Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Magyar摩托罗拉Moto G13评测--带NFC的经济实惠的智能手机
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Drive | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Motorola Moto G13 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 183.5 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 | |
| 77.3 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F Helio G80, Mali-G52 MP2 | 195 g | 64 GB eMMC Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
| 74.4 % v7 (old) | 11 / 2022 | Xiaomi Poco C40 JR510, Mali-G52 MP1 | 204 g | 32 GB eMMC Flash | 6.71" | 1650x720 | |
| 76 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2022 | Realme Narzo 50A Prime T7225, Mali-G52 MP1 | 192.5 g | 64 GB UFS 2.2 Flash | 6.60" | 2408x1080 | |
| 79 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2023 | Motorola Moto G23 Helio G85, Mali-G52 MP2 | 184.3 g | 128 GB eMMC Flash | 6.50" | 1600x720 |
外壳和功能 - 有三种颜色可供选择
玫瑰金、薰衣草蓝或深灰色是Moto G13的三种颜色变体，这是2023年最便宜的摩托罗拉G系列机型。制造商希望这款手机仅有不到180欧元的价格。考虑到低廉的价格，背面仅由塑料制成，但在相机模块的光线折射下，它看起来仍然很漂亮。
然而，对屏幕和背部的压力在液晶显示器上很快就能看到，而且手机不能用正常的力量扭动。边缘和材料过渡符合人体工程学的圆滑，手机的手感不错。
凭借128GB的eMMC闪存，手机的大容量存储相当缓慢，但也很广泛：目前，大多数价格相近的竞争对手仍然提供64甚至只有32GB的数据存储。还有一个NFC模块，这在这个价格范围内绝不是理所当然的事情。
SD卡读卡器是独立的，所以它可以同时使用两张SIM卡。在我们的基准测试中，Moto G13能以其价格范围内的良好传输率说服参考的microSD Angelbird V60，但它并没有真正利用快速存储卡的可能传输速度。
| SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F (Angelbird V60) | |
| Average of class Smartphone (7.7 - 77, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Motorola Moto G23 (Angelbird V60) | |
| Realme Narzo 50A Prime (Angelbird V60) | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 (Angelbird V60) | |
Cross Platform Disk Test (CPDT)
通信、软件和操作 - 稳定的WLAN
摩托罗拉的廉价智能手机使用WiFi 5，与我们的参考路由器华硕ROG Rapture AXE11000一起在基准测试中提供了非常稳定和快速的传输速率。
Moto G13是一款4G手机，我们的德国测试设备提供了在中欧运行的所有必要频率。然而，当你进一步旅行时，你必须检查是否可以在当地使用移动互联网，因为它绝不是一个世界性的手机。
在我们审查期间的随机测试中，对于一个廉价手机来说，移动接收是体面的，但不能跟上高端手机的步伐。
Android 13是预装在Moto G13上的。它是纯粹的 ，没有重大变化，系统只包含Android 一些预装的第三方应用程序。然而，在测试时，2023年1月的安全补丁有点老。
摩托手机可以通过触摸屏迅速而可靠地进行操作。这也归功于摩托罗拉的90赫兹刷新率，它能实现流畅的滚动。
指纹传感器隐藏在待机按钮的右侧，工作可靠而精确。它能快速解锁Moto G13。也可以通过面部识别进入主屏幕：这在黑暗中也很有效，屏幕的余光通常足以识别。然而，由于是纯软件实现，这种方法并不十分安全。
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
| Realme Narzo 50A Prime | |
| iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
| Realme Narzo 50A Prime | |
照相机--主镜头，照片尚可
背面的5000万像素摄像头来自三星，被用于许多廉价的智能手机。摩托罗拉用一个200万像素的长焦镜头和一个深度传感器对其进行补充。
主摄像头在拍摄物体时显示出模糊的细节，但我们很喜欢周围的图像，因为墙壁上的结构也保持得很清楚，而且整体清晰度令人信服。
在低光照和高对比度的情况下，相当低的动态范围变得很明显：明亮的区域被掩盖，而在黑暗部分几乎看不到任何细节。在实验室里，主摄像头显示了一个令人惊讶的测试图表的清晰图像，只是在小细节和对比度方面需要改进。然而，在几个勒克斯的亮度下，相机不能用残余的光线产生合理的图像。
前面有一个800万像素的摄像头。它拍摄的自拍有点太暗，不应该被放大太多，因为否则，模糊的细节就会显现出来。
Image Comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraLowLight
显示屏 - 90赫兹的明亮屏幕
Moto G13的显示屏分辨率为1600 x 720像素，而其他一些价格范围内的智能手机，如 Galaxy A13或 realme Narzo 50A Prime，也能拥有全高清分辨率。然而，摩托罗拉用90赫兹的刷新率进行了补偿，这使得操作更加顺畅，滚动看起来更加漂亮。
Moto G13的屏幕也非常明亮：我们测得的平均亮度为553cd/m²，这是对比设备中的最佳值。因此，你可以在较亮的日子里到外面去，仍然可以在一定程度上识别屏幕内容。还有一个Widevine认证，所以你可以用高清观看内容。
灰度中只有非常轻微的偏蓝，黑度相当低，所以屏幕上的黑暗区域也表现得很好，而且我们也没有注意到任何PWM。
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 555 cd/m²
Contrast: 1914:1 (Black: 0.29 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.17 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.2% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.131
| Motorola Moto G13 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F PLS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Xiaomi Poco C40 IPS, 1650x720, 6.7" | Realme Narzo 50A Prime IPS, 2408x1080, 6.6" | Motorola Moto G23 IPS, 1600x720, 6.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Times | 11% | 18% | 49% | 16% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48.5 ? | 39 ? 20% | 40 ? 18% | 30 ? 38% | 46 ? 5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 33.8 ? | 33 ? 2% | 28 ? 17% | 14 ? 59% | 25 ? 26% |
| PWM Frequency | |||||
| Screen | -5% | -16% | -3% | -14% | |
| Brightness middle | 555 | 492 -11% | 468 -16% | 540 -3% | 522 -6% |
| Brightness | 553 | 453 -18% | 450 -19% | 523 -5% | 502 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 93 | 87 -6% | 92 -1% | 93 0% | 91 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.29 | 0.37 -28% | 0.4 -38% | 0.39 -34% | 0.47 -62% |
| Contrast | 1914 | 1330 -31% | 1170 -39% | 1385 -28% | 1111 -42% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.17 | 4.34 16% | 4.53 12% | 4.39 15% | 4.63 10% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.61 | 5.94 44% | 8.96 16% | 6.65 37% | 8.59 19% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.7 -4% | 6.5 -44% | 4.7 -4% | 5.2 -16% |
| Gamma | 2.131 103% | 2.398 92% | 2.191 100% | 2.261 97% | 2.296 96% |
| CCT | 7380 88% | 7668 85% | 8122 80% | 7597 86% | 7832 83% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
-2% | 1% /
-9% | 23% /
8% | 1% /
-8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 33.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.1 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
性能、排放和电池寿命 - Moto G13持续时间长
淘宝网 联发科Helio G85最初是为中高档手机开发的，但现在显然非常便宜，摩托罗拉也可以将其安装在经济型手机中。该SoC实际上为其价格范围提供了良好的性能率，而且手机的速度大大超过了，例如 Galaxy A13.在日常使用中，菜单导航相当流畅，但在要求更高的应用程序中，你必须考虑到卡顿的问题。
不幸的是，只有非常慢的eMMC闪存被用于存储，这意味着复制和加载需要比高端手机更长的时间。
38.4°C的最高温度并不关键，性能也不会受到影响，3DMark压力测试告诉我们：即使在多次运行该基准测试后，实现的帧率也基本相同。
Moto G13可以将听筒作为第二个扬声器，从而创造出立体声效果。声音总体上是好的，不会过度膨胀，但音乐听起来有点闷闷的。扬声器的声音也不是很响。在智能手机的上边缘有一个3.5毫米音频端口，可用于连接耳机或扬声器。外部音频设备也可以通过蓝牙连接。这里有许多编解码器，如aptX HD、LDAC或LHDC-V，都可以使用。
在我们的Wi-Fi测试中，Moto G13的5000毫安时电池可以持续使用18:35小时。这是一个非常好的比率，允许在中等程度的使用下持续两个工作日而没有问题。然而，该设备的最大充电功率为10瓦，所以有时需要3个小时才能使电池再次充满。
| GFXBench | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (3.6 - 123, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (7.5 - 22, n=15) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
| Realme Narzo 50A Prime | |
| 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (2.3 - 261, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (8 - 9.7, n=15) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Realme Narzo 50A Prime | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
| on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 119, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (5 - 13, n=15) | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
| Realme Narzo 50A Prime | |
| 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | |
| Average of class Smartphone (0.85 - 104, n=201, last 2 years) | |
| Average Mediatek Helio G85 (3.1 - 3.5, n=15) | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Realme Narzo 50A Prime | |
| Xiaomi Poco C40 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | Xiaomi Poco C40 | Realme Narzo 50A Prime | Motorola Moto G23 | Average 128 GB eMMC Flash | Average of class Smartphone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AndroBench 3-5 | -10% | -37% | 96% | 2% | -20% | 360% | |
| Sequential Read 256KB | 281.1 | 300.6 7% | 281.7 0% | 852.8 203% | 282.4 0% | 283 ? 1% | 1839 ? 554% |
| Sequential Write 256KB | 244.7 | 230.3 -6% | 129.8 -47% | 266 9% | 244.6 0% | 194.6 ? -20% | 1425 ? 482% |
| Random Read 4KB | 99.4 | 94.5 -5% | 29.2 -71% | 145.3 46% | 100.2 1% | 82.7 ? -17% | 277 ? 179% |
| Random Write 4KB | 94.9 | 61.5 -35% | 67.7 -29% | 212.5 124% | 100.5 6% | 55.1 ? -42% | 309 ? 226% |
温度
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.4 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.2 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.
| 3DMark | |
| Wild Life Extreme Stress Test | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
| Wild Life Stress Test Stability | |
| Motorola Moto G23 | |
| Motorola Moto G13 | |
| Samsung Galaxy A13 4G A137F | |
演讲者
Motorola Moto G13 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Motorola Moto G23 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 61% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电池寿命
Pros
Cons
评语--低价位的Moto只有几个弱点
摩托罗拉的Moto G13以远低于200欧元的价格出售，并取得了不错的成绩：外壳看起来不错，包装中除了充电器外甚至还包括一个手机盖，而且这款智能手机配备了NFC以及该价格范围内的128GB大容量存储。
电池运行时间也令人信服，相机做得很好，Wi-Fi接收和传输速率很稳定。90赫兹的显示屏可以流畅地使用，并且非常明亮地发光。与其他便宜的手机相比，它只有轻微的蓝色偏光。
我们今年可能会在经济型手机中更多地看到这种水平的表现，但Moto G13表明即使是廉价手机也终于可以流畅地浏览菜单，甚至是一些要求更高的任务，这仍然是一件好事。
遗憾的是，内存只有缓慢的eMMC，但手机在负载下仅有少量发热，几乎没有节流的表现。除了对压力过于敏感的外壳和不确定的更新情况之外，我们几乎找不到任何真正的批评点。
摩托罗拉的Moto G13是一款相当快的平价中档手机，具有良好的功能：90赫兹显示屏、NFC和大量存储。
这款手机 realme Narzo 50A Prime具有全高清屏幕，现在在互联网上以更低的价格出售。 三星Galaxy A13比我们的测试设备稍便宜，但有一个类似的快速联发科SoC。
价格和可用性
摩托罗拉的Moto G13在互联网上的价格已经下降到大约160欧元（约160美元）。包括汽车适配器的深灰色版本现在在amazon.de上售价约170欧元（约170美元）。，价格与cyberport.de相似。.
浅蓝色版本在amazon.de上仍然贵10欧元。，而cyberport.de也提供170欧元的价格。玫瑰金色的Moto G13目前在中欧只在联想的网上商店有售。售价179欧元。
Motorola Moto G13
- 04/10/2023 v7 (old)
Florian Schmitt
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
