片预留了 6 GB 的手持设备工作内存。在 AyaSpace 中,最多可为 780M 预留 16 GB。设置需要重新启动才能生效。工作内存的数量让 RTX 2050妒忌,手持设备在性能方面仍然无法与大多数 dGPU 相提并论,但 780M 对于当前的许多游戏来说已经足够。这里还需要明确的是,如果你想在不进行升频或升采样的情况下进行游戏,最好将自己限制在中低画质设置中。不过,在许多游戏中也可以设置高帧率和高画质。通过 FSR 2.1,Radeon 780M 的帧率可以提高不少。

在我们使用 3DMark 进行的通用基准测试中,Ayaneo 与华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme 相比毫不逊色。两者的得分都很接近。如果让 Ayaneo Air 1S 或更准确地说,让它的处理器在主电源下运行,这款手持设备甚至会在Time Spy 基准测试中超过 ROG Ally 几分。不过,需要注意的是,CPU Turbo 在不连接电源的情况下会明显消耗电池寿命,而且在大多数游戏中并不能提供更高的性能。

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1355U
98.8 pt
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme -1!
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
92.9 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
88.5 pt
Average AMD Radeon 780M
 
87.7 pt
Aokzoe A1 -1!
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
82.1 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
79.1 pt
GPD Win 4 -1!
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
76.8 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2 -1!
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
76.5 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
12795 Points +20%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (7868 - 14249, n=54)
12467 Points +17%
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1355U
12195 Points +14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (10150 - 13828, n=7, last 2 years)
12019 Points +13%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10741 Points +1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
10671 Points
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10261 Points -4%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
9202 Points -14%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1355U
58068 Points +50%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (27771 - 53972, n=29)
46628 Points +21%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (38676 - 50811, n=6, last 2 years)
46039 Points +19%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
38676 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1355U
8815 Points +19%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (6683 - 8775, n=10, last 2 years)
7968 Points +8%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
7865 Points +6%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (4550 - 8816, n=56)
7746 Points +5%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7505 Points +1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
7410 Points
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7193 Points -3%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
6865 Points -7%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Acer Aspire 5 A515-58GM-76S8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, Intel Core i7-1355U
3186 Points +22%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (2444 - 3491, n=10, last 2 years)
2883 Points +10%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
2854 Points +9%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (1496 - 3196, n=56)
2717 Points +4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
2622 Points
Aokzoe A1
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
2461 Points -6%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
2419 Points -8%
GPD Win 4
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
2303 Points -12%
3DMark Vantage P Result
29746 points
3DMark 11 Performance
10092 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
27313 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
6857 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
2912 points
Help

游戏性能

对于那些期望从小型 Ayaneo Air 1S 上获得与全功能游戏 PC 相同的高 FPS 的人来说,我们的游戏基准测试结果可能会让他们失望。不过,对于那些只追求显示屏原生全高清分辨率下的可玩性 FPS 的用户来说,至少在中低画质设置下,他们会看到清晰的画面。所有测试游戏在这款小型游戏掌上电脑上运行时都不会出现卡顿。只有 棘轮与叮当裂痕》(Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart在整个基准测试过程中保持低于 30 FPS,尽管游戏的其他部分运行得比我们的基准测试场景流畅得多。

阿特拉斯坠落(2023), 霍格沃茨传奇(2023)和《博德之门》在中等画质设置下也能达到 30 FPS 以上。如果你想在这里看到更多,可以使用 AMD 的升频或升采样技术。使用 FSR 2.1,《霍格沃茨的遗产》中的帧数可永久保持在 45 FPS 左右。

总而言之,可以得出这样的结论:Ayaneo 安装的显示器与处理器和 iGPU 的性能相匹配。当然,华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme 的全高清显示屏也是如此。 华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme.在游戏基准测试中,这两款设备没有太大差别。显示器的定位 联想Legion Go的定位值得商榷。这是因为它配备了分辨率更高的显示屏,而 AMD 780M 可能无法提供相应的性能。

Performance Rating - Percent
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
97 pt
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
92.1 pt
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
91.9 pt
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
89.7 pt
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
89.4 pt
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
88.2 pt
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.5 (24min, 26P1) fps +5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (17.5 - 33.9, n=10, last 2 years)
27.4 fps +4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.3 (24min, 24P1) fps
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.5 (23min) fps -7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.1 (18min, 22P1) fps -12%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
22.8 (21min) fps -13%
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26 (3.2min, 16.4P1) fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.7 (3min, 16.9P1) fps -1%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.8 (3min, 15.4P1) fps -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.6 - 27.1, n=10, last 2 years)
24.7 fps -5%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.5 (2.34min, 16.7P1) fps -6%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.5 (3.24min, 15.2P1) fps -10%
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.7 fps +14%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.4 - 30, n=11, last 2 years)
25.6 fps +5%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.4 fps
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.1 fps -1%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.9 fps -2%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.9 fps -2%
Strange Brigade - 1920x1080 ultra AA:ultra AF:16
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
46.3 (8.7min, 11.5P1) fps +2%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45.4 (33.1min, 36.3P1) fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (30 - 51.6, n=11, last 2 years)
44 fps -3%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
43.4 (18.1min, 25.6P1) fps -4%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
41.5 (29min, 31.8P1) fps -9%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
40.9 (31.9min, 32.9P1) fps -10%
Dota 2 Reborn - 1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
75.5 (67.6min) fps +32%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
69.7 (64min) fps +22%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
67.2 (58.9min) fps +18%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (55 - 78.7, n=11, last 2 years)
64.5 fps +13%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
63.1 (54.8min) fps +11%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
57 (50min) fps
X-Plane 11.11 - 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3)
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
36 fps +24%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
33.5 fps +15%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
33.5 fps +15%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24.5 - 38.9, n=11, last 2 years)
30.2 fps +4%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
29.9 fps +3%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
29.1 fps
The Witcher 3
1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (47.7 - 103.8, n=21)
89.6 fps +19%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (75.3 - 76.5, n=2, last 2 years)
75.9 fps +1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
75.3 (44min, 55.16P1) fps
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
63.8 (51min) fps -15%
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
47.2 fps +35%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (21.3 - 52.2, n=45)
44.2 fps +27%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (27.5 - 51, n=9, last 2 years)
42.9 fps +23%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
40.1 (21min) fps +15%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
37.5 (30min) fps +7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
36 fps +3%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
34.9 (32min, 32P1) fps
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (14.3 - 36, n=47)
28 fps +6%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.5 (24min, 26P1) fps +5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (17.5 - 33.9, n=10, last 2 years)
27.4 fps +4%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.3 (24min, 24P1) fps
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.5 (23min) fps -7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.1 (18min, 22P1) fps -12%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
22.8 (21min) fps -13%
GTA V
1920x1080 High/On (Advanced Graphics Off) AA:2xMSAA + FX AF:8x
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (32.5 - 68.6, n=49)
60.1 fps +20%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
59.5 (2.03min, 40P1) fps +19%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (39.6 - 68.4, n=10, last 2 years)
56.1 fps +12%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
51.4 (1.467min, 27P1) fps +3%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
50.5 (8.33min, 32.3P1) fps +1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
50.1 (1.854min, 22.2P1) fps
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
49.6 (1.027min, 28.6P1) fps -1%
1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26 (3.2min, 16.4P1) fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.7 (3min, 16.9P1) fps -1%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.8 (3min, 15.4P1) fps -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.6 - 27.1, n=10, last 2 years)
24.7 fps -5%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (12.2 - 27.7, n=49)
24.6 fps -5%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.5 (2.34min, 16.7P1) fps -6%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.5 (3.24min, 15.2P1) fps -10%
Dota 2 Reborn
1920x1080 high (2/3)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
85.6 (76.8min) fps +37%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (31.6 - 98.8, n=56)
79.1 fps +26%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
76.4 (67.4min) fps +22%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
73 (67.5min) fps +16%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (61.1 - 86.9, n=11, last 2 years)
72 fps +15%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
71.7 (64.2min) fps +14%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
62.7 (54.5min) fps
1920x1080 ultra (3/3) best looking
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
75.5 (67.6min) fps +32%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (30.8 - 91.2, n=56)
71.4 fps +25%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
69.7 (64min) fps +22%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
67.2 (58.9min) fps +18%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (55 - 78.7, n=11, last 2 years)
64.5 fps +13%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
63.1 (54.8min) fps +11%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
57 (50min) fps
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark
1280x720 Lite Quality
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
75.2 fps +33%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (27.8 - 84.5, n=54)
69.7 fps +23%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (44.7 - 80.7, n=10, last 2 years)
65.2 fps +15%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
63.6 fps +12%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
57.1 fps +1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
56.6 fps
1920x1080 Standard Quality
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
37.4 fps +9%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (21 - 40.9, n=54)
35.2 fps +3%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (24 - 39.6, n=10, last 2 years)
35.1 fps +3%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
34.2 fps
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
33.5 fps -2%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
32.7 fps -4%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
32.5 fps -5%
1920x1080 High Quality
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
27.7 fps +14%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (15.9 - 30.8, n=55)
26.3 fps +8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (18.4 - 30, n=11, last 2 years)
25.6 fps +5%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
24.4 fps
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
24.1 fps -1%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.9 fps -2%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
23.9 fps -2%
Far Cry 5
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
40 fps +11%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (21 - 49, n=44)
39 fps +8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (23 - 45, n=11, last 2 years)
36.7 fps +2%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
36 (27min) fps
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
35 (21min) fps -3%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
37 fps +6%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (21 - 47, n=44)
37 fps +6%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
35 (26min) fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (22 - 43, n=11, last 2 years)
34.5 fps -1%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
34 (28min) fps -3%
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:T
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (24 - 58, n=10)
49.7 fps +18%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
42 (32min) fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (41 - 42, n=2, last 2 years)
41.5 fps -1%
1280x720 Low Preset AA:T
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
73 fps +55%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (42 - 89, n=42)
71.9 fps +53%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (47 - 78, n=8, last 2 years)
63.6 fps +35%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
62 (51min) fps +32%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
47 (41min) fps
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 - 1920x1080 Low Preset
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
38.6 fps +2%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
38 (27.2min) fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (last 2 years)
38 fps 0%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
37.7 (24.8min) fps -1%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (22 - 53.3, n=12)
37 fps -3%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
34 (9.8min) fps -11%
F1 22
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
57.9 (47min, 38P1) fps +15%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (31.7 - 70.6, n=33)
55.9 fps +11%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (46.6 - 64.6, n=3, last 2 years)
53.9 fps +7%
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
52.5 (40min, 38P1) fps +4%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
51.5 (44min, 44P1) fps +2%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
50.5 (42min, 41P1) fps
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
50.5 (40min, 28P1) fps 0%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
77.9 (63min, 45P1) fps +15%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (41.5 - 95, n=33)
75 fps +11%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (65.2 - 86.7, n=3, last 2 years)
73.1 fps +8%
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
70.4 (57min, 56P1) fps +4%
Aokzoe A1
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
69 (55min, 40P1) fps +2%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
67.5 (58min, 56P1) fps
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
65.4 (52min, 51P1) fps -3%
F1 23
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (27.3 - 61.1, n=31)
49.4 fps +13%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (27.3 - 61.1, n=9, last 2 years)
49.1 fps +12%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43.7 (11min, 32P1) fps
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T AF:16x
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (38.1 - 84.4, n=30)
68.4 fps +8%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (38.6 - 84.4, n=8, last 2 years)
68 fps +7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
63.4 (54min, 52P1) fps
Hogwarts Legacy
1920x1080 Low Preset AA:Low T
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
37.8 fps +7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
35.2 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (last 2 years)
35.2 fps 0%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (29.8 - 37.8, n=3)
34.3 fps -3%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:High T
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (26.2 - 37.6, n=3, last 2 years)
33.3 fps +27%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (21.9 - 37.6, n=5)
29.3 fps +12%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.2 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
24.8 fps -5%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:High T
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (19.4 - 28, n=3, last 2 years)
24.6 fps +27%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (17.7 - 28, n=5)
22.2 fps +14%
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
19.5 fps +1%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
19.4 fps
Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
30.9 fps
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
30.8 fps 0%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (15.7 - 36.8, n=24)
29.3 fps -5%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (15.7 - 32.1, n=8, last 2 years)
26.9 fps -13%
1920x1080 High Preset
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
25.1 fps +10%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.8 - 29.9, n=24)
24.4 fps +7%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
22.9 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.8 - 27.5, n=8, last 2 years)
22.4 fps -2%
1920x1080 Ultra Preset
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
24 fps +10%
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (13.4 - 29.2, n=23)
23.6 fps +8%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
21.9 fps
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (13.5 - 26.5, n=8, last 2 years)
21.8 fps 0%
3840x2160 Ultra Preset
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
8 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  ()
8 fps 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (last 2 years)
8 fps 0%
Atlas Fallen
1920x1080 Low Preset
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
31.5 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  ()
31.5 fps 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (last 2 years)
31.5 fps 0%
1920x1080 Medium Preset
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
29.2 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  ()
29.2 fps 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (last 2 years)
29.2 fps 0%
1920x1080 High Preset
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.4 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  ()
26.4 fps 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (last 2 years)
26.4 fps 0%
1920x1080 Very High Preset
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
21.7 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  ()
21.7 fps 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (last 2 years)
21.7 fps 0%
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart
1920x1080 Low Preset
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
23.9 fps
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  ()
23.9 fps 0%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (last 2 years)
23.9 fps 0%
1920x1080 Medium Preset AA:T
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (22.2 - 25, n=2)
23.6 fps +6%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (22.2 - 25, n=2, last 2 years)
23.6 fps +6%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
22.2 fps
1920x1080 High Preset AA:T
Average AMD Radeon 780M
  (15.7 - 20.6, n=2)
18.2 fps +16%
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
  (15.7 - 20.6, n=2, last 2 years)
18.2 fps +16%
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
15.7 fps
lowmed.highultra4K
GTA V (2015) 91.6 50.1 26
The Witcher 3 (2015) 75.3 34.9 26.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 110.4 89.6 62.7 57
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 56.6 34.2 24.4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 43.5 28.6 29.1
Far Cry 5 (2018) 47 38 36 35
Strange Brigade (2018) 150.4 61.5 52.5 45.4
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) 38 29.9 24.4
F1 22 (2022) 75.3 67.5 50.5 12.8
Hogwarts Legacy (2023) 35.2 26.2 19.4 14.9
F1 23 (2023) 69.9 63.4 43.7 8.87
Ratchet & Clank Rift Apart (2023) 23.9 22.2 15.7
Atlas Fallen (2023) 31.5 29.2 26.4 21.7
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023) 30.9 22.9 21.9 8
Cyberpunk 2077 2.1 Phantom Liberty (2023) 36.14 28.54 23.84

Emissionen - Loud fans, louder speakers

噪音排放

在测量游戏手持设备的音量方面,我们的典型测量设置遇到了问题。在这一测试部分,风扇控制也不便于我们进行报告。我们必须注意到,手持设备的风扇音量非常大,而风扇控制本身不会将风扇转速调到 80% 以上,但 Ayaneo 建议在游戏时将转速调到最高。

如果把 Ayaneo 拿在手上,用户听到的声音会比放在桌上相同距离的手持设备小 3 到 6 dB(A)。因此,可能受到手持设备干扰的反而是第三方。原则上可以说,手持设备在大多数情况下都能保持相对安静,大约为 32 dB(A)。这其中也包括许多较老的游戏,或者对画面的要求没有 AAA 级游戏那么高的游戏。

不过,在玩《霍格沃茨传奇》或《赛博朋克》时,风扇的转速会相当快。根据测量方向的不同,15 厘米外的麦克风可听到 42 分贝(A)至 49.1 分贝(A)的噪音。在我们的测试中,风扇只有在风扇控制中要求达到 5100 转/分钟左右的全速时才会转动。这主要是为了降低屏幕表面温度。但最重要的是,Ayaneo Air 1S 的噪音明显超过了 50 dB(A),达到了 51 dB(A)。

Noise Level

Idle
24.7 / 25.2 / 25.2 dB(A)
Load
32.1 / 47.1 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2036.441.638.243.141.639.42529.430.830.431.933.7323133.63231.337.538.7394032.33537.641.439.637.65032.735.231.147.436.337.56328.92828.340.530.6308025.326.225.331.823.627.510025.927.222.835.625.324.812524.8282331.225.422.716023.921.423.322.921.319.420025.623.526.225.223.519.225024.318.526.921.718.814.131524.118.126.820.119.213.140026.5183021.718.512.45002420.328.623.317.512.963028.925.428.1271812.480031.725.732.829.518.212.1100034.429.134.73522.612.3125038.43639.839.823.512.2160036.134.137.138.924.112.320003829.242.835.719.112.6250037.729.74236.817.212.9315037.229.641.533.619.913.14000393043.235.619.813.4500041.531.441.533.618.313.7630038.328.942.634.716.413.7800034.824.239.731.914.113.61000027.221.434.828.113.913.71250025.117.734.423.813.613.81600022.9152719.412.913.1SPL49.142.652.247.232.125.4N6.23.77.65.41.50.7median 28.9median 25.7median 34.4median 31.2median 18.8median 13.1Delta6.74.76.85.72.61.423.520.222.425.124.625.522.123.528.924.123.823.122.725.622.924.52625.723.421.323.62520.722.221.322.320.618.218.916.22127.616.818.116.617.32515.217.317.117.120.216.117.216.8162114.515.515.716.121.613.314.315.416.221.713.71414.816.823.81411.814.318.625.614.612.11518.726.513.511.114.519.427.514.310.81520.427.514.410.414.420.229.115.510.115.124.228.922.710.120.218.226.413.810.113.619.62813.910.714.418.326.613.710.814.623.229.412.111.312.315.630.711.711.511.61324.111.911.711.912.518.512.21212.112.218.412.512.112.612.415.512.211.912.112.315.811.911.711.711.816.811.611.211.531.339.227.323.326.61.430.80.50.8median 17.1median 25median 13.7median 11.7median 14.42.63.81.51.21.7hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseAyaneo Air 1S Retro Power Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
Radeon 780M, R7 7840U, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Radeon 780M, Z1 Extreme, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM
GPD Win 4
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB
One Netbook XPlayer 2
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
,
Aokzoe A1
Radeon 680M, R7 6800U
Noise
0%
-22%
-12%
-1%
-11%
off / environment *
23
23.3
-1%
24
-4%
26.1
-13%
24.3
-6%
23
-0%
Idle Minimum *
24.7
23.3
6%
31.2
-26%
26.1
-6%
24.3
2%
23.3
6%
Idle Average *
25.2
23.3
8%
31.2
-24%
31.6
-25%
24.3
4%
27.1
-8%
Idle Maximum *
25.2
27.3
-8%
33.5
-33%
31.6
-25%
30
-19%
37.3
-48%
Load Average *
32.1
39.2
-22%
45.5
-42%
35.7
-11%
37.4
-17%
Load Maximum *
47.1
39.2
17%
49
-4%
43.3
8%
40.7
14%
46.2
2%
Witcher 3 ultra *
39.2
48.6
43.3
40.7
41.2

* ... smaller is better

温度

手持设备表面的温度可分为三个区域。虽然握住 Air 1S 的地方仍然相当凉爽,但引起我们关注的主要是触摸屏。在游戏过程中,触摸屏的温度有时会超过 50 °C,因此会让人感到不适。高温也可能对 OLED 面板造成问题。高温对 对这种显示技术的使用寿命产生负面影响。.背面主要是散热片周围的区域在负载情况下会变得非常热。

顺便说一句,制造商建议在游戏时将风扇调至 100% 速度,以尽可能保持屏幕冷却。然而,我们的测试表明,至少在 TDP 设置为 20 瓦的情况下,屏幕表面几乎不会降温。

空闲前端(图像温度已校准)
空闲前端(图像温度已校准)
空闲返回(图像温度已校准)
空闲返回(图像温度已校准)
装载前端(图像温度校准)
装载前端(图像温度校准)
加载回传(图像温度校准)
加载回传(图像温度校准)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
AMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme, AMD Radeon 780M
GPD Win 4
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
One Netbook XPlayer 2
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
GPD Win Max 2
Intel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Beelink SER7
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, AMD Radeon 780M
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
24%
37%
19%
38%
30%
Maximum Upper Side *
55
44.4
19%
35
36%
42.6
23%
28.6
48%
34.2
38%
Maximum Bottom *
53.2
37.9
29%
26.8
50%
39.6
26%
33
38%
35.8
33%
Idle Upper Side *
37.1
29.9
19%
28.4
23%
32.4
13%
24.6
34%
28.6
23%
Idle Bottom *
40.1
28.3
29%
25
38%
34.3
14%
27.6
31%
30.4
24%

* ... smaller is better

压力测试

在使用 Prime95 和 Furmark 进行的压力测试中,Ayaneo Air 中的 Ryzen 7 温度不超过 61 °C。尽管处理器温度相对较低,但表面温度却相当高。

对数压力测试
对数压力测试

发言人

Ayaneo Air 1S 的扬声器不仅音量高达 91 dB(A),而且音质也很好。就我们的口味而言,只有低音可能稍强一些。中音和高音听起来不错。尽管扬声器之间的距离只有 15 厘米,但至少在正常的手持距离下,还是能达到一定的立体声效果。小巧的扬声器可以明显盖过风扇的声音。

扬声器和天线模块
扬声器和天线模块
扬声器和天线模块
扬声器和天线模块
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2039.242.339.22530.532.230.53131.334.331.34025.129.425.15022.625.222.6632127.2218018.329.918.310015.840.115.812512.843.812.816013.449.913.420017.458.717.425014.358.914.331514.664.714.640014.36514.350014.17414.163015.472.415.48001571.815100013.47613.4125013.474.713.4160013.580.613.5200013.487.513.425001384.713315013.475.913.4400012.667.312.6500013.269.213.2630013.468.713.4800013.166.813.11000013.266.413.21250012.757.312.71600012.241.812.2SPL25.691.725.6N0.673.10.6median 13.4median 68.7median 13.4Delta0.88.10.826.325.821.422.12624.925.127.622.532.523.448.72655.818.860.922.167.2267019.372.317.674.217.774.319.575.31571.711.871.311.27410.574.21072.710.17210.67210.97511.374.811.671.71269.71269.612.371.112.669.61270.111.269.824.784.70.666.6median 12median 71.73.42.2hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAyaneo Air 1S Retro Power Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 17% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 13%, average was 18%, worst was 23%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理 - 37 Wh 较小电池

耗电量

我们注意到最大功耗为 50 瓦。因此,随附的电源适配器至少始终能以 15 瓦的功率为手持设备充电。在压力测试中,手持设备的功耗始终保持在 50 瓦。华硕 华硕 ROG Ally的空闲能效要高得多。不过,它在负载情况下的功耗也达到了 65 瓦。特别是在长期耗电情况下,Ally 的 50 瓦耗电量与我们在 Ayaneo Air 上看到的性能水平相当。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.32 /  Watt
Idledarkmidlight 7.01 / 7.91 / 12.3 Watt
Load midlight 19.66 / 50 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, Ayaneo CyberThunder-2TB, OLED, 1920x1080, 5.5"
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, Micron 2400 MTFDKBK512QFM, IPS, 1920x1080, 7"
GPD Win 4
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, BiWin CE480Y2D100-1TB, IPS, 1920x1080, 6"
One Netbook XPlayer 2
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, , IPS, 2560x1600, 8.4"
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
1280x800, 7"
Aokzoe A1
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, , IPS, 1920x1200, 8"
Average AMD Radeon 780M
 
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
Power Consumption
-30%
-39%
-17%
21%
-35%
-44%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
7.01
4.2
40%
7.5
-7%
7.2
-3%
5.4
23%
8.8
-26%
6.2 ?(2.7 - 14, n=49)
12%
Idle Average *
7.91
6.1
23%
12.4
-57%
9.3
-18%
7.6
4%
11.3
-43%
Idle Maximum *
12.3
6.3
49%
13
-6%
9.7
21%
7.8
37%
11.5
7%
10.8 ?(5.4 - 27, n=49)
12%
Load Average *
19.66
56.6
-188%
46
-134%
33.1
-68%
32.1
-63%
56.3 ?(19.7 - 93.2, n=48)
-186%
Witcher 3 ultra *
38.2
64.1
-68%
45.2
-18%
49.6
-30%
31.1
19%
58.3
-53%
Load Maximum *
50
67.2
-34%
56
-12%
50.7
-1%
64.5
-29%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumtion Witcher 3 / Stresstest

05101520253035404550556065Tooltip
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø38.2 (36.9-38.8)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø64.1 (58.3-66.7)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø48.6 (47.6-49.5)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø63.2 (50-67.1)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø9.25 (8.51-10.2)
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø4.95 (4.72-5.57)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power R7 7840U, Radeon 780M; 3DMark06 Return To Proxycon: Ø19.7 (14.9-21.2)

Power consumption with external Monitor

05101520253035404550Tooltip
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power ; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø37.4 (32.8-44.3)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power ; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø42.1 (38.4-45.4)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power ; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø48.2 (46-50.2)
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power ; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø14.8 (12.2-37.5)

电池寿命

内置电池
内置电池
Witcher 3 - 登录电池模式(游戏在第二分钟后运行)
Witcher 3 - 登录电池模式(游戏在第二分钟后运行)

Ayaneo Air 1S 的电池容量并不高,约为 37 瓦时。因此,这款小手持设备的运行时间比较平庸也就不足为奇了。不过,如果使用更大的电池,就很难在这里找到空间了。通过 AyaSpace 可以进行一些设置,从而稍稍改善电池寿命。降低 TDP 和限制 FPS 也能使运行时间略有改善。

在满载情况下,Ayaneo Air 1S 在电池模式下大约需要 30 W。因此,运行时间约为 1 小时。这也是我们使用Witcher 3 和 Battery Eater Pro 进行电池测试的结果。在执行较轻松的任务(如网上冲浪)时,运行时间可略高于 5 小时。播放已安装存储的全高清视频时,运行时间约为 3 小时。

不过,也有可能在电池电量上赌上一个多小时。作为回报,你可以限制 FPS 和 TDP,还可以稍微提高散热。在尽可能低的图形设置下,可以节省 10 到 15 瓦,这样就可以玩两个多小时的游戏。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
5h 55min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness
5h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
3h 05min
Gaming
1h 14min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 03min
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power
R7 7840U, Radeon 780M, 37.5 Wh
Asus ROG Ally Z1 Extreme
Z1 Extreme, Radeon 780M, 40 Wh
GPD Win 4
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 46 Wh
One Netbook XPlayer 2
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 65.5 Wh
Valve Steam Deck 512 GB LCD
45 Wh
Aokzoe A1
R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 65 Wh
Average of class Handheld / UMPC
 
Battery Runtime
119%
25%
77%
16%
103%
H.264
185
568
207%
WiFi v1.3
355
465
31%
450
27%
628
77%
381
7%
Gaming
74
Load
63
77
22%
78
24%
Witcher 3 ultra
57
96
Reader / Idle
581
431

Pros

+ 良好的 OLED 屏幕
+ 触发器和拇指杆中的霍尔传感器
+ 不错的 RGB
+ 稳定的机箱
+ 高 AM4 性能

Cons

- 表面温度高
- 电池寿命短

结论--强大的小型游戏机

Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power - Ayaneo 提供
Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power - Ayaneo 提供

明亮的 OLED 显示屏、强劲的 AMD Ryzen 7 7840U 和坚固的外壳是这款手持设备的亮点。一点 RGB 灯光和出色的控制软件使整体效果更加完美。Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power 是一款可靠的设备。不过,袖珍的外形并没有降低设备的可用性。小电池和小尺寸的全高清屏幕都不太容易释放掌上电脑的全部潜能。在路上,你只希望能有更长的电池续航时间;在家里,你可能希望能有更强的性能,或者至少有更大的屏幕。原则上,我们对游戏硬件的评测显示,目前大多数游戏都能在 Ayaneo 的掌上电脑上运行。不过,该设备会积聚大量热量,因此其表面温度会达到令人不快的数值。尽管如此,这款小型游戏机仍能保持其性能。

除了 5.5 英寸的小尺寸屏幕外,它的质量也让我们感到惊讶。OLED 面板具有高亮度和强大的色彩空间覆盖能力,还能提供快速的响应时间。制造商选择 60 Hz 面板是正确的,因为在大多数游戏中,iGPU 不会产生更多帧数。

这就是这款小型掌上电脑的核心竞争力所在。在全高清分辨率、低或中等画质设置下,它都能轻松驾驭游戏。输入设备位置合理,大小手均可轻松触及和操作。带霍尔传感器的拇指摇杆和触发器可确保重复输入。只有振动对我们来说似乎太弱了一些,但 DualShock 4 控制器的大型隆隆声电机很难在这里找到位置。

Ayaneo Air 1S 是一款可装入口袋的游戏侏儒,搭载 AMD Ryzen 7 处理器。凭借其快速的 iGPU,这款掌上电脑可以流畅地渲染现代游戏。但微型化也有代价,表现为表面温度高、电池续航时间短。

最后,Ayaneo Air 1S 在我们与 华硕 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme.不过,华硕的游戏掌机实际上与 Ayaneo 属于不同的尺寸级别。ROG Ally 的重量比 Ayaneo 多出 200 克,在长时间的游戏过程中,手臂和手掌会明显感觉到多出的重量。至于设计,两款设备可能都是品味问题。因此,我们来到了 Ayaneo Air 1S 的症结所在。

价格和供应情况

我们的测试设备只能通过 Indiegogo 以https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/ayaneo-air-1s-light-thin-oled-amd-7840u-handheld#/价格部分明显高于华硕 ROG Ally。Ayaneo Air 1S 最便宜的配置为 6272 港元(约合 756 欧元)(仍有现货),略低于目前购买 ROG Ally Z1 Extreme 的 800 欧元,但 Ayaneo 可能仍需支付进口税。我们的测试配置(Retro Power,32 GB 工作内存和 2 TB 硬盘)约为 975 欧元。这里还要加上税或关税,所以最终价格可能在 1200 欧元左右。

Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power - 10/11/2023 v7 (old)
Marc Herter

Chassis
83%
Mechanical Inputs
85 / 80 → 100%
Pointing Device
100%
Connectivity
56 / 65 → 86%
Weight
84 / 35-88 → 92%
Battery
59%
Display
85%
Games Performance
75 / 68 → 100%
Application Performance
94 / 76 → 100%
Temperature
85%
Noise
89 / 91 → 98%
Audio
76 / 85 → 90%
Average
81%
88%
Handheld / UMPC - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was given to the author by the manufacturer free of charge for the purposes of review. There was no third-party influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 测试中的 Ayaneo Air 1S Retro Power 游戏掌上电脑 - 口袋里的 Zen4 Power
Marc Herter, 2023-10-21 (Update: 2023-10-21)