Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
MagyarCAT S53评测--具有5G功能的坚固防水手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.3 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | CAT S53 SD 480, Adreno 619 | 320 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 77.2 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2019 | CAT S52 Helio P35 MT6765, PowerVR GE8320 | 210 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 5.65" | 1440x720 | |
| 82.6 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | Gigaset GX6 Dimensity 900, Mali-G68 MP4 | 278 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.60" | 2412x1080 | |
| 81.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro SD 778G 5G, Adreno 642L | 235 g | 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
| 81.1 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | Nokia XR20 SD 480, Adreno 619 | 248 g | 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.67" | 2400x1080 |
箱子和设备 - 重，但保护得很好
CAT S53是一款真正的加固型手机，不仅可以防水防尘，而且由于其加固的底盘和凹陷的屏幕，还可以很好地承受跌落。这在重量上也很明显：CAT手机的重量为320克，即使在户外手机中也不算轻。
上一代产品，即 CAT S52，希望能更优雅。我们的测试设备第一眼看上去就像一个经典的工作电话。因此，有一个略微粗糙的表面，这有助于CAT S53不那么容易从手上滑落，背面有一个抓地的凹槽图案，背面有一个巨大的相机模块。在上边缘还有一个LED灯，其亮度高达120流明。此外，相机模块中还有一个LED闪光灯，可以永久激活。
所有插槽都有橡胶盖保护，用手指很难打开。然而，这些确保了非常好的防尘和防水性能，符合IP68/IP69K和MIL-STD-810H标准。
NFC也在船上，还有一个microSD阅读器。然而，如果你想使用microSD扩展内存，你必须放弃其中的一张SIM卡。在我们与参考的microSD Angelbird V60进行的CPDT基准测试以及复制测试中，读卡器被证明是相当快的。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| CAT S53 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Gigaset GX6 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro (Angelbird V60) | |
| Nokia XR20 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 旧的操作系统
通过CAT S53，制造商还首次为其户外手机之一带来了5G连接。相当多的频率可用于目前最快的移动标准，也可用于4G，因此，即使在旅行时，你也可以用智能手机冲浪。在我们测试期间的随机测试中，移动接收证明是好的，但还没有达到高端智能手机的水平。
在无线局域网方面，有WiFi 5，整体速度不错，但也有明显的波动和个别的传输速率下降的情况。
CAT S53的操作系统仍然基于Android 11，测试时的安全补丁是2022年7月的。对于企业客户来说，一个较早的Android 版本可能是可取的，因为内部编写的应用程序必须适应每个新的Android 版本。然而，至少安全应该是在一个较新的水平上。毕竟，CAT只预装了几个第三方的应用程序，可以很容易地删除。
CAT S53的触摸屏仍然可以在手指潮湿和戴手套的情况下使用。例如，外壳左侧的一个大型可编程按钮可用于启动应用程序或切换集成手电筒。后面的摄像头模块下面有一个指纹传感器。它的位置对大手来说不是很理想，但它能可靠地识别存储的手指，并在大约一秒钟的延迟后从待机状态解锁手机。脸部识别也是可能的，但它只是基于软件，因此不那么安全。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=185, last 2 years) | |
| CAT S53 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=187, last 2 years) | |
| CAT S53 | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone (229 - 1902, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
| Average of class Smartphone (668 - 1864, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Nokia XR20 | |
| CAT S52 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Nokia XR20 | |
| CAT S52 | |
照相机--不是很有说服力
索尼的IMX582被用作主相机的传感器。它提供了4800万像素的分辨率，但默认情况下将四个像素合二为一，这样就可以获得更好的出光率，并创建1200万像素的照片。背面还有一个低分辨率的微距相机，可用于极端特写的特殊模式。
来自主摄像头的照片看起来明显模糊，可以更好地提亮。白平衡在出厂时设置得相当冷。弱点在弱光和高对比度下特别明显。测试图在演播室灯光下也显得很模糊。
视频最多能以1080p和30帧的速度录制。材料的清晰度在这里也可以更高，但至少自动对焦工作得相当快，而且亮度调节效果很好。
自拍相机具有1600万像素的高分辨率。在这里，照片看起来也有点酷，放大后很有颗粒感。
因此，CAT S53不是一款适合摄影爱好者的手机，但该相机对于快照或记录来说是足够的。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLowLight
显示 - CAT S53的真彩色屏幕
屏幕提供的分辨率为1600 x 720像素。在CAT S53的价位上，一个帧率超过60赫兹的全高清屏幕是可能的，而竞争者证明了这一点。504cd/m²的亮度是不错的，但即使是户外手机，更多的亮度总是受欢迎的，以确保在阳光下的良好可读性。
黑值很高，为0.6cd/m²，因此对比度下降，显示的颜色看起来相当暗淡。然而，正如我们在用分光光度计和软件CalMAN进行的测试中发现的那样，颜色再现是真实的。显示器中没有明显的偏色，只有少数色调明显偏离了参考色空间。
我们没有注意到IPS显示屏的PWM闪烁。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 476 cd/m²
Contrast: 793:1 (Black: 0.6 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.18 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 4.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.268
| CAT S53 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | CAT S52 IPS, 1440x720, 5.7" | Gigaset GX6 IPS, 2412x1080, 6.6" | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Nokia XR20 IPS, 2400x1080, 6.7" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen | 62% | 19% | -41% | 21% | |
| Brightness middle | 476 | 521 9% | 505 6% | 510 7% | 599 26% |
| Brightness | 504 | 530 5% | 491 -3% | 495 -2% | 598 19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 82 | 91 11% | 93 13% | 92 12% | 99 21% |
| Black Level * | 0.6 | 0.16 73% | 0.3 50% | 0.46 23% | 0.33 45% |
| Contrast | 793 | 3256 311% | 1683 112% | 1109 40% | 1815 129% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.18 | 2.69 15% | 4.32 -36% | 7.41 -133% | 4.52 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.86 | 5.07 13% | 7.22 -23% | 13.26 -126% | 7.6 -30% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.2 | 1.8 57% | 3 29% | 10.6 -152% | 4.2 -0% |
| Gamma | 2.268 97% | 2.243 98% | 2.268 97% | 2.518 87% | 2.279 97% |
| CCT | 7234 90% | 6622 98% | 7098 92% | 10050 65% | 7309 89% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 7.5 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 53 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.7 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 89 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - 可以使用更多的电力
随着 高通骁龙480 5G，CAT集成了最现代的移动标准，但与这个价格范围内的其他耐用型手机相比，该SoC并没有提供太多的性能。尤其是 Galaxy XCover 6 Pro在处理器和图形性能方面处于一个完全不同的联盟。
CAT S53在菜单中运行时通常没有延迟，但在更复杂的应用程序中或当另一个进程在后台运行时，手机会明显停滞。事实上，系统感觉不那么流畅也是由于智能手机只有60赫兹的屏幕，而且安装了较慢的eMMC存储。
CAT S53的正面温度高达45.1℃，在室温下，CAT S53在负载下已经可以变得相当热。在热天拿着手机也可能变得不舒服。然而，这并不影响性能：在3DMark压力测试结束时仍能达到初始帧率的99.1%。
扬声器位于背面的相机模块中。当手机放在柔软的表面上时，这不是一个理想的位置，但扬声器可以变得相当响亮。这在嘈杂的工作环境中很有帮助。
在声音方面，高音部分被非常强烈地强调，这在我们的图表中也可以看到。音乐听起来也有点闷闷不乐。一个3.5毫米音频端口可用于连接耳机或扬声器，还有蓝牙5.1用于无线连接。现代的aptX TWS+编解码器也是可用的，但不是目前的LHDC变种。
CAT使用一个强大的5500毫安时电池，可以用高达18瓦的功率充电。然而，包装中不包括合适的充电器，只有一条USB线。这款手机甚至支持高达10瓦的无线充电。这款手机的耐力很好，在我们的WLAN测试中几乎达到了19小时，但通过电缆充电可能需要3小时或更长时间。
| CAT S53 | CAT S52 | Gigaset GX6 | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | Nokia XR20 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -45% | 43% | 66% | 35% | -39% | 265% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 510.9 | 286.2 -44% | 953.5 87% | 841.6 65% | 485 -5% | 283 ? -45% | 1834 ? 259% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 208.2 | 195.4 -6% | 454.7 118% | 484.7 133% | 452 117% | 194.6 ? -7% | 1426 ? 585% |
| Random Read 4KB | 140.7 | 76.6 -46% | 194.9 39% | 170.6 21% | 174.8 24% | 82.7 ? -41% | 278 ? 98% |
| Random Write 4KB | 141.4 | 21.3 -85% | 39.9 -72% | 204.2 44% | 146.2 3% | 55.1 ? -61% | 310 ? 119% |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.1 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| Nokia XR20 | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Gigaset GX6 | |
| Nokia XR20 | |
| CAT S53 | |
| Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro | |
CAT S53 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 7.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 30% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Nokia XR20 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 32.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 52% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 70% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| CAT S53 5500 mAh | CAT S52 3100 mAh | Gigaset GX6 5000 mAh | Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro 4050 mAh | Nokia XR20 4630 mAh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -44% | -12% | -32% | -18% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 1135 | 637 -44% | 1002 -12% | 768 -32% | 927 -18% |
| Reader / Idle | 1321 | 1786 | |||
| H.264 | 856 | 895 | |||
| Load | 266 | 301 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 笨重的户外手机，运行时间良好
CAT S53是一款经典的加固型手机，由于其笨重的机身，可以很好地防止环境影响和跌落。它配备了5G、NFC、无线充电和一个色彩准确的屏幕。
电池运行时间令人信服，指纹传感器和触摸屏工作可靠，明亮的集成手电筒使用户在黑暗环境中也能保持安全。另一方面，现在的每部智能手机都提供可永久激活的LED闪光灯，所以额外的手电筒最终可能只是一个漂亮的小玩意。
然而，过时的安全补丁和过时的Android 11对私人用户来说是很烦人的。制造商没有说明是否还计划进行更新。相机更适用于快照和记录过程，而不是真正的摄影爱好者，性能足够，但落后于其他同价位的户外手机。
环境影响让CAT S53很冷淡，由于有5G、NFC和大电池，设备还算不错。然而，在这个价格上有更苗条和更强大的替代品，没有噱头。
类似的强大电池运行时间几乎在任何地方都没有，但有更轻的手机，有更克制的设计，而三星Galaxy XCover 6 Pro甚至可以让你更换电池。 吉格赛特GX6也有一个可拆卸的电池和一个快速的120赫兹显示屏。
价格和可用性
CAT S53可直接从制造商处获得https://www.catphones.com/de-de/cat-s53/价格为549欧元。在amazon.de上也能以这个价格找到这款坚固的手机。.
我们的借贷伙伴cyberport.de甚至还提供了一个很大的折扣，在测试时以476欧元的价格出售这款户外手机。在互联网上可以找到一些更便宜的报价。
CAT S53
-
04/17/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
