惠普EliteBook 865 G9笔记本评测--1000尼特Sure View显示屏不尽如人意
惠普EliteBook 800系列的特点是高质量的商务笔记本电脑。今年,它生产了一个16英寸的型号,可以配备AMD或英特尔的CPU。英特尔系列的产品是EliteBook 860 G9,AMD型号被命名为865 G9。我们已经测试了AMD型号865 G9(型号为6F6H5EA),配备了AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U与集成的Radeon 680M GPU,16GB内存,512GB SSD,16:10 IPS显示屏(1920 x 1200像素),集成隐私过滤器(Sure View),最大亮度为1000尼特。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.2 % v7 (old) | 12 / 2022 | HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M | 1.9 kg | 19 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
89.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.9 kg | 20.5 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2021 | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.2 kg | 16.8 mm | 16.00" | 2560x1600 | |
84.3 % v7 (old) | 02 / 2022 | SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.7 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.8 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2022 | LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G R3 5300U, Vega 6 | 1.6 kg | 16.3 mm | 16.00" | 1280x1200 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳 - 优雅的金属外观
新的16英寸EliteBook 865 G9的外壳与ZBook Firefly 16 G9.它的设计是较少的棱角相比,老的EliteBook 850 G8.银色的铝制外壳看起来质量很高。显示屏盖和底座都非常稳定。笔记本电脑几乎可以打开180度;铰链不能防止最小的摇晃。窄边框使该设备具有非常现代的外观。
新的16英寸设备比旧的15英寸EliteBook 850 G8要厚一点,但没有任何宽度。这款联想ThinkPad T16 G1,也有16英寸的屏幕,略大,也有一点厚。总体而言,新EliteBook 865 G9非常便携。110瓦的电源重量为451克,EliteBook本身的重量约为1.9公斤。
连接性 - 带有USB 4的AMD EliteBook
惠普为EliteBook 865 G9配备了两个快速USB C 4.0端口,也可用于充电和连接外部显示器。在将我们的测试设备连接到USB C屏幕(包括以太网连接和输入设备)时,我们没有遇到任何问题。该设备还具有一个HDMI输出,一个SIM卡插槽,以及两个普通的USB A端口。
沟通
AMD EliteBook配备了高通公司的现代Wi-Fi模块(WCN6856,BT 5.2),应该支持新的Wi-Fi 6E标准。然而,我们无法连接到华硕参考路由器的6-GHz网络。在5-GHz网络中的传输速率非常好--迄今为止记录的一些最快的传输速率为1.7GBit/s。我们在测试时没有遇到任何连接问题。
测试装置还配备了一个英特尔LTE模块(XMM 7560),可以与纳米SIM卡或eSIM卡一起使用。我们的Telekom SIM卡运行良好。WWAN模块必须在制造商处进行配置--不能加装。与英特尔型号(EliteBook 860 G9)不同,该设备不包括可选的5G调制解调器。
Networking | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
网络摄像头
正如在ZBook Firefly 16 G9,该设备配备了一个红外网络摄像头,据称提供500万像素。然而,图像的最高记录为3.7MP(2560 x 1440像素)。该网络摄像头仍然比通常的720p或1080p网络摄像头要好,特别是在清晰度方面。 总而言之,这是一个体面的性能,从大多数其他笔记本电脑中脱颖而出。
维护
基本单元的底盖很容易拆卸--与之不同的是ZBook Studio 16,这个设备没有任何隐藏的螺丝。维护选项很好。除了内存模块和M.2 2280固态硬盘的插槽(每个都隐藏在一个额外的盖子下面)之外,用户还可以更换Wi-Fi和WWAN模块。
输入设备--EliteBook有很棒的键盘
带有专用数字键盘的背光键盘给我们留下了非常好的印象。敲击的力度非常大,所以意见可能会因个人喜好而不同,但总体而言,这是目前移动设备上最好的键盘之一。它比更昂贵的ZBook Studio 16 G9甚至可以和联想的ThinkPads相比,尽管它们的质量在过去几年里有所下降。总的来说,我们更喜欢EliteBook的防泼水输入设备,而不是目前的ThinkPad T16。......只是集成的电源按钮和小的垂直方向键需要一点时间来适应。
惠普已经有一段时间没有在其商务机型上使用触摸杆了,这就给我们留下了大型ClickPad(12.8 x 8.7厘米)。触摸板非常舒适,易于使用。 此外,点击的声音显得非常消沉和优越--这才是它应该有的样子。
显示--确定视图仍然是一个问题
我们的测试装置配备了可选的Sure View面板,它具有集成的隐私过滤器。它的一般特性(1920 x 1200像素,哑光表面和高达1000 cd/m²的亮度)是有希望的,但还有很多需要考虑的地方。集成隐私过滤器可以通过触摸按钮激活,但即使关闭它,可视角度也非常有限--显示屏正前方的甜蜜点非常狭窄,图像质量不会降低。即使是小的移动也会导致对比度和亮度的明显降低。明亮的内容在哑光面板上也会出现轻微的颗粒感。亮度调节是另一个大问题。Sure View只在最低的亮度水平上工作。这导致了两个问题。Sure View在明亮的环境中很难使用(例如在火车上或公共场所),它必须在低光环境中激活,以便达到尽可能低的亮度水平。我们在下表中列出了这些数值。
亮度 | 100% | 90% | 80% | 70% | 60% | 50% | 40% | 30% | 20% | 10% | 0% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
关闭Sure View | 865 | 729 | 634 | 535 | 436 | 332 | 252 | 216 | 180 | 142 | 105 |
Sure View on | 157 | 146 | 136 | 125 | 115 | 104 | 94 | 83 | 72 | 62 | 51 |
总的来说,结果是非常好的。最大亮度达到900cd/m²左右,黑值位于0.3cd/m²左右,这导致了非常高的最大对比度。然而,这只是在你坐在面板前面的情况下才会如此。只有72%的糟糕亮度分布是另一个问题。这意味着特别是右下角要比屏幕的其他部分暗得多。最低亮度--即使使用Sure View--也是51cd/m²,这在非常黑暗的环境中仍然太高。该面板还使用56赫兹的PWM,即使是在最大亮度下。
|
Brightness Distribution: 72 %
Center on Battery: 865 cd/m²
Contrast: 2883:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
73.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36
HP EliteBook 865 G9 X160NV42, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 B160UAN01.K, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | LG Gram 16 (2021) LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H BOE07D8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G LG Display LP160WU1-SPH1, IPS, 1280x1200, 16" | HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA InfoVision X156NVF8 R1, I, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA BOE0A02, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 8% | 16% | -12% | -48% | -8% | -4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 71.4 | 80.1 12% | 95.8 34% | 64.5 -10% | 36 -50% | 68.1 -5% | |
sRGB Coverage | 99.3 | 100 1% | 99.8 1% | 86.2 -13% | 55 -45% | 95 -4% | 96.1 -3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 73.2 | 80.5 10% | 83.8 14% | 62.9 -14% | 37 -49% | 65 -11% | 70 -4% |
Response Times | 26% | -5% | -58% | -13% | 127% | -16% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.5 ? | 27 ? 24% | 44 ? -24% | 58.4 ? -65% | 38 ? -7% | 47 ? -32% | 52.8 ? -49% |
Response Time Black / White * | 23.5 ? | 17 ? 28% | 20 ? 15% | 35.2 ? -50% | 28 ? -19% | 32 ? -36% | 19.5 ? 17% |
PWM Frequency | 56.7 | 312 ? 450% | |||||
Screen | -34% | -53% | -51% | -60% | -39% | -30% | |
Brightness middle | 865 | 404 -53% | 331 -62% | 329 -62% | 299 -65% | 802 -7% | 526 -39% |
Brightness | 771 | 391 -49% | 309 -60% | 316 -59% | 270 -65% | 702 -9% | 499 -35% |
Brightness Distribution | 72 | 80 11% | 88 22% | 92 28% | 85 18% | 77 7% | 93 29% |
Black Level * | 0.3 | 0.29 3% | 0.22 27% | 0.3 -0% | 0.265 12% | 0.245 18% | 0.31 -3% |
Contrast | 2883 | 1393 -52% | 1505 -48% | 1097 -62% | 1128 -61% | 3273 14% | 1697 -41% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 3.9 -63% | 4.64 -93% | 5.4 -125% | 4.57 -90% | 6.22 -159% | 3.6 -50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 8.5 -47% | 9.82 -69% | 10.1 -74% | 8.92 -54% | 9.92 -71% | 6.6 -14% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.5 | 1.7 -13% | 3.16 -111% | 2.5 -67% | 5.02 -235% | 2.6 -73% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 5.4 -42% | 6.9 -82% | 5.1 -34% | 3.8 -0% | 7.69 -102% | 5.5 -45% |
Gamma | 2.36 93% | 2.21 100% | 2.34 94% | 2.1 105% | 2.6 85% | 2.75 80% | 2.02 109% |
CCT | 6922 94% | 6242 104% | 7904 82% | 7609 85% | 6142 106% | 6135 106% | 6527 100% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 75.1 | 65 | |||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 100 | 95 | |||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
-16% | -14% /
-31% | -40% /
-43% | -40% /
-51% | 27% /
4% | -17% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
我们用专业的CalMAN软件(X-Rite i1 Pro 2)对面板进行了测量,对于一台商用笔记本电脑来说,对出厂时的结果相当满意。显示屏的偏色很小,在正常使用中几乎看不到,而且与sRGB参考色彩空间的色彩偏差也很低。激活Sure View会增加偏差。我们不建议在这种模式下处理图像。
我们的校准(可在上面免费下载)进一步改善了色彩显示。该面板涵盖了整个sRGB色彩空间。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
23.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 13.4 ms rise | |
↘ 10.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 49 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.1 ms rise | |
↘ 18.1 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 56.7 Hz | ||
The display backlight flickers at 56.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) . The frequency of 56.7 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
在户外,如果你不坐在显示屏的正前方,就很难使用笔记本电脑。在下面的图片中,可视角度看起来相当好,但摄像头在一定程度上掩盖了限制。从主观上讲,局限性更大,这一点你也可以在户外图片中看到。
总的来说,我们不能推荐Sure View面板。 在实践中,你不会从它的高亮度水平中得到什么,但你很快就会对受限的视角和对比度感到厌烦,即使在Sure View功能被关闭的情况下。哑光的低功耗显示屏,我们已经在相同的ZBook Firefly 16 G9我们已经对相同的ZBook Firefly 16 G9进行了评测,显然整体上是更好的选择。
性能 - Ryzen 7 Pro和单通道内存
淘宝网 Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U其集成显卡Radeon 680M和16GB内存为EliteBook 865 G9的商务笔记本提供了足够的动力。唯一的限制是内存配置,它由一个16GB的模块组成。这使得升级相当容易,但不必要地限制了GPU性能。我们强烈建议购买带有双通道内存的机型或安装第二个模块。
处理器 - AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U
的AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U是一款移动处理器,与普通消费级芯片Ryzen 7 6800U相比,有8个内核(16个线程)和额外的安全功能。惠普的功率限制相当保守,允许处理器短时间内接入30瓦的功率。然后,能耗在几秒钟后稳定在25瓦特。在我们的多核测试中,CPU的性能特别好,而且很稳定。 这款产品ThinkPad T16 G1配备了酷睿i5-1240P在第一次CineBench测试中略微快一些,但随后很快就下降,落在了AMD EliteBook的后面。目前英特尔Alder Lake芯片的性能核心在单核测试中表现更好。
在电池上运行时,性能保持稳定。你可以找到进一步的CPU基准测试结果 这里.
Cinebench R15 Multi loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G -2! |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (9923 - 11026, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (1409 - 1520, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (3784 - 4457, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (587 - 596, n=6) | |
Average of class Office (229 - 764, n=101, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (1652 - 1901, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (242 - 2642, n=102, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (228 - 241, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average of class Office (208 - 2248, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (282 - 307, n=6) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (44011 - 50871, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (7212 - 65460, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (5057 - 5542, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
Average of class Office (2769 - 6687, n=103, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (7044 - 8050, n=6) | |
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
Average of class Office (510 - 1989, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (1433 - 1533, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (11.7 - 13.5, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (1.55 - 18.7, n=101, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=101, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (46.3 - 58, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.192, n=100, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (0.507 - 0.544, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G -1! |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (11272 - 12485, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=102, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (72242 - 79484, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (2419 - 2638, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=102, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (86644 - 92945, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=102, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (10917 - 11637, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=102, last 2 years) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (39609 - 43843, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=102, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average of class Office (5426 - 155900, n=102, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (45568 - 50859, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (641 - 713, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=102, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (5967 - 6637, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=102, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=102, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (19707 - 26584, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 |
系统性能
EliteBook 865 G9的主观表现非常好。这是一个反应灵敏的设备,在测试时没有显示任何稳定性问题。尽管它的单通道内存配置,但测试设备在合成基准测试中取得了良好的结果,这在AIDA内存测试中才变得明显。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (5873 - 6152, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=93, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (9151 - 10263, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (8435 - 8891, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=93, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (6796 - 7417, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average of class Office (1912 - 9773, n=93, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (1154 - 1430, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=93, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (1188 - 1426, n=6) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (1180 - 1523, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=93, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (990 - 1243, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G |
PCMark 10 Score | 5873 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (31003 - 48605, n=6) | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
Average of class Office (7325 - 112436, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (34682 - 45079, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=103, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (34532 - 51096, n=6) | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (92 - 135.3, n=6) | |
Average of class Office (8.3 - 185.2, n=103, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟
我们的标准化延迟测试(网上冲浪,YouTube上的4K,CPU负载)表明,EliteBook 865 G9(其当前BIOS版本)没有任何限制,适合实时音频应用。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H | |
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
LG Gram 16 (2021) |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
AMD EliteBook支持快速的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘,但我们的测试装置只配备了一个PCIe 3.0 2242固态硬盘。三星PM991硬盘的容量为512GB,其中428GB在第一次启动后仍然可用。传输速率并不高,最高为2.7GB/s,但与更快的PCIe 4.0驱动器相比,它们在日常使用中应该不会给你带来任何真正的限制。阅读进一步的SSD基准测试 这里.
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
图形性能
该处理器的集成 AMD Radeon 680M负责图形性能,是目前最快的iGPU之一。不幸的是,它的性能受到单通道内存配置的限制,这使我们的测试装置与英特尔Iris Xe Graphics G7(含96个EUs)。.
笔记本 联想ThinkPad T14 G3配备了相同的AMD处理器,具有相同的功率限制,但具有第二个RAM模块。这种差异令人印象深刻:根据不同的测试,联想的GPU性能比我们的测试设备好45%到75%。
所有这些在你日常使用笔记本电脑作为商业设备时不应该起到很大作用。但如果你有兴趣偶尔玩玩游戏,你可能想升级内存配置,否则你将被限制在几乎所有游戏的最低细节水平上。
无论是在永久负载下还是在电池运行时,图形性能都保持稳定。了解更多GPU基准测试 这里.
3DMark 11 Performance | 6852 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22343 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3719 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1589 points | |
Help |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | |
Average of class Office (298 - 1215, n=19, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (270 - 555, n=31) |
Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU | |
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 | |
Average of class Office (343 - 3964, n=99, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 | |
Average AMD Radeon 680M (389 - 609, n=31) |
* ... smaller is better
Witcher 3 FPS diagram
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 87.7 | 78.3 | 25.9 | 11.3 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 74 | 23 | 14.3 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 108.9 | 83.5 | 55 | 48 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 37.5 | 19.4 | 14.8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 41.4 | 32.4 | 29.3 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 39 | 23 | 21 | 20 |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 72.9 | 30 | 25.3 | 22 |
F1 2021 (2021) | 103.2 | 49.7 | 37 | 16.1 |
Farming Simulator 22 (2021) | 86 | 40 | 30 | 27 |
F1 22 (2022) | 44.1 | 38 | 30 | 7.88 |
排放--非常安静的EliteBook
系统噪音
惠普为EliteBook 865 G9配备了一个风扇和一个热管。由于适度的功率限制,冷却系统不是很活跃。这也意味着该笔记本非常安静。在正常负载下,你可能会听到低沉的呼啸声,最大为29.1 dB(A)。而即使在压力测试中,系统噪音也不会超过32.9 dB(A)。这使惠普成为我们比较领域中最安静的设备之一。只有LG Gram 16更加安静(但提供的CPU性能明显较低)。我们没有听到任何其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 23 / 23 / 23 dB(A) |
Load |
| 29.1 / 32.9 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A) |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ | LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG | SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW | LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -0% | -9% | -25% | -12% | -10% | |
off / environment * | 23 | 23.3 -1% | 26 -13% | 24.4 -6% | 25 -9% | 26 -13% |
Idle Minimum * | 23 | 23.3 -1% | 26 -13% | 24.4 -6% | 25 -9% | 26 -13% |
Idle Average * | 23 | 23.3 -1% | 26 -13% | 24.4 -6% | 25 -9% | 26 -13% |
Idle Maximum * | 23 | 23.3 -1% | 26 -13% | 26.7 -16% | 25.4 -10% | 26.2 -14% |
Load Average * | 29.1 | 25.1 14% | 30.8 -6% | 43.8 -51% | 36.2 -24% | 29.5 -1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 29.1 | 32.1 -10% | 43.8 -51% | |||
Load Maximum * | 32.9 | 34 -3% | 31.1 5% | 44.8 -36% | 36.4 -11% | 34 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
EliteBook 865 G9的表面温度在任何时候都保持在控制范围内--尽管有安静的风扇。温度在低负荷时保持正常,在最大负荷时,仅在基本单元底部的一个区域加热到最高47℃。这并不影响键盘,也不妨碍你在膝上使用该设备。
处理器以30瓦的功率开始我们的压力测试,但随后很快下降到25瓦,持续约10分钟。此后,消耗量进一步降低到23瓦特。在压力测试结束后,我们没有遇到任何性能影响。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.7 °C / 83.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1 °C / -1.8 F).
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -21% | -7% | 1% | -6% | -6% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 39.4 | 45 -14% | 46.9 -19% | 39.1 1% | 39.5 -0% | 37.9 4% |
Maximum Bottom * | 47.6 | 42.8 10% | 45.1 5% | 43.4 9% | 45 5% | 39 18% |
Idle Upper Side * | 23.6 | 33 -40% | 26.4 -12% | 24.3 -3% | 26.7 -13% | 31 -31% |
Idle Bottom * | 24.1 | 33.6 -39% | 24.1 -0% | 25.1 -4% | 28.2 -17% | 27.8 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
发言人
两个立体声扬声器为一台商务笔记本电脑产生了良好的、饱满的声音。虽然扬声器不能完全与高质量的多媒体设备相比,如Apple MacBook Pro 16的性能,但它们比直接竞争者 联想ThinkPad T16 G1.
HP EliteBook 865 G9 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--AMD EliteBook拥有令人印象深刻的耐力
消耗功率
消耗率清楚地显示了明亮的16英寸显示屏的影响:在空闲时,我们测量了EliteBook 865 G9与Sure View面板的最大消耗量为14.1瓦特。相同的ZBook Firefly 16 G9配备普通的全高清面板(约500 cd/m²),只消耗了约9瓦。在负载情况下,AMD系统仍然非常高效,峰值为56瓦,持续消耗约为48瓦。待机运行时,消耗量略高,为1.6瓦。
USB C电源的额定输出功率为110瓦,最大100瓦输送到笔记本电脑。其他10瓦可通过额外的USB A端口使用,例如,可用于为智能手机充电。该电源在最大消耗方面没有问题,而且也有足够的储备,可以在负载下为电池充电。
Off / Standby | 0.38 / 1.6 Watt |
Idle | 5.3 / 12.8 / 14.1 Watt |
Load |
48.5 / 56.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG, IPS, 2560x1600, 16" | SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G R3 5300U, Vega 6, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1280x1200, 16" | HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, I, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA i7-1265U, T550 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Average AMD Radeon 680M | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 27% | 26% | 16% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 0% | 20% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.3 | 2.9 45% | 3.8 28% | 4.5 15% | 3.7 30% | 5.8 -9% | 4.5 15% | 6.7 ? -26% | 4.51 ? 15% |
Idle Average * | 12.8 | 6 53% | 9 30% | 8.5 34% | 6.8 47% | 8.4 34% | 8 37% | 8.73 ? 32% | 7.47 ? 42% |
Idle Maximum * | 14.1 | 6.9 51% | 11.3 20% | 9.1 35% | 8.6 39% | 9.9 30% | 8.7 38% | 10.3 ? 27% | 9.11 ? 35% |
Load Average * | 48.5 | 27.3 44% | 35.2 27% | 43.5 10% | 30 38% | 33 32% | 48.3 -0% | 53.1 ? -9% | 42.4 ? 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 48.7 | 42.6 13% | 37.5 23% | 30.2 38% | 34.3 30% | 45.3 7% | |||
Load Maximum * | 56.6 | 81.53 -44% | 43.5 23% | 69.4 -23% | 45 20% | 60 -6% | 94.7 -67% | 70.3 ? -24% | 60.5 ? -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Power consumption with external monitor
电池寿命
ElieBook配备了76瓦时的电池,使其具有非常好的电池寿命,甚至超过了ThinkPad T16 G1(86Wh)。在150cd/m²的亮度下,我们的测试视频持续播放了18.5小时,这要感谢AMD iGPU的高效视频解码器。Wi-Fi测试持续了15个小时,这也是一个非常好的结果。将显示屏设置为最大亮度后,电池寿命减少到约7小时。低功耗的显示屏应该能提供更好的结果。
设备运行时,完全充电需要约2小时,但只需32分钟就能达到50%。
HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, 76 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 86 Wh | LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh | SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 73 Wh | LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G R3 5300U, Vega 6, 72 Wh | HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 15% | 52% | -18% | 24% | -25% | -20% | |
H.264 | 1112 | 623 -44% | 1204 8% | 576 -48% | 394 -65% | 703 ? -37% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 899 | 846 -6% | 943 5% | 614 -32% | 1026 14% | 509 -43% | 598 ? -33% |
Load | 106 | 208 96% | 258 143% | 132.7 25% | 141 33% | 140 32% | 117.1 ? 10% |
Reader / Idle | 1713 | 1472 | 1937 | 1300 ? |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 是EliteBook 865 G9,但没有Sure View。
新的16英寸EliteBook 865 G9有可能成为市场上最好的商务笔记本之一。它有高质量的金属底盘,良好的输入设备,广泛的端口,以及包括LTE在内的现代连接。AMD机型甚至具有非常好的、稳定的CPU性能和极长的电池寿命。
然而,我们不能推荐我们的测试装置。惠普通过选择单通道配置的RAM浪费了大量的GPU能力,而且Sure View显示屏有太多的缺点,在日常使用中非常明显。高亮度可能是好的,但只要你从哪怕是一个小角度看屏幕,即使不激活隐私显示过滤器,视角和图像质量也非常有限。亮度设置是另一个问题。为了获得低于100cd/m²的亮度水平,必须激活Sure View,而打开隐私过滤器后的最大可用亮度被限制在150cd/m²,这往往是不够的,特别是在远离办公室的地方工作时(例如在火车上或在公共场所)。这些限制错过了隐私过滤器的意义。
新EliteBook 865 G9是一款非常好的商务笔记本,拥有快速的AMD处理器,非常好的键盘,电池寿命长。我们不推荐可选的Sure View显示屏,因为它尽管亮度很高,但对于日常使用来说有太多的缺点。
我们建议选择具有非常好的低功耗全高清显示屏的型号,我们已经在相同的测试中进行了测试。ZBook Firefly 16 G9.如果这与双通道内存配置相结合,我们可以全心全意地推荐EliteBook作为市场上最好的商务笔记本电脑之一。与它的直接竞争者相比,ThinkPad T16 G1配备英特尔Alder Lake处理器的ThinkPad T16 G1相比,我们的机型的CPU性能更加稳定,其iGPU也有可能更快。EliteBook的结构稍显紧凑,其维护选项也非常好。
价格和可用性
我们测试的惠普EliteBook 865 G9的配置可以从各种网上商店买到,包括从惠普自己售价为2,600美元。
HP EliteBook 865 G9
-
12/18/2022 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff