惠普 Envy x360 15 Ryzen 7 7730U 可折叠笔记本电脑评测:首款 IMAX 增强型笔记本电脑
与去年的 惠普 Envy x360 15今年的机型变化不大。几乎相同的 CPU 被安装在不同的名称下,因此性能没有任何提升。集成显卡也仍然是 AMD Radeon RX Vega 8因此,该机型并没有从 AMD 当前相当强大的 iGPU 产品中获益。
惠普 Envy x360 15 的基本配置售价略低于 650 美元,可与中低价位的可转换笔记本电脑竞争。今年惠普 Envy x360 15 的特别之处在于获得了 IMAX Enhanced 认证。这证明该设备符合 IMAX 严格的质量标准,意味着在观看 Netflix 或 Prime Video 等流媒体服务的兼容电影内容时,图像更清晰、更明亮、噪音更小。此外,由于采用了杜比全景声(Dolby Atmos)的竞争对手 DTS:X,音质也更饱满、更身临其境。
作为直接对比,我们选择了非常相似的前代机型,以及 联想 IdeaPad Flex 5 16ARB G8采用相同的处理器。我们还选择了 2023 年推出的其他可转换机型,如 戴尔Latitude 9440 2 in 1和 联想 IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8和 戴尔 Inspiron 17 7435 2 合 1其中,AMD 处理器和英特尔处理器的良好组合受到了关注。去年的 联想 Yoga 7-14ARB G7也包括在内,以展示 AMD 最新 iGPU 的性能。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
87.8 % v7 (old) | 10 / 2023 | HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng R7 7730U, Vega 8 | 1.8 kg | 18.7 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
90 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M | 1.4 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" | 2880x1800 | |
87.9 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2023 | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs | 1.6 kg | 16.28 mm | 14.00" | 2560x1600 | |
86.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8 | 1.9 kg | 18.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.5 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 R5 7530U, Vega 7 | 1.6 kg | 18.6 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
81.9 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2023 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.6 kg | 17.4 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1200 | |
80.7 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2023 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 R7 7730U, Vega 8 | 2 kg | 18.7 mm | 16.00" | 1920x1200 |
外壳 - 质量依然很高
惠普今年只对外壳进行了微小可见的改动。显示屏边框和扬声器外壳仍由海洋级塑料制成,底座由回收铝制成。键帽也是回收塑料,因此笔记本电脑对环境的影响较小。与前代产品相比,我们注意到的唯一区别是边角和铰链的圆润度略有提高。
底座看起来绝对稳定,几乎不会在扭转压力下发生变形。盖子的制造也非常牢固,扭转幅度很小。2 合 1 可转换机的铰链非常坚硬,几乎在任何角度下都能保持稳定。在前代产品中,我们注意到铰链的硬度在 160 度之后略有下降,但在 2023 机型中没有发现这种弱点。不过,由于铰链较硬,显示屏盖会轻微晃动,单手开启的可能性有限。
颜色也与前代产品相同,名为 "夜幕黑铝"。这种颜色和涂层并不特别容易沾染指纹,但也不能幸免。指纹的可见度与视角和入射光有很大关系。
在重量和尺寸方面,惠普 Envy x360 15 2023 与上一代机型几乎没有什么区别。以前的型号.惠普在重量上略有减轻,因此新机型的重量从 1.9 千克减至 1.8 千克。与 联想 IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8相比,同样搭载 AMD Ryzen 7 7730U处理器相比,至少减轻了 200 克。
设备 - 有限制的多样化端口
惠普 Envy x360 15 的硬件配置基本相同,因此提供了相对齐全的端口。由于处理器与前代机型相同,只是名称不同,因此遗憾地省略了 USB-4。由于没有专有的交流适配器,因此两个 USB-C 端口中的一个在充电时始终处于使用状态。连接点的位置也不理想,两个 USB-C 端口都在右侧。
不过,HDMI 2.1 端口和专用的全尺寸 SD 读卡器还是很实用的。除了 USB 电源外,USB-C 端口还兼容 DisplayPort 1.4。
SD 读卡器
集成的 SD 读卡器效果良好,仅次于 联想 IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8的写入速度。读取速度与前代机型相比略有下降,但在日常生活中差异太小,难以察觉。测量是使用我们的 Angelbird AV Pro V60 参考卡进行的。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=29, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 (Angelbird AV Pro V60) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 (Angelibird AV Pro V60) |
交流
惠普还在 2023 机型中安装了 WiFi 6E 芯片,但这是一个稍新的模块。根据我们的测试,接收速度略高于前代产品,而传输速度则略低。与同级别的其他敞篷车相比,性能略低于平均水平。
网络摄像头
幸运的是,前代产品非常出色的网络摄像头没有改变,因此惠普在这一领域仍能从众多竞争对手中脱颖而出。制造商安装的不是 1 或 2 百万像素传感器,而是图像质量更好的 5 百万像素传感器。它支持红外和 Windows Hello,还可以通过惠普的软件实现自动取景或使用多个摄像头显示不同视角等功能。在我们的测试中,摄像头显示的色彩偏差相当大,但网络摄像头在视频通话中的表现仍高于平均水平。摄像头还安装了机械快门,因此不必为了保护隐私而将镜头贴上胶带。
配件和保修 - 遗憾的是仍未带笔
与前代产品一样,包装中除了电源适配器和常见的文件外,没有其他额外的东西,不过在惠普的许多产品照片中,这款可折叠产品都配有活动笔。兼容的 HP Active Pen 在惠普的美国在线商店有售,售价94 美元。
在包装方面,惠普几乎完全避免使用塑料,甚至还用硬纸板制作了线缆收纳盒。然而,令人费解的是,这家美国制造商为何不采用更环保的包装,而是用铝箔收缩包装电源,而不是用纸包装。
在德国,惠普为笔记本电脑提供标准的 2 年保修服务。这在其他国家可能有所不同,因此买家在购买前应仔细确认。
维护 - 只有付出努力才有可能
理论上,今年惠普 Envy x360 可折叠电脑的底板与前代产品一样易于拆卸。一样容易拆卸。拆卸底板时只需拧下四颗螺丝,而不是把螺丝藏在橡胶脚垫下面。不过,在我们的机型上,从夹子上取下底板需要费很大的力气,而且还要弯曲很多。由于我们同时还评测了与惠普 Envy x360 完全相同的英特尔版本,因此我们认为不同设备的难度是不同的。我们在拆卸英特尔版本的底板时没有遇到任何问题。
输入设备 - 一切照旧
键盘和触控板与2022 型号惠普在这方面没有做任何改动。按键反馈坚固扎实,但按键压力点并不均匀,在按键顶端稍软一些。顶排 F 键上的专用表情符号和系统事件实用程序热键现在又开始使用了。顾名思义,emoji 键不仅可以打开表情符号,还可以弹出 GIF 窗口。系统事件实用程序热键可启动惠普命令中心、Omen Gaming Hub、我的惠普或调色板。尽管采用了全尺寸键盘和左右两侧向上的扬声器,但键盘右侧仍有空间放置专用的 POS 和 PICTURE 键。
触控板大小适中,但仍有空间再大一些。与前代产品一样,触控板表面光滑,但点击时有点松软。它也不是玻璃触控板。
显示屏 - 亮丽的真彩 OLED 显示屏
我们的测试设备采用刷新率为 60 Hz 的 1080p 触摸屏 OLED 显示屏。据制造商称,该显示屏覆盖了 100% 的 DCI-P3 色彩空间,最大亮度可达 400 尼特。我们的测试表明,虽然没有达到 400 尼特,但平均 380 尼特的亮度绝对够用。我们证实了惠普宣称的完全 DCI-P3 色彩空间覆盖率。
除了 1080p 触摸屏 OLED 显示屏外,还有一款配备 1080p 触摸屏 IPS 显示屏的可转换机型。在这里,惠普安装的是 Ryzen 5 7530U 处理器。
OLED 显示屏的图像质量非常好。黑色内容为深黑色,色彩丰富。很难评估 IMAX 认证在多大程度上提高了图像质量。这款笔记本电脑绝对适合观看连续剧和电影,可转换的外形为在桌上、床上或沙发上欣赏内容提供了必要的灵活性。
虽然这款笔记本电脑 16:9 的屏幕比例非常适合视频播放,但我们更希望它采用 16:10 的屏幕比例,因为额外的垂直屏幕空间更适合生产活动。此外,15 英寸笔记本电脑的显示屏边缘比同类机型宽得多,因此看起来不再时尚。
|
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 377.48 cd/m²
Contrast: 7680:1 (Black: 0.05 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.79
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.51% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
100% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.93% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng Samsung SDC416C, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 LEN140WQ+, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 LG Philips 140WU2, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 LEN140WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 AU Optronics B140QAN, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx BOE08A8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 LEN160WUXGA, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -48% | -53% | -14% | -53% | -53% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 99.93 | 99.9 0% | 44.4 -56% | 39.8 -60% | 77.2 -23% | 39.6 -60% | 40 -60% |
sRGB Coverage | 100 | 100 0% | 64.4 -36% | 58 -42% | 99.6 0% | 58.5 -41% | 57.6 -42% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 95.51 | 97.2 2% | 45.8 -52% | 41.1 -57% | 77.4 -19% | 40.9 -57% | 41.3 -57% |
Response Times | 45% | -275% | -452% | -874% | -690% | -501% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 3 ? | 1 ? 67% | 19.6 ? -553% | 30.2 ? -907% | 53.5 ? -1683% | 43.6 ? -1353% | 33 ? -1000% |
Response Time Black / White * | 20 ? | 1 ? 95% | 19.3 ? 3% | 19.3 ? 3% | 33 ? -65% | 25.2 ? -26% | 20.2 ? -1% |
PWM Frequency | 500 ? | 360 ? -28% | |||||
Screen | 21% | -88% | -97% | -75% | -94% | -90% | |
Brightness middle | 384 | 386 1% | 231.8 -40% | 335.2 -13% | 532.4 39% | 297.8 -22% | 392 2% |
Brightness | 380 | 389 2% | 216 -43% | 316 -17% | 502 32% | 271 -29% | 371 -2% |
Brightness Distribution | 98 | 98 0% | 87 -11% | 86 -12% | 91 -7% | 81 -17% | 89 -9% |
Black Level * | 0.05 | 0.05 -0% | 0.27 -440% | 0.29 -480% | 0.48 -860% | 0.35 -600% | 0.25 -400% |
Contrast | 7680 | 7720 1% | 859 -89% | 1156 -85% | 1109 -86% | 851 -89% | 1568 -80% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.68 | 2.6 44% | 6.59 -41% | 7.49 -60% | 2.33 50% | 5.16 -10% | 7.3 -56% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.06 | 4.8 32% | 16.83 -138% | 22.25 -215% | 5.99 15% | 19.76 -180% | 20.8 -195% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.79 | 1.8 53% | 3.94 -4% | 2.17 43% | 0.92 76% | 2.28 40% | 5.4 -42% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 2.3 56% | 4.5 13% | 6.9 -33% | 1.6 69% | 2.2 58% | 6.5 -25% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.21 100% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.17 101% | 2.27 97% | 2.29 96% |
CCT | 7651 85% | 6121 106% | 6110 106% | 5988 109% | 6314 103% | 6678 97% | 5993 108% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 22% /
22% | -137% /
-106% | -201% /
-138% | -321% /
-176% | -279% /
-170% | -215% /
-141% |
* ... smaller is better
即使在校准之前,HP Envy x360 15 的灰度平均 DeltaE 值为 2.9,色彩平均 DeltaE 值为 3.1,都能提供非常出色的色彩表现。正如我们的 CalMAN 截图所示,通过校准,这些值可以进一步提高,平均 DeltaE 值分别为 0.6 和 2.4。
凭借出色的色彩空间覆盖率和准确的色彩还原,配备 OLED 显示屏的惠普 Envy x360 15 不仅适用于轻度图像编辑,还可用于专业摄影师或摄像师。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
20 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.5 ms rise | |
↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 40 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
3 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 1.5 ms rise | |
↘ 1.5 ms fall | ||
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 9 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 500 Hz | ≤ 35 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 500 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 35 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 500 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
惠普 Envy x360 的最大亮度略低于 380 cd/m2,高于同类产品的平均水平。特别是对于 OLED 显示屏而言,这一数值是比较靠谱的。由于显示屏亮度高,这款可折叠电脑可以在阳光下使用,而且大部分内容仍然清晰可见。不过,反光显示屏在阳光直射下是一个缺点,会大大降低可视性。
视角几乎完美,这也是 OLED 显示屏的一贯特点。即使从陡峭的角度观看,屏幕也能保持清晰和真实的色彩。在极端角度下有时会出现偏蓝现象,这也是 OLED 显示屏的常见现象,但极端角度并不代表真实的使用场景。
性能 - Zen 3 仍是标准
尽管进行了更新,惠普仍继续在 Envy x360 15 上使用 Zen 3,这意味着其性能与前代产品相比保持不变。不同之处几乎仅限于命名。其他方面Ryzen 7 5825U和 Ryzen 7 7730U在结构上几乎完全相同。
测试条件
除了 Windows 自带的性能模式外,惠普还通过 HP Command Center 提供了自己的性能设置。我们在 Windows 和命令中心设置中都将测试设备设置为性能 模式。值得一提的是,如果不使用 HP Command Center 功能,就无法达到敞篷车的最高性能。因此,用户应花时间熟悉该软件。与前代产品一样,AMD Vari-Bright 也在默认情况下启用,可降低电池电量下的最大亮度。
。
总的来说,惠普的 "命令中心 "提供了四种不同的性能模式,如下表所示,这些设置可用于根据需要调整敞篷跑车的 TDP 限制。
Leistung | Ausgeglichen | Kühl | Leiser Betrieb | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CPU PL1 (HWInfo) | 37 瓦 | 28 瓦 | 17 瓦 | 15 瓦 |
CPU PL2 (HWInfo) | 48 瓦 | 48 瓦 | 25 瓦 | 25 瓦 |
处理器
......(英文 Ryzen 7 7730U几乎与 Ryzen 7 5825U的 是塞尚系列中的一款移动处理器。这是一款塞尚系列移动处理器,拥有 8 个 Zen 3 内核,支持 SMT/超线程。不出所料,几乎相同的处理器在几乎相同的机箱中实现了几乎相同的效果,因此潜在买家不应期望新机型的性能会有所提升。
尽管如此,该处理器的性能仍然非常出色,与其他二合一设备相比,这款可折叠设备的性能确实不错。不过,单核性能落后于配备英特尔 Raptor Lake-U 处理器的机型。另一方面,尽管 AMD 处理器采用了较老的设计,但在大多数情况下多核性能更高。
。
在 Cinebench R15 多循环测试中,处理器的时钟频率相对稳定在 3.1 GHz,偶尔会接近 4.5 GHz 的最大提升时钟频率。温度保持在 80 °C 左右,因此机箱似乎并没有限制 CPU 的潜力。
Cinebench R15 Multi Sustained Load
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
CPU Performance Rating | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 -1! | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
Cinebench R23 / Multi Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (616 - 18698, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (7286 - 11490, n=6) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
Cinebench R23 / Single Core | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average of class Convertible (308 - 1980, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (1335 - 1466, n=6) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average of class Convertible (242 - 7303, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (2849 - 4267, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 781, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (533 - 573, n=6) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (1588 - 1942, n=6) | |
Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=65, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 302, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (221 - 233, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average of class Convertible (175 - 1059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (277 - 374, n=5) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (40263 - 51898, n=6) | |
Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (5222 - 5426, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (6747 - 8257, n=6) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average of class Convertible (319 - 2062, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (1464 - 1500, n=6) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (9.91 - 13.7, n=6) | |
Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 22.4, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (48.4 - 53.6, n=6) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (0.515 - 0.543, n=6) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average of class Convertible | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (11322 - 13069, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (468 - 29594, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
AIDA64 / FPU Julia | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (72772 - 83307, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (2644 - 114033, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (2424 - 2782, n=6) | |
Average of class Convertible (182 - 4841, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU Queen | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (86118 - 95529, n=6) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (10502 - 120368, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (10753 - 11716, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (659 - 16315, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
AIDA64 / FPU Mandel | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (40080 - 45955, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (1420 - 61249, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
AIDA64 / CPU AES | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (1279 - 169089, n=62, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (42560 - 56403, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / CPU ZLib | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (646 - 733, n=6) | |
Average of class Convertible (61.4 - 1243, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (5986 - 6886, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average of class Convertible (254 - 16065, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average of class Convertible (5136 - 53406, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (13747 - 19447, n=6) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
系统性能
与其他转换器相比,惠普 Envy x360 的得分相对较高,性能优于所有配备英特尔处理器的转换器。与惠普 Envy x360 15 2022相比,惠普 Envy x360 15 2022 在 PCMark 10 基准测试中没有明显改善,鉴于芯片和机箱几乎完全相同,这并不奇怪。Crossmark 测试结果也仅相差一到两个百分点,完全在自然误差范围之内。
不过,Crossmark 基准测试再次表明,Ryzen 7 芯片在单核性能方面不如英特尔的变体,而采用 Raptor Lake 的可转换机型,如戴尔Latitude 9440 2 in 1 和联想 IdeaPad F lex 5 14IRU8 ,在这方面一直表现较好。内存不详也可能是导致结果较差的原因之一。但处理器性能仍然比较稳定,在日常办公任务中应该不会出现问题。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (5285 - 6403, n=6) | |
Average of class Convertible (1486 - 7963, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (10084 - 11458, n=6) | |
Average of class Convertible (3975 - 12059, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (8443 - 9761, n=6) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (2764 - 10800, n=59, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (811 - 12360, n=59, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (4705 - 6561, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (310 - 1912, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1296 - 1350, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (389 - 1790, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1301 - 1354, n=6) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Average of class Convertible (252 - 2183, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1372 - 1461, n=6) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (295 - 1868, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (955 - 1086, n=6) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 |
PCMark 10 Score | 6265 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (16353 - 108544, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (34315 - 42873, n=6) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Average of class Convertible (12706 - 125359, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (38520 - 39632, n=6) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Average of class Convertible (10177 - 117920, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (29984 - 41796, n=6) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average of class Convertible (7.4 - 173, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 7730U (94.4 - 110.6, n=6) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
DPC 延迟
在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时,LatencyMon 显示的 DPC 问题比前代产品大得多。因此,我们目前无法推荐惠普 Envy x360 15 2023 使用实时音频软件。不过需要注意的是,随着 BIOS 和驱动程序的更新,情况可能会有所改变。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备
安装的 PCIe 4.0 M.2 固态硬盘与以前的型号相比发生了变化。新款西部数据 PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 M.2 固态硬盘的性能比旧款三星 PM991 M.2 固态硬盘高出 23%。近 3100 MB/s 的连续读取速率非常出色,比所有其他同类产品都要快。在整体评级中,只有戴尔Latitude 9440 2 in 1高出 9%,但价格也高出近三倍。
* ... smaller is better
Sustained Read Performance: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
显卡 - Radeon RX Vega 不再是最新版本
集成 AMD Radeon RX Vega显卡是惠普Envy x360 15的最大弱点。 在3DMark基准测试中,集成显卡芯片的性能仍可与英特尔的Iris XE相媲美。 AMD Radeon 680M的比较 Ryzen 7 6800U的 AMD Radeon 680M 进行比较,就会发现性能上的差距有多大:联想 联想的 Yoga 7-14ARB G7的集成显卡性能要高出 62%,令人瞠目结舌。
目前,AMD 在集成显卡方面绝对领先,所以很遗憾Ryzen 7 7730U没有使用强大的 AMD Radeon 680M 或 Radeon 780MiGPURyzen 7 6800U 或 Ryzen 7 7840U 配置变体无法配置在惠普 Envy x360 上。
不过,与前代产品相比,今年 Envy x360 15 的 iGPU 性能提高了约 11%,这很可能是由于优化了驱动程序。这款可折叠电脑的图形处理性能在同价位产品中完全可以接受,即使它不足以满足高强度游戏的需求。如果能将这款 2 合 1 笔记本电脑升级到 Ryzen 7 6800U 或Ryzen 7 7840U 处理器就更好了。
3DMark 11 Performance | 6816 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 26027 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3806 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1451 points | |
Help |
* ... smaller is better
游戏性能
如前所述,内置 iGPU 无法创造奇迹。对于要求不高的游戏,如《Dota 2》或《英雄联盟》,性能已经足够,但要求更高的游戏则无法在可接受的分辨率下流畅运行。与其他可折叠电脑相比,今年的惠普 Envy x360 15 处于稳固的中场位置,但其性能也被以下产品所超越 联想 Yoga 7-14ARB-G7、就像在合成基准测试中一样。不过,有趣的是,当前惠普 Envy 可折叠电脑的平均性能比去年的 去年的机型几乎相同的芯片。
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (10 - 123.3, n=47, last 2 years) | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
GTA V - 1920x1080 Highest Settings possible AA:4xMSAA + FX AF:16x | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (7.07 - 114.3, n=49, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1920x1080 High Quality | |
Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 | |
Average of class Convertible (4.48 - 107.1, n=60, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 | |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
Witcher 3 FPS chart
low | med. | high | ultra | QHD | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 110.3 | 98.8 | 28.2 | 10.2 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 89 | 52 | 25 | 17 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 108.1 | 91.3 | 56.9 | 54.3 | |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 39 | 17 | 11 | 8 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 39.8 | 32 | 27.7 | ||
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 47 | 21 | 19 | 18 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 87.2 | 33.8 | 28 | 23.5 | |
F1 23 (2023) | 35.9 | 31.9 | 22.1 | 15.5 |
废气排放 - 怠速时比前一代产品更大声
噪音
惠普 Envy x360 15 2023 在中低负载时相当安静。与其他敞篷机型相比,今年的机型在空闲时不会出现异常。相比之下 前代产品的噪音值为 22.7 dB(A)。在负载情况下,今年车型的最高噪音水平比上一代车型低 3 分贝(A)。在所比较的可转换机型中,只有 联想 IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8更安静。负载情况下的平均音量也非常好,为 32.2 dB(A),但前代产品的 23.3 dB(A)足足低了 28%。在负载情况下,所有其他用于比较的敞篷机都比 2023 HP Envy x360 15 的噪音大。
因此,惠普 Envy x360 适合在图书馆或办公室安静地工作,同时也是喜欢将笔记本电脑推向极限而不发出太大噪音的用户的不错选择。
在我们的测试设备中,没有检测到线圈啸叫或任何其他电子噪音。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 25.9 / 25.9 / 25.9 dB(A) |
Load |
| 32.2 / 40.37 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 25.8 dB(A) |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng Vega 8, R7 7730U, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00 | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 Radeon 680M, R7 6800U, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT1T02 | Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 Vega 7, R5 7530U | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1335U, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZAL4512HBLU | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx Vega 8, R7 5825U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 Vega 8, R7 7730U, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -5% | 6% | 5% | 0% | 11% | 0% | |
off / environment * | 25.8 | 24.5 5% | 22.8 12% | 23.1 10% | 24.1 7% | 22.7 12% | 24.2 6% |
Idle Minimum * | 25.9 | 24.5 5% | 23.2 10% | 23.3 10% | 24.3 6% | 22.7 12% | 24.2 7% |
Idle Average * | 25.9 | 24.5 5% | 23.2 10% | 23.3 10% | 24.3 6% | 22.7 12% | 24.2 7% |
Idle Maximum * | 25.9 | 28.1 -8% | 23.2 10% | 23.3 10% | 24.3 6% | 22.7 12% | 28.7 -11% |
Load Average * | 32.2 | 42.8 -33% | 33 -2% | 37.3 -16% | 36.3 -13% | 23.3 28% | 33.1 -3% |
Load Maximum * | 40.37 | 42.8 -6% | 41.3 -2% | 38.6 4% | 44.5 -10% | 43.4 -8% | 41.8 -4% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.8 | 40.9 | 38.7 | 44.5 | 43.4 | 41.8 |
* ... smaller is better
温度
虽然敞篷车在怠速时的温度不会令人不适,但比前一代车型高出近 3 °C,最高温度达 29 °C。底盘表面的温差范围为 4 °C,顶部平均温度为 25.5 °C,底部平均温度为 25.9 °C。在负载情况下,温度会像前代产品一样升高,尤其是机箱右半部分。上半部分的最高温度为 38.5 °C,尚可接受,而下半部分的最高温度为 40.3 °C。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.5 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.5 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.6 °C / 78.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+2.4 °C / 4.3 F).
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 AMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M | Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 Intel Core i5-1335U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 AMD Ryzen 7 7730U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -3% | -2% | -7% | -8% | 6% | -8% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38.5 | 42.3 -10% | 35.2 9% | 39.4 -2% | 40.8 -6% | 36.2 6% | 51.4 -34% |
Maximum Bottom * | 40.3 | 45.4 -13% | 38.2 5% | 38.8 4% | 40 1% | 37.8 6% | 47.8 -19% |
Idle Upper Side * | 27.9 | 26.2 6% | 31.2 -12% | 31.2 -12% | 30.4 -9% | 25.4 9% | 24.8 11% |
Idle Bottom * | 27.8 | 26.6 4% | 30.4 -9% | 32.8 -18% | 32.8 -18% | 26.6 4% | 24.9 10% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
在压力测试(Prime 95 和 Furmark)的前 7 分钟,处理器的主频接近 4GHz。最初几秒钟的功耗为 49 瓦,但随后迅速降至 38 瓦,并在压力测试的剩余时间内保持不变。头 7 分钟后,处理器时钟速度降至 2.7 GHz 左右,然后保持不变。前代产品在初始提升后,主频稳定在 3.5 GHz,因此在此测试中取得了更好的成绩。
今年惠普 Envy x360 15 的 APU 峰值温度接近 90 °C,稳定状态下为 81 °C。压力测试是一种极端情况,我们在此测试系统在满载情况下是否仍能稳定运行。
发言人
虽然扬声器与前代产品完全相同,但音质却发生了一些变化。这可能是由于对 IMAX Enhanced 认证进行了调整。只有当设备的显示屏和扬声器符合 IMAX、DTS 和好莱坞顶级图像编辑的严格要求时,才会获得 IMAX Enhanced 认证。惠普 Envy x360 15 是市场上首款获得该认证的笔记本电脑。如果该技术能像智能电视一样工作,那么在播放 IMAX 增强版电影时,可转换设备就会利用元数据自动进入 IMAX 增强模式。在该模式下,图像和声音会根据规定的预设值进行校准,最终效果与 IMAX 电影院类似。IMAX 电影也可以在 Netflix 或 Prime Video 等流媒体服务上找到,通常可以通过以下事实识别出来:它们是全 16:9 格式,看不到黑条。与 Dolby Vision 或 Dolby Atmos 不同,IMAX Enhanced 并不是自己的标准。相反,IMAX Enhanced 采用现有的标准,并对媒体以及电影制作者意图再现的画面和声音进行认证。
扬声器的整体效果非常出色,明显优于市场上的大多数其他笔记本电脑。扬声器跟不上 MacBook Pro 16 2021 的扬声器、但它们比大多数竞争对手更接近。与前代产品相比,低音略有增强,但中音和高音稍差。不过,与显示屏一样,我们无法确定 IMAX Enhanced 认证在多大程度上发挥了作用,而这正是这款敞篷机最大的营销优势。
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 7% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 功耗增加
耗电量
惠普 Envy x360 15 2023 在空闲和负载情况下的功耗都有所增加。2022 款惠普 Envy x360 15 的功耗在 4 至 7.4 瓦之间,而 2023 款的功耗为 5.8 至 8 瓦。在负载情况下,两款机型的最大功耗均为 65 瓦,但新款惠普 Envy x360 的最低功耗为 42.3 瓦,低了 4 瓦。在待机模式下,2023 型号的功耗也略低,仅为 0.45 瓦。
与其他可转换机型相比,惠普 Envy x360 15 的功耗绝对处于平均水平。在选定的对比机型中,只有前代机型和戴尔Latitude 9440 2 合 1更经济。
由于最大功耗为 65 瓦,因此附带的 65 瓦电源完全足够,在高负载时也不会放电。
Off / Standby | / 0.45 Watt |
Idle | 5.78 / 7.84 / 7.98 Watt |
Load |
42.3 / 65 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng R7 7730U, Vega 8, WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, Kioxia BG5 KBG50ZNT1T02, OLED, 2880x1800, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 R5 7530U, Vega 7, , IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9B1 512GB MZAL4512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1200, 14" | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB, IPS, 2560x1600, 14" | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 16ABR G8 R7 7730U, Vega 8, Samsung PM9B1 1024GB MZAL41T0HBLB, IPS, 1920x1200, 16" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -6% | -8% | -15% | 1% | 7% | -20% | -0% | -9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.78 | 5.1 12% | 5.3 8% | 8 -38% | 4.2 27% | 3.9 33% | 5.4 7% | 5.26 ? 9% | 5.18 ? 10% |
Idle Average * | 7.84 | 8.2 -5% | 9.1 -16% | 10.6 -35% | 6.9 12% | 7.2 8% | 11.1 -42% | 7.78 ? 1% | 8.18 ? -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.98 | 8.7 -9% | 9.4 -18% | 10.7 -34% | 7.8 2% | 7.3 9% | 11.6 -45% | 9.18 ? -15% | 11.1 ? -39% |
Load Average * | 42.3 | 51.4 -22% | 54.9 -30% | 46.8 -11% | 46 -9% | 46.7 -10% | 52.7 -25% | 44.9 ? -6% | 46.8 ? -11% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.7 | 46.3 -11% | 45 -8% | 27.7 34% | 51.9 -24% | 41.1 1% | 47.6 -14% | ||
Load Maximum * | 65 | 64.8 -0% | 55.8 14% | 68.3 -5% | 68.2 -5% | 64.8 -0% | 67 -3% | 59.4 ? 9% | 67.2 ? -3% |
* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / Stress test
Power consumption with an external monitor
电池寿命
惠普新款 Envy x360 15 的电池续航时间还有待提高。在我们的 WLAN 测试中,在调整亮度为 150 cd/m2 的情况下,前一款机型的电池续航时间也比它长 85 分钟。在 WLAN 测试中,该机的电池续航时间仅为 8.5 小时多一点,相比之下表现最差。
与前代产品的差异可能是由于低负载时功耗略高。遗憾的是,4 Wh 的大容量电池不足以在较高的耗电率下取得更好的整体成绩。不过,对于 15 英寸笔记本电脑来说,即使 55 Wh 的电池容量也还是相对较小。在最大亮度下,电池续航时间降至 5 小时 43 分钟;在 WLAN 测试中,电池续航时间降至 5 小时 43 分钟。在 Battery Eater 和最大亮度测试中,这款可转换笔记本在负载情况下仍能使用 107 分钟。
根据负载情况,惠普 Envy x360 15 的电池不足以支撑一整天的工作。
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng R7 7730U, Vega 8, 55 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 7-14ARB G7 R7 6800U, Radeon 680M, 71 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 7435 2-in-1 R5 7530U, Vega 7, 54 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 5 14IRU8 i5-1335U, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 52.5 Wh | Dell Latitude 9440 2-in-1 i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8, 51 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 7% | 20% | 12% | -14% | 5% | 10% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 527 | 584 11% | 668 27% | 588 12% | 555 5% | 612 16% | 599 ? 14% |
Load | 107 | 110 3% | 120 12% | 73 -32% | 100 -7% | 113.1 ? 6% | |
H.264 | 762 | 765 ? | |||||
Reader / Idle | 1192 | 1423 | 1198 | 1330 ? |
Pros
Cons
评语:配置不错,性能稳定,但图形芯片和电池续航能力较弱
去年,我们曾批评惠普在更新其敞篷车时放弃了强大的 AMD iGPU。今年的批评更有道理。去年的更新包括对内饰、设计和处理器的优化,但今年只对机身边缘进行了一些圆润处理,并使用了几乎相同的处理器。安装了性能稍好的 M.2 固态硬盘和稍先进的 WLAN 模块。电池续航时间甚至更差。OLED 显示屏当然是一项重大升级,但在前代产品的某些配置中已经配备。
Ryzen 7 7730 CPU 更为先进,但与去年的 R7 5825U 相同。在 2023 年,其性能仍然不错,可以跟上竞争设备的步伐,但如果采用 Ryzen 7 6800U 或 Ryzen 7 7840U 配置变体,性能可能会大幅提升。
处理器的选择也会影响端口的范围,因此不得不省略 USB-4。除此之外,惠普 Envy x360 的配置确实不错,除了两个 USB-C 端口的位置外,其他方面都非常令人满意。
虽然这款可折叠电脑在原理上表现出色,整体性能也很强大,但惠普却未能在上一代产品的基础上实现真正的升级。
但它仍然配备了不错的网络摄像头,而且明显优于大多数竞争对手。我们测试设备的最大亮点无疑是 OLED 显示屏。OLED 显示屏的亮度非常高,而且能很好地覆盖 sRGB、AdobeRGB 和 DCI-P3 色彩空间,因此这款可转换设备也适用于专业照片和视频编辑。
惠普在宣传新款惠普 Envy x360 15 时非常重视 IMAX Enhanced 认证,事实上,新款惠普 Envy 是首款获得该认证的可折叠电脑或笔记本电脑,以前只有电视机才能获得该认证。这款可折叠电脑也非常适合播放视频内容,激活 IMAX Enhanced 模式的 IMAX 电影看起来效果极佳。不过,我们无法确定 IMAX 增强模式在这些场景中对画面和音质的影响有多大。
价格和供应情况
在惠普的美国网店上,与我们测试机型相同的配置售价为 1199.99 美元。
HP Envy x360 15-fh0077ng
- 10/01/2023 v7 (old)
Philip Macdonald
Transparency
The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.