Notebookcheck Logo

Cubot P80 智能手机评测--超大存储空间和全高清显示屏,售价不到 200 美元

空间大,像素高。

Cubot P80 拥有高达 512 GB 的大容量存储空间,而这款手机的售价甚至不到 200 美元。这听起来好得令人难以置信,因此我们的测试旨在确定是否在其他方面节省了成本,以及 Cubot 手机在日常使用中的表现如何。
ARM Android Smartphone
Cubot P80
Cubot P80 (P Series)
Processor
Mediatek MT8788 8 x 2 GHz, Cortex-A73 / A53
Graphics adapter
ARM Mali-G72 MP3
Memory
8 GB 
Display
6.58 inch 20:9, 2408 x 1080 pixel 401 PPI, Capacitive, IPS, glossy: yes, 60 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 490 GB free
Connections
1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: audio via USB-C, Card Reader: microSD (shared, up to 512GB) , 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Networking
802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2, 2G (850/​900/​1800/​1900), 3G (B1/​B2/​B4/​B5/​B6/​B8/​B19), 4G (B1/​B2/​B3/​B4/​B5/​B7/​B8/​B12/​B13/​B17/​B18/​B19/​B20/​B26/​B28/​B38/​B39/​B40/​B41/​B66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPS
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 9.8 x 165.8 x 75.8
Battery
5200 mAh Lithium-Ion, 18 Watt charging
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 13
Camera
Primary Camera: 48 MPix phase comparison-AF, LED-flash, Videos @1080p (Camera 1); 2.0MP, macro lens (Camera 2); 0.3MP (Camera 3)
Secondary Camera: 24 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: mono speaker, charger, USB cable, silicone bumper, SIM tool, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
217 g
Price
190 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Potential Competitors in Comparison

Bewertung
Datum
Modell
Gewicht
Laufwerk
Groesse
Aufloesung
Preis ab
76.6 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2023
Cubot P80
Helio MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3
217 g512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash6.58"2408x1080
79 %
v7 (old)
08 / 2023
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2
198.5 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.79"2460x1080
78.7 %
v7 (old)
05 / 2023
Nokia G22
T606, Mali-G57 MP1
195 g64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.52"1600x720
79 %
v7 (old)
04 / 2023
Motorola Moto G13
Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2
183.5 g128 GB eMMC Flash6.50"1600x720

外壳和功能 - 厚重,存储空间大

Cubot P80 有两种存储空间可供选择:

  • 256 数据存储空间/6GB 内存:179.99 美元
  • 512 数据存储空间/6GB 内存:185.99 美元

即使是较小的版本,其存储容量也高于该价位的平均水平。此外,它还配备了现代的 UFS 2.1 内存,速度明显快于该级别产品通常使用的 eMMC 闪存。


在积极的一面,Cubot P80 配备了 NFC 功能,可以使用移动支付服务。USB-C 接口根据 USB 2.0 标准进行内部连接。

根据存储容量的不同,有两种颜色可供选择:512 GB 大容量存储机型有浅蓝色和粉红色,256 GB 的 Cubot P80 则有深蓝色和紫色。两个版本都有经典黑色可供选择。

Cubot P80 始终采用塑料外壳,边框采用拉丝工艺,而背面则采用玻璃外观。摄像头模块略微凸起,三个镜头明显突出于外壳。

microSD 读卡器与两张 SIM 卡中的一张共用一个插槽,用户需要在双卡功能和内存扩展之间做出选择。读卡器在拷贝测试中表现相当不错,总体上与同类产品相当。这使得存储卡适用于扩展本已充足的闪存,不过用户在复制过程中需要接受一定的速度损失。

Cubot P80
Cubot P80
Cubot P80
Cubot P80
Cubot P80

尺寸比较

168.6 mm 76.3 mm 8.2 mm 198.5 g165.8 mm 75.8 mm 9.8 mm 217 g165 mm 76.2 mm 8.5 mm 195 g162.7 mm 74.7 mm 8.2 mm 183.5 g148 mm 105 mm 1 mm 1.5 g
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Cubot P80
  (Angelbird V60)
32.1 MB/s
Average of class Smartphone
  (7.7 - 77, n=79, last 2 years)
29.3 MB/s -9%
Motorola Moto G13
  (Angelbird V60)
25.1 MB/s -22%
Nokia G22
  (Angelbird V60)
19.6 MB/s -39%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
  (Angelbird V60)
18.7 MB/s -42%

Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)

05101520253035404550556065707580Tooltip
Cubot P80 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø36.9 (23.5-49.3)
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.3 (25.7-45.6)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø37.6 (30.1-45.4)
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Write 0.5 GB: Ø37.2 (28.2-49.3)
Cubot P80 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø76 (22.2-84.4)
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø68.8 (25.3-76.1)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB; Angelbird V60: Ø73.1 (39-81.8)
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; SDCard Sequential Read 0.5 GB: Ø76 (18.5-78.8)

通信、软件和操作 - 无法进行面部识别

Cubot P80 通过 WiFi 5 标准与无线网络通信,在我们使用华硕 ROG Rapture AXE-11000 参考路由器进行的测试中实现了稳定的传输速率,尽管这些速率略低于同类设备。

作为一款 4G 手机,Cubot 设备允许用户通过移动网络在旅途中建立快速的互联网连接。虽然这在旅行中通常很有效,但需要注意的是,该手机可能不支持全球所有国家的频率,从而限制了其全球兼容性。

Cubot 在 P80 上提供了一个相对纯净的Android 13 版本,没有不必要的臃肿软件,以免因广告目的而占用存储空间。在测试时,系统软件是截至 2023 年 9 月的最新版本,但这一信息可能略有过时。Cubot 目前大约每三个月发布一次安全更新和漏洞修复。不过,生产商没有说明电话支持的持续时间。

关于显示屏,屏幕以 60 Hz 的帧频运行,限制了其提高响应速度的能力。尽管存在这种限制,但触摸屏仍能准确、可靠地接受输入。大尺寸指纹识别器位于机身右侧,可准确识别手指,从待机状态解锁手机时延迟极小。值得注意的是,面部识别不是解锁手机的可用选项。

Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Motorola Moto G13
370 (349min - 383max) MBit/s +13%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
367 (341min - 376max) MBit/s +12%
Nokia G22
362 (319min - 378max) MBit/s +11%
Cubot P80
327 (282min - 334max) MBit/s
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Motorola Moto G13
340 (311min - 351max) MBit/s +11%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
317 (284min - 330max) MBit/s +4%
Nokia G22
315 (226min - 328max) MBit/s +3%
Cubot P80
306 (292min - 322max) MBit/s

Legend

 
Cubot P80 Mediatek MT8788, ARM Mali-G72 MP3, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash
 
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mediatek Helio G88, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
 
Nokia G22 UNISOC T606, ARM Mali-G57 MP1, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
 
Motorola Moto G13 Mediatek Helio G85, ARM Mali-G52 MP2, 128 GB eMMC Flash
020406080100120140160180200220240260280300320Tooltip
Cubot P80; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø305 (292-322)
Cubot P80; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø327 (282-334)

摄像头 - 自拍摄像头是亮点

前置摄像头拍摄
前置摄像头拍摄

Cubot P80 的主摄像头最大照片分辨率为 4800 万像素,但通常通过将 4 个像素合成一个像素来捕捉 1200 万像素的图像,从而提高感光度。虽然该相机提供 "超高清 "模式以拍摄全分辨率照片,但这需要几秒钟的照片处理时间。

在标准拍摄模式下,相机拍摄的图像往往有些暗,细节清晰度有待提高。对比度较低,导致照片看起来有些冲淡。在极弱光线和高对比度等苛刻的照明条件下,动态范围较弱,极亮和极暗的区域都缺乏细节。

在实验室测试中,主摄像头显示的对比度极低,在光线非常暗的情况下,图像仍能大致辨认。

尽管存在这些限制,P80 的背面仍配备了三个镜头,其中包括一个固定焦距的微距摄像头,分辨率为 200 万像素,适合快速抓拍。第三个摄像头虽然不能拍摄照片,但能产生景深效果。

在自拍方面,前置 2400 万像素摄像头采用了标准的全分辨率,照片细节清晰,放大也没有问题。虽然整体细节水平令人满意,但在较暗的区域会明显下降。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera PflanzeHauptkamera UmgebungHauptkamera Low Light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
7.3 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
8.9 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
11.2 ∆E
12.7 ∆E
6.6 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
14.1 ∆E
5.2 ∆E
13.9 ∆E
9.2 ∆E
3.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
8.2 ∆E
ColorChecker Cubot P80: 7.94 ∆E min: 3.05 - max: 14.1 ∆E
ColorChecker
29.4 ∆E
52.6 ∆E
38.5 ∆E
34.8 ∆E
43 ∆E
60.8 ∆E
51.7 ∆E
32.7 ∆E
40.5 ∆E
27.7 ∆E
62.8 ∆E
62.2 ∆E
29.1 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
35.2 ∆E
73.4 ∆E
41 ∆E
41.6 ∆E
77.8 ∆E
68.8 ∆E
51.1 ∆E
36.5 ∆E
23.9 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Cubot P80: 44.77 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 77.79 ∆E

显示屏 - 无 PWM,但有蓝色偏光

子像素阵列
子像素阵列

Cubot P80 配备了同价位中的高分辨率显示屏,面板像素为 2,408 x 1,080,提供扩展的全高清分辨率。相比之下 小米红米 12也具有类似的分辨率,但拥有更高的最高帧频(90 Hz),而 Cubot P80 的最高帧频为 60 Hz。

亮度水平令人满意,平均测量值为 533 cd/m²。虽然没有达到创纪录的水平,但在阳光充足的室外使用也足够了。Cubot P80 的屏幕有明显的偏蓝现象,这在使用分光光度计和 CalMAN 软件进行的测试中很明显。因此,所有颜色都明显偏离最佳值。

虽然没有测量到 PWM 闪烁,但显示屏的响应时间相对较慢。

494
cd/m²
547
cd/m²
564
cd/m²
470
cd/m²
544
cd/m²
561
cd/m²
500
cd/m²
551
cd/m²
563
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 564 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 532.7 cd/m² Minimum: 1.66 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 83 %
Center on Battery: 544 cd/m²
Contrast: 1432:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.1 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 8.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.9% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.427
Cubot P80
IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6"
Xiaomi Redmi 12
IPS, 2460x1080, 6.8"
Nokia G22
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Motorola Moto G13
IPS, 1600x720, 6.5"
Response Times
12%
-50%
-50%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
38.2 ?(19.9, 18.3)
34 ?(18.7, 15.3)
11%
60.2 ?(33, 27.2)
-58%
48.5 ?(27.1, 21.4)
-27%
Response Time Black / White *
19.6 ?(13.3, 6.3)
17.2 ?(9.9, 7.3)
12%
27.7 ?(17.9, 9.8)
-41%
33.8 ?(15.4, 18.4)
-72%
PWM Frequency
Screen
11%
19%
19%
Brightness middle
544
449
-17%
674
24%
555
2%
Brightness
533
437
-18%
641
20%
553
4%
Brightness Distribution
83
95
14%
90
8%
93
12%
Black Level *
0.38
0.5
-32%
0.43
-13%
0.29
24%
Contrast
1432
898
-37%
1567
9%
1914
34%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.1
2.29
68%
4.45
37%
5.17
27%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.8
4.49
58%
7.41
31%
10.61
2%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
8.2
3.7
55%
5.1
38%
4.5
45%
Gamma
2.427 91%
2.254 98%
2.072 106%
2.131 103%
CCT
9580 68%
6198 105%
7799 83%
7380 88%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
12% / 11%
-16% / 6%
-16% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
19.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.3 ms rise
↘ 6.3 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
38.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19.9 ms rise
↘ 18.3 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 53 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

卡尔曼灰度
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 色彩精度
CalMAN 色彩精度
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
卡尔曼色彩空间 sRGB
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 饱和度

性能、排放和电池续航时间 - 无节流的旧版 SoC

联发科 联发科 MT8788是 Cubot P80 智能手机的首选处理器,尽管它采用了更面向智能手机的 Helio P60处理器。可能的原因可能是可用性,因为这两款芯片都是在 2018 年推出的,并已被更新了计算单元的更现代的同类产品所取代。

因此,Cubot P80 在处理器和图形性能方面落后了,这种差异在基准测试中显而易见。在日常使用中,手机菜单一般都能流畅运行,但在运行多个应用程序或要求较高的程序时可能会出现速度变慢的情况。

值得肯定的是,该机配备了快速 UFS 2.1 闪存。诺基亚 G22 在这一价格区间表现出了更高的速度,而 Cubot P80 的 64 GB 容量则在性能和存储容量之间取得了良好的平衡。

在室温条件下,长时间负载时的最大温升为 112.64 °F,这是可以接受的。不过,值得考虑的是,在炎热的天气里,手机可能会发热更多。值得注意的是,即使在持续负载的情况下,SoC 也不会出现节流现象,3DMark 压力测试证实了这一点。

尽管有多个扬声器栅格,Cubot P80 的底部边缘还是只有一个单声道扬声器。虽然音量适中,中音还原也不错,但在最大音量时可能会缺乏清晰度,高音也会过高。

外置扬声器和耳机可通过 USB-C 或蓝牙 4.2 连接,支持各种无线编解码器,包括 SBC、AAC、aptX、aptX HD、LDAC 和 LHDC V、V3 和 V4。

Cubot P80 配备 5,200 mAh 电池,在续航时间方面优于同类设备,在电池测试中达到了 17:16 小时。然而 摩托 G13诺基亚 G22的续航时间稍长一些。这款手机支持的最大充电功率为 18 瓦,充满电大约需要 1:30 小时。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (126 - 2437, n=173, last 2 years)
989 Points +231%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
375 Points +25%
Motorola Moto G13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
351 Points +17%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
310 Points +4%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
299 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (283 - 299, n=2)
291 Points -3%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (473 - 6687, n=173, last 2 years)
3298 Points +138%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1384 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (1382 - 1384, n=2)
1383 Points 0%
Motorola Moto G13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1358 Points -2%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
1318 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1284 Points -7%
Geekbench 6.3
Single-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (193 - 3479, n=159, last 2 years)
1439 Points +337%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
434 Points +32%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
329 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788
  ()
329 Points 0%
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone
  (845 - 10401, n=159, last 2 years)
4010 Points +212%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1284 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788
  ()
1284 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1223 Points -5%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone
  (4609 - 24088, n=191, last 2 years)
12941 Points +79%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9290 Points +29%
Motorola Moto G13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8214 Points +14%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
7226 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (6445 - 7226, n=2)
6836 Points -5%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6637 Points -8%
3DMark
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Average of class Smartphone
  (286 - 17553, n=74, last 2 years)
3077 Points +144%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1392 Points +10%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1263 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (1245 - 1263, n=2)
1254 Points -1%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (240 - 29890, n=74, last 2 years)
3252 Points +195%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1242 Points +13%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1104 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (1098 - 1104, n=2)
1101 Points 0%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (858 - 7180, n=74, last 2 years)
3288 Points +29%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2547 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (2457 - 2547, n=2)
2502 Points -2%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2414 Points -5%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (317 - 20131, n=160, last 2 years)
7682 Points +502%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1334 Points +5%
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (1276 - 1277, n=2)
1277 Points 0%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1276 Points
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Average of class Smartphone
  (267 - 33376, n=160, last 2 years)
11410 Points +925%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1177 Points +6%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1113 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (1029 - 1113, n=2)
1071 Points -4%
2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Average of class Smartphone
  (877 - 8480, n=160, last 2 years)
4587 Points +75%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2626 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (2583 - 2626, n=2)
2605 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
2502 Points -5%
Wild Life Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (408 - 13896, n=111, last 2 years)
2822 Points +333%
Motorola Moto G13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
744 Points +14%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
736 Points +13%
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (651 - 653, n=2)
652 Points 0%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
651 Points
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
408 Points -37%
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (413 - 20321, n=181, last 2 years)
7517 Points +1053%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
749 Points +15%
Motorola Moto G13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
748 Points +15%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
652 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (649 - 652, n=2)
651 Points 0%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
413 Points -37%
Wild Life Extreme
Average of class Smartphone
  (114 - 7094, n=187, last 2 years)
2043 Points +987%
Motorola Moto G13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
190 Points +1%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
189 Points +1%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
188 Points
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (185 - 188, n=2)
186.5 Points -1%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
114 Points -39%
Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Average of class Smartphone
  (112 - 7212, n=185, last 2 years)
2040 Points +1003%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
188 Points +2%
Motorola Moto G13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
187 Points +1%
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (185 - 187, n=2)
186 Points +1%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
185 Points
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
112 Points -39%
GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (3.6 - 123, n=202, last 2 years)
49.3 fps +566%
Motorola Moto G13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12 fps +62%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
10 fps +35%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.8 fps +5%
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (7.4 - 7.5, n=2)
7.45 fps +1%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
7.4 fps
1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (2.3 - 261, n=202, last 2 years)
79.4 fps +857%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
9.5 fps +14%
Motorola Moto G13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
8.8 fps +6%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
8.3 fps
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (8.2 - 8.3, n=2)
8.25 fps -1%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
5.5 fps -34%
on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 119, n=202, last 2 years)
37.1 fps +743%
Motorola Moto G13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7.7 fps +75%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
6.4 fps +45%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
4.7 fps +7%
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (4.4 - 4.5, n=2)
4.45 fps +1%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
4.4 fps
2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 - 104, n=202, last 2 years)
31.6 fps +1029%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.4 fps +21%
Motorola Moto G13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
3.3 fps +18%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
2.8 fps
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (2.7 - 2.8, n=2)
2.75 fps -2%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
2 fps -29%
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Average of class Smartphone
  (0.38 - 46, n=202, last 2 years)
14.9 fps +1142%
Motorola Moto G13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
1.5 fps +25%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
1.2 fps
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (1.2 - 1.2, n=2)
1.2 fps 0%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
0.85 fps -29%
Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 - 100368, n=204, last 2 years)
36733 Points +266%
Motorola Moto G13
Mediatek Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
12107 Points +21%
Nokia G22
UNISOC T606, Mali-G57 MP1, 4096
10858 Points +8%
Average Mediatek MT8788
  (10032 - 10273, n=2)
10153 Points +1%
Cubot P80
Mediatek MT8788, Mali-G72 MP3, 8192
10032 Points
Xiaomi Redmi 12
Mediatek Helio G88, Mali-G52 MP2, 4096
7611 Points -24%
Cubot P80Xiaomi Redmi 12Nokia G22Motorola Moto G13Average 512 GB UFS 2.1 FlashAverage of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5
-30%
24%
-34%
-2%
198%
Sequential Read 256KB
510.3
300
-41%
881
73%
281.1
-45%
682 ?(510 - 811, n=3)
34%
Sequential Write 256KB
351.3
272.5
-22%
367
4%
244.7
-30%
281 ?(243 - 351, n=3)
-20%
Random Read 4KB
132.3
84.8
-36%
131
-1%
99.4
-25%
Random Write 4KB
143.2
115
-20%
172
20%
94.9
-34%
106 ?(22.7 - 152, n=3)
-26%

温度

Max. Load
 44.8 °C42.3 °C34.6 °C 
 44.4 °C39.3 °C34.9 °C 
 43.6 °C37.3 °C34.6 °C 
Maximum: 44.8 °C
Average: 39.5 °C
31.6 °C40.3 °C40.9 °C
34.1 °C40.4 °C43.1 °C
34.6 °C40.4 °C43 °C
Maximum: 43.1 °C
Average: 38.7 °C
Power Supply (max.)  42.3 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.5 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.8 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.1 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.2 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.


热图前端
热图前端
热图返回
热图返回

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

00.20.50.70.91.11.41.61.822.32.52.72.93.23.43.63.84.14.3Tooltip
Cubot P80 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø1.122 (1.114-1.13)
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø1.137 (1.123-1.147)
Cubot P80 Mali-G72 MP3, Helio MT8788, 512 GB UFS 2.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø3.93 (3.92-3.93)
Xiaomi Redmi 12 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G88, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.49 (4.33-4.52)
Nokia G22 Mali-G57 MP1, T606, 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø2.5 (2.44-2.52)
Motorola Moto G13 Mali-G52 MP2, Helio G85, 128 GB eMMC Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø4.5 (4.46-4.52)

发言人

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs203833.82529.428.93126.327.34032.829.35037.834.46329.728.98022.716.710018.91812520.619.916012.932.72009.237.625010.346.23157.350.84006.853.75008.661.763012.364.480010.764.110001168.212508.765.416008.765.920009.269250010.269.5315011.463.7400013.264500014.568.2630014.469800015.366.81000016.359.81250016.352.31600017.237.4SPL24.778.5N0.542.5median 11.4median 63.7Delta3.310.838.642.837.138.62830.232.935.131.838.12625.522.921.621.120.923.729.518.235.213.335.114.543.112.851.411.453.211.755.710.962.415.265.712.266.612.868.810.966.810.966.811.6641258.212.966.813.670.614.37015.169.415.763.516.567.817.457.925.478.90.742.6median 13.3median 63.52.39.8hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseCubot P80Motorola Moto G13
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Cubot P80 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 47% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 46% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Motorola Moto G13 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命

Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Motorola Moto G13
5000 mAh
1115 min +8%
Nokia G22
5050 mAh
1052 min +2%
Cubot P80
5200 mAh
1036 min
Average of class Smartphone
  (476 - 3244, n=203, last 2 years)
982 min -5%
Xiaomi Redmi 12
5000 mAh
803 min -22%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing
17h 16min

Pros

+ 大量存储...
+ ...数据传输速率高
+ 明亮的全高清显示屏
+ 无 PWM
+ 高分辨率自拍摄像头
+ 运行时间长

Cons

- 显示屏明显偏蓝
- 面板频率仅为 60 赫兹
- 主摄像头对比度和细节深度较低
- 只有蓝牙 4.2
- 由于缺少 Widevine,无法进行高清流媒体传输
- 相对较重

评价--适合存储迷和流媒体爱好者

正在审查:Cubot P80。测试设备由 Cubot 提供。
正在审查:Cubot P80。测试设备由 Cubot 提供。

Cubot P80 在经济实惠型智能手机领域脱颖而出,是因为它拥有充足的存储空间,最大限度地减少了在速度方面的妥协。它的长效电池、纯Android 13 和定期更新进一步增强了其吸引力。

该设备的屏幕分辨率高,亮度适中,无 PWM 闪烁,但帧速率仅限于 60 Hz,而且有明显的蓝色色调。遗憾的是,Widevine L1 的缺失阻碍了主要供应商提供高清流媒体功能。

相机系统带来的体验好坏参半。自拍摄像头的高分辨率和可接受的细节给人留下了深刻印象,而主摄像头的低对比度、低细节图像和令人失望的色彩还原则让人失望。

由于选择了稍老的 SoC,因此使用了较老的蓝牙版本,影响了蓝牙的范围和传输能力。这在日常使用中是否明显取决于个人使用习惯。Cubot P80 拥有舒适的手柄和做工精良的塑料外壳。

Cubot P80 对于不以串流为优先考虑、希望以低价获得大量快速内存的消费者来说是一个可行的选择。

相比之下,小米红米 12 虽然预装了广告应用程序,但拍照性能和整体功能更佳。诺基亚 G22 方便用户维修,并提供 3 年保修。

价格和供应情况

配备 256 GB 的 Cubot P80 在亚马逊的售价为 179.99 美元。

同时,配备 512 GB 大容量存储的版本在亚马逊的售价通常为 185.99 美元。

Cubot P80 - 12/07/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt

Chassis
83%
Keyboard
65 / 75 → 87%
Pointing Device
87%
Connectivity
49 / 70 → 71%
Weight
88%
Battery
92%
Display
83%
Games Performance
15 / 64 → 24%
Application Performance
59 / 86 → 69%
Temperature
89%
Noise
100%
Audio
66 / 90 → 73%
Camera
51%
Average
71%
77%
Smartphone - Weighted Average

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > Cubot P80 智能手机评测--超大存储空间和全高清显示屏,售价不到 200 美元
Florian Schmitt, 2023-12- 7 (Update: 2023-12- 7)