联想 ThinkBook Plus Twist Gen 4 可折叠笔记本评测:电子墨水与 OLED 混合技术
联想ThinkBook Plus Gen 4(又称ThinkBook Plus Twist)在CES 2023上首次亮相后,现已广泛上市。 在 2023 年的 CES 上首次亮相后,现已广泛销售。.ThinkBook Plus Gen 4 并没有直接取代 ThinkBook Plus Gen 3。 ThinkBook Plus 3 代由于它们的设计理念和屏幕尺寸大相径庭。不过,它们确实采用了类似的机身材料,目标用户也类似于半专业用户,他们可能会对以消费者为中心的 IdeaPad 系列或偏重办公的 ThinkPad 系列望而却步。
我们这次评测的是一款高端产品,配备酷睿 i7-1355U CPU 和集成 E Ink 显示屏,售价略高于 3000 美元。较低配置的产品配备酷睿 i5-1335U,没有 E Ink 显示屏,售价为 2800 美元,但所有选项都只配备集成显卡、16 GB 焊接内存和 13.3 英寸 2.8K OLED 主触摸屏。
竞争对手包括其他高端可转换子笔记本电脑,如 戴尔Latitude 9330, MSI Summit E14 Flip, 华硕 ZenBook Flip 14或 惠普 Spectre 13.5 系列.当然,它们都没有像联想一样提供 E Ink 触摸屏功能。
更多联想评测:
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.4 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 17.7 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 | |
89.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 989 g | 14.8 mm | 13.00" | 2160x1350 | |
91.9 % v7 (old) | 07 / 2023 | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.1 kg | 16.3 mm | 13.50" | 1920x1280 | |
85.4 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1 kg | 11.8 mm | 13.30" | 2880x1800 | |
89 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Dell Latitude 9330 i7-1260U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 14.1 mm | 13.30" | 2560x1600 | |
86.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2021 | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.4 kg | 14.9 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - ThinkPad Twist 精神永存
与其他 ThinkBook 机型不同,如 ThinkBook 15 G3ThinkBook Plus Gen 4 采用了更多的金属材料,而不是塑料,因此更具奢华感,更能体现其高昂的价格。例如,底座的抗扭曲和抗吱吱作响能力明显增强,可媲美 惠普 Spectre x360 13.5.此外,由于 OLED 和 E Ink 显示屏采用两层玻璃加固,盖子也相当坚固,而其他大多数笔记本电脑只有一层玻璃。
除了外盖上的 12 英寸 E Ink 触摸屏外,扭转机制也有助于将联想机型与市场上的其他大多数可折叠产品区分开来。小铰链可顺时针旋转 180 度用于平板电脑模式,然后逆时针旋转 180 度用于笔记本电脑模式,这与一般转换器上的标准 360 度铰链形成了鲜明对比。从机械角度来看,这种设计效果不错,但与传统的大型铰链相比,盖子更容易摇晃。希望这种独特的旋转铰链能在日常使用中坚持数年。
与标准的 13 英寸超极本相比,扭转机构和副显示屏增加了一些厚度和重量。蜻蜓 蜻蜓 G4为例,其三维尺寸几乎相同,但重量明显减轻了 300 克,更便于旅行。因此,你必须真正重视 ThinkBook Plus Gen 4 的独特功能,才能证明增加重量是合理的。
连接性
该机型仅集成了两个 Thunderbolt 4 端口和一个 3.5 毫米音频插孔。值得注意的是,后者是少数笔记本电脑 如 ZenBook 13等几款子笔记本根本没有耳机插孔。如果您打算连接 USB-A 或 HDMI 设备,请准备好适配器和扩展坞。
我们很高兴笔记本电脑的两侧各有一个 USB-C 端口,这意味着您可以从任何一侧为笔记本电脑充电。这与 Spectre x360 13.5 只能从右侧充电形成鲜明对比。
交流
标配的英特尔 AX211 支持 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.2。与华硕 AXE11000 6GHz 测试路由器配对时,传输速率可靠且基本稳定。
遗憾的是,由于这不是一款 ThinkPad,因此不支持 4G LTE 或 5G 选项。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 |
网络摄像头
标配的 200 万像素网络摄像头带有滑动快门和红外功能。惠普等竞争对手已经开始推出配备 500 万像素甚至 800 万像素传感器的笔记本电脑。 甚至 800 万像素传感器以获得更清晰的图像。
维护
底部面板由 8 颗 T5 Torx 螺丝固定,维修起来相对较快。即便如此,由于只有 M.2 固态硬盘和电池可轻松拆卸,因此可升级的地方并不多,这也是可转换笔记本电脑的共同特点。
配件和保修
零售包装盒包括联想数码笔 2 和 AAA 电池,以及常用的文件和交流适配器。遗憾的是,笔记本电脑上没有磁铁用于吸附或固定触控笔,因此你必须把它放在口袋或包里,以便更安全地携带。
输入设备 - 还可以更好
键盘
键盘给人的感觉好坏参半,因为它几乎成了显示器的陪衬。更具体地说,即使与其他 IdeaPad 机型相比,按键也比我们习惯的要松软。空格键尤其令人沮丧,因为按下它的右半部分时,感觉比左半部分更松软。同时,回车键和退格键也比我们希望的要浅。一般来说,联想在 ThinkPad 的键盘方面做得很好,所以看到他们在 ThinkBook Plus Gen 4 上的失误有点令人失望。
触摸板
点击板(10.5 x 7 厘米)比 ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 (10 x 5.6 厘米)大,但比 Dragonfly G4(12 x 8 厘米)小。与大多数其他笔记本电脑上较软或较有弹性的点击板相比,它在按下时会发出非常响亮的咔嗒声,带来更令人满意的反馈。咔嗒咔嗒声也因此变得更尖锐、更响亮,但这是值得的。
展示 - 主要景点
主触摸屏具备我们所期待的 OLED 的所有基本特性,包括极快的响应时间、完美的黑度和全 P3 色彩覆盖。也许我们的面板最大的缺点是刷新率被限制在 60 Hz。华硕 华硕 ZenBook和 VivoBook 系列采用 90 Hz 或 120 Hz OLED 面板已有一段时间了,这种面板在导航和触摸屏控制时感觉更流畅、反应更灵敏。如果联想今后决定更新该机型,希望这种面板能得到更广泛的应用。
显示屏 | 屏幕尺寸 | 原生分辨率 | 原生刷新率 | 额定最大亮度 |
电子墨水 | 12 英寸 | 2560 x 1600 | 12 赫兹 | 100 尼特 |
OLED | 13.3 英寸 | 2880 x 1800 | 60 赫兹 | 400 尼特 |
E Ink 显示屏有两个明显的缺点。首先,它的原始分辨率小于主 OLED 显示屏,这在 Windows 在两个屏幕之间切换时会产生问题。每当你切换屏幕时,所有内容都会被调整大小和位置,然后你必须手动修复。如果两个显示屏的分辨率比例为 1:1,就能解决这个恼人的问题。
第二个问题与 E Ink 触摸屏的笨拙感觉有关,即使考虑到缓慢的响应时间。这主要是因为 Windows 操作系统没有针对电子阅读器进行优化。例如,自动旋转功能在电子阅读器模式下无法稳定工作,而且在屏幕之间切换时,屏幕需要几秒钟才能加载。因此,过渡阶段不如传统可转换机型在笔记本电脑和平板电脑模式之间简单切换那样流畅或无缝。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 367.5 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.61 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.66
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU SDC ATNA33AA06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 MND007ZA1-3, IPS, 2160x1350, 13" | HP Dragonfly G4 Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 SDC417B, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 9330 AU Optronics B133QAA, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT Sharp LQ134N1JW53, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -20% | -20% | 0% | -14% | -19% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.6 | 68.5 -31% | 68.4 -31% | 99.7 0% | 77.8 -22% | 69.8 -30% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 99.5 0% | 98.3 -2% | 100 0% | 99.9 0% | 98.8 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 97.1 | 69.7 -28% | 70.4 -27% | 96.9 0% | 77.5 -20% | 70.6 -27% |
Response Times | -1565% | -1929% | 106% | -2879% | -2632% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 1.9 ? | 39.9 ? -2000% | 48.8 ? -2468% | 2 ? -5% | 67.6 ? -3458% | 64 ? -3268% |
Response Time Black / White * | 2.1 ? | 25.8 ? -1129% | 31.3 ? -1390% | 1.6 ? 24% | 50.4 ? -2300% | 44 ? -1995% |
PWM Frequency | 60 ? | 240 ? 300% | ||||
Screen | 30% | 20% | 34% | 16% | 16% | |
Brightness middle | 367.5 | 461.2 25% | 408.8 11% | 361 -2% | 542.3 48% | 551.3 50% |
Brightness | 370 | 428 16% | 399 8% | 365 -1% | 516 39% | 517 40% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 86 -12% | 90 -8% | 98 0% | 85 -13% | 91 -7% |
Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.38 | 0.37 | ||
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.61 | 1.79 61% | 2.02 56% | 1.2 74% | 3.18 31% | 1.45 69% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.68 | 3.3 57% | 3.84 50% | 1.9 75% | 6.05 21% | 2.86 63% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.66 | 0.47 29% | 0.61 8% | 0.67 -2% | 1.7 -158% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 1.8 33% | 2.3 15% | 1.2 56% | 3.1 -15% | 1.3 52% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.24 98% | 2.2 100% | 2.27 97% | 2.08 106% | 2.14 103% |
CCT | 6079 107% | 6588 99% | 6203 105% | 6486 100% | 6140 106% | 6580 99% |
Contrast | 1590 | 1278 | 1427 | 1490 | ||
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 65 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -518% /
-248% | -643% /
-315% | 47% /
43% | -959% /
-474% | -878% /
-434% |
* ... smaller is better
OLED 显示屏根据 P3 标准进行了适当的校准,平均灰度和色彩 deltaE 值分别为 2.7 和 4.61。OLED 的色彩较深,而 P3 色彩很常见,因此图形编辑人员最能从中受益。我们的校准 ICM 配置文件可在上面免费下载。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
2.1 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 0.9 ms rise | |
↘ 1.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 8 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
1.9 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1 ms rise | |
↘ 0.9 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 6 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 60 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
与其他 OLED 面板一样,脉宽调制出现在所有亮度级别上。我们能记录到从 0 到 57% 亮度的 238 Hz 频率,以及从 58% 到 100% 亮度的 60 Hz 频率。
室外能见度不错,但对于 OLED 面板来说并不算好。显示屏的最大亮度约为 350 尼特,比一些采用 IPS 面板的产品(如微星巅峰 E13或戴尔Latitude 9330等采用 IPS 面板的产品相比要暗一些,这些产品的亮度可达 550 尼特。因此,除非在阴凉处工作,否则很难避免眩光。
另一方面,即使在阳光下,E Ink 显示屏仍然清晰可读。由于玻璃覆盖层并非完全哑光,因此仍会有一点眩光,但这只是小问题,很容易被忽略。
性能 - 英特尔第 13 代 Raptor Lake-U
测试条件
在运行下面的基准测试之前,我们通过 Windows 和联想 Vantage 软件将设备设置为性能模式。我们建议您熟悉 Vantage,因为它是联想特定设置和软件更新的中心。
处理器
CPU 性能仅比我们数据库中配备相同 酷睿 i7-1355U处理器的笔记本电脑平均水平相比,仅慢约 5%。性能上的微弱差距可归因于联想有限的 Turbo Boost,因为在我们的 CineBench R15 xT 循环测试首次运行后,性能最多会下降 18%。
降级到 酷睿 i5-1335U配置对 CPU 性能的影响仅为 10% 至 15%。如果你不需要酷睿 i7-1355U 的图形性能优势,那么不妨考虑更便宜的酷睿 i5-1335U,因为它在网页浏览、中度多任务处理或视频流等常见使用场景中的速度并不明显降低。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (5673 - 8424, n=18) | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (29580 - 42706, n=18) | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (1529 - 2200, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21547 - 66907, n=18) | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Dell Latitude 9330 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (4045 - 5426, n=18) | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (14596 - 21627, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (31432 - 75408, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (454 - 684, n=18) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (2991 - 4453, n=18) | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (21800 - 46154, n=18) |
系统性能
PCMark 分数略高于大多数采用类似英特尔酷睿-U 系列 CPU 的笔记本电脑。采用 AMD Zen 3+ 或 Zen 4 CPU 的子笔记本,如联想 Yoga 7-14或 HP EliteBook 845 G10 等采用 AMD Zen 3+ 或 Zen 4 CPU 的子笔记本电脑得分往往更高,因为与我们老旧的 Iris Xe 相比,它们的集成 GPU 速度更快。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5455 - 5933, n=15) | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (10203 - 11822, n=15) | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (6763 - 7536, n=15) | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (5723 - 6712, n=15) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1478 - 1643, n=15) |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1444 - 1665, n=15) |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1563 - 1732, n=15) |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (1217 - 1681, n=15) |
PCMark 10 Score | 5747 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (35017 - 71600, n=18) | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (38551 - 73377, n=18) | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (35910 - 93342, n=18) | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average Intel Core i7-1355U (72.2 - 346, n=18) | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在打开我们主页的多个浏览器标签页时,LatencyMon 显示出轻微-中等的 DPC 问题。以 60 FPS 播放 4K 视频几乎完美,在 60 秒的窗口中仅出现 2 次丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 仅一个固态硬盘
我们的测试设备配备了高端 SK hynix PC801PCIe4 x4 NVMe 固态硬盘,与流行的三星 PM9A1 直接竞争。尽管 ThinkBook Plus Gen 4 的外形小巧纤薄,但其性能却非常出色,最大读取速率高达 6200 MB/s。
Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形处理器性能 - Familiar Xe
集成的 Iris Xe 96 EUs与采用相同 GPU 的其他笔记本电脑相比,Iris Xe 96 EUs 的性能达到了我们的预期水平,甚至还略微快了几个百分点。根据我们使用联想 ThinkPad X13 Yoga 的经验,降级到配备 Iris Xe 80 EUs 的酷睿 i5 SKU 时,图形性能预计会大幅下降 30% 至 35%。联想 ThinkPad X13 Yoga G4.目前的 AMD 替代产品,如 Radeon 680M 或 780M 在撰写本文时,它们比任何英特尔 iGPU 解决方案都要快得多。
支持外置 GPU 以获得更快的性能。从技术上讲,你还可以在 E Ink 显示屏上运行 3D 游戏,这很好看,但并不实用。
如下表所示,3DMark 11 分数在电池模式、平衡模式和性能模式之间保持相对接近。这表明整体性能更多受到系统有限的 Turbo Boost 提升的影响,而不是当前配置文件设置的影响。
电源配置文件 | 图形分数 | 物理得分 | 综合得分 |
电池功率 | 6468 | 13039 | 6591 |
平衡模式 | 6509 | 11451 (-12%) | 5636 |
绩效模式 | 6456 | 13055 | 6586 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 7000 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 4996 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1828 points | |
Help |
Blender | |
v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 83B2001SGE | |
v3.3 Classroom OPTIX/RTX | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
v3.3 Classroom CUDA | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 | |
v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 | |
Dell Latitude 9330 | |
HP Dragonfly G4 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU | |
Average Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs (336 - 1259, n=101) | |
Lenovo Yoga 6 13 83B2001SGE | |
Framework Laptop 13.5 13th Gen Intel | |
Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14IRH G8 |
* ... smaller is better
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 102.8 | 91.3 | 26.2 | 11.1 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 89.8 | 59.1 | 32.5 | 15.4 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 114.8 | 84.3 | 68.7 | 60.5 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 46.4 | 25.6 | 17.9 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 38.8 | 34.4 | 34.3 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 50 | 31 | 29 | 27 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 94.4 | 41.1 | 32.5 | 26.1 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 18 | 14.3 | 12.1 | 11.4 |
Tiny Tina's Wonderlands (2022) | 30.8 | 23.5 | 15.4 | 12 |
F1 22 (2022) | 48.5 | 44.7 | 32 | 23.8 |
排放--只有在紧张时才会发出响声
系统噪音
在浏览网页、阅读或视频流等普通负载时,风扇噪音几乎感觉不到,在 24.3 dB(A) 的静音背景下,风扇噪音徘徊在 27 dB(A) 左右。在 3DMark 06 或更高的负载下,风扇噪音会增加到更明显的 38 dB(A),类似于我们在 Latitude 9330.
在长时间运行游戏或其他高负载时,我们能够记录到的最大风扇噪音略低于 42 dB(A)。40 分贝(A)的低噪音范围是大多数采用 U 系列 CPU 的敞篷车和笔记本电脑的典型噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 24.3 / 24.3 / 24.3 dB(A) |
Load |
| 38.2 / 41.8 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 24.3 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ | HP Dragonfly G4 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1355U, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR | Dell Latitude 9330 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260U | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1185G7, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 8% | 10% | 4% | 4% | -4% | |
off / environment * | 24.3 | 22.9 6% | 23.3 4% | 23.3 4% | 23 5% | 24.5 -1% |
Idle Minimum * | 24.3 | 23 5% | 23.5 3% | 23.3 4% | 23 5% | 24.7 -2% |
Idle Average * | 24.3 | 23 5% | 23.5 3% | 23.3 4% | 23.1 5% | 24.7 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 24.3 | 23 5% | 26.8 -10% | 23.3 4% | 23.1 5% | 26.4 -9% |
Load Average * | 38.2 | 32.8 14% | 27.2 29% | 37.7 1% | 37.1 3% | 37.8 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.9 | 36.9 12% | 32.7 22% | 40.1 4% | 40.6 3% | 41.4 1% |
Load Maximum * | 41.8 | 36.9 12% | 35 16% | 40.1 4% | 40.5 3% | 48.8 -17% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
键盘一侧的表面温度比预期的要低,而底部的温度则要高得多。键盘上的热点温度仅为 30 摄氏度左右,而底部则为 39 摄氏度。在笔记本电脑或平板电脑模式下,温度会明显升高,但不会分散注意力。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.8 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.7 °C / 80 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 26.6 °C / 79.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+1.5 °C / 2.7 F).
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Dragonfly G4 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 Intel Core i7-1355U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | Dell Latitude 9330 Intel Core i7-1260U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT Intel Core i7-1185G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -6% | -5% | -10% | -9% | -33% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 34.2 | 44 -29% | 38.6 -13% | 43.1 -26% | 40.6 -19% | 52 -52% |
Maximum Bottom * | 35.8 | 43.2 -21% | 40.4 -13% | 45 -26% | 50.2 -40% | 57.4 -60% |
Idle Upper Side * | 28.6 | 25.6 10% | 28.2 1% | 27.3 5% | 25 13% | 30.4 -6% |
Idle Bottom * | 30.4 | 25.6 16% | 29 5% | 27.8 9% | 27.6 9% | 34.2 -13% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
运行 Prime95 时,CPU 时钟频率和封装功耗将分别飙升至 3.3 GHz 和 54 W,核心温度高达 97 C。这种情况仅持续 10 到 15 秒,然后时钟频率和板卡功耗将降至 2.4 GHz 和 26 W,以保持 75 C 的低核心温度。
运行时 GPU 时钟频率和温度 Witcher 3 将分别稳定在 1297 MHz 和 71 C,相比之下,搭载英特尔处理器的 Dragonfly G4 的温度为 69 C。 蜻蜓 G4.
CPU 时钟 (GHz) | GPU 时钟 (MHz) | CPU 平均温度 (°C) | |
系统闲置 | -- | -- | 48 |
Prime95 压力 | 2.4 | -- | 75 |
Prime95 + FurMark Stress | 1.3 | 898 | 69 |
Witcher 3 压力 | 2.2 | 1297 | 71 |
发言人
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 0.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 98% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
功耗--对于 OLED 而言还不错
桌面闲置时的功耗约为 7 到 8 瓦,但由于采用了 OLED 触摸屏,在显示大部分白色内容(如绝大多数网页)时,功耗可能高达 13 瓦。相比之下,其他采用传统 IPS 面板的笔记本电脑,如ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3或 Dragonfly G4 等采用传统 IPS 面板的笔记本电脑相比,即使在最大亮度设置下,耗电量也几乎只有它们的一半。
当运行较高负载时,耗电量将更接近我们对酷睿 U 系列笔记本的预期。事实上,整体功耗范围与我们在ZenBook S 13 OLED或 Dragonfly G4 上的记录非常相似。
当 CPU 的利用率达到 100%时,我们可以测量到 65 W USB-C 适配器(约 5.5 x 5.5 x 2.8 厘米)的最大功耗为 66 W。由于该机型的散热限制,如下截图所示,这一速度只能持续 10 到 15 秒。
Off / Standby | 0.34 / 0.5 Watt |
Idle | 7.2 / 7.9 / 12.7 Watt |
Load |
37.6 / 65 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK hynix PC801 HFS512GEJ9X115N, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Lenovo UMIS AM6A0 RPJTJ512MKP1QDQ, IPS, 2160x1350, 13" | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5" | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 9330 i7-1260U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Phison 1TB SM2801T24GKBB4S-E162, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 21% | 15% | 14% | 19% | 0% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.2 | 3.3 54% | 4.1 43% | 5.8 19% | 4.7 35% | 4.8 33% |
Idle Average * | 7.9 | 6.5 18% | 7.5 5% | 8.5 -8% | 8.2 -4% | 8.4 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 12.7 | 7.1 44% | 8.2 35% | 8.8 31% | 8.4 34% | 8.6 32% |
Load Average * | 37.6 | 40.7 -8% | 35.5 6% | 35.1 7% | 36.8 2% | 47.1 -25% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.1 | 37 5% | 37.5 4% | 27.6 29% | 30.4 22% | 51.6 -32% |
Load Maximum * | 65 | 58.6 10% | 66.5 -2% | 59.5 8% | 49.9 23% | 65.9 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
电池容量略高于 ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3,以补偿我们要求更高的 OLED 触摸屏。因此,两款机型的无线局域网运行时间几乎相同,都约为 8 小时。Latitude 9330 或惠普 Dragonfly G4 等竞争产品的续航时间至少要长一两个小时。
使用 E Ink 模式阅读时,电池续航时间更长,约为 12 小时。
即使启用联想快速充电功能,从空电到满电也需要大约 80 分钟。
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano Gen 3 i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 49.5 Wh | HP Dragonfly G4 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 Wh | Asus ZenBook S13 OLED UX5304 i7-1355U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 63 Wh | Dell Latitude 9330 i7-1260U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 50 Wh | MSI Summit E13 Flip Evo A11MT i7-1185G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 70 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -3% | 142% | 67% | 34% | 40% | |
Reader / Idle | 927 | 2550 175% | 923 0% | 1267 37% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 481 | 465 -3% | 954 98% | 678 41% | 564 17% | 672 40% |
Load | 76 | 192 153% | 146 92% | 140 84% | 109 43% | |
H.264 | 829 |
Pros
Cons
结论--面向特定受众的优秀二合一产品
如果你喜欢随时携带笔记本电脑和电子阅读器,那么 ThinkBook Plus Gen 4 就是为你量身打造的。E Ink 屏幕在 Windows 11 操作系统下运行良好,不会对机型其他部分的质量造成负面影响。事实上,由于采用了额外的金属和玻璃,机盖和底座比想象中更坚固。
当然,还有改进的余地。尽管屏幕本身质量很高,但在两个屏幕之间切换时,窗口的缓慢过渡和不断调整大小在实际操作中还是感觉很笨拙。同时,自动旋转功能也不可靠,因为其方向经常不正确,这可能是由于该机型独特的扭曲机制造成的。
也许最值得注意的是,ThinkBook Plus Gen 4 比任何传统电子阅读器都要重得多,这可能会给电子阅读器模式下的操作带来困难。如果你喜欢在床上或公交车上进行大量阅读,那么你就必须在重量上下功夫。
ThinkBook Plus Gen 4 作为一款标准的可折叠设备使用效果很好,但与独立的电子阅读器相比,笨重的软件和相对较重的重量阻碍了它的电子阅读器功能。
如果你不看重 E Ink 显示屏,那么像戴尔 XPS 13 2 合 1或 LG Gram 14 2 合 1或 LG Gram 14 2-in-1 等替代产品,它们的重量明显更轻、电池续航时间更长或集成更多端口。不可否认,即使不配置 E Ink 屏幕,ThinkBook Plus Gen 4 的设计也会增加一些有形的重量和厚度。
价格和供应情况
联想现已开始发售 ThinkBook Plus Gen 4,酷睿 i5 非 E Ink 配置的起价为 2800 美元,酷睿 i7 E Ink 配置的起价为 3000 美元。
Lenovo ThinkBook Plus Gen4 IRU
- 09/06/2023 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.