Cubot P80 智能手机评测--超大存储空间和全高清显示屏，售价不到 200 美元
Potential Competitors in Comparison
Bewertung | Datum | Modell | Gewicht | Laufwerk | Groesse | Aufloesung | Preis ab |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76.6 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2023 | Cubot P80 Helio MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3 | 217 g | 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | 6.58" | 2408x1080 | |
| 79 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Xiaomi Redmi 12 Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2 | 198.5 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.79" | 2460x1080 | |
| 78.7 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2023 | Nokia G22 T7200 (T606), Mali-G57 MP1 | 195 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.52" | 1600x720 | |
| 79 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Motorola Moto G13 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 183.5 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
外壳和功能 - 厚重，存储空间大
Cubot P80 有两种存储空间可供选择：
- 256 数据存储空间/6GB 内存：179.99 美元
- 512 数据存储空间/6GB 内存：185.99 美元
即使是较小的版本，其存储容量也高于该价位的平均水平。此外，它还配备了现代的 UFS 2.1 内存，速度明显快于该级别产品通常使用的 eMMC 闪存。
在积极的一面，Cubot P80 配备了 NFC 功能，可以使用移动支付服务。USB-C 接口根据 USB 2.0 标准进行内部连接。
根据存储容量的不同，有两种颜色可供选择：512 GB 大容量存储机型有浅蓝色和粉红色，256 GB 的 Cubot P80 则有深蓝色和紫色。两个版本都有经典黑色可供选择。
Cubot P80 始终采用塑料外壳，边框采用拉丝工艺，而背面则采用玻璃外观。摄像头模块略微凸起，三个镜头明显突出于外壳。
microSD 读卡器与两张 SIM 卡中的一张共用一个插槽，用户需要在双卡功能和内存扩展之间做出选择。读卡器在拷贝测试中表现相当不错，总体上与同类产品相当。这使得存储卡适用于扩展本已充足的闪存，不过用户在复制过程中需要接受一定的速度损失。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Cubot P80 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Nokia G22 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 无法进行面部识别
Cubot P80 通过 WiFi 5 标准与无线网络通信，在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE-11000 参考路由器进行的测试中实现了稳定的传输速率，尽管这些速率略低于同类设备。
作为一款 4G 手机，Cubot 设备允许用户通过移动网络在旅途中建立快速的互联网连接。虽然这在旅行中通常很有效，但需要注意的是，该手机可能不支持全球所有国家的频率，从而限制了其全球兼容性。
Cubot 在 P80 上提供了一个相对纯净的Android 13 版本，没有不必要的臃肿软件，以免因广告目的而占用存储空间。在测试时，系统软件是截至 2023 年 9 月的最新版本，但这一信息可能略有过时。Cubot 目前大约每三个月发布一次安全更新和漏洞修复。不过，生产商没有说明电话支持的持续时间。
关于显示屏，屏幕以 60 Hz 的帧频运行，限制了其提高响应速度的能力。尽管存在这种限制，但触摸屏仍能准确、可靠地接受输入。大尺寸指纹识别器位于机身右侧，可准确识别手指，从待机状态解锁手机时延迟极小。值得注意的是，面部识别不是解锁手机的可用选项。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Cubot P80 | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Cubot P80 | |
摄像头 - 自拍摄像头是亮点
Cubot P80 的主摄像头最大照片分辨率为 4800 万像素，但通常通过将 4 个像素合成一个像素来捕捉 1200 万像素的图像，从而提高感光度。虽然该相机提供 "超高清 "模式以拍摄全分辨率照片，但这需要几秒钟的照片处理时间。
在标准拍摄模式下，相机拍摄的图像往往有些暗，细节清晰度有待提高。对比度较低，导致照片看起来有些冲淡。在极弱光线和高对比度等苛刻的照明条件下，动态范围较弱，极亮和极暗的区域都缺乏细节。
在实验室测试中，主摄像头显示的对比度极低，在光线非常暗的情况下，图像仍能大致辨认。
尽管存在这些限制，P80 的背面仍配备了三个镜头，其中包括一个固定焦距的微距摄像头，分辨率为 200 万像素，适合快速抓拍。第三个摄像头虽然不能拍摄照片，但能产生景深效果。
在自拍方面，前置 2400 万像素摄像头采用了标准的全分辨率，照片细节清晰，放大也没有问题。虽然整体细节水平令人满意，但在较暗的区域会明显下降。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
显示屏 - 无 PWM，但有蓝色偏光
Cubot P80 配备了同价位中的高分辨率显示屏，面板像素为 2,408 x 1,080，提供扩展的全高清分辨率。相比之下 小米红米 12也具有类似的分辨率，但拥有更高的最高帧频（90 Hz），而 Cubot P80 的最高帧频为 60 Hz。
亮度水平令人满意，平均测量值为 533 cd/m²。虽然没有达到创纪录的水平，但在阳光充足的室外使用也足够了。Cubot P80 的屏幕有明显的偏蓝现象，这在使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试中很明显。因此，所有颜色都明显偏离最佳值。
虽然没有测量到 PWM 闪烁，但显示屏的响应时间相对较慢。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 544 cd/m²
Contrast: 1432:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.427
| Cubot P80 IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Redmi 12 IPS, 2460x1080, 6.8" | Nokia G22 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Motorola Moto G13 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 12% | -50% | -50% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38.2 ? | 34 ? 11% | 60.2 ? -58% | 48.5 ? -27% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 19.6 ? | 17.2 ? 12% | 27.7 ? -41% | 33.8 ? -72% |
| PWM Frequency | ||||
| Screen | 11% | 19% | 19% | |
| Brightness middle | 544 | 449 -17% | 674 24% | 555 2% |
| Brightness | 533 | 437 -18% | 641 20% | 553 4% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 95 14% | 90 8% | 93 12% |
| Black Level * | 0.38 | 0.5 -32% | 0.43 -13% | 0.29 24% |
| Contrast | 1432 | 898 -37% | 1567 9% | 1914 34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.1 | 2.29 68% | 4.45 37% | 5.17 27% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.8 | 4.49 58% | 7.41 31% | 10.61 2% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.2 | 3.7 55% | 5.1 38% | 4.5 45% |
| Gamma | 2.427 91% | 2.254 98% | 2.072 106% | 2.131 103% |
| CCT | 9580 68% | 6198 105% | 7799 83% | 7380 88% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 12% /
11% | -16% /
6% | -16% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 19.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.3 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 6.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.3 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池续航时间 - 无节流的旧版 SoC
联发科 联发科 MT8788是 Cubot P80 智能手机的首选处理器，尽管它采用了更面向智能手机的 Helio P60处理器。可能的原因可能是可用性，因为这两款芯片都是在 2018 年推出的，并已被更新了计算单元的更现代的同类产品所取代。
因此，Cubot P80 在处理器和图形性能方面落后了，这种差异在基准测试中显而易见。在日常使用中，手机菜单一般都能流畅运行，但在运行多个应用程序或要求较高的程序时可能会出现速度变慢的情况。
值得肯定的是，该机配备了快速 UFS 2.1 闪存。诺基亚 G22 在这一价格区间表现出了更高的速度，而 Cubot P80 的 64 GB 容量则在性能和存储容量之间取得了良好的平衡。
在室温条件下，长时间负载时的最大温升为 112.64 °F，这是可以接受的。不过，值得考虑的是，在炎热的天气里，手机可能会发热更多。值得注意的是，即使在持续负载的情况下，SoC 也不会出现节流现象，3DMark 压力测试证实了这一点。
尽管有多个扬声器栅格，Cubot P80 的底部边缘还是只有一个单声道扬声器。虽然音量适中，中音还原也不错，但在最大音量时可能会缺乏清晰度，高音也会过高。
外置扬声器和耳机可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 4.2 连接，支持各种无线编解码器，包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC 和 LHDC V、V3 和 V4。
Cubot P80 配备 5,200 mAh 电池，在续航时间方面优于同类设备，在电池测试中达到了 17:16 小时。然而 摩托 G13和 诺基亚 G22的续航时间稍长一些。这款手机支持的最大充电功率为 18 瓦，充满电大约需要 1:30 小时。
| PCMark for Android - Work 3.0 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 27169, n=197, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Cubot P80 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8788 (6445 - 7226, n=2) | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 166, n=206, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8788 (7.4 - 7.5, n=2) | |
| Cubot P80 | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 321, n=206, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Cubot P80 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8788 (8.2 - 8.3, n=2) | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 144, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8788 (4.4 - 4.5, n=2) | |
| Cubot P80 | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 129, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Cubot P80 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8788 (2.7 - 2.8, n=2) | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.38 - 53, n=207, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
| Cubot P80 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8788 (1.2 - 1.2, n=2) | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Octane V2 - Total Score | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=210, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Average Mediatek MT8788 (10032 - 10273, n=2) | |
| Cubot P80 | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
| Cubot P80 | Xiaomi Redmi 12 | Nokia G22 | Motorola Moto G13 | Average 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -30% | 24% | -34% | -2% | 205% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 510.3 | 300 -41% | 881 73% | 281.1 -45% | 682 ? 34% | 1894 ? 271% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 351.3 | 272.5 -22% | 367 4% | 244.7 -30% | 281 ? -20% | 1476 ? 320% |
| Random Read 4KB | 132.3 | 84.8 -36% | 131 -1% | 99.4 -25% | 136.4 ? 3% | 278 ? 110% |
| Random Write 4KB | 143.2 | 115 -20% | 172 20% | 94.9 -34% | 106 ? -26% | 312 ? 118% |
温度
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.2 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Wild Life Stress Test
发言人
Cubot P80 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 48% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G13 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
| Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Nokia G22 | |
| Cubot P80 | |
| Average of class Smartphone (476 - 3244, n=208, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Redmi 12 | |
Pros
Cons
评价--适合存储迷和流媒体爱好者
Cubot P80 在经济实惠型智能手机领域脱颖而出，是因为它拥有充足的存储空间，最大限度地减少了在速度方面的妥协。它的长效电池、纯Android 13 和定期更新进一步增强了其吸引力。
该设备的屏幕分辨率高，亮度适中，无 PWM 闪烁，但帧速率仅限于 60 Hz，而且有明显的蓝色色调。遗憾的是，Widevine L1 的缺失阻碍了主要供应商提供高清流媒体功能。
相机系统带来的体验好坏参半。自拍摄像头的高分辨率和可接受的细节给人留下了深刻印象，而主摄像头的低对比度、低细节图像和令人失望的色彩还原则让人失望。
由于选择了稍老的 SoC，因此使用了较老的蓝牙版本，影响了蓝牙的范围和传输能力。这在日常使用中是否明显取决于个人使用习惯。Cubot P80 拥有舒适的手柄和做工精良的塑料外壳。
Cubot P80 对于不以串流为优先考虑、希望以低价获得大量快速内存的消费者来说是一个可行的选择。
相比之下，小米红米 12 虽然预装了广告应用程序，但拍照性能和整体功能更佳。诺基亚 G22 方便用户维修，并提供 3 年保修。
Cubot P80
- 12/07/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
