AMD Ryzen 7 5825U首次亮相。惠普Envy x360 15 2022敞篷车评测
2022年的Envy x360 15是在2021年的基础上演变而来。 2021年型号在几个方面。最明显的是其新选择的AMD Zen 3 "Barcelo "CPU,以取代去年型号上的Zen 2 "Lucienne "选项。然而,还有许多内部和外部的小变化,我们将在下面的评论中详细介绍。
我们审查的配置配备了Ryzen 7 5825U CPU和FHD IPS触摸屏,价格约为900美元。配备Ryzen 5 5625U的较小选项可低至650美元。英特尔版本的酷睿i5-1235U、i7-1255U、1440p 120 Hz显示屏或RTX 2050显卡也存在,这些都是AMD SKU所没有的。
竞争者包括其他预算到中档的15.6英寸可转换笔记本电脑,如 戴尔Inspiron 15 7506 2合1, 联想Flex系列和 华硕VivoBook Flip系列.用户可以升级到价格更高的Spectre x360 15,以获得更豪华的机型,或者下调到更注重预算的 Pavilion x360 15.
更多惠普评论。
潜在的竞争对手比较
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.8 % v7 (old) | 09 / 2022 | HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8 | 1.9 kg | 18.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
88 % v7 (old) | 06 / 2022 | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD i7-12700H, A370M | 1.8 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 2880x1620 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 03 / 2022 | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs | 1.4 kg | 11 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.4 % v7 (old) | 08 / 2021 | HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr R7 5700U, Vega 8 | 1.9 kg | 18.4 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
84.8 % v7 (old) | 04 / 2020 | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.9 kg | 17.25 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.6 % v7 (old) | 05 / 2022 | Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U R5 5500U, Vega 7 | 1.6 kg | 16.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕
» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
案例 - 小变化
从外观上看,机箱与2021年的机型基本相同。区分新旧机型的最简单方法是仔细观察端口和键盘。惠普很聪明地取消了专有的桶状交流适配器端口,只在2022年的机型上使用USB-C充电。即便如此,我们还是希望看到更多的颜色选择。
在尺寸和重量方面,该模型几乎与 Pavilion x360 15尽管它的材料和结构质量更高。替代品如三星Galaxy Book Pro 360 15或 LG Gram 15都明显更轻,但价格更高。
连接性 - 不再有专有的桶状交流适配器
该模型包括2021年Envy x360 15的所有数据端口,加上一个额外的USB-A端口,总共有四个。事实上,该系统的USB端口比其他大多数15.6英寸的转换机多。
两个USB-C端口沿右侧边缘,意味着充电必须在笔记本电脑的这一侧进行。将两个USB-C端口沿笔记本电脑的左侧和右侧分开会更合适。
SD卡阅读器
SD卡的性能与去年的型号没有变化。将1GB的图片从我们的UHS-II测试卡上移到桌面上大约需要14秒。
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr (AV PRO microSD 128 GB V60) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE (AV Pro SD microSD 128 GB V60) |
通信 - 现在有了Wi-Fi 6E
WLAN已经从AX200 Wi-Fi 6升级到较新的AX211,用于Wi-Fi 6E连接。当与我们的6GHz网络配对时,我们经历了稳定的传输速率。然而,请记住,当涉及到现实世界的传输速率时,Wi-Fi 6E并不一定比普通的Wi-Fi 6快。
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
网络摄像头 - 5MP标准
惠普在最新的2022年修订版上将网络摄像头从100万像素升级到了500万像素,使图片质量得到了巨大提升。事实上,惠普Envy、Spectre和Elite系列的大多数新机型都开始采用相同的500万像素摄像头,而其他大多数OEM厂商仍在使用100或200万像素的传感器。
红外线和网络摄像头快门的出现分别是为了支持你好和保护隐私,而旧型号则缺乏红外线支持。
维护--更方便用户使用
底部面板现在更容易拆卸了,因为在橡胶脚下不再有隐藏的螺丝,正如惠普官方的拆卸视频所展示的那样。.用户可以接触到铝制屏蔽层下面的单个M.2 2280 SSD插槽和两个SODIMM插槽。在2021年和2022年的型号之间,主板和模块的定位还有一些其他的变化,如下图所示。
配件和保修
除了交流电适配器和文件之外,零售盒中没有任何额外的东西,这是一个遗憾,因为许多产品照片都显示了笔记本上的活动手写笔。这支笔在网上要多花35到50美元。
如果在美国购买,标准的一年有限保修期适用。
输入设备 - 新的表情符号键
键盘和触摸板
显示 - 有限的色彩再现
有四种显示屏可供选择。
- 1080p触摸屏IPS,60赫兹,60%sRGB,250尼特
- 1080p触摸屏IPS,60赫兹,100%sRGB,400尼特
- 1080p触摸屏OLED,60赫兹,100% DCI-P3,400尼特
- 1440p触摸屏IPS,120赫兹,100%sRGB,300尼特
我们下面的测量结果只反映了大胆的IPS配置,而1440p120面板是新增加的,在去年的Envy x360 15上是没有的。不幸的是,2022款的IPS面板在色彩还原方面比2021款的IPS面板有所下降(100%对59%的sRGB覆盖率)。如果你想获得完整的sRGB覆盖率,你必须支付更昂贵的OLED或IPS面板。
另外,图像质量很好,颗粒感问题最小,画面干净。只是太糟糕了,我们的基本显示屏选项在质量上更接近于你在便宜的Pavilion 15上看到的东西,而不是更昂贵的Spectre模型。
|
Brightness Distribution: 81 %
Center on Battery: 297.8 cd/m²
Contrast: 851:1 (Black: 0.35 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.16 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 2.28
ΔE Greyscale 2.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
40.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.6% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.27
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx BOE08A8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD Samsung ATNA56AC01-0, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE SDC4159, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr AUOA08B, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML B156HAN02.5, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U B156HAN02.8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 120% | 121% | 71% | -1% | 7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 39.6 | 99.8 152% | 99.9 152% | 69 74% | 39.04 -1% | 42.3 7% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.5 | 100 71% | 100 71% | 99.1 69% | 57.9 -1% | 63.4 8% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.9 | 97.5 138% | 97.6 139% | 70.1 71% | 40.33 -1% | 43.7 7% |
Response Times | 97% | 94% | -51% | -23% | -27% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.6 ? | 0.8 ? 98% | 2 ? 95% | 60.4 ? -39% | 50.8 ? -17% | 51.2 ? -17% |
Response Time Black / White * | 25.2 ? | 1.1 ? 96% | 2 ? 92% | 40.8 ? -62% | 32.4 ? -29% | 34.4 ? -37% |
PWM Frequency | 240.4 ? | 60 | ||||
Screen | 34% | 96% | 35% | -32% | -5% | |
Brightness middle | 297.8 | 340.1 14% | 290 -3% | 337.2 13% | 286 -4% | 299 0% |
Brightness | 271 | 344 27% | 290 7% | 337 24% | 268 -1% | 280 3% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 97 20% | 99 22% | 87 7% | 83 2% | 89 10% |
Black Level * | 0.35 | 0.05 86% | 0.24 31% | 0.2 43% | 0.2 43% | |
Contrast | 851 | 5800 582% | 1405 65% | 1430 68% | 1495 76% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.16 | 2.47 52% | 1.84 64% | 1.73 66% | 7.3 -41% | 5.2 -1% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 19.76 | 5.96 70% | 3.83 81% | 3.69 81% | 21.7 -10% | 20.8 -5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.28 | 2.69 -18% | 1.61 29% | 5.1 -124% | 4.2 -84% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 1.8 18% | 1.24 44% | 2.3 -5% | 7 -218% | 4.1 -86% |
Gamma | 2.27 97% | 2.2 100% | 2.2 100% | 2.19 100% | 2.35 94% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 6678 97% | 6346 102% | 6686 97% | 6872 95% | 5847 111% | 6548 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64.1 | 36.9 | ||||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.6 | 57.5 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 84% /
69% | 104% /
101% | 18% /
30% | -19% /
-24% | -8% /
-5% |
* ... smaller is better
与大多数价格较高的Spectre或EliteBook机型不同,该显示器没有开箱校准。尽管如此,平均灰度和色彩的DeltaE值仍然很体面,分别为2.2和5.16。正如我们下面的CalMAN屏幕截图所示,校准后的颜色有所改善,但由于上面提到的狭窄的sRGB色彩空间再现,较高饱和度的颜色停留在各自的水平。
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
25.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 11.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise | |
↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 70 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
300尼特的最大亮度对于大多数中档15.6英寸多媒体笔记本电脑来说是平均水平。像XPS 15或MacBook Pro系列这样的高价机型可以达到500尼特或更高,以获得更好的户外可视性。如果在户外使用Envy x360 15,预计光面显示屏会产生大量眩光。
性能--Zen 3标准
测试条件
在运行以下任何基准测试之前,我们通过Windows和HP命令中心将我们的设备设置为性能模式。用户应该熟悉Radeon和HP命令中心的应用程序,因为它们可以控制笔记本电脑的关键方面。例如,AMD Vari-Bright在默认情况下是启用的,如果用电池供电,它会降低最大亮度。我们建议禁用Vari-Bright,以提高户外可视性。
处理器
的 睿狮7 5825U携带的核心数量与较早的 Ryzen 7 5700U但它得益于Zen 3平台的所有优化。在单线程和多线程负载中,原始性能大约快15%至25%,同时目标是37至48瓦的范围。多线程性能可与第12代 酷睿i7-1260P而单线程性能则更接近于上一代的 酷睿i7-1165G7.英特尔酷睿i5-1235U或 i7-1255U配置比我们的Ryzen 7 5825U慢,但用户得到了Thunderbolt,更快的集成显卡和独立的Nvidia显卡选项作为回报。
即使最初的Boost时钟速率很短,性能的可持续性也很好。
Cinebench R15 Multi Loop
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1
Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
* ... smaller is better
AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx
Performance Rating | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML -1! |
AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (10886 - 12710, n=4) | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
AIDA64 / CPU SHA3 | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (2315 - 2738, n=4) | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U |
AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (10550 - 11551, n=4) | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE |
AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (5758 - 6675, n=4) | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (9627 - 19826, n=4) | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx |
系统性能
PCMark 10得分一直高于去年的Envy x360 15.特别是涉及CPU性能的分项测试,比GPU重的数字内容创作分项测试高得多,因为Ryzen 7 5700U和5825U共享相同的集成Radeon RX Vega图形。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness
PCMark 10 / Score | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (5337 - 6228, n=4) | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
PCMark 10 / Essentials | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (9553 - 10879, n=4) | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U |
PCMark 10 / Productivity | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (8717 - 9516, n=4) | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE |
PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (4954 - 6372, n=4) | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
CrossMark / Overall | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1124 - 1330, n=4) | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U |
CrossMark / Productivity | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1189 - 1351, n=4) | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U |
CrossMark / Creativity | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (1169 - 1439, n=4) | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U |
CrossMark / Responsiveness | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) (843 - 1088, n=4) |
PCMark 10 Score | 6228 points | |
Help |
AIDA64 / Memory Copy | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (21188 - 42917, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML |
AIDA64 / Memory Read | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (24018 - 39413, n=4) |
AIDA64 / Memory Write | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (23602 - 41720, n=4) |
AIDA64 / Memory Latency | |
Average AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (85.9 - 105.9, n=4) | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD |
* ... smaller is better
DPC延时
LatencyMon显示,在我们的主页上打开多个浏览器标签时,存在轻微的DPC问题。在60 FPS的情况下,4K视频播放是完美的,没有丢帧。
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE | |
HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr | |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx | |
Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U | |
Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD |
* ... smaller is better
存储设备 - 只有一个插槽
一个中档的 三星PM991PCIe3 x4 NVMe固态硬盘包括在我们的测试单元中。顺序读取率在2600MB/s左右,还算不错,但写入率只有一半左右的速度。我们单位的硬盘在循环运行DiskSpd时,会表现出轻微的性能节流,如下图所示,读取率会从2600MB/s下降到约2200MB/s。
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
GPU性能--Radeon RX Vega正在变老
虽然Ryzen 7 5700U和5825U之间有明显的CPU提升,但它们的集成GPU仍然是相同的。图形性能比旧的 UHD Graphics 620但远远落后于 Iris Xe系列.太糟糕了,该型号没有提供任何Ryzen 7 6800U SKU,因为较新的 Radeon 680M可以提供超过我们老化的Radeon RX Vega 8的2倍的性能。Radeon RX Vega 8.
3DMark 11 Performance | 6109 points | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 24486 points | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3186 points | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1324 points | |
Help |
Witcher 3 FPS Chart
low | med. | high | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GTA V (2015) | 93.6 | 83.8 | 23.3 | 9.02 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 73.7 | 45.3 | 22.3 | 13.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 111.6 | 87.7 | 50.1 | 47.9 |
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 31.8 | 16 | 10.5 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 47.8 | 36.7 | 32.8 | |
Strange Brigade (2018) | 77.7 | 29.1 | 24.4 | 21 |
Cyberpunk 2077 1.6 (2022) | 16.1 | 12.6 | 7.3 |
排放
系统噪音 - 大部分时间都很安静
该系统在大多数低到中等负荷下非常安静。例如,当运行3DMark 06的第一个基准场景时,风扇噪音最高只有23.3 dB(A),而安静的背景为22.7 dB(A),在大多数情况下几乎听不到。在浏览或视频流时,噪音徘徊在24 dB(A)范围内,比许多竞争对手更安静。
然而,如果在较重的负载下,风扇噪音迅速增加到高达43 dB(A),这接近我们在华硕ZenBook Flip 15 Q上记录的最大值。华硕ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD或三星Galaxy Book Pro 360 15。
Noise Level
Idle |
| 22.7 / 22.7 / 22.7 dB(A) |
Load |
| 23.3 / 43.4 dB(A) |
| ||
30 dB silent 40 dB(A) audible 50 dB(A) loud |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 22.7 dB(A) |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx Vega 8, R7 5825U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD A370M, i7-12700H, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE Iris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1135G7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD | HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr Vega 8, R7 5700U, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U Vega 7, R5 5500U, Phison PS5013 311CD0512GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -13% | -1% | -22% | -11% | |
off / environment * | 22.7 | 23 -1% | 25 -10% | 25 -10% | 29.3 -29% | 24.1 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 22.7 | 23 -1% | 25 -10% | 25.1 -11% | 29.3 -29% | 24.1 -6% |
Idle Average * | 22.7 | 23 -1% | 25 -10% | 25.1 -11% | 29.3 -29% | 24.1 -6% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.7 | 24.7 -9% | 25 -10% | 25.1 -11% | 29.6 -30% | 28 -23% |
Load Average * | 23.3 | 31.7 -36% | 32.7 -40% | 26.3 -13% | 32.4 -39% | 35.9 -54% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.4 | 45.2 -4% | 30.8 29% | 35.9 17% | ||
Load Maximum * | 43.4 | 45.2 -4% | 42 3% | 35.5 18% | 33.3 23% | 43.9 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
温度
由于处理器在内部的位置,机箱右半部分的表面温度总是比左半部分的温度高。热点在顶部和底部可以达到38℃,这比我们在更薄的笔记本上记录的温度要低。 Galaxy 书本专业360 15在类似的负载下,热点可以达到46℃以上。惠普的机型从来没有变得让人不舒服的温度。
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.8 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx AMD Ryzen 7 5825U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD Intel Core i7-12700H, Intel Arc A370M | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE Intel Core i5-1135G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs | HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr AMD Ryzen 7 5700U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U AMD Ryzen 5 5500U, AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -5% | -7% | -6% | 0% | -7% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 36.2 | 36.4 -1% | 42.6 -18% | 39.6 -9% | 40.1 -11% | 40.6 -12% |
Maximum Bottom * | 37.8 | 40.4 -7% | 40.8 -8% | 44.4 -17% | 42.3 -12% | 43.9 -16% |
Idle Upper Side * | 25.4 | 26.2 -3% | 25.9 -2% | 23.6 7% | 23 9% | 25.6 -1% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.6 | 29.2 -10% | 26.1 2% | 28.2 -6% | 23 14% | 26.2 2% |
* ... smaller is better
压力测试
当运行Prime95对CPU施加压力时,时钟频率和电路板功耗将分别飙升至4.1 GHz和48 W,只持续几秒钟。时钟频率和功耗最终将稳定在3.5 GHz和37 W,以保持77 C的合理核心温度。在去年的Ryzen 7 5700U型号上运行同样的测试,将导致较慢的稳定时钟频率和类似的温度,分别为3.1 GHz和78 C。因此,较新的型号能够运行得更快,而不会更热。
运行 Witcher 3将导致稳定的GPU时钟速率和温度分别为1994 MHz和57 C,而去年的型号为69 C。
靠电池供电运行限制了性能。在电池上进行的3DMark 11测试将分别返回物理和图形分数10037和5488分,而在主电源上则为12620和5994分。
CPU时钟(GHz) | GPU时钟(MHz) | CPU平均温度(°C) | |
系统空闲 | -- | -- | 37 |
Prime95压力 | 3.5 | -- | 77 |
Prime95 + FurMark 压力 | ~3.4 | ~1908 | 73 |
Witcher 3 应力 | ~0.9 | 1994 | 57 |
发言人
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 91% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2021 M1 Pro audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | bass is linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (4.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 0% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 100% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
能源管理--良好的每瓦特CPU性能
消耗功率
桌面上的空转消耗在4瓦到8瓦之间,取决于电源配置文件和亮度设置。更高的负载,如游戏将需要41瓦和47瓦之间,与我们在去年的模型上记录的非常相似。由Iris Xe驱动的LG Gram 15Z90P能够消耗更少的能源,同时提供更多的图形性能,比我们的AMD供电的Envy显示Radeon的每瓦性能更差。
当CPU处于100%的利用率时,我们能够从小型(约9.7 x 5.5 x 2.2厘米)的65瓦交流适配器中记录到最大的耗电量。如下面的截图所示,由于散热限制,这种消耗只是暂时的。在这种负载下,电池仍然可以充电,尽管速度较慢。
Off / Standby | 0.3 / 0.59 Watt |
Idle | 3.9 / 7.2 / 7.3 Watt |
Load |
46.7 / 64.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HBLU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD i7-12700H, A370M, SK Hynix HFM001TD3JX013N, OLED, 2880x1620, 15.6" | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ256HAJD, OLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr R7 5700U, Vega 8, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U R5 5500U, Vega 7, Phison PS5013 311CD0512GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -106% | 4% | 8% | 0% | -12% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 9.1 -133% | 4 -3% | 3.5 10% | 2.97 24% | 5.5 -41% |
Idle Average * | 7.2 | 11.9 -65% | 5.6 22% | 5.7 21% | 7.2 -0% | 9.1 -26% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.3 | 12.4 -70% | 10.1 -38% | 5.8 21% | 9.9 -36% | 9.7 -33% |
Load Average * | 46.7 | 101.3 -117% | 34.7 26% | 46 1% | 40.8 13% | 40 14% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.1 | 85.6 -108% | 34.7 16% | 42.1 -2% | 38.9 5% | |
Load Maximum * | 64.8 | 155.7 -140% | 63 3% | 65.4 -1% | 64.7 -0% | 59.5 8% |
* ... smaller is better
Power Consumption Witcher 3 / Stresstest
Power Consumption external Monitor
电池寿命
运行时间与我们在去年的Envy x360 15上记录的非常接近,即充满电后可在现实世界中浏览约10小时。从空电到满电大约需要90分钟。对于15英寸的外形尺寸来说,电池容量相对较小,但电池寿命仍然非常好。
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx R7 5825U, Vega 8, 51 Wh | Asus ZenBook Flip 15 Q539ZD i7-12700H, A370M, 96 Wh | Samsung Galaxy Book Pro 360 15 NP950QDB-KC3DE i5-1135G7, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 67 Wh | HP Envy x360 15-eu0097nr R7 5700U, Vega 8, 51 Wh | Lenovo Yoga C740-15IML i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 60.3 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 15 Ryzen 5 5500U R5 5500U, Vega 7, 56 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 7% | 25% | 36% | 11% | -14% | |
Reader / Idle | 1198 | 789 -34% | 1654 38% | 1430 19% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 612 | 562 -8% | 679 11% | 591 -3% | 622 2% | 529 -14% |
Load | 100 | 164 64% | 127 27% | 192 92% | 120 20% | |
H.264 | 715 |
Pros
Cons
结论 - 如果可能的话,获得更高的显示选项
对于2022年的更新,惠普本可以直接把Zen 2的CPU选项换成Zen 3,然后就收工了。然而,制造商通过调整设计和内部的各个部分,进行了额外的努力,这一切都使更新的效果比原来预期的好得多。例如,惠普没有必要为了使系统更容易维修而重新设计底部的螺丝,但他们把反馈放在心上,并真正做到了这一点。像这样精细的细节和修复可能意味着冷漠或推荐之间的所有区别。
虽然从技术上讲,2022年的Envy x360 15是对去年机型的刷新,但它在机身内部的一些升级和变化带来了更多东西。
其他升级包括更清晰的500万像素红外网络摄像头,更多的USB端口,6GHz Wi-Fi,以及更快的CPU,但不影响温度或电池寿命。图形性能仍然平平,但用户如果选择英特尔SKU,可以选择升级到GeForce RTX 2050。
今年的机型需要避免的是低端的250尼特IPS显示屏选项,就像我们评测单元上的那个。它的颜色明显比下一步提供全sRGB覆盖和更明亮的背光的显示器差。基本的IPS面板更适合于更便宜的机型,如 Pavilion而不是像我们的Envy这样的中档机型。
价格和可用性
2022年的Envy x360 15现在已经在百思买和HP.com发货,有AMD和英特尔SKU,起价650美元。我们的具体配置售价为900美元,而最高端的英特尔酷睿i7版本售价为1280美元。
HP Envy x360 15-ey0023dx
- 09/28/2022 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo