Notebookcheck Logo

惠普EliteBook 865 G9笔记本评测--1000尼特Sure View显示屏不尽如人意

配备AMD的16英寸商务笔记本电脑。

惠普的EliteBook 865 G9是一款高质量的商务笔记本,拥有最新的AMD硬件和集成的LTE连接。EliteBook有可能成为最好的商务笔记本之一--但我们测试装置中的Sure View显示屏尽管亮度很高,却破坏了我们的好印象。
AMD Business Laptop / Notebook Windows

惠普EliteBook 800系列的特点是高质量的商务笔记本电脑。今年,它生产了一个16英寸的型号,可以配备AMD或英特尔的CPU。英特尔系列的产品是EliteBook 860 G9,AMD型号被命名为865 G9。我们已经测试了AMD型号865 G9(型号为6F6H5EA),配备了AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U与集成的Radeon 680M GPU,16GB内存,512GB SSD,16:10 IPS显示屏(1920 x 1200像素),集成隐私过滤器(Sure View),最大亮度为1000尼特。

HP EliteBook 865 G9 (EliteBook 865 Series)
Processor
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U 8 x 2.7 - 4.7 GHz, 30 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+)
Graphics adapter
AMD Radeon 680M
Memory
16 GB 
, DDR5-4800, Single-Channel, 2 slots, max. 64 GB
Display
16.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 142 PPI, X160NV42, IPS, Sure View Privacy Filter, glossy: no, 60 Hz
Mainboard
AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH
Storage
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, 512 GB 
, 428 GB free
Soundcard
AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller
Connections
3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor
Networking
Qualcomm Fast Connect 6900 Wi-Fi 6E Dual Band Simultaneous (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, LTE
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 359 x 251
Battery
76 Wh, 6304 mAh Lithium-Polymer
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 11 Pro
Camera
Webcam: 5 MP Privacy Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Bang & Olufsen, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 110W PSU USB-C, HP Tools, 36 Months Warranty
Weight
1.874 kg, Power Supply: 452 g
Price
1550 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating
Date
Model
Weight
Height
Size
Resolution
Price
87.2 %
v7 (old)
12 / 2022
HP EliteBook 865 G9
R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
1.9 kg19 mm16.00"1920x1200
89.3 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2022
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1.9 kg20.5 mm16.00"1920x1200
86.3 %
v7 (old)
09 / 2021
LG Gram 16 (2021)
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.2 kg16.8 mm16.00"2560x1600
84.3 %
v7 (old)
02 / 2022
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1.7 kg19.9 mm15.60"1920x1080
83.8 %
v7 (old)
10 / 2022
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
R3 5300U, Vega 6
1.6 kg16.3 mm16.00"1280x1200

新的16英寸设备比旧的15英寸EliteBook 850 G8要厚一点,但没有任何宽度。这款联想ThinkPad T16 G1,也有16英寸的屏幕,略大,也有一点厚。总体而言,新EliteBook 865 G9非常便携。110瓦的电源重量为451克,EliteBook本身的重量约为1.9公斤。

尺寸比较

361.9 mm 255.5 mm 20.5 mm 1.9 kg359.4 mm 236.7 mm 19 mm 1.8 kg359 mm 251 mm 19 mm 1.9 kg357 mm 220.5 mm 19.9 mm 1.7 kg355.9 mm 243.4 mm 16.8 mm 1.2 kg356.3 mm 248.6 mm 16.3 mm 1.6 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g

连接性 - 带有USB 4的AMD EliteBook

惠普为EliteBook 865 G9配备了两个快速USB C 4.0端口,也可用于充电和连接外部显示器。在将我们的测试设备连接到USB C屏幕(包括以太网连接和输入设备)时,我们没有遇到任何问题。该设备还具有一个HDMI输出,一个SIM卡插槽,以及两个普通的USB A端口。

左边:HDMI 2.0b,USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5 GBit/s)2个USB-C 4.0(40 GBit/s,DisplayPort ALT模式1.4,Power Delivery),智能卡阅读器(可选)。
左边:HDMI 2.0b,USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5 GBit/s)2个USB-C 4.0(40 GBit/s,DisplayPort ALT模式1.4,Power Delivery),智能卡阅读器(可选)。
右边。Nano-SIM卡插槽(WWAN型号可选),Kensington Nano安全插槽,USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5 GBit/s,供电),3.5毫米立体声。
右边。Nano-SIM卡插槽(WWAN型号可选),Kensington Nano安全插槽,USB-A 3.2 Gen.1(5 GBit/s,供电),3.5毫米立体声。

沟通

英特尔的LTE模块
英特尔的LTE模块

AMD EliteBook配备了高通公司的现代Wi-Fi模块(WCN6856,BT 5.2),应该支持新的Wi-Fi 6E标准。然而,我们无法连接到华硕参考路由器的6-GHz网络。在5-GHz网络中的传输速率非常好--迄今为止记录的一些最快的传输速率为1.7GBit/s。我们在测试时没有遇到任何连接问题。

测试装置还配备了一个英特尔LTE模块(XMM 7560),可以与纳米SIM卡或eSIM卡一起使用。我们的Telekom SIM卡运行良好。WWAN模块必须在制造商处进行配置--不能加装。与英特尔型号(EliteBook 860 G9)不同,该设备不包括可选的5G调制解调器。

Networking
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Qualcomm Fast Connect 6900 Wi-Fi 6E Dual Band Simultaneous
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1709 (min: 1600) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1633 (min: 1575) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1624 (min: 1598) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1624 (min: 1236) MBit/s ∼100%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12
932 (min: 463) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AX12
664 (min: 646) MBit/s ∼52%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12
1385 (min: 569) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AX12
1159 (min: 1001) MBit/s ∼92%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1347 (min: 110) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1510 (min: 1265) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1309 (min: 1167) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1316 (min: 964) MBit/s ∼81%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12
1400 (min: 707) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12
1266 (min: 1217) MBit/s ∼100%
050100150200250300350400450500550600650700750800850900950100010501100115012001250130013501400145015001550160016501700Tooltip
HP EliteBook 865 G9; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1633 (1575-1713)
HP EliteBook 865 G9; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1708 (1600-1748)

网络摄像头

正如在ZBook Firefly 16 G9,该设备配备了一个红外网络摄像头,据称提供500万像素。然而,图像的最高记录为3.7MP(2560 x 1440像素)。该网络摄像头仍然比通常的720p或1080p网络摄像头要好,特别是在清晰度方面。 总而言之,这是一个体面的性能,从大多数其他笔记本电脑中脱颖而出。

ColorChecker
6 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
2.2 ∆E
6.7 ∆E
4.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
8.1 ∆E
4.7 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
3.9 ∆E
1.8 ∆E
8 ∆E
10 ∆E
5.7 ∆E
3 ∆E
6.4 ∆E
5.1 ∆E
4.5 ∆E
6 ∆E
5.8 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
ColorChecker HP EliteBook 865 G9: 5.53 ∆E min: 1.81 - max: 10.04 ∆E

维护

基本单元的底盖很容易拆卸--与之不同的是ZBook Studio 16,这个设备没有任何隐藏的螺丝。维护选项很好。除了内存模块和M.2 2280固态硬盘的插槽(每个都隐藏在一个额外的盖子下面)之外,用户还可以更换Wi-Fi和WWAN模块。

基层单位内部
基层单位内部
可以更换Wi-Fi模块
可以更换Wi-Fi模块

输入设备--EliteBook有很棒的键盘

带有专用数字键盘的背光键盘给我们留下了非常好的印象。敲击的力度非常大,所以意见可能会因个人喜好而不同,但总体而言,这是目前移动设备上最好的键盘之一。它比更昂贵的ZBook Studio 16 G9甚至可以和联想的ThinkPads相比,尽管它们的质量在过去几年里有所下降。总的来说,我们更喜欢EliteBook的防泼水输入设备,而不是目前的ThinkPad T16。......只是集成的电源按钮和小的垂直方向键需要一点时间来适应。

惠普已经有一段时间没有在其商务机型上使用触摸杆了,这就给我们留下了大型ClickPad(12.8 x 8.7厘米)。触摸板非常舒适,易于使用。 此外,点击的声音显得非常消沉和优越--这才是它应该有的样子。

输入设备
输入设备
键盘背光
键盘背光

显示--确定视图仍然是一个问题

子像素阵列
子像素阵列
沿着边缘有明显的背光渗出
沿着边缘有明显的背光渗出

我们的测试装置配备了可选的Sure View面板,它具有集成的隐私过滤器。它的一般特性(1920 x 1200像素,哑光表面和高达1000 cd/m²的亮度)是有希望的,但还有很多需要考虑的地方。集成隐私过滤器可以通过触摸按钮激活,但即使关闭它,可视角度也非常有限--显示屏正前方的甜蜜点非常狭窄,图像质量不会降低。即使是小的移动也会导致对比度和亮度的明显降低。明亮的内容在哑光面板上也会出现轻微的颗粒感。亮度调节是另一个大问题。Sure View只在最低的亮度水平上工作。这导致了两个问题。Sure View在明亮的环境中很难使用(例如在火车上或公共场所),它必须在低光环境中激活,以便达到尽可能低的亮度水平。我们在下表中列出了这些数值。

Helligkeit Bildmitte in cd/m²
亮度 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
关闭Sure View 865 729 634 535 436 332 252 216 180 142 105
Sure View on 157 146 136 125 115 104 94 83 72 62 51

总的来说,结果是非常好的。最大亮度达到900cd/m²左右,黑值位于0.3cd/m²左右,这导致了非常高的最大对比度。然而,这只是在你坐在面板前面的情况下才会如此。只有72%的糟糕亮度分布是另一个问题。这意味着特别是右下角要比屏幕的其他部分暗得多。最低亮度--即使使用Sure View--也是51cd/m²,这在非常黑暗的环境中仍然太高。该面板还使用56赫兹的PWM,即使是在最大亮度下。

809
cd/m²
825
cd/m²
795
cd/m²
861
cd/m²
865
cd/m²
788
cd/m²
711
cd/m²
663
cd/m²
624
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X160NV42 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 865 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 771.2 cd/m² Minimum: 51 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 72 %
Center on Battery: 865 cd/m²
Contrast: 2883:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
73.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
HP EliteBook 865 G9
X160NV42, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
B160UAN01.K, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
LG Gram 16 (2021)
LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
BOE07D8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
LG Display LP160WU1-SPH1, IPS, 1280x1200, 16"
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
InfoVision X156NVF8 R1, I, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA
BOE0A02, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Display
8%
16%
-12%
-48%
-8%
-4%
Display P3 Coverage
71.4
80.1
12%
95.8
34%
64.5
-10%
36
-50%
68.1
-5%
sRGB Coverage
99.3
100
1%
99.8
1%
86.2
-13%
55
-45%
95
-4%
96.1
-3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
73.2
80.5
10%
83.8
14%
62.9
-14%
37
-49%
65
-11%
70
-4%
Response Times
26%
-5%
-58%
-13%
127%
-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
35.5 ?(17.1, 18.1)
27 ?(12, 15)
24%
44 ?(19, 25)
-24%
58.4 ?(26.8, 31.6)
-65%
38 ?(19, 19)
-7%
47 ?(22, 25)
-32%
52.8 ?(22.9, 29.9)
-49%
Response Time Black / White *
23.5 ?(13.4, 10.1)
17 ?(8, 9)
28%
20 ?(8, 12)
15%
35.2 ?(18, 17.2)
-50%
28 ?(16, 12)
-19%
32 ?(19, 13)
-36%
19.5 ?(6, 13.5)
17%
PWM Frequency
56.7
312 ?(100)
450%
Screen
-34%
-53%
-51%
-60%
-39%
-30%
Brightness middle
865
404
-53%
331
-62%
329
-62%
299
-65%
802
-7%
526
-39%
Brightness
771
391
-49%
309
-60%
316
-59%
270
-65%
702
-9%
499
-35%
Brightness Distribution
72
80
11%
88
22%
92
28%
85
18%
77
7%
93
29%
Black Level *
0.3
0.29
3%
0.22
27%
0.3
-0%
0.265
12%
0.245
18%
0.31
-3%
Contrast
2883
1393
-52%
1505
-48%
1097
-62%
1128
-61%
3273
14%
1697
-41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
2.4
3.9
-63%
4.64
-93%
5.4
-125%
4.57
-90%
6.22
-159%
3.6
-50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
5.8
8.5
-47%
9.82
-69%
10.1
-74%
8.92
-54%
9.92
-71%
6.6
-14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *
1.5
1.7
-13%
3.16
-111%
2.5
-67%
5.02
-235%
2.6
-73%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.8
5.4
-42%
6.9
-82%
5.1
-34%
3.8
-0%
7.69
-102%
5.5
-45%
Gamma
2.36 93%
2.21 100%
2.34 94%
2.1 105%
2.6 85%
2.75 80%
2.02 109%
CCT
6922 94%
6242 104%
7904 82%
7609 85%
6142 106%
6135 106%
6527 100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
75.1
65
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
100
95
Total Average (Program / Settings)
0% / -16%
-14% / -31%
-40% / -43%
-40% / -51%
27% / 4%
-17% / -23%

* ... smaller is better


CalMAN灰度
CalMAN灰度
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼饱和度
卡尔曼颜色
卡尔曼颜色
CalMAN灰度(Sure View开启)
CalMAN灰度(Sure View开启)
卡尔曼饱和度(确定视图打开)
卡尔曼饱和度(确定视图打开)
卡尔曼颜色(确定查看)。
卡尔曼颜色(确定查看)。
CalMAN灰度标定
CalMAN灰度标定
已校准的CalMAN饱和度
已校准的CalMAN饱和度
校准的CalMAN颜色
校准的CalMAN颜色

我们用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)对面板进行了测量,对于一台商用笔记本电脑来说,对出厂时的结果相当满意。显示屏的偏色很小,在正常使用中几乎看不到,而且与sRGB参考色彩空间的色彩偏差也很低。激活Sure View会增加偏差。我们不建议在这种模式下处理图像。

我们的校准(可在上面免费下载)进一步改善了色彩显示。该面板涵盖了整个sRGB色彩空间。

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. DCI-P3
vs. DCI-P3
vs. AdobeRGB
vs. AdobeRGB

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 13.4 ms rise
↘ 10.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.1 ms rise
↘ 18.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 56.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 56.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 56.7 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.


在阳光直射下(关闭Sure View)。
在阳光直射下(关闭Sure View)。

在户外,如果你不坐在显示屏的正前方,就很难使用笔记本电脑。在下面的图片中,可视角度看起来相当好,但摄像头在一定程度上掩盖了限制。从主观上讲,局限性更大,这一点你也可以在户外图片中看到。

视角
视角
视角 (Sure View on)
视角 (Sure View on)

总的来说,我们不能推荐Sure View面板。 在实践中,你不会从它的高亮度水平中得到什么,但你很快就会对受限的视角和对比度感到厌烦,即使在Sure View功能被关闭的情况下。哑光的低功耗显示屏,我们已经在相同的ZBook Firefly 16 G9我们已经对相同的ZBook Firefly 16 G9进行了评测,显然整体上是更好的选择。

性能 - Ryzen 7 Pro和单通道内存

淘宝网 Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U其集成显卡Radeon 680M和16GB内存为EliteBook 865 G9的商务笔记本提供了足够的动力。唯一的限制是内存配置,它由一个16GB的模块组成。这使得升级相当容易,但不必要地限制了GPU性能。我们强烈建议购买带有双通道内存的机型或安装第二个模块。

 
 

处理器 - AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U是一款移动处理器,与普通消费级芯片Ryzen 7 6800U相比,有8个内核(16个线程)和额外的安全功能。惠普的功率限制相当保守,允许处理器短时间内接入30瓦的功率。然后,能耗在几秒钟后稳定在25瓦特。在我们的多核测试中,CPU的性能特别好,而且很稳定。 这款产品ThinkPad T16 G1配备了酷睿i5-1240P在第一次CineBench测试中略微快一些,但随后很快就下降,落在了AMD EliteBook的后面。目前英特尔Alder Lake芯片的性能核心在单核测试中表现更好。

在电池上运行时,性能保持稳定。你可以找到进一步的CPU基准测试结果 这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

09018027036045054063072081090099010801170126013501440153016201710Tooltip
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U: Ø1606 (1590.77-1665.14)
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P; ThrottleStop @30W: Ø1341 (1316.01-1756.34)
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P: Ø1033 (919.1-1746.77)
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø596 (474.78-805.25)
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H; Performance Mode: Ø861 (841.54-932.92)
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø664 (645.73-816.34)
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H; On Battery: Ø487 (449.1-777.88)
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U: Ø749 (726.74-795.75)
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø702 (674.47-727.03)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
 
85.2 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
81.9 pt
Average of class Office
 
79.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
73.9 pt
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
58.8 pt
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
58 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
55.6 pt
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G -2!
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
43.5 pt
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (9923 - 11026, n=6)
10327 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
10047 Points
Average of class Office
  (1577 - 15743, n=92, last 2 years)
9250 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
6597 Points -34%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
4772 (4564.04min - 4772.47max) Points -53%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4652 Points -54%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
4602 Points -54%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
4404 Points -56%
Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
1644 Points +17%
Average of class Office
  (618 - 1995, n=92, last 2 years)
1563 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (1409 - 1520, n=6)
1488 Points +6%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1476 Points +5%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
1444 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
1409 Points
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1311 Points -7%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
1102 Points -22%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (3784 - 4457, n=6)
4099 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
3886 Points
Average of class Office
  (590 - 5980, n=92, last 2 years)
3556 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
2953 Points -24%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
1883 Points -52%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1847 Points -52%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1772 Points -54%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
1670 Points -57%
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Office
  (229 - 764, n=92, last 2 years)
602 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (587 - 596, n=6)
591 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
587 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
579 Points -1%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
575 Points -2%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
535 Points -9%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
518 Points -12%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
431 Points -27%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (1652 - 1901, n=6)
1757 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
1756.34 (1316.01min - 1756.34max) Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
1746.77 (919.1min - 1746.77max) Points +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
1665 (1590.77min - 1665.14max) Points
Average of class Office
  (246 - 2642, n=93, last 2 years)
1561 Points -6%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
933 (841.54min - 932.92max) Points -44%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
816 (645.73min - 816.34max) Points -51%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
778 (449.1min - 777.88max) Points -53%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
832 Points -50%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
805 Points -52%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
727 (674.47min - 727.03max) Points -56%
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (228 - 241, n=6)
236 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
232 Points
Average of class Office
  (98 - 284, n=92, last 2 years)
230 Points -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
224 Points -3%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
222 Points -4%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
218 Points -6%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
215 Points -7%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
205 Points -12%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
166 Points -28%
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
771 Seconds * -154%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
714 Seconds * -136%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
666 Seconds * -120%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
617 Seconds * -104%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
442 Seconds * -46%
Average of class Office
  (208 - 1956, n=93, last 2 years)
419 Seconds * -38%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
303 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (282 - 307, n=6)
298 Seconds * +2%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (44011 - 50871, n=6)
48015 MIPS +9%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
44011 MIPS
Average of class Office
  (7532 - 65460, n=93, last 2 years)
38934 MIPS -12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
28565 MIPS -35%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
22300 MIPS -49%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
21645 MIPS -51%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
21070 MIPS -52%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
19170 MIPS -56%
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
5542 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (5057 - 5542, n=6)
5347 MIPS -4%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5312 MIPS -4%
Average of class Office
  (2972 - 6687, n=93, last 2 years)
5276 MIPS -5%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
5255 MIPS -5%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5113 MIPS -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
4685 MIPS -15%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
3755 MIPS -32%
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (7044 - 8050, n=6)
7789 Points +11%
Average of class Office
  (1018 - 11980, n=92, last 2 years)
7612 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
7166 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
7044 Points
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5564 Points -21%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
5562 Points -21%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5163 Points -27%
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Office
  (510 - 1989, n=93, last 2 years)
1585 Points +11%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1554 Points +8%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
1548 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
1538 Points +7%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
1500 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (1433 - 1533, n=6)
1489 Points +4%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
1433 Points
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (11.7 - 13.5, n=6)
12.8 fps +9%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
11.7 fps
Average of class Office
  (1.72 - 18.7, n=91, last 2 years)
10.4 fps -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
9.18 fps -22%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
5.87 fps -50%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.71 fps -51%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
5.63 fps -52%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
5.37 fps -54%
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
77.1 s * -45%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
54.1 s * -2%
Average of class Office
  (31.3 - 129.6, n=91, last 2 years)
53.2 s * -0%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
53.1 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (46.3 - 58, n=6)
52.9 s * -0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
47.4 s * +11%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
45.9 s * +14%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
45 s * +15%
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
0.664 sec * -28%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.625 sec * -20%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H
0.579 sec * -12%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7
0.556 sec * -7%
Average of class Office
  (0.4244 - 1.135, n=90, last 2 years)
0.543 sec * -5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (0.507 - 0.544, n=6)
0.525 sec * -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P
0.521 sec * -0%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
0.519 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
1665 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
80.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
98 %
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
232 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
3886 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
587 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core
1409 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core
10047 Points
Help
Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
 
92.4 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
90 pt
Average of class Office
 
73.5 pt
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
61.3 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
60.6 pt
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
54.8 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52.8 pt
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G -1!
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
45.2 pt
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (11272 - 12485, n=6)
11862 KRay/s +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
11668 KRay/s
Average of class Office
  (763 - 24250, n=92, last 2 years)
9320 KRay/s -20%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
7189 KRay/s -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
6899 KRay/s -41%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6239 KRay/s -47%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4894 KRay/s -58%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
3612 KRay/s -69%
AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (72242 - 79484, n=6)
75580 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
73770 Points
Average of class Office
  (4113 - 102228, n=92, last 2 years)
47898 Points -35%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
37208 Points -50%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
33606 Points -54%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
30383 Points -59%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
26359 Points -64%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
23249 Points -68%
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (2419 - 2638, n=6)
2520 MB/s +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
2475 MB/s
Average of class Office
  (287 - 4551, n=92, last 2 years)
2212 MB/s -11%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2055 MB/s -17%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1745 MB/s -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1730 MB/s -30%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1573 MB/s -36%
AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (86644 - 92945, n=6)
88685 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
87176 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
75330 Points -14%
Average of class Office
  (8185 - 115197, n=92, last 2 years)
70379 Points -19%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
52847 Points -39%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
51411 Points -41%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
50442 Points -42%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
50407 Points -42%
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (10917 - 11637, n=6)
11277 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
11123 Points
Average of class Office
  (404 - 14288, n=92, last 2 years)
6714 Points -40%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
6687 Points -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
5780 Points -48%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4922 Points -56%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4430 Points -60%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4038 Points -64%
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (39609 - 43843, n=6)
41195 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
40693 Points
Average of class Office
  (2075 - 54365, n=92, last 2 years)
24965 Points -39%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
18088 Points -56%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
18076 Points -56%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
17564 Points -57%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
16186 Points -60%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
14077 Points -65%
AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
70615 MB/s +41%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62886 MB/s +25%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58344 MB/s +16%
Average of class Office
  (7860 - 155900, n=92, last 2 years)
51340 MB/s +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
50118 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (45568 - 50859, n=6)
48032 MB/s -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
44826 MB/s -11%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
19307 MB/s -61%
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (641 - 713, n=6)
676 MB/s +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
655 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
639 MB/s -2%
Average of class Office
  (78 - 1018, n=92, last 2 years)
600 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
389 MB/s -41%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
374 MB/s -43%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
321 MB/s -51%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
287 MB/s -56%
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (5967 - 6637, n=6)
6260 KRay/s +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
6091 KRay/s
Average of class Office
  (432 - 12755, n=92, last 2 years)
4939 KRay/s -19%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3869 KRay/s -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
3748 KRay/s -38%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3454 KRay/s -43%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
3199 KRay/s -47%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
2579 KRay/s -58%
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
44296 MPixel/s +125%
Average of class Office
  (4814 - 54971, n=92, last 2 years)
29077 MPixel/s +48%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
28526 MPixel/s +45%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
28353 MPixel/s +44%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (19707 - 26584, n=6)
24709 MPixel/s +25%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
19707 MPixel/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
16913 MPixel/s -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
13970 MPixel/s -29%

系统性能

EliteBook 865 G9的主观表现非常好。这是一个反应灵敏的设备,在测试时没有显示任何稳定性问题。尽管它的单通道内存配置,但测试设备在合成基准测试中取得了良好的结果,这在AIDA内存测试中才变得明显。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (5873 - 6152, n=6)
6036 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
5873 Points
Average of class Office
  (2463 - 7344, n=86, last 2 years)
5618 Points -4%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5415 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5007 Points -15%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4917 Points -16%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4905 Points -16%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
4299 Points -27%
PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
10639 Points +15%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
10149 Points +9%
Average of class Office
  (5575 - 20841, n=86, last 2 years)
10136 Points +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (9151 - 10263, n=6)
9721 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
9562 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
9456 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
9289 Points
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
7903 Points -15%
PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (8435 - 8891, n=6)
8625 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
8587 Points
Average of class Office
  (3041 - 10415, n=86, last 2 years)
7689 Points -10%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
7056 Points -18%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
6888 Points -20%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
6759 Points -21%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
6596 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6364 Points -26%
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (6796 - 7417, n=6)
7126 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
6894 Points
Average of class Office
  (2126 - 9773, n=86, last 2 years)
6335 Points -8%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5740 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5600 Points -19%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
5013 Points -27%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4616 Points -33%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
4136 Points -40%
CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Office
  (348 - 1891, n=86, last 2 years)
1410 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1392 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (1154 - 1430, n=6)
1342 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1329 Points
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
935 Points -30%
CrossMark / Productivity
Average of class Office
  (393 - 1870, n=86, last 2 years)
1409 Points +3%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1400 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1373 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (1188 - 1426, n=6)
1356 Points -1%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
983 Points -28%
CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Office
  (340 - 1982, n=86, last 2 years)
1466 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1426 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (1180 - 1523, n=6)
1406 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1363 Points
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
920 Points -33%
CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1270 Points +14%
Average of class Office
  (258 - 2017, n=86, last 2 years)
1269 Points +14%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
  (990 - 1243, n=6)
1136 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1118 Points
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
844 Points -25%
PCMark 10 Score
5873 points
Help
AIDA64 / Memory Copy
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64091 MB/s +107%
Average of class Office
  (7158 - 108783, n=93, last 2 years)
49017 MB/s +58%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
47502 MB/s +53%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
47468 MB/s +53%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (31003 - 48605, n=6)
44970 MB/s +45%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
36092 MB/s +16%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
31003 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
23312 MB/s -25%
AIDA64 / Memory Read
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62442 MB/s +80%
Average of class Office
  (7325 - 112436, n=93, last 2 years)
48863 MB/s +41%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
48807 MB/s +41%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
48086 MB/s +39%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (34682 - 45079, n=6)
39700 MB/s +14%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
34682 MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
34493 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
24657 MB/s -29%
AIDA64 / Memory Write
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
66479 MB/s +93%
Average of class Office
  (7579 - 117935, n=93, last 2 years)
53233 MB/s +54%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (34532 - 51096, n=6)
47984 MB/s +39%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
47070 MB/s +36%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
46929 MB/s +36%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
40554 MB/s +17%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
34532 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
23454 MB/s -32%
AIDA64 / Memory Latency
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6
113.5 ns * -23%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
  (92 - 135.3, n=6)
113.3 ns * -23%
Average of class Office
  (8.3 - 185.2, n=93, last 2 years)
97.1 ns * -6%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
92.6 ns * -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
92.4 ns * -0%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M
92 ns *
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
83.1 ns * +10%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
72.3 ns * +21%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

我们的标准化延迟测试(网上冲浪,YouTube上的4K,CPU负载)表明,EliteBook 865 G9(其当前BIOS版本)没有任何限制,适合实时音频应用。

LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 概述
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
LatencyMon - 驱动程序
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1542.6 μs * -183%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1225 μs * -125%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1127 μs * -107%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
544.6 μs *
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
517 μs * +5%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
420.3 μs * +23%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

AMD EliteBook支持快速的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,但我们的测试装置只配备了一个PCIe 3.0 2242固态硬盘。三星PM991硬盘的容量为512GB,其中428GB在第一次启动后仍然可用。传输速率并不高,最高为2.7GB/s,但与更快的PCIe 4.0驱动器相比,它们在日常使用中应该不会给你带来任何真正的限制。阅读进一步的SSD基准测试 这里.

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3100.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1617.1 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 349.62 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 369.48 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 35.62 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 114.98 MB/s
CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 344.3 MB/s
CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 978.6 MB/s
Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
90.1 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
64.9 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
64.1 pt
Average of class Office
 
57 pt
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
54.3 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
41.3 pt
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
 
36.7 pt
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
31.3 pt
DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4278 (4261.41min - 4277.73max) MB/s +141%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3645 (3539.21min - 3644.69max) MB/s +106%
Average of class Office
  (121 - 4554, n=89, last 2 years)
2657 MB/s +50%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2028 (1955.17min - 2027.74max) MB/s +14%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1772 (1755.11min - 1771.67max) MB/s
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1730 (1725.12min - 1730.26max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (1188 - 1882, n=10)
1613 MB/s -9%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1596 (1575.17min - 1595.93max) MB/s -10%
seq write
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4360 (4354.74min - 4360.49max) MB/s +184%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2809 (2738.04min - 2808.76max) MB/s +83%
Average of class Office
  (43 - 5842, n=89, last 2 years)
2567 MB/s +67%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2489 (1082.97min - 2488.9max) MB/s +62%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2245 (2172.86min - 2245.12max) MB/s +46%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1535 (1503.59min - 1535.32max) MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1311 (1226.41min - 1311.35max) MB/s -15%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (195.5 - 1706, n=10)
1284 MB/s -16%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6579 (6306.77min - 6578.61max) MB/s +140%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6524 (5489.01min - 6524.19max) MB/s +138%
Average of class Office
  (124.2 - 7120, n=89, last 2 years)
4362 MB/s +59%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
3445 (3030.59min - 3444.78max) MB/s +26%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
3272 (3009.2min - 3271.56max) MB/s +19%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
2890 (2377.4min - 2890.29max) MB/s +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
2741 (2448.63min - 2741.4max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (1655 - 3111, n=10)
2703 MB/s -1%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5011 (4986.93min - 5011.19max) MB/s +212%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4812 (4803.57min - 4811.71max) MB/s +200%
Average of class Office
  (46.7 - 6791, n=89, last 2 years)
3371 MB/s +110%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2981 (2976.41min - 2980.59max) MB/s +86%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2496 (2283.43min - 2496.07max) MB/s +55%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1725 (1683.37min - 1724.81max) MB/s +7%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1606 (1595.72min - 1606.21max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (228 - 1832, n=10)
1387 MB/s -14%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
94.3 (93.89min - 94.29max) MB/s +112%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
68.2 (67.72min - 68.15max) MB/s +53%
Average of class Office
  (5.55 - 89.9, n=89, last 2 years)
58.3 MB/s +31%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
54.3 (54.16min - 54.32max) MB/s +22%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
48.8 (48.48min - 48.81max) MB/s +10%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (34.5 - 55, n=10)
44.8 MB/s +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
44.5 (43.91min - 44.49max) MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
34.5 (33.47min - 34.53max) MB/s -22%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
254 (251.02min - 253.51max) MB/s +115%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
208 (205.9min - 208.09max) MB/s +76%
Average of class Office
  (1.23 - 429, n=89, last 2 years)
165.2 MB/s +40%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
135 (132.8min - 134.66max) MB/s +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
134.8 (129.08min - 134.75max) MB/s +14%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (94.8 - 188.2, n=10)
124.2 MB/s +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
118 (117.43min - 118.03max) MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
94.8 (92.36min - 94.81max) MB/s -20%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
3078 (2841.35min - 3078.24max) MB/s +278%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2139 (1104.16min - 2139.02max) MB/s +163%
Average of class Office
  (7.49 - 4425, n=89, last 2 years)
1254 MB/s +54%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1145 (798.17min - 1144.85max) MB/s +41%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
814 (780.65min - 814.02max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (507 - 1244, n=10)
807 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
683 (673.81min - 682.59max) MB/s -16%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
507 (486.92min - 507.33max) MB/s -38%
4k q32 t16 write
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1641 (1097.57min - 1640.78max) MB/s +355%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1053 (848.79min - 1053.42max) MB/s +192%
Average of class Office
  (1.5 - 3254, n=89, last 2 years)
943 MB/s +161%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
530 (432.64min - 529.91max) MB/s +47%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (206 - 830, n=10)
430 MB/s +19%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
361 (319.39min - 361.16max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
293 (283.44min - 292.93max) MB/s -19%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
286 (268.44min - 286.33max) MB/s -21%
AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
6858 Points +144%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
4934 Points +76%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4630 Points +65%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
4377 Points +56%
Average of class Office
  (704 - 9204, n=87, last 2 years)
4202 Points +50%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
2805 Points
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (1472 - 3394, n=10)
2662 Points -5%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
2229 Points -21%
Score Read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2857 Points +171%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1915 Points +82%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1497 Points +42%
Average of class Office
  (252 - 3364, n=87, last 2 years)
1476 Points +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1112 Points +6%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (756 - 1484, n=10)
1075 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1053 Points
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
810 Points -23%
Score Write
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3010 Points +137%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2602 Points +105%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2176 Points +71%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2060 Points +62%
Average of class Office
  (247 - 4111, n=87, last 2 years)
2014 Points +58%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1271 Points
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (244 - 1279, n=10)
1091 Points -14%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1055 Points -17%
Seq Read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
5464 MB/s +120%
Average of class Office
  (508 - 5796, n=87, last 2 years)
3452 MB/s +39%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3225 MB/s +30%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2808 MB/s +13%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
2801 MB/s +13%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
2485 MB/s
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (2211 - 2744, n=10)
2446 MB/s -2%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
2211 MB/s -11%
Seq Write
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
4001 MB/s +258%
Average of class Office
  (294 - 5880, n=87, last 2 years)
2350 MB/s +110%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
2345 MB/s +110%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1567 MB/s +40%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1362 MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (180 - 1735, n=10)
1167 MB/s +4%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1119 MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1057 MB/s -6%
4K Read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
86.5 MB/s +97%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
69.7 MB/s +58%
Average of class Office
  (18 - 91.1, n=87, last 2 years)
58.3 MB/s +33%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
54.7 MB/s +24%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
50.2 MB/s +14%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
43.99 MB/s
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (34.3 - 51.4, n=10)
42.4 MB/s -4%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
36.22 MB/s -18%
4K Write
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
221 MB/s +87%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
170.9 MB/s +45%
Average of class Office
  (28.2 - 350, n=87, last 2 years)
167.1 MB/s +42%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
138.6 MB/s +18%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
126.6 MB/s +7%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (91.2 - 163.5, n=10)
125.5 MB/s +6%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
117.89 MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
91.17 MB/s -23%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
2224 MB/s +192%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1584 MB/s +108%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1162 MB/s +53%
Average of class Office
  (182.3 - 2713, n=87, last 2 years)
1073 MB/s +41%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (486 - 1182, n=10)
789 MB/s +4%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
760.82 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
720 MB/s -5%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
553 MB/s -27%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2682 MB/s +158%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
1981 MB/s +90%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
1913 MB/s +84%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
1687 MB/s +62%
Average of class Office
  (183.4 - 3394, n=87, last 2 years)
1612 MB/s +55%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
1041.52 MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
861 MB/s -17%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (121.3 - 1070, n=10)
849 MB/s -18%
Access Time Read
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
0.159 ms * -224%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (0.049 - 0.225, n=10)
0.116 ms * -137%
Average of class Office
  (0.022 - 0.302, n=87, last 2 years)
0.07797 ms * -59%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.059 ms * -20%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
0.049 ms *
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.048 ms * +2%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.04 ms * +18%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
0.035 ms * +29%
Access Time Write
Average of class Office
  (0.017 - 0.625, n=87, last 2 years)
0.06914 ms * -110%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
0.057 ms * -73%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
  (0.023 - 0.103, n=10)
0.0517 ms * -57%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
0.043 ms * -30%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
0.033 ms *
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
0.03 ms * +9%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
0.028 ms * +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.024 ms * +27%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

0140280420560700840980112012601400154016801820196021002240238025202660Tooltip
HP EliteBook 865 G9: Ø2705 (2435-2725.25)

图形性能

GPU-Z Radeon 680M
GPU-Z Radeon 680M

该处理器的集成 AMD Radeon 680M负责图形性能,是目前最快的iGPU之一。不幸的是,它的性能受到单通道内存配置的限制,这使我们的测试装置与英特尔Iris Xe Graphics G7(含96个EUs)。.

笔记本 联想ThinkPad T14 G3配备了相同的AMD处理器,具有相同的功率限制,但具有第二个RAM模块。这种差异令人印象深刻:根据不同的测试,联想的GPU性能比我们的测试设备好45%到75%。

所有这些在你日常使用笔记本电脑作为商业设备时不应该起到很大作用。但如果你有兴趣偶尔玩玩游戏,你可能想升级内存配置,否则你将被限制在几乎所有游戏的最低细节水平上。

无论是在永久负载下还是在电池运行时,图形性能都保持稳定。了解更多GPU基准测试 这里.

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
99 pt
Average AMD Radeon 680M
 
96 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
68.4 pt
Average of class Office
 
67.9 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
62.2 pt
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
59.7 pt
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H -1!
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
58.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
47.4 pt
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G -2!
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
37.6 pt
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
10343 Points +48%
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (6858 - 11668, n=34)
10018 Points +44%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
6969 Points
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6724 Points -4%
Average of class Office
  (1468 - 13132, n=88, last 2 years)
6704 Points -4%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
6305 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
4668 Points -33%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
4072 Points -42%
3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
7050 Points +76%
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (3791 - 7653, n=35)
6673 Points +66%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5654 Points +41%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
5137 Points +28%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
5077 Points +26%
Average of class Office
  (1089 - 9375, n=89, last 2 years)
4861 Points +21%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
4015 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
3036 Points -24%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
2522 Points -37%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
2289 Points +64%
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (1359 - 2607, n=35)
2219 Points +59%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1664 Points +19%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
1591 Points +14%
Average of class Office
  (313 - 4109, n=89, last 2 years)
1585 Points +13%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
1559 Points +11%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
1399 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
1025 Points -27%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
862 Points -38%
Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
32859 Points +50%
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (13008 - 34368, n=35)
30045 Points +37%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
21874 Points
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
19350 Points -12%
Average of class Office
  (3627 - 46692, n=91, last 2 years)
19133 Points -13%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
17598 Points -20%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
17558 Points -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
11499 Points -47%
V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (52 - 78, n=22)
65.4 mpaths +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
62 mpaths +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
59 mpaths
Average of class Office
  (8 - 88, n=74, last 2 years)
51.3 mpaths -13%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
45 mpaths -24%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
26 mpaths -56%
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7
25 mpaths -58%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H
25 mpaths -58%
3DMark 11 Performance
6852 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
22343 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score
3719 points
3DMark Time Spy Score
1589 points
Help
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average of class Office
  (298 - 1215, n=15, last 2 years)
727 Seconds * -31%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
555 Seconds *
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (270 - 555, n=31)
346 Seconds * +38%
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U
1170 Seconds * -127%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P
867 Seconds * -68%
Average of class Office
  (343 - 3964, n=89, last 2 years)
773 Seconds * -50%
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U
516 Seconds *
Average AMD Radeon 680M
  (389 - 609, n=31)
478 Seconds * +7%

* ... smaller is better

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M: Ø14.3 (12-16)
lowmed.highultra
GTA V (2015) 87.7 78.3 25.9 11.3
The Witcher 3 (2015) 74 23 14.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) 108.9 83.5 55 48
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) 37.5 19.4 14.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) 41.4 32.4 29.3
Far Cry 5 (2018) 39 23 21 20
Strange Brigade (2018) 72.9 30 25.3 22
F1 2021 (2021) 103.2 49.7 37 16.1
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) 86 40 30 27
F1 22 (2022) 44.1 38 30 7.88

排放--非常安静的EliteBook

系统噪音

惠普为EliteBook 865 G9配备了一个风扇和一个热管。由于适度的功率限制,冷却系统不是很活跃。这也意味着该笔记本非常安静。在正常负载下,你可能会听到低沉的呼啸声,最大为29.1 dB(A)。而即使在压力测试中,系统噪音也不会超过32.9 dB(A)。这使惠普成为我们比较领域中最安静的设备之一。只有LG Gram 16更加安静(但提供的CPU性能明显较低)。我们没有听到任何其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle
23 / 23 / 23 dB(A)
Load
29.1 / 32.9 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 23 dB(A)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2028.727.731.327.231.82527.226.227.929.930.13125.724.424.224.826.54032.829.830.33231.35023.822.32423.122.66324.721.422.822.322.98027.220.521.319.32010020.218.81919.420.612520.920.621.220.420.616018.6191917.719.920019.118.919.317.41925020.118.819.218.420.831520.9191916.621.340021.116.915.613.119.650022.11715.61320.163020.617.715.713.819.980022.319.5179.621.6100021.617.314.8920.2125021.917.9168.321.5160023.419.216.48.722.9200021.919.114.3921.6250021.716.813.39.521.2315021.416.913.79.721.2400020.315.713.410.419.750001914.71310.418.9630017.313.212.310.517.3800013.112.212.610.913.11000011.612.112.610.711.61250011.211.912.510.711.11600010.511.311.51110.6SPL32.929.126.82332.3N1.71.10.90.51.6median 20.6median 17.3median 15.6median 10.7median 20.1Delta2.622.42.62.2hearing rangehide median Fan NoiseHP EliteBook 865 G9
HP EliteBook 865 G9
Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Noise
-0%
-9%
-25%
-12%
-10%
off / environment *
23
23.3
-1%
26
-13%
24.4
-6%
25
-9%
26
-13%
Idle Minimum *
23
23.3
-1%
26
-13%
24.4
-6%
25
-9%
26
-13%
Idle Average *
23
23.3
-1%
26
-13%
24.4
-6%
25
-9%
26
-13%
Idle Maximum *
23
23.3
-1%
26
-13%
26.7
-16%
25.4
-10%
26.2
-14%
Load Average *
29.1
25.1
14%
30.8
-6%
43.8
-51%
36.2
-24%
29.5
-1%
Witcher 3 ultra *
29.1
32.1
-10%
43.8
-51%
Load Maximum *
32.9
34
-3%
31.1
5%
44.8
-36%
36.4
-11%
34
-3%

* ... smaller is better

温度

EliteBook 865 G9的表面温度在任何时候都保持在控制范围内--尽管有安静的风扇。温度在低负荷时保持正常,在最大负荷时,仅在基本单元底部的一个区域加热到最高47℃。这并不影响键盘,也不妨碍你在膝上使用该设备。

处理器以30瓦的功率开始我们的压力测试,但随后很快下降到25瓦,持续约10分钟。此后,消耗量进一步降低到23瓦特。在压力测试结束后,我们没有遇到任何性能影响。

Max. Load
 39.4 °C39.4 °C36.7 °C 
 38.4 °C37.8 °C28 °C 
 26.6 °C24.7 °C25.1 °C 
Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 32.9 °C
38.7 °C47.6 °C44 °C
26.7 °C43.4 °C39.8 °C
26.8 °C30.1 °C32 °C
Maximum: 47.6 °C
Average: 36.6 °C
Power Supply (max.)  32.7 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.7 °C / 83.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1 °C / -1.8 F).
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(顶部)
表面温度应力测试(底)。
表面温度应力测试(底)。
HP EliteBook 865 G9
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
LG Gram 16 (2021)
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat
-21%
-7%
1%
-6%
-6%
Maximum Upper Side *
39.4
45
-14%
46.9
-19%
39.1
1%
39.5
-0%
37.9
4%
Maximum Bottom *
47.6
42.8
10%
45.1
5%
43.4
9%
45
5%
39
18%
Idle Upper Side *
23.6
33
-40%
26.4
-12%
24.3
-3%
26.7
-13%
31
-31%
Idle Bottom *
24.1
33.6
-39%
24.1
-0%
25.1
-4%
28.2
-17%
27.8
-15%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

两个立体声扬声器为一台商务笔记本电脑产生了良好的、饱满的声音。虽然扬声器不能完全与高质量的多媒体设备相比,如Apple MacBook Pro 16的性能,但它们比直接竞争者 联想ThinkPad T16 G1.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2027.229.72529.929.23124.826.7403236.85023.126.36322.326.48019.328.510019.431.312520.437.916017.744.520017.453.125018.460.831516.666.440013.169.35001368.563013.868.48009.668.91000969.812508.371.516008.7722000969.425009.570.131509.774.1400010.472.4500010.469.7630010.569800010.962.51000010.762.51250010.761.9160001154.8SPL2382.5N0.555.5median 10.7median 68.5Delta2.66.824.225.523.220.722.924.324.724.619.72322.41815.714.316.719.917.829.915.234.311.743.29.750.69.559.69.159.9961.19.260.1957.79.264.59.364.29.864.710.761.41161.511.361.711.964.811.966.711.962.112.36512.258.912.157.411.958.32375.20.436.3median 11.3median 60.11.36.1hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP EliteBook 865 G9Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP EliteBook 865 G9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--AMD EliteBook拥有令人印象深刻的耐力

消耗功率

110瓦的电源
110瓦的电源

消耗率清楚地显示了明亮的16英寸显示屏的影响:在空闲时,我们测量了EliteBook 865 G9与Sure View面板的最大消耗量为14.1瓦特。相同的ZBook Firefly 16 G9配备普通的全高清面板(约500 cd/m²),只消耗了约9瓦。在负载情况下,AMD系统仍然非常高效,峰值为56瓦,持续消耗约为48瓦。待机运行时,消耗量略高,为1.6瓦。

USB C电源的额定输出功率为110瓦,最大100瓦输送到笔记本电脑。其他10瓦可通过额外的USB A端口使用,例如,可用于为智能手机充电。该电源在最大消耗方面没有问题,而且也有足够的储备,可以在负载下为电池充电。

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.38 / 1.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.3 / 12.8 / 14.1 Watt
Load midlight 48.5 / 56.6 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP EliteBook 865 G9
R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
LG Gram 16 (2021)
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
R3 5300U, Vega 6, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1280x1200, 16"
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, I, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA
i7-1265U, T550 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Average AMD Radeon 680M
 
Average of class Office
 
Power Consumption
27%
26%
16%
35%
19%
5%
0%
19%
Idle Minimum *
5.3
2.9
45%
3.8
28%
4.5
15%
3.7
30%
5.8
-9%
4.5
15%
Idle Average *
12.8
6
53%
9
30%
8.5
34%
6.8
47%
8.4
34%
8
37%
Idle Maximum *
14.1
6.9
51%
11.3
20%
9.1
35%
8.6
39%
9.9
30%
8.7
38%
Load Average *
48.5
27.3
44%
35.2
27%
43.5
10%
30
38%
33
32%
48.3
-0%
53.1 ?(20 - 77.7, n=32)
-9%
Witcher 3 ultra *
48.7
42.6
13%
37.5
23%
30.2
38%
34.3
30%
45.3
7%
Load Maximum *
56.6
81.53
-44%
43.5
23%
69.4
-23%
45
20%
60
-6%
94.7
-67%
70.3 ?(48 - 103.2, n=32)
-24%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

0510152025303540455055Tooltip
HP EliteBook 865 G9; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø48.7 (47.2-51.8)
HP EliteBook 865 G9; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø47.3 (45.9-56.6)

Power consumption with external monitor

0510152025303540Tooltip
HP EliteBook 865 G9; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø34.8 (34.1-42.5)
HP EliteBook 865 G9; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø38.7 (33-43.9)
HP EliteBook 865 G9; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø25.2 (18.3-44.5)
HP EliteBook 865 G9; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø35.7 (34.5-43.8)
HP EliteBook 865 G9; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø38.8 (37.9-42.6)
HP EliteBook 865 G9; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø40.2 (36.2-41.4)
HP EliteBook 865 G9; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.23 (2.98-5.82)

电池寿命

充电
充电

ElieBook配备了76瓦时的电池,使其具有非常好的电池寿命,甚至超过了ThinkPad T16 G1(86Wh)。在150cd/m²的亮度下,我们的测试视频持续播放了18.5小时,这要感谢AMD iGPU的高效视频解码器。Wi-Fi测试持续了15个小时,这也是一个非常好的结果。将显示屏设置为最大亮度后,电池寿命减少到约7小时。低功耗的显示屏应该能提供更好的结果。

设备运行时,完全充电需要约2小时,但只需32分钟就能达到50%。

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 108)
14h 59min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 108)
6h 58min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
18h 32min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 46min
HP EliteBook 865 G9
R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, 76 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200
i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 86 Wh
LG Gram 16 (2021)
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H
i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 73 Wh
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G
R3 5300U, Vega 6, 72 Wh
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA
i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh
Average of class Office
 
Battery Runtime
15%
52%
-18%
24%
-25%
-20%
H.264
1112
623
-44%
1204
8%
576
-48%
394
-65%
WiFi v1.3
899
846
-6%
943
5%
614
-32%
1026
14%
509
-43%
Load
106
208
96%
258
143%
132.7
25%
141
33%
140
32%
Reader / Idle
1713
1472
1937

Pros

+ 高质量的金属机箱
+ 快速的AMD处理器
+ 非常好的输入设备
+ USB-C 4.0
+ 非常长的电池寿命
+ 良好的维护选项

Cons

- 具有清晰弱点的Sure View显示屏
- 带有单通道RAM的测试单元
- 不能加装WWAN
- 没有5G的AMD模型

结论 - 是EliteBook 865 G9,但没有Sure View。

审查。HP EliteBook 865 G9。测试单位由campuspoint提供
审查。HP EliteBook 865 G9。测试单位由campuspoint提供

新的16英寸EliteBook 865 G9有可能成为市场上最好的商务笔记本之一。它有高质量的金属底盘,良好的输入设备,广泛的端口,以及包括LTE在内的现代连接。AMD机型甚至具有非常好的、稳定的CPU性能和极长的电池寿命。

然而,我们不能推荐我们的测试装置。惠普通过选择单通道配置的RAM浪费了大量的GPU能力,而且Sure View显示屏有太多的缺点,在日常使用中非常明显。高亮度可能是好的,但只要你从哪怕是一个小角度看屏幕,即使不激活隐私显示过滤器,视角和图像质量也非常有限。亮度设置是另一个问题。为了获得低于100cd/m²的亮度水平,必须激活Sure View,而打开隐私过滤器后的最大可用亮度被限制在150cd/m²,这往往是不够的,特别是在远离办公室的地方工作时(例如在火车上或在公共场所)。这些限制错过了隐私过滤器的意义。

新EliteBook 865 G9是一款非常好的商务笔记本,拥有快速的AMD处理器,非常好的键盘,电池寿命长。我们不推荐可选的Sure View显示屏,因为它尽管亮度很高,但对于日常使用来说有太多的缺点。

我们建议选择具有非常好的低功耗全高清显示屏的型号,我们已经在相同的测试中进行了测试。ZBook Firefly 16 G9.如果这与双通道内存配置相结合,我们可以全心全意地推荐EliteBook作为市场上最好的商务笔记本电脑之一。与它的直接竞争者相比,ThinkPad T16 G1配备英特尔Alder Lake处理器的ThinkPad T16 G1相比,我们的机型的CPU性能更加稳定,其iGPU也有可能更快。EliteBook的结构稍显紧凑,其维护选项也非常好。

价格和可用性

我们测试的惠普EliteBook 865 G9的配置可以从各种网上商店买到,包括从惠普自己售价为2,600美元。

HP EliteBook 865 G9 - 12/18/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis
88 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard
91%
Pointing Device
96%
Connectivity
67 / 80 → 83%
Weight
65 / 20-75 → 81%
Battery
91%
Display
72%
Games Performance
64 / 78 → 82%
Application Performance
92 / 95 → 97%
Temperature
90%
Noise
98%
Audio
83%
Camera
42 / 85 → 49%
Average
80%
87%
Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Notebookcheck中文版(NBC中国) > 评测 > 惠普EliteBook 865 G9笔记本评测--1000尼特Sure View显示屏不尽如人意
Andreas Osthoff, 2022-12-20 (Update: 2024-09-14)