摩托罗拉Edge 30 Neo智能手机评测--小巧美观

Name: Motorola Edge 30 Neo
Brand: Motorola

新的开始。

随着Edge 30 Ultra和Edge 30 Fusion的发布，摩托罗拉也为Edge 30阵营推出了一款入门级设备，并将其称为Neo。我们的评论阐明了这款瘦身的新产品的能力。

Benedikt Winkel, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 10/28/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

5G Android Smartphone Touchscreen

摩托罗拉更新了Edge 30阵容。除了新的型号外。融合型和超，Edge 30 Neo是一款更便宜的入门级设备，定位在Edge 30下面，没有名称扩展。

Neo只有8GB内存和128GB存储的配置。通过microSD卡扩展存储是不可能的。作为回报，有四种颜色可供选择。除了黑色和白色，摩托罗拉还提供 "泡沫水"，一种青绿色，以及 "非常佩里"，即我们评测样品的紫色。除了白色，所有颜色都是与潘通公司合作开发的。各自的颜色在背面显示为一个小方块。

Test device courtesy of Motorola Germany

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Motorola Edge 30 Neo (Edge Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G 8 x 1.7 - 2.2 GHz, Kryo 660 Gold (2x Cortex-A78) / Silver (6x Cortex-A55)

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 619

Memory

8 GB

Display

6.30 inch 20:9, 2400 x 1080 pixel 418 PPI, capacitive, pOLED, glossy: yes, 120 Hz

Storage

128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash, 128 GB

, 113 GB free

Connections

1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, compass, proximity

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5.1, GSM (850, 900, 1700, 1800, 1900 MHz), UMTS (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66), 5G (Band n1, n3, n5, n7, n8, n20, n28, n38, n40, n41, n66, n77, n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 7.75 x 152.9 x 71.2

Battery

4020 mAh Lithium-Ion

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 12

Camera

Primary Camera: 64 MPix (ƒ/1.8, 1.4 μm, OIS) + 13 MPix Ultrawide/ Macro/ depth (f/2.2, 1.12 μm); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (ƒ/2.4, 1.4 μm)

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Onscreen, 68W-Charger, USB-Cabel (Type-C to Type-C), SIM-Needle, Case, My UX, 24 Months Warranty, Head-SAR: 0,98 W/kg, Body-SAR: 1,47 W/kg, Limb-SAR: 2,66 W/kg; GNSS: GPS (L1), Glonass (L1), Galileo (E1); DRM Widevine L1, fanless

Weight

155 g, Power Supply: 130 g

Price

400 Euro

Links

Motorola homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Drive	Size	Resolution
83.6 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2022	Motorola Edge 30 Neo SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	155 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.30"	2400x1080
81.9 % v7 ^(old)	08 / 2022	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G SD 695 5G, Adreno 619	202 g	128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	6.67"	2400x1080
85.8 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	Google Pixel 6a Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20	178 g	128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6.10"	2400x1080
83.4 % v7 ^(old)	06 / 2022	Samsung Galaxy A53 Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4	189 g	128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	6.50"	2400x1080

外壳 - 紧凑的边缘，直板显示

摩托罗拉的Edge 30有一个6.3英寸的直板显示屏，因此相当紧凑。显示屏的边缘比采用弧形显示屏的Edge 30 Fusion的边缘要宽一些，但它们很好，很均匀。Edge 30 Neo的重量为155克（约5.5盎司），令人愉快。

背面的相机驼峰明显突出，这使得该设备放在平面上时会摇晃。在打字时，这几乎不令人讨厌，但触摸上部区域会导致强烈的晃动。

制造质量非常好，缝隙小而均匀。按键在机箱内有轻微晃动。该设备具有IP52认证。

尺寸比较

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Samsung Galaxy A53 Google Pixel 6a Motorola Edge 30 Neo DIN A6 ❌

装备 - 边缘30尼奥只有一个变体

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Neo配备了8GB的内存和128GB的存储。它具有双SIM卡功能，有两张物理nano-SIM卡。摩托罗拉还安装了经过杜比全景声认证的立体声扬声器。

电源键和音量键都在右侧，而且放置得很高。测试人员可以用拇指触及电源和音量调节，但手必须伸出来才能触及音量调节键。

软件-股票-Android 感觉

Edge 30 Neo搭载了Android 12。摩托罗拉的My UX几乎是库存Android ，有一些扩展功能，如著名的Moto手势。例如，摇动设备使手电筒发光。摩托罗拉承诺，从设备销售开始，将提供两年的操作系统和三年的安全更新。在测试时，9月份的安全补丁已经安装。

Edge 30 Neo还支持摩托罗拉Ready For。有了这个软件，智能手机可以连接到屏幕、电视或PC上，作为桌面使用。应用程序可以在大屏幕上显示，文件也可以在设备之间移动。连接是通过USB电缆或通过WLAN无线建立的

通信和GNSS--Wi-Fi 6在Neo上缺失

摩托罗拉的Edge 30 Neo支持5G，但遗憾的是不支持Wi-Fi 6。在与我们的测试路由器--华硕ROG GT-AXE1000的测量中，Edge 30 Neo与对比设备相当。连接建立得很快，并保持稳定。

两张SIM卡上都支持5G接收。测试中的接收是可以接受的。Neo在不同的无线标准中具有良好的频率覆盖，在欧洲城市的操作应该不是问题。

Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	897 (449^min - 907^max) MBit/s +162%
Average of class Smartphone (34.8 - 1875, n=184, last 2 years)	714 MBit/s +108%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	354 (339^min - 359^max) MBit/s +3%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	346 (334^min - 353^max) MBit/s +1%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	345 (328^min - 351^max) MBit/s +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	343 (323^min - 353^max) MBit/s
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	946 (459^min - 973^max) MBit/s +164%
Average of class Smartphone (40.5 - 1810, n=186, last 2 years)	729 MBit/s +104%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	358 (346^min - 370^max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	354 (180^min - 373^max) MBit/s -1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	347 (175^min - 354^max) MBit/s -3%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	269 (255^min - 281^max) MBit/s -25%

Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø343 (323-353)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø345 (334-353)

Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø358 (346-370)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Qualcomm Adreno 619; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø348 (180-373)

Edge 30 Neo无法用GNSS连接说服人。在户外可以迅速建立连接，但它不支持双频GNSS。在室内，即使靠近窗户，连接也需要很长时间，而且定位也不准确。智能手机在记录路线时也很弱。

在与我们的对比设备Garmin Venu 2一起骑车时，Edge 30 Neo表现出了弱点。记录的路线在很多地方偏离了道路。曲线和弧度的显示是有角度的。

电话功能和语音质量--Edge 30 Neo清晰明快

摩托罗拉依靠谷歌软件制作手机程序。该程序在实践中很有说服力，结构清晰。这款智能手机支持通过无线局域网通话，并采用了摩托罗拉的 "ChrystalTalk AI"，这个软件应该可以减少通话时的背景噪音。

在实践中，其结果是令人高兴的。语音质量对参与者都很好，没有嘶嘶声或其他恼人的噪音。声音的传输清晰而自然。

相机 - Neo上只有两个镜头

摩托罗拉在Edge 30 Neo的背面确实没有第三个镜头。6400万像素的主摄像头两侧只有一个1300万像素的超广角摄像头，也负责微距拍摄。安装的摄像头的质量是令人信服的。照片很清晰，色彩平衡很好，两个镜头都很相似。

相机软件为照片提供了一个专业模式。可以手动调整焦点，以及白平衡、曝光时间和ISO值。还有一个全分辨率模式，可以拍摄64MPix的照片，避免像素分化。

3200万像素的前置摄像头拍摄的照片具有锐利度和良好的动态范围，令人信服。肖像模式也能可靠地工作。

相机应用程序的安排很清晰，但提供的设置选项很少。这在视频录制中尤其明显。没有选项可以改变记录的分辨率，只有30和60FPS之间的选择。因此，设置选项与摩托罗拉Edge 30 Fusion 完全相反。视频记录的稳定性很好，但自动对焦非常不稳定。

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main camera Rabbit Main camera Lake Ultra wide-angle 5x Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

摩托罗拉在相机的色彩匹配方面有很好的表现。至少在良好的照明条件下，ColorChecker中的偏差非常小。

Edge 30 Neo的摄像头只在一勒克斯的光线下达到极限。色彩偏差变得很大，或者相机捕捉到的光线非常少。测试图上的细节也几乎无法辨认。

相反，在明亮的光线下，照片的清晰度令人信服，而且只在边缘部分有所下降。

ColorChecker Motorola Edge 30 Neo: 3.87 ∆E min: 1 - max: 7.15 ∆E

配件和保修 - 摩托罗拉提供68瓦的充电器

令人高兴的是，即使是最便宜的Edge 30系列的版本，摩托罗拉也没有在电源上节省。Neo配备了一个68瓦的充电器和一条配套的USB-C电缆。还有一个透明的塑料外壳。

摩托罗拉为该智能手机在德国提供了24个月的保修。保修期可延长一年，并可通过Moto Care计划提供意外保护。

输入设备和操作 - Neo带有显示屏内指纹扫描仪

摩托罗拉使用谷歌的GBoard键盘前作。在实践中，在纵向和横向模式下几乎没有任何打字错误。

触摸屏的滑行性能非常好，在测试中，操作速度和准确性都令人信服。不像 Edge 30 Fusion屏幕上没有保护膜。

该设备是通过显示屏上的光学指纹识别器解锁的。其位置很靠下。然而，光学扫描仪在速度和可靠性方面令人信服。另外，通过前置摄像头也可以解锁。二维人脸识别的安全性较低，但也能快速可靠地工作。

▶ load Youtube video

显示屏 - Edge 30 Neo，120赫兹显示

Edge 30 Neo有一个6.3英寸的OLED面板，采用20:9格式。与Edge 30兄弟姐妹不同，摩托罗拉在Neo中依靠的是直板显示器。刷新率有所降低，但仍然达到了快速的120赫兹的峰值。用户可以选择60和120赫兹的固定水平，或者根据所显示的内容将选择权交给人工智能。通过灵活的显示方式，显示器也可以在48和90赫兹下显示内容。

启用环境光传感器后的最大亮度为1,190 cd/m²；在禁用传感器的测试中，Neo仍能达到491尼特。

在测量过程中，我们检测到PWM，最高显示亮度为68%。在此之上，频率为120赫兹，因此是面板的刷新率。120赫兹也是直流调光模式下的数值。我们无法确定智能手机上的时间性抖动。为此，用iPhone通过显微镜以240帧/秒的速度对显示屏进行拍摄。

不幸的是，摩托罗拉在Edge 30 Neo中没有提供Always-On显示屏。


991 cd/m²	988 cd/m²	1003 cd/m²
987 cd/m²	984 cd/m²	1004 cd/m²
989 cd/m²	985 cd/m²	1001 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1004 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 992.4 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 984 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.5% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.14

	Motorola Edge 30 Neo pOLED, 2400x1080, 6.3"	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.7"	Google Pixel 6a AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.1"	Samsung Galaxy A53 AMOLED, 2400x1080, 6.5"
Screen		-1%	12%	-6%
Brightness middle	984	675 -31%	758 -23%	718 -27%
Brightness	992	686 -31%	767 -23%	730 -26%
Brightness Distribution	98	95 -3%	93 -5%	92 -6%
Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.6	1.3 19%	0.9 44%	1.62 -1%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	3.8	3.9 -3%	2.5 34%	4.21 -11%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3	1.7 43%	1.6 47%	2 33%
Gamma	2.14 ^103%	2.16 ^102%	2.2 ^100%	2.156 ^102%
CCT	6518 ^100%	6591 ^99%	6599 ^98%	6545 ^99%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

730 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 730 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 730 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

具有固定变焦水平和不同亮度设置的测量系列

▶ load Youtube video

摩托罗拉面板的对比度是完美的，这对OLED来说是典型的。显示器的色彩匹配也很成功。偏差只是在灰度上稍大，但并不令人讨厌。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.586 ms rise
1.19 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.6055 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.6005 ms rise
1.31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.7135 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Neo的面板非常明亮。它将所有同类设备远远甩在后面，即使在阳光充足的情况下也总是非常容易阅读。

从不同角度看，显示屏的可读性非常好。没有失真或颜色变化。

性能 - Edge 30 Neo在日常使用中很流畅

摩托罗拉依靠骁龙 695 5G与一个阿德雷诺619图形单元的Edge 30 Neo。这不是一个高端处理器，但在日常使用中的性能是完全足够的。应用程序的打开速度很快，甚至浏览器中许多打开的标签也不会让Neo出汗。

基准测试结果显示，Neo的性能在同类产品的平均水平之内。比较设备之间非常接近。只有Pixel 6a 中的Tensor芯片，在某些测试中可以明显胜出。

Geekbench 5.5
Single-Core
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	1025 Points +54%
Average of class Smartphone (126 - 2437, n=171, last 2 years)	993 Points +49%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	740 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	684 Points +3%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (659 - 697, n=24)	676 Points +2%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	672 Points +1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	659 Points -1%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	666 Points
Multi-Core
Average of class Smartphone (473 - 6687, n=171, last 2 years)	3309 Points +72%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	2940 Points +52%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	1928 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1921 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1663 - 2038, n=24)	1904 Points -1%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1878 Points -3%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1681 Points -13%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1663 Points -14%

Antutu v9 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (99654 - 1650926, n=104, last 2 years)	798401 Points +97%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	715338 Points +77%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	409976 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	404846 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	398622 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (344344 - 416086, n=18)	389461 Points -4%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	379630 Points -6%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (4609 - 24088, n=189, last 2 years)	12976 Points +33%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	11470 Points +18%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	10834 Points +11%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	10396 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	9741 Points
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	9717 Points 0%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6897 - 11732, n=23)	9629 Points -1%

CrossMark - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (187 - 1517, n=156, last 2 years)	882 Points +54%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	865 Points +51%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	599 Points +4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (521 - 606, n=18)	583 Points +2%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	579 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	574 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	568 (619^min) Points -1%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 11976, n=150, last 2 years)	6288 Points +65%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	5950 Points +56%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	3822 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3663 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3171 - 3848, n=19)	3648 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	3638 Points -5%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3626 Points -5%
System
Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 16475, n=150, last 2 years)	10177 Points +28%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	9109 Points +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	7950 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	7836 Points -1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	7810 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6789 - 8231, n=19)	7725 Points -3%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	7157 Points -10%
Memory
Average of class Smartphone (962 - 12716, n=150, last 2 years)	6745 Points +52%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	6592 Points +48%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	4452 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3167 - 4836, n=19)	4227 Points -5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4183 Points -6%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4092 Points -8%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	3855 Points -13%
Graphics
Average of class Smartphone (1017 - 58651, n=150, last 2 years)	16876 Points +286%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	14148 Points +223%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	5178 Points +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4426 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	4375 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (3975 - 4426, n=19)	4340 Points -1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	4295 Points -2%
Web
Average of class Smartphone (841 - 2145, n=150, last 2 years)	1561 Points +13%
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	1476 Points +7%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	1378 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1312 Points -5%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1078 - 1434, n=19)	1253 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	1210 Points -12%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	1207 Points -12%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	21639 Points +184%
Average of class Smartphone (1267 - 74958, n=142, last 2 years)	16706 Points +119%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	9167 Points +20%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 8192	7617 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	7313 Points -4%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (5442 - 9348, n=15)	6775 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	4239 Points -44%

AImark - Score v2.x
Google Pixel 6a Google Tensor, Mali-G78 MP20, 6144	5967 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (4924 - 5839, n=10)	5173 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	5172 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, Adreno 619, 6144	5027 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Samsung Exynos 1280, Mali-G68 MP4, 6144	4714 Points

GPU基准测试的结果与CPU评估的结果相似。Edge 30 Neo表现得很好，属于同类平均水平。

目前的游戏如PUBG Mobile不能在最高设置下玩。然而，在高清设置和高帧率下，显示效果很流畅。

另一方面，UFS 2.2存储的性能则有点低于平均水平。除了 Honor Magic4 Lite所有的对比设备都有更快的内存在身上。

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	1626 Points +359%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	621 Points +75%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	354 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	351 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	351 Points -1%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	2040 Points +465%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	636 Points +76%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	361 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	361 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	357 Points -1%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7261 Points +502%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2275 Points +89%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1206 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1205 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1202 Points 0%

3DMark / Wild Life Score
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	6695 Points +454%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2293 Points +90%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1211 Points 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1208 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	1205 Points 0%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Physics
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2701 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2696 Points 0%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2689 Points 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2676 Points -1%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3902 Points +45%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2721 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2692 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2690 Points 0%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (Vulkan) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3546 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2711 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2694 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2691 Points 0%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4277 Points +32%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3613 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3241 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3182 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3097 Points -4%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	8957 Points +202%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3982 Points +34%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2988 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2967 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2812 Points -5%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	7205 Points +138%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3746 Points +24%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3107 Points +3%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3024 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2887 Points -5%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3455 Points +5%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3297 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3173 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2261 Points -31%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5172 Points +18%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4386 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4360 Points -1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4306 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4120 Points +1%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4086 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4021 Points -2%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3989 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1)
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3621 Points +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2955 Points +2%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2905 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2827 Points -3%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Graphics
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	3939 Points +39%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2827 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2819 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	2759 Points -2%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Physics
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3554 Points +11%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3215 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3093 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2823 Points -12%
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	Points -100%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	9526 Points +123%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	4645 Points +9%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4266 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4215 Points -1%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4118 Points -3%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Graphics
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	13988 Points +209%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	5510 Points +22%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4533 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4523 Points 0%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	4502 Points -1%

3DMark / Sling Shot OpenGL ES 3.0 Unlimited Physics
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	4501 Points +29%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3494 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3403 Points -3%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	3170 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	2997 Points -14%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	81 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	81 fps
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	77 fps
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	252 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	94 fps
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	93 fps
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	92 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +43%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	56 fps +33%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	42 fps
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	40 fps -5%

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	151 fps +221%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	61 fps +30%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	47 fps
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	46 fps -2%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	60 fps +94%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	35 fps +13%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	31 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	30 fps -3%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	29 fps -6%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	100 fps +194%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	38 fps +12%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	34 fps

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	54 fps +218%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	20 fps +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	17 fps
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	16 fps -6%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	52 fps +174%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps +21%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps +5%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	39 fps +225%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	15 fps +25%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	12 fps
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	11 fps -8%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	28 fps +241%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	10 fps +22%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.2 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8.2 fps
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	8 fps -2%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	43 fps +115%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	23 fps +15%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	20 fps
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	19 fps -5%
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	18 fps -10%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Google Pixel 6a Mali-G78 MP20, Tensor, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash	58 fps +164%
Samsung Galaxy A53 Mali-G68 MP4, Exynos 1280, 128 GB UFS 2.1 Flash	26 fps +18%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	22 fps
Honor Magic4 Lite Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	21 fps -5%

Jetstream 2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (13.8 - 387, n=160, last 2 years)	120.5 Points +67%
Google Pixel 6a (Firefox 1ß4-2-ß)	75.261 Points +4%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo (Chrome 106)	72.259 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (48.6 - 105.3, n=19)	71.2 Points -1%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)	64.223 Points -11%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	63.5 Points -12%
Honor Magic4 Lite (Chrome 103)	58.042 Points -20%

Speedometer 2.0 - Result
Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 569, n=146, last 2 years)	136.2 runs/min
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	90.4 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (38.7 - 80.1, n=16)	54 runs/min
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chome 101)	51.24 runs/min
Honor Magic4 Lite (Chrome 103)	44.7 runs/min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)	38.7 runs/min

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (22 - 271, n=151, last 2 years)	113.8 Points +52%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo (chrome 106)	75 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (58 - 111, n=18)	74.3 Points -1%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	72 Points -4%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Chrome 103.0.5060.129)	65 Points -13%
Honor Magic4 Lite (Chrome 103)	60 Points -20%

WebXPRT 3 - Overall
Average of class Smartphone (38 - 347, n=79, last 2 years)	148.7 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (75 - 156, n=12)	101 Points
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)	100 Points
Honor Magic4 Lite (Chrome 102)	88 Points
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	77 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	69 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 100368, n=202, last 2 years)	37036 Points +34%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	33046 Points +20%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo (chrome 106)	27593 Points
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	24159 Points -12%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (17849 - 31647, n=21)	24051 Points -13%
Honor Magic4 Lite (Chrome 102)	21302 Points -23%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)	21269 Points -23%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G (Mi Browser V13.10.0-gn)	2013.3 ms * -34%
Honor Magic4 Lite (Chrome 102)	1978.9 ms * -32%
Samsung Galaxy A53 (Chrome 101)	1920.3 ms * -28%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (1298 - 2501, n=18)	1769 ms * -18%
Average of class Smartphone (277 - 28190, n=159, last 2 years)	1574 ms * -5%
Google Pixel 6a (Chrome 105.0.5195.79)	1531.6 ms * -2%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo (chrome 106)	1501.9 ms *

* ... smaller is better

	Motorola Edge 30 Neo	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G	Google Pixel 6a	Samsung Galaxy A53	Honor Magic4 Lite	Average 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		10%	68%	15%	-12%	19%	152%
Sequential Read 256KB	498.82	523 5%	1312.64 163%	510.1 2%	488.66 -2%	728 ?(303 - 1038, n=71) 46%	1839 ?(226 - 4512, n=191, last 2 years) 269%
Sequential Write 256KB	469.52	488.91 4%	712.94 52%	486.7 4%	385.52 -18%	527 ?(103.2 - 903, n=71) 12%	1426 ?(57.5 - 3908, n=191, last 2 years) 204%
Random Read 4KB	180.19	204.3 13%	219.53 22%	229.9 28%	155.16 -14%	191.7 ?(89.3 - 297, n=71) 6%	277 ?(22.2 - 483, n=191, last 2 years) 54%
Random Write 4KB	169.19	196.38 16%	225.61 33%	210.8 25%	143.61 -15%	185.8 ?(62.6 - 419, n=71) 10%	308 ?(9.4 - 753, n=191, last 2 years) 82%

排放 - Edge 30 Neo保持冷静

温度 - 始终只有手的温度

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Neo在所有的日常领域都保持着极其轻松的状态。最高测量温度为33摄氏度（91.4华氏度），正常温度明显更低。即使在负载情况下，智能手机也不会出现令人不舒服的温度或热度。在用68瓦特充电时，温度增加最多。

Max. Load

Idle


32 °C	31.1 °C	29.6 °C
32.3 °C	32.2 °C	29.8 °C
31.8 °C	31.7 °C	30 °C

Maximum: 32.3 °C
Average: 31.2 °C


29.4 °C	31.1 °C	31.3 °C
29.5 °C	30 °C	33 °C
29.4 °C	30.9 °C	31.8 °C

Maximum: 33 °C
Average: 30.7 °C

Power Supply (max.) 26.9 °C | Room Temperature 21.8 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 32.3 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.2 °C for the class Smartphone.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 %
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.5 % 0%
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.4 % 0%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.3 % 0%
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99.2 %
Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash	99 % 0%

Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.0.2: Ø2.15 (2.14-2.16)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.0.9.1: Ø2.16 (2.16-2.17)

Motorola Edge 30 Neo Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.2 (7.19-7.22)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Adreno 619, SD 695 5G, 128 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø7.23 (7.21-7.25)

扬声器 - 摩托罗拉的立体声扬声器

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Neo的立体声扬声器是令人信服的。它们听起来非常平衡，特别是在中音和高音部分，并保持接近中值。智能手机低端的扬声器要比高端的大得多。低音和低频相当弱。

总的来说，扬声器变得响亮。在最大音量时，播放变得有点尖锐，设备中心有轻微的振动。缺少一个插孔，但通过USB-C的音频输出是可能的。

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Motorola Edge 30 Neo audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 26.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 12% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 12%, average was 37%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

电池寿命 - 电池小，运行时间长

能源消耗

总的来说，摩托罗拉Edge 30 Neo的配置是令人信服的。尽管采用相同SoC的Honor Magic4 Lite在闲置模式下要节俭得多，但Neo在负载下更节俭。平均而言，Neo表现出均衡的能量饥渴。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.05 / 0.27 Watt
Idle	0.9 / 1.55 / 1.56 Watt
Load	2.82 / 4.97 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Motorola Edge 30 Neo 4020 mAh	Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G 5000 mAh	Google Pixel 6a 4410 mAh	Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	Honor Magic4 Lite 4800 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		-21%	-29%	-27%	-34%	-16%	-45%
Idle Minimum *	0.9	0.96 -7%	0.68 24%	0.9 -0%	0.56 38%	0.886 ?(0.56 - 1.2, n=18) 2%	0.894 ?(0.4 - 2.37, n=152, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Average *	1.55	2.31 -49%	1.56 -1%	1.3 16%	2.47 -59%	1.76 ?(0.91 - 4.76, n=18) -14%	1.456 ?(0.6 - 4.26, n=152, last 2 years) 6%
Idle Maximum *	1.56	2.34 -50%	1.58 -1%	1.6 -3%	2.52 -62%	1.92 ?(0.98 - 4.79, n=18) -23%	1.616 ?(0.83 - 4.45, n=152, last 2 years) -4%
Load Average *	2.82	2.88 -2%	5.37 -90%	5.7 -102%	4.83 -71%	3.86 ?(2.4 - 9.52, n=18) -37%	6.45 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=147, last 2 years) -129%
Load Maximum *	4.97	4.88 2%	8.74 -76%	7.3 -47%	5.68 -14%	5.45 ?(4.32 - 9.92, n=18) -10%	9.8 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=147, last 2 years) -97%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.85 (0.96-5.64)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø2.96 (1.151-5.46)

Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.08 (1.03-1.201)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.362 (1.329-1.504)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.2 (2.92-4.13)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.14 (2.9-4.32)

Motorola Edge 30 Neo Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.08 (1.03-1.201)

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.362 (1.329-1.504)

电池寿命 - 使用Neo进行12小时的WEB冲浪

相比之下，可以注意到摩托罗拉在Edge 30 Neo中安装的电池要比该领域的其他制造商小得多。因此，它的运行时间也是对比中最短的。然而，在现实的Wi-Fi测试中，Edge 30 Neo的运行时间达到了12小时。因此，一天的密集使用对Moto来说是没有问题的。

使用68瓦的充电器的充电时间令人印象深刻。智能手机只需10分钟就能从10%充电到50%。从10%到100%的充电需要39分钟。Edge 30 Neo也可以进行无线充电，但那时只能用5瓦特。

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing		12h 01min

Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3 (sort by value)
Motorola Edge 30 Neo 4020 mAh	721 min
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G 5000 mAh	788 min
Google Pixel 6a 4410 mAh	768 min
Samsung Galaxy A53 5000 mAh	886 min
Honor Magic4 Lite 4800 mAh	760 min

Pros

+ 流畅的用户界面体验

+ 明亮的OLED面板

+ 桌面模式

+ 立体声扬声器

+ 68瓦的充电器

Cons

- 低光性能

- 电池小

- 全屏模式下的部分图像错误

- GPS不准确

结论 - 使用Edge 30 Neo很容易上手。

有时不做也不是那么困难。从正面看，Edge 30 Neo是一款普通的智能手机。它既不是特别快，也不是特别大，更不是一个照片奇迹。然而，它并没有任何真正的弱点。SoC为日常使用提供了足够的性能，相机在光线充足的情况下提供了清晰和平衡的照片。总的来说，Neo以其伟大而明亮的OLED屏幕和小巧的外形而令人信服。

如果重点是一个流畅的系统，没有奢侈，有一个伟大的显示屏，但顶级性能却不那么重要，那么Edge 30 Neo就值得一看了。

它也是Edge 30系列中唯一拥有非弧形面板的设备。库存Android ，性能更强的是谷歌Pixel 6a ，但屏幕只支持60赫兹。小米Redmi Note 11 Pro 具有相同的SoC，在许多方面都不相上下，但它的屏幕更大，而且更重。

价格和可用性

摩托罗拉Edge 30 Neo的建议零售价为400欧元（约400美元）。摩托罗拉在其自己的商店里销售https://www.motorola.de/smartphones-motorola-edge-30-neo/p?skuId=551但也有其他零售商，如亚马逊或Cyberport都有销售。

Motorola Edge 30 Neo - 10/21/2022 v7 ^(old)
Benedikt Winkel

Chassis

84%

Keyboard

67 / 75 → 89%

Pointing Device

91%

Connectivity

48 / 70 → 68%

Weight

92%

Battery

89%

Display

92%

Games Performance

32 / 64 → 51%

Application Performance

78 / 86 → 90%

Temperature

94%

Noise

100%

Audio

82 / 90 → 92%

Camera

65%

Average

78%

84%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 458020 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 摩托罗拉Edge 30 Neo智能手机评测--小巧美观

Benedikt Winkel, 2022-10-28 (Update: 2024-08-15)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 紧凑的边缘，直板显示

尺寸比较

装备 - 边缘30尼奥只有一个变体

软件-股票-Android 感觉

通信和GNSS--Wi-Fi 6在Neo上缺失

电话功能和语音质量--Edge 30 Neo清晰明快

相机 - Neo上只有两个镜头

配件和保修 - 摩托罗拉提供68瓦的充电器

输入设备和操作 - Neo带有显示屏内指纹扫描仪

显示屏 - Edge 30 Neo，120赫兹显示

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

性能 - Edge 30 Neo在日常使用中很流畅

排放 - Edge 30 Neo保持冷静

温度 - 始终只有手的温度

3DMark Wild Life Stress Test

扬声器 - 摩托罗拉的立体声扬声器

Motorola Edge 30 Neo audio analysis

Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G audio analysis

电池寿命 - 电池小，运行时间长

能源消耗

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)

电池寿命 - 使用Neo进行12小时的WEB冲浪

Pros

Cons

结论 - 使用Edge 30 Neo很容易上手。

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison