惠普EliteBook 865 G9笔记本评测--1000尼特Sure View显示屏不尽如人意

Name: HP EliteBook 865 G9
Brand: HP

配备AMD的16英寸商务笔记本电脑。

惠普的EliteBook 865 G9是一款高质量的商务笔记本，拥有最新的AMD硬件和集成的LTE连接。EliteBook有可能成为最好的商务笔记本之一--但我们测试装置中的Sure View显示屏尽管亮度很高，却破坏了我们的好印象。

Andreas Osthoff, 👁 Andreas Osthoff (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 12/20/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

AMD Business Laptop / Notebook Windows

惠普EliteBook 800系列的特点是高质量的商务笔记本电脑。今年，它生产了一个16英寸的型号，可以配备AMD或英特尔的CPU。英特尔系列的产品是EliteBook 860 G9，AMD型号被命名为865 G9。我们已经测试了AMD型号865 G9（型号为6F6H5EA），配备了AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U与集成的Radeon 680M GPU，16GB内存，512GB SSD，16:10 IPS显示屏（1920 x 1200像素），集成隐私过滤器（Sure View），最大亮度为1000尼特。

Test device courtesy of campuspoint.de

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP EliteBook 865 G9 (EliteBook 865 Series)

Processor

AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U 8 x 2.7 - 4.7 GHz, 30 W PL2 / Short Burst, 25 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+)

Graphics adapter

AMD Radeon 680M

Memory

16 GB

, DDR5-4800, Single-Channel, 2 slots, max. 64 GB

Display

16.00 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 142 PPI, X160NV42, IPS, Sure View Privacy Filter, glossy: no, 60 Hz

Mainboard

AMD Promontory/Bixby FCH

Storage

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, 512 GB

, 428 GB free

Soundcard

AMD Zen - Audio Processor - HD Audio Controller

Connections

3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 2 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm, 1 SmartCard, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor

Networking

Qualcomm Fast Connect 6900 Wi-Fi 6E Dual Band Simultaneous (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2, LTE

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 19 x 359 x 251

Battery

76 Wh, 6304 mAh Lithium-Polymer

Operating System

Microsoft Windows 11 Pro

Camera

Webcam: 5 MP Privacy Camera
Primary Camera: 5 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Stereo, Bang & Olufsen, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: yes, 110W PSU USB-C, HP Tools, 36 Months Warranty

Weight

1.874 kg, Power Supply: 452 g

Price

1550 Euro

Links

HP homepage

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

潜在的竞争对手比较

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
87.2 % v7 ^(old)	12 / 2022	HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	1.9 kg	19 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
89.3 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2022	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1.9 kg	20.5 mm	16.00"	1920x1200
86.3 % v7 ^(old)	09 / 2021	LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.2 kg	16.8 mm	16.00"	2560x1600
84.3 % v7 ^(old)	02 / 2022	SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1.7 kg	19.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.8 % v7 ^(old)	10 / 2022	LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G R3 5300U, Vega 6	1.6 kg	16.3 mm	16.00"	1280x1200

外壳 - 优雅的金属外观

新的16英寸EliteBook 865 G9的外壳与ZBook Firefly 16 G9.它的设计是较少的棱角相比，老的EliteBook 850 G8.银色的铝制外壳看起来质量很高。显示屏盖和底座都非常稳定。笔记本电脑几乎可以打开180度；铰链不能防止最小的摇晃。窄边框使该设备具有非常现代的外观。

新的16英寸设备比旧的15英寸EliteBook 850 G8要厚一点，但没有任何宽度。这款联想ThinkPad T16 G1，也有16英寸的屏幕，略大，也有一点厚。总体而言，新EliteBook 865 G9非常便携。110瓦的电源重量为451克，EliteBook本身的重量约为1.9公斤。

尺寸比较

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA HP EliteBook 865 G9 SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H LG Gram 16 (2021) LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G DIN A4 ❌

连接性 - 带有USB 4的AMD EliteBook

惠普为EliteBook 865 G9配备了两个快速USB C 4.0端口，也可用于充电和连接外部显示器。在将我们的测试设备连接到USB C屏幕（包括以太网连接和输入设备）时，我们没有遇到任何问题。该设备还具有一个HDMI输出，一个SIM卡插槽，以及两个普通的USB A端口。

左边：HDMI 2.0b，USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 GBit/s）2个USB-C 4.0（40 GBit/s，DisplayPort ALT模式1.4，Power Delivery），智能卡阅读器（可选）。

右边。Nano-SIM卡插槽（WWAN型号可选），Kensington Nano安全插槽，USB-A 3.2 Gen.1（5 GBit/s，供电），3.5毫米立体声。

沟通

AMD EliteBook配备了高通公司的现代Wi-Fi模块（WCN6856，BT 5.2），应该支持新的Wi-Fi 6E标准。然而，我们无法连接到华硕参考路由器的6-GHz网络。在5-GHz网络中的传输速率非常好--迄今为止记录的一些最快的传输速率为1.7GBit/s。我们在测试时没有遇到任何连接问题。

测试装置还配备了一个英特尔LTE模块（XMM 7560），可以与纳米SIM卡或eSIM卡一起使用。我们的Telekom SIM卡运行良好。WWAN模块必须在制造商处进行配置--不能加装。与英特尔型号（EliteBook 860 G9）不同，该设备不包括可选的5G调制解调器。

Networking
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Qualcomm Fast Connect 6900 Wi-Fi 6E Dual Band Simultaneous
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1709 (min: 1600) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1633 (min: 1575) MBit/s ∼100%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1624 (min: 1598) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1624 (min: 1236) MBit/s ∼100%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12	932 (min: 463) MBit/s ∼67%
iperf3 receive AX12	664 (min: 646) MBit/s ∼52%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12	1385 (min: 569) MBit/s ∼99%
iperf3 receive AX12	1159 (min: 1001) MBit/s ∼92%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1347 (min: 110) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1510 (min: 1265) MBit/s ∼88%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1309 (min: 1167) MBit/s ∼80%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1316 (min: 964) MBit/s ∼81%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
iperf3 transmit AX12	1400 (min: 707) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AX12	1266 (min: 1217) MBit/s ∼100%

HP EliteBook 865 G9; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1633 (1575-1713)

HP EliteBook 865 G9; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1708 (1600-1748)

网络摄像头

正如在ZBook Firefly 16 G9，该设备配备了一个红外网络摄像头，据称提供500万像素。然而，图像的最高记录为3.7MP（2560 x 1440像素）。该网络摄像头仍然比通常的720p或1080p网络摄像头要好，特别是在清晰度方面。总而言之，这是一个体面的性能，从大多数其他笔记本电脑中脱颖而出。

ColorChecker HP EliteBook 865 G9: 5.53 ∆E min: 1.81 - max: 10.04 ∆E

维护

基本单元的底盖很容易拆卸--与之不同的是ZBook Studio 16，这个设备没有任何隐藏的螺丝。维护选项很好。除了内存模块和M.2 2280固态硬盘的插槽（每个都隐藏在一个额外的盖子下面）之外，用户还可以更换Wi-Fi和WWAN模块。

输入设备--EliteBook有很棒的键盘

带有专用数字键盘的背光键盘给我们留下了非常好的印象。敲击的力度非常大，所以意见可能会因个人喜好而不同，但总体而言，这是目前移动设备上最好的键盘之一。它比更昂贵的ZBook Studio 16 G9甚至可以和联想的ThinkPads相比，尽管它们的质量在过去几年里有所下降。总的来说，我们更喜欢EliteBook的防泼水输入设备，而不是目前的ThinkPad T16。......只是集成的电源按钮和小的垂直方向键需要一点时间来适应。

惠普已经有一段时间没有在其商务机型上使用触摸杆了，这就给我们留下了大型ClickPad（12.8 x 8.7厘米）。触摸板非常舒适，易于使用。此外，点击的声音显得非常消沉和优越--这才是它应该有的样子。

显示--确定视图仍然是一个问题

我们的测试装置配备了可选的Sure View面板，它具有集成的隐私过滤器。它的一般特性（1920 x 1200像素，哑光表面和高达1000 cd/m²的亮度）是有希望的，但还有很多需要考虑的地方。集成隐私过滤器可以通过触摸按钮激活，但即使关闭它，可视角度也非常有限--显示屏正前方的甜蜜点非常狭窄，图像质量不会降低。即使是小的移动也会导致对比度和亮度的明显降低。明亮的内容在哑光面板上也会出现轻微的颗粒感。亮度调节是另一个大问题。Sure View只在最低的亮度水平上工作。这导致了两个问题。Sure View在明亮的环境中很难使用（例如在火车上或公共场所），它必须在低光环境中激活，以便达到尽可能低的亮度水平。我们在下表中列出了这些数值。

Helligkeit Bildmitte in cd/m²
亮度	100%	90%	80%	70%	60%	50%	40%	30%	20%	10%	0%
关闭Sure View	865	729	634	535	436	332	252	216	180	142	105
Sure View on	157	146	136	125	115	104	94	83	72	62	51

总的来说，结果是非常好的。最大亮度达到900cd/m²左右，黑值位于0.3cd/m²左右，这导致了非常高的最大对比度。然而，这只是在你坐在面板前面的情况下才会如此。只有72%的糟糕亮度分布是另一个问题。这意味着特别是右下角要比屏幕的其他部分暗得多。最低亮度--即使使用Sure View--也是51cd/m²，这在非常黑暗的环境中仍然太高。该面板还使用56赫兹的PWM，即使是在最大亮度下。


809 cd/m²	825 cd/m²	795 cd/m²
861 cd/m²	865 cd/m²	788 cd/m²
711 cd/m²	663 cd/m²	624 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

X160NV42 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Maximum: 865 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 771.2 cd/m² Minimum: 51 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 72 %
Center on Battery: 865 cd/m²
Contrast: 2883:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
73.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.36

Download ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP EliteBook 865 G9 X160NV42, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 B160UAN01.K, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	LG Gram 16 (2021) LG Philips LP160WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H BOE07D8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G LG Display LP160WU1-SPH1, IPS, 1280x1200, 16"	HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA InfoVision X156NVF8 R1, I, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA BOE0A02, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"
Display		8%	16%	-12%	-48%	-8%	-4%
Display P3 Coverage	71.4	80.1 12%	95.8 34%	64.5 -10%	36 -50%		68.1 -5%
sRGB Coverage	99.3	100 1%	99.8 1%	86.2 -13%	55 -45%	95 -4%	96.1 -3%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	73.2	80.5 10%	83.8 14%	62.9 -14%	37 -49%	65 -11%	70 -4%
Response Times		26%	-5%	-58%	-13%	127%	-16%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	35.5 ?(17.1, 18.1)	27 ?(12, 15) 24%	44 ?(19, 25) -24%	58.4 ?(26.8, 31.6) -65%	38 ?(19, 19) -7%	47 ?(22, 25) -32%	52.8 ?(22.9, 29.9) -49%
Response Time Black / White *	23.5 ?(13.4, 10.1)	17 ?(8, 9) 28%	20 ?(8, 12) 15%	35.2 ?(18, 17.2) -50%	28 ?(16, 12) -19%	32 ?(19, 13) -36%	19.5 ?(6, 13.5) 17%
PWM Frequency	56.7					312 ?(100) 450%
Screen		-34%	-53%	-51%	-60%	-39%	-30%
Brightness middle	865	404 -53%	331 -62%	329 -62%	299 -65%	802 -7%	526 -39%
Brightness	771	391 -49%	309 -60%	316 -59%	270 -65%	702 -9%	499 -35%
Brightness Distribution	72	80 11%	88 22%	92 28%	85 18%	77 7%	93 29%
Black Level *	0.3	0.29 3%	0.22 27%	0.3 -0%	0.265 12%	0.245 18%	0.31 -3%
Contrast	2883	1393 -52%	1505 -48%	1097 -62%	1128 -61%	3273 14%	1697 -41%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.4	3.9 -63%	4.64 -93%	5.4 -125%	4.57 -90%	6.22 -159%	3.6 -50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.8	8.5 -47%	9.82 -69%	10.1 -74%	8.92 -54%	9.92 -71%	6.6 -14%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.5	1.7 -13%	3.16 -111%	2.5 -67%	5.02 -235%		2.6 -73%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	3.8	5.4 -42%	6.9 -82%	5.1 -34%	3.8 -0%	7.69 -102%	5.5 -45%
Gamma	2.36 ^93%	2.21 ^100%	2.34 ^94%	2.1 ^105%	2.6 ^85%	2.75 ^80%	2.02 ^109%
CCT	6922 ^94%	6242 ^104%	7904 ^82%	7609 ^85%	6142 ^106%	6135 ^106%	6527 ^100%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)			75.1			65
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)			100			95
Total Average (Program / Settings)		0% / -16%	-14% / -31%	-40% / -43%	-40% / -51%	27% / 4%	-17% / -23%

* ... smaller is better

我们用专业的CalMAN软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）对面板进行了测量，对于一台商用笔记本电脑来说，对出厂时的结果相当满意。显示屏的偏色很小，在正常使用中几乎看不到，而且与sRGB参考色彩空间的色彩偏差也很低。激活Sure View会增加偏差。我们不建议在这种模式下处理图像。

我们的校准（可在上面免费下载）进一步改善了色彩显示。该面板涵盖了整个sRGB色彩空间。

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
23.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 13.4 ms rise
23.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10.1 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
35.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 17.1 ms rise
35.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18.1 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

56.7 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 56.7 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 56.7 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

在户外，如果你不坐在显示屏的正前方，就很难使用笔记本电脑。在下面的图片中，可视角度看起来相当好，但摄像头在一定程度上掩盖了限制。从主观上讲，局限性更大，这一点你也可以在户外图片中看到。

总的来说，我们不能推荐Sure View面板。在实践中，你不会从它的高亮度水平中得到什么，但你很快就会对受限的视角和对比度感到厌烦，即使在Sure View功能被关闭的情况下。哑光的低功耗显示屏，我们已经在相同的ZBook Firefly 16 G9我们已经对相同的ZBook Firefly 16 G9进行了评测，显然整体上是更好的选择。

性能 - Ryzen 7 Pro和单通道内存

淘宝网 Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U其集成显卡Radeon 680M和16GB内存为EliteBook 865 G9的商务笔记本提供了足够的动力。唯一的限制是内存配置，它由一个16GB的模块组成。这使得升级相当容易，但不必要地限制了GPU性能。我们强烈建议购买带有双通道内存的机型或安装第二个模块。

处理器 - AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U

的AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U是一款移动处理器，与普通消费级芯片Ryzen 7 6800U相比，有8个内核（16个线程）和额外的安全功能。惠普的功率限制相当保守，允许处理器短时间内接入30瓦的功率。然后，能耗在几秒钟后稳定在25瓦特。在我们的多核测试中，CPU的性能特别好，而且很稳定。这款产品ThinkPad T16 G1配备了酷睿i5-1240P在第一次CineBench测试中略微快一些，但随后很快就下降，落在了AMD EliteBook的后面。目前英特尔Alder Lake芯片的性能核心在单核测试中表现更好。

在电池上运行时，性能保持稳定。你可以找到进一步的CPU基准测试结果这里.

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U: Ø1606 (1590.77-1665.14)

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P; ThrottleStop @30W: Ø1341 (1316.01-1756.34)

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P: Ø1033 (919.1-1746.77)

LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø596 (474.78-805.25)

SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H; Performance Mode: Ø861 (841.54-932.92)

SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H: Ø664 (645.73-816.34)

SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H; On Battery: Ø487 (449.1-777.88)

LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U: Ø749 (726.74-795.75)

HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7: Ø702 (674.47-727.03)

CPU Performance Rating: Percent
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

CPU Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	85.2 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	81.8 pt
Average of class Office	79.4 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	73.9 pt
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	58.8 pt
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	57.9 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	55.6 pt
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G ^-2! AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	43.5 pt

Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (9923 - 11026, n=6)	10327 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	10047 Points
Average of class Office (1577 - 15743, n=90, last 2 years)	9406 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	6597 Points -34%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	4772 (4564.04^min - 4772.47^max) Points -53%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	4652 Points -54%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	4602 Points -54%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	4404 Points -56%

Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	1644 Points +17%
Average of class Office (618 - 1995, n=90, last 2 years)	1558 Points +11%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (1409 - 1520, n=6)	1488 Points +6%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	1476 Points +5%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	1444 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	1409 Points
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	1311 Points -7%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	1102 Points -22%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (3784 - 4457, n=6)	4099 Points +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	3886 Points
Average of class Office (590 - 5980, n=89, last 2 years)	3647 Points -6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	2953 Points -24%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	1883 Points -52%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	1847 Points -52%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	1772 Points -54%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	1670 Points -57%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Office (229 - 766, n=89, last 2 years)	604 Points +3%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (587 - 596, n=6)	591 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	587 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	579 Points -1%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	575 Points -2%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	535 Points -9%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	518 Points -12%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	431 Points -27%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (1652 - 1901, n=6)	1757 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	1756.34 (1316.01^min - 1756.34^max) Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	1746.77 (919.1^min - 1746.77^max) Points +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	1665 (1590.77^min - 1665.14^max) Points
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=92, last 2 years)	1573 Points -6%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	933 (841.54^min - 932.92^max) Points -44%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	816 (645.73^min - 816.34^max) Points -51%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	778 (449.1^min - 777.88^max) Points -53%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	832 Points -50%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	805 Points -52%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	727 (674.47^min - 727.03^max) Points -56%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (228 - 241, n=6)	236 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	232 Points
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=91, last 2 years)	231 Points 0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	224 Points -3%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	222 Points -4%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	218 Points -6%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	215 Points -7%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	205 Points -12%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	166 Points -28%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	771 Seconds * -154%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	714 Seconds * -136%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	666 Seconds * -120%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	617 Seconds * -104%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	442 Seconds * -46%
Average of class Office (208 - 1956, n=91, last 2 years)	418 Seconds * -38%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	303 Seconds *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (282 - 307, n=6)	298 Seconds * +2%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (44011 - 50871, n=6)	48015 MIPS +9%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	44011 MIPS
Average of class Office (7532 - 65460, n=92, last 2 years)	39132 MIPS -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	28565 MIPS -35%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	22300 MIPS -49%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	21645 MIPS -51%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	21070 MIPS -52%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	19170 MIPS -56%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	5542 MIPS
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (5057 - 5542, n=6)	5347 MIPS -4%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	5312 MIPS -4%
Average of class Office (2972 - 6687, n=91, last 2 years)	5257 MIPS -5%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	5255 MIPS -5%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	5113 MIPS -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	4685 MIPS -15%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	3755 MIPS -32%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (7044 - 8050, n=6)	7789 Points +11%
Average of class Office (1018 - 11980, n=91, last 2 years)	7562 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	7166 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	7044 Points
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	5564 Points -21%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	5562 Points -21%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	5163 Points -27%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Office (510 - 1995, n=92, last 2 years)	1583 Points +10%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	1554 Points +8%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	1548 Points +8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	1538 Points +7%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	1500 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (1433 - 1533, n=6)	1489 Points +4%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	1433 Points

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (11.7 - 13.5, n=6)	12.8 fps +9%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	11.7 fps
Average of class Office (1.72 - 18.7, n=89, last 2 years)	10.6 fps -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	9.18 fps -22%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	5.87 fps -50%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	5.71 fps -51%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	5.63 fps -52%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	5.37 fps -54%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	77.1 s * -45%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	54.1 s * -2%
Average of class Office (31.3 - 129.6, n=89, last 2 years)	53.6 s * -1%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	53.1 s *
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (46.3 - 58, n=6)	52.9 s * -0%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	47.4 s * +11%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	45.9 s * +14%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	45 s * +15%

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	0.664 sec * -28%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.625 sec * -20%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H	0.579 sec * -12%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7	0.556 sec * -7%
Average of class Office (0.4244 - 1.135, n=88, last 2 years)	0.548 sec * -6%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (0.507 - 0.544, n=6)	0.525 sec * -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P	0.521 sec * -0%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	0.519 sec *

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1665 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

80.2 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

98 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

232 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

3886 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

587 Points

Cinebench R23 Single Core

1409 Points

Cinebench R23 Multi Core

10047 Points

Help

... in comparison

Performance Rating
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	92.4 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	90 pt
Average of class Office	74.8 pt
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	61.3 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	60.6 pt
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	54.8 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	52.8 pt
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G ^-1! AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	45.2 pt

AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (11272 - 12485, n=6)	11862 KRay/s +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	11668 KRay/s
Average of class Office (763 - 24250, n=90, last 2 years)	9635 KRay/s -17%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	7189 KRay/s -38%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	6899 KRay/s -41%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	6239 KRay/s -47%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4894 KRay/s -58%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	3612 KRay/s -69%

AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (72242 - 79484, n=6)	75580 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	73770 Points
Average of class Office (4113 - 102228, n=90, last 2 years)	48471 Points -34%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	37208 Points -50%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	33606 Points -54%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	30383 Points -59%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	26359 Points -64%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	23249 Points -68%

AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (2419 - 2638, n=6)	2520 MB/s +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	2475 MB/s
Average of class Office (287 - 4551, n=90, last 2 years)	2285 MB/s -8%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2055 MB/s -17%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1745 MB/s -29%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	1730 MB/s -30%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	1573 MB/s -36%

AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (86644 - 92945, n=6)	88685 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	87176 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	75330 Points -14%
Average of class Office (8185 - 115197, n=90, last 2 years)	69770 Points -20%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	52847 Points -39%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	51411 Points -41%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	50442 Points -42%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	50407 Points -42%

AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (10917 - 11637, n=6)	11277 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	11123 Points
Average of class Office (404 - 14288, n=90, last 2 years)	6784 Points -39%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	6687 Points -40%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	5780 Points -48%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4922 Points -56%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4430 Points -60%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	4038 Points -64%

AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (39609 - 43843, n=6)	41195 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	40693 Points
Average of class Office (2075 - 54365, n=90, last 2 years)	25350 Points -38%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	18088 Points -56%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	18076 Points -56%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	17564 Points -57%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	16186 Points -60%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	14077 Points -65%

AIDA64 / CPU AES
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	70615 MB/s +41%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62886 MB/s +25%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	58344 MB/s +16%
Average of class Office (7254 - 155900, n=90, last 2 years)	52257 MB/s +4%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	50118 MB/s
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (45568 - 50859, n=6)	48032 MB/s -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	44826 MB/s -11%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	19307 MB/s -61%

AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (641 - 713, n=6)	676 MB/s +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	655 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	639 MB/s -2%
Average of class Office (78 - 1018, n=90, last 2 years)	611 MB/s -7%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	389 MB/s -41%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	374 MB/s -43%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	321 MB/s -51%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	287 MB/s -56%

AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (5967 - 6637, n=6)	6260 KRay/s +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	6091 KRay/s
Average of class Office (432 - 12755, n=90, last 2 years)	5103 KRay/s -16%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3869 KRay/s -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	3748 KRay/s -38%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	3454 KRay/s -43%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	3199 KRay/s -47%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	2579 KRay/s -58%

AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	44296 MPixel/s +125%
Average of class Office (4814 - 54971, n=90, last 2 years)	28955 MPixel/s +47%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	28526 MPixel/s +45%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	28353 MPixel/s +44%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (19707 - 26584, n=6)	24709 MPixel/s +25%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	19707 MPixel/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	16913 MPixel/s -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	13970 MPixel/s -29%

系统性能

EliteBook 865 G9的主观表现非常好。这是一个反应灵敏的设备，在测试时没有显示任何稳定性问题。尽管它的单通道内存配置，但测试设备在合成基准测试中取得了良好的结果，这在AIDA内存测试中才变得明显。

PCMark 10 / Score
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (5873 - 6152, n=6)	6036 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	5873 Points
Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=83, last 2 years)	5655 Points -4%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5415 Points -8%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	5007 Points -15%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	4917 Points -16%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4905 Points -16%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	4299 Points -27%

PCMark 10 / Essentials
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	10639 Points +15%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	10149 Points +9%
Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=83, last 2 years)	10126 Points +9%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (9151 - 10263, n=6)	9721 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	9562 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	9456 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	9289 Points
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	7903 Points -15%

PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (8435 - 8891, n=6)	8625 Points 0%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	8587 Points
Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=83, last 2 years)	7790 Points -9%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	7056 Points -18%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	6888 Points -20%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	6759 Points -21%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	6596 Points -23%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6364 Points -26%

PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (6796 - 7417, n=6)	7126 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	6894 Points
Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=83, last 2 years)	6395 Points -7%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5740 Points -17%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	5600 Points -19%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	5013 Points -27%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	4616 Points -33%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	4136 Points -40%

CrossMark / Overall
Average of class Office (348 - 1891, n=86, last 2 years)	1401 Points +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1392 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (1154 - 1430, n=6)	1342 Points +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1329 Points
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	935 Points -30%

CrossMark / Productivity
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1400 Points +2%
Average of class Office (393 - 1870, n=86, last 2 years)	1396 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1373 Points
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (1188 - 1426, n=6)	1356 Points -1%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	983 Points -28%

CrossMark / Creativity
Average of class Office (340 - 1982, n=86, last 2 years)	1462 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1426 Points +5%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (1180 - 1523, n=6)	1406 Points +3%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1363 Points
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	920 Points -33%

CrossMark / Responsiveness
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1270 Points +14%
Average of class Office (258 - 2017, n=86, last 2 years)	1260 Points +13%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M (990 - 1243, n=6)	1136 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1118 Points
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	844 Points -25%

PCMark 10 Score		5873 points
Help

AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency

AIDA64 / Memory Copy
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	64091 MB/s +107%
Average of class Office (7158 - 108783, n=91, last 2 years)	49293 MB/s +59%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47502 MB/s +53%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47468 MB/s +53%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (31003 - 48605, n=6)	44970 MB/s +45%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	36092 MB/s +16%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	31003 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	23312 MB/s -25%

AIDA64 / Memory Read
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	62442 MB/s +80%
Average of class Office (7325 - 127282, n=91, last 2 years)	50257 MB/s +45%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48807 MB/s +41%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	48086 MB/s +39%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (34682 - 45079, n=6)	39700 MB/s +14%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	34682 MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	34493 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	24657 MB/s -29%

AIDA64 / Memory Write
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	66479 MB/s +93%
Average of class Office (7579 - 117935, n=91, last 2 years)	53457 MB/s +55%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (34532 - 51096, n=6)	47984 MB/s +39%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	47070 MB/s +36%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	46929 MB/s +36%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	40554 MB/s +17%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	34532 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	23454 MB/s -32%

AIDA64 / Memory Latency
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, Vega 6	113.5 ns * -23%
Average AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (92 - 135.3, n=6)	113.3 ns * -23%
Average of class Office (6.9 - 185.2, n=90, last 2 years)	96.3 ns * -5%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	92.6 ns * -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs	92.4 ns * -0%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M	92 ns *
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	83.1 ns * +10%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs	72.3 ns * +21%

* ... smaller is better

DPC延迟

我们的标准化延迟测试（网上冲浪，YouTube上的4K，CPU负载）表明，EliteBook 865 G9（其当前BIOS版本）没有任何限制，适合实时音频应用。

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1542.6 μs * -183%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1225 μs * -125%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1127 μs * -107%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	544.6 μs *
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	517 μs * +5%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	420.3 μs * +23%

* ... smaller is better

存储设备

AMD EliteBook支持快速的PCIe 4.0固态硬盘，但我们的测试装置只配备了一个PCIe 3.0 2242固态硬盘。三星PM991硬盘的容量为512GB，其中428GB在第一次启动后仍然可用。传输速率并不高，最高为2.7GB/s，但与更快的PCIe 4.0驱动器相比，它们在日常使用中应该不会给你带来任何真正的限制。阅读进一步的SSD基准测试这里.

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 3100.8 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1617.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 349.62 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 369.48 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 35.62 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 114.98 MB/s

CDM 6 Write 4K Q8T8: 344.3 MB/s

CDM 6 Read 4K Q8T8: 978.6 MB/s

Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD

Drive Performance Rating - Percent
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	90.2 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	65 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	64.2 pt
Average of class Office	57.4 pt
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	54.4 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	41.4 pt
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	36.8 pt
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	31.4 pt

DiskSpd
seq read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4278 (4261.41^min - 4277.73^max) MB/s +141%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3645 (3539.21^min - 3644.69^max) MB/s +106%
Average of class Office (121 - 4554, n=87, last 2 years)	2697 MB/s +52%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	2028 (1955.17^min - 2027.74^max) MB/s +14%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1772 (1755.11^min - 1771.67^max) MB/s
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1730 (1725.12^min - 1730.26^max) MB/s -2%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (1188 - 1882, n=10)	1613 MB/s -9%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1596 (1575.17^min - 1595.93^max) MB/s -10%
seq write
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4360 (4354.74^min - 4360.49^max) MB/s +184%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2809 (2738.04^min - 2808.76^max) MB/s +83%
Average of class Office (43 - 5842, n=87, last 2 years)	2629 MB/s +71%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2489 (1082.97^min - 2488.9^max) MB/s +62%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	2245 (2172.86^min - 2245.12^max) MB/s +46%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1535 (1503.59^min - 1535.32^max) MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1311 (1226.41^min - 1311.35^max) MB/s -15%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (195.5 - 1706, n=10)	1284 MB/s -16%
seq q8 t1 read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6579 (6306.77^min - 6578.61^max) MB/s +140%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	6524 (5489.01^min - 6524.19^max) MB/s +138%
Average of class Office (124.2 - 7120, n=87, last 2 years)	4475 MB/s +63%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	3445 (3030.59^min - 3444.78^max) MB/s +26%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	3272 (3009.2^min - 3271.56^max) MB/s +19%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	2890 (2377.4^min - 2890.29^max) MB/s +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	2741 (2448.63^min - 2741.4^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (1655 - 3111, n=10)	2703 MB/s -1%
seq q8 t1 write
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5011 (4986.93^min - 5011.19^max) MB/s +212%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4812 (4803.57^min - 4811.71^max) MB/s +200%
Average of class Office (46.7 - 6791, n=87, last 2 years)	3473 MB/s +116%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	2981 (2976.41^min - 2980.59^max) MB/s +86%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2496 (2283.43^min - 2496.07^max) MB/s +55%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1725 (1683.37^min - 1724.81^max) MB/s +7%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1606 (1595.72^min - 1606.21^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (228 - 1832, n=10)	1387 MB/s -14%
4k q1 t1 read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	94.3 (93.89^min - 94.29^max) MB/s +112%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	68.2 (67.72^min - 68.15^max) MB/s +53%
Average of class Office (5.55 - 89.9, n=87, last 2 years)	58.1 MB/s +31%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	54.3 (54.16^min - 54.32^max) MB/s +22%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	48.8 (48.48^min - 48.81^max) MB/s +10%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (34.5 - 55, n=10)	44.8 MB/s +1%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	44.5 (43.91^min - 44.49^max) MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	34.5 (33.47^min - 34.53^max) MB/s -22%
4k q1 t1 write
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	254 (251.02^min - 253.51^max) MB/s +115%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	208 (205.9^min - 208.09^max) MB/s +76%
Average of class Office (1.23 - 429, n=87, last 2 years)	163.9 MB/s +39%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	135 (132.8^min - 134.66^max) MB/s +14%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	134.8 (129.08^min - 134.75^max) MB/s +14%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (94.8 - 188.2, n=10)	124.2 MB/s +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	118 (117.43^min - 118.03^max) MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	94.8 (92.36^min - 94.81^max) MB/s -20%
4k q32 t16 read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	3078 (2841.35^min - 3078.24^max) MB/s +278%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2139 (1104.16^min - 2139.02^max) MB/s +163%
Average of class Office (7.49 - 4425, n=87, last 2 years)	1263 MB/s +55%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1145 (798.17^min - 1144.85^max) MB/s +41%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	814 (780.65^min - 814.02^max) MB/s
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (507 - 1244, n=10)	807 MB/s -1%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	683 (673.81^min - 682.59^max) MB/s -16%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	507 (486.92^min - 507.33^max) MB/s -38%
4k q32 t16 write
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1641 (1097.57^min - 1640.78^max) MB/s +355%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1053 (848.79^min - 1053.42^max) MB/s +192%
Average of class Office (1.5 - 3254, n=87, last 2 years)	942 MB/s +161%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	530 (432.64^min - 529.91^max) MB/s +47%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (206 - 830, n=10)	430 MB/s +19%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	361 (319.39^min - 361.16^max) MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	293 (283.44^min - 292.93^max) MB/s -19%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	286 (268.44^min - 286.33^max) MB/s -21%

AS SSD
Score Total
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	6858 Points +144%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	4934 Points +76%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	4630 Points +65%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	4377 Points +56%
Average of class Office (704 - 9204, n=84, last 2 years)	4221 Points +50%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	2805 Points
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (1472 - 3394, n=10)	2662 Points -5%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	2229 Points -21%
Score Read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2857 Points +171%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1915 Points +82%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1497 Points +42%
Average of class Office (252 - 3364, n=84, last 2 years)	1477 Points +40%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1112 Points +6%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (756 - 1484, n=10)	1075 Points +2%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1053 Points
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	810 Points -23%
Score Write
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3010 Points +137%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2602 Points +105%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	2176 Points +71%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2060 Points +62%
Average of class Office (247 - 4111, n=84, last 2 years)	2031 Points +60%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1271 Points
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (244 - 1279, n=10)	1091 Points -14%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1055 Points -17%
Seq Read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	5464 MB/s +120%
Average of class Office (508 - 5796, n=84, last 2 years)	3501 MB/s +41%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	3225 MB/s +30%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2808 MB/s +13%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	2801 MB/s +13%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	2485 MB/s
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (2211 - 2744, n=10)	2446 MB/s -2%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	2211 MB/s -11%
Seq Write
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	4001 MB/s +258%
Average of class Office (294 - 5880, n=84, last 2 years)	2413 MB/s +116%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	2345 MB/s +110%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	1567 MB/s +40%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1362 MB/s +22%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (180 - 1735, n=10)	1167 MB/s +4%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1119 MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1057 MB/s -6%
4K Read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	86.5 MB/s +97%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	69.7 MB/s +58%
Average of class Office (18 - 91.1, n=84, last 2 years)	57.9 MB/s +32%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	54.7 MB/s +24%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	50.2 MB/s +14%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	43.99 MB/s
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (34.3 - 51.4, n=10)	42.4 MB/s -4%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	36.22 MB/s -18%
4K Write
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	221 MB/s +87%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	170.9 MB/s +45%
Average of class Office (28.2 - 350, n=84, last 2 years)	166.8 MB/s +41%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	138.6 MB/s +18%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	126.6 MB/s +7%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (91.2 - 163.5, n=10)	125.5 MB/s +6%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	117.89 MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	91.17 MB/s -23%
4K-64 Read
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	2224 MB/s +192%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1584 MB/s +108%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1162 MB/s +53%
Average of class Office (182.3 - 2713, n=84, last 2 years)	1069 MB/s +41%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (486 - 1182, n=10)	789 MB/s +4%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	760.82 MB/s
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	720 MB/s -5%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	553 MB/s -27%
4K-64 Write
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	2682 MB/s +158%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	1981 MB/s +90%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	1913 MB/s +84%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	1687 MB/s +62%
Average of class Office (183.4 - 3394, n=84, last 2 years)	1623 MB/s +56%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	1041.52 MB/s
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	861 MB/s -17%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (121.3 - 1070, n=10)	849 MB/s -18%
Access Time Read
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	0.159 ms * -224%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (0.049 - 0.225, n=10)	0.116 ms * -137%
Average of class Office (0.022 - 0.302, n=84, last 2 years)	0.08102 ms * -65%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.059 ms * -20%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	0.049 ms *
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.048 ms * +2%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	0.04 ms * +18%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	0.035 ms * +29%
Access Time Write
Average of class Office (0.016 - 0.625, n=84, last 2 years)	0.07108 ms * -115%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	0.057 ms * -73%
Average Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU (0.023 - 0.103, n=10)	0.0517 ms * -57%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	0.043 ms * -30%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	0.033 ms *
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR	0.03 ms * +9%
LG Gram 16 (2021) SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	0.028 ms * +15%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	0.024 ms * +27%

* ... smaller is better

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

HP EliteBook 865 G9: Ø2705 (2435-2725.25)

图形性能

该处理器的集成 AMD Radeon 680M负责图形性能，是目前最快的iGPU之一。不幸的是，它的性能受到单通道内存配置的限制，这使我们的测试装置与英特尔Iris Xe Graphics G7（含96个EUs）。.

笔记本联想ThinkPad T14 G3配备了相同的AMD处理器，具有相同的功率限制，但具有第二个RAM模块。这种差异令人印象深刻：根据不同的测试，联想的GPU性能比我们的测试设备好45%到75%。

所有这些在你日常使用笔记本电脑作为商业设备时不应该起到很大作用。但如果你有兴趣偶尔玩玩游戏，你可能想升级内存配置，否则你将被限制在几乎所有游戏的最低细节水平上。

无论是在永久负载下还是在电池运行时，图形性能都保持稳定。了解更多GPU基准测试这里.

3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark | Geekbench 5.5 | V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10

3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	98.8 pt
Average AMD Radeon 680M	96.3 pt
Average of class Office	69.3 pt
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	68.3 pt
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	62.1 pt
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	59.6 pt
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H ^-1! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H	58.5 pt
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P	47.3 pt
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G ^-2! AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	37.6 pt

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	10343 Points +48%
Average AMD Radeon 680M (6858 - 11755, n=35)	10068 Points +44%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	6969 Points
Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=86, last 2 years)	6876 Points -1%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	6724 Points -4%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	6305 Points -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P	4668 Points -33%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	4072 Points -42%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	7050 Points +76%
Average AMD Radeon 680M (3791 - 7706, n=36)	6701 Points +67%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	5654 Points +41%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H	5137 Points +28%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	5077 Points +26%
Average of class Office (736 - 9375, n=88, last 2 years)	4886 Points +22%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	4015 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P	3036 Points -24%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	2522 Points -37%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	2289 Points +64%
Average AMD Radeon 680M (1359 - 2607, n=36)	2227 Points +59%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	1664 Points +19%
Average of class Office (313 - 4109, n=87, last 2 years)	1618 Points +16%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H	1591 Points +14%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	1559 Points +11%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	1399 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P	1025 Points -27%
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	862 Points -38%

Geekbench 5.5 - OpenCL Score
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	32859 Points +50%
Average AMD Radeon 680M (13008 - 34368, n=36)	30134 Points +38%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	21874 Points
Average of class Office (3474 - 46692, n=89, last 2 years)	19443 Points -11%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	19350 Points -12%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H	17598 Points -20%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	17558 Points -20%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P	11499 Points -47%

V-Ray Benchmark Next 4.10 - GPU
Average AMD Radeon 680M (52 - 78, n=23)	65.9 mpaths +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T14 G3-21CF004NGE AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	62 mpaths +5%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	59 mpaths
Average of class Office (8 - 88, n=73, last 2 years)	53.2 mpaths -10%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P	45 mpaths -24%
HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	26 mpaths -56%
LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1165G7	25 mpaths -58%
SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-11370H	25 mpaths -58%

3DMark 11 Performance		6852 points
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		22343 points
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3719 points
3DMark Time Spy Score		1589 points
Help

... in comparison

Blender: v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD | v3.3 Classroom CPU

Blender / v3.3 Classroom HIP/AMD
Average of class Office (298 - 1215, n=14, last 2 years)	739 Seconds * -33%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	555 Seconds *
Average AMD Radeon 680M (270 - 555, n=31)	346 Seconds * +38%

Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000), AMD Ryzen 3 5300U	1170 Seconds * -127%
Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1240P	867 Seconds * -68%
Average of class Office (343 - 3964, n=87, last 2 years)	743 Seconds * -44%
HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U	516 Seconds *
Average AMD Radeon 680M (389 - 609, n=32)	475 Seconds * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M: Ø14.3 (12-16)

	low	med.	high	ultra
GTA V (2015)	87.7	78.3	25.9	11.3
The Witcher 3 (2015)	74		23	14.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	108.9	83.5	55	48
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	37.5	19.4	14.8
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	41.4	32.4	29.3
Far Cry 5 (2018)	39	23	21	20
Strange Brigade (2018)	72.9	30	25.3	22
F1 2021 (2021)	103.2	49.7	37	16.1
Farming Simulator 22 (2021)	86	40	30	27
F1 22 (2022)	44.1	38	30	7.88

排放--非常安静的EliteBook

系统噪音

惠普为EliteBook 865 G9配备了一个风扇和一个热管。由于适度的功率限制，冷却系统不是很活跃。这也意味着该笔记本非常安静。在正常负载下，你可能会听到低沉的呼啸声，最大为29.1 dB(A)。而即使在压力测试中，系统噪音也不会超过32.9 dB(A)。这使惠普成为我们比较领域中最安静的设备之一。只有LG Gram 16更加安静（但提供的CPU性能明显较低）。我们没有听到任何其他电子噪音。

Noise Level

Idle		23 / 23 / 23 dB(A)
Load		29.1 / 32.9 dB(A)

	30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23 dB(A)

	HP EliteBook 865 G9 Radeon 680M, R7 PRO 6850U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1240P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ	LG Gram 16 (2021) Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG	SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-11370H, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW	LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G Vega 6, R3 5300U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU	HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1165G7, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR
Noise		-0%	-9%	-25%	-12%	-10%
off / environment *	23	23.3 -1%	26 -13%	24.4 -6%	25 -9%	26 -13%
Idle Minimum *	23	23.3 -1%	26 -13%	24.4 -6%	25 -9%	26 -13%
Idle Average *	23	23.3 -1%	26 -13%	24.4 -6%	25 -9%	26 -13%
Idle Maximum *	23	23.3 -1%	26 -13%	26.7 -16%	25.4 -10%	26.2 -14%
Load Average *	29.1	25.1 14%	30.8 -6%	43.8 -51%	36.2 -24%	29.5 -1%
Witcher 3 ultra *	29.1	32.1 -10%		43.8 -51%
Load Maximum *	32.9	34 -3%	31.1 5%	44.8 -36%	36.4 -11%	34 -3%

* ... smaller is better

温度

EliteBook 865 G9的表面温度在任何时候都保持在控制范围内--尽管有安静的风扇。温度在低负荷时保持正常，在最大负荷时，仅在基本单元底部的一个区域加热到最高47℃。这并不影响键盘，也不妨碍你在膝上使用该设备。

处理器以30瓦的功率开始我们的压力测试，但随后很快下降到25瓦，持续约10分钟。此后，消耗量进一步降低到23瓦特。在压力测试结束后，我们没有遇到任何性能影响。

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


39.4 °C	39.4 °C	36.7 °C
38.4 °C	37.8 °C	28 °C
26.6 °C	24.7 °C	25.1 °C

Maximum: 39.4 °C
Average: 32.9 °C


38.7 °C	47.6 °C	44 °C
26.7 °C	43.4 °C	39.8 °C
26.8 °C	30.1 °C	32 °C

Maximum: 47.6 °C
Average: 36.6 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.7 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


23.6 °C	23.6 °C	23.2 °C
23.4 °C	23.1 °C	22.8 °C
22.8 °C	22.4 °C	22.4 °C

Maximum: 23.6 °C
Average: 23 °C


23.5 °C	24.1 °C	24 °C
22.8 °C	23.6 °C	23.9 °C
22.4 °C	22.8 °C	23 °C

Maximum: 24.1 °C
Average: 23.3 °C

Power Supply (max.) 23.8 °C | Room Temperature 19.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

Max. Load

Idle

Witcher 3


40.1 °C	40.3 °C	38.4 °C
39.1 °C	38.2 °C	29.7 °C
28.7 °C	26.3 °C	25.7 °C

Maximum: 40.3 °C
Average: 34.1 °C


39.3 °C	47.7 °C	43.2 °C
27.4 °C	41.6 °C	39.7 °C
27.2 °C	31.3 °C	31.3 °C

Maximum: 47.7 °C
Average: 36.5 °C

Power Supply (max.) 32.3 °C | Room Temperature 20 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.6 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.7 °C / 83.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-1.1 °C / -2 F).

	HP EliteBook 865 G9 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U, AMD Radeon 680M	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 Intel Core i5-1240P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs	LG Gram 16 (2021) Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H Intel Core i7-11370H, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs	LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G AMD Ryzen 3 5300U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000)	HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA Intel Core i7-1165G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Heat		-21%	-7%	1%	-6%	-6%
Maximum Upper Side *	39.4	45 -14%	46.9 -19%	39.1 1%	39.5 -0%	37.9 4%
Maximum Bottom *	47.6	42.8 10%	45.1 5%	43.4 9%	45 5%	39 18%
Idle Upper Side *	23.6	33 -40%	26.4 -12%	24.3 -3%	26.7 -13%	31 -31%
Idle Bottom *	24.1	33.6 -39%	24.1 -0%	25.1 -4%	28.2 -17%	27.8 -15%

* ... smaller is better

发言人

两个立体声扬声器为一台商务笔记本电脑产生了良好的、饱满的声音。虽然扬声器不能完全与高质量的多媒体设备相比，如Apple MacBook Pro 16的性能，但它们比直接竞争者联想ThinkPad T16 G1.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP EliteBook 865 G9 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 5% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.16 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 65% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

能源管理--AMD EliteBook拥有令人印象深刻的耐力

消耗功率

消耗率清楚地显示了明亮的16英寸显示屏的影响：在空闲时，我们测量了EliteBook 865 G9与Sure View面板的最大消耗量为14.1瓦特。相同的ZBook Firefly 16 G9配备普通的全高清面板（约500 cd/m²），只消耗了约9瓦。在负载情况下，AMD系统仍然非常高效，峰值为56瓦，持续消耗约为48瓦。待机运行时，消耗量略高，为1.6瓦。

USB C电源的额定输出功率为110瓦，最大100瓦输送到笔记本电脑。其他10瓦可通过额外的USB A端口使用，例如，可用于为智能手机充电。该电源在最大消耗方面没有问题，而且也有足够的储备，可以在负载下为电池充电。

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.38 / 1.6 Watt
Idle	5.3 / 12.8 / 14.1 Watt
Load	48.5 / 56.6 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, SK Hynix PC601 1TB HFS001TD9TNG, IPS, 2560x1600, 16"	SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung SSD 980 Pro 1TB MZ-V8P1T0BW, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G R3 5300U, Vega 6, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1280x1200, 16"	HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, I, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP ZBook Firefly 16 G9-6B897EA i7-1265U, T550 Laptop GPU, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 1920x1200, 16"	Average AMD Radeon 680M	Average of class Office
Power Consumption		27%	26%	16%	35%	19%	5%	-2%	20%
Idle Minimum *	5.3	2.9 45%	3.8 28%	4.5 15%	3.7 30%	5.8 -9%	4.5 15%	6.94 ?(2.2 - 14.6, n=33) -31%	4.48 ?(2 - 13.8, n=90, last 2 years) 15%
Idle Average *	12.8	6 53%	9 30%	8.5 34%	6.8 47%	8.4 34%	8 37%	8.92 ?(4.4 - 15, n=33) 30%	7.41 ?(3 - 14.9, n=90, last 2 years) 42%
Idle Maximum *	14.1	6.9 51%	11.3 20%	9.1 35%	8.6 39%	9.9 30%	8.7 38%	10.5 ?(5.1 - 18.6, n=33) 26%	8.86 ?(4.89 - 18.6, n=90, last 2 years) 37%
Load Average *	48.5	27.3 44%	35.2 27%	43.5 10%	30 38%	33 32%	48.3 -0%	53.9 ?(20 - 80.4, n=33) -11%	41.9 ?(8.7 - 77.9, n=85, last 2 years) 14%
Witcher 3 ultra *	48.7	42.6 13%		37.5 23%	30.2 38%	34.3 30%	45.3 7%
Load Maximum *	56.6	81.53 -44%	43.5 23%	69.4 -23%	45 20%	60 -6%	94.7 -67%	70.8 ?(48 - 103.2, n=33) -25%	61.7 ?(11.1 - 107, n=90, last 2 years) -9%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

HP EliteBook 865 G9; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø48.7 (47.2-51.8)

HP EliteBook 865 G9; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø47.3 (45.9-56.6)

Power consumption with external monitor

HP EliteBook 865 G9; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø34.8 (34.1-42.5)

HP EliteBook 865 G9; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø38.7 (33-43.9)

HP EliteBook 865 G9; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø25.2 (18.3-44.5)

HP EliteBook 865 G9; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø35.7 (34.5-43.8)

HP EliteBook 865 G9; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø38.8 (37.9-42.6)

HP EliteBook 865 G9; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø40.2 (36.2-41.4)

HP EliteBook 865 G9; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.23 (2.98-5.82)

电池寿命

ElieBook配备了76瓦时的电池，使其具有非常好的电池寿命，甚至超过了ThinkPad T16 G1(86Wh)。在150cd/m²的亮度下，我们的测试视频持续播放了18.5小时，这要感谢AMD iGPU的高效视频解码器。Wi-Fi测试持续了15个小时，这也是一个非常好的结果。将显示屏设置为最大亮度后，电池寿命减少到约7小时。低功耗的显示屏应该能提供更好的结果。

设备运行时，完全充电需要约2小时，但只需32分钟就能达到50%。

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Edge 108)		14h 59min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 108)		6h 58min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		18h 32min
Load (maximum brightness)		1h 46min

	HP EliteBook 865 G9 R7 PRO 6850U, Radeon 680M, 76 Wh	Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 i5-1240P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 86 Wh	LG Gram 16 (2021) i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 80 Wh	SCHENKER Work 15 Tiger Lake-H i7-11370H, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 73 Wh	LG Ultra-PC 16 16U70Q-G.AR36G R3 5300U, Vega 6, 72 Wh	HP EliteBook 850 G8 3C7Z8EA i7-1165G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 56 Wh	Average of class Office
Battery Runtime		15%	52%	-18%	24%	-25%	-19%
H.264	1112	623 -44%	1204 8%	576 -48%		394 -65%	721 ?(348 - 1501, n=31, last 2 years) -35%
WiFi v1.3	899	846 -6%	943 5%	614 -32%	1026 14%	509 -43%	611 ?(230 - 1349, n=90, last 2 years) -32%
Load	106	208 96%	258 143%	132.7 25%	141 33%	140 32%	115.6 ?(56 - 218, n=56, last 2 years) 9%
Reader / Idle			1713	1472	1937		1290 ?(527 - 2296, n=17, last 2 years)

Pros

+ 高质量的金属机箱

+ 快速的AMD处理器

+ 非常好的输入设备

+ USB-C 4.0

+ 非常长的电池寿命

+ 良好的维护选项

Cons

- 具有清晰弱点的Sure View显示屏

- 带有单通道RAM的测试单元

- 不能加装WWAN

- 没有5G的AMD模型

结论 - 是EliteBook 865 G9，但没有Sure View。

审查。HP EliteBook 865 G9。测试单位由campuspoint提供

新的16英寸EliteBook 865 G9有可能成为市场上最好的商务笔记本之一。它有高质量的金属底盘，良好的输入设备，广泛的端口，以及包括LTE在内的现代连接。AMD机型甚至具有非常好的、稳定的CPU性能和极长的电池寿命。

然而，我们不能推荐我们的测试装置。惠普通过选择单通道配置的RAM浪费了大量的GPU能力，而且Sure View显示屏有太多的缺点，在日常使用中非常明显。高亮度可能是好的，但只要你从哪怕是一个小角度看屏幕，即使不激活隐私显示过滤器，视角和图像质量也非常有限。亮度设置是另一个问题。为了获得低于100cd/m²的亮度水平，必须激活Sure View，而打开隐私过滤器后的最大可用亮度被限制在150cd/m²，这往往是不够的，特别是在远离办公室的地方工作时（例如在火车上或在公共场所）。这些限制错过了隐私过滤器的意义。

新EliteBook 865 G9是一款非常好的商务笔记本，拥有快速的AMD处理器，非常好的键盘，电池寿命长。我们不推荐可选的Sure View显示屏，因为它尽管亮度很高，但对于日常使用来说有太多的缺点。

我们建议选择具有非常好的低功耗全高清显示屏的型号，我们已经在相同的测试中进行了测试。ZBook Firefly 16 G9.如果这与双通道内存配置相结合，我们可以全心全意地推荐EliteBook作为市场上最好的商务笔记本电脑之一。与它的直接竞争者相比，ThinkPad T16 G1配备英特尔Alder Lake处理器的ThinkPad T16 G1相比，我们的机型的CPU性能更加稳定，其iGPU也有可能更快。EliteBook的结构稍显紧凑，其维护选项也非常好。

价格和可用性

我们测试的惠普EliteBook 865 G9的配置可以从各种网上商店买到，包括从惠普自己售价为2,600美元。

HP EliteBook 865 G9 - 12/18/2022 v7 ^(old)
Andreas Osthoff

Chassis

88 / 98 → 90%

Keyboard

91%

Pointing Device

96%

Connectivity

67 / 80 → 83%

Weight

65 / 20-75 → 81%

Battery

91%

Display

72%

Games Performance

64 / 78 → 82%

Application Performance

92 / 95 → 97%

Temperature

90%

Noise

98%

Audio

83%

Camera

42 / 85 → 49%

Average

80%

87%

Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Katherine Bodner - Translator - 317 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2017

contact me via: LinkedIn

Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 472283 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Notebookcheck中文版（NBC中国） > 评测 > 惠普EliteBook 865 G9笔记本评测--1000尼特Sure View显示屏不尽如人意

Andreas Osthoff, 2022-12-20 (Update: 2024-09-14)

潜在的竞争对手比较

外壳 - 优雅的金属外观

尺寸比较

连接性 - 带有USB 4的AMD EliteBook

沟通

网络摄像头

维护

输入设备--EliteBook有很棒的键盘

显示--确定视图仍然是一个问题

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

性能 - Ryzen 7 Pro和单通道内存

处理器 - AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U

Cinebench R15 Multi loop

系统性能

DPC延迟

存储设备

Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

图形性能

Witcher 3 FPS diagram

排放--非常安静的EliteBook

系统噪音

温度

发言人

HP EliteBook 865 G9 audio analysis

Lenovo ThinkPad T16 G1 21BWS00200 audio analysis

能源管理--AMD EliteBook拥有令人印象深刻的耐力

消耗功率

Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test

Power consumption with external monitor

电池寿命

Pros

Cons

结论 - 是EliteBook 865 G9，但没有Sure View。

价格和可用性

More articles related to this device

Price comparison