BMAX X14 Pro笔记本电脑回顾。诱人的AMD Ryzen 5，价格低于500美元
14英寸Max X14 Pro副笔记本紧随11.6英寸MaxBook Y11的脚步。 笔记本电脑Y11两年前推出的可转换笔记本。两者都是各自类别中的经济型机型，旨在比相同价格范围内的竞争机型拥有更有吸引力的铝制外形。
在内部，BMax X14 Pro采用了较早但相对不常见的AMD Zen+ Ryzen 5 3450UCPU，这应该是在竞争的500美元以下笔记本电脑上常见的任何赛扬或Atom解决方案的升级。其他功能包括1080p IPS显示屏、背光键盘和宽敞的512GB SSD，这些都是比较典型的高价笔记本电脑。
X14 Pro的替代品包括其他廉价的14英寸机型，如 华硕VivoBook系列, 联想IdeaPad 3系列, 英菲尼克斯INBook X2, 创维CoreBook X, 或 戴尔 Inspiron 14 3000系列.
BMAX X14 Pro
Processor
AMD Ryzen 5 3450U 4 x 2.1 - 3.5 GHz, 21 W PL2 / Short Burst, 18 W PL1 / Sustained, Picasso-U (Zen+)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), RAM: 933 MHz, DDR4, 30.0.13025.5005
Memory
8 GB
, 1200 MHz, 14-14-14-30, Dual-Channel
Display
14.00 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, BOE NV140FHM-N48, IPS, BOE08C7, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
SEAPIY E535N 512GB, 512 GB
Weight
1.388 kg, Power Supply: 188 g
Price
490 USD
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | BMAX X14 Pro R5 3450U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 18.3 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.5 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2021 | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7 | 1.5 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 2240x1400 | |
| 82.9 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.5 kg | 17.95 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.8 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 19 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2020 | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel i7-10510U, GeForce MX350 | 1.5 kg | 15.9 mm | 14.00" | 2160x1440 | |
| 79.5 % v7 (old) | 01 / 2022 | Infinix INBook X2 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
案例
从远处看，机箱看起来很好，就像许多Chuwi笔记本电脑一样。然而，它的弱点一旦被握住就变得更加明显，因为金属底盘比戴尔XPS、惠普Spectre或华硕ZenBook的金属骨架更容易弯曲和嘎吱作响。底座的四角、键盘中心、外盖和铰链都表现出适度的扭曲。因此，虽然X14 Pro看起来像一台零售价超过500美元的笔记本电脑，但它也没有比其他廉价机型如华硕VivoBook或 联想IdeaPad 3 14这些机型主要是塑料的。
连接性
对于一台14英寸的笔记本电脑来说，端口选择是合理的，尽管位置可能相当紧张。例如，沿着左侧边缘的电缆会经常纠缠在一起。
BMax没有宣传HDMI端口的版本，但我们可以确认它是一个HDMI 2.0端口，因为它支持4K和60Hz的外部显示器。
SD卡阅读器
弹簧式MicroSD读卡器提供缓慢的传输速率。请记住，MicroSD卡必须倒着插入，而且可能很难弹出。
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 (AV PRO V60) | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| BMAX X14 Pro (AV Pro V60) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
| Infinix INBook X2 (AV Pro V60) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 (AV PRO V60) | |
| BMAX X14 Pro (AV Pro V60) | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 (AV Pro V60) | |
| Infinix INBook X2 (AV Pro V60) | |
沟通
集成的Wi-Fi 5模块很稳定，尽管速度很慢，两个方向的传输速率平均为250Mbps。
BMAX X14 Pro; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø255 (250-260)
BMAX X14 Pro; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø254 (223-286)
网络摄像头
720p网络摄像头，不支持Windows Hello或隐私快门。
7.7 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
9.5 ∆E
10.9 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
9 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
12.9 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
10.1 ∆E
13.1 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
13.4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
7.7 ∆E
4.2 ∆E
3.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
6.2 ∆E
维护
底部面板由11颗飞利浦螺钉固定，另外还有两颗隐藏在后部橡胶脚下的螺钉。用户只能升级M.2 2280存储，因为内存和WLAN模块都是焊接的。值得庆幸的是，RAM是双通道模式。
配件和保修
盒子里除了交流电适配器和文件外，没有任何额外的东西。由于海外运输的原因，申请制造商的保修可能会很及时或费用很高。
输入设备
键盘
按键反馈和键程比联想IdeaPad笔记本电脑上的按键略微深一些，也更结实。然而，按键反馈的均匀性很差，因为某些按键比其他按键更有弹性。特别是空格键的反馈明显较软，破坏了BMax上的打字体验。
触摸板
支持Precision ，点击板相当大，为11.5 x 7.3厘米，相比之下，10.5 x 7厘米的点击板是比较大的。联想IdeaPad 5 Pro 14.与一些Chuwi笔记本电脑上的点击板不同，BMax上的点击板很可靠，没有任何光标跳跃的问题。它的表面在以中等或较高速度滑行时很光滑，而较低的速度往往更粘。
显示
BMax使用的是京东方NV140FHM-N48 IPS面板，与联想ThinkPad E14上的面板相同。联想ThinkPad E14,ThinkPad L14 G2, 或 IdeaPad S540.这是一款经济型面板，色彩覆盖面有限，黑白和灰度响应时间缓慢，对比度有限，正如我们下面的X-Rite测量结果所示。
值得一提的是，制造商目前宣传的是14.1英寸的屏幕尺寸，具有完整的sRGB覆盖。实际上，X14 Pro有一个14.0英寸的显示屏，sRGB覆盖率只有59%。如果全sRGB覆盖率对你的工作负荷很重要，我们不建议购买这台Max。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE NV140FHM-N48 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 289.3 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 266.6 cd/m² Minimum: 13.3 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 87 %
Center on Battery: 285.4 cd/m²
Contrast: 571:1 (Black: 0.5 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.93 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.47
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
41.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.07
| BMAX X14 Pro BOE NV140FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 LEN140WUXGA+, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 Chi Mei 140HCA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng LGD0619, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel TV140WTM-NH0, IPS LED, 2160x1440, 14" | Infinix INBook X2 140PM42D1568, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 75% | 6% | 53% | 66% | 53% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.4 | 72.2 79% | 42.5 5% | 62 53% | 67.1 66% | 62.7 55% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.2 | 99.5 68% | 63.1 7% | 92 55% | 99.1 67% | 89.2 51% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.7 | 74.3 78% | 44 6% | 63 51% | 69 65% | 64.1 54% |
| Response Times | 14% | 38% | 46% | 38% | -14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 62.8 ? | 45.2 ? 28% | 28.8 ? 54% | 37 ? 41% | 37.6 ? 40% | 65.2 ? -4% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34.8 ? | 35.2 ? -1% | 27.6 ? 21% | 17 ? 51% | 22.4 ? 36% | 43.2 ? -24% |
| PWM Frequency | 59520 ? | 10000 ? | ||||
| Screen | 39% | -17% | 14% | 50% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle | 285.4 | 310.6 9% | 262.7 -8% | 387 36% | 458 60% | 368 29% |
| Brightness | 267 | 302 13% | 245 -8% | 359 34% | 448 68% | 331 24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 92 6% | 84 -3% | 84 -3% | 89 2% | 82 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.5 | 0.22 56% | 0.37 26% | 0.55 -10% | 0.25 50% | 0.39 22% |
| Contrast | 571 | 1412 147% | 710 24% | 704 23% | 1832 221% | 944 65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.93 | 2.67 46% | 6.23 -26% | 4.04 18% | 3.4 31% | 4.9 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.69 | 4.54 76% | 22.62 -21% | 8.28 56% | 6.7 64% | 8.22 56% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.47 | 2.33 48% | 1.8 60% | 1 78% | 1.7 62% | 1.59 64% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 3.7 -54% | 7.1 -196% | 5 -108% | 4.9 -104% | 5.8 -142% |
| Gamma | 2.07 106% | 2.12 104% | 2.22 99% | 2.62 84% | 2.16 102% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 6117 106% | 6398 102% | 6241 104% | 7123 91% | 7704 84% | 7163 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.5 | |||||
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.1 | |||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 43% /
43% | 9% /
-4% | 38% /
27% | 51% /
52% | 17% /
18% |
* ... smaller is better
尽管色温偏暖，但该显示器开箱后的校准效果还不错。由于上述面板的色彩空间较窄，用X-Rite色度计校准后，平均DeltaE值仅有小幅提高。
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 62.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 32.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 30 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 97 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
由于<300尼特的背光，户外能见度相对较差，最多只能算是一般。请确保在Radeon图形菜单下禁用AMD Vari-Bright，否则在电池供电的情况下，面板的最大亮度将只有166尼特。
业绩
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前，我们的设备被设置为性能模式，使用最新的AMD驱动程序和Windows更新，以获得尽可能高的分数。
处理器
原始多线程性能类似于第11代 酷睿i3-1115G4而单线程性能较慢，与第十代酷睿i5-1035G1最相似。 酷睿i5-1035G1.AMD的移动Zen系列直到Zen 2代才在性能方面真正起飞，因此Zen+ Ryzen 5 3450U只能与低端的英特尔酷睿CPU相媲美。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
BMAX X14 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 3450U: Ø527 (516.78-529.72)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U: Ø1525 (1479.45-1545.71)
Lenovo ThinkPad T14-20UES00H00 AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U: Ø1089 (1078.34-1123.14)
Lenovo IdeaPad 5 14ARE05 AMD Ryzen 5 4500U: Ø930 (892.46-973.11)
Walmart Motile M142 AMD Ryzen 5 3500U: Ø604 (598.77-639.56)
HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng Intel Core i5-1135G7: Ø674 (639.66-774.95)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (1089 - 1247, n=2) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (292 - 351, n=2) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (2658 - 3195, n=2) | |
| Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (858 - 892, n=2) | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (530 - 603, n=2) | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (137 - 138, n=2) | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (834 - 976, n=3) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (15163 - 16305, n=3) | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (3355 - 3411, n=3) | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (2565 - 3123, n=5) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (698 - 866, n=5) | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (2.77 - 3.43, n=3) | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (86.5 - 90.6, n=3) | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (0.76 - 0.806, n=3) | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
* ... smaller is better
Performance Rating: Percent
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
| Performance Rating | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U | |
| AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (2205 - 2813, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (12782 - 15357, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (671 - 798, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (41757 - 43786, n=3) | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (4760 - 5335, n=3) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (6504 - 7962, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (23172 - 26298, n=3) | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (271 - 295, n=3) | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (1181 - 1472, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (7659 - 15275, n=3) | |
系统性能
PCMark结果低于许多Core i3或Core i5替代品，可能是由于Ryzen 3450U处理器的单线程和集成图形性能较慢。
令人讨厌的是，AMD Radeon软件偶尔会在我们的设备上崩溃，从而迫使我们重新安装驱动程序。
| PCMark 10 / Score | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (3485 - 3699, n=2) | |
| PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (7067 - 7331, n=2) | |
| PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (5672 - 5801, n=2) | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (2802 - 3303, n=2) | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3699 points | |
Help | ||
| AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (15343 - 28077, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (17983 - 33524, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (17811 - 33371, n=3) | |
| AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 3450U (100 - 125, n=3) | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示了在我们的主页上打开多个标签时的DPC问题。在60 FPS下的4K视频播放很流畅，在我们长达1分钟的测试视频中只有3个丢帧。
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
的产品 SEAPIY M.2固态硬盘提供450MB/s至550MB/s的连续读写速率，这是大多数SATA III SSD的标准。然而，正如我们下面的DiskSpd循环测试结果所显示的那样，该硬盘似乎在维持这些较高的传输速率方面有问题。
SEAPIY E535N 512GB
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
554 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
455.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
219 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
140.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
528 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
435.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
32.63 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
73 MB/s
| Drive Performance Rating - Percent | |
| Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng -8! | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
BMAX X14 Pro: Ø474 (307.86-505.38)
GPU性能
图形性能略微比集成的 Iris Plus Graphics G7在第十代英特尔Ice Lake 系列上发现。虽然已经过时，而且一般不适合游戏，但我们的Radeon RX Vega 8仍然明显快于常见的UHD Graphics 解决方案。
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (1668 - 4317, n=44) | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3779 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12145 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2142 points | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 856 points | |
Help | ||
| X-Plane 11.11 | |
| 1280x720 low (fps_test=1) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (11.5 - 39.9, n=26) | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| 1920x1080 med (fps_test=2) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (10.5 - 31, n=26) | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
| 1920x1080 high (fps_test=3) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF314-42-R27B | |
| Asus ExpertBook B7 Flip B7402FEA | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 14 G2 ITL 20VDS02G00 | |
| Infinix INBook X2 | |
| Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) (9.58 - 27.3, n=25) | |
| BMAX X14 Pro | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
BMAX X14 Pro: Ø37.8 (33-45)
| low | med. | high | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 41.9 | 27.9 | 13.9 | 8.9 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 68.5 | 57.6 | 36.1 | 31.2 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 21.2 | 10.7 | 7.28 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 25.2 | 18.4 | 16.6 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 29 | 11 | 10 | 9 |
排放
系统噪音
在简单的网络浏览或流媒体视频时，风扇的噪音是明显的，但可以忍受。在这样的负载下，风扇的最高值为30分贝（A），而像游戏这样的高负载将在35至40分贝（A）之间。对于采用U系列CPU的超极本来说，这些是相当标准的范围。
Noise Level
| Idle |
| 25.7 / 25.7 / 25.7 dB(A) |
| Load |
| 34.5 / 40 dB(A) |
 | ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.2 dB(A) | ||
| BMAX X14 Pro Vega 8, R5 3450U, SEAPIY E535N 512GB | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 Vega 7, R5 5600U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H) | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel GeForce MX350, i7-10510U, Lite-On CA5-8D512 | Infinix INBook X2 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Foresee GSYAPGC-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 5% | 4% | 2% | -7% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 25.2 | 24.6 2% | 24.3 4% | 25.4 -1% | 29.3 -16% | 23.1 8% |
| Idle Minimum * | 25.7 | 24.6 4% | 24.3 5% | 25.4 1% | 29.3 -14% | 24.3 5% |
| Idle Average * | 25.7 | 24.6 4% | 24.3 5% | 25.4 1% | 29.3 -14% | 24.3 5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 25.7 | 25.1 2% | 24.3 5% | 25.4 1% | 30.8 -20% | 24.5 5% |
| Load Average * | 34.5 | 29.6 14% | 35.7 -3% | 35.4 -3% | 35.7 -3% | 35.2 -2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40 | 31.9 20% | 37.5 6% | 35.7 11% | 38 5% | |
| Load Maximum * | 40 | 45.5 -14% | 37.3 7% | 35.5 11% | 37.9 5% | 38 5% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
笔记本电脑的左半边总是比右半边更热，因为处理器、固态硬盘和内存模块都集中在系统的一侧。机箱两边的温度差异可能会让一些用户感到不舒服。例如，当长时间运行高负荷时，左手掌托的温度可高达45℃，而右手掌托的温度只有30℃。大多数其他超极本没有这个问题，因为它们的处理器和热管几乎总是朝向机箱的后部。
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44.8 °C / 112.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-16.5 °C / -29.7 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 44.8 °C / 112.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-16.5 °C / -29.7 F).
| BMAX X14 Pro AMD Ryzen 5 3450U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 AMD Ryzen 5 5600U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | Infinix INBook X2 Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 21% | 10% | 11% | 13% | 12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 48.4 | 35.8 26% | 39.4 19% | 40.5 16% | 44 9% | 45 7% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51.6 | 42.8 17% | 51 1% | 39.9 23% | 51.3 1% | 44.2 14% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 28.4 | 25 12% | 26.2 8% | 31.3 -10% | 25.1 12% | 26.2 8% |
| Idle Bottom * | 36.6 | 26.2 28% | 32.4 11% | 31.1 15% | 26.1 29% | 29.2 20% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时，时钟频率会在短短几秒钟内提升到2.9GHz，然后下降到2.5GHz，几分钟后最终稳定在2.2GHz。当受到游戏等紧张条件的影响时，核心温度也出现在59℃的高位。
当运行Witcher 3 ，GPU时钟速率开始时相对较高，在800至900MHz范围内，最终可能由于散热限制而降至800MHz以下。因此，在游戏的第一分钟左右，帧率会略高。
用电池供电运行不会限制性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将返回几乎相同的结果。
| CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度Tctl/怠速(°C) | |
| 系统空闲 | -- | -- | 35 |
| Prime95压力 | 2.2 | -- | 59 |
| Prime95 + FurMark压力 | 1.5 | 220 | 59 |
| Witcher 3 应力 | 0.7 | 737 | 59 |
发言人
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
BMAX X14 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 11.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (33.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 95% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 91% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 7% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理
消耗功率
该系统比大多数其他较新的超极本的耗电量略高，因为它使用的是老一代的AMD CPU。运行高要求的负载将耗费40瓦至46瓦，而戴尔Inspiron 14 7400则为35瓦至42瓦。 戴尔Inspiron 14 7400或惠普Pavilion 14即使BMax的性能较慢。每瓦性能较低是选择老一代CPU时需要付出的共同代价。
在同时运行Prime95和FurMark时，我们能够从小型（约9.5 x 4.1 x 6厘米）47.5瓦的交流适配器中记录到50瓦的临时最大耗电。
Power Consumption
| Off / Standby | 1.9 / 2.2 Watt |
| Idle | 6.3 / 9.6 / 9.9 Watt |
| Load |
46 / 50.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| BMAX X14 Pro R5 3450U, Vega 8, SEAPIY E535N 512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 2240x1400, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 R7 5700U, Vega 8, WDC PC SN530 SDBPTPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Intel Optane Memory H10 with Solid State Storage 32GB + 1TB HBRPEKNX0203AH(L/H), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, Lite-On CA5-8D512, IPS LED, 2160x1440, 14" | Infinix INBook X2 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Foresee GSYAPGC-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 9% | 19% | 8% | -9% | 17% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 6.3 | 3.8 40% | 4.5 29% | 4.8 24% | 3 52% | 4.3 32% |
| Idle Average * | 9.6 | 6.9 28% | 6.5 32% | 8.5 11% | 9 6% | 6.3 34% |
| Idle Maximum * | 9.9 | 8.8 11% | 7.1 28% | 12.4 -25% | 11 -11% | 9.6 3% |
| Load Average * | 46 | 42.2 8% | 40.4 12% | 37.7 18% | 60.8 -32% | 40.7 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.8 | 37.7 5% | 31.7 20% | 35.4 11% | 56 -41% | 36.9 7% |
| Load Maximum * | 50.3 | 68.4 -36% | 54.3 -8% | 45.3 10% | 65.6 -30% | 44.4 12% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
BMAX X14 Pro; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø39.8 (33.5-43.2)
BMAX X14 Pro; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø40.3 (32.2-50.3)
Power Consumption external Monitor
BMAX X14 Pro; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø37.3 (31.5-46.2)
BMAX X14 Pro; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø36.2 (31.5-43.1)
BMAX X14 Pro; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø36.8 (32.3-42.4)
BMAX X14 Pro; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø30.8 (30.4-31.4)
电池寿命
WLAN运行时间相当不错，充满电后约为6.5小时。然而，从空电到满电的充电时间相对较慢，为3.5小时，而大多数其他超极本只有1.5小时。
| BMAX X14 Pro R5 3450U, Vega 8, 55 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 5 Pro 14ACN6 R5 5600U, Vega 7, 57 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 7400 7415 2-in-1 R7 5700U, Vega 8, 54 Wh | HP Pavilion 14-dv0357ng i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 43 Wh | Huawei MateBook 14 2020 Intel i7-10510U, GeForce MX350, 56 Wh | Infinix INBook X2 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 50 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 39% | 64% | -9% | 94% | 2% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 395 | 550 39% | 647 64% | 360 -9% | 768 94% | 401 2% |
| Reader / Idle | 1298 | 1115 | ||||
| Load | 60 | 137 | 117 | |||
| H.264 | 356 | 836 | ||||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 121 |
Pros
+ 有吸引力的轻质金属机箱
+ 易于升级的M.2 SATA III SSD
+ 对于这个价格来说，性能还算不错
+ 背光键盘
Cons
- 底盘出现明显的吱吱作响和弯曲
- 不可升级的内存
- 狭窄的色彩空间
- 充电速度慢
- 没有USB-C接口
判决书
BMax X14 Pro最好的方面是其低于500美元的低价和相对于这个价格来说比较快的AMD Ryzen 5 CPU。与戴尔Inspiron 3000系列等其他廉价机型相比，它看起来也比实际价格要高。 惠普14系列，或联想IdeaPad 3系列。
X14 Pro的缺点与许多Chuwi笔记本电脑相似，该机型注重视觉设计，牺牲了质量保证或其他硬件的削减。例如，我们的空格键比其他所有的键都要松软，而反馈应该是统一的，同时机箱的弯曲、扭曲和吱吱作响比我们希望的更容易。它的显示屏也只覆盖了59%的sRGB，尽管它声称有100%的覆盖率。
如果你正在寻找一台廉价的14英寸笔记本电脑，使性能和便携性最大化，那么Max X14 Pro可以填补这一空白。然而，要想获得更饱满的色彩和更好的可靠性，你必须花更多钱购买更知名的制造商的中档超极本，如 联想IdeaPad 5系列或 HP Envy系列.
价格和可用性
BMax X14 Pro是，现在亚马逊上发货售价为499美元，使用60美元的优惠券代码后为439美元。
BMAX X14 Pro
- 02/16/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
Price comparison
